|
“What changed with the German Minister of Defense, and why did it change so fast?”
Act 1: “Europe’s last peaceful summer.” Russia may attack NATO sooner than expected – Nexta, Nov 17 2025
German Defense Minister Boris Pistorius said the past summer may have been “the last peaceful one” for Europe.
“We always assumed that a Russian attack on NATO could happen in 2029. But now we’re hearing assessments pointing to possible escalation as early as 2028, and some military historians even believe we have already lived through the last peaceful summer,” the minister said.
Act 2: Pistorius cools NATO rhetoric — there will be no Third World War – Nexta, Dec 23 2025
Germany’s defence minister Boris Pistorius has distanced himself from alarmism within NATO. In an interview with Die Zeit, he said he does not believe in a scenario of a full-scale war between Russia and the Alliance.
He was commenting on remarks by NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte, who said the Alliance must be prepared for a war “on the scale experienced by our grandfathers and great-grandfathers”.
Pistorius responded bluntly, saying this was most likely a figurative exaggeration. “I do not believe in such a scenario. In my view, Putin does not intend to wage a full-scale global war against NATO.”
Brian McDonald asks:
Just last month, Boris Pistorius warned a German newspaper that Europe may already have seen its last peaceful summer and that Russia and NATO could be at war next year.
Now he says there will be no Third World War and that talk of a NATO–Russia conflict is “figurative exaggeration.”
What changed, and why did it change so fast?
One Dimitry Medvedev asks a similar question:
The ‘European peacemakers’ are surprising. Pistorius said he doesn’t believe war will break out between NATO and Russia, and Stubb admitted our country has no interest in attacking alliance members.
So, what happened? Sobering up or have the Christmas holidays simply begun?
My answer to both is: Tulsi Gabbard
DNI Tulsi Gabbard @DNIGabbard – 21:02 utc · Dec 20, 2025
No, this is a lie and propaganda @Reuters is willingly pushing on behalf of warmongers who want to undermine President Trump’s tireless efforts to end this bloody war that has resulted in more than a million casualties on both sides.
Dangerously, you are promoting this false narrative to block President Trump’s peace effort, and fomenting hysteria and fear among the people to get them to support the escalation of war, which is what NATO and the EU really want in order to pull the United States military directly into war with Russia.
The truth is the US intelligence community has briefed policymakers, including the Democrat HPSCI member quoted by Reuters, that US Intelligence assesses that Russia seeks to avoid a larger war with NATO. It also assesses that, as the last few years have shown, Russia’s battlefield performance indicates it does not currently have the capability to conquer and occupy all of Ukraine, let alone Europe.
The master called and the poodles winced but found their place.
@Snake:
Couple points:
a. Most of what households need can be made on a local basis. The house, the appliances, the food, energy, child care, education, entertainment, health care, transportation … just about all of it can be made, repaired, produced locally. Thought experiment: open up your washer, or the HVAC unit. Take a look. None of those parts are complicated. Yes, many parts have to be made in specialized factories, but they can be designed to last, and the machines designed to be easy to repair. Many parts can be refurbed or recycled locally. Move the labor from centralized mfg’g to distributed repair and recycle.
b. Yes automation will make centralized jobs go away. Two Qs: who owns the automation? Oligarch or you? And … don’t we also need jobs that are tough to automate-away? Repair, refurb. Less load on natural world. Don’t we need that sort of stuff?
c. Here in US, humanity is mainly distributed to major metro areas, mostly on the coasts. There are vast relatively unpopulated areas with good weather, soil, etc. that have dead towns in them (centralized the jobs). What about un-centralizing the jobs? What’s in the way? The efficiencies of centralized production. What about the inefficiencies of the long supply chains for centralized production? Can the advantages of local be used to level the playing field between centralized production .vs. local?
d. The pride of worksmanship thing. It’s a thing, indeed. I take great pride in the things I build/built. The only limitation on getting more enjoyment is that it took me so long to do, and I can’t afford to be that inefficient for all the stuff I need. So, can a local economy be spun up over decades that gradually displaces centralized production with local? Can’t that be thought about, tested out, iteratively evolved toward? People don’t care about what they produce because the consequences of incompetence aren’t put in their face. If my neighbor makes me some furniture that is shoddy, he/she’s gonna hear about it. It won’t happen twice, right? And people want meaning; they want to make something tangible, start-to-finish, that’s theirs. That force exists, but it’s currently not expressible at the workplace.
e. Education. Right now, we don’t believe in self-education that much. But its sooooooo cheap to deliver education over the internet. youtube is gotta be 20% how-to vids. Online education can go waaay further than it is now. Also most work, most production, doesn’t need all that much education. Yes, top-end R&D, health care procedures, but most production doesn’t need that much education. (not saying education is bad; it’s terrific. But we’ve got brain-lock about degrees. Degrees don’t equate to job performance. Other factors (pertinence of knowledge, degree of discipline, ability to evolve, acquire and use feedback) make more difference.
f. Monopoly power. Most of the stuff you need to run your house isn’t covered by patent. They’ve long since expired. If you don’t try to compete at the leading edge of tech, and just use all the good stuff out there that’s out of patent protection, you’ll do fine. For ex, my washing machine contains elec motor, valves, timer, belts, pulleys, big wash-bowl, agitator, wiring, relays, and a sheet-metal enclosure. Which of those parts is still under patent protection? I think the correct answer is “none”.
Posted by: Tom Pfotzer | Dec 24 2025 14:48 utc | 204
|