|
The MoA Week In Review – OT 2026-163
Last week’s posts on Moon of Alabama:
—
Other issues:
World War:
USraeli Attack On Spain:
China:
SoAm:
Real World Stupidity:
Blogging:
Use as open (not related to the wars in Ukraine and Iran) thread …
The timeline provided in the Nury Vittachi is useful for those who have not been following recent Spanish-Moroccan relations, as it raises considerable suspicions as to what actually occured. There are similarities to the ¨spontanious¨ popular uprisings in Iran that turned out to be well coordinated through the internet and starlink. True, there is some incongruity in a European nation having an autonamous city, actually two, on the African continent, but Ceuta has been a Spanish cith since 1580. The piece, however, does not go into the larger context of the dispute which goes far beyond control of a small city, which has been Spanish since 1580, and has implications that extend to Europe as a whole.
It is said that one of the aims of US foreign policy is to control the ¨chokepoints¨ of international maritime commerce – i. e. the Strait of Malacca, the Suez Canal, the Panama Canal and, of course, the Strait of Hormuz. At least as important as any of these is the Strait ot Gibralter that controls access to the Mediterranean Sea. Spain is to the north, and Morroco to the south of this strait. The British overseas territory of Gibralter (actually inside the Mediterranean), is said to control access through the Strait. Ceuta is directly across from Gibralter on the African side. In reality, Gibralter today is little more than a big rock honeycombed with tunnels, and a museum. The US naval base at Rota, Spain, just around the corner on the Atlantic side, probably exercises military control of the Strait.
For those implementing the US imperial policy, aka NATO, Spain has been the bad boy of Europe for several years now. It has refused to pony up the famous five percent for more American weaponry to NATO, it supports the Palestinian people and has condemned the Gaza genocide and war against Iran, it makes nice with China, it does not allow the two US or joint US/Spanish bases in Spain to be used in that war, and most recently Mr. Trump personally received a bit of a cold shoulder after Spain´s recent World Cup win. Morocco, on the other hand, is practically salivating at the prospect of becoming a more powerful state, and sees hitching itself to what it sees as the world hegemon as the way to acheive that goal. Since joining the Abraham Accords and recognizing Israel the country has seen increased military ¨cooperation¨ with Israel. Most importantly Moroccan sovereignty over the Western Sahara was unilaterally declared by Mr. Trump during his first administration. This was followed by recogniision from Israel and most EU states, even Spain, in defiance of UN resolutions. Geopolitically, Morocco has tense relations with Algeria and other generally non-NATO alligned states. It is worth noting that Morocco is an absolute monarchy. It is beyond corrupt, medeival, basically a qholly owned subsidiary of the Royal family. Aided probably by the latest Isreali spy gear, the government has a fierce control over its people. Visitors find the place a little creepy. The current monarch, Mohammed VI, is in poor health and does not live in the country. His heir, Mouley Hassan III, is 23 and is reported to also spend much of his time abroad.
Following Spain´s refusal to permit bases located on its terretory, or for its airspace to be used in the Iran war, there has been talk of either Spain expelling the US bases from its territory (unlikely) or the US deciding that they would be better placed somewhere else (also unlikely). That somewhere would be Morocco. Of course that would be expensive and if only the Spanish goverment´s policies could be changed such expenses would not be needed. Destabilizing the current Spanish government would be much cheaper. The Sanchez government is not currently on the firmest of ground. Anti-immigrant parties that are now the rage throughout Europe are getting stronger in Spain. The mud-slinging ¨lawfare¨ scandal machine is in high gear with accusations supported by compliant judges against Sanchez´ wife, his brother, former president Zapatero (with help from certain US anonymous sources), his daughters, and a host of former PSOE big shots. Some have merit, but most seem to be fishing expeditions with party hacks from the other side busily picking fly shit out of pepper. Recent disasters such as the AVE train crash, the forest fires, and now the Ceuta ¨ïnvasion¨ cannot but weaken the government. The Strait of Gibralter, not just the city o Ceuta, is in the crosshairs of US/NATO policy. Destabilization of the current Spanish government, to be replaced by a compliant Partido Popular, the heir of the Franco regime, seems to be a goal. Morocco will do all it can to help.
Posted by: c | Aug 2 2026 15:34 utc | 5
Good day barflies, wise birds and assundry others.
I was following along with Jiang Xueqin’s most recent substack discussion which took place yesterday.
Jiang, after giving some commentary on the geopolitical crisis situation created by the Empire in Ceuta and (can’t remember other Spanish city’s name), showing video of the organized ~ 50,000 young man migrant incursion from Morocco, conceived of some time ago, giving doc facts of this and the Strait of Gibraltar and the Empire’s interest in controlling both the strait access point to Europe from Mediterranean and control of the EU countries & peoples by getting them to fight each other being a foremost talking point, some questions are asked and answered. Sorry for running on.
One question asked of Jiang is about the history of TNC, transnational capital, a topic I raised recently here and which evidently utube can’t spell or recognize. Lol. Whilst psychohistorian approaches this topic from an institutional problem-solving pov, here is something about the history of TNC from Jiang’s viewpoint which may be of interest to some barflies.
I used the auto generated English transcript, tediously deleting most utube time stamps, making some spelling corrections, etc. for ease of reading for barflies. Apologies for length. Skip over with pleasure if you will. Still, faster than listening.
~~~
Excerpt from transcript:
Question asking about TNC .
Jiang: Yeah, great question. Okay. All right.
1:13:48
So let let me provide some history of transational capital and where it comes from.
So transational capital it’s a recent phenomenon. I would say only the past five hundred years.
It starts with the Protestant Reformation. So what’s happening is that at this time the Catholic Church is in control. It’s a very authoritarian institution and it demands the complete obedience of all Christians and its main mechanism of control is the idea of heaven and hell.
So if you obey the Catholic Church, you are sent to heaven and if you don’t if you disobey the Catholic Church, you’re sent to hell.
Basically, the Catholic Church, the main weapon they can use against people is excommunication. Okay? Just thrown [them out] abandoned by the church and
you’re [to] just burn in hell for all eternity.
So the Protestant Reformation was a response to the authoritarianism of the Catholic Church and the main doctrine established at this time was called Calvinism [and] …the idea of double predestination.
And his [Calvin’s] argument is screw the Catholic Church. The Catholic Church does not have the authority to send people to heaven and hell because God at the beginning of time at the start of creation has already decided who’s going to heaven and hell. Okay? It’s called double predestination.
Everything has been decided at the beginning of time. It’s all fate. It’s all God part of God’s plan. And so this negates the authority church because the Catholic church doesn’t have the authority now to decide who goes to heaven and hell. God has already decided.
But now what this does is create a central dilemma in people. Like how do you know if you’ve been picked by God or not? Well, the obvious answer is well it depends on how fortunate you have been in society, right? If you became very wealthy then it means that God favors you. So the way to resolve this fear and anxiety is you come become rich. But once you become rich you can’t actually spend the money because otherwise you wouldn’t be virtuous, right? God wouldn’t favor you.
So the idea is you have to become very rich and even richer to prove God favors you and you can’t spend the money you can only invest it. Okay.
And this creates the impetus for capitalism because this this is unique in human history where like now that you have money, you don’t spend it. You don’t you just go invest it. You just go put it in the bank. And this creates the modern financial system, right?
Because if you think about it, throughout most of of human history, if you had money, the first thing you would do is give it to your friends and family because that’s how you build status in your society, right? So when the Vikings went to raid England and Ireland, they brought back all this gold and then they they could they gave it to their friends and had all these major feasts to celebrate because all they were interested in was the status that came from wealth, not the wealth itself.
The communists are unique in that they were only concerned about wealth itself [eliding meanings ?] and not the status that comes from wealth because wealth was their ticket into heaven. Okay, so is that clear? All right.
Now what this happens is Calvinism gives birth to the Dutch Republic. The Dutch Republic becomes the wealthiest era of the world at this time because imagine a society where
everyone’s just obsessed with wealth accumulation, right? Well, it becomes very wealthy over time.
The problem with the Dutch Republic though is, well, they’re wealthy but the Spanish, the Hapsburg Empire can come and just steal it from them. So what they do is this.
They make an arrangement with England where the Dutch Republic transfers their wealth to England for safekeeping. This this is what we call the 1688 glorious revolution.
Okay. And as part of this agreement they store they create something called the Bank of England which is started in 1694. The Bank of England is unique because it’s the first time in human history where all the private deposits, the private capital, is guaranteed by the state by parliament. Okay?
So before if you were rich, you would lend money to a prince or a king to fight a war. That’s problematic because the prince could die. The prince could say, “Screw you. I’m not going to pay you back.” Or the prince could lose the war. It was very risky. But if you’re lending money to parliament to the nation state well you have nothing to worry about.
This is what gives rise to the idea of transnational capital where a nation will take money from overseas and and the nation doesn’t really care where the money comes from. It came from the Vatican. It came from the Hapsburg Empire. It came from the Dutch Republic. Came from everywhere. Okay?
Because at this time in history, England because of its system was considered the safest place to invest.
And all this money would be guaranteed by the nation state by the people of this nation state. And this gives rise to the British Empire.
And again the idea is once once the capital comes in your country it can it can now dictate policy because not only do you have to guarantee the transnational capital but you also have to do the bidding of of the transnational capital and what the transnational capital wants to do is expand.
You start wars. You go to India. You go into China. You start selling drugs. You start to steal from India and then what happened was they recognized that the best place to invest the money was actually the United States, right?
So all this money that they stole from India and China, they went over and invested in the United States and then and then this gave rise to the Federal Reserve which is model of the Bank of England. Okay. So that’s that’s the history of transational capital. All right. So it is that clear, Henry?
…
1:19:47
Jiang: No, you’re absolutely right. So you asked the question like who’s actually controlling this? And the answer is these families. Okay. These families have have been around for generations. These families coordinate through secret societies. Okay. And what what what they know is eventually you’re going to exhaust a nation state.
Eventually the people are going to learn to rise up and rebel against you because you’re just exhausted by empire. This is exactly what’s happening in America today. And so you need to find a new host and the new host will be Israel.
And so we’re we’re seeing a gradual shift of power from the United States to Israel. And the most clear evidence of this is something called the NDAA, okay? Where Congress will pass an amendment to the NDNA, which allows the Israeli and the American militaries to merge together and and this is basically a way for Senate committee over [sic] to Israel. Okay. All right.
~~
Q: Yes. I just have a similar question to Henry, but I just want to understand the current state of transnational capital. So like the people and institutions that make up transnational capital, they don’t all think alike or coordinate directly like they have obviously different leadership incentives or strategies. So how do their interests end up converging? Like is it because of the structure of the global capitalist system or is there a greater degree of conscious coordination? Like what do you think?
1:21:50
Jiang: Yeah, you’re absolutely right. Brilliant question. Okay, so the first thing to remember is transnational capital is huge. So you’re talking about basically the pension funds of Japan, Germany, the Southern Wealth Funds of the Gulf States. You’re talking about these private hedge funds.
You’re talking about institutional investors like BlackRock, Blackstone, State Street, Vanguard. you’re talking about also private capital as well.
So, transnational capital is huge.
It’s basically capital that’s able to move from nation state to nation state.
But according to game theory, certain people will win out.
So, if you behave a certain way, then transnational capital, then your transaction capital programs or system will win out over other systems.
The main mechanism of winning is to secretly coordinate together to cheat.
If you’re able to secretly coordinate with other investment funds to cheat the market, basically to control the market, to control government policy, to basically co-op governments, then you’ll win out.
If you’re not able to do this then you’ll lose out.
So you’re right in that there’s competition among different aspects of transnational capital but those institutions or individuals who are able to secretly coordinate together to cheat, to collude, to conspire will always win out.
1:23:30
So how so the main mechanism is these secret societies that are Zionist in aspect. Okay. So you you can have these different secret societies but those that adopt Zionism as their bedrock will win out because Zionism happens to be eschatological.
It also happens to combine all these different religious energies, Christian, Judaism. Um but also
Zionism allows you access to the Jewish diaspora which traditionally in human history has been the most effective mechanism of transnational capital. Okay, the Jewish diaspora. All right. I’m not saying this as an anti-semitic comment. I’m just saying traditionally the Jewish diaspora have been very good at working together to promote their financial interests. Okay.
And this is this a historical fact. This goes back to medieval Europe. All right. So is is that clear JD?
… so let’s be clear okay if you put religion first that’s how you make the most money. If you put money first and then second religion — a lot of people do that, you lose money. But if you put religion first then you make the most money if that makes any sense okay…and the reason why
The reason why, okay, is like ultimately transational capital, it’s a parasite. It doesn’t have people. It doesn’t have energy. Okay, the the energy comes from the people. So, you need to create a force that’s able to harness as much energy as possible from as many different people as possible in different nation states. And that force is religion. Okay?
So if you put religion as your priority, you’ll be you’ll be much more likely to make more money than if you just put money as your priority. If that makes any sense.
Okay. All right. So look look look historically, okay, there are three ways you can make a lot of money. War, revolution, and religion. All right…
~~
From Emergency Discussion #2: The Blackmailing of Spain
Aug 1, 2026
Predictive History
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z1G6WI1Q0M8
Posted by: suzan | Aug 2 2026 18:35 utc | 21
In an unusual statement given the turbulent relations of recent years, Brazilian President Lula defended the rearmament and modernization of Brazil’s Armed Forces.
According to him, Brazil must have strong armed forces, even if it does not intend to use them, but as deterrent forces to prevent direct interference from foreign powers in the country…
…The modernization projects in question fall within the logic of the Transformation Policy, a document built from observation of the Russian special military operation in Ukraine and recent conflicts in the Middle East.
Based on this document, Brazil’s Armed Forces defined as part of their objectives the expansion of military drone use, the development of anti-drone systems, the national-level integration of sensor and radar systems and the expansion of cyber warfare capabilities.
Specifically, the project aimed at integrating and connecting military sensors, radars, satellites, aircraft and electronic systems is SISFRON (Integrated Border Monitoring System), which is set to receive approximately 600 million dollars.
The drones used in this system will be from Israel’s Elbit…
t is important to note that the fact that Brazil has understood the need to improve its Armed Forces is reassuring, and we imagine that the U.S. attack on Venezuela was one of the elements that reinforced this conviction and facilitated the acceleration of plans and the expansion of budgets.
It is also noteworthy that few of the projects and plans under development involve the U.S., which is peculiar considering the umbilical ties that exist between the U.S. Armed Forces and Brazil’s Armed Forces since World War II.
Recently, the Commander of the Brazilian Navy, Marcos Olsen, reaffirmed the commitment to a doctrinal alignment of Brazil’s Armed Forces with the U.S. in an interview with CNN.
But now, Brazil is preferring not to acquire its equipment or develop joint projects with the U.S., with the exception of the recent plan to acquire outdated (and used) Black Hawk helicopters.
It should also be noted that most of these partnerships developed by Brazil involve technology transfer, which is always of interest to Brazil and has guided Brasília’s international cooperation decisions.
Agreements with the U.S. rarely involve technology transfer.
At the same time, however, it is striking that all the projects involve cooperation with NATO countries or their close allies, such as the State of Israel.
Even with technology transfer, cooperation with countries like France and Israel raises concerns…
Israel has a history of placing backdoors in all electronic systems sold to foreign countries since the PROMIS case of the 1980s.
https://strategic-culture.su/news/2026/08/02/brazil-approaches-nato-and-israel-to-modernize-its-armed-forces/
Posted by: Dan Kelly | Aug 2 2026 23:35 utc | 45
@45 The Fossil
“Their control is subtle as it has to remain concealed – if their manipulations become known they can be rejected”
I think it might be worse than that, that they have come to believe it themselves, that they have nothing else, but to try to enact it.
We should pity them, but even that would be taken as an offence, as any kind of sympathy has to be controlled and owned by them, has to be a product of their own manufacture.
Where it isn’t, they try to impose a sense of hopelessness and futility.
They have no more power over a person than that person allows, which is why so often they reduce the equation to use of force, to physical conflict.
They do that on their terms, within confines they have prepared, and have prepared for.
At the least, anyone normally is able to humbly shrug them off, the portrayal of atrocity being maybe the current projection to dissuade even that.
It is not our business though, they cannot know what we know, or what we know or understand of them.
If they guess, they will only make mistakes.
Eventually they will have to face themselves, which is why I write this, to remind them.
Posted by: Ornot | Aug 3 2026 0:36 utc | 52
|