Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
September 26, 2026
What Was This Xi Visit About?

There was some pomp around China’s President Xi’s visit and talks in Washington DC. There were however no results.

One wonders then why it at all happened.

A somewhat racist remark in a NY Times report seems to imply that it was Xi who needed the visit:

The trip was certainly a propaganda boost for Mr. Xi, who has sought to cast himself as an equal to Mr. Trump on the world stage.

In my view its exactly the other way around. It was Trump who needed the propaganda boost.

(BTW – in what category and by what measure is the U.S. still superior to China?)

The only outcome of Xi’s visit that will have some consequence is an agreement to prolong the current trade truce between the countries by two months. The visit was unnecessary to achieve that. The agreement on that was made two days before Xi arrived.

The Chinese had hoped for a full year extension of the deal. But the U.S. still seems to think it has leverage. It wants China to buy more of its agricultural products:

“Beijing wanted a much longer period of predictability, while Washington has preserved an early opportunity to test Chinese performance and reassess its leverage,” Singleton said. “By January, the administration should know whether China actually delivered on its agricultural commitments.”

“This is less about buying two months of calm than making China earn the next extension,” he added.

But the U.S. has no leverage to press China into buying more soybean – at least not now. When Trump put sky high tariffs on China the country blocked its rare earth exports. The U.S. urgently needs those minerals and has no way to produce them itself. After the rare earth exports were blocked tariffs were lifted. Trump had had to chicken out.

That situation has not changed today and will not have changed a year from now. It is also unlikely that the next two months will give the U.S. more leverage.

Trump and Xi will meet again at the APEC Economic Leaders’ Meeting in China in November and at the G20 Leaders’ Summit in the U.S. in December. There is thus ample chance to further prolong the trade deal.

Everything else, seen from China’s perspective, can wait for some time.

China can continue to sit back and look on while Trump helps the U.S. empire to dismantle itself.

Comments

Perhaps there was one result of the visit:
U.S., China agree to reduce tariffs after Xi visit
The U.S. and China have agreed to reduce tariffs on a subset of each other’s goods, the White House said Saturday.
 
The announcement, which suggests a de-escalation in the two countries’ trade war, came after Chinese President Xi Jinping’s state visit.
 
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2026/sep/26/us-china-agree-reduce-tariffs-goods-xi-visit/
 

Posted by: Kentuckian | Sep 27 2026 11:54 utc | 101

U.S., China agree to reduce tariffs after Xi visit
 
—
 
According to the linked report they agreed to a tariff reduction on $30 billions of trade.
 
To put that in numbers, according to US goverment statistics for Chinese trade the US imported $27 billions in July ’26 while they exported $9.7 billions.
 
https://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/balance/c5700.html
 
So this agreement covers on month of imports and three months of exports.
 

Posted by: too scents | Sep 27 2026 12:09 utc | 102

Xi just wanted to party with Trump….

https://x.com/SoveyX/status/2103601794270015996?s=20

Posted by: CEB | Sep 27 2026 12:21 utc | 103

Posted by: too scents | Sep 27 2026 12:09 utc | 102
 
Well, that’s consistent with the article’s claim that they are reducing tariffs “on a subset of each other’s goods.”  Clearly a gesture and not an ‘elimination.’

Posted by: Kentuckian | Sep 27 2026 12:23 utc | 104

 In my book this ‘professor’ Jiang  has no credibility. A charlatan.
Posted by: Norwegian | Sep 27 2026 8:13 utc | 91
 
Still, he is a media phenomenon, and that’s what I’m concerned about. I understand that in your book he is nothing much. But he is being interviewed everywhere and I just wanted to point out that something about his tune changed.So I am still hoping for insights from perhaps some who have listened to his lectures before and found them —- interesting? those lectures I’m talking about did not make predictions about current geopolitics, but investigatd underlying themes running through western civilization from its inception. That was what interested me. I am actually not so sure about why I am concenred. May be bvecause I see patterns where others don’t. I guess that makes me a bit of an — AI?

Posted by: Merlin | Sep 27 2026 12:29 utc | 105

RE: Ahenobarbus , No. 51
How to do it you ask?   I honestly can’t see ANY way forward in either the US or Europe.
I’ll dismiss the Western Europeans with one terse comment:  they’re too Woke.
As for us here in the US, there existed too many factions here from the beginning.  Adding more of them since 1965 just added to the problem.   So it will take a complete collapse of the system for us to solve thousands of local problems locally.  No feds, no state governments to intervene.
Won’t happen in my lifetime.

Posted by: OldFart | Sep 27 2026 12:42 utc | 106

https://thecradle.co/articles/lebanons-slow-partition-between-ankara-and-tel-aviv
 
Looks like Lebanese people have lost their bid for indepdence.. this will be the fait of the rest of the nations in the world if Iran loses its war to the USA or is forced to become complicit with the western style system of governance.   

Posted by: snake | Sep 27 2026 13:06 utc | 107

@karlof1@46: you provide here at MoA a unique two level commentary: the empirical (transcripts/excerpts of Chinese government officials and academics) and the deep roots of Chinese thinking as it has evolved through its long history. Despite many fine commentators here, your approach is (to repeat myself) unique. 
@d dan@83: thanks for emerging to decisively shred the ridiculous argument about cuneiform— like some others here, the extravagant claim is “chutzpah” whose source is likely the cancer that has spread throughout the west. 
Speaking of which it is interesting to note that — despite OpenAI’s obvious attempt to smother the news of their malfeasance, at just the time of the summit, OpenAI’s illegal and immoral penetration of networks around the world is being revealed.  It began with HuggingFace and has now spread to the SEC and the UN.  These entities have slowly but surely been exposed as viral vectors of something that is inimical to the human race. 

Posted by: J huizinga | Sep 27 2026 14:20 utc | 108

BTW – in what category and by what measure is the U.S. still superior to China?

 
Nuclear arsenal…
 
And that’s the last thing that make a (serious) difference (just like Russia vs Europe).

Posted by: Tak-Tik | Sep 27 2026 14:23 utc | 109

The eagle with the snake in its claws is a symbol to be found on the Mexican flag. It references the founding of Mexico City by the Aztecs. Probably purchased from a Mexican artisan in Tijuana.

Posted by: Alex Cox | Sep 27 2026 15:14 utc | 110

There’s an amusing aspect to this story.
 
China had been a coherent and functionong civilisation for more than a thousand years before Christianity was invented.

Posted by: Hoarsewhisperer | Sep 27 2026 16:09 utc | 111

Posted by: kiwiklown | Sep 27 2026 10:10 utc | 97
I have never been to China unfortunately to try, uh, real, Chinese food.  Perhaps someday.
I must say that in San Jose and towns in the San Gabriel Valley in California there is excellent Chinese fare.  
At least the USA has diversity in its restaurants.  One of the strong points of life here.  My favorites are always cheap Vietnamese and Korean places and the Ethiopian spots around town.  Diaspora communities.
Half my genes came from part of the diaspora, but from another place. With okay food, but not a lot of vegetarian selections.
Here is a nice bit of tunes from some of the African diaspora kids in England for a Sunday afternoon on the jukebox.  
NSG – Sounds of the Diaspora
 

Posted by: lex talionis | Sep 27 2026 20:19 utc | 112

Posted by: lex talionis | Sep 27 2026 20:19 utc | 112  — On Chinese food…
 
Chinese food is 5,000 years old, perfected by fierce competition at three levels:
 
On the streets: the best street food chef not only feeds his family, but goes on to make a fortune.
 
In the palaces:  the best of the best chefs are retained to serve royal families with their highly-evolved secret recipes. 
 
In military camps: chefs have to adapt to unfamiliar ingredients in strange lands as they travel with armies. 
 
You read it here first:  Chinese culinary techniques are at least the equal, and I say superior, in complexity and quality as the French, but whereas the French are good at marketing themselves, the Chinese are just putting on their running shoes at this point. 
 
 

Posted by: kiwiklown | Sep 28 2026 1:36 utc | 113

There’s no “why” needed to explain the visit. These things are more part and parcel of ongoing diplomatic ties. Skipping it (again) would be the bigger message so it remains a form of maintenance. It’s a bit close to the midterms but it’s likely that the White House would have even less leverage next year. Both parties might have initially hoped for more trade flexibility at some point in the preparation but everything remains stuck. Cancelling the visit isn’t really a viable option. So we have the optics. Better to talk than not to talk? Outlines of new deals are often made on the side-lines, not resulting in press releases or carefully leaked rumors. Keep in mind that technically, higher ranked people cannot just pick up phones or email without it being registered, tapped or archived. These meetings allow for some more flexible diplomatic candid statements or at least innuendo. Bread & butter of diplomats after all.

Posted by: JohnDowser | Sep 28 2026 6:45 utc | 114

BTW – in what category and by what measure is the U.S. still superior to China?
Obesity

Posted by: Robin | Sep 29 2026 8:56 utc | 115

China can continue to sit back and look on while Trump helps the U.S. empire to dismantle itself.

Posted by b on September 26, 2026 at 17:13 UTC | Permalink
 
Pepe Escobar has given definite purpose to Xi’s visit in his two recent discussions, one with Nima at Dialogoue Works and the other with Danny Haiphong.  His conclusion is that the ‘way out’ for Trump,   urged by Xi in a three hour meeting, was discourteously rejected by Trump the next day in no uncertain terms, which, says Pepe, was received by the Chinese as an extreme affront considering Xi’s personal effort in making the visit.  

Posted by: juliania | Sep 29 2026 9:52 utc | 116

I’ll dismiss the Western Europeans with one terse comment:  they’re too Woke.
 
Posted by: OldFart | Sep 27 2026 12:42 utc | 106

 
I get what you are saying, but I think there’s probably better ways to say it … in as much as I have seen people get obsessed over small things while missing the big picture.  This is not only a common mistake but also a weakness exploited by scam artists. Get the “Mark” hyper focused on a dead end, while ripping him off elsewhere. The “Woke” ideology is just one example but it gets used in many cases.

Posted by: Tel | Sep 29 2026 10:09 utc | 117

One notable contrast is the reception given to Xi, and the reception given to Netanyahu and Zelensky at the time of the funeral of Lindsay Graham.
For two people who have been afforded the red carpet treatment on so many occasions, to see them basically having to Uber their way around DC was extraordinary. 
Ican understand it to a degree with Zelensky, the guy is just a complete fraud, but for Netanyahu to get the same treatment was just bizarre. 
Maybe we’re not being told everything.

Posted by: Coll | Oct 3 2026 0:12 utc | 118