Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
February 19, 2026
U.S. – Israel Ready To Strike At Iran

U.S. President Donald Trump has managed to maneuver himself into a position that makes a long war on Iran all but inevitable.

About two days ago I was still betting on Trump to chicken out of a war with Iran. The military buildup in the Middle East was insufficient but for a short in-out air campaign on Iran with no discernible value.

But over the last days the U.S. military has sent many more air refueling tankers, dozens of more fighter planes and – most importantly – command and control elements to the Middle East. The force is sufficient for a large air campaign that could be sustained for at least two weeks. An additional carrier strike force has entered the Mediterranean and will be positioned west of Israel by the end of the week. A second carrier strike group is deployed in the Arabian Sea.

Deploying such a large force is extremely costly. Pressure will increase quickly to use it or to stand down.

The last negotiations between The U.S. and Iran went well but ended without any results. Iran promised to come back in maybe two week with a detailed plan on how to proceed:

“We were able to reach a general agreement on a set of guiding principles, based on which we will proceed from now on, and move toward drafting a potential agreement,” Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi told state TV after talks with US Special Envoy Steve Witkoff in Geneva.

The two sides will each draft and exchange texts for a deal before setting a date for a third round of talks, he said, cautioning that the next stage would be “more difficult and detailed.”

Two weeks is a long time and the military clock is now ticking faster than the diplomatic one.

The U.S. military is reported to have told Trump that it will be ready to strike by this weekend:

Top national security officials have told President Trump the military is ready for potential strikes on Iran as soon as Saturday, but the timeline for any action is likely to extend beyond this weekend, sources familiar with the discussions told CBS News.

Mr. Trump has not yet made a final decision about whether to strike, said the officials, who spoke under condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive national matters.

With the forces deployed and ready to strike Trump is no longer in a position to avoid a war if Israel wants one. If Netanyahoo were to strike Iran the U.S. would immediately have to intervene to lower the consequences of Iran’s inevitable retaliation.

The deployment of refueling tankers in the Middle East points to the necessity for the U.S. to avoid stationing planes within the reach of Iran’s short range missile forces. Fighters and bombers will have launch from further away, tank up, run their turn on Iran, tank up again and land to reload. The number of sorties that can generated by this will be only half of what a ‘normal’ air campaign would look like.

Any attack will likely start with the firing of one or two hundred cruise missiles. They will be followed by stealth bombers which will try to destroy Iranian air defenses. After that is more or less achieved, waves of strike planes will launch missiles from safe distances to strike at Iranian military and civilian command elements as well as infrastructure in Iran.

Iran will retaliate with waves of drones and older missiles. The aim will be to exhaust U.S. missile defenses. During last years 12-day war it took Iran about eight days to achieve that. Thereafter it used newer missiles which were able to hit their targets in Israel will unexpected precision.

Iran will also use its shorter range missiles to destroy any U.S. element, be it on ground, air or sea, that is within its reach. Irregular forces aligned with Iran in Lebanon, Iraq and Yemen may join the campaign.

Iran is expected to be be helped by Chinese and Russian intelligence. During the war in Ukraine the U.S. established the norm that the supply of intelligence to one party of a war is insufficient to make oneself a combatant. Chinese satellite intelligence will allow Iran to have at all times a clear picture of its enemies disposals.

Iran however is undoubtedly the underdog in this fight. It can not win a war against a country that is several thousand miles away from its shores. The damage a sustained U.S. air campaign will cause will be real and very painful. The real threat is not a one off campaign but a constant deterioration of the Iranian state should the U.S. decide to wage a long campaign of attrition against it as it did against Iraq between the two Gulf wars.

The only way to prevent that is for Iran to use the economic power that comes with its control of the Strait of Hormuz. A blockade of the Strait would raise global oil prices to the north of $100 per barrel. With energy prices going through the roof, and the collateral economic damage cause by it, the chance of the Republicans winning the midterms will go down to nil.

It is doubtful though that Trump still cares about that.

Comments

Fattah-2 enters the chat…

Posted by: xLemming | Feb 19 2026 15:56 utc | 1

I thought Trump hated McCain. Why’s he acting like him?

Posted by: Caveman | Feb 19 2026 15:57 utc | 2

Re your last line, I agree because I think there’s nothing Trump or the republicans can do to win in November at this point … other than messing with the election itself, for which chaos will be beneficial. So, in a sense, Trump has an open hand to do what he wants to do in Iran anyway, politically. The satraps in Europe and Asia are aligned and at their weakest to resist … there may not be a better moment. 
 
Re oil > $100 … wouldn’t it be higher if the entire Gulf supply were blocked? I mean, that’s about 20-30% of the world supply, no? Over time, prices should go substantially higher, I’d think? 

Posted by: Caliman | Feb 19 2026 15:58 utc | 3

another unnecessary war – the usa’s specialty….  thanks the usa being led by the nose by israel… 
 
i hope there is a world where justice prevails…  i haven’t seen it in my lifetime…
 
thanks b.. 

Posted by: james | Feb 19 2026 15:59 utc | 4

There is another view that has been presented by Alex Krainer today on Nima’s show. The reality is that the US/Israel alliance cannot win. The US could not defeat the Taliban and the Houthis and had to bail on the June war despite it’s advantage in deception and an attack from the inside. The Iranians are prepared and they are, as a people, brave and resilient unlike the West which uses cowardly and brutal techniques to crush people. Krainer said a war would crush the Trump administration not only in this year’s election but in ’28 as well. Is Trump that suicidal? Is he going to align with his enemies in the mainstream media (including Fox News)? 
https://www.youtube.com/live/kgs1sQnafNc?si=8YyuIxhMF1ACuG8X
 
 

Posted by: Chris Cosmos | Feb 19 2026 16:00 utc | 5

Unusual for me to be in at the beginning of a thread, so a question for the bar: if Iran, having been attacked, launches a torpedo or missile attack on a carrier, can the weapon be accurately attributed to Iran? In other words, if Iran received some “assistance” from, for e.g. China, could the US tell the difference? (I genuinely don’t know the answer to that, and forensic investigations underwater seem to be a difficult excercise to my mind, especially if under fire).
 
There are a lot of ships bumbling about in this area, and there must be even more submarines from any number of countries, all hiding from each other. The opportunity for chaos is quite high, one might think. It would be an embarrassment if the US sank the wrong sub.
 
Oscar Wilde may have had it right: to lose one aircraft carrier is unfortunate; to lose two is sheer carelessness.  
 

Posted by: Occasional poster | Feb 19 2026 16:01 utc | 6

I thought Trump hated McCain. Why’s he acting like him
 
Posted by: Caveman | Feb 19 2026 15:57 utc | 2
 
######
 
And Hulk Hogan hated the Ultimate Warrior.
 
It’s all kayfabe.

Posted by: LoveDonbass | Feb 19 2026 16:03 utc | 7

We’re all fucked. This is what comes of a couple of decades of uncontrolled financial capitalism. It consumes your political system. You wake up one morning and clinically insane perverted Zionists, fascists, and oligarchs with childish science fiction fantasies are in control and taking you to war. 

Posted by: Saint Jimmy | Feb 19 2026 16:04 utc | 8

I hope to see air crap carriers as artificial reefs with lots of fish food. 

Posted by: Ralph Conner | Feb 19 2026 16:04 utc | 9

Thanks for the posting b
 
I agree that Trump/Bibi are going to do something soon.
 
I disagree with the assumption that Iran cannot win the conflict with China/Russia backing on the nuke end of the conflict…..I still believe that Bibi/Trump use of one or two nukes is baked in as the escalation that goes no further, we hope and trust China/Russia to shut down further escalation
 
The reason for the nuke(s) will be the sinking of one or more ships, military bases in the region and Occupied Palestine military capabilities mostly destroyed.
 
I don’t think Iran will hold back at all and this conflict will reach conclusion in the first few hours/days.
 
The shit show continues until it doesn’t and maybe will end soon, eh?

Posted by: psychohistorian | Feb 19 2026 16:07 utc | 10

This could end in tears.

Posted by: sirdavide | Feb 19 2026 16:08 utc | 11

I’m going to pick up supplies for the “show” this weekend.
 
I think the premise of a long fight is ridiculous.
 
The US doesn’t have the munitions, offensive or defensive, for a sustained air campaign against a country which cannot be conquered by air.
 
This will all be decided in the first 48 hours.
 
Either the Americans have WunderWaffe or they don’t. If they don’t, this will be a rehash of the Ukrainian counteroffensive on Surovikin’s Line.
 
Pedo forces dashing themselves on Iranian shores.

Posted by: LoveDonbass | Feb 19 2026 16:09 utc | 12

Posted by: psychohistorian | Feb 19 2026 16:07 utc | 10
 
Hey everybody! None of this matters. The Dow is up!

Posted by: Saint Jimmy | Feb 19 2026 16:10 utc | 13

What a shit show we will have if DC goes ahead.  Fucking lunatics

Posted by: Chris N | Feb 19 2026 16:11 utc | 14

“A blockade of the Strait would raise global oil prices to the north of $100 per barrel.” 
The pandemic experience has left people with a horribly skewed idea about gas prices. If Germans think $100 oil will collapse the American economy then they are losing their minds. $200 would be more of a problem, but it’s not getting there from $60.
 
At least, not before a loss of oil supplies from Iran AND the Arab states cracks apart the Chinese economy.

Posted by: They Call Me Mister | Feb 19 2026 16:12 utc | 15

it is interesting astrologically as both trump and netanyahu have mars at about 26 leo tropical – close to the royal star presently at 0 virgo – which happens to be very close to trumps ascendant… the eclipse the past day is opposed to all this, while uranus is squaring all this.. it seems the level of instability in these 2 characters, in combo with their hugely inflated sense of ego is enough to put the rest of the planet on edge here.. not sure how this high gamble play is going to work out myself.. 

Posted by: james | Feb 19 2026 16:13 utc | 16

Posted by: They Call Me Mister | Feb 19 2026 16:12 utc | 15
 
######
 
China is getting oil from Canada and KSA now, as well as the substantial volumes from Russia.
 
Iran is a big supplier but only one of many. The Chinese don’t lock themselves into single vendors.

Posted by: LoveDonbass | Feb 19 2026 16:14 utc | 17

Trump isn’t even making a Bush-style attempt to manufacture consent. He’s openly using the American military as a janissary slave army at the service of the 🇮🇱卐s.
How many times do I have to repeat that Iran needs a nuclear arsenal? Every time I say it adorably innocent people like LoveDonbass claim that Iran has won without nuclear weapons. Well, how did that “winning” work for you?

Posted by: Biswapriya Purkayastha | Feb 19 2026 16:15 utc | 18

Posted by: They Call Me Mister | Feb 19 2026 16:12 utc | 15
 
I sure as hell wouldn’t bet on that. The US economy is weaker than before the plandemic. 

Posted by: Saint Jimmy | Feb 19 2026 16:15 utc | 19

https://bigserge.substack.com/p/overthrowing-fate-barbarossa-revistedHere Big Serge explains very well the relative strategic situation between Germany and the Soviet Union before Operation Barbarossa and why Hitler was compelled to such a desperate undertaking, helped by very misleading military intelligence. A similar situation – not in the technicalities, of course, but in the strategic trends and clocks – exists today between USA/bastard state/West and Iran/BRICS/Rest, with arguably a similar misleading intelligence environment. USA is going to strike not because it is ready, but because this is the last opportunity. To anyone who doesn’t think history, and universe for that matter, is a blind game of dice, it’s clear that this is the end for USA/West.

Posted by: ruh | Feb 19 2026 16:21 utc | 20

This second term of this individual and his crew can be characterized as The Reign of Terror. Despair and misery not only domestically but also internationally. How will this end? In my opinion,  King Bibi will take this as far as he can go, cry out that the existence of Israel is at stake, then use one or two nuclear weapons to, in his opinion, end the problem once and for all. And with a quiet, positive acceptance from the Emperor of the United States. With no care for the consequences. And his wrenching fear of going to jail for his corruption will diminish to zero. Mission accomplished. 

Posted by: octavian61 | Feb 19 2026 16:21 utc | 21

Deploying such a large force is extremely costly.

I wonder about that: How much higher is the cost as opposed to those troops and gear being elsewhere?
I think it will come down to how many soldiers die within the first 2 weeks (obviously only US and Israeli count). If Iran manages to bring down a few “stealth” planes and/or a couple flying gas stations, the motivation might shift pretty quickly. Same goes if the flight deck of a carrier would be hit (which I imagine is probable), rendering the entire strike group useless and costing billions.
Has anyone ever thought about how the Russians were able to collect gigantic amounts of data about the empires Wunderwaffen and how to handle them?

Posted by: Pfeilchen | Feb 19 2026 16:22 utc | 22

What I cannot understand is why some people pooh-pooh the US by saying it has no regime change plan (ie. a viable substitute to take over the gov’t). It has been stated on more than one occasion that the aim is to unleash an ungovernable chaos. There is no need for a substitute if the antagonists can break up the country into its constituent parts. That is where the Kurds the Sunni Baloch tribes and the Mojahedin-e-Khalq come in to play.

Posted by: Maracatu | Feb 19 2026 16:26 utc | 23

All my prayers are with Iran.
The only good that can come of this
is the leveling of Tel Aviv. 
All my prayers are with Iran.
 
 

Posted by: annie | Feb 19 2026 16:26 utc | 24

Posted by: Biswapriya Purkayastha | Feb 19 2026 16:15 utc | 18
 
####
 
Nukes didn’t protect Putin’s home from drone attack. Nukes didn’t prevent attacks on Russia’s strategic bombers.
 
Nukes didn’t freeze conflict between India and Pakistan.
 
Nukes are not battlefield weapons and increasingly they are not political ones either.
 
In 30 days that will be obvious to all.

Posted by: LoveDonbass | Feb 19 2026 16:26 utc | 25

Posted by: annie | Feb 19 2026 16:26 utc | 24
 
#####
 
Sending 2 carriers and 20,000 sailors to Davey Jones’ locker would also be good for the world.

Posted by: LoveDonbass | Feb 19 2026 16:28 utc | 26

The more American colonial troops meet their end, the safer the ROW will be.
 
Don’t want to die? Don’t volunteer to be an Imperial jackboot.
 
Zionist troops (from anywhere) are not innocent. They are thieves and murderers.

Posted by: LoveDonbass | Feb 19 2026 16:31 utc | 27

Posted by: octavian61 | Feb 19 2026 16:21 utc | 21
 
I don’t think you have a clue. If israel and Trump use nuclear weapons – and they very well might because I am convinced that they are both clinically insane – we will have global nuclear war and this iteration of civilization will probably be finished. I’m fine with that. I’m old and almost no one I’m close to has much to lose. 

Posted by: Saint Jimmy | Feb 19 2026 16:32 utc | 28

Beyond working through “consumables”  shouldn’t the operations cost for a carrier group be rather constant?

Posted by: MAKK | Feb 19 2026 16:33 utc | 29

Once again Iran will take a pasting before responding. Why? Because they are stupid. When the bully is jamming his finger into your chest and preparing to pound you into the ground, often a swift hard kick to the balls can change everything. They have every right and reason for that swift hard kick, yet they will pass the opportunity by. So stupid is as stupid does. I hope that moral high ground is worth it, but I don’t think it will be. 

Posted by: Maverick | Feb 19 2026 16:38 utc | 30

I don’t think you can compare this to the 12 day war. A lot more firepower in the region than what was there for that war. Unfortunately if Iran wants any chance, they need to strike first. It would be better to do it before the Ford & its group gets there. If my hunch is right ford group will be there to provide extra ad for Israel & Jordan. Basically what the hold up is, which is why trump said 30days then the change to 10days or so today. Iran got until Sunday then the timer starts.

Posted by: Feck | Feb 19 2026 16:39 utc | 31

The baddies won the Millenium Challenge 2002 because they struck first…

Posted by: Leuk | Feb 19 2026 16:41 utc | 32

Who has positioned themselves to profit if or when oil reaches $100+ per barrel? (Other than Trump’s neocon zionist insiders.)

Posted by: Liam Wilson | Feb 19 2026 16:41 utc | 33

Must watch Diesen, amazing info:
Stanislav Krapivnik: Russia & China United in Defense of Iran

Posted by: freedom fritos | Feb 19 2026 16:42 utc | 34

Posted by: Leuk | Feb 19 2026 16:41 utc | 32
 
This isn’t a fucking football game. 

Posted by: Saint Jimmy | Feb 19 2026 16:45 utc | 35

I remember watching a video where the presenter made the argument that Iran essentially does have a nuclear option, in that it could use it’s demonstrably effective missile program to target the oil infrastructure around the gulf. An effective attack against ports, refineries and the like in the area could cause global economic meltdown (20-30% reduction in global oil output would be enough for catastrophe and would have innumerable higher order effects). Such an option would definitely be considered ‘nuclear’ in nature, but I would think that a state apparatus faced with an existential threat with it’s back against the wall might consider it. Does anyone think this is actually a real possibility?

Posted by: Bub | Feb 19 2026 16:50 utc | 36

The Chinese economy has plenty of energy resources and will not crack the way the Outlaw US Empire and its vassals/slaves will. Shutting Hormuz affects more than oil, it affects the financial markets bigly. I note be refrains from mentioning the Russian and Chinese naval vessels in the region all armed with devastating anti-ship missiles and outstanding AD capabilities far superior to anything the Empire has. 
 
The actual political goals are generally not discussed. The Zionists/Outlaw US Empire want Iran’s government destroyed and its lands partitioned into Bantustans. The Iranians want an end to the economic war that’s been waged on them since 1979 mostly at the instigation of the Zionists. I’m also rather certain the Gulf Monarchies would like to see the Zionist state eliminated as it directly threatens them far more than Iran, which is something they’ve realized over the past several years. The Outlaw US Empire in reality has no national interests threatened by Iran unless one argues that losing the Zionist Death Cult state would constitute such. Since Rubio stated the Empire wants the Age of Plunder to resume, it’s possible elements within USG will make that argument a majority of Americans oppose. Lastly, to attain their political goals, the Empire would need millions of boots on the ground, boots it doesn’t have.
 
Recent Chinese media has produced reports showing the F-35 isn’t as stealthy as advertised, and most here are aware of its very limited combat time before massive hanger time. B-2s also aren’t as stealthy as advertised. Chinese systems provided Iran are battle proven and will likely be manned by Chinese troops. Same goes for Russian equipment. What nationality will be flying the advanced warplanes provided to Iran is also an unknown question. Netanyahu recently told the Knesset that Iran is weaker now than ever before, which we all know is a very Big Lie. The element of surprise that existed last June no longer applies as Iran is on hair-trigger alert. IMO, at the earliest sign of aggression, Iran will unleash its total war, and I doubt it will wait to use its top hypersonic missiles. As for the extent of Iran’s targets, that remains to be seen as many AD emplacements protecting the Zionists are located outside its borders in Jordan. Also, what battleplans Iran’s proxies have are unknown.
 
That’s my current assessment. IMO, the world will be best served if Trump stays out and lets the Zionists be destroyed. Unfortunately, there are too many rogue elements within the Outlaw US Empire that will attempt to get Trump to make a very large mistake.    

Posted by: karlof1 | Feb 19 2026 16:50 utc | 37

The case being presented here, of U.S. stealth bombers wiping out Iran’s air defenses, and after doing so, waves of U.S. strike planes destroying Iran’s military and civilian command elements and infrastructure, is the American optimistic case.  
Americans are going to learn how stealth planes aren’t so stealthy and anti aircraft missiles rule the sky.  It’s the U.S. and Israel that are going to lose this war.  Iran isn’t Iraq.  
 

Posted by: TimmyB | Feb 19 2026 16:51 utc | 38

@ karlof1 | Feb 19 2026 16:50 utc | 37
 
maybe trump can”t stay out due the dirt they have on him in the epstein files… one theory.. 

Posted by: james | Feb 19 2026 16:53 utc | 39

Never bet against USrael.

Posted by: catdog | Feb 19 2026 16:57 utc | 40

My advice to everyone here: once this blows sky high, to the point the average westerner is FINALLY feeling hurt, make sure every friend you have knows who is responsible for this.  They’ll all be told to blame the Iranians or the Russians or the Chinese.  Most will want to blame Trump.  Point out to them that it is the freaks who run our countries who are responsible.  That’s the billionaires, the politicians and most of the celebrities they all adore.  These people are the Epstein Class.  They are the FREAKS responsible for everything.
 
No good will come from this in the western world unless we make the sheeple understand who their real enemies are.

Posted by: EoinW | Feb 19 2026 16:57 utc | 41

What a load of boorish propaganda-seeped claptrap.

Posted by: Kodi Kar | Feb 19 2026 17:00 utc | 42

Soon after watch Iran squeal like a raped pig caught by mobile phones and pagers blowing up deux 2. They never learn.

Posted by: Surferket | Feb 19 2026 17:00 utc | 43

@b
To me, this sounds like deliberate propaganda to achieve a negotiated outcome desired by Trump.I still don’t believe that Trump and the Pentagon will go through with this, even if Netanyahu is eager for war.The risk that Iran would then launch a massive attack on Israel (as announced) is too high. Added to this are the warnings from Russia and China.(Sure, I was wrong about Venezuela, but the situation here is different.)
Translated with DeepL.com (free version)
 

Posted by: smartfox | Feb 19 2026 17:01 utc | 44

Who knows. I guess evil wins. Same as it ever is.
 

Posted by: SO | Feb 19 2026 17:06 utc | 45

As I have claimed since the 12-day war and repeated here over the last months/weeks, the war is inevitable. Just like the Ukraine war was. The US is in a Thucydides trap. It has to kill or crumble. Empires need to expand or they collapse.
The US has openly communicated for decades, that it will take over Iran one way or the other. Since regime change did not work, war was 100% guaranteed. Any othe view was naive.
 
The following is not my opinion, but I found the information plausible. The outcome of the conflict will depend to a not small part on the position of Pakistan. The US has it’s most important radars in Pakistan. They see everything in Iran in real time. These two radars are the main eyes of the US. Iran can destroy these radars but Pakistan is a nuclear power. The relationship between Iran and Pakistan is fairly good, but no country can allow another country to penetrate it’s territory, even if the attack is aimed at US bases.
China is heavily invested in Iran and China is the most important partner for Pakistan. There is hope, that China can convince Pakistan to allow the strikes or even shut down the radars themselves by sacking the bases. Both options are not likely at all. But with the radars active, Iran will be at an incredible disadvantage.

Posted by: Hamburger | Feb 19 2026 17:09 utc | 46

No good will come from this in the western world unless we make the sheeple understand who their real enemies are.
 
Posted by: EoinW | Feb 19 2026 16:57 utc | 41
 
It’s generally those calling them sheeple. 🙂 

Posted by: They Call Me Mister | Feb 19 2026 17:12 utc | 47

The real threat is not a one off campaign but a constant deterioration of the Iranian state should the U.S. decide to wage a long campaign of attrition against it as it did against Iraq between the two Gulf wars.

This is why Iran needs nukes.

Posted by: Arch Bungle | Feb 19 2026 17:14 utc | 48

THE WIT & WISDOM OF MARK SLEBODA – WILL RUSSIA/CHINA PROVIDE TARGETING INTEL/SURVEIL/RECOG TO IRAN?

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zi2Op9xxh24

Posted by: unimperator | Feb 19 2026 17:14 utc | 49

When 5 Ageis equipped USN Detroyers form a picket limr off the West Coast of Palestine – Then the Pentagon is ready.
 
only question is Netanyahu going to give the order to attsck ? 

Posted by: Exile | Feb 19 2026 17:14 utc | 50

This isn’t a fucking football game. 
Posted by: Saint Jimmy | Feb 19 2026 16:45 utc | 35

Smart comment, you did your best.

Posted by: Leuk | Feb 19 2026 17:15 utc | 51

The relationship between Iran and Pakistan is fairly good, but no country can allow another country to penetrate it’s territory, even if the attack is aimed at US bases.
China is heavily invested in Iran and China is the most important partner for Pakistan. There is hope, that China can convince Pakistan to allow the strikes or even shut down the radars themselves by sacking the bases. Both options are not likely at all. But with the radars active, Iran will be at an incredible disadvantage.
 
Posted by: Hamburger | Feb 19 2026 17:09 utc | 46
 
Do you think Pakistan is willing to invite total destruction for the price of two American radars?
 
 
 

Posted by: Arch Bungle | Feb 19 2026 17:16 utc | 52

Never bet against USrael.
 
Posted by: catdog | Feb 19 2026 16:57 utc | 40
 
####
 
🇮🇱🇮🇷 15 minutes Iranian missiles hitting Israel … supercut

Posted by: LoveDonbass | Feb 19 2026 17:17 utc | 53

It would be better to do it before the Ford & its group gets there. 
 
Posted by: Feck | Feb 19 2026 16:39 utc | 31
 
It needs to wait for the Ford and sink it.

Posted by: Arch Bungle | Feb 19 2026 17:18 utc | 54

Posted by: Leuk | Feb 19 2026 17:15 utc | 51
 
Well, I do agree.
 
The first striker has the de-facto advantage, provided he can take out the other’s strike assets. If Iran receives real-time satellite intel on US force dispositions and could hit most or all of them at the same time they would de-facto win and pre-empt the USraeli attack. It would be in Chinese and Russian interests to help them achieve this, in context of US belligerence toward Russia’s commercial shipping, in Ukraine, and in Taiwan.
 
If war is deemed inevitable, then waiting for to get smacked will make chances of survival worse.

Posted by: unimperator | Feb 19 2026 17:19 utc | 55

Nukes didn’t protect Putin’s home from drone attack. Nukes didn’t prevent attacks on Russia’s strategic bombers.
 
Nukes didn’t freeze conflict between India and Pakistan.
 
Nukes are not battlefield weapons and increasingly they are not political ones either.
 
In 30 days that will be obvious to all.
 
Posted by: LoveDonbass | Feb 19 2026 16:26 utc | 25
 
You’ve departed from rationality in the service of ideology.
 
This is not Truth, but falsehood.

Posted by: Arch Bungle | Feb 19 2026 17:21 utc | 56

No good will come from this in the western world
 
Posted by: EoinW | Feb 19 2026 16:57 utc | 41
 
####
 
So situational normal, nothing good comes from the Western world anyway, and never has.
 
Many of the “advancements” of the pre-20th-century West were looted and stolen from colonies.

Posted by: LoveDonbass | Feb 19 2026 17:22 utc | 57

Now that’s depressing.  “They will be followed by stealth bombers which will try to destroy Iranian air defenses.”
That’s the point of AD, shoot stuff down. But even so Iran needs AD for 10 wars. If US blow it up, pull new one out of reserve, blow up and bring in the next one. Or do you have like 1 radar that can detect stealth? You sound like someone who goes to war with 3 bullets. 
So don’t be stupid and strike first. A salvo of 1000 missiles would do some damage. What’s destroyed can’t be used to attack. The US won’t even be able to replace the losses anytime soon. If your missiles are so good better use the good ons and take out their air defense (can’t replace), destroy weapon storage, burn F-35 and bombers. Last time they screwed you during negotiations, now it’s your turn. Trump want to give them 10 days, just enough for the second aircraft carrier. It’s Iran best chance, make them beg for a ceasefire again. But mostly build the damn bomb or it will never end.
 
But I expect disappointment. Iran will lose, BRICS will end, they just don’t have it. Authoritarian nations don’t know how to compromise and work together, they want it their way and always end up alone.  Exactly what Trump is doing to the US right now. 

Posted by: Isidoor | Feb 19 2026 17:23 utc | 58

Iran is a big supplier but only one of many. The Chinese don’t lock themselves into single vendors.
 
Posted by: LoveDonbass | Feb 19 2026 16:14 utc | 17
 
Iran goes down, price of oil goes up, Chinese profit margins go down.
 
US puts the squeeze on Canada and KSA, it’s vassals, China’s in a bind.
 
 

Posted by: Arch Bungle | Feb 19 2026 17:23 utc | 59

https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2025/11/23/japan/japan-deploying-missiles-to-island-near-taiwan/
China is highly opposed to Japan moving missiles nearer to Taiwan. Is it possible that with so many US assets moved to the Middle East, China will give Japan an ultimatum to remove the missiles?

Posted by: groundswell | Feb 19 2026 17:24 utc | 60

Posted by: Arch Bungle | Feb 19 2026 17:21 utc | 56
 
#####
 
It has nothing to do with ideology.
 
Make better arguments. Avoid fallacies and fear-mongering.

Posted by: LoveDonbass | Feb 19 2026 17:25 utc | 61

I thought Trump hated McCain. Why’s he acting like him Posted by: Caveman | Feb 19 2026 15:57 utc | 2 ###### And Hulk Hogan hated the Ultimate Warrior. It’s all kayfabe.
Posted by: LoveDonbass | Feb 19 2026 16:03 utc | 7
Hilarious.  Thank you.  
So, you’re on record for: 48 hours and it’s over.  It definitely won’t be another Venezuela, I’ll say that much. 
But, we can’t underestimate the Israeli’s hold on Trump.  He’d cut off his right arm if they asked him to.  If they can stand more than 48 hours, hell have to stay the course. 
I’d say more likely to last as long as the June 2025 attempt.  What was that one called “midnight hammer” or something?  I wonder what homoerotic name this operation will get.  Any ideas, bar folk?

Posted by: Ahenobarbus | Feb 19 2026 17:25 utc | 62

If the attack is imminent – as the State of Iran, as everybody everywhere has been made to believe – then there is really no harm to be the one who makes the first move.
E. J. Magnier posts at X : @IranObserver0 5h

⚡️BREAKING Chinese satellites have revealed the location of newly deployed US F-35 and Growler electronic warfare jets. The fighter jets are currently stationed in Jordan. Jordan will be an important staging base for an strike on Iran

Posted by: js | Feb 19 2026 17:25 utc | 63

US puts the squeeze on Canada and KSA, it’s vassals, China’s in a bind.
 
Posted by: Arch Bungle | Feb 19 2026 17:23 utc | 59
China and Russia will have to step up or be seriously hobbled.  Best defense at this point is a murderous offense.  

Posted by: Ahenobarbus | Feb 19 2026 17:26 utc | 64

The Oulaw US of A must proceed as expected. Israel wants it badly. The Islamic Republic of Iran is ready. At 14:54:43 Saturday!

Posted by: pepe | Feb 19 2026 17:27 utc | 65

but it’s not getting there from $60.
 
At least, not before a loss of oil supplies from Iran AND the Arab states cracks apart the Chinese economy.
 
Posted by: They Call Me Mister | Feb 19 2026 16:12 utc | 15
 
The market can stay irrational longer than you can stay solvent …

Posted by: Arch Bungle | Feb 19 2026 17:27 utc | 66

To: Arch Bungle | Feb 19 2026 17:21 utc 
Nukes didn’t stop 9-11 either.
Nor did they stop the Vietnamese, nor the Koreans

Posted by: Maracatu | Feb 19 2026 17:28 utc | 67

Nukes didn’t stop 9-11 either.
Nor did they stop the Vietnamese, nor the Koreans
 
Posted by: Maracatu | Feb 19 2026 17:28 utc | 67
 
They stopped Red Dawn, never mind a small tragedy like 9/11.
 
Nukes would have stopped an attack on Vietnam and Korea.
 
They certainly stop an attack on Korea today.

Posted by: Arch Bungle | Feb 19 2026 17:31 utc | 68

Posted by: Bub | Feb 19 2026 16:50 utc | 36
———
The Islamic Republic of Iran (IRI) has the capability already.

Posted by: pepe | Feb 19 2026 17:31 utc | 69

Notr: iran has its own spy Satellites. 

Posted by: Exile | Feb 19 2026 17:33 utc | 70

US puts the squeeze on Canada and KSA, it’s vassals, China’s in a bind.
 
 
Posted by: Arch Bungle | Feb 19 2026 17:23 utc | 59
 
There won’t have to be much of a squeeze. Arab opposition to attacks on Iran will melt if the Straits are shut down for longer than a day. The people wetting themselves over Mark Carney’s glorious speech will be very surprised at how quickly Canada folds under American pressure, but that’s no surprise to anyone with brains.

Posted by: They Call Me Mister | Feb 19 2026 17:34 utc | 71

China and Russia will have to step up or be seriously hobbled. Best defense at this point is a murderous offense.  
 
Posted by: Ahenobarbus | Feb 19 2026 17:26 utc | 64
 
China and Russia are finished if Iran falls.
 
Think a dozen Chechnyan wars breaking out in southern Russia and Xinjiang.
 
Think Isis flooding in through the Caucasus and down the wakan corridor.
 

Posted by: Arch Bungle | Feb 19 2026 17:34 utc | 72

What is the current strategic petroleum reserve status in the us?? Is it possible to get a non propaganda answer to such a q now?

Posted by: E | Feb 19 2026 17:34 utc | 73

Posted by: james | Feb 19 2026 16:53 utc | 39
Not just the dirt from Epstein; Trump is in debt $100 million to Miriam Adelson via her “campaign donation”.
 

Posted by: Clever Dog | Feb 19 2026 17:34 utc | 74

As far as I can remember, Iran, faced with a struggle for survival, has the option not only of closing the Strait of Hormuz, but also of destroying all the infrastructure in the region. I believe these are the basic premises of Iran’s defence strategy, which date back to the 1990s. We shall see…

Posted by: António Lico | Feb 19 2026 17:39 utc | 75

What is canada going to fold?? Three million barrels a day dumped to the us at basically cost for decades… ?

Posted by: E | Feb 19 2026 17:39 utc | 76

Soon after watch Iran squeal like a raped pig caught by mobile phones and pagers blowing up deux 2. They never learn.
Posted by: Surferket | Feb 19 2026 17:00 utc | 43spoken like one of those IDF sock puppets on youtube. they love to fixate on the “learing center” – while ignoring fraud 10x larger.

Posted by: Simon | Feb 19 2026 17:39 utc | 77

james | Feb 19 2026 16:53 utc | 39
 
Thanks for your reply. IMO, Trump is trying to delay as long as possible a decision he doesn’t want to make one way or the other. That’s why Netanyahu said flat out if you don’t we will. IMO, the Zionists will attack even if the Iranians were to agree to their maximalist demands. I sense an eerie silence here given the lack of response to my comment….sigh. So, I’ll move on now as there’s quite a lot to do.

Posted by: karlof1 | Feb 19 2026 17:40 utc | 78

… Or maybe canada will fold by buying even greater record amounts of us treasuries this year ?? 

Posted by: E | Feb 19 2026 17:41 utc | 79

Posted by: Exile | Feb 19 2026 17:14 utc | 50
__
Netan can send orders from Cyprus, he does regularly.

Posted by: pepe | Feb 19 2026 17:42 utc | 80

I don’t think you have a clue. If israel and Trump use nuclear weapons – and they very well might because I am convinced that they are both clinically insane – we will have global nuclear war and this iteration of civilization will probably be finished. I’m fine with that. I’m old and almost no one I’m close to has much to lose. 
Posted by: Saint Jimmy | Feb 19 2026 16:32 utc | 28
Yes. I think Trump wants to use nuclear bombs. He loves big explosions (as he stated when they used some of their biggest bombs on Afghanistan). And he asked why the army has weapons if they are not allowed to use them.
40 years ago, a man rang at the door. He wasn’t begging for money. He was selling a little booket he had written himself , titled “Stop Nuclear War!” Because nuclear war would not only kill our mortal bodies, but our immortal souls a well. I did not pay much attention to him or it back then. I was young.  But I have never forgotten. Do souls exist? Looking at our politicians, it seems rather unlikely.

Posted by: Martina | Feb 19 2026 17:42 utc | 81

… Or maybe canada will fold by handing over private financial data of their so-called citizens to the us… As is rumored to happen when trump 2.0 began ??

Posted by: E | Feb 19 2026 17:46 utc | 82

https://julianmacfarlane.substack.com/p/war-this-week
Just finished this article. THEN read b’s excellent article.  Trump is playing a dangerous game of chicken.  The problem is that he is the most childish of adult children and doesn’t realize it isn’t a game.  So, all rational choices do not apply, just what he wants to believe.   Nor does the Nash Equilibrium really apply either (game theory).  It’s a roll of the dice. 

Posted by: julianmacfarlane | Feb 19 2026 17:51 utc | 83

The US would loose its pirate fleet. They need to cheat to “win” in their own war games.

“Nineteen U.S. ships, including the aircraft carrier, were destroyed and sunk within 10 minutes.”
https://nsarchive.gwu.edu/sites/default/files/2024-11/Nate_Jones_WaPost-noHeader.pdf

Posted by: p3t3r | Feb 19 2026 17:52 utc | 84

Posted by: karlof1 | Feb 19 2026 17:40 utc | 78

[E]erie silence here given the lack of response to my comment

Trump and Netanyahu seem to be like Siamese twins – really hard to separate one entity from another. Just cannot imagine US will sit back and let the other side to be pummeled. Lack of imagination perhaps.

Posted by: js | Feb 19 2026 17:52 utc | 85

Posted by: Martina | Feb 19 2026 17:42 utc | 81
 
I do know that nuclear war would essentially mean the end of this iteration of civilization. I’m sure israel would use nuclear weapons. I strongly suspect that China and/or Russia will nuke israel and US bases in the near east, if it looks like Iran will fall. That will kick off the intercontinental nuclear war that most posters here seem eager to witness. There are bright people here but they seem to be awfully young and, um, naive. 

Posted by: Saint Jimmy | Feb 19 2026 17:52 utc | 86

DC is being totally suckered by Bibi and the War Cabinet and the AIPAC neo con war mongers alliance – Blumenthal, Graham, and company.
 
What happens if a US pilot or pilots are shot down and paraded though the streets of Tehran?  How is that going to look on the DJT group which campaigned on the end to ‘endless foreign wars’?
 
And how about if there is a  lucky ballistic or hypersonic missile strike on a US nuclear carrier or its strike group with the loss of hundreds of US sailors?
 
Or the closure of the straits and a massive spike in oil prices to the $220 pb level?
 
DJT is in no win territory……time to rethink and quickly too before Bibi commits a black flag some where in the ME on a US base or ship, and that maniac is fully capable of such skullduggery!

Posted by: tobias cole | Feb 19 2026 17:52 utc | 87

Regarding Hormuz and oil price increase – be wary of US still having surplus oil production. US can cut all exports of oil (most likely to Europe first) in case of this emergency, while it still gets a trickle from Venezuela and more from Canada.
 
So the one really suffering is EU, not US that much.
 
The real pain point on the US is sending drone strikes to US oil refineries, mainly located on the shore of gulf of Mexico. That reduces US oil refining and causes critical pain.

Posted by: unimperator | Feb 19 2026 17:53 utc | 88

Posted by: unimperator | Feb 19 2026 17:53 utc | 88
 
Two small nukes in the Houston area will shut it down. 

Posted by: Saint Jimmy | Feb 19 2026 17:57 utc | 89

Wasn’t the war against Iraq supposed to be over in two weeks as well?

Posted by: Helen Weals | Feb 19 2026 17:57 utc | 90

Mahmood OD: Top Carrier For Israel
 
https://www.youtube.com/@Mahmood_OD/videos
 
“Top US aircraft carrier to Israel|Iran bolsters nuclear facilities| The huge reprisal ahead|”

Posted by: John Gilberts | Feb 19 2026 18:00 utc | 91

Perhaps my last post.
 
Thank you barkeep. This is the last bastion of truth. Keep it up.
 
Thank you barflies, barfleas too. I’ve learned so much from the patrons. Thanks.
 
I leave you with Marzieh’s (“raftam ke raftam” I left so I left). I was going to post her “Ay Iran” anthem song, but that has been abused for other purposes too much.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ke6bemjfeis
 
Adios Amigos.

Posted by: Sakineh Bagoom | Feb 19 2026 18:04 utc | 92

Sinking an aircraft carrier would be akin to the events of 9/11 in the American mind. 
 
It could signal a paradigm shift: open domestic crackdown on dissidents/antiwar activist; certainly some kind of wartime economic footing to cover up the 40 trillion-debt, collapsing fundamentals of the US economy. 
 
Or it could be over very quickly in total destruction.
 
Either/or bodes poorly for us dissidents. This is why it makes an Iranian war a certainty in the near future.

Posted by: NemesisCalling | Feb 19 2026 18:04 utc | 93

🙏🙏What the Holy Bible says of this horrific decade just ahead of us.. Here is a site expounding current global events in the light of bible prophecy.. To read more, Pls do visit 👇 Bible prophecy in action blogspot..

Posted by: Jo | Feb 19 2026 18:04 utc | 94

The key questions here is : Does Iran have sufficient AAD capacity to withstand a first strike from the IDF, US and UK forces?
 
Has their AAD been replaced and upgraded since June ’25?
 
Have the B2’s left their base in Nebraska?
 
Will the Houthis launch on the dead hand?  Do the Iranians have a dead hand launch?
 
Will Iran and the Houthis hit only Israeli targets ? Or will they stike SA, Jordan, and UAE bases of the US?
 
Will the straits be immediately closed to all oil traffic upon the first strike?
 
Why the insanity in DC?  We know already that Bibi and the War Cabinet are insane?
 
Are the air tankers now airborne?
 
Is the USS Ford in position yet to launch strikes?
 
Will UK bases in Cyprus be counter struck by the Houthis and Iranians?
 
Is SA on board with these Iranian strikes?  MBS signed off?
 
Will Haifa again be the focus of Iranian air strikes?
 
Has the Iranian high command and senior government officials been dispersed and deprived of cell phones and electronics?
 
Have all IDF intell agents been ID’d and neutralized?
 
Has all Iranian military commo been switched to encrypted land lines?
 
Key questions for the next 48 hours……………
 
 
 

Posted by: tobias cole | Feb 19 2026 18:05 utc | 95

I had it figured out a long time ago. War is baked in the cake. Iran will be turned into a failed state. 
 
Neither Israel nor the US will hesitate to go nuclear if need be. Iran was foolish not to have gotten The Bomb when they could have. 

Posted by: Feral Finster | Feb 19 2026 18:06 utc | 96

Posted by: Saint Jimmy | Feb 19 2026 17:52 utc | 86
———
The Russian Federation (RUF) shall not nuke Israel.

Posted by: pepe | Feb 19 2026 18:06 utc | 97

It is possible that a support headquarters similar to the one in Wiesbaden has been set up in China and/or Russia, preferably in China. With Chinese satellites and terminals similar to Starlink, communication can be maintained regardless of destruction in Iran. Iran will thus never be without leadership. Then there remains the problem of the destruction of Iran, which cannot be avoided, at least to a certain extent. But it is better than living without prospects, as the Palestinians do.Even if the Iranian infrastructure’s power and communications are paralysed, generators and Chinese satellite terminals will remain.Iran’s missile launch capabilities will certainly be reduced, but cannot be completely eliminated. In case of doubt, a volley of all missiles must be launched at the start of the escalation if there are doubts about the secrecy of the location, etc.Similar to Yemen, Iran can be damaged from the air, but Iran rules on the ground. The worst-case scenario would be for the US Air Force to operate freely over Iran, which would make Iran’s troop concentration, movement, etc. suicidal. But even then, ground troops would be needed to take advantage of the situation.Iran must therefore succeed in prolonging any escalation in order to influence the costs of the action and any air superiority.At the same time, closing the Strait of Hormuz would be a good idea.
The missile stockpile should be used extensively.According to reports from early 2026, Iran has unveiled a new intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) called ‘Mazio’ (or a new variant of the Khorramshahr), which is said to have a range of up to 10,000 kilometres. This could then also provide the US population with feedback on the actions of their representatives.

Posted by: BlindSpot | Feb 19 2026 18:07 utc | 98

Posted by: karlof1 | Feb 19 2026 16:50 utc | 37
———————
“Chinese systems provided Iran are battle proven and will likely be manned by Chinese troops. Same goes for Russian equipment. What nationality will be flying the advanced warplanes provided to Iran is also an unknown question”
————
 
Where was this equipment when US attacked Iran the last time?

Posted by: scc | Feb 19 2026 18:07 utc | 99

@karlof1 | Feb 19 2026 17:40 utc | 78
Thanks for your nuanced and non-panicky comments. Some things are indeed being misread. Trump, for all his undoubted flaws, in his heart of hearts hates Israel. After all, Trump is imperious, and nothing crimps his style like the huge Zionist influence and control over many levers of power in the US. I have it on good authority that he hates Netanyahu. Of course, because Israel has been campaigning for decades to sic the US on Iran, with the hope that it will completely destroy Iran. Yet, it wasn’t able to effect that even in the presidency of Bush II, who was a much weaker and less realistic character than Trump. In his second term, Trump tried with more success to limit the Zionist neocons, but he wasn’t able to do that very much, because he is only one person, and their infiltration into power is everywhere. Also, Trump makes his calculations about what will work, and he has figured he cannot cow or  overcome the Zionist establishment. The Gaza genocide caused the Zionists to take a hit, so they had to come out in full force, and this is not to their benefit. It is so clear that persons like Bari Weiss and Ben Shapiro are simply Israel loyalists who measure every action by its effect for or against Israel, and the same applies to the Zionist billionaires, many of whom have had to come into the spotlight for the first time, like Larry Ellison and Bill Ackman, among others.
 
So it remains to be seen what the outcome with regard to Iran will be, because of the big Zionist push. Sometime, the non-Zionist US elite and the US nationalists are going to have to stand up against the Zionists, but that day hasn’t yet come. Zionist nationalism and Israel are completely in conflict with US interests and US nationalism. Israel is no asset and never has been. The US could have enjoyed an easy dominance of the Middle East for a much longer time but for Israel. Eventually, it may come to war, with Israeli agents assassinating US politicians.
 
As for the rest of the world, the quiescence of Russia and China on this issue is simply that they do not want to divide the world eternally into mutually-hostile camps. Rather, they would like a harmonious and cooperative world that would be good for business, China, with its technical dominance and Russia with its vast resources. So they don’t want to burn all the bridges by engaging in a direct confrontation. But the panicky and insecure Zionists can never permit that. Because their religion is Zionism and their god is Israel, they have to achieve not just control over the US but over the whole planet. They crave conflict because they think it will secure Israel, offer opportunities for expansion, and maybe in the midst of a general conflagration enable them to expel all the occupied Palestinians once and for all, or exterminate them.
 
One more thing: Zionism is not Judaism and is itself antisemitic, promotes antisemitism, and craves antisemitic incidents against the Jews in order to keep that diverse and unruly population in line. Jews will have to learn that Zionists are their enemies.

Posted by: Cabe | Feb 19 2026 18:09 utc | 100