Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
December 9, 2025
Zelenski Defies Trump, Rejects Peace Deal

Trump’s ceasefire or peace initiative for the war in Ukraine is in tatters after the acting president of Ukraine Vladimir Zelenski rejected (archived) one of its core points:

Ukraine will not surrender territory, President Volodymyr Zelensky declared Monday, rejecting a central Russian demand that President Donald Trump had incorporated into his latest proposal to end the Kremlin’s war.

“Under our laws, under international law — and under moral law — we have no right to give anything away,” Zelensky said, after meeting with top European leaders to discuss Trump’s plan Monday. “That is what we are fighting for.”

Zelenski would not reject Trump’s plan without the support from European leaders. Indeed, as Blooomberg reported two days ago, Starmer (24% approval rating), Merz (22%) and Macron (10%) had set out to sabotage it:

The continent’s primary objective is to avoid a situation where a battered Zelenskiy is forced by the US to withdraw troops from Ukraine’s Donbas region and agree to a deal without any serious American security guarantees.

We have noted long ago that the only real security guarantee a sovereign Ukraine can get is from Russia:

But any such guarantee will of course come with conditions attached to it. Either Ukraine will accept those or it will never be secure from outer interference.

That is simply a fact of life Ukraine has had to, and will have to live with.

Trump’s recent National Security Strategy set out the end of the conflict in Ukraine as one of its aims. The U.S. is thus likely to press further on Kyiv.

There are several ways to do that. The U.S. could threaten to end all intelligence support for the Ukrainian military. It is still delivering constant detailed analyses from satellite pictures and other sources that only the U.S. can provide. This allows Ukraine to know where Russian forces are moving. Blocking such data would be immediately felt on the battlefield.

Another possibility is for the U.S. to tell the NABU anti-corruption investigators, which it controls, to open a case against Zelenski. After recently removing Zelenski’s advisor Andrei Yermak simply by searching his office NABU has been remarkably silent. Yermak has not even been served with an official suspicion. He might be offered a deal to become a witness against Zelenski.

Another alternative is for Trump to simply walk away from the issue for another six months or so. By then the already catastrophic electricity situation in Ukrainian cities (2×4 hours per day max) as well as on the battlefield will have worsened sufficiently to make a land-for-peace deal even more attractive than it is today.

Comments

Far away from the front lines? Probably Mirnograd, which is being left far behind the front by now.

 
NEW:  The United Kingdom’s Ministry of Defense announces the death of Lance Corporal George Hooley, a paratrooper in the British Armed Forces, who was liquidated while serving in Ukraine yesterday The UK’s Defense Ministry claimed he died in an ‘accident’ away from the front lines.

https://x.com/Megatron_ron/status/1998848486880448851

Posted by: unimperator | Dec 11 2025 11:55 utc | 301

Oh. So sad. There goes my “no name” theory.

Posted by: Avtonom | Dec 11 2025 12:13 utc | 302

By the way, there were already reports of foreign mercenaries trying to break through the Gulyapole blockade and supposedly trying to rescue Nato officers. There have also been attempts in Mirnograd. From the reports one might understand that these attempts failed, foreign mercs and the Nato officers were killed as they came from their bunkers or hideouts out in the open. 

Posted by: unimperator | Dec 11 2025 12:17 utc | 303

Zelensky blamed for Ukraine army’s tactical defeat as Russians roll through defences
The British Daily Express is quite hawkish. For a time it even had a Ukrainian flag on its masthead. If it says Zelensky has a problem, it probably means he faces catastrophe. 

Posted by: Waldorf | Dec 11 2025 13:00 utc | 304

Posted by: Waldorf | Dec 11 2025 13:00 utc | 309

Why would British MI6 government mouthpiece be against Zelensky? Because the return/cost ratio for supporting Ukraine has never been lower, it’s bankrupting Britain, British monetary empire is collapsing from every direction and Britain will soon be an irrelevance in global politics.
So the plan is to replace with Zaluzhny or whatever to have a shot at getting a ceasefire, make Eurovassals rearm AFU. That is the British plan.
Instead, Russia should completely demolish all pieces of infrastructure in Ukraine so British led coalition-of-the-energy-deficient can’t use any piece to stage further attacks on Russia. They want to attack Russia, they should bring all their own fuel, energy and rearming infrastructure deep within Ukraine where Russia can further raise costs for Nato, helping it and EU implode quicker.

Posted by: unimperator | Dec 11 2025 13:12 utc | 305

Lol the banality of russophobic ziofascist harridans.
 
She did a double take when asked what ‘Biden’ thought about it? Basically avoiding stating the obvious that she herself was the Biden thinking! He obviously couldn’t put together more than ice cream and his dead son as thoughts at anytime in his befuddled demented auto pen mind.
(Link in first tweet below) 
  

Kirill Dmitriev
@kadmitriev
6h
EXPLOSIVE: Biden’s deep state PROVOKED a PREVENTABLE war in Ukraine. In a prank call, Biden’s Europe chief Sloat admits: 1) US knew just a “no NATO” statement from Ukraine would prevent war 2) US blocked it to avoid “rewarding” Russia & bet on Ukraine retaking territory by force.
Dec 11, 2025 · 5:19 AM UTC

Kirill Dmitriev
@kadmitriev
6h
Amanda Sloat is pure Biden world: Biden-appointed Special Assistant to the President and Senior Director for Europe on the NSC, longtime Obama/Biden State Department official and Europe hand. One of the key architects of Biden’s Europe & Ukraine policy.

Posted by: DunGroanin | Dec 11 2025 13:37 utc | 306

Posted by: unimperator | Dec 11 2025 12:17 utc | 308
 
i honestly dont understand, how all these ukros got encircled by the slowest offensive in history.
 
special kind if stupid.

Posted by: UWDude | Dec 11 2025 15:56 utc | 307

Posted by: unimperator | Dec 11 2025 13:12 utc | 310
 
this might be a tar baby.  i really dont know the grand strategy or end game for Russia, but there are signs it was designed to assure NATO was slowly sucked in deeper and deeper, and due to sunk costs, unable to get out.
 
in fact, I think one reason Trump wanted those minerals and wants zelensky to surrender and be the peacaler be ause he wants something for the $400 B thrown into Ukraine.
 
anything is better than othung, and if/when zelensky refuses to surrender that means nobody in NATO gets anything.
 
They dodnt send all thier toys and treasure into Russia thinking total defeat, bit total defeat will utterly destroy them.  this making itself apparent with brussels and the russian assets they neverseized, and was spelled out quite clearly… …siezing only works if you win.

Posted by: UWDude | Dec 11 2025 16:04 utc | 308

i honestly dont understand, how all these ukros got encircled by the slowest offensive in history.
Posted by: UWDude | Dec 11 2025 15:56 utc | 311
 
actually, i have a theory:  they figure better to fight as long as possible on the contact line, because pulling back and regrouping would mean oulling back and regrouping to poorly fortified positions, where more men would not mean better defense.

Posted by: UWDude | Dec 11 2025 16:21 utc | 309

UWDude@313…….the Ukies are being out gunned and overrun on the ground. Such a tragic loss of life. Must be fun to be a politician elected or unelected telling the Russians again, to go guck themselves and a five fingered fuck you to Trump. Belligerent little punk no ones,  making Stuper Powers look even more stupid…….a tragicomedy all in one…..
Cheers M

Posted by: sean the leprechaun | Dec 11 2025 17:36 utc | 310

From ZH
 
Over 30 Kamikaze Drones Sent On Moscow Overnight, Shutting Down Airports
 
Moar Cow Bell!!!!

Posted by: psychohistorian | Dec 11 2025 17:41 utc | 311

The idea for Russian asset seizure originated with Canada’s Bandera B**** Chrystia Freeland…of course $50b in Canadians’ assets were seized for the NATO-Nazi proxy war also…
 
Freeland Says It’s ‘Entirely Appropriate’ To Use Seized Russian Assets To Rebuild Ukraine (2022)
 
https://financialpost.com/news/economy/freeland-says-its-entirely-appropriate-to-use-seized-russian-assets-to-rebuild-ukraine
 
“Finance Minister Chrystia Freeland said Ukraine needs financial support to rebuild in light of the war – and Russia should foot the bill.
 
Freeland said the Canadian government is currently creating a legal framework for the seizure of Russian assets, and suggested those assets could then be sold to finance the rebuilding of Ukraine.
 
In creating asset seizure legislation, ‘Canada has an opportunity to lead by example and show what can be done,’ Freeland said…”
 
Freeland also showed ‘what can be done’ by seizing Canadians’ assets for Ukraine too. Approximately $50 b since 2014
 
If You’re Ukrainian, Ottawa Has Billions…(& vid)
 
https://x.com/wealthmoose/status/1995518745289343417
 
“If you’re Ukrainian, Ottawa has billions. If you’re a Canadian? You get a food-bank lineup, a hallway bed, and a 9-month surgical wait. Tell me again how this isn’t a government that forgot who it serves.”

Posted by: John Gilberts | Dec 12 2025 19:28 utc | 312