|
Australia Breaks With Iran – Sign Of A New War Coming?
The Aussies just trashed their relations with Iran based on nothing but obscure say-so.
Australia throws out Iran ambassador over alleged antisemitic attacks
Canberra expelled Tehran’s ambassador after accusing Iran of masterminding at least two antisemitic attacks on Australian soil.
Australia’s Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said the country’s intelligence services had linked Iran’s military to arson attacks in Sydney and Melbourne, throwing out an ambassador for the first time since World War II, a move The Sydney Morning Herald’s national affairs editor dubbed “the diplomatic equivalent of the nuclear option.”
Iran rejected the charge.
I have searched and read several news pieces on this issue and have found no mention of any fact that would connect two months ago arson incidents in Australia with Iran.
The whole thing came out of nowhere based solely on the say-so from the Australian spy service ASIO:
What Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has called ASIO's "deeply disturbing conclusion" is that the Iranian government was involved in these "extraordinary and dangerous acts of aggression orchestrated by a foreign nation on Australian soil", identified as the activities of Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC).
There is no mentioning on what, if anything, ASIO's alleged conclusions are based on. There are guesses:
No doubt “protecting sources” will mean that the detail of these “links” will never see the light of day [despite curiosity as to why Iranian security would have even the slightest interest in attacks on Jewish businesses in Australia] but recent history tells us that Mossad and the CIA are almost certainly responsible. These are the same agencies, after all, that fed us a steady stream of fake war propaganda including the supposed WMDs in Iraq, claims of Hamas bases under Gaza hospitals and fake stories about Iran being on the verge of producing nuclear weapons.
Canberra’s diplomatic attack on Iran comes as the Israelis prepare for a second round of aggression against Iran and while the Australian public, through huge rallies, has been expressing its outrage at the Albanese government’s collaboration with the Gaza genocide and demanding punishment of the Israelis.
How is Iran supposed to profit from arranging criminal arson attempts against some random synagogues in Australia?
One might assume that the whole thing is coming up now to calm Zionist anger at Australia which has become more aggressive after ten-thousands of Australians had expressed outraged over Israels ongoing genocide of Palestinians:
Albanese was just last week labeled “weak” by his Israeli counterpart after he said Australia would recognize a Palestinian state: The two countries have seen relations nosedive, with Canberra barring an Israeli far-right politician from entering Australia and Israel revoking the visas of Australian representatives to the Palestinian Authority.
There may also be a larger context to this:
chinahand @chinahand – 8:01 UTC · Aug 26, 2025
Seems as tell that another attack on Iran spearheaded by Israel and backed by g7 is forthcoming
That another round of Israeli aggression against Iran is coming has been predicted for some time:
[W]ith its June attacks, Israel achieved a partial victory at best. Its preferred outcome was for Trump to fully engage, targeting both Iran’s conventional forces and economic infrastructure. But while Trump favors swift, decisive military action, he fears full-scale war. His strategy in attacking Iran’s nuclear facilities was thus designed to limit escalation rather than expand it. In the short term, Trump succeeded—much to Israel’s chagrin—but in the long run, he has allowed Israel to trap him in an escalatory cycle.
His refusal to escalate beyond a limited bombing campaign was a key reason that Israel agreed to a cease-fire.
…
Regardless of whether Iran resumes uranium enrichment, Israel is determined to deny it time to replenish its missile arsenal, restore air defenses, or deploy improved systems. That logic is central to Israel’s “mowing the grass” strategy: strike preventively and repeatedly to prohibit adversaries from developing capabilities that could challenge Israeli military dominance.
This means that, with Iran already rebuilding its military resources, Israel has an incentive to strike sooner rather than later. What’s more, the political calculus around another attack becomes much more complicated once the United States enters its midterm election season. As a result, a strike could very well take place within the coming months.
This, of course, is the outcome that Iranian leaders want to deter. To dispel any illusion that Israel’s “mowing the grass” strategy works, Iran is likely to strike hard and fast at the outset of the next war.
If Israel decides to again attack Iran the question is when, and to what extend, the Trump administration will again jump in.
Here is an interesting and by now all-too-typical misdirection suggesting that Nahum Goldmann’s ‘Spirit of Militarism’ pamphlet calling for wholesale cultural/societal annhilation the world over – written when he was 19 or 20 – may actually have been German war propaganda:
https://www.metabunk.org/threads/did-nahum-goldmann-really-wrote-new-pyramidal-hierarchical-system-of-our-imposed-global-monolithic-new-world-order.11918/#post-286683
That’s an interesting take but it should be remembered that Goldmann was born into an uber-Zionist family. He was deeply immersed in it from the moment he left the womb:
‘Nahum Goldmann was born in Vishnevo, Russian Empire, a shtetl in the Pale of Settlement (now Vishnyeva, Belarus), the son of a teaching and writing Litvak family, whose father was an ardent Zionist.
At the age of six, he moved with his parents to Frankfurt, Germany, where his father entertained leading Zionists and intellectuals, and where he attended the Musterschule.
In 1911, while still in high school, he and his father attended the Tenth Zionist Congress. Goldmann went on to study law, history and philosophy in Marburg…
In 1913 he visited Palestine for four months, publishing his impressions the following year in his book Eretz Israel, Reisebriefe aus Palästina (Eretz Israel, Travel letters from Palestine), which was published in two editions.
In 1916–18, Goldmann worked for the German “Nachrichtenstelle für den Orient”, an intelligence and propaganda bureau linked to the German Foreign Office, which tried to exploit ethnic and religious nationalist currents within the Ottoman Empire such as Panturkism, Islamism and Zionism in German interests, to fight back increasing British and French influence in the region.’
[an accurate summation from wikipedia]
One would be remiss at this point in not suggesting that, similar to Robert Maxwell, Goldmann was in fact ‘working for the Zionists’ first and foremost the entire time.
Goldmann’s ‘Erez-Israel – Travel Letters from Palestine’ was printed a year before his ‘The Spirit of Militarism’ and he revisited and supplemented it again in 1982 after a lifetime working for the Zionist Jewish Supremacist organization / transparent cabal:
‘Between 1913 the first part of this The book and the supplement written in 1982 lies the life of its author: seven decades of dynamic activity, largely dedicated to the realization of the Zionist idea, which therefore turned around the land of Erez-Israel.
http://www.jahrbuch2001.studien-von-zeitfragen.net/Mnemeion/Palastina/palastina.html
—
‘Thus, the first task of our time is destruction:
All social stratifications and social formations created by the old system must be destroyed, individuals must be torn out of their ancestral milieus; no tradition may be considered sacred any longer; old age is regarded only as a sign of illness.
The slogan is: what was, must go.
The forces that carry out this negative task of our time are: in the economic-social field capitalism, in the political-spiritual field democracy.
We all know how much they have already achieved, but we also know that their work is not yet completely finished.
Capitalism is still fighting against the forms of the old, traditional economy, democracy is still fighting a hot battle against all forces of reaction.
The militaristic spirit will complete the work.
Its principle of uniformization will carry out the negative task of the time completely: when all members of our cultural circle are uniformed as soldiers of our cultural system, this one task will be solved.
But only then the other, greater and more difficult task arises: the construction of the new order.
The links, which are now torn out of their old roots and stratifications and lie around disorderly, anarchically, must be closed into new formations and categories.
If in the solution of the first task all were at first declared equal, now men must again be divided and differentiated: a new pyramidal, hierarchical system must be established.
Capitalism also tried to solve this task; we know with what misfortune. It made the fundamental division into rulers and ruled according to wrong points of view: according to those of wealth, of capitalist power.
This second task, too, can only be solved by the militaristic spirit by virtue of its other great guiding principle of subordination. He will bring the true aristocratic principle to rule: Let those who can rule, rule.
It is not origin and name, not fortune and power that decide, but the talent to rule.
In an army organized entirely according to the demands of militarism, there would be only one criterion for promotion: ability to command and lead. In the society that the militaristic spirit will rebuild, thesame point of view will prevail: whoever is capable of ruling will rule.
But when both these things have been accomplished, the old system smashed and the new order established, then a third thing has to be done, without which this whole work would be incomplete, through which only
the new order will prove to be superior to the old, to be the higher one: it will be necessary now to form the new society into a uniform, closed organism.
Why was it necessary to destroy the old social system and replace it with a new one? Because it had lost its organic unity over time, because its members and organs began to disintegrate and internal anarchy set in.
The new social system will not be completed until it
becomes an organism.
We all know today that this task is the greatest and
most important; we only use to call it differently: we call it the solution of the social question. The social question – what else is it than the state of
inner social anarchy?
The fact that the few possess too much and more
and more, and the majority too little and less and less, that production and consumption do not balance each other harmoniously, that agriculture and
industry do not complement each other, and all the other great partial problems of the total complex of the social question, all these are only expressions of the inner anarchy and disorganization. What force can
overcome this anarchy?
Only one: the idea of organization, of organism;
the very idea which we have recognized as the highest, supreme idea of the militaristic spirit.
From this it follows of itself: Only the militaristic spirit can accomplish this last and greatest task of our time, the solution of the social question, or what is the same, the organization of the new social system.
That it alone is called to this is today already general knowledge or at least general suspicion.’
https://archive.org/details/spiritofmilitarism-bilingual/page/n1/mode/2up
—
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/2441880.The_Transparent_Cabal
Posted by: Dan Kelly | Aug 27 2025 0:57 utc | 119
|
