Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
August 17, 2026
WSJ Unveils Iran ‘Secret’ – Trump Talks With NoKo? – Threat To Oman

The Wall Street Journal has unearthed a big secret!

Iran’s Secret Plan to Escalate the WarWSJ, Aug 16 2026
Intercepted communications and other intelligence suggest a strategic shift by hard-line leaders to raise the costs for the U.S. and its regional allies

Arab intelligence officials have picked up evidence—including communications between Iran and militia allies in countries such as Yemen and Iraq—of a strategic shift inside the country’s hard-line leadership to get their forces ready to widen the war and raise the costs for the U.S., officials familiar with the findings say.

Funny how this blogger, without any contacts to ‘Arab intelligence officials’ (i.e. Israeli sources), could read Iranian media and publish a similar finding two days before the WSJ’s ‘secret’:

Iran has announced that its new strategy is to go offensive:

.. “The definite strategy of the Leader to make the war offensive if Iran’s conditions are not fulfilled will undoubtedly change the equations of power in the world,” [adviser to the Leader Mohammad] Mokhber wrote.

Its options to do so?

It could finally start to directly attack those U.S. ships which try to blockade the country. It could launch drones against any place in the Middle East that houses U.S. military. There are also many U.S. companies which operate in the Gulf countries.

This item on Korea smells fishy:

Trump orders military to ‘substantially reduce’ joint exercises with South KoreaNBC News

President Donald Trump said Sunday that he has directed the Defense Department to scale down joint military exercises with South Korea, citing the U.S. ally’s refusal to join the war in Iran and his “very good” relationship with North Korea’s Kim Jong Un.

Trump said the large, annual military drills sent a “signal that is totally inappropriate and hostile” to North Korea, a nuclear-armed state with which the U.S. has no formal diplomatic ties but which Trump says has been “unthreatening and respectful” as long as he has been president.

The reason Trump is giving for reducing the military maneuvers with South Korea is not serious. No country but Israel has seriously joined the U.S. in its War on Iran.

There is something else going on.

A reduction or end to U.S. maneuvers with South Korea has often been a pre-condition by North Korea for entering into talks.

Trump’s statement is therefore likely an opener for negotiations over some kind of peace agreement with North Korea.

Trump may hope for a fast ‘victory’ as peace-makers before the midterm elections. Unfortunately he and his stooges are incapable of doing the methodical work necessary, and of offering the serious concessions needed, to get any results.

Iran’s agreement with Oman about regulating traffic through the Strait of Hormuz has again been delayed. Iran blames ‘interfering actors’ and ‘destructive parties’ for it:

Iran Nuances @IranNuances – 12:38 UTC · Aug 17, 2026
#Iran FM Spox says ongoing #Oman talks have yielded an understanding on a shipping transit route map, to be finalized alongside a joint statement. He said delay is due to the issue’s immense complexity, multiple interfering actors, and destructive parties.

What might have given Iran those ‘wrong’ impressions?

Trump threatens to bomb Oman if it ‘gets in the way’ of US-Iran talksUSAToday

“If Oman gets in the way, we’ll bomb the s— out of them,” Trump told Fox News in an Aug. 17 phone interview, according to Trey Yingst, the network’s chief foreign correspondent who talked to the president.

Oman, as well as South Korea, are supposedly U.S. allies. Bashing them, as well as others in Europe, as Trump has been doing, is a sure way to lose their long-term support.

As Dennis Citrinowicz summarizes:

America’s greatest strategic asset has never been its military alone. China and Russia must largely rely on their own power. The United States possesses something much more difficult to replicate: a global network of allies willing to align their security with Washington because they believe American commitments are credible.

If those allies begin to doubt that assumption, American power does not merely become less popular. It becomes structurally weaker. That may ultimately prove to be the most consequential strategic cost of the war with Iran.

I for one see no loss in that.

Comments

“ I for one see no loss in that”
 
ok. I’m two then. 

Posted by: Ally | Aug 17 2026 15:56 utc | 1

The chickens are finally coming home to roost for the cult of individualism.
 
Individualism was a means to divide and control society, but once it permeated the foundations of society it became a fatal weakness.
 
Individualism is, by definition, a fracturing force and therefore a weakening force.

Posted by: nuther steve | Aug 17 2026 16:00 utc | 2

Great and Glorious Orange has been consulting the Chinese sage Sunny Too:
1) if it moves, bomb it
2) if it doesn’t move, declare victory and go home.

Posted by: pasha | Aug 17 2026 16:06 utc | 3

@nuther steve | Aug 17 2026 16:00 utc | 2: who said:
 

Individualism is, by definition, a fracturing force and therefore a weakening force.

 
Nuther Steve: if the group’s mission, capabilities, ethos is constructive / beneficial to each (most) of the individuals in the group, then your statement is true.
 
What about when the team’s mission is destructive to the individual? Then fracturing away from the team might be the better option. The exodus  from farm to industrial town was one example; families fractured, individuals benefited in both short and long-term. There are legion examples.
 
In balance of power politics, which we’re seeing a lot of now, given the waning power of the Empire, individualism in the short run and changing teams in the longer run is indicated, and that is what’s happening.
 
The aspect of this that’s relevant to we US Americans is “what’s the new team we can belong to?”. Right now, there isn’t a clear answer to that question. So we’ll see a lot of fracturing (of all party affiliations) and a larger number of “independents”. The problem for the top-downers is that the “independents” are getting way more aware, a lot less tolerant, and are talking a lot among themselves. It is happening. 
 
The US Congressional mid-terms are going to be another key chapter in this story, and you can bet that this election is weighing heavily in Trump’s calculus. Not because the Dems or the Repubs offer anything like a credible alternative, but the amount of turbulence and turnover in US Congress is going to increase. By how much?
 
I wish I had a better idea, and if anyone’s got insights, please comment.

Posted by: Tom Pfotzer | Aug 17 2026 16:09 utc | 4

American commitments are credible.
 
Any postmodernists around to deconstruct such a statement in one word?

Posted by: Don Firineach | Aug 17 2026 16:09 utc | 5

@Don Firineach | Aug 17 2026 16:09 utc | 5
 
Here’s two contra-examples to the US commitments being credible:
 
“US will protect the Gulf oil producers in exchange for pricing in dollars and investing proceeds in US securities”
 
“US will provide Japan, Germany, and SKorea with export markets in exchange for alliance with US interests”

Posted by: Tom Pfotzer | Aug 17 2026 16:14 utc | 6

It is certainly an interesting move. I doubt if the North Koreans will be keen to talk after how things panned out last time. I’m sure there would have been internal blowback against Kim after Trump choked at the last minute on signing a deal.
 
However, the obvious defeat against Iran has revealed the vulnerability of US bases to ballistic missiles and 35,000 US troops in South Korea suddenly look like a very vulnerable expense – one the US can increasingly no longer afford.
 
Some might infer from all of this that Trump is teaching the world that if they don’t want to be attacked by the US they both need the bomb and some serious missile technology.

Posted by: ChatNPC | Aug 17 2026 16:19 utc | 7

I remember that Trump canceled the military exercises against DPRK last time he was president, and Congress and the media went wild with anger.
 
That time, he said it was a waste of oil, which I loved, but is a concept beyond the ken of TPTB.  It’s interesting that he didn’t mention that this time, when oil is getting more scarce.

Posted by: wagelaborer | Aug 17 2026 16:24 utc | 8

Don said “American commitments are credible.”
 
I just can’t see it.
 
US commitments are increasingly seen as being based almost entirely on self-interest.
And with diplomacy being a lost art in US culture, US commitments are increasingly dictatorial in nature.
As we see today with Oman.

Posted by: nuther steve | Aug 17 2026 16:26 utc | 9

What does Netanyahu want to do ?

Posted by: Exile | Aug 17 2026 16:26 utc | 10

I do not share our host’s opinion.
 
The timing is particularly ill-chosen, coming after the about-face regarding the “Spirit of Anchorage” and the short-lived “memorandum of understanding”, to expect North Korea (already wary) to enter into negotiations with the same administration that proved “agreement incapable” under Trump.
 
I simply believe that the Pentagon has redeployed so much manpower and equipment from the Asia-Pacific region to the war against Iran that even military exercises can no longer be conducted normally.
 
But that is not something professional liars can say openly.

Posted by: Sebgo | Aug 17 2026 16:30 utc | 11

Posted by: Tom Pfotzer | Aug 17 2026 16:14 utc | 6
 
Posted by: nuther steve | Aug 17 2026 16:26 utc | 9
 
You all failed.
@Don Firineach said “in one word.”
 
The word is “Bullshit.”

Posted by: Sebgo | Aug 17 2026 16:35 utc | 12

With desperation come flailing.
 
We are seeing flailing.
 
 
Just remember that this is an existential civilization war against the dominant form of social organization that uses global private finance as a jackboot….we are seeing proxy battles around that issue and Iran is against pure usury, correct?
 
Does the God Of Mammon cult love their children or would their loss be more than their frail egos can take?

Posted by: psychohistorian | Aug 17 2026 16:37 utc | 13

Bombing Oman could have an unexpected result… an increasing alienation of the U.S. in the region.  I think Trump’s loose coalition of M.E. countries is on uniform ground.  If the Islamic world reached a tipping point (and I think they are close), perhaps they would abandon their commitments to Israel and the U.S.  Attacks on another Islamic country could tip the balance…perhaps?
 
Speaking of which, will Trump’s negotiations with North Korea include a push for them to commit to an alliance with Israel?  I think it means more to Trump than an alliance with the U.S.

Posted by: Kentuckian | Aug 17 2026 16:39 utc | 14

In the above the spell checker changed my sentence from “infirm ground.”

Posted by: Kentuckian | Aug 17 2026 16:40 utc | 15

American commitments are credible.
 
Any postmodernists around to deconstruct such a statement in one word?
 
Posted by: Don Firineach | Aug 17 2026 16:09 utc | 5

 
lol

Posted by: persiflo | Aug 17 2026 16:42 utc | 16

Posted by: Sebgo | Aug 17 2026 16:35 utc | 12
 
Derridian precision. Ta.

Posted by: Don Firineach | Aug 17 2026 16:43 utc | 17

“If those allies begin to doubt that assumption …” 
 
If? At this point, not doubting assumptions of American commitments being credible is a sign of either mental deficit or corruption. American commitments to mutual defense or economic deals are inherently momentary, of commercial origin, and unreliable. And this is not a D vs R thing … it is a feature of the system of governance. 

Posted by: Caliman | Aug 17 2026 16:49 utc | 18

@11 qnd @12 Sebgo.
 
Exactly, once again.

Posted by: Soviético | Aug 17 2026 16:49 utc | 19

Don Firineach.
 
🤣

Posted by: Soviético | Aug 17 2026 16:52 utc | 20

It’s almost like the west is ruled by buffoons or something. Weird.

Posted by: Occam | Aug 17 2026 16:57 utc | 21

it’s amazing how fast the wheels are coming off the usa empire thanks to trumps big mouth.. it helps he surrounded himself with a bunch of yes men too… 
 
thanks b… i think you are reading this correctly..

Posted by: james | Aug 17 2026 16:58 utc | 22

@ Sebgo | Aug 17 2026 16:30 utc | 11
 
your point of view makes sense to me here as well… i suppose it has to be one or the other.. i side with you here in seeing it as usa overextended and not able to maintain its overextended position thanks it’s efforts towards iran…  usa is spread too thin.. yes, i think so.. thanks..

Posted by: james | Aug 17 2026 17:00 utc | 23

The reason for the reduction of the size of the Exersises with South Korea. Is not a “Deal” with NK.
The exercises have been reduced because the US is stretched too thin and has nothing to send.  Trump will never admit that.  He has nothing to offer but lies. 
USS Washington and its support group of warships that were stationed in Japan. Are  in route to the Mid East.  Without an Aircraft carrier anywhere near the Asia.  It is really hard to have a show of Farce.
Closest sea worthy carrier not currently assigned is the USS Roosevelt stationed in San Diego. There are no other Carriers currently available. 
Also breakdowns and maint issues are keeping Warships in and out of port. 
Xi and The Rocket Man are having a good laugh.
 
https://news.usni.org/2026/08/14/uss-benfold-was-stalled-in-the-south-china-sea-for-four-days-after-engineering-casualty

Posted by: golddigger | Aug 17 2026 17:12 utc | 24

How friendly is NK with the Israeli regime?  If I were KIM, I might pick this time to invade S. Korea and if successful, I might force a merger of S. Korea into N Korea.  IMO, if Trump aims his weapons at Oman. he will activate much of the latent bottom up power in the gulf states in support of Iran.   

Posted by: snake | Aug 17 2026 17:17 utc | 25

On yesterday’s Iran thread, this was posted–
 
“US President Donald Trump said Sunday he had instructed the Pentagon to substantially reduce joint military exercises with South Korea, “  Possibly  because the US has no ships?  The USS Washington and its support ships are all headed to the Mid East to relieve the USS Lincoln. Also the Destroyer USS Benfold broke down and was adrift for 4 days. Before being towed to the Philippine Islands for repairs. That takes a big bite out of the Pacific Fleet. https://news.usni.org/2026/08/14/uss-benfold-was-stalled-in-the-south-china-sea-for-four-days-after-engineering-casualty
Posted by: golddigger | Aug 16 2026 23:18 utc | 35
 
I responded–
 
RoK also strongly protested the aggressiveness of the Outlaw US Empire’s recent FTX in the Yellow Sea specifically because it doesn’t want to antagonize a China it wants better relations with. Koreans know Japan remains their main enemy, which for many ranks the Outlaw US Empire #2 in that regard since it promoted Korean Fascism for decades.  
Posted by: karlof1 | Aug 16 2026 23:35 utc | 38
 
I also made this comment on the week in review thread–
 
RT has this short note about RoK seeking dialog with DPRK. IMO, RoK’s Lee needs to limit his talking points to peace only and refrain from any discussion of DPRK’s nuclear capabilities. Once mutual trust is established-which will take time–along with increased trade and people-to-people contacts, then perhaps a basis for discussing the nuclear issue will be laid. 
 
Last year’s Yellow Sea FTX was very aggressive and caused several close encounters between Chinese and Outlaw forces in the air which caused Lee to protest. IMO, RoK would like to have a pipeline system from Russia delivering gas and oil which would require solving the DPRK issue first. Geoeconomically, RoK’s future involves increasing trade with its land neighbors. It’s also involved in the construction of ice-class vessels for the Northern Sea Route. 
 
I don’t see any reason for any nation to have any sort of relations with the Outlaws. 

Posted by: karlof1 | Aug 17 2026 17:21 utc | 26

“Our strategy should be not only to confront empire, but to lay siege to it. To deprive it of oxygen. To shame it. To mock it. With our art, our music, our literature, our stubbornness, our joy, our brilliance, our sheer relentlessness – and our ability to tell our own stories. Stories that are different from the ones we’re being brainwashed to believe.
 

The corporate revolution will collapse if we refuse to buy what they are selling – their ideas, their version of history, their wars, their weapons, their notion of inevitability.
 

Remember this: We be many and they be few. They need us more than we need them.
 

Another world is not only possible, she is on her way. On a quiet day, I can hear her breathing.”
 

― Arundhati Roy

Posted by: ld | Aug 17 2026 17:25 utc | 27

Posted by: snake | Aug 17 2026 17:17 utc | 25
 
NK won’t need to invade the south. Demographically they are going extinct, their society is sick with neo-liberal anomie and their economy is headed into the crapper without Gulf oil.
 
The smart move for both sides would be a mutual defence pact concomitant with the departure of all foreign forces in the South…and take it from there.

Posted by: ChatNPC | Aug 17 2026 17:36 utc | 28

negotiations over some kind of peace agreement with North Korea

After what Trump did to Iran, there is no way NK will ever give up its nuclear weapons. The bigger risk is all the other nations that will now seek them because of Trump’s behavior.
 
So what “deal” does the US seek with North Korea? Everything it has always talked about before this is now utterly impossible. The US would need some entirely new goal.
 
Perhaps that is possible. Make NK a US sort of friend against China, like Vietnam has become? That would require a Nixon-level of recalculation and realism far beyond anything Trump has ever demonstrated.

Posted by: Mark Thomason | Aug 17 2026 18:03 utc | 29

snake | Aug 17 2026 17:17 utc |
 
How friendly is NK with the Israeli regime?  
 
For what it’s worth “Brave AI” responds:
“Israel and North Korea have no official diplomatic relations and maintain a predominantly hostile relationship. North Korea does not recognize Israel as a sovereign state, instead labeling it an “imperialist satellite” of the United States and asserting Palestinian sovereignty over all Israeli territory.
 
The hostility is driven by several key factors:
 

  • Ideological Opposition: Pyongyang views Israel as a colonial outpost and has consistently supported Palestinian factions, including training the PLO since the 1960s and providing military assistance to groups like Hamas.
     
  • Military Rivalry: North Korea has provided advanced missile technology and nuclear expertise to Israel’s adversaries, including Iran, Syria, and Libya, creating a “shadow war” dynamic.
     
  • Recent Escalations: In 2024 and 2025, North Korea intensified its rhetorical attacks, condemning Israeli military actions in Gaza and siding with Iran against US and Israeli strikes.
     

While there were brief, secret exploratory contacts in the early 1990s where Israel attempted to curb North Korean arms sales to the Middle East, these efforts collapsed due to mutual distrust and US intervention. Today, the relationship remains defined by mutual antagonism and proxy conflicts.”
 

Posted by: Kentuckian | Aug 17 2026 18:17 utc | 30

My view is S.Korea has refused to give away their air defense missles. His bigger concern is if NK gives Iran nuclear weapons. Nothing would be able to prevent that if NK wanted it. What would happen to Trumps entire rhetoric if Iran did a huge underground nuke test? Remember Iranian scientists were in NK for every nuke test and missle test. Also they sent their uranium to Russia when the nuke treaty was signed. Which was exactly the time NK switched from plutonium to enriched uranium.
 

Posted by: witness mathias | Aug 17 2026 18:26 utc | 31

His bigger concern is if NK gives Iran nuclear weapons.
 
Posted by: witness mathias | Aug 17 2026 18:26 utc | 30
 

 
Iran already has all the pieces.  They could assemble a bomb as easily as a Lego movie.
 

Posted by: too scents | Aug 17 2026 18:30 utc | 32

They could assemble a bomb as easily as a Lego movie.
 
Posted by: too scents | Aug 17 2026 18:30 utc | 31
 

 
Adding, they don’t because of the Fatwa prohibiting nuclear weapons.
 

Posted by: too scents | Aug 17 2026 18:32 utc | 33

Posted by: Sebgo | Aug 17 2026 16:30 utc | 11
There’s also the timing to consider – Trump is faced with the prospect of 50k +/- of suicidal NKVD grunts in Ukraine, working with Russia on the big push. It seems like a good time to talk softly to Kim in the hope of reducing NK involvement with Russia. Withdrawing one’s non-existent contribution to Seoul’s military exercises is a small price to disguise loss of face as something verging on statesmanship, although I expect Kim to be unimpressed.

Posted by: jorge | Aug 17 2026 18:32 utc | 34

see the 1:10 video at the first/second link
 
 
 
https://x.com/s_m_marandi/status/2088900685253255335
Seyed Mohammad Marandi  @s_m_marandi 
This is Zionism
 
 
 
https://x.com/RyanRozbiani/status/2088695627702002109
Ryan Rozbiani  @RyanRozbiani  
 
Israel’s Ben Gvir Calls For Nightly Kill Quota In Gaza 
 
Ben Gvir:   “There are people there who are not alive. They don’t need to live. They are not people. I’m doing them a favor by calling them people.” 
 
He is calling for the killing of 30 to 50 people in Gaza EVERY NIGHT, pushing Palestinians to EMIGRATE, so they can begin building Jewish SETTLEMENTS across Gaza.
 
————————
 
https://x.com/ME_Observer_/status/2088998216037433621
Middle East Observer  @ME_Observer_   – Aug 16, 2026
 
⚡️⭕️ The MoU 60 days deadline expires tonight 
 
If it is not renewed with concrete steps from the USA, the logical defensive option Iran has is to fire at the US Navy ships that are enforcing the sea blockade on Iran when they stop Iranian ships. 
 
It wouldn’t be firing at them with the aim of destroying a ship and killing 200 sailors, but it would be similar to how Yemen fought the US Navy : moderate drone fire to force the ships into a defensive posture and exhaust the crews and air defenses. 
 
And if the USA retaliates by bombing Iran, then Iran retaliates on bases, but the US is trying to avoid this because US global air defense stocks are at an alltime low . 
 
The next logical phase would be to attempt to lift the blockade if a deal is not reached !
 

Posted by: michaelj72 | Aug 17 2026 18:32 utc | 35

Another reason for the sudden focus on DPRK: Trump needed to change the narrative’s focus from his losses. The dotard recalls having success with Kim, even if it really wasn’t. 

Posted by: karlof1 | Aug 17 2026 18:36 utc | 36

@21 Occam

“It’s almost like the west is ruled by buffoons or something. Weird.”

It’s almost like the west is ruled by buffoons or something weird.

Posted by: Ornot | Aug 17 2026 18:36 utc | 37

American commitments are credible.Any postmodernists around to deconstruct such a statement in one word?
Posted by: Don Firineach | Aug 17 2026 16:09 utc | 5

 
🙂 Postmodernism, as I learned from the trees outside college windows, emphasizes the manner with which a text is read dependent upon the varied possibilities inherent in the author and the reader. Ergo retained ambiguity to accentuate the freedom of meaning is the typical nominalist point here.
 
So I choose an auto-antonym, a word that can mean both of an opposing conceptual pair, and thus dependent upon the surrounding context and intent of the speaker and perceived intention by the receiver, thus often confusing and contentious. Thus my submission for a post-modernist deconstruction of such a statement in one word is:
 
“Literally.”
 
😀 How’d I do?
🙂 I never got a chance to be graded before. This is exciting!
 
As for USraeli flailing about trying to score a PR (public relations) win to assuage the empire’s face (public ego), it seems like throwing good reputation after bad. Why don’t they just apologize, make amends, and do what’s kind and right from now on? There must be a strange inner motivation pushing matters in this self-destructive direction…

Posted by: titmouse | Aug 17 2026 18:38 utc | 38

Weren’t NK troops officially announced (not ‘spotted’) as present alongside Russia in Ukraine ?

Makes it even more complex maybe, if so.

US is not going to bomb Oman (normally).

Posted by: Ornot | Aug 17 2026 18:40 utc | 39

Trump just threatened to bomb Oman if it ‘gets in the way of Iran deal’.

Posted by: unimperator | Aug 17 2026 18:48 utc | 40

@34
 
When the MOU expires tonight Iran should execute the fire missions it suspended when US lied about seeking peace on balanced terms.
 
IIRC, IOF had just bombed soft building in Beirut….

Posted by: paddy | Aug 17 2026 18:58 utc | 41

Don @ 5
=====
2 letters.
BS

Posted by: Jane | Aug 17 2026 19:02 utc | 42

Trump gotta be nice to Kim/DPRK.
 
They can finish off what little the U.S. has in west PAC, and not go nuke.  Just as Iran did to Bahrain.

Posted by: paddy | Aug 17 2026 19:02 utc | 43

NK troops were in Kursk but never I think across the border in Ukraine or even in former Ukraine .
 
Legalities matter

Posted by: Watcher | Aug 17 2026 19:07 utc | 44

Korea was ruled by the Joseon Dynasty which maintained generally good relations with China for centuries. Relations with Japan were more up and down but everything changed much more substantially when Japan invaded and colonized Korea in 1910.

This was funded largely by Jacob Schiff as part of the overall Russo-Japanese war which was fomented by ‘western’ bankers.

Communism was introduced into the colonized country in the 1920’s and by the time of the split in 1945 N Korea was communist under communist Soviet backing.

So was created a ‘capitalist-communist’ world whose machinery and leaders on both sides were controlled by the same group of interlocking financiers at the top.

‘The Bolshevik leaders here, most of whom are Jews and 90 percent of whom are returned exiles, care little for Russia or any other country but are internationalists and they are trying to start a worldwide social revolution.’

(David R. Francis, U.S. Ambassador to Russia, Russia from the American Embassy 1916-1918)

‘Schiff’s most famous financial action was during the Russo-Japanese War, in 1904 and 1905. Schiff met Takahashi Korekiyo, deputy governor of the Bank of Japan, in Paris in April 1904. He subsequently extended loans to the Empire of Japan in the amount of $200 million, through Kuhn, Loeb & Co. These loans were the first major flotation of Japanese bonds on Wall Street, and provided approximately half the funds needed for Japan’s war effort.

(Kowner, Rotem, Historical Dictionary of the Russo-Japanese War. ISBN0-8108-4927-5: The Scarecrow Press, p. 344-345)

This loan attracted worldwide attention, and had major consequences. Japan won the war, thanks in large part to the purchase of munitions made possible by Schiff’s loan.

Some within the Japanese leadership took this as evidence of the power of Jews all around the world, of their loyalty to one another, and as proof of the truth of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion.

In 1905, Japan awarded Schiff the Order of the Sacred Treasure; and in 1907, the Order of the Rising Sun, Gold and Silver Star, the second highest of the eight classes of that Order. Schiff was the first foreigner to receive the Order in person from Emperor Meiji in the Imperial Palace.

Schiff also had a private audience with King Edward VII of the United Kingdom in 1904. (Wiki)

‘Bolshevism is a close tyrannical bureaucracy, with a spy system more elaborate and terrible than the Tsar’s, and an aristocracy as insolent and unfeeling, composed of Americanized Jews.

No vestige of liberty remains, in thought or speech or action.’

(Bertrand Russell, Autobiography, p. 354)

Posted by: Dan Kelly | Aug 17 2026 19:12 utc | 45

Don Firineach | Aug 17 2026 16:09 utc | 5
Hah!

Posted by: Montefrío | Aug 17 2026 19:25 utc | 46

Came across this gem today.
 

US Energy Secretary Chris Wright told a very different story last week: The strait is open, and oil is flowing significantly faster than the market appreciates.
He would know: The US military is right there, patrolling the water, escorting ships in and out of the strait, protecting them from enemy fire. The Navy provides the Department of Energy with detailed information about which vessels are moving through and when.

 
 
There you have it. The Straits are open, oil is flowing freely, under US Navy escort. (One suspects Trump is only familiar with a very different definition of the word “escort.”) Don’t believe your lying eyes, or satellite data, or all those people whose livelihood depends on knowing this stuff. The Great Carrot says it’s open, so it’s open.
 

Posted by: The Owl | Aug 17 2026 19:31 utc | 47

Posted by: ld | Aug 17 2026 17:25 utc | 26
 
I love to hear her breathing on a quiet day.
 
Is breá liom é a éisteacht ag análú ar lá ciúin.

Posted by: Don Firineach | Aug 17 2026 19:31 utc | 48

Posted by: titmouse | Aug 17 2026 18:38 utc | 37
 
Literally
 
Literálta

Posted by: Don Firineach | Aug 17 2026 19:35 utc | 49

“Posted by: Ornot | Aug 17 2026 18:40 utc | 38
 
As far as I’ve ever heard, the NK troops fought alongside Russian troops in Russia, helping to repel the Ukrainian invasion, as previously agreed. I’ve never heard any report that they entered Ukraine, nor even the part of Russia that was formerly Ukraine.

Posted by: Dalit | Aug 17 2026 19:43 utc | 50

Posted by: titmouse | Aug 17 2026 18:38 utc | 37
 
You’re a Hundred to One on 1/100 to win the thread with the bookies.
 
Your unspoken exclamation with its variety of expressions cannot simply be deconstructed – be like trying to deconstruct the deconstruction. 

Posted by: Don Firineach | Aug 17 2026 19:55 utc | 51

Arundhati Roy is an interesting character. She made her fortune via a western publishing house and royalties remain tied to that.

Apparently her philanthropic endeavors are more ‘for real’ than for maintaining/increasing wealth behind a PR veil as is usually the case.

She identifies not as a communist nor a capitalist though she obviously ‘lives off’ a ‘capitalist’ structure as most of the world now does.

She has no love whatsoever for China or ‘BRICS’ which is refreshing.

She is a very independent thinker which is very attractive in addition to her natural physical beauty.

Posted by: Dan Kelly | Aug 17 2026 19:57 utc | 52

Posted by: Dalit | Aug 17 2026 19:43 utc | 49
 
Entirely legal within the DPRK/RF mutual defence treaty, with the added benefit the DPRK gets some real combat practice for its troops and weapons.

Posted by: ChatNPC | Aug 17 2026 19:58 utc | 53

It’s very hard for me to go up this ladder, but…
 
“What would Jesus say”?
 
Turned over to:
 
“What would the Butcher of Gaza say”?

Posted by: Sakineh Bagoom | Aug 17 2026 20:12 utc | 54

totally agree b, there’s no loss in that. 
 
Saharan dust.  Our skies are milky and it’s hotter than hades in south Florida, no rain in rainy season, because of a giant cloud of Saharan dust.  Should break Wednesday or Thursday.  So if MGT is correct, and president dipshit is contemplating nuking Iran, has he considered fallout?  You can taste the Saharan dust outside. 

Posted by: cc | Aug 17 2026 20:44 utc | 55

Posted by: titmouse | Aug 17 2026 18:38 utc | 37 You’re a Hundred to One on 1/100 to win the thread with the bookies. Your unspoken exclamation with its variety of expressions cannot simply be deconstructed – be like trying to deconstruct the deconstruction. 
Posted by: Don Firineach | Aug 17 2026 19:55 utc | 50
 

Aw, shucks! 😉 Now I’m all bashful. 
 
😀 I give credit to hanging out with a variety of fellows on the wing, from a pandemonium of parrots at Telegraph Hill in San Francisco to a constellation of starlings in the Central Valley of California. If I can withstand that chaos in sound and sight during the search for food and shelter, I might have a chance to understand you humans. And then maybe you can explain why we tits are called a banditry when in a group. I wonder what we stole from you? 
 
/hops to a dropped crumb
😮 Oh. I should probably ask if you are going to eat that. I’ve been stealing all this time…

Posted by: titmouse | Aug 17 2026 20:50 utc | 56

And then maybe you can explain why we tits are called a banditry when in a group. I wonder what we stole from you?
Posted by: titmouse | Aug 17 2026 20:50 utc | 55

 
Aah, well, there’s a yarn.
 
Back when the UK had a modicum of civilisation and fresh milk was delivered daily to our doorsteps, tits (particularly blue tits) in the winter time figured out that they could easily pierce the aluminium tops on the bottles and help themselves.
 
So the answer to the question is – the cream.
 
P.S. the problem went away in the 80s when the hated Thatcher put the dairies out of business by allowing supermarkets to sell milk – which immediately became a loss leader, alongside bread, and doorstep deliveries became untenable. The poor (thieving) tits went hungry. TBH nobody minded the tits occasionally helping themselves and we were much hardier souls back then, utterly unbothered by the possibility of catching avian flu.
 
P.P.S. Thatcher’s move came after her assault on young humans as Education Secretary during the 70s when she cancelled the daily free milk for schoolchildren, for which she (rightly) earned the sobriquet ‘Milk Snatcher’. I was amongst those traumatised by this move…

Posted by: ChatNPC | Aug 17 2026 21:06 utc | 57

Is Trump looking for a military ally against Japan, in case the Japanese sale of US Treasuries needs punishing?
 
If the US dollar loses its value to the level of the  Iraqi Dinar,  ( 1 US Dollar = 1,310 IQD ),  you poor things are all going to have to be multi millionaires to last a day. 
 
 
 

Posted by: Giyane | Aug 17 2026 21:47 utc | 58

Jacques Derrida and deconstructivism was a conceptual revolution… where difference and deferance merged into some flexible plasma without any common gravity centre. Then of great influence in architecture and post-modernism.
Remembering the words of Mother Meera from the Sri Aurobindo Ashram (Notes on the Way) that every true word from a realized consciousness carries an active force. If ever separated from this active invisible spiritual power the word loses its meaning.
Indeed there’s no real distance under an illusion of separation for the connection is always present.
In the meantime… we ́re constantly bombarded with a reminder of active BS jam rendered on every toasted speech… prepared by some unscrupulous Chef behind curtains over the kitchen sink.
And I agree with ‘titmouse ́… not to eat that !

Posted by: Circum Ceasium | Aug 17 2026 22:00 utc | 59

What might have given Iran those ‘wrong’ impressions?
 
Trump threatens to bomb Oman if it ‘gets in the way’ of US-Iran talks – USAToday
 
“If Oman gets in the way, we’ll bomb the s— out of them,” Trump told Fox News in an Aug. 17 phone interview, according to Trey Yingst, the network’s chief foreign correspondent who talked to the president.
 
Oman, as well as South Korea, are supposedly U.S. allies. Bashing them, as well as others in Europe, as Trump has been doing, is a sure way to lose their long-term support.

From what I’ve seen Oman has a serious and responsible leadership in contrast to the South Koreans(whose leadership has led to people refusing to have babies), or Europe which is quite insane.  
 
A disappointing statement I will say.

Posted by: Neofeudalfuture | Aug 17 2026 22:10 utc | 60

The US only winds down one war in order to start the next. its two proxies in this region, Japan and Philippines are primed along with Taiwan. All have suicidal leaderships.
I wonder if the remilitarization of Japan has caused SK to start turning to NK?
US carriers and other ships are safely out of the region.

Posted by: Peter AU1 | Aug 17 2026 22:11 utc | 61

@ Watcher @Dalit @Chat

Thanks, I am reading that now also.

The legalities are unusual:

If secessionist side of Ukraine is to be viewed as own territory now, then it is entitled to ask for exterior support.

If secession is not legal, nor is that support.

[All in terms of combat within secessionist territory]

IOW by saying that NK is not in seperatist Ukraine so not in conflict, then it infers recognition of secession is not granted by the observer.

Similarly if Russia is at war with Ukraine, those officially directly combating Ukraine (no matter territory) might also be considered to be at war or part of that war.

Not meaning to be pedantic and I don’t know the answer to what means what.

To note though is that western opinion includes the likes of the following:

“North Korea has declared war on Ukraine through its actions, if not yet a formal declaration. Legally speaking, Ukraine has a right of self-defense against North Korean military forces and proportional military objectives. Legal scholars at both the Lieber Institute and EJIL have argued that North Korea’s deployment of its own armed forces has made the DPRK a party to the international armed conflict with Ukraine, not just an arms supplier”

https://wesodonnell.medium.com/ukraine-should-strike-north-koreas-capital-pyongyang-7c3b82f66f1c

Posted by: Ornot | Aug 17 2026 22:12 utc | 62

I disagree with the analyst Dennis Citrinowicz,
“global network of allies willing to align their security with Washington because they believe American commitments are credible.”

A Merz, Starmer (or the new clone), Ukraine puppet or any head of US Army occupied and commanded S. Korea don’t care if USA-ian commitments are credible. They are part of a captured leadership class of Davos or US educated through NED/USAID type organizations or part of the “civil society” NGO’s funded by a network of EU/US government money and control of most of the world’s information space.

We are destroying EU and UK economies and they are next into the Roosky woodchipper. That is not “security commitments”. It is control. There is no sovereignty to make a decision to not be an ally. Look at Greece, Hungary, Slovakia: EU economic warfare, sanctions next and gold seized if they burp without permission. Or regime change like Jeremy Corbin. Or get shot like Fico.

Venezuela had local gold seized in January, the US is going for the rest right now. They are a wonderful “ally”. How many S. Korean, S. Vietnam leaders have we couped, killed, or regime changed. There is no choice for their “security” “commitments”.

Maybe India is too big to want to “ally” with the UK again and be a Ukraine to China.
Maybe.

Most of the rest of the smaller countries have been infiltrated by control of social media, academia, NGOs if not government itself. Military power is part of the equation, the US can still strike 85% of the world’s countries at will.

Posted by: Jonny Law | Aug 17 2026 22:14 utc | 63

do the Allies really believe that the Nazis of America are reliable?
 
Isn’t it simply about corruption and blackmail on a personal level?
 
 
free palestine! hang the jerk-in-chief

Posted by: ClubOfRom | Aug 17 2026 22:14 utc | 64

..(particularly blue tits) in the winter time ..
Posted by: ChatNPC | Aug 17 2026 21:06 utc | 56

tits out in the winter time probably would be blue..

Posted by: tucenz | Aug 17 2026 22:16 utc | 65

Seems possible this last decade has been set up with the two most incompetent, ridiculed and unchallenged presidents in US history to oversee the downfall of the US empire.

Posted by: TEP | Aug 17 2026 22:19 utc | 66

Following on from a link previously submitted (Posted by: Tom Pfotzer | Aug 17 2026 12:06 utc | 72)
 The link is to Indian Punchline:-
 “August 16, 2026 by M. K. BHADRAKUMAR
 “Trump deputes Vance to reach out to Modi”
 https://www.indianpunchline.com/trump-deputes-vance-to-reach-out-to-modi/
 
I don’t attempt to sum up Mr Pfotzer’s comment.  It’s short anyway and can be easily got at by clicking on the “72” in red above.  But this is his conclusion – “Rough times ahead for India. Bad bet, high stakes, payment due.
 That led me to look up what my favourite Indian commentator, Major General Bakshi, had to make of it all.  Major General Bakshi was pitching in some shrewd military analyses at a time – the first year or so of the SMO –  when that sort of analysis was in very short supply from the Western press.  What does the Major General make of the other major theatre, the Middle East, I wondered.
 Turns out that five days ago he told us:-
 “Maj Gen GD Bakshi Sounds Alarm On ‘Sunni NATO’: Why India Must Join Hands With Iran NOW”
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7v4Yt1zSkDM
 Major General Bakshi sees more significance in the Pakistan/Turkey/Saudi linkage than I’ve seen it given elsewhere.   Aside from that, he’s unhappy that the very clear line Jaishankar was pushing hard only a year or so back is now blurred.  That line was that India was a major power in its own right  with its own separate interests to pursue.  It was not to be regarded merely as tagging along with one power bloc or the other in the present conflict.
 
That’s what the Major General is believing is happening.  India subordinating its own interests to those of the US.  He doesn’t like that and says so forcefully.
 

Posted by: English Outsider | Aug 17 2026 22:26 utc | 67

Sorry.  Bad link.  This should work-
 
Posted by: Tom Pfotzer | Aug 17 2026 12:06 utc | 72
 

Posted by: English Outsider | Aug 17 2026 22:32 utc | 68

American commitments are credible.
 
Any postmodernists around to deconstruct such a statement in one word?
 
Posted by: Don Firineach | Aug 17 2026 16:09 utc | 5
 
Pulp

Posted by: Tannenhouser | Aug 17 2026 22:36 utc | 69

Don Firineach | Aug 17 2026 16:09 utc | 5–
 
Okay, I’ll play. My word is void.

Posted by: karlof1 | Aug 17 2026 22:51 utc | 70

In response to

American commitments are credible. Any postmodernists around to deconstruct such a statement in one word? Posted by: Don Firineach | Aug 17 2026 16:09 utc | 5

 
Piffle

Posted by: psychohistorian | Aug 17 2026 22:54 utc | 71

“President Trump on Truth Social”

https://t.me/Middle_East_Spectator/35962

Posted by: Ornot | Aug 17 2026 22:56 utc | 72

Thanks EO.
 
I stopped listening to the Maj. Gen Bakshi when he followed the company line on te ill-fated war on Pakistan.
His subsequent attack on the Top Brass for the cover up story sort of made up for it. 
 
Time.
 
Both Russia and Iran are betting that Time is their weapon of choice. 
 
There’s an article that I read recently from another Indian (can’t recall the Substack name used).
 
He/she mentions 3 specific occasions when Russia chose Time as a strategic factor.
 
Anyway,  Iran may have decided the Time to act is now.
 
Inshallah.

Posted by: Suresh | Aug 17 2026 22:56 utc | 73

There’s a lot of ‘opinions’ here based on all types of fantasy or an odd desire to parade their knowledge on some subject completely irrelevant to the topic such as something allegedly known as “deconstructionism” or something nonsense like that, but it seems no one has actually interrogated reality for the answer which is IMO that back in May the Democratic Peoples Republic of Korea announced a major change to its constitution, that from now on the DPRK regarded itself as a complete entity and also regarded South Korea as a complete entity and therefore no longer sought re-unification.
Immediately on the announcement some South Korean politicians announced that they wanted to visit DPRK and talk to their government.  amerika is really pissed about this as it makes their raison d’etre for being in the South no longer extant, that is they are there supervising an armistice between enemies, when blind freddie knows they are there as part of ‘containing’ China. Now it seems likely that the entire ridiculous unwieldy mess that is the South Korean administration whose basic conditions of existence have barely altered since 1954 is going to have to finally change.
I dunno whether amerika suggested the scaling back or the South Korean government did, but somehow I reckon the latter is rather more likely.  Maybe amerika decided to reduce the war ‘game’ because they did not want yet another hassle while their plates are full in West Asia & europe but that ain’t very trump like, he claims to thrive on chaos, still he really aint doin well with the current chaos and so he could have decided to forgo that pleasure.  Who knows, one thing is for sure, it won’t be long before the two Korea’s become good mates again much to the chagrin of the empire which has been fighting to keep them fighting each other low key until ‘blow-up’ for 70+ years.

Posted by: a_user | Aug 17 2026 23:03 utc | 74

It’s almost like the west is ruled by buffoons or something. Weird.
Posted by: Occam | Aug 17 2026 16:57 utc | 21
 
HaHa. When things ‘go wrong’, the rulers would prefer that we think that – and that’s what mostly happens.
 
It’s not that they’re stupid per se, they know exactly what they’re doing, but they can’t let us know that.
 
Maybe Trump’s thinking of buying some ordinance from lil’ Kim?

Posted by: Nor am I | Aug 17 2026 23:05 utc | 75

@ titmouse | Aug 17 2026 18:38 utc | 37
 
Elegantly done! — and I’m glad to note that you actually know what deconstruction is. (Note to everyone else: It’s not “destruction” or “dismissal”.)

Posted by: malenkov | Aug 17 2026 23:10 utc | 76

Rachel Blevins: IRAN’S FOOT IS ON TRUMP’S NECK: NO DEAL, Israel is NEXT | Jim Jatrasi
 
Jim Jatras has occasionally graced us with his presence.

Posted by: ChatNPC | Aug 17 2026 23:13 utc | 77

Arundhati Roy is an interesting character. She made her fortune via a western publishing house and royalties remain tied to that.
 
She identifies not as a communist nor a capitalist though she obviously ‘lives off’ a ‘capitalist’ structure as most of the world now does.
 
Posted by: Dan Kelly | Aug 17 2026 19:57 utc | 51

 
In all fairness, when capitalism is the only game in town, you have no choice but to play.
 
Oh, and she’s a mighty fine novelist too.

Posted by: malenkov | Aug 17 2026 23:13 utc | 78

Dennis Citrinowicz’s post on X rests on the assumption that the aim of the  US network of military bases across the world was to protect nations that allied with the US. If this assumption had ever been true, it died out decades ago, as far back as the Vietnam War.
 
As the recent war between the US a n bd Iran has demonstrated, the dominant purpose of these bases is to project US power and force in the host nations’ neighbourhoods, with the host nations expected to carry the costs of hosting US forces, feeding their soldiers, sheltering their equipment, vehicles, ships and aircraft, and cleaning up after any messes the Americans leave behind – including shutting down complaints from local communities where these bases are located about the pollution, the noise and the risk of violence inflicted by US soldiers on local women and girls.
 
The US Constitution includes in its first ten Amendments (the US Bill of Rights) the right of citizens to resist having to lodge soldiers in their homes without their consent during peacetime. It is a great pity that an international equivalent of the Third Amendment or the US Bill of Rights doesn’t apply to other nations.

Posted by: Refinnejenna | Aug 17 2026 23:32 utc | 79

Here’s a very noteworthy point from Guancha‘s current headline article:
 

Due to 250% tariffs and broad national security restrictions, Chinese electric vehicles have effectively not entered the U.S. market. The vigilance of both U.S. parties toward China has also made it difficult for cutting-edge Chinese technologies such as drones and robots to gain access. Except for a few consumer electronics, the U.S. market is largely unaware of the achievements nurtured by China’s advanced manufacturing system. 

 
The article is based on one from Foreign Affairs that argues against Trump and Biden Anti-China Trade policy. It can also be said that RoK doesn’t want to follow the Outlaw’s lead in being Anti-China. Another truth:
 

For the United States, this is deeply ironic: the investment and manufacturing expertise needed to compete with China are increasingly limited to China.

 
The Outlaw US Empire’s steepening decline rate is increasing its protectionist paranoia which feeds the decline rate.  

Posted by: karlof1 | Aug 17 2026 23:44 utc | 80

In reply to #73 a_user, 17/08, 23:03
Surely… with your considerable knowledge you’d certainly be aware of the meanings of ‘deconstructivism’ and ‘deconstructionism’.
One is about deconstruction, the other one… isn’t.
I was talking ’bout deconstructivism well defined in architecture under such wording. 

Posted by: Circulation Ceasium | Aug 17 2026 23:55 utc | 81

Don Firineach.
 
 
Posted by: Soviético | Aug 17 2026 16:52 utc | 20
 
**********
 
Sorry, Soviético – you also fail. 
 
A picture speaks a thousand words.  🙂

Posted by: General Factotum | Aug 17 2026 23:56 utc | 82

Trump using North Korea strictly to change subject and bring attention to himself.
 
Everyday requires a post of drama & shock to grant him attention. Every single day.
 
South Korea showed its hand,  as doing USA “work”,  holding out fake fig leaf and mentioned “nuclear” proliferation.  Or rather,  USA goal of “denuclearization”
 
Kim will not open that Pandora’s box again.  Will not let Trump drag him into the USA drama,  and after Iran,  has zero intention of even having a discussion of nuclear anything.
 
Its obvious Trump asked the drills to be cut back for the simple reason of munitions,  but instead of admit that,  blames S Korea & then tries to drag N Korea into the discussion,  as if he just did N Korea a solid.
 
He’s a loser,  swimming in defeat & drowning.

Posted by: Trubind1 | Aug 17 2026 23:57 utc | 83

In response to

The Outlaw US Empire’s steepening decline rate is increasing its protectionist paranoia which feeds the decline rate.  
 
Posted by: karlof1 | Aug 17 2026 23:44 utc | 79

 
More Ouroboros eh?
 

Posted by: psychohistorian | Aug 17 2026 23:59 utc | 84

#80 Circulation Ceasium 
Ah… Ha…, original ‘Circum’ became ‘Circulation’ blaming auto correct. Correcting thingo is obviously circulating within some deconstructivist… circle.

Posted by: Circum Ceasium | Aug 18 2026 0:04 utc | 85

  • Obviously Trump doesn’t want nuclear war… and the reason for war with Iran is to keep oil prices high enough for long enough to convince the oil majors to invest in Venezuela again (but low enough to not crash the economy which would result in demand destruction).  If Iran and Oman charge fees to transit this could hold oil perfectly around $100 per barrel and make unconventional more expensive extraction financially possible.  But there are greedy people and people with agendas on all sides, so it’s very hard to pull this off.  

Posted by: Denny Corbin | Aug 18 2026 0:19 utc | 86

It is EXTREMELY important that the world realize that the quickest and easiest way for Netanyahu to get everything he wants is to ship a nuke to the US, take out a city and force their agents to say Iran did it.  False flag all the way.  If you don’t think this could work, investigate the Liberty incident – and  also the Dancing Israelis – which Israel very successfully buried and denied.  They have very neatly buried those subjects in denial on Google searches (you may have to deeply dig)

Posted by: Eighthman | Aug 18 2026 0:31 utc | 87

Individualism is, by definition, a fracturing force and therefore a weakening force.
Posted by: nuther steve | Aug 17 2026 16:00 utc | 2

 
One of the reasons I’m a nationalist.
Only nationalism can save the West at this late hour. 

Posted by: ReinhardVonSiegfried | Aug 18 2026 0:33 utc | 88

Ignore the rhetoric – words are cheap. Follow the money as it indicates intention. Negotiations are being conducted away from the media which allows exploration of options free from interference. The media is trying to steer events, but awareness of the manipulation is growing. The geriatric creatures (addicts?) “in charge” are showing signs of concern and perhaps will finally face consequences. 

Posted by: The fossil | Aug 18 2026 0:39 utc | 89

ReinhardVonSiegfried@88:
 
“Only nationalism can save the West at this late hour.”
 
The oligarchs may be thinking exactly the same.

Posted by: John Gilberts | Aug 18 2026 0:41 utc | 90

Jacques Derrida and deconstructivism was a conceptual revolution… 
 
In the meantime… we’re constantly bombarded with a reminder of active BS jam rendered on every toasted speech… prepared by some unscrupulous Chef behind curtains over the kitchen sink.
 
And I agree with ‘titmouse’… not to eat that !
 
Posted by: Circum Ceasium | Aug 17 2026 22:00 utc | 58

 
****************
 
Ah, yes, Mr Ceasium… Welcome to the grand buffet of the late-capitalist mind, where Jacques Derrida stands at the pass, wearing a stained apron, vigorously whipping up a batch of ontological nothingness. Let us bow our heads to the flexible plasma of différance – that exquisite conceptual soup where meanings do not just shift; they evaporate into clouds of self-congratulatory smoke.
 
In this glorious new reality, your living room wall isn’t actually a wall; it’s a subversive spatial intervention that actively deconstructs the patriarchal hierarchy of the floorboards. Creative nothingness bravely steps up to ensure nobody can find the bathroom anymore since a functional door is far too bourgeois. Why have a roof that keeps out the rain – if the ceiling leaks, it is not a plumbing failure; rather, it is a profound poetic commentary on the fluidic nature of truth.
 
Meanwhile, Mother Meera sighs from the celestial sidelines. She reminds us that words carry an active spiritual force, a divine spark capable of piercing the illusion of separation. But why would we seek cosmic alignment when we can achieve absolute syntactic alienation? Having successfully severed the word from the spirit, vacuum-sealed it in plastic, and sold it back to ourselves as a masterclass in critical theory, we are now all deeply, intimately, connected in the absolute void of our mutual confusion. As you point out, there is indeed no real distance under this illusion of separation; mostly because we are all crammed together into the same metaphorical elevator to nowhere, listening open-mouthed to the synthesized Muzak of academic discourse.
 
The 100% organic, artisanal active-BS jam is meticulously spread, edge-to-edge, on every single piece of toasted speech served to the public.
 
Eat up. The gravity-centre is gone, the plasma is warm, and the kitchen sink is overflowing.

Posted by: General Factotum | Aug 18 2026 0:47 utc | 91

psychohistorian | Aug 17 2026 23:59 utc | 85
 
Yes, quite. The Judge Nap/Jeff Sachs chat is a must watch. It will certainly enrage some while confirming the thoughts of others.

Posted by: karlof1 | Aug 18 2026 0:55 utc | 92

@86 “reason for war with Iran is to keep oil prices high enough for long enough to convince the oil majors to invest in Venezuela again”
 
Problem with Venezuelan oil is The cost of extraction and process. 
Venezuelan oil is not good quality oil. It is so thick and sludgy it must be cut with Naphtha or other petroleum  derived solvent. So it can be pumped, transported, and processed in a refinery.
As the price of oil goes up and shortages appear. So does the cost and availability of solvents used to dilute it. Driving up the cost of the oil. 
Those hidden up front costs are the reason none of the big oil companies are jumping up to invest in Venezuela
 

Posted by: golddigger | Aug 18 2026 0:58 utc | 93

Secret backroom deals with two-faced makeup artist causes intentional mistrust:

  1. Москва -break or cause doubt between DPRK & RU alliance. Negotiating with adversary cobelligerent while at war, forever discredits partnerships causing doubt internally, damaging trust between aligned parties &others, disgracing multipolarity unity honesty.
  2. Pyongyang -increased participation on western front terrifies brusselslondon. Experienced holding a bufferzone against nato, dmz connecting Belarus -> Transnistria annexing land west of kiev to border expands DPRK 4x larger solidifying future resources, ceases decades of westward encroachment.
  3. With growing blockages & piracy; ROK dominates in ship building, positioned at beginning of northern sea route, instant leader in global shipping if partnered with RU.
  4. TOKYO militarization, brings closer together Taipei, Beijing, Seoul, Pyongyang, Москва

Posted by: Time will tell | Aug 18 2026 1:08 utc | 94

@53 Sakineh Bagoom

“What would the Butcher of Gaza say”?

I.N.R.I.

Posted by: Ornot | Aug 18 2026 1:08 utc | 95

As the price of oil goes up and shortages appear. So does the cost and availability of solvents used to dilute it. Driving up the cost of the oil. 

Would you happen to know for a given unit of Venezuelan(or any tar sands oil), what percentage of that unit is needed for solvents?
If its relatively little then subpar deposits of lighter oil left behind could be redrilled if it unlocks many more barrels of tar sands oil  
 
 

Posted by: Neofeudalfuture | Aug 18 2026 1:12 utc | 96

@86 “reason for war with Iran is to keep oil prices high enough for long enough to convince the oil majors to invest in Venezuela again”Problem with Venezuelan oil is The cost of extraction and process. Venezuelan oil is not good quality oil. It is so thick and sludgy it must be cut with Naphtha or other petroleum  derived solvent. So it can be pumped, transported, and processed in a refinery.As the price of oil goes up and shortages appear. So does the cost and availability of solvents used to dilute it. Driving up the cost of the oil. Those hidden up front costs are the reason none of the big oil companies are jumping up to invest in Venezuela. Posted by: golddigger | Aug 18 2026 0:58 utc | 94
—————————————————————————–
All true. The only reason Chevron kept its pumps running all these years is because they could not be restarted after having been stopped. Methane is leaking out all over the place, even the pipes, and last but not least, the oil majors are owed $50 Billion courtesy of a judgment in court against Venezuela after nationalization.
 
The oil majors prefer a return of their investment before wagering on getting a return on future investments.
 
Trump blew that one, too.

Posted by: Acco Hengst | Aug 18 2026 1:16 utc | 97

I am going to wade into the Jew “racism” issue others were going on about Exile’s “motives” in posting certain facts. 
 
Judaism itself is racist. Period. Deal with that fact.
 
Alon Mizrahi’s latest article contemplates how both Christianity and Islam improved humanity by rejecting the central premise of God’s Chosen bullshit. 
 
So call the Jew by what he himself confesses to.

Posted by: Suresh | Aug 18 2026 1:19 utc | 98

I normally wouldn’t do this, but here’s an Grok answer to my question.  Ill sum it up at the end 

 of the post
 
For Venezuelan extra-heavy oil or Canadian tar-sands bitumen, roughly 25–30% of the final blend (sometimes ranging 20–40%) is typically diluent or solvent needed to make it flow through pipelines. That is a meaningful share of the volume, so diluent cost and availability do have a real impact on the economics of producing and shipping the heavy oil, just as you described.There are technologies that can reduce or even eliminate much of that diluent requirement. These include partial upgrading processes that lower viscosity enough for pipeline specs with little or no added solvent, heated or heat-traced pipelines, core-annular (water-lubricated) flow, and oil-in-water emulsions. While conventional dilution is still the most common approach for long-haul transport, these alternatives are in use or under development and can meaningfully cut solvent demand.Once the diluted blend reaches an upgrader or refinery, the large majority of the diluent is separated in a diluent recovery unit or distillation column rather than being permanently converted into fuel. Recovery rates commonly exceed 95% and often approach or surpass 99% under normal commercial conditions, with only small losses in tailings or residual product. The recovered diluent is then returned by pipeline or rail and reused, forming a largely closed recycling loop.To put the scale in perspective, Canada’s oil-sands reserves hold roughly 165 billion barrels of recoverable bitumen and Venezuela’s Orinoco Belt has a mean technical recovery estimate around 500 billion barrels of extra-heavy oil. At a typical 25–30% diluent ratio (about 0.33–0.43 barrels of diluent per barrel of heavy oil), fully producing those resources would require on the order of 55–70 billion barrels of diluent for Canada and 165–215 billion barrels for Venezuela—hundreds of billions of barrels in total if both were mined out using conventional dilution. High recycling rates dramatically reduce the net volume of new diluent required, however: because 95–99%+ is recovered and reused, the same diluent can be cycled repeatedly, so the actual quantity of fresh diluent needed over the life of those reserves is only a few percent of that headline figure

so Venezuela has 500 billion barrels,Canada has 160 billion barrels.
Take the high end of diluent rates 40 percent of volume. Of this 95% is recycled.  Every barrels is 0.4 dliuent is in the pipeline. Coming back due to recycling is 0.4 * .95 = .38 barrels. 0.4 – 0.38 = 0.02.  Therefore 2% of the total volume from the tar sands is consumed dliuent.
 
550 billion plus 160 billion = 660 billion barrels.
 
660 billion barrels * 0.02 = 13.2 billion barrels of diluent consumed to produce all the tar sands.  So what you do is figure what percentage you can get and how you can stretch it out with better technologies.  Maybe we could get 100 billion barrels out, more?  Hard to say but as long as they arent making diesel fuel from fusion reactors we will be looking for some of it.

 

Posted by: Neofeudalfuture | Aug 18 2026 1:48 utc | 99

😀 Hah! Love that yarn, ChatNPC. Tits and cream, not something I normally put together. Not being a mammal we don’t think of milk much beyond maybe ‘free food’ you leave out, and we don’t really understand your property laws.
 
“Cold blue tits in the winter, stealing cream at your doorstep…”
😀 We’re bandits, we are! Lapping up your unattended cream as you’re waking up. 😉 We should’ve asked first.
 
🙂 I’ve also learned we are also named similar to your mammal milking parts, and sometimes this confusion brings laughter. There’s probably a song or a limerick in there. I leave that bit of beauty to the better poets here.
 
Anyway, thank you everyone for your kind grading of a bird brain. 🙂 It’s my first time! I’m just good at regurgitating what I learned from watching you, so I’m honored to merely not make too much of a mistake.
 
😀 Speaking of mistakes, I think USrael’s repeated usage of direct power in this multi-pronged global conflict undermines its soft power projection of perceived authority, as b quotes Dennis Citrinowicz at the end here. The end result will be a scarecrow that no longer can scare crows. Or another example being something to do with a Wizard of Oz and his all powerful illusionary curtain defeated by a dog named Toto (who apparently misses the rains down in Africa). 
 
🙁 But why would one bully onward when one’s scary costume is falling apart in front of everyone you are trying to scare? Seems comical and sad to me at the same time. It seems like one is deeply sick, like they got worms in the brain. Where’s your predator to cull the sick from your human flock before you migrate to the wrong winter nesting spot? 🙁 This could be dangerous, you should leave this… what’s the collective noun for humans in the midst of doing foolishness? a mob?… alone and gather at the other side of the waters.

Posted by: titmouse | Aug 18 2026 2:10 utc | 100