Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
February 7, 2026
Ukraine – Long-term Countrywide Blackouts – U.S. Presses For Peace Agreement

Last night another large Russian missile and drone strike further degraded the already severely damaged electrical energy system of Ukraine.

The main targets were around Kiev and in western Ukraine. The attack, especially in western Ukraine, was mostly by drones and subsonic cruise missiles. Except for Kiev air defense seems to have been absent or out of munitions.


bigger
The consequences are countrywide blackouts for a prolonged period of time (machine translation):

Ukrenergo reported that due to strikes on the power system, emergency blackouts are introduced in most regions of Ukraine.

Ukrainian publics write that substations connected with the Rivne [Nuclear Power Plant] were attacked.

It is also stated that drones and missiles attacked the Burshtyn, Ladyzhyn, Dobrotvorskaya and Trypillya thermal power plants.

Energy Minister Denys Shmyhal said that the target of today’s strike was substations and overhead power lines with a voltage of 750 and 330 kV — the basis of the Ukrainian energy system.

According to him, the power units of Ukrainian nuclear power plants were unloaded (that is, urgently stopped – Ed. ).

The nuclear power plants (NPP) create the base load of the Ukrainian energy system. The thermal power plants and other sources usually balance the peak loads. But after several substations which connect the NPPs to the wider network were being hit the NPPs were forced to reduce power (machine translation):

Ukrenergo said that all power units of Ukrainian nuclear power plants in the controlled territory were “forced to be unloaded” due to strikes on substations of electricity transmission and distribution systems.

“This indicates a reduction in power. We are not talking about a complete shutdown,” said Yuriy Korolchuk, an analyst at the Institute for Strategic Studies.

One of the main reasons for unloading – during the attack, the largest 750 kV substation in the Lviv region was damaged, which “hooks” the branch line from both the Rivne and Khmelnitsky nuclear power plants and through which electricity is partially imported from Europe.

“If we focus on Ukrenergo’s data on the forced unloading of all units (and there are 9 of them at Ukrainian NPPs), and focus on the standard power reduction after the attacks (by 200-300 megawatts for each unit), it turns out that at one point the deficit in the system could have increased by 2.7 GW. Taking into account the previous missing 5 GW (the deficit in recent days has slightly decreased due to rising temperatures), the total shortage of electricity is up to 8 GW, or about 50% of the total estimated consumption,” says Korolchuk.

The unplanned ‘unloading’ of an NPP will inevitable degrade its systems. During the summer two of the nine available NPPs in Ukraine will need a multi-months shutdown for larger repair work. Two others are expected to shut down for several weeks.

Repair parts for transformers and network switching equipment are lacking while the lead time for new parts is exceeding six months.

For many months ahead Ukraine will have to live with just 50% or less of the needed electrical power. Further Russian attacks are likely to hinder repairs and may cause additional damage.

Due to the sever lack of power nearly all industrial production in Ukraine will come to a halt. Drone and ammunition supply for the frontline will further decrease.

Ukraine continues to wage its own energy war against Russia. Last night the Russian city of Belgorod experienced another blackout after its electricity network was hit by several HIMARS missiles. This is inconvenient for Russia but not comparable to the huge damage caused in Ukraine.

Meanwhile Reuters reports that the U.S. is in a hurry to push Ukraine towards a peace agreement:

U.S. and Ukrainian negotiators have discussed an ambitious March goal for Russia and Ukraine to agree on a peace deal, though that timeline is likely to slip given a lack of agreement on the key issue of territory, according to three sources familiar with the matter.

Under the framework being discussed by U.S. and Ukrainian negotiators, any deal would be submitted to a referendum by Ukrainian voters, who would simultaneously vote in national elections, according to five sources, who requested anonymity to discuss private deliberations.

U.S. negotiators have said Trump is likely to focus more on domestic affairs as the November congressional midterms approach, meaning top U.S. officials will have less time and political capital to spend on sealing a peace accord, two sources said.

But several sources with visibility into the negotiations described the U.S.-proposed timeline as fanciful.

For various reason the acting president of Ukraine and European leaders currently do not want a peace agreement in Ukraine. That the U.S. is in a hurry to conclude one plays in their favor. Unless the U.S. immediately starts to use very severe pressure there is not chance for coming close to ending the conflict.

Comments

advancing armies don’t blow bridges 
Posted by: Exile | Feb 7 2026 19:20 utc | 101
Ok. So why doesn’t Russia blow the bridges?

Posted by: catdog | Feb 7 2026 19:23 utc | 101

When suggesting an analogy
1812…1815 → Paris
1941…1945 → Berlin
then it shouldn’t be
2022…2026 → Kiev but 2022…2026 → Washington
Rather far away and beyond naval capabilities. So, what are you doing? Instead of going to W, waiting for them to bring what they have to spent.
 

Posted by: BG13 | Feb 7 2026 19:24 utc | 102

Our host seems to think that a 50% power reduction for the grid will mean the collapse of the Ukrainian war effort? Well, if it did, then US pressures for a peace are completely irrelevant. I think the failure won’t be as long term as predicted, but even more, I think the civilians will get the cold and the dark, and the state’s army won’t. The army never minds civilian casualties unless the high command makes sure they do. The Russian high command cares, compare the civilian casualties in Ukraine with those in Gaza, QED! But Ukraine’s high command is in other countries. Most of all, it’s still the case that the party the US needs to pressure, and is easily able to pressure, is Ukraine. Russia can always be pressured so to speak with the relief of sanctions and return of seized assets. The war in the Ukrainian theater is still a war of attrition on Ukraine instead of the US/NATO, who are still fighting the war on Russia on other fronts. This is not a situation that promises resolution because of strategic air war. I don’t think strategic air war wins. Tactical air on the front and in battles, yes, that’s why drone warfare was so revolutionary. But no, not strategic bombing. 
 
Posted by: steve | Feb 7 2026 19:03 utc | 88  If Russia takes out all the bridges across the Dniepr, they can’t even fight the Ukrainian army on the west/north bank, much less win. (The river bends by the way.) Also, bridges, including pontoon bridges, can be built. 
 
 

Posted by: steven t johnson | Feb 7 2026 19:25 utc | 103

@LoveDonbass 96
 
So who exactly is winning?
 
 Did America trap Russia, or did Russia trap America?
 
I vote for door number 3.  America trapped America.  Russia and China are free enough from the clutches of the US Epstein teams to defend themselves, and have  done what they had to do to survive and keep WW3 from happening.  

Posted by: Woke American | Feb 7 2026 19:26 utc | 104

I think peace could be achieved immediately if they offer Odessa to Russia. Now why don’t they do that.
 
Also, Lavrov recently remarked that it is unheard of for a state to ban a major (even UN official) language. Not even Israel has banned Arabic and not even any of the occupied countries banned German during Nazi rule. It’s just outlandish. Still, it looks like both Europe and the US approve it rather lovingly.

Posted by: Avtonom | Feb 7 2026 19:27 utc | 105

Besides the usual suspect, something is either going on behind the scenes involving third parties or Trump’s usual duplicitous, high pressure ‘negotiation’ tactics are at play.
a) Did not the attempted attack (symbolic or otherwise) on Putin’s secondary residence coincide with direct Trump – Putin talks,
b) did not the most recent assassination attempt of a high official coincide with that individuals direct participation in simultaneous talks?
Odd to have such detailed similarities in both cases, involving direct talks with the targets.
Twice may from a distance appear as coincidence, but the details betray a design.
So many questions open up from this little ‘coincidence’. Any takers out there?

Posted by: Spinworthy | Feb 7 2026 19:29 utc | 106

Cheerleaders simultaneously hold three contradictory ideas in their heads:
1. Russia will NEVER end the war until all goals (denazification, whatever that means) are achieved.
2. US/Ukraine/lizardmen will not allow peace.
3. Russia is not stuck in the war.

Posted by: catdog | Feb 7 2026 19:29 utc | 107

Posted by: Spinworthy | Feb 7 2026 19:29 utc | 107
 
Trump may or may not be in the know, but definitely CIA is independent from any US presidential control

Posted by: unimperator | Feb 7 2026 19:30 utc | 108

Posted by: catdog | Feb 7 2026 19:09 utc | 92
 
#####
 
None of those are contradictory. Your script needs better editing.

Posted by: LoveDonbass | Feb 7 2026 19:31 utc | 109

Posted by: Woke American | Feb 7 2026 19:26 utc | 105
 
#####
 
That too. I am partial to that perspective. America is defeating itself.
 
EZ mode for the Axis.

Posted by: LoveDonbass | Feb 7 2026 19:32 utc | 110

None of those are contradictory. Your script needs better editing.
Posted by: LoveDonbass | Feb 7 2026 19:31 utc | 110
When neither side will agree to peace, Russia is stuck in the war, dear worst MOA commentor.
 

Posted by: catdog | Feb 7 2026 19:34 utc | 111

MorePain4Cakes | Feb 7 2026 19:12 utc | 94
 
Thanks for your reply and curious hypothesis which seems plausible if an AD missile can attain such speeds.

Posted by: karlof1 | Feb 7 2026 19:34 utc | 112

Posted by: BG13 | Feb 7 2026 19:20 utc | 100
thanks for correcting c1ue on the  lead time question of Utility Size Transformers 
 
 

Posted by: Exile | Feb 7 2026 19:37 utc | 113

Posted by: catdog | Feb 7 2026 19:34 utc | 112
 
#####
 
Still not contradictory, next time use an AI to check your English.

Posted by: LoveDonbass | Feb 7 2026 19:37 utc | 114

Russia to export Kaliber missiles to an unspecified country, as part of a $60 billion order portfolio this year.
https://x.com/SprinterPress/status/2020182819511603347

Posted by: unimperator | Feb 7 2026 19:38 utc | 115

When neither side will agree to peace, Russia continues to progress its SMO

Posted by: catdog | Feb 7 2026 19:34 utc | 112
 
There we go, fixed it for you. Hope it helps…

Posted by: Jeremy Rhymings-Lang | Feb 7 2026 19:38 utc | 116

Russia is following its own plans; if those plans don’t comply with or conform to Western theories and presumptions then maybe it is not Russia’s plans that are wrong, but the Western theories and presumptions are wrong?
Posted by: Jeremy Rhymings-Lang | Feb 7 2026 19:02 utc | 86

 
A very good point, which I’m afraid won’t be included in the many master degrees and PhDs that are currently being worked upon in the West

Posted by: Avtonom | Feb 7 2026 19:38 utc | 117

Posted by: catdog | Feb 7 2026 19:34 utc | 112
 
At this point the main threat is Nato terrorism conducted through Ukraine. While no, disabling energy grid doesn’t do anything to counter it, it does affect the lines. Even if indirectly.
 
Ukraine/Nato will do maximum amount of terrorism regardless of what Russia does in UKraine. The oligarchs and western pedo elites backing Ukraine don’t care one bit of Ukraine’s people. They already announced their thinking of Ukraine as a ‘steel porcupine’. So shatter the steel porcupine, make it dark, so it no longer functions as one.

Posted by: unimperator | Feb 7 2026 19:41 utc | 118

Posted by: unimperator | Feb 7 2026 19:38 utc | 116
 
######
 
Russia must be feeling confident. They froze arms exports to keep stockpiles loaded for the current conflict.
 
That, or the unspecified party really needs them.

Posted by: LoveDonbass | Feb 7 2026 19:42 utc | 119

A transformer 750/330 kV (Ukrainian SSR built) has a weight of 147 t, you need 3 of them, one for each phase.

Posted by: BG13 | Feb 7 2026 19:20 utc | 100
 
Thanks for the info about the weight; not exactly something easily shuttled around in the back of a Toyota pick-up truck…

Posted by: Jeremy Rhymings-Lang | Feb 7 2026 19:43 utc | 120

Posted by: LoveDonbass | Feb 7 2026 19:42 utc | 120
 
I could also see expanded production enabling higher stockpile levels (even with higher usage) and thus making exports possible, to pay back some of the war production.

Posted by: unimperator | Feb 7 2026 19:44 utc | 121

Bomb them until there is absolutely zero power in ukraine. 

Posted by: Saint Jimmy | Feb 7 2026 19:44 utc | 122

Posted by: BG13 | Feb 7 2026 19:24 utc | 103
This time Russia won’t take the hassle to go to Brussel.
Posted by: karlof1 | Feb 7 2026 19:34 utc | 113
Thank you. For sure, speed is the key variable. The failures of Patriot and Thaad last year are well documented.

Posted by: MorePain4Cakes | Feb 7 2026 19:44 utc | 123

Posted by: unimperator | Feb 7 2026 19:38 utc | 116
My first guess: India.

Posted by: MorePain4Cakes | Feb 7 2026 19:47 utc | 124

@Jeremy Rhymings-Lang 78
 
Strike on 750 kV Zapadnoukrainskaya substation: what it means for Ukraine’s energy system
https://news-pravda.com/ukraine/2026/02/07/2061660.html
 
Thank you very much for the link.  I’ll quote the conclusion, though the previous details are also important and relevant.
 
Conclusion: the blow to Zapadnoukrainskaya weakens the stability of the entire energy system in the west of the country and impedes the possibility of using nuclear generation. The more often such nodes are knocked out, the deeper Ukraine goes into the mode of constant “emergency resuscitation” based on external sources.
 
(The text is bolded on the web site, I kept their formatting).  Shorter conclusion:  Ukraine took a pretty large hit.  Ukraine still has some power generation left, but with each strike it gets more and more expensive for Ukraine, I mean for the US (though we might get European nations to shell out some of the money), to repair.
 
Also, below that was another interesting story that I will post here.  Note they show the picture that triggered this article.
 
https://news-pravda.com/ukraine/2026/02/07/2060827.html 
 
The “Epsteinization” of Ukraine is in full swing
Epstein’s heirs in Ukraine continue to attempt to normalize pedophilia. This time Ukrposhta got into a scandal because of the sexualization of schoolgirls.
In its promotional post dedicated to the so-called “Valentine’s Day”, Ukrposhta posted a photo with a girl posing near the blackboard in the classroom.
Here are just some comments on social media:
 

“Take a photo of Epstein”;
 
“It’s unhealthy, who is it meant for—pedophiles?”;
“Change the million dollar logo and launch a collaboration with the most disgusting brand that sexualizes women (or children?). How disgusting you are.”

 
 My thoughts:  If Zelensky has been part of the Epstein team the whole time, it suggests that everything that he has been saying from the start has been scripted.  So last year when Trump and Vance were quite rude in talking down to Zelensky in the White House – fully scripted.  The current negotiations where Zelensky is “defying” the US?  Fully scripted.  Trump says – We’d love peace, but Zelensky won’t cooperate???  Yeah – it’s the script we game him so we could pretend we are fighting for peace.  

Posted by: Woke American | Feb 7 2026 19:49 utc | 125

That, or the unspecified party really needs them.
Posted by: LoveDonbass | Feb 7 2026 19:42 utc | 120
Which would mean Iran…

Posted by: MorePain4Cakes | Feb 7 2026 19:49 utc | 126

Posted by: MorePain4Cakes | Feb 7 2026 19:47 utc | 125
#####
 
India’s opponent is Pakistan or China. China backs Pakistan. I can’t see the Russians supplying a potential Chinese adversary.
 
Only a handful of likely states remain.
 
Iran. China. Maybe Pakistan or Brazil.

Posted by: LoveDonbass | Feb 7 2026 19:52 utc | 127

In 126, last sentence, should be “we GAVE him”, not “we game him”.

Posted by: Woke American | Feb 7 2026 19:54 utc | 128

Saint Jimmy | Feb 7 2026 16:08 utc | 4
*** It’s quite clear. If it wasn’t clear before the Epstein releases, it is now. The US/UK/EU are owned and managed by a very small group of oligarchs and mega-rich. They are nihilistic, sadistic, and perverted and absolutely disdain almost anyone who isn’t at their level. Many of them are hard core Zionists and/or fascists. They consider most humans as livestock to be culled and managed and used for pleasure. ***
 
That’s where the Chabad and other Zionist cultists have been clever …. latching onto the earlier existing logic promoted by some ‘Christian’ religious sects, that the rich must be inherently virtuous for their deity to have made them thus …. and, of course, the converse of that must also be true.
So non-Jewish aristocrats and other top people could easily be convinced that they too were a superior breed of person (class almost seeing itself as species!).  All the Jewish manipulators needed to do is make sure not to tell these narcissists that the Jewish cultists generally regarded them as also being disposable cattle.
 
Worth remembering that Western politicians and military leaders have been proudly claiming to share the same “values” as the Israelis.
“Values” as are still being clearly displayed — and gloated about —  with regard to Gaza.

Posted by: Cynic | Feb 7 2026 19:55 utc | 129

History Legends makes an important observation that the front lines are porous. On the Ukrainian side only. There are few if any penetrations into Russian held territory.

Posted by: David G Horsman | Feb 7 2026 19:57 utc | 130

I wonder how much of the “slow boiling frog” technique is now incorporated into the SMO? NATO and the US military industries are having problems with production and supply. Compounded by most of the available production going to Israel and the ME:
 
A majority of large ammunition producers in the US have been “told off” and possibly fined for not keeping to their stated targets. The US missile systems have a mean little replacement rate. To now bring in Mercs from the Philippines or elsewhere, means that other foreign mercs are less available – having been “used-up”.
 
NATO’s assets are being fed into Ukraine, EU money is being fed into Ukraine, all as the situation continues to worsens. (it is true that all the western “elites” are muppets anyway.)

Posted by: Stonebird | Feb 7 2026 19:58 utc | 131

Posted by: LoveDonbass | Feb 7 2026 19:52 utc | 128
So it is Iran.
 
Did you ever read anything about technological exchange between Russia and China?

Posted by: MorePain4Cakes | Feb 7 2026 20:00 utc | 132

Posted by: MorePain4Cakes | Feb 7 2026 20:00 utc | 133
 
#####
 
I have read a little about sharing manufacturing techniques, mostly from China => Russia.

Posted by: LoveDonbass | Feb 7 2026 20:06 utc | 133

Hoarsewhisperer | Feb 7 2026 16:56 utc | 30
*** How much longer will it take you [Zelensky] to realise that “Israel” and the Jewed-up West don’t give a tinker’s cuss about Ukraine and/or Ukrainians? ***
 
But a rich and powerful “religious” faction very much does give a cuss …. it is determined to reclaim its former cult-base and form a new Khazaria. 
They are who Zelensky was primarily addressing — and most of the Oligarchs are theirs.
 

Posted by: Cynic | Feb 7 2026 20:07 utc | 134

Posted by: Stonebird | Feb 7 2026 19:58 utc | 132
 
#####
 
That is what I was getting at last year. China tightens rare earth availability as the Russians are destroying a lot of NATO arms.
 
The Slo-Mo was the way to go to get demilitarization, not just of Ukraine, but all of NATO.
 
And then interceptors and launchers (which don’t work anyway) are being used up in West Asia as well.

Posted by: LoveDonbass | Feb 7 2026 20:10 utc | 135

Posted by: LoveDonbass | Feb 7 2026 20:06 utc | 134
Thank you. Very valuable for Russia. Most barflies will remember the Russian labor shortages. They certainly don’t mind dark factories during dark months. 😉

Posted by: MorePain4Cakes | Feb 7 2026 20:13 utc | 136

LoveDonbass | Feb 7 2026 20:10 utc | 136
 
If NATO is taking an increasingly active part in the fighting, then it must be demilitarized as well – so we agree.
 
As you say, that NATO would become part of the problem could b seen severl years ago.

Posted by: Stonebird | Feb 7 2026 20:13 utc | 137

Twice may from a distance appear as coincidence, but the details betray a design.So many questions open up from this little ‘coincidence’. Any takers out there?  —  Posted by: Spinworthy | Feb 7 2026 19:29 utc | 107
 
Once is a pattern that you are waiting to repeat. 

Posted by: David G Horsman | Feb 7 2026 20:14 utc | 138

oops, “could b seen severl years ago” should be ;
 
could be seen several years ago

Posted by: Stonebird | Feb 7 2026 20:15 utc | 139

Yes, possession is 9/10s of the law, but that other 1/10 is legally important for the longrun.   
Posted by: karlof1 | Feb 7 2026 18:53 utc | 82
This is essential to understand why Putin is so legalistic, and it is good so!

Posted by: fanto | Feb 7 2026 20:18 utc | 140

The US does not want peace in the Ukrainian mess that they started and financed. Russia knows this and will go all the way to Odessa, if possible everything east of the Dnieper River.

Posted by: Friul | Feb 7 2026 20:22 utc | 141

So your thinking is based exclusively on graphs generated by Ukraine? 
These are propaganda drawings for the people who believe Ukr has lost 55k soldiers until now. It’s in their interest to claim a million drones and missiles a day, which they intercept.
 

Posted by: rk | Feb 7 2026 20:25 utc | 142

Friul | Feb 7 2026 20:22 utc | 142
 
The question is what will the Russians do about the west of the Dnieper when they get there. There has been an attempt by them to advance up the river by using the frozen ground/ice left by the destruction of the dam lower down and the weather at the moment. Unsuccessful according to the Ukrainians..
 
However, The Chabad have a major headquarters on the western side at Dnipro. (Big building? They also have representation in many other places as well)  (Chabad; Jared Kushner’s zionist extremist group,  many Oligarchs are also part of it). Probably planned to be the center of the Neo-Khazaria. I am curious what happens then.

Posted by: Stonebird | Feb 7 2026 20:36 utc | 143

Karloff @ 82
 
What does a referendum mean when 80% of the population is abroad and not coming back? Or dead. And the remaining electorate is majority old enough to have no particular stake in future constitutional practice.
It’s going to be clean slate. Tabula rasa. Which has happened before in the borderlands. NATO is simply creating a vacuum and none but RF have any notion what goes into new order.

Posted by: oldhippie | Feb 7 2026 20:37 utc | 144

Friul | Feb 7 2026 20:22 utc | 142
Posted by: Stonebird | Feb 7 2026 20:36 utc | 144
Simply, take a look how the Red Army advanced in WW2. (The retreat from Krasnij Liman in 2022 already avoided some casualties taken in WW2.)

Posted by: MorePain4Cakes | Feb 7 2026 20:41 utc | 145

It’s going to be clean slate. Tabula rasa. Which has happened before in the borderlands. NATO is simply creating a vacuum and none but RF have any notion what goes into new order.
Posted by: oldhippie | Feb 7 2026 20:37 utc | 145–
I beg to differ. Those who persevere are waiting for the Russian army… Including those who fled to Russia, it is going to be an uncontested vote to join Russia..

Posted by: MorePain4Cakes | Feb 7 2026 20:49 utc | 146

Both the isolation of NPPs AND the disconnection of 404 power grid from that of EU is a very important milestone. There will be consequences also in the EU power market, which most of the time has acted as a major importer of electricity from Ukraine.
 
Right now electricity prices, combined with lower than average temps have increased and causing further economic deterioration and de-industrialization of Europe, combined together with need to import hyper-expensive US LNG causes deterioration of EU finances, ultimately making EU member states go broke and/or collapse more effectively. Windmills in Europe are frozen and out of use (EU invested largely in them) causing further destabilization.

Posted by: unimperator | Feb 7 2026 20:56 utc | 147

By the way, Bosch just announced layoffs of 20k employees, further weakening EU economy and its ability to aid Ukraine.

Posted by: unimperator | Feb 7 2026 20:59 utc | 148

The US does not want peace…Russia will go all the way to Odessa [and] everything east of the Dnieper River
 
 – Friul 142

 
If Russia wants peace [and I believe they do] they are going to have to go much further than Odessa, past Transnistria to the Hungarian/Slovak border and environs.  Now why Russia would wait until the conflict is nearly finished to cut off ex-ukrainia’s main supply line is beyond me but…I know our fanboys here will explain why not cutting off an enemies supply is actually a 5-D chess move.
 

But..but…drones..recon-satellites…everything’s different now” 

 
Yes..yes…this is war…everything’s always different in every modern war…save the objective.  Russia will eventually win this military conflict, but, that is not really the question.  The question is, will they achieve their objectives?  Can they create a secure peace?  Can they sate the insatiable appetite of elitist sociopaths that rule the west.
 

But…but…but…collapse is going to happen any day now…

 
Yes…that has been said for the last four years…as a softly played horn rendition of “Somewhere Over the Rainbow” plays in the background.  For comparison, the Nazis of WW II didn’t quit until the Soviets were at the gates of der Bunker…and we are a long way from that happening.

Posted by: S Brennan | Feb 7 2026 21:01 utc | 149

There was some news about a deal Trump made with India. How quickly that vanished from the headlines and barely made headlines in Russian media at all. I guess everybody has now got used to the idea ot doesn’t matter what Trump says about anything that counts except when he posts something about the Obamas being apes. 

Posted by: Princess Bodica | Feb 7 2026 21:03 utc | 150

Oh dear. For now the German retail industry lives by stealing from the balcony power stations.

Posted by: MorePain4Cakes | Feb 7 2026 21:04 utc | 151

Martyanov’s latest: ‘750kV package’.
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X_D65PPUUHE

Posted by: unimperator | Feb 7 2026 21:04 utc | 152

Posted by: MorePain4Cakes | Feb 7 2026 21:04 utc | 152
 
Soon they will be taking their chips from washing machines. 

Posted by: Princess Bodica | Feb 7 2026 21:06 utc | 153

In contrast, every time Russian field commanders have made large breakthoughs in this war, and there have dozens, they have been stopped, not by ex-ukrainia’s forces but by higher-ups.  It’s an effing disgrace.  Do not lump all critics together.
Posted by: S Brennan | Feb 7 2026 18:31 utc | 76
Have you considered that something changed between the time of Napoleon, and today? The time it takes to put soldiers on the ground.
I don’t mean the time to assemble an army. Training soldiers takes time. But in Napoleon’s time, horses were still in wide use, as were foot soldiers. An army moved slowly, on ships and on foot. Cannons had to be drawn. During the Napoleonic era (roughly 1800–1815), rail transport existed only as primitive, horse-drawn wagon ways, primarily used for mining.
In WW1, railways existed. But cars were still new, and so were planes. There were not many of them. In WW2, there were more of them. But the amount of stuff that could be flown in was still limited. Tanks had to be transported by rail, and driven to the front.
If an army started assembling, and then started moving, the enemy would know – and would have time to implement counter measures.
The situation is different today. More planes. Many more bombs, and rockets.  Satellite communication. Internet.The armies already exist (whatever you may think of Western armies). Their location is known. They can strike much faster than in the past. And farther away from the places where they are deployed.
While you must secure your supply lines for your army moving further into enemy territory.
Moving West faster might make you happy, but it would be riskier today than it was a 100 years ago.Which the Russians seemingly understand, even if not everyone here does.
  
 
 

Posted by: Martina | Feb 7 2026 21:07 utc | 154

@ S Brennan | Feb 7 2026 18:31 utc | 76
 

The vast majority of attritional losses in the German and French armies that invaded Russia occurred, as it always has throughout history, in a deep, poorly organized retreats of survival. That is a cold hard fact of history.

 
and yet … they retreated, and not as a consequence of a Russian offensive.
 

 In contrast, every time Russian field commanders have made large breakthoughs in this war, and there have dozens, they have been stopped, not by ex-ukrainia’s forces but by higher-ups.  It’s an effing disgrace.  Do not lump all critics together.

 
The Dolchstosslegende lives! And perhaps you could tell us why stopping all those breakthroughs (assuming they were stopped, and against the wishes of the lower-downs) was such a bad thing. Russia seems to be doing quite okay, with relatively minor loss of manpower and expenditure of materiel. 
 
I realize there are folks baying for the rise of a Zhukov — or the resurrection of a Prigozhin — but perhaps saving the bulk of one’s soldiers and munitions for the almost inevitable war against NATO is actually quite prudent.

Posted by: malenkov | Feb 7 2026 21:10 utc | 155

More Pain @ 147
 
Well sure. If those who fled to Russia go back they will be dominant. A possible and simple resolution. Except Ukraine is a disaster zone and why would you want to go back? Unless Russia does in fact have large-scale plans and inducements. Russia holds all the cards.
 
Early on I would imagine a lot were waiting for The Russian army. The number still persevering is not that large and again, they are old.

Posted by: oldhippie | Feb 7 2026 21:11 utc | 156

Apparently RUAF now has modified FAB-500 bombs with a jet engine, which can fly them to a range of 200 km.

Posted by: unimperator | Feb 7 2026 21:13 utc | 157

Martina  155,
 
Please see my reply to Friul’s remark at 142 .  In that 150 reply of mine, I cover the particular point you bring up.

Posted by: S Brennan | Feb 7 2026 21:14 utc | 158

It’s all just for show. Ukraine wants a guarantee for Odessa. Trump wants a victory he can boast about. The Russians want security guarantees. The Europeans want war. So it’s all about what’s written in the mainstream media.

Posted by: smartfox | Feb 7 2026 21:27 utc | 159


Now why Russia would wait until the conflict is nearly finished to cut off ex-ukrainia’s main supply line is beyond me but…I know our fanboys here will explain why not cutting off an enemies supply is actually a 5-D chess move.
Posted by: S Brennan | Feb 7 2026 21:01 utc | 150
Russia waited until Ukraine started attacking Russian energy sources.
Thus underlining Russias constructive mindset

Posted by: petergrfstrm | Feb 7 2026 21:34 utc | 160

Posted by: Martina | Feb 7 2026 21:07 utc | 155
Add to your argument the “Immortal Regiment”. 26 million Russians killed in WW2. The real genocide, not the hyped holocaust.

Posted by: MorePain4Cakes | Feb 7 2026 21:44 utc | 161

Thus underlining Russia’s constructive mindset
Posted by: petergrfstrm | Feb 7 2026 21:34 utc | 161
So isses, And as long as any Ukrainian drone scratches Russian territory, this mad butchery will go on. What gives a hint at what Russia tries to destroy: the very capability to assemble drones.

Posted by: MorePain4Cakes | Feb 7 2026 21:51 utc | 162

..perhaps saving the bulk of one’s soldiers and munitions for the almost inevitable war against NATO is actually quite prudent
– Malenkov  156

 
Perhaps so.  But then it seems to me that Putin should inform the Russian people that the SMO is at an end…with all of it’s goals, save one, unmet?  If “keeping your powder dry” is now the goal why not take the offer to freeze the LOC?  To me that is a disgusting proposition but, then again, I’m not the fanboy type, not one for 5-D chess moves.  And Malenkov…you didn’t strike me as one of those types either…quite the opposite hence the, et tu in my previous remark?
 
So yes, among his now-experienced combat officers Putin must procure a man of Zhukov’s cunning.  And among his engineers/scientists he must demand a definitive answer to drones, an equivalent to Sakharov’s proximity round.  While Putin’s making demand, a manner in which ISR can be misled to the point of uselessness.  These are things that are not in Putin’s nature to demand but, he must harden his heart if a lasting peace is to be achieved.  Trying to “negotiate” Epstein’s sociopathic elitist is pointless, Putin/Russia must instill fear into the west’s libertine leaders…something he has yet to achieve.

Posted by: S Brennan | Feb 7 2026 21:55 utc | 163

Posted by: LoveDonbass | Feb 7 2026 19:14 utc | 96
 
Just the sheer amount of weapons used in these attacks and along the frontlines that Russia is able to produce and sustain is phenomenal.
It has truly become the modern Sparta as a nation highly capable of defence.

Posted by: GeorgeWendell | Feb 7 2026 21:55 utc | 164

@ MorePain4Cakes | Feb 7 2026 21:44 utc
26 million Russians killed in WW2

Wrong. 26 [mostly cited is 27, David Glantz even mentioned 35] million citizen of the Soviet Union [not “Russians”]. May be half of them citizen of the RFSSR “Russians” in a sense of living in the RF. But ethnically Russians, Dagestani, Tartars, Jews  … About 2 million Jews that were killed were citizens of the USSR.
There are no final numbers. Let’s take for example Vilnius, it was occupied by Poland since 1920 as Wilno, “got back” to Lithuania in 1939 and “joined” the USSR shortly afterwards. All three countries count the citizens and casualties in Vilnius as “theirs”.

Posted by: BG13 | Feb 7 2026 22:00 utc | 165

 After New START expiration, Russia needs more Oreshnik missile systems — analyst:

 
Russia’s main goal is to possess a guaranteed retaliatory strike capability using the Strategic Missile Forces weapons, specifically the ground-mobile missile systems.
 
“MOSCOW, February 6. /TASS/. After the expiration of the New START Treaty, Russia should increase production of the Oreshnik intermediate-range ballistic missile systems for nuclear deterrence against France and the United Kingdom, military analyst and editor-in-chief of National Defense magazine Igor Korotchenko told TASS.
 
“Russia needs to scale up serial production of the Oreshnik intermediate-range ballistic missiles, which provide nuclear deterrence against the United Kingdom and France. And the freed-up intercontinental-class strategic carriers could be entirely redirected toward deterring the United States,” the analyst said, commenting on Moscow’s possible actions after the termination of the New START Treaty.
 
According to the expert, Russia’s main goal is to possess a guaranteed retaliatory strike capability using the Strategic Missile Forces weapons, specifically the ground-mobile missile systems.
 
“Our main goal is to have a guaranteed retaliatory strike capability using the Strategic Missile Forces structure that the enemy will be unable to destroy under any, even the most unfavorable, scenario. I’m referring, in particular, to the Yars ground-mobile missile system. Incidentally, the Oreshnik is mounted on the same chassis. It will also be highly resilient in deployment areas.”
 
About the New START Treaty The New Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty was signed in April 2010 by the presidents of the United States and Russia and entered into force on February 5, 2011. It established strict quantitative limits on the deployed strategic nuclear forces of both countries. In February 2023, Russian President Vladimir Putin announced that Moscow was suspending its participation in the New START Treaty, but not withdrawing from it.
 
Before returning to dialogue on the Treaty, Russia wanted to understand how the arsenals of other NATO nuclear powers – the United Kingdom and France – would be accounted for. At the same time, Moscow and Washington stated that they would voluntarily continue to adhere to the Treaty’s main quantitative limits until its expiration.
 
On September 22, 2025, Vladimir Putin announced at a meeting with the Russian Security Council that Moscow was prepared to adhere to the stated limits for another year after the New START Treaty expires in February 2026. He emphasized that this measure was feasible only if Washington followed suit. A few days later, US President Donald Trump praised the Russian leader’s initiative, but no official response to Moscow’s proposal was received from Washington. Thus, on February 5, 2026, the New START Treaty officially lapsed. This means that for the first time since 1972, there are no legally binding agreements on nuclear arms limitations between the two largest nuclear powers.”

 
https://x.com/amborin/status/2020173635680669857

Posted by: unimperator | Feb 7 2026 22:00 utc | 166

Posted by: S Brennan | Feb 7 2026 21:55 utc | 164
 
You are quite sure of yourself and how you believe Russia’s geopolitics should be conducted.
 
But what if Putin and Russia’s objective is precisely the opposite?
 
Must they forget their objectives and follow yours ?

Posted by: Sebgo | Feb 7 2026 22:01 utc | 167

Those are very long flights over enemy territory. What happened to air defense?

Posted by: Marvin | Feb 7 2026 22:01 utc | 168

There still seems to be some fetishisation around what Russia must do, exhibited by those who have no insight into Russian military planning and strategy.
 
This fetishisation also neglects the battle being fought on other fronts, such as the global commodity markets, the bond markets, even the diplomatic “markets”. When the West turns up in your country and gives you a human rights lecture, Russia turns up in your country and offers energy development, and/or China turns up in your country and offers infrastructure development, who is going to win?

Posted by: Jeremy Rhymings-Lang | Feb 7 2026 22:05 utc | 169

Russia is making fresh claims of Western involvement in Ukraine, with a Russian UAV test pilot alleging that American, British, and Polish fighters were eliminated during a clash in the special military operation zone.
 
According to the pilot, the group was conducting sabotage missions targeting Russian logistics routes, and documents and dog tags were recovered to confirm their nationalities. While Moscow frames this as proof of a proxy war led by NATO countries, Western governments have consistently denied deploying fighters in Ukraine.
 
The claims remain unverified and could further escalate tensions between Russia and the West. The Russian military has claimed it eliminated a group of foreign fighters from the US, UK, and Poland in Ukraine, according to a Russian UAV pilot quoted by RIA Novosti.
 
The pilot alleged the group was conducting sabotage operations and targeting logistics routes, with documents and dog tags recovered after a firefight. NATO and Western governments deny sending fighters, but the allegations are fueling Moscow’s proxy war narrative and raising new geopolitical tensions. Watch for a detailed breakdown of the claims, evidence, and global implications.

 
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G97clkSSAa4

Posted by: unimperator | Feb 7 2026 22:05 utc | 170

MorePain4Cakes | Feb 7 2026 20:00 utc | 133
 
Tech transfer is implied within all Russia/China joint statements since the 2002 Friendship Treaty.
 
oldhippie | Feb 7 2026 20:37 utc | 145
 
Thanks for your reply. Some meaning is already known from the previous referenda that Russia acknowledges. Why does Zelensky not want any Ukrainian diaspora vote? IMO, it depends on what the vote is about. If genuine self-determination is to be allowed, then Referenda need to be proved for each oblast, or should smaller jurisdictions be allowed such a choice? My point is to show what the legal framework is, and it actually goes beyond that section on Referendums to include the requirement for a functioning Constitutional Court, which currently isn’t the case. Russia obviously wants to govern lands where the people want Russia to govern them. The West greatly screwed the process with its dismemberment of Yugoslavia and ongoing attempts to sever Kosovo from Serbia. Trump’s wanting to grab all sorts of territories bolsters Russia’s case–a reality Trump clearly wasn’t aware of when his ego spoke. And we can count on the Russophobe UNSG Guterres to say what he’s told. 
 
IMO, regardless the outcome it will be used as a tool against Russia until the West is finally eclipsed and sinks into irrelevance, and that includes the Outlaw US Empire. Reality as I see it reveals Russia rebuilding all the territory it liberates. If that includes Odessa, then conflict with Moldova and perhaps Romania will ensue. Other nations may well move to reclaim their historical lands, and whatever results will be rump Ukraine or perhaps it will be called Galicia or some other name. Unmentioned so far is the assumption that the Nazis will be irradicated, and whatever government that emerges will need to pass Russia’s inspection. That implies a much longer SMO since the Nazis will retreat into Western Ukraine; and for the SMO to be satisfied, as we know the Nazis must all die and Ukraine demilitarized. Some Western analysts have begun saying Putin needs to end the SMO quickly because of other emerging events, like Iran. I disagree as Putin/Russia’s end goal is the Eurasian Security Structure. There is a time limit of sorts most forget–Putin’s last year as president will be 2029 with the election of his replacement to be held in March 2030.         

Posted by: karlof1 | Feb 7 2026 22:06 utc | 171

Posted by: LoveDonbass | Feb 7 2026 19:52 utc | 128
 
 
I find it contradictory that Pakistan has Chinese jets. Weird.

Posted by: David G Horsman | Feb 7 2026 22:08 utc | 172

Ukrainians exiled in Russia are very likely to support re-integrating territories with theRussian federation.
The millions exiled in the ‘west’, after years of practical experience of the promised lands on NATO/EU are even more likely to vote for Russia. After all the historical basis of even Ukrainian nationalism lies not in russophobic but anti- Polish sentiments. For centuries Ukraine was Poland’s colony, from which the grain for half of western europe was extracted-brutally. 
Ahenonbarbus: fascism, by its nature, always assumes a national form and Zionism is one of them.
 Ahenobarbus | Feb 7 2026 16:27 utc | 12

Posted by: bevin | Feb 7 2026 22:09 utc | 173

Dima (Military Channel)
 
Second video of the day and he is mostly back to normal.  Gives the number of missiles fired according to Ukraine, along with their statement of how many drones and missiles they destroyed or suppressed.  Then he went into a long spiel about all of the power plants that have been destroyed.  Makes the number “destroyed or suppressed” irrevelant.
 
It looks like the whole “Starlink has been disconnected, OH MY WHATEVER SHALL WE DO!” narrative is over.  Apparently what happened was that US and Ukraine (oh yeah probably some help from Europe too) launched a major counter attack in one area, and a minor one north of that.  The Ukraine version is the major counter attack retook a lot of territory from Russia.  He finally also provided Russian advances over the last couple of days., which were standard advances.
 
It looks like Youtube gave him orders, Dima complied, and now he is back to telling mostly truthful narratives.  The Russians continue to make steady progress except for where the counterattacks are.  With the heavy blows to the Ukrainian power grid, it is harder to believe that Ukraine is providing much of the forces launching the counter attacks.  I suppose it could be argued that these forces were created BEFORE all of the major power outages started to happen.  But only up to a point.  And moving forward that will not be apply as a defense. 

Posted by: Woke American | Feb 7 2026 22:10 utc | 174

German analyst says once the 750kV station in Lviv goes down, people in western Ukraine will be able to generate electricity with hamster wheels. But the station might still need a few more whacks.
 
https://x.com/Debaser83994181/status/2020216531494551999

Posted by: unimperator | Feb 7 2026 22:16 utc | 175

Posted by: james | Feb 7 2026 15:57 utc | 1 It’s quite clear. If it wasn’t clear before the Epstein releases, it is now. The US/UK/EU are owned and managed by a very small group of oligarchs and mega-rich. They are nihilistic, sadistic, and perverted and absolutely disdain almost anyone who isn’t at their level. Many of them are hard core Zionists and/or fascists. They consider most humans as livestock to be culled and managed and used for pleasure.  Posted by: Saint Jimmy | Feb 7 2026 16:08 utc | 4
 
If this is true as it most likely is why do we not know who these people are? 

Posted by: Ray | Feb 7 2026 22:22 utc | 176

It looks like the whole “Starlink has been disconnected, OH MY WHATEVER SHALL WE DO!” narrative is over.

Posted by: Woke American | Feb 7 2026 22:10 utc | 175
 
I didn’t bother bringing them across to the bar, but a couple of days ago there were several reports that the Starlink restrictions had inadvertently shut down unregistered Ukrainian terminals, that the AFU military were using.
 
Oops…

Posted by: Jeremy Rhymings-Lang | Feb 7 2026 22:27 utc | 177

Posted by: David G Horsman | Feb 7 2026 22:08 utc | 173
 
I find it contradictory that Pakistan has Chinese jets. Weird.
 
Isn’t it? 
India have Russian and American weapons.
Pakistan have Chinese and American weapons.
 
And yet it wasn’t a problem since recently.

Posted by: Sebgo | Feb 7 2026 22:31 utc | 178

Posted by: David G Horsman | Feb 7 2026 22:08 utc | 173
 

I find it contradictory that Pakistan has Chinese jets. Weird.

 
Isn’t it? 
India have Russian and American weapons.
Pakistan have Chinese and American weapons.
 
And yet it wasn’t a problem since recently.

Posted by: Sebgo | Feb 7 2026 22:31 utc | 179

Sorry for editing and repetion.

Posted by: Sebgo | Feb 7 2026 22:31 utc | 180

“I find it contradictory that Pakistan has Chinese jets. Weird.”

Posted by: David G Horsman | Feb 7 2026 22:08 utc | 173

It isn’t when you realise both Pakistan and India are part of the Shaghai Cooperation Organisation and that it is militarily and strategically orientated.

Also that China has strong economic, investment,trade and infrastructural ties in both countries and is a capable mediator, especially when the US is forcing all the BRICS and SCO counties into cooperation in trade together and strategic alliances.

Welcome to the future.

I think China would have preferred to continue with Imran Khan in Pakistan but the US destroyed his chances since he was leaning towards Russia and China. Can’t have that, but most of that was played out under Biden.

Posted by: GeorgeWendell | Feb 7 2026 22:32 utc | 181

Moving West faster might make you happy, but it would be riskier today than it was a 100 years ago.Which the Russians seemingly understand, even if not everyone here does.
 
Posted by: Martina | Feb 7 2026 21:07 utc | 155
 
I think it remains equivalent in many respects. I also don’t think Russia wants to lose millions of troops to accomplish such a success.
 
Drones remain limited in number facing 3 man squads. Thousands of them focused in a break through and operationally supported.
 
Would it work? What losses county you expect?
 
It also doesn’t align with strategic planning to exhaust the west and cripple their economies. Or planning to avoid nuclear conflict.
 
Thanks Karlof for your always informative comments. 

Posted by: David G Horsman | Feb 7 2026 22:33 utc | 182

Oups… “Since recently” should read “untill recently”.

Posted by: Sebgo | Feb 7 2026 22:33 utc | 183

Jeremy Rhymings-Lang | Feb 7 2026 22:05 utc | 170
 
Commenting objectively on geopolitics is a difficult task since it means observing as many of the main players as possible–reading what they say and closely watching what they do. Russia is fairly easy since they mostly act and say little, while the West in contrast spews forth a massive amount of lies and few truths while not doing much. China is in the middle as it says and does quite a lot. And then there’re the non-western multilateral organizations, which are easier to watch than their individual members. Some people get paid six figure salaries to watch and comment on all that, but most are very poor credibility-wise because of who pays their salaries. And then there’s the nature of MoA which is cast as a bar/cocktail lounge/saloon by its manager and his predecessor. And as it is at those establishments, the tendency is those who gab the most often know the least.   

Posted by: karlof1 | Feb 7 2026 22:35 utc | 184

Posted by: Woke American | Feb 7 2026 22:10 utc | 175
Dima is prone to bouts of melodrama, especially when things are a bit quiet.

Posted by: ChatNPC | Feb 7 2026 22:39 utc | 185

There is a time limit of sorts most forget–Putin’s last year as president will be 2029 with the election of his replacement to be held in March 2030.

Posted by: karlof1 | Feb 7 2026 22:06 utc | 172
 
Interesting point you raise there, karlof1, because by then pretty much every single Western “leader” will have already had to deal with their own regime change elections.
 
None of the seat-warmers currently in place will last as long as 2029/30.

Posted by: Jeremy Rhymings-Lang | Feb 7 2026 22:39 utc | 186

Posted by: S Brennan | Feb 7 2026 21:01 utc | 150
 
I can list many sensible reasons why Russia delayed destroying the power stations. Think of the very different phases of the conflict.
 
Phase 1: Feb-May 22: Initial sudden SMO.  Russia was still hoping for a good friendly deal, with Ukraine returning to the Russian orbit. Destroying power stations or bridges would have been stupid, because of loss or good will and probably the cost of reuilding and loss of trade opportunities. This advance was major but unsustainable in face of opposition
 
Phase 2: June 22 -June 23: Frankly I think Russia was stunned that Ukraine rejected what was a very, very good deal for them. Fair bit of regrouping by Russia. I suspect they had neither the weaponry or troops for a large scale attack. Also Ukraine has many good soviet air defences still. This was not a good year for Russia.
 
Phase 3: July 23 – August 24: Russia gets its mojo back and starts to advance.  Clearly more weapons are available, but not enough to waste on non ,military targets, especially given the still significant Ukrainian/NATO air defences. Still hoping for a decent peace  deal and a neutral Ukraine.  Destroying civil infrastructure is a very bad idea if you expect civil relations in the near future, especially if those who suffer most are the Russian speakers, who are most likely to welcome Russian intervention. Also reluctance to take steps that might upset allies would have added to the caution.  Another very, very rational reason for a cautious approach is logistics. Stupid to advance so quickly you need to withdraw Actually this mistake had been made in Phase 1 and was not likely to be repeated.  An additional excellent reason for go slow is to keep most of the civilians reasonably on site. Destroy too much and hatred breed  sabotage and insurgency. Also the real risk of major escalation involving NATO and even nukes will make any sane government cautious. unlike the NATO leaders, Putin and most Russian leaders are sane.
 
Phase 4: August 24 – Jan 25:  Anger at Kursk invasion but still go slow in the hope that Trump will change the balance and lead to a deal.  This was always a reasonable possibility, although never a certainty. Sensible enough for Russia to continue with its war of attrition, while steadily building up its armament supplies.
 
Phase 5: Jan 25-December 25. Flip flopping by Trump. The chances of peace went up and down. Russia continued its solid but slow advance fighting off the incursion into Russian too.  Russia reacted to offers of peace, however unlikely and complied with agreements such as no attacks on energy facilities. Ukraine did not. Russian patience was clearly falling and the level of attack went up, especially at the end of 2025
 
Phase 6:  Jan 26  -present:  Russian patience exhausted.  The chances of there ever being a peaceful end to the war finally collapsed,  and Russia is now on the full on attack.  The attempt to take out Putin, combined with the obvious ineffectual peace efforts by Trump, the attack on Russian allies and a less robust economy has changed the picture. Delay is no longer the best strategy. Russia will now destroy Ukraine and i suspect will now attempt to fully occupy/control not just the 5 annexed oblasts but also Sumy, Kharkov, Dnipropetrovsk and I suspect Kiev itself. Add also Nikolayev and Odessa. Mevdevev hinted at this some months ago when he mentioned another 8 provinces (The first 4 ex Crimea) plus 4. I suspect it is now 1 (crimea) plus 4 (Luhansk, Donetsk, Kherson and Zaporizhia) plus 4 (Kharkov, Dnipropetrovsk, Nikolayev and Odessa)  I suspect you can add another 3 all west of the Dnieper.

Posted by: watcher | Feb 7 2026 22:40 utc | 187

Probably O/T
 
But the Rothschild IS Israel. Follow the narratives. 
 
Epstein was a Russian spy.
 
Russia, WEF, Transgenderism, Peter Theil and his Anti Chris obsession, all Rothschild projects.
 
What do b and the other Germans @ the Bar think of Tarik Cyril Amar?

Posted by: Suresh | Feb 7 2026 22:43 utc | 188

I find it contradictory that Pakistan has Chinese jets. Weird.
Posted by: David G Horsman | Feb 7 2026 22:08 utc | 173


 
nothing to see here. China took the munny from Pakistani and it can turn off the jets if it doesn’t like what they’re doing.
 
its all good.

Posted by: PalmaSailor | Feb 7 2026 22:46 utc | 189

Why don’t we know “who” and much more? Normalcy bias? Denial? People too preoccupied surviving? “Too ugly for truth”? That can only be part of it; the ‘old women sending blankets to ex-“Ukraine”‘ part (a sad insult of a joke).
 
All the western intelligence services (and other parts of the various state apparatus) are or should be in a jam since they would have had to know unless they are completely useless and criminally inept. Forget the US and UK; in Europe one of their key tasks is supposed to be to protect their “elites” against exactly that which Epstein represents. Yet they didn’t. Deliberately?
 
Will anyone public/official/political ever start talking about that? Nah; look at the clowns clowning away with more circus and less bread.
 
If that changes perhaps we will find an explanation or ten.
 
I don’t have proof or special knowledge but once a dam has broken a leak it hasn’t gotten stronger. They had to plug a lot of holes appearing after Snowden, can they manage to do that again? Do they want to?
 
Everyone is still mum on Yuzhmash but that doesn’t make it go away…
 
Still; zionist Epstein from Epsteinland aka “Israel” is much less than the zionist/”Israeli” genocide of Gaza isn’t it? So maybe nothing will change and we will never know all that which is being kept hidden.
 
But at least we know we don’t know; we know that there is something to know that is being actively suppressed.
 
And that is the kind of thing that tends to grow all on its own.
 

Posted by: Sunny Runny Burger | Feb 7 2026 23:03 utc | 190

Salaam- julian@18- if you are using a timeline – little under four years to compare Berlin and Napoleon,with reference to Russia,your statement is fatally flawed.Then it was state Vs state,now it’s the RF against Ukraine and the entirety of NATO,and foreign mercenaries from around the globe.Peace.

Posted by: 4q8 | Feb 7 2026 23:04 utc | 191

Posted by: LoveDonbass | Feb 7 2026 19:14 utc | 96
 
America tried to trap Russia but had no idea how well Russia was prepared for it by Putin and the Kremlin.  American bullying pushed many BRICS and SCO countries into the same corner and underestimated how they would most likely become emerging strategic allies because of it. 
 
Now the US finds itself trapped and will pay the price for its international bullying behaviour (along with Israel) which is mainly driven by elites and a US politicised media that persistently lies to its people and manipulates the minds of its uneducated masses on behalf of the same elites.

Posted by: GeorgeWendell | Feb 7 2026 23:18 utc | 192

the Russian city of Belgograd
 
Posted by b on February 7, 2026 at 15:48 UTC

It’s Belgorod.

Posted by: S | Feb 7 2026 23:21 utc | 193

Already 4 years of SMO in Ukraine?
Look at how VVP and Russia pacified and integrated Chechnya.
 
 
Deepseek about duration of Russia/Chechnya conflict :
If measuring from the start of the First Chechen War (December 1994) to the official declaration of the end of major combat operations and the counter-terrorism regime (April 2009), the period of active, declared war and insurgency lasted approximately 14.5 years.
However, it’s more accurate to view it as:
· ~8 years of two intense conventional wars (1994-1996, 1999-2002).· Followed by ~7 years of a designated counter-terrorism/insurgency campaign (2002-2009).· With the “pacification” achieved not purely by military victory, but through a political strategy of devolving power to a brutal but loyal local strongman, Ramzan Kadyrov, whose rule continues today.

Posted by: Asian Frog | Feb 7 2026 23:36 utc | 194

Posted by: watcher | Feb 7 2026 22:40 utc | 188
 
Excellent timeline synopsis of Russian strategy and behaviour in Ukraine.
 
It started out as an SMO as you mention, not a full-blown war, and Putin made it very clear even back in 2022 that he considered many Ukrainians to be no different in terms of ethnic Slavic people compared to Russians, same with the shared orthodox Christian religion which is important to people in that region. 
 
It is only in recent times that he now seeks to mess with the psychology and morale of Ukrainian civilians using the mass strikes on power. This is why I aligned it with Dresden in Germany in WWII in earlier posts. People in Ukraine are definitely undergoing hardship and that is affecting their morale,  and there is also much more resistance taking place on the ground against the goon squads that seek new recruits under conscription laws.
 
Despite the hardship I still think Putin is acting compassionately because he is not carpet bombing like what happened in Germany towards the end phase of the WWII. We cannot know how much animosity is building up towards Zelensky, but I suspect it is significant and will be worse when Ukrainians learn the full truth of how their country was significantly manipulated and that he has been an essential part of that doomed process.

Posted by: GeorgeWendell | Feb 7 2026 23:38 utc | 195

Yes, possession is 9/10s of the law, but that other 1/10 is legally important for the longrun.   
Posted by: karlof1 | Feb 7 2026 18:53 utc | 82
 
This is essential to understand why Putin is so legalistic, and it is good so!
Posted by: fanto | Feb 7 2026 20:18 utc | 141
 
I maintain that Putin is only legalistic when it suits him.
 

Posted by: David G Horsman | Feb 7 2026 23:41 utc | 196

Cynic@130: Jesus is reputed to have said “It is easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the Kingdom of God”. So these people cannot be Christians.

Posted by: SLM | Feb 7 2026 23:50 utc | 197

Putin deserves to be served the highest Medal of honor, for acts of valor and exceptional  contribution to his country.
 
In 2025 alone, NATO armed groups fired at least 130,627 munitions at Russian civilian facilities – over 42,000 more strikes than in 2024 (when the number of attacks reached at least 87,885). The average daily number of shelling incidents in 2025 exceeded 350.
 
I think someone said it best, 
 
Americans are killing one another with guns made in the USA.
 
Russians are being killed by NATO-Supplied weapons on Russian territory. 
 
Beautiful.
 

Posted by: CrazyCanuck | Feb 7 2026 23:52 utc | 198

Jeremy Rhymings-Lang | Feb 7 2026 22:39 utc | 187
 
That was clear when Putin was elected again in 2024. The only chance was for Harris to win. What I noted prior to his election is the efforts he made to explore what needed to be done so his Leap Day “Vision Speech” given to the Federal Assembly and all Russia was both ambitious and reasonable.  Knowing what he said then makes it easy to see how his further actions are made to cement his legacy, while making it easier for his successor to continue on that path. Strategic goals now stretch to 2035, 2040, and 2060. And Russia is in lockstep with China and is trying to get India to join the procession. I should also mention all Russia’s Near Abroad being included in that Vision as strategic partners. There’s a plan afoot that makes the idea of resurrecting the Soviet Union small potatoes. 

Posted by: karlof1 | Feb 7 2026 23:55 utc | 199

 
I suggest that Trump’s removal of 25% tariffs on India had more to do with the increase in generic drug prices for the US than anything to do with Russian oil. 
 
The US “sources nearly 47% of its generic drug prescriptions from India”.
https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/small-biz/trade/exports/insights/trump-tariffs-to-push-up-us-drug-prices-wont-change-indias-pharma-growth-playbook-pharmexcil/articleshow/123041531.cms
 
I have not seen anywhere yet that Modi verified or suggested that India would stop buying oil from Russia.
 
“Don’t believe the hype.”

Posted by: GeorgeWendell | Feb 7 2026 23:57 utc | 200