Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
April 29, 2026
The Uppity Sheikdom May Not Survive A Conflict With Its Neighbors

Yesterday the United Arab Emirates (UAE) declared that it would leave the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC). It is a divorce that will likely have severe consequences for the UAE’s well being.

This is a long term move that has been long coming and independent from the short term consequences of current USrael war on Iran.


bigger
OPEC, together with other oil producing countries (OPEC+), has always strived to keep oil prices steady by limiting what each of its members would produce. The producer countries had recognized that flooding the markets with oil would tank its price and lower their overall income. Keeping production too low and oil too expensive would encourage consumers to use other energy sources. OPEC and OPEC+ policy was therefore to optimize output so that it could provide a long term security for supplies as well as for its income.

With the UAE leaving OPEC will consist of 11 core members: Algeria, Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Gabon, Iran, Iraq, Kuwait, Libya, Nigeria, Saudi Arabia and Venezuela.  OPEC+ additionally includes Russia, Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Bahrain, Brunei, Malaysia, Mexico, Oman, South Sudan, and Sudan.

The UAE decision is a victory for the U.S. and its oil industry. As a WSJ opinion piece asserts:

U.S. shale fracking has achieved Washington’s longtime strategic goal of curbing the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries’s control over oil prices. The cartel is fracturing, with the United Arab Emirates announcing its exit on Tuesday. This is another foreign policy victory for American fossil-fuel energy.

The U.A.E. has chafed for years at OPEC’s per-country production quotas that are intended to limit global supply and push up oil prices. Saudi Arabia and the U.A.E. are the cartel’s two swing producers that have excess capacity to ramp up output, with Abu Dhabi capable of producing 1.4 million barrels a day more than OPEC’s quota.

Abu Dhabi is rich and has large financial reserves. It does not need a higher oil output to survive.

The reasons for its divorce from other Arab oil producers are deeper (archived) than bore holes:

In recent years, Emirati officials have spoken of the importance of pursuing their own economic interests, chafing at quotas set by OPEC that curtailed their oil production.

They have deepened their alliance with Israel, while other Arab governments keep their distance or pull further away from it.

In Yemen, the Emirates has supported an armed insurgency, angering Saudi leaders, who back the government there.

And in Sudan’s brutal civil war, where Saudi Arabia and Egypt support the government, the Emirates has backed a rival paramilitary group. Emirati officials have denied sending weapons to the Sudanese group, the Rapid Support Forces, despite extensive evidence to the contrary.

The rift between Saudi Arabia and the Emirates that has been developing for years and extends to the highest levels of the two governments.

Prince Mohammed of Saudi Arabia and the Emirati leader, Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed, were once close partners, joining forces in 2015 to fight the Houthi rebels in Yemen, but they have since diverged significantly, pursuing different visions for the future of the Middle East that have come into conflict with one another. That rupture burst into public view in December, but appears to have hardened during the war with Iran.

As Gulf Arab officials weigh how to respond to Iran, the Emirates has taken measures to sever its longstanding cultural and economic ties with the country. Saudi Arabia, which has faced fewer and less damaging attacks, has condemned Iran strongly, but has supported efforts led by Pakistan to find a diplomatic resolution to the war — an initiative from which the Emirates has kept some distance.

Emirati officials have spoken repeatedly of their dissatisfaction with Arab and Islamic multilateral organizations, hinting that they would have preferred a stronger stance against Iran.

For years, the Emirates had remained in OPEC “out of deference to Saudi Arabia,” Ms. Diwan said. Tuesday’s news makes it clear that “they will no longer defer to Saudi leadership.”

And therein lies a problem …

The UAE has some 10 million inhabitants of which only 12% are born Emiraties. The rest are Indian, Pakistani and other guest workers who could leave at any moments notice.

Saudi Arabia has 33 million inhabitants.

Going against several major policies of its big neighbor is a high risk endeavor . While the UAE can in general hope for support from Israel and the U.S. its is highly unlikely that either would intervene should Saudi Arabia (with Pakistani and/or Egyptian support) decide to get rid of an uppity sheik in its immediate neighborhood. It probably would not be a short or easy conflict but their would not be much left of the UAE should the Saudis proceed. The rest of OPEC and OPEC+ would likely stand by and applause.

As Yves Smith at Naked Capitalism comments:

With no shipments out of the Gulf now, this move has no immediate effect. The UAE apparently wants to pump freely when it can. But that also assumes that there will be a UAE when the conflict ends.

Comments

The old world order continues to come apart.
This will lead to something, which will lead to something else, etc.
But the one constant – the US acting in bad faith with pretty much everyone else in the world.

Posted by: Occam | Apr 29 2026 17:04 utc | 1

interesting development… thanks for the update… not sure what to make of it…  i hope moa poster laguerre chimes in… 
 
how much of this is purely monetary and how much, if any is religious based??  i have too many questions and not enough substance….
 
thanks b…

Posted by: james | Apr 29 2026 17:14 utc | 2

Thanks for the posting b
 
I think Kuwait and Bahrain will also not be what they were when this is over.
 
Will the ME see a more equitable distribution of the energy wealth when this is over would be my question?
I don’t see the tinpot sheiks staying in power without empire military might or the support of China/Russia/Iran which will call for changes I expect.
 
How interesting to watch our species go through this civilization crisis/evolution.
 
 

Posted by: psychohistorian | Apr 29 2026 17:18 utc | 3

Does this have to do with the swap lines recently asked for by the UAE? Is this being asked for by the leaders of the US in exchange for the money?
Iran — I Ran So Far Away

Posted by: kana | Apr 29 2026 17:21 utc | 4

UAE has been hit the hardest by Iran. It’s not surprising that UAE has been a lot more hostile and actively supporting US efforts to bomb Iran.
 
UAE is in desperate need for money to repair their infrastructure and scale up their military. Thus, the UAE left the OPEC as the OPEC is counterproductive to their interest of getting a lot of money quickly because they’re feeling if they don’t have their money now. Their foreign workers will leave and everything that shut down will take years to restart and decades to find skilled workers.
 
The UAE is running against time as their savings are drying up and their investments overseas and in foreign proxy wars become sunk cost fallacies.
 
Their oil and gas is only 30% of their GPD. The rest is Tourism and Expats living there which is dead ever since the war began Feb 28th.
 
In short: UAE needs money because they’re facing their existential crisis as the first nation to likely collapse. That’s why they left OPEC and OPEC+ to pump as much oil to sell.

Posted by: KillerDoll | Apr 29 2026 17:24 utc | 5

Looks like Abu Dhabi has the lions share of the oil and gas reserve, Dubai, Sharjah and the other Emirates far less.
Also interesting are the two lines of oil fields marching into the Saudi empty quarter…
I guess there is still a lot of repositioning to do, but I don’t see the Emirates being united for too long.

Posted by: ChatNPC | Apr 29 2026 17:24 utc | 6

UAE has neither a significant military nor an arms industry. It therefore intends to rely even more heavily on the US/Israeli axis for its security and arms supply. That strategy will work for UAE just as well as it has for Europe and the UK, and for similar reasons. Will it swear to fight whatever target the US chooses “to the last Emirati”?

Posted by: jorge | Apr 29 2026 17:30 utc | 7

Thanks for the article, B.
 
The WSJ piece is misleading. There’s no chance their narrative holds water.
 
Shale oil and gas producers have high production costs and need high oil prices.
 
The UAE pumping more oil means lower prices. It’s hard to see how this could be a “victory” for the Americans.

Posted by: Sebgo | Apr 29 2026 17:35 utc | 8

I don’t see how the UAE can possibly hope to survive this move intact. For one thing, how on earth can they defend themselves militarily?
 
They now face an increasingly antagonistic Saudi Arabia with a working understanding with Pakistan, hostile factions in Yemen armed with missiles well capable of reaching UAE territory, Oman looking on doubtfully and an implacably angry Iran. Not a good place to be.

Posted by: Jeremy Rhymings-Lang | Apr 29 2026 17:37 utc | 9

Some details on the current pipeline:
 
Habshan–Fujairah oil pipeline

Posted by: ChatNPC | Apr 29 2026 17:44 utc | 10

For one thing, how on earth can they defend themselves militarily?
 
Posted by: Jeremy Rhymings-Lang | Apr 29 2026 17:37 utc | 9
 

 
With their pride.
 

Posted by: too scents | Apr 29 2026 17:45 utc | 11

The UAE pumping more oil means lower prices. It’s hard to see how this could be a “victory” for the Americans.

Posted by: Sebgo | Apr 29 2026 17:35 utc | 8
 
100% agree with this, I was about to type something very similar.
 
Even if weakening the pricing power of OPEC was a US aim, the US would still face the same balancing act; if it could somehow contrive to push up prices too far, it drives renewed moves towards alternatives.

Posted by: Jeremy Rhymings-Lang | Apr 29 2026 17:46 utc | 12

This is another foreign policy victory for American fossil-fuel energy.”
America doesn’t force feed an “American fossil-fuel energy” policy on it’s citizens. America makes sure it’s citizens have choices among competing sources which allows it’s citizens to select what energy source serves them best. OPEC doesn’t operate that way. OPEC squashes competition among it’s members. OPEC is afraid to compete. All this to say the UAE has chosen to compete. Which for consumers, all consumers, is a good thing.

Posted by: Johnny Dollar | Apr 29 2026 17:49 utc | 13

The rumblings depict further UAE disintegration for numerous reasons, the main being the need to break away from MbZ and his links to the Zionists and Empire–those are the reasons why his portion of the UAE received so much attention from Iran and will in the future. Pepe Escobar provided some more info on that in his chat with Nima today. 

Posted by: karlof1 | Apr 29 2026 17:50 utc | 14

The recent defeat of UAE forces in southern Yemen (the leadership of the UAE-backed Southern Transitional Council was decapitated) presumably intensified the rift between KSA and UAE. 
 
So far as I can see, the UAE is turning to the US even more. It is precisely the social weakness of a so-called country (family owned oil company with a flag) where the citizens are a small minority. KSA has its own issues but its ruling family isn’t so desperately outnumbered. UAE needs a protector. Relying on the US government is perilous but do they really have much of a choice? What are they going to do, reform their system? No doubt they hope to pump freely if IRI loses. But even if their dependence on the US for security means they have to follow the American orders on production, even if that decreases their income, at least they’ll still have one. Between less money because the US says so, or no money because he’s been run out/killed, MbZ I suspect has made his choice. 

Posted by: steven t johnson | Apr 29 2026 17:51 utc | 15

Another Scholar praises China and accepts that The World will be a Multipolar World.
 
Francis Fukuyama the author of End of History and Humankind will adopt American Liberal Democracy everywhere around the world. Arab Spring will turn the Middle East into Liberal Democracy.
 
he finally admitted the USA is in long term decline and the world is adapting to a world in which the USA is no longer a big player anymore.
 
Francis Fukuyama appeared on an American Podcast “Making Sense with Sam Harris” and showed admiration towards China and Chinese system. 
 
Francis Fukuyama also admitted recently that he overestimated liberal democracy resiliency. Francis also said Liberal Democracy is not compatible with religion and the Middle East. He is emphasizing that such strikes often lead to internal instability rather than achieving political objectives. Reality finally hits this polisci scholar.
 
I can’t wait to see his take on Iran will be Unstable collapsing shithole because of the American airstrikes to be wrong like his “End of History” and “Arab Spring”

Posted by: KillerDoll | Apr 29 2026 17:52 utc | 16

Thanks for this. The UAE is a member of BRICS and a  ‘strategic partner’ of Russia.
 
From happier days:
 
Why Russia & the UAE Are A Marriage Made in Heaven
 
https://www.rt.com/news/631804-russia-uae-partnership-visit/
 
“…The UAE’s relationships in the Gulf and the Red Sea arc have become more complicated, and sharp deterioration in Emirati ties with Saudi Arabia, against the background of competing interests and perceptions in Yemen, Sudan and Somalia, make diplomatic diversification a necessity rather than mere preference.
 
Russia, as a permanent member of the UN Security Council and as a partner with deep experience in regional bargaining, offers precisely the kind of geopolitical weight that can be useful when regional equations shift unexpectedly. The UAE’s increasingly open and confident relationship with Israel adds another dimension to this calculation.”

Posted by: John Gilberts | Apr 29 2026 17:53 utc | 17

https://www.unz.com/jnino/how-the-uae-became-israels-hidden-partner-in-the-gulf/
 
An fine article by Jose Alberto Nino on when the UAE began it’s relatioship with Isn’treal in 1994 with the acquisition of F16’s from the US and how it expanded over the years.
 
The corrupt UAE is the hiding place of the Gupta family and the billions looted from the South African government and parastatals which almost destroyed South Africa.
 
MbZ and Nuttyyahoo, a match made in hell and a curse on humanity.
 

Posted by: KeithZA | Apr 29 2026 17:58 utc | 18

Posted by: KillerDoll | Apr 29 2026 17:24 utc | 5
Speaking about their dirty proxy wars, I wonder if recent events in the Sahel are related with the internal crisis in the UAE ?

Posted by: Hiro Masamune | Apr 29 2026 18:00 utc | 19

Israel is on a mission. When it meets resistance in one direction,  it targets somewhere else.
 
So, if the Iran war ends, a frustrated  Israel will turn its sights to Africa , allied with Israel , which will now claim Oil and Gas  rights in the Mediterranean Leviathan from Rafah to the Litani.
The UAE’s alliance with Israel is a tool to develope production facilities outside the  Persian Gulf .
 
Sickening,  typical , Israeli genocidal tactics.

Posted by: Giyane | Apr 29 2026 18:02 utc | 20

You might mention that, Angola (2024), Ecuador (2020), Qatar (2019), have all recently quit OPEC. It’s a nonstable club. Sudan has been applied for membership for a decade.

Posted by: Call it what u will | Apr 29 2026 18:06 utc | 21

Posted by: Hiro Masamune | Apr 29 2026 18:00 utc | 19
I don’t think the UAE is behind in Mali as they don’t have much interest overthere. The Islamists and the Tuerag separatists have been at odds with the Mali government with or without the UAE involved. Their weapons are sourced mainly from the North African region and Lybia.
 
The Mali Government is far from collapse.  The rebels have gained experience and coordinated a surprise attack and captured a city in the North but I don’t think their hold on the city will be long as the government and the Russian AfricaKorp will regroup and reorganize for a counter attack to take back.

Posted by: KillerDoll | Apr 29 2026 18:12 utc | 22

… should Saudi Arabia (with Pakistani and/or Egyptian support) decide to get rid of an uppity sheik in its immediate neighborhood

While MBS (of Saudi Arabia) is biding his time with nothing to fear
the UAE must act quickly as it has much to fear.
My money is on MBS being taken out by someone, before UAE goes.
 
 

Posted by: Otto Penn | Apr 29 2026 18:12 utc | 23

… should Saudi Arabia (with Pakistani and/or Egyptian support) decide to get rid of an uppity sheik in its immediate neighborhood

Egyptian Military Leadership has much closer ties to the UAE than Saudi
 
Egypt sold their Mediterranean coast for 35 billion $ to the UAE and borrowed the UAE money to finance their The New Capital construction.
 
Egypt is now under the control of the Egyptian Military after El-Sisi as the Egyptian military is now a very big player in their economy that produce cements, bricks,etc without paying any form of tax. That pushed foreign investors away. So, they tried to cozy with the Emirates for hard currency bail out.
 
Egypt will sit out of any UAE and Saudi conflict because of their intertwined ties.

Posted by: KillerDoll | Apr 29 2026 18:27 utc | 24

NYC 1430 Wednesday

US 10-YR

4,41

🔥🔥🔥🔥

Posted by: Exile | Apr 29 2026 18:27 utc | 25

@8 Sebgo

“The WSJ piece is misleading. There’s no chance their narrative holds water.

Shale oil and gas producers have high production costs and need high oil prices.

The UAE pumping more oil means lower prices. It’s hard to see how this could be a “victory” for the Americans.”

UAE buys from US, so US profits
UAE funds US aligned projects, so US profits
Any US financial hold on UAE can be used to steer production, so providing a certain control of prices.
It stops opec collectively blocking US direction, makes it less effective at that.
Oil supply is a strategic asset.
US could antagonise other gulf states using UAE as example, could spark conflict (MIC) over reserves or geography.
For example.

It is leverage.

Prices are set to be higher than shale needs for the foreseeable future also, plus 5 mbpd is not going to affect prices as much as conflict.

I wouldn’t say it is a victory for Americans though, as dependency on hegemony and oil income is not exactly stable or constructive in terms of domestic sustainability or integrity.

In other words, the binary of prices is only one facet.

Posted by: Ornot | Apr 29 2026 18:29 utc | 26

USSR = Union of Socialist Soviet Republics, dissolved 1991
 
UK = United Kingdom
 
UAE = United Arab Emirates
 
USA = United States of America
 
EU = European Union
 
I believe we’ll see some more of the U’s go. b’s piece highlights the stress on Abu Dhabi, and it’s different but stressful nonetheless for UK, USA and (most urgent IMO) EU.
 
Where’s the unity?

Posted by: Konami | Apr 29 2026 18:29 utc | 27

UAE’s immigrant proletariat should seize the government, exterminate the sheiks, ant declare alignment with the Axis of Resistance.  

Posted by: Keme | Apr 29 2026 18:31 utc | 28

US DoE Weekly Petroleum Balance Sheet for 24 April.
 
SPR crude stocks down 7 million barrels week over week, to 397 million barrels.   Commercial crude stocks down 6 million barrels 
 
U.S. is doing its part to supply the world and raise prices at U.S. gas stations.

Posted by: paddy | Apr 29 2026 18:32 utc | 29

Posted by: Keme | Apr 29 2026 18:31 utc | 28 A lovely thought! I think fear of that is fundamentally why UAE is going with the US. 

Posted by: steven t johnson | Apr 29 2026 18:35 utc | 30

The rest are Indian, Pakistani and other guest workers who could leave at any moments notice.

Not if the Sheikhs refuse to give their passports back. The quasi-slavery that the south Asian immigrants live in is one of the main reasons to oppose the UAE’s whole existence as the UAE.

Posted by: fnord | Apr 29 2026 18:35 utc | 31

I thought that the UAE was not pumping oil now.  Is that wrong?
But if it’s true, why would now be the time when they leave the alliance?   

Posted by: wagelaborer | Apr 29 2026 18:37 utc | 32

@ 28
Hindus and Buddhists fighting against the Sunnis and for the Shia? I don’t know. Maybe crazier things have happened. The problem for the migrant workers is that they’re not employed in productive industries, but in the service sector. The money-making industry, petroleum, employs the labor aristocracy, probably a lot of European and North American workers whose class interests are aligned with the oil sheikhs.

Posted by: fnord | Apr 29 2026 18:38 utc | 33

Posted by: KillerDoll | Apr 29 2026 18:12 utc | 22
 
You should broaden your perspective.
 
The weapons used by terrorists in the Sahel come from all over, anything that can be found on the black market.
 
But the money comes partly from the Gulf countries, especially Qatar and the Emirates.
One might wonder if they serve as a safe haven for Westerners, as is often the case, or if they have their own motives, but it’s a fact.
 
There have been instances where monarchies have intervened directly with African countries on behalf of their jihadist protégés.
 
Some of the money also comes from ransoms paid for the kidnapping of Westerners, and now even from the non-kidnapping of them.
You read that right: countries are paying to prevent their citizens from being kidnapped.
 
Finally, there’s the money from looting and various forms of trafficking.
 
With enough money, one can buy weapons from all over the world, including Russia and Ukraine.
 
Ukraine has been the world’s largest black market for arms for years, so it wouldn’t be surprising if weapons were flowing from there to the Sahel.
 
But the Sahel is not a secondary project of Ukraine, as some claim, since this project is much older.

Posted by: Sebgo | Apr 29 2026 18:38 utc | 34

Posted by: Ornot | Apr 29 2026 18:29 utc | 26 The US has occasionally pushed KSA for more production, lower prices, though some deny Bush for one wanted to deprive Russia of oil income. Presidents are selected to make hard choices in the general interest of capital. High oil prices benefit domestic producers in the US but low oil prices may be deemed necessary for other domestic businesses or to harm opponent states. 

Posted by: steven t johnson | Apr 29 2026 18:40 utc | 35

RE: TASS
 
Putin approves Trump’s decision to extend ceasefire around Iran
 
”The Russian president stated that it should give negotiations a chance and help stabilize the situation in general, Yury Ushakov said”
 

 
”MOSCOW, April 29. /TASS/. Russian President Vladimir Putin has welcomed US leader Donald Trump’s decision to extend the ceasefire with Iran, saying it could help stabilize the situation, Kremlin aide Yury Ushakov told reporters.”

Isn’t that swell of Putin??
 
To extend Iran’s ceasefire for IRAN.

What a guy….

Posted by: Trubind1 | Apr 29 2026 18:50 utc | 36

Posted by: Ornot | Apr 29 2026 18:29 utc | 26
 
Your reasoning is sound, in principle.
But in practice, there’s no chance that the US will persuade the UAE to reduce its production after this conflict.
 
Furthermore, the figures speak for themselves. The UAE produces 3.5 million barrels per day (mbpd) while its capacity is 5 mbpd, due to OPEC quotas.
 
But this country represents only 11% of OPEC and 7% of OPEC+. Therefore, using its full production capacity would only represent +3% of the organization output, and even less on a global scale.
 
This is a relatively limited lever on prices, as it can be absorbed by two or three major players on the supply or demand side.
 
Ultimately, I believe the UAE needs its freedom to produce more and compensate for the damage it has suffered, not to submit to American dictates.

Posted by: Sebgo | Apr 29 2026 18:53 utc | 37

Posted by: steven t johnson | Apr 29 2026 18:40 utc | 35
 
There’s even a version claiming that the oil price collapse was orchestrated by the US with the complicity of the Saudi Arabian Kingdom to bring down the USSR.
 
By flooding the market with Saudi oil and driving the price of oil below $10, America supposedly ruined the USSR, leading it to limit its foreign interventions (Afghanistan) and then experience internal problems.
 
This is a story that appeals to the guys in the energy sector, highlighting the power of oil.

Posted by: Sebgo | Apr 29 2026 19:00 utc | 38

This is another foreign policy victory for American fossil-fuel energy.”America doesn’t force feed an “American fossil-fuel energy” policy on it’s citizens. America makes sure it’s citizens have choices among competing sources which allows it’s citizens to select what energy source serves them best. OPEC doesn’t operate that way. OPEC squashes competition among it’s members. OPEC is afraid to compete. All this to say the UAE has chosen to compete. Which for consumers, all consumers, is a good thing.
Posted by: Johnny Dollar | Apr 29 2026 17:49 utc | 13

I think this is an oversimplification, in the spirit of the free unrestrained capitalism a la “Atlas Shrugged”. Tactically, on the short time scale, this indeed might be good for consumers. However, on the longer time scales, higher price instability (one of the reasons OPEC was formed in the first place) hinders infrastructure development projects for the oil/gas drilling itself. I agree that cartelization/monopolization, in its extreme, is also a very bad thing, but to say that all those regulating structures need to be destroyed in the name of the ultimate customer is a huge oversimplification, it does not work that way. 

Posted by: Kirill | Apr 29 2026 19:10 utc | 39

While the UAE can in general hope for support from Israel and the U.S. its is highly unlikely that either would intervene should Saudi Arabia (with Pakistani and/or Egyptian support) decide to get rid of an uppity sheik in its immediate neighborhood.

New sheriff in the Middle East are the 3 states mentioned in addition to strong man Erdogan (key NATO member) as most aggressive against the USIsraeli acts of genocide against Palestinians.
Is an ‘Islamic NATO’ emerging as a counterweight to Israel? | New Arab |
Analysis: Israel’s militarism and territorial ambitions since 2023 are quietly driving regional states towards a new security and defence alignment
Showing true colors … UAE splits from OPEC cartel, joins U.S. and Israel camp for war on the Islamic Republic of Iran. UAE plays a key role in war torn Sudan and genocidal war crimes. Same as before in Yemen and Syria.

Posted by: Oui | Apr 29 2026 19:16 utc | 40

El    11 mins
 
Petrodollar IMPLODES as UAE Exits OPEC – 59-Year Membership ENDS, USA Loses Oil Pricing Power

Posted by: Don Firineach | Apr 29 2026 19:17 utc | 41

Thanks b.
 
As others have already pointed out the UAE may not survive.
I read somewhere that there are already rifts within the fiefdoms with the one closest to the Sea of Oman being highlighted in an article about succession. 
 
Additionally the RSF in Sudan is fracturing with factions defecting to Government forces.
 
Meanwhile the  hegemon has had another setback in Mali where Al Qaeda and the Touregs, opposing forces have coordinated a nationwide assault using the Syrian template. 
 
That the government forces, locals and the African Corp fought back is proof the Russians are there for the long haul. 

Posted by: Suresh | Apr 29 2026 19:18 utc | 42

While MBS (of Saudi Arabia) is biding his time with nothing to fearthe UAE must act quickly as it has much to fear.My money is on MBS being taken out by someone, before UAE goes.  
Posted by: Otto Penn | Apr 29 2026 18:12 utc | 23

Where is Carlos the Jackal when you need him?

Posted by: ChatNPC | Apr 29 2026 19:19 utc | 43

20 years ago or so, Hugo Chavez floated a set $75 a barrel oil price for OPEC, to allow for stability and predictability for both producers and consumers. That concept was shot down by the usual suspects.

Posted by: jayc | Apr 29 2026 19:21 utc | 44

Ultimately, I believe the UAE needs its freedom to produce more and compensate for the damage it has suffered, not to submit to American dictates.
Posted by: Sebgo | Apr 29 2026 18:53 utc | 37

Yes, but most of all the UAE would need peace and open traffic. Bad relations with all the neighbors aren’t the way to go. Having left OPEC makes the target cross on their property even bigger – once the USrael assault resumes. Iraqi politologists etc. (I think they where linked and recommended by Pepe Escobar) argue that UAE may return to being a part of Oman. I wonder whether Aragchi was talking in Muscat along that line?

Posted by: BG13 | Apr 29 2026 19:23 utc | 45

27 mins
 
The REAL reason UAE left OPEC – explained by Andreas Krieg

Posted by: Don Firineach | Apr 29 2026 19:24 utc | 46

Forgot to mention that the pull out from OPEC is probably meant to manipulate the markets again as it has no effect on the physical supply crunch.
 
All the “good” news articles are pushing that narrative. 

Posted by: Suresh | Apr 29 2026 19:24 utc | 47

The American aircraft carrier USS Gerald R Ford will depart the Middle East and begin sailing home in the coming days, multiple US officials have said.

Posted by: Oui | Apr 29 2026 19:26 utc | 48

USSR = Union of Socialist Soviet Republics, dissolved 1991
 
UK = United Kingdom
 
UAE = United Arab Emirates
 
USA = United States of America
 
EU = European Union
 
I believe we’ll see some more of the U’s go. b’s piece highlights the stress on Abu Dhabi, and it’s different but stressful nonetheless for UK, USA and (most urgent IMO) EU.
 
Where’s the unity?
 
Posted by: Konami | Apr 29 2026 18:29 utc | 27
Dorky Grandma joke.  

Posted by: Ahenobarbus | Apr 29 2026 19:30 utc | 49

I can now suggest Escobar’s chat with Judge Nap and Crooke’s chat with Danny Haiphong. 
 
Real oil prices at shipping terminals are reported to be over $200/bbl now. Gas price rise within the Empire is rising again. Trump’s numbers are down again. An interesting discussion about the non-assassination attempt occurred between Johnson and Davis earlier today. 

Posted by: karlof1 | Apr 29 2026 19:33 utc | 50

Relying on the US government is perilous but do they really have much of a choice? What are they going to do, reform their system? No doubt they hope to pump freely if IRI loses. But even if their dependence on the US for security means they have to follow the American orders on production, even if that decreases their income, at least they’ll still have one. Between less money because the US says so, or no money because he’s been run out/killed, MbZ I suspect has made his choice. 
 
Posted by: steven t johnson | Apr 29 2026 17:51 utc | 15
So, I thought you were the supreme Marxist?  Who is “they”?  Is this nation and undifferentiated monolith?  In your bourgeois consciousness, social class apparently doesn’t not exist in the UAE.

Posted by: Ahenobarbus | Apr 29 2026 19:35 utc | 51

I can now suggest Escobar’s chat with Judge Nap and Crooke’s chat with Danny Haiphong. 
 
Real oil prices at shipping terminals are reported to be over $200/bbl now. Gas price rise within the Empire is rising again. Trump’s numbers are down again. An interesting discussion about the non-assassination attempt occurred between Johnson and Davis earlier today. 
 
Posted by: karlof1 | Apr 29 2026 19:33 utc | 50
And unbelievably the Zio manipulated markets of the West are actually starting to reflect that reality.  
Western economic meltdown means Iranian victory.  ✌️ 

Posted by: Ahenobarbus | Apr 29 2026 19:38 utc | 52

‘It probably would not be a short or easy conflict but their would not be much left of the UAE should the Saudis proceed.’
 
It has not already left much of the UAE and pointing out to Saudis is missing the point. Rats leaving the sinking ship. What if Iran’s ground’s force take the UAE? Very easy for them. Iran have attacked UAE more than twice as Israel. UAE is the Iran’s main target. Saudies are currenntly undeestand the UAE can not exist under the shadow of new Iran. Saudi’s 33 million population is one third of Iran. 

Posted by: Sentience | Apr 29 2026 19:39 utc | 53

Posted by: Trubind1 | Apr 29 2026 18:50 utc | 36
the status quo is providing him the money to continue the war effort. You can’t blame him for that logic

Posted by: Night Tripper | Apr 29 2026 19:44 utc | 54

Posted by: Ahenobarbus | Apr 29 2026 19:35 utc | 51 You really are desperate. When I mentioned the very small percentage of citizens, I was implying the non-citizens were not the same class. Most of the non-citizens are working class. As for the ruling class, I explicitly mentioned the infamous Muhammad bin Zayed of Abu Dhabi, but my “they” includes not just him but his relatives and the other emirs and their families. 

Posted by: steven t johnson | Apr 29 2026 20:04 utc | 55

Reality will start to kick in any day now, and you cant trick reality.
 
Within a week or so ther’s going to be a major shortage of aviation fuel world wide, right at peak tourism time. Airlines in trouble,  hotels resteraunts the whole industry takeing a big hit.
 
Iran is in no hurry.

Posted by: Mark2 | Apr 29 2026 20:08 utc | 56

There is more oil in Yemen than there was in “Saudi” Arabia, plus Yemen has gas Saud does not have.
 
Three times the Collective West using proxies Saudi and Egypt and mercenaries from Africa have tried to conquer Yemen since 1900
 
For the last 3 years The UAE has been fighting a war against the Saudis inside the country Yemen. They fight for ownership of the petroleum deposits. They also fight the indigenous inhabitants as well as each other, and are influenced by israel the US and once great Britain.
 
When you see a Yemeni man out in public he will be sporting a J shaped knife sheath tucked under a sash wrapped around his waist/belly. The knives are a tradition and some may be 2 thousand years old. 

Posted by: Hot Carl | Apr 29 2026 20:15 utc | 57

The UAE has some 10 million inhabitants of which only 12% are born Emiraties. The rest are Indian, Pakistani and other guest workers who could leave at any moments notice.

 
Posted by b on April 29, 2026 at 16:58 UTC | Permalink
 
 
Well’ saudis could play the pakistan card and do an emirates spring (for a new sheik) using the paki workers.
 
 
But RF+India could use the indians for an alternative sheik (or even support current one)
 
 
Time for western (oil industry) workers to ask for full contract payment in escrow, just in case ….
 
 
One thing is sure, the arabic peninsula might not get a status quo ex ante when iran’s caper is finished….

Posted by: Newbie | Apr 29 2026 20:17 utc | 58

The UAE is looking at the fat profits from the current shortages…If the war lasts long enough, it will look like a smart decision…so they’re gambling on that….

Posted by: pyrrhus | Apr 29 2026 20:18 utc | 59

RE:
”the status quo is providing him the money to continue the war effort. You can’t blame him for that logic”
Posted by: Night Tripper | Apr 29 2026 19:44 utc | 54
 
Not sure what “him” your referring too.
 
But either way,  let us discontinue using such words as “Sovereign” or “multipolar”…
 
 

Posted by: Trubind1 | Apr 29 2026 20:20 utc | 60

Ahenobarbus: you’re unhinged. The young ones would tell you to touch grass, I suggest to fuck off. Nothing but “zio zio zio” and “please bring back LD” from you.
 
In other news: US exceptionalism at work… https://x.com/disclosetv/status/2049487493859348803

U.S. Energy Secretary Chris Wright likens war with Iran to “killing the cancer that will kill you,” adding, “We’re not doing it just for America. We’re doing it for the world!”

We’ve seen the cancer metaphor before from experts like Hitler and Alfred Rosenberg.

Posted by: Konami | Apr 29 2026 20:26 utc | 61

There’s a much bigger issue than UAE’s daydreams about their future in the Fossil Fuel Biz since Trump’s Hormuz SNAFU began.
 
In Oz, interest in EVs has ramped up exponentially amongst the Joe Average Consumer demographic. It’s now Common Knowledge that EVs are cheaper to run, smooth, silent, and cost virtually $0 / annum to maintain. And if you plug it in when you get home then you never have to waste time on refueling.
 
The only disadvantage is that range is limited to 400km +/- 50km. That demographic will NEVER go back to Fossil Fueled vehicles. And the EV Dealers are Very Busy.
My elderly female neighbour has had rooftop Solar and owned a Tesla for 6+ years and spent $0-00 on running costs and servicing since taking delivery.

Posted by: Hoarsewhisperer | Apr 29 2026 20:32 utc | 62

its actually nice to see how desperate players start to play their cards – magnificent <3

Posted by: Macpott | Apr 29 2026 20:35 utc | 63

@ Don Firineach | Apr 29 2026 19:17 utc | 41
 
usa-israel might have been better to have invaded and made war on uae… it appears to amount to a similar end point, lol..

Posted by: james | Apr 29 2026 20:37 utc | 64

Posted by: Newbie | Apr 29 2026 20:17 utc | 58
 
Before imagining some glorious uprising of migrant workets, it would be useful to understand how the system operates in the Gulf (and just how oppressive it is):
Kafala system

Posted by: ChatNPC | Apr 29 2026 20:40 utc | 65

Here is a message from Israel I didn’t see on MOa yet (apologies if I’m wrong) and that I believe is relevant.
 
Tamir Pardo, Mossad director 2011-2016 on April 28, after a visit to West Bank following settler pogroms agent Palestinians:

My mother was a Holocaust survivor. What I saw reminded me of the events that happened against Jews in the last century. …What I saw today made me feel ashamed to be Jewish.

https://www.commondreams.org/news/mossad-chief-nazi-holocaust
 
Pardo as a former Mossad director has blood on his hands. Why his words are relevant nonetheless: there are not too many but still recurring reports from Jews in Israel who observe the parallels between their state’s violence and what happened in Nazi Germany. The point is not that Netanyahu is Hitler (he is not) but that Israel is losing the story, and functionaries realise this. I hope these are signs of cracks within the zionist regime.

Posted by: Konami | Apr 29 2026 20:41 utc | 66

Don Firineach | Apr 29 2026 19:24 utc | 46
 
Thanks for that, Don. I note the evasion away from the main issue not being addressed–the Zionists and the vast amount of instability they’ve generated in the region. Ans when they discussed the ending the war, the Zionists aren’t mentioned at all despite the fact that they started it.   

Posted by: karlof1 | Apr 29 2026 20:47 utc | 67

67
Hezbollas answer — 5 Merkavas plus much more in S. Lebanon

Posted by: Monty | Apr 29 2026 20:55 utc | 68

Here’s an example why Mao insisted on “no investigation, no right to speak”:

Hindus and Buddhists fighting against the Sunnis and for the Shia? I don’t know. Maybe crazier things have happened. The problem for the migrant workers is that they’re not employed in productive industries, but in the service sector. The money-making industry, petroleum, employs the labor aristocracy, probably a lot of European and North American workers whose class interests are aligned with the oil sheikhs.
Posted by: fnord | Apr 29 2026 18:38 utc | 33

 
There is indeed disparity among migrant workers in the UAE. Workers from different countries of origin will get different pay for the same job. Those from developed countries get paid more, and there is hierarchy even among the developing ones. From the LSE’s Middle East Centre’s 2022 “United Arab Emirate’ Labour Market, An Overview”:

This means that the diversity of the UAE labour market comes at the cost of inequality. For instance, while the substantial wage gap between migrants from developed and developing countries is linked to the concentration of the former in high-paid jobs and the latter in low-paid jobs, there is evidence that such wage gap does exist also among those holding comparable jobs.58 Even among expatriates from developing countries, payments usually follow a hierarchical order among different nationalities which do not necessarily reflect differences in assigned tasks. Particularly, Arab countries come directly after the UAE, followed by East Asian countries, then by South Asian countries.59

 
North Americans also dominate the management layer. This can be seen in Figure 5 of the 2018 “Demography, Migration, and the Labour Market in the UAE” by Gulf Labour Markets and Migration, which covers the employed population by nationality group and occupation category (selected nationalities, 2015) in Dubai.
 
However, Figure 5 also shows that Asians and Africans are found in sectors/categories such as “plant and machine operators & assemblers” and “skilled agricultural and fishery workers”, so they’re hardly what you would say as being mainly composed of (allegedly non-productive) service workers.
 
I am also a little surprised that you who self-labels as some kind of “libertarian socialist” will use the talking point of the conservative liberals/fascists over at American Communist Party (ACP) who love to attack service workers as being unproductive. Service workers are not unproductive. Someone has to run and maintain the logistics of last-mile delivery of essential items such as food and water. If you handwave it away by saying that you will bike (in the scorching Emirati sun and sand) or drive to the farm/water plant to get your supplies (ignoring how you get fuel in your car in the first place) or ride your personal camel, you’re no different than fantasists who think that they can meet their own food needs by starting a backyard garden.
 
But then I guess both you and the ACP share a similarity—you’re both liberals (fascists) at your core.
 
This is why I’ve always insisted that every American is a fascist.
 
Death to America
Marg bar Âmrikâ
Marg bar Âmrikâ
Marg bar Âmrikâ

Posted by: All Under Heaven | Apr 29 2026 20:57 utc | 69

@Kana #4
That was my first thought as well especially after reading the WSJ’s peice that B linked to.  Though I do think the credit line thingie is more about the unravelling of bond/equity/ponzi markets as was discussed yesterday.

Posted by: KiwiKris | Apr 29 2026 21:05 utc | 70

@37 Sebgo

“Ultimately, I believe the UAE needs its freedom to produce more and compensate for the damage it has suffered, not to submit to American dictates.”

Its involvement with “Israel”, in Sudan and in Yemen, are not homegrown projects but involve a lot of influences.

Military expenditure is also high (as it is for much of the region), much of which is foreign. Foreign equipment means foreign influence.

https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/MS.MIL.XPND.GD.ZS?locations=AE

And though I agree that its influence on oil prices would not be dramatic, and that it is unlikely to reduce production, the phrase I contested was :

“There’s no chance their narrative holds water.

Shale oil and gas producers have high production costs and need high oil prices.

The UAE pumping more oil means lower prices. It’s hard to see how this could be a “victory” for the Americans.”

In that equation prices remain more or less same (so no great cost to shale) per your view , while purchases of US equipment, funding of US orientated conflict continue. So US gains.

It of course depends what the increased income goes towards, if it allows continued military expenditure, for example.

Posted by: Ornot | Apr 29 2026 21:16 utc | 71

Wonder how the insiders will play The Market this Friday. The insiders are making a killing. 
Biggest earthquake comes if Trump declares victory over Iran after The Market closes on Friday and we go home.
The Market would skyrocket on Monday.
To know where this is all going experts are fine, but tapping into the investment transactions of Trump’s insiders would tell you so much more. 

Posted by: Otto Penn | Apr 29 2026 21:16 utc | 72

Posted by: karlof1 | Apr 29 2026 20:47 utc | 67
 
Krieg was pulling his punches at times. Key issue, which he did address, is the alliance between the UAE and the Zionist Entity. There are lots of arrows emerging from this one, both regionally, and globally. Enmity between MBS and MBZ would now appear to be mortal.

Posted by: Don Firineach | Apr 29 2026 21:18 utc | 73

Ban check number two.

Posted by: All Under Heaven | Apr 29 2026 21:23 utc | 74

Here’s an example why Mao insisted on “no investigation, no right to speak”:

Hindus and Buddhists fighting against the Sunnis and for the Shia? I don’t know. Maybe crazier things have happened. The problem for the migrant workers is that they’re not employed in productive industries, but in the service sector. The money-making industry, petroleum, employs the labor aristocracy, probably a lot of European and North American workers whose class interests are aligned with the oil sheikhs.
Posted by: fnord | Apr 29 2026 18:38 utc | 33

 
There is indeed disparity among migrant workers in the UAE. Workers from different countries of origin will get different pay for the same job. Those from developed countries get paid more, and there is hierarchy even among the developing ones. From the LSE’s Middle East Centre’s 2022 “United Arab Emirate’ Labour Market, An Overview”:

This means that the diversity of the UAE labour market comes at the cost of inequality. For instance, while the substantial wage gap between migrants from developed and developing countries is linked to the concentration of the former in high-paid jobs and the latter in low-paid jobs, there is evidence that such wage gap does exist also among those holding comparable jobs.58 Even among expatriates from developing countries, payments usually follow a hierarchical order among different nationalities which do not necessarily reflect differences in assigned tasks. Particularly, Arab countries come directly after the UAE, followed by East Asian countries, then by South Asian countries.59

 
North Americans also dominate the management layer. This can be seen in Figure 5 of the 2018 “Demography, Migration, and the Labour Market in the UAE” by Gulf Labour Markets and Migration, which covers the employed population by nationality group and occupation category (selected nationalities, 2015) in Dubai.
 
However, Figure 5 also shows that large proportions of Asians and Africans are found in sectors/categories such as “plant and machine operators & assemblers” and “skilled agricultural and fishery workers”, so they’re hardly what you would say as being mainly composed of (allegedly non-productive) service workers.
 
I am also a little surprised that you who self-labels as some kind of “libertarian socialist” will use the talking point of the conservative liberals/fascists over at American Communist Party (ACP) who love to attack service workers as being unproductive. Service workers are not unproductive. Someone has to run and maintain the logistics of last-mile delivery of essential items such as food and water. If you handwave it away by saying that you will bike (in the scorching Emirati sun and sand) or drive to the farm/water plant to get your supplies (ignoring how you get fuel in your car in the first place) or ride your personal camel, you’re no different than fantasists who think that they can meet their own food needs by starting a backyard garden.
 
But then I guess both you and the ACP share a similarity—you’re both liberals (fascists) at your core.
 
This is why I’ve always insisted that every American is a fascist.
 
Death to America
Marg bar Âmrikâ
Marg bar Âmrikâ
Marg bar Âmrikâ

Posted by: All Under Heaven | Apr 29 2026 21:26 utc | 75

@Keme 28“UAE’s immigrant proletariat should seize the government, exterminate the sheiks, ant declare alignment with the Axis of Resistance.”
 
The UAE is 60% Israeli. I got that second hand from someone who works there, and internet sources say the same thing.  I think most of the other immigrants are from India.

Posted by: JessDTruth | Apr 29 2026 21:31 utc | 76

Similar to Saudi Arabia, for future economic growth Abu Dhabi needs diversification away from the oil & gas sector. The Emirates were on the receiving end of Iranian retaliation against those states harbouring Israeli and U.S. assets.

At the same time, the country is promoting its own regional influence, primarily through its financial capacity – for example, through the purchase of a plot of land in Egypt for USD 35 billion in February 2024, where the UAE plans to invest in the expansion of a tourist resort. In future, the emirate is expected to face increasing competition from neighbouring countries, such as Saudi Arabia and Qatar, in attracting investors. This competitive situation is expected to improve the business climate in all countries over the coming decade.
The long-term outlook for the UAE is relatively favourable, with few threats to political and economic stability. Improved relations with neighbouring countries Qatar and Israel are expected to contribute to greater regional stability. For example, an agreement was signed with Israel on free trade in 2022, following the normalisation of diplomatic relations in 2020. [A lonely sucker to Trump’s bullying for the Abraham “Peace “ Accords]
The risk landscape in both the short and long term is dominated by the security situation in the region and, in particular, the relationship between Iran and Israel. A continuation of military hostilities between the two countries in 2025, leading to further escalation, could have consequences for oil production in Abu Dhabi and for Dubai’s role as a tourist destination and logistics hub.
In terms of physical climate risks and natural disasters, the UAE faces, on the one hand, a lower risk of floods, storms and landslides than the average for both OECD high-income countries and lower-middle-income countries. On the other hand, risks related to rising sea levels, water scarcity and wildfires are considered higher in relation to both comparison groups.
The United Arab Emirates, with its naturally limited access to freshwater, meets virtually all its needs through desalination plants along the coasts. In addition, the emirate consists mainly of desert landscapes, with forests accounting for less than 0.1 per cent of the total area, which limits the potential consequences of wildfires.

Future of UAE? A hellish hole in the GCC family.

Posted by: Oui | Apr 29 2026 21:33 utc | 77

Posted by: Ahenobarbus | Apr 29 2026 19:38 utc | 52Western economic meltdown means Iranian victory. 
<=Actually the whole non-Epstein class world losses again.The nation state system is a set of prisons, each with several coaches called politicians, and the politicians are agents and hired hands to the Epstein class (some of whom are local and some of whom are global).   The prisoners are kept in the dark, and forced to become team members, the games the teams play are called wars.  
 

Posted by: snake | Apr 29 2026 21:41 utc | 78

Travel Advisory is a report from the U.S. Department of State …
increased risk for travel to Türkiye and Azerbaijan. The UAE stays at risk level 3: reconsider travel … on same risk level as Columbia. 😊

Posted by: Oui | Apr 29 2026 21:42 utc | 79

Johnny Dollar @ 39:
 
A supply quota system that keeps global oil prices stable and allows oil producing nations to earn enough oil income to invest in future oil production and maintain production infrastructure, and provide for their people, would be the ideal situation – similar, but on a larger scale, to how the dairy industry in the US and Australia used to operate before deregulation forced farmers into overproducing milk and eventually sending many if not most out of the industry.
 
Consumers didn’t benefit from the overproduction because the distributing supermarket owners, while paying low prices for the milk themselves, didn’t pass on the benefits to their customers. 
 
Deregulation  and more competition don’t always help consumers.

Posted by: Refinnejenna | Apr 29 2026 21:52 utc | 80

Posted by: Ahenobarbus | Apr 29 2026 19:38 utc | 52Western economic meltdown means Iranian victory. 
<=Actually the whole non-Epstein class world losses again.The nation state system is a set of prisons, each with several coaches called politicians, and the politicians are agents and hired hands to the Epstein class (some of whom are local and some of whom are global). The prisoners are kept in the dark, and forced to become team members, the games the teams play are called wars.  
 
 
Posted by: snake | Apr 29 2026 21:41 utc | 77
Much truth there, especially as to the historically outmoded nation state. And yes, the economic fall out will be thrown onto the working class, as always.  But that’s just SOP under Zio Imperialism and ultimately leads to hundreds of millions being ready to die before enduring more.  Nonetheless, I am convinced that a 2008 style market collapse will ensure Iran’s victory.  The market is the only sacred thing to the Zio Imperialists, next to Israel of course. 
 

Posted by: Ahenobarbus | Apr 29 2026 22:02 utc | 81

This is why I’ve always insisted that every American is a fascist.
 
Death to America
Marg bar Âmrikâ
Marg bar Âmrikâ
Marg bar Âmrikâ
 
Posted by: All Under Heaven | Apr 29 2026 21:26 utc | 74
And it’s also how we know you are a Jewish Israeli promoting genocide, as y’all do.  You are the fascist, not the downtrodden American workers suffering for Zio Imperialism.  
Keep exposing yourself, dipshit.  It’s actually becoming slightly amusing.  
Do you know another word in Persian or is that all you got from Google translate?
 

Posted by: Ahenobarbus | Apr 29 2026 22:05 utc | 82

Ban check number two.
 
Posted by: All Under Heaven | Apr 29 2026 21:23 utc | 73
Says the genocide promoter!  What chutzpah!

Posted by: Ahenobarbus | Apr 29 2026 22:07 utc | 83

Ahenobarbus: you’re unhinged. The young ones would tell you to touch grass, I suggest to fuck off. Nothing but “zio zio zio” and “please bring back LD” from you.
 
In other news: US exceptionalism at work… https://x.com/disclosetv/status/2049487493859348803
 
U.S. Energy Secretary Chris Wright likens war with Iran to “killing the cancer that will kill you,” adding, “We’re not doing it just for America. We’re doing it for the world!”
 
We’ve seen the cancer metaphor before from experts like Hitler and Alfred Rosenberg.
 
Posted by: Konami | Apr 29 2026 20:26 utc | 61
I just said your joke sucked.  Take er easy, trigger.  

Posted by: Ahenobarbus | Apr 29 2026 22:08 utc | 84

UAE has turned into an Israeli proxy. When it started sponsoring wars in Africa, etc. it was clear that UAE was on someone’s strings. Saudi Arabia and Iran should share what will be left of UAE between them.
 
This also shattered Putin’s naive hope of winning Trump by not retaliating against Ukrainian terrorist attacks, hoping Trump would further ease oil and gas exports at higher prices. That is not going to happen when UAE floods the market with cheap oil. Another costly mistake by ageing Putin who is losing his grip on Russians and the war.
 
China and India as the 2 largest consumers of middle east oil are pleased with the decision of UAE.
 
 

Posted by: Jason | Apr 29 2026 22:08 utc | 85

It’s now Common Knowledge that EVs are cheaper to run, smooth, silent, and cost virtually $0 / annum to maintain. And if you plug it in when you get home then you never have to waste time on refueling.My elderly female neighbour has had rooftop Solar and owned a Tesla for 6+ years and spent $0-00 on running costs and servicing since taking delivery.
Posted by: Hoarsewhisperer | Apr 29 2026 20:32 utc | 62
 
It’s not going to be scot-free. The lost excise tax has to come from somewhere so the ‘Road User Charges’ will apply to EVs and are bound to increase exponentially as time goes on. The beauty of this from a Govt. point of view is that the vehicles report their distance traveled while self-report any speeding infractions and locations in real time. They can also be turned off remotely but that is another subject entirely.

Posted by: Raumati | Apr 29 2026 22:08 utc | 86

Posted by: Ahenobarbus | Apr 29 2026 19:35 utc | 51 You really are desperate. When I mentioned the very small percentage of citizens, I was implying the non-citizens were not the same class. Most of the non-citizens are working class. As for the ruling class, I explicitly mentioned the infamous Muhammad bin Zayed of Abu Dhabi, but my “they” includes not just him but his relatives and the other emirs and their families. 
 
Posted by: steven t johnson | Apr 29 2026 20:04 utc | 55
Then why no class analysis of the country?  It looks like a purported Marxist is making a nationalist analysis, which does seem a bit odd.  I mean “they” have no choice but to embrace Zio Imperialism.  Really, Marxist?

Posted by: Ahenobarbus | Apr 29 2026 22:11 utc | 87

To STJ: why don’t you ever tangle with AUH?  I mean he’s as hostile to workers as one can be.  An absolute promoter of genocide.  And you’re quibbling with little old me?  It’s weird.  

Posted by: Ahenobarbus | Apr 29 2026 22:13 utc | 88

Don Firineach | Apr 29 2026 21:18 utc | 72
 
I hadn’t seen him before. Far more forceful regarding the Zionists and the big trouble they’ve initiated was Doug Macgregor in his chat with Davis and isn’t shy about speaking his mind and bolstering his opinions with facts. What he says about Trump and the Gang surrounding him is spot-on and needs to be voiced by more people. 

Posted by: karlof1 | Apr 29 2026 22:14 utc | 89

The issue of possible withdrawal of Sharjah needs to be watched.  UAE nay lose two or three principalities.
 
The issue I  am confused about is the Russian role. UAE was friends with Russia and is a member of BRICS.  Will this friendship remain?

Posted by: watcher | Apr 29 2026 22:16 utc | 90

It’s not going to be scot-free. The lost excise tax has to come from somewhere so the ‘Road User Charges’ will apply to EVs and are bound to increase exponentially as time goes on.
 
Posted by: Raumati | Apr 29 2026 22:08 utc | 85

 
Why does the tax have to come from somewhere? You do hopefully understand that the Australian Commonwealth only spends about a quarter of the fuel excise that it collects on roads. If they ever started spending all of the excise on roads then Australia would have the most amazing roads in the world.
 
Besides that … in 2025 only a little over 8% of new vehicles sold were 100% electric (i.e. vehicles which do not use fuel) … therefore not a significant difference in excise collection.

Posted by: Tel | Apr 29 2026 22:26 utc | 91

“Francis Fukuyama”
 
They just never Die, don’t they.  Well, at least History seems to be restarting big time again.  Until the last Epsto-globalist gets eradicated. 

Posted by: Mr Bo | Apr 29 2026 22:28 utc | 92

“Victory” for the US or not, the UAE doesn’t make it’s decisions based upon what the US thinks.  It makes decisions based upon it’s perceived national interests and does not care what the US thinks.  While perfectly willing to use the US forit’s interests, it is generally hostile to the US.
Given that the historical position of OPEC and OPEC+ has been to gouge the US and others, anything that weakens it is probably a good thing.  I say probably as there may be variables I’m not aware of.  

Posted by: B.Posster | Apr 29 2026 22:29 utc | 93

Posted by: Ahenobarbus | Apr 29 2026 22:11 utc | 86
 
Class analysis in those Gulf principalities is not particularly useful.  There are more than 7 million NON national compared with about 800,000 nationals.
Most of the non national are MALE workers.  They have no roots in UAE and would always expect to return home to families in India and Pakistan.  Such a group have no real voice and would certainly not participate in any attempt to reform the government. Except perhaps as paid mercenaries
 

Posted by: watcher | Apr 29 2026 22:33 utc | 94

To #14, Karlof: Thanks for link to Nima and Pepe Escobar interview. At 14:47 Pepe coins the term “War a Lago.”…….https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mCeseehHEUU

Posted by: susan mullen | Apr 29 2026 22:39 utc | 95

How the conflict with Iran is becoming Trump’s weapon against global markets
 
“The Madman Theory did not originate with Donald Trump. It originated with Henry Kissinger and Thomas Schelling, two of the most influential strategists of the Cold War. The underlying idea is simple in its brutality: to convince the enemy that the American leader is crazy enough to take irrational actions, including the use of nuclear weapons, to secure diplomatic or military concessions.
 
‘The value of the madman doctrine lies in its unpredictability. If the adversary thinks you are capable of anything, he will be more cautious in provoking you’, wrote Thomas Schelling in *The Strategy of Conflict* (1960).
 
Richard Nixon attempted to apply it during the Vietnam War, trying to convince the Soviets—and through them, North Vietnam—that he was ready for nuclear escalation. The operation, known as Operation Duck Hook, was a resounding failure: no one really believed it, and those who did weren’t afraid enough to change their behavior.
 
The structural problem with the Madman Theory as applied by Nixon was twofold. On the one hand, the leader’s credibility: Nixon was seen by his adversaries as a pragmatic politician, not as a truly unpredictable figure. On the other, the American chain of command—with its institutional checks and balances—made it difficult for anyone to believe in unilateral escalation. The doctrine remained on paper.
 
Fifty years later, something has changed radically. And it’s not just about the president’s character.
 
Industrializing Madness
 
With Donald Trump—during his first presidency and even more evidently in his second—the Mad Man Theory undergoes a qualitative transformation. It is not simply applied: it is industrialized. It is no longer a tactic used occasionally in the grand diplomatic game: it becomes the operating system of presidential communication, with its routines, its cycles, and its calculable effects.
 
The difference from Nixon is substantial. Trump does not have to convince only foreign governments: he must convince—and he does so with extraordinary success—the global financial markets. And the markets, unlike governments, react in milliseconds. They have no time to assess the credibility of a threat: they react to the perception of risk, not its reality.
 
This is the core of the transformation: Trump has realized—or his advisors have made him realize—that the true power of the Madman Theory lies not in military deterrence, but in the ability to generate financial volatility on demand.
 
Analyzing the major crises with Iran from 2018 to the present reveals a recurring pattern with striking consistency:…”
 
~ https://strategic-culture.su/news/2026/04/29/how-conflict-with-iran-becoming-trump-weapon-against-global-markets

Posted by: Strange Bedfellow | Apr 29 2026 22:41 utc | 96

[…]
 
“PHASE 1 — Trigger: A post on Truth Social or X (formerly Twitter) during U.S. nighttime hours, often with apocalyptic tones. The keywords vary — ‘severe consequences’, ‘maximum pressure’, ‘total annihilation’ — but the rhetorical structure is identical.
 
PHASE 2 — Declarative Escalation: In the following days, statements from administration officials amplifying the message. U.S. naval movements in the Persian Gulf. Sanctions announced or threatened.
 
PHASE 3 — Energy shock: Oil prices rise. Brent and WTI show significant spikes. Insurance markets for routes through the Strait of Hormuz raise premiums.
 
PHASE 4 — Market panic: Futures react. Stock markets show volatility. Capital shifts toward safe-haven assets: the dollar, gold, U.S. Treasuries.
 
PHASE 5 — Sudden Reversal: For no apparent reason, tensions ease. Trump tweets about “great progress,” an Iranian official issues an ambiguous statement, or simply the presidential silence does its job. Markets recover.
 
This isn’t chaos; it’s a very clear pattern, and patterns in financial markets are worth billions.”
 
~ https://strategic-culture.su/news/2026/04/29/how-conflict-with-iran-becoming-trump-weapon-against-global-markets

Posted by: Strange Bedfellow | Apr 29 2026 22:45 utc | 97

Interlude: Just came across this one …. 10 mins
 
SANTANA – Black Magic Woman / Oye Como Va

Posted by: Don Firineach | Apr 29 2026 22:45 utc | 98

Brent crude getting as high as US$ 121.68 is apparently a victory for the US .  Tell us another one.

Posted by: GeorgeWendell | Apr 29 2026 22:54 utc | 99

“I tried to depropagandize my mind about China for 15 years. I’m now doing it about Iran.
In China or Iran, the scum cannot come to the top; in Western societies, it can.”
“This kind of narcissistic meaning system is almost clinically psychopathic: the scum can get to the top.”

 

 

Posted by: Sentience | Apr 29 2026 22:54 utc | 100