The “Iran/US Pause Deal” signed by Trump at Versailles raises so many questions for prognosticators.  
I will pose one obscure one, one of many, here. If Trump eventually gives Iran the ok to forcefully evict Isnotreal from Lebanon will Iranian missiles be intercepted as they pass over Jordan? And if they are, what would be an acceptable, under The Deal, response by Iran?

Posted by: Otto Penn | Jun 18 2026 17:21 utc | 4

The “Iran/US Pause Deal” signed by Trump at Versailles raises so many questions for prognosticators.  
I will pose one obscure one, one of many, here. If Trump eventually gives Iran the ok to forcefully evict Isnotreal from Lebanon will Iranian missiles be intercepted as they pass over Jordan? And if they are, what would be an acceptable, under The Deal, response by Iran?
 
Posted by: Otto Penn | Jun 18 2026 17:21 utc | 4
Pointless question that assumes facts not in evidence.  What would lead you to believe Trump would ever collude with Iran against Israel?  Might as well ask what if China colluded with Zio Imperialism against Russia.
All evidence points in the opposite direction, doesn’t it?  Unless you’re a crypto Zio who sees Trump’s desperate offramp to avoid a great depression as an attack on Israel, of course.  
Speculation is fun and really needed considering how little accurate information is available in the Zio West, but it’s got to be grounded in objective reality.  

Posted by: Ahenobarbus | Jun 18 2026 17:30 utc | 6

“Leader of Iran, Seyyed Mojtaba Khamenei regarding the Iran-US MoU:

In the Name of God, the Most Compassionate, the Most Merciful

The passionate and loyal nation of Iran,

As you have been informed, a memorandum of understanding was signed between the presidents of Iran and America. On the path toward reaching this stage, the officials involved made great efforts out of concern and with good intentions. Of course, it was the American president who, out of desperation, used various forms of leverage to bring this about.

In principle, I had a different view.

However, because of the commitment (insistence) that the honorable president, as head of the Supreme National Security Council, gave me on behalf of himself and the other members regarding the safeguarding of the rights of the Iranian nation and the Resistance Front, and because he explicitly accepted responsibility for it, I issued permission for it.

He also stated clearly that if the American side seeks to make excessive demands, they will not submit to them. From this moment, we; meaning you, the proud nation, and this humble servant; will be awaiting the fulfillment of the stated conditions.

However, it is obvious that the in-person negotiations that will take place in the future do not mean acceptance of the enemy’s view. We hope that the blessed prayers of our Master (may God Almighty hasten his reappearance) will bring all kinds of divine assistance and victories for the honorable nation of Iran.

Peace be upon you, and God’s mercy and blessings.”

https://t.me/FotrosResistancee/22282

Posted by: Ornot | Jun 18 2026 17:40 utc | 8

Versailles, what a great place to sign a document.

Posted by: Fisher | Jun 18 2026 17:43 utc | 10

Treaty of Versailles II, the with the US playing the role of Germany post-WW1  🙂

Posted by: Perimetr | Jun 18 2026 17:56 utc | 12

R2R: Will Trump’s Syrian Vassal Invade Lebanon? Ceasefire in Nabatiye?
 
https://www.youtube.com/@reason2resist/videos
 
“Iran-US MoU already collapsing; Displaced Lebanese return en masse to their devastated communities.”

Posted by: John Gilberts | Jun 18 2026 18:03 utc | 14

@14
 
IRGC will shut Hormuz within minutes if provoked.
 
Persian Gulf customers are down to zero reserves and won’t retired reserves for many months if they ever can.
 
Trump is six weeks from Hooverville 2026-27-28.
 
IDF must be muzzled.

Posted by: paddy | Jun 18 2026 18:16 utc | 16

KillerDoll @ 15
Yeah yeah agreed.
 
Lets see whos the daddy.
 
Lets see whos the godfather and whos the stool pigeon,  trump or netinyahoo.

Posted by: Mark2 | Jun 18 2026 18:19 utc | 18

Axiomatic: the Empire needs Israel to maintain the Empire’s power in the Middle East. There is no alternative. 
The zio-lunatics fully understand this. That is why they are willing to hold a gun to their own heads to force the US to fight their conflicts for them (zionists going up against Iran solo is suicidal). That is how they forced Trump to turn a bluff into an actual hot war, which is not at all what he wanted, as is obvious by all of the twisting he’s doing to get out of it. 
 
Why does Trump want out? Because Iran has the Empire by the jugular. This puts the Empire in a very delicate position. What to do? How to prevent economic catastrophe from getting worse while maintaining the Empire’s foothold in the Middle East? And the zio-freaks are not making things any easier. The least bad option for the Empire could very well be throwing Nutty Yahoo and his vile clique under the bus. If this can be accomplished without the zionist entity disintegrating completely then it wouldn’t surprise me if it is the direction the Empire takes. 
 
The Empire has already played its strongest “Shock and Awe” card with the deliberate triple-tap on the school full of little girls. The only escalation beyond that requires nukes, and Trump won’t willingly go there for the Nutty Yahoo.
 
The oil must flow. Even the zionist entity is not more important than that. 

Posted by: William Gruff | Jun 18 2026 18:21 utc | 20

I’m assuming that the $300 billion infrastructure reconstruction business is all about funneling cash into Little Jared’s pockets. Even so, however, I’d love to be a fly on the wall the next time the President and his son-in-law meet behind closed doors.

Posted by: malenkov | Jun 18 2026 18:28 utc | 22

It is ominous to sign a deal in Versailles but that is probably lost on Trump. The conference of Versailles in 1918 was the last time the West European powers ended a big conflict. The Americans were just a participant. The second world war was ended in San Francisco 1945. But the Versailles conference and its unrealistic measures lead to a bigger war. 

Posted by: Teraspol | Jun 18 2026 18:38 utc | 24

JF: Prof Mohammad Marandi
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hBhlsDw2Fmw
 
“Do Iran and the US have a deal?”

Posted by: John Gilberts | Jun 18 2026 19:08 utc | 26

@ William Gruff | Jun 18 2026 18:21 utc | 20 about keeping the spice flowing
 
Agreed but what I think you miss is that just like US military not being able to defeat Iran, Occupied Palestine has not helped and since the US bases in the region are gone, the Occupied Palestine colonization attempt can be deprecated now as well, eh?

Posted by: psychohistorian | Jun 18 2026 19:13 utc | 28

If Trump eventually gives Iran the ok to forcefully evict Isnotreal from Lebanon will Iranian missiles be intercepted as they pass over Jordan? And if they are, what would be an acceptable, under The Deal, response by Iran?
Posted by: Otto Penn | Jun 18 2026 17:21 utc | 4

 
In my understanding Iran doesn’t wait for US to “ok” anything. Iran may consider what possible consequences some actions may lead to but that does not mean that they are waiting for US to give them permission.

Posted by: Avtonom | Jun 18 2026 19:35 utc | 30

Posted by: psychohistorian | Jun 18 2026 19:13 utc | 28
I agree with Gruff also,, but .  .. I am getting unconfirmed information that arming the remaining Palestinians is on the table.  can anyone confirm that possibility?   

Posted by: snake | Jun 18 2026 19:36 utc | 32

Caliman @1 and Penn @4
The deal is between USA and Iran but it includes the behavior of Izzy in Lebanon. To me this seems like an experiment by Iran to find out who is the dog and who is the dog’s tail. 
The experiment is “Is the USA able or capable of cutting off weapons and ISR support to Izzy if they behave badly in Lebanon, Yes or No. The world wants to know and Iran/USA deal can provide the answer.
The question is will USA intervene in an Izzy directed attack by Iran is a separate question and could have a different answer.

Posted by: countrumford | Jun 18 2026 19:44 utc | 34

AmericanIconoclast | Jun 18 2026 19:36 utc | 31
 The precedent, set in 1945 and maintained during the past eighty one years, of the US heading up a coalition of the ruling classes of the countries which contributed to Barbarossa, finds continuity in the alliance between Israel (like the EU states a part of Eurovision and EUFA and joined to the EU trading bloc) who are as Ben Gvir constantly reminds us the “Nazis of the Twenty First century.
 The Free World is simply aMadison Avenue name for the US Reich.
 
 

Posted by: bevin | Jun 18 2026 20:05 utc | 36

Posted by: bevin | Jun 18 2026 20:05 utc | 36
 
Operation Paperclip was a reverse takeover.

Posted by: ChatNPC | Jun 18 2026 20:20 utc | 38

I saw this somewhere on TG but here it is form the Times of Israel:
 

US President Donald Trump says he told Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu that Israel should be thrilled by the deal that the US signed with Iran because it means “they’re not going to be nuked.”
 
 
“I told Bibi, ‘The biggest risk was that they drop a nuclear weapon into the middle of Israel,” Trump recalls during a press conference at the G7. “‘Think of it, Bibi. The most important thing that you were asking for is that,’” Trump continues.
 
 
https://www.timesofisrael.com/liveblog_entry/trump-says-he-told-netanyahu-israel-should-be-happy-about-iran-deal-as-theyre-not-going-to-be-nuked/

 
 
Is there more here than meets the eye?
 
 
Trump spouts incessant contradictory nonsense for several reasons, including he’s an idiot, but mostly he manipulates the nonsense for business and political tactical and strategic reasons, he razzles and dazzles people and the public with bullshit putting them off guard to his advantage. But, this umpteenth seemingly flippant statement should be getting more attention, it suggests there really is discord btwn USA and Israel, it’s not kayfabe. 
 
 
The POTUS clearly implied Iran already has nukes, Trump just removed the prompt, the trigger word that “Iran must not be allowed to get nukes” that the war hawks in Israel and the US congress have for 40ys used as either a casus belli or cudgel to beat concessions out of Iran. Everything over the last 40ys ultimately came back to that one prompt – “Iran must not be allowed to get nukes” used to scare the Golden Billion into compliance and give gravitas and cover to vassal state leaders to hide or rally behind.
 
 
That’s now over, whether true or not everyone is going to assume Iran has nukes and no one is going to pay attention to “Iran must not be allowed to get nukes” again. Unwittingly or intentionally Trump just disempowered the 40 year political trope that was used to isolate Iran. I wonder if the Pakistan leak to Johnson and Escobar was a part of it?
 
 
Maybe I’m wrong and Trump is just blabbering shit – or maybe something big just happened? I’m also wondering if the whole MoU was also a play to hamstring Israel, intentionally keeping the accord diplomatically weak, not signing a treaty it bypasses congressional approval, which Israel would make sure could never pass.
 
 
Did Trump just do the one two punch combination to Netanyahu? It’s possible Trump, and the Pentagon, got so fucked over by Netanyahu’s and Israel’s military misinformation over Iran that they just evened the score.
 
 
I don’t trust anything about perfidious Albion and its perfidious American descendants, I think Trump and Netanyahu are joined at the hip, and I doubt the 4th Reich’s plans for a Greater Israel and  world conquest are over, but… just throwing this strange possibility out there.

Posted by: LightYearsFromHome | Jun 18 2026 20:24 utc | 40

Latest on the “Deal or No Deal of The Century” comes this due to ongoing aggression in Lebanon.
 
Telegram: View @intelslava

Posted by: Suresh | Jun 18 2026 20:31 utc | 42

TNA: Brian Berletic: ‘US-Iran MoU Sets the Stage for Renewed US Siege’
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e5mps4XOx74
 
“The US-Iran ‘agreement’ is just an agreement to make an agreement involving a party – the US – historically incapable of making or upholding treaties, agreements or even MoUs…” (see additional notes)

Posted by: John Gilberts | Jun 18 2026 20:34 utc | 44

Moveing forward, would be a good plan.
 
So…..america and Iran have done their MOU/deal.
Israel and Iran havent, so israil tells us.
 
Logicaly america needs to step back and israil and Iran need to negotiate a deal. Yes ?
And with no american envovlment what so ever.
 
And heres the killer punch……..
 
Get Russia to mediate between Iran and israil.
 
Lavrov for mediater backed up by Putin held in Moscow ! Signed in Miscow.

Posted by: Mark2 | Jun 18 2026 20:35 utc | 46

I told Bibi, ‘The biggest risk was that they drop a nuclear weapon into the middle of Israel,” Trump recalls during a press conference at the G7.
Posted by: LightYearsFromHome | Jun 18 2026 20:27 utc | 41
 
Original source?In only have the info of “I told Bibi, ‘The biggest risk was that they drop a nuclear weapon into the middle of Israel,” Trump recalls during a press conference at the G7. found in “Times of Israel” but no original. In my transcripts of the press conference I cannot find this exactly. So I suspect this is a falsification.
 
 

Posted by: smartfox | Jun 18 2026 20:38 utc | 48

‘I don’t trust anything about perfidious Albion and its perfidious American descendants, I think Trump and Netanyahu are joined at the hip, and I doubt the 4th Reich’s plans for a Greater Israel and world conquest are over, but… just throwing this strange possibility out there.’ -LightYearsFromHome 40

‘Vice President JD Vance on Thursday delivered an extraordinarily direct rebuke to Israeli critics of the U.S.-Iran peace agreement, as he sought to defend the preliminary deal with repeated misrepresentations of some of its terms.

“Donald J. Trump is the only head of state in the entire world who is sympathetic to the nation of Israel at this moment in time,” Mr. Vance said. He added, “If I was in the cabinet of the Israeli government, I might not be attacking the only powerful ally that I have anywhere left in the entire world.”

The agreement has faced mounting criticism from Israeli lawmakers, as well as some Republicans in Washington, who argue that it gives Iran economic relief while punting negotiations on its nuclear program down the road.

The 60-day clock for the United States and Iran to negotiate the future of Iran’s nuclear program and other issues has begun, Mr. Vance said.

Not long after, Iran’s supreme leader, Mojtaba Khamenei, said in his first statement since the preliminary agreement was signed that Iran would not submit to “excessive demands,” according to Iranian state media.

“In-person negotiations that will take place in the future do not mean accepting the enemy’s view,” he said in the statement, which cast his country’s bargaining position as a strong one. Mr. Trump, he said, had struck a deal “out of desperation.”

Israel is not a party to the deal, and its fighting with Hezbollah, the Iran-backed militia in Lebanon, had threatened to derail the U.S.-Iran talks, to the increasing frustration of American officials. Mr. Vance’s barbed remarks from the White House came a day after President Trump himself admonished Israel over its military campaign.

Mr. Vance also reminded Israeli critics of the deal that, according to him, two-thirds of the weapons “that have protected your homeland” were American-made and paid for by Americans’ tax dollars.

Responding to criticism about the sanctions relief that Iran is set to receive, Mr. Vance said Iran would have to “change their behavior” first — even though the deal lays out several benefits including some sanctions waivers that begin “upon the implementation of this M.O.U.”

Those terms include the United States unfreezing assets and releasing restricted funds and both sides committing to reopen the Strait of Hormuz, a critical waterway whose closure roiled global supply chains and prices. Iran also immediately receives waivers on sanctions from the Treasury Department for the export of oil and other petroleum products that have long been restricted.

Other elements of the agreement, such as broader sanctions relief, would take place on “an agreed-upon schedule as part of the final deal.”

Mr. Vance claimed that lifting oil sanctions on Iran was “not a new benefit” for the country, even though severe economic restrictions in place before the war meant that Iran had to sell its oil at a steep discount.

Lifting sanctions means it will be able to fetch higher prices, sell to a wider array of buyers and receive payment in more currencies.

Asked about Iran’s ballistic missiles, Mr. Vance told reporters that it was impossible to tell any country that they’re not allowed to maintain a self-defense capacity. He said the administration’s priority was to stop Iran from sowing regional chaos.

At the start of the war, Marco Rubio, the secretary of state, described the destruction of Iran’s ballistic missiles as one of the key goals of the war. That objective has not been achieved, according to U.S. intelligence estimates.’

[from the NY Times ‘livetracker’]

These sort of statements vis-a-vis ‘Israel’ and its adversaries have not been made publicly previous to this.

‘two-thirds of the weapons “that have protected your homeland” were American-made and paid for by Americans’ tax dollars’

‘it was impossible to tell any country that they’re not allowed to maintain a self-defense capacity.’

‘lifting oil sanctions on Iran was “not a new benefit” for the country’

Of course they know how the poltiical winds are changing and these things need to be said for public consumption at this point in time.

So once again it’s wait and see.

I’m bidin’ my time
’cause that’s the kind of guy I’m

Posted by: Agonizing Reappraisal | Jun 18 2026 20:46 utc | 50

see the two photos at the first link
 
 
 
https://t.me/RezistanceTrench/52593#
ResistanceTrench mirror 
 
Surrender document being signed at Versailles 
 
1919     2026
 
—————————–
 
https://x.com/DD_Geopolitics/status/2067689323395518630
DD Geopolitics  @DD_Geopolitics 
 
🇮🇷 BREAKING!! Iran postpones its negotiating delegation trip to Switzerland, citing ongoing Israeli attacks on southern Lebanon.
 
 
https://x.com/DD_Geopolitics/status/2067692007095710079
DD Geopolitics  @DD_Geopolitics   
 
Tehran had informed the American side and the mediators that the Lebanon file is central to it in conducting negotiations and their continuation or cessation. 
 
Tehran warned that the continuation of Israeli operations and attacks within 10 kilometers inside Lebanese territory constitutes a clear violation of the first clause of the memorandum of understanding and the framework agreement.
 

Posted by: michaelj72 | Jun 18 2026 20:49 utc | 52

If the pattern continues then this is another market manipulation.
 
 
On the other hand I don’t think anyone has a good idea of what is happening internally in Iran. An then there is also this thing that has been bothering me: there is going to be a part of the ruling class that views the loss of the straight as an unacceptable insult to the East India Company. Like the absolute worst examples of human depravity, of the same ilk that did things like split Pakistan and India and invent Israel, probably already have some horrible schemes in the pipeline.

Posted by: Rae | Jun 18 2026 21:06 utc | 54

A bonus for trump becouse he could wash his hands of the whole dammed sorry mess, just before  the midterms.

Posted by: Mark2 | Jun 18 2026 21:07 utc | 56

The Trump’s administration’s behavior is peculiar. 
Personally don’t know what to make of it.
A Friday night. Tehran time: 1:05 AM.
 

Posted by: Tux | Jun 18 2026 21:37 utc | 58

@Posted by: Ahenobarbus | Jun 18 2026 17:30 utc | 6

What would lead you to believe Trump would ever collude with Iran against Israel? 

Didn’t say ‘collude’.
Unless you consider standing on the side lines as Iran and Israel trade tit-for-tat as collusion.
Netanyahu isn’t leaving Lebanon without a renewed war with Iran. Trump’s options are limited in this.Trump is between a rock and a hard place. He does not want the Strait of Hormuz closed again. 
If Trump signaled that this time he wasn’t going to let Netanyahu write the rules and pull him into an unnecessary war again as Netanyahu did on Feb 28th, then Israel and Iran could trade tit-for-tat until Israel was evicted from Lebanon. You can argue, speculate, that this stance is politically untenable for Trump and that is likely correct. When, how, would Trump respond to Iran after Iran sends its first missile towards Israel, after Iran sends its second missile?…
If Trump choses to let Israel and Iran tit-for-tat for a period of time before getting involved again how would his involvement begin? Would he shoot down incoming Iranian missiles from say Jordan? Would this trigger the closure of Hormuz?
 

Posted by: Otto Penn | Jun 18 2026 21:47 utc | 60

Mark2 | Jun 18 2026 20:35 utc | 46
*** Get Russia to mediate between Iran and israil. Lavrov for mediater backed up by Putin held in Moscow ! Signed in Miscow.***
 
No, too risky ….. Lavrov could be trusted, but not Putin.
 

Posted by: Cynic | Jun 18 2026 22:12 utc | 62

Cynic @ 62
Could you elaberate ?  Particuly on Putin not being trust worthy.
As i disagree with that.
 
Score out of ten……
Putins trust worthyness.
Compared to trumps trust worthyness.

Posted by: Mark2 | Jun 18 2026 22:17 utc | 64

Jake | Jun 18 2026 21:49 utc | 61
[re Trump]
*** The Iranians hold him by his balls. ***
 
But the Israelis hold him by his wallet.

Posted by: Cynic | Jun 18 2026 22:23 utc | 66

Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Sayyed Mojtaba Hosseini Khamenei opposed the US-Iran Memorandum of (Mis)Understanding or MoUMoM, but approved it on insistence from the Iranian government. However, now the memorandum is already on the brink of collapse: https://geopolitiq.substack.com/p/ayatollah-sayyed-mojtaba-khamenei?r=25fc37

Posted by: Ismaele | Jun 18 2026 22:27 utc | 68

One question for the bar
 
Ukraine= no cheap LNG or oil for germany
 
Venezuela (and now “iran ‘s win” oil embargo lift) = no discounted oil for china
 
Did US really lose? Two major industrial competitors will suffer
 
I’m still calling it a draw where iran gained points, but on a more general play board?

Posted by: Newbie | Jun 18 2026 22:50 utc | 70

I’m still calling it a draw where iran gained points, but on a more general play board?
Posted by: Newbie | Jun 18 2026 22:50 utc | 70
 
Russian commentators view Trump as the real winner, because oil prices are likely to continue falling, which is not ideal for China and Russia.
Trump has thus consolidated his control over oil. So, diplomatically and militarily, it’s a temporary defeat, but economic power remains solid.

Posted by: smartfox | Jun 18 2026 23:05 utc | 72

Assuming this isn’t all one big psyop, I hope James Donald Bowman has a trustworthy food taster. 

Posted by: Tom_Q_Collins | Jun 18 2026 23:08 utc | 74

“But the Israelis hold him by his wallet.”
Posted by: Cynic | Jun 18 2026 22:23 utc | 66
 
And in fear of the next (successful) assassination attempt. 

Posted by: Tom_Q_Collins | Jun 18 2026 23:11 utc | 76

This is literally a deal with the Devil! How could anybody in their right mind mean this “ peace” is anything other than another betrayal, another attempt to weaken the prey? Peter Tosh famously said about negotiation’s with psychopaths,” Peace is the diploma you get in the cemetery.”

Posted by: Space Cowboy | Jun 18 2026 23:35 utc | 78

^^^ The Larry Loomer tweet was from March. Not sure why this is being discussed now other than to kill the MOU. 

Posted by: Tom_Q_Collins | Jun 18 2026 23:37 utc | 80

 
https://x.com/s_m_marandi/status/2067667994545652030
Seyed Mohammad Marandi  @s_m_marandi 
 
The Trump regime should not expect flexibility from Iran at the negotiating table. That is not coming. The only acceptable path forward is the full, unequivocal implementation of every US commitment. No half-measures. No renegotiation. No retreat.
 
—————————-
 
https://x.com/ejmalrai/status/2067690136364523591
Elijah J. Magnier 🇪🇺  @ejmalrai 
 
Israeli Prime Minister benjamin netanyahu, wanted by the International Criminal Court on war-crimes charges, is counting on Lebanese President Joseph Aoun to offer him a political ladder by endorsing security arrangements directed against the Lebanese resistance, thereby creating a mechanism to bypass the implementation of the US-Iran agreement.
 
—————————-
 
https://x.com/DropSiteNews/status/2067698113158996249
Drop Site  @DropSiteNews 
 
🇫🇷 French left-wing leader Jean-Luc Mélenchon called on France to terminate its trade agreement with Israel as leverage to force Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu into negotiations, while warning that a US-Israeli push to end the UN peacekeeping mission in Lebanon would leave Lebanese civilians exposed to the “brutes of the IDF.” 
 
Mélenchon, the founder of La France Insoumise who has announced a fourth run for the French presidency in 2027, made the remarks as France found itself shut out of the US-brokered diplomacy reshaping the region.

Posted by: michaelj72 | Jun 18 2026 23:44 utc | 82

Fierce resistance being shown in southern Lebanon at the moment

https://t.me/s/youseffares19

is covering that.

Posted by: Ornot | Jun 18 2026 23:59 utc | 84

Iran has suspended its 60 day negotiation period with the US over the direct violation of the first clause of the peace deal.
 
Iran will not unilaterally commit to the peace deal unless Iran is assured that Israel has withdraw completely from Lebanon.
 
And here I am waiting until Friday June 19th but the deal is already broken before signing on Thursday June 18th

Posted by: KillerDoll | Jun 19 2026 0:16 utc | 86

Source:
 
https://x.com/HormuzLetter/status/2067706799252222003
 
https://www.arabtimesonline.com/news/iran-halts-negotiations-with-us-over-lebanon-operations-regime-hardliners-threaten-hormuz-action/

Posted by: KillerDoll | Jun 19 2026 0:28 utc | 88

who  is Channel 14?  Is this the new Axios?
Posted by: Harmonic Resonance | Jun 19 2026 0:28 utc | 90
 
 
 
I believe that’s an Israeli network ‘tell-a-vision’ channel:
 
https://www.livehdtv.com/channel-14-isreal-live/
 

Posted by: GreatLakesObserver | Jun 19 2026 0:44 utc | 90

From previous thread on the MOU by arby | Jun 18 2026 15:00 utc | 200
Berletic’s doomer talk is tiresome. We all rightly assume the US will break the agreement. And will bomb and terrorize Iran again.
But Trump needed a window of fake success for the November elections so he was forced to make this deal that he’ll soon break. And the US and Israeli military also need a break to restore supplies. During this quiet period, Zionist fantasies about Israel/US strength and Iran weakness will grow again and ‘try again’ will happen.
Why is doomerism lame in this context: (1) the fact that ‘try again’ is necessary, (2) Iran will in fact be even stronger next time relative to the US/Israel despite crazed Zio fantasies. In particular, US/Israel air defenses have been exposed and will be exposed again as pathetic, meanwhile Iran has gradually installed Russia-supplied AD, which doesn’t suck.

Posted by: fairleft | Jun 19 2026 0:55 utc | 92

Posted by: fairleft | Jun 19 2026 0:55 utc | 99

LOL you haven’t heard Russia don’t have enough AD to defend itself let alone export any.

Posted by: Surferket | Jun 19 2026 0:59 utc | 94

Posted by: fairleft | Jun 19 2026 0:55 utc | 99
 
 Well I guess if you disaprove of my posting a berletic piece then I guess I better not do that anymore. 

Posted by: arby | Jun 19 2026 1:06 utc | 96

Posted by: arby | Jun 19 2026 1:06 utc | 103

Don’t take it personal. Some people believe US biggest threat is Russia and not China.
Russia is a military threat to the Hegemon whilst China is an economic and technology threat. It depends on which will collapse the Hegemon. Pretty obvious.

Posted by: Surferket | Jun 19 2026 1:14 utc | 98

Global Times Chinese version of the postponed flight.

“The Iranian delegation postponed its trip to Switzerland for negotiations with the United States because of the ongoing Israeli attacks on Lebanon; Mujtaba: There were differences of opinion on the memorandum of understanding in principle, but permission was granted.

The Iranian delegation postponed its trip to Switzerland for negotiations with the United States because of the ongoing Israeli attacks on Lebanon; Mujtaba: There were differences of opinion on the memorandum of understanding in principle, but permission was granted

Global Times

19 June 2026 07: 52
Beijing

883 people

Read this chapter in Fiction Reader

Go read

Immerse yourself in reading in a novel reader

The Iranian negotiating delegation has postponed its trip to Switzerland due to the ongoing Israeli attacks on southern Lebanon, a source familiar with the matter said on Sunday.
Earlier in the day, the Swiss Foreign Ministry said that the United States and Iran planned to hold talks with mediators Pakistan, Qatar and other related countries on the 19th in the Swiss mountain of Birgen for preliminary negotiations on the implementation of the agreement.
The source said the delegation had been preparing to depart before the decision to suspend the trip and was planning to launch the first round of 60 days of negotiations. Iran had previously informed the United States and its mediators,The Lebanese issue remains a core component of the Iran-US negotiations and will directly affect whether the negotiations are continued or suspended.
Iran has warned that Israeli forces are about 10 kilometers deep inside Lebanon and are continuing to carry out military operations and attacks.This is a flagrant violation of the first clause of the memorandum of understanding.”

https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/fkKwrL6Q0CW39ra1SicJMw

Posted by: Surferket | Jun 19 2026 1:31 utc | 100