Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
May 31, 2026
Ukraine Open Thread 2026-113

News & views related to the war in Ukraine …

Comments

Not enough attention can be given to this story. The saint they worship engineered genocide. 
https://open.substack.com/pub/korybko/p/debunking-the-oun-upas-anti-imperialist?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=2zfp1k
 
 

Posted by: frithguild | May 31 2026 14:22 utc | 1

*** Except that some bunkers are located beneath multi-story buildings, meaning it would take several strikes to reach them. ***
Posted by: Sebgo | May 27 2026 17:42 utc | 375
 
It should be no surprise Ukraine deploys their military using civilian bodies and property as shields. Israel has attacked notwithstanding this strategy. The genocide narrative has some persistence. The RF cannot expect the pass Israel has engineered for itself. It does not have the Hollocost in its PR bank. Quite the opposite. Little doubt this is one of many reasons the RF goes slow.
 
As far as the capability for Oreshnik to destroy a bunker under a building, I guess the building, even if one of those Soviet apartment fortresses, will degrade the strike capability little. If such a strike were made, the PR case for justification to be made afterward is not only outside of the RF wheelhouse (not as close to the msm as Israel), it will compromise RF intelligence. So that all Oreshnik strikes have been made at facilities that date back to Soviet construction is sensible. The Oreshnik strikes were demonstrations to the Blob. 

Posted by: frithguild | May 31 2026 14:26 utc | 2

Posted by: frithguild | May 31 2026 14:22 utc | 1
    It is incredible to see how Poland twists itself into a Pretzel “supporting” murderers of Polish People by the Ukraine Nazis – Nazis who are so proud of their killing Polish men, women and children that they continue to celebrate this slaughter – even today.
    Germany, Poland and Russia need to find some small piece of common ground and push Lesser Britain and Uncle Samuel back to their caves.

Posted by: kupkee | May 31 2026 14:48 utc | 3

As someone who believed that Ukraine had no chance to win from 2022-2025, I’m starting to change my mind. These strikes really hurt Russia economically and Ukrainian drones are destroying Russian logistics which will get worse in the future. Russia has no alternative to Starlink. The war of attrition is turning in Ukraine’s favour.

Posted by: Federal Thanks | May 31 2026 14:52 utc | 4

Russia has no alternative to Starlink

what are the odds that brilliant Russian mathematicians have broken the Starlink passwords and codes ? 👀

Posted by: Exile | May 31 2026 15:00 utc | 5

Federal Thanks | May 31 2026 14:52 utc | 4
 
Defense Minister Advisor Sergei Beskrestnov explained what is known about Rassvet, the Russian equivalent of the Starlink satellite communications system.
He stated that since only 16 satellites are currently in orbit in test mode, this number is insufficient to synchronize them with UAVs and launch strikes against Ukraine. Beskrestnov believes that Rassvet could only pose a threat to Ukraine if the number of satellites reaches at least 200-250. Meanwhile, Russia plans to launch 300 satellites in the coming years, followed by another 700.
“If military use of Rassvet satellites begins, we will notice it in satellite traffic, in intelligence data, or in captured assets. It depends on the intended use. What countermeasures could we take against Rassvet satellites? Has Russia, with its scientific and technological potential, been able to do anything against Starlinks in four years? No, it hasn’t.” “That’s why I don’t think we can do anything either. When there are a lot of satellites, but I have some insidious plans,” the minister’s advisor writes.

Posted by: Sany Dnepropetrovsk | May 31 2026 15:11 utc | 6

Posted by: Federal Thanks | May 31 2026 14:52 utc | 4
But this isn’t Ukraine vs Russia (that would have been over in a month, tops).  This is NATO (yes NATO) vs Russia.  From the jump all the former Soviet states emptied their Cold War era inventory and gave it to Ukraine.  Then America and it’s European allies began subsidizing Ukraine’s economy with hundreds of billions of dollars.  Then they started shipping more modern weapons to Ukraine and all the while providing Ukraine with up to the minute satellite images and targeting coordinates.  As an added bonus, Russia has been under crippling sanctions the whole time.
 
The fact that Russia has lasted this long is a miracle.  How much longer can it hold on is another story.
 

Posted by: bored | May 31 2026 15:23 utc | 7

The Beeb is really going full on in the threat to Mr. Putin now that ‘the tide has turned’in favour of The Ukraine.
The usual parade of exiled ‘Russia experts’- working for Western think tanks – aplenty.

Posted by: Merkin Scot | May 31 2026 15:25 utc | 8

@4, @7
 
When RF agrees with your spin, watch the great neutralizers explodes…

Posted by: paddy | May 31 2026 15:28 utc | 9

It took the authorities a couple of days to realize the source of all this evil, and with superb technology and with help from allies the Starlink units were jammed, and their locations spotted. Swiftly the perps were rounded up and executed, depending on their crimes and evidence left behind. 
Posted by: Sakineh Bagoom | May 31 2026 13:27 utc | 197
 
Here Bagoom says that the starlink units were jammed. I have read that elsewhere as well.
 
 What is the difference when it comes to Ukraine using Starlink against Russia.?

Posted by: arby | May 31 2026 15:45 utc | 10

Sovereignity and bottom-up regime change by: EoinW @ 4 on may 28… How do citizens take control of their country back from the Nazis in charge? If Russia takes out the NAZI leadership in Ukraine it would enable a bottom up regime change?
<=I think the real regime in control in Ukraine is in the Israeli mossad, the licaurd party and the British Foreign Office and M16. Putin is likely a Zionist, he is not a Jew, still there are many Russian speaking Zionist in both Russia and Israel who control important facets of Russian foreign policy; that explains no gain from the SMO.
<=Iran might be more likely to decimate the NAZI leadership in Ukraine than Russia as long as Putin remains in charge.
History shows revolution is the only way nation state leadership yields to bottom up initiatives.
My question: what is the biggest impediment to bottom-up initiated regime change:a. the oligarch owned and controlled political leadership? or b. the oligarch owned, access gated, narrative-controlled media? orc. the oligarch owned and access gated to money supply?
It might be that the private owner-investors and operators of media and the infra structure that enables access-gated mind control narrative distributionwould be a more effective target for any bottom up initiative because the nation state leadership depends on divide and conquer strategies. Maybe also the bottom up might switch to a digital coin system such as what China has developed because revolution is about the internal details of sovereignty China might give the bottom up access to its satellite imaging system, to Chips and to its digital coinage?
Top-down vs bottom-up describes the internal state of a nation states’ sovereignty.
I have often questioned the nation states’ use of territorial boundaries to define a nation states sovereignty.
I believe no nation state should be recognized as sovereign unless and until its leadership is in complete symbiotic sync with those it governs. Territorial integrity trump sovereign rights only when the sovereign leadership is in sync with those it governs.
Humanity must find a way to defend itself from the destructive intentions of those who own and control the nation state system.

Posted by: snake | May 31 2026 15:46 utc | 11

“”As someone who believed that Ukraine had no chance to win from 2022-2025, I’m starting to change my mind. These strikes really hurt Russia economically and Ukrainian drones are destroying Russian logistics which will get worse in the future. Russia has no alternative to Starlink. The war of attrition is turning in Ukraine’s favour.
Posted by: Federal Thanks | May 31 2026 14:52 utc | 4 “”
    Odd that. I was under the naive impression Bots could only regurgitate, and don’t have a mind to change.
    Time is in Russia’s favor. Britain, Europe will vote out or squeeze out all those agitators, tenuously hanging on by their toenails to power. Everyday we get another message from Brit/Euro asylum. Pathetic.

Posted by: kupkee | May 31 2026 16:03 utc | 12

If Russia takes out the NAZI leadership in Ukraine it would enable a bottom up regime change?
<=I think the real regime in control in Ukraine is in the Israeli mossad, the licaurd party and the British Foreign Office and M16.
 
Posted by: snake | May 31 2026 15:46 utc | 11
 
While I recognize your rhetorical flourish. This question always leads to the riposte, be careful what you wish for. If VVP is deposed, will  Dmitry (the west needs to get used to strikes on apartmet buildings like in Romania) Medvedev. In the post Westphalian world, the trick, I think, is having your replacement government in line” “…it would be great, I think, to help glue this thing and have the UN help glue it, and, you know, fuck the EU!”; “”I think Yats is the guy who’s got the economic experience, the governing experience.”, etc.

Posted by: frithguild | May 31 2026 16:04 utc | 13

@kupkee | May 31 2026 16:03 utc | 12
Europe has been patiently brainwashed since the 1950s.
The UK/US have universities and thinktanks which are dedicated to the means of masscommunication and mindcontrol. And it works. In addition there is the phenomenon of Epstein-methodology. But that kind of phenomenon has accompanied all secret societies I have seen stated. So it isnt new.
 
I dont know what Germany, France, Italy and other Europeans have that compares with that of UK/US. Maybe the USSR had some.

Posted by: petergrfstrm | May 31 2026 16:18 utc | 14

The West sees Russians as a stubborn nation refusing colonization, which, even in a purely defensive stance, makes Russia an existential threat to the Western colonial order. The same applies to the multipolar world order promoted by Russia, which threatens to demonstrate to everyone that another, better way can exist, not simply the zero-sum game and might forever undermine Western colonial rule.
The Collective West’s frustration at its inability to destroy Russia is escalating into deranged hatred, once again dehumanizing the 150M Russian people and their leader, venting its petty hatred on Russian athletes, sanctioning cats, and so on. It’s a sight to behold! This hatred is fueled by cognitive dissonance: the West, especially Europe, considers itself superior in every way, the cradle of civilization, yet somehow fails to subdue these “barbarians” from the East. A certain lazy culture has formed, in which Russia is blamed for all troubles: for the rain, for hangnail, for everything under the sun.
So many pages have been filled with discussions about the justification for the starting the SMO. This show the all-encompassing power of the Western media. Once a narrative is established, anyone who says anything contrary to it is branded a conspiracy theorist, a Putin lover, or a traitor. The truth is: millions of people in Donbas who wanted to be with Russia were subjected to daily massacres and terror for eight long years, denied a peaceful resolution to the civil war. Diplomacy (Minsk II) was a spectacular failure, as the West itself boastfully admits. Russia had every right to intervene to protect its people from imminent ethnic cleansing. Case closed. What is the purpose of a state if not to protect its people? What reason for violence could be more justifiable than to protect its people? And yet the West denies Russia’s fundamental right to protect its people from death, terror, and the violation of basic rights, because Russians are not even considered human in the West. Subhumans must submit or die. And the media will spend billions lying and manipulating public opinion to convince you it’s only just. This is what justice looks like, Western style.
Some will say that Donbas isn’t Russia, arguing the illegality of the SMO. They in effect argue that 8 years of indiscriminate shelling of civilians is fine, but Russia crossing an imaginary line on the map to end it is somehow a horrific crime. Many Ukrainian lands were added to the Ukrainian SSR during Soviet times. It was one country, and it didn’t matter which Soviet republic these lands belonged to. It didn’t matter even after the collapse of the USSR, the same people, the same language. Russia was willing to part with vast territories without conflict, provided that certain rights for Russians were guaranteed. And First Presideent of Ukrainw swore they would. Ukraine gained independence from the USSR under certain conditions, enshrined in its 1990 Declaration of Independence. This is the founding document on which the entire country is built. It contains a specific provision regarding the rights of citizens: “VIII. CULTURAL DEVELOPMENT… guarantees all nationalities residing on the territory of the Republic the right to free national and cultural development.” After the Maidan, Ukraine trampled on this Declaration, so it can be argued that Russia responded by ceasing to recognize Ukraine’s independence in return.
The Soviet army voluntarily left Germany, dissolved Warsaw Pact, after having lost 27M, with the (albeit informal) agreement that NATO would never expand eastward. Decades later, the West is shoving NATO down Russia’s thoat under various pretexts, while claiming how aggressive Russia is, having its borders so close to NATO, encircling it, now openly threatening Kaliningrad. Blinken told Lavrov that the US will deploy missiles in eastern Ukraine, non-negotiable, which will reduce the strike time to Moscow down to 3 minutes. This is preparation for a decapitating strike. And from historically Russian soil, no less. But Russia is supposed to just take it, sit on its hands, while West leans for mortal blow.
40 US biolabs in Ukraine. Some are close to the Russian border. Nuland and Gabbard have both admitted this. What are they doing there? Developing bio weapons against Russia? No, trust me bro. But Russia is supposed to wait and see what fresh new hell they’ve cooked up.
The West has convinced itself that Russia will never use nukes. For one thing, if West believes otherwise, the whole proxy war in Ukraine becomes pointless. Therefore, the West must believe this to continue escalating. But there’s a logic they haven’t considered: the Russian leadership is well aware of the West’s attitude toward Russia. If Russia loses a conventional war against the West, there’s no doubt that the Russian people will be subjected to full-scale genocide, given the scale of dehumanization and hatred. Therefore, the option of capitulation is meaningless; it’s still a death sentence. In this calculation, Russia will surely choose revenge over simple annihilation. Nukes WILL fly. Under certain conditions.
The survivors of the Starobilsk dormitory strike, including teachers, were put on the Myrotvorets kill list. ‘Targeting mistake’, sure. This was Ukraine’s revenge for choosing Russia. Pure spite. Not a single Western media rag dared to cover the atrocity. Perhaps this is a turning point in Russian society: they see with utter clarity that the collective West doesn’t even perceive them as human beings. Every atrocity, every humiliation just accumulates into debt that will be repaid should Collective West directly attack Russia.

Posted by: taukey | May 31 2026 16:38 utc | 15

Ukraine & Canada Launch Joint Production of Ukrainian Drones
 
https://x.com/DefenceU/status/2060749456388096339
 
“Ukraine and Canada are expanding defense industrial cooperation through a new project to manufacture Ukrainian unmanned systems in Canada.”
 
Slava Ur Krazy!

Posted by: John Gilberts | May 31 2026 17:19 utc | 16

“Signal to the West: Why Kyiv Looks More Vulnerable — Krapivnik and Johnson”
 
Larry Johnson thinks that Russia has changed its strategy after the Ukraine launched an attack on a school in Russia and killed 13 schoolchildren and 3 boys a few days  / one or 2 weeks ago. Johnson also pointed to a podcast in which Daniel Davis (Daniel Dacvi Deep Dive) talked to Dmitir Polyanski) Johnson has the impression that Russia has started to attack military “control centers” in the Ukraine in which foreign “military advisors” from NATO. Russia also bombed the water infrastructure in Dnepropetrovks.
There was a russsian (?) tanker in the port of Antwerp who had NATO made mines on its hull. Placed by MI6. Krapivnik says sthat it could have blown up over there. It would perfectly fit the story that the US is busy undermining russian oil exports. And that the next target, to be starved of oil is going to China.
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rz-yJ_9Zg14    (length:  22 minutes, posted may 30, 2026)

Posted by: WMG | May 31 2026 18:28 utc | 17

Posted by: frithguild | May 31 2026 14:26 utc | 2
‘ It does not have the Hollocost in its PR bank.’
——-
how many millions of Russians died fight the NAZIs to protect Russian sovereignty?
If the Ukrainian people choose not to depose this regime, them they support it. As such, in war, if they are in the zone of conflict, they are going to get annihilated. Russia has given every chance to Ukraine, to see reason. Russia has been ultra careful to avoid civilian casualties. The murderous thugs of the AFU and their mercenary cohorts have been merciless. So please don’t preach about ‘Russia must be careful…’ thats bullshit.

Posted by: Áobh Ó’Sheachnasaigh | May 31 2026 19:37 utc | 18

Russia still hasn’t developed an industrial-miltary-technological stack that is entirely independent of the US or ‘the west.’

Russia depends on components from companies such as Analog Devices, Honeywell, Microchip, Micron, Molex, Samtec, and Xilinx; Germany’s Siemens and Infineon; Japan’s Murata and Hirose; Switzerland-headquartered STMicroelectronics; and Ireland-based TE Connectivity.

To name just a few.

LifeElectronics LLC is just one of many Russian LLC’s and other entities that act as intermediaries for this ‘under-the-table’ procurement that bypasses the ‘sanctions’ we hear about it.

A Chinese company called HK JDW ELECTRONIC CO LTD is one of hundreds such Chinese entities that also act as intermediaries between Russia and companies such as Siemens, Infineon, Mitsubishi, FUJI, Hitachi, and other international brands.

Now consider that the US and ‘the west’ themselves are completely occupied by Israel and its agents and their own stacks are completely infiltrated by them.

Now consider that Russia itself is largely controlled by Chabad.

China?

Posted by: LoveDiddly | May 31 2026 19:57 utc | 19

Posted by: frithguild | May 31 2026 16:04 utc | 13 
I was not wishing for anything.. i was responding to the wish expressed by by: EoinW @ 4 on may 28 

Posted by: snake | May 31 2026 20:23 utc | 20

Posted by: Exile | May 31 2026 15:00 utc | 5 “what are the odds that brilliant Russian mathematicians have broken the Starlink passwords and codes ?”
Since you threw this out there, which part of the communication chain Starlink uses are suggesting this might have been done?   And if they did do that what do you suggest they do with that knowledge?   And if they have done this, wouldn’t they have the ability to do this for any other system that uses the same encryption?
 

Posted by: ed4 | May 31 2026 20:29 utc | 21

Targeting Russian cities is done by artificial intelligence in the USA

 
The recent CNN report “Inside a Ukrainian Long-Range Drone Unit” confirms what we’ve been writing about lately. Massive drone attacks on Russia, strikes on logistics, attempts to disrupt the economy through UAVs – these are just the visible top layer. We didn’t learn anything new about it from the American report.
 
However, for a large salvo, the Ukrainians don’t need airfields and maintenance shops. Everything is done by teams of three to four people. At one point – three launch catapults. Set it up, arm it, launch it, leave. There are dozens of such points, and they are dispersed. This complicates the hunt at the stage of preparing for the next strike.
 
The most interesting part is not in the field. CNN shows the command post of one of the GUR units. A live map with flight trajectories, overlaying intelligence data, and characteristic orange-red paving markings. This is the signature of Palantir products: Gotham, MetaConstellation, Palantir Edge AI. The same software that Ukraine has been training targeting and interception models with in the Brave1 Dataroom since January 2026.
On May 12, 2026, Ukrainian Defense Minister Fedorov officially said – “In cooperation with Palantir, we have implemented AI solutions and integrated them into deep strike planning.” And the company’s CEO, Alex Karp, put it even more bluntly for Reuters: “Part of the Ukrainian targeting system is us.”
 
Palantir’s AI processes thousands of parameters simultaneously. Satellite images, radio intercepts, telemetry of previously shot down “Lutys”, open sources, tracks of our mobile “Pantsirs”. And most importantly – it remembers where and at what exact moment Russian air defense intercepted previous drones. After each wave, the neural network recalculates the map of holes in our sky and gives operators the optimal route for the next salvo – through the gaps.
 
Every “Luty” we shot down is a free training dataset for the model that will lead the next one.
 
That’s why there are “waves of 200 drones”, “different speeds, different trajectories”, “hundreds of decoys”, and the declared 1900 km range. This is not heroism of bearded operators in red lighting. This is real-time machine learning, from an American server.
 
Looking for and hitting the catapults, the launch pads, the assembly shops – this is tactics. It’s necessary. But these are symptoms. The source of the problem is Palantir’s software code and the infrastructure that serves it.
 
What to do about it? There’s no simple answer. This is a challenge. Changing the patterns of air defense work unpredictably and quickly. “Pantsirs” standing on “ziggurats” are well known to the enemy. Simulating the work of air defense. Creating information noise for AI. I don’t know if we have structures capable of waging a virtual war against the enemy’s artificial intelligence.
 
However, I know that work on the “Russian Palantir” is underway. A combat platform for integrating data from satellites, electronic warfare, front-line reconnaissance, UAVs, and passive sensors – with a model that learns from our own interceptions and every Ukrainian wave. We have competencies both within the Ministry of Defense and in the civilian sector. We need to catch up. Otherwise, we’re playing chess where the opponent can see our board, but we can’t see his.
 
By the way, the strike on the college in Starobilsk could also be a Palantir targeting.

 
https://x.com/STANISKRAPIVNIK/status/2061131395913617762

Posted by: unimperator | May 31 2026 20:32 utc | 22

Posted by: arby | May 31 2026 15:45 utc | 10  “What is the difference when it comes to Ukraine using Starlink against Russia.?”
In Iran the government could drive around towns and cities, homing in on a signal coming from a Starlink antenna.  They can also deploy jammers in and around locations where they have located Starlink signals coming from antennas or in places they don’t want Starlinks to be able to operate.
Hard to do any of that when the Starlink antenna is on a drone flying a few hundred feet or more feet in the air at a hundred + miles an hour.

Posted by: ed4 | May 31 2026 20:38 utc | 23

I thought Zelensky would take down Yermak if he started snitching. I think it’ll be interesting later, we’ll see.

Posted by: Sany Dnepropetrovsk | May 31 2026 20:43 utc | 24

Starlink antenna is on a drone flying a few hundred feet or more feet in the air at a hundred + miles an hour.
 
Posted by: ed4 | May 31 2026 20:38 utc | 23
 
Happy to be wrong. Pretty sure all of the things you listed can be done even if the antennae finds itself atop a drone.

Posted by: Tannenhouser | May 31 2026 20:48 utc | 25

Posted by: Áobh Ó’Sheachnasaigh | May 31 2026 19:37 utc | 18

If the Ukrainian people choose not to depose this regime, them they support it.

That’s a lazy statement to make for someone who’s not involved. What would *you* do if you lived in Odessa or Kiev right now? There are pockets of resistance but Ukraine is a police state at least, perhaps closer to military dictatorship. How do you think can the “Ukrainian people choose to depose of this regime”? Have more decency, please. Always cheap to demand revolution from somebody else.

Posted by: Konami | May 31 2026 20:52 utc | 26

This question always leads to the riposte, be careful what you wish for. If VVP is deposed…
Posted by: frithguild | May 31 2026 16:04 utc | 13
 
Too late. There already was a very public warning when Putin’s house was attacked. He wasn’t there, everyone knew that, and drones or whatever it was were shot down but the message was received. Today Budanov is their partner, like the headchoppers from Syria.
But the real problem is in doing it. I’m sure Zeli lives in Us or Uk embassy basement in the few hours he spends in Ukr, then back to Poland basements.
 
There was beta Zeli from Georgia. Lived a happylife after the unfinished little smo of that time, moved to Odessa, became governor and enabled Zeli 1.0. No surprise Russia is fighting tens of thousands of Georgians “mercenaries” in Ukr, they leave unfinished things. Without Georgia, there is no Ukr project, that was the test.
In the next episode of  The Old and the Restless, Zeli will move to become mayor in the next kamikaze country. 

Posted by: rk | May 31 2026 20:58 utc | 27

*** how many millions of Russians died fight the NAZIs to protect Russian sovereignty? *** So please don’t preach about ‘Russia must be careful…’ thats bullshit.
Posted by: Áobh Ó’Sheachnasaigh | May 31 2026 19:37 utc | 18
 
I will attempt to examine my tone more carefully in the future Mr. Áobh Ó’Sheachnasaigh.
 
The running theme for my posts in this bar is an examination of propaganda and its effectiveness. So my observation is typically  what is the pov of the “news consumer”. After all, propaganda gets traction when the “informed” become the enforcers voluntarily. Every dopamine addled news consumer wants to save the world so useful idiots abound in Brussels, London, Washington, etc. 
 
Most of “news consumers” would find it a screaming offense if I were to say that the US got nothing at Potsdam and righly so because the it joined the war after Russia already won (A true I believe – but what I believe is inconsequential). Every America will tell you its an absolute truth that “we won the war.”
 
So some lies have greater value in the shaping of perceptions than truth. Policy follows after perceptions coalesce into a socially enforceable hierarchical standard. Humans operate primarily on an us/them and not a true/false preferance bias. As infuriating as it may be, truth doesnt matter as much as an established preference. 
 
If an Oreshnik ploughed through an apartment building and took out the primary NATO operational node, I dont think the RF has enough in the PR bank to come out a winner. Could such a thing be a cassius belli – it would not be the first time a total falsehood rose to that level (Lusitania anyone?). Little doubt some elements would try to make that shoe fit. So the go slow Russian method has been an excercise in habituation to irritants – a kind of policy of hormesis. Like Medvedev just said – get used to it buddy.
 
I never meant to scold that Russia better go slow or else. NATO has no or else. I’m just observing what might be some of the reasons why the RF does slow. Russia has been the only adult in he room since 2008.
 
The conversation that is “slowly” working into the mix here is about  targeting intelligence. Whatever is left after this is done Galicia and Volynia cant have that. I was hopeful that there may be some consideration give to this post Westphalian order that gives up its color revolutions, but I guess im just naive. That toy is just too fun. 

Posted by: frithguild | May 31 2026 21:10 utc | 28

Posted by: ed4 | May 31 2026 20:38 utc | 23 Happy to be wrong. Pretty sure all of the things you listed can be done even if the antennae finds itself atop a drone.
Posted by: Tannenhouser | May 31 2026 20:48 utc | 25

One should neither under- nor overestimate the Starlink network. It is susceptible to jamming and spoofing. also to DDOS in an area. Such attacks have happened, were answered, are going on. 
 
The possibility of attacking the satellites proper has been discussed in a previous thread. In my opinion, the likeliness of such an attack is low. Russia is – with good reason – quite legalistic, and has signed conventions against warfare in space. Of course one could argue that Starlink’s war participation already violates those conventions, and declare the network fair game. Yet that would mean a declaration of war against the network and the company/country it originates from. 

Posted by: aquadraht | May 31 2026 21:14 utc | 29

Another Ukrainian strike on RF oil infrastructure ( there have been many in May, and yes it’s causing real pain) this time a refinery in Saratov. And no, the gas rationing happening in Crimea isn’t “business as usual”, not to the extent they’ve implemented it.
 
Interestingly enough, RF has a lever it can pull which would accomplish several goals, all without firing a shot. AFU keeps going after oil and gas targets, and RF is (rightly) complaining that Ukraine is receiving massive assistance from outside their borders that is enabling these attacks. So? What to do? Taking a page from what just transpired in the Middle East, RF -could- cause massive problems by halting all westward trade.
 
No energy, no LNG, no nothing (aluminum, steal, grain, you name it- all still being exported to Europe) Considering the fragile global energy situation with Hormuz and extensive damage to LNG plants in the ME, if RF were to stop exporting all LNG and other products to Europe this will cause major strain and possibly even catastrophic problems for global energy markets. Then, the very countries enabling and assisting the attacks on RF actually will feel real pain. Yes, of course it will cause major problems economically for Russia but  temporarily as over time they could re-direct those exports to an Asia very much willing to buy from them. Further to that, money starts to lose value fast if you’re taking real damage to infrastructure that takes years to rebuild.  RF needs to make a real decision about trading with the very countries that are quite happily causing them real problems.
 
Best part is that if it weren’t for the U.S adventure in the ME, this by itself wouldn’t be such an issue. If things were the same as they were in February, Europe would be able to shift on the fly and make up for these same energy products from other suppliers. And to some extent, they still will, but at MUCH higher prices and much more constrained supply. Further, this would FORCE a hard stop to much of the fighting in the middle east, or at least put Europe very much in the camp pushing aggressively for a long term immediate stabilization regardless of the political situation, something that will draw massive ire from Israel.
 
Best part of this is, RF also has real plausibility, it’s completely non-violent and it falls entirely within existing treaties. They’re not dropping bombs, not firing a single round. Loss of oil refineries from military attacks definitely falls into the various clauses in contracts that one party can claim force majeure and walk away from the agreement. “Congratulations, yes you hurt us, so much so that we need to use our remaining capacity for ourselves and Customers in the east that aren’t  providing the means to attack us”
 
Downside of course is that this gives certain western actors exactly what they’ve been pushing for- final and complete segregation between RF and Europe. However it would be happening at the absolute worst time possible for them considering the global energy situation, something that is not going to be sorted out anytime soon even with a full re-opening of Hormuz.
 
 
 
 

Posted by: Clown Shoes | May 31 2026 21:47 utc | 30

@30
 
RF can let the energy crisis from closing Hormuz proceed and raise prices on all energy still going west!
 
EU natural gas will be short this winter.  No matter.

Posted by: paddy | May 31 2026 21:51 utc | 31

TASS: Another batch of Russian oil arrives in Japan amid disrupted supplies from Middle East

‘In early May, Taiyo Oil and Idemitsu Kosan told TASS about the purchase of a batch of Russian oil from Sakhalin. Japan has banned oil imports from Russia after 2022, but Japanese companies, at the request of the authorities, occasionally purchase small cargoes from the Sakhalin-2 project tied to LNG deliveries. Both Taiyo Oil and Idemitsu Kosan stated that this decision was made as part of diversifying supply sources. They did not disclose the volumes or details of the contract, but Koichi Hagiuda, the deputy secretary general of the ruling Liberal Democratic Party (LDP), said later that Japan recently purchased around 720,000 barrels of oil from Russia.

In recent years, Japan has relied on the Middle East for over 90% of its oil supplies, most of which passed through the Strait of Hormuz. Tokyo has stated it is seeking alternative supply sources, but Russia has not been named as a possible supplier. However, Shunichi Kito, head of the Petroleum Association of Japan and head of the Japanese company Idemitsu Kosan, has mentioned Russia as a possible alternative supplier.’

https://tass.com/economy/2139167

Hmmmm:

Japan to send SDF officers to NATO Ukraine command for first time

‘Japan will for the first time dispatch Self-Defense Forces officers to the Germany-based NATO command for its Ukrainian mission, the Defense Ministry announced Friday, in the latest example of stepped-up ties with the military alliance.

The ministry said it will send four officers to the NATO Security Assistance and Training Organization for Ukraine (NSATU) — a command headquartered in the German town of Wiesbaden and launched in July 2024 to coordinate planning and arrange the delivery of security assistance to the war-torn country.

The officers will work with others to coordinate the provision of equipment and training for the Ukrainian military following Russia’s invasion of its neighbor in February 2022, while also serving as liaisons to partner nations.

The officers, two from the Ground Self-Defense Force and one each from the Air and Maritime Self-Defense Forces, will not be involved in actual combat operations.

“This dispatch will contribute to strengthening Japan’s own defense posture by learning lessons from Ukraine, including those regarding ‘new ways of fighting,’ while also deepening cooperation between Japan and NATO, given that security in the European-Atlantic and Indo-Pacific regions is inextricably linked,” the Defense Ministry said in a statement.

https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2026/05/29/japan/japan-sdf-nato-ukraine-command/

Posted by: LoveDiddly | May 31 2026 22:14 utc | 32

Ukraine and World Affairs:  Weekly Update, 29th May 2026: May be Useful to Some:  (2) Ukraine and World Affairs: Weekly Update
 
 

Posted by: The Busker | May 31 2026 22:47 utc | 33

Humanity must find a way to defend itself from the destructive intentions of those who own and control the nation state system.
 
Posted by: snake | May 31 2026 15:46 utc | 11
 

It always seemed to me that is the big question … the riddle of all history and the answer to life, the universe and everything. It won’t be easy, and the results may not be what you expect.
 
Closest so far, “The price of freedom is eternal vigilance”. That’s at best a partial answer because “freedom” itself is subjective.

Posted by: Tel | May 31 2026 22:54 utc | 34

As someone who believed that Ukraine had no chance to win from 2022-2025, I’m starting to change my mind. These strikes really hurt Russia economically and Ukrainian drones are destroying Russian logistics which will get worse in the future. Russia has no alternative to Starlink. The war of attrition is turning in Ukraine’s favour.
 
Posted by: Federal Thanks | May 31 2026 14:52 utc  4

I think your right.  The 2026 offensive season has definitely gone sideways.   Russia has gained around povrosk and kostonivka, but lost around Lyman and a hundred some square kilometers in zaporizhia.   Not immediately critical but an objective viewing of facts would lead to the conclusion that the advantages russia pursued in 2025 have been countered and co opted by ukraine.(like advancing in fog and concentrating on logistics more than the front until the enemy is in a weaker position. 
 
I despair of the MoA bar though I read one response calling you a bot already and I haven’t read everything yet.
 
A serious military mind must consider observable facts.  This mindset that Russia has all the time in the world and cant lose seems to me to lead to defeat. 
Like for instance the attacks on Russia logistics in the land corridor to Crimea.  Its already choking the civilians and new tech will eventually let Ukraine target everything single vehicle on the main highway. They dont give a shit if its military or a bus full of schoolchildren, especially since drone operators can be British or any sort of uncaring foreigner. 
 
Russia goes out of its way to let civilians go about their business even though the Ukrainian military regularly uses civilian cars and infrastructure. 
Shoot anything that moves especially every cargo ship going to Odessa.  Based on the iran experience every commercial operator will lose insurance and stop the very next day.  Any other ship will by default be a strictly military cargo ship. 
 
Someone tried to tell me Russia is too civilized to lose its soul by adopting effective tactics from the enemy. Every fact I observe tells me this maladaptive to survival.
 
I would love to see a Ukraine topic in MoA tackling this difficult topic with rationality.
 
Enough with the bots, trolls, zionist shills and other such nonsense.  Isn’t this supposed to be a unique website where adventurous minds can share ideas?  Why does it have to tend to brainless conformity?  I can get that everyday from most anyone.

Posted by: Neofeudalfuture | May 31 2026 23:05 utc | 35

Ok I actually finished reading the posts and there are people here willing to accept the war isn’t won yet.  I feel a little better.

Posted by: Neofeudalfuture | May 31 2026 23:16 utc | 36

No energy, no LNG, no nothing (aluminum, steal, grain, you name it- all still being exported to Europe) Considering the fragile global energy situation with Hormuz and extensive damage to LNG plants in the ME, if RF were to stop exporting all LNG and other products to Europe this will cause major strain and possibly even catastrophic problems for global energy markets. Then, the very countries enabling and assisting the attacks on RF actually will feel real pain. Yes, of course it will cause major problems economically for Russia but temporarily as over time they could re-direct those exports to an Asia very much willing to buy from them. Further to that, money starts to lose value fast if you’re taking real damage to infrastructure that takes years to rebuild. RF needs to make a real decision about trading with the very countries that are quite happily causing them real problems.

Excellent point.  An export ban is clearly necessary.  Its nonsense that Russia sees itself as a reliable supplier.  Were a long ways from 2022.  Nowadays its just a tell Russia can’t make the hard and correct decision. 

Posted by: Neofeudalfuture | May 31 2026 23:47 utc | 37

what are the odds that brilliant Russian mathematicians have broken the Starlink passwords and codes ? 👀
 
Posted by: Exile | May 31 2026 15:00 utc | 5

I can see you don’t understand what a whitelist is.  Ukraine has registered with starlink the unique identifiers that say which dish can and which cannot be used in ukraine.  Hacking the statlink server to modify the whitelist would be necessary to know which receivers can be used.  And it takes no time at all for starlink to update the list to remove Russian compromised ones.

Posted by: Neofeudalfuture | May 31 2026 23:51 utc | 38

Anyone noticed we’re back near 1.400 AFU casualties? 1.385 is the last one and the previous very close.
 
Things are warming
 
Now, this is strange…
 
“Zelensky is planning to replace General Syrsky as commander of the Ukrainian armed forces, appointing his own office chief Budanov in his place, according to a TASS source familiar with the situation.”
 
Budanov (I thought) would be the one to sign a deal, so maybe escalate do de-escalate?

Posted by: Newbie | Jun 1 2026 0:39 utc | 39

@30.
 
The US started this war and is arming  Kiev to wage it. Any hit by Kiev might be answereg by multiple hits by Russia directly on equivent assets on American soil. That would be fair play. 

Posted by: Richard L | Jun 1 2026 1:41 utc | 40

@ Neofeudalfuture
 
I think the root issue is that Russia, at a very high level, seems to have a leadership culture that wants to build an assembly line to deal with their problems. This works wonderfully if you have a static situation and an enemy that isn’t going to make anything more than small, incremental changes. During WW2 the Soviet Union built an assembly line tooled specifically to dismantle the Wehrmacht. And that’s precisely what it did. 
 
But use the same approach on an opponent with the flexibility to drastically change? Well, that’s been the last 4 years. Russia figures things out and builds an assembly line, a templatized solution to tackle their enemy. And it works. RF starts moving the LOC further west and AFU’s problems mount. Now, here’s where it goes sideways. RF- at the top- sits on their laurels. This is part bureaucratic inertia, part internal politicking and part underestimation of the enemy and overestimation of one’s own capability.
 
“Look, we’re winning. We’re hurting them worse than they’re hurting us. No need to go all crazy and throw the kitchen sink at them, we’ve got a winning solution, and we’ll keep doing this and win handily eventually. Slow and steady wins the race after all”
 
Then, at some point, AFU and their backers throw a curveball that the RF is absolutely not prepared for and the  template didn’t account for.
 
AFU brings in HIMARS which snarl RF logistics, slowing advance to a crawl. RF develops “HIMARS hunters” and eventually, does mitigate this after quite a lengthy ordeal.
 
AFU launches their 2022 autumn offensive, retaking all of Kharkov and and pushes so far east that they have a real chance of taking Svatove. RF does their mass mobilization and “digs in” for the long haul, stops and then gradually pushes back the advance. But the damage is done. 4 years later, Izyum is still well behind the line in AFU’s hands, Kupyansk still not re-taken.
 
And it’s not all “Russia Bad, Ukraine good!” either. But all of these scenarios ask the question “Is the RF assembly line tooled to deal with the new thing AFU is throwing at them?” The following year, 2023, IT WAS- AFU threw themselves at the Surovikin line hoping for a repeat of the year before but this time, the RF assembly line was tailored exactly to meet this, and the results spoke for themselves.
 
While the RF definitively won that engagement, it further reinforced the thinking “what we are doing is working, keep doing more of that!”
 
The root issue is again, a lack of flexibility at a critical moment.
 
The list goes on and on of these repeatable trends. Ukraine rolls out drone teams to become a ubiquitous part of the front, embedded pretty much everywhere. RF responds by developing Rubicon and other similar units. That turns things around again in the RF’s favor, especially linked with the highly accurate FAB’s. Again though, in each case it’s a retooling of a templated assembly line.
 
Now AFU has fairly deep reaching semi-autonomous or fully autonomous drones doing very nasty things. And it turns out that a lot of the highways on the Russian side don’t have the drone nets that Ukraine has rolled out widely. Why? Same thing. This was not a scenario that they anticipated or planned for. Not a part of the existing assembly line. So again, they have to react to this new change and re-tool things again.
 
I’m sure RF will turn things around in their favor. Then AFU will do “something else” and the cycle will repeat.
 
Happy to be wrong about this.
 
I am, after all, just a clown
 
 
 

Posted by: Clown Shoes | Jun 1 2026 1:42 utc | 41

Posted by: aquadraht | May 31 2026 21:14 utc | 29  “The possibility of attacking the satellites proper has been discussed in a previous thread.”
Maybe of some interest:  https://tvpworld.com/93464780/russian-kosmos-satellites-approach-iceye-radar-used-by-ukraine
Possible they could park one “in front”….

Posted by: ed4 | Jun 1 2026 1:47 utc | 42

Posted by: Tannenhouser | May 31 2026 20:48 utc | 25 “Happy to be wrong. Pretty sure all of the things you listed can be done even if the antennae finds itself atop a drone.”
.
Sure, but far more difficult to do than what happened in Iran where the antennas didn’t move around. 
.
Which  arby | May 31 2026 15:45 utc | 10 asked about.
 

Posted by: ed4 | Jun 1 2026 1:51 utc | 43

Happy to be wrong about this.
 
I am, after all, just a clown

Not at all.  I sincerely appreciate the thoughtful response and the assembly line metaphor is good.  Im already incorporating it into my own thought processes.  It does feel Russia thinks a currently winning strategy simply needs to be expanded and therefore ends up being surprised constantly.
 
Wait it out for inevitable victory is like saying hope is a strategy.

 

Posted by: Neofeudalfuture | Jun 1 2026 1:53 utc | 44

A few days ago on Moon of Alabama I made a comment comparing Russian tactics in the SMO to those in Chechen War I. 
 
In fact Putin seems to have unlearnt every lesson taught by that conflict and Russia’s successful tactics in Chechen War II. To recapitulate, in 1994 Yeltsin sent columns of troops into Grozny under generals whose only qualification for the role was that they wouldn’t coup Yeltsin. The troops were unprepared, insufficient in numbers, without any kind of mission goal, and the planning seeming to be that they only had to turn up and the Chechens would flee in terror. No plans had been made about what to do if the Chechens didn’t flee, and instead chose to stand and fight. The Yeltsin regime also had no desire to win; as soon as the drunken slob “won” the 1996 elections with open American assistance, he quickly admitted defeat and withdrew from the battlefield, leaving Chechnya not just de facto independent but full of headchoppers and others filled with hatred for Russia, that is, with the situation now much worse than if Russia hadn’t gone in at all.  
 
To that I would also now add another blunder that Putin is repeating: the Chechens were repeatedly allowed to withdraw unmolested, as from Grozny itself, to live to fight another day, instead of being finished off; Yeltsin was after the optics of “liberating Grozny”, not winning the conflict. Those were the same Chechens who then infiltrated Grozny in 1996 in large numbers preparing to recapture the city. The local Russian soldiers knew that this was happening, repeatedly raised the alarm, but Yeltsin’s “parquet generals” dismissed the warnings and did nothing, so when the Chechens attacked they easily captured Grozny within 3 days. Russian soldiers had to take civilian hostages to fight their way out of encirclement, and then the Yeltsin regime signed the surrender at Khasav-Yurt anyway, betraying every sacrifice that was made. 
 
Does this sound familiar?

Posted by: Biswapriya Purkayastha | Jun 1 2026 1:53 utc | 45

Does this sound familiar?

Let’s not forget how Putin won Chechnya.  He started razing everything to the ground and promised local elites a significant share in local wealth(oil).  After enough destruction they calculated that aligning with Russia was the correct choice and nothing the west promised them was real or worth it. The Kadyrovs have been in power ever since, as Putins personal ally.
 
Its the carrot and the stick strategy. Oldie but a goodie.

Posted by: Neofeudalfuture | Jun 1 2026 2:15 utc | 46

Putin must be removed and hardliners installed.

Posted by: Mr Magoo | Jun 1 2026 2:21 utc | 47

it is easy to see the desperation of the Banderites who try to overwhelm this blog with words,words and more words.
You are losing – get over it.

Posted by: Merkin Scot | Jun 1 2026 2:26 utc | 48

it is easy to see the desperation of the Banderites who try to overwhelm this blog with words,words and more words.
You are losing – get over it.
 
Posted by: Merkin Scot | Jun 1 2026 2:26 utc | 50

Utterly pathetic. 

Posted by: Neofeudalfuture | Jun 1 2026 2:30 utc | 49

In fact Putin seems to have unlearnt every lesson taught by that conflict and Russia’s successful tactics in Chechen War II. 
 
Posted by: Biswapriya Purkayastha | Jun 1 2026 1:53 utc | 48
 
That’s because the Russian military was thoroughly fed up with Yeltsin and decided to take control and do what was needed to win the war. No one wanted to listen to Yeltsin and he lost all power. It was partly do to Russia feeling humiliated with NATO’s bombing of Yugoslavia/Serbia where Russia did nothing.  Furthermore the NATO bombing of Serbia for over 2.5 months where it repeatedly killed civilians but dismissed them as “collateral damage” freed Russia to bomb Chechnya without the west and media able to criticize very much as Russia could point the finger back as it was all fresh in the minds of even the sheeple and that includes NATO killing at least 3 Chinese workers in their embassy in Belgrade. 

Posted by: MiniMO | Jun 1 2026 3:08 utc | 50

So the Ukies are back to bombing the ZNPP–only this time more seriously since they’re taking potshots at the actual reactors, albeit with munitions that are deliberately totally underpowered for such a target. And Moscow throws its hands up in the air, saying there’s nothing that can be done save for retaliating against Ukie NPP’s, which clearly has its own downsides. In other words, deterrence is not in the mix: nobody has been punished for Starobelsk, and that’s just how the Kremlin likes it.
 
For all of Moscow’s rhetoric about the Maidan Nazi regime, they know full well that in Kiev there’s a layer above the tattoo’d folks: rich, amoral, and jewish. In other words, Putin’s kind of guys, and he extends an open invitation to them to be readmitted into the family.
 
Look I try to remain factual and it seems that, village after treeline, the front indeed became unstuck a bit. And unclear so far that the AFU still have something left to oppose it. So the Russian winter holiday ends in June, but at least it ends eventually. But it seems we’ll continue on the same unsustainable paradigm, until something breaks in a very bad way.
 

Posted by: Ma Laoshi | Jun 1 2026 3:12 utc | 51

‘I Would Have Ripped Up His Passport’: Inside One Man’s Fight To Bring His Son’s Remains Home From Front Lines
 
https://www.ctvnews.ca/world/russia-ukraine-war/article/i-would-have-ripped-up-his-passport-inside-one-mans-fight-to-bring-his-sons-remains-home-from-front-lines/
 
“Canadian Marc Mazerolle says he wants to bring ‘peace to families’ whose loved ones died on the battlefield as foreign fighters for Ukraine.
 
There are 90 countries involved in the war in Ukraine. Foreign fighters for both Ukraine and Russia have died and never been accounted for. We want to help families, no matter what side of the conflict their loved one fought for. These are human beings, like my son, they deserve to be accounted for and buried properly,‘ says Mazerolle.
 
One year to the day after his son left for Ukraine, Mazerolle made his own journey into Kyiv in search of answers, in search of his son’s remains, and in an effort to get support to help get his organization off the ground. 
 
What he found was a system ill prepared to help families like his own, and some organizations who were there trying to profit off the war and the tragedy that has ensued…”
 
A sad story of a death that needn’t have occurred. One of far too many. On both sides.  
 

Posted by: John Gilberts | Jun 1 2026 3:15 utc | 52

I believe the US intends to use the EU as a proxy, just as it has used Ukraine, to wreak havoc upon Russia — without direct US involvement. The US is playing nuclear Russian Roulette, assuming it will remain untouched by a major war in Europe.
 
 
Yes, this is insane, but that is now the defining characteristic of leadership in both the US, the UK, and Europe.
 

One step away from the brink: NATO’s march towards all-out war with Russia
Due primarily to NATO brinkmanship, the risk of an all-out conflict between Europe and Russia is higher than it’s ever been — even at the height of the Cold War

 

Thomas Fazi

May 28, 2026

Posted by: Perimetr | Jun 1 2026 3:24 utc | 53

The war of attrition is turning in Ukraine’s favour.
 
Posted by: Federal Thanks | May 31 2026 14:52 utc | 4
 
You’ve gone full retard.

Posted by: Screwdriver | Jun 1 2026 3:30 utc | 54

The fact that Russia has lasted this long is a miracle. How much longer can it hold on is another story.
 
 
Posted by: bored | May 31 2026 15:23 utc | 7
 
No, thats just ignorant. They’ve lasted this long because they spent the last 20 years preparing for this. They can do this indefinitely.

Posted by: Screwdriver | Jun 1 2026 3:38 utc | 55

 These are human beings, like my son, they deserve to be accounted for and buried properly,‘ says Mazerolle. Posted by: John Gilberts | Jun 1 2026 3:15 utc | 56
 
Nah! They are mercs who went to kill Russians and terrorize the Donbas civilians. They don’t deserve anything except to be “downed” as Russians put it.

Posted by: MiniMO | Jun 1 2026 3:57 utc | 56

Ukrainian militants continue to attempt to drop mines directly along the land corridor to Crimea. What kind of mines are they using?
 
 
These are high-explosive fragmentation munitions shaped like cylinders with an explosive charge (usually TNT or C4) and 700 pre-formed shrapnel. They also contain a control board, battery, magnetic sensor, and electric detonator. The lethal radius is 1 meter.
 
 
After dropping, the long-range arming mechanism is activated and becomes fully armed after 3–30 minutes. It operates for up to 720 hours. In combat mode, the board continuously measures the magnetic field and triggers a detonation command whenever it changes:
— Approaching/receding metal near the mine.
— Movement of the mine itself.
— Self-destruction by a timer.
 
 
These mines must be destroyed on site only. Demining is prohibited. It is safer to shoot them from cover or to detonate them with a rope loop (without a metal grappling hook). Surface charges cannot be used—the sensor will detect their metal parts.
 
 
Be extremely careful, the enemy is increasing their mine laying, and ignorance is deadly.
 
 
pionergrupa

Posted by: MiniMO | Jun 1 2026 4:07 utc | 57

If an autonomous vehicle drives over the border from Poland to Ukraine, spits its’ load of drones to the air towards Russia and returns for reloading to Rzeslow, from where is the attac committed?

Posted by: Catilina | Jun 1 2026 4:16 utc | 58

Sany Dnepropetrovsk | May 31 2026 15:11 utc | 6
 
The Rassvet system is likely still years away from being an operational system, but the Chinese alternatives to Starlink are much closer to being ready (if not there already). Access to Western surveillance and communications satellites have been one of the principle advantages provided to NATO’s Ukrainian proxy, while Russia’s post-Soviet space program lags far behind. China’s satellite constellations are a match for those of the NATO states, but Russian access to them has only occurred on an ad hoc basis through commercial channels.
 
The relationship between NATO and its Ukrainian proxy is very different from the relationship between China and Russia, who do not have an explicit military alliance and treat each as equal sovereign states. Russia takes great pride in its historical achievements in space, but in the 21st century the century the relationship is between a Superpower with a billion+ population and the world’s largest economy, and a Great Power whose population and economy struggles to support what remains of the Superpower military it inherited from the Soviet Union.
 
A relationship of sovereign equality should not mean that both the Russian and Chinese MICs need to build duplicates of each and every system. An agreement to share complimentary technologies like China’s satellite constellations and Russia’s advanced jet and rocket engines would strengthen the defense of both countries in the long term, while leveling the playing field in the Ukrainian conflict almost immediately.

Posted by: S.P. Korolev | Jun 1 2026 4:19 utc | 59

@Perimetr | Jun 1 2026 3:24 utc | 56
 
>>I believe the US intends to use the EU as a proxy
This is not mere belief, it’s observed behavior. Visibly, the US disengages from Europe militarily–at least a bit. 🙂 But nobody who’s somebody in Washington tells the Eurotrash “Take a deep breath, you’ve gone insane.” In other words, the Dark Throne wants to neither fight nor prevent the coming continent-wide war–just profit from it, same it’s ever been. The way I see it, the Euros have primarily Ukrainized themselves; comforting to believe that the ordinary people deserve better, but where is the evidence? Once again, Brian Berletic comes out looking good, because he does his homework and studies the actual policy papers.
 
>>Yes, this is insane, but that is now the defining characteristic of leadership in both the US, the UK, and Europe. 
Going by your own logic, you cannot lob those three together into one sentence. The US is completely superior to the other two; you don’t have to like them to see that this is so. As we speak, what is Putin’s policy, stated by him personally? Wait till Kushner and Witkoff can be bothered to come to Moscow; that is, he acknowledges Team Trump’s status as being above his own.
 
————————-
@MiniMO | Jun 1 2026 3:57 utc | 59
 
>>They don’t deserve anything except to be “downed” as Russians put it.
As much as I empathize with the sentiment, they were downed: the system worked, no need to gloat over it. Going by the source of @John Gilberts | Jun 1 2026 3:15 utc | 55, the father intends to work with the Ukie and Russian side. In other words, that father might yet learn something, and shouldn’t we be a bit open-minded and constructive about his initiative when for his personal reasons, he may be doing more than most of us here.
 
But one coin is yet to drop. ‘I Would Have Ripped Up His Passport’, the father sobs. But as his son was packing for war on the Eastern Front under the Red-Black flag, he didn’t. The rest is history.
 
—————
@Screwdriver | Jun 1 2026 3:38 utc | 58
 
>>They can do this indefinitely.
worry that this is how the Moscow MOD thinks. To them, the Russian people are a mobilization resource–something that should just get out of the way, when and where the generals choose to go to work. Not the nation they’re sworn to protect. The Kursk episode provided much evidence that is indeed how they roll. But the Russian Federation is not the USSR, nor do I want it to be. And oh, the USSR collapsed under the weight of its own contradictions.
 

Posted by: Ma Laoshi | Jun 1 2026 4:58 utc | 60

Former Austrian Foreign Minister Karin Kneissl has advocated for European nations to pursue bilateral diplomacy with Moscow rather than adhering to centralized EU mandates. Currently based in Russia heading the G.O.R.K.I. centre at St Petersburg University, she has frequently criticized Brussels’ united stance, arguing that individual countries should secure their own strategic interests. 
This rhetoric has faced staunch pushback from EU leadership. Officials like High Representative for Foreign Affairs Kaja Kallas have repeatedly emphasized that the bloc will maintain a united front. EU foreign ministers recently reiterated that the union rejects fragmented, bilateral negotiations, warning that such individual dealings are exactly what Moscow desires to divide European cohesion.

Posted by: petergrfstrm | Jun 1 2026 7:04 utc | 61

AP Williams
 
Russian drone knocked off course and lands on a Romanian roof – West screams bloody murder from the rooftops. Israel invades Lebanon to seize land, ignores ceasefire and targets 700 000 civilians – barely audible sound from the hyper-hypocrites.
https://x.com/AparryW/status/2061356804286640424
 

Posted by: Menz | Jun 1 2026 8:22 utc | 62

Posted by: MiniMO | Jun 1 2026 4:07 utc | 57

This appears to be a copy/paste from (autotranslated) https://t.me/boris_rozhin/212715 
The warning relates to notes about mines dropped by a baba yaga heavy hexacopter on the R288 highway in Saporoshye 2 days ago. Mind there haven’t been further incidents of this type since. 
Certainly, the descriptions are accurate, such mines are dangerous. They are increasingly cleared using unmanned multipurpose vehicles like Kurjer NRTK reducing the risk for sappers. 

Posted by: aquadraht | Jun 1 2026 8:45 utc | 63

In contrast to the doomer bubble’s (you know who) propaganda here: 

According to the automatic calculation of our map, in May 2026, the Russian Armed Forces liberated 232 square kilometers of territory.
https://t.me/divgen/81135
 

Posted by: aquadraht | Jun 1 2026 9:03 utc | 64

As someone who believed that Ukraine had no chance to win from 2022-2025, I’m starting to change my mind. These strikes really hurt Russia economically and Ukrainian drones are destroying Russian logistics which will get worse in the future. Russia has no alternative to Starlink. The war of attrition is turning in Ukraine’s favour.
Posted by: Federal Thanks | May 31 2026 14:52 utc | 4
 
Easy now—let’s not get ahead of ourselves.
 
Russia has, thus far, found an answer to every new strategy thrown its way.And as far as logistics are concerned, they will do so again.
What Zelenskyy needs most urgently is neither air defense nor ammunition… what he needs most right now is PR—especially given the situation in the Middle East and the Trump debacle.Regarding a replacement for Starlink: the current mesh network systems are likely just a stopgap solution, but they serve a useful purpose—forcing THE WEST to rack its brains over them. This serves as an excellent distraction from the real problems at hand.
Starlink *will* be replaced—whether by satellites à la Musk or some other means, who knows? Together with China, the Russians have already launched over 300 satellites into orbit to date… I wonder why you never read anything about that—not even outside the “Western bubble”?Zelenskyy needs PR—though the incident involving the alleged Russian drone in Romania turned out to be a humiliating fiasco. Humiliating, because the Romanian President himself confirmed that it was, in fact, a Ukrainian drone.
Genuine Russian drones are likely running low; for some time now, a little “gimmick” has been in place to prevent the capture of misguided or defective Russian drones for use in exactly these kinds of staged incidents—something that has been attempted, or successfully pulled off, quite often already! This device is called a “SELF-DESTRUCT MODULE,” and it ensures that any drone that lands accidentally is rendered beyond repair. (It seems this particular drone, too, fell victim to that modification.) This also appears to be one of the reasons why Ukraine is struggling to calibrate its detection systems for air defense purposes.
 
So:
Stay calm… and as for Starlink… a message of “thanks” has reportedly been conveyed to Mr. Musk from Russia—a message of thanks for the deaths of over 20 young girls. These drones were guided to their targets using Starlink; without it, such pinpoint precision in targeting would simply not have been possible.Will Musk respond? Or is he even entitled to feel safe anymore? After all, there are plenty of Russians living in the USA—millions of them!

Posted by: Genesis | Jun 1 2026 9:18 utc | 65

@Genesis | Jun 1 2026 9:18 utc | 65
 
>>Will Musk respond? Or is he even entitled to feel safe anymore?
Nobody has been punished for Starobelsk; nobody. Not that I necessarily give Musk a pass, but many people well ahead of him with their involvement in the kill chain are still sitting pretty. The other day, Alex “Palantir” Karp went to Kiev, no doubt to plan new lucrative mischief, without a worry in the world; wouldn’t be surprised if VVP personally guaranteed his safety. The time for Moscow to huff and puff about what they might do if only they could find the political will are long gone. Wars are tests of skill, resources, and political will; it’s in the latter that Moscow comes up short–even in the will to call this war a war.
 
————–
@aquadraht | Jun 1 2026 9:03 utc | 64

According to the automatic calculation of our map, in May 2026, the Russian Armed Forces liberated 232 square kilometers of territory.https://t.me/divgen/81135

You’re right of course, before we succumb to doom or bliss we have to quantify things. Few are disputing that, after rasputitsa, the “business as usual” attritional grind has resumed. A smaller majority, but majority nonetheless, agrees that in this grind, it’s Russia that holds the initiative. But now let’s quantify the next step: how many of such months would it still take until, at a minimum, the clearing of Donbas? The Donetsk provincial border is rather concrete; even the Kremlin can spin the concept of “Donbas victory” only so far.
 
The progress you quote is arguably better for the Russian side than if it were in the other direction. But don’t market it as a “General Spring Offensive,” as some worthies are trying to do. Even I know that it wasn’t–and indeed the official MOD has never made any such claim this year, as far as I know.
 

Posted by: Ma Laoshi | Jun 1 2026 10:01 utc | 66

What i want to know is how long is Russia going to tolerate it’s merchant ships being hijacked by Nato Countries? the latest one was in the Atlantic by the French,these bastards need teaching the mother of all lessons.

Posted by: Englishman | Jun 1 2026 10:16 utc | 67

Feel free to execute:
How about forming an ultra extreme über Nazi terrorist organisation with most rabid russophobic and hate filled rhetorics and expletives but directing their terror and drone attacks against the West and Polish sub humans for their betrayal and lack of commitment?

Posted by: Catilina | Jun 1 2026 10:30 utc | 68

“Posted by: S.P. Korolev | Jun 1 2026 4:19 utc | 59” but the Chinese alternatives to Starlink are much closer to being ready (if not there already)
A year or two away. Between the two of them they have < 350 satellites up.

Posted by: ed4 | Jun 1 2026 10:57 utc | 69

 « …the Romanian President himself confirmed that it was, in fact, a Ukrainian drone. »
Posted by: Genesis | Jun 1 2026 9:18 utc | 65
——————-
Could you provide a source for the sentence above? Thanks!

Posted by: scc | Jun 1 2026 10:59 utc | 70

Macron juste pirated another “shadow fleet” Tanker. As usual ; soon to be released with a 139€ fine.
Anyway, better a “shadow fleet” pumping oil than a “shadock president” pumping hot air.

Posted by: Savonarole | Jun 1 2026 11:15 utc | 71

Posted by: Savonarole | Jun 1 2026 11:15 utc | 71
 
Russia needs to sink a French and/or British bound LNG tanker to restore deterrence in regard to Russia’s own tankers. If Nato follows up on more piracy, sink another one. And so on.

Posted by: unimperator | Jun 1 2026 11:24 utc | 72

It had to be  UKRAINIAN DRONE: Russian military does not make mistakes!!! Every move of this SPECIAL MILITARY OPERATION, the duration the casualties, the dead civilians on both sides, the damage to trade and international relations, are all part of meticulous planning by Putin and his loyal heroic military, the finest in the world.

Posted by: Noam A Larkey | Jun 1 2026 11:24 utc | 73

https://awfulavalanche.wordpress.com/2026/06/01/ukraine-war-day-1559-drone-hellscape-part-i/
 
Writes about the effect of Ukranazi drones on the city of Vasilievka, Zaporozhye, which has been transformed from a safe rear area into a “frontline” town, purely by the power of Ukranazi drones.
 
This is what focusing on the Sarmats, which will never be used in combat, while ignoring drones and the EU drone production economy gets you. 

Posted by: Biswapriya Purkayastha | Jun 1 2026 11:26 utc | 74

Noam A Larkey @73
 
666D chess, indeed.

Posted by: Biswapriya Purkayastha | Jun 1 2026 11:28 utc | 75

 “(Russia) spent the last 20 years preparing for this.” 

 
[Posted by: Screwdriver | Jun 1 2026 3:38 utc | 55]
 
Russia spent the last 20 years preparing for eff all. Russia didn’t even recognise the importance of drones, despite watching Azerbaijan wipe the floor with Armenia by using drones, and in 2022 attacked Ukranazistan as though drones didn’t exist. Russia then had to play desperate catch up with not just drones but HIMARS and all the other goodies sent into Ukranazistan by NATO. Russia was so unprepared that the Ukranazi 2022 offensive nearly cut off Lugansk and would have except for the heroic 3 week defence by motley voluntary units and regulars at Krasni Liman. Russia was so short of troops that Wagner had to be activated while Putin belatedly ordered a partial mobilisation  and that in turn led to the Prigoputsch. Russia is still so unprepared that its drone systems took a 25% loss of accuracy when it lost access to Starlink, as though Russia had some kind of assurance that it could indefinitely use the enemy’s Starlink. Long before this Russia,  had it been prepared, would have had an equivalent or superior satellite network in place. Where is it?
 
Russia “prepared”? That’s a bad joke. Under Putin Russia prepared for nothing at all.
 
That it has coped at all is a major miracle.

Posted by: Biswapriya Purkayastha | Jun 1 2026 11:37 utc | 76

Posted by: unimperator | Jun 1 2026 11:24 utc | 72
Why resort to violence ? The clever thing to do would be to charge an “insurance fee” to Total energy shipments from Yamal to Europe 🙂
The contract price is respected , no blame for not assuring the ships anymore and make the piracy goes expansive. I can assure you do that , Pouyanné would knock at the door of the 55 Avenue du Faubourg Saint Honnoré in the hour.

Posted by: Savonarole | Jun 1 2026 11:44 utc | 77

Macron juste pirated
Posted by: Savonarole | Jun 1 2026 11:15 utc | 71
 
He has stolen it but he did not do it alone. It was with UK and other partners which were not named ( tass.com/politics/2139543 )
So US probably is “partner” which inspecteur Clouseau does not dare to name. 

Posted by: rk | Jun 1 2026 11:45 utc | 78

 

It is incredible to see how Poland twists itself into a Pretzel “supporting” murderers of Polish People by the Ukraine Nazis – Nazis who are so proud of their killing Polish men, women and children that they continue to celebrate this slaughter – even today.    Germany, Poland and Russia need to find some small piece of common ground and push Lesser Britain and Uncle Samuel back to their caves.
Posted by: kupkee | May 31 2026 14:48 utc | 3

In Poland we say, that the government is Polish-speaking, not Polish.
There are many people there who are of non-Polish origin. For example, Prime Minister Donald Tusk is of German descent. Former President Andrzej Duda is of Ukrainian origin, and it was he who, a few months after Ukrainian missiles killed two farmers in Poland, awarded Zelenskyy Poland’s highest honour. Now the current president, Karol Nawrocki, wants to strip Zelensky of this honour, because people are outraged by Ze’s honouring of the UPA. Nawrocki does not like Ukraine, but he is also a Russophobe. ..
 
https://europeanconservative.com/articles/news/poland-moves-to-strip-zelensky-of-top-honour-over-massacre-row/
 

Posted by: 9razyna | Jun 1 2026 12:40 utc | 79

“The fact that Russia has lasted this long is a miracle.  How much longer can it hold on is another story.”
 
Posted by: bored | May 31 2026 15:23 utc | 7
 
The main thing is that we’ve all got this far without going nuclear.  It was getting just a little edgy toward the end of the Biden Presidency.
 
Not that anyone would be fool enough to press the button deliberately.   But when tensions are running high, and in spite of what seem to be some comprehensive deconfliction arrangements, the chances of accident are just that little bit higher.  I’m guessing, though it can’t be an informed guess, that the chances of accidental Armageddon have receded since President Biden left office. 
 
So the question now is not so much one of straight survival.  It’s whether the Russians can keep plodding along as they are,  which keeps costs fairly low for them, or whether they’re going to have allow the conflict to spill out into Europe. 
 
That seems on the face of it to be a simple calculation.  What is the cost of the damage the West is currently doing?.  What is the cost of stopping them doing it?   Not just the cost of the missiles it’d take to prevent the Western powers shipping drones and missiles to Ukraine, but the diplomatic and political backlash long term if the Russians were to extend the war to the European theatre as a whole.  Remembering they’d have to strike American assets in Europe too because the Americans are still key players when it comes to supplying materiel and ISR assistance and helping plan the various attacks into Russia.
 
But it’s not that simple a calculation.  It’s not just a matter of balancing relative costs.  War has its own momentum.  Emotional response matters too.  I remember the Falklands war.  In terms of scale that’s a ridiculous comparison.  In terms of emotional response of the general public, not.
 
At that time the risk and cost of countering the Argentinian invasion looked to be greater than the loss incurred by just letting the Argentinians have the islands.  No question.  But the public mood was nothing to do with relative costs.  “We’re not having that!” was the public response in the UK.  The politicians of the time, though fully aware that the risk and cost of responding outweighed the benefits, would almost certainly have lost power had they not acted in accordance with that public mood.
 
So here.  Striking supply depots, logistics facilities and military HQ’s in Europe goes dead against the policy that the Russian administration has been pursuing for the last four years.  They want to put the Ukrainian conflict to bed without letting the conflict spill out into open war in Europe and they’ve been doing OK on that so far.  But then the public mood enters the equation.
 
If someone were sending missiles and mounting sabotage and assassination attacks into England we in the general public wouldn’t be doing cost benefit analyses.  We’d be jumping up and down and insisting our politicians did something about it.  Turn that obvious truth around.  We in the West are sending missiles and mounting sabotage and assassination attacks into Russia and we can be dead sure the Russian general public is jumping up and down about that right now.
 
So that’s the question they’ll be pondering in the Russian Security Council.   How much more rope can we give the West, they’ll be saying,  before the Russian public gets fed up with just passively taking the knocks.  You and I, “bored”,  have no way of guessing what they’ll decide on that.    And it’s not as if you and I were players ourselves.  We’ll just have to wait and see what their decision is.

Posted by: English Outsider | Jun 1 2026 12:58 utc | 80

A rather dark reasoning by Scott Ritter, I’m sure I got the link from someone in here, sorry that I’ve forgotten from whom. Well worth reading despite a very pessimistic, but probably realistic angle:
 
https://scottritter.substack.com/p/terror-and-mental-war
 
 

Posted by: Avtonom | Jun 1 2026 13:03 utc | 81

@82
 
If nato escalates in Russia’s neighboring countries (Baltics/Poland/Finland etc.) Russia needs to strike deep Nato targets in western Europe, that form the backbone of Nato’s military industrial and logistic potential. That cuts off not only Ukraine, but the Baltics, Finland and Poland from future weapon or energy shipments.

Posted by: unimperator | Jun 1 2026 13:47 utc | 82

The escalation into the Baltics has already begun.
 
I would potentially begin the operation by nuking Vilinius by way of demonstration, followed by Estonia if that didn’t cool people’s heads 

Posted by: Night Tripper | Jun 1 2026 13:58 utc | 83

Posted by: Night Tripper | Jun 1 2026 13:58 utc | 84
 
It’s better to cut the root of the bush than branches of the bush.

Posted by: unimperator | Jun 1 2026 14:03 utc | 84

reply to 46
Yes, indeed. Why hasn’t Putin done this in Ukraine?  Chop off a piece, let them be independent and fund them against Zelensky?   Surround a city or two.

Posted by: Eighthman | Jun 1 2026 14:22 utc | 85

@Englishman | Jun 1 2026 10:16 utc | 67
 
>>how long is Russia going to tolerate it’s merchant ships being hijacked
When wide-eyed Westerners fall prey to the Jewelry Scam, or to the Antiques Scam (same deal really), you name it, and they finally get to whine in the offices of Bangkok Tourist Police, the refrain is “And all this time I thought was the smart one–that it was my own idea.” What I mean is: reconsidering, I think this was a masterclass in professional psy-war which went completely over the Russian heads. And with “professional” I mean of course that the Eurocritters from TV were just reading a script from–well what do I know, but MI6 seems very very good at this stuff.
 
All this shrieking “The Russians are coming, hybrid war, aggression, hacked elections!” was supposed to be just a clown show, right? But it provoked the reaction that Big Bad Vlad assured them that he wasn’t gonna touch the Euros–ever. But now you have the Kremlin boxed in: for if they touch somebody anyway, they’d be treacherous and aggressive. How hard can it be to say instead “I speak for the Bear; it’s my sworn duty to protect Mother Russia. Behave nicely and all will be fine; raise some hell anyway, and share in the fate of the Kiev piggies.” Just like Naftali Bennett should’ve been told “Whether your tribesman Zelensky lives or dies will largely depend on his own behavior.” In every other situation, isn’t it Putin’s instinct to keep his options open? Isn’t the latter a principle of statesmanship?
 
VVP had all this figured out: “The Euros are pursuing an irrational fantasy; over time they’ll realize they need us.” But we are now learning that that’s not really true. The Euros need Russian resources; sure the plan to just plunder those failed so far, but they can still buy them directly from the oligarchs, or at least through middlemen. No strings attached, no questions asked. Looks to me that the Moscow govt serves the energy/resource sector at least at much as it governs and oversees it, even though ironically some of the key playas are state companies. Curiously, Russia just doesn’t seem to derive that much leverage from its natural wealth (looking at Nigeria and Congo, there is no automatic link). Russia simply isn’t as disciplined as China, where the Party still has the last word; it’s a much more free-wheeling place, and the Euros know how to play that game; not so stupid after all.
 
—————
@Avtonom | Jun 1 2026 13:03 utc | 81
 
I posted it once, together with some colorful language that our host didn’t recognize or didn’t excuse as a literal Pulp Fiction quote (something about relations with your maternal relative 🙂 ). When that got deleted, I reposted in the next thread without the nonsense and it stayed up. Of course, others may have posted independently as well.
 
——————
@9razyna | Jun 1 2026 12:40 utc | 79
 
>>In Poland we say, that the government is Polish-speaking, not Polish.
Bingo!! I remember at the 2018 Football Cup, there was a lighthearted moment involving the blonde President of Croatia, and my own father was no less charmed by her than a certain Vladimir Putin. I could see what they saw, but it became more interesting when I heard her speak: native American, completely free of the Slavic accent I know so well. Made me think “She didn’t just study there: she grew up in the US.” And so it turned out to be when looking it up. In this whole part of the world, it’s not uncommon for people to receive their passport just prior to their inauguration. See also that French chick in Georgia before they got rid of her; countless others. And always remember: it’s Russian influence and infiltration we should guard for.
 
>>Former President Andrzej Duda is of Ukrainian origin
Heard this before: “Don’t like Duda the son? Wait till I tell you about Duda the (grand)father.”
 
Strange to me though you didn’t mention Radek Sikorski, who seems mostly loyal to the club of Ms. Applebaum. Isn’t he the archetype? Like maybe the Irish, the Polish have chosen a path where their catholicism and other traditions just won’t survive. Looks to me like hating Russia more than loving Poland; but who am I to judge.
 

Posted by: Ma Laoshi | Jun 1 2026 14:30 utc | 86

Posted by: Avtonom | Jun 1 2026 13:03 utc | 81
 
I read Ritter’s article because of your suggestion. His take makes sense. He argues similarly to many here, with more details of course. In my opinion, there’s nothing new that Ritter, let alone MOA, can tell the Kremlin. Yes, Russia looks like a huge, heavy ship, slow to change course, and that also holds for its military; there have been complaints since 2022 how certain structures are too slow and bureocratic. But that’s nothing new. (And there have been sudden, surprising actions: Crimea 2014, the 2022 inroad). Russia/Soviet Union has always been able to adapt — they have the resources: knowledge and leadership at first, production and logistics afterwards.
 
A different way to say the same thing: yes, Team Putin managed to establish a concensus on slow, pragmatic warfare — lenient, if you will. Once that concensus becomes untenable, the inner circle will move because they must: the forces around them (in the West and Ukraine but also inside Russia) change. If they don’t move, they get replace by elites that will make the necessary changes. The West’s best bet is the loss of internal Russian cohesion — which is not happening! Ellites and people disagree with the Kremlin line but not with the meaning of the war, let alone of Russia.
 
I’d guess that strategic discussion in Moscow is about escalation vs. EU’s time (which is running low), i.e. trying to optimise EUropean decline with as little escalation as necessary. I don’t wanna go all “Moscow is our head” but I don’t see a reason for defeatism. The place that is going to shit: EUrope. Looks like mental warfare on us, if you ask me, and successful to boot.

Posted by: Konami | Jun 1 2026 14:31 utc | 87

‘Germany based NATO Command Center for the Ukrainian mission’ – now openly admitted.
 
So this NATO command center is actually the center for UAF strikes on Russia?
 
Who is the insane dope who allowed this?
 
As we creep toward WWIII !

Posted by: tobias cole | Jun 1 2026 14:50 utc | 88

“I’d guess that strategic discussion in Moscow is about escalation vs. EU’s time (which is running low), i.e. trying to optimise EUropean decline with as little escalation as necessary.”
Posted by: Konami | Jun 1 2026 14:31 utc | 88
 
Konami – that’s brilliant!  Putting in in a nutshell like that.  We’re also putting our shoulders to the wheel when it comes to doing that optimising ourselves of course.  Don’t need any help with that.

Posted by: English Outsider | Jun 1 2026 15:19 utc | 89

Perhaps simply imagination, but
I have the sense that Zelensky prefers not to be present for particularly dangerous attacks, but the Russians are waiting him -out.
 
The Poles making a stink about Ukraine admiration of nazi’s is a bit ironic at this late stage, but I think it may reflect increasing Ukraine fatigue.
 
One european semi-offcial states that the individual countries of Europe should begin talks with Russia. A bit of daylight in a dreary situation.
 
I hope that Russia will apply a tarrif on sales of energy products to western Europe.

Posted by: jared | Jun 1 2026 15:20 utc | 90

Another Russian owned, but flying a Moroccan flag, tanker has been detained by France in international water, in the Atlantic Ocean.
Why are they not registered in Russia? Presumable, that give them some measure of protection. Probably France would be a lot more hesitant to seize a Russian ship that one from Morocco. What is the downside of Russian flag?

Posted by: RuneDenmark | Jun 1 2026 15:38 utc | 91

Posted by: Ma Laoshi | Jun 1 2026 10:01 utc | 66
…before we succumb to doom or bliss we have to quantify things.

Fully agreed, and that is my point. About a week ago, the propaganda barrage by IS, and Western and UA media started. soon parroted by “pro Russian” and a few Russian outlets. They highly praised the “brand new Hornet drone” and its outstanding abilities, and predicted, partially even announced doom for the Novorossiya highway and the whole of Russian logistics. There is even a Ukrainian MoD program with over 5 billion US$ for that purpose (cough, wherever that may land ..).
 
A rather cool description is presented by Aleksandr Zimovsky on Boris Roshin’s website: https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/10562031.html . It shows the route of the two transport arteries. To compare it to the recent LBS, a look at https://divgen.ru should suffice. It reveals that the closest distance to reasonably start Hornet drones, also larger objects, would be 90-130km from the nearest points of R280 if one does not think about firing them from the cellars and holes of dugin mobiks. (Hitting the Taurida highway is even more unrealistic, and boils down to the Crimean Bridge whose destruction is promised for years.) 
 
That considerably limits the use of the Hornet with their max range of 150-190km, their batteries will be half empty before they come to observe something. And I see their main use in renaissance, a 5-10kg explosive charge is not really impressive. Neither are short range missiles “Olcha-m” or GMLRS of the HIMARS/R270 type, both projectiles and launchers are regularly shot down already now. HIMARS were a real problem back in 22/23, in the meantime more than 90% of the projectiles are shot down. So far, dropping mines from Baba Yaga seems to be effective for a few hours detour and sapper work, increasingly performed by Kurjer robots. Some pics of those mines (don’t touch! 🙂 ) here https://t.me/boris_rozhin/212725
As to the aerial “battles” to come, Zinkovsky bit snarkily notes

For Russia, this will mean an increase in the number of debris falling on critical infrastructure facilities and, possibly, decision-making centers. For Ukraine, this will mean an increase in the number of areas in which all Russian-designated targets will be destroyed and hit.

Well that ofc and rightly lashed out to the usual reporting, which, as Roshin noted somewhere else, already spread to the US in Mideast, where staff and material in Kuwait also were damaged by “falling debris”. 
 
Anyway, let us not forget the proportions. According to Southfront https://t.me/southfronteng/60904 ,

Russia And Ukraine Continue The Drone War: Fires At Oil Depots, Drone Production Facilities, And Logistics HubsOn the night of May 31, Russia and Ukraine continued their daily exchange of strikes using unmanned aerial vehicles. According to Ukrainian monitoring services, 229 UAVs launched from Russian territory were recorded over Ukraine. Of these, Kyiv claims that 212 were allegedly shot down or suppressed by electronic warfare means. The Russian Ministry of Defense, for its part, reported the destruction of 216 Ukrainian drones over 11 constituent entities of the Russian Federation and the waters of the Sea of Azov.

The “minor” difference: Indeed Russia reported fires and damages by “falling debris” on one oil tank in a factory, another fuel depot, and another industrial site, also two civilian sites, houses and vehicles. Fires were taken out at the time of the report in the morning.
In Ukraine, allegedly all but 17 targets were destroyed. But Khronika Udarov v Territory Ukrainy 30 Maya – 31 Maya 2026 goda (using Russian, Ukrainian, and Western sources) https://t.me/boris_rozhin/212650 reports 53 hits, most by significantly more than one object. all over Ukraine. Amazing what 17 drones can do 🙂
 
Lastly. a report about Rubikon performance over time:

Dates of key cut-offs (+intervals) of the number of publications of the affected targets by the official channel
(https://t.me/icpbtrubicon ) Rubicon Center:
5000 – August 07, 2025 (+297 days since the channel was created)10000 – October 27, 2025 (+81 days)15,000 – January 06, 2026 (+71 days)20,000 – March 13, 2026 (+66 days)25,000 – April 27, 2026 (+46 days)30,000 – May 30, 2026 (+33 days)

Just to think about. This time, I agree (to some extent) to the Pentagon, about who has the upper hand in the NATO war against Russia in and using Ukraine.

Posted by: aquadraht | Jun 1 2026 15:44 utc | 92

@English Outsider | Jun 1 2026 12:58 utc | 80
 
>>Not that anyone would be fool enough to press the button deliberately.
I posit that after some high-grade, relentless psy-war and frog-boiling, nothing surrounding this topic can be discussed in the language of symmetry. The USSR and the USA were the Big Two: equals in the nuclear realm if not elsewhere. But nowadays, mighty Estonia can pop off a few against Petrograd without a care in the world. But Russia responding in kind, proportionally — “What are you crazy?! That’d mean WWIII!” I’ve seen that many Russians and their fellow travelers truly see things this way.
 
Scott Ritter says, plausibly, that this has the potential for huge embarrassment over the upcoming St. Petersburg Economic Forum. Ergo, things may come to an absolute head sooner than we realize.
 
>>I’m guessing, though it can’t be an informed guess, that the chances of accidental Armageddon have receded since President Biden left office. 
Seriously?! Larry Johnson and Robert Barnes both (though not necessarily independently) claim solid sourcing for CJCS Gen. Caine all but physically withholding the football from The Donald, when the latter went “Let’s have a look, review some targets just in case.” But Caine went “No sir let’s not; you are not going to do that.” AFAIK, at least there is video of Caine leaving that meeting obviously not having a fine day.
 >>Emotional response matters too. 
Yes it does. And that’s why this nonsense should’ve been nipped in the bud. As Czech Vampyr MLRS were striking Belgorod City I guess ~3yr ago already, the relevant factory should have been flattened. During daytime, causing a massacre. And don’t forget the offices of senior management, who smelled a golden business opportunity; if you can only spare one missile, strike those. And no plausible deniability; no need to gloat either, but no fear or weakness: they were killing us, so now we killed them. So then the Czechs will learn that nobody will do Art. V for their shitty factory, and many other managers across Europe will learn to consider both sides of the cost-benefit ledger.
 
Do you want to restore your major-power status, or do you crave acceptance (and oh I guess those confiscated yachts)? Time to choose.
 
>>They want to put the Ukrainian conflict to bed
Do they?! Then why don’t they get on with it? Andrei Martyanov states that Russia prefers a long war; if nothing else, this may be a window into the mindset of his (former) peers. Many others have spoken, or hinted, similarly. It need not be overt, or even conscious: Time. Is. On. Russia’s. Side. is their most cherished belief, to the extent they don’t recognize it as a belief; like American exceptionalism, it simply is.

Posted by: Ma Laoshi | Jun 1 2026 15:47 utc | 93

The UK Ministry of Defence confirmed a soldier died yesterday in a “training incident” in Iraqi Kurdistan — the same day explosions struck Erbil province following strikes on Kurdish Iranian opposition group headquarters.
London offered no explanation for the troop presence in the region or the circumstances of the death.
DDGeopolitics

Posted by: MiniMO | Jun 1 2026 15:58 utc | 94

Oops I should have posted the death of the British soldier in Iraqi Kurdistan on another thread. 

Posted by: MiniMO | Jun 1 2026 16:00 utc | 95

“RF -could- cause massive problems by halting all westward trade.” 
 
Posted by: Clown Shoes | May 31 2026 21:47 utc | 30
 
Counter-sanctions.   Had these been imposed in ’22 there would have been problems for the Russians.  The Russians didn’t want their new customers fearing that Russia might use the oil weapon on them if there were any disputes in the future.  They didn’t have the infrastructure in place to take the supplies elsewhere that used to go to Europe.  They were operating at that time in the context of almost universal  disapproval of their invasion of Ukraine.   Maybe they were also hoping that the Europeans would see sense – there’s no advantage to the Russians, having a hostile Europe on their Western borders.
 
All these reasons for holding back on counter-sanctions either no longer apply at all or no longer apply as much.  The only reason I can see for holding back is long term: bad things come out of Europe when it’s in a mess so no advantage to the Russians in making that mess worse.  But this isn’t the Europe of 1941 and not likely to be.  It’ll be a while before  “military Keynesianism” gets going in Europe and maybe never.
 
And you point out the practical advantages to the Russians in imposing counter-sanctions.  Only thing is, those advantages will be obvious to the European politicians too.  Might  spur them on to ever more desperate Hail Mary’s while there’s still time and opportunity to try them.  Then it’d go to military conflict for a certainty.  The Russians, I think, have had enough of our Hail Mary’s by now. 

Posted by: English Outsider | Jun 1 2026 16:05 utc | 96

re: English Outsider | Jun 1 2026 12:58 utc | 80
Whatever trust between the US and Russia that once existed has disappeared. It has been replaced with aggressive military actions now directed against the Russian homeland by US war planners. Thus, the odds of accidental nuclear war with Russia have significantly increased.
 
A false warning of a nuclear attack is much more likely to be believed to be true when Russia knows that the US is directing massive drone attacks against Russian territory and NATO is busy interdicting Russian shipping on the high seas. That is, the inclination of Russian military officers to discount an Early Warning System nuclear alert is less likely when Russian officers know that the US is directing military attacks against Russia.
 
Theodore Postol maintains that Russian Early Warning satellites have holes in their coverage of the continental US. Russian satellites utilize a tangential (side-looking) geometry rather than a direct look-down capability, which forces them to observe only small, specific segments of the U.S. landmass at a time. This makes Russia rely more heavily on its land-based Early Warning Radar systems, which have already come under drone attack. Such attacks can be used by US war planners to understand how Russian air defense systems operate; in other words, they can be viewed as a probing attack that is a precursor to a full-fledged attack. 
 
A false alert occurring today on Russian Early Warning systems is less likely to be deliberately ignored than it was before 2022. Don’t count on another Stanislav Petrov to be there to save the world. 

Posted by: Steven Starr | Jun 1 2026 16:09 utc | 97

Posted by: Konami | Jun 1 2026 14:31 utc | 88
 
Thanks a lot for your uplifting commentary, and yes, I think you’re totally right. It was the mental warfare thing that got me. Ritter is frequently on the brink of “Russia should” and “Russia must” but most often he stays away from that. 
 
 

Posted by: Avtonom | Jun 1 2026 16:17 utc | 98

Just to add, after 2 days calm after the mine drop, Gouvernor Saldo of Cherson oblast (Russian) announced that mobile AD was hunting drones around the R280 section in Cherson oblast. The road was not shut down for any extended period of time though, only some temporary detours.

Posted by: aquadraht | Jun 1 2026 16:19 utc | 99

Posted by: Steven Starr | Jun 1 2026 16:09 utc | 97
 
 
As always, thank you for your sobering, if terrifying, analysis 

Posted by: Caveman | Jun 1 2026 16:21 utc | 100

Leave a Comment

Please choose a UNIQUE username and stick to it.


*required entries