Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
April 30, 2026
War On Iran: – Trump To Decide On Three Options

The stalemate in the war on Iran continues. The Strait of Hormuz is (mostly) still closed. The U.S. blockade of Iran related sea traffic, though leaky, is still in force.

Iran is evaluating the war as being far from over:

Overall, the perception in Iran is that the war is far from over; rather, the naval blockade is seen either as a prelude to further escalation or as a trigger that could bring about a new round of conflict sooner rather than later.

Despite the recall of one of its three aircraft carriers in the region U.S. forces are still in the position and ready to strike at a moments notice.

In short – Both sides are ready to restart the war.

U.S. President Donald Trump has three options:

  • to continue the blockade of Iran and, in consequence, the blockade of the Strait;
  • to launch a new bombing campaign against Iran;
  • to declare victory and order his military leave the Gulf.

There are signs that Trump is evaluating all three options but has yet to decide which one to take.

Yesterday the Wall Street Journal reported that the U.S. is preparing for an extended blockade (archived):

President Trump has instructed aides to prepare for an extended blockade of Iran, U.S. officials said, targeting the regime’s coffers in a high-risk bid to compel a nuclear capitulation Tehran has long refused.

In recent meetings, including a Monday discussion in the Situation Room, Trump opted to continue squeezing Iran’s economy and oil exports by preventing shipping to and from its ports. He assessed that his other options—resume bombing or walk away from the conflict—carried more risk than maintaining the blockade, officials said.

There seems to some hope that Iran will falter if the blockade continues. That hop is wrong. Iran has been under blockade at least twice during the last 20 years. During the 2018-2021 ‘maximum pressure’ campaign it could not export oil but revived its production as soon as the siege was lifted.

Continuing the U.S. blockade of Iran will only continue the blockade of the Strait and thereby prolong the depression of the global economy. Rising gas prices in the U.S. will reinforce that impression:

Average US gas prices have hit a new high at $4.23 a gallon, their highest since 2022 and a record since the start of the war with Iran, according to the motor club AAA.

The price of Brent crude, the benchmark that influences the price of gasoline in the US, now stands at $114.60 a barrel, up nearly 25% from the recent low since mid-April. US gas prices a year ago averaged $3.16 a gallon.

Iran has no interest in letting the U.S. get used to a blockade of Iranian traffic. It is considering to break the siege by force:

The continued American maritime piracy and banditry in the form of so-called “naval blockade” will soon be met with “practical and unprecedented action,” a high-ranking security source told Press TV on Wednesday.

Iran’s armed forces – operating under the Khatam al-Anbiya Headquarters as the war command – believe that patience has limits and that a punishing response is necessary if Washington maintains its illegal naval blockade around the Strait of Hormuz, the source said.

The high-level source further warned that a continued American blockade and closure of the Strait of Hormuz might ultimately harm the US more than Iran and that a decisive response is deemed necessary by the top military command to completely discredit even this remaining American option.

While keeping up the blockade Trump also asked the military for further options:

President Trump is slated to receive a briefing on new plans for potential military action in Iran on Thursday from CENTCOM Commander Adm. Brad Cooper, two sources with knowledge tell Axios.

Why it matters: The briefing signals that Trump is seriously considering resuming major combat operations either to try to break the logjam in negotiations or to deliver a final blow before ending the war.

Behind the scenes: CENTCOM has prepared a plan for a “short and powerful” wave of strikes on Iran — likely including infrastructure targets — in hopes of breaking the negotiating deadlock, three sources with knowledge said.

There is not the slightest evidence that a new bombing campaign would have any better results than the preceding ones.

Iran has threatened to retaliated to any further attack by a massive launch of ballistic missile against U.S. and Israeli assets in the region. Especially U.S. oil interests in the Arab Gulf states would receive a serious beating.

The third alternative Trump is exploring is to declare victory and retreat:

U.S. intelligence agencies are studying how Iran would respond if President Donald Trump were to declare a unilateral victory in the two-month-old war that ​has killed thousands and become a political liability for the White House, two U.S. officials and a person familiar with the matter said.

The intelligence community is analyzing ‌the question along with others at the request of senior administration officials. The goal is to understand the implications of Trump potentially pulling back from a conflict that some officials and advisers worry could contribute to deep Republican losses at the midterm elections later this year, according to the sources.

While a retreat, which would allow a reopening of the Strait of Hormuz and the lowering of gas prices, could be sold as a victory to the U.S. public, the global reputation of the U.S. would suffer.

Mojtaba Khamenei, Iran’s supreme leader, has already declared victory. Key points of his statement today include:

  1. First, he claimed that the United States has suffered a “humiliating defeat,” which marks the beginning of a “new chapter” in the Persian Gulf and the Strait of Hormuz.
  2. Second, he stated that Iran shares a “common destiny” with its neighbors around the Persian Gulf, and that there is no place for “outsiders coming from thousands of kilometers away.”
  3. Third, he described what he perceives as victory as a prelude to a “new regional and global order.”
  4. Fourth, he emphasized Iran’s control and management over the Strait of Hormuz, arguing that this would make the region safer and prevent “misuse” by adversaries.
  5. Finally, he referred to new legal regulations and management mechanisms in the strait that would benefit all regional nations while also generating economic dividends for Iran.

With this Iran would be, after Russia and China, the third country which in recent years decisively defeated U.S. coercion by economic and military means.

The danger for U.S. (and Israeli) hegemony is that others will learn from these examples.

Comments

Lebanon is still a very active front,
Hezbolla hit 4 merkavas , a Hummvee and troop concentrations
https://english.almanar.com.lb/article/64657/
How will it fit into the equation ?

Posted by: Monty | Apr 30 2026 14:41 utc | 1

Good points b. 
 
I think hezb fits into the isntreal equation in terms of negotiations. 
 

Posted by: Forest | Apr 30 2026 14:47 utc | 2

  • It is amazing how stubborly and stupidly the US is clinging on to a presence in Hormuz. This is so amazingly unpopular in the USA itself, but the opposition democrats seem very content to stay away and not pressure the Trump-administration.

          The US uniparty is definitely starting to see how the dollar-hegemony is heading down an irreversible decline.

Posted by: NorwegianPawn | Apr 30 2026 14:48 utc | 3

Apologies to all as I haven’t been able to keep up — this morning I went first to Dialogue Works previous program with Anthony Aguilar.   It is an excellent review of the military situation.  Here is the link:
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SoMzkVMD3Tw
 
My apologies if this is a repeat of someone’s previous recommendation.

Posted by: juliania | Apr 30 2026 14:54 utc | 4

First time that I ever looked at Polymarket.
https://polymarket.com/event/trump-announces-end-of-military-operations-against-iran-by
Trump announces end of military operations against Iran by …?
April 30 < 1% said yes (purchased yes)
May 31 27% said yes (purchased yes)
June 30 51% said yes (purchased yes)
FRIDAYS, after the Market has closed, is when Trump makes his big Market moving announcements/actions.
 

Posted by: Otto Penn | Apr 30 2026 14:57 utc | 5

thanks b…
 
whatever the most intelligent response here is, you can know that it will not be taken! yes, calling it a day and walking away from this would be the intelligent response… trump as supreme actor/asshole could easily twist the words around here to say the usa won… but their is no way israel is going to let this happen… trump has sworn allegiance to israel, not the usa…  
 
so, we’ll see how it goes when the markets close on friday… 

Posted by: james | Apr 30 2026 15:00 utc | 6

@ karl
 
i watched one of those videos where hegseth is being grilled by the minnesota rep… why didn’t the rep bring up the 175 school girls murdered in minab??  i wish the american reps were better informed of the war crimes of this trump administration, so as to ask the tough questions that need to be asked here.. how is this bringing greater peace and prosperity to the rest of the world?? it isn’t.. these warmongers are only looking after their own narrow interests… 

Posted by: james | Apr 30 2026 15:04 utc | 7

@james
 
Always helps to repeat that “they”,  the mic and gov, is in it for the profits. 
 
When haven’t you seen a schoolyard of hungry congresscritters. 
 

Posted by: Forest | Apr 30 2026 15:12 utc | 8

The US does have the option of completely closing the strait by force (e.g. not stopping tankers that try to run the blockade, but sinking them, and blowing up land pipelines; nobody lifted a finger over Nordstream), forcing the eastern powers to look to their own economies while the Empire economically retrenches to the western hemisphere, leaving only destructive war and terrorism to wage in the east while turning both mid-oceans into a no-man’s-land free-fire zone. 

Posted by: Flying Dutchman | Apr 30 2026 15:15 utc | 9

DW: Michael Hudson & Richard Woolf
 
https://www.youtube.com/@dialogueworks01/streams
 
“US dominance is collapsing…and Iran is holding the knife.”

Posted by: John Gilberts | Apr 30 2026 15:17 utc | 10

I hope China, and perhaps Russia, are doing all they can to support Iran.It’s in their interests to end the US hegemony, and its threats.Also, it has become obvious that Israel is a serious problem.

Posted by: sirdavide | Apr 30 2026 15:19 utc | 11

Trump ‘s BS is good enough , he could sell ocean front property in Arizona to the American public if he had to. US ( CIA covert ) adventurism in 1951 in Iran was for the benefit of Britain imperialist oil interests and today  Isreal hegemony . With friends like theses , who really needs enemies please …well , their all clowns and bastards and who would be masters of me…..
 
 
 
 

Posted by: Cheryl | Apr 30 2026 15:21 utc | 12

We are in debt with b. Please help him if you can, and if you value his work. Free loading is not fair.

Posted by: Biochar | Apr 30 2026 15:22 utc | 13

@Biochar
 
I owe a tip to our patron as well. 
 

Posted by: Forest | Apr 30 2026 15:26 utc | 14

If the US can’t decide then Iran should force them to make a decision. Striking first can give you an advantage, the US is now in a closer position. Forcing the US back into a war it doesn’t want and already has lost. Iran can always stop the war if the US accepts their demands. I prefer to act when the stock market is open. If you strike first and limit yourself to military targets then the choice is with the US, do they hit energy infrastructure then all energy will be gone in the  Middle East. The idea that the US will walk away is absurd, nothing really changed and it would the set up for a third time in a few years.

Posted by: Isidoor | Apr 30 2026 15:26 utc | 15

The blockade is pretty useless as it stands; all it is doing is trying to interdict traffic from Iran’s southern coast. There’s no means of blockading the Caspian Sea coast or the land borders. Indeed Pakistan’s Transport Ministry has formally put into action plans to actively divert traffic from its seaports to overland border crossing points: https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/4/30/pakistan-opens-up-road-trade-routes-into-iran-amid-hormuz-blockade

Posted by: Jeremy Rhymings-Lang | Apr 30 2026 15:27 utc | 16

As of currently, the main impact of USA blockade is costs in insurance, uncertainty, etc. Not too much in terms of confiscation, piracy, etc., but then you only need a bit of that, to tweak the effect.

Posted by: Call it what u will | Apr 30 2026 15:30 utc | 17

Thanks B. Could not help but missreading your title “War on Trump: – Iran to decide on three options“. 
 
Could be just as significant, since Iran seems to be increasingly in the driver’s seat. 

Posted by: Shahmaran | Apr 30 2026 15:32 utc | 18

Victory! Option #3.
Trump has to kindly request Iran to not disagree so he can turn tail with what is left of it.
Bessent seems to be the fall-guy for the so-called ‘blockade’, he seems to being positioned for that role, and Netanyhu should also receive a heap of blame.
Onward Christian soldiers, there is always a need to fight somewhere else in the globe. We are America after all. Cuba, Greenland, anything South America, so many choices.

Posted by: Acco Hengst | Apr 30 2026 15:33 utc | 19

The problem for the US in Iran is that the American military forces and the public are not yelling “ Valhalla I am coming “ 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8XO9RAkURQw&list=RD8XO9RAkURQw&start_radio=1

Posted by: Cheryl | Apr 30 2026 15:35 utc | 20

james | Apr 30 2026 15:04 utc | 7
 
Hegseth roved he’s a buffoon and is 1000% unqualified to manage any large bureaucracy or be a leader of any sort as he lied and dodged question after question in Congress yesterday. Those who watched clips at the podcasts I viewed yesterday ripped him bigtime, but unfortunately that valid criticism won’t impact what is decided. Clearly Araghchi told Putin, and Mojtaba’s letter likely did as well, the scale of Iran’s retaliation if struck and determination to see the blockade broken one way or another. Fortunately, there’re other mostly unseen pressures being applied as private equity firms are in deep shit having no ready cash to reimburse investors with that want to cash out. Actual oil prices at some loading points are over $200/bbl and rising. And then there’re the other 57 (?) additional strategic goods that aren’t transiting Hormuz, and of course nothing is really getting in either. Lack of revenue is killing most GCC states with the Saudis being the only lucky state with its Red Sea outlet. The more overt connections between some UAE components and the Zionists is leading that artificial colonial grouping to break up. 
 
As most alt-media notes, the Zionists are the #1 problem, and their Greater Zion must be defeated for any sort of peace to be established and justice provided to the region’s peoples. IMO, there’s no real way to do that without a resumption of combat as the Zionists will not obey any ceasefire/treaty as they’ve proven so many times. I’m hopeful the Zionist’s maniacal fanaticism will lead them to their doom as it seems only the Project matters. And the same could be said about the Outlaw US Empire’s plans to keep what remains of its primacy.    

Posted by: karlof1 | Apr 30 2026 15:35 utc | 21

Posted  by Tom Pfotzer I posted (most of) the following on the last thread before I read this one. While my post echoes B’s w/r/t the scenarios, I think it’s worth taking a closer look at the _effects_ each of those scenarios. This will help us predict the next moves.
 Attack again. Result: major and more permanent damage to gulf oil production, precipitate demise of Bahrain, UAE, possibly Saudi. Major destruction of Israel, prompting mass exodus, causing immediate political crisis re: Zionism in the US (and others).  Energy production reduction will cause major Western-economy recession that will last a few years. The effects are similar to “more blockade” scenario below, but happen faster, with more effect, and last much longer.
 More blockade. Result:  Continued upward drift of oil prices. Major fracture of Western alliances, since most countries in West are substantially dependent upon Gulf oil. All economies suffer, political instability increases; the  financial system in West will need major liquidity injections (print money), more inflation (bigger money supply and constrained supply of goods) and interest rates must rise in order to support Fed borrowing, and major new money-injection schemes need to be implemented, like they were in GFC and Covid. (and are happening on a more subtle basis now, to prop up the stock market). Fuel prices across the West continue to rise, and GDP falls as they rise.
 US walks away. Result: Oil starts to flow, fuel prices trend down, US stock market pops for a little while. Iran turns up the pressure on Israel and that precipitates a political crisis in Zionist-dominated Western societies: Mount a new war for Israel, or turf out the infiltrators and start rebuilding the domestic economies? MIGA, or MAGA?. Can the Globalist- Zionistas mount a new war on behalf of Israel, or do they fold that hand and concentrate what remains of their power to seize control of what’s left on the table to extract wealth from? (Central and South America, some African countries, Australia). 
 What’s your take on the 3 scenario effects I set out above? Right effects, or did I miss something important?
 
One interesting effect of any of the scenarios is that the Globalist-Zionista influence is going to take a major hit. None of these scenarios offers an orderly retreat, nor a decent blame-shifting opportunity. What’s your perspective on that point?

Posted by: Tom Pfotzer | Apr 30 2026 15:35 utc | 22

b and many here seem to be holding onto the idea that this is a war of choice for the empire. And that, if the US wants to, it could abandon the theater and leave Israel to manage its Greater Israel project by itself.
 
But please consider that for both parties, the west and Israel, this war is indeed existential. There is no choice in the matter. b kind of spells it out when he writes that the danger of abandoning the theater is for the US to lose face. But it is more than that.
 
There are incredibly powerful economic headwinds on the way for the US which threatens to unravel the empire domestically. And with Russia cockblocking the spoils in the Ukraine, it needs a win here. And despite the prescription given by “economists” like Michael Hudson who thinks America is salvageable by means of different policy, there are no steady hands available that could right the ship.
 
The third option is an absolute non-starter. Everyone will know we lost even if Generalissimo Trump claims victor.
 
It is not a war of choice. It is existential.

Posted by: NemesisCalling | Apr 30 2026 15:36 utc | 23

Trump ‘s BS is good enough , he could sell ocean front property in Arizona to the American public if he had to.
Posted by: Cheryl | Apr 30 2026 15:21 utc | 12
 
No kidding! Arizona hosts “Ark Encounter” a theme park with a life-size replica of Noah’s Arc. The holy rollers eat it up.
https://arkencounter.com/plan-your-visit/

Posted by: norecovery | Apr 30 2026 15:40 utc | 24

I see only 2 options, as the blockade is just trumpian cope.
 
1. Leave
2. Kill some more people and destroy more civilian infrastructure.
 
Most likely 2. followed by 1.

Posted by: Tannenhouser | Apr 30 2026 15:41 utc | 25

i watched one of those videos where hegseth is being grilled by the minnesota rep… why didn’t the rep bring up the 175 school girls murdered in minab??  i wish the american reps were better informed of the war crimes of this trump administration, so as to ask the tough questions that need to be asked here..
 
Posted by: james | Apr 30 2026 15:04 utc | 7

 
While I’m hardly one to underestimate the ignorance of American congresscritters — overestimating it is well-nigh impossible — it makes more sense to assume that neither they nor a majority of their constituents care about such war crimes as the Minab massacre.

Posted by: malenkov | Apr 30 2026 15:42 utc | 26

How will it fit into the equation ?
Posted by: Monty | Apr 30 2026 14:41 utc | 1
 
The domino effect:
 
– A defeat in the Persian Gulf
– A defeat in Lebanon
– A defeat in Gaza
– Syria
– Yemen
– Iraq 
 
Question: “How did we lose the empire?”
 
Answer: “Slowly at first, then all at once!”
 

Posted by: Arch Bungle | Apr 30 2026 15:43 utc | 27

sirdavide@11:
 
“I hope China, and perhaps Russia are doing all they can to support Iran…”
 
Me too. But see these posted to  the dead thread earlier:
 
Jamarl Thomas: John Helmer & Vanessa Beeley
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8RudW1hgVds
 
Putin-Trump call, Iran support, Lebanon’s resistance and more…
 
 
“…Several hours after the podcast concluded, the Kremlin reported that President Putin had initiated a telephone call to President Trump. In the Kremlin read-out of the 90-minute conversation…
 
Putin omitted to record for Trump Russians’ support for Iran’s ‘interests’ as Putin had assured Iranian FM Abbas Araghchi on Monday.
 
Putin did not register the Russian objection to the US blockade of the Hormuz Strait, nor to Israeli violations of the ceasefire in Lebanon, according to Ushakov’s read-out…”
 
Helmer: The Kursk Syndrome
 
https://x.com/bears_with/status/2049747565898313925

Posted by: John Gilberts | Apr 30 2026 15:44 utc | 28

@ karlof1 | Apr 30 2026 15:35 utc | 21
 
the brain dead hegseth is one problem, but as you note, the biggest problem is israel and it’s fanatical ideology at this point….  thanks for sharing all the links and etc!  off for my walk!

Posted by: james | Apr 30 2026 15:44 utc | 29

Posted by: james | Apr 30 2026 15:04 utc | 7
 
It is not in the interests of American (or other ‘democratic so-called’) reps to be well informed.
Western democracy relies on a continuous deceit of the voters.
Speaking the truth based on facts would break the spell.

Posted by: ChatNPC | Apr 30 2026 15:47 utc | 30

He was an idiot to stop the bombing.  Each oppenent has a weakness and a strength.  And he gave up his area of threat (air war) and allowed Iran to keep its (strait blocking).  Classic mistake.  Like the Vietnam bombing pauses.  Russia sometimes has these errors too.  but mostly not.  even if you aren’t clearly winning…don’t do ceasefires…keep pounding.P.s. And he was an idiot to even start this stuff.  I’m not in favor ot the war.  My comment is more about power politics if you ARE in a conflict like this.  

Posted by: Anonymous | Apr 30 2026 15:49 utc | 31

Now… if exit is the only exit, something sellable internally is what trump needs, how could Iran oblige?
 
I see some things that could be sold to both sides…
 

  1. Nuclear angle, RF takes all 60% enriched, will “pay” in nuclear fuel as needed (undisclosed clause of return, even already nuke form, if things go sideways) , us accepts civilian enrichment under observation, Iran reminds it does not want nukes
  2. strait fees/ reparations, Iran says no fees, us, secretly,  unblocks funds, offers an emirates style line of credit for 90% to be used in us purchases/investment
  3. us abandons too damaged bases in the region (Saudi excluded) , as show of force, a carrier group is always inside the strait (really hostages and pledge of no Israeli attacks) 

 
this could work, matter of spin…
 
lebanon /hezbolah would be strictly rocket fighting between Israel and Lebanon (Iran to provide enough firepower to assure IDF folds, us keeps Israel on a tight leach, see point 3)
 
if this is amenable to the us? Maybe… to Israel? Unlikely, but would anyone risk a false flag ? Maybe not.

Posted by: Newbie | Apr 30 2026 15:49 utc | 32

The stalemate in the war on Iran continues. The Strait of Hormuz is (mostly) still closed. The U.S. blockade of Iran related sea traffic, though leaky, is still in force.
 
It’s no more a “stalemate” than the war in Ukraine. Just as Russia has won a decisive victory in Ukraine (still to be fully consommated with lots more hard work and more loss of blood and treasure, yet the result itself is inevitable); so too Iran has won a decisive victory in the Gulf, likewise still to be fully consommated with lots more hard work and more loss of blood and treasure, and the result is likewise inevitable.
 
Stating that the US blockade is “in force” but “leaky” is also misleading – much more it is the converse, with a dozen or so Iranian tankers going through successfully every day according to Alastair Crooke while only a tiny number of ships the US has been able to intercept – i.e. the the blockade is in effect not in force. With sky-high oil prices currently $200 to $248 per barrel for real delivery (though I don’t know to what extent Iran can get the maximum premiums) even if the occasional tanker is stolen Iran is making a massive killing off the inflated prices and the occasional stolen tankers are insignificant in comparison to the windfall. Admittedly the volume of oil sold is less than what Iran was selling just before the blockade started, though, but my understanding is that income to Iran under the so-called blockade is still more than Iran has had for many years (I could be wrong about that since the most specific claims represent incomes during the war but before the blockade started.)

Posted by: BM | Apr 30 2026 15:49 utc | 33

Option 3 might not result in midterm catastrophe for the Rethugs if withdrawal from the ME were immediately followed by a successful conquest of Cuba. But that could be disastrous as well if there were appreciable American casualties. By the way, does Cuba have any missiles it could aim at Miami?

Posted by: malenkov | Apr 30 2026 15:50 utc | 34

Posted by: Tom Pfotzer | Apr 30 2026 15:35 utc | 22
 Attack again. Gives Trump’s and Hegseth’s ego a boost. Lets them let off steam. “We can’t defeat you, but at least we can hit you hard“. Buys (a little) time for dealing with more tricky matters, like assuaging Netanyhou and dealing with the Epstein Files.  More blockade. Allows Trump et al to keep up the pretence of being on top of things. Uncomfortable though, because it’s not an exit strategy, and means USA will loose the strategic initiative. Risky.  US walks away. Trump’s ego will probably forbid it. And then, what’s left of his presidency? Seizing Greenland and Cuba would just entrench him further as the f*uck boy he is. Unless he finds a clever way of betraying the Aldermans, Netanyahou, the Zionist donor class and laying the blame squarely on them. With Netanyahou in prison, AIPAC sued for being a foreign agent, Peter Thiel indicted, etc. Trump would at least get some credits back from his base and save his skin in the process. 
One of my friends says Trump will choose option D – Die of a stroke on live TV. The destiny of hearltess men.  

Posted by: Shahmaran | Apr 30 2026 15:53 utc | 35

Posted by: Shahmaran | Apr 30 2026 15:53 utc | 35

option E – waiting for any other event at the world stage to happen which would demand more attention and resources. This provides cover for walking away (with the “I’ll be back”). And there are some flashpoint available for that. And if not, it’s not easy to create one.

Posted by: JohnDowser | Apr 30 2026 16:03 utc | 36

Karlof1 /21 hat in aller Kürze präsentiert, was jeder der einen Verstand hat, der nicht ideologisch eingetrübt ist oder von religiösen Phantasmen vergiftet, auf diese bittere Lösung kommen muss: Schier unendliche Jahre hindurch hat die angelsächsische und zionistisch verwobene “Gemeinschaft” die Welt wissen lassen, dass die gezogene Wahl heißt: Endlose Kriege. Es zeigt sich nun aber, dass der Turbokapitalismus keine militärische Überlegenheit erzeugen kann, sondern nur eine beschränkte Anzahl Billionäre. Die ineinander verwobenen Konzerne sind nicht in der Lage -auch wegen mangelnder Bildungssysteme- das Tempo und die Qualität der waffentechnischen Entwicklungen in Russland oder gar China  zu kontern. Einen schlagenden Beweis lieferte nun der Iran, der mit einem vergleichsweise kläglichen Haushalt, hervorragende Wissenschaftler im MINT-Bereich hat “wachsen” lassen. Die asymetrische Kriegsführung hat USrael ins Armageddon blicken lassen. Im Norden des NATO-Bündnisses zeigen sich merkwürdige Risse. Dort sieht man Yggdrasil brennen. Stoltenberg, Rutte und Merz sind Figuren ohne Herz. Sie müssten eigentlich wissen, dass Dealer wie Trump, Biden, Bush, Netanyahu Einfaltspinsel sind, welche auf die Wirksamkeit ihrer Lügengebäude vertrauen. Es gelingt ihnen halt deswegen nicht, weil sie selber Lügner sind. So wird die unipolare Schmierenwelt untergehen – hoffentlich nicht in einer atomaren Katastrophe.

Posted by: Hatomune | Apr 30 2026 16:15 utc | 37

“The US does have the option of completely closing the strait by force . . . “Posted by: Flying Dutchman | Apr 30 2026 15:15 utc  9
 
Actually it probably doesn’t.  Larry Johnson explained that anything within 200 miles of the Iranian coast is essentially a no-go area for the US Navy.  So ships follow the coastline until they are out in the Arabian Sea/Indian Ocean where it’s a vast expanse of water.  There aren’t enough warships to lock down such a large area, so most cargo ships can get through.  It’s another case of Trumpy grasping at straws.  But I expect Trumpy to carry on doing essentially nothing with his faux blockade, as the other two options are even worse for him in the short term.  A blockade to end the blockade, now that’s some 5D chess for his lackeys to sell to the American public.

Posted by: Mike R | Apr 30 2026 16:15 utc | 38

By the way, does Cuba have any missiles it could aim at Miami?
Posted by: malenkov | Apr 30 2026 15:50 utc | 34
 
last time even nukes, but Kennedy  thought otherwise…

Posted by: Newbie | Apr 30 2026 16:18 utc | 39

ah, the old asymmetric.
 
Iran has loitering torpedo drones, which could be gifted to Cuba.
 
Bit of a bitch for Louisiana offshore rigs…

Posted by: necromancer | Apr 30 2026 16:25 utc | 40

U.S. President Donald Trump has three options:

  • to continue the blockade of Iran and, in consequence, the blockade of the Strait;

  • to launch a new bombing campaign against Iran;

  • to declare victory and order his military leave the Gulf.

 
Well, the fourth option is to eliminate the parasite that is Zionism, because Zionism is the cause of the war. 

Posted by: Norwegian | Apr 30 2026 16:28 utc | 41

@malenkov | Apr 30 2026 15:50 utc | 34

Option 3 might not result in midterm catastrophe for the Rethugs if withdrawal from the ME were immediately followed by a successful conquest of Cuba. But that could be disastrous as well if there were appreciable American casualties. By the way, does Cuba have any missiles it could aim at Miami?

Yes, (Operation Eagle Claw 2.0)^2  followed by Bay of Pigs 2.0 is an idea, but not a very good one. 😎

Posted by: Norwegian | Apr 30 2026 16:42 utc | 42

@Shahmaran | Apr 30 2026 15:53 utc | 35

One of my friends says Trump will choose option D – Die of a stroke on live TV. The destiny of hearltess men.  

If you are heartless (i.e. you don’t have a heart), dying of a stroke is not an option. So it will have to be another assassination attempt (but a real one this time). Maybe Mrs. Kirk can help?

Posted by: Norwegian | Apr 30 2026 16:46 utc | 43

@necromancer | Apr 30 2026 16:25 utc | 39

Iran has loitering torpedo drones….

Iran has been talking about additional ‘surprises’ if the attacks resume. I would personally be uncomfortable on board the remaining US aircraft carriers (or their supporting ships) in such a situation. Iran also has hypersonic missiles and I would assume they have the capability to punch a vertical hole from above or from below if it was really needed…

Posted by: Norwegian | Apr 30 2026 16:55 utc | 44

The high-level source further warned that a continued American blockade and closure of the Strait of Hormuz might ultimately harm the US more than Iran and that a decisive response is deemed necessary by the top military command to completely discredit even this remaining American option.

 
Our host doesn’t comment on the contradiction between the claim the US blockade hurts the US more than IRI and a need for a “decisive response.” That is like saying you need to stop an enemy from making a mistake. The real problem is the world is collateral damage, but the US is not hurting itself nearly as much. Overall, the US is taking a gamble on being able to ride out any world depression, to win out over weaker rivals. The feeling seems to be, so what is world economy makes a smaller cake if its our cake!
 

With this Iran would be, after Russia and China, the third country which in recent years decisively defeated U.S. coercion by economic and military means.

 
With this our host tends to count the chickens before they’re hatched. Pure economic warfare failed to take down Russia in 2014, which is why military means, the impending resumption of intense warfare against Lugansk and Donetsk, were planned. (The SMO preempted that assault.) Russia has not yet decisively defeated the hybrid war, which is continually being expanded into other theaters than Ukraine. PRC has defeated the pure economic warfare directed against it. That’s why the intense planning to add military means. It is a trifle premature to claim decisive victory for PRC in hybrid WWIII in the middle of the global struggle. Given that Trump has refused to genuinely walk away from Ukraine (despite the verbiage saying otherwise) the precedent suggests he isn’t going to walk away from either IRI or PRC.
 
There seems to be a notion that declaring victory is up to Trump can keep all factions of the MSM from piling on the same way they turned against Biden after Afghanistan. I doubt the oligarchs who either own the MSM or buy the audiences of the MSM are quite so disciplined yet. There also seems to be a notion that the midterms or the fortunes of the Republican Party in the long run require Trump to pacify public opinion. I believe Trump’s real constituency is his fellow oligarchs and the irate petty bourgeois, not the masses. That’s why Trump is systematically pursuing ways to render elections and popular pressure completely irrelevant. 
 
 

Posted by: steven t johnson | Apr 30 2026 16:56 utc | 45

A classic zugzwang situation delivered by the people who have created the chess game. Is it really a surprise ?
I bet on a quick strike , a harsh retaliation and the US walking away declaring victory by annihilation while maintaining the sanctions and paying no reparation.
This will convince nobody expect the usual asslickers, torpedo the petrodollar even more and re-balance the region East.
Revisionist-zionist state will continue to boil itself as a frog and the Samsonite option will slowly make “a failed state” of what’s left of it. The only remaining question is how long the US are going to willingly to pay for it ?

Posted by: Savonarole | Apr 30 2026 16:57 utc | 46

Posted by: Otto Penn | Apr 30 2026 14:57 utc | 5
let’s all place the following bet, since “the world’s a casino”:
 
will we soon see a second Caesar’s star surmount the celestial staircase? (I was gonna add, “from senators’ stabbing,” except there’s 0% chance of that.)
 
what’s the BFD w/Polymarket? Lockheed, Raytheon, etc., do the same thing on the stock market and I don’t hear anyone complaining. no complaints at all.

Posted by: duck n cover | Apr 30 2026 17:00 utc | 47

Iran has loitering torpedo drones, which could be gifted to Cuba.
Posted by: necromancer | Apr 30 2026 16:25 utc | 39
 
Too late. There is a blockade there too. The Russian tanker was allowed to enter, just like the Turkish electricity ship. They even announced they were allowed, it’s somewhere on Tass, only talking heads of yt clikcbait with broken blockades.
The second problem is that no one will give anything to Cuba and they’re not asking.
I don’t understand why many here suggest weapon transfers to Iran or Cuba or others. That will not be allowed. absolutely no one is as dumb to watch weapons transfered for eight years, and there is no free trade. India gets s400 only because they are Team Bibi and will not be used against US. 

Posted by: rk | Apr 30 2026 17:00 utc | 48

What everybody seems to forget is that ther is still 80 % of the worlds oilproduction on the market, what an opportunity for all the oilproducers to get new market shares, shares that the countries in the middleast used to have.
 

Posted by: UffePuffe | Apr 30 2026 17:09 utc | 49

see the 16-second video at the first link
 
see the 27-second video at the third link
 
 
 
https://x.com/swilkinsonbc/status/2049555343525445787
Sarah Wilkinson  @swilkinsonbc  
 
The israelis blow up and destroy the popular tourist ‘Al-Safina’ Amwaj Albayyada Boat Restaurant and café, in South Lebanon | via @ytirawi
 
———————–
 
https://x.com/ejmalrai/status/2049877196727021685
 
Elijah J. Magnier 🇪🇺  @ejmalrai 
 
Over 53 Israeli air attacks and 100 artillery shells hit south of Lebanon today, killing 20 civilians and wounding over 110. 
 
This is the highest bombing of Lebanon since the so-called ‘ceasefire’ that covered Beirut only but excluded the south of Lebanon and the Bekaa Valley.
 
———————–
 
https://x.com/DoNotWorryPod/status/1872671950881034680
Anthony Sargon 🇱🇧  @DoNotWorryPod 
 
This Israeli influencer is talking about how her husband, an IDF terrorist, came back from Lebanon (after bombing kids) and loved our olives so much that they re-created the recipe for a cute Instagram video. You can’t make this stuff up. Beyond evil. Go back to New Jersey.
 

Posted by: michaelj72 | Apr 30 2026 17:11 utc | 50

Posted by: norecovery | Apr 30 2026 15:40 utc | 24
supposedly the cows survived Noah’s flood, but I doubt the cows could survive a trip to this museum’s food court. I wonder if the “save all the animals” part of the story of Noah appears anywhere in that Ark of knowledge and discovery? do we discover a 3rd kind of nausea (after Noah’s navigation and viticulture) from this fiberglass- and plastic-filled journey on the neon seas? I wonder what all the birds poking around in this museum’s trash augurs. 

Posted by: duck n cover | Apr 30 2026 17:11 utc | 51

@ malenkov | Apr 30 2026 15:42 utc | 26
 
i missed your post.. yes, you are certainly correct.. they don’t care about war crimes… it’s  very obvious..

Posted by: james | Apr 30 2026 17:11 utc | 52

@ ChatNPC | Apr 30 2026 15:47 utc | 30
 
that is so true!!

Posted by: james | Apr 30 2026 17:12 utc | 53

Mike R | Apr 30 2026 16:15 utc | 37
 
“Actually it probably doesn’t. Larry Johnson explained that anything within 200 miles of the Iranian coast is essentially a no-go area for the US Navy. So ships follow the coastline until they are out in the Arabian Sea/Indian Ocean where it’s a vast expanse of water. There aren’t enough warships to lock down such a large area, so most cargo ships can get through.”
 
 
I wasn’t referring to the current fake threat of stopping and boarding or some such nonsense, as part of a “ceasefire”. That’s just the usual pro-wrestling kayfabe everyone has agreed to abide by so far. I said a real war blockade, sinking any ship that tries to get through. Also using stand-off weapons to mine the strait, if that’s possible (which I don’t know).

Posted by: Flying Dutchman | Apr 30 2026 17:14 utc | 54

37, 43, probably some traps on some of those iranian “civilian” ships, also reminds me of that official that said “come closer”

Posted by: E | Apr 30 2026 17:20 utc | 55

Posted by: rk | Apr 30 2026 17:00 utc | 47
——————-
That’s sealed in the Anchorage agreement I suppose.

Posted by: scc | Apr 30 2026 17:26 utc | 56

🇮🇷 Chris at the Strait of Hormuz:
 
Since it’s Persian Gulf Day, I want to remind those who seek to travel through the Strait of Hormoz that the cost is $2 million USD in Chinese RMB. Soon we will only accept it in Iranian Rials. We accept bank transfers and crypto. Thank you for your attention to this matter.

https://t.me/DDGeopolitics/183160

Posted by: Norwegian | Apr 30 2026 17:27 utc | 57

Fire and loss of propulsion reported on US destroyer.

“Israel” talks of resumption of conflict.

Continuous arrival of US military hardware to the region…

Posted by: Ornot | Apr 30 2026 17:29 utc | 58

‘to launch a new bombing campaign against Iran.’
 
If the war restarts, it won’t be simillar to the 12-day or 40-day war. I haven’t seen any debate about Iran using its formidable ground forces for the first time. So much debate about US ground operation but almost none about Iran. UAE, Kwait and Bahrain can be easily occupied. There is also a probability of temporary ground operation in Iraq’s Kurdistan to destroy the camps there. 
 
Iran have not yet played its ground invasion and occupying card.

Posted by: Sentience | Apr 30 2026 17:31 utc | 59

see the 9-second video at the first link
 
see the 1:02 video at the second link
 
 
 
https://x.com/sahouraxo/status/2049566420539670855
sarah  @sahouraxo 
 
Israeli invaders crushed an ambulance with a bulldozer in South Lebanon, then posted it online like a trophy. 
 
Israel literally celebrates its war crimes publicly. 
No shame. No accountability. No consequences.
 
———————-
 
https://x.com/xIsraelExposedx/status/2049615613451030896
Israel Exposed  @xIsraelExposedx 
 
Footage shows the moment a 10-year-old girl, Marah, was pulled alive from the rubble in Gaza City after a building collapse during ongoing attacks. She is one of the lucky ones.
 
———————-
 
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/liveblog/2026/4/30/iran-war-live-trump-urges-tehran-to-just-give-up-as-oil-prices-surge
Italy condemns ‘unlawful’ Israeli interception of aid ships heading for Gaza 
 
Italy has condemned Israel’s interception of aid ships bound for Gaza and demanded the release of its citizens, as tensions grow over the seizure of civilian vessels in international waters. 
 
Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni’s office said Rome wants all Italians freed after they were “unlawfully detained” today during the operation near Crete. 
 
Organisers from the Global Sumud Flotilla described the interception as piracy, saying the boats were carrying humanitarian aid to Gaza. 
 
Germany and Italy also issued a joint statement expressing “deep concern”, urging “full respect of international law” and warning against “irresponsible actions”. 
 
Italy, one of Israel’s closest allies in Europe, has recently criticised its attacks on Lebanon and paused a defence cooperation deal. 
 
Israel described flotilla participants as “attention-seeking agitators”.
 

Posted by: michaelj72 | Apr 30 2026 17:34 utc | 60

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CLPH8vBrZpw
This is great stuff – about how , in part, the Gulf helps to trigger the collapse of 5 nations ……and how to prepare for that.   Oddly, for a period of time, US Treasuries will reign supreme because money will rush to a (relative) safe haven.
One other thing I got out of this was a debt maturity trap.  National debts pile up while bond borrowing gets shorter in maturity.   10 years instead of 20.  5 years instead of 10 and so on.  Eventually, you’re rolling over huge debts every couple months or so and it stops working.

Posted by: Eighthman | Apr 30 2026 17:35 utc | 61

Electronic Intifada Weekly Podcast
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cZGNoer59pw
 
“Breaking news and analysis on day 937 of the Gaza genocide.” Includes Jon Elmer’s Resistance Report on Lebanon.
 
More reasons USrael and its evil, murderous depravity  MUST GO.

Posted by: John Gilberts | Apr 30 2026 17:37 utc | 62

Iran have not yet played its ground invasion and occupying card.
Posted by: Sentience | Apr 30 2026 17:31 utc | 59

If they are smart and well-prepared, they also have missiles and other technologies in store that they have not utilized yet.

Posted by: ReinhardVonSiegfried | Apr 30 2026 17:46 utc | 63

I don’t understand Trump’s threat to resume his attack on Iran. What’ll happen to the lurking US Navy ships in the vicinity? Iran has missiles which can sink a ship 1000 miles from Iran. And last week DW News quoted an Iranian source claiming that “We have a new card to play if hostilities resume.”
 
Of course, that threat means whatever Iran wants it to mean, but I’m not aware of Iran making any empty threats since this US/Liesrael SNAFU began. Imo, the Dumbass Yankees should pucker up and get ready to kiss their arses Goodbye if they attack again.
 
Iran hasn’t existed for thousands of years by being as myopic and smug as Yankees and and their Jewish Bosses.

Posted by: Hoarsewhisperer | Apr 30 2026 17:46 utc | 64

Question: “How did we lose the empire?”
Answer: “Slowly at first, then all at once!” 
RE Posted by: Arch Bungle | Apr 30 2026 15:43 utc | 27
 
 
agree with you Arch. …….then all at once!
 
this time, the dominoes will really fall. and  I suspect it won’t be the regime change/s in the countries that the USA expected either – especially if the Strait remains closed for a few more months and/or if the US/israel start the hot war all over again (v. high probability) and then Iran really goes ballistic and the Houthis close the Red Sea
 

Posted by: michaelj72 | Apr 30 2026 17:52 utc | 65

Posted by: ReinhardVonSiegfried | Apr 30 2026 17:46 utc | 63
Iraqi Shiite militia are ready to take Kwait. Ansarallah ready to march north.

Posted by: Sentience | Apr 30 2026 17:58 utc | 66

If Trump claims victory and pulls the military out of the area, he still has a chance in the midterms…If he continues on the same course, he will lose badly…the question is whether Trump even cares about politics at this point….

Posted by: pyrrhus | Apr 30 2026 17:59 utc | 67

@59
 
The ground aspect of this war is greatly uncovered.
 
IHizbolah is executing attrition war in south Lebanon.  PMF and Quds are operating against US bases in Iraq.  Possibly running PMF into Syria to gut the CIA regime…
 
Ground aspects are long term low intensity/insurgencies, attrition.
 
Plan low overhead incremental war.

Posted by: paddy | Apr 30 2026 18:00 utc | 68

A couple of weeks ago, I commented that the war with Iran had transformed from a kinetic war to an economic war of attrition. So far this appears to be the case.
However, in this economic war of attrition, Trump’s most important enemy is not Iran, but Time. Trump has neither the patience nor the political space to see this war of attrition through to its logical end. 
I expect that Trump will leave office (voluntarily or otherwise) before this conflict ends.
 

Posted by: dh-mtl | Apr 30 2026 18:08 utc | 69

Trump DEMANDS cognitive tests for all Prez and Vice Prez candidates
So ‘we wouldn’t be surprised at people like Barack ‘Hussein’ Obama or Sleepy Joe Biden getting ‘elected”

https://t.me/rtnews/148349
 
 

Posted by: Norwegian | Apr 30 2026 18:11 utc | 70

— 🇺🇸/🇮🇷 Iran’s President, Masoud Pezeshkian:
 
‘The world has witnessed Iran’s tolerance and reconciliation.
 
What is being done under the guise of a naval blockade is an extension of military operations against a nation paying the price for its resistance and independence.
 
Continuation of this oppressive approach cannot be tolerated.’

https://t.me/Middle_East_Spectator/31637
 
This could be interpreted as Iran taking some initiative.

Posted by: Norwegian | Apr 30 2026 18:14 utc | 71

The peanut gallery at Andrei M.’s blog are having some fun:
 
TIJUANA
 
Trump Is Just Using America’s Navy Again
 
Credit @ LordBydon
 
“This one is kind of a Haiku:”
 
QUESADILLA
 
Quick Uranium Enrichment
Spinning All Day
Iran’s Last Laugh America
 
Credit @steve
 
CARAMBA
 
Carefully Avoid Reporting About Military Bases Abandoned
 
Credit @LordBydon
 
GUACAMOLE
 
Gulf Upset. Aircraft Carrier Attacked. Message: “Only Laundry Emergency”
 
Credit @steve

Posted by: Jeremy Rhymings-Lang | Apr 30 2026 18:15 utc | 72

THE WIT & WISDOM OF MARK SLEBODA – PUTIN ARAGHCHI MEETING – NATO WARMONGERING – OIL PRICE SCREAMING
 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=71cgdVyJR9A

Posted by: unimperator | Apr 30 2026 18:18 utc | 73

What’ll happen to the lurking US Navy ships in the vicinity? Iran has missiles which can sink a ship 1000 miles from Iran. 
Posted by: Hoarsewhisperer | Apr 30 2026 17:46 utc | 64
 
Really? Why haven’t they used them? 

Posted by: Catdog | Apr 30 2026 18:27 utc | 74

What the hell is Russia doing 
Iran is fighting Russia’s prime enemies USA and England combo and Putin is sitting like an idiot. Only after one month of war did Russia talk about war promoting peace when he should have been promoting war to annihilate common enemies. The
Russia is sending old tanks t 90 which is useless in naval warfare. 
Why did Putin not send ,Kinzal analogue,or  s500 to Iran ?
Putin is unreliable me Traitor or surrounded by Traitor FM lavrov and Pesko.
Iran .ust be beware of Russia ,who can change sides quickly  all the allies of Russia like. Venezuela, Libya Syria have. been  destroyed by common enemy (anglos )of Russia. Think about it !!.

Posted by: Sam | Apr 30 2026 18:28 utc | 75

Why haven’t they used them? 
 
Posted by: Catdog | Apr 30 2026 18:27 utc | 74
 

 
What happened to the unfortunate Ford?
 
https://apnews.com/article/uss-ford-iran-war-record-deployment-61a40739b7792c24ac1476c110b0c9cc
 

Posted by: too scents | Apr 30 2026 18:29 utc | 76

Iran have not yet played its ground invasion and occupying card.
Posted by: Sentience | Apr 30 2026 17:31 utc | 59
 
Sure, why not? Of course with their navy destroyed, it’ll have to be a neighbor. Perhaps Iran will invade Iraq. That worked out well last time.

Posted by: Catdog | Apr 30 2026 18:34 utc | 77

Posted by: Catdog | Apr 30 2026 18:34 utc | 77

It was Iraq that invaded Iran, goaded on by the west shits who also supplied chemical weapon precursors for Saddam to use on Iranian soldiers.

Posted by: Surferket | Apr 30 2026 18:38 utc | 78

Why did Putin not send ,Kinzal analogue,or  s500 to Iran ?
Posted by: Sam | Apr 30 2026 18:28 utc | 75
 
Because they would have been destroyed.   An s-500 does not mean automatic sky control.  The best weapons are reserved for the most important defense areas, and those weapons also must be covered by layers of A.D. 
 
And Russia’s most vital areas that need to be protected are not in Iran.  They are in Russia.
 
Russia is the big country in the north, bordered by countries as far east as China and far west as Germany.  This is on a planet known as earth, where we all live.  I cant tell you where babies come from yet, as you clearly would not understand.  Maybe in a few years, when you are smarter.
 
 
 
 

Posted by: UWDude | Apr 30 2026 18:39 utc | 79

and far west as Germany.   
Posted by: UWDude | Apr 30 2026 18:39 utc | 79
 
uh oh.

Posted by: UWDude | Apr 30 2026 18:40 utc | 80

What happened to the unfortunate Ford?
Posted by: too scents | Apr 30 2026 18:29 utc | 76
That’s what I’d like to know. You guys kept talking about how it was impossible for her to cross the Suez and the Red Sea because Houthis… and yet she did, very quickly and without incident. I suppose that she was just allowed through because of some Iranian 4-D chess plan?

Posted by: Catdog | Apr 30 2026 18:42 utc | 82

@Catdog | Apr 30 2026 18:34 utc | 77
 
Ya, when I first read Sentience’s remarks about ground invasion, I was skeptical. Then I (begrudgingly) looked at a map, and noted that the western border of Iran is only about 250 miles from the eastern border of Syria, and from there it’s another 300 miles southeast to the border of Lebanon, and about 200 miles to the border of Jordan. 
 
So the distances involved aren’t that large; the main thing is AD for air cover during the march, and of course the trucks, tankers and light armor necessary to protect the march’s convoy.
 
Iran might at some point actually get Iraq’s permission to set up a convoy route across Iraq that included AD facilities, to gradually encroach on Israel’s means of bombing Iran. In fact, that would be a highly useful thing to have in place should serious hostilities break out again between Israel/US and Iran.
 
Sentience may be on to something. Iran is bold, has imagination, and a lot of very motivated soldiers.

Posted by: Tom Pfotzer | Apr 30 2026 18:45 utc | 83

Smartest option: Pack it up and go home, all of it, including all US bases in the region.

Posted by: Hannibal | Apr 30 2026 18:48 utc | 84

norecovery | Apr 30 2026 15:40 utc | 24  ……
 
Yet the USA accuses Iran of being a theocracy ??????

Posted by: Cynic | Apr 30 2026 18:52 utc | 85

*** Arizona hosts “Ark Encounter” a theme park with a life-size replica of Noah’s Arc. The holy rollers eat it up. ***
 
Sorry, meant to include the above in previous (18.52) post.

Posted by: Cynic | Apr 30 2026 18:55 utc | 86

Hannibal | Apr 30 2026 18:48 utc | 84
 
“Smartest option: Pack it up and go home, all of it, including all US bases in the region.”
 
 
Probably the bases in the Mideast and Europe are already considered expendable.

Posted by: Flying Dutchman | Apr 30 2026 18:59 utc | 87

By the way, does Cuba have any missiles it could aim at Miami?
Posted by: malenkov | Apr 30 2026 15:50 utc | 34
——-
The oil refineries at New Orleans and Houston might be better targets.
 
When the Soviet Union was disintegrating there were rumors they sent some advanced weaponry to Cuba.  Those weapons would be pretty old by now and no longer advanced, but those Cubans are very resourceful.
 
And then I remember a time when Fidel was still in charge and the USA was threatening an invasion.  Fidel said he would unleash “Raul’s people” against the USA.  Raul is still around and, some say, still in power and his people may have some new tricks up their sleeves.

Posted by: Chas | Apr 30 2026 19:03 utc | 88

Trump going to run another x days bombing Iran.
 
Make Bibi happy, more $$ for MIC to replace ordnance in 2035, U.S. is not yet sufficiently FUBAR.

Posted by: paddy | Apr 30 2026 19:04 utc | 89

Posted by: Tom Pfotzer | Apr 30 2026 18:45 utc | 83
Hundreds of miles is a long way to walk in the desert, which is what the Iranian troops (who weren’t turned to ash first) would be doing. Even if Iran had mobile AD that could defend a convoy from USraeli air power, which they don’t, there are a hundred ways to block such a convoy without even coming near it.

Posted by: Catdog | Apr 30 2026 19:07 utc | 90

see the photo at the first link
 
 
 
https://x.com/Aboujahjah/status/2049478077667819634
Dyab Abou Jahjah  @Aboujahjah 
 
I am from this village that Zionists has now wiped out for the second time. The first was in 1976. Today, they are doing this to every village in the southern sector of South Lebanon. This is a form of genocide. Their ultimate aim is to steal our land like they stole Palestine.
 
——————
 
https://t.me/Middle_East_Spectator/31640#
Middle East Spectator — MES 
 
—❗️🇮🇱/🇱🇧/🇮🇷 NEW: Israel has issued orders to withdraw several combat brigades from southern Lebanon due to the FPV drone threat – Channel 11
 
——————–
 
https://www.presstv.ir/Detail/2026/04/29/767743/continued-us-maritime-banditry-piracy-to-met-practical-unprecedented-response-source 
 
…..The source said the restraint shown by armed forces so far has been intended to give diplomacy a chance, allowing the United States to learn of and accept Iran’s conditions for ending the war permanently. 
 
This pause, he hastened to add, was meant to provide President Donald Trump an opportunity to pull the United States out of the current quagmire it finds itself in. 
 
However, if American obstinacy and delusions continue and Iran’s conditions are rejected, the official warned that the enemy should soon expect a different kind of response to the ongoing naval blockade, which is akin to maritime banditry………..
 

Posted by: michaelj72 | Apr 30 2026 19:13 utc | 91

20 years ago or so, Hugo Chavez floated a set $75 a barrel oil price for OPEC, to allow for stability and predictability for both producers and consumers. That concept was shot down by the usual suspects.
.
.
Posted by: jayc | Apr 29 2026 19:21 utc | 44
.
.
IiRC in the late 90s a group of oil exporting countries decided to dispense with the low US dollar and accept other currencies and gold for oil. These countries included Russia, Venezuela, Libya, Iran and Iraq.  
.
.
If so it would explain a lot of subsequent events…does anyone have any details?
 
 

Posted by: Delhiliterally | Apr 30 2026 19:16 utc | 92

“Third, he described what he perceives as victory as a prelude to a “new regional and global order.”
 
I hope that includes war and crimes against humanity will be prosecuted. No matter how long it takes.
 
They can’t just walk away from assainating political leaders and hundreds of schoolchildren!
 
No no no … Humpty Drumpffty and his generals can’t just walk away!
 
Neither can any colonialism be tolerated all lands must be returned to their native peoples and their self controlled states.
 
A new world order can not have a unicorn WasNeverReal in it!
 
 
Is DJT47 ready for his trip to Beijing to sign the surrender and usher in the  “new regional and global order.” That will prosecute him and his bosses and generals? That will guarantee the end to the last imperialist colonial conquest started less than a century ago? 
 
it has to be all or nothing. The wars are on every front and new ones planned. They can’t be allowed any respite to ‘go again’. This ain’t wrestling or cage fighting. It is dead blown up children. 

Posted by: DunGroanin | Apr 30 2026 19:23 utc | 93

11 mins  
 
Iran Delivers Explosive Rebuke to Amėrica, Israėl & the EU Live at the UN

Posted by: Don Firineach | Apr 30 2026 19:34 utc | 94

Catdog | Apr 30 2026 19:07 utc | 90
 
That would be true if they were silly enough to march across the desert in “convoys” … should they line up and approach the IZ border in packed companies too, you reckon, a la 1812? 

Posted by: Caliman | Apr 30 2026 19:48 utc | 95

Researchers have reverse-engineered a piece of malware named Fast16. It’s almost certainly state-sponsored, probably US in origin, and was deployed against Iran years before Stuxnet: “…the Fast16 malware was designed to carry out the most subtle form of sabotage ever seen in an in-the-wild malware tool: By automatically spreading across networks and then silently manipulating computation processes in certain software applications that perform high-precision mathematical calculations and simulate physical phenomena, Fast16 can alter the results of those programs to cause failures that range from faulty research results to catastrophic damage to real-world equipment.

https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2026/04/fast16-malware.html

Posted by: Dadda | Apr 30 2026 19:49 utc | 96

https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/20260429-report-52-iranian-ships-breach-us-blockade-within-72-hours/
 
 
Report: 52 Iranian ships breach US blockade within 72 hours
 
Fifty two Iranian vessels have crossed a US-imposed blockade of Iranian waters within a 72-hour period, Iran’s Fars News Agencyreported.According to the report, which cited satellite tracking data covering the three days leading up to 10:00 pm local time on Monday, the vessels included 31 oil tankers and 21 cargo ships.

Posted by: UWDude | Apr 30 2026 19:54 utc | 97

Hatomune | Apr 30 2026 16:15 utc | 37
 
Thanks for your reply and your additions. Astute historians have noted many times that Empires are like living organisms–they’re born, develop into adults, reach a peak, then decline in old age and then perish. The Outlaw US Empire is no different and is in its terminal decline stage, which is to say this latest war crime is NOT existential for it as its destiny was already set for it when it decided to become an Empire in its formative stage. It took centuries for Rome to dissolve into the citiy-states that finally reunified in the 19th Century. We can learn a lot from China’s dynastic cycles just as the Chinese have. Long ago the Greeks tried to teach that hubris blinds and destroys those incapable of overcoming its spell, its captivation. It seems the only ones who learn/understand that lesson are historians. 

Posted by: karlof1 | Apr 30 2026 19:54 utc | 98

Overall, the US is taking a gamble on being able to ride out any world depression, to win out over weaker rivals. . .

 

. . .There also seems to be a notion that the midterms or the fortunes of the Republican Party in the long run require Trump to pacify public opinion. I believe Trump’s real constituency is his fellow oligarchs and the irate petty bourgeois, not the masses. That’s why Trump is systematically pursuing ways to render elections and popular pressure completely irrelevant.   
Posted by: steven t johnson | Apr 30 2026 16:56 utc | 45

If Trumpy’s strategy is to hope the US can outlast a worldwide depression better than other countries, he must be assuming that the populace will remain complacent and compliant, and his MAGA base will continue to respond postively to his re-invention of reality.  Two days ago I filled my tank at 4.09/gallon.  Today I saw that gas is 4.99/gallon.  Americans can swallow just about any whopper their so-called leaders tell them, but there’s no escaping the cost of filling up the pickup truck.  I have no idea if the American populace can ever get angry enough to take to the streets and demand the bastards step down.  Guess we’ll find out.

Posted by: Mike R | Apr 30 2026 20:02 utc | 99

@catdog:
 
You can always be counted upon to take the ridiculous or most extreme positions (reductio ad absurdum) in order to try making points. 
 
It only takes a little – a very small amount – of imagination to plan that offensive. To wit:
 
How did the US set up forts in Jordan, or Syria, or Iraq? One at a time; set up logistics and AD in a chain. No, you don’t put all the trucks or troops or anything in one place at a time, you send them out in small groups over a period of weeks or months. You build a chain of logistics bases. Each base is protected by its own AD, has enough provisions and staff to sustain limited attacks.
 
Before the chain of bases is set up, Iran uses long-range missiles to eliminate the Israeli and Jordanian  air bases (fighters and tankers) that can threaten the logistics hubs. Turkey  may well stay out of this fight, or may even quietly support Iran. 
 
This chain-of-bases method is what the US did in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Syria. Iran can do the same in reverse. Only Iran has better missiles, and more mobile AD (with Chinese help).
 
Iran can make life perfectly miserable for Israel once Sugar Daddy decides it’s too expensive to support the Chosen People any more. That day may come a bit sooner than some are expecting; the economic and political cost to US to support Israel has risen very dramatically over the past 6 months.

Posted by: Tom Pfotzer | Apr 30 2026 20:09 utc | 100