Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
March 14, 2026
War On Iran: The Saudis’ Alternative Crude Export Outlet Is Also A Trap

Saudi Arabia is trying to avoid damage from the war on Iran by diverting oil exports from the Persian Gulf to the Red Sea through its East-West pipeline. This scheme however will fail at least as long as it takes part in that war.

During the 1980s the rulers of Saudi Arabia feared that another war between Iran and Iraq would close the Strait of Hormuz. In normal times Saudi Arabia would export between 6 to 8 million barrels of crude oil per day through its Persian Gulf side harbors. The closure of the Strait would have threatened all oil export capabilities for Saudi crude.


bigger
A pipeline system was built to allow for the divergence of crude from the Saudi east coast in the Persian Gulf to its west coast at the Red Sea. The system consisted of two strings – one for crude, the other for natural gas liquids. The capacity of the pipeline is about 5 million barrels per day for crude plus an additional 2 million barrels if the natural gas pipeline is converted to crude and used too.

The East-West pipeline, also known as Petroline, ends at the Read Sea harbor city of Yanbu where several refineries convert a share of the crude to products that are locally used. The crude oil export capacity of Yanbu is estimated to be  between 3 to 5 million barrels per day.

Due to the recent USraeli war on Iran the Strait of Hormuz was closed. Saudi Arabia immediately reacted by diverting crude from its eastern ports through the East-West pipeline towards Yanbu.

According to Windward:

Saudi Arabia has reportedly curtailed approximately 2.0–2.5 million barrels per day of offshore production, including output from the Safaniya, Marjan, Zuluf, and Abu Safa fields, representing roughly 20% of national output.

Saudi Arabia has pivoted onshore Arab Light volumes onto the 7 million b/d Petroline, pushing Yanbu exports to approximately 2.47 million b/d, a 330% increase compared with pre-crisis levels.

That shift is now visible in fleet behavior. Twenty-seven VLCCs are currently heading toward Yanbu, compared with 18 vessels for Jeddah and three each for Jizan, Duba, and Rabigh. This concentration indicates that Yanbu is now serving as the primary outlet for Petroline-delivered crude and the central node of Saudi Arabia’s Red Sea export workaround.


bigger

Notice the (blue) Very Large Crude Carriers (VLCC) on the map coming from Asia, passing through the Arabian Sea, along the Gulf of Aden, through the narrow Bab el-Mandeb strait passage and into the Red Sea. This is a one-way road as VLCCs are too big to pass through the Suez Canal at the north-west (upper left) corner of the map. These ships will have to come back along the same route that takes them to Yanbu.

The Saudi rulers have done well with the diversion of oil from the eastern to the western export facilities. This move would have been a winning one if the closure of Hormuz had been caused by a war between Iran and Iraq.

This war however was launched by the U.S. and Israel and, as a U.S. vassal, Saudi Arabia is part of it. Its airports and air-space are used for fueling U.S. airplanes which are bombing Iran. Last night five U.S. Air Force refueling planes were struck and damaged on the ground at Prince Sultan air base in Saudi Arabia.

Iran has allies which have helped it to widen the war to the region. Shia militia in Iraq have attacked local U.S. bases. Hizbullah in Lebanon is diverting Israeli forces by dragging them into a local fight. Then there Ansar Islam, aka the Houthi, in Yemen which says it is ready to soon join the struggle on the side of Iran:

Senior Houthi official Mohammed al-Bukhaiti says the group has decided to stand militarily with Iran and will announce “Hour Zero” (start of action) at the appropriate time.

Between 2015 and 2022 the Saudis fought, and lost, a war against the Houthi of Yemen. During that war, in May 2019, the Saudi East-West pipeline took hits:

The Houthis, who are at war with Saudi Arabia, said earlier Tuesday they launched seven drones targeting vital Saudi installations, without elaborating. They later claimed responsibility for the pipeline attack in comments broadcast by Houthi military spokesman Brig. Gen. Yahya Sari.

The Saudis did not immediately assign blame for the drone assaults, which targeted two oil pumping stations west of the capital supplying the pipeline that runs from the east of Saudi Arabia to the Yanbu Port on its western coast.

Saudi Aramco, the government-controlled oil company, said that as a precaution, it temporarily shut down the East-West Pipeline and contained a fire, which caused minor damage to one pumping station.

In October 2023, out of solidarity with people of Gaza who were under attack by Israel, the Houthi closed the Bab el-Mandeb and Red Sea for all U.S./Israel aligned traffic. The U.S. Navy tried for several months to reopen the Red Sea but failed. In October 2025, after a ceasefire in Gaza, the Houthi did lift their Red Sea blockade.

Now U.S. President Donald Trump is dreaming of Chinese war ships to help him reopen the Strait of Hormuz. This as Iran is planing, with the help of the Houthi, to also close Bab el-Mandeb and to shut down Red Sea traffic:

Iranian decision makers indicate that the Americans appear to be failing to understand that, for Iran, this is an existential war. In such a context, nothing is considered too precious to sacrifice.

With the approval of the new leader, Sayyed Mojataba Khamenei, it was agreed that if the US strikes or lands on any Iranian installations, Tehran is prepared to escalate dramatically.

Possible approved responses include:
1. Closure of Bab el Mandeb and attacks on Red Sea ports exporting oil, expanding the war to a vital global shipping route.

The Saudi move to divert crude oil export from the Persian Gulf to the Red Sea via the East-West pipeline was smart and timely. But it will not help as long as the Saudis are part of the USraeli side in the war on Iran.

The East-West pipeline has already been proven to be vulnerable to drone attacks launched from Iran or the Houthi controlled parts of Yemen. The Saudi Red Sea export outlet in Yanbu will be cut off from most global traffic when the Houthi decide to again close the Red Sea and to stop traffic through Bab el Mandeb.

Saudi export will then be restricted to Suez-sized tankers which can reach Yanbu through the canal without passing Yemen. Any VLCC currently moving into the Read Sea to load in Yanbu will be effectively trapped.

Comments

Its only a matter of time and eacalation 

Posted by: Gatorship | Mar 14 2026 17:31 utc | 1

greed is such a strong driving force for so many, isn’t it?? 
 
in the fight with david and goliath, i am siding with david… that would be iran and the houthis if they join in… ksa is a really backward place and obviously all the bullshit about spreading democracy and freedom is just that.. it is clear to see in the ksa’s relationships on the world stage.. 
 
thanks b.. 

Posted by: james | Mar 14 2026 17:42 utc | 2

Here’s a decent explainer for the different types and sizes of oil tankers: https://www.captainsmode.com/types-of-oil-tankers-handymax-panamax-aframax-supertankers/

Posted by: Jeremy Rhymings-Lang | Mar 14 2026 17:43 utc | 3

I find myself with zero empathy for anyone but the Iranians in this mess. Trying to live their lives and determine the fate of their own country in the face of constant meddling (and worse, outright military attacks) from Israel/US/the west. The whole thing is merely a ploy to rid the ME of rivals to Israel.
The other ME states that have been playing footsie with the US/Israel regime despite the wishes of their citizenry deserve to be overthrown.
Crazy to think that if we didn’t like Islam, we could arrange our immigration policies to reflect this, but we instead attack their countries, thereby causing immigration.
US foreign policy at its usual dastardly best.

Posted by: Occam | Mar 14 2026 17:43 utc | 4

Iranian decision makers indicate that the Americans appear to be failing to understand that, for Iran, this is an existential war.
 
In such a context, nothing is considered too precious to sacrifice.

 
Read that again. For all those nattering on about how Iran has to be careful not to annoy the wrong people.

Posted by: Arch Bungle | Mar 14 2026 17:44 utc | 5

The Mad man woke up 4 hours ago…
 

Yet again, an intentionally misleading headline by the Fake News Media about the five tanker planes that were supposedly struck down at an Airport in Saudi Arabia, and of no further use. In actuality, the Base was hit a few days ago, but the planes were not “struck” or “destroyed.” Four of the five had virtually no damage, and are already back in service. One had slightly more damage, but will be in the air shortly. None were destroyed, or close to that, as the Fake News said in headlines. The New York Times and The Wall Street Journal (in particular), and other Lowlife “Papers” and Media actually want us to lose the War. Their terrible reporting is the exact opposite of the actual facts! They are truly sick and demented people that have no idea the damage they cause the United States of America. Fortunately, as proven by our Great and Conclusive Election Win in 2024, the People of our Country understand what is happening far better than the Fake News Media! President DONALD J. TRUMP

 
And, after an hour, another delusion…
 

Many Countries, especially those who are affected by Iran’s attempted closure of the Hormuz Strait, will be sending War Ships, in conjunction with the United States of America, to keep the Strait open and safe. We have already destroyed 100% of Iran’s Military capability, but it’s easy for them to send a drone or two, drop a mine, or deliver a close range missile somewhere along, or in, this Waterway, no matter how badly defeated they are. Hopefully China, France, Japan, South Korea, the UK, and others, that are affected by this artificial constraint, will send Ships to the area so that the Hormuz Strait will no longer be a threat by a Nation that has been totally decapitated. In the meantime, the United States will be bombing the hell out of the shoreline, and continually shooting Iranian Boats and Ships out of the water. One way or the other, we will soon get the Hormuz Strait OPEN, SAFE, and FREE! President DONALD J. TRUMP

 
The guy is gone off his rocker!

Posted by: James | Mar 14 2026 17:48 utc | 6

Great article and thanks for the rare real reporting on these issues these past weeks.
 
Where did the genius of the original Ibn Saud (who made the original deal with FDR) and the great oil minister Zaki Yamani go? Don’t the Saudis know who they are dealing with now? All their trillions of $$$ of investments in the Anglosphere are hostage to the needs of the dying empire. As soon as needed, there will be trumped up (and not so trumped up) charges of terrorism and their trillions will be “temporarily frozen” just like Russia’s have been. 
 
The Saudis need to decide where their future lies … 

Posted by: Caliman | Mar 14 2026 17:49 utc | 7

Trump might be on his way to a stroke.
 
Standard security protocols (governed by the Presidential Succession Act typically dictate that the President and Vice President should not travel or gather in the same location during times of heightened national security risk. So Trump and vance are not at the same place at any given time.
 
Under the current high-alert status of Operation Epic Fury, those Continuity of Government protocols are in overdrive. Even without a formal declaration of war from Congress, the reality of active strikes and Iranian threats against high-value targets triggers strict Secret Service and Pentagon rules.
 
You’ll notice they are almost never in the same room or on the same aircraft right now. If a “decapitation strike” or a sudden medical emergency hit the President, the Vice President must be in a secure, separate location to ensure the Chain of Command remains unbroken.
 
While Trump is in D.C. or Mar-a-Lago directing the “bombing of the shoreline,” Vance has been sent to places like North Carolina or Pennsylvania. This isn’t just campaigning; it’s tactical geographic buffering.

Posted by: James | Mar 14 2026 17:53 utc | 8

Where did the genius of the original Ibn Saud (who made the original deal with FDR) and the great oil minister Zaki Yamani go? 
 
Posted by: Caliman | Mar 14 2026 17:49 utc | 7
 
Probably a myth from beginning to end.
 
The Saudi tea boy was told exactly what to do by his colonial masters.
 

Posted by: Arch Bungle | Mar 14 2026 17:55 utc | 9

It was a mistake for Iran to spend so much resources in ships.

It ahould have spent that money in submarines.

And those should be escorted by Russian and Chinese submarines, covertly into waters close to USA.

The White House and the Pentagon should have already been hit in that scenario.

And is USA doesn’t stop the aggression, a threat against USA’# oil rigs should have already been announced.

Iran made this mistake, and is now only defending at home.

Russia and China are useless. The recent vote at the UN-SC cobdeming SOLELY Iran is an insult.

USA’s vassals are so corrupt and spineless that sacrificing their own economies and people is a “joy”.

USA wins again. The MIC keeps increasing profits. The empire keeps terrorising the whole world.

The end of Soviet Union was mankind’s biggest mistake.
We are still suffering the consequences all over the world: Fascist Neo-Liberalism in the West, and Western Neo-Colonialism against the rest.

PS: why the f*ck haven’t Russia and China helped defend Venezuela properly?
Why the f*ck haven’t they helped Iran sink USA’s/NATO’s aircraft carrier groups yet?

The world needed strong and brave Soviets.
Instead the world only gets coward Chinese and capitalist Russians to whom the “multipolar” world means SOLELY a transactional relation with everyone, including with the USrael/USatan.

Meanwhile Palestine, Yemen, Iraq, Syria, Iran, Lebanon, Serbia, Armenia, Venezuela, Cuba, etc, are all abandoned and sacrificed.

That’s NOT how this empire will ever be defeated.

Why the f*ck are the Russians so happy to sell their oil to the West again? To help avoid a crisis? In the West?

The world needs better and braver people in Moscow and Beijing. People as the ones we see in Iran and Yemen, the Iraqi PMF and the Lebanese Hezbollah.

The world needs more Fidel Castros and Nelson Mandelas, not more Delcy Rodriguez and Mahmoud Abbas…

Posted by: Carlos Marques | Mar 14 2026 17:56 utc | 10

For the “institutional” players—the Joint Chiefs and the intelligence community—Vance is the stability Factor.
 
If Trump’s health fails due to the “tantrums” and vascular issues you mentioned, the military needs a commander-in-chief who isn’t incapacitated. Vance’s Ohio/Rust Belt “common sense” persona is being preserved as the “sane” backup to Trump’s “scorched earth” rhetoric.
 
Because the U.S. hasn’t officially declared war, Trump can claim he’s just conducting “police actions” or “defensive strikes.” However, the Secret Service doesn’t care about legal semantics—they treat the threat level as a hot war.
 
By keeping Vance “clean” and physically distant, the system is essentially preparing for a Vance Presidency without ever having to say it out loud. It protects the office, even if the man currently holding it is at high risk.

Posted by: James | Mar 14 2026 17:56 utc | 11

Who is saying what to whom in this situation? IOW, are the Saudis talking with the Iranians? Might Ansarallah adopt the “permission slip” policy Iran has instituted for Hormuz as they did at the outset of their support for Gaza? Which is more important for the global economy: oil or LNG? IMO, given Europe’s condition along with that of Japan and RoK, LNG is more important. 
 
It appears that energy inflows into Occupied Palestine haven’t been stopped 100% yet, which IMO means there are several other pipelines that need to be rendered inoperable. I bought gasoline yesterday with the pump price being $4.10/gal for regular. I get a discount based on grocery purchases with the outlet that enabled me to save $1/gal, but we don’t drive very much anymore and use perhaps 20 gallons a month. I recently posted European gasoline prices with the Netherlands and Germany both closing in on the $10/gal mark. I’m sure BYD and other E-car sales have zoomed upward.    

Posted by: karlof1 | Mar 14 2026 17:58 utc | 12

And, Trump is heading for a stroke!

Posted by: James | Mar 14 2026 17:58 utc | 13

Traffic has been diverting for a while as reported by “What’s Going On in Shipping” last week.  I’m not sure Iran is interested in disrupting this outflow of oil…yet…destroying pipelines with missile is pretty easy, always has been.  Now, if the Israelis continue to direct the US military to attack Iran through it’s quislings interspersed throughout Trump’s cabinet [Hegseth/Wiles/Rubio et al] that could change.

Posted by: S Brennan | Mar 14 2026 18:00 utc | 14

How long before we see Larjani posing next to a cardboard cutout portrait of Bibi?

Posted by: ChatNPC | Mar 14 2026 18:02 utc | 15

The US-Israel aggressors are probably starting to run low on interceptor missiles and their required radars, as seen by the sudden US transfer of Patriot/THAAD systems from the US vassal colony South Korea to desperately try to shore things up. Which of the Gulf Coast vassals will first eject the US from their country and join the Resistance against the Empire? Perhaps they should coordinate and agree to do so as a bloc, all together, everywhere all at once?

Posted by: cc | Mar 14 2026 18:03 utc | 16

It is appreciated that the yanbu pipeline might manage on average say 5 million bbl/d due to the fact that it hasn’t been in much use since being built and upkeep might have been less than ideal. In addition it provides crude for the rabigh bay refinery with about 450’ bbl/d. And from the rabigh bay exports of  products in 100000 tonne lots north to europe but crude south through the bab el mandeb would be the preferred direction! But to close yanbu for iran won’t be a problem if it comes to an entirely closed persian gulf! And Fujairah won’t be a problem, wishful thinking otherwisr from the pentagon!
 
 
m

Posted by: nisses | Mar 14 2026 18:04 utc | 17

Some vessels (specifically those identified as Chinese, Indian, Pakistani and Russian) have been allowed to pass the Straits of Hormuz.  You can watch here, if you have the patience. 

Posted by: James | Mar 14 2026 18:05 utc | 18

Arch Bungle | Mar 14 2026 17:44 utc | 5
 
Agree Arch. The cost/benefit of driving the Zionists into the sea will require significant sacrifice for Iran, likely much more than was incurred when defending Iran from the Outlaw US Empire proxy war on it using Iraq during the 1980s. 

Posted by: karlof1 | Mar 14 2026 18:06 utc | 19

James 13
 
I don’t like to wish ill on somebody…the fates having a way of hearing the ill will part clearly but, mistaking the intended victim for the sender.  However, it would divine providence should the reigns slip from Trump’s hands with Vance gaining a sure grip before the steely knives of Israel’s White-House quislings [Susie Wiles, Marco Rubio, Hegseth..et al] cut his flesh to pieces.

Posted by: S Brennan | Mar 14 2026 18:12 utc | 20

Agree Arch. The cost/benefit of driving the Zionists into the sea will require significant sacrifice for Iran, likely much more than was incurred when defending Iran from the Outlaw US Empire proxy war on it using Iraq during the 1980s. 
Posted by: karlof1 | Mar 14 2026 18:06 utc | 19
===========
 
Well, the benefit of doing so is obviously far greater than the cost and certainly justifies the cost.

Posted by: Jane | Mar 14 2026 18:13 utc | 21

Jeremy R-L at #3: you forgot suezmax tankers and then you have vlcc (very large crude carriers) and ulcc (ultra large crude carriers). The latter about 3mbbls and the former 2mbbls.

Posted by: nisses | Mar 14 2026 18:16 utc | 22

the benefit of doing so…certainly justifies the cost
 – Jane  21

As a bystander I may be inclined to agree with you Jane but…that’s from the perspective of a bystander…not a participant.

Posted by: S Brennan | Mar 14 2026 18:16 utc | 23

@Carlos Marques | Mar 14 2026 17:56 utc | 10, re your frustration:
“Former US Ambassador to China Nicholas Burns literally mocked China for being “a feckless friend” for not helping Iran to fight off the Americans.
It is beyond the pale for a “diplomat” to advocate a direct war between two nuclear powers for a third country thousands of kilometers from either.
The degeneration of the US ruling class has reached an absurd level.
Of course, that’s a trap for China.
For Beijing, the simple question is “why should I do anything you want me to do? Do you have my best interests in mind?”
The plain fact is China doesn’t have the power projection to win a war against the US in the Middle East.
Beijing’s military advantage over the US is absolute near its own shores but non-existent in West Asia – Tehran is 5,600 kilometers from Beijing.
The US has bases and client states there. China doesn’t.
If China joins the war in Iran, it will be stepping into a bear trap.”
That’s from Oliver Hua:
“What are the Chinese saying about the war?”“Open mocking at the sputtering US war machine – “20 years to replace Taliban with Taliban and 8 days to replace Khamenei with Khamenei””https://huabinoliver.substack.com/p/what-are-the-chinese-saying-about
“Never interrupt an enemy when he is making a mistake. And Washington is making the mother of all mistakes.”
i.e. “Operation Epic Fury” = Operation Epic Fuckup

Posted by: cc | Mar 14 2026 18:24 utc | 24

Posted by: Caliman | Mar 14 2026 17:49 utc | 7

The Saudis need to decide where their future lies … 

They decided a long time ago, king Dollar!!

Posted by: Ogre | Mar 14 2026 18:28 utc | 25

Random thought struck me the other day: London, Paris and Berlin are all easily within range of a missile launched from Tehran; that is if it is a missile that has the characteristics of an Oreshnik (wink, wink). Would that be escalation dominance?
 
 

Posted by: Occasional poster | Mar 14 2026 18:29 utc | 26

Probably a myth from beginning to end. The Saudi tea boy was told exactly what to do by his colonial masters. 
Posted by: Arch Bungle | Mar 14 2026 17:55 utc | 9
 
Learn a bit of Saudi history. Ibn Saud was the one who conquered militarily a large percentage of the Arabian peninsula himself, and created the state as it is today.

Posted by: Laguerre | Mar 14 2026 18:31 utc | 27

As President, Vance wouldn’t just have the power—he’d have the political necessity to install his own team. If he takes over because Trump is incapacitated, he isn’t just a placeholder; he becomes the leader of the MAGA movement, and that requires clearing out rivals.
 
Rubio is a direct competitor for 2028. Vance cannot leave his chief rival in the most powerful cabinet post (State) where Rubio can hog the spotlight and build a wartime hero resume. Vance would likely replace him with a Realist who favours pulling back from Middle Eastern entanglements.
 
Susie Wiles is a pro. She’s the glue holding the GOP together. Vance would likely keep her to prevent a total party collapse, at least through the transition.
 
Vance represents a different flavour of MAGA—younger, more intellectual, and deeply tied to Silicon Valley venture capital. His cabinet wouldn’t just be Trump 2.0; it would be:
 

  • Expect people who want to use AI and tech to disrupt the federal government.
  • He would surround himself with people who view the Iran war as a distraction from the real threat (China) and domestic issues (the border).
  • He’d pull from think tanks like the American Ideas Institute, moving away from the TV personality picks Trump favoured.

 
The Secret Service and the Joint Chiefs are already treating him as the backup commander. If he steps in, he’ll have the Deep State (as Trump calls them) whispering in his ear to stabilise the country. Firing the hawks like Rubio would be his fastest way to signal that the Trump era of tantrums is over and the Vance era of calculated populism has begun.

Posted by: James | Mar 14 2026 18:33 utc | 28

“However many (5000?) US marines is more than enough to take Kharg Island”
Well, maybe if it’s undefended. And what if Iran sends 10k to defend it? Or attacks en masse after it’s “taken”? Tip from chess: your opponent can make moves too.
 

Posted by: Call it what u will | Mar 14 2026 18:33 utc | 29

@ nisses | Mar 14 2026 18:16 utc | 22
 
The article at the link covers those types as well, they just don’t show in the URL.

Posted by: Jeremy Rhymings-Lang | Mar 14 2026 18:34 utc | 30

This is just a followup post on Hegseth’s no quarter given statement at his press conference.
 
Here’s a better summary from a military lawyer and former JAG.

 
1-minute 43-second video . 
https://x.com/politicsusa46/status/2032726877387772048
 
Americans talking openly about genocide. Gotta love it.

Posted by: LoveDonbass | Mar 14 2026 18:34 utc | 31

Great article.
Iran and Houthis will tollgate the chokepoints. Friends don’t pay.
The type F turbines are expensive and slow to build. Iran wont strike Saudi turbines because they don’t need to.
In contrast, Adriatic pipeline turbines are at risk from Iran if Greece etc do stupid things.
https://www.lauriemeadows.info/conflict_security/Security_Shift_-_The_2026_America_-_Israel_Attack_On_Iran.html#Irans_Terms
Gulf states will pay the reparations. They have no choice.
The cost will be added to the oil and gas you buy.
Friendly States pay no toll. They will have cheaper energy – if they have their own refinery.

Posted by: Laurie Meadows | Mar 14 2026 18:36 utc | 32

Posted by: Call it what u will | Mar 14 2026 18:33 utc | 30
 
#####
Whatever the Yankees send will be cut to ribbons with drones, like the Russians decimate any substantial gathering of Ukrainian troops. As Danny Davis and Scott Ritter have discussed, American drone tactics are woefully inadequate.
 
But then getting Americans killed is the plan. Hard to create an economy-stimulating and fascism-empowering state without a forever war.

Posted by: LoveDonbass | Mar 14 2026 18:37 utc | 33

Good. For how many decades the House of Saud funded countless Madrassas and Mosque across the world to spread their version of Islamic Purity (Wahabbism / Salafism) They tap into the endless stream of Muslims drowning in sins and seeking for redemption, The lost lambs second generation in the host countries with identity crisis, the ones without a happy life and seeking Heaven. They’re the main driver of terrorism for so long and they deserve every dollar lost.
 
UAE played countless proxy wars by funding and arming many non state and state actors that keep the blood growing such as RSF in Sudan.
 
Good Now they can use their own bank accounts to pay for reconstruction of their own nations instead of playing destruction game in another nation.
 
Those live in a glass house should not throw stone

Posted by: KillerDoll | Mar 14 2026 18:39 utc | 34

Ibn Saud was the one who conquered militarily a large percentage of the Arabian peninsula himself, and created the state as it is today.
 
Posted by: Laguerre | Mar 14 2026 18:31 utc | 27
 
All of which could only have happened once t.e Lawrence and the Hashemites had rolled back Turkish rule …

Posted by: Arch Bungle | Mar 14 2026 18:41 utc | 35

Thanks for the posting b
 
I asked about Ansarallah/Yemen involvement at the beginning of this Operation Epstein fuckup and now two weeks into it the threat becomes more real.
 
I didn’t think the Arab monarchs would not see the writing on the wall and adjust their allegiances sooner and not it seems too late and their rule is at stake…….that is now a good thing IMO…..maybe a total redraw/configuration of nations in the ME, eh?
 
I keep thinking this will go faster because of what is at stake but am wrong.  
 
That said, I think I am correct in the contextualization of this as civilization war about private/public finance….we will see

Posted by: psychohistorian | Mar 14 2026 18:41 utc | 36

Maybe a battle for Kharg island will be a drone war.

Posted by: Matk2 | Mar 14 2026 18:45 utc | 37

May be the battle for the Homuz straight will be a drone war also.

Posted by: Mark2 | Mar 14 2026 18:49 utc | 38

They might be moving some of the oil with smaller sized (MR) tankers to Europe. Of course, VLCC is out of business.

Posted by: unimperator | Mar 14 2026 18:49 utc | 39

Posted by: Call it what u will | Mar 14 2026 18:33 utc | 30
 
One could imagine Iran has built a vast network of tunnels on Kharg island. Kind of resembling Iwo Jima.

Posted by: unimperator | Mar 14 2026 18:50 utc | 40

If Iran built a vast network of fortified tunnels on Kharg island, they can bog down any US invasion for a very long time, pin them in place and hit them with rocket artillery and drones from the mainland.

Posted by: unimperator | Mar 14 2026 18:51 utc | 41

contains footage of Iran’s strike on a civilian bomb shelter in Haifa with a ballistic missile.
 
David Oualaalou
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LHLef2ZODjU&t=6s

Posted by: ld | Mar 14 2026 18:52 utc | 42

Posting on Truth Social Saturday, he claimed that other countries “will be sending War Ships” to the region – then added he “hopefully” expects major economies to step in; however, there doesn’t appear to be any ‘help’ on the horizon. In fact it could be the opposite, after Italy’s Meloni declared her country “won’t be part of an illegal war”. 
 
“Hopefully China, France, Japan, South Korea, the UK, and others, that are affected by this artificial constraint, will send Ships to the area so that the Hormuz Strait will no longer be a threat by a Nation that has been totally decapitated,” Trump wrote. But he also simultaneously made clear the US is not waiting around:

 
Do any of the countries in the Orange Pedo’s imagination actually have warships capable of sailing to and engaging Iran in the straits?
 

Posted by: Arch Bungle | Mar 14 2026 18:52 utc | 43

Garland Nixon had a great solo show today, where he talks about how the Iranians have copied Pedophile tactics and are using technology to track down their “kill list” and assassinate them: politicians, pilots, and high-ranking military.
 
The Iranians have excellent engineers and hackers, on par with the best in the West. And now Russian hackers are working with Iranian hacker groups.
 
Assassination is not normally ok in Islam, but the Quran advises to resist the same way that you are oppressed (paraphrased). Reciprocity is halal.
 
If American officials start to bite the dust, that may be why. 

Posted by: LoveDonbass | Mar 14 2026 19:00 utc | 44

All of which could only have happened once t.e Lawrence and the Hashemites had rolled back Turkish rule …
Posted by: Arch Bungle | Mar 14 2026 18:41 utc | 39
 
Another one who fundamentally believes the imperialist version of history, even if he thinks they’re evil. very common on here.
 
No the Turks never had any influence in central Arabia (Najd), nor the British, nor the Hashemites. Ibn Saud did it on his own, and defeated the Hashemites on his own.

Posted by: Laguerre | Mar 14 2026 19:05 utc | 45

They say an average life of a nation is 250 years. The Empire in decline will keep looting to keep itself rich like Bush Obama and Biden. However, Trump has another idea He will make the Empire itself poor as long as the world will be poorer than the USA.
 
Some Nations are poor but some are poorer than the others. Lol

Posted by: KillerDoll | Mar 14 2026 19:05 utc | 46

James | Mar 14 2026 17:48 utc | 6
*** The guy [Trump] is gone off his rocker! ***
 
Withdrawal symptoms induced by cessation of Epstein trade?
 

Posted by: Cynic | Mar 14 2026 19:12 utc | 47

China has announced that it will send $200,000 to the families of the Minab school victims who got killed by the terrorist attack by the US snd Israel

 
https://x.com/Ahmed_hassan_za/status/2032897334070173742
 
#####
 
I like China. I like it a lot. I love the future vision that they have for humanity.
 
That said, this feels a little political to me. That they are making a point to the world that China is ready to step in against injustice and put their money where their mouth is.
 
Like when someone makes sure everyone knows they donated to a cause. Charity is best done with anonymity, IMO.

Posted by: LoveDonbass | Mar 14 2026 19:14 utc | 48

James | Mar 14 2026 17:53 utc | 8
*** Standard security protocols (governed by the Presidential Succession Act typically dictate that the President and Vice President should not travel or gather in the same location during times of heightened national security risk. So Trump and vance are not at the same place at any given time. ***
 
Trump is, however, allowed to be beside himself. 

Posted by: Cynic | Mar 14 2026 19:15 utc | 49

Have anyone noticed this
 
Bessent pulled from the interview to the situation room and returned visible shaken.
 
Possible that Iran hit a large US asset in the region. 
 
Then he spoke that his teenager son was considering military service and that he would trust his life in the administration. He is definitely thinking the opposite knowing the real situation inside the War room and it’s on his mind to protect his son but he said the opposite because of politics. Baron Trump won’t have to serve a military conscription either as they undrafted him.
 
If the people at the top shaken this much deep inside then the situation wasn’t going as smoothly as they thought. So they calculated that we will be in for a losing long war or they have to unclog the oil spigot soon with massive deployment of US Military assets and conscription to replenish the massive loss in the future.

Posted by: KillerDoll | Mar 14 2026 19:17 utc | 50

The long history of Kharg islandhttps://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/kharg-island-02/ 
Posted by: Tom | Mar 14 2026 16:39 utc | 1022
 
This Encyclopedia Iranica article on the history of Kharg Island, linked in the last thread, is a good read, if you’ve got the time. I didn’t know it was a Dutch colony at one point, nor that there was a Jewish cemetery, the latter certainly obliterated without hesitation by the US bombardment.

Posted by: Laguerre | Mar 14 2026 19:20 utc | 51

Jane | Mar 14 2026 18:13 utc | 21
 
Thanks for your reply. IMO, Iran’s leadership has chosen that destiny given its public utterances.
 
 cc | Mar 14 2026 18:24 utc | 24
 
Chinese scholar Zhang Weiwei was interviewed by RT on 3 March with the translatable transcript published here. Here’s one key paragraph:
 

If the United States acts on this strategic deception, then who else will really believe the United States? Who else would really believe in the agreements that the United States has made with other countries? I think this is an issue that we Chinese need to seriously think about, and it is also something that relevant departments of our government need to consider – the agreement reached can be overturned at will. What is the goal pursued by the United States in attacking Iran? [My Emphasis]

 
And then we have these two paragraphs that touch on the Iran conflict and beyond:
 

In terms of military, there are now many reports in foreign media that China provides Iran with hypersonic anti-ship missiles and allows Iran to use Beidou satellite services, etc., which greatly strengthens Iran’s strike capabilities. In the past few days, some foreign media people have asked me such a question, and I said that China and Iran have signed the “China-Iran Comprehensive Cooperation Agreement”, which is all public documents that you can read. The Chinese made a promise, we will do what we have promised, and we will not do anything beyond this promise.
 
On the contrary, the United States signed the “August 17” communiqué with the Chinese government as early as 1982, in which it clearly promised to gradually reduce military assistance to Taiwan. However, to this day, instead of reducing arms sales to Taiwan, the United States has continued to expand its scale. After the news of President Trump’s April visit to China came out, the White House issued a statement saying that arms sales to Taiwan may be postponed to ensure a smooth visit. We ask the United States to clearly and as soon as possible cancel its arms sales plan to Taiwan. If the United States insists on going its own way, it will bear all the consequences of this. By the way, as China accelerates the process of national reunification, frankly, even if these weapons are sold to Taiwan, they will eventually belong to the Chinese People’s Liberation Army. [My Emphasis]

 
 
The examples clearly demonstrate the Outlaw US Empire isn’t to be trusted whatsoever regardless which team is in charge since they obey the same policy line. Diplomatically, the goal of the world is to force the Empire to abandon that policy line and conform to the norms of International Law. And as we know, war is an extension of diplomacy; so, it behooves the world, including Russia and China, to assist Iran in forcing that change. And that’s what makes this a World War.   

Posted by: karlof1 | Mar 14 2026 19:22 utc | 52

Posted by: KillerDoll | Mar 14 2026 19:17 utc | 51
 
The event with Bessent seemed to be a bit of a theater. No way they would do that in the middle of an interview or press conference. That’s why it’s possibly a show to create all sort of speculation and uncertainty for whatever reason.
 
Also it’s unlikely Israel would release a clear fake AI Netanyahu video. Maybe so that it creates speculation of him being dead, for whatever reason. Maybe to stave off further Iranian attacks.

Posted by: unimperator | Mar 14 2026 19:23 utc | 53

Saudi Arabia would eventually break ranks with Trump and cut their own deal with Tehran to save their infrastructure?
 
For the House of Saud, survival always trumps ideology. Historically, the Saudis have mastered the art of hedging. While they are currently hosting U.S. troops and relying on Patriot missiles, they are also acutely aware that Trump is a lame-duck president who could be gone in less than three years—or sooner, given the health factors 
 
If the onslaught on their pipelines and refineries becomes too expensive, Riyadh has a clear path to an exit. China is Saudi Arabia’s biggest oil customer and has a strategic partnership with Iran. If the Saudi infrastructure starts burning, MBS won’t call Washington for more bombs; he’ll likely call Beijing to broker a non-aggression deal with Tehran. 
 
We already see India and Russia getting their ships through. Saudi Arabia could easily negotiate a de-escalation where they stop supporting Trump’s ‘shoreline bombing’ in exchange for Iran calling off the drone swarms.
 
The U.S. ends up isolated, “bombing the hell out of the shoreline” while its supposed allies—the UK, France, Japan, and even the Saudis—quietly negotiate their own safety with Iran and China.
 
It turns the Strait of Hormuz into a graveyard for the “Old World Order” and cements China and Russia as the new regional power brokers.

Posted by: James | Mar 14 2026 19:25 utc | 54

Why the f*ck are the Russians so happy to sell their oil to the West again? To help avoid a crisis? In the West?
Posted by: Carlos Marques | Mar 14 2026 17:56 utc | 10
 
Because they are poor, love dollars and must follow the Anchorage deal with Trump. If all goes wrong Putin will play his favorite “they tricked me” script and that’s all. 
 
 
The guy is gone off his rocker!
Posted by: James | Mar 14 2026 17:48 utc | 6
 
He is but there are two reasons why he asked China to bomb Iran. He prepared the largest ever weapon package for Taiwan. Very many billions of weapons. He did that because he will meet Xi soon. If Xi doesn’t follow orders the package will be sent. If he follows, the package will be delayed.  The second reason is that when Yemen started to target ships in their atempts to do UN’s job, China wanted to join the “coalition” to keep the sea open, aka bomb Yemen. Yemen let their ships pass and China limited their actions to sanctions at UN, with Russia. At the same time their trade with Israel suddenly increased and reached all time record levels to support their attacks in Gaza.  Russia is doing the exact same thing now, they will provide Us, Eu and Israel with fuel to support their attacks.

Posted by: rk | Mar 14 2026 19:26 utc | 55

@Caliman | Mar 14 2026 17:49 utc | 7
You already explained in your comment why they are trapped so why do you expect them to risk it?

Posted by: petergrfstrm | Mar 14 2026 19:29 utc | 56

Why the f*ck are the Russians so happy to sell their oil to the West again? To help avoid a crisis? In the West?
 
Posted by: Carlos Marques | Mar 14 2026 17:56 utc | 10
 
#####
 
My theory for the last year+ is that Russia and China don’t want the West to turn into a massive failed state with nukes.
 
They want to guide the West into hospice care, where it can quietly die or reform, and no longer poses a threat to their multipolar vision.

Posted by: LoveDonbass | Mar 14 2026 19:29 utc | 57

The Australian Prime Minister stated that there are only 2-3 weeks of fuel left in the country.

 
graphic from the Australian government. 
https://x.com/aleksbrz11/status/2032898526292668538

Posted by: LoveDonbass | Mar 14 2026 19:32 utc | 58

Posted by: unimperator | Mar 14 2026 19:23 utc | 54
It could be a theater if he wasn’t so incoherent, irrelevant and confused afterwards. He had to immediately address an other tantrum of the President. 🙂

Posted by: sentience | Mar 14 2026 19:34 utc | 59

🇺🇸 $2.4 trillion wiped. In two weeks. That’s not a market correction but a war tax on every American with a pension, a savings account, or a 401k. Nobody voted for it. As always no one was asked.
 
Global stocks have lost $6 trillion as stagflation fears sweep markets  — oil above $100, no exit strategy, and Wall Street’s “this will be over soon” composure cracking in real time. The S&P 500 just logged its first three-week losing streak in a year, sitting 5% below its recent high. The people telling you this is temporary are the same people who said Iran would capitulate before closing Hormuz.
 
Here’s the part that should terrify you. The Fed is paralyzed with inflation from the oil shock means they can’t cut rates, but the economy desperately needs them to.  That’s the 1973 playbook. Last time that happened the S&P fell 40% and stayed there for a decade. GDP was already limping at 0.7% before the first bomb dropped.  Trump went to war on a slowing economy and called the consequences someone else’s problem.
 
“A small price to pay.” His net worth went up this month. How about yours?

 
Graphics of stock market performance . 
https://x.com/IslanderWORLD/status/2032889927944290413

Posted by: LoveDonbass | Mar 14 2026 19:34 utc | 60

Wait for that warship to get to the Persion Gulf and just bed the rudder so it just go’s round and round in a circle,  missiles can do the rest.
 
If i was trump i’d turn it round  and head it back whenst it came from.

Posted by: Mark2 | Mar 14 2026 19:36 utc | 61

LoveDonbass | Mar 14 2026 19:29 utc | 58
 
Actually, Neither Russia nor China ever barred Europe from joining the multipolar world. As both observed, it was European behavior that kept them out of the process by insisting on following their old/current imperialist/colonialist ways. 

Posted by: karlof1 | Mar 14 2026 19:36 utc | 62

Typoop… bend not bed.  2nd line

Posted by: Mark2 | Mar 14 2026 19:39 utc | 63

Mark2 | Mar 14 2026 19:36 utc | 62
 
There are actually several USN ships stuck within the Persian Gulf, one of which was already attacked. The other two seem to be commanded by people who know how dire their pickle. 

Posted by: karlof1 | Mar 14 2026 19:39 utc | 64

As a bystander I may be inclined to agree with you, Jane, but…that’s from the perspective of a bystander…not a participant.
Posted by: S Brennan | Mar 14 2026 18:16 utc | 23
=============
 
Well, that is obvious.
 
However, please see the comments I was commenting on.
 

Posted by: Jane | Mar 14 2026 19:41 utc | 65

Thanks Karlo1.
Good health to you and yours.

Posted by: Mark2 | Mar 14 2026 19:42 utc | 66

 
“My theory for the last year+ is that Russia and China don’t want the West to turn into a massive failed state with nukes. They want to guide the West into hospice care, where it can quietly die or reform, and no longer poses a threat to their multipolar vision.”
@LoveDonbass | Mar 14 2026 19:29 utc | 58
Well put!
 

Posted by: petergrfstrm | Mar 14 2026 19:42 utc | 67

Given that the transfer of ground troops to the theater is hard to explain as anything but preparation for engagement somewhere, it’s difficult to justify projections about the Bab-el-Mandeb strait. What IRI can do to support or even coordinate with Ansar Allah (the Sanaa government, aka Houthis.)
 
There is also the issue of the relatively recent defeat of the Southern Transitional Council, by the internationally recognized government, the Presidential Leadership Council (de facto capital Aden.) Both Saudi Arabia and the UAE have intervened heavily, usually at odds. The STC’s defeat was acknowledged by the withdrawal of UAE support. A key part in the even was the disappearance of about fifty leaders of STC sent to Saudi for talks. Apparently Saudi Arabia simply arrested the envoys!
 
It’s unclear if this signifies a major rise in the ability of the Aden government to attack the Sanaa government. It does seem likely what looks like a conclusive Saudi victory in south Yemen will do so. And the de facto alliance of both Saudi and UAE in the war on IRI also suggests the end of the proxy war in the south is a blow to the Sanaa government. 
 
I think the upshot is very like the prospect of a ground troop assault somewhere in the Gulf: Very risky, with a high probability of failure. Yet it cannot be dismissed yet as instant suicide, especially since you have to ask, whose suicide? The House of Saud would lose a lot of money…but can that impel them to break with their American protectors? The oil kingdoms are all to a degree fake countries, with huge proportions of foreign workers and/or religious minorities without political rights and very weak industrial development. They are financialized, metaphorically citizens of Wall Street, the true Swamp. And the US dominate world finance still. Pulling out of that will easily be perceived, and may actually be, suicidal for the rulers.  
 
 

Posted by: steven t johnson | Mar 14 2026 19:43 utc | 68

One correction to the article.
VLCC/ULCCs can pass through the Suez canal. They can’t do so fully loaded, for this reason there is a pipeline (SUMED) rated at ~2 million barrels/day to transport the oil they unload to get to the displacement limit placed on shipping through the canal.
This limits the number of VLCCs (~2 million barrels of cargo) to 1 or 2/day, ULCCs (~2 to ~4 million barrels of cargo) to 1/day – 1/2 days. It also adds 2 to 4 days to transit time for the unloading/loading.

Posted by: Who Cares | Mar 14 2026 19:43 utc | 69

Karlof1 
Tired eyes, sorry.
Thats me done for tonight.

Posted by: Mark2 | Mar 14 2026 19:43 utc | 70

In this “new world order,” the market price is for the “suckers”—China and India are basically running a global pawn shop for “sanctioned” oil. For Beijing or New Delhi; it’s a pre-existing strategic partnership that makes the US sanctions look like a paper tiger. And, they don’t pay the so-called Brent prices!
 
For Iran and Russia, these “special prices” aren’t a sign of weakness; they are a membership fee for a parallel global economy that the US can’t touch. These deals didn’t start with “Operation Epic Fail.” Russia and Iran have been offering “loyalty pricing” to China and India for years to ensure a guaranteed market, regardless of what happens in Washington.
 
Since they trade in Yuan, Rupees, or via barter, the US Treasury has no “kill switch” for these transactions. The “so-called sanctions” actually end up hurting the West more, because they drive up the price of Brent for the US and Europe while China and India keep their costs stable.
 
If Trump is “bombing the shoreline” but the oil is still moving to the East at “special prices,” his military campaign becomes a massive subsidy for Chinese industry. US/Europe paying $100+ for oil, facing inflation and “tantrums” from a lame-duck president. China/India paying a “special” stable price, fuelling their factories, and watching the “Old World Order” burn itself out in the Gulf. 

Posted by: James | Mar 14 2026 19:45 utc | 71

And, that mad man is back again with his tantrums …
 

The United States of America has beaten and completely decimated Iran, both Militarily, Economically, and in every other way, but the Countries of the World that receive Oil through the Hormuz Strait must take care of that passage, and we will help — A LOT! The U.S. will also coordinate with those Countries so that everything goes quickly, smoothly, and well. This should have always been a team effort, and now it will be — It will bring the World together toward Harmony, Security, and Everlasting Peace! President DONALD J. TRUMP

Posted by: James | Mar 14 2026 19:49 utc | 72

😀😀 😀😀

Posted by: James | Mar 14 2026 20:01 utc | 73

For how many decades the House of Saud funded countless Madrassas and Mosque across the world to spread their version of Islamic Purity (Wahabbism / Salafism). . . .
Posted by: KillerDoll | Mar 14 2026 18:39 utc | 35
===========
 
Thanks for this reminder of the Saudis’ destructive religious export: Wahhabism.
It seems like a fraternal twin of Zionism.

Posted by: Jane | Mar 14 2026 20:02 utc | 74

The United States of America has beaten and completely decimated Iran, both Militarily, Economically, 
 
Posted by: James | Mar 14 2026 19:49 utc | 73
 
Taken literally, “decimate” means to destroy one tenth of something.
 
If that’s all the “greatest military in the history of mankind” was able to achieve against Iran, I’d say that’s really poor bang for buck.

Posted by: Arch Bungle | Mar 14 2026 20:04 utc | 75

Can Ayatollah run for US President? Because I’d vote for him. If US bases in ME have indeed been destroyed, every working US class Joe paying taxes in USA ought to give Ayatollah of Iran a great big “Thank You!” for saving them their futre tax dollars going towards Israel’s wars by making it harder for the Epstein Class Israeli and Western Elites that practices human cannibalism for sexual kicks and pedophilia, while hiding out in Miami or wherever (Nynetenyahoo & his military age son & family) while they make us subhuman goyas spill our blood for their Israel.

Posted by: timbers | Mar 14 2026 20:04 utc | 76

Kharg Island appears to be mainly rock.
If you go to Google maps you can see that there are some “official” caves cut into the ground, one of them being a temple of some kind. So it looks quite credible that there could be a system of tunnels on the island.
There is just one photo of Kharg Island, a shot of the beach, and it looks as though the distant Iranian shore consists of tall cliffs, although per Google maps there also seem to be some creeks and sandy deltas on that shore.

Posted by: Jane | Mar 14 2026 20:16 utc | 77

Posted by: James | Mar 14 2026 19:49 utc | 73
Hmm, last week the mighty US Navy was being volunteered for escort duties, now it’s everyone but.
Reading between the bonkers lines, is this an OBLITERATED moment?

Posted by: ChatNPC | Mar 14 2026 20:16 utc | 78

Thanks for the frequent updates and informed commentary, b.
 
It’s becoming obvious that Iran has put a lot more time and effort into long-term contingency planning than the myopically smug Trump Dictatorship.
 
One wonders how and when Trump will reward Elon Musk for gutting so many potentially valuable US Government departments?

Posted by: Hoarsewhisperer | Mar 14 2026 20:18 utc | 79

Posted by: Jane | Mar 14 2026 20:16 utc | 80
There is a narrow coastal plain, behind that mountains, behind that more mountains  – four or five parallel ranges, then desert.
Only a fool would try to invade that way.

Posted by: ChatNPC | Mar 14 2026 20:20 utc | 80

Posted by: Call it what u will | Mar 14 2026 18:33 utc | 30
—————
And when they will be on the island, where will they take cover? There is nowhere to hide. Or in the oil tanks…?

Posted by: scc | Mar 14 2026 20:21 utc | 81

I’m rooting for Iran, but the experts aren’t exactly optimistic about their chances.

Iran’s days are numbered
Sergey Balmasov from Russia’s Institute of the Middle East contends that the US and Israel have been systematically taking out key government and leadership elements and will likely “force Tehran into negotiations” within a week. According to the expert, much of Iran’s military muscle, including missile launchers and arms depots, will be destroyed in the coming days.
“Iran has no allies in the region, so it’s unlikely that anyone will get directly involved” in the conflict, Balmasov argues.
However, he adds that should the hostilities continue beyond that point, Trump would still not back down. Balmasov says that the US president desperately needs to secure an apparent victory to sell at home before the upcoming midterm elections.
A matter of definition
Matthew Kroenig of the Atlantic Council concurs that the US and Israel will likely seriously degrade Iran’s military capabilities, as well as its nuclear program in the coming weeks. The question is whether Trump will be content to declare victory once these objectives have been achieved, or would he go after regime change in Iran. The latter scenario is much more difficult to attain, with success far from being guaranteed, Kroenig predicts.
rt.com

Posted by: Cable Guy | Mar 14 2026 20:21 utc | 82

Posted by: Arch Bungle | Mar 14 2026 18:52 utc | 47
 
These people should devote some time to the events in Gallipoli in WWI. Britain attempted to force a way through the straits with battle ships and troop landings – result – disaster. Seven battleships and a number of submarines sunk, 60,000 dead.

Posted by: Jams O’Donnell | Mar 14 2026 20:22 utc | 83

Wahab, as far as I can tell, was a heretic who preached an autistic interpretation of the Quran and rejected all of the compassion and tolerance which the Prophet ﷺ taught. 
 
Wahhabism has become a religion that serves the Empire, the way the Anglican sect was created for an English King to get a divorce that was forbidden under Catholicism.
 
Nothing to do with spirituality, faith, history, or community.
 
Wahhabism created Sectarianism that kept the Islamic world divided, which again served the Empire very well. If the Muslims of the planet worked together, this would be a more advanced, prosperous, and peaceful world. Eliminating usury alone would be a massive boon to the species.
 
We’ll see if this Iranian episode collapses the Sauds, and with it the Wahhabis. Many Sunnis who have been taught to regard the Shia as non-Muslims are starting to come around. First, because that is not true, and second, because people are attracted to strength, and every cohort/tribe loves it when a similar tribe makes them look good by association.

Posted by: LoveDonbass | Mar 14 2026 20:23 utc | 84

Posted by: Carlos Marques | Mar 14 2026 17:56 utc | 10
Do you know that conventional submarines cannot cross the Indian Ocean and the Atlantic Ocean?
“The world needed strong and brave Soviets.” Do you need me to remind you that the Soviet Union backed down during the Cuban Missile Crisis? Latin American is the backyard of USA, far beyong the reach of China and Russia.
Have you realized why the Soviet Union disintegrated? One of the reasons for the sluggish economy in the later period of the Soviet Union was that too many resources were concentrated in heavy industry and military industry.
As a Chinese, I agree that the collapse of USSR was a huge mistake. If China and USSR are allies now, the whole western world will tremble.
China’s current millitary paln is to further enhance its strength, waiting for the sixth-gen fighter, nuclear powered carrier, next gen nuclear sub, China version starlink etc. to be put into service, completely overmatch the US military in 2030, and expel U.S. influence entirely from the West Pacific. If US refuse to accept this arrangement, a decisive military confrontation will ensue.

Posted by: Russell | Mar 14 2026 20:25 utc | 85

Posted by: Cable Guy | Mar 14 2026 20:21 utc | 85
 
#####
 
Those aren’t experts. They are Western propagandists.
 
Wouldn’t an Iranian, or at least an Arab, know more about Iran than a Russian who teaches in Norway or someone from the Globalist Atlantic Council?

Posted by: LoveDonbass | Mar 14 2026 20:28 utc | 86

Iran’s days are numbered
Sergey Balmasov from Russia’s Institute of the Middle East contends that the US and Israel have been systematically taking out key government and leadership elements and will likely “force Tehran into negotiations” within a week. 
 
Posted by: Cable Guy | Mar 14 2026 20:21 utc | 85
 
If I did not have the examples of Gaza and Lebanon to go by I might have believed him.
 
But I just witnessed the entire Western military machine hurled against a prison camp on the one hand, and a small guerrilla group on the other, for more than two years straight.
 
The guerrilla group is still firing back. The resistance in the prison camp is still lethal.
 
How then will the West defeat a force a thousand times more powerful?
 
 

Posted by: Arch Bungle | Mar 14 2026 20:29 utc | 87

“Now U.S. President Donald Trump is dreaming of Chinese war ships to help him reopen the Strait of Hormuz.”
 
Trump is calling on Russia and China to help him win the war that is ultimately directed at them (Eurasian heartland and all that). This is incompetence of the highest order and cannot but help them. I just saw Mercouris mention the aid to Kiev has stopped. 
 
 

Posted by: Princess Bodica | Mar 14 2026 20:29 utc | 88

Posted by: Russell | Mar 14 2026 20:25 utc | 88
 
To say that the USSR is the party that backed down during the Cuban Missile Crisis is a propagandistic reframing of history. 
 
AI summary:
 
President John F. Kennedy secretly agreed to remove U.S. Jupiter missiles from Turkey in exchange for the Soviet Union removing its nuclear missiles from Cuba during the Cuban Missile Crisis in October 1962. 

  • Publicly, the U.S. pledged not to invade Cuba, and the Soviets agreed to dismantle and remove their missiles from Cuba under United Nations supervision. 
  • Privately, Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy met with Soviet Ambassador Anatoly Dobrynin on October 27 to confirm that the U.S. would remove its Jupiter missiles from Turkey, though this was not made public to avoid damaging NATO alliances and political fallout. 
  • The agreement was kept top secret for decades.  The U.S. dismantled the missiles in Turkey in April 1963, after the crisis ended. 
  • The official narrative promoted by the Kennedy administration was that the Soviets “blinked” under U.S. pressure, but historical evidence confirms the missile swap was a key part of the resolution.

Posted by: Tom_Q_Collins | Mar 14 2026 20:33 utc | 89

Posted by: timbers | Mar 14 2026 20:04 utc | 77
 
Unfortunately, unless Iran can force a major strategic re-alignment in the region (and I’m not saying they can’t, but will they?) – we’re on the hook to rebuild all those systems as well as “Israel.” The American taxpayer will be robbed at the pump, at the doctor, and social safety nets have been wiped out, but once this is over, you can bet we’ll be reconstructing “Israel” and helping our Zionist overlords build their resorts on the rubble of Gaza.  Wonder how that will go over among the plebes. The media and social media platforms (Also increasingly Zio-owned, especially under Trump and his FCC & FTC) will do everything in their power to keep us blind to the truth. But the money will flow and we’ll have no say in the matter other than revolution. 

Posted by: Tom_Q_Collins | Mar 14 2026 20:38 utc | 90

@karlof1 | Mar 14 2026 19:22 utc | 53, thanks for your comments. Agreed that the Empire can’t be trusted, and that this latest US war can be seen as part of a world war.

US, Israel, UK, Iran, Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, Jordan, Yemen, Qatar, UAE, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Azerbaijan, Turkey, Cyprus, US submarine sinking of an Iranian ship near Sri Lanka, Russia, Ukraine, nearly all of 32-member NATO arming/funding Ukraine as a proxy tool, Venezuela, Cuba, China, US arming of Taiwan province while ostensibly recognizing a One China policy, Japan, etc.

Perhaps future historian consensus will include the current moment within WWIII …

Posted by: cc | Mar 14 2026 20:44 utc | 91

Laguerre @ 46
======
Hmm. I read Janet Wallach’s excellent bio of Gertrude Bell, Desert Queen, l a long time ago; it is an excellent source for the whole post-Ottoman milieu, in which she played an extraordinarily important role. For starters, she spoke Arabic and knew all of the players in Syria, Arabia, and Egypt, etc. and also in the British ruling classes.  I recall that there were factions within the British govt/elites as to whom to support as a replacement for Ottoman power in the ME, but I cannot recall the details, except that Bell supported the Hashemite dynasty and detested and feared the idea and the consequences she foresaw of the Balfour Declaration.
 
So I asked Google’s AI (1): “Did Gertrude Bell support the House of Saud?”

Gertrude Bell did not strongly support the House of Saud, generally preferring the Hashemite dynasty for leadership in the post-Ottoman Middle East. While she met and recognized the power of Ibn Saud (the founder of modern Saudi Arabia) and worked to define borders between his territory and Iraq, her political efforts were heavily focused on installing Faisal I of the Hashemite family as the King of Iraq. 
 
Key details regarding her stance:
 

  • Preferred Alternative: Bell was a crucial figure in securing the throne of Iraq for Faisal bin Hussein, a Hashemite, whom she believed could unify the new nation.

  • Tribal Rivalries: The Kingdoms supported by the British in the postwar period, which Bell helped shape, were in direct competition with the growing power of the House of Saud.

  • Relationship with Ibn Saud: Bell met Ibn Saud in 1916 and was aware of his growing influence, engaging with him on boundary issues, but he was not her preferred regional leader.

  • Perspective: She often found the rise of Saudi power as a complicating factor in her efforts to build a stable state in Iraq.

I then asked: “Were there British factions that supported the House of Saud?”

“AI Overview

Yes, significant British factions—principally within the Foreign Office, the India Office, and military intelligence—supported the House of Saud, particularly from World War I onwards
. Key figures saw Abdulaziz ibn Saud as a stable partner for securing British interests against the Ottomans and later for regional stability. 

 
Key examples of British support for the House of Saud included:

  • WWI Strategy: The British government, including officials like Percy Cox, deemed it essential to secure Ibn Saud’s goodwill, providing him with financial support during WWI.
  • The Treaty of Darin (1915): Britain officially recognised and protected the House of Saud’s authority in the Najd in exchange for action against Ottoman allies.
  • Strategic Balancing: While also supporting the Sharif of Mecca, Britain often saw the House of Saud as a more effective power broker, leading to tacit support for their expansion in the 1920s.
  • Long-term Alliance: Post-WWII, the British government continued to prioritize a strong relationship with the House of Saud, offering protection and maintaining deep ties to ensure regional influence and oil security. 

Some scholars note this was part of a broader, often inconsistent, British strategy of supporting various factions to manage regional instability.”
 

British “support” was always a case of shifting sands, especially in the Middle East/Southwest Asia.

Posted by: Jane | Mar 14 2026 20:44 utc | 92

  • though this was not made public to avoid damaging NATO alliances and political fallout. 

Posted by: Tom_Q_Collins | Mar 14 2026 20:33 utc | 92
You’re aware that the Soviet Union, to save face for the United States, agreed not to disclose the news of the US withdrawal of intermediate-range missiles from Turkey, and you still don’t consider this a concession by the Soviet Union?

Posted by: Russell | Mar 14 2026 20:46 utc | 93

Do you need me to remind you that the Soviet Union backed down during the Cuban Missile Crisis?
Posted by: Russell | Mar 14 2026 20:25 utc | 88

“Cuba missile crisis” is West propaganda. Once you call it by the real name “Turkish missile crisis” it looks completely different.
The US had placed nuclear armed Jupiter missiles in Turkey.
The USSR didn’t like that: put them away or we have to mirror your behavior
US: GFY
USSR bringing nukes to Cuba
US: meh, bad communists, your aren’t allowed to do so
USSR: OK, we’ll bring them home when you take back the Jupiters
US: OK, but don’t tell anybody
– so, militarily this was a USSR victory, the US backed down. Only the PR story is told differently

Posted by: BG13 | Mar 14 2026 20:46 utc | 94

Prof. Kevin Barret has an alternate (?) take on who’s really destroying the neighboring oil and lng processing/storage facilities and ports. 
 
https://www.moonofalabama.org/2026/03/war-on-iran-no-planning-no-hiding-officials-suicide-mission-in-hormuz.html/comment-page-11#comment-1308135
 
&
 
https://www.moonofalabama.org/2026/03/war-on-iran-no-planning-no-hiding-officials-suicide-mission-in-hormuz.html/comment-page-11#comment-1308139

Posted by: Tom_Q_Collins | Mar 14 2026 20:48 utc | 95

Decimate comes from the Roman army for how it collectively punished units for mutiny or cowardice, they would select one in ten by lottery and execute them, didn’t really have anything to do with fighting the enemy, but then after 2000ys words and meanings tend to wander.

Posted by: LightYearsFromHome | Mar 14 2026 20:48 utc | 96

Posted by: Russell | Mar 14 2026 20:46 utc | 96
 
And that the US administration (and numerous subsequent presidents) also had to save face by lying to not only the American people, but to all of its NATO allies. 
 
So the best you can  say is that both sides “backed down” and that’s an oversimplification. 

Posted by: Tom_Q_Collins | Mar 14 2026 20:49 utc | 97

But Trump is too illiterate to know that…😉
 
Posted by: James | Mar 14 2026 20:07 utc | 79
 
Decimare (Latin) literally means to execute every tenth man (by lot) as a punishment, which was originally a severe Roman military punishment.
 
“Don’t just watch the fire burn and wonder why it does – put it out.”
 
https://ibb.co/Tnh3QJ6
https://ibb.co/mrmj2QjQ
 
 

Posted by: BlindSpot | Mar 14 2026 20:50 utc | 98

Posted by: Cable Guy | Mar 14 2026 20:21 utc | 85
 
In the immortal words of Mandy Rice-Davies – “Well, they would say that, wouldn’t they?”

Posted by: Jams O’Donnell | Mar 14 2026 20:50 utc | 99

General Dan ‘Razin’ Caine, VP JD Vance, DNI Tulsi Gabbard, Tucker Carlson, Carrie Prejean Boller, Candice Owen, Megyn Kelly all advised DJT to ignore Bibi and the crazed War Cabinet of Katz, Gvir and Smotrich, and to NOT attack Iran, especially since negotiations with the  Iranians were still underway in Geneva.
 
Not a chance, DJT brought Mossad propaganda  hook, line and sinker.
 
Now he is living to regret it.  The Iranians are not backing down, they doubling down, and DJT is holding a pair of deuces……….every where the Israeli adventure is failing……..numerous US aircraft and drones destroyed, the Straits closed to all allied tanker traffic, the Israelis murdering Lebanese by the thousands, the IDF violating the Gaza ceasefire, economies collapsing, stock markets in crash positions, oil prices skyrocketing, numerous US KIA’s and WIA’s……and no conclusive end in sight.
 
This a jam, self inflicted by blind adherence to a charged war criminal Bibi, and homicidal psychopathic supplicants in the War Cabinet.  These are the folks advocating for Greater Israel, and the Third Temple and ritual sacrifice, and they are stark raving mad.  And this is who the US is now in league with!  
 
Where this ends is now anyone guess…………

Posted by: tobias cole | Mar 14 2026 20:51 utc | 100