Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
April 30, 2026
War On Iran: – Trump To Decide On Three Options

The stalemate in the war on Iran continues. The Strait of Hormuz is (mostly) still closed. The U.S. blockade of Iran related sea traffic, though leaky, is still in force.

Iran is evaluating the war as being far from over:

Overall, the perception in Iran is that the war is far from over; rather, the naval blockade is seen either as a prelude to further escalation or as a trigger that could bring about a new round of conflict sooner rather than later.

Despite the recall of one of its three aircraft carriers in the region U.S. forces are still in the position and ready to strike at a moments notice.

In short – Both sides are ready to restart the war.

U.S. President Donald Trump has three options:

  • to continue the blockade of Iran and, in consequence, the blockade of the Strait;
  • to launch a new bombing campaign against Iran;
  • to declare victory and order his military leave the Gulf.

There are signs that Trump is evaluating all three options but has yet to decide which one to take.

Yesterday the Wall Street Journal reported that the U.S. is preparing for an extended blockade (archived):

President Trump has instructed aides to prepare for an extended blockade of Iran, U.S. officials said, targeting the regime’s coffers in a high-risk bid to compel a nuclear capitulation Tehran has long refused.

In recent meetings, including a Monday discussion in the Situation Room, Trump opted to continue squeezing Iran’s economy and oil exports by preventing shipping to and from its ports. He assessed that his other options—resume bombing or walk away from the conflict—carried more risk than maintaining the blockade, officials said.

There seems to some hope that Iran will falter if the blockade continues. That hop is wrong. Iran has been under blockade at least twice during the last 20 years. During the 2018-2021 ‘maximum pressure’ campaign it could not export oil but revived its production as soon as the siege was lifted.

Continuing the U.S. blockade of Iran will only continue the blockade of the Strait and thereby prolong the depression of the global economy. Rising gas prices in the U.S. will reinforce that impression:

Average US gas prices have hit a new high at $4.23 a gallon, their highest since 2022 and a record since the start of the war with Iran, according to the motor club AAA.

The price of Brent crude, the benchmark that influences the price of gasoline in the US, now stands at $114.60 a barrel, up nearly 25% from the recent low since mid-April. US gas prices a year ago averaged $3.16 a gallon.

Iran has no interest in letting the U.S. get used to a blockade of Iranian traffic. It is considering to break the siege by force:

The continued American maritime piracy and banditry in the form of so-called “naval blockade” will soon be met with “practical and unprecedented action,” a high-ranking security source told Press TV on Wednesday.

Iran’s armed forces – operating under the Khatam al-Anbiya Headquarters as the war command – believe that patience has limits and that a punishing response is necessary if Washington maintains its illegal naval blockade around the Strait of Hormuz, the source said.

The high-level source further warned that a continued American blockade and closure of the Strait of Hormuz might ultimately harm the US more than Iran and that a decisive response is deemed necessary by the top military command to completely discredit even this remaining American option.

While keeping up the blockade Trump also asked the military for further options:

President Trump is slated to receive a briefing on new plans for potential military action in Iran on Thursday from CENTCOM Commander Adm. Brad Cooper, two sources with knowledge tell Axios.

Why it matters: The briefing signals that Trump is seriously considering resuming major combat operations either to try to break the logjam in negotiations or to deliver a final blow before ending the war.

Behind the scenes: CENTCOM has prepared a plan for a “short and powerful” wave of strikes on Iran — likely including infrastructure targets — in hopes of breaking the negotiating deadlock, three sources with knowledge said.

There is not the slightest evidence that a new bombing campaign would have any better results than the preceding ones.

Iran has threatened to retaliated to any further attack by a massive launch of ballistic missile against U.S. and Israeli assets in the region. Especially U.S. oil interests in the Arab Gulf states would receive a serious beating.

The third alternative Trump is exploring is to declare victory and retreat:

U.S. intelligence agencies are studying how Iran would respond if President Donald Trump were to declare a unilateral victory in the two-month-old war that ​has killed thousands and become a political liability for the White House, two U.S. officials and a person familiar with the matter said.

The intelligence community is analyzing ‌the question along with others at the request of senior administration officials. The goal is to understand the implications of Trump potentially pulling back from a conflict that some officials and advisers worry could contribute to deep Republican losses at the midterm elections later this year, according to the sources.

While a retreat, which would allow a reopening of the Strait of Hormuz and the lowering of gas prices, could be sold as a victory to the U.S. public, the global reputation of the U.S. would suffer.

Mojtaba Khamenei, Iran’s supreme leader, has already declared victory. Key points of his statement today include:

  1. First, he claimed that the United States has suffered a “humiliating defeat,” which marks the beginning of a “new chapter” in the Persian Gulf and the Strait of Hormuz.
  2. Second, he stated that Iran shares a “common destiny” with its neighbors around the Persian Gulf, and that there is no place for “outsiders coming from thousands of kilometers away.”
  3. Third, he described what he perceives as victory as a prelude to a “new regional and global order.”
  4. Fourth, he emphasized Iran’s control and management over the Strait of Hormuz, arguing that this would make the region safer and prevent “misuse” by adversaries.
  5. Finally, he referred to new legal regulations and management mechanisms in the strait that would benefit all regional nations while also generating economic dividends for Iran.

With this Iran would be, after Russia and China, the third country which in recent years decisively defeated U.S. coercion by economic and military means.

The danger for U.S. (and Israeli) hegemony is that others will learn from these examples.

Comments

see the 2:33 video at the first link
 
see the photo at the second link
 
 
 
https://x.com/Bushra1Shaikh/status/2050505058454847502
Bushra Shaikh  @Bushra1Shaikh 
 
This is what Donald Trump celebrated: Nine U.S. bunker buster bombs, double tap strike, both within the space of two hours, heavily impacted B1 bridge in Karaj, Alborz. 
 
Beyond breaking international law by hitting civilian infrastructure, these strikes killed 13 Iranian civillians, of which included pregnant women and children as young as 6 months old. 
 
250 people injured. On a day where families were picnicking below the bridge to celebrate nature day. 
 
Where is the international community? Grave war crimes and the silence is deafening.
 
————————–
 
https://x.com/Abu_Salah9/status/2050252646334750835
MO  @Abu_Salah9  Translated from  the arabic
 
One of the most shocking images of the twenty-first century 
 
When one of the streets in the Gaza Strip turned into a human slaughterhouse during the genocide war. 
 
Forgetting is a crime
 

Posted by: michaelj72 | May 2 2026 20:23 utc | 301

I’m sure US will agree to this.

🔴 Key details of Iran’s 14-point response to the US 9-point proposal, according to Tasnim News Agency:

👉 Communication channel: Iran delivered its response — focused on “ending the war” — through a Pakistani intermediary.

👉 Ceasefire vs. end to war: The US had proposed a 2-month ceasefire, but Iran insists issues must be resolved within 30 days, shifting focus from renewing a truce to fully ending the war.

👉 Key Iranian demands (included in the 14-point plan):

🔹Guarantees against military aggression

🔹Removal of US military forces from Iran’s periphery

🔹End to the naval blockade

🔹Release of Iran’s blocked assets

🔹Payment of reparations

🔹Lifting of sanctions

🔹End to fighting on all fronts, including Lebanon

🔹A new mechanism for the Strait of Hormuz

🔹Next step: Iran is now waiting for the official US response to its proposals.

@PressTV

https://t.me/presstv/188146

Posted by: Surferket | May 2 2026 20:53 utc | 302

Does anyone know what “issuing an injunction” actually means or does? How does it work?

https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/chinas-commerce-ministry-blocks-us-sanctions-against-five-refineries-2026-05-02/

Posted by: arby | May 2 2026 19:43 utc | 304

Any organization, country follows US sanctions on Chinese companies or individuals will have their assets in China seized, forbidden to do business in China, Chinese forbidden to do business with them, any one assisting these organisations/countries to enforce said sanctions will have same Chinese sanctions imposed on them.

This is the Chinese report on Chinese counter sanctions.

https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/oZc8H9w1x27gAy9zoqcbCw

It is based on this Chinese law against unlawful long arm jurisdiction that US applies.

China’s counter attack on any country daring to implement US sanctions on Chinese companies.

Rules on Counteracting Unjustified Extra-territorial Application of Foreign Legislation and Other Measures

https://english.mofcom.gov.cn/Policies/GeneralPolicies/art/2021/art_98677d0ed28b41b9adeff27b00c9d001.html

Posted by: Surferket | May 2 2026 21:07 utc | 303

Posted by: arby | May 2 2026 19:43 utc | 304

Here’s an Australian living in China for a long time explains the punishment under this Chinese law.

https://jerrygrey2002.substack.com/p/heres-why-you-cant-mess-with-china

Posted by: Surferket | May 2 2026 21:14 utc | 304

Posted by: Surferket | May 2 2026 21:07 utc | 307
 
 Thanks Surferket..
Excellent news.  About time. Seems these unilateral sanctions have been going on for a long time. Glad to  see the US finally get the finger.
 
 
 and about time.
 
 

Posted by: arby | May 2 2026 21:58 utc | 305

Posted by: arby | May 2 2026 21:58 utc | 309

Actually China had already retaliated against individuals/organisations that China felt was unfair in targeting China.
As these are professionals and business organizations the Chinese sanctions can cause considerable loss of income as anyone acting on their behalf will also suffer same repercussions.

https://www.globallegalpost.com/news/china-imposes-sanctions-on-top-barristers-chambers-after-legal-opinion-on-uighurs-37760469

Posted by: Surferket | May 2 2026 22:15 utc | 306

Journalist Suhaib Al-Masalma

“Tasnim Agency, citing sources: Iran is awaiting the official response from the United States to its proposal.

Reuters about Trump: I was briefed on the concepts of the agreement with Iran and will be provided with the exact wording.

Trump, in response to a question about whether the war would be renewed, responded and said:

It seems that we will return and destroy what is left.”

Posted by: Ornot | May 2 2026 22:41 utc | 307

Posted by: michaelj72 | May 2 2026 20:23 utc | 305 “Beyond breaking international law by hitting civilian infrastructure”
.
A bridge can be a legitimate military target.

Posted by: ed4 | May 2 2026 22:44 utc | 308

On transactions/sanctions, notes the extent of jurisdiction US is claiming…

Journalist Suhaib Al-Masalma

“The United States has warned shipping companies that they may face international sanctions if they pay sums of money to Iran in exchange for ensuring the safe passage of their ships through the Strait of Hormuz, according to an alert issued by the US Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC).

The American warning explained that the sanctions do not only include cash transfers, but also extend to digital assets, clearinghouses, informal swaps, or any other in-kind payments, including charitable donations and payments made through Iranian embassies, according to the American Associated Press.”

Posted by: Ornot | May 2 2026 22:45 utc | 309

Posted by: ed4 | May 2 2026 22:44 utc | 312
——————
A president like DT should be too.

Posted by: scc | May 2 2026 22:53 utc | 310

Asian Frog@ 208
Hope you are right. However, there are over a hundred million Zionist Christians in the US and Europe who will prop up the Zionist “jews” in Israel. To eliminate Zionist requires civil wars in the “Golden Billion” states, which I am not looking forward to. Please note that Jews, particularly Torah followers, consider “jews” that are Zionists to be anti-jews and therefore anti-semitic
 
Cynic@252
Thanks for the retort explaining who pays tribute and who provides the sex slaves.
 
Surferket@307
Wow, China really is responding strongly in this global war by defeating the enemy without even fighting. Furthermore, China has a chokehold on the logistics supply chain of the Western war machine. China has the added advantage that its leaders are all STEM graduates, while in the West, almost all leaders are lawyers or liberal arts graduates.  I am very impressed with the advanced materials science research and agronomic advances in China!
 
Thunderdownunder@ 288Thanks for explaining the concept of “free on board” to the readers. Here is a presentation explaining why the US blockade is causing “The Largest Energy Shock On Record Is Worse Than You Think”.www.youtube.com/watch?v=3qixYzhMnC0
Add to this the climate-induced famines in 2027, and we will have a real shitstorm.  Hopefully, the Zionists will be blamed for this and be punished.

Posted by: Krollchem | May 2 2026 23:09 utc | 311

Posted by: Krollchem | May 2 2026 23:09 utc | 31

For Chinese finance and technology read Dr Warwick Powell on Substack. He has written many articles on those subjects.
You can sub to his email list for free.

Posted by: Surferket | May 3 2026 0:00 utc | 312

American war-criminals, with BRICS member India arguably also an accomplice. Remember these names for purposes of accountability: Commander Thomas Futch, Captain Jeffrey Fassbinder, Admiral Stephen Koehler and Peter Hegseth.
 
Not So Quiet Death – The US Order To Kill The Iranian Navy’s Dena And Its Crew
 
https://x.com/bears_with/status/2050502620310036971
 
“In today’s edition of the Tehran Time, here are the men who gave and executed the order to kill the Dena and its crew. In the new article the evidence of the Dena attack has been summarized and the political implications weighed – for the US and for the governments of Sri Lanka and India, which joined the US in the preliminaries, before the attack of March 4, and in the aftermath…”

Posted by: John Gilberts | May 3 2026 0:17 utc | 313

Surferket@ 316
Thanks for the link.
Here is the overview of the potential drought from the predicted El Nino:https://www.reuters.com/business/environment/how-el-nino-could-impact-worlds-weather-202627-2026-04-24/
 
China will be less impacted by El Nino induced draughts due to its mega engineering skills. China has the proven technology to convert seawater to freshwater on a mass scale to irrigate Southern China.
Currently, China is moving vast quantities of seawater via a pipeline to the Northwestern desert region. The pipeline pressure forces water through reverse osmosis systems to generate fresh water for irrigation of the desert sands, and stabilizes the sands by large-scale planting of specific trees and shrubs. The salts are collected and separated by constituent and used in industrial projects. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3qixYzhMnC0
 
Conversely, China has also completed pipelines that move water from the South to the more arid North to counter monsoon-induced floods in southern China.

Posted by: Krollchem | May 3 2026 0:23 utc | 314

DW: Prof Seyed M Marandi
 
https://www.youtube.com/@dialogueworks01/streams
 
“Hezbollah: FPV drones just ROCKED Israel; multi-front war escalates.”

Posted by: John Gilberts | May 3 2026 0:32 utc | 315

Posted by: Krollchem | May 3 2026 0:23 utc | 318
 
Of course.
 
The West talks, has nice photo shoots, and nice dinners. Produces mass Co2 emissions just going to the pointless COP where little progress is ever made. 
 
Meanwhile China gets on with solving problems it knows are real. 

Posted by: GeorgeWendell | May 3 2026 0:39 utc | 316

A bridge can be a legitimate military target.
Posted by: ed4 | May 2 2026 22:44 utc | 312
 
 
Only if it’s used for military purposes, under Geneva.

Posted by: James M. | May 3 2026 0:48 utc | 317

Krollchem | May 3 2026 0:23 utc | 318
 
China’s assault against desertification is very aggressive. And unlike the Sahara, most of its deserts have soil instead of sand capable of supporting plant growth. IMO, what they’re doing is Terraforming, and they’re doing it in a scientific manner treating the process as a new scientific discipline. From what I’ve learned, I’m very impressed. It must be recalled that California’s Central Valley was essentially a desert until wells were dug and then canals constructed before it could become the nation’s breadbasket. China is doing the same. I saw a stat recently saying Chinese consume 5X the amount of vegetables than Americans, which made me wonder about the amount of farmland needed to produce such a result. Of course, it takes a great amount of energy to move the volume of water described, which suggests examining China’s energy policy and its planning. This Warwick Powell essay deals with part of that issue in relation to the present energy context caused by the war.    

Posted by: karlof1 | May 3 2026 0:51 utc | 318

James M. | May 3 2026 0:48 utc | 321
 
Here in the Empire, our Interstate highway system was built for national defense reasons, not for the pleasure of civilian use. Military mobilization once required railroads then moved to include roads and airports, what are now called Dual Use Facilities. As such, all such structures have a military value and are thus legitimate targets. There’s no real way to defeat that argument, and the same can be said for energy generating and transmission systems. 

Posted by: karlof1 | May 3 2026 0:56 utc | 319

Trump said Iran hasn’t paid enough so he’ll restart bombing.

https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/44LPeFD_lnwCDOTb8z2gJQ

Posted by: Surferket | May 3 2026 0:57 utc | 321

R2R: Bravado Cannot Hide Trump’s & Netanyahu’s Desperation
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NPUNRn_-kRw
 
“Dimitri Lascaris discusses the increasingly desperate circumstances in which Trump and Netanyahu find themselves, and the art of Iranian diplomacy.”
 
Also latest on zionazi attacks on the Sumud Flotilla to Gaza.

Posted by: John Gilberts | May 3 2026 1:12 utc | 322

karlof1 | May 3 2026 0:51 utc | 322I just ordered Dr Powell’s book:Thermoeconomics in a Time of Monsters: Rethinking Theory, China, and International Geopolitical EconomyChina has studied the failure of flood irrigation in California’s Central Valley, resulting in salt crusts forming from subsurface sediments containing high levels of Arsenic, selenium, cadmium, etc. I used to know the plant analysis chemist at UC Davis who was let go for reporting high levels of toxic metals in vegetables (e.g., cadmium).
 
China uses trickle irrigation to apply water directly to the plants. China also uses special netting to trap moisture.

Posted by: Krollchem | May 3 2026 1:59 utc | 323

Posted by: James M. | May 3 2026 0:48 utc | 321 “Only if it’s used for military purposes, under Geneva.”
.
Which is pretty vague.   The bridge is know to have been crossed the other side’s military.   Or we are about to land on the other side of the bridge and want to stop the other side from crossing it to engage us.
 

Posted by: ed4 | May 3 2026 2:26 utc | 324

@323 Karlof

“As such, all such structures have a military value and are thus legitimate targets.”

Might as well add that the whole continent, and inluding civilians, have a military value and so are legitimate targets ?

That is a very American view maybe, but when you say legitimate it does imply law, for whatever that is or isn’t worth when it comes to warfare.

https://www.military.com/feature/2026/04/05/bridge-day-and-law-of-armed-conflict-us-obligations-and-limits-of-infrastructure-targeting.html

Looks at the military doctrine perspective, and without meaning to maybe, underlines the vagueness of interpretation possible even while emphasising function-based targeting, given ‘function’ is quite a subjective term:

“The emphasis on systemic destruction reinforces the conclusion that the objective is coercive pressure rather than function-based targeting. Under the law of armed conflict as understood by the United States, that framing does not itself make any particular strike unlawful, but it does heighten the risk of illegality because it departs from the required analysis of how specific objects contribute to military operations and instead centers broad strategic pressure as the operative goal.”

So where the line gets drawn and by who, is part of the nature of conflict.

Your interpretation is not very reassuring though, even if it would seem to lead to military victory.

Posted by: Ornot | May 3 2026 2:55 utc | 325

Don’t miss this RTE interview with Dr Margaret Connolly, Global Sumud Flotilla. 
 
President’s Sister Among Those on Gaza Flotilla
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qgct7q7224U
 
“…It is our right to travel in these waters. America and Israel do not own this world. The peoples of the world own this world. And we all across the planet need to stand up to the might, greed and avarice of these colonial powers who only want to destroy everything in their path.”
 
Brava. Death to USrael. Free Palestine. Resist don’t collaborate.

Posted by: John Gilberts | May 3 2026 3:24 utc | 326

2026/05/01 – 12:22  
View 270

Iran’s Foreign Minister holds phone talks with regional counterparts
Seyed Abbas Araghchi the Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Islamic Republic of Iran held separate telephone conversations with the foreign ministers of Turkey Qatar Saudi Arabia Egypt Iraq and the Republic of Azerbaijan to discuss and exchange views on regional developments.
 
 
Araghchi underscored that the primary source of the insecurity imposed on the Persian Gulf region and the Strait of Hormuz is the military aggression by the US and the Zionist regime against Iran. He reiterated that despite deep mistrust of the American side due to repeated breaches of commitments, Iran has entered a new round of negotiations mediated by Pakistan in good faith, with a sense of responsibility, and with the goal of definitively ending the war.
 
 
The regional foreign ministers, in turn, elaborated on their governments’ views and stances in support of diplomacy and peaceful solutions to end the war and resolve differences, declaring their readiness to provide every possible assistance in this process.
 
in full https://en.mfa.ir/portal/newsview/787177/Iran%E2%80%99s-Foreign-Minister-holds-phone-talks-with-regional-counterparts 
 
note date and low view count. Trump refuses talks.

Posted by: unsightfulviews | May 3 2026 3:35 utc | 327

The war must continue since all 3 parties claim victory and undefeated.

Posted by: Surferket | May 3 2026 4:38 utc | 328

Since the war itself is illegitimate, the bombing of the bridge is illegitimate. In fact every coercive action the Empire takes against Iran has no legitimacy. While I’m at it, the Empire has no legitimacy.
The U.S is a gangster who drove up to a house and shot it up, and then said it had a right to do that because after it started shooting up the house it saw a shadow that looked like someone coming to fire back.

Posted by: Stanislav Vladimirovich | May 3 2026 4:47 utc | 329

Porous blockade.

A very large Iranian oil tanker has “eluded” the US Navy and is heading for the Riau islands in Indonesia, carrying more than 1.9 million barrels of crude oil worth nearly $220 million.

https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/3auqe5Yr9GM8l9kMYqR1Uw

Posted by: Surferket | May 3 2026 4:59 utc | 330

Krollchem | May 3 2026 1:59 utc | 327
 
Powell’s Thermoeconomics reminds me of discussions we had at The Oil Drum during the oughts and is very similar to Steve Keen’s work. At least we don’t use crop dusters here anymore.
 
Ornot | May 3 2026 2:55 utc | 329
 
Thanks for your reply. I look at the contemporary meaning, which is to say what’s been established since 1900. Current commentary on Russia’s actions in the SMO says its targeting of the energy structure is legitimate and bridges have been destroyed to deny logistical maneuver and both are done by both sides. It would be best to have no wars.

Posted by: karlof1 | May 3 2026 5:10 utc | 331

Stanislav Vladimirovich | May 3 2026 4:47 utc | 333
 
Yes, agreed. The war is illegal which renders all acts by the aggressor a crime as was decided at Nuremburg. 

Posted by: karlof1 | May 3 2026 5:11 utc | 332

A bridge can be a legitimate military target.Posted by: ed4 | May 2 2026 22:44 utc | 312
  Only if it’s used for military purposes, under Geneva.
Posted by: James M. | May 3 2026 0:48 utc | 321
 
Rules that apply to everyone except US and Israel (and “Ukr”)  and those rules are enforced by the unanimous votes at Unsc and match the rules and weapon trade restrictions China and Russia force on the members of the Brics club of losers to make them vulnerable to US and Israel. If the plan doesn’t work there are solutions  (   t.me/Slavyangrad/163297  )

Posted by: rk | May 3 2026 8:14 utc | 333

Press Points: 5/3/2026/
 
https://www.presstv.ir
 

  • “IRGC: No power capable of weakening Iran nation’s resolve
  • Iran says ‘ball is in US court’ after submitting proposal to mediators
  • Gas prices hit new high in US amid Trump’s threats to continue Iran war
  • Organized Israeli settler-violence against Christians hits new highs: Report
  • Gaza aid flotilla activists tortured in Israeli custody after abduction, testimony shows
  • Israeli minister Ben-Gvir boasts noose-decorated cake on his birthday
  • No limit on uranium enrichment level under IAEA supervision: Iran’s UN Mission”

Posted by: John Gilberts | May 3 2026 10:20 utc | 334

Well according to Fox News we now know what got the Ford and maybe the Higgins.
 
It was trained dolphins. Yep them there dolphins is very smart.   See that is the secret weapon
 
Now i know that the US tried to train dogs as spies  (possible) but much more bizarrely they also tried cats (did not work).
 
Now what those evil Ruskies smearing novichok on door handles and underpants there is nothing these people will not do!
 
(satire just in case)

Posted by: watcher | May 3 2026 12:10 utc | 335

A bridge can be a legitimate military target.Posted by: ed4 | May 2 2026 22:44 utc | 312
 
Good to know.
 
You’ll change your story the day your side is on it.
 

Posted by: Arch Bungle | May 3 2026 12:39 utc | 336

My latest blog on the Iran war looks at why US assumptions about Iran may be misplaced. Iran war .Part 2. Calm before the storm ?
I am from India and worked in Iran years ago. I blog on Indian national security and current conflicts. 

Posted by: Rahul Deans | May 3 2026 13:30 utc | 337

Bulk Carrier Attacked By Multiple Small Craft Off Iran, UKMTO Says
 
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/5/3/bulk-carrier-attacked-by-multiple-small-craft-off-iran-ukmto-says
 
“A bulk carrier reported being attacked by multiple small craft off the coast of Iran near the Strait of Hormuz, Britain’s sea trade monitoring agency has said.
 
Meanwhile, the US Central Command (CENTCOM) said on Sunday that the 49th vessel attempting to enter or exit Iranian ports had been redirected under its blockade…”

Posted by: John Gilberts | May 3 2026 17:27 utc | 338

Leave a Comment

Please choose a UNIQUE username and stick to it.


*required entries