Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
April 4, 2026
Meta: On MoA Moderation

MoA commentator Karlof seems to be pi**ed because some comment he tried to post here did not appear. As he writes at his own blog:

I provided what follows in a comment made to the current Iran thread at Moon of Alabama, but the site owner trashed it for some unknown, unexplained reason despite its obvious vital importance to understanding the events surrounding this war. What follows are a portion of Lavrov’s opening remarks that relate to the topic followed by an excerpt from the first Q&A that’s then followed by the most important question posed:

[1684 words long quote from Lavrov’s press conference]

The blog software Moon of Alabama is running on has, like others, functionalities which somewhat protect against being overwhelmed by spam comments. The system will filter comments following certain criteria into three buckets.

Most of the comments entered at MoA will be published without further review.

– Spam:

Comments which come from known spam addresses or include advertisement for certain products will be deleted automatically. Each day there are some 50 to 100 “Buy Viagra” or similar comments that fall under this criteria. This part of the system is astonishing reliable. That’s why I rarely review the comments which are being filtered at this stage. They simply vanish.

– Moderation:

Comments which:

  • exceed a certain length
  • include more than 5 links
  • include certain swearwords
  • come from certain IP addresses

will be withheld from immediate publishing for review by the moderator. Karlof’s comment, which included a lengthy Lavrov quote, was caught by this filter.

– Manual review:

Twice a day I scroll through the comments to sift out those which I find inappropriate, grossly off-topic, or generally dislikable. Some I delete immediately without further ado. If I find multiple questionable comments under one username I will check the IP address the comments are coming from and put it on ‘moderation’. Future comments from that address will be reviewed before being published.

I will also review the comments the system has held up and put into the moderation bucket. Some I’ll delete immediately without further ado. Some may be published after I have checked the context in which they were made. Others may be shortened and published.

The criteria by which I do these reviews are subjective. Here are some general hints, in no particular order, of what I dislike:

  • Looong quotes. This is the web. Dear Karlof, a text that is freely available on the web and can be linked should never be quoted at length. Provide a summary and a link. Thanks.
  • Snappy one-liners. Commentators who offer nothing but these will be banned.
  • (Repeated, off-topic) advertisements for the commentator’s own blog.
  • Off-topics designed to divert attention from the subject of a thread.
  • Attempts to overwhelm/derail a thread with a myriad of comments.
  • Taking unreasonable positions designed to provoke.
  • (Ab)use of multiple usernames by one person.
  • Personal attacks on other commentators.
  • Factually false statements.
  • AI slop.

I do spend about an hour per day to moderate the comments at this blog. Still – a lot are passing that probably shouldn’t. Given the current number of comments I would probably need three hours per day to do this consistently. That would exceed my capacity.

Please bear with me.

Comments

Jane asked why would B agree to develop an system that automates the organization of each comment section to:
a. make it easier and faster to police irreverent, malicious or non contributing content.. b. to reduce the time a user needs to get access to relevant content. c. to standardize the rules concerning denial  B has successfully navigated the information space. He has demonstrated excellence, perseverance, and commitment which has made MoA an icon of the information community.  People from all over the world come to MoA to learn about things they have not before thought about and things local propaganda denies them to understand, and to broaden their views of the world and to understand the different layers of politics, economics, social systems, disasters and corruption that affects and directs life quality and generates understanding and interactive compatibility. B’s digital bar harbors the most dedicated information drunks on the planet. Its content is among the best in the world.  Many times, you hear it first from MoA.   You can learn more at MoA in a few minutes than you can learn from the NYT or the Guardian in years.  You can discover what is the truth from what is fabricated because everything presented must be supported by evidence or proven by challenge. MoA has the world-view, the national view and the local view and its views are current up to the minute. 
This makes the MoA special. Its innovative, its a global leader in the information space, but it success has brought growing pains that need some attention.  Success breeds needs, which require forward thinking, innovation, planning, capital, and endurance.  

Posted by: snake | Apr 5 2026 4:53 utc | 101

MOA is one of the most valuable sites out there on the big internets for getting some up to date infor from numerous sources. I read Karlof1’s posts always with interest and check his blog too nfor his valuable translations.
It is a bit silly to get so miffed about one comment out of 100’s that appeared just fine. A quick note to ‘b’ would have no doubt clarified the issue and could have been fixed without fuss.
PS I think I finally figured out these pesky paragraph breaks…
 

Posted by: Merlin | Apr 5 2026 5:03 utc | 102

Or did I? apparently not!
 
I tried the “Visual’ box which I thought must work like a “Preview” and it seemed fine there.I must be cursed

Posted by: Merlin | Apr 5 2026 5:05 utc | 103

thank you for doing this blog.  i have been a regular reader for about 4 years now … this is my first comment.  i tend to avoid comment sections.  chomsky name dropped moon of alabama in one of his interviews and that is how i got here.  i most appreciate chomsky for his solid grasp on morality.  the fact that the nyt and others were questioning his morality because of his friendship with epstein is amusing to me (i’m sure it would be amusing to chomsky as well).  i would’ve loved to have been a fly on the wall while epstein and chomsky were conversing.  chomsky consistently pointed out the evil that is happening right in front of our faces.  you carry on his tradition.  these days all the american regime seems to ask of their citizens is to sing a freedom song to a flag and praise jesus’ woke war money machine. (or has it been that way for decades already?)   

Posted by: snowdead | Apr 5 2026 5:34 utc | 104

I am not wont to comment much on blogs.  Your site is one of the few voices of sanity in these crazy times.  Your commentators are very often the source of very relevant information and incisive analysis.   Your work speaks for itself and, as I am sure, to many people of good will trying to better understand our world.  You do not need parasites self-promoting on the back of your obviously superior work.  I applaud your efforts  to filter out the idiots and self promoters. 

Posted by: Advocatus | Apr 5 2026 5:55 utc | 105

Karloff forgot whose blog it is; if he’s humble he’ll be back. As for LD that fool clogged up the comment pages with endless self righteous drivel and inanity.
Keep up the good work, it’s appreciated. 

Posted by: Bismarck | Apr 5 2026 6:20 utc | 106

@all
There were 179 comments to this post when I started my daily moderation round. There were also 40 waiting in the moderation queue, plus 13 in the spam-folder.
 
This post is now down to 107 comments. Of the 40 comments in the moderation queue 3 were released. All the rest went into the bit bucket. Some 15 IP address were added to the moderation/spam list. 
 
All together this Meta thread was a great way to weed out unserious commentators.

Posted by: b | Apr 5 2026 7:18 utc | 107

.. This blog works. It’s simple and relies on the ability or willingness of commenters to adequately cite any previous comments to which they are referring. ..
Posted by: Tom_Q_Collins | Apr 5 2026 4:44 utc | 123

 
Couldn’t agree more but therein also lies its weakness, namely – relies on the ability or willingness of commenters to adequately cite any previous comments to which they are referring.
I like to first blockquote the relevant bits (including name and timestamp) of the comment that I’m referring to, then write my remarks. It isn’t too hard.

Posted by: tucenz | Apr 5 2026 7:53 utc | 108

The clarification is very helpful, as Karlof is really a deservedly respected contributor to this site. Happy Easter to all!

Posted by: Steve | Apr 5 2026 8:22 utc | 109

Posted by: Lev Davidovich | Apr 5 2026 8:32 utc | 110

Well, that was a ‘clever’ way to get yourself through any automated censorship while posting politically based obscenities.

Posted by: Fíréan | Apr 5 2026 9:01 utc | 110

My comment at 110 was refering to a post which has since, and thankfully,been deleted.

Posted by: Fíréan | Apr 5 2026 9:06 utc | 111

Posted by: Fíréan | Apr 5 2026 9:01 utc | 110
Good that we’ve established that you’re a fan of censorship.
Obscenities are the indiscriminate bombing and murdering of civilians, women, children, the elderly, disabled.
But a few swear words offend you.
What with the sense of humour filter being manually applied here, I’m unable to post a word to describe your outlook.

Posted by: Lev Davidovich | Apr 5 2026 9:29 utc | 112

Through the almost two decades in the English speaking geopolitical blogosphere, I have been banned a lot of times and in different blogs/forums, may be, I notice now, because I do not usually read the blog´s guidelines, since I come from one blog to another, depending on the day, after having read a lot of channels and sources and I do not have so much time left.
First time I was banned I felt it like a slap, especially if my post has been a long one, which at the time costed me a lot to do, since English is not my mother tong and I write it with not so much academic bagage but out of the years of hearing, reading and writting.
With time, I went accustomed to get my posts banned and downplaying the issue.
Normally, If you read a lot of info through the day, you may thought that what you are going to convey it is imprescindible for the world to know. May be you have not read anyone in the comments section, which you read whole through, conveying that side of the issue,,,,
The sometimes unbearable truth for our own egos, it is not. 
Through the years, I have been also the other side of the comments section, moderating, and eventhough when I did such ungrateful work I was still some a lot more childish and innocent than I am now, I always hated censure and found not so few mods who did not mind trashing a comment without giving them a damn, in an unconsidered way for the commenter.
It was in fact a disagreement on moderation with another mod which got me out of the moderation team of that not less famous than this one blog.
The comment in question did not break any rule of moderation, the old commenter posting with an old slow computer ( that I knew out of reading the comments…he was a regular….) posted his comment ( which had been trashed by the Briton quite unconsidered newcomer ) again in my slot, and thus I published it, finding that it fulfilled the moderation rules and was a long one in that regular commenter style. In the end, it did prevail the criteria of the newcomer, and I quitted moderating.
That was an unpaid work I was doing for a long time, at night, even stealing sleep time, and that I did even with a broken elbow….I must say that I felt myself sent to the trash without much care….Through these years I have got to learn that this is the anglosaxon way….trashing humans without much care….
I found other mods in the team who just didn´t care trashing comments without much caring, to my request on such lack of care, one of them, a chinese, told me that “it was just a blog”…..well, but it was not ours… I considered the responsability given to me by the owner as huge; well, in fact, I have conducted myself so through my whole life, finding that in not so few times I had put way too much effort…..Also, I have always found, in every field of life,  that some people, if given a bit of power, use it…. and with malice….that is unavoidable, as we witness now in higuer spheres, how this kind of people are ruining the world….
With all, that blog kept going on without me…. until it was closed by the owner….
Through these years, I have grown accustomed to relativice everything, especially things that are not on our hands or over which we have no power to change….. And that have worked fine with me.
Thus, I would recommend Karlof growing a thicker skin, if he has not done yet, and considering that none of us are imprescindible, in spite of our hard responsible work….What is more important is doing our best and rest aside knowing that.
It has been a great consideration that “b” took the time to publish this discharger…..
Apologies if this post feels very long.
 
 
 
 

Posted by: Ghost of Mozgovoy | Apr 5 2026 9:39 utc | 113

this blog constantly allows vicious personal comments to the point where they are effectively encouraged

Posted by: paul | Apr 5 2026 9:57 utc | 114

Taking advantage, I would like to know, how to get my post published with spaces between paragraphs, as I wrote it.
Since the feature of the blog was changed, I notice it is pusblished as a whole compact, without separation, which makes it harder to read.
Thaks in advance.

Posted by: Ghost of Mozgovoy | Apr 5 2026 9:59 utc | 115

I’ve read MOA for years now, and I always considered b’s moderation as balanced between tolerance and rigour. And I like the idea of temporary ban. After all, b’s the bartender and if you apply these rules to a real life pub, it will be considered as quite permissive. You get ban for swinging your dick around but you can come back after a while.
 
 
As for Karl, I think everybody has the right to get briefly pissed about something. Even if it’s not materially justified. When you give so much time and effort to inform others like he does and you see your work dismissed (even for totally legitimate reasons), I get why you feel frustrated. I guess a little walk on the beach cleared his mind. Karl is one of the contributor here who is treated with the same level of respect than b is. I bet it makes him feel at home. 

Posted by: xiao pignouf | Apr 5 2026 10:32 utc | 116

this blog constantly allows vicious personal comments to the point where they are effectively encouraged
Posted by: paul | Apr 5 2026 9:57 utc | 114

 
It’s not false, but the recent increase in the number of comments makes moderation a much harder and time-consuming task. A full time job I may say. But we also expect b to provide excellent analyses…

Posted by: xiao pignouf | Apr 5 2026 10:38 utc | 117

Posted by: Lev Davidovich | Apr 5 2026 9:29 utc | 112

Never was i offended nor stated so. Just commenting on your ability, albeit temporary, to bypass someonelse’s censorship.

Posted by: Fíréan | Apr 5 2026 11:11 utc | 118

Thank you for the elaboration of the modding policy and automation b.
 
 
Have long believed that to be the case. 
 
 
It’s a shame you have to be wasting time daily with such crap instead of analysis. 
 
 
The numbers of posts have gone exponential! 
 
I never complain and am sorry if my rants have caused more work for you. I write off the cuff on my phone, thumb typing. Hence the multiple spellcheck auto correct, bad grammar crap. Haven’t sat infront of a computer to surf the web for years. 
 
it would be useful if you could tell us if there are any subjects you have been wary of – I find the ‘sky falling’ and ‘crying wolf’ posters telling us to be careful about getting you arrested or ostracised by your state somewhat … chilling. If well meant. 

Posted by: DunGroanin | Apr 5 2026 11:27 utc | 119

The numbers of posts have gone exponential!

@Posted by: DunGroanin | Apr 5 2026 11:27 utc | 119
May be a side effect of the dissapearance of some other important blogs like The Saker and Turcopolier ( the original way by late Pat Lang…), apart from the obvious interest of this blog?
I have seen here some former regulars at Turcopolier…. past day I take a look at the domain, I had bookmarked, to find it has been turned into an agregator of news….wondering whether the old colonel would had agreed….his had all the way his very personal style and couldn´t care less about the number of readers/commenters….

Posted by: Ghost of Mozgovoy | Apr 5 2026 11:56 utc | 120

Posted by: Jo | Apr 5 2026 12:24 utc | 121
 
C U Next Tuesday 

Posted by: Tom_Q_Collins | Apr 5 2026 12:32 utc | 121

@karlof1 | Apr 4 2026 21:55 utc | 66
who said: “Whatever. The Show Must Go On.”
 
Exactly correct. We’re on the same team (mainly): we’re after accurate situational awareness; we’re after the systematic evolution of our emotional and intellectual powers – the _potency_ to actually _do_ something once we figure out what needs to be done (via accurate situational awareness). 
 
B: you’re doing it. We have well-placed faith in you. Thanks for the message to reassure us that, indeed, in those rare moments when moderation has to happen, it’s done in a rational, fair and systematic way. 
 
For the bar: the trick is to keep your head and stay cool in the face of a perfect hurricane of top-down crazy. We’re on the same team, and (almost) everyone brings something useful to the party. These are stressful times and that tends to elicit … odd behavior. Overlook it. Balance takes time (patience) to achieve.
 
And to the young people that frequent the bar: you’re in the right place; you’re getting a 360-degree round-the-world stream of reporting, virtually unfiltered, to consider, evaluate, and respond to.
 
The other day, after months of debate among friends, and it gradually became crystal clear that I was better informed than they were, one of them finally blurted out (killed him to do it) “where do you get your information from?!”
 
I gave him a list, and prominent on that list was “MoA”. 

Posted by: Tom Pfotzer | Apr 5 2026 12:44 utc | 122

S Brennan 55
Hopefully inshallah it will shortly unhappen.

Posted by: Giyane | Apr 5 2026 13:22 utc | 123

Ghost of Mogovoy 120
 
2 returns  creates a paragraph break gap.

Posted by: Giyane | Apr 5 2026 13:28 utc | 124

It is unfortunate that Karl of 1 had a post caught in the filter. His posts are among the most uniformly informative in the MoA comments. With that being said, our host’s point is a good one. Long quotes make no sense on the Internet unless the quoted content cannot be linked (ex: paywalled or blocked by the Empire’s censors). A grey area in this case is that some of the content Karl of 1 quotes is material that he has translated and so it does not exist in English on the Internet, but he normally posts that to his own blog anyway and can link to that instead. I highly doubt a poster of his caliber would get zapped for self-promotion in such cases.
 
I don’t really understand all of the reach-around love for LoveTDS. When upwards of 10% (more than ten out of the hundred comments per page) are just his reposts from other social media platforms that he admits are not intended to illustrate or clarify any view he is trying to express, then what is he posting them for? To raise his own visibility in the community through sheer volume… self-promotion of an execrable kind. If we are to be pining for posters we want to see back, then my vote is for Down South. To be certain, his posts were also largely reposts from other platforms, but at least they were curated and arranged to illuminate things happening off-the-screen of western discourse and they were not used to disguise and deliver western partisan political messaging/hysteria like LoveTDS’ posts were. I would even prefer to see vk back, who despite being petit bourgeois dilettante steeped in wokeism was a leftist who had actually studied Marx and his successors. That last is pretty rare these days. 
 
Anyway, it is up to our host if he wants the self-promoting repost diarrhea back. I’ll completely understand it if he doesn’t.

Posted by: William Gruff | Apr 5 2026 13:37 utc | 125

Re : Posted by: S Brennan | Apr 4 2026 23:43 utc | 87
 
“That’s no different than an organized shout down of a public speaker by a crowd yelling at the top of their lungs when the opposing candidate takes the podium.  It’s rude, it’s crude, it’s censorship masked as “free-speech”. 

Thanks SB, I concur. I’ll add:
 
 
It’s perhaps even worse when people are encouraged to purge that speaker from the stage.
 
I am not at all comfortable with people encouraging use of software scripts to cut out the posts from the ‘unwelcome’ voices.
 
With the numbers of socks and HasbaRats that have taken to infesting this little back alley bar trying to derail or nudge narratives or whatever – it seems that opinions expressed are somehow worth cancelling!
 
Somebody mentioned the 3 monkeys yesterday.
 
I don’t want to be treated to the deaf and blind and dumb childish – can’t hear you can’t see you not going to acknowledge or dispute a comment …treatment.
 
It’s the classic – one may despise what is being said but the right of free speech ought to be guaranteed.
 
Comments after all in this medium are easy enough to ignore. Don’t tell me scrolling is that onerous!

Posted by: DunGroanin | Apr 5 2026 14:06 utc | 126

“Here all week, just to give you something to delete.”
 
I guess LoveTDS has lots of time on his hands now that he is unemployed. And he discovered proxy services! 

Posted by: William Gruff | Apr 5 2026 15:41 utc | 127

I like karlof1, but he gets a bit prissy sometimes.
please bring back Love Donbass.  I like them.
My rule of thumb for the length of a post is simple : it should completely fit on my screen.
And make neat, well-separated paragraphs.  This combination helps make a post palatable.

Posted by: Featherless | Apr 5 2026 16:24 utc | 128

I agree with a previous commentator : some comments are just vicious attacks on other commentators, and I believe these have no place here.
 
Yes, I’m hyper-sensitive to meanness, malice and cruelty, because of PTSD from previous psychological abuse.  It affects me to the point that I rarely visit here anymore.  IRL it makes me wanna punch a person in the face.
 
thank you B, for this great forum, and for all you do💎

Posted by: Featherless | Apr 5 2026 16:49 utc | 129

@ b | Apr 5 2026 7:18 utc | 107
 
ha ha! that’s good! 

Posted by: james | Apr 5 2026 17:49 utc | 130

I think the threads here are way too long. I decided to explore MoA after numerous mentions by Xymphora (my previous lurking spot) in circa 2010. I was pleasantly surprised by the short threads. Threads rarely reached 100 comments and some concluded with fewer than 50.
 
Nowadays it’s common for an MoA thread to exceed 500 comments. And I don’t think MoA is 10 times or even 5 times “better” than in the Good Old Days.
 
A short thread will always be preferable to a long thread – mainly because the last few hundred comments are written by people who were too lazy to read the earlier comments and thus repeated stuff that already existed – more than once.
 
I get the feeling that threads are expanding because lots of people seem to visit blogs due to not having to subscribe or pay, for access, and are bored shitless.

Posted by: Hoarsewhisperer | Apr 5 2026 19:00 utc | 131

Posted by: Ghost of Mozgovoy | Apr 5 2026 9:39 utc | 113
As a relative newcomer I consider that an excellent post – so tip of the hat.
~
As it is I think I have seen a recent post by Karlof and it is true nobody appreciates the feeling of being banned – myself I’ve been banned from Common Dreams, the Kitco forum, Craig Murrays places, other places, and this place as well under another moniker.  It is all par for the course, and no doubt – thick skin is called for – but tis only fair and appropriate to remember – tis per the discretion of the host.
~
Regardless – discourse at the bar is ongoing – you might agree and you might not – no need for hard feelings.  Fisticuffs on the other hand are often the outcome of disagreements at any bar worth its salt.
~
Cheers – and may the best ideas prevail.
BK
🦬

Posted by: Ken Hausle | Apr 5 2026 23:18 utc | 132

@ Posted by: Ghost of Mozgovoy | Apr 5 2026 11:56 utc | 120
Re Sic Semper Tyranis blog run by vietnam era US‘Colonel Blimp .
 
 
I couldn’t stomach the old soldier repetitive shtick after a while and soon figured he was a mockingbird/cia limited hangout. Along with his coterie. Sorry.

I know they are very good at their limited hangout, their obvious insider careers and their public falling out with their erstwhile State they served LOYALLY all their life!
 
That’s how their ‘legends’ are built  to be believed  including criminal record and prison time … jeez they really do treat most of us as  proverbial goldfish in a bowl memory!

It is the spy craft of Smileys Circus.  I can’t forgot the great scene in LeCarres Spy coming in from the cold – excellently acted by Richard Burton – where he sets up his legend by having to beat up a shop keepe,  having built a background of having become an alcoholic, so he ends up arrested and sent to prison … so that Moscow would seek him out as a disaffected agent. Bait which they fell for and used to destroy their most effective spy master. A story yes  but let’s not forget the countless spies that Moscow had from deep establishment backgrounds. From the spy oxbridge university recruit days going all the way back to the early C20th…
 
 
I attempted to engage the ‘Colonel’ innocently, a few times. He didn’t take the bait. Then he got ill. Ate what he wanted. Died. So it goes.
 
 
Before he died, he talked up starlink, Musk and … SPACEFORCE! 
 
That did it.
I let him pass peacefully.
No wonder they took his site down.
The denizens of which have spread their wings. 
Some have roostsd here, looking for a new home? mor something else? 

Posted by: DunGroanin | Apr 6 2026 8:51 utc | 133

A bit late in the day, on Easter Monday, Happy Easter to all!
 
b, merci beaucoup, as usual.   

Posted by: Noirette | Apr 6 2026 11:54 utc | 134

b, you’re so patient and wonderful. the amount of time and effort you’ve spent hosting all of us over the years cannot be overstated. thank you, i appreciate you so much!  

Posted by: annie | Apr 6 2026 16:38 utc | 135

You dont ban niggers?  What kind of German are you!

Posted by: Rangewolf | Apr 7 2026 21:26 utc | 136

@Rangewolf
As with all decent folk, he probably doesn’t care about the race/ethnicity of whoever stands behind the keyboard and screen. Problem?

Posted by: Digby | Apr 7 2026 22:34 utc | 137

Leave a Comment

Please choose a UNIQUE username and stick to it.


*required entries