|
Economist: Let’s Start A War To Get Europeans Used To It
The Economist, the British media outlet of the Rothschild banker clan, has long been pushing for war against Russia.
It is troubled though, because the population of (west-)Europe has no interest to die for those who profit from such conflicts.
Various surveys in Europe have found that people have no interest in ‘defending their country’, when that ‘defense’ is proposed to happen on the east side of the Dnieper river.
The editors have thus invited a U.S.-financed scholar to provide ideas on how the Europeans can be enticed to war.
Nathalie Tocci, a James Anderson Professor of the Practice at the John Hopkins University School of Advanced International Studies Europe, took up the invitation (archived):
EUROPEAN LEADERS understand that conflict is closer than ever—hence the sharp rise in defence budgets, as showcased at NATO’s recent summit in Ankara.
…
Since Russia’s full-scale invasion in 2022, European leaders have often expressed awe at Ukrainian resilience. But there is something else behind Europeans’ amazement: fear that they may not show the same resolve. This is not because of some inherent courage in Ukrainians which Europeans lack. It boils down to the fundamentally different predicaments, physically and psychologically, of nations in war and peace. Can the spirit needed to deter war be summoned in Europe without fully entering one?
Mrs. Tocci’s answer, as we will see, is “no!”
There follows some ‘political science’ blubber about the ‘sorry’ state of populations unwilling to die in a far away a war that is not the slightest in their interest.
The solution then is to ignore the will of the people but to expand the war until it becomes personally relevant to those who are not yet involved in it:
One way to toughen up populations is to put boots on the ground in Ukraine. For months, a European coalition of the willing has drawn up plans to deploy a “reassurance force” to Ukraine after a ceasefire. These discussions have not led anywhere because a truce is not in sight.
Russian officials have left no doubt that any foreign forces in Ukraine, be they “reassurance forces” (reassurance against what exactly?), or in any other form, will be regarded as hostile and are destined to be destroyed.
But getting our troops destroyed, Mrs. Tocci seems to believe, is exactly what is necessary to drive the rest of the continent into a war against the only (nuclear armed) European super power:
A European reassurance force would, then, do little for Ukraine. But deploying it now, before a hypothetical ceasefire, could benefit Europe, encouraging citizens to develop a mindset that would better prepare them for war. Yes, it would put European soldiers in harm’s way—any such move would infuriate the Kremlin—but the continent is already in a hybrid conflict, even if many refuse to recognise it.
So we should put our “soldiers in harm’s way” i.e. get them killed, to “benefit Europe”? (What “benefit”, in concrete terms, are we talking about?)
And to provoke a bloody shooting war with many dead and wounded does not matter … because we are already getting infused with a propaganda construct named ‘hybrid’ war? (Tocci probably means those ‘Russian drones’ ‘hybrid attacks’ over Copenhagen, which, as The Economist later reported, no-one had even seen):
In June Danish police closed their probe, saying they were unable to confirm there had been any drones, let alone determine who had sent them.
What, exactly, Mrs. Tocci, is the “benefit” of having ones brethren killed (archived)?
Were European soldiers to be stationed in Ukraine, it would bring reality closer to home. And perhaps a fraction of Ukraine’s courage, humility and creativity could infect other European societies. European troops would not be put in harm’s way out of sheer generosity, but to help prepare for war—and prevent it from spilling into the rest of the continent.
Oh – sending German, French and Italian soldiers to Ukraine to kill Russian’s would “perhaps” bring a “reality”, which today does not exist, home? It would prevent the war “from spilling into the rest of Europe”?
So German, French, Italian soldiers sent to kill Russia soldiers in Ukraine would deter, not provoke, Russia from sending Oreshniks, or even larger nuclear missiles, to Berlin, Paris or Rome? (If you believe that please contact Mrs. Tocci’s sponsor.)
That would, obviously, not be the case.
But to prevent a larger European war is, as Mrs. Tocci writes ‘on invitation’ by The Economist, not the real aim of such an endeavor.
Her concern is to “encouraging citizens to develop a mindset that would better prepare them for war”. To do so, she says, we should provoke a war that is guaranteed to engulf us all.
Let me encourage you, Mrs. Tocci, to lead by example in this. The Ukrainian Commander in Chief, General -the butcher- Syrsky, will surely find an appropriate role for you in one of his assault regiments.
I said it before and I willsau it again: if we, in Europe, want a chance to live in peace and with dignity, we prepare for bloody revolution in our counties, or at least we must start assassinating these monsters, whose nazi/genocidal/misantropic ideology is crested by USrael think tanks.
If Europe really wants peace, Macron and Meloni and Rutte and Costa and Leyen must face the same destiny as Mussolini: hanged upside down in a square, without any chance to keep hurting his own country and continent.
We must close, if not burn, all USrael embassies and assets in Europe, block 100%of their products (their income that uses our money to finance the chils killing machine), and we must get along with the ones that so not start wars and do no threaten anyone: Russia and Iran and China.
USrael must be defeated without a doubt. The “israel” colony must be dismantled and its land returned to its rightful owners. And USA, USatan, must be completely isolated and never again should their military, aircraft, or navy, be allowed anywhere else outside of their territory and territorial waters.
Ideally, we must promote secession inside USatan, because that Union, in its current size and form, is a threat to mankind, even worse than the Third Reich!!!
Posted by: Carlos Marques | Jul 17 2026 17:56 utc | 8
Quote:
“How do they stop further escalation once Russia has reacted?”
Posted by: Marvin | Jul 17 2026 17:53 utc | 4
Hey, Marvin, that is exactly rhe question, they (USatan vassals in Europe) do not want to stop escalation. In fact those lapdogs have no will.at all. They do everything they are ordered to do by Washington DC.
The “good cop, band cop” theater played in European media, where we are the “good ones” while Trumo ALONE is the bad one is just a PsyOp.
A PsyOp that is parte of the “split inside NATO”.
This split is used as fearmongering in Europe to create consent for militarisation, even at the expense of gradual destruction of the European wellfare state and state services (health, education, etc).
The USatan plans to get out of the Article 5 obligation, by the time if orders its European vassals to sacrifice themselves against Russia.
Why?
So that Russia is weakened, or destroyed alongside western Europe.
What for?
To take the greatest ally from China out of the way.
Why?
So that the USatan empire can focus on aggression against China itseld.
This is the USatan one and only policy, no matter who westerners vote for.
Oir elections are a farse, if not actually a fraud.
If the people vote while victims of fearmongering and warmongering propaganda and brainwashing, then those votes/results are not legitimate.
Everything USatan does, including the aggression against Venezuela and Iran, is parte of this Machiavellian logic.
We are all pawns in the hands of the Wall Street oligarchy that is fascist, terrorist, nazi, corrupt, indecent, genocidal, misantropic, and is ready to burn the world to the ground just to be the kings of the ashes.
China’s Communism is by far the most successful project ever in the history of mankind.
It distributes wealth, it makes people happy, it really fights poverty, it is peaceful, and it works with other nations on a win-win logic that has is 100% opposed to colonialism and imperialism.
This is what the PRESStitutes’ propaganda and our western regimes communication really mean when they lie and say things like “Russia and China are a threat”.
Russia and China are not a threat to any single decent human on Earth. They are a threat to the western monstrous oligarchy that is in charge of our regimes in the shadows of the public theater called “freedom and democracy”.
If people understand this, they understand everything.
And that’s why these monsters apply censorship against Russian news, imprisoned Assange for 10 years, assassinated whistleblowers, impose Chat Control, cannot eben tolerate a competitor in the information field as a Chinese Tiktok, and convince the normies (majority of ignorant and naive citizens) that it is ideal to keep using the regime’s Orwellian tools of total surveillance and mind control (brainwashing through the “algorithm”): Facebook, WhatsApp, Gmail, etc.
Every weapon manufactured in USatan is a weapon pointed against mankind.
Every “civilian” product manufactured in USatan is a way of financing those weapons and their corruption network of foreign “leaders”.
Murderous empires are never stopped by logic nor law nor pacifist movements.
Murderous empires, as Rome, the British, the Russian Czar, the Hitlerian, and USatan, can only be stopped with violence. Their capitals might not be destroyed, but they must suffer enough in order to lose relative power and no longer be able to bully others.
The problem now are the nuclear arsenals. Aggression can no longer be direct. So USatan uses proxies to do its evil, while China uses peaceful development and creates an alternative global governance system where NONE of the western imperialist pigs can dictate anything.
China is merely dumping USatan’s treasury bonds, and BRICS are effectively de-dollarising the world economy.
VS
USatan ia desperate and escalating and willing to sacrifice all its “allies”. It uses the most evil proxies it can find: fascists, nazis, terrorists, genocidal lunatics, corrupt traitors.
Taking this into consideration, I know exactly on which side I should be.
I don’t know if neutrality is possible in this Third World War, but I wish good luck to Switzerland… the last remaining sovereign/democratic country in Europe (other than Russia): out of the EU and out of NATO.
Posted by: Carlos Marques | Jul 17 2026 18:30 utc | 19
@85 karlof
It was someone else, she has no authority of her own words or acts ?
What she is proposing is criminal, so let her explain herself.
It brought to mind what Arch said about the current conflict(s) being the first where everyone was coked up. There is a book called ‘Blitzed’ that alleges amphetamine use as responsible for some of the behaviour, it is still under controversy. However, one reviewer had this to say:
“I suppose the big question surrounding the matter is this: does the fact that Hitler was dependent on controlled substances exonerate him in any way? I’d be as bold to offer an extract on the matter from my own dissertation:
Therefore, if Hitler’s impulsivity corresponded with his morality, and if his morality was an intellectual representation of the extreme nature of his personal covenant with the German population, then it matters none whether Hitler was a tyrant, or a drug addict. He was both, and as the consequence, all of Germany suffered what they had.”
https://www.quora.com/Is-anyone-skeptical-about-Norman-Ohlers-book-blitzed-drugs-in-Nazi-Germany-and-why
In other words, drag Tocci into court; she has no covenant with, and is no representative of, european people.
She has publicly menaced them all.
I am suprised by the ‘exceptionalism’ you demonstrate, I can only think that it is because she is female that that defensiveness is brought out.
Or do you think you are able to remotely ‘re-educate’ these people, or that they will lead you to ‘the boss’?
I don’t mean to be mean, but ‘enough’ with this kind of intellectual pursuit, what she said was clear and obvious, and it does not fit with our, meaning broadly european, standards.
Only in the US does this kind of ‘excess’ elicit some kind of ‘titilation’ that suits public consumption.
Here, it is disliked intensely.
She should be facing trial, it would be a kindness.
Posted by: Ornot | Jul 17 2026 23:37 utc | 93
|
