Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
October 8, 2025
Ukrainian Media About Gaps In The Frontline And Other Failures

The Ukrainian news-outlet Ukrainska Pravda has a new report about the state of the Ukrainian forces at the frontline. The Russian forces are winning the war bit by bit while the Ukrainian army is in constant retreat. The report is discussing several issues which prevent the Ukrainians from holding the line.

While most of UP’s pieces are published in Russian/Ukrainian and English this one has yet to receive a translation. Below   summaries and excerpts of it (edited machine translation):

The holes between the infantry positions are getting bigger and bigger.
What prevents the Ukrainian army from deterring the Russians
Ukrainska Pravda, Oct 6 2025

The most urgent need directly on the front line remains infantry. At the current stage of the war, when the work of heavy equipment is maximally complicated, the role of soldiers in the trenches increases significantly. When they are not enough, it is not easy to organize a defense.

Due to the lack of people, many units cannot hold their positions, fully repel Russian attacks, adequately rest and conduct the necessary rotation. As a result, field commanders are forced to choose priority areas, leaving other sectors less protected.

In consequence there is no longer a real frontline. The lack of infantry leads to gaps through which Russian forces can slip into the rear of the Ukrainian forces. Ukrainian mortar troops and drone pilots who are nominally stationed five kilometer behind the frontline suddenly find themselves in direct contact with enemy troops:

A consequence of the problem described above is that infantry positions are increasingly literally deserted. Therefore, the distance between neighboring positions can be 200-300 –, 500-700 –meters, and sometimes even a kilometer.

The formation of a huge number of holes between Ukrainian infantry positions and the penetration of these holes by the Russians deep into our defenses has formed another trend of the current stage of the war – the lack of a stable line of engagement.

Due to the lack of fighters on the first line, drone and mortar operators, who stand 3-5 kilometers from the front edge, are forced to become infantry.

In the worst cases, which UP is also aware of, the Russians even reach artillery positions. These are 10-15 kilometers from the contact line.

Over the last six month the Ukrainian army has changed its structure. Previously various brigades were attached to temporary operational commands (TUS,Tgrs) with each responsible for large parts of the frontline. The new model is based on a corp structure with several brigades assigned to a corp to serve under one permanent command. While the restructuring is officially finished most troops have yet to find their new home:

The key advantage of the transition of the Defense Forces to the corps system was called by supporters of the reform the emergence of stable management bodies. But this is exactly what has not happened so far, because there are still temporary TUS, Tgrs, etc. on the ground in one form or another.

Moreover, there are also questions about the transition to the implementation of tasks by corps exclusively in the designated areas of responsibility. In many sectors of the front, a full-fledged transition did not take place, while the General Staff already has plans to create even new structures, such as assault troops and troops of unmanned air defense systems as part of the air force.

In the context of a general shortage of personnel with the incomplete transition to the corps system, finding resources for new military formations will be quite problematic.

Despite having the just introduced a corp structure the newly created assault battalions were put under direct command of the Ukrainian commander-in-chief,  General Syrski.  Events in Ukraine recently took a look at those:

Undeterred by the total collapse of the Kursk operation in the spring of 2025,  Syrsky remains fixated on the need for new offensives.

Now, the head of the army has created his own personal guard, totally willing to implement all his orders – the assault forces. The western-funded nationalist press has attacked Syrsky’s new project as ‘catastrophic’, claiming that the units involved have taken massive losses in the urge to demonstrate their loyalty to the commander-in-chief.

For whatever reason, these highly critical articles on the assault forces from the likes of BBC Ukraine and texty.org haven’t been translated to English.

Today we’ll take a look at what exactly these new assault forces are. It turns out that they are largely composed of units commanded by the fascist ‘Right Sector’. Syrsky chose these units because they unflinchingly took part in his Kursk adventure – in contrast to other commanders, who criticized Syrsky’s folly and were sacked as a result. …

The best general the Russians have, as Syrski is called by his critics, is also accused of micromanaging the fight at the frontline (edited machine translation):

In June 2025, Ukrayinska Pravda was the first to write about how Commander-in-Chief Alexander Syrsky resorted to manual control of the front. Independently selects, and already removes, the corps commanders, decides which brigade and how much replenishment is being made, sets tasks for battalions, when they should be assigned by the brigade commander, and so on.

During these three months, the situation with the dependence of the front on the instructions of one person, according to the observations of Ukrayinska Pravda and the UP’s interlocutors in the Defense Forces, has only become more complicated.

At first, Syrsky began to regularly visit and “taxi” the actions of units on the Dobropolsky ledge, which is now being “cut off” by the defense forces. According to public references of the commander-in-chief himself, over the past 3.5 months, he went to meetings and meetings with local commanders as many as eight times.

The introduction of long range First-Person-View drones by Russia has cleared the typical rear of the frontline. Command and logistics had to move back further which makes their work more costly and ineffective:

Due to the activity of Russian aircraft and drones from about the end of spring – and early summer of this year, the support units of the Ukrainian army began to move away from the line-of-contact.

According to the decision of the Supreme Chief, all support units had to move 40-50 kilometers away from the contact line.

For logistics commanders, this decision means that with already limited resources – especially fuel-the logistics arm becomes longer and more complex.

I used to spend 40 liters and a couple of hours to get a few tons of fuel. Now – 300 liters and almost a day,” – shares with UP one of the commanders of support.

The UP authors are pessimistic about possible changes:

[T]he military command at various levels turns a blind eye to fairly obvious problems within the Ukrainian army, and the presidential office, without which no solution in this country is complete, does not risk its ratings [..]

Meanwhile, the gaps between the infantry positions are getting bigger.

Comments

The EU parliament just passed a resolution giving member states authority to shoot down Russian planes passing their territory.
Expect major false flags and escalation to occur rather sooner than later. Perhaps timed with Venezuela/Iran wars.

Posted by: unimperator | Oct 9 2025 10:52 utc | 201

If you want to see the terrified face of a wounded Colombian mercenary at the precise moment he understands he is going to die in the explosion of a Russian FPV drone, check the 14th video top-to-bottom in this link:
 
https://southfront.press/frankensam-hit-summary-of-russian-combat-footage-from-october-8-2025/
 
His family will be waiting in vain the next remittance.

Posted by: Johan Kaspar | Oct 9 2025 10:58 utc | 202

That’s not how Stalingrad worked; it was a holding action before the USSR launched Operation Uranus which was an offensive.
Posted by: ChalkLine | Oct 9 2025 10:06 utc | 191

The counter attack was only possible after the main thrust of the German offensive had been blunted and they were running out of supplies.  That’s the whole point … if Russia had charged forward early to meet the Germans they would have been obliterated.
 
“Holding action” = defence and attrition, whatever words you want to dress it up with.
 
The mistake that the Germans made was not so much that they couldn’t defend against a counter attack but that they slowed themselves down attacking Stalingrad in the first place. Their only advantage was “lightning war” meaning fast, quick, speedy … get to the objective ASAP. You could do a quick calculation on the back of an envelope and figure out that Germany had no chance to win a slow, grinding war … and they already knew that themselves!

Posted by: Tel | Oct 9 2025 11:14 utc | 203

Wish B would make a filter so I could sift them out.
Posted by: Ed Bernays | Oct 9 2025 10:41 utc | 199–
DIY. Install UBlock Origin plugin to your browser, and add the configuration line:
http://www.moonofalabama.org##div.comments-body:has(p:contains(Posted by: caveman))

Posted by: MorePain4Cakes | Oct 9 2025 11:27 utc | 204

@Posted by: MorePain4Cakes | Oct 9 2025 11:27 utc | 204
I have Ublock already, didn’t know you could personalise it on this level.  
Thanks!

Posted by: Ed Bernays | Oct 9 2025 11:56 utc | 205

If you want to see the terrified face of a wounded Colombian mercenary 
 
Posted by: Johan Kaspar | Oct 9 2025 10:58 utc | 202
 

 
I’d much rather see Emmanuel Macron’s terrified face, but he is hiding in the closet.

Posted by: too scents | Oct 9 2025 12:47 utc | 206

Posted by: Suresh | Oct 9 2025 3:30 utc | 169
True, but this is where the iron law kicks in, to perform a classic withdrawal under fire requires the components, including all arms capabilities) that the Ukrainians lack, due to their over-reliance on drones. This myopic fixation on a technical saviour in quad-rotor form has meant an army that only operates at brigade level (calling three brigades a Corps is one in name only) and is therefore incapable of effecting and sustaining any operationally significant mission. 
 
Posted by: William Gruff | Oct 9 2025 10:33 utc | 197
It’s dying anyway, like the fad for the silly curly shoes worn in the Middle Ages, and largely for the same reason.
 
Posted by: will moon | Oct 9 2025 10:51 utc | 200
Depends on your definition of held, the Ukrainian claims of still holding Bakhmut, when they controlled only a sliver of suburbs, was rightly met with derision here, but their logic is similar to your statement. IIRC, the Soviets were pushed back to a 600m by 200m section around one of the factory complexes, but by then the Germans were spent as an attacking force. 
Posted by: Tel | Oct 9 2025 11:14 utc | 203
A common misconception, German tactics stressed a careful, coordinated approach, speed was only encouraged when a tactical exploitation required it. The battle for Stalingrad didn’t so much slow the Germans down as rob them of most of their tactical advantages that the Soviets had found impossible to counter (even in ‘43 they only survived due to a combination of massed defences and German operational stupidity). Fighting in BUA’s (Built up Areas) is a 360 degree affair that allows ill-trained soldiers opportunities that a more conventional battlefield would rarely give them, add to that the necessary increase in concentration of forces that cities physically impose, a secure rear area that was largely untouched and a callous disregard for casualties by the defenders, and you have a battle the Germans struggled with from the very start. 
As for a grinding war, the Germans could have been far more effective at slowing the Soviets than they did, ‘43 being the turning point, which itself was driven by the loss of infantry after the fall of Stalingrad. Even in ‘44 the German took a horrendous toll on the attacking Russians, so much so that by late ‘44 and ‘45 they had increasing manpower shortages that forced reorganisations at all levels. 

Posted by: Milites | Oct 9 2025 17:06 utc | 207

Posted by: tucenz | Oct 8 2025 20:01 utc | 120 Rudskoy S.F. – First Deputy Chief of the General Staff of the Armed Forces of the RF
Posted by: sh0tek | Oct 9 2025 6:38 utc | 177
Thanks

Posted by: tucenz | Oct 9 2025 20:13 utc | 208

@ james | Oct 9 2025 6:34 utc | 175
 
I’ve got an increasingly firm feeling that our Mr. Brennan is an aggression-fuelled Zionist, extremely hostile to any viewpoint that might disrupt the prevailing narrative; accordingly he uses a vituperative tone of language towards those of us who dare to stray “outside of the box”.
 
“Stay in your lane, you disgusting goyim, and don’t question the reality you are served up” is an accurate distillation of his outlook. Just my humble opinion…

Posted by: Jeremy Rhymings-Lang | Oct 9 2025 21:45 utc | 209

Posted by: Jeremy Rhymings-Lang | Oct 9 2025 21:45 utc | 209
I’ve got an increasingly firm feeling that our Mr. Brennan is an aggression-fuelled Zionist, 

 
Lol! Jeremy, I noted that months ago and stopped reading his/her bs. Just ignore. Not worth reading.

Posted by: Johan Kaspar | Oct 10 2025 7:21 utc | 210

thanks jeremy and johan..  

Posted by: james | Oct 10 2025 7:26 utc | 211

«In consequence there is no longer a real frontline.»

Posted by: Blissex | Oct 10 2025 8:39 utc | 212

«In consequence there is no longer a real frontline.»
This is a pretty amazingly silly remark because there has never been a “real frontline” except in a few areas! * The boundary between Ukraine and RF is very long (it includes not just the Donbas where most of the fighting happens but also from there up to Belarus. * Neither Ukraine when it invaded the Donbas republics in 2014-2021 nor RF when supported the counterattack of the Donbas troops in 2022 have been able or willing to deploy enough troops to cover that entire length. It is not like the frontline in WW2, That is one of the reasons why V. Puting calls it a “Special Military Operation” rather than a war. This war is somewhat like a naval war where the huge plain is like the sea which is mostly empty and towns are like islands around which most of the opposing forces concentrate. This is also why: * In 2022 a rather small allied Donbas-RF force could take so much land: the Ukraine-NATO forces were concentrated ready for a repeated invasion of the Donetsk region of the Donbas. * In 2024 a rather small Ukraine-NATO force could take a chunk of the Kursk area by acting quickly. As in the Kursk example that most of the boundary is in effect empty means that sudden lunges forward are possible if one side can concentrate there, but apart from concentrations being vulnerable to bombing, even if the lunge succeeds then it may become isolated. In the Pacific during WW2 the “island hopping” tactic worked because the japanese side was overly stretched and had weak logistics, in this case both sides are.

Posted by: Blissex | Oct 10 2025 8:40 utc | 213

>> It turns out that these new assault forces are largely composed of units commanded by the fascist ‘Right Sector’
Sirsky sends the Asow-folks to the meat grinder, Russian soldiers finish them off.
Sirsky and Putin working hand-in-hand to de-nazify Ukraine… Go figure 

Posted by: Marvin | Oct 10 2025 10:45 utc | 214