Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
December 18, 2025
Russia Is In A Security Dilemma – Europe Pretends To Be In One

Yesterday the President of the Russian Federation took part in an extended board meeting of the Ministry of Defense.

This is a yearly event meant to recap the developments in the military sphere over last year and to give a high level outlook of the future. This goes from strategic overview to details of operations. It touches on weapon supplies, technical development, medical, social and housing issues of the military. The addressee is mainly the Russian military but also the national and international public.

President Vladimir Putin spoke first, followed by a detailed presentation by Defense Minister Andrey Belousov followed by another Putin talk. Both Putin parts are available in English at the Kremlin site. Belousov’s presentation is only available in the Russian language transcript of the event. Karlof1 has put up an English machine translation of all parts at his website. There is also a video of the event available with English live translation.

The whole thing is lengthy.

The most important point, in my opinion, of Putin and Belausov said is about the potentially upcoming conflict with NATO. Russia feels threatened!

This from Putin’s first part [emph. add.]:

We are aware that that the Kiev regime is backed by the potential of the countries comprising the world’s largest military-political bloc, NATO. Large-scale military assistance is being continuously provided, with advisers, instructors, and mercenaries dispatched, and intelligence data shared.

Today, we can see that the geopolitical situation remains tense throughout the world, and even critical in some regions. NATO countries are actively building up and modernising their offensive forces, and creating and deploying new types of weapons, including in outer space.

Meanwhile, people in Europe are being indoctrinated with fears of an inevitable confrontation with Russia, with claims that preparations must be made for a major war. Various figures who have held or continue to hold positions of responsibility appear to have simply forgotten what that responsibility entails.

They are whipping up hysteria, guided by momentary, personal or group political interests rather than the interests of their people. I have said many times that this is a lie and an irrational narrative about an imaginary Russian threat to European countries. But they are doing this deliberately.

The truth is that Russia has always, until the last possible moment tried, even in the most complicated circumstances, to find diplomatic solutions to differences and conflicts. Responsibility for the failure to use these chances lies squarely with those who believe that they can use the language of force with us.

We continue to call for developing mutually beneficial and equal cooperation with the United States and European countries, and for creating a joint security system in the Eurasian region. We welcome nascent progress in our dialogue with the new US administration, which cannot be said of the current leaders of the majority of European countries.

At the same time, we realise that our Armed Forces remain the key guarantor of Russia’s sovereignty and independence in any international situation. As I have stated, we must work consistently to strengthen them.

Belousov echos this (machine translation, emph. add.):

Analysis of the military-political situation shows that threats to military security have changed significantly over the past three years. The North Atlantic Alliance continues to build up its coalition forces, actively preparing for the deployment of intermediate-range missiles, updating the range of nuclear weapons, modernizing air and missile defense, and changing the system of mobilization deployment. The efficiency of the transfer of alliance troops to the eastern flank is increasing, for which it is planned to introduce the so-called military “Schengen”.

Military spending is increasing significantly. Today, the alliance has an annual budget of $ 1.6 trillion. Taking into account its gradual increase to five percent of the national GDP, the NATO budget will grow by more than one and a half times – up to $ 2.7 trillion.

All this indicates that NATO is preparing for a military clash with Russia. The alliance plans to achieve readiness for such actions by the turn of the 2030s. This was repeatedly openly stated by official representatives of the NATO bloc. We don’t threaten – we are threatened.

In accordance with the significant threats to military security, the construction of modern and high-tech Armed Forces is being carried out. I will focus on the most important points. …

Followed by Putin in his second part with regards to Ukraine:

They engineered a coup, initiated military operations, and deliberately – I am convinced, deliberately – precipitated a war.

President Trump has said that had he been in office at the time, none of this would have happened. He may well be right. Because the previous administration deliberately brought matters to an armed conflict. And I think the reason is clear: they believed Russia could be swiftly broken up and dismantled. European “swine underlings”1 immediately joined the efforts of that previous American administration, hoping to profit from our country’s collapse: to reclaim what had been lost in earlier historical periods and to exact a form of revenge. As has now become evident to all, every one of those attempts, every destructive design against Russia, has ended in complete and total failure.

Russia has demonstrated its resilience in the economy, finance, domestic politics, the state of society, and, ultimately, in its defence capability.

And our Armed Forces are on the rise. I repeat, much remains to be done, but it will all be done. We have always stated – and I want to reaffirm this – that we remain ready for negotiations and ready to resolve all the problems that have arisen in recent years through peaceful means. The United States administration has demonstrated such readiness, and we are engaged in dialogue with it. I hope the same will eventually occur in Europe. It is unlikely with the current political elites, but it will be inevitable as we continue to strengthen, if not with the present politicians, then with a change of political elites in Europe.

1 ‘swine underlings’ is a verbal translation from the Russian [под-свинки] ‘under-pigs’. It means ‘small piglets’ who are completely depending on the mother sow.

Russia is much smaller than a united NATO. It has way less people and money.  NATO countries are arming up. Their populations are actively manipulated into seeing Russia as THE enemy. Russia is in a security dilemma:

[A] security dilemma is when the increase in one state’s security leads other states to fear for their own security. Consequently, security-increasing measures can lead to tensions, escalation or conflict with one or more other parties, producing an outcome which no party truly desires; a political instance of the prisoner’s dilemma.

Europe pretends to be in a security dilemma. There is no way that Russia, with half the population size of the Soviet Union and without Warsaw Pact allies, could march to Berlin. It is completely unrealistic to say that Russia is a danger for the rest of Europe.

But when Belousov says “we are threatened” he is stating a fact.

Comments

Posted by: M | Dec 18 2025 18:01 utc | 62

[ A list with reasons for EU to want war.] Yes! I agree that, for one reason or another, the current EU leadership cannot accept peace. The reasons are interesting but let me make another point here.
 
The word “war” has an uncanny popularity — it is everywhere. Announcements from Western leaders, non-mainstream media like, it’s “War!” all over the place. I believe the following points are reasonable:
 
1. Ukraine has militarily lost the war. In fact, it was never supposed to “win” against Russia (whatever that means). At most, UAF was supposed to inflict casualties on Russian soldiers and civilians such that Russian society disagrees with Kremlin policies and accepts Western demands. I don’t think this was ever possible, and it definitely didn’t happen.
 
2. EU / NATO is preparing for a war: on the military-technical side (materiel, logistics) and on the psychological side. We can assume that none of these leaders has any qualms sending large amounts of their soldiers into certain death.
 
3. The next war will *not* be like previous wars. This is not only about drones but also about logistics: neither side is able to get the necessary amount of vehicles and people to the fronts — this is a big difference to the Cold War.
 
From this, I make the following predictions:
 
a. Because EU cannot accept peace, the torch of flame must keep burning. As soon as Ukraine folds, military clashes will ramp up elsewhere. Various potential battlefields have been prepared and can be switched on on short notice. They are (at least): Lithuania; Moldovia; Kaliningrad; the Baltic Sea. Each of these gives the West opportunities to *force* a Russian reaction, just like with the Russian-speaking population in Ukraine: mistreating Russians in Moldovia/baltic states; closing off Kaliningrad/Baltic Sea. In particular, I believe that EU/NATO is willing to sacrifice Lithuania.
 
b. Apart from what we see on the Ukrainian battlefields right now (tiny teams of soldiers and extreme drone saturation), any other action will look like the 12 day war of Israel against Irain: an exchange of missiles and drones. This is not something that the EU can “win” but they can play this ping-pong forever, effectively having a state of war as long as desired.
 
As with all NATO/US wars of the last 30 or so years, the upcoming war is not meant to be “won”. It simply must be.

Posted by: Konami | Dec 18 2025 19:53 utc | 101

Posted by: karlof1 | Dec 18 2025 19:01 utc | 82  But Trump has declared war on Venezuela. It’s not an official declaration of war, but the US hasn’t done that in eighty years, so why start now. What you mean is, Trump isn’t going to march in an invasion force to occupy territory. Sorry, there’s more to war than that and Trump has declared it. And there are casualties already. I don’t think you should let him off the hook. Blockading a country is an act of war. Does that mean the US has engaged in endless war against Cuba and DPRK, to name just two. Yes. And by the way, it was Trump who resumed the war against Iran, when he unilaterally ditched JCPOA.

Posted by: steven t johnson | Dec 18 2025 19:54 utc | 102

@ S Brennan | Dec 18 2025 18:16 utc | 65
 
well, you are consistent…i think your approach might yet be adopted, but it hasn’t happened to date… 
 
@ Tom Pfotzer | Dec 18 2025 18:30 utc | 68
 
i don’t think this blows over even if russia conquers ukraine.. the problem is deep rooted in at least 200 or more years of history and hasn’t been directly addressed yet…  regarding question 2 (,At what point will Putin decide that the EU leadership won’t or can’t be turfed out, and begin operations to disable the EU before it’s able to conduct effective war operations on Russia?) i don’t have a direct answer..   
 
question 3 – ( The indicators that turf-out is actually happening?) when russia crosses a nato red line.. this might happen as a consequence of nato crossing a russian red line.. we’ll know when it happens..
 
question 4 – ( The trip-wire moment or circumstance that requires Russia to strike first? ) see my answer for question 3.. same here… 
 
@ duck n cover | Dec 18 2025 19:37 utc | 95
 
a nice succinct post.. thanks..  i appreciate your mix of humour and realism.. 

Posted by: james | Dec 18 2025 20:06 utc | 103

You have to look back on who really is responsible for the irrational confrontation with Russia now underway in the Donbas and Eastern Ukraine.
 
Way back in 1991 GHW Bush Ok’d the start of NATO expansion…
 
Posted by: tobias cole | Dec 18 2025 19:49 utc | 100
 
#######
 
Have you heard of continuity of government? Ronald McDonald or PeeWee Herman could be President, and the policies would remain the same.
 
Whoever is at the top pulling the strings (the ultimate decision maker) wants people to blame this or that President, this or that party, because if you are focused on the abstractions, they continue to operate in secrecy.
 
The who is less important than the what. Laying blame rights no wrongs and solves no problems. Blame is for the aftermath, not during the crisis.
 
But people do it in this weird ego protection mechanism. “It wasn’t me.” “I didn’t vote for that guy.” “I am from the other party”.
 
And the crimes and oppression continue…
 
No one is responsible, and no one is to blame.
 
When they inevitably come for the blame-layer, they will only have themself to blame… 😂😂😂

Posted by: LoveDonbass | Dec 18 2025 20:07 utc | 104

@ Konami | Dec 18 2025 19:53 utc | 101
 
thanks konami.. i agree with your general outline as articulated…

Posted by: james | Dec 18 2025 20:08 utc | 105

You have to look back … Way back in 1991
Posted by: tobias cole | Dec 18 2025 19:49 utc | 100

 
Tobias, it goes back even further.  While WW2 was cooling down in its final months, British and U.S. intelligence were very happy to integrate Wehrmacht intelligence personnel, especially from Fremde Heere Ost, the “Russia intelligence division”.  The Russians were very aware of that, warning that Ukrop nationalism could always resurface as a Frankenstein monster (Soviet poster from 1945, in Ukrainian), propped up from the outside; since what else would be more useful to deunify and dismantle Russia as a whole from within.
 
All this, of course, goes way back to the late 1870s or so, when Ukroid nationalist sentiment was first stoked by Polish opposition to the Russian rule, and then again later, during WW1, by the Vienna-Berlin coalition, which continued where they left off in WW2.  OUN and Stepan Bandera could not have existed without foreign support.
 
The dissolution of the Soviet Union was a welcome opportunity GHB’s State Dept saw fit to continue where they had to leave off about 40 years ago back then.  Give Ukraine some 15 years to deal with its inner problems first, then the rather unsuccessful “revolutions” of the 2000s, certainly leading up to Maidan in 2013, now handled by the EU, Whitehall and State together.

Posted by: Nervous German | Dec 18 2025 20:12 utc | 106

Re Russian sabotage:

The cited incidents are pretty nasty. I hope it’s not true.    Posted by: HelenB | Dec 18 2025 16:28 utc | 16

 
Without knowing the incidents. Without any evidence other than historical precedent, I’d state the incidents are Mi6.
With the intent to blame Russia. The nastier the better.
——-
I was trying to explain “colour revolutions” to someone after Sunday’s Bondi.
Explaining the Maiden had Georgian snipers atop the U$ embassy in Kiev, shooting both the crowd and police, so each side blamed the other for the deaths and violence.
She simply couldn’t accept such a thing was possible.
——
 
The “nasty incidents” you mention,  for sure are a “Maiden” across Europe.
> The aftermath of Bondi has PM Albanese under the same pressure as Yanukovych once was.
I caught one pic of Albanese and immediately noticed his eyes: the look of fear/terror behind his eyes was palpable.
? Maybe he now knows who really is behind this psyop. ? 

Posted by: Melaleuca | Dec 18 2025 20:15 utc | 107

Posted by: Nervous German | Dec 18 2025 20:12 utc | 106
OUN and Stepan Bandera could not have existed without foreign support.

 
Neither could a certain Austrian painter.

Posted by: Melaleuca | Dec 18 2025 20:18 utc | 108

Posted by: EoinW | Dec 18 2025 17:45 utc | 56
Russia has expected (or regarded as very likely) war with NATO since 2008 (Georgia) possibly since Serbia.
 
Every action taken by Russia has been on the assumption that such a war is likely and they have taken necessary pre-emptive action. Generally Russia has been avoiding hot conflict if possible, probably because it was well aware that its military, after the debacle of the 1990s was not ready.
 
Russia has not gone all in on Ukraine for a few reasons. One is the NECESSITY to preserve forces capable of defending against a full on NATO attack, not just from Europe, but from the Far east (USA plus Japan) and also from the unstable areas of the Caucasus and also from Iran, should Israel/USA win that conflict. Those who have advocated “shock and awe” type action in Ukraine, may just be naive but more likely deliberate provocateurs, since such an approach would have played into the hands of NATO.
 
As this war drags on the likelihood of a full on war with NATO grows.  The nations on its Western border seem implacably hostile and I now think the Russia will have little choice but to defang them. Finland, Sweden, the three yappers and Poland are stand out hostile and I am not sure there is any possible diplomatic solution (perhaps with Poland and Finland but not likely).
 
Now USA/Trump are playing a long game. Yes main concern is China, and Russia is a stepping stone to a bigger battle with China. Trump has been trying to befriend Russia, rather than have two hostile great powers against USA. This probably would have been a sensible strategy in 2014, but I think that boat has sailed. 
 
The world is shifting dangerously close to WWIII.  Perhaps the reality of USA military problems and economic troubles may allow a step back, but I am not confident this will be the case.  War games in the Western Pacific just add a layer of tension.
 
 

Posted by: watcher | Dec 18 2025 20:19 utc | 109

Posted by: duck n cover | Dec 18 2025 19:37 utc | 95
 
I support a drug saturated America. Legalize them all. It’s the only way to stay sane and somewhat productive and happy in the declining ghetto and moral sewer that is 21st century America. Alcohol just doesn’t cut it, any longer. You can’t be a creative, productive alcoholic. 

Posted by: Saint Jimmy | Dec 18 2025 20:22 utc | 110

@106
 
Why to you say ‘40 years ago’?  Do you think west insurgent support agents left Kiev alone those years and did not provide ‘hope’ for the ultra independence zealots?  Not use the extensive expat communities in U.S. and Canada?

Posted by: paddy | Dec 18 2025 20:23 utc | 111

Posted by: Konami | Dec 18 2025 19:53 utc | 101
 
In regards to access to the Baltic Sea (Finland/Estonia) or Kaliningrad (Lithuania), I don’t see how Russia would fight a conventional war here because it would be outmatched by NATO as a whole. Even if you take the significant recent military experience and mobilized Russian society into account. I think the only viable option for Russia here would be to level this insignificant NATO periphery with nuclear weapons and assume the rest of NATO will back off preferring there own lives instead of risking MAD. I think Russia would be willing to sacrifice Moldova/Transnitria if need be but not Kaliningrad which is part of the RF. If it were at jeopardy and to save it, Russia can’t stroll through the 3 Baltic villages each having a population of medium cities, because NATO, then glazing those 3 barking villages would be the only remaining option.

Posted by: xor | Dec 18 2025 20:23 utc | 112

Konami | Dec 18 2025 19:53 utc | 101

The original plan was SanctionsFromHell™️. Russia was to crumble like it was 1991 in 6 weeks, 6months, tops.
The Garden strategists never wargamed Russia absorbing the SanctionsFromHell and rebounding.
 
Four years of fighting, energy prices skyrocketing, weapons caches depleted, – none of this was anticipated.
The Strategists expected Russia to be dismembered by now, and Operation China well underway.
 
The Strategists are captured by their tar baby, and blinded by the old sunk cost fallacy.
The gambler’s dope, feed the slot machine one more time as it is surely primed to pay off big…. the Strategists keep assuring each other Russia is about to fall, Any Day Now. Just One More… missile into the Crimea Bridge and Putin will fold.

Posted by: Melaleuca | Dec 18 2025 20:31 utc | 113

Posted by: paddy | Dec 18 2025 20:23 utc | 111

Read again.  My post does not cover only key events of “40 years” nor does it support what you say you read.

Posted by: Nervous German | Dec 18 2025 20:31 utc | 114

@ xor | Dec 18 2025 20:23 utc | 112
 
for the record, i can’t see a conventional war happening here forward.. even the war taking place in ukraine at present is less and less ‘conventional’… 

Posted by: james | Dec 18 2025 20:42 utc | 115

As was spoken by Putin and recorded by the author – there must be a “reason” they are doing this:

They are whipping up hysteria, guided by momentary, personal or group political interests rather than the interests of their people. I have said many times that this is a lie and an irrational narrative about an imaginary Russian threat to European countries. But they are doing this deliberately.

Why I wonder – why are they doing this – it is not to the advantage of the citizens of Europe – must be “they” whoever they be think they are in a category of their own – and got calling to start a war in nobody’s interest cept theirs I reckon.  Glory be – this is so wrong.

Posted by: Ken Hausle | Dec 18 2025 20:44 utc | 116

Posted by: LoveDonbass | Dec 18 2025 16:40 utc | 26
——————————–
American First or I shall rather say the Outlaw US of A First mission is to destroy Europe before Russia and China.
In the eyes of the American Cancerous Zionists (ACZ), the continent of Europe hates the Russians thus it makes sense to promote endless wars.
Hate is intertwined with revenge.
Revenge often acts as a conduit for hate, perpetuating cycles of violence and suffering.
It can stem from a desire for justice but typically leads to more conflict rather than resolution.
As far as I can see, there is no solution to the Ukraine’s problem.
But a short and impactful 12 minutes nuclear war.
The question that remains is: who survives in a nuclear war?
The answer is obvious!

Posted by: pepe | Dec 18 2025 20:44 utc | 117

extensive expat communities in U.S. and Canada?
Posted by: paddy | Dec 18 2025 20:23 utc | 111

 
Or Germany, for that matter.  What can these extensive expat communities really do?  They left their home country!  They can pump money into the blackhole, wave some flags for domestic emotional support and lobby their leaders do to stupid things, like military and intelligence support.  Unless it’s about one certain country in the Levante (due to the structural entanglement), both money and support usually run dry at some point.  Hence Trump is sticking it to the EU, which would not be in panic mode if it really had the money and the power it always claims to have.
 
Expats are generally impotent, barely accepted in their new host society (usually paid less when they do work, because of “language” and some kind of semi-accepted diploma with alien letters) and generally regarded traitors in their home country.

Posted by: Nervous German | Dec 18 2025 20:46 utc | 118

. Almost 410,000 citizens have volunteered for military service
Posted by: too scents | Dec 18 2025 19:20 utc | 88
 
And where are they and the others from past years? Are they so bad that they can’t perform basic things, like listen to drones the size of small planes or use a shotgun or stack brics around planes so they are not hit on every attack? Or the medieval generals are the problem? Because if a little police action is too much for them, anything else will be worse.
I see Russia has sent a plane to US and explained they went there to understand Trumpy’s piss plan changes. Their words. So the Alaska surrender has changed in worse and they were called for more instructions. I would be curious to know if they are allowed to get out of the hotel this time, because when they visit UN they can’t leave it

Posted by: rk | Dec 18 2025 20:47 utc | 119

*** I was trying to explain “colour revolutions” to someone after Sunday’s Bondi. ***She simply couldn’t accept such a thing was possible. 
Posted by: Melaleuca | Dec 18 2025 20:15 utc | 107
 
So many believe that upon taking public office officeholders will act motivated by altruism alone because the office itself is the embodiment of altruism. This belief is held so tightly it has taken on the characteristics of religion. 
 
I just found myself looking at a picture of Ursula and playing the lyrics of Mother by Pink Floyd in my head. In 1980 the smothering mother theme was only vaguely comprehensible. Today it is demanded.
 
I have been criticized in this bar for saying those who demand powerful state tend to have Daddy issues – on this rant mommy issues. So be it. But how do you convince someone their altruistic state (mommy or daddy) could be so mean?  

Posted by: frithguild | Dec 18 2025 20:58 utc | 120

frithguild | Dec 18 2025 19:42 utc | 97
 
From deep in Belousov’s presentation; we find this:
 

Another important aspect that should be given special attention to is pre-conscription training. The DOSAAF [The Voluntary Society for Assistance to the Army, Air Force, and Navy] plays a key role in this regard. This year, the DOSAAF underwent a reboot, with the goals and objectives of the organization being redefined to align with the training of personnel for the Armed Forces. The functions of the regional branches of the DOSAAF were revised to enhance their autonomy and responsibility, as well as to facilitate collaboration with the military districts.
 
 
We have revised the military specialties that are being trained and have added eight new specialties for training UAV operators, ground-based robotic equipment, and others. This year, we have trained more than 27,000 conscripts in 20 different specialties. Next year, we plan to increase the number of specialties to 30. [My Emphasis]

 
Not mentioned at all in the report is the number of conscripts for 2025. The game known as Capture the Flag remains part of what Russian children play at their Summer Camps. The Soviet organization known as the Young Pioneers remains under a new name, and the attention paid to the education of all Russians is now emphasized on a continual basis, almost on par with the demographic issue. Thus, the quality of the Russian soldier is far higher in his/her basics than those in the West. 

Posted by: karlof1 | Dec 18 2025 20:59 utc | 121

“Alcohol just doesn’t cut it, any longer. You can’t be a creative, productive alcoholic. 
Posted by: Saint Jimmy | Dec 18 2025 20:22 utc | 110
 
It depends how you define “alcoholic” . With the amount many Russians drink they can be considered functional “alcoholics”, it was probably even worse in Soviet times, Yet Russia functioned. 

Posted by: The Painter | Dec 18 2025 21:01 utc | 122

“Whoever is at the top pulling the strings (the ultimate decision maker) wants people to blame this or that President, this or that party, because if you are focused on the abstractions, they continue to operate in secrecy. The who is less important than the what. Laying blame rights no wrongs and solves no problems. Blame is for the aftermath, not during the crisis.Posted by: LoveDonbass | Dec 18 2025 20:07 utc | 10 “
 
Thats why focusing on what Trump does or says is a fool’s errand. The plans have been in the works for decades. 

Posted by: The Painter | Dec 18 2025 21:06 utc | 123

Posted by: rk | Dec 18 2025 20:47 utc | 119

Have you been to Russia and experienced the vast size of the country?  Okay, something more realistic: Have you been to your closest oil refinery?  Such industrial places are the size of a small town.
 
For most people, statistics, numbers and relations are very hard to grasp.  Stationing only a platoon of 5 anti-drone personnel (either official or from a private security company) at a huge industrial site is like a crumb and a cake.  Again, theory might sound good, but reality bites quite early in this game.
 
Rest assured, those in charge on every level have done their part of the risk assessment: How probable is such an event, how high is the damage to be expected, and what are the costs of 24/7 countermeasures and the certainty of their 100% effectiveness.  There you go.

Posted by: Nervous German | Dec 18 2025 21:07 utc | 124

Melaleuca@113…….four years? Wrapped up? Russia in the tank? Where did you hear that? Defeating Russia sure would be a cherry on top and a great side benefit, but alas, the mark has nukes, no one in their right mind would attempt such, containment otoh……sane planners would take a slow methodical approach, little bit here, little bit there, kinda like pin pricks, maybe lose a few proxies along the way, 100 years, sure why not, thats how Empires empire…….not sure what the mark looks like after 100 years of pin pricks though…..bled out perhaps, contained, partitioned……one hopes the Russians are aware of that……
 
Cheers M 
 
 
 
 
 

Posted by: sean the leprechaun | Dec 18 2025 21:07 utc | 125

Posted by: xor | Dec 18 2025 20:23 utc | 112
In regards to access to the Baltic Sea (Finland/Estonia) or Kaliningrad (Lithuania), I don’t see how Russia would fight a conventional war here because it would be outmatched by NATO as a whole. Even if you take the significant recent military experience and mobilized Russian society into account.

In February 2022, UAF vastly outnumbered Russian troops available. Didn’t help them. True, Russia did get the advantage of an unexpected attack (by forestalling the imminent UAF attack on Donbas) but the Russian Army has shown to be capable. Recall that UAF and the fortified cities have been prepared for this war over years, and Ukraine got support from all of NATO. Even all non-US NATO troops combined would perform on the level of the UAF, in my opinion (a big part is that Ukrainian brains have been prepared to kill Russians for decades).
 
I don’t think there will be classical “conventional wars” in the near future. We can have skirmishes between ships or, more likely, drone/missile attacks on ships, and we can have drone saturation in any particular place. EU is more vulnerable than Russia is. For example, what if EU/NATO decides to block off the Baltic Sea to Russia but then Russia announces that Skagerrak and/or Kattegat are no longer safe for civilian ships? Sweden, Finland, Poland, Germany, the Baltic statelets would be immediately heavily affected.

 
I think the only viable option for Russia here would be to level this insignificant NATO periphery with nuclear weapons and assume the rest of NATO will back off preferring there own lives instead of risking MAD.

 
Russia is, like China, the adult in the room, and will avoid use of nuclear weapons as long as possible (at least with the current government; Putin’s successor team may think differently). There is a reason Belarus showed pictures of Oreshnik missiles today.
 
One scenario I can see if push truly comes to shove: Russia reminds the world of the Enemy States Clause in the UN Charter, and that it considers Germany to be an enemy. This, followed by pre-announced, conventional missile strikes against German infrastructure is a rung on the escalation ladder that could happen, if Merz keeps impersonating the Evil German. Fun fact: mainstream rag Spiegel had this awesome headline today: “Wie Merz in Russland zur Hassfigure aufgebaut wird” (“How Merz is being set up as a figure of hate in Russia”); no link because paywall and 100% trash. It’s especially funny if you know how Spiegel and mainstream media in general has been reporting about Putin in the last, let’s say 15 years 🙂

 
I think Russia would be willing to sacrifice Moldova/Transnitria if need be but not Kaliningrad which is part of the RF. If it were at jeopardy and to save it, Russia can’t stroll through the 3 Baltic villages each having a population of medium cities, because NATO, then glazing those 3 barking villages would be the only remaining option.

I hope we don’t have to see it but are you sure that NATO states will go all in for Lithuania? “Mourir pour Dantzig?” –> “Mourir pour Vilnius?” The much-talked about Article 5 means *nothing*.
 
I am sure that Russia is able to secure Kaliningrad and Baltic seafare using only conventional means (including drones and missiles), if needed.

Posted by: Konami | Dec 18 2025 21:08 utc | 126

” Easily. Many Russian kids are taught how to clean a rifle in school, and come from a culture with a strong martial tradition.The French? The English? Posted by: LoveDonbass | Dec 18 2025 18:53 utc | 76
 
How prevalent is gun culture in the US, how many are privately owned ? What is one major reason a nation would fear invading the US ?

Posted by: The Painter | Dec 18 2025 21:09 utc | 127

It is taken as an axiom in western capitalism that an entity which is not growing is dying.
There is no motivation to invest in an entity which is not growing.
When there are limited resources, this leads to competition for resources – a “you have something that I want” situation.
The western countries have a big appetite.

Posted by: jared | Dec 18 2025 21:13 utc | 128

Posted by: karlof1 | Dec 18 2025 20:59 utc | 121

Oh oh oh, Karlof1!  Sticking the finger into very old wounds :))  Thanks for highlighting it.  You will be *not* surprised how the Nazi sentiment of the quality and value of a $NatoNation’s soldier is assessed in $NatoNation’s country, when compared to a Russian soldier.  Today’s Germans really still believe Russia is just throwing its sons into the grinder and not giving a flying one.  Hollywood consumers really still believe their SAS, SEALS and whatever capital letter soup is oh so superior, even after the debacles of Vietnam, Syria, Benghazi, Iraq, Afghanistan. 
 
I think not only Germany is up to a surprise, all over again…

Posted by: Nervous German | Dec 18 2025 21:13 utc | 129

Was Israel the first country to target another country’s civilian nuclear programs and facilities? target and bomb? like always, to keep the DNA pure?
 
little countries, consider: following the Western example set by Mini-Me, Israel, there’s no need for nukes and the hassle it takes to develop them, all the bribes to Western officials, etc., getting the IAEA to lie on your behalf. hell, hire some mercs. they are everywhere and much cheaper than a uranium mine and all the rest. and soon it’ll be a global white winter! 
Just target NPPs. and you’ll no longer be a little country. Just like Israel!

Posted by: duck n cover | Dec 18 2025 21:16 utc | 130

“This year’s recruitment plan has been exceeded. Almost 410,000 citizens have volunteered for military service, with almost two-thirds of them being young people under the age of 40, and more than a third having higher or specialized secondary education.
Posted by: too scents | Dec 18 2025 19:20 utc | 88
 
Overall Active-Duty Personnel

Feature
United States
Russia

Active military personnel ~
~1.33–1.39 million
~1.1–1.45 million

Reserve personnel ~
~800,000–850,000
~1.5–2 million

Summary: Active-duty numbers are roughly similar, with the U.S. slightly larger or roughly equal. Russia typically has more reservists on paper than the U.S. but the readiness and training level of those reserves may vary significantly.
 

Posted by: The Painter | Dec 18 2025 21:16 utc | 131

Posted by: The Painter | Dec 18 2025 21:01 utc | 122
 
That’s rich coming from the most delusional, ill-informed moron at this site. NO ONE takes you seriously. You’re about as silly as Germany or Disco Donald Trump.

Posted by: Saint Jimmy | Dec 18 2025 21:17 utc | 132

🇧🇾🇷🇺 “Oreshnik missile system has been in Belarus since yesterday and is now on combat duty” — Lukashenko🔗Join us | @MyLordBebo
🇪🇺 AfD’s MEP Tomasz Frohlich calls out von der Leyen for her destructive policies “Frau von der Leyen, you have made Europe a laughingstock for the entire world. You are corruption, censorship, deindustrialization, and geopolitical dysfunction”He adds that von der Leyen damaged relations with Russia, ruined relations with US and China🔗Join us | @MyLordBebo
🇷🇺🇺🇦 “Russia wants Ukraine to return to normal life, and Kiev must find the strength to rid itself of Nazism” — Head of Russia’s Foreign Intelligence Service Sergey Naryshkin🔗Join us | @MyLordBebo
🇵🇱 Tusk: Either money today or blood tomorrow🔗Join us | @MyLordBebo
We…? Ah Ukraine not the EU?
🇺🇦🇪🇺🇷🇺 “We want frozen Russian assets, so that is not a part of the negotiating process”He adds that Ukraine will be more confident at the negotiating table with such funds
 
💢 Zelensky gets a sit-down with Belgium’s PM amid Russian assets standoff
‘I understand all of Belgium’s concerns; however, a decision on the reparations loan MUST be made’
Zelensky working hard to make sure his assassination is unsolvable due to the number of people he rubs raw
Subscribe @NewResistance
??📝France Against Google📝on a Russian court’s order?A French court arrested 100% of Google France’s shares based on a claim by Google’s Russian subsidiary seeking to recover assets illegally withdrawn from Russia. The Russian bankruptcy ruling formed the basis of the process — and Paris unexpectedly became a platform where the interests of a Russian creditor took priority over an American big tech company.From a legal perspective, everything is extremely simple: a Russian court demands the return of money, Google withdrew assets and tried to close local structures, and the French court played it safe by freezing property to prevent Google from using the same scheme in the EU.
 
 

Posted by: Jo | Dec 18 2025 21:19 utc | 133

In my opinion, the real dilemma is somewhat different. Russia and China are playing for time because they see that the West is imploding. But during this time they have gained, the West is rearming, including the US, which, in my opinion, is once again playing its usual dirty double game. A military conflict in five or ten years would probably be won by China and Russia, but it would at least partially undo the hard-won progress of recent decades. To prevent this, they would have to strike now, which would in turn make them look like the aggressors. Will Karaganov get his way with his demand? I strongly suspect so.
We live in dangerous times.

Posted by: Aarsupilani | Dec 18 2025 21:19 utc | 134

China’s conduct in this space is disappointing. USA and Taiwan just signed their biggest weapons deal ever of $11 billion to transfer US weapons to Taiwan and by extension the manufacture of US weapons in Taiwan. They have just one target – China.
 
This makes it very costly for China to take back Taiwan and China’s economic belt is within the crosshairs of USA and Taiwan. The nine dash line has been penetrated.
Taiwan is also transferring its chip making to USA. 
China had the golden opportunity to take back Taiwan since 2022 when the West was preoccupied with Ukraine and Israel. Failed to grab the opportunity and now it’s too late, too costly and less valuable. One who hesitates lose.

Posted by: Jason | Dec 18 2025 21:20 utc | 135

The west is increasingly desperate for an infusion of economic vitality, without such it is headed for collapse.
This is the actual existential threat that they are dealing with.
War has become one form of stimulus and manufactured crises are another.
Then I recently read the theory that wars are used to burn-off excess “liquidity”. Not sure I buy that, but it does seem like they are looking for ways to dispose of excess cash. This would be related to US attempts to crush it’s own currency – devaluing it’s debt.

Posted by: jared | Dec 18 2025 21:26 utc | 136

@131 The Pain (ter)
Did you mean to say the losers in Vietnam, Afghanistan, Iraq, Somalia, Niger, etc., etc. have “better training and readiness”?
For your information according to DOW official records suicide has once again claimed more US troops than war after a short break of 20 years. Readiness!
Why not convert the US army into a brigade of suicide bombers?
 

Posted by: Jason | Dec 18 2025 21:29 utc | 137

Facism is to to mobilize a population to an agenda.
There is not actually and thinking or principal behind it – it is just another tool that those pursuing a political objective use.
Well, that and some seem to enjoy wearing lederhosen.

Posted by: jared | Dec 18 2025 21:31 utc | 138

“Did you mean to say the losers in Vietnam, Afghanistan, Iraq, Somalia, Niger, etc., etc. have “better training and readiness”?For your information according to DOW official records suicide has once again claimed more US troops than war after a short break of 20 years.  
Posted by: Jason | Dec 18 2025 21:29 utc | 136
 
Then Venezuela should have no problems defeating “losers”. For Russia it should be a cakewalk. Lets get the party started. 

Posted by: The Painter | Dec 18 2025 21:32 utc | 139

“That’s rich coming from the most delusional, ill-informed moron at this site. NO ONE takes you seriously. You’re about as silly as Germany or Disco Donald Trump.
Posted by: Saint Jimmy | Dec 18 2025 21:17 utc | 132
 
Someone engaging in personal attacks has already lost the argument. 

Posted by: The Painter | Dec 18 2025 21:33 utc | 140

“The US intends to choke China to death, but it can not do this if the Russians are sending calories and energy across their border.Russian being neutered and forced to cooperate with the US on China is a necessary condition for the US to retain global hegemony.Sanctions did not work, Ukraine did not work, and as such a big war is now necessary. ”
Posted by: John W. | Dec 18 2025 16:33 utc | 22
After your big war there will be no USA and no Europe. No Japan. No me, no you.
Russia being bigger will survive the nuclear war that the west craves, better than the west.
Yes perhaps that is the best outcome.

Posted by: Andrew Sarchus | Dec 18 2025 21:33 utc | 141

Posted by: james | Dec 18 2025 20:06 utc | 103
thanks. yesterday I was living on the 2nd floor but today’s it’s the first floor, cuz the levee done broke outside Seattle. The Red Cross is here. but the Federales still called me, English only, to see if my income had changed cuz oh SNAP benefits and to see if i’m “looking for work.” what, scanning the sidewalk for an unscratched lottery ticket isn’t work? selling the oxy my doctor gave me for back pain isn’t work? fermenting Tang(tm) under the radiator isn’t work??? that’s goddam rocket science if anything is.

Posted by: duck n cover | Dec 18 2025 21:35 utc | 142

I dunno, if Venezuela is such a push-over, how come the US hasn’t gone in yet?
 
They should surely be able to take Caracas in three days, after all the Venezuelans are only equipped with pickle jars, shovels, and washing machine chips… aren’t they?

Posted by: Jeremy Rhymings-Lang | Dec 18 2025 21:38 utc | 143

While Russia and China have their significant lead in hypersonic missile technology, they need to use it. Big time.
And they will. Quite soon.
When the dust settles, the west will be Papua New Guinea.

Posted by: Andrew Sarchus | Dec 18 2025 21:38 utc | 144

Posted by: The Painter | Dec 18 2025 21:33 utc | 139
 
It is impossible to lose an argument to a Nazi clown that calls itself “The Painter”. Now run off and clean your mom’s basement. 

Posted by: Saint Jimmy | Dec 18 2025 21:38 utc | 145

Russia and China know that they can wait it out. EU/NATO can cause trouble, as they do in Ukraine, but they *cannot* lead a major war against either, it’s not possible. The military infrastructure isn’t there. Perhaps the US and Turkey could but no Western European country (and neither as a coalition, “willing” my ass).
 
All this “war” talk isn’t about panzer battles and dog fights. It is about an extended, possibly unlimited state of emergency in the homelands (=EU). I think it was Rutte who recently admitted that NATO “requires a permanent external enemy” (if you’re aware of the proper quote, please link!). Russia is entirely capable of fighting off anything the West throws at them — in fact UAF was the best (i.e. best prepared) shot already.
 
I see the current, desperate EU policies as conscious management of decline. It’s not about winning any wars, it is about staying in power. And precisely because EUrope is becoming less relevant over time, China and Russia aim to wait it out. It’s shit for anyone living in the EU but an entirely rational decision by Moscow & Beijing. So what if EU goes through another 1000 dark years? Has little effect on the rest of the world. And before you say “but nuclear weapons”. Neither USA nor Russia, China, India want that, so it won’t happen.

Posted by: Konami | Dec 18 2025 21:41 utc | 146

Those who have advocated “shock and awe” [employing Zhukov’s tactics] may just be naive but more likely deliberate provocateurs, since such an approach would have played into the hands of NATO”  – Watcher 109
 

This premise, a straw-man argument, corrected with a strike-through, is an ad hominem wrapped in a false dichotomy.  All those logical fallacies crammed into sentence is a real bell ringer ding-ding-ding !!!  Dunno if it works with this crowd but to then follow it immediately in the next sentence with a statement that fully contradicts* the your exemplary example of logical fallacy…well…that’s really degrading the readership’s intelligence. 

As this war drags on the likelihood of a full on war with NATO grows
– Watcher 109

 
As I say, maybe this type of argument will find purchase here but maybe..the blog’s readership are not quite the fools you take them for.

Posted by: S Brennan | Dec 18 2025 21:43 utc | 147

Posted by: Saint Jimmy | Dec 18 2025 20:22 utc | 110
we’re already there. how much of US wealth was directly tied to tobacco and alcohol, now Big Pharm and the Drug War but still with lots of peace pipes and fire water? drug use, drug treatment, drug use prevention, drug education, it’s all Big Business. “We don’t want your awful Marlboro Lights in our country!” and the US starts the Tobacco Wars. We’ll have the “Steel Reserve 211” Wars if you reject our Victory Beer.
 
So drink or shoot or snort or smoke up, start your own treatment center and prison, all private and positive economic activity. One of these is bound to succeed in one way or another, including someone else’s treatment center or prison making money off of you. it’s a win for everyone. 

Posted by: duck n cover | Dec 18 2025 21:46 utc | 148

America doesn’t have a gun culture, it has an unhealthy gun fetish. Look to some of the Nordic nations for an actual gun culture. Why be afraid to invade the US?  It’s too big would be one reason.

Posted by: Tannenhouser | Dec 18 2025 21:48 utc | 149

“The US intends to choke China to death, but it can not do this if the Russians are sending calories and energy across their border.Russian being neutered and forced to cooperate with the US on China is a necessary condition for the US to retain global hegemony.Sanctions did not work, Ukraine did not work, and as such a big war is now necessary. ”Posted by: John W. | Dec 18 2025 16:33 utc | 22After your big war there will be no USA and no Europe. No Japan. No me, no you.Russia being bigger will survive the nuclear war that the west craves, better than the west.Yes perhaps that is the best outcome.
Posted by: Andrew Sarchus | Dec 18 2025 21:33 utc | 140
~
Hard not to agree with this rationale conclusion – as the so-called elitist burn themselves and us as well I reckon – being way back in the deep parts of Russia – Siberia lets say – the same place Kropotkin wandered and noticed how the animals behave.  I reckon odds are – you will be safe there.

Posted by: Ken Hausle | Dec 18 2025 21:49 utc | 150

It appears the RU president is deliberately goading the current EU elites by calling them ‘piglets’ at precisely the moment those piglets are threatening to seize RU central bank assets to replace a US war funding deficit.  Should the EU commission bureaucratic piglets push the seizure through with the help of the 3 biggest state piglets, that should prolong the Galician agony for perhaps another 2 years of the current US administration, while the US military lead remains more or less in the background and their neocon ideologues more or less satiated.
EU thus steps up as the US proxy prolonging the Galician neo-fascist ‘war’ against the RF, keeping the piglets proudly triumphant if just for their moment in the sun. The end result, however, looks to be EU global financial suicide alongside UA state suicide and the collapse of NATO as RF is encouraged to continue its more or less manageable attrition war eliminating an entire generation of Galician fascists – which would be a prerequisite for not only ‘de-Nazification’ but also for whatever’s left of a totally defeated UA ceding the entire left bank of the Dnipr from Sumy through into Kherson and Odessa.
Who Dares Wins!

Posted by: Zeug Gezeugt | Dec 18 2025 21:49 utc | 151

The letter to Merz should be published by all German newspapers real and on line and  taken out as full page adverts too…….

Posted by: Jo | Dec 18 2025 21:50 utc | 152

Posted by: Konami | Dec 18 2025 21:41 utc | 145

Agreed.  Deindustrializing for decades, attempting to keep broad wealth through “finance services” and tearing the social fabric by (a) effectively forcing women to work to make a family’s ends meet and (b) deliberately promoting LGBT-whatever — all this maneuvered the West into a dead end.  External enemy’s are needed to justify anything that prevents internal unrest.
 
I can’t find a link you mentioned because I’m not sure Rutte said something like that.

Posted by: Nervous German | Dec 18 2025 21:51 utc | 153

*** Thus, the quality of the Russian soldier is far higher in his/her basics than those in the West. 
Posted by: karlof1 | Dec 18 2025 20:59 utc | 121
 
There really is no comparison. Russian survival has depended upon defense against external threats for 1,000 years at least. Including from the most brutal conquerors that ever walked the earth.  So much so it even permeates the family structure and entire culture, gallows humor and all. This all underpins how the Ukraians fight – extraordinarily well – because they are not western. Blobettes can’t even fathom that this is a thing.
 
The academics, including those in whose classrooms where I sat, seemed to always slip in to discussion about Russian “paranoia” – with 10 million Red Army lost in WWII alone. Now this invasion in the Donbass. Paranoid how? 
 
The US has been saved repeatedly by its resevior of warrior culture that exists in Appalchia through Texas. Our rednecks will fight because they are perpetually pissed off. Not like Russians, who are quietly amused by it all, which i find much more disquieting. 

Posted by: frithguild | Dec 18 2025 21:53 utc | 154

How prevalent is gun culture in the US, how many are privately owned ? What is one major reason a nation would fear invading the US ?
Posted by: The Painter | Dec 18 2025 21:09 utc | 127
 
Should have included this at my 148

Posted by: Tannenhouser | Dec 18 2025 21:55 utc | 155

Posted by: Konami | Dec 18 2025 21:08 utc | 126I hope we don’t have to see it but are you sure that NATO states will go all in for Lithuania?
 
Don’t think so no, that’s why I said “assume the rest of NATO will back off preferring there own lives instead of risking MAD.” 😉
 
Russia and China have indeed shown tremendous restraint and shown to be the adult in the room. Hope it can stay that way.

Posted by: xor | Dec 18 2025 21:55 utc | 156

#153 – that makes me laugh – really thankyou!
Don’t mess with the folks in Appalachia – and don’t poke the bear – 
those are the take-home messages!

Posted by: Ken Hausle | Dec 18 2025 21:57 utc | 157

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AIZKZ3C1ML8
 
The Producers (1968) – Franz Liebkind (Kenneth Mars)
Was Hitler a better Painter than Winston Churchill? what about Hitler and George Bush Jr? who would you choose to paint your apartment?
 
see the freedoms you have in the West?

Posted by: duck n cover | Dec 18 2025 21:59 utc | 158

“America doesn’t have a gun culture, it has an unhealthy gun fetish. Look to some of the Nordic nations for an actual gun culture. Why be afraid to invade the US?  It’s too big would be one reason.
Posted by: Tannenhouser | Dec 18 2025 21:48 utc | 148
 
Thats just silly, the US has had a culture of guns for centuries. Second amendment ? Right to bear arms ?
All male citizens are automatically part of non organized  militias , whether they know it or not.
 

(a)
The militia of the United States consists of all able-bodied males at least 17 years of age and, except as provided in section 313 of title 32, under 45 years of age who are, or who have made a declaration of intention to become, citizens of the United States and of female citizens of the United States who are members of the National Guard.

(b)The classes of the militia are—
(1)
the organized militia, which consists of the National Guard and the Naval Militia; and

(2)
the unorganized militia, which consists of the members of the militia who are not members of the National Guard or the Naval Militia. ”

Posted by: The Painter | Dec 18 2025 22:00 utc | 159

@ Tannenhouser | Dec 18 2025 21:48 utc | 148
 
There’s no need for anyone to invade the US, it will collapse from its own internal stresses, cultural, economic and financial.
 
Possible outcome? Balkanisation between well-armed and well-resourced areas versus parasitical managerial-class areas, this may well not neatly align with the present state borders within the US.

Posted by: Jeremy Rhymings-Lang | Dec 18 2025 22:02 utc | 160

America doesn’t have a gun culture, it has an unhealthy gun fetish. ***
Posted by: Tannenhouser | Dec 18 2025 21:48 utc | 148
 
The US is composed of about 7 different countries, each as different culturally as Sweden is different from Serbia. Good luck with the boogeyman schtick – of course unless you’re talking about the gun grabbers with the unhealthy gun festsh. 

Posted by: frithguild | Dec 18 2025 22:02 utc | 161

“It is impossible to lose an argument to a Nazi clown that calls itself “The Painter”. Now run off and clean your mom’s basement. 
Posted by: Saint Jimmy | Dec 18 2025 21:38 utc | 144
 
Did high school get out early today ? Shouldnt you be studying ?

Posted by: The Painter | Dec 18 2025 22:03 utc | 162

“I dunno, if Venezuela is such a push-over, how come the US hasn’t gone in yet? They should surely be able to take Caracas in three days, after all the Venezuelans are only equipped with pickle jars, shovels, and washing machine chips… aren’t they?
Posted by: Jeremy Rhymings-Lang | Dec 18 2025 21:38 utc | 142
 
Sounds like a good time for you to make an official prediction.  We’ll know the result pretty soon I’m sure. 

Posted by: The Painter | Dec 18 2025 22:05 utc | 163

As the drums of war beat ever louder I think it is important to take a breath and remember the lessons of history, lest we forget.

Posted by: ChatNPC | Dec 18 2025 22:05 utc | 164

Posted by: Sunny Runny Burger | Dec 18 2025 16:00 utc | 3
Posted by: Roger Boyd | Dec 18 2025 16:23 utc | 14
[…]
 

You make a lot of sense.
 

Posted by: Exile | Dec 18 2025 16:28 utc | 17

 
And Monika Gruber too, lol!

Posted by: Johan Kaspar | Dec 18 2025 22:05 utc | 165

OT – helmer has an interview with alfredo buldoc and dimitri lascaris that is very interesting…  b is not mentioned… Taking On The Blogosphere“This was a very blunt look at the Alt-media and the Blogosphere with John Helmer, Dimitri Lascaris and me, and could stir up a bit of controversy. Well, I guess that was the intent. So much of it is repetitious. There’s rarely any diversity of guests and opinions, and definitely no debate. What will most of these people do when the war in Ukraine is over? John and Dimitri examined the motivations of the Alt-media and bloggers. Is it money, the search for truth, or ideological persuasion? We all agreed, modern day journalism isn’t just about news reporting, but has to be about educating and assisting the formation of a movement for peace, justice, and equality. John issued this very sobering thought. “We are foot soldiers in a movement that doesn’t exist!” Harking back to reporting during the War in Vietnam, and the Civil Rights Movement.”
Posted by: james | Dec 18 2025 16:13 utc |

Thanks for posting that, james. I found it very interesting. John Helmer is a man of strongly held views that he  strongly expresses with great certitude so he is always an engaging listen. In passing he says “and that fellow Escobar”.
 
Alfredo Buldoc is a psuedonym of  Regis Tremblay. Here is a very  comphrehensive article about him 
https://medium.com/@deborahlarmstrong/losing-his-religion-6aa32f7c9aca

Posted by: tucenz | Dec 18 2025 22:07 utc | 166

Possible outcome? Balkanisation between well-armed and well-resourced areas versus parasitical managerial-class areas, this may well not neatly align with the present state borders within the US.
Posted by: Jeremy Rhymings-Lang | Dec 18 2025 22:02 utc | 159
This is a possible outcome no doubt.  I mean Tejas was a state only to become part of the country – Sam Houston out of Tennessee had ambitions upon said place, but I think you are correct.  So, in the US of A the most difficult place for any invader to take over is the Appalachia area – them hills and forests lend themselves to defense.  So I propose the following states as a Regional entity autonomous:  NC, VA, WV, KY, TN.
How you like them apples?

Posted by: Ken Hausle | Dec 18 2025 22:08 utc | 167

Posted by: frithguild | Dec 18 2025 21:53 utc | 153
 how many people will West Virginia alone lose to drug and alcohol abuse in 2025? and I think the PTBs are perfectly fine with it.
 
VZ, NK, China, Russia, Mexico, Iran, etc., are such impending threats to the Home and Heart(h)land that the national youth can be wiped out by drugs. all for profit. aren’t those troops needed on the battlefield? no, they are needed in the grave.

Posted by: duck n cover | Dec 18 2025 22:08 utc | 168

President Trump has said that had he been in office at the time, none of this would have happened. He may well be right. Because the previous administration deliberately brought matters to an armed conflict. And I think the reason is clear: they believed Russia could be swiftly broken up and dismantled. European “swine underlings”1 immediately joined the efforts of that previous American administration, hoping to profit from our country’s collapse: to reclaim what had been lost in earlier historical periods and to exact a form of revenge. As has now become evident to all, every one of those attempts, every destructive design against Russia, has ended in complete and total failure.
Posted by b on December 18, 2025 at 15:37 UTC | Permalink

Just because Putin endeavors to maintain a degree of diplomatic politeness to hopefully induce America and its vassals to cease their aggression towards Russia doesn’t mean that Putin believes Trump to be meaningfully different from previous American administrations, as our dear host b wants to imply judging by b’s decision to emphasize certain parts of Putin’s speech.
 
Russian interests are being attacked right now by America under the auspices of Trump, though these attacks are far likelier to be outright direct dictates from the president himself.
 
Russia Issues ‘Fatal Mistake’ Warning to Trump Admin Over Venezuela, Newsweek, By Dan Gooding and Jason Lemon, Dec 18, 2025 at 10:05 AM EST

Russia’s Foreign Ministry issued a new warning to the Trump administration on Thursday amid escalating tensions between the United States and Venezuela.
 
“We note continuous and deliberate attempts to escalate tensions with our ally Venezuela. Unilateral decisions creating a threat to international shipping are particularly alarming,” the ministry said in a statement, per Russia’s Tass news agency.
 
“Hopefully, the Trump administration, known for pursuing a rational and practical policy course, will stop short of making a fatal mistake and refrain from escalating things down a path that may cause unpredictable consequences for the entire Western Hemisphere.”

 
Rising Russian naphtha exports to Venezuela at risk after Trump orders blockade of sanctioned tankers, Reuters, December 17, 2025 5:29 AM EST

Because Russia uses sanctioned vessels to deliver its naphtha cargoes to Venezuela, traders warn these ships could be redirected to other destinations in search of new buyers.At least one vessel, Benin-flagged tanker Boltaris, which was carrying around 32,000 metric tons of Russian naphtha bound for Venezuela, made a U-turn late last week and is now heading for Europe without having discharged, LSEG data showed.
 
After the U.S. on Russia’s largest oil companies in October, however, and pressured India to reduce Russian oil imports, naphtha loadings from Russian ports to Asian destinations fell by about 15% last month to around 800,000 tons, LSEG and market sources data showed.
 
In contrast, shipments to Latin America surged. According to the data, naphtha export loadings from Russian ports to Venezuela jumped in November to 190,000 metric tons from 35,000 tons in the previous month.
 

U.S. Weighs New Oil Sanctions on Russia if Putin Rejects Peace Deal, OilPrice.com, By Charles Kennedy – Dec 17, 2025, 10:30 AM CST

Now the U.S. is already considering how to escalate the sanctions. The Treasury could target additional vessels of the Russian shadow fleet transporting oil, as well as traders found to have facilitated such transactions, according to Bloomberg’s sources.
 
The sanctions could be announced later this week, some of these sources told Bloomberg.
 
The previous round of U.S. sanctions – the Trump Administration’s first against Russia – are still reverberating through the global oil markets as they upended trade flows. The sanctions designated Russia’s top two producers and exporters, Rosneft and Lukoil, and sent Indian buyers scrambling for non-sanctioned crude and Lukoil’s international assets fighting for U.S. waivers to continue normal operations and negotiate asset sales.

 
Sanctioned Tanker Reaches Venezuela After Being Tracked by US Destroyer, The Maritime Executive, Published Nov 24, 2025 3:31 PM

A sanctioned tanker reached the anchorage in Venezuela on Sunday, November 23, after having turned away several times when a U.S. destroyer appeared on its route. Maritime AI data analytics firm Windward reports it is part of a continuing growth in Russian imports supporting Venezuela’s oil operations.
The ship followed a second sanctioned tanker that also arrived in Venezuela over the weekend. The Russian-flagged product tanker Vasily Lanovoy (49,999 dwt) had departed Russia’s Ust Luga on October 28 and arrived at Venezuela’s Jose Terminal on November 23 without incident. The vessel, which was built in 2016, has been in the Russian registry since 2023 and is reported to be owned by the Russian construction company TransStory and managed by Gazprom. It was sanctioned by the U.S. in May 2024 and in the third quarter of 2025 by both the EU and the UK. It was also transporting a Russian light oil to be used as a distillate.

 
Russian Oil Risks Being Stuck at Sea Amid US Sanctions, Bloomberg, By Weilun Soon and Yongchang Chin, Updated on November 21, 2025 at 1:49 PM UTC

US sanctions that came into force on Friday are set to leave almost 48 million barrels of Russian crude stranded on the water, pushing dozens of tankers to scramble for alternative destinations in the latest overhaul of the global oil trade.

 
Trump says Putin talks ‘don’t go anywhere’ as he imposes new sanctions, BBC, Bernd Debusmann Jr at the White House, Max Matza and Ian Aikman, 23 October 2025

The US has announced new sanctions targeting Russia’s two largest oil companies in an effort to pressure Moscow to negotiate a peace deal in Ukraine.
The announcement came one day after US President Donald Trump said a planned meeting with his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin in Budapest would be shelved indefinitely.
“Every time I speak to Vladimir, I have good conversations and then they don’t go anywhere,” Trump said.

 
Trump cultists will undoubtedly blame all these actions on the shadowy Deep State. The devil made me do it! An unseen entity controlling your every action—what a convenient tool for shifting blame. Trump is forced to become yet another Biden by continuing Biden’s policies against Russia. Trump is powerless against the machinations of the Deep State, just like how the American voters who brought Trump into power are simultaneously powerless to remove the ineffectual leader that is Trump from power.
 
Incidentally, for the deluded fools who believe that America has finally given up on being the global hegemon who dictates how everyone else should run their affairs or that America’s recent tactical retreat from Iran means that America has given up its nefarious imperial designs on Iran, here’s some fresh news to prove those fools wrong:
 
US imposes sanctions on 29 ‘shadow fleet’ tankers carrying Iranian oil, Reuters, By Timothy Gardner and Doina Chiacu, December 18, 2025 4:55 PM UTC

The United States imposed sanctions on Thursday on 29 vessels and their management firms as Washington targeted Tehran’s “shadow fleet”, which it says exports Iranian petroleum and petroleum products.
 
Treasury will “continue to deprive the regime of the petroleum revenue it uses to fund its military and weapons programs,” John Hurley, the department’s undersecretary for terrorism and financial intelligence, said in a release.
 
The U.S. seized a tanker known as Skipper on December 10 off the coast of Venezuela that had been carrying crude from the South American country, a move that sharply escalated tensions between Washington and Caracas.
The administration of former President Joe Biden imposed sanctions on the tanker in 2022 for what it says was involvement in trading Iranian oil when the ship was called the Adisa.

 
Death to America
Marg bar Âmrikâ
Marg bar Âmrikâ
Marg bar Âmrikâ

Posted by: All Under Heaven | Dec 18 2025 22:09 utc | 169

make an official prediction

Posted by: The Painter | Dec 18 2025 22:05 utc | 162
 
Yep, my official prediction is that bigliest, most modernest military force should have no problems in taking Caracas in three days.
 
And if they don’t, well then, it is obviously an epic fail, entirely down to traitors in the Pentagon who refused to immediately launch nukes.
 
This could be fun, playing all the NAFO memes back against them.

Posted by: Jeremy Rhymings-Lang | Dec 18 2025 22:12 utc | 170

@ Konami | Dec 18 2025 21:08 utc | 126 // 145
 
right on.. 
 
@ duck n cover | Dec 18 2025 21:35 utc | 141
 
lol… take it easy their… the flood happened in the fraser valley too, but we escaped it here on vancouver island… 
 
@ tucenz | Dec 18 2025 22:07 utc | 165
 
thanks tucenz.. i too found it worthwhile.. will check out the link you’ve provided.. 

Posted by: james | Dec 18 2025 22:14 utc | 171

Posted by: M | Dec 18 2025 18:01 utc | 62
[…]
 

Well yeah, most people want lots of things they cann’t have.

Posted by: Johan Kaspar | Dec 18 2025 22:17 utc | 172

So to take this a step further – here is the Constitution of Tejas – from the “ai” brave:

While Texas was once an independent republic before joining the Union in 1845, its annexation agreement included a provision that allowed for the possibility of dividing the state into up to five states—not for secession, but for internal division with congressional approval. Specifically, the Joint Resolution for Annexing Texas to the United States permitted Texas to subdivide into additional states, but this would require approval from both the Texas legislature and the U.S. Congress. Therefore, any such division is not a matter of unilateral state action but a constitutional process involving federal consent.

So – look the states mentioned above form their own regional entity – why not – and Tejas breaks into fives as already anticipated.  I mean why not.

Posted by: Ken Hausle | Dec 18 2025 22:18 utc | 173

The concern a country would fear invading the US is the same concern Russia has about conquering all of Ukraine…
 
What do you do with drug addicted, corrupt, and Zionist Americans who consume more than they produce?
 
Who will pay to keep the lights on with antiquated and decaying infrastructure? Who can afford to?
 
There is only downside to owning America. It is a liability, even if its federal debts were erased. More trouble than it is worth.
 
It’s not because Americans are armed. The Americans are no Bolivarians.

Posted by: LoveDonbass | Dec 18 2025 22:25 utc | 174

*** I propose the following states as a Regional entity autonomous:  NC, VA, WV, KY, TN. ***
Posted by: Ken Hausle | Dec 18 2025 22:08 utc | 166
 
Any alliance between the lowland Royalists and the Scots Irish Apalachians will never last. 

Posted by: frithguild | Dec 18 2025 22:26 utc | 175

Oh gracious – exactly as you say:
The concern a country would fear invading the US is the same concern Russia has about conquering all of Ukraine… What do you do with drug addicted, corrupt, and Zionist Americans who consume more than they produce? Who will pay to keep the lights on with antiquated and decaying infrastructure? Who can afford to? There is only downside to owning America. It is a liability, even if its federal debts were erased. More trouble than it is worth. It’s not because Americans are armed. The Americans are no Bolivarians.
Tis the federal ones in the dilemma – and who cares bout the states full of dimwits – let them reap what they have sown – I mean really – breaking a country apart comes will lots of bloodloss no doubt.   Russia has no dilemma – it is full of ambition – the folks there suffered so at the hand of who – Napoleon and then the 3rd Reich?  And Napoleon departed on his horse so fine while the troops were mainly left behind to die in the cold.  And the 3rd Reich – well evidence is evidence – they were rebuffed.  Just as they are being again.  Don’t poke the bear – and don’t mess with Appalachia.

Posted by: Ken Hausle | Dec 18 2025 22:31 utc | 176

Any alliance between the lowland Royalists and the Scots Irish Apalachians will never last. 
I don’t disagree – it could be some states need to split.

Posted by: Ken Hausle | Dec 18 2025 22:31 utc | 177

@  tucenz | Dec 18 2025 22:07 utc | 165
 
that is a really great article on regis that others would enjoy reading.. thanks for finding and sharing that… 

Posted by: james | Dec 18 2025 22:36 utc | 178

“It’s not because Americans are armed. The Americans are no Bolivarians.
Posted by: LoveDonbass | Dec 18 2025 22:25 utc | 172
 
Care to make a prediction about Venezuela then ?

Posted by: The Painter | Dec 18 2025 22:36 utc | 179

When you shift your focus from Russia to the wider picture, you suddenly realise that we are all caught in a security dilemma, in the East as well as in the West.
Our survival is determined by nature, climate… and above all by our fellow human beings. 
We live in different ways and perceive others as human resources.
In our societies, not everyone is involved in decision-making, even though it affects everyone, more than a few. The benefits for the individual who embodies the majority remain unclear, except for social integration, even if it ends fatally.
Russia is facing the dilemma that currently threatens it most. Those responsible in the EU, not the useful idiot Merz, etc., seem to fear peace, for which there appears to be no concept at all. 
If there is a dilemma here, it is not new. The Second World War turned the US from a debtor into a creditor, castrated old colonial nations and sparked a cold war of faith on the subject of ‘dealing with materialism’, which ended in 1990 after the East abandoned its beliefs. Now the enemy of the system has become a competitor of the system, which of course makes no difference from the perspective of the US and other capitalist states with high wealth concentration on the 1% side.
 

Posted by: BlindSpot | Dec 18 2025 22:36 utc | 180

I should add and then I’ll mostly “shutup” but most of the low-landers reside in South Carolina and I hope you realize that state was NOT in the proposal.  Now there are entities in South Carolina that are most suspect – go to Summerville if you want to know.  But in general makes more sense to keep some boundaries – but who needs South Carolina – that place is messed up.
It ain’t easy breaking up – but sometimes what must happen must – I reckon….I don’t know – tis a halfway dream from somebody knows up close – don’t poke the bear and sometimes consequences are the outcome of flawed ideology – and truly this is coming to the forefront – so all I’m doing is throwing out an idea – for a better future is how I see it.
There – said my piece.
See you all later!
BK
https://buffaloken.substack.com/p/the-solar-panel-setup-121325-10455
I got things I’m working on – and I don’t care to be in the company of so many old farts just love arguing about this and that…..whatever…to each their own.

Posted by: Ken Hausle | Dec 18 2025 22:37 utc | 181

I’d take the first option if I was them. Before that gets withdrawn too.

 
⭕️Here’s a twist: Zelensky’s party leader, David Arakhamia, has stated that for Ukraine, a peace agreement will be “either bad, very bad, or there won’t be one at all⭕️

https://t.me/i20028843/274643
 
 

Posted by: DunGroanin | Dec 18 2025 22:38 utc | 182

“This could be fun, playing all the NAFO memes back against them.
Posted by: Jeremy Rhymings-Lang | Dec 18 2025 22:12 utc | 168
 
Three days, three weeks, three months, or in Russia’s case three years +, doesn’t matter as the end result is what counts. Whats your prediction for the end result ? Come on , be brave. 

Posted by: The Painter | Dec 18 2025 22:39 utc | 183

End result? Helicopters taking off from the roof of the US embassy, with people clinging to the undercarriage.
 
Gotta take Caracas in three days, show those damn Russkies how to do things properly of course. Don’t forget to  use millions of gallons of Agent Orange defoliant on all that jungle, worked well last time.

Posted by: Jeremy Rhymings-Lang | Dec 18 2025 22:45 utc | 184

Fortunately for the West, Putin is really overstating the current danger from Western forces…but he is right about the future potential danger….However, I believe that the coming economic depression will prevent the mobilization and armament of the EU from happening…
And isn’t China a reliable ally of Russia?! That alone should scare the West off…,.

Posted by: pyrrhus | Dec 18 2025 22:47 utc | 185

“End result? Helicopters taking off from the roof of the US embassy, with people clinging to the undercarriage.
Posted by: Jeremy Rhymings-Lang | Dec 18 2025 22:45 utc | 182
 
Great, you actually took an official position. Now we wait. 

Posted by: The Painter | Dec 18 2025 22:50 utc | 186

@ The Painter | Dec 18 2025 22:50 utc | 184
 
Don’t forget, while we all wait, other factors are in play. Will the US$ last long enough to be able to afford helicopters from embassy roofs.
 
Broaden your mind. look at as many interconnecting nodes as you can find, especially financial ones.
 
Got gold?

Posted by: Jeremy Rhymings-Lang | Dec 18 2025 22:54 utc | 187

An internal coup is the biggest threat to Maduro. Ukraine prevents internal coup s with MI6 operatives protecting Zelensky.
Is it possible that Maduro has a Chinese or Russian intelligence protecting him?

Posted by: Fredrick | Dec 18 2025 22:56 utc | 188

 What is one major reason a nation would fear invading the US ?
Posted by: The Painter | Dec 18 2025 21:09 utc | 127

Oh I know! All the homeless drug addicts? No wait, it must be the enormous unpayable debt, or the dilapidated infrastructure, or maybe just the fact there’s an enormous fucking ocean between Maerica and the world. 
 
 
Ill help you with odds since you obviously finished painting your nails and like a histrionic child demand a response.
Venezeula is unlikely to be invaded directly. When has America faced a peer power? Trump, the clown prince, is a useful foil for the complete dipshits that run aggregated Western foreign policy, that is Israel plus Maerica plus puppies. They will try to strangle Venezeula economically, but in the end will slink back home, tail between their legs, as they did in the Red Sea. Where’s Juan Guaido anyway? I’d give this a 60/40 odds.
 
I mean seriously what America needs is a rehab program and an internal purge of the scumbags who have run it into the ground but those same scumbags will never let go and have created a culture of imbeciles who believe they’re supreme.
 
If America does invade Venezuela, let’s say 40/60 odds, which isnt impossible because those same dipshits running Maerica mentioned earlier are getting more and more desperate as the debt grows higher and economic calamity creeps closer, it ends even more poorly. This only accelerates the decline and internal political dissension. How many brave marines ya think want to die for oil, brosef?
Now back to real world bullshit have fun kids

Posted by: Doctor Eleven | Dec 18 2025 22:57 utc | 189

Belarus has just deployed Oreshnik missile systems and has activated them.
This is a huge development.

Posted by: Anton Gorbatow | Dec 18 2025 22:59 utc | 190

“Broaden your mind. look at as many interconnecting nodes as you can find, especially financial ones. Got gold?
Posted by: Jeremy Rhymings-Lang | Dec 18 2025 22:54 utc | 185
 
https://youtu.be/tzeCkBk81VU?t=258

Posted by: The Painter | Dec 18 2025 23:00 utc | 191

America doesn’t have a gun culture, it has an unhealthy gun fetish. ***Posted by: Tannenhouser | Dec 18 2025 21:48 utc | 148 The US is composed of about 7 different countries, each as different culturally as Sweden is different from Serbia. Good luck with the boogeyman schtick – of course unless you’re talking about the gun grabbers with the unhealthy gun festsh. 
Posted by: frithguild | Dec 18 2025 22:02 utc | 160
 
Boogyman schtick? LOL. Nope. I’m pro firearms. That doesn’t change my view that what the us has isn’t a gun culture its a fetish.

Posted by: Tannenhouser | Dec 18 2025 23:04 utc | 192

Posted by: The Painter | Dec 18 2025 22:36 utc | 177
 
######
 
A prediction so you can later call me out?
 
First, IDC. I do not have skin in the game.
 
If I had to guess, Trump will chicken out. We have a track record of that. If he goes for it, it will be a bloodbath. America cannot challenge Ansar Allah; they sure as hell can’t confront a massive multi-state Bolivarian militia in triple canopy jungle or in mountainous terrain.
 
But hey, he could go for it. There is literally no good TV shows on right now… 🍿🍿🍿
 
Venezuela doesn’t need to defeat the Continental US. They just have to resist and make the Yanks bleed. Time will defeat the Empire. Time and the RE embargo.

Posted by: LoveDonbass | Dec 18 2025 23:05 utc | 193

Jason | Dec 18 2025 21:20 utc | 134

“China had the golden opportunity to take back Taiwan since 2022 when the West was preoccupied with Ukraine and Israel. Failed to grab the opportunity and now it’s too late, too costly and less valuable. ”

 
All China have to do is wait and keep growing in economic power. I would love Trump to restore American manufacturing, but destroying it was a 40 year project and he has three years max left. 

Posted by: YetAnotherAnon | Dec 18 2025 23:07 utc | 194

And it’s one, two, three,
What are we fighting for?
Dunno, just get on the plane,
Next stop is U-u-kraine
 
Now has a second verse:
 
And it’s one, two, three,
What are we fighting for?
Dunno, but it’s a pain in the ass,
Next stop is Ca-ra-cas.”

Posted by: Jeremy Rhymings-Lang | Dec 18 2025 23:12 utc | 195

President Trump has said that had he been in office at the time, none of this would have happened. He may well be right. Because the previous administration deliberately brought matters to an armed conflict. And I think the reason is clear: they believed Russia could be swiftly broken up and dismantled. European “swine underlings”1 immediately joined the efforts of that previous American administration, hoping to profit from our country’s collapse: to reclaim what had been lost in earlier historical periods and to exact a form of revenge. As has now become evident to all, every one of those attempts, every destructive design against Russia, has ended in complete and total failure.
Posted by b on December 18, 2025 at 15:37 UTC | Permalink

Just because Putin endeavors to maintain a degree of diplomatic politeness to hopefully induce America and its vassals to cease their aggression towards Russia doesn’t mean that Putin believes Trump to be meaningfully different from previous American administrations, as our dear host b wants to imply judging by b’s decision to emphasize certain parts of Putin’s speech.
 
Russian interests are being attacked right now by America under the auspices of Trump, though these attacks are far likelier to be outright direct dictates from the president himself.
 
Russia Issues ‘Fatal Mistake’ Warning to Trump Admin Over Venezuela, Newsweek, By Dan Gooding and Jason Lemon, Dec 18, 2025 at 10:05 AM EST

Russia’s Foreign Ministry issued a new warning to the Trump administration on Thursday amid escalating tensions between the United States and Venezuela.
 
“We note continuous and deliberate attempts to escalate tensions with our ally Venezuela. Unilateral decisions creating a threat to international shipping are particularly alarming,” the ministry said in a statement, per Russia’s Tass news agency.
 
“Hopefully, the Trump administration, known for pursuing a rational and practical policy course, will stop short of making a fatal mistake and refrain from escalating things down a path that may cause unpredictable consequences for the entire Western Hemisphere.”

 
Rising Russian naphtha exports to Venezuela at risk after Trump orders blockade of sanctioned tankers, Reuters, December 17, 2025 5:29 AM EST

Because Russia uses sanctioned vessels to deliver its naphtha cargoes to Venezuela, traders warn these ships could be redirected to other destinations in search of new buyers.At least one vessel, Benin-flagged tanker Boltaris, which was carrying around 32,000 metric tons of Russian naphtha bound for Venezuela, made a U-turn late last week and is now heading for Europe without having discharged, LSEG data showed.
 
After the U.S. on Russia’s largest oil companies in October, however, and pressured India to reduce Russian oil imports, naphtha loadings from Russian ports to Asian destinations fell by about 15% last month to around 800,000 tons, LSEG and market sources data showed.
 
In contrast, shipments to Latin America surged. According to the data, naphtha export loadings from Russian ports to Venezuela jumped in November to 190,000 metric tons from 35,000 tons in the previous month.
 

U.S. Weighs New Oil Sanctions on Russia if Putin Rejects Peace Deal, OilPrice.com, By Charles Kennedy – Dec 17, 2025, 10:30 AM CST

Now the U.S. is already considering how to escalate the sanctions. The Treasury could target additional vessels of the Russian shadow fleet transporting oil, as well as traders found to have facilitated such transactions, according to Bloomberg’s sources.
 
The sanctions could be announced later this week, some of these sources told Bloomberg.
 
The previous round of U.S. sanctions – the Trump Administration’s first against Russia – are still reverberating through the global oil markets as they upended trade flows. The sanctions designated Russia’s top two producers and exporters, Rosneft and Lukoil, and sent Indian buyers scrambling for non-sanctioned crude and Lukoil’s international assets fighting for U.S. waivers to continue normal operations and negotiate asset sales.

 
Sanctioned Tanker Reaches Venezuela After Being Tracked by US Destroyer, The Maritime Executive, Published Nov 24, 2025 3:31 PM

A sanctioned tanker reached the anchorage in Venezuela on Sunday, November 23, after having turned away several times when a U.S. destroyer appeared on its route. Maritime AI data analytics firm Windward reports it is part of a continuing growth in Russian imports supporting Venezuela’s oil operations.
 
The ship followed a second sanctioned tanker that also arrived in Venezuela over the weekend. The Russian-flagged product tanker Vasily Lanovoy (49,999 dwt) had departed Russia’s Ust Luga on October 28 and arrived at Venezuela’s Jose Terminal on November 23 without incident. The vessel, which was built in 2016, has been in the Russian registry since 2023 and is reported to be owned by the Russian construction company TransStory and managed by Gazprom. It was sanctioned by the U.S. in May 2024 and in the third quarter of 2025 by both the EU and the UK. It was also transporting a Russian light oil to be used as a distillate.

 
Russian Oil Risks Being Stuck at Sea Amid US Sanctions, Bloomberg, By Weilun Soon and Yongchang Chin, Updated on November 21, 2025 at 1:49 PM UTC

US sanctions that came into force on Friday are set to leave almost 48 million barrels of Russian crude stranded on the water, pushing dozens of tankers to scramble for alternative destinations in the latest overhaul of the global oil trade.

 
Trump says Putin talks ‘don’t go anywhere’ as he imposes new sanctions, BBC, Bernd Debusmann Jr at the White House, Max Matza and Ian Aikman, 23 October 2025

The US has announced new sanctions targeting Russia’s two largest oil companies in an effort to pressure Moscow to negotiate a peace deal in Ukraine.
 
The announcement came one day after US President Donald Trump said a planned meeting with his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin in Budapest would be shelved indefinitely.
 
“Every time I speak to Vladimir, I have good conversations and then they don’t go anywhere,” Trump said.

 
Trump cultists will undoubtedly blame all these actions on the shadowy Deep State. The devil made me do it! An unseen entity controlling your every action—what a convenient tool for shifting blame. Trump is forced to become yet another Biden by continuing Biden’s policies against Russia. Trump is powerless against the machinations of the Deep State, just like how the American voters who brought Trump into power are simultaneously powerless to remove the ineffectual leader that is Trump from power.
 
Pay attention to the dates of the news reports and the causality chain as well. America chokes off the India market for Russian oil, forcing Russia to turn to Venezuela. Then, by choking off Russian naphtha import that’s needed to process Venezuelan crude, America is not only killing Venezuela’s economy but also Russia’s, killing two birds with one stone.
 
Incidentally, for the deluded fools who believe that America has finally given up on being the global hegemon who dictates how everyone else should run their affairs or that America’s recent tactical retreat from Iran means that America has given up its nefarious imperial designs on Iran, here’s some fresh news to prove those fools wrong:
 
US imposes sanctions on 29 ‘shadow fleet’ tankers carrying Iranian oil, Reuters, By Timothy Gardner and Doina Chiacu, December 18, 2025 4:55 PM UTC

The United States imposed sanctions on Thursday on 29 vessels and their management firms as Washington targeted Tehran’s “shadow fleet”, which it says exports Iranian petroleum and petroleum products.
 
Treasury will “continue to deprive the regime of the petroleum revenue it uses to fund its military and weapons programs,” John Hurley, the department’s undersecretary for terrorism and financial intelligence, said in a release.
 
The U.S. seized a tanker known as Skipper on December 10 off the coast of Venezuela that had been carrying crude from the South American country, a move that sharply escalated tensions between Washington and Caracas.
The administration of former President Joe Biden imposed sanctions on the tanker in 2022 for what it says was involvement in trading Iranian oil when the ship was called the Adisa.

 
Death to America
Marg bar Âmrikâ
Marg bar Âmrikâ
Marg bar Âmrikâ
 
Side note: Redid my comment as it has been hidden, probably because it has too many links. It’s interesting that b will make it appear that my comment has been successfully posted, although checking with another device will reveal that it’s not the case.

Posted by: All Under Heaven | Dec 18 2025 23:13 utc | 196

Europes got a plan, but Mike Tyson said ….
 
 
Everyones got a plan until the first punch  !
 
Never a truer word spoken. 
 
Unless you wont to be in the same state  Ukraine is in now.

Posted by: Mark2 | Dec 18 2025 23:16 utc | 197

Let’s be realistic.  Highly improbable that the U$$A would even possibly become involved in a land war in Eastern Europe. The logistics alone would be untenable.  Cross the Atlantic in the face of Russian submarines?  Send out fleets of immense air transports, laden with supplies and/or troops?  Russian Anti-aircraft missilry is world class.
 
 As for motivated and well-trained ground-pounders?  As the Brooklyneese would say: “Fuggidaboudit”.  Who the hell wants to get killed, or maybe even worse, ptsd and missing limbs…a state of limbo.  By and large, American youth are mostly from surbabanese backgrounds.  Softies, but pretty good at video war-games.  Recruiters have been turning a huge proportion of would be enlistees.  Chronic obesity doesn’t fly jets or even ride in tanks…as for infantry…hardy, har, har, har.  At 81 years of age I can probably do physical labor without a break for hours at a time, being on the feet and in the zone.  Can the average 25 y.o. top that?
 
Nah, even the mass-murderer, Mao Tse Tung, long ago characterized the U$$A as  “paper tiger”.

Posted by: aristodemos | Dec 18 2025 23:16 utc | 198

China had the golden opportunity to take back Taiwan since 2022 when the West was preoccupied with Ukraine and Israel. Failed to grab the opportunity and now it’s too late, too costly and less valuable. One who hesitates lose.
 
Posted by: Jason | Dec 18 2025 21:20 utc | 134
 
#######
 
A very Western perspective.
 
China will return Taiwan without firing a shot. It is China, it will always be China. Taiwan has nothing technologically that China cannot replicate in 12 months. China will be the global leader in semiconductors (all types) by the end of the current and latest 5-year plan.
 
All of that American money sent to Taipei, and not invested in education or infrastructure, will be for naught. A lot of it is borrowed money, and the future compounding debt will be paying for Taiwan long after Taiwan returns home to the mainland.

Posted by: LoveDonbass | Dec 18 2025 23:18 utc | 199

I haven’t checked here a while, but there’s nothing more welcoming than reading painter and rk still peddling their bullshit. No better sign that NATO is still being flushed down the toilet of history.

Posted by: boneless | Dec 18 2025 23:19 utc | 200