|
Trump Bombs Yemen (Short Take)
(The system is acting up on my thus just this short take.)
Fresh US strikes in Yemen with 53 now dead, Houthis say – BBC
Thoughts:
- Bombing Yemen is stupid. The Saudis tried for years to get their way by doing that and were defeated.
- Yemen can and does shoot back.
- It is only a question of time until it hits a U.S. war ship and causes casualties.
- Then Trump will be hard pressed to escalate the war towards Iran.
- Iran can not be defeated.
That's it.
Yeah the Pink Dots! Back when I had a band I was working with, my drummer was a huge fan of them, and it was referential point for our music. I never came round to really listen to them much, as I was playing myself all the time, but this has changed lately, so I shall take the dive. Thanks for that!
On studying philosophy, it’s important to see that this subject cannot produce textbooks like physics or engineering. Language has other qualities than maths (and others than art as well). Its meaning changes over time, and translation is not always easy or even possible. Many thoughts and concepts make full sense only against the background of their times. This so-called “history of ideas” (Ideengeschichte) is at the same time one of the great strengths of studying the field, because it allows to reconstruct a dimension of depth into otherwise flat and only surface-wise “obvious” notions a society operates with day in, day out.
History of ideas is intimately interwoven with general historiography; it’s rich enough for several lifetimes of intensive work, so don’t let it stress you out. It’s better to find an approach which you truly enjoy; this might be a language, a religion, or (the insider’s choice) the history of arts. Also note that this naturally brings up a cultural predicament. European philosophy is not necessarily Euro-centric, as from the C19th that scientists begin to systematically review other traditions. For instance, a guy named Max Müller from Dessau, who was woorking in England, translated and ordered the full Rig Veda, something that no one had done before, not even on the subcontinent. In the process he found a report about the instance they discovered that reincarnation is logically “congruent”, after which it was incorporated into the system … [winking at Runny]. The MoA is such a curious place!
Philosophy is a lived practice more than anything. Books are letters to friends, someone has said, but the real thing is the neverending conversation. Working with another philosopher for me often means that I live them for a while. You don’t need any tools for it, at times not even a common language, and you can do it while high on LSD. You can philosophize with children, with the uneducated, and even with animals about some things (like friendship with a cat).
Plato has captured all this perfectly in his approach to writing about philosophy. Various ‘friends of wisdom’ gather and start a conversation. Sometimes they find nothing, like in his Sophistes, where they are searching for a first principle and have to concede there is none – aside from the basic fact of being conscious, of course. It is from there where Aristotle, who is often misunderstood, chimes in to develop the systematic approach about many a aspecific field of inquiry, including the method of inquiry itself. You would like to read that, eh? It’s only becoming clear with Sonderegger, and for now untranslated. Sorry.
But don’t worry, there is enough good stuff out there. How to find it? Here’s a general rule of thumb: read the original author! It was their idea after all, and usually it’s also them who understood it best. Beware of authors who say, “well this Kant guy was, in general, about right, but he made a little error here and there, and if you allow I shall also fill in where he forgot this and that, etc.”
It’s of course helpful to learn at least one other language for that. The aim is not so much fluency in conversation, but being able to analyse critical passages to get down to their meaning, even if most of it persists on remaining opaque. There is beauty in that, too – the world is not a fully well-ordered collection of entries into an archive, after all. As they say, there are three eminent traditions of systematical Philosophy, given through old Greek, German, and Sanskrit respectively. Other traditions may shine, but their strengths are usually found in a more performative approach to subjects. But you don’t need to read Kant, and certainly not in the original, at some point in the future to make the journey worthwhile. You, melaleuca, are in Autralia, IIRC? Perhaps you can hook up with Patroklos over a beer one day, though I realize it might not be just around the corner for you.
Now, to the question: what to read?
I dare say a “History of Philosophy” will be a good starting point. Many are available, and I can’t recommend one from the english language naturally, as I’m German. It should be fun to read, and I suggest it should be willing to paint the philosophers it is presenting as the people they were, too. There are so many colourful folks out there, it’s great fun to get to know them a little, and it certainly furthers one’s understanding to get acquainted with them in this sense, too. The other practical ressource are the well-tended encyclopedias, such as the Stanford and Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy, which give overview articles that will often represent the state of the discussion fairly well.
Enjoy!
Posted by: persiflo | Mar 19 2025 21:29 utc | 398
|