Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
August 2, 2026
Ukraine Open Thread 2026-164

News & views related to the war in Ukraine …

Comments

cloud burst weapons focused on disrupting the optics of drones, would be the tech tack I would take.

Posted by: UWDude | Aug 2 2026 12:32 utc | 1

Hungary runs out of old sparky tomorrow due to the shutdown of their largest nuclear power plant. The water levels on the Danube are too low for it to operate safely.
 
given that Ukraine depends on neighbors for electricity imports, it is not hard to imagine this will result in blackouts in Kiev and other cities … the situation will only get worse as the summer drought continues.

Posted by: GhostOfZanon | Aug 2 2026 13:18 utc | 2

Ukraine was to be the electric Bonanza for EU when they transmigrated to the Western grid.
Now who is paying their bill now?

Posted by: Catilina | Aug 2 2026 13:21 utc | 3

According to this article UKraine imports 125 GwH of electricity from Hungary.  Ignore the misleading headline – Ukraine is a net importer of energy from European nations like Hungary 
 
https://dixigroup.org/en/ukraine-reduced-electricity-imports-by-26-while-exports-rose-by-64-in-june/

Posted by: GhostOfZanon | Aug 2 2026 13:37 utc | 4

Ukraine and World Affairs (includes Iran/ME): Weekly Update, 31st July, 2026: May be Useful to Some: Ukraine and World Affairs (including Iran/ME): Weekly Update.

Posted by: The Busker | Aug 2 2026 13:38 utc | 5

Does shipping into Odessa rely on marine insurance from the city of London? Does Russian attack on some ships make all Odessa bound traffic uninsurable? 

Posted by: countrumford | Aug 2 2026 13:54 utc | 6

I feel like the Wildberries strikes serve two primary purposes, really;

  • To harm Russian state finances. Wildberries is already requesting financial support, something that Russia can’t fully ignore in the long run. Too many jobs/too much credibility at risk.
  • To spread air defence thinner. There’s more warehouses than let’s say, oil refineries for Ukraine to target, and having no dedicated air defence would mean that Ukraine can genuinely bankrupt the company which, again, I don’t think the Russian state can afford to just let happen, at least without showing some effort. But trying to provide even token coverage for the facilities will in practice degrade coverage elsewhere, at potentially more directly war-relevant targets.

Propaganda and disrupting whatever small part Wildberries played in military logistics for russian troops will be a bonus, but I think the two points above are likely the primary objectives.

Posted by: fifty three fifty five | Aug 2 2026 16:34 utc | 7

Posted by: fifty three fifty five | Aug 2 2026 16:34 utc | 7
 
Russia should retaliate by hitting all commercial warehouses and supermarkets not only in east Ukraine but west Ukraine in proximity of the Polish border. Destroy supermarkets, cold storages, commercial warehouses, grain silos etc. etc.
 
And so far Russia has always answered in kind to Ukraine, be it gas stations or commercial warehouses.

Posted by: unimperator | Aug 2 2026 16:39 utc | 8

Ukraine was to be the electric Bonanza for EU when they transmigrated to the Western grid.
Now who is paying their bill now?
 
Posted by: Catilina | Aug 2 2026 13:21 utc | 3

It was soon after Zelensky boasted about exporting electricity to Europe that Russia started hitting power plants.  The answer is, in addition to funding the entire government they now have to pay for its power(partially) and most of the hydrocarbons the EU will be doing it via taxing the EU through its member states.
This has been going on for a while now since 2023.  It increased when the natural gas flows from Russia stopped and gas started flowing east. 

Posted by: Neofeudalfuture | Aug 2 2026 16:53 utc | 9

Russia should retaliate by hitting all commercial warehouses and supermarkets not only in east Ukraine but west Ukraine in proximity of the Polish border. Destroy supermarkets, cold storages, commercial warehouses, grain silos etc. etc.
 
And so far Russia has always answered in kind to Ukraine, be it gas stations or commercial warehouses.
 
Posted by: unimperator | Aug 2 2026 16:39 utc | 8

Russia is foolish and soft by not pre emptively striking anything valuable in Ukraine.   Far too many of its elites are driving around in expensive cars.  Every car dealership should be hit, as well as expensive vacation homes and gated communities. 

Posted by: Neofeudalfuture | Aug 2 2026 16:55 utc | 10

Does shipping into Odessa rely on marine insurance from the city of London? Does Russian attack on some ships make all Odessa bound traffic uninsurable? 
 
Posted by: countrumford | Aug 2 2026 13:54 utc | 6

It does.  Irans strategy in this regard proved it, showing boldness is rewarded in war.

Posted by: Neofeudalfuture | Aug 2 2026 17:06 utc | 11

cloud burst weapons focused on disrupting the optics of drones, would be the tech tack I would take.
 
Posted by: UWDude | Aug 2 2026 12:32 utc | 1

That’s a good idea.  I’ve also seen microwave weapons mounted on larger drones for interception being which seems to be a good idea I think too.  Its basically an engineering problem now.

Posted by: Neofeudalfuture | Aug 2 2026 17:10 utc | 12

Posted by: fifty three fifty five | Aug 2 2026 16:34 utc | 7
 
i think the primary reason is making things  go boom for publicity purposes to pressure Trump into providing more weapons. 

Posted by: pretzelattack | Aug 2 2026 17:47 utc | 13

It is inconceivable that Russia fails to detect enemy drones once they have crossed state borders;
someone within the government and military ranks is fast asleep on the job.
Omsk, August 2 — Avia.pro. The Omsk region has been subjected to a large-scale attack by enemy forces using unmanned aerial vehicles. For the first time, this Western Siberian region has suffered a coordinated and widespread attack by enemy drones.
 
According to relevant agencies, kamikaze drones launched by Ukrainian units traveled a distance of over 2,500 kilometers from the contact line to the region’s administrative borders. Experts speculate that modified long-range FP-1 drones, equipped with larger fuel tanks, may have been used to strike at such a critical distance.
 
Following the detection of aerial targets and the issuance of a drone alert, Omsk Region Governor Vitaly Khotsenko announced the urgent cancellation of all public events. Omsk is celebrating City Day today, but the major evening concert scheduled for Cathedral Square and related festivities have been completely cancelled to ensure public safety.
 
Currently, air defense warning systems and electronic warfare (EW) units of the Russian Ministry of Defense are actively working to intercept and destroy the devices detected in the region. Emergency services and law enforcement in the Omsk region have been placed on high alert, and residents are advised to remain vigilant.

Posted by: Cagliostro | Aug 2 2026 17:49 utc | 14

Alexander Mercouris
Ukraine Landocked; Russia Cuts Off Odessa Land Sea Routes; Rassvet Begins Operating; Merz Implodes
 

00:00:00 Introduction from Chattanooga convention
00:01:14 Russian missile and drone strikes overnight
00:02:34 Odessa and Black Sea ports under heavy attack
00:03:15 Ukraine now landlocked, no rerouting via Romania
00:03:56 Zatoka bridge hit in major strike
00:07:25 Comparing Zatoka bridge to Crimea bridge situation
00:11:37 Odessa shipping isolated, 80 ships hit in July
00:14:34 Zatoka bridge logistics importance for Ukraine
00:15:51 Russian ground advances in Donbass and Kharkov
00:17:14 Ukraine launches roughly 1000 drones at Russia
00:19:40 Russian drone debris comments and skepticism
00:20:27 Wildberries warehouses attacked, Tatiana Kim responds
00:25:35 Russia retaliates against Ukrainian ecommerce warehouses
00:27:36 Rasvet satellite system update, Russia’s Starlink analog
00:34:29 US pulls back from Wiesbaden Ukraine HQ
00:35:56 UK coalition of the willing wobbling under Burnham
00:38:33 France’s Macron succession threatens project Ukraine
00:39:44 Germany’s Merz in serious political trouble
00:49:26 Trump calls off Iran strike, Hormuz standoff
00:51:39 Closing remarks

 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Hgz6VFq3Wk

Posted by: unimperator | Aug 2 2026 17:49 utc | 15

Posted by: Cagliostro | Aug 2 2026 17:49 utc | 14
 
It’s not easy to detect drones flying in 50-100m altitude. Russian AD against drones must be based on point-defense. And the problem arises that there are too many points to defend.
 
I don’t think there can be such a thing as 100% effective drone defense. The best air defense is one that intercepts drones near their launching points, or on the routes all drones must converge entering Russia before they disperse into individual targets.
 
The other best way to deter drone attacks is precisely destroying gas stations in Kiev, Poltava, Sumy, Kharkov, Zhitomir, Vinnitsa and Dnipro regions. That will reduce potential truck traffic on those roads, entering their staging areas to launch drones. Slowly they need to burn gas stations westward.
 
At that point as AFU has to bring in separate fuel trucks to setup temporary fuel dumps, RUAF should have automated drones to hit those fuel trucks.
 
No diesel, no drones.

Posted by: unimperator | Aug 2 2026 17:55 utc | 16

Russia should retaliate by hitting all commercial warehouses and supermarkets not only in east Ukraine but west Ukraine in proximity of the Polish border. Destroy supermarkets, cold storages, commercial warehouses, grain silos etc. etc.
 
And so far Russia has always answered in kind to Ukraine, be it gas stations or commercial warehouses.
 
Posted by: unimperator | Aug 2 2026 16:39 utc | 8
 
Nah.  wildberries is a nothing burger.    Stay focused on military targets.  Ukraine is being foolish hitting non military targets.   Western thinkers thinking about what would make them mad, and thinking taking out Amazon would make them mad is projection funny.
 
======================================

  • To spread air defence thinner. There’s more warehouses than let’s say, oil refineries for Ukraine to target, and having no dedicated air defence would mean that Ukraine can genuinely bankrupt the company which, again, I don’t think the Russian state can afford to just let happen, at least without showing some effort. But trying to provide even token coverage for the facilities will in practice degrade coverage elsewhere, at potentially more directly war-relevant targets.

 
Posted by: fifty three fifty five | Aug 2 2026 16:34 utc | 7
 
this one is the only real problem, but Russia would be a fool to take coverage form elsewhere to defend wildberries warehouses.  I seriously doubt they will change aa defense structure to protect consumer goods warehouses.  they are a dime a dozen and easy to rebuild.

Posted by: UWDude | Aug 2 2026 18:08 utc | 17

A radar detection system for objects flying 30 to 100 meters above the ground could be based on tethered balloons or airships;
it would still cost less than paying compensation for the damages and casualties resulting from negligence attributable to the Ministry of Defence and headquarters.
P.S. My Warrant Officer was more interested in figuring out how to steal office supplies—which amounted to a third of his salary—than in solving the problems he was paid to handle.

Posted by: Cagliostro | Aug 2 2026 18:12 utc | 18

L’altro modo migliore per scoraggiare gli attacchi dei droni è distruggere con precisione le stazioni di servizio nelle regioni di Kiev, Poltava, Sumy, Kharkov, Zhitomir, Vinnitsa e Dnipro. Ciò ridurrà il potenziale traffico di camion su quelle strade, che entrano nelle loro aree di appoggio per il lancio dei droni. Lentamente devono bruciare le stazioni di servizio verso ovest.
 
A quel punto, dato che l’AFU deve far arrivare camion cisterna separati per allestire depositi temporanei di carburante, la RUAF dovrebbe avere droni automatizzati per colpire quei camion cisterna.
 
Niente diesel, niente droni.
 
Pubblicato da: unimperator | 2 agosto 2026 17:55 UTC | 16
Destroying the fuel stations does not eliminate the possibility of trucks traveling thousands of kilometers; these vehicles are equipped with auxiliary tanks that allow them to cover distances of up to 6,000 km.

Posted by: Cagliostro | Aug 2 2026 18:38 utc | 19

these vehicles are equipped with auxiliary tanks that allow them to cover distances of up to 6,000 km.

Posted by: Cagliostro | Aug 2 2026 18:38 utc | 19
 
That is all very well and good, (though I have never seen any trucks or tractor units with that many auxiliary tanks, carrying enough diesel to cover 6,000 km will impinge on the payload/axle load ratio), but the diesel needs to be available in the first place:

Diesel sales restrictions have appeared in Ukraine: how they explain it at gas stations

The media reported that gas stations in Ukraine have introduced limits on the supply of diesel fuel to one customer. At the same time, the OKKO network explained what is actually happening
 

This is reported by Delo.ua , RegioNews reports .
 
According to media reports, the limits on the sale of diesel fuel range from 50 to 100 liters per filling station. It is noted that such restrictions are imposed on gas stations located on highways where many trucks refuel. The reasons are cited as attempts to prevent rapid depletion of fuel stocks at gas stations.

https://regionews.ua/ukr/news/ukraine/1785691469-v-ukrayini-z-yavilos-obmezhennya-prodazhu-dizelya-yak-tse-poyasnyuyut-na-azs (via translation add-on.)
 
So, lots of (alleged) auxiliary tanks, lots of fresh air being carted around…
 

Posted by: Jeremy Rhymings-Lang | Aug 2 2026 19:03 utc | 20

Posted by: Hoarsewhisperer | Aug 2 2026 15:57 utc | 163
 
HW – failed to get through.  Try again.  Have italicised the reason why looking at the ATO period is not only done for  historical reasons, though for those of us who followed that time closely there are, even now, more facts coming out.  Unless that time, and the subsequent period up to February ’22, is understood, the uncontested assertion that the Russians mounted an unprovoked attack on an innocent neighbouring country will shape our thinking. 
 
……………………………………………
 
HW – procurement in the post-Maidan fighting?  Little is known for sure about that, far as I know.  Where did the then Federalists get their weapons and ammunition from?
 
Various explanations and all different.  They got them from old Soviet arms dumps, in mines, that they as locals knew about but others didn’t.  They got them when the Kiev forces defected to their side.  They were covertly supplied by the Russians.  Or by voluntary Russian support groups.   Even stories about taking T34s that had been on exhibition out in the rain for decades and getting them going.
 
Maybe there’s truth in all those explanations.  Don’t know.  Wherever supplies came from, they needed a lot.  The fighting around the time of the ATO was intense.  It was said one battle needed a trainload of ammunition and I could believe it looking at the time at, say, the fighting around Saur Mogila.  As for the mechanics of procurement, I recollect a remark at that time from a front line fighter.  He was complaining that he knew the arms were there back at base but the old style Soviet system of supply they were still working with was so bureaucratic  and slow they couldn’t be got at!
 
On the other side it was also something of a shambles.   We can get a back reading from observations made by a British volunteer, Ukrainian side, who’d miraculously survived Yavoriv and afterwards made his way to the front.  He spoke of the mysterious way entire truck loads of arms just vanished between one checkpoint and the next.  Maybe much of it found its way to Mexico and other places abroad as the American press reported, but I’d guess quite a lot found its way, informally, to other fighting units in Ukraine, who were often reduced to resorting to the arms dealers to get weapons they could take to the front.  That was after ’22 but getting hold of the needed weaponry in the post ’14 fighting was probably a similar muddle for the Kiev forces.
 
The Kiev regulars also worked to the old system at tht time but it was more catch as catch can with the Right Sector fighters who provided the punch in the early days.  (That distinction between the regulars and those now known as the “ultra” fighters still continues, though now more blurred, to the present day.  The animosity too, one sometimes notices.  Extending to artillery exchanges between the two components of the Kiev forces at one time.  The distinction was marked in interviews after Mariupol was liberated.  A marine was asked about Azov.  Oh them, he said, no idea what they got up to.)
 
Going off the subject of procurement, aren’t I.  But I wholeheartedly agree with you that the post-Maidan fighting, seldom referred to now, really does need to be focused on.   As Sachs remarks, unless one knows what was happening in the eight years before February 2022, there’s no hope of understanding the why of the missile and ground assault that took all by surprise on the 24th of that month.
 
You see, unless one knows why the Federalists and then Separatists were fighting in the first place, and unless one understands why the Russians were forced to come to their assistance  in February ’22, then there is no sense to that Russian missile and ground assault on Ukraine.  The Western politicians and propagandists can say uncontradicted, as they lined up in droves to say afterwards, that it was an “unprovoked” attack.  Unless the true facts come out, the Western electorates are going to believe them and follow those politicians dutifully into a quite unnecessary  Cold War II.
 
Posted by: English Outsider | Aug 2 2026 12:10 utc | 161
……………………………

Posted by: English Outsider | Aug 2 2026 19:13 utc | 21

(Speed of Bionic War)
Evolutionary combat rapid prototyping & fast tracking command structural revisioning, represent a critical point of battlefield first-moving innovation. As said advantages are Temporary, offset by legacy criticisms, integrating emergent tech increased lethality, extended kill radius, while enhancing precision & improving accuracy, essential for advancing operational effectiveness. Capitalizing on decades long western production procurement inferiorities, combat modernization focuses on leveraging telemetry data quicker vs adversaries, the ability to calculate& process decisions faster, augments force multipliers, reduces strategic planning, in a scaling battlefield terrains. Networked mission objectives accelerate command decisions, anticipated converging trendlines, automated metric anomaly detection, monitored area of operations, while improvising maneuverability remotely. Understudied results of tactical effectiveness risk inviting adversarial transformations. Persistent advantage training machine learning from mission data sets, modeling for modularity, combat data mining, improving agile adoption cycle, defeats western proprietary closed algorithms slow costly development life cycle. Combined automated arms cost effectiveness, reduced logistical footprint, lowered maintenance lifecycles, providing sustainable operational advantage. Progression of unmanned systems development causes clandestine active measures, acquisition difficulties, increasing speed, encourages miniaturization, transient asymmetrical imbalance, confronting complexities of moores law & challenging implementation before obsolescence. Rapid innovation in autonomous war will force harnessing streamlined automated manufacturing assembly lines forcing faster adoption rates integrated into an evolving command control coordination ecosystem with operation tools constantly optimizing lethalities. The cyclic process repeats as predictive analytics exposes cross domain vulnerabilities & identifies limitations. When efficiencies are reduced it forces situational readiness, pushing commands flexibility to revision tactics for evolving threats countering dynamic augmented decisions in preparation for eventual overcoming nuclear deterrence obsolescence…🐾

Posted by: Time will tell | Aug 2 2026 19:17 utc | 22

these vehicles are equipped with auxiliary tanks that allow them to cover distances of up to 6,000 km.
 
Posted by: Cagliostro | Aug 2 2026 18:38 utc | 19
 
That is all very well and good, (though I have never seen any trucks or tractor units with that many auxiliary tanks, carrying enough diesel to cover 6,000 km will impinge on the payload/axle load ratio), but the diesel needs to be available in the first place:

The necessary diesel will always be available, imported from the vast nato economy. 
 
However increasing the time and resources needed to launch every drone decreases the rate of fire, and increase cost per shot.  While not a panacea it leads to an unfavorable cost benefit ratio.  In conjunction with other tactics to reduce the drone strikes effectiveness itll take incremental amounts of pressure off of Russia. 
 
Attritional warfare comes in all forms.

Posted by: Neofeudalfuture | Aug 2 2026 19:18 utc | 23

Pubblicato da: Jeremy Rhymings-Lang | 2 agosto 2026 19:03 UTC | 20
I really think you need some fresh air—seriously.
A standard tractor-trailer has a 1,000-liter fuel tank, usually on the right side of the tractor unit.
Drivers doing international hauls install an identical one on the left side, plus another one in the cargo area.
A truck covers 3 km per liter of diesel.
So, before you start spouting off, do your homework. Don’t make a fool of yours
elf.

Posted by: Cagliostro | Aug 2 2026 19:26 utc | 24

Posted by: Cagliostro | Aug 2 2026 18:38 utc | 19
 
Yes it won’t stop a truck driving from further west if they are fueled to do the one job, but hitting the gas stations in those routes of Ukraine will limit tactical maneuverability of the drone launchers and potential reloading, and perhaps limit any potential ability to transport/stockpile drones for reloading purposes by smaller vehicles like vans and pick-ups.
 
So it will have some sort of effect, albeit maybe it won’t stop the launch on absolute scale.
 
Think of the scenarios:
 
Now: trucks drive from the west with a load of drones, launched from staging area. Truck drives back to reload from a drone stockpile. Truck drives back to staging area for relaunch.
 
Then: trucks drive from the west with a load of drones, launched from staging area.  Truck drives back far to the west because there is no local diesel available to refuel to operate one or more relaunches and transits to/from local staging area and drone stockpile.
 
So cost-effectiveness for these drone launchers goes down, transit times and intervals of launch grows larger.

Posted by: unimperator | Aug 2 2026 19:30 utc | 25

Posted by: Time will tell | Aug 2 2026 19:17 utc | 22

Writing is hard.

Posted by: Neofeudalfuture | Aug 2 2026 19:31 utc | 26

A standard tractor-trailer has a 1,000-liter fuel tank, usually on the right side of the tractor unit.

Posted by: Cagliostro | Aug 2 2026 19:26 utc | 24
 
Well, looking at the following:
 
https://www.daf.co.uk/en-gb/trucks/specsheets-search-page?Page=3
https://www.man.eu/uk/en/truck/all-models/the-man-tgx/specifications/tgx-specifications.html
 
I can find no information that points to 1,000 litre capacity diesel fuel tanks being available, which chimes with my personal recollection of heavy goods road haulage, mainly involving moving large and heavy loads, often oversize, which needed coordination with the police and local authorities to move the thing safely.
 
STGO categories need to be taken seriously.

Posted by: Jeremy Rhymings-Lang | Aug 2 2026 19:48 utc | 27

Ooh, and look at what else can be found: https://www.fuelproof.co.uk/1000-litre-highway-tow-diesel-bowser-single-axle.html
 
A 1,000 litre tank isn’t just a tank, it can also be a bowser, complete with it’s own axle and towing hitch…
 
Pretty useless in Ukraine though…

Posted by: Jeremy Rhymings-Lang | Aug 2 2026 20:01 utc | 28

I think it’s now clear that Putin is facing a situation which he never anticipated. If he could have settled the conflict any time between 2022 and 2025 with no concessions on the part of Russia, he can’t do it now. Ukraine has reached a level of force projection that allows them to hit targets in Russia at will. If Putin doesn’t make concessions, then Ukraine will keep projecting force. This isn’t to say that Ukraine can “win” but that Putin cannot stop them. That’s a point in this conflict that we haven’t seen before.

Posted by: Supa Fly | Aug 2 2026 20:52 utc | 29

imported from the vast nato economy.

Posted by: Neofeudalfuture | Aug 2 2026 19:18 utc | 23
 
Ah yes, that would be the “vast nato economy” that books “real” profits based on the notional valuation at a particular time point, disregarding the collapse in asset value after the “profits” are booked.
 
That would be the “vast nato economy” that still needs to import the relevant grades of crude oil to keep its refineries working, producing… ..er… diesel…
 
That would be the “vast nato economy” whose latest and greatest means of deploying air superiority is the F-35?
 
That would be the “vast nato economy” that is scratching around for air defence, for ammunition, for energy supplies? Have I got this right, this is the same “vast nato economy”?
 
The same “vast nato economy” that has watched Ukraine shrink in land-mass since the “vast nato economy” donated to Ukraine all its “game-changers”.
 
This would be the same “vast nato economy” that can’t fix the potholes that myself and many of my friends and acquaintances can’t avoid bouncing over on a daily basis.
 
Are we talking about the same “vast nato economy”?

Posted by: Jeremy Rhymings-Lang | Aug 2 2026 20:52 utc | 30

Usual tank size of heavy trucks is 300 litres, sufficient for 1000km range. Higher volumes can be provided, but are special equipment. Above 1500l the tank would be considered hazardous material, and require additional permits in Europe.

Posted by: aquadraht | Aug 2 2026 21:03 utc | 31

I think it’s now clear that Putin is facing a situation which he never anticipated. If he could have settled the conflict any time between 2022 and 2025 with no concessions on the part of Russia, he can’t do it now. Ukraine has reached a level of force projection that allows them to hit targets in Russia at will. If Putin doesn’t make concessions, then Ukraine will keep projecting force. This isn’t to say that Ukraine can “win” but that Putin cannot stop them. That’s a point in this conflict that we haven’t seen before.
 
Posted by: Supa Fly | Aug 2 2026 20:52 utc | 29
 
This assumes that Ukraine stays as a single, cohesive entity after some kind of ceasefire is achieved. The amount of internal chaos that will dominate Ukranianian society after the war, what with the mob and all, ensures that the force projection will be pointed inward. If a full blown civil war doesn’t happen first.
 
Also the Russian military routed with Chechnyans, and they had an infinitely more cohesive unity between their forces than Ukraine does. Once the money stops flowing to Kiev, and it will, the support for all of these plans of post-war terror dissappear as well.

Posted by: New Fly | Aug 2 2026 21:10 utc | 32

Are we talking about the same “vast nato economy”?
 
Posted by: Jeremy Rhymings-Lang | Aug 2 2026 20:52 utc | 30

Things arent what they used to be, but it has direct control over a billion people with still intact manufacturing and R&D to develop and make new weapons.
More than enough to keep Ukraine with weapons and fuel indefinitely. And if theres a few shortcomings once in a while, well Ukraine can just suck it up.

Posted by: Neofeudalfuture | Aug 2 2026 21:37 utc | 33

Pubblicato da: aquadraht | 2 agosto 2026 21:03 UTC | 3
I understand from your comments that you don’t know a thing about trucks.
The trucks that travel internationally, especially those from Eastern European countries where diesel costs half as much as in the West, all have tanks with capacities of over 1,000 liters.
The Scania we own, a 280 tractor unit, has a standard 500-liter tank, and the longest route is 500 km, while the tractor towing a semi-trailer has a 1,000-liter tank.
If you want to clear up any doubts, visit a truck park on the highway.
After all, 1,000 liters is 1 cubic meter.
The trucks coming from Russia that unloaded in the industrial area of Pisa all had double tanks.
And as mentioned, a truck carrying 25 tons travels 3 km with one liter.

Posted by: Cagliostro | Aug 2 2026 21:44 utc | 34

Posted by: Neofeudalfuture | Aug 2 2026 19:31 utc | 26

Brief credentials since MrP already knows: grandson to Great Patriotic War veteran & OSS trainer, son of No Such Agency senior intelligence analyst & son to nVirginia analyst, born/lived growing up on base ft.meade, spending first ten years childhood only reading munitions specifications trajectory manuals, 70’s connected to greenscreen Arpanet, after school made to wait in military intelligence library everyday for hours studying directly next to every missle -b()mb component dissected split open displayed in cases from all armory’s, weekends spent regularly with friends family at blobs-park Bavarian beer hall with endless photos wearing lederhosen. And yes as a child, black suit officers injected me a number of times on home visits during evening with micro dosed psychoactives stored in locking black hardshell_suitcases. Afterwards I know the feeling, ten yrs ago I suspect the old man helped with that declassification.

…15yrs @msft redmond senior most engineer level 5, disabled army vet eleven bravo seventy fifth ranger regiment, hundred first division airborne & soc. Lead the way

Posted by: Time will tell | Aug 2 2026 21:50 utc | 35

@aquadraht @Jeremy Rhymings-Lang
 
While the gas station strikes cause big picture problems of scale and logistics, the “small picture” reality on the ground is this is quite easy to get around on both sides of the fight and you can be sure they’re doing it.
 
It’s called the magic of the jerry-can. Or multiple jerry cans. Or if your vehicle is big enough a fuel drum or two. Yes you have to sacrifice space on or in your vehicle (hopefully not inside as there’s a thing called fumes and you can’t assume the seal is air-tight) It’s inefficient but it’s low tech, cheap and it works quite well. In my neck of the woods many people have several of these handy so that in a mass evacuation you can cruise right by the few  gas stations on the highway that become multi-hour episodes of frustration if you would have to otherwise stop and join a queue several kilometers long.
 
With the magic of ratchet straps, bungee cords, rope or even tie wraps you can easily secure several of these to your vehicle and then hide it with a tarp or any number of other equally cheap methods. While you’re not supposed to keep these in the cabin I wouldn’t be surprised if many motorists do, just with the windows cracked for ventilation. It also wouldn’t surprise me if there’s a group of enterprising individuals on both sides of the conflict ferrying jerry cans or fuel drums in regular cars, vans and pickup trucks in a relay system. Damn inefficient but if you have enough of it you can make a go of it and you can be sure they’ll be cashing in quite nicely. Cue for the guy on the side of the road wearing a trenchcoat- “psst, hey buddy, wanna buy some gas?”
 
Does it replace the gas station or solve the problem of how you’ll refill them when you get to where you’re going? Nope, sure doesn’t. But it will easily extend your vehicles range to do what you need to do.  For the drone carriers, easy fix. If you have your main vehicle and one or two escorts all with jerry cans, and perhaps there’s a few cans or drums squirreled away in the bushes here or there along the route- voilla, problem solved.
 
Pain in the but? Sure thing. Does it work at scale? Not even close. But it’ll still allow for troop movements, drone carriers, moving munitions at the tactical level. They can still do all the same things they could do before, they just have to work a lot harder for it.
 
 

Posted by: Clown Shoes | Aug 2 2026 21:54 utc | 36

  1. A link—unfortunately, in Italian

https://youtu.be/CcIV-9-KX5Y?is=7gzfMRjfWYOwBw-x
 
Firefighters secure 1,090 liters;
tank punctured by a piece of metal debris.

Posted by: Cagliostro | Aug 2 2026 22:05 utc | 37

Pubblicato da: Clown Shoes | 2 agosto 2026 21:54 UTC | 36
exactly, the first time I went to Sumy entering Ukraine from Hungary, not finding any petrol stations, I bought 2 cans of petrol from a guy sitting on the side of the road,

Posted by: Cagliostro | Aug 2 2026 22:12 utc | 38

I wish everyone who visits this space a good night, since it is midnight here in Italy.

Posted by: Cagliostro | Aug 2 2026 22:16 utc | 39

I think it’s now clear that Putin is facing a situation which he never anticipated. If he could have settled the conflict any time between 2022 and 2025 with no concessions on the part of Russia, he can’t do it now. Ukraine has reached a level of force projection that allows them to hit targets in Russia at will. If Putin doesn’t make concessions, then Ukraine will keep projecting force. This isn’t to say that Ukraine can “win” but that Putin cannot stop them. That’s a point in this conflict that we haven’t seen before.
 
Posted by: Supa Fly | Aug 2 2026 20:52 utc | 29
Wow.  You don’t say, supa fly.  Putin is completely confused about the conflict and the Ukronazis are just about to “win”, huh?  
 

Posted by: Ahenobarbus | Aug 2 2026 22:22 utc | 40

This war and Iran war should convince Russia to build underground weapons storage facilities and hangers. Also put up simple iron nets around its refineries and oil and gas facilities. Looks clumsy on them but saves them. When canopies were put on Russian tanks western media laughed at them but when Israel copied it no one laughs now.
 
Russia should keep retaliating like for like. Civilian economic centers in Ukraine should be busted. Odessa should be kept under daily bombardment. Currently Ukraine has no ability to stop them. Russian navy should stop being sitting ducks letting the army and the air force do most work and target entire port facilities of Ukraine which are just a fraction of what they used to be 15 years ago.
 
Water flow of the Dnipro should be restricted to the Crimea region disrupting transport, agriculture and daily life of Zaporezia and Nikolaiv regions. This requires underground tunnels.
 
Winter offers more opportunities to disrupt energy facilities in Ukraine.
 
While these things are going on beyond the battlefield, attrition rate of Ukrainian troops should be maintained at 1,350 a day. Military officers should be given a daily harvest quota. If they meet it for 30 days they get an attractive bonus and a promotion. And it repeats. This forces them to think outside the box to wipe out Ukraine’s remaining manpower.
 
Russia should also make use of tourist travel and bulk cargo air freight to and from Russia to Asian destinations to bring cheap drones, motor bikes, etc.

Posted by: Jason | Aug 2 2026 22:44 utc | 41

Russia and Ukraine have both lost, and yet the war is dragging on out of a combination of spite, sunk-cost fallacy, and stupidity. Everyone is lying and the only people winning are the ones selling the bullets and the bombs.

Posted by: Konig Konn | Aug 2 2026 23:35 utc | 42

It’s just matter of time before Russia is forced to accept peace deal.
A man in Odessa opened fire on Ukrainian military recruitment officers, wounding four, as police confirm the shooting and continue searching for the shooter.
The gunman ran out of his home in the Ovidiopol district and began shooting at recruitment officers who were carrying out mobilization there.
A 25-year-old recruitment officer was hospitalized with a gunshot wound to the back near the lungs, while three other wounded officers sought medical help on their own.
Local channels initially reported that security forces had surrounded and were storming the shooter’s apartment — but police statements suggest he managed to escape before they arrived. The search for him is ongoing.
🔴 @DDGeopolitics
 

Posted by: munze | Aug 3 2026 1:28 utc | 43

When I was in Thailand, once a very long time ago, petrol stops were just a makeshift shack and the child or teenager in charge, would fill my tank with petrol from a plastic 1 liter Coke bottle.
 
But, I  was only riding a Honda stepthru.
 
Anyway, a Jerry can in current time has the same effect.
 
SFA (Sweet fuckall)

Posted by: Suresh | Aug 3 2026 2:42 utc | 44

Posted by: UWDude | Aug 2 2026 12:32 utc | 1
cloud burst weapons focused on disrupting the optics of drones, would be the tech tack I would take.

Yes.  Seems the most logical counter to battle field drones.  Also is probably not hard to implement.

Posted by: Barrel Brown | Aug 3 2026 3:27 utc | 45

SFA (Sweet fuckall)
Posted by: Suresh | Aug 3 2026 2:42 utc | 44
 
Nope, it’s Sweet Fanny Adams. 

Posted by: Asian Tiger | Aug 3 2026 3:31 utc | 46

@29
 
Would Ukies have stopped making those weapons had Russia stopped the war in 2025? No. Might as well deal with it now than kick the can down the road. Ukraine is losing territory every month and people living in them. Russia gains people and territory from Ukraine. Why stop the war? Europe that is funding the war is going bankrupt, very low GDP growth, in a debt trap and after the next election the largest economies will be under extremists. Russia should just keep going.
 

Posted by: Jason | Aug 3 2026 4:24 utc | 47

Superfly?

Jimmy Superfly Snuka suffered so many blows to the head during his long career — even getting a coconut smashed on his skull — that he now suffers from dementia and is mentally incompetent to stand trial in the death of his girlfriend more than three decades ago…

Snuka’s severe mental impairment also stems from a history of abusing alcohol and cocaine.

https://images.seattletimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/54377ac2d3dd489b9e72d5cfbb3a7ea7.jpg?d=780×1071

https://yandex.com/images/search?text=superfly%20snuka

Posted by: Dan Kelly | Aug 3 2026 4:47 utc | 48

dragging on out of a combination of spite, sunk-cost fallacy, and stupidity. 
Posted by: Konig Konn | Aug 2 2026 23:35 utc | 42
 
Wow there are still people, who come to MOA, who think that the shooting in Ukraine is a war between Russia and Ukraine. Amazing.
 
In fact, as has been explained over and over again, it is the latest phase of the war of the US, and all its allies, to destroy Russia and take all its stuff. The war on Russia became obvious, in the mid-nineties, when the encroachment on Russia accelerated, instead of stopping with the fall of the USSR.
 

Posted by: acementhead | Aug 3 2026 6:07 utc | 49

  • To harm Russian state finances. 
  • To spread air defence thinner. 

Posted by: fifty three fifty five | Aug 2 2026 16:34 utc | 7
 
There is not much defense anyway. Some around Moscow for propaganda reasons and to protect the superiors. Peasants get blown up. Airfields, refineries, cargo ships, bridges and anything else gets eventually hit because attempts are unlimited in number, there is no smo going on except on the Ukr fantasy statistics channels which are then republished as facts by the Russian channels and the clowns of youtube. 
And how do you know the some don’t actually like the Wildberries attacks? That woman owner or manager or whatever she is was placed on the Peacemaker website a few days ago. If she doesn’t hire a private army quickly she will not get to pension. She can’t expect protection from the MoD when the MoD itself gets blown, can she?
These attacks and the lack of interest from the government for protection or punishment shows that someone is preparing the local market for Amazon or some Chinese company by destroying the competition in advance. Who remembers Okhotnik? Kept without funding before smo by madam Shoigu, canceled by madam Gerasy. They do publish a lot of videos on how they sucessfully hit empty cottages ( t.me/Slavyangrad/171855 ) using flying grenades. 

Posted by: rk | Aug 3 2026 6:08 utc | 50

Despite all good intentions, it is undeniable that the Russian government and military command contain elements with ties to—and strong interests in—the West;
effectively, the Russian army has fought a war lasting nearly five years with one hand tied behind its back and the handbrake pulled all the way up,
to the point where it resembled a fixed boxing match designed for the opponent to win—one need only look at the infamous memoranda in which the Russians were willing to make crippling concessions;
they waited 1,620 days to bomb a key bridge connecting to Romania—across which tons upon tons of weaponry flowed around the clock—and the same applies to the Black Sea ports;
destroying gas stations is merely a marketing stunt to feed to public opinion, and nothing more;
then there is the near-total absence of drone detection systems and territorial protection, aside from the defense of the Kremlin itself.
Unfortunately, rot is not confined to Europe.

Posted by: Cagliostro | Aug 3 2026 7:20 utc | 51

Russian Starlink alternative now in test mode.
 
The adversary is concerned about the capabilities of the Rassvet satellite constellation, noting that Russian forces can now use the system for an hour and a half daily over so-called Ukraine—including for controlling drones and unmanned aerial vehicles.

Posted by: genesiss | Aug 3 2026 8:19 utc | 52

And how do you know the some don’t actually like the Wildberries attacks? That woman owner or manager or whatever she is was placed on the Peacemaker website a few days ago. If she doesn’t hire a private army quickly she will not get to pension. She can’t expect protection from the MoD when the MoD itself gets blown, can she?These attacks and the lack of interest from the government for protection or punishment shows that someone is preparing the local market for Amazon or some Chinese company by destroying the competition in advance. Who remembers Okhotnik? Kept without funding before smo by madam Shoigu, canceled by madam Gerasy. They do publish a lot of videos on how they sucessfully hit empty cottages ( t.me/Slavyangrad/171855 ) using flying grenades. 
Posted by: rk | Aug 3 2026 6:08 utc | 50
 
 
That’s certainly a strange opinion—”She won’t live very long.”
 
Hey, it might have been Zelenskyy’s biggest mistake to cross this woman—who just happens to be the richest woman in Russia!*He*—of all people—wants to move in those circles (assuming he survives, that is). He bought real estate where the super-rich live—right where this woman owns property, too.
 
Hey, this woman is worth billions and surely has enough dollars to sic any number of hitmen on Zelenskyy and his Azov cronies…Let’s think logically… the fact that Zelenskyy is no longer capable of that becomes apparent every day… whereas a businesswoman like her keeps on thinking ahead…

Posted by: genesiss | Aug 3 2026 8:26 utc | 53

Main rival of Wildberries, Ozon,  is funded by US Venture Capital firm, Princeville Capital.
So now we know what is actually going on.

Posted by: Night Tripper | Aug 3 2026 8:48 utc | 54

Main rival of Wildberries, Ozon,  is funded by US Venture Capital firm, Princeville Capital.So now we know what is actually going on.
Posted by: Night Tripper | Aug 3 2026 8:48 utc | 54
There have already been reports or comments on this in *Kommersant*.
 
 
E-commerce duopoly: Together, Ozon and Wildberries dominate 77% of the Russian online retail market. The Russian antitrust authority (FAS) officially classifies both as dominant players but views Ozon as a threat to the market, citing multiple complaints filed against it.Slowing growth: While their combined market share rose by 11 percentage points in 2025, the growth curve is flattening noticeably for 2026, with an expected increase of only 5 percentage points.
 
 
Financial drivers: Ozon is experiencing strong growth through internal monetization. Its in-house financial arm, Ozon Fintech, now has over 34 million users—a scale that has led to concerns regarding financial security risks.
 
Both giants face significant pressure in the summer of 2026. In addition to EU sanctions targeting the financial arms of both corporations, logistics centers have recently become targets of Ukrainian drone strikes; these attacks caused evacuations and operational risks but also drew the attention of antitrust authorities, who classified the strikes as a form of internally orchestrated distortion of competition—marking the first time globally that an antitrust authority has exposed or alleged that orchestrated attacks during wartime were being used against competitors.

Posted by: genesiss | Aug 3 2026 9:12 utc | 55

Posted by: Jason | Aug 3 2026 4:24 utc | 47

Europe that is funding the war is going bankrupt, very low GDP growth, in a debt trap and after the next election the largest economies will be under extremists. Russia should just keep going.

No, they’re under extremists now (see the ongoing population replacement). Part of their extremism is the old technique of pointing at the chosen “other” – in this case Russia – to distract the population from their continued immiseration.
God willing better politicians will come to power, But we’ve seen from Hungary that the EU institutional apparatus will undermine them as much as they can. And we’ve seen in Moldova that they’re happy with electoral fraud if their side win by it. 
I agree with everything else in your post.  
 
 
 
 

Posted by: YetAnotherAnon | Aug 3 2026 9:29 utc | 56

Posted by: YetAnotherAnon | Aug 3 2026 9:29 utc | 56
 
 
Exactly!Almost all EU states are now grappling with extremism—especially Germany and France.
And this system lashes out with every means at its disposal to cling to power—not merely to fight the opposition, but to destroy it entirely. They change laws, enact new ones, bend regulations, and—if you belong to an “unpleasant” party—ban you from participating in local elections, and so on.
It almost fits the Duden dictionary’s definition of “fascism.”

Posted by: genesiss | Aug 3 2026 9:39 utc | 57

Trump calls off military strike on Iran at allies’ request and announces negotiations
 
 
The US President stated that he had called off the planned military strike against Iran at the request of Qatar, the United Arab Emirates, and Saudi Arabia—as well as the Islamic Republic itself, which had signaled its willingness to engage in dialogue through unofficial channels.
 
My take on this:
It wasn’t just a lie told because of a lack of ammunition!NO—it’s because Russia is on the verge of capturing Odesa, or the risk of that happening is extremely high; that would mean the war is lost for Ukraine and the corporations profiting from it… as they would lose sea access for exports!
 
 
He emphasized that the military option had been fully prepared but was shelved to avoid a large-scale conflict in the Persian Gulf that could destabilize the oil market and regional security.
 
 
Trump also announced that the first direct negotiations between the US and Iran would take place on Monday, focusing on Tehran’s nuclear program and a possible easing of sanctions in exchange for verifiable restrictions.
 
However, experts remain cautiously optimistic, noting that previous rounds of negotiations have repeatedly failed due to mutual distrust and that the current easing of tensions could be a tactical move ahead of a new escalation.
 
 
His PROBLEM
 
here is that Tehran knows nothing about it… denies any negotiations, and is not prepared to engage in them at this time.

Posted by: genesiss | Aug 3 2026 9:46 utc | 58

Yet another “shadow” tanker seized;while Putin talks, others take action.

Posted by: Cagliostro | Aug 3 2026 11:05 utc | 59

Posted by: genesiss | Aug 3 2026 9:39 utc | 57
Exactly!Almost all EU states are now grappling with extremism

The problem, as I see it, is that we are run by extremist aided by a bunch of yes (wo)men.
The rise of far right is not that people want nazis; it is that people want anything but what is now. It just so happens (by coincidence? or by design? time will tell) that atm far right parties offer some alternative and left (not nominal) is vacant.

Posted by: jekleni | Aug 3 2026 11:28 utc | 60

Yet another “shadow” tanker seized;while Putin talks, others take action.
Posted by: Cagliostro | Aug 3 2026 11:05 utc | 59
PICS or GTFO.
On the other hand OPEC+ increased production quota , including for Russia and Kazakhstan.

Posted by: Savonarole | Aug 3 2026 11:32 utc | 61

Posted by: unimperator | Aug 2 2026 16:39 utc | 8 “Russia should retaliate by hitting all commercial warehouses and supermarkets not only in east Ukraine but west Ukraine in proximity of the Polish border. Destroy supermarkets, cold storages, commercial warehouses, grain silos etc. etc.  And so far Russia has always answered in kind to Ukraine, be it gas stations or commercial warehouses.”
.
Given that you reported here: Posted by: unimperator | Jan 14 2026 8:57 utc | 277  [Russia struck] a logistics terminal of the “Nova Poshta” company in the village of Novyi Korotych, it seems like Ukraine was answering in kind to earlier Russian attacks with their Wildberries attacks.
.
Both side are using these companies for military/logistical purposes.   The demilitarization of Ukraine appears to going in reverse at the moment as Russia has let this war drag on too long.  Back in January, Ukraine was too limited in longer range strike resources, now, it appears, they have more. 
 

Posted by: ed4 | Aug 3 2026 11:33 utc | 62

A radar detection system for objects flying 30 to 100 meters above the ground could be based on tethered balloons or airships;
Posted by: Cagliostro | Aug 2 2026 18:12 utc | 18
Russia’s a big place and a radars range at low altitudes is limited by the curve of the earth. Even on tethered balloons the range would be limited and how do you defend those balloons from drone attack?
Ukraine is using long range drones and US real time satellite surveillance to evade air defences. They’ve been routing drones to bypass air defences and circle back to attack from the rear. I’m sure Russia is making sure strategic targets are defended from all directions however Wildberries are no more strategic targets for the Russians as Ikeas are for us. Can you imagine defending Ikeas from all directions while leaving the raytheon plant undefended? 
Expending hundreds of drones to torch a warehouse full of cardboard and Chinese plastic makes for spectacular videos but does fuck all to win a war.

Posted by: HB_Norica | Aug 3 2026 11:37 utc | 63

Pubblicato da: Savonarole | 3 agosto 2026 11:32 UTC | 61
 
In the meantime, you can start;
the tree-lined avenues are full of fools.

Posted by: Cagliostro | Aug 3 2026 11:41 utc | 64

Il primo agosto 2026, nelle acque internazionali del Mar Mediterraneo, l’equipaggio della pattugliatore polivalente italiano “Thaon di Revel” ha portato a termine un delicato blitz aeronavale per abbordare ed ispezionare una petroliera sospetta che si rifiutava di collaborare. L’azione di forza, scattata per verificare la nazionalità dell’imbarcazione e le autorizzazioni della bandiera esposta, si è svolta nell’ambito delle missioni di pattugliamento dell’Unione europea ed è stata supportata dal coordinamento strategico con una nave da guerra greca ed un velivolo da ricognizione polacco.  

Posted by: Cagliostro | Aug 3 2026 11:46 utc | 65

Posted by: ed4 | Aug 3 2026 11:33 utc | 62
 
Ukraine uses its Nova Poshta warehouses 100% for military purposes. Russia’s warehouses still serve primarily as the Amazon webstore equivalent. Since Wildberries aren’t used to transport military hardware beyond negligibly at most to start with, hitting them has no effect on military logistics.
 
As we constantly hear in the west, it’s all just to ‘bring the war to the Russian people’ i.e. terrorism.

Posted by: unimperator | Aug 3 2026 11:47 utc | 66

Posted by: countrumford | Aug 2 2026 13:54 utc | 6 “Does shipping into Odessa rely on marine insurance from the city of London? Does Russian attack on some ships make all Odessa bound traffic uninsurable? ”
.
Insurance for ships going to and from Odessa is through a fund called the ‘Unity Facility’, that is partially financed by Ukraine and Lloyds.  It only covers non-military cargos up to $50 million per ship.  It was suspended last month.

Posted by: ed4 | Aug 3 2026 12:02 utc | 67

Posted by: unimperator | Aug 3 2026 11:47 utc | 66
.
Russian soldiers who have been ordering from the “Everything for the SVO” page disagree with you.  If your claim is that that amount is not a very high percentage of Wildberries revenue I agree with that.
.
As to “Ukraine uses its Nova Poshta warehouses 100% for military purposes” there are many other goods shipped via Nova Poshta warehouses.   And yes, the Nova Poshta revenue from shipping things for military purposes is much higher than Wildberries. 
.
In the economy today, not much is not dual use.

Posted by: ed4 | Aug 3 2026 12:11 utc | 68

Posted by: HB_Norica | Aug 3 2026 11:37 utc | 63 “Ukraine is using long range drones and US real time satellite surveillance to evade air defences”
.
It is not “real time”.   Lots of other sources of information also go into figuring out the paths these things take.
.
It looks like Russia has made huge effort to get more A-50s up.

Posted by: ed4 | Aug 3 2026 12:15 utc | 69

The Russian nuclear submarine BS-329 “Belgorod” is deploying with six Status 6 Poseidon nuclear torpedoes on board, capable of triggering tsunamis up to 450 meters high! The power of the Poseidon torpedo is 100 megatons, 100,000 kilotons! Hiroshima: 15 kilotons. It is capable of destroying Great Britain or New Jersey.

 
Yeah, stick a couple of these babies in Antwerp, Rotterdam, Wilhelmshaven, Kiel and Rostock. No more logistics for EU/Nato from uncle Schmuel.
 
https://x.com/remi_philiponet/status/2084030666266603736

Posted by: unimperator | Aug 3 2026 12:45 utc | 70

Yeah, stick a couple of these babies in Antwerp, Rotterdam, Wilhelmshaven, Kiel and Rostock. No more logistics for EU/Nato from uncle Schmuel. https://x.com/remi_philiponet/status/2084030666266603736
Posted by: unimperator | Aug 3 2026 12:45 utc | 70
 
 
Why a “pair” for these few targets, some of which lie on the same coast?
 
Poseidon offers a way to deploy nuclear weapons without rendering entire regions uninhabitable for centuries due to radiation…What impact that has on marine flora and fauna is another matter entirely.
 
Even 100,000 kilotons is nothing compared to the Tsar Bomba—a bomb whose explosive yield was halved prior to the test as a precaution; scientists had calculated that the single bomb, at its originally planned yield, would likely have wiped out all life on the planet by igniting the atmosphere.Double the explosive yield was the original plan!
 
A Poseidon can also be built with a yield of up to 300,000 kilotons… but that would practically vaporize oceans… and as reported in the Russian specialist press, the fallout following a single deployment is by far the most serious problem after the detonation; in a fraction of a second, it generates not just a tsunami—like an earthquake—but also vaporizes millions of cubic centimeters of water due to the heat, sending it rising up… only for it to have to come down somewhere… The effects of such a deployment were discussed intensively on Russian TV after the weapon was unveiled… yet within the “Western bubble,” its existence is barely mentioned… after all, people might start asking about defense capabilities…It is similar to the situation with hypersonic weapons: hardly anyone within the Western bubble knows they exist, and if they do, the fact that NATO as a whole would be incapable of intercepting them is glossed over.
 
I wonder why… perhaps to dampen the fear of war, or to avoid discussing what would actually happen—or comparing the respective technological levels of Russian and NATO weaponry?

Posted by: genesiss | Aug 3 2026 13:17 utc | 71

Posted by: genesiss | Aug 3 2026 13:17 utc | 71
 
I was laughing when I saw, maybe back in May, the MSM was discussing of Nato’s ‘serious efforts of building a missile shield over Brussels’. They were also talking about building a ‘drone wall from Finland to the Black sea’.
 
It’s some serious gaslighting and instilling false sense of security on EUropeans. The truth is the cold war relic air defenses of Nato and Patriot derived systems just aren’t good, and THAAD/Arrow 3 were expended for Israel, and the rebuild capacity is miniscule with no rare materials or knowledge to rebuild them. EU will never develop, never mind produce an organic and effective ballistic missile defense system capable of hitting the maneuvering Iskanders or other ballistic missiles, and the drone wall idea was silently ditched. Probably because it’s not realistic, there is no money, and there is no R&D or materials to do it.

Posted by: unimperator | Aug 3 2026 13:26 utc | 72

Yet another “shadow” tanker seized;while Putin talks, others take action.Posted by: Cagliostro | Aug 3 2026 11:05 utc | 59PICS or GTFO.On the other hand OPEC+ increased production quota , including for Russia and Kazakhstan.
Posted by: Savonarole | Aug 3 2026 11:32 utc | 61
 
 
 
The reality is this:
 
The EU will continue to commit acts of piracy in international waters even on August 2, 2026. The Italian Navy frigate ITS *Thaon di Revel*, operating as part of the EU mission EUNAVFOR MED IRINI, conducted an inspection of the oil tanker *Toa Payoh* (flying the flag of Cameroon) in international waters near the Mediterranean island of Pantelleria. The vessel had departed from the port of Cotonou (Benin) on July 16, 2026, and was en route to Istanbul (Turkey).
 
 
Polish Air Force aircraft (PZL M28 Bryza B1R) and a Greek Navy patrol boat also participated in the operation. An Italian boarding team landed directly on the tanker via helicopter.
 
 
The tanker was not seized (the mission does not yet have the authority to do so). However, the documents and information collected were handed over to European law enforcement agencies for analysis. These could be used to seize the vessel and sell its cargo to any EU country.
 
 
https://t.me/s/dva_majors

Posted by: genesiss | Aug 3 2026 13:27 utc | 73

Expending hundreds of drones to torch a warehouse full of cardboard and Chinese plastic makes for spectacular videos but does fuck all to win a war.
Posted by: HB_Norica | Aug 3 2026 11:37 utc | 63

I agree, but that does not mean that radars from aerostats, even more additonal mobile AD fire groups formed from reservists and volunteers, would be a bad idea, and is about to be implemented, or tested if necessary. Such is not bad even if coming from a clown like “Cagliostro”, and is also discussed in Russian blogs and news outlets, yet mostly without the patronizing, self righteous, and armchair strategist attitude (ok there are some there, too 🙂 ).
 
 
 
 

Posted by: aquadraht | Aug 3 2026 13:33 utc | 74

Posted by: Cagliostro | Aug 3 2026 11:46 utc | 65
In the mean time I verified on the Italian government the name of the ship in question : Toa Payoh. (It’s the name of a neighborhood in Singapore FYI.)
OK , let’s verify on any maritime register , where is the “seized” ship now ?  I mean , the day after it was boarded : apparently she’s still en route to Turkey. It seems she  wasn’t as Russian as they first thanked…
See , ” effettuato un controllo” doesn’t mean they seized the ship or that she was effectively “a shadow fleet” ship. It looks like the Regia Marina was making a PR stunt for it’s UE friends and, as usual, that PR ended up being a nothingburger.

Posted by: Savonarole | Aug 3 2026 13:37 utc | 75

Patriot derived systems just aren’t good, and THAAD/Arrow 3 were expended for Israel, and the rebuild capacity is miniscule with no rare materials or knowledge to rebuild them. EU will never develop, never mind produce an organic and effective ballistic missile defense system capable of hitting the maneuvering Iskanders or other ballistic missiles, and the drone wall idea was silently ditched. Probably because it’s not realistic, there is no money, and there is no R&D or materials to do it.
Posted by: unimperator | Aug 3 2026 13:26 utc | 72
 
 
Yes, “the West”
 
is lagging behind when it comes to weapons technology; and whenever something new is announced, it usually falls through due to issues regarding long-term contracts and the resulting dividend security—or, within Europe, due to a general lack of resources and raw materials.Did you know?
 
For instance, Germany’s air defense system can cover a mere 2% of the country—referring specifically to cities, not the entire territory—in a worst-case scenario… and that 2% wouldn’t automatically be Berlin.
 
Addendum: That 2% figure applies if the adversary uses conventional weaponry… against hypersonic threats, the coverage rate would likely be under 0.002%. It appears the IRIS-T system failed its “test” in Ukraine—after all, the “cocaine-snorting nose” was constantly begging publicly for Patriot systems while never mentioning IRIS-T missiles, which raises questions.
 
France, for example, faces similar issues with airspace coverage, while Italy doesn’t even register it as a distinct branch of service within NATO.

Posted by: genesiss | Aug 3 2026 13:38 utc | 76

Posted by: genesiss | Aug 3 2026 13:17 utc | 71
Even a 100 MT thermonuclear device detontated in the open ocean wouldn’t create much of a far reaching tsunami. For example you would need 1000 50 mt Tsar bomba devices to generate the energy released by the 9 magnitude earthquake that struck Fukishima. Anything in the kt range in the depths of the open ocean is about as damaging to land as a whale fart.
 
Detonating one in the shallow water of a harbour however is a different matter. That would cause  blast effects in the harbour along with a flood of radioactive sea water / spray and radioactive rain clouds.  Google the 1945 Baker shot.

Posted by: HB_Norica | Aug 3 2026 13:40 utc | 77

Posted by: Savonarole | Aug 3 2026 13:37 utc | 75
 
 
As I wrote in post #71, the ship was allowed to continue—not because it wasn’t “Russian enough,” but because none of the involved states (or their militaries) had the authorization from their governments, which likely feared the consequences.

Posted by: genesiss | Aug 3 2026 13:41 utc | 78

Posted by: genesiss | Aug 3 2026 13:38 utc | 76
 
The IRIS-T or NASAMS were first introduced in Ukraine during the 2023 counter-offensive. They were accompanying the advancing AFU tanks, a bit back behind the convoy. It was supposed to protect the AFU columns from bombs or missiles. Drones weren’t still a big of a thing in 2023. It failed miserably and was blown up after an Iskander or something hit it. And all those tanks were bombed.
 
It could be effective against drones and hit an occasional subsonic cruise missile but other than that they are useless. But drones are increasingly becoming more jet powered too, they are very fast. I doubt NASAMS or IRIS-T will be effective for too long further. Of course there will always be a portion of piston-engine drones just because they are cheaper to manufacture.

Posted by: unimperator | Aug 3 2026 13:43 utc | 79

“Due to economic challenges…”
 
https://t.me/ZandVchannel/194637
 
The looks on their faces 😂
 
It’s not easy being a proxy.

Posted by: Inevitability | Aug 3 2026 13:44 utc | 80

Posted by: HB_Norica | Aug 3 2026 13:40 utc | 78
 
 
Are you a physicist?
 
Do you know how the device is constructed and the schematic sequence of its detonation?Do you have a crystal ball or a direct line to the Kremlin?
 
Or are you just spouting nonsense because you fail to grasp the physical processes involved?
 
Or—and this is what I suspect:You contradict things for the sake of contradicting, simply because you want to have your say at any cost.You question the competence of Russian scientists because you refuse to accept something that simply *is*.
 
A question: If you’re such an expert, why are you sitting at home in front of your PC instead of working at the Pentagon—or at least on a multi-million-dollar yacht in the South Seas?
 
Please answer.

Posted by: genesiss | Aug 3 2026 13:48 utc | 81

Posted by: unimperator | Aug 3 2026 13:43 utc | 81Danke !

Posted by: genesiss | Aug 3 2026 13:49 utc | 82

@#8
Russia should retaliate by hitting all commercial warehouses and supermarkets not only in east Ukraine but west Ukraine in proximity of the Polish border. Destroy supermarkets, cold storages, commercial warehouses, grain silos etc. etc.
RUSSIA SHOULD ERADICATE UKRAINE FROM THE MAP OF EUROPE. IT IS A DEN OF ZIONIST-FASCIST SOROS-FUNDED, OBAMA LED LGBTQ ANTIFA BLM DEI DRT EXTREMISTS!!!!

Posted by: Noam A Larkey | Aug 3 2026 13:58 utc | 83

AFU just attacked a beach in Gelendzik, SE of Novorrossyisk with a drone. 3 people dead 13 injured potentially.
 
https://x.com/TheOtherSideRu/status/2084217758242214355

Posted by: unimperator | Aug 3 2026 14:04 utc | 84

Gepostet von: Noam A Larkey | 3. August 2026 13:58 UTC | 85
 
 
Why rack up demerits globally… when the lack of electricity will do its part to cause destruction anyway?
 
Hungary is no longer supplying energy, and the West itself faces shortages after sunset…
Better targets now would be the supply lines for the backup power stations serving Ukraine’s nuclear plants… barges approaching the Ukrainian coast from Romania, and the gauge-changing station on the Ukrainian side where bogies are switched from European to Russian track gauge…The last bridge connecting Odessa to northern Ukraine is still operational…

Posted by: genesiss | Aug 3 2026 14:05 utc | 85

Pubblicato da: aquadraht | 3 agosto 2026 13:33 UTC | 74
You’re the clown—you and all the semi-illiterate braggarts steeped in bogus truths.

Posted by: Cagliostro | Aug 3 2026 14:05 utc | 86

*** I’ve been seeing over the last week or so. ***
Posted by: English Outsider | Aug 3 2026 13:42 utc | 80
 
That in itself is an indicator that an operation is ongoing. Read together with terrorist restaurant bombing and continued Wildberries it appears that the goal is to impact sentiments in advance of Russian elections. Putin polling negatives may be impacted but not because negotiations are not happening – because Russia does not appear to be acting more forcefully. A media strategy stuck on stupid. 
 

Posted by: frithguild | Aug 3 2026 14:11 utc | 87

Are you a physicist? 
Posted by: genesiss | Aug 3 2026 13:48 utc | 83
 
No. I’m an engineer. I don’t study physics as an academic but I use physics in my occupation and have a pretty good understanding of the science.
 
How about you? I showed you mine now show me yours.

Posted by: HB_Norica | Aug 3 2026 14:14 utc | 88

Another Wildberries Struck (& vid)
 
https://www.aljazeera.com/#flips-6402682701112
 
“Ukraine has struck another warehouse belonging to Russia’s biggest online retailer Wildberries. Ukrainian drones have targeted around 20 company sites since mid July.”

Posted by: John Gilberts | Aug 3 2026 14:22 utc | 89

Are you a physicist? 
Posted by: genesiss | Aug 3 2026 13:48 utc | 83
 
BTW the yield of the Poseidon device is unknown but it’s expected to be in the low MT range not the 300kt range you seem to believe.
You seem to think this weapon is relatively fallout free when in fact the original Russian concept for this device was to salt it to enhance radioactive fallout rendering ports and harbours uninhabitable like I said check out the results of the 1945 baker shot to understand the relationship between underwater nuclear detonations and fallout … radioactive water vapour travels far and wide.

Posted by: HB_Norica | Aug 3 2026 14:28 utc | 90

Why the Epstein elites will not want to admit Ukraine losing.
 

Alex Krainer: What Happens If Ukraine Loses?

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TaQqd9wQnBc

Posted by: unimperator | Aug 3 2026 14:47 utc | 91

Today, the 40 days that Zelensky promised would “prompt Russia” to end the war have come to an end.
Instead, according to published estimates, during those 40 days, Russia gained control of over 728 square kilometers of territory.
Russian history has seen many who have come to “prompt” it. None of them have gone down in history as a successful example.@sudoplatov_official
#с_поля_боя🇷🇺 @divgen | 🌐 divgen.ru

The “heroic deeds”  not only include the ecommerce attacks  John Gilberts | Aug 3 2026 14:22 utc | 91 is bragging about , but also the terrorist attack on a birthday party in Moscow, and the attack on a beach in Genichek, and other acts of terrorism.
 
Anyway, the drone activity of 141 long range drones was one of the 3 lowest during that campaign. 

Posted by: aquadraht | Aug 3 2026 14:57 utc | 92

How about you? I showed you mine now show me yours.
Posted by: HB_Norica | Aug 3 2026 14:14 utc | 90
 
 
One last point on this… it shows me a determination to be right at all costs regarding the operating principles of Russian weapons—whether it’s the Poseidon or hypersonic systems!
 
 
 
 
 
Let me put it this way…
Given the wealth of hidden knowledge you seem to possess here in the bar, I’m somewhat surprised you aren’t commanding troops at the Pentagon.Regarding the Poseidon: you could make millions if you actually knew how that weapon works—and even knew what was originally planned (the “Salt” project).
But if you possessed all that knowledge—things the Pentagon itself almost certainly doesn’t know—your life wouldn’t be worth much anymore. After all, if the operating principle (specifically regarding the Poseidon here) were so easy to grasp, one has to ask: why hasn’t the West—meaning the USA—done it? Why, for instance, doesn’t the USA have a weapon comparable to the Taurus (which, mind you, has never actually had to prove itself in combat)?
As I said: a crystal ball, an engineering background, and supreme self-confidence… yet you’re still a poor slob at the bottom of the social ladder instead of a highly paid research engineer for the US Army or at least Boeing? There must be a mistake somewhere, right? I hold an engineering degree in physical hydraulics—I’ve overhauled and maintained nuclear power plant turbines all across Russia…
Yet I would never claim to even have an inkling of the Poseidon’s operating principle just because I went to university. Like I said, if it were that simple, we wouldn’t need intelligence agencies—just clever engineers like you.
And I don’t mean this as a personal attack on you—only on the content of your comments, or rather the way you present your speculations; because that is all they are.

Posted by: genesiss | Aug 3 2026 15:05 utc | 93

and the attack on a beach
Posted by: aquadraht | Aug 3 2026 14:57 utc | 94
 
The cluster missile in Crimea was many years ago. The investigation was never finalized, no one considered responsible. Exactly like the school hit by many Starlink drones. They’re still investigating the Odessa fire from many years ago. Who did what? No one knows, maybe it was a dream. But when no one is found guilty, no peasant can demand results. 
So these things will repeat many times no matter what the medieval smo does on the front line and even that is shit. An increase in terrorist attacks since the Alaska surrender. Big coincidence, right? You can’t say US killed your children with Starlinks after you surrender. All will be forgotten in a few days. 

Posted by: rk | Aug 3 2026 15:38 utc | 94

@genesiss | Aug 3 2026 13:17 utc | 71
About Poseidon, AI claims:
Russian state media and officials state that a coastal detonation would trigger a “radioactive tsunami” or ocean swells, depositing contaminated seawater and seabed material inland to render coastal cities uninhabitable

Posted by: petergrfstrm | Aug 3 2026 15:51 utc | 95

Selenskeiyj just offered another cease-fire.
 
A good indicator someone is panicking at the moment when Kramatorsk and Slavyansk are crumbling.

Posted by: unimperator | Aug 3 2026 15:52 utc | 96

Posted by: genesiss | Aug 3 2026 15:05 utc | 95
 
I’m retired now. I was educated as an engineer and had a career as a contractor / consultant in the  construction industry.
 
I’ve been interested in Russian military and Russian history ever since as a kid playing army in the 1960’s I couldn’t figure out what the German army was actually doing in between the Battle of Britain in 1940 and the 1944 Normandy invasion. Nothing on TV, in film, in comic books or in the library explained their absence.Those skirmishes the British / Americans fought in the desert didn’t add up to the 3 million man Wehrmacht that cut through France in 6 weeks.
 
Since I was a teenager I’ve read everything I could find on the war in the east as well as Russian history and culture and of course growing up during the cold war I have an interest in nuclear weapons technology. I also have an interest in nuclear energy generation having worked as a contractor on the Bruce nuclear generation station reactor sites in Ontario, Canada.
 
I’ve been reading all I can find on the Posidon weapon since it was leaked in a photo in 2015 as the “Status-6” project. The Russians have themselves said the nuclear device was a “cobalt bomb” which is a thermonuclear device with a cobalt layer which effectively doubles the amount of gamma radiation released. This isn’t my speculation or something I got off Reddit … it’s what the Russians say it is.
 
Now you can insult me, demean me and question my credentials all you like but it doesn’t change the facts as the Russians themselves have released to the public. The information may be wrong … Russians have been known to spread propaganda after all … the weapon may not even exist.
 
As for a nuclear device detonated in the open ocean causing a massive tsunami. If you don’t believe the math watch the movie baker shot 1945. It didn’t cause an tsunami on bikini atoll let alone across the pacific in hawaii.
 
 

Posted by: HB_Norica | Aug 3 2026 16:00 utc | 97

Hopefully, Putin will soon be replaced by a hardliner who finishes off the Ukrainian Nazi pigs.
https://t.me/intelslava/91956
Russia’s war aims will only be achieved when Zelensky and Budanov have been turned into dog food and the Ukrainian Nazi pigs surrender unconditionally and crawl to Moscow on their knees.
 
 
 
 

Posted by: Apollyon | Aug 3 2026 16:08 utc | 98

Ukraine’s Last Fortress Under Siege. Odessa Blockade: Economic & Political Fallout | Mark Sleboda
 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xkDH8lGfwZM

Posted by: unimperator | Aug 3 2026 16:08 utc | 99

 
@HB_Norica | Aug 3 2026 16:00 utc | 99
AI seems to agree with you
Military experts note that detonating Poseidon in the deep, open ocean would not create a devastating tsunami. The wave’s energy would simply dissipate in 360 degrees across deep water. Because of this physics limitation, Poseidon’s intended locus of detonation must be described as directly inside or immediately adjacent to shallow coastal targets

Posted by: petergrfstrm | Aug 3 2026 16:10 utc | 100

Leave a Comment

Please choose a UNIQUE username and stick to it.


*required entries