Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
December 23, 2025
“What changed with the German Minister of Defense, and why did it change so fast?”

Act 1: “Europe’s last peaceful summer.” Russia may attack NATO sooner than expectedNexta, Nov 17 2025

German Defense Minister Boris Pistorius said the past summer may have been “the last peaceful one” for Europe.

“We always assumed that a Russian attack on NATO could happen in 2029. But now we’re hearing assessments pointing to possible escalation as early as 2028, and some military historians even believe we have already lived through the last peaceful summer,” the minister said.

Act 2: Pistorius cools NATO rhetoric — there will be no Third World WarNexta, Dec 23 2025

Germany’s defence minister Boris Pistorius has distanced himself from alarmism within NATO. In an interview with Die Zeit, he said he does not believe in a scenario of a full-scale war between Russia and the Alliance.

He was commenting on remarks by NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte, who said the Alliance must be prepared for a war “on the scale experienced by our grandfathers and great-grandfathers”.

Pistorius responded bluntly, saying this was most likely a figurative exaggeration. “I do not believe in such a scenario. In my view, Putin does not intend to wage a full-scale global war against NATO.”

Brian McDonald asks:

Just last month, Boris Pistorius warned a German newspaper that Europe may already have seen its last peaceful summer and that Russia and NATO could be at war next year.

Now he says there will be no Third World War and that talk of a NATO–Russia conflict is “figurative exaggeration.”

What changed, and why did it change so fast?

One Dimitry Medvedev asks a similar question:

The ‘European peacemakers’ are surprising. Pistorius said he doesn’t believe war will break out between NATO and Russia, and Stubb admitted our country has no interest in attacking alliance members.
So, what happened? Sobering up or have the Christmas holidays simply begun?

My answer to both is: Tulsi Gabbard

DNI Tulsi Gabbard @DNIGabbard – 21:02 utc · Dec 20, 2025

No, this is a lie and propaganda @Reuters is willingly pushing on behalf of warmongers who want to undermine President Trump’s tireless efforts to end this bloody war that has resulted in more than a million casualties on both sides.

Dangerously, you are promoting this false narrative to block President Trump’s peace effort, and fomenting hysteria and fear among the people to get them to support the escalation of war, which is what NATO and the EU really want in order to pull the United States military directly into war with Russia.

The truth is the US intelligence community has briefed policymakers, including the Democrat HPSCI member quoted by Reuters, that US Intelligence assesses that Russia seeks to avoid a larger war with NATO. It also assesses that, as the last few years have shown, Russia’s battlefield performance indicates it does not currently have the capability to conquer and occupy all of Ukraine, let alone Europe.

The master called and the poodles winced but found their place.

Comments

@  LoveDonbass | Dec 24 2025 23:35 utc | 258
 
no one is perfect…. i do find great enjoyment in embracing humility…  how about you?? 
 
@ Norwegian | Dec 25 2025 9:59 utc | 283
 
i found it interesting what you had mentioned earlier on the spyware that microsoft and etc. are imposing on the operating systems..  thanks… 
 
 

Posted by: james | Dec 25 2025 19:33 utc | 301

To those of you who have not tried a Linux distro yet…Try one in 2026 or right now
Norwegian | Dec 25 2025 9:59 utc | 283

Right on Norwegian! 2026 it is, I am putting together a dual boot system to run CAD initially and eventually plan to go all in.
 
The ridiculous cost of 30 year old corporate software, the endless spying which causes performance and security issues hobbles the industrious worker in the west.  While not a big fan of free-anything, open source software is the only way to own your work. 
 
Not to mention that copyright laws in the west are welfare for the idle rich, 20 years max, the disparity between copyright laws and those of patents is shameful.  Consider a science minded individual could build a fusion reactor that fits in a suitcase and he’s got 20 years to profit from it…most of which will be spent jumping through regulatory hoops.  Whereas, the Bill Gates of the world can “borrow” somebody else’s software, sell it to a third party, tell this friend he’ll buy the software from him for a 1/10th of the contract he now has and then he has 90 years to profit from something he’s put no effort into.  And then, with all the free time, go off and rape children.
 
 

Posted by: S Brennan | Dec 25 2025 21:30 utc | 302

Agreed! Same argument will apply to literally everyone else who builds their own multi-satellite constellation. Yes, space is gettting very, very crowded and it’s only going to increase. On the plus side, one nice feature is that every satellite in LEO has a fairly short life span (spacex are about 5 years)  before they burn up on re-entry. Or hopefully burn up on re-entry! Posted by: Clown Shoes | Dec 25 2025 17:28 utc | 296

 
Space segments in the size of StarLink are a hubris sodden idea.
and that Hubris has a calling date. look into “Kessler Syndrome”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kessler_syndrome
One misstep may turn into cascading collisions and a full denial to space.
For everyone. Expect the US to “brinkmanship” such an instrument.
 

Posted by: MAKK | Dec 26 2025 10:41 utc | 303

Yes, kessler syndromeThat’s why sleepy berletic miss the boat.The question of who will have superior lanching capacity is not so important, because if one fighting party gets losing, he will simply use the kessler syndrome to destroy everything.Therefore, the question which matters are :
– who owns pseudo-satellite ? Europe has solar plane, and China has pilotable balloon
– who can operate without satellite communication and without underwater optical fiber ? Answer : not the thassocracy
 
 

Posted by: Parisian Guy | Dec 26 2025 18:00 utc | 304

Posted by: Nervous German | Dec 24 2025 4:22 utc | 143
Posted by: Nervous German | Dec 24 2025 4:32 utc | 144
In the absence of links, I tried finding one of those articles, citing some of the text word for word, and couldn’t. Were these machine-translated?Thanks.
Posted by: joey_n | Dec 25 2025 0:31 utc | 264

 
Sorry for the late reply.  These are paid AI translations from the paid print-only edition of a regional German daily which I will not further specify for reasons which are hopefully obvious; if not, my argument would delve into the shallows of German c0pyright law and the lawfare it allows, which is likely the most restrictive and most aggressively enforced of all G-20 nations, since it does not know the concept of “fair use”.
 
Yahoo has a variation of the DPA article I posted on DIHK;  guess you have to trust me on the EPD article about the Bundeswehr questionnaire.  Chances are high Yahoo and other news aggregators have English versions of DPA and AFP articles; not so much for smaller agencies like Evangelischer Pressedienst or Katholische Nachrichtenagentur, which are both run by the two major German churches, as the names imply.

Posted by: Nervous German | Dec 26 2025 18:10 utc | 305

As for the nonsense Karaganov’s spouting, the man’s off his head. As far as they can the Russians will avoid responding to the European war of words or  to the European pinprick “dirty war” efforts.
They’d lose all credibility with their friends if they did respond.  Subjecting Europe to serious military action would be like beating up a man in a wheelchair.  The Chinese and the Africans would see that as decidedly down market:  the Russians would be regarded as nothing more than bullies, hitting the Europeans when the Europeans don’t have the ability to hit back.

Posted by: English Outsider | Dec 26 2025 22:32 utc | 186

Posted by: Digby | Dec 28 2025 11:31 utc | 306