Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
August 14, 2025
Some Thoughts On The Upcoming Summit

After reading some 20+ pieces about the upcoming Trump-Putin talks I still have no idea of what the outcome might be. Trump's uttering about the talks and Ukraine are, as usually, all over the place.

There seems to be some agreements already between the parties. If it were not so there would be no summit.

The Russian side is aiming at much more than Ukraine. The size and high ranks of its delegation is otherwise unexplained:

The Kremlin aide noted the very high level of the Russian delegation, which he said would include Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, Ushakov himself, Defense Minister Andrey Belousov, Finance Minister Anton Siluanov, and Special Presidential Representative for Investment and Economic Cooperation with Foreign Countries Kirill Dmitriev, who has been a key figure in the Ukraine settlement process.

“In addition to the presidents, five members from each delegation will participate in the negotiations,” he said, adding that “of course, a group of experts will also be nearby.”

There are nuclear weapon agreements that need an update and renewal. There are development opportunities in the Arctic and other economic aspects where both sides could win.

In fact, I suspect that there will be no decisions about the war in Ukraine.

The U.S. side knows that the war is a lost cause. Russia holds, as Trump has said, all the cards in that game. Whatever Trump does or says the war will be won on the ground by Russian forces. The best for him is to pull the U.S. out of the conflict and to leave the problem for the European vassals to solve.

For Russia the summit will be a big win even if there were no outcome. It has proven to global majority that it is reasonable and willing to go the extra mile to meet Trump even on U.S. territory. After this there will be no more pressure from China or India to stop the war.

Comments

PUTIN SUBMARINES SURROUND AUSTRALIA WITHIN RANGE OF US BASES

2014 | John Helmer | Dances with Bears inc graphic of subs surrounding Oz

It is eleven weeks since President Vladimir Putin visited Brisbane, Australia, for a summit meeting of the G20 states.
Putin was escorted in the Coral Sea, east of Brisbane, by a Russian Navy flotilla making the longest deployment of the Russian surface fleet ever displayed. Including Russian submarines shadowing the flotilla, this was also the most powerful Russian force ever to practice aiming at targets on the Australian continent operated by the Australian Defence Forces, the US military, or the two at bases they operate together.
Because these bases run in secret, most Australians had no idea what was happening, and what was changing.
The Australian media – controlled by three proprietors — Rupert Murdoch; the government; and until February 6 a mining oligarch called Gina Rinehart — didn’t alert them.
The Russian Navy off the Australian east coast in November was armed with ballistic and cruise missiles, with nuclear warheads capable of striking every US warfighting base on the Australian continent, plus the Australian cities.
Like Putin, the flotilla withdrew northwards to base on November 16.

https://johnhelmer.org/putin-submarines-surround-australia-within-range-of-us-bases-ray-atomizes-australian-politicians/

Posted by: Melaleuca | Aug 15 2025 2:19 utc | 201

Posted by: karlof1 | Aug 14 2025 19:45 utc | 74
Thanks for this, karlof1.

Posted by: juliania | Aug 15 2025 2:27 utc | 202

I note that my gold mining stocks do not seem to think anything nefarious is imminent.
But what do they know?

Posted by: necromancer | Aug 15 2025 2:27 utc | 203

My take on the “Mossad|CIA|Neocons|Illuminati gonna kill muh Putin!”
It’s non-zero probability, ergo, we should all take a drink, have a toke, or do whatever floats your boat tonight. We’ll know soon enough. I don’t think it will happen, but as Chuck Berry once said “it goes to show you never can tell.”
Such a tail event, if it were to happen, would lead to a chain of unpredictable chaos that could end in a nuclear exchange. SO let’s all take a deep breath and hope for the best.
Good luck to all!

Posted by: Ghost of Zanon | Aug 15 2025 2:28 utc | 204

I note that my gold mining stocks do not seem to think anything nefarious is imminent.
But what do they know?
Posted by: necromancer | Aug 15 2025 2:27 utc | 202
Winning on stock speculation! No real concern about anything else. Huge numbers of westerners have this attitude. They don’t really give a fuck about anything other than the short-term performance of their speculative investmests.

Posted by: ThouShalt | Aug 15 2025 2:38 utc | 205

Posted by: Jane | Aug 15 2025 1:14 utc | 184
#######
They don’t hate Trump. He’s an old, weak man who has a history with pedophiles.
They hate what he represents. Oligarchy, colonialism, and white supremacy.
If he could keep his mouth shut, the world would happily forget about him.
However, his ego demands constant attention, so he has to be in the limelight at all times.
—-
If (hypothetically) Trump died tomorrow morning, what would change in the world? Would prisoners go free? Would Gazans be able to eat? Would the genocide in Syria abate? Would Zelensky surrender?
The measure of a man is how much he is needed, and Trump, frankly, serves no one except the Zionist end-of-days cult that has been angling to blow up the world for 80 years since the invention of nuclear weapons to trigger the rapture.

Posted by: LoveDonbass | Aug 15 2025 2:40 utc | 206

James M: I can’t believe you’re seriously defending US “democracy”. Douglas Macgregor who only speaks of the “uniparty” has a much better grip.
What you’re saying is: the things that candidate A and candidate B will/would do throughout one cycle aren’t identical. Okay. You’re right.
What you’re missing: apart from constructed and trivial differences [1], the big lines of US policy are independent of who has the majority in House or Senate and who’s putting up the resident clown in the White House.
Three examples for my claim on the big lines:
1. An extremely strong measure for a country’s domestic policies are taxes. Both Democratic and Republican governments have decreased tax pressure on rich over decades. (Look at a graph of the corporate tax over time.) Both have supported tax havens.
2. Both parties foster “deregulation”, i.e. less state control on oligarchs. When the US state was strong, it could act on monopolies with anti-trust laws; an important measure to save capitalism from itself; last use AFAIK in the 1970s after which the Chicago Boys’ neoliberal agenda was enforced, again a bipartisan policy.
I believe you’re an USA citizen, so you’ll know much more about related issues, like the continual degradation of the unions or the consistent influx of poor immigrants (this puts a lot of pressure on the poor, for obvious and intended reasons). Interesting fact: US population grows almost linearly since the 1930s; see wiki graph — this is extremely unusual among Golden Billion countries and worth thinking about.
3. The differences that do exist in US dominating faction (call them “elites” or “capitalists”; I do not mean differences in the general population) are not tied to party lines. Questions like: “China or Russia first?”, “Old or new capital?”
This was extremely visible with Trump 47: several Republican neocons moved to the Democrats; several popular Democrats went Republican.
[1] The trivial differences that are deliberately invented to divide the population are along identity policy lines. In the past, topics like abortion, the role of religion in schools, segregation. Currently, gender policy, climate topics. I am not saying these are irrelevant for a society but these topics are so hot that ordinary citizens see them as majorly dividing lines, making any form of cooperation against government/capital harder, probably impossible.

Posted by: Konami | Aug 15 2025 2:43 utc | 207

Posted by: James M. | Aug 15 2025 1:02 utc | 179
Sad to say, you have no idea what you’re talking about there. Are you seriously denying that a “deep state” exists and/or that it perpetuates across many administrations/elections?
https://billmoyers.com/2014/02/21/anatomy-of-the-deep-state
We’re not talking about typical government “bureaucrats” here – the NOAA or EPA are not what people mean when they speak of “the deep state.”
You should really read this book. Aaron Good does a great job building on the work of previous and current (even mainstream) scholars like C Wright Mills, Michael Glennon, Peter Dale Scott, and Lance DeHaven Smith.
Here’s the whole pre-press thesis, which was later edited and added to for publication, for free.
https://scholarshare.temple.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/d50ff5be-a0ac-4660-8214-f16609a7d0fc/content
You’re all hung up on the people at the lower and/or elected levels. The functionaries, which Glennon and Good call the “Madisonian State.” Again, even the State Department has another layer [both official and quasi-official] regardless of who is in the White House. Glennon and Good name it as part of the “Trumanite State” (contrasted with the Madisonian State).

Presidents and other members of the Madisonian institutions have very little ability to control the Trumanite network. Out of 668,000 civilian Defense Department employees, only 247 are politically appointed. Therefore, hundreds of national security policymakers are drawn from the national security bureaucracies to oversee and manage those bureaucracies. These include some of the president’s top personal assistants as well as the high-ranking staff members of the extremely powerful National Security Council.
[…]
During this era, the Trumanite network has been held together by the same things that, according to Bagehot, held Britain’s efficient institutions together. Specifically, these are: loyalty, collective responsibility, and most significantly, secrecy. The Trumanites’ work at rarified locations within the offices of powerful institutions like the Pentagon or CIA headquarters. They cannot speak about their work with friends or family members. Officials with access to classified information must sign nondisclosure agreements which require them to submit anything they write to prepublication review if it pertains to their work. Since information is power in the network, Trumanites are “both information gluttons and information misers” . Glennon cites the case of the Pentagon spy ring that stole secrets from Nixon’s National Security Council and passed them on to the Joint Chiefs of Staff.
Tellingly, the Nixon administration acted to halt hearings on the crime despite being its victim. This episode illustrates the information miserliness of the Trumanite NSC as well as the Pentagon’s information lust. It also reveals the fecklessness of the Madisonian institutions when confronted with Trumanite crimes.

Again, we’re not talking about the FDA, HHS, FAA, FCC here. When we’re discussing the “deep state” we mean those elements or factions of the federal executive “defense” and law enforcement agencies and the private individuals, contractors, think tanks and other non-governmental organizations that comprise it.

Posted by: Tom_Q_Collins | Aug 15 2025 2:43 utc | 208

LYFH… are you still able to watch Flightrader24. I think it needs a login now
(Too many people were reporting/noticing too many “inconvenient” flights to strange places by strange planes.… so we want you to login, so we know who you are, we want to watch who is watching us.)
From xwitter, a Russian government Ilyushin landed at Anchorage commercial airport yesterday.
Telegram says other Russian planes have arrived.
I haven’t seen good reports of who is supposed to be on what planes.

Posted by: Melaleuca | Aug 15 2025 2:49 utc | 209

The concept (and reality) of a “deep state” is indeed often tied back to Turkey. Nemesis Calling is 100% correct on that.
Steven T Johnson and others becoming so ruffled when this topic is even examined or pointed out smacks of the proverbial lady who doth protest too much. Are we REALLY denying that there is such a thing as the American deep state in 2025?
Another excerpt from Aaron Good’s book entitled “American Exception: Empire and the Deep State”, re: Turkey.

While the term deep state has become ubiquitous in the Age of Trump, as yet it has no widely accepted definition. The term originally derives from Turkey where it described “a closed network said to be more powerful than the public state” (Scott 2007, 267).
The deep state of Turkey availed itself of false flag terror orchestrated by the security apparatus with links to organized crime (Scott 2007, 267). The Turkish deep state originated from networks originally established by NATO’s Operation Gladio in order to maintain stay-behind paramilitary forces that could become an insurgency following a communist takeover (Jenkins 2008). The Turkish example was a narrower conception of the deep state than those that would follow, but it did point to state power existing outside of the public state and the formal security services.
Collectively, the formally organized state did not exercise a monopoly on the legitimate use of violence since the deep state had deemed extra-legal violence acceptable even if not explicitly “legitimate” (a potentially subjective adjective).
[…]
In Turkey, the “deep state” came to be widely perceived by the public and the political class. This is why the country’s political system served as the origin of the term itself. While in postwar Turkey there have been various elected governments and a formal security hierarchy, the Turkish deep state has repeatedly intervened to assert its sovereignty. For example, following years of terrorist attacks and assassinations, Turkish General Kenan Evren led a coup which installed him as President of Turkey in 1980.
Much of the violence preceding the coup was carried out by the Grey Wolves, a paramilitary terror organization. The Grey Wolves were intertwined with Turkey’s Counter-Guerrilla, an element of the Turkish state that had engaged in domestic terrorism including a 1977 sniper assault on peaceful demonstrators that killed 38 and injured hundreds more (Ganser 2005, 236). Counter-Guerrilla was the Turkish branch of Gladio, the NATO and CIA operation that established secret armies ostensibly to resist a Soviet invasion but repurposed as parapolitical state actors. The significance of the US-Grey Wolves linkage is that they suggest that the postwar Turkish deep state was to a considerable extent a US deep state franchise of sorts.

And inside the jacket cover:

American Exception seeks to explain the breakdown of US democracy. In particular, how we can understand the uncanny continuity of American foreign policy, the breakdown of the rule of law, and the extreme concentration of wealth and power into an overworld of the corporate rich. To trace the evolution of the American state, the author takes a deep politics approach, shedding light on those political practices that are typically repressed in “mainstream” discourse.
In its long history before World War II, the US had a deep political system—a system of governance in which decision-making and enforcement were carried out within—and outside of—public institutions. It was a system that always included some degree of secretive collusion and law-breaking. After World War II, US elites decided to pursue global dominance over the international capitalist system. Setting aside the liberal rhetoric, this project was pursued in a manner that was by and large imperialistic rather than progressive. To administer this covert empire, US elites created a massive national security state characterized by unprecedented levels of secrecy and lawlessness. The “Global Communist Conspiracy” provided a pretext for exceptionism—an endless “exception” to the rule of law.
What gradually emerged after World War II was a tripartite state system of governance. The open democratic state and the authoritarian security state were both increasingly dominated by an American deep state. The term deep state was badly misappropriated during the Trump era. In the simplest sense, it herein refers to all those institutions that collectively exercise undemocratic power over state and society. To trace how we arrived at this point, American Exception explores various deep state institutions and history-making interventions. Key institutions involve the relationships between the overworld of the corporate rich, the underworld of organized crime, and the national security actors that mediate between them. History-making interventions include the toppling of foreign governments, the launching of aggressive wars, and the political assassinations of the 1960s. The book concludes by assessing the prospects for a revival of US democracy.

Posted by: Tom_Q_Collins | Aug 15 2025 2:53 utc | 210

Morons still think “Trump is fighting the Deep State”. He never would have been “elected” if that were true.

Posted by: ThouShalt | Aug 15 2025 2:57 utc | 211

The only Russians in the danger zone will be the peaceniks.
The hard men are all home, waiting.

Posted by: necromancer | Aug 15 2025 2:58 utc | 212

Welp, I know no one is really interested in my take here, but, meh, for what it’s worth:
The US panicked, FULL STOP. Russia is winning in the battlefield. I have ZERO delusions about WHY the US keeps this war going: THE THEFT of Russian resources, rare earths in the Donbas, worth 4.8 TRILLION.
Russia is the owner of all of this now. The US/Trump will lie, gaslight, manipulate and otherwise bullshit Russia, whispering sweet peace nothing’s in Putin’s ear, so as to get at those resources. And Putin TAKES THE BAIT EVERY. SINGLE. TIME.
I mean what is this bullshit about the US and Trump and Co. being sincere? Utterly laughable. Putin should know better as the US,Trump has bullshitted him before, only to back track on whatever false promises the US made
I am a US citizen and even I know the US is NOT agreement capable, so why does Russia and others suddenly believe that they are?
No matter what Trump says, he will have to STOP sending weapons to the Ukronazis (even if by EU proxies), if he is serious about ending the war and Jewlensky MUST GO in the process and the Nazis cease to exist.
If none of these things happens, Russia will be dealing with this utter nonsense again, cuz the EU/Jewlensky aren’t gonna give it up.

Posted by: Kay | Aug 15 2025 3:00 utc | 213

Notice how what Pepe Escobar calls ‘the barking European vassals and chihuahuas’ aka ‘The Coalition of the Willing’ members, like Canada’s Mark Carney and UK’s Sir Keir Starmer are most careful to signal support for both Trump AND Zelensky…
Prime Minister Carney Speaks With Prime Minister of the UK Sir Keir Starmer
https://www.pm.gc.ca/en/news/readouts/2025/08/12/prime-minister-united-kingdom-sir-keir
“Yesterday the Prime Minister, Mark Carney, spoke with the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, Sir Keir Starmer.
The prime ministers agreed on the categorical imperatives of ending Russia’s war of aggression and establishing a lasting peace and security for Ukraine.
The two leaders welcomed the leadership of President Trump and the United States in working toward securing peace in Ukraine in the context of upcoming negotiations.
As members of the Coalition of the Willing, the prime ministers reaffirmed Canada and the United Kingdom’s commitment to coordinating closely with the US and with President Zelenskyy and the people of Ukraine, in pursuit of peace and security in Ukraine and Europe.”
Remember this. Canada is a member of the Coalition of the Willing for Ukraine. This fact is regularly omitted by msm and even alternative media who mostly refer only to its European members.
The same trick was successfully played during the Gulf War in 2003 when an earlier Liberal PM, Jean Chretien, convinced all that Canada was not a member of that American ‘Coalition of the Willing’, even though the reality was that Canada’s support and involvement in that war was in many ways even greater than official coalition members.

Posted by: JohnGilberts | Aug 15 2025 3:02 utc | 214

Welp, I know no one is really interested in my take here, but, meh, for what it’s worth…
Posted by: Kay | Aug 15 2025 3:00 utc | 212
I read your posts with interest. No need to try to play the victim here.

Posted by: ThouShalt | Aug 15 2025 3:06 utc | 215

I incorrectly said “Trumanite State” but it’s really referred to as a “network.” Anyone who denies the existence of an American deep state must accept the logical conclusion of that stance. Namely, if you’re saying there is no US deep state, then you’re also implying that our federal government is completely subject to the democratic will of the voters, either directly – and semi-immediately – (through elections and appointments requiring representative democratic confirmation) or indirectly – and slower moving – inasmuch as the various direct hires, contractors, bureaucrats, etc. who become employed under the auspices of one administration may or may not hang around through subsequent administrations, subject to their competence, expertise and seeming objectivity.
Yet again: The “deep state” people speak of is the often amorphous or nebulous collection or network of people (overworld, underworld, government employees), agencies, foundations, think tanks, institutes, councils, large MIC contractors, and others who are not subject to democratic control or oversight, are largely secretive, whose chosen policies seem to span decades regardless of who gets elected, and that can act quickly and decisively – often in unconstitutional, supra-constitutional and otherwise criminal ways – to effect new policies and strategies or ensure the continuance of current ones.
And anyone who trots out the “secret cabal” strawman on this topic is either misinformed or disingenuous and not worth debating.

Posted by: Tom_Q_Collins | Aug 15 2025 3:09 utc | 216

@Everything Is False:
I’m IMPRESSED.
Now, list all US CEO’s and billionaires.
List the folks part of the Trump regime.
See another pattern yet?
Jew Supremacy is a REAL thing and the biggest elephant in the room, but ssssshhhh not supposed to tell!

Posted by: Kay | Aug 15 2025 3:12 utc | 217

https://nitter.net/DD_Geopolitics/status/1956164270322016368
Another Russian IL-96-300 has landed in Anchorage carrying members of the official delegation, according to Flightradar24.
Just prior, a separate flight brought in Kremlin pool journalists.
Putin is expected to arrive after a stop in Magadan, ahead of the upcoming Russian-American summit in Alaska.
——
TASS news implied that Sergei Lavrov and the Russian Ambassador to the US may also have been on the first aircraft.
They reported they had arrived prior to the second aircraft landing.
——-
Rodion Miroshnik, Russian Foreign Ministry Ambassador-at-Large for investigating crimes of the Kiev regime, stated that Zelensky is inadmissible for the execution of agreements on Ukraine due to his legal status and will not be able to sign anything.
——-
Trump on the possibility of reducing the number of U.S. troops in Europe.
Trump said he hopes the Anchorage summit will lay the groundwork for the next meeting on Ukraine, which could also be held in Alaska.
[er, nope. Putin said when the Alaska announcement was made, meeting 2 would be in Russia]
~~~~~
https://nitter.net/MyLordBebo/status/1956093354904551875
The decision to hold the Trump-Putin meeting in Alaska became a difficult challenge for the U.S. Secret Service — Bloomberg citing sources.
The preparation for the summit was a “one-week sprint.”
To ensure security in Anchorage, hundreds of agents had to be deployed and provided with accommodation.
The car rental market in Anchorage is small, so agents also had to bring vehicles from other parts of the state and even the country.
DOGEai @dogeai_gov:
Holding high-stakes summits in remote locations like Alaska isn’t just a logistical nightmare—it’s a taxpayer-funded bonanza for bureaucrats. Anchorage’s car rental scramble? Classic D.C. inefficiency.
Instead of pre-planning, agencies panic-deploy hundreds of agents, burn cash on last-minute vehicle imports, and call it “security.”
Meanwhile, the Pentagon’s Joint Mobility Office (JMO) exists to coordinate exactly this type of operation—yet here we are, watching another emergency scramble. Real leadership means strategic readiness, not reactive chaos.
Cut the waste, fund deterrence, and stop treating taxpayer dollars like a slush fund for bureaucratic incompetence.
—-
https://nitter.net/MenchOsint/status/1956088512123433093
Putin’s plane live tracking.
RSD105 • Ilyushin Il-96-300PU Airborne Command Post reg RA-96025.
He is expected to stop in Kamchatka or Magadan before the meeting in Alaska.

Posted by: Melaleuca | Aug 15 2025 3:12 utc | 218

They don’t hate Trump.
Posted by: LoveDonbass | Aug 15 2025 2:40 utc | 205
========
LOLOLOL.
These are your projections
No, they hate Trump.
Say his name and they start to exhibit symptoms.
I have witnessed this firsthand for years now.
What is wrong with you, LD?
You seem to be the ancient one with progressive dementia.
You don’t live in the USA, you hate the USA and Yanks, and you don’t know WTF you are talking—-make that bloviating—about.

Posted by: Jane | Aug 15 2025 3:13 utc | 219

any grandma stories for me later today as a type of bedtime story?? lol..
Posted by: james | Aug 14 2025 21:50 utc | 120
I have one that I think relates to the subject here, james. I was out all day today, and travelling home on the train I sat behind a small group of obviously damaged young adults. One, in a wheelchair was emitting explosive remarks directed towards other members of the group. One of their two female caretakers kept up a light dialogue with that one potentially disruptive individual, and had others on the train besides me captivated by what she was doing.
She did not insist that he desist, but kept up a friendly conversation with him throughout the long journey, distracting him without talking down to him. I, and I’m sure the others on the train, would not have had the skill to do what she was doing. A gentleman from the rear of the carriage even came forward to quietly tell her he was deeply affected by how she was managing the situation. And with her encouragement, we could see that the wheelchaired individual was responding in a manner that showed depth of understanding and enjoyment of the recognition she was giving him. There were still some explosions – he couldn’t help it – but they obviously understood one another, and they enjoyed the chat nonetheless.
Only now I see how this human back and forth is what we would hope will be the result of this meeting in Alaska. In fact, I can’t say otherwise than thank you, God for showing me how our expectations might be met tomorrow, particularly if we lower them to a human level.
Have a good sleep.

Posted by: juliania | Aug 15 2025 3:15 utc | 220

Do not quite agree w Brian Berletic …
Trump on use of military is a coward …
▪️Soleimani assassination was devious and looked good for domestic purpose, counterproductive
▪️Drawing in Taliban for talks in Doha, Qatar was simply cut and run leaving chaos to the next President 😂
▪️All administrations failed the Middle East because policy is run on Islamophobia, building up a terror state with U.S. weaponry, a nuclear state
▪️Iraq, Afghanistan, Iran are all non-nuclear states
▪️The Alaska Summit is of another order … facing the strongest nuclear might on earth. Decapitating the Russian leadership means global suicide … instantly. 🌎🔥🔥

Posted by: Oui | Aug 15 2025 3:18 utc | 221

Lol! Jane says “they all hate Trump”, implying that Trump is a morally good savior who is “against the Deep State”!. Jane, what you need to understand is that you are being manipulated into your support of Trump as some kind of populist hero. He isn’t that. Have you heard what he says about Israel and Gaza? And Iran?

Posted by: ThouShalt | Aug 15 2025 3:21 utc | 222

Michael Kofman, who, along with Rob Lee, cheerlead the start of the Ukraine war, is now in one of the Stages of Grief.
I think he’s at denial, anger, bargaining~depression, and acceptance
https://nitter.net/KofmanMichael
The Russian advances and loss of Ukrainian capacity is undeniable.. even by the most zealot “Ukraine is winning” crazies.

Posted by: Melaleuca | Aug 15 2025 3:23 utc | 223

DW: Richard Wolff & Michael Hudson
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b3d8JNQ517s
“Trump declares war on Russia in Alaska.”

Posted by: JohnGilberts | Aug 15 2025 3:29 utc | 224

Posted by: Jane | Aug 15 2025 3:13 utc | 218
There are plenty of good reasons for real people in the US to hate Trump. Those are the same reasons – or rearranged – that they have or had for hating Obama or Bush. Sometimes it’s a feeling of betrayal (being kicked off medicaid for example, or having the food bank you rely on to be able to feed your family shut down due to budget cuts or tax cuts for the super wealthy and corporations). Other times it’s an unconstitutional or blatantly illegal act (like invading Iraq, starting the Syrian “civil war” or assassinating General Soleimani of Iran). Yet others it’s a reversal on a campaign promise (“looking forward not backward”, being the LEAST transparent administration in history, prosecuting journalists, carrying out a coup in Ukraine, allowing Bibi to begin a genocide, not releasing the Epstein files, bombing Iran on behalf of Israel and their genocide). Or even others (divisive rhetoric, needlessly cruel or petty photo-ops or social media posts, etc.).
I can’t speak for Love Donbass (she can’t or refuses to speak for herself, too – might as well be an “AI” in a black box spitting out voluminous, anonymous and condescending/judgmental comments from “on high” with no personal skin in the game) – but my feelings about Trump, as what I consider to be an actual leftist, are too complex to amount to “hate” – I think Trump is great inasmuch as he personally, his administration and their “public relations/diplomacy” are pure 100% mask-off US imperial posturing and/or telling lies so obvious that everyone, everywhere can see the USA is and has been a hypocritical criminal farce since before WWII, but in the past 40 years (since Reagan) dialed so far up into brazen corruption and self-contradiction that it’s impossible to ignore.
Or the TL/DR version – Trump is the perfect personification of the US Empire, both at home and abroad. They don’t even try to hide it anymore. And that’s a good thing until the nukes start flying or the poor and working class in the US are subjected to martial law. Hell, maybe even that last part would be a good thing. At least it’d wake more people up to what this country really is – and almost always has been.

Posted by: Tom_Q_Collins | Aug 15 2025 3:31 utc | 225

There is no deep state, only Empire.
An empire doesn’t need secret police when the regular police will happily arrest anyone on political orders. An empire doesn’t need a secret judiciary when the Supreme Court is stacked with willing stooges.
Americans cling to the idea of a ‘Deep State’ like a safety blanket, a way to absolve themselves of the generations of apathy that led here. “I voted for the right guy, but gosh darn it that pesky Deep State foiled his plans!”
There is no deep state, only Empire.

Posted by: barrybarrybarry | Aug 15 2025 3:40 utc | 226

Again, we’re not talking about the FDA, HHS, FAA, FCC here. When we’re discussing the “deep state” we mean those elements or factions of the federal executive “defense” and law enforcement agencies and the private individuals, contractors, think tanks and other non-governmental organizations that […] it [comprises].
Posted by: Tom_Q_Collins | Aug 15 2025 2:43 utc | 207
===========
I first started hearing about the “deep state” maybe 15 years ago or so. At first it sounded pretty arcane (although for me credible), but soon poked its nose up over the radar when it was clearly associated with the name of Peter Dale Scott. Scott’s work seemed to put the stamp of official recognition on the idea. The existence of the Deep State was not a product of paranoia—its existence was an established fact.
To me it was fascinating to witness how the status of the term, and the idea of the, deep state evolved, was transformed, how it gradually pushed its way into everyday speech and analysts’ prognostications.
By the Trump era the existence of a, or the, deep state was a given. People talked about it in a most casual fashion.
Still, there was controversy and debate as to exactly who made up the Deep State and what was its character, or goals.
Or does the Deep State actually consist of competing factions?
Has “democracy” withered to such an extent that the country is being driven hither and thither by powerful but unacknowledged and hidden competing forces?
Clearly, the debate as to the character of the Deep State continues . . .
(Usage note: “comprise” means “include, encompass,” not “compose, make up.”)

Posted by: Jane | Aug 15 2025 3:49 utc | 227

@ juliania | Aug 15 2025 3:15 utc | 219
thanks! that is a great story and warms the heart… putin would be the one who represents that female character and trump would be the fellow she is talking to.. my take…
did you finally see the link i shared which grieved was referencing on the other thread?? it is there much earlier in the thread..
thanks for the uplifting story.. we need exceptional people to make the changes needed and i think putin is one such individual..

Posted by: james | Aug 15 2025 3:55 utc | 228

Posted by: Tom_Q_Collins | Aug 15 2025 3:31 utc | 224
Like you, I always think of LoveDonbass as a female. Female brain, anyway. I heard somewhere that “everyone on the internet is a man”. People do make that assumption for most posters here, but LD does seem eminently female in character. Nothing wrong with that, per se. Jane, otoh, fully admits being female and it is easy to lightly troll her into an angry response by acting like a know-it-all man talking down at her.

Posted by: ThouShalt | Aug 15 2025 4:00 utc | 229

Lol! Jane says “they all hate Trump”, implying that Trump is a morally good savior who is “against the Deep State”!. Jane, what you need to understand is that you are being manipulated into your support of Trump as some kind of populist hero. He isn’t that. Have you heard what he says about Israel and Gaza? And Iran?
Posted by: ThouShalt | Aug 15 2025 3:21 utc | 221
================
Did you read the comments I was responding to?
I did not write: “They all hate Trump.”
What I wrote, to paraphrase, is that those who hate Trump hate the man, not the idiotic items that LD said they think he stands for.
I said nothing whatsoever about my own stance toward Trump.
This is one of the most idiotic, illogical comments ever.
I am not going to waste more time explaining how idiotic it is.
Suffice to say: “my support of Trump” —- ????????
“Have you heard what he says about Israel and Gaza? And Iran?” —-???????? WTFWTFWTF?
Go and fetch your brain out of the toilet before you write more comments, at least any directed toward me.

Posted by: Jane | Aug 15 2025 4:04 utc | 230

Posted by: Jane | Aug 15 2025 3:49 utc | 226
Seriously this book lays it all out. The particular link below is to the original thesis which has been greatly improved upon since, but it’s a good start.
https://scholarshare.temple.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/d50ff5be-a0ac-4660-8214-f16609a7d0fc/content
There is no deep state, only Empire.
Posted by: barrybarrybarry | Aug 15 2025 3:40 utc | 225
That is the intellectual “security blanket” viewpoint. The US pretends that there is no US Empire. That is key here. And empire cannot exist without a deep state when the imperial core is stage managed like a bottom-up democracy or democratic republic. Certain doings must be kept secret, above the law.
It’s one or the other.
They pretend that there IS NO empire AND to have a democratic republic within which some of the “democratic” organs that comprise it are vested with (intentionally limited) powers of oversight and accountability, and the illusion of bottom-up, popular governance, then a deep state is absolutely needed.
-or-
You openly maintain and manage an empire, but you forego the democracy, popular sentiment stuff in governance. A monarch, philosopher king, or rule by the “wise” in which the population knows and expects that they are ruled by men, and not laws, doesn’t need a deep state – unless the actions undertaken by the rulers are so breathtakingly corrupt and evil (at home or abroad) that there needs to be bread and circuses, plausible deniability and some level of secrecy to keep the plebes happy enough not to riot in the streets or bring out the guillotines. In that case, you also need some kind of “deep state.”

Posted by: Tom_Q_Collins | Aug 15 2025 4:07 utc | 231

Deep State is a conglomerate of the Intelligence Agencies across the Nine Eyes … CIA – MI6 – Mossad sharing crucial communications intercepts NSA – GCHQ – Unit 8200.
DS or the Blob are primary, politicians follow. See RussiaGate as an example … a life of its own … the Mockingbird corporate media part of kabuki theatre in Washington DC – London – Tel Aviv.
The blob returns?
https://newcriterion.com/dispatch/the-blob-returns/
‘A million calls an hour’: Israel relying on Microsoft cloud for expansive surveillance of Palestinians
White supremacy the second generation Elon Musk – Peter Thiel (Palantir) – Zuckerberg

Posted by: Oui | Aug 15 2025 4:08 utc | 232

@ Melaleuca | Aug 15 2025 2:19 utc | 200
i never heard of gina rinehart before.. wealthiest lady in australia… interesting background..

Posted by: james | Aug 15 2025 4:12 utc | 233

there is such a thing as reverse tds too… the suffers of reverse tds are generally oblivious to it..

Posted by: james | Aug 15 2025 4:14 utc | 234

This is one of the most idiotic, illogical comments ever.
Posted by: Jane | Aug 15 2025 4:04 utc | 229
Thank you, I appreciate the accolades. There have been a lot of really idiotic comments over the years here and I appreciate being named #1.

Posted by: ThouShalt | Aug 15 2025 4:15 utc | 235

Posted by: james | Aug 15 2025 3:55 utc | 227
I would say my story is more of a parable than an equivalence, james — but yes, thanks, I did see your link to the substack. Plus I found an interview by clicking on his name and searching – sorry I didn’t copy the name of the interviewer but it was recent, on youtube.
He still feels very much that there is lots going on behind the scenes, and that it may not be with Trump himself initiating things, but that is why his team is there. But we cannot know for sure, if indeed this is true; so that we ourselves go back and forth, or sit on the fence as you say, is a good sign of what needs to happen at present.
Off to bed, I, anyway.

Posted by: juliania | Aug 15 2025 4:23 utc | 236

Tomorrow is the Big Day! Everyone get ready to brag if they were right in their predictions! Nobody will admit any error if their predictions with certainty don’t come true.
Posted by: ThouShalt | Aug 15 2025 1:57 utc | 195
I’ve been saying for months that VVP is going to have a sit-down with President Trump, that the two clearly respect each other, and Western “resistance” fans are going to be bitterly disappointed with what Russia ends up agreeing to. The last week has brought increasingly more heft to that argument- I don’t think it’s likely that VVP is trying to bait out an armed attack by globalist elements to help President Trump domestically, but it makes a lot more sense than an exceptionally dangerous trip for a PR victory.

Posted by: They Call Me Mister | Aug 15 2025 4:24 utc | 237

@james
Her dad, Lang Hancock, flew over remote Western Australia (and it was terrifyingly remote) in the 50s. Everywhere his eyes landed became his property.
Hundreds of thousands (millions) of acres, of some of the richest iron ore and minerals on the planet. Appropriated by one man because he said so.
Rinehart’s obscene wealth has brought her nothing.
She’s a fat -actually morbidly obese-, lonely, unpleasant woman in control of qizzilions, (dollars and people) and her own children and grandchildren hate her.
As does all of Australia.

Posted by: Melaleuca | Aug 15 2025 4:25 utc | 238

Frankly, to even discuss the concept of (the American or trans-Atlantic) deep state, you really have to do some in-depth reading and engage in some healthy critical skepticism of what you’re constantly being told by members of either side of the aisle or their respective media minions and “thought leaders.”
Too many people initially over-simplify it, and as a result are tricking themselves into believing that if there really was a deep state, it must be a uniform, discrete, easily identifiable cabal of persons, agencies or organizations and thus a simple task to wrap their minds around it.
But yes, in that same fashion, anyone who thinks or EVER thought that Trump was “at (or going to) war with the deep state” is either a feckless simpleton member of the Trump cult, or does not even begin to understand what meticulous scholars and readers define as ‘the deep state’.
If, after election, a president “goes to war with” the deep state, it is only comparatively tiny factions (people, agencies, corporations, banks, oligarchs) on the lower levels of the Trumanite network with particular policy axes to grind or payouts/contracts/sinecures jeopardized. JFK, Nixon and to some degree Carter (even Lincoln in a more primitive era) fit that category.
No potential/acceptable candidate who would even think of going to war with the real deep state writ large (which would entail going to war with the trans-Atlantic oligarch kakistocracy) even exists. For the most part anyone sElected to (or vetted to run for) any remotely high political office in the US (and similar in many other places) has already been groomed and self-selected according to the ‘acceptable’ views and policy goals on a wide range of topics, but at the root – western financial (or extractive) capitalist hegemonic dominance over the world maintained and “justified” with the illusion of liberal participatory democracy and rule of law for all.
I’ll shut up about the deep state now.

Posted by: Tom_Q_Collins | Aug 15 2025 4:25 utc | 239

Honestly, why are we talking about Trump?
He can’t do anything substantive. He’s going to put on a show tomorrow.
A few people suggested that the Russians may cut the Americans in on the Arctic, but Pepe Escobar disabused me of that. Russia will never cut America into the Northern Silk Road.
The Russians are devastating NATO; they aren’t losing a lot of men right now. The Russian standoff tactics are working brilliantly.
Trump can provide nothing and Putin wants for nothing.
Nothing substantive will happen. Anything that does happen is likely to be a typical Trump announcement without meaningful action by America.
It is 6 months later, and Russia still hasn’t been able to reopen its embassy or resume direct flights.
And Trump just signed that EO calling the Russian government a national security threat.
I think this is another pathetic attempt to distract from Epstein and Gaza.
Many MAGAs are thrilled to avoid talking about how Epstein provided Melania to Donald, which has been validated by Melania threatening to sue Hunter Biden for saying that for $1 billion.

Posted by: LoveDonbass | Aug 15 2025 4:27 utc | 240

Posted by: They Call Me Mister | Aug 15 2025 4:24 utc | 235
I’ve bookmarked your comment for review after the “summit” has taken place. Will you be willing to eat crow yourself when and if you’re wrong? Or will you employ voodoo pretzel logic and pilpul to show “the resistance” you were 100% correct when things don’t go so well for whatever it is that Trump is aiming for (ostensibly “ending the war and a mutual exchange of mineral wealth” – as stupid as the first part is to anyone that’s actually been listening to the Russians).
Can you really see Putin agreeing to some kind of DMZ or security corridor without concrete proof that NATO will not expand or the US – under Trump’s or any future administration – begin the shenanigans in Eastern Europe, or continue the economic warfare currently (and in many cases initiated by Trump) against Russia in hope for regime change or the “de-colonization” of the Russian Federation?

Posted by: Tom_Q_Collins | Aug 15 2025 4:30 utc | 241

sweet dreams juliania!
@ melaleuca – money can’t buy happiness and sometimes it leads to the direct opposite.. too bad more people aren’t hip to this.. relationships with others is most important – love essentially..

Posted by: james | Aug 15 2025 4:33 utc | 242

Posted by: Tom_Q_Collins | Aug 15 2025 3:31 utc | 224
=============
Of course there are plenty of reasons to hate Trump.
There are also reasons to approve of him, or of his actions.
There are actual reasons why people voted for Trump!!
Trump supporters are not all inmates in an asylum.
Where I live, however, most responses to Trump fall into the “irrational” category.
I live in a very blue state, and within that state I live in an ultra-blue community, one where anyone with a Trump sign in his/her yard could expect both the sign and the person who owns it to be fair game for obloquy, ridicule, having the sign stolen, etc., and the blue population would think this is fine.
So I am pretty sure I know what I am talking about when it comes to irrational hatred of Trump.
I can think of a number of times I have sat at the dinner table with friends/family and if the name of Trump comes up, there is ZERO capacity to discuss his actual policies, in particular his domestic policies. There is just a visceral reaction to the very name of Trump. These people also tend to make assumptions that everyone thinks just as they do in every respect. Their hatred of Trump easily transfers to anyone they imagine might have voted for him.
The idea that someone could be horrified by some of Trump’s policies (the Israel/Gaza horror show, and BTW I have been walking the talk on Gaza for 89 weeks now, and before Oct. 7,so don’t even go there) but approve of others (immigration reform; healthcare reform [appointment of RFK Jr/.]; going after the perps of RussiaGate; at least understanding others’ reasons for voting for Trump) is not within their cerebrums.
This is TDS. A visceral, irrational hatred of Trump. These are also the people who are potential totalitarians because their hatred of Trump blinds them to the idea that he actually has the same rights as other Americans—for example, to legal defense when he is accused of something. Just as they easily fall into the view that Trump supporters also have no rights—are not, actually, human. It is OK to steal their signs and diss them, while refusing to engage on a rational level with actual political realities.
For instance, even though many such people would describe themselves as anti-imperialist, one could not have a discussion or debate with these people as to whether Trump is an anti-globalist or not. They cannot suspend their emotions enough to even step back and consider such a question. As for RussiaGate, having swallowed the “get Trump” agenda back in 2017, they cannot look at the facts now.

Posted by: Jane | Aug 15 2025 4:38 utc | 243

RE: Nixon – Watergate “happened” and “happened” in the manner and scale it did in part because of Nixon’s ‘War on Drugs’ which jeopardized a substantial portion of the CIA’s Asian drug trade black budget and pissed off the (then powerful) China Lobby. If that were to move forward as intended it would have also jeopardized the CIA’s participation in, and coverup of, the JFK assassination and threatened to delegitimize or destroy the agency in its then-contemporaneous form. Nixon also opened the door to Red China, which greatly irked other factions of the d__p state, in ways both separate from, and intertwined with, the drug war considerations. Long story short, the period from 1963 – 1974 encompassed the greatest perceived threats to the American d__p state in its history and that isn’t even touching on Bretton Woods.
If there was no d__p state, the entirety of the CIA’s budget would be public at least from the appropriations level. In reality, they are operating with orders of magnitude more (budgetary and illicit) cash than most Americans even realize.

Posted by: Tom_Q_Collins | Aug 15 2025 4:45 utc | 244

@james.
Actually I probably should look beneath the now 1/2 century narrative of Lang Hancock.
Knowing now that almost no popularly promoted story is actually “true” or without some extra layers.
I’d be suspicious now because a little earlier, the Kimberley region of Western Australia was mooted as a Homeland For the Jews (before 1947 and Israel).
If you were to carve off a piece of the Australian continent, the Kimberley would be an excellent option.
Water, oil, gas, diamonds, gold, agricultural land, … (lawlessness)…most of the genociding had already been taken care of.
I wonder now who Hancock was working for… and why he was in that region with an airplane. (Who had an airplane in the 1950s?) (for reference, my parents didn’t even have a car).
We are lead to presume it was all lucky serendipity.
Which means it probably wasn’t.

Posted by: Melaleuca | Aug 15 2025 4:46 utc | 245

Posted by: Jane | Aug 15 2025 4:38 utc | 241
OK, we’re off topic big time now, but if you’re not in the top 5-10% of earners or holders of wealth in the US, other than the perception of success in illegal immigration, which Trump policies do you approve of – and which of them have materially (not “pwning the libz”) helped you and/or your family?
Also which have materially (having nothing to do with the genocide or Ukraine war) hurt you and/or your family?

Posted by: Tom_Q_Collins | Aug 15 2025 4:47 utc | 246

This is really a global forum. Posters from all over the world. Mostly Yanks and Brits though. We Yanks argue a lot amongst ousrelves. We have no common purpose, no common ideology.

Posted by: ThouShalt | Aug 15 2025 4:47 utc | 247

Nothing wrong with that, per se. Jane, otoh, fully admits being female and it is easy to lightly troll her into an angry response by acting like a know-it-all man talking down at her.
Posted by: ThouShalt | Aug 15 2025 4:00 utc | 228
======================
Yes, men do often talk down to me or use patronizing language because they know I am a woman.
Instead of sticking to the merits of what I have written.
I post at another blog under a neutral handle.
Other commenters there assume I am a man and they do not talk down to me in this way.
It is quite interesting to see myself referred to as “he,” along with references to my balls, etc.!!
Probably some commenters here are women in neutral camo.
Jane is not my real name, but I happen to like that name, and it is short.

Posted by: Jane | Aug 15 2025 4:48 utc | 248

Jane now throws her floppy Massachussets hat in the ring with the rest of the crowd who shouts “TDS!” at anyone who ever criticizes Trump.

Posted by: ThouShalt | Aug 15 2025 4:52 utc | 249

From Xinhuanet

ANCHORAGE, United States, Aug. 14 (Xinhua) — U.S. President Donald Trump on Thursday estimated that his upcoming meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin in the U.S. state of Alaska has a 25 percent chance of not being successful.
In an interview with Fox News Radio, Trump said his meeting with Putin is like “a chess game,” adding that he believes Putin is arriving with the intention of making progress toward reaching a deal on the Russia-Ukraine conflict.
He said if positive progress is made during the meeting, it would lay the groundwork for a second one, which would also include Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.
Trump on Wednesday warned that Russia would face “very severe consequences” if Putin refuses to agree to a ceasefire in the ongoing conflict with Ukraine.

Trump can barely spell chess, let alone play the game.

Posted by: psychohistorian | Aug 15 2025 4:54 utc | 250

@barrybarrybarry | Fri, 15 Aug 2025 03:40:00 GMT | 225

Americans cling to the idea of a ‘Deep State’ like a safety blanket, a way to absolve themselves of the generations of apathy that led here. “I voted for the right guy, but gosh darn it that pesky Deep State foiled his plans!”
There is no deep state, only Empire.

This is true. Empire is a natural tendency for all great powers in an anarchic state of nature. The accumulation of power is the end goal of empire, to have primacy in the system, to better secure itself against its rivals.
A “deep state” is comfort food to Americans who can’t abide the idea of imperialism, thinking it all made up by a shadowy cabal of nefarious evildoers, even though it is a natural course of events. It helps them sleep at night, I suppose. It’s simply not true.
America is an empire with a bureaucracy in service to its goals of primacy. But, all empires fall…

Posted by: James M. | Aug 15 2025 4:57 utc | 251

About deep state and about the US being an empire.
One usually omitted aspect of how power has become arranged in the US I believe is realised by freemasons while they dont tell you out of lojalty to the brethren.
Namely that the Illuminati was Britains move to counter the alarming process of the colonials to move towards declarations of independence. The same day Illuminati was officially founded, may 1 1776, there was an anti-independence incident.
Opponents of independence retained control of the Pennsylvania Assembly in a special election that had focused on the question of independence.
Before that date several colonies had already declared independence for local state governments.
The reason I bring up this early historical item is that I am sure intelligent freemasons in the US have known ever since about the true nature of the Illuminati but their lojalty to Britain has not completely vanished so there are old remnants of that lack of lojalty to independence that has weakened the US ever since.
The ties to Britain are probably closely related to the issue of slavery. But as time passed the British influence only strengthened. The US became an oligarchy indirectly brought about by those who lyingly presented themselves as enemies of the bankers and champions of the common people like Andrew Jackson.
Americans are very wrong about their own history and keep defending ideas that limits their options.
During the 20th century the Pilgrim Society was the new name for the angloamerican establishment that invaded the US but is still omitted from all documentaries. This because the US Pilgrims were instructed to undereducate americans so wages could be brought down to Britains levels. That establishment organised all the modern thinktanks and the MI6 MI5 CIA FBI etc
And those in the know never even told you about what all the talk of Illuminati was really about.
No matter whether you consider Illuminati to be significant or not you ought to be aware of how deep the ignorance is about history and what the lojalties are.

Posted by: petergrfstrm | Aug 15 2025 4:58 utc | 252

Jane now throws her floppy Massachussets [sic] hat in the ring with the rest of the crowd who shouts “TDS!” at anyone who ever criticizes Trump.
Posted by: ThouShalt | Aug 15 2025 4:52 utc | 247
=================
You have a reading comprehension problem.

Posted by: Jane | Aug 15 2025 4:59 utc | 253

Posted by: Jane | Aug 15 2025 4:38 utc | 241
And what precisely do you mean by “walking the walk” on Gaza? Have you called out fellow Trump supporters on their support – implicit or explicit – of the genocide (that yes, has been ongoing since before the LIHOP Oct 7 “incident”)?
But I do hope you answer my questions above. How has any Trump policy materially hurt or helped you since he was re-elected? Let’s take the focus off the alleged TDS libs for a minute and discuss Trump on his own merits, or lack thereof. I don’t care about relational anecdotes or Russiagate. None of us here at MoA ever fell for any of that. But if you can answer my questions, I can enumerate multiple ways that Trump’s *policies* are and will be VERY bad for the poor and working class in this country now and in the foreseeable future.

Posted by: Tom_Q_Collins | Aug 15 2025 5:00 utc | 254

Jane, I do like your posts as do most here. And I respect you for being pro-Trump in a social environment like urban Massachusetts where TDS is a very real thing. You are a fighter.

Posted by: ThouShalt | Aug 15 2025 5:01 utc | 255

Posted by: James M. | Aug 15 2025 4:57 utc | 249
Neither you nor barry cubed have the slightest idea what the fuck you’re talking about. Neither of you have yet bothered to even try countering a single factual assertion I or anyone else have made on the deep state and both of you cling to faux dispositive generalizations and blanket denials (pun intended) rather than attempts at proving your (false) beliefs or disproving the research and analysis of others.
Until you do any of that, your commentary is worse than worthless – it’s a literal waste of electrons.

Posted by: Tom_Q_Collins | Aug 15 2025 5:03 utc | 256

Posted by: ThouShalt | Aug 15 2025 5:01 utc | 253
LOL

Posted by: Tom_Q_Collins | Aug 15 2025 5:04 utc | 257

barrybarrybarry and James M. should probably take their hippy dippy zen-infused banal shallow 11th grade circle jerk to a sweat lodge in Sedona or something.
bbb: “There’s no deep state, only Empire.”
James M: “You’re right my brother, let us return to an anarchic state of nature. All empires fall, and fall is beautiful in Sedona.”

Posted by: Tom_Q_Collins | Aug 15 2025 5:07 utc | 258

ALASKA SUMMIT FORECAST
I am sure that the analysis and predictions from b , Karlof1 and others are more accurate than any I could make- but still-
In fact, I am not prone to making predictions-even if endorsed by the portents of my family heirloom crystal ball that has been recently enhanced with a new AI driven Occam’s Razor app. But last night I had a dream about the big pow-wow in Alaska, and it was very perplexing with some very disturbing visions of the future which could IMO lead to nuclear annihilation of much of the Earth. The visions are so unhinged that I am reticent about consulting the crystal ball for an “informed” second opinion. Actually, I am scared stiff that the portents of the magic ball will agree with my recent night mare.
After the ritual diplomatic BS, Emperor Donald will sit down in front of VVP (a mere president) and will pointedly wag his finger at Vlad and insist- “We will tolerate RF keeping Crimea and Donetsk for the time being, pending future talks which must include Mr. Zelensky (another mere president). In the meantime, you (Putin) must call an immediate cease fire and order all RF troops to immediately withdraw from all other Ukrainian lands that they presently occupy illegally. Furthermore, the RF will have to accept a large contingent of EU soldiers stationed throughout Ukraine to guard against any future expansionist ideas on the part of Russia.
If this is not acceptable then I will immediately order a new regime of economic and diplomatic sanctions on Russia such as the like of only Satan himself could formulate.
After a short time thinking, VVP replies-
“Mr. Emperor, you wag your imperial finger in a very convincing manner, and I accept these demands subject to the following minor points of compromise-
The US must immediately cease any arms or capital deliveries to Ukraine and any EU or NATO country likely to deliver such to Ukraine. Also, the RF will only accept US soldiers in Ukraine as a guardian force. Apart from Donetsk, the future of other Ukrainian oblasts can be discussed at subsequent talks.
Furthermore, as a gesture to humanity as a whole the US must immediately cease all arms shipments to Israel which is clearly engaged in a genocidal project against Palestine. The US must also insist -as a priority- that Israel immediately cease its attacks on the Gaza enclave and put an immediate stop to the illegal settlement of the West Bank by Israeli terrorist groups.” The US must agree to supporting a real and substantive Palestinian state,and declare this intent at the UN General Assembly in September this year.
Following this, Emperor Donald agrees and the Summit pauses for coffee and a snack while a comprehensive written agreement is drafted by representatives of both sides.
This is then followed by a well-choreographed photo-op where Emperor Donald and President Putin sign the historic TREATY OF ANCHORAGE.
In my dream I could not get a clear idea of the reaction from European or Ukrainian leaders, since a bank of very black storm clouds obscured the vision. Nevertheless, there was a great deal of extremely bad language uttered. The distorted vision of Israeli leaders was accompanied by lightening bolts between the clouds, and an unprecedented torrent of putridly bad language (both Yiddish and English) and a hail of disembodied Hebrew prayer beads.
Make of all this whatever you want barflies, but I console myself in the knowledge that “it was only a dream”.

Posted by: Barrel Brown | Aug 15 2025 5:07 utc | 259

OK, we’re off topic big time now, . . .
Posted by: Tom_Q_Collins | Aug 15 2025 4:47 utc | 244
=============
Yes, we are.
Cheerio.

Posted by: Jane | Aug 15 2025 5:08 utc | 260

Or will you employ voodoo pretzel logic and pilpul to show “the resistance” you were 100% correct when things don’t go so well for whatever it is that Trump is aiming for (ostensibly “ending the war and a mutual exchange of mineral wealth” – as stupid as the first part is to anyone that’s actually been listening to the Russians).
Posted by: Tom_Q_Collins | Aug 15 2025 4:30 utc | 239
You’re putting words in my mouth, but I suppose you are desperate at this point. My simple prediction was that the left-wing resistance is going to be bitterly disappointed by VVP’s pending deal with President Trump. The speed with which he is bringing a large and valuable delegation to Alaska speaks to major consequences- I don’t believe Western media is currently aware of what those consequences are, or would report honestly if they were. Your problem is that you credulously took the report of Western “journalists” to be a fact.
Much of the economic warfare might be wound down at this summit. Perhaps a comprehensive peace agreement could be outlined- perhaps the United States would withdraw from the war if all parties refused to honor it. None of that is important, because the fact of significant diplomatic movement by an American government towards Russia is absolutely fatal to the war in the Ukraine.
By the way, a major rupture between the United States and the European Union would be the most significant move against the “trans-Atlantic oligarch kakistocracy” in half a century. Do you really think the police in Washington DC have been federalized by coincidence? If so, you’d better pray you’re right.

Posted by: They Call Me Mister | Aug 15 2025 5:13 utc | 261

Posted by: Jane | Aug 15 2025 5:08 utc | 258
So you couldn’t even come up with one thing? Or are you the CEO of an “AI” company about to issue your IPO? At least be honest.
Either Trump has implemented a policy that has materially helped you and your family now and in the future or he hasn’t. It’s not rocket science (unless you’re a Space-X executive).
Not an artful dodge at all, if so.

Posted by: Tom_Q_Collins | Aug 15 2025 5:14 utc | 262

Posted by: Jane | Aug 15 2025 4:38 utc | 241
And what precisely do you mean by “walking the walk” on Gaza? Have you called out fellow Trump supporters on their support –
Posted by: Tom_Q_Collins | Aug 15 2025 5:00 utc | 252
==============
I am not a “fellow Trump supporter” and that is why I am not answering your presumptuous questions based on false premises.
You and ThouShalt really have reading comprehension issues, being unable distinguish between discussion of a social and political phenomenon and people’s personal political beliefs. Indeed you are presenting with a touch of TDS yourself!!! Now get some sleep.

Posted by: Jane | Aug 15 2025 5:16 utc | 263

Posted by: Tom_Q_Collins | Aug 15 2025 5:00 utc | 252
########
Very few will call out Trump or Trump supporters over Gaza. A few folks LARP as being pro-Palestine and refuse to make the conclusions obvious to most of the planet.
No one is supposed to be upset about Epstein (rape, grooming, blackmail)
No one is supposed to be upset about genocide (mass murder)
No one is supposed to be upset about attacking Iran on behalf of Israel (military aggression)
Like some people pretend to be a gender that they are not, some people pretend to be pro-Palestine but cannot choke out a criticism of the United States for enabling yet another genocide.
And if someone says the truth online, they get accused of being an AI or schizophrenic using typical Judaic gaslighting tactics.
TDS is supposed to be a mental disorder. Having an opposition to Trump is now a sign of mental illness.
Think about the implications of labelling people clinically crazy for opposing Israel.
Welcome to Trumpmerica.
I love it. It likely means we are approaching an inflection point.
Things will go on until they cannot.
Quos Deus vult perdere, prius dementat

Posted by: LoveDonbass | Aug 15 2025 5:22 utc | 264

Posted by: They Call Me Mister | Aug 15 2025 5:13 utc | 259
LOL. “left wing resistance” meaning what, exactly? I genuinely want to know what the heck that even means. In the US? In the Global South? In Russia? Are US Democrats “left wing”?
I never put a single word in your mouth. I asked you a series of questions. Do you know the difference?

By the way, a major rupture between the United States and the European Union would be the most significant move against the “trans-Atlantic oligarch kakistocracy” in half a century. Do you really think the police in Washington DC have been federalized by coincidence? If so, you’d better pray you’re right.

Have you not been reading the (alt) news including MoA? There is already a huge break between the US and EU. And no, that isn’t what I was talking about at all. In fact it WILL be a good thing, but for none of the reasons you seem to imply. If the EU US/NATO vassals are forced to back up their tough talk by ramping up military budgets and going on a real war footing with Russia, but with populations that actually expect to see social benefits for their tax dollars and who have parents and grandparents who have actually seen real warfare, they’ll riot and demand a return to more socialistic governments/policies. That’s good.
LOL Police in DC federalized by coincidence. Ha ha ha….have the courage to spell it out. Exactly what are you implying there? I promise not to put any words in your mouth. You say it…

Posted by: Tom_Q_Collins | Aug 15 2025 5:23 utc | 265

Posted by: Jane | Aug 15 2025 5:16 utc | 261
Then let’s revisit the comment that prompted my original questions:
Jane Says (I’m done with Sergio): and BTW I have been walking the talk on Gaza for 89 weeks now, and before Oct. 7,so don’t even go there) but approve of others (immigration reform; healthcare reform [appointment of RFK Jr/.]; going after the perps of RussiaGate; at least understanding others’ reasons for voting for Trump) is not within their cerebrums.
To which I replied with some questions on WHETHER you could name any Trump policies that MATERIALLY have benefited (or hurt) you. Let’s start with healthcare reform – can you articulate anything on what RFK Jr. is doing that will help you, in concrete material terms?
And please stop with your LD-esque faux scolding and diversions like “get some sleep” – You opened the door, I’m just asking you to walk through it.

Posted by: Tom_Q_Collins | Aug 15 2025 5:26 utc | 266

You and ThouShalt really have reading comprehension issues
Posted by: Jane | Aug 15 2025 5:16 utc | 261
No we don’t. We are both very logical men who read your emotional posts with clarity. You, Jane, are now just following in the footsteps of men like Gruff and S Brennan who call anyone who criticize Trump for any reason at at all “TDS”.

Posted by: ThouShalt | Aug 15 2025 5:31 utc | 267

To continue with my OT indulgence.
I read decades ago, that if Gina Rinehart was a country (and she’s large enough to be considered one), she would be the xx-(pick a ranking) richest country on earth…

Posted by: Melaleuca | Aug 15 2025 5:31 utc | 268

Posted by: LoveDonbass | Aug 15 2025 5:22 utc | 262
Trust me, it’s quite ironic actually. Probably a lot like the way a lot of previously fervent Israel supporters have had to face the fact that Israel is actually quite evil, I was previously a believer that most of the liberals accused of having “TDS” were probably just shallow thinking Democrat shill haters. But after seeing so many legitimate looking questions and criticisms either be deflected or disingenuously brushed off as “TDS” I now think that most of these Trump supporters or defenders, along actual policy lines, really are unthinking Trump Cultists.
Gee… I mean, can anyone…ANYONE…remember a single kind word, let alone a DEFENSE of a SINGLE Biden policy uttered here at MoA? Including by me? Yet you touch that third rail of criticizing Trump on actual policy and easily quotable statements and all the sudden you’re “TDS” – lol, like I said a few months ago. That has become no more meaningful than “antisemite” or “racist” – just a thought ender and online “gotcha”. These people don’t want to discuss reality – they want to pre-realize the greatness of their chosen savior – just like the Obamabots of 2014.

Posted by: Tom_Q_Collins | Aug 15 2025 5:31 utc | 269

@Tom_Q_Collins | Fri, 15 Aug 2025 04:07:00 GMT | 230

You openly maintain and manage an empire, but you forego the democracy, popular sentiment stuff in governance.

Empire and democracy are not mutually exclusive elements. An empire is a state that exerts control over a much wider swath of territory then it started out with. A democracy is a form of government. You can have democratic empires – Athenian empire, the British empire, maybe the German empire, etc.
For the US, the empire started with the expansion westward, grabbing the Ohio river basin, Louisiana Purchase, Florida, Mexican War, Texas, Hawaii and Alaska. All that land most Americans think of as part of the US, and is not seen as external. But it was acquired through imperial expansion. People forget that.

Posted by: James M. | Aug 15 2025 5:32 utc | 270

LOL Police in DC federalized by coincidence. Ha ha ha….have the courage to spell it out. Exactly what are you implying there? I promise not to put any words in your mouth. You say it…
Posted by: Tom_Q_Collins | Aug 15 2025 5:23 utc | 263
Tom, calm down. First off I mean left wing, Western, perpetually online wannabe “resistance” types. The global south is a mirage: Modi would be surprised at the idea that India would ever be part of an anti-Israel coalition, for one.
There will definitely be unrest throughout the EU, but that’s also why repression is increasing. Most of the more popular parties are like thr AfD: superficially nationalist but quite ready to let the Americans keep the lead on NATO.
As for DC police, their federalization will be very convenient if an “unexpected” crime wave starts to rise as part of a color revolution attempt. Don’t be stupid by pretending that President Trump is planning a coup.

Posted by: They Call Me Mister | Aug 15 2025 5:36 utc | 271

I don’t intend to pile on against you Jane, as your comments are usually astute.
But your “problem” here in this thread arose from your own lack of judgment in bothering to reply to the Perpetually Posting dumbass.

Posted by: A Sock in Donbass | Aug 15 2025 5:37 utc | 272

For the US, the empire started with the expansion westward, grabbing the Ohio river basin, Louisiana Purchase, Florida, Mexican War, Texas, Hawaii and Alaska. All that land most Americans think of as part of the US, and is not seen as external. But it was acquired through imperial expansion. People forget that.
Posted by: James M. | Aug 15 2025 5:32 utc | 268
Yes, and most of the expansion against the native tribes was similarly imperial/ colonial, which means most of country outside the Thirteen Colonies and the states you mentioned. No likely American government could give back that land even if they wanted to.

Posted by: They Call Me Mister | Aug 15 2025 5:40 utc | 273

Don’t be stupid by pretending that President Trump is planning a coup.
Posted by: They Call Me Mister | Aug 15 2025 5:36 utc | 269
Look who’s putting words in whose mouth now.
There will never be a coup in DC. There’s no American Embassy there, silly. And Trump is just as much a coup perpetrator as any previous Republican or Democrat. He just hasn’t tried one in the vicinity of a nuclear power yet. Do you want me to elaborate?
Oh, P.S. plenty of current Trump sycophants in Congress and in the populace were fully in support of Obama and McCain’s coup in Ukraine against the evil Russkies.

Posted by: Tom_Q_Collins | Aug 15 2025 5:41 utc | 274

Posted by: A Sock in Donbass | Aug 15 2025 5:37 utc | 270
Jane will attack even when people give her due respect. She feels like she is being victimized all the time. Because she is a woman.

Posted by: ThouShalt | Aug 15 2025 5:44 utc | 275

Posted by: James M. | Aug 15 2025 5:32 utc | 270
Totally irrelevant to the discussion of the GLOBAL US empire (that officially isn’t). Unless you can name me a US state in the southern hemisphere or Asia “proper”.
Nobody said that “empire and democracy aren’t mutually compatible” – what I said was that global empire and (true) democracy requires a deep state.
Please stay on the topic. Which was the existence of the US deep state in the context of “our” global empire and the maintenance of the appearance of (popular) checks and balances, aka “democracy.” You can’t have one without the other. At least not the way the US/trans-Atlantic overworld/elite seem to want to stage manage and run things.

Posted by: Tom_Q_Collins | Aug 15 2025 5:45 utc | 276

An empire is a ruling apparatus or construct (emperor or empress – individual, multiple or nebulous) predicated on forced economic rent extraction and control of the economy from vassals or subordinate peripheries [near or remote], whether governmental or territorial control is exerted there or not. You’re thinking of a colonial empire.

Posted by: Tom_Q_Collins | Aug 15 2025 5:49 utc | 277

I’ll put a good word in here for James M. An idiot called Acementhead tried to turn an otherwise on-topic disagreement into a referendum on the fucking Covid vaccinations, and then ran away when James M offerered a reasonable wager on topic.

Posted by: ThouShalt | Aug 15 2025 5:53 utc | 278

Leaders of two nation states meeting in Alaska will decide the fate of all humanity..and not one human will be there to represent humanity.. ???
The meeting in Alaska would not have been necessary if the authority of nation states did not allow leaders to use the nation state in ways that violate or infringe on human rights.
The ultimate determinate of peace on earth is human rights; not short lived or politically motivated agreements decided between nation state leaders.

Posted by: snake | Aug 15 2025 5:55 utc | 279

The Palantir (Israel tech coup) was completed when Musk took DOGE into several agencies, and their databases were given to AIs to be able to target and find any American who might dissent to anything. Except for the gunships, this is right out of the movie, “Captain America: The Winter Soldier“.
There is an irony in America becoming a Zionist MAGA police state.
I like a few Americans, and I feel bad for them. There was nothing they could have done to prevent it.
As always, maintain a passport.

Posted by: LoveDonbass | Aug 15 2025 5:57 utc | 280

Posted by: ThouShalt | Aug 15 2025 5:44 utc | 275
“Jane” isn’t even a woman in any meaningful sense of the concept. In the same way nobody reading can conclusively say neither of us are dogs.
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/f/f8/Internet_dog.jpg
In fact at this point, I think Jane is probably a complete construct like LoveDonbass. I have at least – many times over – provided (meaningless) personal details as to my life here at MoA, as have most if not all of the regular commenters that I respect for genuineness and honesty. Those who continually hide or pivot on anything remotely related to IRL are suspect from the get-go. Anyone who presupposes or puts forth that no “intelligence” (state or private) agencies occasionally or regularly interject or participate here are naive or themselves fucking liars. Is it a coincidence that one of the pre-eminent “defense” and “intelligence” journals is named “Jane’s”?
One could be forgiven for speculating, given the recent context (on this very page of comments).
This is one reason I will always keep LoveDonbass and her opinions at arm’s length even when I agree. She is too cowardly (or shrewd if she’s an infiltrator) to ever even remotely provide personally empathizeable context. Dehumanizing herself for the sake of “the mission” – like Jane maybe? Who the fuck cares if I’m in Dallas or Houston – the NSA lol I have a fucking security clearance AND multiple previous felony and misdemeanor convictions in my 20s. So why do Jane and LoveDonbass care so much – and why do you or anyone else? Nobody is asking for your real first or last name, physical, MAC or IP address, SSN, employer, DL# or what the fuck ever. All any “intelligence” agency has do do is compromise b’s site. The fact that LoveDonbass is so fucking “concerned with privacy” as to not even provide a single sliver of her personal lived context is far more suspicious than her even providing fake info. LOL so ridiculous, and I’m the one being called paranoid about the fucking spooks and Unit 8200 pussy bitch Jew hasbarats who for sure lurk and even comment here.

Posted by: Tom_Q_Collins | Aug 15 2025 6:01 utc | 281

Not new info for MoA, but satisfying to see others struggle with cognitive dissonance:

Ukrainians overused Patriots. So Russia learned their exact capabilities and has finished developing ballistic missiles that they can no longer intercept.
The missiles use radar decoys and high speed maneuvering to render Patriot air defenses useless. USA no longer has a reliable counter to Russian ballistic missiles.
In one volley, only 1 out of 7 missiles were intercepted.

https://www.twz.com/land/ukraines-patriots-now-struggling-with-enhanced-russian-ballistic-missiles

Posted by: Melaleuca | Aug 15 2025 6:07 utc | 282

As for DC police, their federalization will be very convenient if an “unexpected” crime wave starts to rise as part of a color revolution attempt. Don’t be stupid by pretending that President Trump is planning a coup.
Posted by: They Call Me Mister | Aug 15 2025 5:36 utc | 271

You see that Antifa black-hooded goons, BLM doing Burn Loot Murder in minority districts, cartel muscle protesting deportation … those are all a continuation of politics by other means.
And while on the topic, calling out the National Guard to put down such insurrection attempts is also a continuation of politics by other-other means.

Posted by: Tel | Aug 15 2025 6:10 utc | 283

Posted by: Tom_Q_Collins | Aug 15 2025 6:01 utc | 281
Good rant. I guess I think Jane has shared a lot more personal info than has LD even though LD posts a lot more. Jane is more of a real person. You have shared a lot also. Houston. My niece lives there. We’re all anonymous though. That’s why we all get away with being jerks 😉

Posted by: ThouShalt | Aug 15 2025 6:11 utc | 284

Antifa is back!
LMFAO!
I thought they “re-branded” as Nihilist Violent Extremists!

Posted by: Tom_Q_Collins | Aug 15 2025 6:18 utc | 285

My 2 cents, I might be wrong, but look for the words “popular sovereignty” to come up…

Posted by: MacCosham | Aug 15 2025 6:21 utc | 286

Like a kid anticipating Christmas.
One more sleep (12hours to go) and it’s Meeting Day Alaska. !
Which are the best livestream sites?

Posted by: Melaleuca | Aug 15 2025 6:26 utc | 287

Bros and Bro-ettes:
I just want the core charge back on my brand new transmission and class action compensation claim honored by scumbag Stellantis and the scumbag lawyers.
Ya see I’m a real guy with real problems. If b would ever open up a forum for us poor, peed-upon Yanks (literal victims of capitalism that we are) to vent, even the black box AI chatbots like “c1ue”, “William Gruff” and “LoveDonbass” would have some more grievance material to ingest and synthesize into new, more realistic sounding LLM responses to prompts!
We’re SUFFERING here!!! Trump is K-K-K-illing US!
LOL ok sorry for the nonsense. But I would bet 2/3…maybe 1/3 of current MoA comment(ator)s are fake…Israeli AI.

Posted by: Tom_Q_Collins | Aug 15 2025 6:27 utc | 288

Another thing that tells us that Jane is quite real is that a few words purposely written in a tone of male condescension can set her off. LD can’t be trolled.

Posted by: ThouShalt | Aug 15 2025 6:29 utc | 289

Stop sniping at one another
Look while i am not a doomsayer, there is at least a realistic possibility that WWIII may be declared tonight. How about we try to work together for a while and focus on important stuff, not personality gripes.
I come here for information and analysis not yer 8 teenage girl back biting

Posted by: watcher | Aug 15 2025 6:30 utc | 290

You and ThouShalt really have reading comprehension issues, being unable distinguish between discussion of a social and political phenomenon and people’s personal political beliefs.
Posted by: Jane | Aug 15 2025 5:16 utc | 263

An affliction so alarmingly common, you might almost start to think it was the normal way to behave. But sadly reading comprehension requires reading effort and reading attention span … the modern world discourages such things.

Posted by: Tel | Aug 15 2025 6:32 utc | 291

Posted by: Tom_Q_Collins | Aug 15 2025 6:01 utc | 281
#######
If I reveal personal details, it will just mean that all of my interactions will be framed by my age, race, or nationality as though those things are more important than what I have to say.
I am not female, and it is funny that people say I am. I know why the local hasbara agents do it. They are very mad about the things I post. As they say, “I am over the target.”
That said, I could lie. I could say I am American, and I could say that I am related to Trump. That I went to UTSA, that I lettered in high school, won the state basketball championship, and am divorced with 3 children. That I was going to get a medical degree.
None of that would be true, which is the real point of maintaining pseudonymity. I don’t attempt to present myself to you for social judgment, so you know I am not lying about who I am because I don’t make any claims about myself.
Now, let’s say you know my origin and age. What would that change about anything that I have written? Would it make me more or less credible?
I don’t argue based on authority. If people think I am a quack, ok. If people hate me, ok. I am not posting to make friends or to become popular. I am posting my perspectives on moral and existential issues. Feel free to disagree, not because I am rich and handsome (I am neither), but because my perspectives are incorrect and someone can prove that.
Honestly, I crave intelligent pushback because iron sharpens iron. I can only get smarter by being challenged with better arguments.
If people don’t think America is doomed, fine. Make the case. Deconstruct what I have written.
Instead, an endless chain of Zio-Socks will call me names and post records of how often I post. They don’t realize that the more they try to silence me, the more I want to be heard, particularly on matters like genocide.
Truly, anyone who doesn’t loudly oppose genocide (and child sexual abuse), really isn’t earning their keep as a human, IMO.

Posted by: LoveDonbass | Aug 15 2025 6:35 utc | 292

Posted by: watcher | Aug 15 2025 6:30 utc | 290
🤣🤣😅❤️

Posted by: Tom_Q_Collins | Aug 15 2025 6:36 utc | 293

I saw that the counsellor at South Park school lost his job and is now applying for a job with ICE.

Posted by: George | Aug 15 2025 6:37 utc | 294

Stop sniping at one another
Look while i am not a doomsayer, there is at least a realistic possibility that WWIII may be declared tonight. How about we try to work together for a while and focus on important stuff, not personality gripes.
I come here for information and analysis not yer 8 teenage girl back biting
Posted by: watcher | Aug 15 2025 6:30 utc | 290
Lighten up, Francis. If we are all gonna die today, might as well go out with friendly sniping rather than whatever it it is you are saying. What is it that you are saying?

Posted by: ThouShalt | Aug 15 2025 6:38 utc | 295

I first started hearing about the “deep state” maybe 15 years ago or so. At first it sounded pretty arcane (although for me credible), but soon poked its nose up over the radar when it was clearly associated with the name of Peter Dale Scott.
Posted by: Jane | Aug 15 2025 3:49 utc | 227

New words for an old concept … so old it fades to the background and started to get forgotten.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Managerial_Revolution
X is an unknown quantity and spurt is a drip under pressure … but none-the-less many people are comfortable with self-proclaimed experts running their lives for them. Every time it fails … the experts excuse themselves saying they did not have sufficient power and authority and it would have been fine if only the naysayers had a little more faith.

Posted by: Tel | Aug 15 2025 6:40 utc | 296

Posted by: LoveDonbass | Aug 15 2025 6:35 utc | 292
Sorry my earlier reply to @watcher was intended for this.
Honestly I don’t care about the backing details. Not at all.
You just seem like an AI. Totally fake. This is a bar. What if a synthetic walked into your house or pub? Would you engage?

Posted by: Tom_Q_Collins | Aug 15 2025 6:40 utc | 297

You just seem like an AI. Totally fake.
Posted by: Tom_Q_Collins | Aug 15 2025 6:40 utc | 297
#####
Back-handed compliment, but I will take it. 😅😅😅
On the matter of being paranoid about who is really who, in a different environment, I would have anecdotes to share.
Your instincts are good, IMO.

Posted by: LoveDonbass | Aug 15 2025 6:47 utc | 298

there is at least a realistic possibility that WWIII may be declared tonight.
Posted by: watcher | Aug 15 2025 6:30 utc | 290
#####
In which case, get off of MoA and call your mother to tell her that you love her.
If this is the end, don’t spend your final moments among strangers.

Posted by: LoveDonbass | Aug 15 2025 6:51 utc | 299

LoveDonbass, no offense. Just shrug it off.
But Jane and c1ue – I’m pretty sure they’re both (among other regular high minded MOA wannabe authorities) FUCKING RICH.
Jane – just admit it. You’re loaded. Well compensated. That’s why you are unable to address the class war Trump is now leading remotely objectively. C1ue has always been an Ann Randian mythical self-created New World Man.
I speak for the educated and uneducated plebes.

Posted by: Tom_Q_Collins | Aug 15 2025 6:51 utc | 300