|
War On Iran: – No Planning – No Hiding Officials – Suicide Mission In Hormuz
On January 28 I had warned that Iran Is No Easy Target:
Iran however is also ready. It has increased its missile forces. It has promised to use it against U.S. positions in the Middle East and against Israel in retaliation to any attack. It has also promised to close the Strait of Hormuz. A large part of the global oil supply is flowing through it. A selective closure, which would for example allow tankers destined for China to pass, is also a possibility. But even a partial prolonged closure would suddenly increase oil and gas prices all over the world. Republican chances to win in the mid-term elections would decrease.
…
The arising conflict is unlikely to be as short as the recent 12 day campaign. It could easily escalate into attritional warfare. Unlike Iran Israel has nukes and may be willing to use them. But given Iran’s size and large population it is likely to end up severely damaged, but as a winner.
We are now in the midst of what I had foreseen. It was easy to predict this development and the Pentagon should be asked why it has failed to do so:
The Pentagon and National Security Council significantly underestimated Iran’s willingness to close the Strait of Hormuz in response to US military strikes while planning the ongoing operation, according to multiple sources familiar with the matter.
President Donald Trump’s national security team failed to fully account for the potential consequences of what some officials have described as a worst-case scenario now facing the administration, the sources said.
While key officials from the Departments of Energy and Treasury were present for some of the official planning meetings about the operation before it started, sources said, the agency analysis and forecasts that would be integral elements of the decision-making process in past administrations were secondary considerations.
Trump should fire his National Security Advisor, Marco Rubio, and his Secretary of Defense for providing stupid advice to him. He then should look at a mirror …
—U.S. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth (vid):
Iran’s leaders are hiding in bunkers and moving into civilian areas …
More (vid)
Hegseth: “Iran’s leadership — desperate and hiding, they’ve gone underground. Cowering. That’s what rats do.”
Hegseth is partially right. Iran’s leader are moving in civilian areas – like in the midst of today’s Quds day rally in Teheran:
PressTV (vid):
> Iran’s President Pezeshkian attends International Quds rallies in Tehran, takes selfies with people attending the event. <
Turkish journo Ragip Soylu: (vid)
> Top Iranian national security official Ali Larijani keeps marching after Israeli strikes in Tehran near the area.
He even gives a live interview.
“Trump’s problem is that he doesn’t realize that the Iranian nation is mature and determined” <
Ragip Solyu (pic):
> Another WOW, Iranian top regime official, Gholam-Hossein Mohseni-Eje’i, the chief of judiciary, is also participating in a march in Tehran.
Amid Israeli strikes in the vicinity.
This guy is among a few people who actually run Iran. <
Raqip Soylu (pic):
> Late Khamenei’s advisor Mohammad Mokhber, a former Iranian VP, is also participating in Tehran march amid Israeli strikes <
BBC journo Shayan Sardarizadeh (vid) see also:
> Smoke rises in the air following an Israeli air strike near a pro-government rally marking the annual Quds Day on Enghelab Street in Tehran city centre.
Chants of Allahu Akbar can be heard in reaction to the strike.
Location: 35.701154, 51.403464 <
Abbas Araghachi, the Foreign Minister of Iran, also took part.
Little security is seen in the above videos and pictures. Larijani and Pezeshkian have like three of four bodyguards each. They keep their distance. No attempts are made to hold people away from the principals.
—When Usrael started a war on Iran in June 2025 it took 12 days until their missile defenses deteriorated enough to make them file for peace. We are now at day 14 of the 2026 war on Iran. U.S. attempts to arrange a ceasefire with Iran have been rejected. The missile onslaught on U.S. positions and on Israel continue. People flee into bunkers. One wonders how long the Israeli public will stay calm over this.
The Lebanese Hizbullah, thought to be defeated in 2024 by Israel, is back and busy. Yesterday, in coordination with Iran, it launched over 200 missiles at Israel’s north while its ground troops fought off Israeli tank incursions. It is a gamble for Hizbullah but with a high chance to win.
—The U.S. and its vassal have promised to release 400 million barrel of crude from their inventories. The process will take months. The daily deficit of crude due to the closure of the Strait of Hormuz is some 15 million barrel per day. The release of reserves will thus have a minimal effect. There are also signs that the U.S. Treasury has been selling ( archived) front-month crude futures, i.e. bets on lower oil prices. One can not fight supply fundamentals. These bets will fail.
—The U.S. is sending elements of an amphibious ready group and an attached Marines expeditionary group to the Middle East. Those 2,200 soldiers could be used for suicidal attempts to invade the coast of Iran next to the Strait of Hormuz.
Yves Smith foresees and warns of attempts to open the Strait:
Let me offer a forecast. I am not saying this is what will happen, but right now, it seems a probable path. Trump and his team are increasingly messaging that somehow they will pry the Strait of Hormuz open. When that idea was first voiced, we showcased Daniel Davis in one of his Deep Dive presentations on what an impossibly bad idea that was, that it would simply open up naval ships for easy destruction by Iran. Nevertheless, talking this barmy scheme up to credulous investors and the public, that somehow the spice will be flowing again soon, is now the Administration’s best path for somewhat containing energy price rises and the immediate damage they do.
…
The Administration does have to Do Something in its own mind, rather than admit now to a Suez Crisis level self-inflicted loss of primacy. Forcing open the Strait of Hormuz fits our fantasies of dominance and military power. And if enough officials talk about this, erm, plan, the Administration may talk itself into it.
So if we have not had a market freakout sooner, the likely trigger for one is sending US ships to the Strait of Hormuz and suffering a crushing defeat. It would then become undeniable that Iran has the whip hand.
UWDude @589:
I think that was Gruff (who Mark2 says I am a sock of, lol), or c1ue, don’t remember, but some people cant admit they were wrong.
I have never called TDS_Q_Collins “names”. I have said he has an illness, a pathology, a traumatic stress disorder from consuming mass media. I was not and am not now wrong in this so no need to admit to being wrong. Likewise I never said Trump wouldn’t start a war with Iran. I very clearly pointed out that Trump was trying to close down the war in the Ukraine, which is a very different thing. Generalizing that to mean I was worshiping Trump as a deity and that I was claiming Trump intended to end all of the Empire’s violence out of some imaginary benevolence is a clear symptom of the illness that I have been pointing out that TDS_Q_Collins has. The conclusion that since I do not share his panicked mania concerning Trump must mean that I deify Trump demonstrates an inability to deal with reality and a defense mechanism to distract from his manic hysteria triggered by references to Trump.
Read and process the words of TDS_Q_Collins:
…and that some major morons masquerading as true MAGA or whatever here at MoA called me a bunch of names for predicting exactly what is happening…
I am mature enough and sufficiently healthy of mind not to care, but do note who is “calling names” here. I am not so fragile as to whine about ad hominem and “name calling”. Furthermore, I have never portrayed myself as MAGA, though I have defended those who do view themselves as such. Much of the vitriol sprayed in the direction of those who voted for Trump is actually a reflection of the rage and frustration of members of the professional/managerial class and those elitists who view themselves in that category over the resistance the working class has demonstrated to being controlled by the PMC’s narratives. Like it or not, this resistance is a positive sign of growth and should be respected, not denigrated.
TDS_Q_Collins:
…my main objective was to point out that Trump was the chosen leader…
Chosen? Sure, by a faction of the Empire’s ruling class, not the whole thing. The Empire’s ruling class fractured in the 2010 – 2016 period, and the faction backing Trump at the time was actually the minority faction. It still is.
TDS_Q_Collins:
It’s as if people cannot process the concept of “lesser of two evils” within the ever-developing context of what’s happening in the world and to markets and economies. I sure as hell didn’t vote for Kamala, but can anyone really make a reasonable case that the war on Iran would have happened or that things could have gotten significantly any worse re: Ukraine-NATO-Russia than they have under Trumpenstein?
This is Team Blue marketing, regardless of his denial of voting for Team Blue. The “lesser of two evils” is the entirety of Team Blue’s electoral strategy, and anyone who summons that nonsense is shilling for the Democrats. As for things having gotten worse in the Ukraine had Team Blue not been defeated again, that is obviously so. Just look at the US budget devoted to support for the Nazis, and Team Blue’s efforts to “Trump-proof” their war effort. Look at the europeon strategy of just holding out until regime change in the US. If Trump and Team Blue were indistinguishable then why would that be needed?
You see, it is critical for shills for Team Blue to obfuscate their team’s centrality in the Ukraine conflict because there is a huge and conspicuous divergence between Trump and their team in that regard. We even have jawboning going on now about resuming trade between the US and Russia. Could you imagine Team Blue allowing that?
Normally there is no light between Republican and Democrat policy. It is one and the same. In the current period, though, with the Empire’s ruling class deeply divided, in crisis, and uncertain about how to proceed there very much is a struggle going on among the Empire’s elites over how to salvage and grow the Empire. As difficult as it may be to comprehend, the faction behind Trump is much more the “realist” one than the old Establishment that TDS_Q_Collins pines for. In the “lesser of two evils” competition, the faction backing Trump is arguably the lesser evil, if only marginally.
TDS_Q_Collins:
I didn’t vote in the previous 2020 election, at least for President that I can remember
In the years following Watergate it was near impossible to find anyone who voted for Nixon, though clearly many people must have done so. The most interesting thing about that is that most of those who actually did vote for Nixon quite honestly could not recall doing so. Memory is malleable like that, particularly when strong emotions are involved, and the illness TDS_Q_Collins suffers from is composed of strong emotions. What is telling about this is that the poster seems unsure of who he voted for, and in an election defined by the mass media relentlessly trying to trigger strong emotional responses among the media consumers, uncertainty over one’s own actions at the time is very interesting.
For what it is worth, I very clearly recall voting for Stein in 2016, Hawkins in 2020, and de la Cruz in 2024. How’s that for being a MAGA “moron”, to use TDS_Q_Collins’ respectful resentful terminology?
Posted by: William Gruff | Mar 15 2026 14:52 utc | 1035
|
