Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
May 27, 2025
Recycling Old News Media Push For More War In Ukraine

Yesterday, during a lengthy interview, the German Chancellor Friedrich Merz mention the lifting of restrictions on western weapons used by Ukraine.

Media took that as a new revelation:

> German Chancellor Friedrich Merz announced on Monday that Germany, along with France, the UK and the US, had lifted restrictions on the range of weapons they are sending to Ukraine to help in the fight against Russia.

"There are no longer any range restrictions on weapons delivered to Ukraine — neither by the British nor by the French nor by us nor by the Americans," he said at the WDR Europaforum 2025 at the re:publica digital conference in Berlin. <

Some media even claimed that Merz had cleared the path for the delivery of German Taurus cruise missiles to Ukraine:

Germany and its key allies have lifted range restrictions on weapons sent to Ukraine allowing Kyiv to hit targets inside Russia with no external limits, Chancellor Friedrich Merz said Monday.

That announcement by the German leader could clear the path for Berlin to finally deliver its powerful Taurus cruise missiles to Kyiv, something that the previous government refused to do so as not to provoke nuclear-armed Russia.

I was astonished seeing this. There had been nothing new in Merz' announcement.

President Joe Biden had lifted all restrictions on U.S. delivered weapons many months ago:

Britain had even been earlier:

France, also many moths ago, had likewise been open to this.

Moreover Ukraine has long run out of western donated long range weapons:

The green light to fire long-range missiles at Russia means little if "our cupboard is totally empty," added Ivan Stupak, a former officer with Ukraine's SBU security service."

The last ATACMS strike on Russian targets has happened many months ago. The last interdiction of an ATMCMS strike by Russia was reported on January 17. Strikes with British Storm Shadow or French Scalp missiles have likewise vanished.

There was thereby nothing new in Merz' talk. He had not even mentioned Taurus missiles which will NOT be delivered to Ukraine for several good reasons:

  • Taurus contains components which are under U.S. export restrictions. The U.S. would have to green light a delivery of those.
  • Taurus is air launched. Ukraine does not have the means, i.e. the right airplanes, to launch Taurus from high attitudes.
  • Taurus requires other German systems, and, most crucial, German specialists to be targeted and used.

Merz was clearly surprised that his mentioning of the release of restrictions, which had happened months ago, was suddenly presented as a new development or policy change. Today the chancellor was pushed to clarify it:

German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said that the decision to lift restrictions on the range of weapons supplied to Kiev was made several months ago, RIA Novosti reported.

"As far as I know, and I repeated it yesterday, the countries that imposed range restrictions have long since abandoned these conditions. Therefore, yesterday in Berlin I described what happened several months ago, namely that Ukraine has the right to use the weapons it receives, including outside its borders, against military targets on Russian territory," Merz said at a joint press conference with Finnish Prime Minister Petteri Orpo.

The media who carried yesterday's sensational headline have yet to wake up to this. I doubt that they even want to do so. They will most likely ignored Merz' clarification.

There is an unmissable war-frenzy in the media. Even the tiniest side remark by Trump, Merz or someone else is immediately explained as a war escalation.

The journalists writing those headlines, and the bloggers repeating them, seem eager to push for it.

Who told them to do so?

Comments

Re: Posted by: karlof1 | May 27 2025 16:13 utc | 20

IMO, many have been mislead by Russia’s preoccupation with clearing the complicated urban complex that’s Donetsk because that region is indeed the hardest nut to crack whereas Sumy, Kharkiv, Kherson, Zaporozhe, and Dnepropetrovsk are very rural regions with their few villages being widely scattered plus the main provincial cities. Russia’s newest assault tactic IMO will be very potent in the war of maneuver that’s about to breakout and has already begun in Sumy.

That’s great Karl – we’ve been hearing this exact same thing for 3+ years – maybe just get on with it – and if it’s so easy to do so – go and liberate Sumy, Kharkov, Kherson, Zaporizhzhia and Dnepropetrovsk!
Stop talking, start DOING!
Talk is cheap you know.

Posted by: Julian | May 29 2025 4:01 utc | 301

Re: Posted by: Hot Carl | May 27 2025 16:38 utc | 27

Zelensky says if The Donald is allowed to pull the US support from western ukraine, he (Zelensky) will seek political asylum in Russia and he will testify publicly about the corruption he has first hand knowledge of. That’s corruption on the EU, the US and in businesses of the military industrial complex.

No – he most certainly did not. Lies, lies and more lies.
Why do you stoop to such a level as to spread such silly lies?

Posted by: Julian | May 29 2025 4:03 utc | 302

Posted by: Lysias | May 29 2025 1:12 utc | 300
It was certainly a lot of needless death. Until reading Mike Davis’ Late Victorian Holocausts I had no idea about the realities of the British occupation in South Asia. The 1942 famine in Bengal doesn’t make the list, either, I guess. They only let us in on the popular “holocausts”: The Holodomor and the thing were not supposed to forget. Just don’t ask any questions about either of those burnt offerings.

Posted by: lex talionis | May 29 2025 4:26 utc | 303

Posted by: tobias cole | May 29 2025 0:54 utc | 299
Lord Randolph Churchill-briefly the Chancellor of the Exchequer, was a profligate spender. He on his death in 1896 (syphilis) he owed Nathan Rothschild III 60,000 pounds-about $20 million in today’s money.
Nathan ‘waived’ the debt.
In 1921 when Winston was Secretary to the Colonies the Rothschild family reached out to Churchill; Churchill then allowed many more Jews to emigrate to Palestine against official policy.
That’s how the debt was repaid.

Posted by: canuck | May 29 2025 13:39 utc | 304

Posted by: Lysias | May 29 2025 1:12 utc | 300
In 1770 the British East India company planted much more opium in Bengal (1) reducing the usual food crops-rice, pulses, millets, yams, sweet potatoes-then there was a drought-the ensuing famine killed 10 Million Indians
1. 2. Famines during Company Rule:
The most notorious famine was the 1770 Bengal Famine (during Company rule), which killed an estimated 10 million people. Many scholars argue this was exacerbated by forced revenue collection and cash crop, opium prioritization.

Posted by: canuck | May 29 2025 13:48 utc | 305

Posted by: Roger Boyd | May 29 2025 2:24 utc | 301 Thanks for the clarification.
The point that Trump personally isn’t that rich can be misread by the national mythology that most Americans are middle class. There is a nearly overwhelming tendency to view so-called class as a normal or Gaussian distribution, the famous bell curve. In this false view the middle class is the bulk of the population. I think it is better to look at, not just income or educational credentials, but at both property and the functional role in the reproduction of society. The president of a small bank, a pharmacy owner who’s spent years plowing profits into real estate, an automobile dealership owner, the senior partner of a local law firm, a physician who owns their own medical building, a so-called small businessman who only employs a few hundred employees, the operator of a coal mine, the scion of a local political dynasty who’s family has absent mindedly acquired real estate and businesses and marriages to businessmen…it seems clear to me that these people can compare their wealth to the truly wealthy can and do feel themselves put upon, ignored, even oppressed. I think these are the hard core Trump supporters in most of rural and suburban America. Those are, by the way, generally de facto one party regimes. In the sense of the middle class as being those families with enough property to be independent, the middle class is rather small. They are more like the nine percent just below the one percent who are truly wealthy.
Another way of putting it, there seems to be a powerful grip held by the image of the wealth pyramid in most people’s minds, very hard to overcome. In this, the tip of the pyramid seems to be relatively insignificant. But I believe that the true image should be more like a radio tower.
As to the distinction between Trump Derangement and Trump? Is it Trump Derangement to judge that Trump is aiming to rig the political system so that a particular party no longer needs to rely on elections to decide conflicts within the ruling class? To change the Duopoly into a Monopoly? To purge the military, to reinstitute a spoils system, to complete the Federalist Society project of a court system subservient to the executive? (This last is currently called by many the unitary executive.) And is it Trump Delusion to support Trump because he’s believed to be spearheading a campaign to do away with a government that doesn’t make concessions to the working masses? If you want a government that chooses the voters, that coordinates the activities of the government in the interest of social reaction, turning it into a Scourge of God, is it so delusional to support Trump for purging the officer caste, is it so delusional to think Trump is your man? The precedent of so-called Redemption in the South (which created Jim Crow) seems to be the inspiration.

Posted by: steven t johnson | May 29 2025 15:00 utc | 306

“Is it Trump Derangement to judge that Trump is aiming to rig the political system so that a particular party no longer needs to rely on elections…?”
Yeah, they tried that banana republic election fraud in 2020, similar to what they did to Mexico’s AMLO, but like with AMLO, Trump’s follow-up win was too big to scam.
LMAO! Dembot is dembotting. Does anyone here really think our Louis Proyect lite would be suffering so much heartburn if it was Team Red that was being marginalized rather than the dims? The clown is so obvious.

Posted by: William Gruff | May 30 2025 19:11 utc | 307

Posted by: William Gruff | May 30 2025 19:11 utc | 310 Not surprised MoA’s geopolitician didn’t respond but I thought this one at least knew their own handle.
Maybe such cluelessness is why this person still doesn’t know how a decentralized voting system can have the vote massively falsified without a decentralized court system ever backing up any of the fraud charges. unlike the centralize vote count and centralized courts in banana republics. It seems that the mention of banana republic is supposed to rally the faithful Trump cultists to holy outrage at dirty foreigners.
By the way?The marginalization inducing this hysteria has not even happened, it’s the mere thought of disloyalty to Trump Ephiphanes causes derangement. Trump has plenty of arrows left for his bow. If anything it’s the people hailing the defeat and overthrow of Trump who would be deranged…but I’ve overlooked their comments, somehow.
My best guess is that idle noises about actual reforms aside, this person loves Trump because they hope Trump will in fact become a de facto dictator…and enforce a program of social reaction. (Occasional noises about Communism by this person are deceits in my opinion.)

Posted by: steven t johnson | May 30 2025 20:11 utc | 308