Quote of the day:
 

‘The mental health of European leaders raises doubts about how useful they can be in negotiations on Ukraine’ – Lavrov. – https://t.me/vicktop55/38516

Posted by: LightYearsFromHome | Dec 11 2025 18:22 utc | 3

Posted by: Judge Barbier | Dec 11 2025 18:29 utc | 4

The more they talk about it, the less likely it’s going to happen. Because these parasites and sociopaths always compensate lack of ability with talking.
 
That said, there are news that Trump is seeking to dissect the EU into parts, by stripping Hungary, Slovakia, Italy and Poland out of the EU.
 
The more they talk about stealing assets the more likely that will succeed. The more they talk about EU tax payers picking up the full bill of Ukraine funding, the more likely that will succeed.  ECB is already begging Italy not to talk its gold out of ECB jurisdiction (this would start an uncontrollable spiral leading to the destruction of the Euro).

Posted by: unimperator | Dec 11 2025 18:35 utc | 5

The Russian money is the collateral.
Posted by: Judge Barbier | Dec 11 2025 18:29 utc | 4
There is no Russian money in Euroclear. The Russian assets have the form of Euro bonds. The EU already spent the money they got for the bonds. They just won’t pay their debts. And probably try to issue new bonds to sell to other gullible  investors. Which might be harder than they imagine.

Posted by: Martina | Dec 11 2025 18:42 utc | 7

^ @3
 
…adding, shout out to Lavrov. I know, not very diplomatic, but very catchy:
 
Fite Dem Back

Posted by: LightYearsFromHome | Dec 11 2025 18:44 utc | 9

Civil disobedience. Rolling strikes. Boycott everything American.
A people’s revolution.
 

Posted by: Bingo | Dec 11 2025 18:47 utc | 11

Following earlier post secret docs USA trying to get ,4 countries  away “from NATO ie Austria Hungary re posted beneath , also Bulgarian Gov resigned vos of corruption stuff…and any  news Serbia,????? So Georgia and Moldova quiet?
 
Poland is mighty cheesed off it has been excluded from the recent London meeting ZuK France Germany Ukraine
US defense website claims to have seen a leaked document unveiling a dramatic US proposal to prise four countries away from the European Union as part of a bold new ‘Make Europe Great Again’ strategy. 
The secret file, reported by Defense One, supposedly claims Trump intends to pull Austria, Italy, Hungary and Poland away from the EU and closer in to Washington’s circle of influence – a move that would rip through the continent’s political landscape. 
The document is also said to call for the US to back parties and movements that ‘seek sovereignty and preservation/restoration of traditional European ways of life.’ 
The supposed leak comes just a week after the release of the official, 33-page National Security Strategy, which sparked debate for its stark warning that Europe faces ‘civilisational erasure’ and for suggesting it is ‘far from obvious whether certain European countries will… remain reliable allies.’

Posted by: Jo | Dec 11 2025 18:52 utc | 13

Thanks to all for the replies…
The atmosphere is getting hot in Bruxelles….

Posted by: Judge Barbier | Dec 11 2025 19:05 utc | 15

Posted by: Me | Dec 11 2025 18:56 utc | 14
 
 
Let’s follow that line of reasoning.  You want an even smaller group of elites with total global jurisdiction to “benevolently” govern us?  If they wont do it at the nation state level what makes you think it would be any better?  In fact it would be worse because you would have nowhere to go or hide.
 
 
Thanks for the reply.. You seem to agree there would be no war if only one nation state existed.   Your argument is that even fewer elite would control the whole world.. My argument is that the distribution of the masses would be much broader and much more powerful and much more likely to act to limit the use of the government in ways the benefit the few over the many. 
 
 
I suggest bottom up power possessed by the governed mass would be active all of the time, global in nature and always threatening to the few. As such the elite would be reluctant to use the government in ways that benefit the few over the many. If you add the 2nd government idea to the equation, the freedom of the few to corrupt a government designed to benefit the masses would be highly limited and the efficiency of the 2nd government would be enhanced many, many times over. Furthermore projects would be global.. so roads, Rail roads, and airports, bridges, dams, nuclear power plants and the like would be built where they can improve the quality of life for the most number of people.. 
 
 
Further the distribution of top down highly restricted power inherent in a distributed, multinational set of governments would be abolished.. This would allow the global governed masses to concentrate their oversight efforts on the legislating and policing powers engaged in by the leaders of the central mono government.   The need for large standing armies would disappear.. this weakens further the power of the the leaders of the central government to engage in corruption and to use the government to enhance the lot of the few.. Also I think the idea of a two party political system will disappear.. as each nation will be presenting candidates for elections to the mono government. 
 
 
  
 

Posted by: snake | Dec 11 2025 19:27 utc | 17

Canada’s Defence Spending Ramps Up
 
https://x.com/dimitrilascaris/status/1999148926402732479
 
“The government of Prime Minister Goldman Sachs is spending money on weapons like a drunken sailor. It will spend up to $1 billion on tens (and possibly hundreds) of thousands of shiny new rifles. It also plans to flush $2.7 billion down the toilet to buy US-made HIMARS missile systems – the same missile systems that Russia has methodically destroyed in the Ukraine war.”
 
Canada Out of NATO/Ukraine – Down with Carney the best Canadian PM America ever had – Yves Engler for PM – 
 

Posted by: John Gilberts | Dec 11 2025 19:36 utc | 19

Alexander Mercouris
 
https://www.youtube.com/@AlexMercouris/videos
 
“UK banks warn Starmer asset seizure plan illegal; Kiev energy close to collapse; Siversk, Huiliapole.”

Posted by: John Gilberts | Dec 11 2025 19:44 utc | 21

ZH was brutally shut down for being too independent some  years ago. It then reopened a few weeks later – toeing the Deep State line. The comments remain Independent and informative.
 
 

Posted by: Exile | Dec 11 2025 19:59 utc | 23

@ Exile | Dec 11 2025 19:59 utc | 23
 
I used to regularly visit them, then, after the shutdown of advertising support from Google, I noticed a distinct change in the tone of many of their articles, in particular their reliance on the Epoch Times for reporting on China.
 
Anyway, before we get too far off-topic, we can compare minor fires at a Russian fertiliser plant with the possibility of a cooked dinner in Ukraine:

Ukrenergo warned about electricity restrictions for Friday, December 12. Shutdown schedules will be implemented again in Ukraine

This is reported by Ukrenergo, reports RegioNews .
 
It is noted that schedules of hourly shutdowns and power restrictions (for industry) will be introduced in all regions of Ukraine. The reason is the consequences of Russian attacks on energy facilities.
 

“Attention! The situation in the power grid may change. Time and scope of application of outages at your address-find out on the official pages of regional power companies in your region. When electricity is available on schedule, please consume it sparingly, ” the power engineers urge.

https://regionews.ua/ukr/news/ukraine/1765483098-vidklyuchennya-svitla-po-vsiy-ukrayini-v-ukrenergo-poperedili-pro-obmezhennya-na-12-grudnya (via translation add-on.)
 
I did see an actual schedule earlier, which showed power only being available for 8 hours out of any 24 hour period. Reminded me of mid-1970s Britain, 3-day weeks, sugar and bread shortages, intermittent electricity, TV closing at 2230 each evening.
 
Grim times.

Posted by: Jeremy Rhymings-Lang | Dec 11 2025 20:15 utc | 25

Is there any confirmation that Lyman has been reoccupied? Quite a surprise, I didn’t think the Russians were even near it yet.

Posted by: catdog | Dec 11 2025 20:12 utc | 24
 
As far as I can find, it is just Telegram rumours at the moment, though having said that, some of those channels seem to be quite well-informed.
 
Like Seversk, it is one that I will wait for official confirmation from the Russian Defence Ministry; the fog of war is swirling even thicker than usual at the moment.

Posted by: Jeremy Rhymings-Lang | Dec 11 2025 20:30 utc | 27

In response to
”
Grim times.
Posted by: Jeremy Rhymings-Lang | Dec 11 2025 20:15 utc | 25
”
 
I doubt it will take much to reduce that 8 hours a day to zero for more regions and this may force the MAD conditional surrender instead of it happening militarily.
 
And it sure doesn’t look like negotiations are going anywhere.

Posted by: psychohistorian | Dec 11 2025 20:32 utc | 29

Jeremy Rhymings-Lang | Dec 11 2025 20:15 utc | 25
 
<i>”mid-1970s Britain, 3-day weeks, sugar and bread shortages, intermittent electricity, TV closing at 2230 each evening. Grim times.”</i>
 
1970s Britain
a) still 98% white British
b) still had an industrial/manufacturing base, nearly all gone now
c) replacement birthrate
d) a male on median wage could afford to buy a house
e) AND support a wife at home rearing children
f) no food banks
g) pawnshops were something you read about in Victorian books, not something on every High Street
h) no people sleeping in shop doorways
 
I admit the electric shortages (miners strike) were a pain if you had kids to bath and keep clean. But the sugar price was great for our health, I gave up having sugar in my tea and never went back to it. 

Posted by: YetAnotherAnon | Dec 11 2025 20:50 utc | 31

@ YetAnotherAnon | Dec 11 2025 20:50 utc | 31
 
I’m not very good at implying things I guess, the comparison was looking at the downfall of the Heath government under such conditions, and comparing that with the prospects for a downfall of the Kiev junta, given the conditions increasingly prevailing in Ukraine.
 
Very much O/T here, but there is a potentially deep rabbit-hole that opens up, if one compares Heath as a bachelor, with his enthusiastic championing of Boy Scouts obtaining their Sailing badge on board his Morning Cloud private yacht…

Posted by: Jeremy Rhymings-Lang | Dec 11 2025 21:27 utc | 33

Isn‘t Morning Cloud a play on the phrase Morning Glory ? 
from urban dictionary…..Morning Glory means; To awaken with a boner so hard a cat couldn’t scratch it 
 

Posted by: Exile | Dec 11 2025 21:46 utc | 35

I have one question about one thing (particularly with the cleaning of prokovsk’s suburbs, taking Lyman and AFU counterattacks in kupiansk)
 
AFU casulaties 1.100s , ten days in a row.
 
Either there are a lot of surrenders not being presented or AWOLs through the roof.

Posted by: Newbie | Dec 11 2025 21:56 utc | 37

Western values in full geer trying to steal what is not belonging to them.
 
It looks like we have a stalemate here with little Belgium displaying fierce resistance.
 
In the meantime the Russian Army took Sieviersk (I announced it some 24 hours ago), Lyman (and progressing further), and the East side of Guliaipolie.
 
The trapped troops in the Dimitrov cauldron are either surrendering either being destroyed.
 
Corpses exchange: 11’000 against 201.  Ratio: almost 55 to 1.
 
Lavrov stated the truth: that is Odessa and Nikolaiev and Kherson were founded and built by Russians. Necessary to speak about restoration. Well, liberation will be also correct.
 
Medvedev: G7, C5, G20 etc. all those formats are loss of time.
 
In 2025, the military support of the western countries to Ukraine was the lowest since 2022.

Posted by: Naive | Dec 11 2025 22:08 utc | 39

Julian can add one more 50,000+ population city to his list.

Posted by: Milton | Dec 11 2025 22:04 utc | 38
 
I dunno, Julian will probably add it to his list of “non-strategic, sleepy backwoods settlements” that Russia continues to liberate at a glacial pace…

Posted by: Jeremy Rhymings-Lang | Dec 11 2025 22:13 utc | 41

@JRL
how’d ya get the blockquote to work? I’ve only got clocks and thumbs and other emojis?>> I have never claimed to be a tech guy

Posted by: Melaleuca | Dec 11 2025 22:24 utc | 43

Posted by: Ghost of Zanon | Dec 11 2025 21:55 utc | 36
 
this is the delusion you get when people who think power flows from the mouth of lawyers are in charge.
they love those stupid scenes in movies where somebody gives a speech and suddenly everybody changes their minds.

Posted by: UWDude | Dec 11 2025 22:28 utc | 45

Can someone from the well-informed Moonkind Community give me some context for events in Bulgaria? I’m struggling to find in-depth analysis anywhere…can anyone point me to some links?

Posted by: Billy2Hats | Dec 11 2025 22:31 utc | 47

Re: Posted by: S Brennan | Dec 11 2025 18:52 utc | 12
 

As I said the other day, Russia needs to work an end of war deal that creates a border with Slovakia/Hungary that includes a hydrocarbon/shipping corridor and a security deal with said parties and Austria.  Slovakia/Hungary/Austria are very much at risk due to the machination of SS-Officer-von der Leyen.  All the mentioned parties need to prepare an exit route or have their borders erased.

 
 
 
Ha – yes – doing this would constitute a Russian WIN in this conflict.
 
Anything short of this is at best a draw / stalemate.
 
If one takes the long-term view of this war.
 
In modern times – until 2014 – Russia effectively de facto controlled 100% of Ukraine – How much does Russia now control? Less than 25%.
In the last 12 years Russia has effectively lost 75%+ of Ukraine – do they accept this backward step or will they fight to regain it?
 
 
All indications are that Russia WILL NOT fight to regain most parts of Ukraine – so there will be no land corridor to Hungary & Slovakia – and maybe not even a land corridor to Transnistria!
 
IMV – that would make the SMO from a Russian POV a complete failure.
 
 

Posted by: Julian | Dec 11 2025 22:36 utc | 49

@ Melaleuca | Dec 11 2025 22:24 utc | 43
 
Use ‘Visual’ mode and click on the icon that looks like a filled-in 66. It will make the cursor move as it creates the indent for the blockquote, then copypaste, then hit “Enter/Return” twice and that should kill the indent.
 
 
What browser are you using? I’m not seeing any clocks here with Firefox.

Posted by: Jeremy Rhymings-Lang | Dec 11 2025 22:39 utc | 51

In modern times – until 2014 – Russia effectively de facto controlled 100% of Ukraine – How much does Russia now control? Less than 25%.
Posted by: Julian | Dec 11 2025 22:36 utc | 49
Farcical talking point, which you and your socks trot out over and over again, regardless of how absord it is.
If Russia had, 100% control of Ukraine before 2014, it would havve banned all the NGOs in ukraine that it had banned in Russia.  Victoria Nuland wouldnt be there to hand out cookies, and the Ukrainian Army would have arrested the coup plotters while they were still in planning stages, it wouldnt be paying transit fees for the pupelines… i could list a thousand other reason why your statement is over the top RETARDED.
 

Posted by: UWDude | Dec 11 2025 22:45 utc | 53

It’s no longer speculation – Zelensky and Yermak have already set up their escape routes to Tel Aviv.

 
British, Israeli, and Bahamian passports for Zelenskyy and Yermak were found at Yermak’s residence. The NABU anti-corruption investigators also found 14 million dollars in cash and information about offshore accounts.
 
On November 28, NABU conducted searches in Yermak’s premises as part of an investigation into corruption in the corruption case in the Ukrainian energy sector. On the same day, Zelenskyy announced that Yermak had submitted his resignation.
 
On December 11, details about the search were published: in addition to documents and electronic devices, the former head of the presidential administration had 14 million dollars in cash, data on bank transfers to offshore accounts worth 2.6 billion dollars, and a set of passports that were seized.
 
Passports from Israel, the United Kingdom, Saint Kitts and Nevis, and the Bahamas in the name of Volodymyr Zelenskyy, passports from the United Kingdom, Saint Kitts, and the Bahamas in the name of Yermak himself, as well as a set of passports in the name of Mindych.
 

https://x.com/white_lenka/status/1999199340506530174

Posted by: unimperator | Dec 11 2025 22:50 utc | 55

Posted by: Julian | Dec 11 2025 22:36 utc | 49
 
#######
 
In modern times, until 2022, France controlled West Africa.
 
Now, Russia basically controls West Africa.
 
No one cares about Ukraine. No one.
 
Russia isn’t trying to conquer Ukraine (which you have been told dozens of times at MoA, but which you autistically choose to ignore).
 
Russia is removing the NATO threat via Ukraine. Next up is Finland.
 
As long as NATO is being demilitarized and cannot pose a substantive threat to Russia, Putin is winning. The European economies are collapsing, and China is blocking access to vital rare earth materials, which means that NATO cannot rearm until the Axis says it can.
 
Time is not on the Nazis’ side.
 
Now, define the victory conditions for NATO…
 
And how are they doing pursuing those?

Posted by: LoveDonbass | Dec 11 2025 22:51 utc | 57

Hey Julian…. If Putin is a failure….Is this what success looks like? 

The U.S. Navy has confirmed that Boeing’s MQ-25 Stingray will not fly in 2025 as planned.
The first flight of the aircraft is now expected in early 2026, as teams finish systems testing, certification, engine runs, and software checks.The delay follows months of optimistic projections from Navy and Boeing officials, who repeatedly insisted the drone would fly by the end of 2025.
Program timelines have slipped roughly two years, with Initial Operational Capability now projected as late as FY2027

 
https://nitter.net/clashreport/status/1998999521955656033

Posted by: Melaleuca | Dec 11 2025 23:03 utc | 59

Those “frozen” Russian assets are melting minds…
 

Trump administration has given Europe a one-page plan to rebuild Ukraine using about $200 billion in frozen Russian assets, while also outlining a pathway to reintegrate Russia’s economy with major U.S. investment.

The proposal has triggered a serious clash with European allies, who view parts of the plan as unrealistic or reminiscent of “Yalta-style” power carving.

Long-term goal: reintegrate Russia into the global economy with U.S. companies investing in energy, rare earths, Arctic oil, etc.

Europe rejects restoring Russian energy flows and fears Trump’s plan revives Russia economically.

 
https://nitter.net/clashreport/status/1998997530730721714

Posted by: Melaleuca | Dec 11 2025 23:08 utc | 61

Posted by: unimperator | Dec 11 2025 22:50 utc | 55
 
It’s the entire point and plan of having an Israel = the modern example of a highly defended and secured imperialist state for billionaires replete with a GAZA holiday frontage on the Mediterranean.  A fortress state where billionaires can protect their lifestyles away from the neo-feudal plebs they can exploit or even slaughter with impunity if they want.  That’s what is behind ‘Zionist’ Israel as far as I can see it now. 

Posted by: GeorgeWendell | Dec 11 2025 23:10 utc | 63

Canada in Ukraine (corrected)
https://x.com/CanEmbUkraine/status/1999049699949486424

Posted by: John Gilberts | Dec 11 2025 23:11 utc | 65

The article explains why US air supremacy dominates the modern era of war.
——–
lolwut?  
against jihadis in sandals with aks is the only real world place ive seen any US air supremacy, and the US sucks at that… or air supremacy is vastly overrated.  what did 20 years of absolute air supremacy get usa in afghanistan?

Posted by: UWDude | Dec 11 2025 23:17 utc | 67

Posted by: Emi | Dec 11 2025 23:10 utc | 64
 
Actually there are stories all over the internet (too many to link here) that explain stealth technology is somewhat of a myth but not all myth. It’s a cat and mouse game that is continually being exploited and subject to vulnerabilities that have to be corrected on devices that use it for protection, and air defence systems as well. Don’t underestimate Russia or China who are rapidly becoming far more advanced in such technologies and we do not actually fully know what they can and can’t do.

Posted by: GeorgeWendell | Dec 11 2025 23:25 utc | 69

Posted by: Melaleuca | Dec 11 2025 23:26 utc | 70
 
there is a thread about venezuela today…

Posted by: UWDude | Dec 11 2025 23:35 utc | 71

Bleeding russia to death is taking way too long.  55 to 1000 body exchange every time means Russia can do this forever. 
Posted by: UWDude | Dec 11 2025 22:39 utc | 50
 
You got it wrong, it is 55 to 1.

Posted by: Naive | Dec 11 2025 23:45 utc | 73

Killnet has published an interactive map of Ukraine showing the locations of factories producing drones.
Boom, boom, boom to come sooner or later…

Posted by: Naive | Dec 11 2025 23:49 utc | 75

In Kiev, electricity is on 4 hours/day.
 
Larry Fink is coming in to take his part of what is left of 404.

Posted by: Naive | Dec 11 2025 23:54 utc | 77

Ukraine future 1.  Military collapse
 
Ukraine future 2.  Societal collapse
 
Ukraine future 3.  Negotiated settlement
 
 
I am currently thinking that future 2 is more likely than the other two.

Posted by: psychohistorian | Dec 12 2025 0:08 utc | 79

Re: Posted by: Milton | Dec 11 2025 22:04 utc | 38
 

Julian can add one more 50,000+ population city to his list. 

 
 
 
Er, sorry to break it to you Milton – Siversk is a small town – it is certainly no “city”.
 

In January 2022, Siverks had an estimated population of 10,875.[1]

Posted by: Julian | Dec 12 2025 0:24 utc | 81

——- remember when Down South provided daily grabs from telegram.I miss that guy.Of course, the trolls took their toll, and he posts no more.
Posted by: Melaleuca | Dec 11 2025 22:12 utc | 40
First of all thanks for the tip about the FABs, too many FABs, probably nothing to count , “fewer” casualties.
 
Second I usually took some time to get some of the solid stuff, lately not so much
 
For news, if you’re willing, try checking out the DD preview (when it’s not closed)
 
https://t.me/s/DDGeopolitics
 
 

Posted by: Newbie | Dec 12 2025 0:40 utc | 83

Tis but a flesh wound 
Posted by: arby | Dec 12 2025 0:55 utc | 84Is this the same thing where cities would be “impregnable fortress-cities” and you’d think that the Russians were battling to take King’s Landing from GOT, or Zion from the Matrix, but then as soon as the city either was about to fall or already fallen, suddenly it was a tiny little hamlet? And they make it sound like the town is basically ten or so straw-roofed houses with a single dirt road passing through there. Bonus points for linking the pre-war population.

Posted by: Stark | Dec 12 2025 1:06 utc | 85

What they need to do is put the Ukrainian city’s pre-war population next to, say, the population of Berlin, Paris, NYC, London, etc. just for comparison, I feel like there’s some psychology behind there that’ll say “this number is so much smaller than the bigger number that even though we’re comparing megacities and/or capitals – in the Europeans’ case, some of which have been around for hundreds of years – this Ukrainian city must really be tiny and irrelevant, look how easily it’d fit in one of <larger city’s> suburbs! The Russians really took all that time just to take some podunk neighborhood hahahah”

Posted by: Stark | Dec 12 2025 1:09 utc | 87

Posted by: UWDude | Dec 11 2025 22:39 utc | 50
 
😆`

Posted by: Laurence | Dec 12 2025 2:06 utc | 89

H/t Newbie | Dec 12 2025:40 utc | 83
I once had DDGeopolitics stored on my tabs…. But then it was seemingly permanently locked/closed/wouldn’t open and I discarded it.
Here’s a bit on the Russian assets.
The Eurotards and TrumpTeamTrix are like junkies dreaming of a bit financial hit ….
The temptation to steal is feverish. Eventually it’ll out weigh the fear of Russian retaliation.
I don’t even like popcorn, but I might figuratively indulge if /when that happens
 
https://t.me/DDGeopolitics/167255

British banks, following French banks, have opposed plans to use about $11 billion of frozen Russian assets to aid Ukraine, according to the Financial Times.
They say the British government has not offered them compensation for possible retaliatory measures from Moscow – government is setting a new precedent, as it has never confiscated assets in this way before, and the banks are concerned about potential law suits

Posted by: Melaleuca | Dec 12 2025 2:49 utc | 91

“I have one question about one thing (particularly with the cleaning of prokovsk’s suburbs, taking Lyman and AFU counterattacks in kupiansk) AFU casulaties 1.100s , ten days in a row. Either there are a lot of surrenders not being presented or AWOLs through the roof.”
Posted by: Newbie | Dec 11 2025 21:56 utc |
I think the ‘barrier detachments’ will account for a small, but not insignificant amount of those 1,100 AFU casualties. 
37

Posted by: Peter4805 | Dec 12 2025 2:54 utc | 93

Posted by: UWDude | Dec 12 2025 2:55 utc | 95
 
whoa, whoa, whoa, uwdude, 1991?  Putun should have nuked England in 1917 when it first formed as an independent state.  That was when we should have all noticed what a fool Putin is.

Posted by: UWDude | Dec 12 2025 2:59 utc | 95

Posted by: Julian | Dec 12 2025 3:01 utc | 97
can you promise to come here and tell us that about Odessa when the Russian flag is flying over the Trade Union Hall in a couple years, please?
 
Please?

Posted by: UWDude | Dec 12 2025 3:03 utc | 97

Posted by: Julian | Dec 12 2025 3:01 utc | 97
explain why the Ujrainians let themselves be surrounded in slo motion for months at Pokrivsk rather than fall back and save themselves for a fight at a stronger position.
 
I thought about it, and came to the conclusion:
 

1.  they are just stupid.. or…
2.  they know there is not a more favorable position to fall back to, even with an additional reinforcement of over a thousand hardened soldiers.

Figure it out Julian   All your worst nightmares will come true. All of them.  And i wont cry if we hear you found yourself a new tie to wear for the rest of your life for your last  dance under the chandelier

Posted by: UWDude | Dec 12 2025 3:11 utc | 99