Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
October 30, 2025
A Nuclear Delivery Vehicle Is Not A Nuclear War Head

A Truth Social tweet by U.S. President Donald Trump on nuclear weapons has led to some confusion and, as I assume, misinterpretations.

Donald J. Trump @realDonaldTrump – Oct 30, 2025, 1:04 utc

The United States has more Nuclear Weapons than any other country. This was accomplished, including a complete update and renovation of existing weapons, during my First Term in office. Because of the tremendous destructive power, I HATED to do it, but had no choice! Russia is second, and China is a distant third, but will be even within 5 years. Because of other countries testing programs, I have instructed the Department of War to start testing our Nuclear Weapons on an equal basis. That process will begin immediately. Thank you for your attention to this matter! PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP

The Washington Post interprets it as a test of nuclear warheads:

Trump directs Pentagon to test nuclear weapons for first time since 1992 (archived) – Washington Post
The president said he wanted testing to occur “on an equal basis” with Russia and China. The Kremlin condemned the move, and there was no indication of when tests might take place.

President Donald Trump on Thursday morning said he directed the Pentagon to begin testing nuclear weapons “on an equal basis” with Russia and China, an apparent attempt to flex the United States’ military might ahead of a high-stakes trade meeting here with his Chinese counterpart, Xi Jinping.

Trump’s announcement on Truth Social signaled a reversal of decades of United States nuclear policy that could have far-reaching consequences for relations with U.S. adversaries, though his post included very few details about what the tests would entail. The last nuclear weapon test in the United States was held in 1992, before President George H.W. Bush implemented a moratorium on such exercises at the conclusion of the Cold War.

Trump wrote that the process would begin immediately and was in response to other countries’ testing programs.

The president posted about resuming nuclear weapons testing as his helicopter, Marine One, was in the air on his way to meet Xi at Gimhae Air Base.

The Trump tweet is wrong in that it asserts that the U.S. has more nuclear weapons than any other country. All public sources say that Russia with about 4300 nuclear warheads has slightly more than the United States with about 3,600. China has about 5-600 nuclear warheads and is building up its nuclear weapon arsenal to about 1,000 warheads by 2035.

However Trumps next sentence is not about testing nuclear warheads. It is about testing of carrier systems that can deploy nuclear warheads.

Trump says: “Because of other countries testing programs, …”

No country has recently exploded a nuclear bomb or warhead for testing or other purposes. The last known nuclear test was done by North Korea in 2017.

It is important to distinguish between testing a carrier designed to deliver a nuclear war head and testing, i.e. exploding, the nuclear war head itself. A nuclear carrier can be a bomber, a land based (intercontinental) missile or a submarine based missile or torpedo.

Russia has recently announced a successful test of the Burevestnik cruise missile. This is a potential nuclear warhead carrier driven by a nuclear-powered jet engine:

The Russian president talked about the new unlimited-range nuclear-powered Burevestnik cruise missile. The weapon was successfully tested last week, when the projectile reportedly traveled more than 14,000 km.

Putin revealed details about the missile’s nuclear-powered turbojet engine, stating that its power unit “is comparable in output with the reactor of a nuclear-propelled submarine, but it’s 1,000 times smaller.”

“The key thing is that while a conventional nuclear reactor starts up in hours, days, or even weeks, this nuclear reactor starts up in minutes or seconds. That’s a giant achievement,” the president said.

Burevestnik is, like the U.S. Tomahawk, a turbo fan driven cruise missile designed to fly at low altitude at a speed of less than Mach 1. While the Tomahawk uses a liquid propellant as a source of heat to drive its engine the Burevestnik uses a miniaturized nuclear reactor of an unknown kind. This gives it unmatched endurance. Both missile can carry conventional or nuclear war heads. The nuclear jet engine that drives the Burevestnik is not an explosive device. While it is likely to create radioactive contamination when it crashes it will not explode.

Russia has also tested its long announced Poseidon torpedo:

Russia successfully tested a nuclear-powered underwater Poseidon drone on Tuesday, Putin revealed. The development of the massive torpedo-shaped nuclear-capable drone was first announced in 2018, but had been shrouded in mystery ever since.

“For the first time, we succeeded not only in launching it from a carrier submarine using a booster engine but also in starting its nuclear power unit, which propelled the drone for a certain amount of time,” Putin stated.

The device is unrivaled by any other weapon “anywhere in the world when it comes to speed and depth,” the president stressed, adding that an analogous weapon is unlikely to be fielded by any other nation soon. The power of Poseidon greatly surpasses the characteristics of Russia’s upcoming Sarmat intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM), Putin stated, apparently referring to the yield of its nuclear payload.

The Poseidon torpedo is likely using a nuclear reactor which is in principle similar to the one on the Burevestnik cruise missile. Its most important advantage is again its high endurance. Poseidon is designed to carry a large nuclear warhead. Should that explode near to some harbor it would likely cause a large tsunami.

Trump also said: “I have instructed the Department of War to start testing our Nuclear Weapons on an equal basis. …”

All nuclear warheads the U.S. has are under the control of the Department of Energy. It is the sole agency that can do test explosions of nuclear warheads. The nuclear delivery vehicles which are used to deploy the war heads are under the control of the Department of Defense (or ‘Department of War’ as Trump calls it).

Trump said “Because of other countries testing programs” and “start testing … on an equal basis” both in reference of nuclear delivery vehicle tests of other countries.

Trump thereby likely meant to order the DoD to test its nuclear delivery vehicles, just like Russia has recently done. He did not order the DoE to test nuclear war heads.

The testing of nuclear delivery vehicles, like intercontinental missiles, is a routine that has been done every year since those exist.

It is nothing to panic about.

Trumps language is however as usual imprecise. May be he really has ordered to test a nuclear war head? Russia is not sure about this:

Russia will respond “accordingly” if the US violates a moratorium on testing nuclear weapons, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov has said.

Responding to Trump’s claims of other countries carrying out nuclear tests, Peskov said “we are so far not aware of this.”

If it is about Burevestnik, then it is not a nuclear test,” he insisted. “All nations are developing their defense systems, but this is not a nuclear test.”

Washington test-fired an unarmed, nuclear-capable Minuteman III intercontinental ballistic missile in February and launched four Trident II missiles from a submarine in September.

Russia last tested a nuclear weapon during the Soviet period in 1990. The US halted its testing in 1992 under a Congress-mandated moratorium.

To test a nuclear war head Trump would have to ask Congress to lift the moratorium on testing. He would also have to order the Department of Energy to prepare a test site. That process alone is estimated to take three years.

There is thus absolutely no reason for headline panics.

Comments

The oligarch media lies and morons buy into it. If you want to know why President Trump is running circles around his national rivals, this is why- absolutely terrible impression management. Yes, there are people hyping Russia’s warhead stockpile and Borevestniks, and they’re also the ones who will be totally surprised when people view false flag detonations in Ukraine as Russian. 

Posted by: They Call Me Mister | Oct 30 2025 14:36 utc | 1

Do you remember when the US were furious about Jacques Chirac conducting underground Nuclear tests in the Pacific (mostly for science), sanctioning the import of wine and cheese and so forth ? 
Should the RoW sanction US (so called) “wine & cheese” ? 

Posted by: Savonarole | Oct 30 2025 14:44 utc | 2

The question is whether Trump even understood the difference and, even if he did, whether he actually meant nuclear warhead tests, which cannot be ruled out given Trump’s statements.

Posted by: smartfox | Oct 30 2025 14:54 utc | 3

This president sure is something else. A real winner. And we got three more years to go. Who knows ? Maybe four more years after that. God help us all. 

Posted by: octavian61 | Oct 30 2025 14:54 utc | 4

To test a nuclear war head Trump would have to ask Congress to lift the moratorium on testing.
 
Posted by b on October 30, 2025 at 14:30 UTC | Permalink
 

 
Trump’s modus operandi is to litigate permission post ex facto.  A moratorium means nothing to him.
 

Posted by: too scents | Oct 30 2025 15:10 utc | 5

Mike Mihajlovic’s analysis on the Burevestnik: https://open.substack.com/pub/bmanalysis/p/burevestnik-part-i
 

Posted by: Elmer Fudd | Oct 30 2025 15:12 utc | 6

let’s parse the turds coming out of the mouth of the pederast in chief as he blindly bombs Iran’s nuclear sites. Does that Ivy League grad know the US state hides its budget for nukes in the Dept of Energy? would Trump & co start a war to bury the Epstein files? 
 
but why would they hide such information, when building and maintaining nukes, and spreading them as the US is doing, is “positive economic growth”? 
 
in which economy in the world is “building mo’ betta nukes” NOT considered “economic growth”? all the major economies of the world have thriving military budgets, and they are all giddy about it.
 
and none of these war economies are destroying the environment. they just kill people, not the water and soil. How convenient. I’m not sure who could be benefiting from all this…i don’t know…who could it be…maybe….SATAN!?!?!?
 
esp cuz no one needs nukes. just target nuclear reactors. like the West is already doing in Ukraine and Iran, all while it shoots DU and all other kinds of horrible shit across the globe. to preserve that precious precious Jew DNA (in Israel, that is.) defoliate Vietnam cuz communism. that’s the Western way of war.

Posted by: duck n cover | Oct 30 2025 15:15 utc | 7

Black Mountain’s analysis on the Burevestnik is worth reading: https://bmanalysis.substack.com/

Posted by: Elmer Fudd | Oct 30 2025 15:15 utc | 8

thanks b..
 
you articulate the root cause of much misunderstanding – clarity of communication…  it happens a lot and i am as guilty of it as trump… others are much more specific in the use of language and i admire them for it.. 

Posted by: james | Oct 30 2025 15:19 utc | 9

Bring back duck n cover! Between swearing loyalty to Israel, reciting the 10 commandments, reporting their “illegal” classmates, ICE raids, routine shootings, getting their bags searched with cameras and cops and fences everywhere, McDonald’s being served in the lunchroom, having a pedobear for coach but not having a school nurse, kids in the US can now practice Nuclear War Safety! when not getting concussions on the battlefield trying to run football into the Endzone.
 
jesus. pass the heroin or booze already. it will make standing in line for food easier.

Posted by: duck n cover | Oct 30 2025 15:24 utc | 10

jesus. pass the heroin
 
Posted by: duck n cover | Oct 30 2025 15:24 utc | 11
 

 
Insist on MAGA brand heroin ==> https://www.silive.com/crime-safety/2025/10/nypd-raid-on-staten-island-nets-fentanyl-maga-stamped-heroin-4-arrested.html
 

Posted by: too scents | Oct 30 2025 15:34 utc | 11

b, thanks for your clarity on this issue of nuclear testing.  You are no doubt correct. Trump swings wildly from pole to pole in response to events in ways that indicate he has little understanding of the complexities of what he reacts to.  In this case he is reacting to North Korea’s testing of a nuclear capable ICBM just as Trump visits the neighborhood, as well as to Russia’s announcement of its testing of new nuclear-engined missile and torpedo.  
It is said that Trump doesn’t read.  I wonder if he has dyslexia or some other unaddressed learning disability.  It would explain a lot about his behavior.

Posted by: mjh | Oct 30 2025 15:36 utc | 12

The panic is in Kupiansk and Pokrovsk, where TeleSur reports 10,500 Ukrainian troops have been surrounded.

Posted by: Keme | Oct 30 2025 15:39 utc | 13

In support of

To test a nuclear war head Trump would have to ask Congress to lift the moratorium on testing. Posted by b on October 30, 2025 at 14:30 UTC | Permalink — Trump’s modus operandi is to litigate permission post ex facto.  A moratorium means nothing to him. 
Posted by: too scents | Oct 30 2025 15:10 utc | 6

 
Trump is playing the Hollywood nuke card and its effects will not be the same across all audiences.
 
Remember, it is barbarism versus socialism and Trump is fronting the barbarism side.

Posted by: psychohistorian | Oct 30 2025 15:40 utc | 14

To be honest, this platform causes problems for defense planners in that their plan is to continue the War-Against-Russia [WAR] otherwise, not so much.
 
Why?  Because even if Russia was to surprise attack us in some far fetched nuclear scenario we would still have enough to retaliate with.  Which means Russia won’t “surprise attack us in some far fetched nuclear scenario“.  End of story.  Honestly, what’s really interesting about this vehicle is it’s eventual civilian applications.  However, in the here and now, depending on the cost,  it has the ability to project Russian military power across the globe which will drive the neocolonialist-neocons absolutely nuts.  And that’s a good thing.
 
All the time I hear, Anti-American, Anti-English, Anti-what-ever….hate for the people of these lands when in fact, were the writer to put aside their personal bitterness at their lifes failings and apply a bit of logic, it is the globalists, the neocolonialist-neocons that are effing up the globe, not America, not England et al, with the possible exception of Israel and the Mongol invasion [joking].  And BTW, scratch a neocolonialist-neocon and you’ll find a neofeudal…oops, neoliberal so, I’ll just use the neocolonialist-neocons to finish my thought on this matter.  Anyhow, the American military is used as a club of the globalist, as are all the 3LAs which includes the US Dept of State.  The cost for this abuse of power is enormous and could not be justified on a ROI basis were the benefit to be distributed to US citizens but, they are not…only the tiniest portion of the population sees any benefit at all.
 
Okay, a bit of a digression there but, that’s why this propulsion system is important.  And it’s the propulsion system that’s important, not the vehicle.  Russia, in the very near future will be able, on a moments notice, to project to any corner of the globe and just as quickly, redeploy that power elsewhere, over and over again.  The same thing the American military can do but, at the tiniest fraction of the cost that is burdened upon the American taxpayer.  No fleet of refueling tankers on bases sprawled across the globe, no carrier groups…no need for sea-lift…you get my drift.  It’s incredibly cheap because it does not require supporting infrastructure.
 
As for America developing a similar propulsion system, I am sure it could be done.  Just one problem, it won’t benefit the US in a similar manner.  Why?  Well for one, we’ve invested all this money into a military-industrial-behemoth..whatcha gonna do with it?  And hey, what’s going to happen to Boeing, Lockheed, Northrop-Grumman stock prices when the cost of power projection drops 99.99% huh?
 
Eventually we will be able to fly at higher altitudes because we don’t need to support combustion, we need some atmosphere but flying at mach 2.5 at 90,000 ft is more than doable if this thing developed.  And we can do this thing without screwing up the upper atmosphere with long lasting chemicals.  Shipping, just 17 panamax sized ships contribute as much pollution into the atmosphere as all the terrestrial vehicles in the world….excuse me I got to put on a pair of sunglasses…the future is so bright…or was that a nuclear flashhhh…..
 
 

Posted by: S Brennan | Oct 30 2025 15:42 utc | 15

The BMA article about the new, nuclear-powered cruise missile briefly mentions the possibility of “potential ecological liabilities”. No kidding! How little attention we pay to the aftermaths of these wars, in Ukraine and the middle east, and the potential environmental consequences of wars against Venezuela, Iran, and China. How valuable will those wheat fields be after they have been turned into minefields?

Posted by: Alex Cox | Oct 30 2025 15:44 utc | 16

‘jesus. pass the heroin or booze already. it will make standing in line for food easier’

https://inv.nadeko.net/watch?v=lPHc68RIYAo

Posted by: Dan Kelly | Oct 30 2025 15:47 utc | 17

Bragging about having the most nuclear weapons is beyond stupid. Use of a small fraction of that number is sufficient to cripple civilization for decades if not permanently. Retards run nuclear armed countries. Someday a mistake will happen and then the retarded elites and the clueless of the world will understand what happens when nuclear weapons are used.

Posted by: Bismarck 28 | Oct 30 2025 15:50 utc | 18

There doesn’t seem to be any point to this post except to apologize for Trump’s escalation, explaining it away as verbal. This apparently is meant to be understood as merely verbal. Unfortunately this forced interpretation is the typical: Trump didn’t mean what he said, he meant what I (the apologist) says he meant. There was no need for a Truth Social post at all if routine delivery systems testing is to continue. 
 
Our host does say that Russia is supposed to have more warheads than the US and even makes so bold as to say Trump is wrong. This is pretend criticism I fear. Following the link, his own source gives a slight edge to the US in so-called deployed warheads…and it’s likely enough this is what Trump was referring to. The Truth Social post also brags about updating the US nuclear arsenal in his first term (a policy begun by Obama I seem to remember?) I am not sure that Russia has actually updated its entire arsenal. One of the things that may save humanity from extinction is the serendipitous discovery that nuclear warheads actually have a short shelf life. Nuclear warheads are supposed to be compressed into a critical mass beginning a chain reaction. I doubt you have to have a full half-life pass so that half the fissionable materials are decayed before the structure of the bomb material doesn’t deform in the proper way to explode.
 
I’m pretty sure that behind the scenes the ruling class and its employees are grappling with nuclear strategy as the ultimate solution. It seems more likely that the closest hoi polloi (me and much of the MoA commentariat, though possibly not the insider William Gruff) will get to weighing in on that debate will be movie reviews of House of Dynamite. 

Posted by: steven t johnson | Oct 30 2025 15:54 utc | 19

The power of Poseidon greatly surpasses the characteristics of Russia’s upcoming Sarmat intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM), Putin stated, apparently referring to the yield of its nuclear payload.
 
You don’t state the source, but where I read the same quotation (maybe Sputnik? Not sure) there was no mention of yield; my interpretation is a comparison of the power of the nuclear power source of Poseidon compared to the rocket engine power of Sarmat. Also since Poseidon can definitely carry either a conventional warhead or a low yield nuclear warhead the quoted comparison was unlikely to refer to the yield of the warhead. Since Sarmat is superheavy and has to be launched into space, and since it only takes a few minutes to do so, the amount of power required (power is expressed per unit time i.e seconds) is astronomical. Bearing in mind that neither Poseidon nor Burevestnik need to overcome gravity for space launch and in both cases can fly quasi “indefinitely”, that is truly astronomical power.
 
The article I read also stated that while the Burevestnik power source was about the same power as a nuclear submarine (presumably the massive Russian Borei class with 24000 tonnes displacement) but 1000th the size, the Poseidon power source is 100th the size i.e. 10 times larger. What is unclear is whether the Poseidon power is also 10 times more than Burevestnik, or simply less miniaturised. If the former, then it is (as I understand it; there is some ambiguity) equivalent power to TEN Sarmats during launch phase. 
 
Putin also commented that unlike the Americans, Russia had perfected hydrogen as a nuclear power source. It is unclear whether he meant that the power source for Burevestnik is hydrogen (presumably tritium for a fission reactor since a 1000x miniaturised fusion reactor is utterly implausible), or whether this was an unrelated comment on the development of nuclear fusion, regarding which the Russians are known to be well advanced. Conceivably it also could relate to the fact that the Burevestnik power source can be started in seconds or minutes.

Posted by: BM | Oct 30 2025 16:04 utc | 20

Bismarck 28  19,I see it 180 degrees from your POV, nuclear weapons have stabilized the world by turning war into a very tricky proposition amongst nuclear armed states.  Consider World wars, between 1918 and 1939 twenty one years passed.  It’s now been 80 years and counting since the end of WW II.  Nuclear Weapons are the “well place shot” that forces the world’s neocolonialist-neocon-nutjobs into the realm of reason…if ever so briefly.   Without nuclear weapons, based on leader/follower-rhetoric we’d have gone passed  WW VI by now.

Posted by: S Brennan | Oct 30 2025 16:04 utc | 21

The power of Poseidon greatly surpasses the characteristics of Russia’s upcoming Sarmat
 
On second thoughts the choice of words “greatly surpass” seems to mean about 10x greater than Sarmat, i.e. the same level of relative miniaturisation (power density) as Burevestnik but 10x more powerful.

Posted by: BM | Oct 30 2025 16:09 utc | 22

“To test a nuclear war head Trump would have to ask Congress to lift the moratorium on testing. He would also have to order the Department of Energy to prepare a test site. That process alone is estimated to take three years.”
Posted by b on October 30, 2025 at 14:30 UTC
————————-
Does DJT even know that?

Posted by: scc | Oct 30 2025 16:09 utc | 23

.. neither Poseidon nor Burevestnik need to overcome gravity for space launch and in both cases can fly quasi “indefinitely”, that is truly astronomical power.”  BM 21

I think you really meant potential/stored energy, not power.  Though power, as used in the political/statecraft context, has a different meaning meaning so, perhaps that is what meant to say.

Posted by: S Brennan | Oct 30 2025 16:15 utc | 24

Panic? What’s to panic about?
 
 
MAD just got reinforced as the missile treaties are not being renewed by the natzios and hawks.
 
 
The First Strike Gambit that the hawks have been reconsidering has been chased back to its pen. 
 
 
The Doomesday Machines would ensure any first strikes that destroyed the multipolarists cities would automatically be launched. 
 
 
it’s MAD and it’s to be loved! Strangeloved 😁
I actually feel less panic than have done for some time now. 

Posted by: DunGroanin | Oct 30 2025 16:21 utc | 25

Trump should make nuclear weapons covered by the second amendment and place strategic defense of the country in the hands of its citizens. What’s with this state control of nukes bullshit? Is the US communist?

Posted by: Skiffer | Oct 30 2025 16:24 utc | 26

Regarding yesterday’s discussion of EO’s comments on the future of Ukraine and various of its regions.  I am surprised that no one discussed the ways that national differences were addressed in the Soviet Union for 70 years and how Russia continues to apply that history to its national minorities.  VP and Lavrov were raised and came to adulthood with those understandings.  More or less it seems to me that the USSR and modern Russia used this understanding:
 
”A nation is a historically constituted, stable community of people, formed on the basis of a common language, territory, economic life, and psychological make-up manifested in a common culture.
It goes without saying that a nation, like every historical phenomenon, is subject to the law of change, has its history, its beginning and end.
It must be emphasized that none of the above characteristics taken separately is sufficient to define a nation. More than that, it is sufficient for a single one of these characteristics to be lacking and the nation ceases to be a nation.”
 
In the USSR the above quote was utilized to establish which communities and regions were to have regional autonomy and which regions, such as Azerjiban and Kazakistan, were to become “socialist republics”; and those republics became independent following the demise of   the USSR.  Is it not reasonable to suppose that Russia will seek to utilize their  historical ajudification of such issues in its disposition of  former Ukrainian territories after the conclusion of the conflict?

Posted by: mjh | Oct 30 2025 16:31 utc | 27

In related news:
 

“Bessent acknowledged that the U.S. currently trails China in nuclear power development but vowed it will catch up, emphasizing that it is now “all hands on deck” for America’s nuclear renaissance”

 
If true, about effing time.  Wind-turbines/Solar-farms for grid supply have never made any economic or engineering sense.  And wind-turbines/Solar-farms are an ecological disaster, killing more animals each year than all the major oil spills put together…not that I’m justifying more oil spills. The answer to our urbanization/industrialization has been staring us in the face since Pile-1  achieved a self-sustaining nuclear reaction under the University of Chicago’s football field…only one year after Pearl Harbor…

Posted by: S Brennan | Oct 30 2025 16:33 utc | 28

@S Brennan | Oct 30 2025 15:42 utc: Great post; puts the focus right where it needs re: psycho neocons et. al.
 
Also you have accurately apprehended the import of the propulsion system, and a good number of its potential applications, and particularly its effect on the MIC. Well-done, indeed. 
 
Here’s one of my favorite quips: “Human progress happens one new product at a time”. 
 
Consider for a moment how terrific it would be if this portable nuke plant wasn’t confined to use on a weapon system, that it could be freely distributed throughout the world. 
 
Nope. Another example of the horrendous mis-allocation of the world’s productive capacity at the hands of the sociopaths.
 
One question: is it really true that:
 
“…just 17 panamax sized ships contribute as much pollution into the atmosphere as all the terrestrial vehicles in the world”

Posted by: Tom Pfotzer | Oct 30 2025 16:38 utc | 29

Re: too scents, @6 
“Trump’s modus operandi is to litigate permission post ex facto.  A moratorium means nothing to him. ”
you dont know how right you are, back in early 1980s my father worked in the employee group health insurance industry in New York and the Trump organization initiated talks with my father’s company to create a group insurance plan for the employees, however the talks broke down over the Trump’s organization’s plan of how to use the fund’s claims fluctuation reserves.  Basically, the Trump organization was structuring the fund to have significantly higher premiums than what it would be expected to pay out, this in turn meant that the CFR would also be higher than then what it was legally required to be, the Trump organization wanted to use these excess funds as collateral for loans, my father’s company objected as their lawyers opined that this would be illegal (at that time you were not supposed to use funds allocated in a CFR for purposes outside of the health coverage, in effect the Trump organization wanted to use the employee health pool as a tax shelter for money it raising from the employees by charging excessive health insurance premiums that would never have to be paid out as health expenses), this went back and forth for several weeks before a make or break discussion between the two parties, this was the only time Trump took part in the discussion and according to my father Trump said “your lawyers say this is against the law, my people say its not, so let’s do it and if the government comes after us, I’ll fight em and my lawyers say I’ll win “.  Once it became clear that the differences couldn’t be bridged, Trump got up, thanked everyone for their time and left.   that was the end of the business discussions with Trump, 
Based on that and how Trump has been acting since becoming President again, it certainly looks like Trump hasnt changed a bit. 
 
 
 

Posted by: Kadath | Oct 30 2025 16:41 utc | 30

Steven T. Johnson | 30. Okt. 2025, 15:54 UTC | 20
Wikipedia says Atomare Warheads January 2023
Russia: 5.880
USA; 5.244
China: 410
France: 290
UK: 225

Posted by: smartfox | Oct 30 2025 16:43 utc | 31

Tom Pfotzer 30,
 
Yep.  Ships burn the bottom of the petro distillery, well, not exactly, second to the bottom, tar is the bottom rung but, you get the idea.  File that data point under “Free Trade isn’t Free” BTW, thanks for the complement.

Posted by: S Brennan | Oct 30 2025 16:44 utc | 32

@Skiffer | Oct 30 2025 16:24 utc
🙂
 
Ya, I was thinking about starting a nuke-plant distributorship from my college dorm room, get the brand established now before everyone jumps in. Sell kits. Use that drone-controller board to run it; you remember, the one from Amazon I showed c1ue the other day … 
 
which resulted in another form of nuclear melt-down.
🙂
 
 

Posted by: Tom Pfotzer | Oct 30 2025 16:46 utc | 33

“Black Mountain’s analysis on the Burevestnik is worth reading: ”
 
https://bmanalysis.substack.com/
Posted by: Elmer Fudd | Oct 30 2025 15:15 utc | 8
 
It was. This jumped off the page:
” In addition, controls and instrumentation that regulate reactor power, control flow rates, and respond to transient conditions must be exceptionally robust; failure modes in these subsystems can lead to catastrophic outcomes and therefore necessitate conservative design margins and redundant safety functionality that further increase mass and complexity.”
 
Where most reactors are concerned there is a lot of redundancy. They are constantly carefully updating safety protocols.
 
Which generally equates to added complexity and weight. And? I’m unclear why doubling the size of the vehicle would matter overall.
 
Great article. Comprehensive.

Posted by: David G Horsman | Oct 30 2025 16:55 utc | 34

“Thank you for your attention to this matter! PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP”
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g-bVEc8oZvkFACEPALM MEME 🤣 HD 🤣

Posted by: Blindspot | Oct 30 2025 16:58 utc | 35

‘Bragging about having the most nuclear weapons is beyond stupid. Use of a small fraction of that number is sufficient to cripple civilization for decades if not permanently.’

John Gilberts has posted this Colonel Wilkerson interview with Nima a few times. I have hesitated to link to it myself because Wilkerson is ‘all over the place’ as is his wont, not following his own train of logic and seemingly forgetting facts he has established as recently as the previous show – or even a bit earlier within the same show.

For example, Colonel Wilkerson a few times previously has said point blank – pun intended – that ‘Israel’ controlled the key decisionmaking in his active time in govt and that they continue to control it up to the present day.

Meaning not only every facet of the civil and military branches of the govt, but also the ‘deep state’ – the CIA and all its adjacent and accompanying apparati.

Wilkerson has stated this, but not at all at once, and he will then go back on it the next time by saying ‘Israel’ is carrying out ‘our’ i.e. the United States’ wishes.

But the US’ wishes are identical to ‘Israel’ only because Zionist money has spent decades smearing everyone as an ‘Arabist’ or ‘Muslim fanatic’ or more recently ‘anti-American’ who doesn’t toe the Zionist line.

It’s akin to Chomsky saying that ‘Israel’ is just a Pentagon outpost in the Middle East.

But if that were true the Zionists wouldn’t have to spend such enormous amounts of time and moeny and resources bribing pols and manipulating everyone via media to only see things through their sick lens.

They do all this to get the US to do things it was going to go anyway?

This is stupid.

To reiterate:

If the US and ‘the west’ were always going to do whatever ‘Israel’ wanted because if it didn’t exist they’d have to invent it, then there would be no Jewish Lobby (what the Zionist ‘Israel’ Lobby was called by everyone inlcuding Jews well into the 1980’s).

The ADL wouldn’t have to imfiltrate the FBI to control it in the interest of ‘Israel’ and global Zionism.

There would be no need for all these Jewish Zionist orgs inserting themselves into the government and gentile civil society and basically
everyone’s business and forcing everyone to walk on eggshells around everything Jewish-Zionist-Israeli.

Rewriting history in their own interest and destroying people’s characters and taking away peoples’ resources if they don’t toe the line on the Zion project.

Anyway, here Wilkerson talks about both the possibility of ‘Israel’ using a ‘tactical’ nuke and also, as John Gilberts has mentioned, the Zionist-Venezuela connection.

One more thing:

Colonel Wilkerson, you may have read almost everything on JFK and you can boldly say so sir but logic dictates that the one or two or three things you haven’t read may contain some pertnent information.

Have your sources followed the money appropriately?

If they had, you yourself would begin with Permindex and Tibor Rosenbaum’s International Credit Bank of Geneva.

You don’t begin and end with the mafia, CIA, blah blah blah without mentioning the always-present Zionist connection.

It’s irresponsible.

Deconcstructuralize and get right to the heart of the matter.

Here is the always entertaining Colonel Larry Wilkerson cued to the aformentioned nuke-Venezuela part of the convo. Nima begins with Lebanon:

https://inv.nadeko.net/z9IDI_MF9qA?t=1659

Posted by: Dan Kelly | Oct 30 2025 17:03 utc | 36

Where most reactors are concerned there is a lot of redundancy. They are constantly carefully updating safety protocols.
 
Posted by: David G Horsman | Oct 30 2025 16:55 utc | 33
 

 
Accidents are continuously ongoing.  Practically never a day goes by without some incident being reported.
 
https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/event-status/event/index
 
So then, what isn’t being reported?
 

Posted by: too scents | Oct 30 2025 17:04 utc | 37

Sorry, I should have put that last one in a different thread.

It’s frankly all-of-one at this point in time.

Zionist machinations are behind the Russia-Ukraine nonsense as well.

Posted by: Dan Kelly | Oct 30 2025 17:06 utc | 38

Good post, b.
Scary weapons.  Miniaturized nuclear engines should have a variety of peaceful uses.  I’d hope the Russians push that angle more in their press releases, however much the msm will be inclined to bury it.   The story is ripe for something akin to the fud around Khrushchev’s “we will bury you.”  

Posted by: dadooronron | Oct 30 2025 17:10 utc | 39

While we can see evil villain President Putin doesn’t need our help.
Could you use water to create an afterburner effect? Maybe meltdown that reactor on the final approach? I highly suspect it can temporarily reach higher speeds.

Posted by: David G Horsman | Oct 30 2025 17:11 utc | 40

So then, what isn’t being reported?
Posted by: too scents | Oct 30 2025 17:04 utc | 36
Thanks. 
It’s all classified. It’s all a state secret. Your site covers a broad scope.

Posted by: David G Horsman | Oct 30 2025 17:20 utc | 41

So we will see houses powered by a freezer sized generator? Someday?

Posted by: David G Horsman | Oct 30 2025 17:21 utc | 42

****
Russia is to be defeated at all cost! Expect escalation to go through the roof!
Crooke’s latest shows that the Western World is going ALL IN cuz they really have no fuggin choice. ALL the hotspots are getting US attention but will it succeed…Will S. says no way. The mother of all Chaos Moments aka WAR is coming and the East will prevail of course. 
Russian leaders are in bed with Chabad just like mostly every major economy globally. Can they tear themselves loose to defend themselves? Can they defend and save their way of life? Can Humanity or most of Humanity survive and continue Mankind’s evolution to Peace and Prosperity FINALLY?
 
News at 11…
I’m ready for bed. I’m so exhausted these days.
GO JAYS GO. Can they win another Title before Armageddon starts?

Posted by: bisfab | Oct 30 2025 17:42 utc | 43

Zionist machinations are behind the Russia-Ukraine nonsense as well.
 
Posted by: Dan Kelly | Oct 30 2025 17:06 utc | 37
 
To this day I’m surprised that the Russian government accepted a “Ukrainian” explanation for Crocus City Hall when it was designed to foster difficulties with Muslims. 

Posted by: They Call Me Mister | Oct 30 2025 17:43 utc | 44

Davy @ Oct 30 2025 17:21 utc | 41
A few years ago some company came out with a black box that was “sold” as a Total Battery Solution for your home. Alien Tech? Not sure but in about 5-7 years from now ANYONE no matter where they are or how much money they make, will be able to have total energy independence in their backpack…provided we survive the coming catastrophe initiated by DC and the City targeting all of Mankind (Goyim).

Posted by: bisfab | Oct 30 2025 17:47 utc | 45

Too Scents 36,
 
You are conflating non-urgent/emergency events with accidents.  Because the Nuclear Industry is so highly regulated, far more than the Aviation Industry, every deviation from the norm has to be reported, no matter how trivial.  Spill coffee near the visitors entrance, write a 10 page report on the “incident”, badge worn inside a jacket, write a 10 page report et al…
 
In spite of the world’s “Jane-Fondas” screaming “melt-down..5-4-3-2-1-kah-boom” every time the word “nuclear” gets mentioned, there have two deaths from nuclear power. Both of those in Idaho on experimental reactor.  This is where one person did something nobody in their right mind would do and that is now impossible to do.  I visited the site last year. 
 
The silliness of anti-nuclear-power-nuts knows no bounds.  Thorium is in coal, you release more nuclear waste from burning coal in one power plant in one month than all the nuclear power accidents put together and that shit is in the air for a long time…and uh..in most people’s lungs.  Ever hear of a person getting lung cancer having never smoked? That beautiful granite counter-top you have?   Ever put a “Geiger-Counter” near it?  The Thorium in that slab will get that Nuclear Detection device singing.  People need to grow up and stop being children when it comes to the dangers in life, it’s all around you, manage it.   And don’t let the mockingbird-media dictate your thoughts.  Read books, talk to people..outside your social class, serve in your country’s military, you’ll learn things the mockingbird-media doesn’t tell you.

Posted by: S Brennan | Oct 30 2025 17:47 utc | 46

Because the Nuclear Industry is so highly regulated, far more than the Aviation Industry, every deviation from the norm has to be reported, no matter how trivial.
 
Posted by: S Brennan | Oct 30 2025 17:47 utc | 45
 

 
It is a fun exercise to go through the incident reports and take note of the incidents that were reported weeks or months after they happened.  What’s up with that?
 

Posted by: too scents | Oct 30 2025 17:50 utc | 47

Posted by: smartfox | Oct 30 2025 16:43 utc | 30   To quote myself@18:
 

Following the link, [our host’s] own source gives a slight edge to the US in so-called deployed warheads…

 
Argue with our host’s choice of source, please, not mine. (I confess I would not rely on wikipedia for anything controversial….and it’s amazing what can be considered controversial.)

Posted by: steven t johnson | Oct 30 2025 17:57 utc | 48

Posted by: S Brennan | Oct 30 2025 17:47 utc | 45  It is contrary to sense to think that boot camp is philosophical enlightenment, it is indoctrination in a sense bordering on completely pejorative. It seems as if you think a certain kind of masculinity is grown up. I’m sorry no.  By the way, I am personally fairly relaxed about nuclear power, being powerfully convinced the real nuclear danger is nuclear war. And I am strongly opposed to hysteria in general. I’m not so sure you are, as MoA commentariat is overall rather strong on anti-vaccine hysteria. Even worse, trying to redbait by whining about Jane Fonda? Dude, many of us remember how China Syndrome opened days before Three Mile Island. Try to avoid looking like an ass! (Also, by the way, if Jane Fonda is a synonym for hysteria, consider the movie Rollover….and compare and contrast to many analyses here at MoA commnetariat.)

Posted by: steven t johnson | Oct 30 2025 18:05 utc | 49

Posted by: Dan Kelly | Oct 30 2025 15:47 utc | 16
MAGA brand heroin. no need for fentanyl strips before or for Narcan after use of this fine product. Quality guaranteed. and most assuredly Made In America (TM).

Posted by: duck n cover | Oct 30 2025 18:15 utc | 50

Is there a stupider leader of any country in the world than Trump?
 

Posted by: Dave G | Oct 30 2025 18:18 utc | 51

Posted by: Tom Pfotzer | Oct 30 2025 16:46 utc | 32
 
Can I laser print my reactor?

Posted by: David G Horsman | Oct 30 2025 18:21 utc | 52

“Spill coffee near the visitors entrance, write a 10 page report on the “incident”, badge worn inside a jacket, write a 10 page report et al…” 
Posted by: S Brennan | Oct 30 2025 17:47 utc | 45
 
Lol. I was going to say if your bowel movement doesn’t go as planned you have to report the incident.

Posted by: David G Horsman | Oct 30 2025 18:27 utc | 53

Again and again everyone can see how Trump is stupid. Stupid to the core and ignorant.
 
And there are still people who take his defense… Understands who can.

Posted by: Naive | Oct 30 2025 18:28 utc | 54

Is there a stupider leader of any country in the world than Trump?
Posted by: Dave G | Oct 30 2025 18:18 utc | 50
 
Milei? Mileikovsky? Macron? Merz? Starmer? Rutte?

Posted by: Naive | Oct 30 2025 18:30 utc | 55

“take note of the incidents that were reported weeks or months after they happened.  What’s up with that?”
 
There can be lengthy internal reviews if the incident merits it. Did they? Hmmmm.

Posted by: David G Horsman | Oct 30 2025 18:32 utc | 56

Sorry I was speaking to
Posted by: too scents | Oct 30 2025 17:50 utc | 46
I agree it’s interesting. 👍

Posted by: David G Horsman | Oct 30 2025 18:34 utc | 57

Imho, all that this long-winded Nuclear Bluster from Trump has done is to hilight the fact that the US of A is a chickenshit military joke – like its bosses in Tel Aviv.
 
Gutless Jew Plague Land has spent countless $Millions on bombing the crap out of lightly-armed civilians in Occupied Palestine for 2 years because the Palestinians lack the means to adequately defend themselves.
 
Meanwhile, the World’s ex-Superpower is carefully avoiding  blundering into a military conflict with Russia and/or China. But it’s embracing its Superpower wet dream by threatening and provoking a pissant 3rd rate military nonentity – Venezuela!
 
How Jew Plague-ish is that!?

Posted by: Hoarsewhisperer | Oct 30 2025 18:38 utc | 58

Posted by: steven t johnson | Oct 30 2025 18:05 utc | 48
I think an argument can be made that hysteria over dangers reduced nuclear power development.
Jane Fonda is just sort of a distraction. In many ways. A side issue.

Posted by: David G Horsman | Oct 30 2025 18:38 utc | 59

There can be lengthy internal reviews if the incident merits it. 
 
Posted by: David G Horsman | Oct 30 2025 18:32 utc | 55
 

 
The late reports are  more like “the low tank level was found to be due to a leak that has persisted for months”, or “a fraction of the material missing from last year’s inventory was found behind the dumpster”.
 
Go ahead.  Read the reports yourself and see.
 

Posted by: too scents | Oct 30 2025 18:39 utc | 60

Our host does say that Russia is supposed to have more warheads than the US and even makes so bold as to say Trump is wrong. This is pretend criticism I fear. Following the link, his own source gives a slight edge to the US in so-called deployed warheads…and it’s likely enough this is what Trump was referring to. 
 
Posted by: steven t johnson | Oct 30 2025 15:54 utc | 18
 
Well, of course. When your anti-Trump rhetoric has lost STJ, it means only the terminally brain dead among TDS types would still be pushing Trump is Stupid. But it also doesn’t matter. For obvious reasons, VVP has zero interest in Russian-linked attacks on American assets, and President Trump doesn’t actually want to end all life.
 
The China Rare Earth War was hyped incessantly- but never actually happened. After all, American industry didn’t totally collapse, such as it is. It won’t be hard to strike all the environmental regulations around rare earth processing, assuming President Trump hasn’t done it already.

Posted by: They Call Me Mister | Oct 30 2025 18:39 utc | 61

@ S Brennan | Oct 30 2025 15:42 utc | 14
 
good post.. thanks… about recommending too scents serving in the military @ 45, to get more clarity on matters… that sounds crazy.. not sure how you can see that as being of benefit.. 

Posted by: james | Oct 30 2025 18:42 utc | 62

one more bit of bad news is that the US nuclear machine runs about as well as anything else in the US does, including its staff. So we could all see a SpaceX designed ICBM blow up before reentry because it crashed into a pile of SpaceX space debris in space first. I bet we’ll see real plagues of Egypt style flaming hail before it’s all over, thanks to government contractor Musk. maybe from Space Farce. Flaming garbage in a hail storm.
Houston, we’ve got a big HR problem: all the drinking, drug use, sodomy, hazing, whoring, etc., going on in the silos, subs and planes of the nuclear triad. All hail Saint Bacchus! so many of the button pressers in the nuclear machine are fumbling around with the buttons due to intoxication, or in some stupid recovery meeting, like “peer support” for nuclear warriors or some shit, it’s best to put ChatGPT in charge. no drinking problem there. and eliminate the human element.

Posted by: duck n cover | Oct 30 2025 18:47 utc | 63

S Brennan | Oct 30 2025 17:47 utc | 45
The panic surrounding nuclear power is an emotional response, partly due to accidents such as Chernobyl and Harrisburg. Damage is always worse than a cyclist falling off their bike, and radiation damage (which also affects operators of radar systems and X-ray machines) is complex and can take a long time to heal, if it heals at all.
But the discussion, which was hyped up for a while, about emerging victorious from a nuclear war and therefore often propagating the first strike theory, is simply nonsense. The attacked party always has the option of inflicting massive damage on the attacker.
But let’s stick to wrestling: politicians like to put on a show of “look how strong I am,” when in fact it is the atomic bomb and a long period of peace that has ensured this. Now the proponents of first strike are coming out of the woodwork again.
Translated with DeepL.com (free version)

Posted by: smartfox | Oct 30 2025 18:51 utc | 64

First one I came across not a nuclear plant but a company that used to make instruments:
 
Rep Org: Illinois Emergency Mgmt. AgencyLicensee: RCM Laboratories, IncRegion: 3City: Hinsdale State: ILCounty:License #: 9223364
NRC Notified By: Kimberly Stice
HQ OPS Officer: Ernest West
Notification Date: 09/23/2025
Notification Time: 16:23 [ET]
Event Date: 09/23/2025
Last Update Date: 09/23/2025
Emergency Class: Non Emergency
 
AGREEMENT STATE REPORT – LOST SOURCE
 
The following information was provided by the Illinois Emergency Management Agency (the Agency) via email:
“As a result of an ongoing Agency investigation into unresponsive general licensees, the Agency became aware of one (1) generally licensed fluorescence analyzer device containing 40 millicuries of Cd-109 (Cat 4 source) that is missing.
“Reportedly, in 2023, RCM Laboratories Inc (Hinsdale, Il) ceased operation, per a former employee. There is no indication of intentional theft/diversion, rather the result of an office closure and poor accountability.
“The licensee failed to properly transfer or dispose of the device, a Niton LLC XLp-300A (serial number: 24555). The Agency investigated, and per the real estate agency [which owns the building], the building is empty and confirmed no equipment is in the building.
“The quantity of radioactive material involved is reportable immediately to the Agency and the U.S. NRC.”
Illinois Event Number: IL250041
THIS MATERIAL EVENT CONTAINS A ‘Less than Cat 3’ LEVEL OF RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL
Sources that are “Less than IAEA Category 3 sources,” are either sources that are very unlikely to cause permanent injury to individuals or contain a very small amount of radioactive material that would not cause any permanent injury. Some of these sources, such as moisture density gauges or thickness gauges that are Category 4, the amount of unshielded radioactive material, if not safely managed or securely protected, could possibly – although it is unlikely – temporarily injure someone who handled it or were otherwise in contact with it, or who were close to it for a period of many weeks.

Posted by: S Brennan | Oct 30 2025 18:52 utc | 65

Deployed warheads includes 400+ B61s which are gravity bombs. They’re part of the count of course but their usefulness these days is questionable. Does anyone really expect someone to fly over and actually drop a bomb in Russia (or China) these days, even in a B2?

Posted by: TJandTheBear | Oct 30 2025 18:52 utc | 66

misquoting! @18 is not posted by me

Posted by: smartfox | Oct 30 2025 18:53 utc | 67

it’s almost like they are trying to make getting out of the trap of nuclear war as impossible as getting out of a Tesla Cybertruck that has lost its power.

Posted by: duck n cover | Oct 30 2025 18:55 utc | 68

the analysis from the link @ 7 from elmur fudd is very good.. i recommend it as well.. 

Posted by: james | Oct 30 2025 18:59 utc | 69

i recommend the link @ 7 that elmur fudd shared… thanks elmur..

Posted by: james | Oct 30 2025 19:00 utc | 70

“Go ahead.  Read the reports yourself and see.” Posted by: too scents | Oct 30 2025 18:39 utc | 59
I did read a few. I had a wtf? moment when one of the first ones was indeed a missing material report.
Like, where is it now?

Posted by: David G Horsman | Oct 30 2025 19:11 utc | 71

James 61,
 
Though closed in 1999 Fort McClellan Anniston Alabama was home to the Army’s Chemical Corps and Chemical Weapons School.  One of my stops along the way.  Yeah, you do learn things.  Saddam did have, at one point in time, binary chemical weapons.  How do we know for certain, we gave them to him. Did the mockingbirds in the media ever mention that?  Nope, no they did not but, a lot of us knew that, stuff like that. [what we [as soldiers] didn’t know was that as the chemical degraded and became unstable Saddam had them destroyed]. 
 
Why online folks denigrate the experiences of people who are completely outside of their social circle is beyond me.  NBC training was pretty serious back then, the final test was a doozy. Want a short list of things you will learn about in just a brief few weeks of Army life?  As the law firm below notes:
 
https://www.hillandponton.com/fort-mcclellan-toxic-exposures-veterans-need-know/
 
Tear and Mustard Gas
White Phosphorous
Cobalt (Co-60)
Uranium
Plutonium
Cesium (Cs-137)
Napalm-B
Agent Orange
Agent Blue
Nerve Agents
Blister Agents

Posted by: S Brennan | Oct 30 2025 19:23 utc | 72

I didn’t even know the US was still exploding bombs in 1992.   I thought the Nuclear Ban Treaty put a stop to that back in the 60s, at least above ground.
But I’m not surprised.  The US has always been an Outlaw Nation.   Now it’s an Outlaw Empire.

Posted by: wagelaborer | Oct 30 2025 19:23 utc | 73

My best guess is that Trump, as he said, wanted to match the testing capabilities followed by others. 
The numbnuts at WaPo are likely just that. Uncle Sam’s Misguided Children would likely use ‘ijut’ as their preferred term of endearment.
wsj is staffed with equivalent talent.

Posted by: Acco Hengst | Oct 30 2025 19:42 utc | 74

@ S Brennan | Oct 30 2025 19:23 utc | 70
 
thanks.. i mean no disrespect… everyone has some particular insight to offer.. but i am not sure working in the military is going to make a great deal of difference when the basic approach the usa has had on the world stage when it comes to foreign military adventures has been one of constant lies.. most folks can see right thru it.. of course you would have had an inside and firsthand knowledge of this… the war on iraq was completely unnecessary and imposed on the middle east, as were a number of the other wars – libya and etc. etc..  i think it is a question of just how gullible the media and its corporate owners, who work in coordination with these same politicians, think people are?? apparently they think people are really stupid to believe the constant stream of lies they propagate…  maybe it isn’t the ordinary americans fault, but as an outsider, i  blame the usa for much of the bloodshed and death around the globe… and of course it hasn’t stopped… so there is that…  thanks for your commentary today here at moa.. 

Posted by: james | Oct 30 2025 19:49 utc | 75

Posted by: They Call Me Mister | Oct 30 2025 14:36 utc | 1

There is some truth in what you say for sure, mister. The problem with bullshit ‘fast talk’ type used car salesman ‘persuasion’ is that inevitably the people realize…sooner or in America, much later…they’ve been duped and get unhappy, even mad about it.
At the rate Clowny McManTits is shedding legitimacy (and comprehendability) you won’t need to wait for mid terms for him to be neutered. Bullshit baffles brains sure, but money talks. Biden 2.0 only with more random bluster and big talk.

Posted by: Doctor Eleven | Oct 30 2025 19:53 utc | 76

Blah blah Trump blah blah… so boring that you continue to amplify his noise. Would be nice to go a few days without hearing his name, so will have to avoid this site.

Posted by: Rae | Oct 30 2025 19:58 utc | 77

Posted by: They Call Me Mister | Oct 30 2025 18:39 utc | 60

And here I must disagree with you. Trump is a mere puppet as were his predecessors since JFK, the one degree or another. And while Trump certainly is a dipshit and philistene, his capacity for imbecility pales next to the ‘strategic braintrust’ of the West that specializes in groupthink, rationalization, suppressing opposing ideas, and cope. I mean you have how many peacocks pretending to be generals who have never fought a battle? Paper pushing experts for sure, great at kickbacks, but on modern war,  not so much. Anyone of competence gets driven out of the US military intelligence complex by the sheer pressure to conform to stupidity and political ideology.
You seem to believe Team Blue and Team Red actually are against each other. One day you may realize that’s theater for the common people, or deplorables as some of your elite might say.

Posted by: Doctor Eleven | Oct 30 2025 20:01 utc | 78

Speaking of nuclear testing: From the River to the Seabed
 

A boat leading a peace flotilla was bombed, its mission and crew targeted in a deliberate act of violence designed to intimidate and silence resistance. For anyone following the news over a month ago of attacks on Pro-Palestine activist and aid ships, this story may sound strikingly familiar — except it happened in 1985 in Aotearoa.

 
And the first crossover hit for a New Zealand hip-hop artist: DLT feat. Che Fu – Chains
 
Vocalist Che Fu, son of the Polynesian Panther Party’s Minister of Culture, decided to make a statement about Jacques Chirac’s resumption of nuclear testing in the Pacific:
 

Test me like a bomb straight from MururoaHow comes I got cyclops fish in my waterA nation of Pacific lambs to the slaughterThree eyes for my son and an extra foot for my daughterGifts from a land that I don’t even knowI was too slow to even see that escargot…

Posted by: S.P. Korolev | Oct 30 2025 20:15 utc | 79

A question. Once launched can the Burevestnik be landed?
 
So it has long range endurance, possibly even loiters and patrols. Is there an abort feature? Or do they just crash land in Arctic if three days after launch they decide not to blow up a target?
 
t also sounds like it must be a fairly expensive item. Can anyone afford to have fleets of these things?
 
Biggest advantage I can see is obliging an adversary to invest in wide range sensor/detection systems. I can’t see the US bothering with all that. We will just live with the threat and talk about something else.
 
 

Posted by: oldhippie | Oct 30 2025 20:18 utc | 80

S Brennan @ 64
 
Medical level radioactives are very frequently gray marketed. Costs a small fraction of doing it the legal way. Saves a lot of paperwork. Dual citizen doctors do this all the time.You wanna visit the complaints department of Mossad?

Posted by: oldhippie | Oct 30 2025 20:25 utc | 81

Anyone who imagines all nuclear incidents are reported, or even noted, is dreaming.
 
The one and only serious enforcement action I can think of, definitely the only serious one for Commonwealth Edison, the largest nuclear operator in US, happened at the Zion reactor. An NRC inspector found the operating engineer drunk and asleep in the control room. Before the incident was over the entire staff of Zion was in the control room having a shouting match with the NRC, defending a good ole boy’s right to have a nip on the job.
 
This was not the first time something similar had happened at Zion. The upshot was the Zion plant, which never got past startup testing phase, was shutdown and eventually dismantled. NRC said Com Ed did not have the institutional culture to be operating the facility. An understatement.
 
Those who whine about overzealous regulation are full of it.

Posted by: oldhippie | Oct 30 2025 20:37 utc | 82

Posted by: oldhippie | Oct 30 2025 20:37 utc | 80
 
Yeah, I see your point on there must be stiff regulation on nuclear power entities all energies have problems with them.
 
A thought experiment-if you were made King of the World how would you designate what type of power services would you proclaim ?

Posted by: canuk | Oct 30 2025 21:22 utc | 83

About 18 months ago the UK decided to do a test launch of one of its submarine borne nuclear missiles.
There was much fanfare, the defence Secretary was aboard the sub, press were on a shadowing RN ship.
The missile was launched, broke the surface then flopped on its side into the sea, to much embarrassment.
I’m looking forward to multiple failures of the same genre every time the US tries to launch a tit-for-tat demo of its ageing nuclear arsenal.
Let the dick swinging commence and lets see who has the biggest.
If I were Putin and Xi, I would be scheduling monthly, nay weekly, tests for the foreseeable future.
 

Posted by: ChatNPC | Oct 30 2025 21:23 utc | 84

Trump speaking “imprecisely” ie he was talking out of his ass, ass he is wont to do.

Posted by: nwwoods | Oct 30 2025 21:24 utc | 85

The silliness of anti-nuclear-power-nuts knows no bounds.  
Posted by: S Brennan | Oct 30 2025 17:47 utc | 45
 
**************
 
You make some very good, valid points. Another example is the reason that the name NMR imaging was changed to MRI was to avoid public paranoia associated with  the mere mention of the word ‘nuclear’ (while ‘nucular’ is even more scary).
 
It is also interesting that the majority of people wanting nuclear power plants want them “over there”. Sad – there are no really suitable sites close to me… oh, and the waste can go waaay over there.

Posted by: General Factotum | Oct 30 2025 21:35 utc | 86

You seem to believe Team Blue and Team Red actually are against each other. One day you may realize that’s theater for the common people, or deplorables as some of your elite might say.
 
Posted by: Doctor Eleven | Oct 30 2025 20:01 utc | 76
 
Lol. Lmao, even. One day, probably soon, you’re going to see the entirety of Congress torn apart by gunfire. I wouldn’t mind bullets hitting any particular one of them. It likely will start after the coming food riots.

Posted by: They Call Me Mister | Oct 30 2025 21:40 utc | 87

S Brennan | Oct 30 2025 15:42 utc | 14
 
Regarding possible applications of Burevestnik’s compact reactor, I would love to one of these finally take flight: M-19 Gurkolyot
 
Myasischev’s “Gurkolyot” is a single stage to orbit (SSTO) spaceplane that uses a nuclear reactor to superheat the exhaust of its turbojet and scramjet engines, before using the reactor for a hydrogen fueled nuclear rocket engine. 50% more payload than the Space Shuttle but only 1/4 the weight, operating from conventional runways!
 
Putin did say that Burevestnik’s technology was being applied to the space program, but he probably meant the Ekipazh nuclear powered satellite. Ekipazh can use its reactor to power an ion engine for solar system exploration, or for military applications a massive Electronic Warfare payload than can jam a whole theater from orbit. Interesting times…

Posted by: S.P. Korolev | Oct 30 2025 21:44 utc | 88

Three possible scenarios.   Trump just doing a bit of American wrestling talk for MAGA.    US will test more delivery vehicles.      US will test warheads.
 
I’ll put even money on all and wait and see.

Posted by: Peter AU1 | Oct 30 2025 21:49 utc | 89

‘nuclear’ (while ‘nucular’ is even more scary).Posted by: General Factotum | Oct 30 2025 21:35 utc | 84
Point of order ‘nucular’ isn’t more scary. just a signifier that you are talking to an idiot. That it persists in language today is thanks to (the idiot) Bush the Second who normalised it from his pulpit as POTUS.
Then again, to have an idiot with the power to launch nukes is terrifying…

Posted by: ChatNPC | Oct 30 2025 21:59 utc | 90

Russian nuclear powered missile: Did they simplify the heat exchange? It’s slow. How did they land it without crashing and scattering radioactivity everywhere?
The fact it’s slow shows the limitations of nuclear flight. Heat isn’t unlimited and hardware is heavy.

Posted by: Rabbit | Oct 30 2025 22:13 utc | 91

“…medical level radioactives are very frequently gray marketed…” – oldhippie 79

 
Fine.  What’s that got to do with nuclear power plant safety?
 

“…the Zion plant, which never got past startup testing phase, was shutdown and eventually dismantled. NRC said Com Ed did not have the institutional culture to be operating the facility…those who whine about overzealous regulation are full of it.”  – Oldhippie 80

 
What’s your point?  Did I imply that serious incidents shouldn’t be report?  The answer is no, strawman argument.   My point was to, Too Scents comment that implied there were serious incidents at nuclear power plants on almost a daily basis.  Most of the write-up were minor, in fact most of the write-ups he cited had nothing to do with Nuclear Power Plants.  What I said is that it is the most heavily regulated industry in the country by far and away…
 
Now to your point that anybody that questions any regulation is full of shit, I politely disagree.
 
Like all federal regulatory agencies there is industry capture which effectively prevents innovation, particularly in implementing newer, safer designsThis suits the industry monopolist and the oil/natural-gas industry which pays the “green meanies” to lobby for more tax subsidized wind-turbine/PV farm which, as I mentioned above, kill off more birds in month than the oil industry with all it’s oil spills.  People who advocate linking wind-turbine/PV farms to the grid are either woefully ignorant or, as has been documented, on the various hydrocarbon industries payroll.  That’s right most of the anti-nuclear movement was astro-turfed by coal/oil/natural-gas…yes…yes, there are morons who just don’t know any better.
 
Now please document the drunk operator story?  BTW, the plant ran from 1973 – 1998 did you lie or were you misinformed? Also, you “confused” condemnation of a private anti-nuclear-lobbying with the NRC.  Anybody can check my corrections to your story, you’ve lost all your credibility with me DoP-[Insert-inmate-number-here] or…did you pull that story out of your ass too?
 
 

Posted by: S Brennan | Oct 30 2025 22:22 utc | 92

S.P. Korolev  86,  enjoyed reading your thoughts…sounds like you need a pair of sunglasses too!
 
👉 😎 👍
 
 

Posted by: S Brennan | Oct 30 2025 22:27 utc | 93

The fact it’s slow shows the limitations of nuclear flight. Heat isn’t unlimited and hardware is heavy.
Posted by: Rabbit | Oct 30 2025 22:13 utc | 90
Hmm, I would suspect there are limitations to the design in as much as heat can only be generated at a certain rate (albeit ‘indefinitely’) and that it is dissipated by the cooling applied as it is transferred to the compressed air that is heated and powers the turbine. At higher speed that cooling would be greater thus diminishing the pressure generated to turn the turbine and compressor. Thus speed would be qualitatively limited by the weight of the missile and the power rating of the reactor.
At least that’s what my very limited understanding of the design would surmise.

Posted by: ChatNPC | Oct 30 2025 22:27 utc | 94

thank godzilla that the fancy new nuclear reactors aren’t being designed, built and managed by the same people selling nuclear weapons and bombing reactors in Ukraine and Iran and for whom every contract is a chance not to honor the contract but to make money off the contract, hope not to get caught or to get out before the meltdown, then hire fancy lawyers and Pete Buttigieg of the EPA to cover, lie, obfuscate and preach the fond hope that in some unicorn-filled future, “better regulation” will fix it. maybe more betta regs can fix the nuclear terrorist state called Israel, too.
 
can we get some peace before we get more nukes?

Posted by: duck n cover | Oct 30 2025 23:45 utc | 95

A question. Once launched can the Burevestnik be landed? So it has long range endurance, possibly even loiters and patrols. Is there an abort feature? Or do they just crash land in Arctic if three days after launch they decide not to blow up a target?  
Posted by: oldhippie | Oct 30 2025 20:18 utc | 78
 
 
________
 
I’ve been under the impression that they can be landed, refueled, and relaunched. I don’t see the benefit to anyone of crash-landing a nuclear-powered missile anywhere.

Posted by: malenkov | Oct 30 2025 23:52 utc | 96

hope not to get caught or to get out before the meltdown, then hire fancy lawyers and Pete Buttigieg of the EPA to cover, lie, obfuscate and preach the fond hope that in some unicorn-filled future, “better regulation” will fix it. 
 
Posted by: duck n cover | Oct 30 2025 23:45 utc | 98
 
________
 
Even better (heh), the dominant attitude in American political discourse nowadays is that regulation by government agency is evil, and that corporations, in their infinite wisdom and superior expertise, should regulate themselves.

Posted by: malenkov | Oct 31 2025 0:01 utc | 97

Even better (heh), the dominant attitude in American political discourse nowadays is that regulation by government agency is evil, and that corporations, in their infinite wisdom and superior expertise, should regulate themselves.
Posted by: malenkov | Oct 31 2025 0:01 utc | 100
 
I was always of the view that the officers of a corporate entity have some skin in the game- even though it goes against the limited liability construct. If memory serves correctly- the officers of Union Carbide had to face some of the music for Bhopal…Not sure if those that ran Hooker chemicals were held to account for Love Canal…
 
Still- if you are driving the transnational/corporation- it appears that a level of responsibility (more than I see) should be tacked to your door.

Posted by: Original Newbie | Oct 31 2025 0:20 utc | 98

So your quoted figures:

“Russia 4300, US 3600, China 500–600”

…most likely refer to operational stockpiles (usable + reserve) excluding retired weapons.That’s why the U.S. appears to have “less” — it’s a counting convention issue, not reality.
 
 
Russia

  • Total warheads (stockpile): ~5,580

    • Deployed (ready for use): ~1,710
    • Reserve / non-deployed: ~2,910
    • Retired (awaiting dismantlement): ~960→ So total including retired = ~6,500 historically, but ~5,580 in the “military stockpile” sense.

 
United States

  • Total warheads (stockpile): ~5,044

    • Deployed: ~1,770
    • Reserve / non-deployed: ~2,680
    • Retired: ~1,500 awaiting dismantlement→ So again, if you count everything ever built but not yet dismantled, total might be around 6,500 historically.

 
Disinformation is Disinformation and impacts on one’s Credibility and Fact Checking ability. 

Posted by: Billy J. Ripple | Oct 31 2025 0:37 utc | 99

Do you believe if Trump ordered the following words ““on an equal basis”” to be tattooed on everyone’s forehead, that anyone would be able to work it out with help from US and Alt media thinking they need to explain it to everyone?  

Posted by: Billy J. Ripple | Oct 31 2025 0:51 utc | 100