Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
April 29, 2026
The Uppity Sheikdom May Not Survive A Conflict With Its Neighbors

Yesterday the United Arab Emirates (UAE) declared that it would leave the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC). It is a divorce that will likely have severe consequences for the UAE’s well being.

This is a long term move that has been long coming and independent from the short term consequences of current USrael war on Iran.


bigger
OPEC, together with other oil producing countries (OPEC+), has always strived to keep oil prices steady by limiting what each of its members would produce. The producer countries had recognized that flooding the markets with oil would tank its price and lower their overall income. Keeping production too low and oil too expensive would encourage consumers to use other energy sources. OPEC and OPEC+ policy was therefore to optimize output so that it could provide a long term security for supplies as well as for its income.

With the UAE leaving OPEC will consist of 11 core members: Algeria, Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Gabon, Iran, Iraq, Kuwait, Libya, Nigeria, Saudi Arabia and Venezuela.  OPEC+ additionally includes Russia, Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Bahrain, Brunei, Malaysia, Mexico, Oman, South Sudan, and Sudan.

The UAE decision is a victory for the U.S. and its oil industry. As a WSJ opinion piece asserts:

U.S. shale fracking has achieved Washington’s longtime strategic goal of curbing the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries’s control over oil prices. The cartel is fracturing, with the United Arab Emirates announcing its exit on Tuesday. This is another foreign policy victory for American fossil-fuel energy.

The U.A.E. has chafed for years at OPEC’s per-country production quotas that are intended to limit global supply and push up oil prices. Saudi Arabia and the U.A.E. are the cartel’s two swing producers that have excess capacity to ramp up output, with Abu Dhabi capable of producing 1.4 million barrels a day more than OPEC’s quota.

Abu Dhabi is rich and has large financial reserves. It does not need a higher oil output to survive.

The reasons for its divorce from other Arab oil producers are deeper (archived) than bore holes:

In recent years, Emirati officials have spoken of the importance of pursuing their own economic interests, chafing at quotas set by OPEC that curtailed their oil production.

They have deepened their alliance with Israel, while other Arab governments keep their distance or pull further away from it.

In Yemen, the Emirates has supported an armed insurgency, angering Saudi leaders, who back the government there.

And in Sudan’s brutal civil war, where Saudi Arabia and Egypt support the government, the Emirates has backed a rival paramilitary group. Emirati officials have denied sending weapons to the Sudanese group, the Rapid Support Forces, despite extensive evidence to the contrary.

The rift between Saudi Arabia and the Emirates that has been developing for years and extends to the highest levels of the two governments.

Prince Mohammed of Saudi Arabia and the Emirati leader, Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed, were once close partners, joining forces in 2015 to fight the Houthi rebels in Yemen, but they have since diverged significantly, pursuing different visions for the future of the Middle East that have come into conflict with one another. That rupture burst into public view in December, but appears to have hardened during the war with Iran.
…
As Gulf Arab officials weigh how to respond to Iran, the Emirates has taken measures to sever its longstanding cultural and economic ties with the country. Saudi Arabia, which has faced fewer and less damaging attacks, has condemned Iran strongly, but has supported efforts led by Pakistan to find a diplomatic resolution to the war — an initiative from which the Emirates has kept some distance.

Emirati officials have spoken repeatedly of their dissatisfaction with Arab and Islamic multilateral organizations, hinting that they would have preferred a stronger stance against Iran.
…
For years, the Emirates had remained in OPEC “out of deference to Saudi Arabia,” Ms. Diwan said. Tuesday’s news makes it clear that “they will no longer defer to Saudi leadership.”

And therein lies a problem …

The UAE has some 10 million inhabitants of which only 12% are born Emiraties. The rest are Indian, Pakistani and other guest workers who could leave at any moments notice.

Saudi Arabia has 33 million inhabitants.

Going against several major policies of its big neighbor is a high risk endeavor . While the UAE can in general hope for support from Israel and the U.S. its is highly unlikely that either would intervene should Saudi Arabia (with Pakistani and/or Egyptian support) decide to get rid of an uppity sheik in its immediate neighborhood. It probably would not be a short or easy conflict but their would not be much left of the UAE should the Saudis proceed. The rest of OPEC and OPEC+ would likely stand by and applause.

As Yves Smith at Naked Capitalism comments:

With no shipments out of the Gulf now, this move has no immediate effect. The UAE apparently wants to pump freely when it can. But that also assumes that there will be a UAE when the conflict ends.

Comments

Why Elvira  Nabiullina got it sooo wrong….
 
Why those that point at the 10 year treasury interest rate ALWAYS get it wrong. They are just as bad as Elvira  Nabiullina. 
 
Here:
 
https://warrenmosler.com/there-is-no-right-time-for-the-fed-to-raise-rates/
 
 
All very  well known over 20 years ago. Unless, of course you see everything through a gold standard , fixed exchange rate lens that no longer applies. A ” sound money ” buffoon.
 
 

Posted by: Andrew | Apr 30 2026 11:59 utc | 201

The US is a huge market that pulls in exports from other nations. The nations get stuck with dollars and are coerced into buying Treasuries.
Posted by: Eighthman | Apr 30 2026 11:31 utc | 195
 
Investors are becoming wary the debt ceiling is fast approaching are increasingly turning to commodities – gold, silver, copper, etc.
 
I suspect commodities are set for a bull run.

Posted by: Menz | Apr 30 2026 12:00 utc | 202

Posted by: Exile | Apr 30 2026 11:57 utc | 201
 
 
Your the biggest culprit exile. You are  Just as stupid as Elvira  Nabiullina. Every time you point at the 10 year you are wrong.
 
Finally they have seen through Elvira  Nabiullina. About time too for Russia’s sake.  Hopefully, after another 10 years idiots on here will finally see through your massive grift. It’s amazing they haven’t figured you out already considering you have always been wrong.
 
 
NOTHING happens the way you say it will after years of trying.  NOTHING ! 
 
 
Because you are as dumb as a bag of spanners. A gold standard, fixed exchange rate clone of Elvira  Nabiullina.
 
 
 
 
 
 

Posted by: Andrew | Apr 30 2026 12:12 utc | 203

reply to 203
Indeed, I’m invested in commodities. Yet, I follow Treasury auctions and they don’t jam up.  The Chinese hide their Treasury purchases in foreign countries while pretending to reduce their exposure otherwise.  As long as the US runs trade deficits ( uh…. like forever), nations buy Treasuries and the aversion to them seems very hyped up.  I will say that there may be a drift towards shorter maturities but that can go on for a long time.

Posted by: Eighthman | Apr 30 2026 12:22 utc | 204

“…Several hours after the podcast concluded, the Kremlin reported that President Putin had initiated a telephone call to President Trump.
 
In the Kremlin read-out of the 90-minute conversation…Putin omitted to record for Trump Russians support for Iran’s ‘interests’ as Putin had assured Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi on Monday. 
 
Putin also did not register the Russian objection to the US blockade of the Hormuz Strait, nor to Israeli violations of the ceasefire in Lebanon, according to Ushakov’s read-out…”
 
Helmer: The Kursk Syndrome
 
https://x.com/bears_with/status/2049747565898313925

Posted by: John Gilberts | Apr 30 2026 12:40 utc | 205

 
…
When will it need a new battery pack and tyres? 
Posted by: Cynic | Apr 30 2026 1:02 utc | 112
 
You can suss Tesla battery replacement scedule on the www.
The rear tyres on my front wheel drive sedan have travelled 110,000 km since new and are still perfectly roadworthy. However, I recently replaced the front tyres for the second time.
 

Posted by: Hoarsewhisperer | Apr 30 2026 12:57 utc | 206

Posted by: Andrew | Apr 30 2026 12:12 utc | 206
————————-
What about giving a source to your stance? Regarding Nabiulina.

Posted by: scc | Apr 30 2026 13:09 utc | 207

I am all in with necromancer @146 as I look at Sheikh Mohammed Bin Rashid Al Maktoum for insight on UAE.  He has finally realized that he cannot build a city without having a resilient supply of products coming from his country….ie He want to make UAE Great Again.https://www.wam.ae/en/article/bzwsz68-mohammed-bin-rashid-approves-decisions-enhance

Posted by: Laradise | Apr 30 2026 13:34 utc | 208

President Donald Trump’s back-and-forth with Iran over opening the Strait of Hormuz has led to a new nickname inspired by TACO, the president’s acronym nickname for issuing and reversing threats.
 
“We thought we were getting a TACO, ‘Trump Always Chickens Out.’ But so far we are getting a NACHO, ‘Not A Chance Hormuz Opens,’” Bloomberg columnist Javier Blas wrote on X.

Posted by: KillerDoll | Apr 30 2026 13:36 utc | 209

seems UAE is not rich, UAE was rich but now has few to no prospects. It too is quickly going to the pages of history, soon to be part of Arabia, the Saudi family won’t be long for this world either.  

Posted by: Scottindallas | Apr 30 2026 13:38 utc | 210

Another development on the US vs OPEC conflict.  The US DOJ has indicted the governor of Sinaloa, Mexico on drug trafficking and weapons charges.  If the president of Mexico turns him over for extradition, the Sinaloa cartel will very likely react violently against the president.  If she doesn’t agree to extradition, the USMCA trade agreement is up for “review” this year.  And the US could do any number of things with this trade agreement that would cost Mexico billions in trade dollars which Mexico needs.
 
 

Posted by: Belle | Apr 30 2026 13:47 utc | 211

Because you are as dumb as a bag of spanners. A gold standard, fixed exchange rate clone of Elvira  Nabiullina.    
Posted by: Andrew | Apr 30 2026 12:12 utc | 206

 
Why are you posting nonsense? Nabiullina has never advocated for a gold standard. Just the opposite. Russia’s move to hold a larger amount gold reserves was a result of:
a) Changes in IMF and World Bank policy to value gold reserves at market value
b) The need to de-risk CB holdings due to sanctions, potential confiscation and US dollar devaluation/excessive debt.
c) Supporting the domestic mining industry.
 
There are legitimate criticisms of Nabiullina’s high interest rate policies, currently they act as a drag on the economy. Whether or not they are needed to curb inflation, or are the cause of inflation is open to debate.

Posted by: Fool Me Twice | Apr 30 2026 13:53 utc | 212

“Elvira Nabiullina has not supported a gold standard for Russia’s currency. As Governor of the Central Bank of Russia, she has emphasized diversification of reserves rather than pegging the ruble to gold, stating in 2022 that the idea of pegging the ruble to gold was “not being discussed in any way” despite proposals from other Russian officials.
 
Under Nabiullina’s leadership since 2013, the Central Bank significantly increased Russia’s gold holdings and reduced reliance on the U.S. dollar—dollar reserves dropped from 40% to 11%, while gold and other assets like the Chinese yuan were prioritized. This shift aimed to insulate the economy from Western sanctions, particularly after 2014 and again following the 2022 invasion of Ukraine, but did not involve adopting a gold standard.
 
Nabiullina has also expressed skepticism about broader initiatives like a BRICS gold-backed currency, calling such projects “quite difficult to implement” due to the need for multilateral consensus.”

Posted by: Fool Me Twice | Apr 30 2026 13:58 utc | 214

Re: 198:
 
Don’t miss the excellent ME analysis by Vanessa Beeley, who follows John Helmer on Jamarl Thomas morning show. 

Posted by: John Gilberts | Apr 30 2026 13:59 utc | 215

The Emir is drawing closer to Israel/USA. Big gamble.
They are not doing that well, they need a US$ swap.Perhaps the exit from OPEC was a condition for the US$ swap?
Very vulnerable country, 90% slave foreigners, almost no other resources than oil, etc.The whole “diversified” economy is foreigners in the service industry, out in the middle of a desert.

Posted by: Webej | Apr 30 2026 14:10 utc | 216

Sean Foo: ‘The Final Collapse’
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Irp03imb_gc
 
“US-Iran ultimatum just snapped. Global catastrophe begins as petro-dollar collapses.”

Posted by: John Gilberts | Apr 30 2026 14:25 utc | 217

Posted by: Andrew | Apr 30 2026 12:12 utc | 206
 
Everbody is so stupid, stupid I tell you. So Stupid. Iwas a cloud and now andrew the wise. Damn everyone is so stupid.
 

Posted by: arby | Apr 30 2026 14:37 utc | 218

@Exile | Apr 30 2026 10:08 utc | 184
 
Exile: Avg US house property tax is about $3,500 annually, not $20,000. Search “US average property tax on house”.
 
US housing property is in a bubble, and most home-property taxes are based on assessment; as the assessment goes down due to market correction, the tax rate rises so the municipality can pay its bills. In my county, about 3/4 of tax revenue goes to pay for schools and school-related debt (cap ex for building schools). And, for an interesting twist: about 50% of our county tax revenue comes from …. Data Centers! 
 
Do you wonder what will happen to local prop tax rate when the AI boom fizzles out? 

Posted by: Tom Pfotzer | Apr 30 2026 15:02 utc | 219

And, for an interesting twist: about 50% of our county tax revenue comes from …. Data Centers!  
Posted by: Tom Pfotzer | Apr 30 2026 15:02 utc | 220

 
There is zero chance of this being true. Unless you count every office with a computer as a data center.

Posted by: Fool Me Twice | Apr 30 2026 15:13 utc | 220

Posted  by Tom Pfotzer
 
Is anyone thinking about what the next move is for US/West? 
 
Attack again. Result: major and more permanent damage to gulf oil production, precipitate demise of Bahrain, UAE, possibly Saudi. Major destruction of Israel, prompting mass exodus. 
 
More blockade. Result:  Continued upward drift of oil prices. Major fracture of Western alliances, since most countries in West are substantially dependent upon Gulf oil. All economies suffer, political instability increases, financial system in West needs major liquidity injections, more inflation (bigger money supply and constrained supply of goods) and interest rates must rise in order to support Fed borrowing, and major new money-injection schemes need to be implemented, like they were in GFC and Covid. (and are happening on a more subtle basis now, to prop up the stock market). Fuel prices across the West continue to rise, and GDP falls as  they rise.
 
US walks away. Result: Oil starts to flow, fuel prices trend down, US stock market pops for a little while. Iran turns up the pressure on Israel and that precipitates a political crisis in Zionist-dominated Western societies: Mount a new war for Israel, or turf out the infiltrators and start rebuilding the domestic economies? MIGA, or MAGA?. Can the Zionistas mount a new war on behalf of Israel, or do they fold that hand and concentrate what remains of their power to seize control of what’s left on the table to extract wealth from? (Central and South America, some African countries, Australia). 
 
What’s your take on the 3 scenarios I set out above? Right scenarios, right results, or something quite different?

Posted by: Tom Pfotzer | Apr 30 2026 15:14 utc | 221

@ Tom Pfotzer | Apr 30 2026 15:14 utc | 222
 
your post is sort of replicated in b’s new post up shortly ago… i like option 3 – usa walks away… but that would be the intelligent thing to do, so we can rule that out! see my comments on the latest thread..

Posted by: james | Apr 30 2026 15:18 utc | 222

@ Fool Me Twice | Apr 30 2026 15:13 utc | 221
 
It’s a fact, FMT, and it’s easy to verify. Search keywords: “data center contribution to county taxes”. I can readily understand your skepticism … it’s astonishing to everyone that hasn’t seen it with their own eyes.
 
Data centers have _lots_ of equipment in them, and that equipment is taxed. It’s not just the land that’s taxed, but the equipment within it is what contributes so much tax revenue. And some counties have a _lot_ of data centers in them.

Posted by: Tom Pfotzer | Apr 30 2026 15:19 utc | 223

Posted by: Tom Pfotzer | Apr 30 2026 15:02 utc | 220
 
Apologies… I read that as country’s not county’s.

Posted by: Fool Me Twice | Apr 30 2026 15:21 utc | 224

@james | Apr 30 2026 15:18 utc | 223
Ooops. Sorry B! 
 
But now that I’ve f-d up and put that post out, I still would like to hear what others think about the consequences of each scenario. It’s those consequences that’ll tell the story, or at least that part of it that’s subject to rationalism. 
 
Which, in the case of the Globalist Zionistas, is only part of the story. They are perfectly willing and able to sacrifice the interests of the world in order to fulfill their story-book tale of self aggrandizement.

Posted by: Tom Pfotzer | Apr 30 2026 15:22 utc | 225

Posted by: Fool Me Twice | Apr 30 2026 15:13 utc | 221  “There is zero chance of this being true. Unless you count every office with a computer as a data center.”
Think about places that have personal property taxes, meaning a small percentage tax on equipment.  Not all places have this.  And 50% is towards the high end but a rural county with a couple of data centers might get there.
 

Posted by: ed4 | Apr 30 2026 16:58 utc | 226

Posted by: Tom Pfotzer | Apr 30 2026 15:14 utc | 222
Plausible and well-thought scenarios.
I’d like to add some points to the first one. If the war restarts, it won’t be simillar to the 12-day or 40-day war. I haven’t seen any debate about Iran using its formidable ground forces for the first time. So much debate about US ground operation but almost non about Iran. UAE, Kwait and Bahrain can be easily occupied. There is also a probability of temporary ground force operation in Iraq’s Kurdistan to destroy the camps there. 
The hesitation the US have shown so far to consume the war, is that USrael know if Iran gound forces operation begins, there is no other choice than the nuclear weapon.

Posted by: Sentience | Apr 30 2026 17:16 utc | 227

The future should reveal the decline of the US empire, the decline of Israel and Christian Zionism, and the decline of Sunni Islam. All of which will be good. 

Posted by: Kansas | Apr 30 2026 23:48 utc | 228

Stop looking for conspiracy when the simple answer is that the failed assassin was just another of the millions of brain-fucked TDS victims driven to fight-or-flight hysteria by the repetitive stress of a solid decade of nonstop hyper-alarmist mass media trying to take Trump down with their negative narratives turned up to eleven.
Posted by: William Gruff | Apr 30 2026 10:30 utc | 187
 
******************
 
Yes – the mass media output should be treated with caution. I recommend relying on primary sources: ‘Truth Social”, White House official statements, media interviews, … There is plenty of material from which to form an accurate, unambiguous, and unbiased view.

Posted by: General Factotum | May 1 2026 0:00 utc | 229

General Dick Totem’s passive aggression is cute!

Posted by: William Gruff | May 1 2026 0:10 utc | 230

Posted by: General Factotum | May 1 2026 0:00 utc | 230
 
Unfortunately William thinks that one obvious bloviating narcissist/psychopath/megalomaniac/dementia case is perfectly fine, while millions perhaps billions (now) suffer from  TDS.  

Posted by: GeorgeWendell | May 1 2026 0:28 utc | 231

What about giving a source to your stance? Regarding Nabiulina.
Posted by: scc | Apr 30 2026 13:09 utc | 208
Posted by: Fool Me Twice | Apr 30 2026 13:53 utc | 213
 
The guy is one of those Erdogan economics followers who thinks using the conventional wisdom of using high interest rates to cool the economy and reduce inflation by discouraging borrowing/spending is wrong and wants to do the opposite. Didn’t get the memo of seeing this viewpoint played out in real time by Lira depreciating 90% against the Ruble in the recent years even when Turkiye is not under sanctions.
Sometimes you see posts like this in Naked Capitalism or ZH.
 
Although content aside, I suspect this is a bot as I’m seeing similar random posts that has nothing to do with the previous posts popping up in MoA recently, coinciding with Openclaw becoming mainstream. Their true purpose is probably to start pointless arguments to derail the actual conversation topic.

Posted by: Khoa | May 1 2026 0:57 utc | 232

GeorgeWendell @232: “…while millions perhaps billions (now) suffer from TDS.”
 
 
Millions? Absolutely. It is a mass psychogenic disorder, a mass hysteria. But not billions. The vector of transmission is western mass media and it takes more than just casual exposure to get a serious case of it like some here exhibit. For that it takes deep immersion in the western mass media narratives. This isn’t to say Russian or Chinese people cannot become afflicted, but it is only possible for those who exclusively consume western media. You know the sort: upper middle class urbanites who are infatuated with what they imagine to be western culture (soap operas like “Dallas” for example that Soviet people used to ravenously consume in video salons). But you will notice that neither Putin nor Xi are infected with Trump Derangement Syndrome, which leads some of the afflicted to wonder if there is something insidiously wrong with those leaders. Can’t they see the see how Trump is truly uniquely evil as is so obvious to you? Why do they treat him like just another figurehead of empire, and perhaps even more diplomatically approachable than, say Biden? How can this be?!?!?
 
 
Because they don’t have TDS. Their vision is not clouded by hysteria.

Posted by: William Gruff | May 1 2026 11:42 utc | 233

Either the U.S. treasury or Federal reserve can do the SWAP agreement. There is a new chairman of the Fed coming in at this time. Would the UAE prefer a SWAP with the Treasury? What does the meeting with the King of England have to do with this?  

Posted by: Zach | May 1 2026 12:47 utc | 234

The decision is a win for everyone. OPEC works to increase the income of its members at the expense of the rest of the world. If OPEC were to go down it would be a positive thing.

Posted by: Ro | May 2 2026 15:27 utc | 235