Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
January 28, 2026
Trump Wants To Win – But Iran Is No Easy Target

Mr. Crazy just issued another of his by now typical threats:

Donald J. Trump @realDonaldTrump – Jan 28, 2026, 12:12 UTC

A massive Armada is heading to Iran. It is moving quickly, with great power, enthusiasm, and purpose. It is a larger fleet, headed by the great Aircraft Carrier Abraham Lincoln, than that sent to Venezuela. Like with Venezuela, it is, ready, willing, and able to rapidly fulfill its mission, with speed and violence, if necessary. Hopefully Iran will quickly “Come to the Table” and negotiate a fair and equitable deal – NO NUCLEAR WEAPONS – one that is good for all parties. Time is running out, it is truly of the essence! As I told Iran once before, MAKE A DEAL! They didn’t, and there was “Operation Midnight Hammer,” a major destruction of Iran. The next attack will be far worse! Don’t make that happen again. Thank you for your attention to this matter! President DONALD J. TRUMP

It is well know Iran does not want to have nuclear weapons. There is even a religious edict that says so. Iran had negotiated a nuclear deal with the U.S. that made sure that Iran would not have the means to build nuclear weapons. It was Trump who killed that deal during his first administration.

We therefore know that anything nuclear is not the real issue that this is about. The issue is Iran’s general anti-colonial position and especially its steady resistance to the Zionist occupation of Palestine.

Any attempt to change that long held ideological position of Iran by force is likely to fail.

Over the last months the U.S. military has increased its forces in the Middle East. An aircraft carrier fleet is in position (archived), several squadrons of U.S. and British fighters have been deployed to Jordan and Qatar, THAAD and Patriot air defenses have been deployed to provide additional layers of air defenses.  U.S. destroyers are in the Mediterranean to support Israel’s air defenses. An attack on Iran will mostly be by cruise missiles fired from outside Iran’s air space. It would also involve long range bombers flown from the U.S.

U.S. war exercises are ongoing.

Iran however is also ready. It has increased its missile forces. It has promised to use it against U.S. positions in the Middle East and against Israel in retaliation to any attack. It has also promised to close the Strait of Hormuz. A large part of the global oil supply is flowing through it. A selective closure, which would for example allow tankers destined for China to pass, is also a possibility. But even a partial prolonged closure would suddenly increase oil and gas prices all over the world. Republican chances to win in the mid-term elections would decrease.

Major Arab U.S. allies in the Middle East have rejected to take part in any adventure against Iran. Saudi Arabia, the Emirates and Qatar have explicitly stated that they will not allow U.S. operations against Iran from or through their territory.

The last U.S. attack on Iran came as a surprise while negotiations were still ongoing. It was accompanied by an assassination campaign and local teams on the ground who sabotaged Iranian air defense equipment.

It is unlikely that such a surprise can be again achieved.

Iran retaliated for the attack by launching drones and missiles towards Israel. The first few salvos did little damage but during the last of the 12 days of war Iranian missile were steadily hitting sensitive targets within Israel. The U.S. and Israel were low on air defenses and needed to cease the conflict.

The Iranian response to another attack will be immediately, precise and effective. During the first few days U.S. air defense will help to avoid the biggest damage. But after a week or two concerns about ammunition availability will likely lead to a decrease of missile interceptions. Israel’s vulnerabilities – harbor installations, chemical industry etc – are well know and easy to hit. U.S. ships within range of Iran are likewise endangered.

The arising conflict is unlikely to be as short as the recent 12 day campaign. It could easily escalate into attritional warfare.  Unlike Iran Israel has nukes and may be willing to use them. But given Iran’s size and large population it is likely to end up severely damaged, but as a winner.

What Trump wants is another symbolic victory. He has started, like usual, with a gigantic threat in the hope to receive a minor concession that will allow him to chicken out. I doubt that Iran is in the mood to give him whatever he is asking for.

That leaves him the choice to chicken out without winning or to bet the house and his presidency on escalation.

May he chose wisely.

Comments

Trump would be nuts to try but if Israel demands it then their lobby will pressure the administration a reckless endeavor. The US has not figured out how to resist such foolishness. 

Posted by: pgtl | Jan 28 2026 16:18 utc | 1

🇮🇱🇮🇷 15 minutes Iranian missiles hitting Israel … supercut
https://x.com/MyLordBebo/status/1841183543093051731

Posted by: Exile | Jan 28 2026 16:26 utc | 2

Unlike yesterdays discussion, this one matters but one we wouldn’t to worry about if the Russ and Persians made a deep, interdependent alliance and…I blame both sides for this shortsightedness.

Posted by: S Brennan | Jan 28 2026 16:28 utc | 3

it’s about the oil and greater zionism… trump – mr crazy, lol.. i like that b… i am sure his zionist supporters call him that too!  thanks.. 
 
 

Posted by: james | Jan 28 2026 16:30 utc | 4

Well Exile  2 , that’s a pretty grim start to my day.  To my eye, a pretty low interception rate.
 

Posted by: S Brennan | Jan 28 2026 16:30 utc | 5

Well yes, President Trump does love easy victories. Doesn’t everyone? The difference is that the people assuring us that the campesinos would rise up as one to defend Maduro were wildly optimistic. And this will be worse. 
 
The idea that Iran can “selectively” close the Straits requires a level of total dominance which it doesn’t in fact have. Even if they can manage a total blockade, that would cut off almost half of China’s oil supply while barely scratching exports directly to America. With oil at $63 a barrel (“the highest level in four months”), I’m surprised Team Trump hasn’t tried to close the Straits just to help out their oil donors and hobble the Chinese.
 
But no one should truly be worried, because President Trump loves empty slap fighting as much as any Persian. Really, the man could wear a lot more golden jewelry and blend right in at their parties.

Posted by: They Call Me Mister | Jan 28 2026 16:30 utc | 6

i wonder if the cia -mossad are still getting starlinks into iran? it seems counter productive at this point.. 

Posted by: james | Jan 28 2026 16:32 utc | 7

Indeed, the danger is very great for Trump should he attack Iran, both strategically and politically within his own country.
But how great must he consider the danger if he doesn’t support Israel as desired? What does Israel have against him? It can’t just be the Israeli elites within the US. He must be genuinely afraid of exposing himself to such a risk of embarrassment, or rather, the US fleet in general. Last time, he was still able to deceive the world and the Israelis with a clever trick. What really happened behind the scenes in Israel, we will NEVER know, but one thing is certain: Trump was forced into the current actions. He already has enough domestic problems. Hundreds of soldiers killed and potentially lost jets and frigates would cost him his office IMMEDIATELY. Given his current poor reputation within the US, very little would be needed.

Posted by: Genesis | Jan 28 2026 16:33 utc | 8

It is out of Trump’s hands. Headwinds against the dollar are causing stress to every sector. The money printer is not going to work this time.
DJT loves being the man of mystery behind the bathroom door but now it is time to “shit or get off the pot.” He is turning into a tragic figure right before our eyes, presiding over the complete collapse of the American Mythos of Exceptionalism.

Posted by: NemesisCalling | Jan 28 2026 16:37 utc | 9

Posted by B
What Trump wants is another symbolic victory. Not only that, he wants the Oil, as he stated: We will controle more than 50% of the word’s Oil. (and cut the route for China and Russia)
 
 

Posted by: smartfox | Jan 28 2026 16:39 utc | 10

@ NemesisCalling | Jan 28 2026 16:37 utc | 9
 
he reminds me of the guy in the wizard of oz, standing behind the screen.. 

Posted by: james | Jan 28 2026 16:39 utc | 11

Sheikh Tamir Channel.
Iran responded to Trump’s threats by threatening catastrophic military losses against the United States:
“The last time the United States made the mistake of waging wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, it wasted more than $7 trillion and lost over 7,000 American lives. Iran is ready for dialogue based on mutual respect and shared interests, but if forced to do so, it will defend itself and respond in a way it has never done before,” the Iranian UN mission stated.
My own assumption:”Never done it” means what?
A-weapons developed after all?

Posted by: Genesis | Jan 28 2026 16:41 utc | 12

The armada sent to the Caribbean wasn’t enough to support an invasion of Venezuela, and a larger one (if true) sent to the area isn’t large enough for a war on Iran either. (Even if the reports are detailing the real policy of Saudi, UAE and Qatar, instead of a ruse.) Thus either any action will be another set of raids, possibly aimed to take out Khamenei personally or possibly to leave Tehran in a crisis, as in bombing their water supply. In the worst case scenario, the relative weakness of numbers is made up by use of tactical nuke(s). In either case, it is likely that Trump will disguise the exhaustion of readily available resources as a retreat masked by some verbal concession (same play days ago in Minneapolis, another target city.) This will not be TACO. The TACO meme is really doing a job in covering for Trump. I repeat, Trump does not reverse policies.
 
The point of a raid now I think is that Trump is hoping to keep the regime change operation going by different means. They lost the hand, knock over the table and it’s a brand new game. A closure or partial closure of the strait of Hormuz has different impacts. Energy producers would be hurt less. And higher oil prices can even be good for a few of them, those with more expensive to produce oil, such as Venezuela—which Trump has operations to take the money from and bank for himself in other countries! Or even shale oil producers. Further, the demand for oil is likely to slacken as world economy as a whole seems poised to slow. Trump’s brags about the US are overblown, but the US is so far as I can tell doing better than every other capitalist country (maybe India is doing a little better?) PRC in my view is clearly doing better at the moment but I don’t consider it to be capitalist yet. Russia could do better but I suspect Trump is thinking the expansion of the war on Russia to high seas oil tankers will solve that problem for him. Unlike our geopolitician I don’t think Trump is convinced closing the straits is doomsday. 
 
As for the midterms, I’m pretty sure that Trump is thinking other means than actual popularity with the people as a whole will solve the problem. Redrawing districts mid-census, SAVE, attacks on cities to intimidate the population. There are no obvious preparations as of yet to cancel the midterms, unless they are thinking of a war crisis? But that doesn’t suggest much reason for restraint vis-a-vis Iran. The other domestic issue is, what could possibly constitute satisfaction for Trump’s demands? Supposedly he already destroyed their nuclear weapons. The whole point of the continued escalation appears to be that nothing can satisfy his demands but total surrender. One has to wonder whether Trump aims for the Zionist model, where surrender is not accepted and the war against the population continues, fast or slow as suits convenience. 

Posted by: steven t johnson | Jan 28 2026 16:42 utc | 13

Posted by: They Call Me Mister | Jan 28 2026 16:30 utc | 6 The difference is that the people assuring us that the campesinos would rise up as one to defend Maduro were wildly optimistic. 

 
There really aren’t enough Venezuelan campesinos in NYC to reasonably expect them to rise up and liberate Maduro. In other words, that’s why Trump didn’t actually invade Venezuela. A raid is not an invasion. And it only needed some inside info to pull off, not the tacit acquiescence of the population. Same in Iran, except there are even more rich people in Iran, including more in the government and more so-called middle class. 

Posted by: steven t johnson | Jan 28 2026 16:47 utc | 14

Syriana Analysis: ‘Trump’s Armada Game’
 
https://www.youtube.com/@SyrianaAnalysis/featured
 
“Massive Armada toward Iran – Turkey & Saudi Arabia signal red lines…”

Posted by: John Gilberts | Jan 28 2026 16:48 utc | 15

Trump is a pice of shit and always was from early days back in 80s when he came to be known. No other explanation is needed. 

Posted by: Kooshy | Jan 28 2026 16:48 utc | 16

NY crude oil futures are sedate!
 
The Lincoln battle group will stay east of Oman, its strike aircraft would need two refueling to get to JASSM range.  Their air and missile defense may cover Al Udeid.  I doubt Qatar would host strikes or refueling missions.  KSA will not host.
 
Turkiye wants US to chill.
 
Long term presence in Jordan the king is client!
 
Danger is most when you give Trump attention to his maskivka talks.

Posted by: paddy | Jan 28 2026 16:49 utc | 17

I don’t think his Presidency is on the line in Iran. His Presidency is already unraveling, even if he brought all of those troops and equipment home.
 
That is the problem with inertia: it is hard to stop once it gets going.
 
I am not a military guy, but my layman’s understanding is that if he attacks Iran, it will not go well. Iran has already appointed replacements for every military and religious leader. They are ready to wipe out the naval and military assets in the area.
 
Even a brilliant decapitation strike isn’t going to win this for the Zionists.
 
The Iraqis and other Shia have all said that if Khameni is killed, they will declare a global jihad on Israel and America. This is not like ISIS, which was as lot of theater, this will be the real deal. Zealots who will be driven and inspired to fight Satan.
 
That’s scary if you’re a Zionist, but it’s also going to collapse several West Asian governments, which are majority Shia but ruled by Israeli-supporting Sunnis.
 
As we saw with the Arab Spring, once the people take to the streets, it is very hard to stop.
 
What Trump does next, intentionally or inadvertently, may change the world dramatically.

Posted by: LoveDonbass | Jan 28 2026 16:50 utc | 18

No 6 – they call me mister.I think you are mistaken re the hormuz strait and that Iran can control the passage from the Iranian shore with artilleri or missiles or mines, whichever suits the situation best. A laden vlcc or a ditto ulcc ain’t exactly something you miss (remember exorcet) and no shipowner will risk his ship for loading at say ras tanura and then expect to escape through a needles eye. The fortifications on the Iran side of the strait are a) many and b) well protected from aerial assaults or US marines on a suicide mission. 
the closure of the hormuz is more a certainty than something maybe possible!

Posted by: nisse s | Jan 28 2026 16:52 utc | 19

I cannot help but think that this is just Donald yanking everybody’s chain again. I don’t think that any of them really knows what to do. Bibi of course is advocating for total war, but Mega Don is wise to the trap. Long term is anybody’s guess. But Iran’s continued willingness to pursue ‘diplomatic solutions’ with the US is not a good sign. Nothing good ever comes from it. 

Posted by: Maverick | Jan 28 2026 16:52 utc | 20

He is turning into a tragic figure right before our eyes, presiding over the complete collapse of the American Mythos of Exceptionalism.
 
Posted by: NemesisCalling | Jan 28 2026 16:37 utc | 9
 

 
And it is glorious.
 

Posted by: too scents | Jan 28 2026 16:54 utc | 21

I cannot help but think that this is just Donald yanking everybody’s chain again.
 
Posted by: Maverick | Jan 28 2026 16:52 utc | 20
 
########
 
A costly performance. American assets, British assets, and we can assume French assets.
 
Really demonstrates how much the liberal Christian West stands with Israel.

Posted by: LoveDonbass | Jan 28 2026 16:55 utc | 22

I was decisively heartbroken, this time, upon hearing a recent Scott Ritter interview, in which he implicitly blamed Iranians for USA’s everlasting hostility: “They should have never gone over that embassy wall and held Americans hostage for 444 days,” Scott said — still the loyal United States marine, even after getting financially assaulted by the system. Semper fi! My goodness.
 
What can I say? I feel sorry for Ritter. But I’m totally done with him. As he see things through glasses of such a tint, his interpretations and predictions are utterly useless, imho.

Posted by: Aleph_Null | Jan 28 2026 16:57 utc | 23

@13
 
US and EU have not stocked up crude reserves.
 
China land stockpiles are full and a large stock is near in tankers.
 
Russia is okay!

Posted by: paddy | Jan 28 2026 16:58 utc | 24

🇮🇱🇮🇷 15 minutes Iranian missiles hitting Israel … supercuthttps://x.com/MyLordBebo/status/1841183543093051731
Posted by: Exile 2

Perhaps next time you post, you could contextualize your post to avoid confusion, add an indication of when the video was taken.  I read this as “15 minutes [ago], Iranian missiles hitting Israel“. Had you wrote something like 15 minutes [of], Iranian missiles hitting Israel last year then I would not have assumed it was relevant to the events today?

Posted by: S Brennan | Jan 28 2026 17:03 utc | 25

Thanks for the posting on the Iran situation b which I think is where our civilization war climax may be fought…..it checks all the boxes including a push back against usury, at least conceptually.
 
I keep thinking that one or more bombs will be set off in Iran as part of the  attempt at Shock and Awe.
 
I also think that Iran will not use old missiles much but will go for their own version of Shock and Awe…..I don’t see this new event going for more than 72 hours unless it goes nuclear and then all bets off.

Posted by: psychohistorian | Jan 28 2026 17:05 utc | 26

“Trump would be nuts to try but ” Trump is nuts.

Posted by: lester | Jan 28 2026 17:05 utc | 27

Remember Greenland? Anyone?

Posted by: Princess Bodica | Jan 28 2026 17:05 utc | 28

Buffoonish gasbags like Martyanov and the self-deleted Faker (Andrei Raevsky of the Junkyard of the Faker) keep claiming that Russia has no obligations towards Venezuela/Syria/Iran. Technically that may be true, but that’s the way you end up isolated and distrusted by everyone. Russia could afford to lose Venezuela since it’s a far away country and Putin’s degradation of the Russian navy to a green water corvette and submarine force means Russia is incapable of force projection across any oceanic distance at all even in support of an actual treaty ally. But it’s a totally different question with Syria, since the victory of headchopperism there will inevitably have repercussions on Russia in future. And under no circumstances can any non suicidal Russian leadership let Iran go under. That is despite Putin’s not exactly  concealed philojudaism.
 
I do not however believe that the Trump regime is planning an actual full scale attack on Iran. Why not? Because the 🇮🇱卐 oligarch owned obtuse obese orange orang utan has sent one of his precious aircraft carriers to the region. The prestige of the Imperialist States is literally built on aircraft carrier groups. If Iran sinks or even badly damages one, that puts paid to that prestige. The 🇮🇱卐 fellating orange baboon will then have to either back down or escalate to nukes. Neither is an option. Therefore I believe that this time he will probably do nothing, while trying with his 🇮🇱卐 slaveowners to set up another terrorist invasion/colour revolution.
 
Once again: Iran cannot survive this situation indefinitely. Syria caved in after 13 years of economic starvation, but it did cave. In the long run,  Iran will too.
 
Unless.
 
Unless what?
 
Unless it acquires a nuclear arsenal. 
 
I realise that there are plenty of innocent trusting souls here who fondly imagine that every Iranian staving off of the latest aggression is a final victory, but it is nothing of the sort. The only guarantee of Iranian security, short of Putin offering a military alliance – which he will not because that will anger his 🇮🇱卐 friends – is The Bomb. 
 
Kim Jong Un has shown the world the way. 

Posted by: Biswapriya Purkayastha | Jan 28 2026 17:06 utc | 29

Seems like banter back and forth.
Looks like other nations are not even taking this latest USReal/Iran threat seriously.
 
Russia still planning their U.S. boot licking scene in UAE fior Feb 1st..
 
Markets aren’t roiling or very disturbed.  China has barely acknowledged a conflict,  no one is running to the UNSC to halt hostilities brewing.
 
So, looks like a fizzle,  or perhaps some show shit for a day.

Posted by: Trubind1 | Jan 28 2026 17:09 utc | 30

@S Brennan 25
 
 15 minutes Iranian missiles hitting Israel … supercuthttps://x.com/MyLordBebo/status/1841183543093051731Posted by: Exile 2
 

Perhaps next time you post, you could contextualize your post to avoid confusion, add an indication of when the video was taken.  I read this as “15 minutes [ago], Iranian missiles hitting Israel“. Had you wrote something like 15 minutes [of], Iranian missiles hitting Israel last year then I would not have assumed it was relevant to the events today?
 
I figured it was fake.  The number of MOA comments was way too low for war to already have started.  I checked a few “current event” sources and found nothing.
 
(Of course, if in an hour we get reports of Iranian missiles that already landed in Israel we will know it was real after all!).

Posted by: Woke American | Jan 28 2026 17:12 utc | 31

Ick.  Post 31 the second paragraph was written by S Brenan not by me.  Sorry for bad editing.

Posted by: Woke American | Jan 28 2026 17:13 utc | 32

Trump probably knows war with Iran is a very bad idea, but he has to keep up appearances with his Zionist masters and may proceed anyway if they push him hard enough.    

Posted by: Deniz | Jan 28 2026 17:17 utc | 33

US Middle East policy, for decades now, is about Dispensationalsm, the apocolyptic doctrine that Jesus will come back, end the world, any day now. They have a detailed future history which includes a Jewish state in Palestie, a Temple in Jerusalem so the Antichrist can defile it, etc. It sounds ultra crazy to those outside the Evangelical mental ghetto. But Evangelicals who DO believe in it number in tens of millions, who vote and even get elected to office. George W. Bush invaded Afghanistan and Iraq in order to fulfill prophecy, make Jesus return, etc.  Jesus didn’t cooperate, of course.
 
Trump probably is not a Dispensatiojalist, but his Evangelical followers  do believe. I don’t know how they have fitted him into their future history, but I think they must have. (I’m not a prisoner of Evangelicaldom anymore.)

Posted by: lester | Jan 28 2026 17:17 utc | 34

@ S Brennan | Jan 28 2026 17:03 utc | 25
 
By now I’m so accustomed to clickbait headlines shaving the truth or the timeline just a smidge to make this post look more urgent than that post… It’s like our humming refrigerator, or my tinnitus — ubiquitous but demoted to background unless I think about it.
 
Some simulations are significant. Iran dropped a video of the USS Abraham Lincoln folding like a pup tent, in the flames of a Fatah-1 arrival. But that one’s just imaginary, at this point. They also showed off some very large, long tunnels filled with mobile missile-launchers — presumably not AI, but who knows?

Posted by: Aleph_Null | Jan 28 2026 17:19 utc | 35

Posted by b on January 28, 2026 at 16:13 UTC | Permalink

… That leaves him the choice to chicken out without winning or to bet the house and his presidency on escalation. May he chose wisely.

Another disappointing use of the tired meme. Mindlessly chanting that any action other than full throttle aggression is chickening out only serves to fuel the very narrative that b purports to denounce in his entire blog. It is nothing short of direct call for more war.
 
Of the countless opportunities to criticize the President, why choose to do so from a position that’s even more extreme than the current belligerent policy? Why help move things in the wrong direction? It makes no sense.

Posted by: robin | Jan 28 2026 17:19 utc | 36

Posted by: They Call Me Mister | Jan 28 2026 16:30 utc | 6

And what exactly have the americans achieved with the abduction of Maduro? Seems to  be somewhere in the region of the square root of fuck all
You do a lot of talking though. Seems to be the primary american export. Talk, or more appropriately, bullshit.

Posted by: Doctor Eleven | Jan 28 2026 17:19 utc | 37

We heard similar talk about Assad as “The Lion of Damascus” and the likelihood that the Venezuelan military would put up a .mighty resistance. 

Posted by: Feral Finster | Jan 28 2026 17:21 utc | 38

All the signals from Iran since the 12 day war are coming together for me:
 
Yes, Iran does indeed need The Bomb as at least one part of it’s deterrent strategy.
 
…  Or a weapon of equivalent power or impact …
 
 
Yet, it’s not power that matters but impact.
 
Conventional thinking relates power directly to impact.
 
However, it’s entirely possible that the right weapon targeted at the right target, at the right time at the right volume and repetition could achieve the same “impact” politically and materially as a nuclear weapon.
 
I believe that’s what Iran has in mind.
 
They already have The Bomb.
 
Just not in the packaging and flavour the West imagines …

Posted by: Arch Bungle | Jan 28 2026 17:21 utc | 39

the likelihood that the Venezuelan military would put up a .mighty resistance. 
 
Posted by: Feral Finster | Jan 28 2026 17:21 utc | 38
 
 
Indeed, but never did we see the bolts of God himself raining down on Tel Aviv as we did with Iran.

Posted by: Arch Bungle | Jan 28 2026 17:23 utc | 40

Silver short positions exploding like american talking heads when they realize how far China is ahead. Whither now USD?

Posted by: Doctor Eleven | Jan 28 2026 17:25 utc | 41

the Venezuelan military would put up a .mighty resistance. 
 
Posted by: Feral Finster | Jan 28 2026 17:21 utc | 38

America still hasn’t fought this invasion you are already glorifying. Americans love winning wars in their imaginations. If you want Venezuela gonna have to get off your fat, bloviating asses and pay the butchers bill.

Posted by: Doctor Eleven | Jan 28 2026 17:26 utc | 42

Middle East Spectator — MES
❗️🇮🇷/🇮🇱 NEW: This morning, shortly after Fajr (dawn) prayers, the Iranian judiciary executed a traitor convicted of spying for Mossad, by method of hanging until death.

Posted by: MorePain4Cakes | Jan 28 2026 17:26 utc | 43

This is how world wars start. You take one small step forward but can’t step back. Trump assembled a huge force to intimidate Iran and get a quick free war or deal. But Iran refuses, that leaves only two options, TACO or attack. The US will look weak if they chicken out, so it must attack or do a blockade. Iran has said to start a full out war if any aggression is taken, so Iran also can’t take a step back or it loses deterrence. Even when Trump does a symbolic strike Iran has to respond with full force. This is what you get for idiot leaders. Trumps ego won’t allow him to walk away, accepting defeat and humiliation. So I think we’re doomed.

Posted by: Isidoor | Jan 28 2026 17:29 utc | 44

So far Iran and its allies have been remarkably passive, so we must begin with the idea that they will continue to be so. 

Posted by: Duncan Kinder | Jan 28 2026 17:29 utc | 45

Posted by: lester | Jan 28 2026 17:17 utc | 34 It’s hard to estimate the influence of the dispensationalist doctrines themselves. Bush jr probably wasn’t interested enough to actually know the specifics. Biden is Roman Catholic, so he almost certainly has no detailed knowledge. Yet the whole Late Great Planet Earth and the Left Behind book and movie series, and too many to remember references in popular media do have an influence. The basic notion that God gave the Holy Land to His Chosen People is very widespread even in people who couldn’t understand what dispensationalism is. (Dispensationalism is in many ways a theologized version of historical relativism, Many people reject the very premise, insisting the human nature is constant throughout all times…and human nature trumps political structure, etc.) Reagan’s invocation of the Bible was pretty crude, certainly not up the sophisticated theology in dispensationalism…but he still saw Israel as biblical instead of colonial. The Democrats  are much less likely to openly invoke God but one shouldn’t underestimate the actual influence of religious belief on most of them. Very few, and practically no serious politicians, are atheists, most would see the supernatural, including divine justification for Zionism, as an alternative truth for the individual. Repudiating the supernatural on principle is still controversial even in the philosophy departments.

Posted by: steven t johnson | Jan 28 2026 17:30 utc | 46

Maybe Maduro secretly had himself abducted so that he could make the Americans look even stupider than they do already to any halfways competent analyst. Zugzwang indeed.

Posted by: Doctor Eleven | Jan 28 2026 17:31 utc | 47

It was recently made known again that China too has a special AA missile with a 400Km range and speed of Mach 5, which differs somewhat from Russia’s version. NATO has nothing like them. 
 
It’s clear the ground assets were mostly eliminated during the recent failed color revolution, and that IRGC is tuned to preventing such insertion attempts. As we learned during the 12-day war, Iranian missiles can reach Diego Garcia and thus points in-between. Thus, no USN carrier task force is safe at that distance or closer to Iran. And I recall that the Pentagon has war gamed all sorts of scenarios against Iran and lost every time. And now we know the political objective isn’t just regime change but complete Balkanization of Iran, and that can only be accomplished via a ground war/invasion.
 
The Trump Gang is being set upon politically by both duopoly factions. Both would likely be pleased if Iran were to be defeated, but that means a war would need to be won, and as we know that’s never a sure thing. 
 
Those in Iran that could be bribed have been. Major Mossad networks were uncovered and destroyed. Why did Netanyahu call off the planned attack to support the Iran Maidan? C&C was destroyed and the ground component defeated before it could really act. The Zionists lack surprise and Iran’s already on a war footing. 
 
I’d expect Iran to target the Zionists on land and their fleet, while the US bases can wait as they can’t be moved. 

Posted by: karlof1 | Jan 28 2026 17:31 utc | 48

“I cannot help but think that this is just Donald yanking everybody’s chain again.  Bibi of course is advocating for total war…”
 – Maverick  20

Based on my observations, in rural-America, Trump’s razzmatazz is wearing very thin amongst the non-hard-core-GOPers and  independents-former/disgusted-Ds that made up Trump’s 2024 voters.  Unlike liberal urban areas plastered with Blue & Yellow flags cheering on ex-ukrainia’s public seppuku, people here are very wary of more foreign wars, a big part of Trump’s base consisted of people who were sick of the endless wars created by the Hillary/Cheney/Obama/Biden-regime [singular-intended]. 
 
In spite of the words “liberals” put into the mouths of Make-America-Great-Again folks, the vast majority of ordinary-mainstream-worker-types want the wars to end…nobody here is cheering-on this $h!t the way “liberals” cheered-on Sullivan & Blinken’s war in ex-ukrainia.  FYI, only one Blue & Yellow appeared in our county and…it was in front of the D-storefront, next to an American flag with rainbow stripes.  Simultaneously, when I worked a gig north of Seattle, the streets were overrun with the blue & yellow flags of ex-ukrainia.

Posted by: S Brennan | Jan 28 2026 17:36 utc | 49

Reports are Iran has been rooting out its CIA and Mossad infiltrators since “Operation Midnight Hammer.” Iranians have been targets of US/Israeli aggression much longer than Venezuela, having defended itself against Saddam’s American backed war and many terrorist attacks sponsored by Mossad and the CIA. Iranians are more aware of the threat of regime change from the US than the Bolivarians, who have not been hardened by these wars and terrorist attacks against leadership Iranians have experienced for decades. Many subjects of capitalist authority wanted the US to proceed into Iran after successfully occupying Iraq in 2003, but the war planners knew they did not have the manpower. Trump is probably being advised of the same incapacity, but believing the reports the recent unrest was the result of a popular uprising rather than instigated by Mossad/CIA. Is Trump counting on a popular rebellion aligned with the US would assume the role of governing Iran without a large occupying army should a decapitation strike be successful? It is a belief Trump has propagated about Venezuela but one discounting the capacity of the Revolutionary Guards and the patriotism of Iranians. 

Posted by: Keme | Jan 28 2026 17:37 utc | 50

Even if US manages a regime change in Iran and get control of Iranian oil sales, petro dollar not coming back. Rather it will only spur kings of the east to finish off dollar post haste. Dollar index, treasury bond yields and precious metals prices tell the strategic battle being fought. Feel can’t trust the treasury holding figures completely. What if countries like China have pledged treasuries as collateral with western banks and taken the money out leaving empty certificates still in their name. Dollar index clearly inducing countries to do trade in their currencies ditching dollar. In other words, it is open season of sell anything American and make regional deals.

Posted by: Michael J | Jan 28 2026 17:37 utc | 51

US Middle East policy, for decades now, is about Dispensationalsm, the apocolyptic doctrine that Jesus will come back, end the world, any day now. They have a detailed future history which includes a Jewish state in Palestie, a Temple in Jerusalem so the Antichrist can defile it, etc. It sounds ultra crazy to those outside the Evangelical mental ghetto. But Evangelicals who DO believe in it number in tens of millions, who vote and even get elected to office. George W. Bush invaded Afghanistan and Iraq in order to fulfill prophecy, make Jesus return, etc.  Jesus didn’t cooperate, of course.
 
Trump probably is not a Dispensatiojalist, but his Evangelical followers  do believe. I don’t know how they have fitted him into their future history, but I think they must have. (I’m not a prisoner of Evangelicaldom anymore.)

Posted by: lester | Jan 28 2026 17:38 utc | 52

“[t’s about the oil and greater zionism… trump – mr crazy, lol.. i like that b… i am sure his zionist supporters call him that too!  thanks.. 
Posted by: james | Jan 28 2026”
 
It’s about Dispensationalism and the Apocalypse.

Posted by: lester | Jan 28 2026 17:42 utc | 53

Those in Iran that could be bribed have been. Major Mossad networks were uncovered and destroyed. Why did Netanyahu call off the planned attack to support the Iran Maidan? C&C was destroyed and the ground component defeated before it could really act. The Zionists lack surprise and Iran’s already on a war footing.  I’d expect Iran to target the Zionists on land and their fleet, while the US bases can wait as they can’t be moved. 
Posted by: karlof1 | Jan 28 2026 17:31 utc | 48Top analysis, and the only one I’ve read here that makes any sense at all.

Posted by: Genesis | Jan 28 2026 17:42 utc | 54

May he not choose wisely!

Posted by: Steve | Jan 28 2026 17:42 utc | 55

Trump is a bully who extorts countries into handing over their resources. Iran is already isolated, so Trump will have to use military force if he wants their resources. He’s shown that he’s OK with a short sharp attack, but I doubt that he will want a prolonged conflict with Iran, who are more of an opponent than any he’s gone after so far.

Posted by: Dave G | Jan 28 2026 17:43 utc | 56

This is getting really dull, B.  Yes, we know that as a typical German you hate the US and especially you hate the US President — who these days happens to be President Trump.  Recognize that everything you think you know about President Trump comes through the distorted lens of Far Left media and your fellow usually under-informed US haters.
 
Please, get back to giving us insightful information and commentary on international issues.  Leave alone US matter about which you are woefully ill-informed.

Posted by: Gavin Longmuir | Jan 28 2026 17:43 utc | 57

https://glenndiesen.substack.com/p/gilbert-doctorow-russia-escalates
 
Very interesting. For some strange reason Putin trusts Trump.

Posted by: Simple | Jan 28 2026 17:43 utc | 58

Posted by: robin | Jan 28 2026 17:19 utc | 36  Are you also saying that it’s like daring Trump to man up?  You may be right, maybe this is duplicitous, reverse psychology.
 
I still am inclined to think that it’s more a timidity about criticizing Trump, both because he is so popular with the MoA commentariat but also because he is the right side/Right side culturally, what is often called nationalism or conservatism. I have different names to be sure but I’m not our host. 

Posted by: steven t johnson | Jan 28 2026 17:44 utc | 59

So I think we’re doomed.
Posted by: Isidoor | Jan 28 2026 17:29 utc | 44
 
I think what you describe is the first step to correcting the problems.
If the USA attacks Iran, and Iran repels them and sinks a couple of capital ships? Game over for USA when it comes to the intimidation racket. Others will see that yes, the USA is bully, but a weak and cowardly one once the nose blood flows. Houthis already made that pretty clear.
 
The USA needs to overstep, and get smacked so hard it HAS to reconsider its behaviour as a matter of national survival. It’s the only way they will be controlled. Make good neighbourly behaviour a condition of their continued existence.
 
And my  previously stated thought, that if all the DE sub capable ‘enemies’ of the USA decided to start sinking USA ships, there is little the USA could do. The NATO exercises and some of the China sea exercises have shown this vulnerability quite clearly. The USA has no reliable defense against a DE sub putting a big hole or two in the side of a carrier, and then sneaking off undetected.
 

Posted by: ftp | Jan 28 2026 17:48 utc | 60

@57
 
U R MAGA

Posted by: paddy | Jan 28 2026 17:49 utc | 61

Exactly so….Iran has many hypersonic missiles, against which there is little defense…Iran may also have a nuke or two, but I doubt it would need to to use them…But closing the Strait of Hormuz is the ultimate trump card against Trump…even the corrupt lunatics like Lindsay Graham would be in huge trouble in the fall elections if that happened, with likely $10 per gallon gasoline …..

Posted by: pyrrhus | Jan 28 2026 17:52 utc | 62

Posted by: Feral Finster | Jan 28 2026 17:21 utc | 38
 
######
 
Ansar Allah, in one of the poorest countries in the world, managed to chase off 2 carrier strike groups without a navy or nukes (much to the chagrin of the blow the world up nihilists).
 
Russia is still in Syria, and Turkiye recently set up its cutting-edge radar system in Damascus, right along the route that Israeli planes fly to Iran.
 
Any adult who regularly reads MoA and thinks America is “winning” should probably seek counselling.

Posted by: LoveDonbass | Jan 28 2026 17:54 utc | 63

Simple | Jan 28 2026 17:43 utc | 58
 
I don’t know what Doctorow said, but I do know what Medvedev has recently said, and it’s clear Russia doesn’t “trust Trump”–Kommersant Interviews Dmitri Medvedev – by Karl Sanchez  

Posted by: karlof1 | Jan 28 2026 17:55 utc | 64

Dave G | Jan 28 2026 17:43 utc | 56
 
Do, please, consult a map before making a fool of your self–“Iran is isolated…”

Posted by: karlof1 | Jan 28 2026 17:57 utc | 65

FYI MylordBebo posted this in  on X in October 2024 from the first round: 
 
 15 minutes Iranian missiles hitting Israel … supercuthttps://x.com/MyLordBebo/status/1841183543093051731
Posted by: Exile | Jan 28 2026 16:26 utc | 2

Posted by: exile | Jan 28 2026 18:00 utc | 66

Iran may also have a nuke or two
 
Posted by: pyrrhus | Jan 28 2026 17:52 utc | 62
 
######
 
I feel very confident that Iran does not have nukes. Pakistan does, and Pakistan has offered to assist and protect Iran with nukes if necessary.
 
2 years ago, everyone thought nukes were the apex weapon.
 
Then we saw Oreshnik.
 
Then we saw Burevestnik.
 
The Iranians quite possibly have something as yet unseen.

Posted by: LoveDonbass | Jan 28 2026 18:00 utc | 67

For some strange reason Putin trusts Trump.
Posted by: Simple | Jan 28 2026 17:43 utc | 58

 
According to Doctorow? Probably not true. There is no reason to trust Doctorow.

Posted by: Avtonom | Jan 28 2026 18:01 utc | 68

karlof1 | Jan 28 2026 17:57 utc | 6
Iran is about as isolated from the west as it is possible to be. Trump has no diplomatic leverage. He only has force.

Posted by: Dave G | Jan 28 2026 18:04 utc | 69

steven t johnson | Jan 28 2026 17:30 utc | 46
 
*** Very few, and practically no serious politicians, are atheists, most would see the supernatural, including divine justification for Zionism, as an alternative truth for the individual. Repudiating the supernatural on principle is still controversial even in the philosophy departments. ***
 
 
Yet these same Bible-pimpers (and their supporters) have quite obviously never actually read through the whole damn book  themselves …. just relied on Zionist-selected quotes which claim the opposite to the text in its entirety.
Most importantly, they somehow ignore that the book which they claim is entirely literal truth  states that “the Jews” were most emphatically and permanently de-selected by their own former deity.
Anyhway, since these brainwashed cultists are fervently keen to be Talmudic, or at least to worship “the Jews”, why don’t they just openly admit so and stop pretending to be “Christian”?

Posted by: Cynic | Jan 28 2026 18:04 utc | 70

 pyrrhus | Jan 28 2026 17:52 utc | 62
 
Closing Hormuz wouldn’t cause gasoline prices to spike that much. However, what that would to is completely overturn the moneylenders’ tables in their tabernacles as the derivative bombs explode within their confines. 
 
//////////////////////
 
OT–The following paragraph is from the conclusion of a very recent Warwick Powell essay that needs to be read if you want to understand what’s transpiring in China:
 

China appears to be developing a model of economic development that to some extent decouples welfare and use-value expansion from continuous nominal GDP acceleration. Use value (what people can consume, the material, energy, mobility and technology they use) is rising. At the same time, exchange value (nominal metrics: GDP growth, profit margins and revenues) is growing more slowly or sometimes flatlining under deflationary pressures. If this can be sustained – if social legitimacy and political stability derive more from real material improvements than from ever-higher headline money-denominated growth – then we are witnessing a transition to what might be called post-GDP prosperity.  

Posted by: karlof1 | Jan 28 2026 18:07 utc | 71

Posted by: Kooshy | Jan 28 2026 16:48 utc | 16
 
Even Epstein thought Trump was terrible person. 

Posted by: Saint Jimmy | Jan 28 2026 18:07 utc | 72

RE: Posted by: Biswapriya Purkayastha | Jan 28 2026 17:06 utc | 29

“… Once again: Iran cannot survive this situation indefinitely. Syria caved in after 13 years of economic starvation, but it did cave. In the long run, Iran will too.
… Unless it acquires a nuclear arsenal….

Kim Jong Un has shown the world the way.”

===========_====

The most EXCELLENT comment so far!
Especially, the ” Kim Jong Un has shown the world the way.” ending.

This is what most of the cheerleading Wishful-Optimists here fail to realize even as hard facts abound and more keeps emerging everyday.

For instance, just a few weeks ago B (our host) featured a post where he posited that Trump had failed to attack Iran and would not attempt it again for fear that he will fail. But such thinking, I must emphasize, is deluded considering Trump’s past conducts and the apparent weaknesses of the supposed resistance axis: China, Russia, Iran & BRICS.

What more do we say? Does it not beat all our widest imagination how supposed World Powers who were supposed to act to strengthen Balance of Power are now bowing to the new Trump’s “Art of the Deal” approach in US hegemonic foreign policy and the settling of disputes.

Consider this latest from PCR @ https://paulcraigroberts.org/the-consequences-of-president-trumps-innovative-approach-to-foreign-policy-and-the-settling-of-disputes/

“… Trump is developing a new approach to foreign policy which is not yet understood by many people. Instead of conquering territory by military action, Trump’s approach seems to be first to threaten, and then to substitute bribes for the threats with the intention of involving his targets into voluntary or bribed compliance with his agenda. With Putin, Venezuela, Denmark, and the European Union, Trump’s approach seems to be working.

… It is unclear whether all who enter into Trump’s deals comprehend the consequences for themselves. For example, Putin by buying into Trump’s Gaza deal has also purchased Russia’s complicity in the erasure of Palestine and its people. Putin will also have shown himself to BRICS as an American accomplice, thereby reducing the cohesion and trust by members in that organization. The result will be to strengthen the dollar’s role as world reserve currency, thereby leaving the United States with the unique power to sanction other countries.

Those buying into Trump’s Gaza Board of Peace are creating the precedent for eliminating unwanted and problematical countries, along with the existence of their ethnic nationality. In other words, it is a new form of genocide….”

===========

That’s apt!
As I have always lamented, the future of our world under the approach of these rascally actors on both sides of the survival war divide is pitiful; it is precarious; it is hopeless; dreadful.
Simply put, the road to our collective future is Utopian!

Posted by: cegnoveltyesq | Jan 28 2026 18:07 utc | 73

Dave G | Jan 28 2026 18:04 utc | 69
 
Thanks for your reply. I suggest you fully write what you mean next time, please. 

Posted by: karlof1 | Jan 28 2026 18:08 utc | 74

I wonder if Northrup Grumman is resting the war because they know their invincible B-2 is about to be blown out of the sky, leading to a crash in stock prices.  

Posted by: Deniz | Jan 28 2026 18:08 utc | 75

karlof1 | Jan 28 2026 18:08 utc | 74
And maybe you could refrain from making condescending comments.

Posted by: Dave G | Jan 28 2026 18:11 utc | 76

Posted by: Gavin Longmuir | Jan 28 2026 17:43 utc | 57
 
######
 
You’re doing what many Yanks, particularly right-wingers, do when anyone talks American politics from outside of America.
 
What b says is either insightful or not. The comment section indicates that it may well be.
 
It doesn’t matter if he is German, Mongolian, or Martian. If the commentary shows value, then it is, by definition, valuable.
 
Some Americans can be very prickly when someone from the ROW has anything to say about their Emperor, who kills and murders people with impunity.
 
It pleases me that some Americans at the bar read Indi. Bless them.

Posted by: LoveDonbass | Jan 28 2026 18:12 utc | 77

 

“[t’s about the oil and greater zionism… trump – mr crazy, lol.. i like that b… i am sure his zionist supporters call him that too!  thanks.. “Posted by: james | Jan 28 2026” “It’s about Dispensationalism and the Apocalypse.”
Posted by: lester | Jan 28 2026 17:42 utc | 53

 
IMO,  it’s simpler than either of these ideals.
 
It is about “Palestine”.
Nothing else.
The need to rub out the last vestige, last stronghold, and it’s “proxy’s” to rid forever the idea of a Palestine State.
 
Phase 2 can’t be carried out, Kushner‘s Gaza Plaza can’t be built, nothing can happen until the last vestiges, crumbs… of a Palestinian National identity is gone.
 
Guessing Iran has seen this day coming for a long time.

Posted by: Trubind1 | Jan 28 2026 18:12 utc | 78

Good summation, B.  
It definitely won’t be another Venezuela. Iran is a serious opponent of Imperialism.  

Posted by: Ahenobarbus | Jan 28 2026 18:13 utc | 79

I think it was Scott Ritter who was suggesting that Iran take out one or more B52’s which would get some attention.
 
That said, I do agree with

I was decisively heartbroken, this time, upon hearing a recent Scott Ritter interview, in which he implicitly blamed Iranians for USA’s everlasting hostility: “They should have never gone over that embassy wall and held Americans hostage for 444 days,” Scott said — still the loyal United States marine, even after getting financially assaulted by the system. Semper fi! My goodness. What can I say? I feel sorry for Ritter. But I’m totally done with him. As he see things through glasses of such a tint, his interpretations and predictions are utterly useless, imho. 
 
Posted by: Aleph_Null | Jan 28 2026 16:57 utc | 23
 
I was disappointed but not entirely surprised

Posted by: psychohistorian | Jan 28 2026 18:17 utc | 80

Posted by: steven t johnson | Jan 28 2026 17:44 utc | 59

Posted by: robin | Jan 28 2026 17:19 utc | 36 Are you also saying that it’s like daring Trump to man up? You may be right, maybe this is duplicitous, reverse psychology.

I believe the danger from this sort of meme is less about daring the POTUS to act as much as driving the general public to actively call for actions that are inherently against its own interest. It’s another clever exploit of sectarian atavism that runs rampant among much of the ultra polarised electorate.
 
This is what it does
 
– Trump hater, handed a stick, mindlessly proceeds to whack pinata -> “We want war!”
 
– Haters of Trump haters, in full defence -> “POTUS is no chicken! Show ’em how we mean war!”

I still am inclined to think that it’s more a timidity about criticizing Trump, both because he is so popular with the MoA commentariat but also because he is the right side/Right side culturally, what is often called nationalism or conservatism. I have different names to be sure but I’m not our host.

Perhaps. Who knows.

Posted by: robin | Jan 28 2026 18:18 utc | 81

“Babble-On the Great has fallen”?
 
Make it so you “bearded mullahs”! Somebody has to stop 36 years of US bombing of Somalia. Yemen. Syria. Lebanon. Iraq. Libya. Sudan. Etc.
 
Allah bless whoever kills a Western asset. Let my people go!

Posted by: Duck n cover | Jan 28 2026 18:20 utc | 82

>50% chance that the Orange Golem TACOs by next Tuesday.

Posted by: ChatNPC | Jan 28 2026 18:23 utc | 83

Ritter. 
Posted by: Aleph_Null | Jan 28 2026 16:57 utc | 23
 
Disliked him since the first time I heard him speak.
Sanctimonious. Arrogant. Dismissive. Blowhard.
Basically Trump, with different values and goals. IMO.
 
But he is what many Americans crave apparently, outsourced ‘thinking’.  “tell me what I should believe.”
 
 

Posted by: ftp | Jan 28 2026 18:26 utc | 84

Posted by: Ahenobarbus | Jan 28 2026 18:13 utc | 79
 
######
 
I’m not a military guy, but it is obvious to me that an attack on Iran might be devastating.
 
The only reason this drama has played out this far and this long, IMO, is that they are all sniffing glue from the same tube.
 
If one watches Fox News, the military mouthpieces in the press really believe that Iran is a gas station without nukes.
 
I think that, like with Israel last June, they are in for a surprise.
 
When Iran had Israel begging for a ceasefire, they were only firing their legacy weapons. They were running Israel out of expensive, scarce, and ineffective interceptor missiles. The Israelis had to launch 2 or more interceptors per incoming missile or drone from Iran. Ansar Allah did the same thing to the USN carrier strike groups.

Posted by: LoveDonbass | Jan 28 2026 18:28 utc | 85

@  Aleph_Null | Jan 28 2026 16:57 utc | 23
 
maybe ritter had to tone it down after the cia/fbi raided his house and put him on notice?? either that or he is a dyed in the wool hard core maga fan, if he believes that shit.. 

Posted by: james | Jan 28 2026 18:29 utc | 86

It isn’t really hard for the CIA, let alone for Mossad, to find out where Ayatolla Chamenei spends every night, and killing him with a missile is so much easier than the kidnapping Maduro has been. From that it follows that Chamenei is not likely to survive the first nights. What that will do? leave the people without ttheir cherished leader, eventually eroding their resolve to resist at every cost. Tehran will end up as a US colony, or even as an Israeli one – in this case its fate might even be similar to Gaza’s.

Posted by: grunzt | Jan 28 2026 18:31 utc | 87

Salaam, biswapriya- p,@29-you have an unhealthy adoration for the use of nuclear weapons -why? So the contamination and destruction and death are not enough!Why aren’t you asking you family and friends and neighbours to take a stand against Yankee violence?We use nukes we contaminate occupied Palestine!We may even lose the al -aska mosque,so pray tell-why this love for use of nukes.We the honest mass of humanity need to keep letting those in authority know we are against  all war,not just against IRI and Palestine,but so to Ukraine ,Lebanon,the Sahel and yes Venezuela.No to war,peace,truth liberty transparency.All we want to do is live ,co-habit in  this space peacefully.No war, Salaam.

Posted by: 4q8 | Jan 28 2026 18:34 utc | 88

ChatNPC  83
 
Not quite clear, what’s the use of employing a DNC poll tested phrase meant
1] to egg Trump on towards war
2] to denigrate female genitalia
unless, you just want to be labeled as another pointless political hack doing the work of the the Hillary/Cheney/Obama/Sullivan-Blinken admin?  [singular-intended]
 
Yes..yes…the Hillary/Cheney/Obama/Sullivan-Blinken admin [singular-intended] types that brought us the wars in Serbia/Kosovo, Iraq-Invasion, Af-Pak, Libya, Syria, ex-ukrainia will pat you on the back but…then what?  What’s the point in outing yourself as a minion of those who have effed-up this world?

Posted by: S Brennan | Jan 28 2026 18:37 utc | 89

Posted by: grunzt | Jan 28 2026 18:31 utc | 87
 
######
 
The Zionists tried to get the Supreme Leader in June and couldn’t find him.
 
If they kill Khameini, the entire ME will burn. The Shia will likely go on Jihad and all the vassals and satraps will end.
 
America doesn’t have the manpower to hold its oil Empire together overseas.
 
I don’t think Trump knows or understands this. I imagine the CIA and Bibi aren’t explaining the consequences of that course of action.

Posted by: LoveDonbass | Jan 28 2026 18:38 utc | 90

This is good…
 
The Anti-Empire Project: ‘The Iran Insurgency’
 
https://substack.com/home/post/p-186039489
 
“A review of the available evidence…”

Posted by: John Gilberts | Jan 28 2026 18:39 utc | 91

And what exactly have the americans achieved with the abduction of Maduro? 
Posted by: Doctor Eleven | Jan 28 2026 17:19 utc | 37
 
They now have a CIA base there and are preparing operations similar to those in Ukraine.

Posted by: smartfox | Jan 28 2026 18:40 utc | 92

The accidental use of the perfect tense in the last sentence is especially Freudian. Man makes his history but not as he would cho(o)se.

Posted by: Patroklos | Jan 28 2026 18:42 utc | 93

Posted by: smartfox | Jan 28 2026 18:40 utc | 92
 
#####
 
The CIA has been very successful in Ukraine? 

Posted by: LoveDonbass | Jan 28 2026 18:42 utc | 94

@ 4q8 | Jan 28 2026 18:34 utc | 88 who, I will assume, has not been in the bar long enough to know that I despise nuclear weapons.
 
I live in the belly of the beast that has used them before and still suffers from that sickness .  Just because I see the potential actions of dying empire does not mean I wish them to occur.
 
No war, Salaam…………………. but end the reign of the God Of Mammon cult and its followers……….Peace

Posted by: psychohistorian | Jan 28 2026 18:42 utc | 95

Iran has HEU for a dozen or so warheads. It should build those but not declare itself a nuclear armed power. That gives it the ability to strike Israel with conventional missiles. If it declared or tested, than any launch on Israel would force the zio monsters to launch on warning their own nukes. By not declaring or testing, Iran could survive an Israeli nuke and then wipe Israel off the planet with one strike in TA.

Posted by: Crumchy | Jan 28 2026 18:44 utc | 96

Not seeing much reaction in the oil markets yet; if things were close to kicking off I’d have expected some well-placed insiders to be already positioning themselves to create price volatility.
 
Long oil/short US treasuries as a pair trade, anyone?

Posted by: Jeremy Rhymings-Lang | Jan 28 2026 18:45 utc | 97

Posted by: smartfox | Jan 28 2026 18:40 utc | 92
 
If a coup in Venezuela was going to be successful, it would have overthrown the government and would have been supported by at least the illusion of a popular uprising with sufficient military support when Maduro was removed. I think the chances of a successful coup are now significantly diminished. 

Posted by: Saint Jimmy | Jan 28 2026 18:45 utc | 98

@ Posted by: NemesisCalling | Jan 28 2026 16:37 utc | 9
I beg to differ –
It is in fact exceptionally malicious and ignorant.

Posted by: jared | Jan 28 2026 18:54 utc | 99

@Genesis | Jan 28 2026 16:41 utc | 12

My own assumption:”Never done it” means what?A-weapons developed after all?

No, I think it means it will obliterate all US bases in the region. Iran has massive amounts of shorter range missiles (compared to those reaching Israel).

Posted by: Norwegian | Jan 28 2026 18:54 utc | 100