Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
April 15, 2025
Ukraine Confirms Sumy Strike Target – Russian Build Up For Summer Campaign

Yesterday I reported of Sunday's missile attack in Sumy, Ukraine:

There was a ceremony planned for the seventh anniversary of the founding of the 117th Territorial Brigade. This was to take place in the congress center of the Sumy State University. Medals were to be presented for the recent participation of the brigade in the attack on the Russian oblast of Kursk. Invitations to the commanders of neighboring units were sent out.

The Russian military got wind of the event and destroyed the congress center (pics) with two Iskander missiles. There were military and civilian casualties. But under the rules of war the strike was on a legitimate target.

Ukrainian politicians had alleged that the head of the Sumy Oblast State Administration Volodymyr Artiukh had send out the invitation for the event and had arranged for the military ceremony to take place in the middle of the city.

The government of Ukraine essentially confirmed that today by removing Artiukh from his position:

The Cabinet of Ministers has approved the dismissal of Volodymyr Artiukh from the post of head of Sumy Oblast State Administration and the appointment of Oleh Hryhorov to this position.

Konotop Mayor Artem Semenikhin accused Volodymyr Artiukh, Head of Sumy Oblast State Administration, of organising a gathering of soldiers from the 117th Brigade for an award ceremony in the centre of Sumy on 13 April.

Artiukh acknowledged that an award ceremony for servicemen took place in the city centre, but did not name the initiator.

Do not expect any western mainstream media to report these facts.

I have for quite some time not reported on the progress of the war in Ukraine. That is not because nothing is happening there. The Russian forces are pressing on all fronts while building up their reserves. Most of the many small pushes are successful but the current progress isn't measured in miles per day.

This is an attrition war. The capturing of land, which still happens, is not the measure of success. The destruction of the enemy's material and personnel resources is what matters. In this regard the Russian forces are making good progress. Over the last month the daily Ukrainian casualties as reported by the Russian Ministry of Defense have crept up from a low of about 1,200 per day to some 1,500 per day now. That is still far away from the 2,500 per day reported during the summer and fall of 2024 but still a noticeable increase.

There is also an intensification of air and drone strikes on military factories far behind the frontlines. Instead of once or twice per week these are now a daily occurrence. The results of these strikes are only rarely reported. They do not have an immediate effect on the fighting. But they will over time diminish Ukraine's resources and its supplies of weapons and munition.

The ground in Ukraine is still muddy. Only when it dries up will we see a general campaign by the Russian forces.

They will look for weak spots in Ukraine's defense lines and push on each of those until one or more breakthroughs occur. Fresh forces will then moved up to exploit the breaches.

Comments

DS map update:
https://deepstatemap.live/en#6/49.4324126/32.0581055
Overall: Another bad day, for the RFA. This time only 1.2 kmsq. I.e. Almost nil. Also, with RFA and UFA trading wins.
Specific changes, S to N:
1. [UFA win] Small loss of RFA territory near Dniproenerhiia (VN sector).
2. Another gain in fields near Nadeshdynka, DP sector.
3. [UFA win] UFA recaptured area N of Novyi Trud (directly S of Pokrovsk).
4. Fields NW of Valetynivka. RFA continues to advance along the H20 highway, between the Pokrovsk and NY sectors.

Posted by: Anonymous | Apr 15 2025 23:00 utc | 101

Posted by: james | Apr 15 2025 22:36 utc | 96
the comments made by trump, tucker and vance need to take into consideration the audience.
It is very hard to break through American ignorance, indifference, and bloodlust. Especially conservatives.
To get them to calm down, you have to do it while still assuring them of their superiority and machismo.
I dont know how else to explain it, but remember 100 IQ is average, (its actualy 97 now, I think), 50% of Americans are below that.
I remember trying to convonce Americans the Iraq War was a ridiculous idea. I didn’t even bother with the immorality of it, I had to appeal to the repercussions, which was a weak selling point because, “yeah but if we dont, another 9-11).”
So calling chinese workers pretty much “peasants” was actually not a bad way to try to get through to Americans the damage done to them through corporate offshoring.
It’s also got to be zinger and newsworthy, to get some ink.
That’s just the way it is. Americanus Boobus is not even willing to sit through a ten minute lecture about corporate labor exploitation of chinese labor unless it affects them directly in a bad way, and it doesnt, their garages are stuffed with cheap chinese shit they bought to fill the void in their souls.

Posted by: UWDude | Apr 15 2025 23:07 utc | 102

Posted by: Bertold | Apr 15 2025 15:56 utc | 4
‘Which begs the question…
What is the Russian production being hoarded for then?
After all, this industry continues to operate and produce, so what is Russia preparing for with millions and millions of shells…etc.?
Perceptive question. Let us just say that Russia stands well prepared for any eventuality. The Russians now must assume that there is a plot underway to unleash a full invasion, as crazy as that must seem.
As Andrei Martynov has indicated, NATO does not want Russia to move from SMO to full scale war. If that happens Russia can level the Ukraine n a matter of days and destroy European cities (and US cities for that matter) with devastating effectiveness.
Posted by: Áobh Ó’Sheachnasaigh | Apr 15 2025 20:19 utc | 76
———————————————————–
My view, based on what former Swiss NATO intelligence analyst Jacques Baud stated years ago just after the start of the SMO, is that Putin was not trusting the West and started preparing for defending Mother Russia against a Western attack.

Posted by: Acco Hengst | Apr 15 2025 23:24 utc | 103

Re: Posted by: Pierrot | Apr 15 2025 17:48 utc | 40

Back in 1914 there was movement warfare on the western front for six months. Then, each side lacking a decisive victory, soldiers dug trenches protected by landmines, barbwire and supported by heavy artillery. 1915 to 1917 saw massive technolocial leaps forward, including the development of Air forces and armored all terrain vehicles with embarked guns called “tanks”. Both of these have reigned supreme throughout the whole following century. Despite these, the static front couldn’t be broken until mid 1918, when German forces wasted their last reserves in spring and summer offensives, which despite tactical successes couldn’t lead to decisive victory, and were left with not enough soliders to man their trenches all along the frontlines. Overwhelmed by far superior forces, they were led to unconditionnal surrender late 1918.
The pattern is for you to see. It is quite obvious. Just replace western front by eastern Donbass, germans by nato-backed ukrainians, planes and tanks by drones and hypersonics, spring offensive by, well, spring offensive, and you’ll get an idea what will inevitably happen. The time doesn’t matter and russians generals don’t have to oblige to your unability to handle frustration. War is not a video game. Quite early in the SMO, RUAF top command estimated that war will last to at least 2025. The final date is not important, what is important is that NBU is reaching its attrited threshold, and it is a process that no western power is able to reverse. Movement warfare will come when its due, when russians will maximize their gains and minimize their losses.

Using World War I as an example of how attrition warfare works.
So you are claiming Germany was defeated in World War I by attrition warfare – how do you make this claim with a straight face when 20 years later Germany was marching all over Europe?!?
So, if I draw the parallels – you are asking Russia to win this war via attrition warfare (but not territorial conquest implicitly) – and then just wait for a new war with Ukraine in 20 years when Ukraine has been rebuilt ?!?
How is that a good result for Russia?!?

Posted by: Julian | Apr 15 2025 23:24 utc | 104

@Passerby #91
From 2017: North Korea’s Missile Success Is Linked to Ukrainian Plant, Investigators Say (nytimes)
“Yuzhmash”.
They were trying to transfer ICBM technology to Eastern Canada too (for peaceful launches, but the proposed rockets were identical to Soviet ICBMs).
https://archive.ph/EfyqZ
Freelance designers may well have contributed to proliferation of missile technology to other countries.
I wonder if SpaceX used any eX-Soviet eXperts. Elon has praised the RD-180.

Posted by: Billb | Apr 15 2025 23:25 utc | 105

@ Acco Hengst | Apr 15 2025 20:40 utc | 81
your first paragraph – i think you are right about that…
2nd para – tucker carlson seems like a mixed bag, but mostly i like him.. bare in mind, i have limited knowledge of him and only watched a few of his videos… that was a kind of ignoramus comment from vance showing his hillbilly background, lol..
Posted by: james | Apr 15 2025 22:36 utc | 96
——————————————————–
Jane, IMHO, surely got his number and stated it far better than I could. Maybe she can kindly repeat her posting, which followed Tucker’s mediocre interview of Putin.

Posted by: Acco Hengst | Apr 15 2025 23:26 utc | 106

horseguards. You beat me to it. LTCM on steroids. Could be interesting. Treasury already muttering about buying Tbonds ..

Posted by: Formerly Miss Lacy | Apr 15 2025 23:29 utc | 107

Posted by: james | Apr 15 2025 22:36 utc | 96
the comments made by trump, tucker and vance need to take into consideration the audience.
It is very hard to break through American ignorance, indifference, and bloodlust. Especially conservatives.
To get them to calm down, you have to do it while still assuring them of their superiority and machismo.
So calling chinese workers pretty much “peasants” was actually not a bad way to try to get through to Americans the damage done to them through corporate offshoring.
It’s also got to be zinger and newsworthy, to get some ink.
Posted by: UWDude | Apr 15 2025 23:07 utc | 102
——————————————————–
Not my view of how to get through to conservatives or boobs.
The multitudes have been indoctrinated with Russia bad, China bad. Only last November did the US Congress, including one of my GOP Senators vote for $62B for Ukraine. Turning that supertanker around takes a lot of time and maneuvering. DJT should ask Madison Ave how it is done. Vance is not stupid.
Musk, DJT, Hegspeth and Vance communicating about hitting the Houthis with emojies? Frat boy stuff.

Posted by: Acco Hengst | Apr 15 2025 23:34 utc | 108

Not my view of how to get through to conservatives or boobs.
Posted by: Acco Hengst | Apr 15 2025 23:34 utc | 108
i know some irl, and inusually just say, “yeah, well, these things are complex”, and leave it at that.
There is nonway I could ever change their minds. I don’t wear a suit on a cable news show.
Memes are the most effective tool, but even then, anybody in the space to see good memes is aleeady open minded.
How do you suppose you are supposed to do it? Tell them to “read this book”?
Seriously, pretend im boobus, then try to convince me offshoring is bad. At best, they’ll ne like, “yeah, thats bad. Look at this jacket I got from Wal Mart for only $15, just as good as the $200 ones from Nordstroms”
and they arent exactly wrong.

Posted by: UWDude | Apr 15 2025 23:41 utc | 109

Hopefully, this year’s good weather will dry the feet of clay that support Russia’s high command and they will take the land they need to be secure. And we can call it peace…a peace that could have been agreed to more than a year ago but for the go-slow warfare employed by Russian war planners.
Posted by: S Brennan | Apr 15 2025 16:00 utc | 7
Indeed, I wonder about this as well. The Ukrainian “brothers” are being massacred, many of them actually Russian, while Russia itself is taking substantial, albeit far less, casualties. The Jewish Bolsheviks would have been proud of such a successful strategy of killing off so many ethnic Russians.
Would the death toll have been less if Russia had simply gone in hard core, initially civilian casualties may have been high, but how does that compare to the old men and women being sent into the meat grinder? Suspect many more are dying through attrition than shock and awe, including Russian soldiers.

Posted by: Organic | Apr 15 2025 23:44 utc | 110

Posted by: Melaleuca | Apr 15 2025 22:51 utc | 98
I think Russia has a significant military outpost in Transnistra and a good % of the people are Russian

Posted by: watcher | Apr 15 2025 23:49 utc | 111

Suspect many more are dying through attrition than shock and awe, including Russian soldiers.
Posted by: Organic | Apr 15 2025 23:44 utc | 110
based on what?
the hypothetical shock and awe that would shock the world with its brutality?
The one where Russia civilians are crushed in their Ukrainian apartment buildings during a blitz campaign?
And can you even guarantee victory after all that? Will the ethnic Ukrainian Russians consider you great liberators after you killed their families?
The one where hundreds of thousands of Russians and Ukrainians are killed in a few months instead a few years? How would a dusty Rusdian army faire under such a shock? Would it even be able to hold together? What about the country?
Just, no.
The slow drain is better in that the little cuts arehealed easier, and Russia an still fight off NATO. Some big blitz could result in a grievous weakening of the Russian army, and NATO would pounce.

Posted by: UWDude | Apr 15 2025 23:54 utc | 112

Will the ethnic Ukrainian Russians consider you great liberators after you killed their families?
.………….
I meant ethnic Russians in Ukraine.

Posted by: UWDude | Apr 15 2025 23:56 utc | 113

its also unapologetically pro Russian to the point of being basically the only proudly pro-Soviet Union place on the planet.

Posted by: UWDude | Apr 15 2025 23:58 utc | 114

I think Russia has a significant military outpost in Transnistra and a good % of the people are Russian
Posted by: watcher | Apr 15 2025 23:49 utc | 111
its also unapologetically pro Russian to the point of being basically the only proudly pro-Soviet Union place on the planet.
Posted by: UWDude | Apr 15 2025 23:58 utc | 114

Posted by: UWDude | Apr 15 2025 23:58 utc | 115

Posted by: Exile | Apr 15 2025 19:56 utc | 73
‘Sure ….the DPRK (with a population of 10 million) is out producing the RF (with a population of 145 million) in artillary rounds.
Completely believable’ –
Lets not be like propaganda media and keep things at least fairly accurate. Not that i completely rely of Wikipedia for always-accurate information, but…
Current population of DPRK is aro 26mil. Thats a lot more that 10mil.

Posted by: Áobh Ó’Sheachnasaigh | Apr 16 2025 0:13 utc | 116

Jane, IMHO, surely got his number and stated it far better than I could. Maybe she can kindly repeat her posting, which followed Tucker’s mediocre interview of Putin.
Posted by: Acco Hengst | Apr 15 2025 23:26 utc | 106
================
I don’t know how to search for this posting.

Posted by: Jane | Apr 16 2025 0:16 utc | 117

Anyone knows what’s going on here? Putin has rushed backed to the Kremlin, footage may be old and released as part of misinformation campaign.
Does anyone have collaborating info?
“Russia’s UVB-76 military communications radio, sometimes dubbed ‘Doomsday Radio’, broadcasted 4 sudden mysterious codes, purpose unknown
1. NZHTI – 33 702 – NEPTUN – 66-52-20-75
2. NZHTI – 8002 361 – TIMUS – 56-85
3. NZHTI – 7000 0 8002 – LISOPLASH – 67-203-0808-0809
4. NZHTI – 62 505 – NUTOBAKS – 78 15 92 71
The radio station’s purpose is unknown but is sometimes associated with Russia’s nuclear triad and the Western Military Sector.” – MES

Posted by: Suresh | Apr 16 2025 0:20 utc | 118

@ Jane | Apr 15 2025 15:32 utc | 1
we are in a class war and the elites are winning…
Posted by: james | Apr 15 2025 16:04 utc | 9
=============
I did not write that sentence.

Posted by: Jane | Apr 16 2025 0:28 utc | 119

Posted by: Melaleuca | Apr 15 2025 22:51 utc | 98
I think Russia has a significant military outpost in Transnistra and a good % of the people are Russian
Posted by: watcher | Apr 15 2025 23:49 utc | 111
A land bridge to Odessa, unless you think Russia would be OK with gaining Odessa with access only from the Black Sea, means a land bridge to Transnistria. Package deal. Look at a map.

Posted by: Mike R | Apr 16 2025 0:41 utc | 120

nd I add, militarily, it doesn’t matter why McClellan was such a failure.
Posted by: S Brennan | Apr 15 2025 17:38 utc | 37
This is why nobody visits your blog. Do you even have one?
Why bring up the US Civil War? What possible connection does this have to this SMO?
Did the Athenians invade Persia?
Grow up!

Posted by: Suresh | Apr 16 2025 0:42 utc | 121

UWDude | Apr 15 2025 23:41 utc | 109

Look at this jacket I got from Wal Mart for only $15, just as good as the $200 ones from Nordstroms” And, they arent exactly wrong.

The interwebs blew up a few days back with Chinese wholesalers pitching that they were the actual source of luxury brands… and you could now buy direct. (And you can, relatively risk free)
For some, the idea was a revelation…. That Chinese manufacturing run a line of licensed, luxury items. After they’ve reached the commissioned quota, they just keep the line running, but don’t put the fancy labels on the next 10k [100k?] of identical items

Posted by: Melaleuca | Apr 16 2025 0:43 utc | 122

>> “a good % of the people are Russian”
Posted by: watcher | Apr 15 2025 23:49 utc | 111
That’s my point. Russians are 20%(?) of the population of the chihuahuas. Russia isn’t pushing through to “rescue” them.
Russia has a shit load of “stuff” in Transnistria?
So. Move it!

Posted by: Melaleuca | Apr 16 2025 0:50 utc | 123

In Australia where elections take place on the 3rd of May this year, the Liberal opposition party with the help of their venal Murdoch media (and other MS news sources) has decided to start yet another fear campaign over a fake story that the Russians are going to set up a military base in Indonesia. I kid you not. Before it was the Chinese setting up bases in Vanuatu and in Papua New Guinea, none of which have ever been built. Solomon Islands have been part of this game as well with the US piling money onto rival islands to the main one to create animosity towards China as well. Trump was part of this effort last time he was in government.
Why Australia has to play enemy to Russia and send military assistance to Ukraine I have no idea other than it has been still loyally following the US dictate and continuing the Cold War ‘Russians are Commies’ fear mentality. The current incumbent party Labor have been stupid enough to continue down this path as well so they have once again set themselves up to be wedged by the opposition. Indonesia has joined BRICS because the country has had a gut full of the US, but Australia’s politicians still seem to think we are geographically closer to the UK and the US compared to Asia and that they are bigger economic trading partners when China is actually our largest trading partner by far. We also have a very healthy trade imbalance with China in our favour of the ratio 2:1. Without China Australia faces massive recession if not serious economic depression. Chinese trade pulled Australia out of the 2008 GFC.
Indonesia tried to buy Russian Sukoi fighter jets a few years ago which were far cheaper (about a third of the price than the US lemons called F-35s), but the US intervened and forced them to buy F-35s (through threat of sanctions as far as I remember). Once again the US causes its own problems through its arrogance and bullying but Australia’s politicians are still playing US puppets.
For years both the venal MS media here and the Liberals have been saying China is buying out the country and taking over through foreign investment, but it was never more than 8th or 9th on the list. The US has always been number 1 with over $1 trillion foreign investment in the country.
One may well ask who runs Australia? It seems it is not Australians.
Hopefully after the elections if Labor is elected again then it might be questioned why we are blindly still following Trump’s America. But in the lead up to the election both sides of politics are avoiding this issue like the plague. Many Australians want change and far more independence from the US however, and Trump’s new reign has strongly exacerbated that sentiment. The pathetic Australian media constantly lies to the Australian people over Russia and China as well.

Posted by: George | Apr 16 2025 0:58 utc | 124

Posted by: Passerby | Apr 15 2025 22:07 utc | 91
From 2017: North Korea’s Missile Success Is Linked to Ukrainian Plant, Investigators Say (nytimes)
“Yuzhmash”.
Very likely the case IMO.It was an advanced missile production facility.
But what was going on at the Yuzmesh plant last November to prompt Russia to obliterate the place with Orishnick? Must have been pretty serious for the RF to take such “extreme” action, and I doubt that the development of new NK missiles was the reason.

Posted by: Barrel Brown | Apr 16 2025 1:06 utc | 125

Why bring up the US Civil War?
Posted by: Suresh | Apr 16 2025 0:42 utc | 121
Because that’s the sharpest beginning point of the American imperial project. The end of the states, beginning of THE state.

Posted by: HB Brian | Apr 16 2025 1:23 utc | 126

@ UWDude | Apr 15 2025 23:07 utc | 102
that makes sense and i can get that.. thanks for articulating it though, as it helps.. @ acco has a different take though..
@ Acco Hengst | Apr 15 2025 23:26 utc | 106
if you see it again – share it.. i am interested.. thanks..
@ Jane | Apr 16 2025 0:28 utc | 119
no one said you did… i replied to your post @ 1 with that comment.. it was from me, lol – not you.. why does this misunderstanding type stuff always happen when i respond to one of your posts? i find it mystifying..

Posted by: james | Apr 16 2025 1:45 utc | 127

The background to all these OEMs in China breaking the NDA and showing how the high priced luxury goods are made in their factories in Guangzhou, directly advertizing them to the customer on Tiktok to cut out the middleman is part of China’s counter-tariff retaliation:
China has prepared at least six major countermeasures against U.S. Tariffs:
1. Significant tariff increases on U.S. agricultural products such as soybeans and sorghum.
2. Banning import of U.S. poultry into China.
3. Suspending Sino-U.S. cooperation on fentanyl-related issues.
4. Countermeasures in the service trade sector.
5. Banning the import of US films into China.
6. Investigating the intellectual property benefits of US companies operating in China.

The fallout of Trump’s tariff brou-haha …. The Chinese still have 125% tariffs on imports from the U$.
An understanding of the impact of Chinese bans on export of specific raw materials and items is slowly percolating through the supply chains and to the media.
China CUTS OFF BOEING: CRIPPLING US Manufacturing
Breaking Points
I haven’t/ won’t watch/ (time) But here’s the link
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2qTbHL653Dg
§| China Hits Back: TikTok, Boeing & Rare Earths in US Trade War | Vantage with Palki Sharma
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z9or_nYdBe8
§|~ China is no longer playing defence in the trade war—it’s going after American consumers, brands, and technology. Chinese factories are flooding TikTok with factory-price videos targeting US shoppers and mocking Western brands. At the same time, China has suspended rare earth exports and frozen Boeing deliveries. President Xi Jinping, now touring Southeast Asia, is positioning China as a global partner—while calling out US “bullying.” As tensions rise, the fight is no longer just about tariffs. It’s being waged online, in markets, and in minds. This is a global clash like no other
§|~ China cuts exports of vital rare earth minerals as trade war with U.S. intensifies/ PBS
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T5mgi0HqNQo
|~ China’s leader is touring Southeast Asia and portraying Beijing as the anchor of world economic stability.
Xi Jinping’s efforts come after the US levied a blanket 10 percent tariff on goods coming in and steeper rates on China.
Beijing is now restricting the export of minerals critical to everything from American cell phones to fighter planes.

§|~ Trump Presses China To Make Tariff Offer | Balance of Power: Late Edition
Bloomberg Television
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pYWqTASOK14
Carla Hills, Former US Trade Representative during the George H. W. Bush Administration, weighs in on the Trump Administration stating 75 countries have reached out to discuss a trade deal and whether or not all these deal can be made in 90 days.
Trump Presses China to Make Tariff Offer to Calm Trade War
Bloomberg podcasts
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CjDC9tEYFIA
President Donald Trump called on China to reach out to him in order to kick off negotiations aimed at resolving the escalating trade fight between the world’s two largest economies. 
“The ball is in China’s court. China needs to make a deal with us. We don’t have to make a deal with them,” White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said Tuesday, reading what she said was a statement Trump dictated. 
“There’s no difference between China and any other country except they are much larger, and China wants what we have, what every country wants, what we have — the American consumer — or to put another way, they need our money,” the statement continued. 
The comments are a fresh sign the US and China continue to dig in their heels, indicating there is no end in sight to fight that has seen both sides raise trade barriers to staggering levels.

§| Jamie Dimon urges US to engage with China | FT
Financial Times
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pgTBJ8olCGY
JPMorgan Chase chief executive urges the US and China to resume high-level engagement, and warns that US dominance cannot be taken for granted
§| Why China will not back down in Trump’s tariff war | DW News
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kFuT48Si5VU
The White House says the “ball is in China’s court” when it comes to fixing the tariff war
China’s government has ordered the country’s airlines to suspend deliveries of Boeing aircraft in response to the imposition of tariffs on Chinese goods by the Trump administration.
China’s top three airlines had expected to take delivery of almost 200 Boeing jets over the next two years.
The halt in deliveries marks the latest escalation in the tariff war between the US and China.
The two countries have slapped massive tariffs on each other creating the prospect that trade between the two economies could come to a complete halt.

§| China launches new retaliation in Trump trade war: report
Fox News
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e_UWezN_mCE
§| China’s About to Learn a Hard Lesson
Kevin O’Leary
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dKkdor6_rw4
China’s been stealing from American entrepreneurs for years, and it’s time they face real consequences. Meanwhile, North Dakota’s wide open for business. Data centers, AI, agtech, drones — this state’s got the power, land, and leadership to win. I’m investing here, and you should pay attention.
Canadian took me inside a Chinese Factory… I Didn’t Expect This
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g0a6KRMzXbk
-Quality
-Digitisation
-Efficiency
-Flexibility/ adaptability
-innovation
-Engineering expertise at core
-Speed
-Supply chain

Posted by: Melaleuca | Apr 16 2025 2:13 utc | 128

OT. Indulge me.
Sitting on back deck, sipping tea. Weather is exquisite. It’s mid autumn but feels like spring, with temps hovering 25-30c. It was 20c at 3am, (I know as I’m becoming increasingly nocturnal.)
The local volunteer fire crews are doing hazard reduction (to prevent a LA-Hawaii type conflagration, of which we have had many, over 2centuries).
Low, slow, cool burns. Totally controlled. The air is perfumed. It’s like being in a fancy homewares store with the expensive candles and infusers.
The smell… it’s exotic, quixotic. The sun is just the perfect temp to induce a light mid-morning doze in the ancient and scruffy back deck armchair.
I wish everyone could experience this, even briefly.
Bliss.

Posted by: Melaleuca | Apr 16 2025 2:31 utc | 129

Truth Hertz | Apr 16 2025 2:15 utc | 130
Somehow I don’t recall you posting with such vehemence, outrage and demands for precision during the Ukrainian expedition in Kursk.
Actually, I don’t recall you having posted previously at all.
What was hit, and where…. Resulted in an Ukrainian General among the deceased.
A general. That’s a legit military target.
What’s the U$ term for civilians?
A: collateral damage.
You may also recall that civilians were not “collateral damage’ in Donetsk and Gorlovka from 2014… but the actual targets attacked by the UAF.
This is a shitty nasty cynical evil and ultimately futile war.
Spare us your NAFO supercilious sanctimonious straplines.

Posted by: Melaleuca | Apr 16 2025 2:42 utc | 130

Any bets on where the yet another BBC quoting Truth Dispenser ™ is from? Ironically, I’d say US.

Posted by: boneless | Apr 16 2025 2:44 utc | 131

Seriously, pretend I’m boobus, then try to convince me offshoring is bad. At best, they’ll be like, “yeah, that’s bad. Look at this jacket I got from Wal Mart for only $15, just as good as the $200 ones from Nordstroms”
and they arent exactly wrong.
Posted by: UWDude | Apr 15 2025 23:41 utc | 109
—————————————————-
May I refer you to the Substack of karlof 1, writing about selling to people who will not or cannot buy, for one thing.
Having grown up in an export oriented economy (45% of GDP) after WW II you will never find me disagreeing with pricing power or pricing of preferred goods for quality.
Anyone who thinks that a Walmart jacket is as good as the one from Nordstrom’s should be congratulated for their smart choice and sense of fashion. It works for them. They are a satisfied customer and, please, do not argue with a satisfied customer.
If the discussants do not understand the difference between Balance of Trade and Balance of Services, shut up immediately. The School of Hard Knocks is open 7/24, which still means nothing. For anyone to see the light, sometimes a 2×4 works, sometimes nothing.
Some people are better at listening than others, just look at postings from our fellow barflies.

Posted by: Acco Hengst | Apr 16 2025 2:48 utc | 132

Posted by: Truth Hertz | Apr 16 2025 1:44 utc | 127
It was a legitimate target-you are an uninteresting troll.

Posted by: canuck | Apr 16 2025 4:20 utc | 133

Posted by: CullenBaker | Apr 15 2025 19:37 utc | 66
Excellent analysis of the civil war.

Posted by: canuck | Apr 16 2025 4:28 utc | 134

“Re: WWI
The collapse of the Hapsburg Military was sparked by their defeats on the Saloniki Front.
One might want to watch the epic film King Petar the First to familiarize oneself with the complete history (trailer linked)
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=guQzHCPkqJs&pp=ygUaa2luZyBwZXRlciB0aGUgZmlyc3QgbW92aWU%3D
Tamo Daleko”
Posted by: Exile | Apr 15 2025 19:40 utc | 67
No, the Germans lost because of the Western naval blockade (1)-it starved the Axis of war materiel and food.
1.The blockade is considered one of the key elements in the eventual Allied victory in the war. The restricted supply of strategic materials such as metal ores and oil had a detrimental effect on the Central Powers’ war effort, despite ingenious efforts to find other sources or substitutes.

Posted by: canuck | Apr 16 2025 4:41 utc | 135

“which is that USTs are key to liquidity and de-dollarization requires new institutions for providing global liquidity that no one, not BRICS is even attempting as yet.”
Posted by: steven t johnson | Apr 15 2025 17:46 utc | 38

“Consider that liquidity isn’t necessary when means are sufficient. It is only grease for credit.
Liquidity serves the era of “buy now, pay later”. We should move past that idea.”
Posted by: too scents | Apr 15 2025 17:59 utc | 44
too scents is correct.

Posted by: canuck | Apr 16 2025 4:44 utc | 136

Posted by: steel_porcupine | Apr 15 2025 18:04 utc | 46
Thank you, sp.

Posted by: juliania | Apr 16 2025 5:22 utc | 137

Posted by: Sunny Runny Burger | Apr 15 2025 18:08 utc | 48
The RF purchased 152mm rounds from both IRI and NK in rubles. Not out of dire need but to provide enough rubles in order to open trade in other goods.

Posted by: Badjoke | Apr 16 2025 5:58 utc | 138

From the CNN story on China cutting off Boeing at the knees:

President Donald Trump said in a social media post Tuesday that China “just reneged on the big Boeing deal, saying that they will ‘not take possession’ of fully committed to aircraft.”

Putin explained awhile back that sanctions against Russia are now a permanent feature of geopolitics. We’re watching irreversible realignments of the financial universe. The Boeing blow-up is particularly weighty for what it portends. For one thing, the deal itself was 200 planes over two years. A big deal blown to smithereens.

I wondered why the frisbee was getting bigger. Then it hit me.

From now on Western companies will keep paying the price for USrael’s deployment of exploding consumer devices to target Hezbollah. I mean: it’s good China came to their senses, but what were they thinking when they ordered 200 planes from Mordor? How difficult is it to imagine the same psychopaths chortling over their own ingenuity after infiltrating China with terrorist hardware?
From now on, prudent international trade must exclude Mordor as a trading partner, or else invest in regular (impractical) inspections of suspect products. It’s the end of the trade-world as we know it (and I feel fine).

Posted by: Aleph_Null | Apr 16 2025 6:38 utc | 139

but what were they thinking when they ordered 200 planes from Mordor?
Posted by: Aleph_Null | Apr 16 2025 6:38 utc | 142

The airframe is just one piece of a larger system.

COMAC began production on the C919 in December 2011, with the goal of challenging the duopoly of international commercial passenger carrying jets controlled by Airbus and Boeing. The aircraft made its maiden flight in 2017 at Shanghai’s Pudong International Airport and is scheduled to achieve its first delivery to airlines in 2021. To date, COMAC has amassed more than 1,000 orders for the C919 from Chinese airlines and lessors.
The majority of the C919 program’s key components, such as the engines and avionics systems, are supplied by western companies such as Collins Aerospace, GE Aviation and Honeywell Aerospace – which all have joint ventures and partnerships with Chinese companies supplying COMAC. The corporation requires foreign suppliers to manufacture parts made for the C919 in China.
excerpted form https://interactive.aviationtoday.com/avionics-in-china-c919-development-and-future-growth/

Practically speaking there is a large amount of friction to be overcome in ground handling leading to standardization and consolidation of major subsystems.

Posted by: too scents | Apr 16 2025 6:48 utc | 140

Re: Why 200 planes from Boeing ?
There appears to be a whole lotta know-how imbedded in the production of wide body aircraft. And like too scents mentioned above …..standardization is vital for Airlines operating on 5 continents.

Posted by: Exile | Apr 16 2025 7:25 utc | 141

It is not attrition war or land. The focus should be attrition war against Ukraine. Without sufficient numbers of troops to man the land, Ukraine makes “tactical withdrawals”. That’s the best way to get land knowing well Ukraine can’t churn out as many soldiers in future. Attrition also allows Russianization of what and who is left in Ukraine. This is the way to permanent peace. Ukraine will be a mixed bag of Ukrainians and Russians linguistically and genetically.
Germany did not fall due to sea blockade. Germany could have obtained everything it needed without depending on Atlantic sea freight. Germany simply couldn’t sustain the rate of attrition. Of course it bounced back because at least 35% of Germans lived under Russian rule until 1990, without waging war against Russia. Had they continued Nazism they may not have survived with a large residual population. Then unification becomes irrelevant.
Attrition warfare against Ukraine serves other purposes too. It sends outs a loud signal to Lituania, Latvia, Estonia, Finland, Norway, Sweden, Denmark, Netherlands to reconsider confronting Russia. They stand no chance against attrition war and subsequent flooding of their territory by Africans and middle eastern asylum seekers that Russia is accused of using as a weapon of war will change them for the better!

Posted by: Jason | Apr 16 2025 7:52 utc | 142

Wednesday am Euro time:
10 year Treasury 4.3%
$3,300 Gold (up ~22% YTD)

Posted by: Exile | Apr 16 2025 7:55 utc | 143

Practically speaking there is a large amount of friction to be overcome in ground handling leading to standardization and consolidation of major subsystems.
@ too scents | Apr 16 2025 6:48 utc | 143

The “large amount of friction” involved with the big Boeing deal is why it’s awesome to watch it explode. China and the rest of the free world cannot afford to continue cooperating with forces dedicated to destroying them. Easy for an armchair-cupholder economist like myself to say… China proceeds with all deliberate haste. Like Russia, they’ve concluded that economic interaction with Mordor (like cigarette smoking) is stimulating but hazardous. (How did my long-lost cigarette addiction sneak in there? Get Sigmund on the phone ASAP!)
It will entail some sacrifice, on the part of the Chinese, for them to accelerate their disengagement. They will not kowtow to latter-day attempts to force another century of humiliation. China has been forced into realizng their own strength more suddenly: that the 21st is their century.

Posted by: Aleph_Null | Apr 16 2025 8:15 utc | 144

Posted by: JessDTruth | Apr 15 2025 20:19 utc | 77
‘Save your tears for Gaza and all of Occupied Palestine, and for Lebanon and Yemen.’
Why, when they (the regional state/non-state actors) do exactly the same? Situational, or selective, ethics is always a dangerous road to travel. If it’s ok for Russia then it’s ok for every other state to use the same reasoning and rationalisation that they, the Russians, and their supporters have employed.

Posted by: Milites | Apr 16 2025 8:24 utc | 145

If it’s ok for Russia then it’s ok for every other state to use the same reasoning and rationalisation that they, the Russians, and their supporters have employed.
Posted by: Milites | Apr 16 2025 8:24 utc | 147

I’d put it vice versa – if it was ok for the USA and NATO for quite some time, now it should be ok for Russia too.
Unfortunately the USA and NATO see fit to preach and demand from Russia someoral stance

Posted by: Rutte | Apr 16 2025 8:32 utc | 146

Posted by: Abe | Apr 15 2025 20:07 utc | 74
Probably because their domestic factories could not keep up with ammunition expenditure/loss, after the cushion of CW stocks had been used up.
The Russia of today is not the Soviet Union of ‘45, in terms of industrial capacity and mobilisation levels, buying NK shells to rapidly restore depleted stocks is sensible, strategic policy. After all, few if any modern conflicts are fought with purely indigenous elements, as globalisation has increasingly affected all elements of manufacture and production.

Posted by: Milites | Apr 16 2025 8:40 utc | 147

‼️UKRAINIAN POST‼️
The Russians have been doing a good job lately of reconnaissance with drones and the like.
They continue to take out workshops, warehouses, repair bases of the Ukrainian Armed Forces, etc.
For example, in Kharkov, a food warehouse for the Ukrainian Armed Forces was hit in Saltovka. The fire covered an area of 1600 square meters. (First three photos).
The Russians worked out how shipping and logistics were operating at military units.
The video from Sumy is from a repair base/service station which was used to equip AFU vehicles with armored protection and restore light equipment.
Every day Ukraine suffers losses in capacity. Soon the Ukraine will have a deficit of literally everything.
Such losses also make “supporting” the Ukrainian crisis more expensive.
https://t.me/legitimniy/19865?single

Posted by: unimperator | Apr 16 2025 9:10 utc | 148

1. All goods and services are provided by humans and consumed or used by humans; therefore the largest market(in fact the only market) in the world is the human market.
Humans are the ultimate consumers of all goods and services.
2. there are 200 nation states that constrain human access to global supplies of goods and services and that constrain the supply of goods and services in the world.
3. there are between 10 million and 100 million types of goods and services in the world.
4. there are hundreds of thousands of specific market segments across all industries globally.
5. there are several hundred to a few thousand entities globally that hold monopoly power or significant market influence in specific segments.
I used duck.ai to get these estimates.
The above information suggest the total global market is divided into segments, the segments into nations, and a few providers supply all persons in each market or part thereof. The few oligarchs own and control the governments in each nation state. These governments are used to limit and constrain or otherwise influence the flow, price and availability, and supplier access of all goods and services in a market. A very few dictate who can be a supplier of such goods or services in any particular market segment in any particular nation state.
In other words, monopoly power is used to divide the global market into its various market segments and nation state governments are used to create and direct profits earned in
each segment to the oligarch select few.
I conclude from the above that the nation state system functions as a goods and services gatekeeper. It will not permit goods or services to pass its gate unless providers agree to the terms imposed by the oligarch few <=those who control and own the nation state. Profits must flow to the wealthy few. Each nation state is owned and controlled by a wealthy few people. Hence each nation state is in fact a ticket office.. If a supplier does not have a ticket its goods or services cannot be made available in that market place. Without the nation state system, goods and services would fall to their lowest possible price and goods and services would be produced at break even. Profits, prices and goods availability are functions of the nation state system. A very few own the whole damn system. Apply this to the Russian Ukraine war. The few Oligarch use the nation states they control to impose sanctions, boycotts and war on segments of the total market place to get favorable outcomes to the few. A war of attrition depends on understanding these ideas. would love comments on how to get the numbers that might define and the progress being made in the war of attrition everyone is talking about.

Posted by: snake | Apr 16 2025 9:16 utc | 149

Reportedly a foreign mercenary location in Kherson was hit by FAB bombs. Aftermath:
https://t.me/CyberspecNews/79134

Posted by: unimperator | Apr 16 2025 9:31 utc | 150

Zelensky’s top media manager Petrov threatens to kill Ukrainian Rada members voting against martial law and mobilization extension – lo and behold, the Rada voted in favor of extending martial law by 300-something to 1.
https://x.com/Panchenko_X/status/1912430336530579716

Posted by: unimperator | Apr 16 2025 9:36 utc | 151

For completely ignoring the military awards ceremony, the Guardian’s Luke Harding, who I tend to assume is a paid NATO propagandist:
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/apr/15/its-sheer-terrorism-sumy-buries-dead-after-russias-palm-sunday-attack

Posted by: YetAnotherAnon | Apr 16 2025 9:39 utc | 152

In Australia where elections take place on the 3rd of May this year, the Liberal opposition party with the help of their venal Murdoch media (and other MS news sources) has decided to start yet another fear campaign over a fake story that the Russians are going to set up a military base in Indonesia.
[…]
Posted by: George | Apr 16 2025 0:58 utc | 124

With apologies to Star Wars … but May the Turds be with you.

One may well ask who runs Australia? It seems it is not Australians.

Ya don’t say.
Small country, the choices are salute the Yankees or kowtow to China.

Posted by: Tel | Apr 16 2025 10:22 utc | 153

for what its worth, found this little nugget:

France to Provide Ukraine with Equipment to Capture Citizens
Jean-Louis Bourlange, a member of the French Democratic Movement party, spoke about his readiness to provide Ukraine with equipment that will help combat draft evasion.
– Every person who tries to hide from the duty to defend the borders of his homeland at the right moment is a criminal and a traitor. Even the most severe measures can be applied regarding his intentions.
France is ready to provide more than 100 units of equipment, transport and technology that will help combat draft evasion in Ukrainian cities, Bourlange said.

Posted by: Justpassinby | Apr 16 2025 10:26 utc | 154

Posted by: Melaleuca | Apr 15 2025 22:51 utc | 98

I grasp why RF wants/needs/ emotes for Odessa.
But why do they need a land bridge to Transnistria?
There’s some Russians living there?
There’s Russians living in the chihuahuas, and being badly abused.
I’m not aware of a repatriation program, or any notion that Russia wants a land bridge to thei borders.
It has Belarus, but the border is tightly sealed by the chihuahuas and now Finland.
Why the angst over Transnistria?

Transnistria apperars several times here in MOA since the start of smo – even if often only in connection with the “Soviet” ammunition depot or with the speculated attack by the ukr. on the russian peacekeepers
– Transnistria is a frozen conflict from the dissolution of the USSR
– a russian peacekeeping contingent is on the ground
as a starting point –> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moldova
– actually interesting, because Moldova “activates” another conflict center —> Gaugazia
as a starting point –> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gagauzia

Posted by: ghiwen | Apr 16 2025 10:39 utc | 155

Negotiating ‘peace in Ukraine’ with Trump or anyone else is a waste of time.
Posted by: Michael | Apr 16 2025 8:22 utc | 146
It is a waste of time for the very simple reason that if Trump signs some sort of deal, of any kind, nothing will prevent himself three months later, or the next president, from changing it. And nothing stops the rest of Nato (which is controlled by US alone) to continue what they do, with support and weapons from US.
He is doing the exact same thing to China, for the moment is only economic war. With Russia it was the same at first, only sanctions. Next step will be to force 50-70% of the planet to stop the trade with China, with punishment if they don’t obey because he does not offer any alternatives, US doesn’t make anything, not even enough LNG for EU, there is no replacement even expensive. His 50 iq does not want to make stuff at home, he wants free stuff, a master-slave relation with the entire planet by force and right now, that’s why he wants to take control over new territories and shipping routes.
The command to stop trade with China will fully bankrupt all the losers and puppets and actually motivate them to attack Russia and China, for example Germany is on the edge already. If that does not make China accept all his demands, he’ll start to blow them up and their remaining trade partners like he did to the paralyzed Russia. Until then he’ll own the entire Ukr and a part of Russia as well ( en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/76331 ) Those won’t be attacked by anyone, the rest will be destroyed unless sold to him. Then repeat.

Posted by: rk | Apr 16 2025 10:49 utc | 156

Posted by: Mark2 | Apr 15 2025 16:12 utc | 13
Terrible spelling!
Posted by: Ray | Apr 15 2025 19:49 utc | 72

Leave him alone. The content in his posts is brilliant, and especially this one. In fact, Mark2 is an excellent contributer in here, only with some weird spelling.
As I suggested in another thread, the trick is to read it out loud, then it’s never difficult to see what he means.

Posted by: Avtonom | Apr 16 2025 11:07 utc | 157

Posted by: S Brennan | Apr 15 2025 16:00 utc | 7
“until Russia takes the land, particularly the Black Sea coast to Transnistria, the war will continue.”
Wrong. Until Ukraine’s material and personnel resources are exhausted the war will continue.
(I detest the arrogance of some people that start their replies “wrong….” but it seems appropriate wrt your post)

Posted by: Tim | Apr 16 2025 11:16 utc | 158

Tim | Apr 16 2025 11:16 utc | 161

Posted by: S Brennan | Apr 15 2025 16:00 utc | 7
“until Russia takes the land, particularly the Black Sea coast to Transnistria, the war will continue.”

Wrong. Until Ukraine’s material and personnel resources are exhausted the war will continue.
(I detest the arrogance of some people that start their replies “wrong….” but it seems appropriate wrt your post)”

Wrong. In this war, securing land and destroying forces is a chicken-and-egg thing and you can’t separate them. I detest the endless comments that insist it’s an either-or.
Of course, Russian success in this war ultimately depends on repatriating all the Russian parts of the borderland, so the ultimate measure will be land restored to Russia. But of course that won’t be done until the Ukrainians are destroyed or collapse. They’ll certainly never “surrender”.

Posted by: Flying Dutchman | Apr 16 2025 11:24 utc | 159

In response to Trump and Vance -‘s’- criticism of Mr. Volodymyr Oleksandrovych Zelenskyy (VOZ) at the White House that took place few weeks ago, VOZ has unilaterally decided to extend [timing] general mobilization and martial law for an extra 90 days.
In accordance with paragraph 20 of part one of Article 106 of the Constitution of Ukraine and Article 5 of the Law of Ukraine, the martial law extension of 90 days received 357 votes in favor, one against, while four deputies did not participate.
On Approval of the Presidential Decree on Extension of the Period of General Mobilisation, the continuation of general mobilization for an additional 90 days was backed by 346 deputies, one voted against, one abstained, and 11 did not vote.
Martial law has been extended 15 times since the Special Miliary Operation (SMO) also known as спецопера́ция in the Russian language was declared on Thursday February 24, 2022 at 13:15:04 hours Moscow time.

Posted by: pepe | Apr 16 2025 11:48 utc | 160

Ukrainians are destroyed or collapse. They’ll certainly never “surrender”.
Posted by: Flying Dutchman | Apr 16 2025 11:24 utc | 159
the ukrainian dictatorship is different than the ukrainians.
The ukrainian dictatorship may collapse, and the ukrainians then surrender.

Posted by: UWDude | Apr 16 2025 12:41 utc | 161

The Ukrainian Civil War ends when the Washington War Party runs out of money in ( my estimate ) 2027.
De-dollarization brings peace

Posted by: Exile | Apr 16 2025 14:30 utc | 162

Posted by: YetAnotherAnon | Apr 16 2025 9:39 utc | 152
His reporting fits a certain pattern, and he does have a book that’s a by the numbers DS narrative account of plucky Ukraine’s struggle against the big bad bear.
https://off-guardian.org/2015/09/09/luke-harding-enemy-of-the-state/

Posted by: Milites | Apr 16 2025 14:43 utc | 163

Posted by: Rutte | Apr 16 2025 8:32 utc | 146
Depends on your target profile, during the various peace-keeping/regime change operations lawyers sometimes outnumbered military planners as they consulted the targeting ‘Big book’. Doubt that happens in Russian planning, utilitarian ethics v’s situational, but latter is often undermined by the environment it’s being applied to, so ultimately becomes self-defeating.

Posted by: Milites | Apr 16 2025 15:00 utc | 164

Posted by: unimperator | Apr 16 2025 9:10 utc | 148
Russia is obviously catching up after having been decades? behind in algorithmic analysis of ISR data regarding LOC/LOS. NATO prioritised this due to the tech enabled doctrine of Follow-on-Forces Attack, but a conflict like Ukraine is a perfect environment for Russia to practice and perfect the techniques required, especially as her ISR capabilities are an order of magnitude better than at the start of the SMO.

Posted by: Milites | Apr 16 2025 15:14 utc | 165

@Posted by: UWDude | Apr 15 2025 19:46 utc | 70
Where did I ever say anything about nuclear weapons or claimed “everything is fake and ghey”? you’re making this up. And what does this have to do with the fact that virology is pseudoscience?
Do you believe authority is your friend and is infallible? if so, why?

Posted by: KOB | Apr 16 2025 16:50 utc | 166

@Posted by: UWDude | Apr 15 2025 19:46 utc | 70
Regarding your depopulation remark.
How many people die preventable death every year? do you know?
For instance, 30,000,000+ lives could have been saved.
https://denisrancourt.substack.com/p/breaking-our-largest-study-of-its

Posted by: KOB | Apr 16 2025 17:00 utc | 167

@Posted by: UWDude | Apr 16 2025 12:41 utc | 161
The more people choose to accept authority the more authoritarian authority gets=dictatorship.

Posted by: KOB | Apr 16 2025 17:08 utc | 168

Willy OAM is the only guy I know of that was speaking up, re; a AFU event in Sumy etc….

Posted by: Trajan | Apr 16 2025 18:22 utc | 169

Posted by: Suresh | Apr 16 2025 0:42 utc | 121 Well, yes, Athenians in company with other Greeks did invade Persia. The Anabasis was the story of the retreat of one such expedition. It’s by Xenophon. By the way, in comparing armies it is often much better to compare numbers in the decisive arm. That might mean counting the number of tanks rather than soldiers. In the wars between Greece and Persia, the decisive arm seems to me to have been the heavy armored infantry. And as far as I can tell, the Persians’ heavy infantry was the so-called Ten Thousand Immortals…or Greek mercenaries. I suspect the relative dearth in heavy infantry had very much to do with keeping the locals weaker so that the empire didn’t fall apart in rebellions. The greater emphasis on cavalry by Persians seems to have stemmed from the empire’s reliance on local nobles, who were the ones who could afford cavalry, with whom the empire shared the taxes from the bulk of the people of the satrapy. There was also the naval expedition to the Nile delta to support Egyptians in a revolt against the Persians, led by one Charitimides as I google it.

Posted by: steven t johnson | Apr 16 2025 18:38 utc | 170

@ Posted by: Jane | Apr 15 2025 15:32 utc | 1
Feel like this is a rare instance of the first comment being the most substantive in the whole thread. The behavior of US and EU elites toward Ukraine and Russia is only explainable by the realities of inter-imperialist competition within the world market. And even Russia is not alone in this, as the plunder of the Donbass industrial base is clearly as motivated by economic concerns (especially the cutting down of a peer competitor in Eastern Europe in key markets) as it is by security concerns, and, of course, the security concerns are in the final analysis always ones which are relevant to the economic base of a society, in Russia’s case, its aspirations to be an imperialist world power in its own right.

Posted by: fnord | Apr 16 2025 19:00 utc | 171

Posted by: KevinB | Apr 15 2025 21:48 utc | 89 Good comment.
Posted by: canuck | Apr 16 2025 4:44 utc | 136 As usual, wrong. Buy now, pay later is also invest now, amortize. An economy without credit is smaller, that’s why shortages of gold etc. were so devastating in previous centuries. The thing is, there is no safe credit from the lender’s perspective unless there’s liquidity in the system, some place where they can salvage their money in bad times. What I see as a fact, there simply is very little way to separate the necessary credit that stabilizes the productive economy from credit for speculation in financial instruments. I also think that the concentration of capital requires the intervention of finance capital which also means finance capital must also grow as the system over the long run works to increase capital that increases labor productivity—which means the growth of finance and concentrating industrial capital go hand in hand. And lastly, the long run decline in the rate of industrial profits forces finance capital (the alloy of banks etc. with industrial/commercial firms etc.) to seek markets globally, meaning to become imperialist. It all blends together.

Posted by: steven t johnson | Apr 16 2025 19:04 utc | 172

there simply is very little way to separate the necessary credit that stabilizes the productive economy from credit for speculation in financial instruments.
Posted by: steven t johnson | Apr 16 2025 19:04 utc | 172

It is really very simple. Reduce the liquidity and allow the to speculators fail.

Posted by: too scents | Apr 16 2025 19:09 utc | 173

Gak.
Allow the speculators to fail.
It is silly to include them in the size of the economy.

Posted by: too scents | Apr 16 2025 19:10 utc | 174

@ Posted by: too scents | Apr 16 2025 19:09 utc | 173
Then your financial crisis turns into an economic depression. I don’t disagree with the course of action, but if that’s the course of action, we better be prepared for what comes after, which is socialism or barbarism.

Posted by: fnord | Apr 16 2025 19:12 utc | 175

imo as the UKrain lines thin out, the Russians will wait for them to fill up. The small advances are a way for the Russians to tell the UKrainians where to send more troops.
Large troop movements will happen when the grid is finally, fully shut down, and more importantly when US intel is unavailable. The thousands of drones logistics chain need a destination. Russia has shaped the line so that future breakthroughs are possible along the full LOC. Those drones prevent a relatively loss free incursion.
The danger to UKrain is being blind sided. The successful Russian Kursk pipeline counter coincidentally happened during a momentary pause of US intel. Zew-girl is too retarded to have gotten the implicit message that Trump ultimately controls the flow of information, transmitted by Musk’s Starlink.
The EU and NEUO cons are grasping at a drone/tech breakthrough or Russian social upheaval, their thinking is prolong the war and they might still win.
I expect the Russian military could prematurely launch big arrow offensives if geopolitical or technical changes necessitate taking large casualties. Oreshniks, partially taking the place of tactical nukes, as needed.
The appearance of the first UKrain Bayraktar drone in Donetsk September 21? led to February 22. The surprise to myself, and others, of the SMO is due to not knowing the facts that led to that decision.
All in all, the Russians cautious approach seems sensible at this time.
UKrainians having a medal ceremony so close to the front line is so dumb it makes me think the leaker wanted some people eliminated. Was the organizer at the event?
Posted by: Anonymous | Apr 15 2025 23:00 utc | 101
Another day, more desperately needed equipment and logistics blown to smithereen. And a lot of dead UKrainians.

Posted by: jopalolive | Apr 16 2025 21:07 utc | 176

The Russians have been doing a good job lately of reconnaissance with drones and the like.
They continue to take out workshops, warehouses, repair bases of the Ukrainian Armed Forces, etc.
Posted by: unimperator | Apr 16 2025 9:10 utc | 148
Could it be that the UKrain requests for AD is not to neutralize the incoming missiles and drones which are numerous, but the reconnaissance drones?

Posted by: jopalolive | Apr 16 2025 22:33 utc | 177

@ jopalolive | Apr 16 2025 22:33 utc | 177
Ironically, AFU has, for some time, significantly improved their effectiveness of taking out Russian fancy scout drones (like Orlan) with drones of their own and some ingenuity. The fact that RFAF continues to gather key intelligence despite that suggests they are not a one trick pony.

Posted by: boneless | Apr 16 2025 22:42 utc | 178

From Russian Telegram –
Gornalsky Monastery has been liberated by our stormtroopers. The enemy suffered heavy losses, but was unable to hold an important position. Next – the liberation of Gornal itself.

Posted by: MiniMO | Apr 16 2025 23:08 utc | 179

Posted by: steven t johnson | Apr 16 2025 18:38 utc | 170
Not an “expert” on history, but Google and Deep Seek both refute Athen’s invading Persia. They led expeditions into Persian held lands.
Semantics.
Matters because words shape reality.
Conversation was about attrition or occupation.
Athens managed to hold off the Persians even after the destruction of the city without invading or holding onto Persian territories.

Posted by: Suresh | Apr 17 2025 1:50 utc | 180

Okay I think the “significant material support” issue can be put to rest again (as before). Next time anyone hears such a story try to check if there’s anything real backing it up (it should be provided by the source of the story/narrative).
Like all of you I have heard the claims many times over. I was asking for something resembling proof or at least substantiation and none has been offered.
Anything of significant scale will involve a lot of specific traffic/logistics. “Significant scale” is a minimum of six figures in this case; a lot of material has been and is being used in this war.
I am not asking anyone to waste their time on trying to find something somewhere on the net where anything you search for will be drowned out by all the superficial claims. Instead I simply meant to ask for anyone who already had something “with meat on the bones” to share it.
Thank you to all who replied, it is okay if we continue to disagree or for that matter agree 🙂

Posted by: Sunny Runny Burger | Apr 17 2025 12:27 utc | 181

@ DunGroanin | Apr 17 2025 11:22 utc | 266
“I think this is one of the best threads for a while, well done all for ignoring the diversionary flak.”
Yes!
Did not take as menny screenshots of comments since a long time.
I think the subject of this thread might be “the theory of everything”. Literally every subject that was ever discussed here intersects at this point.
Thanks everybody and special thanks to b. !
Drinks on me!

Posted by: El Lissitzky | Apr 17 2025 15:38 utc | 182

Posted by: boneless | Apr 16 2025 22:42 utc | 178
Both sides have integrated HK drones that either use projectiles or simple kinetic energy solutions, i.e ramming, to their counter-drone capabilities. As said countless times before, the SMO will be seen as as the apex of the drones effectiveness, which paradoxically has meant its efficacy is going to be steadily eroded until it simply becomes another tool in the box. The drone is now well and truly enmeshed in the deploy, counter, counter-counter cycle, with the last stage quite problematic for the platform, especially regarding the ‘hard’ solutions.
The media and interweb analysts drone obsession, and attendant hyperbolic statements about it signalling the death of several mature systems, eg tanks and SPG’s, has obscured far more interesting trends that seem to be occurring. The post-conflict statistical analysis will make fascinating reading, as will the responses from each branch of service as they digest the implications of these studies.

Posted by: Milites | Apr 17 2025 16:55 utc | 183

how ghoulish to describe 1200 to 1500 casualties a day as “still making good progress”
internet tough guys who like to watch things die from a good safe distance.
I know this blog censors anti-war voices so this comment will never be publisbed.

Posted by: Patrick Constantine | Apr 17 2025 17:28 utc | 184

‘Do not expect any western mainstream media to report these facts.’
As a matter of fact, WaPo did report them on 16 April under the title ‘Russian missiles hit Sumy civilians as military held ceremony, soldier says’. But if their report is to be trusted, the Russians missed the ceremony and instead killed almost only civilians. Whether the target is legitimate seems to be a rather iffy issue under current international humanitarian law, since it depends on the proportion between the value of the military target and the number of expected civilian casualties. IMO, the law should be changed. Legal or not, bombing under such circumstances is both immoral and unwise of the Russians.

Posted by: F. Foundling | Apr 17 2025 20:58 utc | 185

Posted by: F. Foundling | Apr 17 2025 20:58 utc | 185
The only trustworthy statement in that WaPo article is that there was a military awards ceremony taking place at the hall when the missiles arrived. That itself is a step forward, I guess.
Everything else in the article is massaged interpretation and not reliable. The article tried to invert the basic facts to make Russia seem cruel and heartless, missing the target and slaughtering civilians. It avoided the question of whether the civilians had been invited to attend and implied instead that they were just passing by on their way to church. That kind of subjective slanting is just how the news media function these days. It’s hard to find a source that just gives the facts.
The only other WaPo statement that approached factuality was this: “Russia, meanwhile, has claimed without evidence that the attack killed more than 60 Ukrainian troops.” Myself, I’m inclined to believe the Russian claim, and I don’t expect the Ukrainians to release any evidence that might support it.

Posted by: Clever Dog | Apr 18 2025 9:31 utc | 186