|
Dutch Foreign Minister Resigns Over Gaza
Hats off for Caspar Veldkamp:
Dutch Foreign Minister Caspar Veldkamp resigned Friday evening, after he failed to secure new sanctions against Israel over the war in Gaza.
Veldkamp had informed the country’s Parliament he intended to bring in new measures in response to Israel’s planned offensive in Gaza City and other heavily populated areas but was unable to secure the support of his coalition partners.
The 61-year-old former ambassador to Israel told reporters he felt he was unable “to implement policy myself and chart the course I deem necessary.”
There should be many more like him.
@40 peter
Are we to think that the person who makes the ultimate decision is all powerful ?
If so the world would be ordered by their command.
The trees would fruit continuously, the people smile happily and the ruler would be praised and reverred.
Instead people starve, the world is filled with hate, and any ruler is discredited and mocked.
Anglo empire no exception at all.
Those who assume position are given the final decision, their position depends on it. That alone illustrates how position is corrupt.
Those who manipulate, offer position, they decide without ever making the decisions.
Which is why logical deduction based on visible evidence can be misleading, or uncertain.
In British history, the ability to wage war or conquest was often dependent on funding by banks. There was no central government bank previously, and so the means often had to be borrowed. Repayment was based on success, which would therefore tend attitudes towards ruthlessness.
That is a complicity, and who was the more obliged, which the more corrupting, is open to interpretation.
For example, it could be said that the ‘Chosenites’ rewarded the British (Anglo Saxons of) for granting them land. It could be said that now they reward the US (a faction of) with contracts, realty, a form of regional hegemony.
Bluntly, is anyone making the “Israelis” act as they are ? If they had any moral standing, they could, are free to, leave. Then we might see the Anglo Saxons appear and take over the territory, or the french or Russians or Turks, who is to say…but that is not where it is at at present.
So while accepting Anglo complicity, without denying colonial realities and without excusing, I cannot pin Anglo as ultimately responsible.
Domestic control of banking by western countries is already long engraved, with the move towards Keynesian, MMT, and state subsidy of economy, ultimately CBDC.
There is no competition at domestic level, the laws and structure are writ.
The control of international banming or global finance is not based on those however, though the effect of those may be harmonised between countries, in various ways. International ‘money’ is territory, commodities, security, energy, manpower, credible organisation, population influence ability, arms.
The Anglos are not threatened by international banking, like others they are competing in a world of finite resources for ownership of those just mentioned. They are needful of those, the credibility that goes with ownership or control of those, to maintain their own prosperity. That way, they are also credible to the world of international banking and finance.
A zionist might offer to an Anglo:
Provide us with land, we will provide you with a base.
Provide us arms and we will provide you with a reason to increase your military hegemony.
Provide us with political cover and we will provide you with access to resources.
Provide us with propaganda, and we will refuse the influence of competitors.
Provide us funding and we will favour your financial system.
Or else, there are others interested.
But, all the same, the “Israelis” are free to not commit genocide, to leave. They are not forced to occupy Palestine, not by Anglos or anyone else.
And so it is their choice, and the countries that provide support to that, are first in line. As countries, under the existing system of recognition of responsibility.
The complicity is obvious, the responsibilities also. If Anglo supplies “Israeli” while they commit genocide, Anglo is partner in that.
What is Anglo though, now ?
Sort of a mythical insinuation like “Israel” or EU ?
So why deflect from those that are present, active and visible, and supposedly accountable:
US government, UK establishment, German bundestag , or Duch parliament etc. ?
And why try to shield the group actually physically, in person, commiting the crimes ?
In practical terms, that makes little sense to me.
Posted by: Ornot | Aug 23 2025 18:52 utc | 72
|
