Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
January 22, 2026
Ukraine Open Thread 2026-020

News & views related to the war in Ukraine …

Comments

Russia seems to be having problems. President Putin is asking for negotiations again.

Posted by: guest from franconia | Jan 22 2026 15:03 utc | 1

Russia seems to be having problems. President Putin is asking for negotiations again.
Posted by: guest from franconia | Jan 22 2026 15:03 utc | 1
Putin tries to prevent the Russian victory.

Posted by: Simple | Jan 22 2026 15:19 utc | 2

Meanwhile high-rise apartment buildings in Kiev continue deteriorating, hundreds of thousands of people expected to leave in coming weeks, well, if they can. The most modern Nato air defense systems and Himars keep being trashed like old cars in a wrecking yard.
 
When is the next scheduled EU/Nato meeting in Kiev, by the way?

Posted by: unimperator | Jan 22 2026 15:24 utc | 3

I can only speculate why Putin continues to try to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory. But he does and at least some of us see it. 

Posted by: Maverick | Jan 22 2026 15:25 utc | 4

But he does and at least some of us see it. 
 
Posted by: Maverick | Jan 22 2026 15:25 utc | 4
 

 
Psychologists call it projection.
 

Posted by: too scents | Jan 22 2026 15:28 utc | 5

Posted by: too scents | Jan 22 2026 15:28 utc | 5
 
It is not clear to me if you understand the meaning of the word projection. 

Posted by: Maverick | Jan 22 2026 15:31 utc | 6

Scott Ritter: “Europe is COLLAPSING…” | Europe PANICS After Trump’s Greenland Threats

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tNTyhW-z7-A

Posted by: unimperator | Jan 22 2026 15:34 utc | 7

My take is Russia is a) tired of all the “protecting Ukr is protecting Europe & democracy” thing and simultaneously b) kind of content that the SMO has dragged so many billions out of the western economies. So, they start the beginning of the end. Not because they want to make the Ukr population so miserable but because they realize that’s the only possible end.
 
Whether – and/or when – the European leaders realize what’s going on, remains to be seen.

Posted by: Avtonom | Jan 22 2026 15:35 utc | 8

First Russia-US-Ukraine meeting imminent – Zelensky

The first trilateral talks between Russia, Ukraine and the US will take place over the next two days in the UAE, Vladimir Zelensky has claimed.

Posted by: Norwegian | Jan 22 2026 15:36 utc | 9

 Whether – and/or when – the European leaders realize what’s going on, remains to be seen.
Posted by: Avtonom | Jan 22 2026 15:35 utc | 8

 
Rutte and Stubb claim Ukraine is winning. Obviously they say all sorts of things – Stubb also said EU can defend itself without America only to refute he claiming it a few minutes later.

Posted by: unimperator | Jan 22 2026 15:38 utc | 10

@Avtonom #8
Objective reality is that the EU can’t do shit militarily. The French, German, UK and other nation militaries are tiny, with the sole exception of Poland. And Poland’s is much smaller than Ukraine’s at the start of the SMO.
But EU “leaders” are really just bureaucrats. And bureaucrats must adhere to the official line, even if it is completely in opposition of objective reality.

Posted by: c1ue | Jan 22 2026 15:41 utc | 11

@ guest from franconia  seems to be having problems and is seeking direction from moa, lol.. 

Posted by: james | Jan 22 2026 15:47 utc | 12

It is not clear to me if you understand the meaning of the word projection. 
Posted by: Maverick | Jan 22 2026 15:31 utc | 6
 
It is typical of the low-IQ cheerleaders here to try and spin any of Russia’s failures as if they are the personal problems of the person pointing it out.

Posted by: catdog | Jan 22 2026 15:50 utc | 13

French navy just seized a tanker transporting russian oil off the Spanish Mediterranean coast.

Posted by: robin | Jan 22 2026 15:51 utc | 14

Posted by: guest from franconia | Jan 22 2026 15:03 utc | 1
 
Please cite a reputable source, or we’ll have to assume you’re making it up.  
 
We’ve heard this same tired trope before.  Witkoff is going to Moscow, peace negotiations are at the “10 yard line”, blah blah blah blah blah.

Posted by: Ghost of Zanon | Jan 22 2026 15:53 utc | 15

Zelensky calls out EU hypocrisy about respecting Greenland sovereignty by not doing more to defend it from a Russian or Chinese invasion.

Posted by: Ludovic | Jan 22 2026 15:55 utc | 16

More of the Hollywood from Reuters
 
Trump sends message to Putin ‘war has to end’ after good meeting with Zelenskiy
 
Reading that the coming meeting is in UAE this weekend then FOR SURE there won’t be an Iran attack in that area this weekend, eh?

Posted by: psychohistorian | Jan 22 2026 15:57 utc | 17

The US economy is failing. ukraine is a freezing wreck and there is no hope for a NATO victory. Pervert Trump makes the US look like an evil, violent buffoon on an international stage. Right wing war mongering imperialist trolls pop up everywhere to desperately distract anyone who wanders by from the ugly truth. 

Posted by: Saint Jimmy | Jan 22 2026 15:59 utc | 18

The French, German, UK and other nation militaries are tiny================not quite sccurate – while the active duty military in the EU is indeed tiny – the ready reserve is substantial. For example, Germany alone has around 1,000,000 in its ready reserve.
 
 
 
 

Posted by: Exile | Jan 22 2026 15:59 utc | 19

This is impossible now: DTEK responds to Kyiv residents’ calls to return to normal power outage schedules

At the moment, Kyiv is unable to resume electricity supply to consumers according to the usual schedules. Due to the consequences of the massive strikes of the aggressor country, the russian federation, a deep emergency mode continues to operate in the capital.
 
This is stated in a message that DTEK published in Threads on Wednesday, January 21.
 
The post was probably a response to numerous comments from Kyiv residents in the network, who demand that the power company return the power outage schedules to the capital.
 
Now it won’t work. Although the critical infrastructure has been powered up, the city’s power system is still in a deep emergency mode. There is not enough electricity to meet the schedules,” DTEK said.
 
At the moment, the electricity supply is carried out manually. For this reason, blackouts are protracted.
 
 
The company also emphasized that what is happening in Ukraine, in particular in Kyiv, has never happened anywhere else in the world.
 
Zero days without power outages for a month in a row. Power engineers are doing historic work to get us back on schedule,” the post says.
 
As the Ukrainian News agency earlier reported, on January 21, President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said that as of the morning, more than half of Kyiv had been without electricity. There had been no heating in about 4,000 apartment buildings.
 
Kyiv Mayor Vitali Klitschko said in an interview with The Times that since the beginning of January, about 600,000 people have left the capital because of the consequences of russian strikes on the energy sector.

https://ukranews.com/en/news/1129950-this-is-impossible-now-dtek-responds-to-kyiv-residents-calls-to-return-to-normal-power-outage

Posted by: Jeremy Rhymings-Lang | Jan 22 2026 16:01 utc | 20

It’s important to detach a bit from the daily theater and see what’s going on. US continues eating EU economically, by grabbing the largest potential future source of resource, mining and tourism activity (Greenland) as compensation for the lost Ukraine war which EU insisted continuing and funding till physical bankruptcy and collapse of their economies and societies.
There will soon be a global economic reset, but what we saw in Davos by western banker/Epstein island elites was admission that it is not the one they were looking for. It’s the three pole world, China, USA and Russia with Europe, having no resources at all except some beach front properties on the Med, shoved to the trash bin of history.
Trump, Greenland, Nato fracture etc. are symptoms of losing Ukraine war, which caused astronomical sums of economic and political capital and military potential. The ReArm EU project going nowhere, Merz admitted EU and all its policies for decades as failures. There is no future for EU member states, except without leaving and removing the liberal scum.

Posted by: unimperator | Jan 22 2026 16:04 utc | 21

Posted by: Exile | Jan 22 2026 15:59 utc | 19
 
Let’s see what that looks like after a few German bases and industrial facilities get levelled. 

Posted by: Saint Jimmy | Jan 22 2026 16:07 utc | 22

Posted by: Exile | Jan 22 2026 15:59 utc | 19
 
######
 
What is a “ready reserve”?
 
When did they last do simulations or training?

Posted by: LoveDonbass | Jan 22 2026 16:07 utc | 23

This is How The History of Now is Written With A Hammer (& vid)
 
https://johnhelmer.net/this-is-how-the-history-of-now-is-written-with-a-hammer/
 
“In all large criminal gangs – racketeer influenced and corrupt organizations (RICO) as they are termed in US law – There is always the mouth that talks tough; the pocket which collects the money; the gun that’s the enforcer. The mouth is the most expendable so long as the pocket keeps full and the gun stays loaded.
 
In President Donald Trump’s enterprise, he is the first; Steve Witkoff is the second; Stephen Miller is the third.
 
On the eve of Witkoff’s new meeting with President Vladimir Putin today (January 22), the Kremlin theory is, as it was in the talks with Witkoff last year, that Putin is moving Trump the mouth through Witkoff the pocket.
 
It has been the Iranian experience that this is a miscalculation – that the gun moves the mouth more directly, more often than the pocket.
 
In the podcast aired from Crimea with Regis Tremblay and Dimitri Lascaris on Tuesday evening, the aim is to predict the future form the Moscow perspective while anticipating the worst from the Montreal viewpoint.
 
It is also explained why, in order to keep the long war going against Russia, Denmark and the NATO allies will come to terms which will also save Trump the cost of bribing the Greenlanders for the deal.
 
This is how history is being written with the hammer…”

Posted by: John Gilberts | Jan 22 2026 16:08 utc | 24

Posted by: Norwegian | Jan 22 2026 15:36 utc | 9
 
#######
 
By the time they have said meeting, will Ukraine or America be in any position to negotiate?
 
NATO may not last a month.
 
Another performance as the theater burns around the audience.

Posted by: LoveDonbass | Jan 22 2026 16:10 utc | 25

Any ukrainian with commen sence will be heading west for the border right now.  Before the rush starts. If the west wont come to ukraine,   ukranians will go to the west, land of shiney things, and influencers on the net.
Berlin, Paris , i recomend london and england generaily , we’ll give you a nice house or luxury hotel accomadation. Free money,  an an plenty of local girls.
 
We already have a lot of ukraians here at the momment none of them will ever go back, they say.
 
Karma, lap it up.

Posted by: Mark2 | Jan 22 2026 16:11 utc | 26

Putin asked Witkoff to travel to Moscow ?
why?

Posted by: Night Tripper | Jan 22 2026 16:16 utc | 27

Russia continues to highlight a big obstacle to any prospect of peace agreements being signed:

[…] who will sign any agreement with Russia and the United States on behalf of the Ukrainian state?
 
Let’s start with Zelenskyy, who hasn’t been president of Ukraine according to his own country’s constitution for two years now. It doesn’t matter that he’s recognized as such in the West, other countries, even the UN administration. The main thing is that he’s illegitimate for the Russian leadership, as has been stated repeatedly.

~~~

So, the Ukrainian delegation includes Secretary of the National Security Council (NSDC) Umerov, who could be subject to an anti-corruption investigation at any moment for his machinations while serving as Minister of Defense. The NSDC is a purely advisory body to the head of state (former President Zelenskyy) without any direct legal authority.
 
Zelenskyy’s head of his office, Budanov*, has absolutely no legal authority, and he’s also on Rosfinmonitoring’s list of terrorists and extremists. In our country, he faces only one fate: trial and prison, if he survives.
 
Arakhamia remains, leading the Servant of the People faction, which is still on the verge of collapse, in the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. Outside the walls of parliament, his powers, already modest, become negligible.
 
Even if this entire gang, including the usurper Zelensky, reaches an agreement with Washington and signs documents, it would be legally easy to not only challenge such agreements, but even violate them without significant consequences.

https://en.topwar.ru/276774-ft-ssha-ne-podpishut-soglashenie-s-ukrainoj-do-vyjasnenija-pozicii-moskvy.html

Posted by: Jeremy Rhymings-Lang | Jan 22 2026 16:17 utc | 28

How long before Trump says the Board of Peace needs to take over Ukraine?

Posted by: psychohistorian | Jan 22 2026 16:20 utc | 29

Posted by: Mark2 | Jan 22 2026 16:11 utc | 26
 
You can’t get out unless you bribe someone. They will shoot you. 

Posted by: Saint Jimmy | Jan 22 2026 16:20 utc | 30

Posted by: Jeremy Rhymings-Lang | Jan 22 2026 16:17 utc | 28
 
#######
 
A settlement remains impossible given the constraints that have existed for years now, even if we put aside Russia’s goals.
 
Trump can’t deal (no USG support). Zelensky is unauthorized, and all of that before anyone approaches that the West (not just America) is agreement incapable.

Posted by: LoveDonbass | Jan 22 2026 16:25 utc | 31

Another 750kV station near Kiev was attacked by Geran-3 drones (the jet engine variant).
 
https://x.com/AMK_Mapping_/status/2014353986573553853

Posted by: unimperator | Jan 22 2026 16:25 utc | 32

On the question of Russia’s half hearted approach to the conflict:
As many have stated, the best, fastest and cheapest (both in human casualties and money) would be to destroy the bridges over the Dnjepr; first destroy half of them, tell the ukrainean population to decide which side they want to live on, wait two weeks and then destroy the other half. Would be interesting to see how many would choose which side. After that, destroy all dams and the Dnjepr will form a natural barrier that should guarantee peace.
Is it really that simple? Opinions are divided. It requires a lot of energy to destroy a bridge beyond repair. And there is still active air defence that prohibits planes to fly. Although remote controled suicide planes with lots of explosives on board might come in below the air defence horizon (just above river surface) and do the job. But technical feasalbility aside, Russia doesn’t even seem to be interested in such a decisive maneuver. Why not?
For a long time, international opinion might have been an important factor. But after Gaza, Iran, Venezuela, the drone attack on Putin, etc. such considerations are no longer relevant.
There still is a powerful die hard pro western faction in Russia, especially among the young, english speaking netizens. Is the timid approach to the conflict aimed to appease these pro western Russians?
Is Russia maybe playing for time? Sacrificing it’s soldiers while creating the finacial and economical conditions to undermine the imperial ones?
Or is it really legalistic? Within the SMO going beyond Donbass can’t be done for legal reasons? The interpretations of the current situation seem too arbitrary for that.
 
I have not heard any plausible explanation for Russia’s glacial approach. Most speculations sound like cope. My personal guess is, that it is more difficult to successfully take out all of the bridges than most people believe and that Russia simply is limited in it’s ability to finish the conflict faster than it does.

Posted by: Hamburger | Jan 22 2026 16:28 utc | 33

 The US nightmare: Russia’s Iskander smashes US Patriots in Ukraine Four years of Russia-West missile contest have pushed one question to the front: how fast the US can replace its air defense under constant strikes.
 
The answer depends on two factors:  US industry and political choices •
 
 
Air defense is treated as a BUSINESS model, not a wartime necessity • Patriot was designed for PEACETIME readiness and controlled conditions • Attrition breaks the math: ~$1B per battery, interceptor stocks worth HUNDREDS of millions •
 
 
Losses CAN’T be replaced at the pace REAL combat demands  Russian strike adaptation • US-made systems became the highest-value targets • Strike density increased accordingly • Weapon mixes expanded to OVERWHELM and EXHAUST defenses The outcome is stark: Most US air-defense systems lost in Ukraine were destroyed not by drones or rockets, but by Iskander and Kinzhal missiles.
 
 
For the first time in US history, flagship air-defense systems are being ELIMINATED AT SCALE in real combat. Ukraine conflict has exposed the combined industrial, military, and political limits of the US model. Can the US actually adapt under this kind of pressure, and if so, what would have to change first?

 

https://x.com/NewRulesGeo/status/2014001911104688185

Posted by: unimperator | Jan 22 2026 16:28 utc | 34

Saint jimmy  @  30
I was expecting someone to say that…
The first rush across the border will be the border gaurds and their familys,  imagine how much bribe money they have pockated already.
 
When word gets out the border is now very pourous the stampede will follow.
 
No doubt welcomend with open arms like the fall of the iron curtain.
 
Or not as is more likley.  (Incert smiley face)

Posted by: Mark2 | Jan 22 2026 16:30 utc | 35

Posted by: Mark2 | Jan 22 2026 16:30 utc | 35
 
Very possible. If I’m a ukrainian soldier right now, I’m looking for the very first opportunity to surrender. 

Posted by: Saint Jimmy | Jan 22 2026 16:35 utc | 36

Looks as if the technicians are losing control of grid stability, this is the second video clip I’ve seen today of a local transformer spontaneously combusting:  https://news-pravda.com/world/2026/01/22/2023580.html
 
The damage to economic output must be immense.

Posted by: Jeremy Rhymings-Lang | Jan 22 2026 16:38 utc | 37

Germany is reportedly starting to build gas power plants. They have only one source of gas right now, US LNG which may be quite expensive and unreliable.

Posted by: unimperator | Jan 22 2026 16:43 utc | 38

Saint jimmy. Liked.
———–‐———-
Regards hamburgers suggestion that Russia takes out the bridges.
 
Ukraine solders are retreating,  it would be them takeing out the bridges to slow the advancing Russians down.
 
But you new that all ready did’nt you.

Posted by: Mark2 | Jan 22 2026 16:44 utc | 39

Posted by: Mark2 | Jan 22 2026 16:44 utc | 39
 
Certainly logical for a retreating army to take out bridges. The Russians might take out a bridge to trap ukrainian forces, though. 

Posted by: Saint Jimmy | Jan 22 2026 16:49 utc | 40

@Hamburger #33
I have repeatedly posted that Russia’s approach to the SMO is to both minimize casualties (of its own troops, of Ukrainian civilians) while attriting Ukrainian and Western troops, weapons platforms and ammunition.
Could Russia have stormed Ukrainian defenses much earlier? Very possibly, but with a guaranteed enormously higher level of casualties. And casualties, in turn, which could embolden an otherwise reticent (as far as directly intervening) Europe.
Furthermore, the attrition process minimized risk from multiple factors, the outcome of which was unknown before the SMO:
1) The extent to which the West would support Ukraine, starting with the transfer of stockpiles of Soviet era weapons in former Warsaw Pact nations to Ukraine (likely) to specific logistic and intelligence support (likely) to various levels of weapons platforms (MANPADs, anti-tank handhelds to air defense to tanks and armored vehicles to fighter jets).
2) The extent to which Ukraine could hold up under pressure of war. Much of this was obviated by massive Western cash transfers. This river of cash bought out the entire Ukrainian elite in a cooperative shitstorm of corruption.
3) The willingness of Russia’s allies to continue support for Russia despite Western actions. ie attempts to sanction China and India, and closely related,
4) The openness of the Global South and China/India/rest of BRICS to support Russia in going full “shock and awe” like the Strelkov dumbfucks want. At this point, nobody can say that Russia has not tried to settle the Ukraine/Russian security problem via diplomacy. Equally, the advent of 10/7 and Gaza ethnic cleansing has made even the destruction of Ukraine’s electricity grid, impossible for the West to criticize without having their own hypocrisy in not criticizing Israel’s actions, glaring.

Posted by: c1ue | Jan 22 2026 16:50 utc | 41

ukraine is a freezing wreck and there is no hope for a NATO victory. 
Posted by: Saint Jimmy | Jan 22 2026 15:59 utc | 18
The war could not be going better for “NATO”. An endless quagmire for Russia, sucking up Russian resources and attention while Russia’s allies get rolled up everywhere else. Venezuela, Iran, Syria, Africa. The way things are going, Russia could very well end up “winning” in Ukraine and yet suffer a collapse worse than the USSR.
Trump’s annexation of Greenland shows what a non-threat the US considers Russia at this point.

Posted by: catdog | Jan 22 2026 16:50 utc | 42

DW: Richard Woff & Michael Hudson: ‘NATO Could Collapse’
 
https://www.youtube.com/@dialogueworks01
 
“This could break NATO; Trump, Rutte & Europe’s last stand.”

Posted by: John Gilberts | Jan 22 2026 16:51 utc | 43

If the blackouts get any worse Ukrenergo may have to rebrand as Ukrenegro.

Posted by: Truthsayer | Jan 22 2026 16:51 utc | 44

Posted by: catdog | Jan 22 2026 16:50 utc | 42
 
Oh gosh. Trump has not annexed Greenland. Iran and Venezuela are still intact. The “endless quagmire” has revealed NATO as weak and clearly inferior in most aspects. It has also broken the EU economy and hurt the UK, as well. All you’ve got now are bluster and lies. Maybe you can go to ukraine and help them out. 

Posted by: Saint Jimmy | Jan 22 2026 16:56 utc | 45

Saint jimmy @  40
Disagree ,  prisoners  are a liabilty and would slow and take up available resourses. Bettter to encourage a rout. That would hav a desired pyscholical effect on communeities  they past heading west.
 
A bit like herding cattle, get the tail end of the hered moveing the one’s at the front will move even if they dont know the threat from behind

Posted by: Mark2 | Jan 22 2026 16:58 utc | 46

Posted by: Mark2 | Jan 22 2026 16:58 utc | 46
 
Makes sense. Possibly better than many little Berezinas. 

Posted by: Saint Jimmy | Jan 22 2026 17:00 utc | 47

Within a month, more than 1,000 Ukrainians were hospitalized due to hypothermia and frostbite

In the period from December 20 to January 18, 1103 Ukrainians applied for emergency medical care due to frostbite and hypothermia. Of these, 1,016 patients were hospitalized
 

This was reported by the Ministry of Health, reports RegioNews .
 
The ministry notes that now the situation with cold injuries in Ukraine is controlled, but it may worsen with a strong cold snap or worsening weather conditions.
 
During this period, emergency services processed 544,404 calls and made 364,849 trips, an average of more than 18,000 per day.

https://regionews.ua/ukr/news/ukraine/1769083300-uprodovzh-misyatsya-ponad-1000-ukrayintsiv-potrapili-do-likaren-cherez-pereoholodzhennya-ta-obmorozhennya (via translation add-on.)

Posted by: Jeremy Rhymings-Lang | Jan 22 2026 17:03 utc | 48

Posted by: John Gilberts | Jan 22 2026 16:08 utc | 24
 
Thank you, John.  In the middle of the night last night I watched half of Trump’s Davos speech.  Speaking of not being able to ‘get out’,  I was already going to post that [my] experience on this thread.  But I did get out.   Trump, for all I know, is still trapped within his own speech.
 
He’s much better off being unable to escape the experience in Alaska.  Lots of trees and wild animals there,  and graveyards.  
 
But also stars,   plenty of stars.

Posted by: juliania | Jan 22 2026 17:04 utc | 49

Posted by: c1ue | Jan 22 2026 16:50 utc | 41
Yes, you are correct that the attrition strategy minimizes the risk for a the strong power in a conflict against a weaker power. But the attrition strategy was not adopted until after the Ukrainian summer 2022 offensives. By that time, it should have been very obvious how far the west was willing to go in support of Ukraine, and how durable Ukraine is. It has been years now- why hasn’t Russian leadership switched to a winning strategy? You can whine about Strelkov but he was right, and if Russian leadership had listened to him and mobilized more and sooner, Kherson and Kharkov would be in Russian hands.

Posted by: catdog | Jan 22 2026 17:05 utc | 50

And on a more human level on the way west the solders could scoop up their familys on the way to the western border, even better if they got away with guns amunition excetra.  Usefull for takeing out billigerent banderites and border gaurds. 
 
Better  than rotting alone in a Russian prison cell.

Posted by: Mark2 | Jan 22 2026 17:07 utc | 51

The French, German, UK and other nation militaries are tiny================not quite sccurate – while the active duty military in the EU is indeed tiny – the ready reserve is substantial. For example, Germany alone has around 1,000,000 in its ready reserve.    
Posted by: Exile | Jan 22 2026 15:59 utc | 19..
Since when has Germany almost stopped training new soldiers (conscription suspended)?
Where are these reservists supposed to come from?
Most of the really well-trained soldiers from back then are probably in their late 50s today. Go to a reservist meeting sometime; you’d think you were at a retiree event. They have absolutely no clue about current technology.
And new volunteers and former volunteer soldiers aren’t prepared for drone warfare, let alone trained in it.
Just like drones aren’t a training topic to this day, by whom, when the highest-ranking officers are still trained according to Wehrmacht strategies. Even in the USA, about 75% of all active officers have never been in combat, let alone in modern drone warfare where trenches no longer offer protection. Combat units consist of 3 to 4 soldiers instead of platoons or companies.

Posted by: Genesis | Jan 22 2026 17:09 utc | 52

[sigh] I see some of the “usual suspects” are having to re-hash stale memes because they haven’t got any new material.

Posted by: Jeremy Rhymings-Lang | Jan 22 2026 17:13 utc | 53

the wise ones will flee East towards Mother Russia.
 
1/2 of Ukrainians who have left the place since 2014 went east

Posted by: exile | Jan 22 2026 17:19 utc | 54

Those who say the attrition strategy has been used as a way to minimize casualties . Surely this argument (if it still stands up at all) is weakening by the day as casualties inevitably mount vs. an earlier blitzkrieg/decapitation strike against the regime/major cities.

Posted by: Night Tripper | Jan 22 2026 17:21 utc | 55

Zelensky talked to Trump in Davos: “Security agreement for Ukraine has been completed. the agreement can now be signed” (?????????????????????????????????????)
 
Don’t believe a word of it. Zelensky can make agreements until he is dead. IF (a very big IF) there is an agreement then did Russia agree with that and is Russia willing to sign it ? My current bet is that Russia won’t sign anything before its goals are met.

Posted by: WMG | Jan 22 2026 17:22 utc | 56

And it’s true… for some time now, there has been hardly any reaction or statement from the Kremlin regarding the drama within the EU, let alone the showman Trump.
But some people claim that Putin is seeking negotiations because he has to?
Nonsense… Putin has always sought the path of negotiation. A completely violent takeover of Ukraine brings him nothing but problems.
In negotiations, however, he can make demands, and as with any negotiation, initially completely excessive ones if he’s smart… He can always back down with demands later… Therefore, negotiations can only bring advantages, and should the rest of Ukraine dare to do it, there would still be an opportunity… BECAUSE ONE thing is certain: the rest of Ukraine will become a stumbling block to the EU and thus to NATO—a financial stumbling block, but also a politically very dangerous one, with thousands of poor soldiers returning and then realizing how THEIR LEADERSHIP has fled to millions of villas. Dangerous because Nazis don’t abandon their ideology with a weapon, and these weapons will 100% NOT be abandoned. Putin must have a very, very strong interest in leaving this “surprise egg” for the EU… a financial hole… and battle-hardened, betrayed soldiers.

Posted by: Genesis | Jan 22 2026 17:23 utc | 57

Posted by: Jeremy Rhymings-Lang | Jan 22 2026 17:13 utc | 53
 
They’ll be appearing here all week. 

Posted by: Saint Jimmy | Jan 22 2026 17:25 utc | 58

Zelensky talked to Trump in Davos: “Security agreement for Ukraine has been completed. the agreement can now be signed” (?????????????????????????????????????) Don’t believe a word of it. Zelensky can make agreements until he is dead. IF (a very big IF) there is an agreement then did Russia agree with that and is Russia willing to sign it ? My current bet is that Russia won’t sign anything before its goals are met.
Posted by: WMG | Jan 22 2026 17:22 utc | 56.:
Sign…HE???
He’s not even for the Kremlin, he’s not authorized to sign, he’s illegally in office.
Therefore, he shouldn’t be making such pronouncements.
Unless…the plan is that nothing is supposed to be signed at all.
He CAN’T. Putin WON’T.He’ll only be laughing himself to sleep.
But it will fail first and foremost because of Sylensky…WHO CAN’T SIGN ANYTHING!

Posted by: Genesis | Jan 22 2026 17:27 utc | 59

Posted by: c1ue | Jan 22 2026 16:50 utc | 41
 
Yes, your points about the necessity of a prudent approach are absolutely valid. I mentioned the international opinion as factor, but all that was really only of significance until Gaza etc. Today, the US is hated so much in BRICS world, and the western duplicity is recognized by everyone who could be of importance to Russia. Today, the global south is not looking for moderation, they are looking for someone to finally stand up to the Überbully USA. They are looking for a palpable victory. Not trade surplus or GDP growth or alternative payment systems. The whole world is eager to see the US put into place. Everyone is waiting for a signal.
Minimizing losses is exactly what motivates the idea to take down the bridges. The moment those bridges are gone (and subsequently the dams) the war is over. No more deaths. Of course, it would have to be done in two stages to give everyone, including the military, time to move to a preferred side of the river.
 
The moment for Ukraine to take down those bridges themselves is decades away. The frontline still moves at snail pace. For years people have fantasized about the imminent collapse of the Ukraine military. But it has infinite money and still lots of weapons, including stuff that destroys Russian ships and infrastructure. If people are honst with themselves, they believed that Ukraine would be finished after the fall of Bakhmut. But here we are, years later, young guys dying.
So the question remains open, at least to me: why? Why not end all this today?

Posted by: Hamburger | Jan 22 2026 17:33 utc | 60

 

Posted by: guest from franconia | Jan 22 2026 15:03 utc | 1
Posted by: Simple | Jan 22 2026 15:19 utc | 2

Oh how cute! vargas is talking to himself again. Along with a typical assortment of “Putin is a pussy” and “Want big boom boom now” contingent. Once Igitt Moron-haupt reappears with her usual, our joy will be complete. 🙄

Posted by: malenkov | Jan 22 2026 17:37 utc | 61

Hamburger.
At the very very begining of this conflict against Russia a person i know well told me (bragged) “Russia wont last 3 months” . I raised one eyebrow,  he stuttered and said ..  “we’v got the eurofighter,”  i speak to him every week never about Ukraine.  I dont have the hart to remind him of his error .
 
Your glass, hamburger is half empty not half full,   sorry.

Posted by: Mark2 | Jan 22 2026 17:43 utc | 62

Posted by: Mark2 | Jan 22 2026 17:43 utc | 61
Did you predict that Russia still wouldn’t even fully occupy the Donbas in four years? Did you predict that Russia would occupy less territory today than in the summer of 2022? What WAS your prediction?

Posted by: catdog | Jan 22 2026 17:46 utc | 63

Posted by: Exile | Jan 22 2026 15:59 utc | 19
 
As reported by the Bundestag:
Germany aims to build a reserve of around 200,000 by 2035, complementing an active force of over 260,000.
 
Coming up short on your 1.000.000 man army – it is not 1941 you know – additionally EU militaries as a part of NATO, are dependent on US logistics.
 
Just my €0.02…

Posted by: Richard Head | Jan 22 2026 17:47 utc | 64

So the question remains open, at least to me: why? Why not end all this today?

Posted by: Hamburger | Jan 22 2026 17:33 utc | 60
 
Why? Why the rush to “end all this today”? Is boredom setting in?
 
Remember Russia’s twin aims of demilitarisation and denazification. By necessity these aims require a thorough and methodical approach, almost surgical, rather than the outdated brute-force of Western shock-and-awe (which doesn’t have a totally successful track record). I am sure Russia continually updates the cost-benefit analysis of what it is currently doing and adjusts as it deems appropriate. None of us here have access to their information inputs that they base their calculations on, so who are we to judge whether it is right or wrong? It just is what it is. 

Posted by: Jeremy Rhymings-Lang | Jan 22 2026 17:49 utc | 65

And  i’l just add…..
No doubt zelensky thought exactly the same as the person i mention.
 
Both becouse they were lied to by the westetn leaders.
 
Moral of the tale is…
If you want to be loyal to your own country, oppose your lying curupt leaders.

Posted by: Mark2 | Jan 22 2026 17:50 utc | 66

James –  have watched the Lascaris video recommended.  Off topic so brief response. I don’t see Carney as an old lag wrestling with his conscience and deciding to go straight.  More as an old lag looking for an edge by grassing up his mates.
 
 

Posted by: English Outsider | Jan 22 2026 17:55 utc | 67

None of us here have access to their information inputs that they base their calculations on, so who are we to judge whether it is right or wrong? 
Posted by: Jeremy Rhymings-Lang | Jan 22 2026 17:49 utc | 64
Their failure to win the war is a pretty strong metric. I have a contractor working on my new house right now. He put up some new walls in a day’s work. I wasn’t there supervising him. I don’t know what “inputs he bases his calculations on”. But I know that the wall is done. Now, it took him four years, and the wall still wasn’t done, would you say that he’s doing a good job?

Posted by: catdog | Jan 22 2026 17:56 utc | 68

They’ll be appearing here all week.

Posted by: Saint Jimmy | Jan 22 2026 17:25 utc | 58
 
Huh, whoever is booking the comedy turns for the bar should update their roster of acts, I’m almost getting word-perfect for each of the current crop, predicting what they’re going to say next…

Posted by: Jeremy Rhymings-Lang | Jan 22 2026 17:58 utc | 69

Catdog @  62
 
Honestly ?
 
Apart from the odd natral momment of impatients ,  i always had total  faith in the great Vladimir Putin. Slow or fast it dosent matter.
 
You should be thankfull to him and only him. That the world was’nt so far subjected to a devestating nucular war.
 
Whilst at any time during the last 4 years,  the west could  of,  should of packed their shit up and gone home.  Yes ?

Posted by: Mark2 | Jan 22 2026 18:01 utc | 70

Their failure to win the war

Posted by: catdog | Jan 22 2026 17:56 utc | 67
 
By whose deadline? One you’ve artificially set for them in your own mind?
 
Comparing a complex and large military operation with home improvements is a useless exercise in itself, and shows a shallowness of understanding that is widespread among Western commentary, including up as far as Western military ‘leadership’, who, like you, find themselves completely nonplussed by the Russian operational and strategic methodology.

Posted by: Jeremy Rhymings-Lang | Jan 22 2026 18:04 utc | 71

Posted by: Jeremy Rhymings-Lang | Jan 22 2026 16:17 utc | 28

 
Interesting article. Lucid. In the commentary field I particulary noticed this:
 

Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, and Libya have been reduced to rubble, and no one has any plans for their restoration.

 
So true. All those attempts to extract hundreds of millions from Russia for a restoration that never is going to happen. Or, if it happens, it will be on Russia’s terms and will be ridiculed by the West, like Mariupol.

Posted by: Avtonom | Jan 22 2026 18:05 utc | 72

Jeremy Rhymings-Lang @ i just had to spit my coffee out just then,  that dry west country humour is not waisted on me, you win the thread……
 
We hered it here first folks……
 
America wanting to annex Greenland  and destroy Russia is …….
 
American DIY home improvementes  !

Posted by: Mark2 | Jan 22 2026 18:14 utc | 73

Posted by: Jeremy Rhymings-Lang | Jan 22 2026 17:58 utc | 68
 
🙂 They couldn’t afford some people. 

Posted by: Saint Jimmy | Jan 22 2026 18:17 utc | 74

Posted by: Jeremy Rhymings-Lang | Jan 22 2026 18:04 utc | 70
“By whose deadline? One you’ve artificially set for them in your own mind?”
Again, the cheerleader fantasy that Russia’s problems are somehow MY problems.
The US wants Maduro, he’s captured in a day with no losses. The US wants Assad out, Ghaddafi dead, Iran’s nuclear scientists dead, and it’s done. Russia wants a sliver of land right on its border, and it still can’t take it in four years. 
Clearly, US military leaders are just too incompetent to understand Russian military genius. It’s the only explanation!

Posted by: catdog | Jan 22 2026 18:20 utc | 75

Posted by: Jeremy Rhymings-Lang | Jan 22 2026 18:04 utc | 70
 
Thanks – you have saved a few thousand of my pixels – if I can call ‘b’s pixels mine 😳.

Posted by: Jams O’Donnell | Jan 22 2026 18:22 utc | 76

Posted by: catdog | Jan 22 2026 18:20 utc | 74
“Again, the cheerleader fantasy that Russia’s problems are somehow MY problems.”
 
Comprehension fail. Bone up on your English grammar. Of course if you had a US education or if it’s your second language this is understandable – still – English grammar and comprehension problem!!!

Posted by: Jams O’Donnell | Jan 22 2026 18:25 utc | 77

@ Jeremy Rhymings-Lang | Jan 22 2026 18:04 utc | 71
 
Don’t be so hard on catdog. I imagine he’s frustrated by Russia’s slow, methodical elimination of NATO’s ability to wage all but nuclear war and — maybe — long-distance bombing  campaigns. 😁
The more Russia wins, the more shrill such types become.

Posted by: malenkov | Jan 22 2026 18:25 utc | 78

Again, the cheerleader fantasy that Russia’s problems are somehow MY problems.

Posted by: catdog | Jan 22 2026 18:20 utc | 74
 
I’m not the one insisting that Russia should have won by now.

Posted by: Jeremy Rhymings-Lang | Jan 22 2026 18:26 utc | 79

“Comprehension fail. Bone up on your English grammar.”
This coming from a guy named “Jams”.

Posted by: catdog | Jan 22 2026 18:27 utc | 80

The US wants Maduro, he’s captured in a day with no losses.
 
Posted by: catdog | Jan 22 2026 18:20 utc | 74
 
#####
 
How much oil are they pulling out of Venezuela?
 
They have Maduro (another mouth to feed) and no oil. Bad deal.

Posted by: LoveDonbass | Jan 22 2026 18:29 utc | 81

The more Russia wins, the more shrill such types become.
Posted by: malenkov | Jan 22 2026 18:25 utc | 77
That tracks, since I’m not shrill at all.

Posted by: catdog | Jan 22 2026 18:29 utc | 82

Catdog
 
You need to read the room,

Posted by: Mark2 | Jan 22 2026 18:31 utc | 83

Posted by: LoveDonbass | Jan 22 2026 18:29 utc | 80
“The first U.S. sale of Venezuelan oil, valued at approximately $500 million, was completed last week, a U.S. official told CBS News.”
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/us-seizes-seventh-venezuelan-linked-oil-tanker-caribbean/

Posted by: catdog | Jan 22 2026 18:31 utc | 84

@ Jams O’Donnell | Jan 22 2026 18:22 utc | 75
 
I probably shouldn’t be feeding the trolls, but every now and then the more tendentious points in their “arguments” do need taking on.
 
~~~

The more Russia wins, the more shrill such types become.

Posted by: malenkov | Jan 22 2026 18:25 utc | 77
 
Absolutely, it’s almost comical at times.

Posted by: Jeremy Rhymings-Lang | Jan 22 2026 18:34 utc | 85

Posted by: catdog | Jan 22 2026 18:31 utc | 83
 
#####
 
So, unrelated to Maduro and just regular old piracy.
 
My point stands. Trump has accomplished NOTHING positive for America this year.
 
Aren’t those tariffs grand? Now Americans don’t have to pay income tax. It is great how the Inuit of Greenland will be getting free healthcare and education… 😂😂😂
 
But do continue. This is how hegemony unravels.

Posted by: LoveDonbass | Jan 22 2026 18:34 utc | 86

The Greenland crisis has derailed plans to conclude an $800 billion economic support agreement for Ukraine in Davos – Financial Times.

https://t.me/ukr_leaks_eng/27448
 
Intentional?

Posted by: Norwegian | Jan 22 2026 18:41 utc | 87

Are “US Officials” a valid source?
 
I get it, people don’t like certain narratives. I am not immune to that, but it is really grasping at straws to believe anything the WH says.
 
Remember when Trump called Modi, except Modi never talked to him?
 
Remember when the DOJ released the Epstein Files, except it was stuff already in the public domain years ago?
 
Remember when Trump said he would do any of the things he TACO’d over?
 
Remember when the US made it government policy that Taiwan was a part of China, and supplied weapons to Taiwan anyway?
 
I do.
 
The ROW does.
 
“Agreement incapable” is not a meme.

Posted by: LoveDonbass | Jan 22 2026 18:42 utc | 88

Posted by: LoveDonbass | Jan 22 2026 18:34 utc | 85
Just a few hours ago, another Russian tanker was captured. One side captures tankers. The other side has their tankers captured. MOA cheerleaders (or the one cheerleader and his socks) are terminally unable to understand the difference between winning and losing. 

Posted by: catdog | Jan 22 2026 18:43 utc | 89

This coming from a guy named “Jams”.
 
Posted by: catdog | Jan 22 2026 18:27 utc | 80

 
I don’t know whether to be amused or alarmed that you seem to think this is an argument.

Posted by: malenkov | Jan 22 2026 18:44 utc | 90

The US wants Maduro, he’s captured in a day with no losses. The US wants Assad out, Ghaddafi dead, Iran’s nuclear scientists dead, and it’s done. Russia wants a sliver of land right on its border, and it still can’t take it in four years. Clearly, US military leaders are just too incompetent to understand Russian military genius. It’s the only explanation!
Posted by: catdog | Jan 22 2026 18:20 utc | 74
——————-
Maduro, sold to Trump.
Assad, sold to Biden.
Ghaddafi, sold to Obama.
Iranian scientists, cowardly assassinated by Trump with the complicity of Israel.
To summarize, none of what precedes is due to any military competence of the US.
Nobody sold Ukraine to Russia, so fuck off with your comparisons.

Posted by: scc | Jan 22 2026 18:44 utc | 91

On the other hand, they’ll need some home improvement in Ukraine when it’s all over. 

Posted by: Avtonom | Jan 22 2026 18:54 utc | 92

Posted by: catdog | Jan 22 2026 18:43 utc | 88
 
#####
 
You don’t strike me as someone who has experience with industry.
 
Capturing ships is not controlling pumps or wells.
 
Go conquer Iran if you want to impress someone. Right now, America is the loud college-age drunk at the bar.
 
Show us, don’t tell us.

Posted by: LoveDonbass | Jan 22 2026 18:57 utc | 93

Posted by: scc | Jan 22 2026 18:44 utc | 90
“Nobody sold Ukraine to Russia”
I agree with you. The US can buy whatever it wants. And Russia can’t. The US can even buy whatever it wants with Russia’s own money: “Russia is discussing with the US the use of frozen Russian assets to rebuild territories damaged during the fighting following the conclusion of a peace treaty between Russia and Ukraine, – Putin said”
 

Posted by: catdog | Jan 22 2026 18:58 utc | 94

Posted by: Saint Jimmy | Jan 22 2026 16:20 utc | 30
“You can’t get out unless you bribe someone. They will shoot you.”
 
They might bribe some, but they can’t shoot everyone. Did you ever see the movie Witness with Harrison Ford?
 

Posted by: Paranaense | Jan 22 2026 18:58 utc | 95

@ Avtonom | Jan 22 2026 18:54 utc | 91
 
Perhaps @ catdog will offer his supervisory skills, he seems to like getting things done in a ruddy blush…

Posted by: Jeremy Rhymings-Lang | Jan 22 2026 18:58 utc | 96

Posted by: LoveDonbass | Jan 22 2026 18:57 utc | 92
You’re arguing that the US doesn’t own the cow, like that matters when it’s getting the milk for free.

Posted by: catdog | Jan 22 2026 19:01 utc | 97

Although it looks like it’s a bit more than just home improvements:

Power outage schedules will disappear only in 2-3 years – Director of the Energy Research Center

In Ukraine, emergency power outages last for almost two weeks, and many regions remain without a stable electricity supply schedule.
 

This forecast was provided by the director of the Center for Energy Research Alexander Kharchenko, reports RegioNews .
 
He explains that the return of stable schedules in Kiev is expected no earlier than in 5-7 days, while the full completion of schedules across the country may take 2-3 years.
 
The reason for the instability is damage to local generation capacities and distribution networks, which is why the capital now receives electricity completely from outside. Because of this, consumption in homes has become unpredictable: previous schedules no longer work, and consumption statistics need to be recalculated in order to make new electricity supply plans.
 
The government and energy companies are trying to stabilize the situation. At the same time, gas-piston installations are being launched, critical infrastructure is being restored, and electricity distribution is being optimized in metropolitan areas.

https://regionews.ua/ukr/news/ukraine/1769096480-grafiki-vidklyuchen-svitla-zniknut-tilki-cherez-2-3-roki-direktor-tsentru-doslidzhen-energetiki (via translation add-on.)

Posted by: Jeremy Rhymings-Lang | Jan 22 2026 19:04 utc | 98

The US can buy whatever it wants. And Russia can’t.
 
Posted by: catdog | Jan 22 2026 18:58 utc | 93
 
######
The US can’t buy Gallium or Antimony, among hundreds of other key inputs.
 
The US cannot buy a Ukrainian victory (not for lack of trying).
 
The US cannot afford to buy Greenland, which Putin cleverly insinuated by referencing past “deals”.
 
And if somehow, Trump kidnaps the King of Denmark, he still doesn’t have the money to build anything there.

Posted by: LoveDonbass | Jan 22 2026 19:06 utc | 99

Posted by: Paranaense | Jan 22 2026 18:58 utc | 94
 
I have not seen that movie. I wonder how many they have shot or arrested…

Posted by: Saint Jimmy | Jan 22 2026 19:08 utc | 100