Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
March 31, 2025
Racist Allied Underestimation Of Russia’s Abilities Led To Its Win

Yesterday I had linked the New York Times whitewashing of President Biden's (proxy) war against Russia:

Today's long-read from the NYT is some weird whitewashing and fake history. Anyone who, during the last three years, has read more than the propaganda from the New York Times already knew each and every of these points:

Alex Cristoforou also remarks on it:

NYT article admits that this was more than proxy war between the US and Russia. It was as close as could be to an all out hot war between the two sides (US and Russia).

NYT however is running cover for the Biden administration. When you read through this very long article, the conclusion is that the Biden administration and US military command were easily defeating Russia until…

  1. The Ukraine Generals started acting up and disobeyed US orders.
  2. Zelensky chased "big wins" for PR reasons, failing to follow US strategy.
  3. Resulting in the 2023 counteroffensive 'failure.' Trust was broken between US and Ukraine.
  4. What followed was the US keeping Ukraine in the game up to the US elections, by striking targets in Crimea and pre-2014 Russia.
  5. Trump entered the WH and decided to wind the war down, handing Russia the win.

"History Is Written by the Victors."
In this case the NYT has decided that the US (under Biden) was victorious, IF not for the insubordinate Ukrainian Generals and ego of Zelensky. Trump will be blamed for the end result capitulation.

👉The article 100% explains why NATO and the Europeans still believe that they can win this war. Peak delusion and propaganda.

The U.S. has in fact lost the war. If you do not believe so (yet) please read this remarkable piece:

‘Please don’t use my name’ A report by journalist Shura Burtin on the growing war weariness among UkrainiansMeduza, Mar 27 2025

The frontline reporting is extremely grim. Ukraine and its army are done with.

But back to the New York Times piece.

Alex Cristoforou's diagnosis of delusion and propaganda does not go deep enough.

A quote from the New York Times piece reveals that a very real factor behind starting and losing the war is pure racism:

Within the coalition, the prevailing wisdom was that the 2023 counteroffensive would be the war’s last: The Ukrainians would claim outright triumph, or Mr. Putin would be forced to sue for peace.

They didn’t have to be as good as the British and Americans, General Cavoli would say; they just had to be better than the Russians.

U.S. General Christopher G. Cavoli is the commander of the United States European Command and Supreme Allied Commander Europe. His lack of historic knowledge and respect of the abilities of Russian soldiers should have disqualified him.

It is for racist people like him that the U.S., UK and Ukraine failed to recognize that have had no chance to win.

Comments

RT 01.04.25
Germany, Great Britain, and France are incapable of a military confrontation with Russia, says former CIA analyst Larry Johnson.
Some Western European states are preparing for a war with Russia for economic reasons, a war they are bound to lose. One such example is Germany, which is preparing for war for economic reasons…and failed miserably. Although the Germans were doing very well during this time, the awakening was terrible.
In the latest episode of the podcast “Judging Freedom,” Andrew Napolitano speaks with former CIA analyst Larry Johnson about the plans of some Western European states to not only prolong the war in Ukraine without US support, but to enter it directly.
Napolitano gets straight to the point:
“Do you think the European elites, the leaders of the EU, or the leaders of NATO are preparing for war against Russia without US support?”
Napolitano is referring to the rearmament plans of Brussels and some EU countries, which intend to incur large-scale debt for the militarization of the European Union. Furthermore, French President Emmanuel Macron and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer have announced the deployment of troops to Ukraine. This step represents a further escalation, clearly aimed at sabotaging US peace efforts.
“Yes, they are talking about it and making preparations. The problem is that they don’t have the necessary resources. Specifically, this means they lack the necessary industrial production capacity and military strength.”
Johnson believes that economic considerations are primarily behind the desperate bellicosity driving both the British Prime Minister and the future German Chancellor, Friedrich Merz. Britain has granted loans to Ukraine and hopes for their repayment, Johnson explains. If Ukraine loses, these loans will “go down the toilet.”
What, by the way, also drives Trump, or rather, he is driven by his financiers, is that if Ukraine capitulates, 100% of investments will be lost, and we’re NOT just talking about billions here, we’re talking about trillions.
German politicians have also hinted several times that their commitment is focused on their own economic interests. One of Germany’s most committed warmongers, CDU MP Roderich Kiesewetter, said back in 2023:
“This is also an extremely economic issue. If Ukraine collapses, the subsequent costs will be much greater than if we intervene much more strongly now. And if Europe wants to complete the energy transition, it needs its own lithium deposits. The largest lithium deposits are in the Donetsk-Luhansk region. (…) So we also have completely different goals in the background here.”
And Merz promised a lot during the election campaign and won’t be able to keep ANYTHING of them, so a war is necessary.
“She said I was a complete idiot” – Fico on a telephone conversation with Ursula von der Leyen
For a real military engagement, Germany, France, and Great Britain lack everything they need to achieve real success on the battlefield.
Do they have the logistics for the necessary troops? Are their armies capable of supplying the troops with food, ammunition, and fuel, which are needed if these nations actually want to play a role on the battlefield? Let’s put it this way: Germany and France are no longer what they were in the 1940s. They were both military powers. But those days are long gone. Germany and France are now just a sickly image of themselves.”
Europe is trying to save its economy before unrest breaks out by switching to a war economy.

Posted by: berthold | Apr 1 2025 15:55 utc | 201

Lavrov hints at 2nd meeting with US
‘I don’t want to make any predictions, but we can see progress made to remove these obstacles’ — Lavrov, referring to sanctions

https://t.me/rtnews/89067

Posted by: Norwegian | Apr 1 2025 15:59 utc | 202

The Lord abhors dishonest scales,
but accurate measures are His delight
Proverbs 11:1
Looks like God is a monetarist 🙂

Posted by: E | Apr 1 2025 16:00 utc | 203

The nytimes article to uncover the “secret partnership”—Now It Can Be Told—is a vehicle itself to *concretize* definitive lies about Project Ukraine, whether concerning North Korean troops fighting w/ Russia or valiant Ukrainian victories in Kharkiv, etc.
As if to set the record straight, finally, and to reveal all hidden elements/actions at last, the nytimes enfranchises its readers, us, into the information it has now uncovered in the interests of full disclosure.
But they perpetuate falsehoods and make up things and fictionalize matters nonetheless.
They lie even when they tell the truth.

Posted by: steel_porcupine | Apr 1 2025 16:05 utc | 204

Europe is throwing a temper tantrum because they see what is coming. America is divorcing itself from Europe and seeking to align itself with Russia. Such an alignment and cooperation would control the Artic. It would give the US access to Russian resources and future markets. It would give Russia access to US capital and technical expertise. It would be a reversion to the mean as well. Prior to the development of the “special relationship” between the US and England that saw the US take up The Great Game, Russia and the US enjoyed good relations. Russia weighed in and kept Britain and France from intervening in the Civil War. Russia relied on the US to counter Britain in the Pacific Northwest and the Alaska sale was made partly to counter British expansion. Teddy Roosevelt was instrumental in negotiating a peace in the Russo-Japanese War.
Anyway, things don’t have to be the way they are and a US divorced from Europe has no reason to be adverse to Russia. Europe would be marginalized both economically and diplomatically in such a situation and they see that coming. As the Cold Warriors die off and the Neocons are marginalized, there is room for rapprochement. The US and Russia just have to keep talking and moving towards normalizing relations regardless of what happens in Ukraine.

Posted by: CullenBaker | Apr 1 2025 16:17 utc | 205

Posted by: steel_porcupine | Apr 1 2025 16:05 utc | 205
RE: *curing* state-sponsored lies
<< The nytimes utilizes a strategy for the purposes of narrative management relative to the state-fostered lies it promulgates. It *replicates* false information, whether it's about Russia's hacking of the DNC server, or the full-bore hoax of "fine people on both sides" & "suckers and losers" as a means of embedding the lie in any repetition of the narrative going forward. Countless examples of this have happened. It then *stovepipes* the falsehood by continually referring back to it again & again, citing all the other media outlets which *reported* it. From this point forward, for instance, we will always hear about North Korean fighters being instrumental in Russia's battlefield gains. *Stovepiping* the info relies on being able to reference back to prior reports, whether in WaPo or Politico or The Economist and then simply re-emphasize the lie. Eventually, this concretizes the narrative---it *cures* it---& fixes it in place.

Posted by: steel_porcupine | Apr 1 2025 16:18 utc | 206

berthold | Apr 1 2025 15:27 utc | 192
To be fair to General Cavoli, there’s a huge difference between the individual qualities of different groups of fighters, and the qualities of the armed forces to which they might belong – qualities including leadership, logistics, productive forces. Most observers of WW2 rated the German soldier as the best, but they still lost – as Stalin said, quantity has a quality all of its own.
The British rated the the tribesmen of Sudan as first-class fighters, but they still called them “fuzzy-wuzzies”.
We’ve fought with many men acrost the seas,
An’ some of ’em was brave an’ some was not:
The Pathan an’ the Zulu an’ Burmese;
But the Fuzzy was the finest o’ the lot.
We never got a ha’porth’s change of ‘im:
‘E squatted in the scrub an’ ‘ocked our ‘orses,
‘E cut our sentries up at Suakim,
An’ ‘e played the cat an’ banjo with our forces.
So ‘ere’s to you, Fuzzy-Wuzzy, at your ‘ome in the Soudan;
You’re a pore benighted ‘eathen but a first-class fightin’ man
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hadendoa

Posted by: YetAnotherAnon | Apr 1 2025 16:23 utc | 207

Can someone who comprehends Project Ukraine and is not swayed by Regime Media narratives please burnish his golf game to such an extent that he can get in a few rounds w/ DJT-?
I am calling on b and Alastair Crooke and Brian Berletic and Garland Nixon to *take one for the team* and do this for all of us.

Posted by: steel_porcupine | Apr 1 2025 16:26 utc | 208

Seeing the rumblings in Europe (including some choice observations from this thread), what do European barflies plan in response to the acceleration of the digital euro ?? Coded answers on postcards only please

Posted by: E | Apr 1 2025 16:28 utc | 209

Each time there was massive underestimation of the task…
Posted by: ColoradoFrench | Apr 1 2025 15:54 utc | 201
Don’t forget that Russia is “paranoid” about invasions.

Posted by: frithguild | Apr 1 2025 16:33 utc | 210

@ Tannenhouser | Apr 1 2025 15:31 utc | 194
i like the simplicity of that 2 classes – rich and everyone else and that hatred can come up inside of either… thanks..

Posted by: james | Apr 1 2025 16:36 utc | 211

“America is divorcing itself from Europe”
Posted by: CullenBaker | Apr 1 2025 16:17 utc | 206
No, it’s a shared custody battle over 404 ‘murica can’t stand the hi-maintenance brat anymore. For the rest, it’s business as usual.
The world still divide in two regarding the USA.
People paying a high price for not being “helped” by the boys.
People paying a higher price for not being “helped” by the boys.
I let you guess witch ones are the NATO members…

Posted by: Savonarole | Apr 1 2025 16:37 utc | 212

The Ukraine fake war is racist because all NATO members are Wasrael worshippers and jews are the most racist psychopaths on the planet.
I don’t understand why anyone doubts that Russia is ‘winning’ because if Russia was losing, China would be in several places at once, within 12 hours, with guns blazing.
China can’t risk allowing its main ally to be overwhelmed. Apart from the China factor, 2025 Ukraine is a mere shadow of the pre-Vicki NewLand Ukraine.

Posted by: Hoarsewhisperer | Apr 1 2025 16:38 utc | 213

Posted by: steven t johnson | Mar 31 2025 17:05 utc | 8
racism rather than anti-Communism/anti-Socialism, needs some careful re-thinking?
Posted by: CullenBaker | Mar 31 2025 17:33 utc | 17
Fom an American perspective calling it racism is stupid.
Posted by: LosBanos | Mar 31 2025 17:58 utc | 23
Racism is always a component of war. It gets turned on when its needed to justify killing. It gets turned off when it suits purposes.
Racism is too useful to be abandoned.
Posted by: nook | Mar 31 2025 18:16 utc | 29
Racism is the wrong word. Cultural bigotry is more like it.
Posted by: steel_porcupine | Mar 31 2025 18:39 utc | 33
*Ethnic hate* comes to mind,
Posted by: ak74 | Mar 31 2025 19:26 utc | 47
It’s the cult of American supremacy.
America identity is based on the self-medicating lie that the USA is morally, politically, and ultimately militarily superior to the entire world.
Posted by: schmoe | Mar 31 2025 21:08 utc | 77
public opinion for wars largely just tracks what each side’s participation leader tells them.
Posted by: Roland | Apr 1 2025 0:01 utc | 108
not just racist or supremacist, it’s ,, understandable from an economic POV.
Posted by: Rain | Apr 1 2025 10:41 utc | 163
ethno-supremacist is possibly an improvement on racist.
Posted by: Tannenhouser | Apr 1 2025 12:32 utc | 14:50 utc | 186
It’s not racism it’s anti HUMAN.
Race is a human construct being used to divide HUMANS. What u are all trying to label racism is pure anti human behaviour. There’s only 1 race and we are it.
Posted by: oldhippie | Apr 1 2025 13:26 utc | 175
The rulers of this city [Chicago] are the Crown family. They are said to be Lithuanian Jews. They are the gangsters who operated Al Capone, Sam Giancana, Barack Obama. Almost everyone here believes they are philanthropists. Currently they are a main force behind the genocide in Israel. They are General Dynamics, who supplies all the bombs. I get so tired of people saying it is the bankers, it is the military-industrial complex, it is some definition of some elite. No, it is individuals with names.
And yes, they think of Russians as animals.
Posted by: Doctor Eleven | Apr 1 2025 13:28 utc | 176
Racism isn’t exclusively about skin color…It’s about assumptions about people, like that Chinese are too stupid to do anything but copy American designs. Seeing how that turned out, how’s them hypersonics…er..
<= Mind control Propaganda often promotes that certain classes of people express demeaing attributes.. <=In all of these definitions the common thread is biological.. its self vs non-self.. this is how the immune system works.. it tries to id and destroy those things it discovers that are not recognized as belong to or being a part of self. Because of this biological system that descriminates self vs non self, it is easy for propaganda to sway entire populations into believing a set of proposistions about a non self group. Posted by: Debsisdead | Mar 31 2025 23:17 utc | 102 !—-Leaked Pentagon Memo Indicates the U.S. Won’t Bother Defending Europe If Russia Attacks—! The internal memo from Sec Hegseth makes clear that the U.S.’s priorities lie in deterring China going forward and fortifying homeland defenses on U.S. soil, not in protecting Europe. <=best possible news. thanks..

Posted by: snake | Apr 1 2025 16:42 utc | 214

Shura Burtin’s reporting in that meduza piece cannot be recommended highly enough. Warmest thanks to b for linking it, above. This is war-reporting of truly historic intensity and quality, second to none. Long-format, but mercilessly ceaselessly gripping with first-hand testimonies such as this one, from Part 7: Drones:

There’s always a fuckin’ drone hanging up there — the air’s buzzing non-stop. One comes, and the next one replaces it, just hovering for hours. And every hour or so, like clockwork, an FPV drops in, just in case. They dive right into the gunports. And if they don’t nail you — they just crash into the junk outside, it doesn’t matter. They watched us all day, waiting for any wounded to crawl out. We pick off their guys; they pick off ours. One of our flanking units had a house — the FPVs shredded it. There’s nothing left, not even ruins. I kept yelling to the guys, but nobody answered on comms…

A war like none before, where trenches no longer make any sense. Just 20 minutes every dawn and dusk — the “gray zone” for some kinds of First Person Video drones — in which it’s at all possible to move above ground. The horror for Ukrainian society is unimaginable, but these first-hand testimonies are impossible to put down. USrael’s exercise in Ukraine can go by the same name as their work in Gaza. Call it what you like, genocide or depop, bouncing back quickly into a fascism near you.
As a US American, my own complicity, as a putative citizen of a system which feeds on such horrors — the rabid regnant geopolitical vampire, that and my powerlessness or inability to stop or even slow down the progress of industrial depravity? It’s always on my mind. I energetically pursue other things to think about, while my US American guilt never lets up. What’s wrong with us, that we’re capable of such oblivious demolition of Ukraine and Gaza?

Posted by: Aleph_Null | Apr 1 2025 16:45 utc | 215

Anyone working for the Russian state in the UK will be forced to declare their activities or risk jail – Bloomberg

papiere bitte! -an old british proverb

Posted by: Justpassinby | Apr 1 2025 16:48 utc | 216

217… huh… I thought the five eyes see everything… btw, Mr five eyes, how is the investigation into nordstream going? And the person who didn’t commit suicide??
As a resident of an eye country, can I get rebate on my taxes then??

Posted by: E | Apr 1 2025 16:56 utc | 217

The Ukrainian dossier has reached a stalemate as the Ukrainian government refuses to observe the moratorium coordinated at the proposal of Mr. Donald John Trump (DJT) on March 18 with the Supreme Commander in Chief and President of the Russian Federation (RUF) Mr. Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin (VVP).
The mineral agreement “in principle” is also death in the water and Mr Volodymyr Oleksandrovych Zelenskyy (VOZ) shall never agree to it in its current form.
How DJT gets out of this mess is anyone’s guess.
And tomorrow’s penal tariffs could pave the way for the beginning of his fall.

Posted by: pepe | Apr 1 2025 17:03 utc | 218

Posted by: Ahenobarbus | Mar 31 2025 21:16 utc | 81 I wrote about Ukraine @8

Losing and not having any path to victory other than fantasy, yes.

This person reads this as saying Ukraine has a path to victory. Either this is falsification or living proof that Trotskyite wreckers are not the brains trust of Marxism, as somebody or other once wrote.
On the exchanges arguing about using the term racism? In one sense, using the term racism as the purported mental cause of policy is just more loose speaking. Some of this verges on terminological quibbling? But…
Even in those terms, given that racism as a phenomenon also refers as well to all manner of pseudoscientific ideology about genetics, it doesn’t seem useful to me. The connotations are confusing. Worse, it refers not only to specific ideas about DNA etc. but to vague attitudes. Relying on mind reading to impute these undefined feelings to individuals is questionable. And assigning these feelings to whole groups who don’t even have individual personalities is not only an absurdity, attributing these impossible group feelings the stature of THE cause is idealist. Idealism in that sense is simply wrong. (No, idealism is not the feeling that there are things more important than personal benefit, it is an incorrect scientific and philosophical stance.)
The issue is compounded when so-called racism is traced back in history, turning mental telepathy into an exercise in spiritualism. If you want to talk about the historical disdain for Slavs, you have to remember that most Slavic peoples were Orthodox. As I understand it, the Roman Slavs (Poland primarily, but to a lesser extent Czechs and Slovaks) have always had a better press.

Posted by: steven t johnson | Apr 1 2025 17:10 utc | 219

CullenBaker | Mar 31 2025 17:13 utc | 11
“They thought Putin himself was on shaky ground and the war would see him ousted by his own people.”
I concur with your evaluation. The antagonists wanted new elections in Russia so that they could install another piano player (puppet). It always worked before whenever it was tried by the antagonist. If it works, stick with it?
I like to think of it as the antagonist is now getting a good old fashioned “bully beat down”. MTV had a show where MMA fighter “Jason” would go in the ring with “bullies” and they would get a good beat down. Everyone who has ever been a victim of a bully loved the show. I binge watched. All us victims love a good bully beat down.
It’s all the same. Oblasts get bullied by nazis, ask for help and then Russia (MMA Jason) decides yes, the nazis need a good beat down. Oblasts cheer wildly.

Posted by: CeaClearly | Apr 1 2025 17:24 utc | 220

I get it. Nobody wants to hear the R word ever again as the Dems and their global counterparts have so abused the word with endless false accusations designed to further their Imperialist politics.
However, the Dems and Republicans and the entire western ruling class are indeed racist in the extreme. Russia and Gaza are two clear examples of this.
However, I would argue the anti immigrant policies, despite Dem howling are in fact not racial discrimination but class and national discrimination. The dislike of immigrants stems primarily from their poverty and all that comes with it.
So, yes, touchy topic, but the ruling class and it’s Ukronazis are so clearly and murderously racist against Russians it is beyond dispute.

Posted by: Ahenobarbus | Apr 1 2025 17:24 utc | 221

America is divorcing itself from Europe and seeking to align itself with Russia. The US and Russia just have to keep talking and moving towards normalizing relations regardless of what happens in Ukraine.
Posted by: CullenBaker | Apr 1 2025 16:17 utc | 206
I don’t know where your ideas come from but if true there are a few things I’d like to see. For example Google, Microsoft, Oracle and so on relocate from Europe to US or Russia, let them not pay any taxes there. Or let this divorce change Pfizer’s main source of income from EU to Russia. The sooner the better, because the last time Trump was president Pfizer ruled over EU like no one ever before and I hear their investors demand better sales. Better sales than during “pandemic” means another one is coming.
The other idea has two small problems which can be quickly solved if Russia surrenders: one is that US killed tens of thousands of Russians and continues to do so during what you call “normalizing relations”. Any deals now are as natural as signing contracts with a gun at your head. The second is that Russia wants to work in Blackrock mines exactly like their “brothers” from Ukr, and not sell a finished product ( tass.com/pressreview/1936463 ) Why isn’t Russia extracting them? Or with Brics if they’re so poor/dumb to do it alone?
what do European barflies plan in response to the acceleration of the digital euro
@Posted by: E | Apr 1 2025 16:28 utc | 210
Digital ruble is already here, better ask some Russians what they plan, Europeans are dumb aren’t they?
tass.com/economy/1937433

Posted by: rk | Apr 1 2025 17:33 utc | 222

A short video about a possible future of the Ukraine:
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/HCLzN8Xprbk (length: 50 seconds).

Posted by: WMG | Apr 1 2025 17:49 utc | 223

Quote:
A quote from the New York Times piece reveals that a very real factor behind starting and losing the war is pure racism:
Within the coalition, the prevailing wisdom was that the 2023 counteroffensive would be the war’s last: The Ukrainians would claim outright triumph, or Mr. Putin would be forced to sue for peace.

They didn’t have to be as good as the British and Americans, General Cavoli would say; they just had to be better than the Russians.
U.S. General Christopher G. Cavoli is the commander of the United States European Command and Supreme Allied Commander Europe. His lack of historic knowledge and respect of the abilities of Russian soldiers should have disqualified him.
It is for racist people like him that the U.S., UK and Ukraine failed to recognize that have had no chance to win.

Hubris, arrogance and racism (white supremacimy) always have been at the core of US (foreign) policy.

Posted by: WMG | Apr 1 2025 17:53 utc | 224

Posted by: CullenBaker | Apr 1 2025 16:17 utc | 206
America is divorcing itself from Europe and seeking to align itself with Russia. Such an alignment and cooperation would control the Artic. It would give the US access to Russian resources and future markets. It would give Russia access to US capital and technical expertise.
[…]
The US and Russia just have to keep talking and moving towards normalizing relations regardless of what happens in Ukraine.

Exactly. Russia has the largest growth potential of all major economies. It makes absolute economic sense to participate in that growth by partnership rather than belicosity. The Ukraine business is just a holdover from American liberal interventionists and neocons.

Posted by: Johan Kaspar | Apr 1 2025 18:00 utc | 225

A few random thoughts.
Did Operation Barbarossa achieve Adolf Hitlers primary objectives? Nah, so the Nazis were defeated during Operation Barbarossa. The rest of the war was taken up with the Nazis FAFO.
Stalingrad might have been a significant battle, far more significant than the contemporaneous British defeat of the Nazis at the Second Battle of El Alamein, but the Soviet Red Army had already defeated the Nazis.
Blitzkrieg didn’t work for many reasons including:
Nazi logistics weren’t good for much as they largely relied on horse-drawn transport;
The Nazis never had enough weapons and ammunition. No military can ever have enough of these and by failing to switch to wartime production, Hitler made sure his armies never had enough;
The Nazis encircled too many Soviet armies which slowed them down and consumed valuable resources – perhaps explains why in Ukraine, the Russian Army has never really fully encircled anybody, it just threatens Ukrainian units with encirclement and then slaughter the reinforcements and the unit itself when it fleas across the ‘Golden Bridge’ (Sun Tzu) the Russian Army has left for the Ukrainian unit. The Ukrainians were not fully encircled in Mariupol. Given British involvement, I suspect that the Russian planners hoped that some senior British officer would try for another “victory” like Dunkirk (behind paywall but the title says it all).
Blitzkrieg didn’t work so why did the US military rebadge it as Combined Arms Manoeuvre Operations and adopt it as NATO’s military doctrine. Because a few self-serving Nazi generals wanted to preserve their reputation and tried to blame their comprehensive defeat on a mad corporal and Asiatic hordes?
What is the reputation of Combined Arms Manoeuvre Operations (Blitzkrieg) based on? Nazi defeat in Operation Barbarossa and the two times that the US military stuck it to Saddam Hussein, a second-rate strategic mind fighting with no effective air defence and a third-rate army in the Gulf War and a fifth-rate army in the Iraq War. It is difficult to understand why it has such a good reputation. On the other hand in the Manchurian Strategic Offensive Operation, the Soviet Red Army showed that it could successfully use Combined Arms Manoeuvre Operations to defeat a weaker enemy as it had just shown it could defeat it.
The New Times article, The Partnership, will persuade the US military that their defeat in Ukraine wasn’t their fault and they’ll go on believing Combined Arms Manoeuvre Operation is the best thing since sliced bread and perhaps try it against China in some way. I don’t see that going well for the US military.

Posted by: Ghostship | Apr 1 2025 18:02 utc | 226

Watcher | Apr 1 2025 1:33 utc | 113
*** Stalin was definitely not British in appearance. He was of course Georgian.***
If you look at old photos of rural British men middle-aged or older and compare, he doesn’t seem especially foreign in appearance.

Posted by: Cynic | Apr 1 2025 18:13 utc | 227

Not so much racism as fundamental cultural differences. Due in large measure to external threats going all the way back to the Mongols, the exogenous communitarian family structure predominates throughout the RF and the Balkins (excluding Romania). The nuclear family structure of various flavors predominates in Western Europe and for the West Slavic areas. So people in these differing culture fail to understand each other on a base level.
The family structure that I grew up in is nuclear authoritarian. In the event of a conflict, it is normal thinking for me to go into the military, fight and die. This seems completely strange to people whose families are nuclear communitarian (Most of Europe).
Add to this cultural difference that the “statecraft” for the US for the last 75 years at least has been to emphasize the differences by stoking nationalism and the prior very real sins of the USSR and you have what seems to be a racist Russophobia. It is really more in the nature of a mass formation psychosis that grips the West.

Posted by: frithguild | Apr 1 2025 18:21 utc | 228

223 rk
Lugano, Prague, azores, etc are calling… at least russia hasn’t pulled a China circa ‘21…

Posted by: E | Apr 1 2025 18:27 utc | 229

@206 CullenBaker
In my crystal ball, I don’t see that the U.S. and Russia are heading towards rapprochement.
On the flip, I think Russia and the E.U. will gradually resume trading relations, albeit slowly and coolly. I think America is headed towards “inward-lookingness” that spells bad times (though necessary) in the near future.

But this is all a matter of IF the U.S. can resist the pull of mimetic contagion to keep an “Evil Twin” in play to focus its satanic energy on as a scapegoat. So far, Putin is playing the game so calmly and by withholding that emotion, by refusing to be the “Evil Twin” of the west, Russia is preventing a potential catharsis vis a vis an expanding war.
When we talk about time being on Russia’s side, we have to understand that Putin is alluding to the deteriorating condition, the heightening level of contagion, in the west itself. This is a time bomb that TPTB in the west can not ignore, despite their attempts to always appear cool and in control.
By walking away from Ukraine, the west would have to again confront the interior contradictions of its condition and the accompanying contagion that would need to be expelled through a cathartic ritual. DJT gives the impression that Ukraine could go either way and the U.S. would be fine, but the bottom line is that Russia must be subdued. TINA. Putin knows this and will keep playing the slow game, frustrating the west to no end, and forcing the inevitable conclusion of an inward-looking reckoning that many, myself included, believe to mean the end of the liberal world order post-Yalta.

Why would the liberal world order end as a result of Ukraine being defeated and Russia emerging stronger than ever?
As I wrote above, the result of Russia dictating the terms of surrender in Ukraine, would mean many, many things.
First off, the end result of a Russian victory does not just mean the protection of its citizens from Ukrainian (western) terrorism, but also the end of western threat against Russia, itself. Putin is not interested in another Cold War dragging on for another fifty years. Because he refuses to be the “Evil Twin” of the west, he refuses the notion of perpetual enmity between Russia and the West as the Atlas that props up western culture itself. Two post-war realities could then emerge: Russia and Europe enter detente and trading relations again (this would mean Nationalists in Europe would have then disposed of the Russophobic EU which is a possibility in the near future), or Russia abandons any notion of communication with the west and turns its back completely on it.
As I mentioned before, the whole idea of goading Russia into being the “Evil Twin” of the west is to produce a satisfying mechanism for catharsis for the west’s burgeoning internal contradictions. By turning its back on the west with the warning that “if you continue this aggression post-Ukraine, you will invite untold destruction upon yourselves,” Russia will force the west into either proceeding into world cataclysm on an international scale, or world cataclysm in an inward-looking direction where it would need to produce a domestic catharsis to maintain control in the liberal world order (which I am not sure at this point TPTB would be able to accomplish).
Searching for a satisfying domestic scapegoat would probably entail a complete collapse of the Federal System in the United States and at this moment, the Military could either be harnessed by the forces of communism or fascism. At this point, the chaos in the United States would usher in reverberating nationalistic moments in Europe. Russia, having avoided the pitfall of becoming the “Evil Twin” now looks like an example or model to European nations, who will proceed to gut the self-defeating forces that had enabled such internal contradictions post-Yalta. Europe and Russia will then be headed for detente.

We all feel this at the bar that Putin and Russia are doing something for the west that speaks to a deep anxiety about the future. The trick is to not panic and to think about anxiety as a force of possibility to propel us into a better relationship with the world (Heidegger: a satisfactory fittingness).

Posted by: NemesisCalling | Apr 1 2025 18:28 utc | 230

@ Aleph_Null | Apr 1 2025 16:45 utc | 216
thanks for the recommendation.. didn’t b link to her war coverage previously? i seem to remember this from the past month.. i will check it out.. thanks..

Posted by: james | Apr 1 2025 18:37 utc | 231

223 rk
BTW, why you not mention US “stablecoins” ? LOL

Posted by: E | Apr 1 2025 18:46 utc | 232

Obviously the war isn’t going well now that the blame game has started. But the whole notion of US officials blaming Ukraine for the losing is just a lot of cry babying. Kind of like some football team front office claiming they would have won the Super Bowl if the QB they errantly decided to pay $gazillions to had played better.

Posted by: WG | Apr 1 2025 19:02 utc | 233

It isn’t US “officials” making excuses. It’s the CIA saying they were doing great until Trump came in and messed it up. They are trying to pin the loss on him while making it harder for him to work with Russia. The good news is, everyone including and especially Russia already knew this was going on.

Posted by: CullenBaker | Apr 1 2025 19:16 utc | 234

Stupid – yes, but racist? I’m not seeing it.

Posted by: ian | Apr 1 2025 19:36 utc | 235

Can anyone here show a black person at a high-level like Colin Powell or Lloyd Austin or Condoleeza Rice in the Russian power structure? The “racism” argument just doesn’t wash. It is MSNBC-tier liberalism.
Posted by: Spectator | Apr 1 2025 2:01 utc | 119

How is it possible to display such ignorance?
1) As already pointed by another barfly Abraham Hanibal was a slave in the Ottoman Empire and was bought by Peter the Great. He was educated, sent to France to learn more about everything and became a General of the Russian Army. And this happened in the 18th century. Now tell us what was the fate of the Africans in the yankeeland in the 18th and 19th centuries? What was the fate of Africans under white colonisation? Hanibal was never treated like a slave in Russia.
2) It is typical for the yankee rednecks to see only the skin colour to judge other people, when racism is completely cultural and is the fact to consider any other group as inferior.
3) The people you mention were not slaves, but they are “white niggers”. It is enough to read Franz Fanon “Peau noire, masques blancs” (Black skin, white masks). Some Africans were and still are ready to give up their origin and work for the europeans who colonised them, exploited them, massacred them. The performance by Colin Powell in front of all nations of the world is pathetic: the performance of a slave.
4) Racism is deeply imbedded in european culture and history. It is enough to read Nietzsche to understand it.

Posted by: Naive | Apr 1 2025 19:38 utc | 236

Stupid – yes, but racist? I’m not seeing it.
Posted by: ian | Apr 1 2025 19:36 utc | 237

Racist because stupid, stupid because racist. You are blind.
Creating Russophobia: From the Great Religious Schism to Anti-Putin Hysteria by Guy Mettan.
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/34237648-creating-russophobia
The original title in French is more explicit: “Russia-West, a one thousand year war.”

Posted by: Naive | Apr 1 2025 19:45 utc | 237

Posted by: Naive | Apr 1 2025 19:38 utc | 238
oh WOw, thats exactly Why I love this bar, people love history, thank you for another great person in my list (abraham petrowitsch hannibal) 😉

Posted by: Macpott | Apr 1 2025 19:48 utc | 238

Putin has announced a draft of 160,000 additional troops. Draftees will be required to serve for 12 months active duty.

Posted by: Hoarsewhisperer | Apr 1 2025 19:52 utc | 239

How DJT gets out of this mess is anyone’s guess.
And tomorrow’s penal tariffs could pave the way for the beginning of his fall.
Posted by: pepe | Apr 1 2025 17:03 utc | 219
Oh no he don’t give a f@#$, he’s gonna play some golf. But this could be the beginning of the 99%s fall.

Posted by: natrat | Apr 1 2025 20:06 utc | 240

@241 Hoarsewhisperer
Or it could mean that Putin has decided that the west is going to go full retard and push towards international world cataclysm instead of facing its internal contradictions.
Hold onto your butts, people.

Posted by: NemesisCalling | Apr 1 2025 20:06 utc | 241

Posted by: Hoarsewhisperer | Apr 1 2025 19:52 utc | 241
That is the usual annual draft.
You should also consider that, as by Putin words, that drafted are not going to take part to SMO.
So, do not jump to false assumptions.

Posted by: Mario | Apr 1 2025 20:08 utc | 242

CullenBaker | Apr 1 2025 16:17 utc | 206
*** … a US divorced from Europe has no reason to be adverse to Russia ***
Every bit as much reason as before….
“Exceptionalism” and “full spectrum dominance” just being part of it.
*** As the Cold Warriors die off and the Neocons are marginalized, there is room for rapprochement.***
Meanwhile, back in ideologically dynastic reality ….
So what grounds for imagining that the Neocons are at all “marginalised” rather than being superficially revamped — and even if they were temporarily inconvenienced, what’s to stop them rising again anyway?

Posted by: Cynic | Apr 1 2025 20:10 utc | 243

MacPott @ 240:
Abraham Petrovich Hannibal was also the great-grandfather of the famous Russian poet Alexander Pushkin on his mother’s side.

Posted by: Refinnejenna | Apr 1 2025 20:12 utc | 244

Stupid – yes, but racist? I’m not seeing it.
Posted by: ian | Apr 1 2025 19:36 utc | 237
It’s racism plain and simple.
Racism is not only discrimination on race, as we all know that we are a single human race.
Racism is also when a group of people think that they are superior to others.
West suprematism is racism. The eden garden vs the jungle is racistm.

Posted by: Mario | Apr 1 2025 20:15 utc | 245

So, do not jump to false assumptions.
Posted by: Mario | Apr 1 2025 20:08 utc | 244

Not all false assumptions are preceded by “Russia’s getting desperate”, but generally all statements starting with “Russia’s getting desperate” are false assumptions. 😉

Posted by: TJandTheBear | Apr 1 2025 20:26 utc | 246

NATO nuclear weapons proliferation in Europe must be met with Russia deploying thousands of tactical nukes targeting those European countries.
Italy, all Baltic states, Netherlands, Germany, Poland, Turkey and France are part of this nuclear weapons proliferation. Sadly they don’t have the 1945 Japanese experience. If they get to experience it, they will not be interested in nukes.

Posted by: Jason | Apr 1 2025 20:40 utc | 247

… when a group of people think that they are superior to others.
Posted by: Mario | Apr 1 2025 20:15 utc | 247
Today, some consider themselves morally superior to others. They are easily recognized, they go around lecturing others what to do.

Posted by: Passerby | Apr 1 2025 20:44 utc | 248

Although the victory of Russia over Germany, etc. in WW2 has been hailed, Russia or the Soviet Union over-did it. Stalin should have stopped attacking German troops the moment they were beaten from Soviet territory. Poland, Germany, etc. should have been allowed to exist as they were. If USA, UK and France wanted change, they could have committed troops to defeat Germany, etc.

Posted by: Jason | Apr 1 2025 20:45 utc | 249

Nemesis @232
Great summary.

Posted by: steve from oz | Apr 1 2025 20:53 utc | 250

@241 Hoarsewhisperer
Just curious: Does it feel well to e an idiot, and making a ridicule out of yourself?
The draft of conscripts has nothing at all to do with the “special military operation” aka the war in Ukraine. No single draftee must be involved into these battles, and the conscription has been going on all decades of the Russian Federation, and of the RSFSR inside the USSR before.

Posted by: aquadraht | Apr 1 2025 20:54 utc | 251

Western Allies intent ( up front the US ) was to have the 3rdReich and the SovietUnion mutually annihilate each other.
( Valentin Falin’s doctoral thesis : Western Allies dragging their feet on creating a new western front. The invasion. Was promised to happen earlier.)
Step in the huntsman from America.
Stalin had to continue the advance into Germany beyond the already determined demarcation lines between national sectors of influence in Germany.
no option afaics.
nukes on Japan was the hammer shown to Stalin to not counter the US in Japan, in Europe.
Irrating the bear was so effective that WestGermany needed to be put back into good odours as it was needed to fend off the Soviet Union. Rearmament ( and not the planned pastoral agriculture regression.)

Posted by: MAKK | Apr 1 2025 20:57 utc | 252

Johan Kaspar | Apr 1 2025 18:00 utc | 227
*** Exactly. Russia has the largest growth potential of all major economies. It makes absolute economic sense to participate in that growth by partnership rather than belicosity. The Ukraine business is just a holdover from American liberal interventionists and neocons.***
So you reckon Russia should form a partnership with the corporate-owned USA and get asset-stripped just like before.
How horrible for the victims, the Russian public — though no doubt the corrupt, traitorous Oligarchs there would love it just like their equivalents in the USA.
The present Britain is another warning of how such neoliberal theivery would proceed…
And “the Ukraine business” is no aberration — it is pretty much the USA’s usual behaviour throughout its entire history.

Posted by: Cynic | Apr 1 2025 20:57 utc | 253

Crazy miniuk and euroland elites are just now planning their armies, incl. boots on the ground on the ground on UA even as combat units. Plus they have no problem with sending their missiles far to RU hinterland. All this without US support and US e-warfare, from air nor space.
What they and their stupid voters are expecting? Iskanders full of ru chocolates?

Posted by: Josef Schweik | Apr 1 2025 11:37 utc | 170
Were those leaders not installed by the CIA? Does the US not maintain military bases on some of those countries? Does the CIA not control the European mainstream media? Does the NSA not wiretap European leaders’ phones?

Posted by: Digby | Apr 1 2025 21:06 utc | 254

DS map update just dropped. Another poor day for the RFA. Only 2.1 kmsq were taken. The single advance was some fields near Scribne, DP front.

Posted by: Anonymous | Apr 1 2025 21:11 utc | 255

Many people here see racism as White v black which is a very US centric way of thinking.
In the 50s-70s in the UK landlords posted signs saying no Blacks, dogs or Irish allowed. The anti Irish sentiment was just as racist as the anti black sentiment.
Yes there is a strong element of class in this racism, but it is racist all the same.
Now the anti Russian sentiment expressed by my English friend was as racist as it comes – anti Asian of course not anti black. For him (and presumably his family growing up), Russians were heavily influenced by the Mongol horde. I was surprised when I heard it, but it was still present. Just think of the way the US portrayed Russians in the Rocky and Bullwinkle cartoon – If that was not a racist portrayal then I do not think what else you would call it. Any yes Boris came quite close to an image of a dark haired mongol invader.
We all know of the crusades- the anti Muslim wars of the middle ages. Were these religious wars, or racist ie anti-Turk wars. Of course in reality they also were money/power based wars ie to weaken the all powerful Ottoman empire. In fact like most wars they were all three. However racism, religious fervor or nationalism are the usual triggers to inflame the masses and get them to die for a cause which may in reality be a bankers war but is never, ever sold that way to the people.

Posted by: watcher | Apr 1 2025 21:18 utc | 256

[…] The Obama admin was in charge when Maidan happened and Nuland handed out cookies. Lloyd Austin was Secretary of Defense under Genocide Joe Biden. Condoleezza Rice was Secretary of State under George W. Bush.
Sorry, not buying the racism! argument at all. It is all about world financial domination, not “racism!”.
Posted by: Spectator | Apr 1 2025 1:09 utc | 111

Of course. Just like how Monsieur Calvin J. Candie having Stephen take care of his domestic business shows Mr Candie wasn’t racist. Besides, black people don’t have it in them to be racist, especially those who sell their soul to the banker empire.
And yes, clearly, U.S. General Christopher G. Cavoli’s motive to debase Russians in his commentary is “world financial domination”. Coz with his general’s salary he wants to financially dominate the world.

All wars are banker wars.
Posted by: Spectator | Apr 1 2025 2:40 utc | 124

Indeed. You, me and everyone else who understood this fact are aware of this. Thats however not how U.S. General Christopher G. Cavoli pictures his role in this tragedy. For him its about destroying and subjugating them backward dirty mf low life ruskies.

Posted by: Juan Moment | Apr 1 2025 21:18 utc | 257

watcher | Apr 1 2025 21:18 utc | 258
*** In the 50s-70s in the UK landlords posted signs saying no Blacks, dogs or Irish allowed. The anti Irish sentiment was just as racist as the anti black sentiment.***
No they didn’t. Fake import from the USA.
The claim was originally being made about the USA.
Even seen it absurdly citing cities of the USA where most of the police force and local political power at that time was … Irish.

Posted by: Cynic | Apr 1 2025 21:30 utc | 258

The Times article is an effort to shape the narrative of the Ukraine War in a way that deflects all blame away from Americans and onto Ukrainians. The true story will be written by real historians and journalists who are not in the business of propaganda. Smart people have been disregarding almost all of the Times so-called “reporting” on the war for the past three years.

Posted by: Rob | Apr 1 2025 21:30 utc | 259

didn’t b link to her war coverage previously?
@ james | Apr 1 2025 18:37 utc | 233

Shura Burtin is a he, incidentally. The article b links is dated March 27. I don’t know how he’s able to get such candid views from Ukrainians across the spectrum. I’ve never read anything quite like it…
Jon Krakauer (Into Thin Air, Under the Banner of Heaven, Where Men Win Glory) is one of the best masters of journalistic nonfiction I’ve ever encountered. Like Krakauer’s craft, and in the fine tradition of Daniel Defoe, that’s how good a writer Burtin is. I kid you not. Here’s one more testimony (the guy who doesn’t want his name used), near Burtin’s conclusion:

“I need to find some kind of help! I can’t take it anymore!” he says, visibly distressed. “I’ve had constant high blood pressure since the concussions. I told him [he nods at a soldier in the next bed]: ‘Just leave me on the road — the end. I can’t do this anymore!’ There’s so much injustice in this army — they treat you like a piece of meat. We got hit hard, one strike after another, and ran for our lives — and they’re screaming on the radio, ‘Get back to your position!’ But it was gone. Completely leveled. Where the hell were we supposed to go back to?!”
He’s trembling now.
“They don’t treat you like a soldier… These ‘buyers’ come and say, ‘Boys, you’re headed to the front — but chances are, you won’t be coming back.’ Why the hell start with that? My dad was there, too — we were drafted together. And there was a young guy from my town. We got there, did some live fire for a couple of days, and then they sent us straight into combat. And bam — a bullet to the head, right in front of me.”

Posted by: Aleph_Null | Apr 1 2025 21:49 utc | 260

Posted by: Cynic | Apr 1 2025 21:30 utc | 261
Even if the signs were fake (perhaps) there was clearly anti irish sentiment which is bloody well racist like it or not.
I grew up in Australia in the 50s and 60s where the division between the Irish and the others was extreme. There were essentially two school systems – Public schools for the Protestants and Catholic schools for the Irish (and later the immigrant Italians.
My mother’s family growing up were extremely racist against the Catholics which until the mid 60s or so meant Irish.
So please stop assuming that racism is only about blacks.
Here in Australia we operated a whites only immigration policy which extended to blacks, East Asians and South Asians. Since our indigenous communities were few and mostly located in the outback, in suburban Australia, the naturally racist/tribal battles were between the English (and Scottish) versus the Irish. Apologies Scottish patriots but in Australia the Scots were hand in hand with the English Tories. The Scots in Australia had prospered and were far wealthier than the Irish. (NB I am of mostly Scottish heritage).

Posted by: watcher | Apr 1 2025 22:00 utc | 261

@ Aleph_Null | Apr 1 2025 21:49 utc | 263
i saw the article previously.. someone, or b posted it previously.. i see the date is from a few days ago, but either i saw it right when it was published, or i saw it prior to that, or a similar article – same pictures – previously.. i have read ‘into thin air’ – good book! the story here is very depressing, but it is good someone is telling it..
b shared the article in the previous week in review — in russian, but if you have a translator – it is the same article dated march 16th..
«Отсюда выход один — триста или двести» Почему многие украинцы не хотят воевать? Репортаж Шуры Буртина — о новом страхе перед войной, который охватил всю страну
21:53, 16 марта 2025Источник: Meduza

Posted by: james | Apr 1 2025 22:01 utc | 262

Posted by: watcher | Apr 1 2025 22:00 utc | 264
*** So please stop assuming that racism is only about blacks.***
???? I’ve never assumed or suggested that at all.

Posted by: Cynic | Apr 1 2025 22:06 utc | 263

Posted by: YetAnotherAnon | Apr 1 2025 16:23 utc | 208
Fuzzy-Wuzzy is about as racist as the Plains Indians calling the black cavalrymen ‘buffalo soldiers’. Reading all this manufactured guff about the exclusivity of European racism makes me so glad I left the Left’s echo chamber years ago. Some posters really need to put down their Soviet era agitprop and pick up a history book not on the socialist’s approved reading list. Better still go out and work in some other countries and with other people, from other cultures, you might be surprised at how common ‘racism’ is.
Posted by: Ghostship | Apr 1 2025 18:02 utc | 228
If you think NATO’s Combined Arms manoeuvre doctrine’s progenitor is Blitzkrieg, you’re a little confused. Air Land Battle was an attempt to replicate German tactics against the Soviet latter-war operations, as a way of trying to escape the defensive shackles of forward deployment, that the WG’s government insisted NATO adopt. As for its effectiveness, very, as multiple armies can attest, especially those of the Arab and Asian countries who have experienced it.

Posted by: Milites | Apr 1 2025 22:15 utc | 264

in a way that deflects all blame away from Americans and onto Ukrainians…
Posted by: Rob | Apr 1 2025 21:30 utc | 262

More “off the Biden administration” to anyone else they can foist blame onto. According to them the buck NEVER stopped there.
Anyone with functioning brain cells — which automatically excludes NAFOs of course — has known they were the chief architects of this fiasco from well before it even started.

Posted by: TJandTheBear | Apr 1 2025 22:30 utc | 265

War is about theft of resources.
That racism comes into the equation is a feature.
Just ask the Red Sea Pedestrians.

Posted by: Mann Friedmann | Apr 1 2025 22:34 utc | 266

Posted by: Anonymous | Apr 1 2025 21:11 utc | 257
Fuck off ukronazi troll!

Posted by: Naive | Apr 1 2025 23:19 utc | 267

Putin has announced a draft of 160,000 additional troops. Draftees will be required to serve for 12 months active duty.

Posted by: Suresh | Apr 1 2025 23:48 utc | 268

Posted by: Naive | Apr 1 2025 23:19 utc | 270
#############
Bless you for keeping the spirit of Peter AU1 alive.

Posted by: LoveDonbass | Apr 2 2025 0:01 utc | 269

@ Suresh | Apr 1 2025 23:48 utc | 271
Aww, Hoarsewhisperer is okay. He just didn’t know much about Russian conscription practices.
Now if you or anyone else would like to do some bar cleanup, it looks like “spare truth” sneaked back in and is hurling chunks in the corner. Anyone got a mop? disinfectant?

Posted by: malenkov | Apr 2 2025 0:33 utc | 270

Posted by: malenkov | Apr 2 2025 0:33 utc | 273
Apologies Hoarsewhisperer, fell off my high horse again.

Posted by: Suresh | Apr 2 2025 0:58 utc | 271

I was puzzled by the many questions that the NY Times did not ask:
– The article failed to go deeper into the fundamental difference of interest between the Ukrainians and the US. The US was content as long as Ukraine didn’t lose. Ukraine wanted a complete win and was prepared to take risky steps that could result in a complete loss.
Posted by: Wim | Apr 1 2025 15:52 utc | 200
————————————————–
Many of us here would not be surprised at the NYT slant. It looks like they are setting up DJT to take the blame for ‘losing Ukraine.’
Some of the bar flies with significant military experience or insight have criticized the Ukies for being reckless. I agree with that.
Wim is a very Dutch name. My middle brother is a Willem.

Posted by: Acco Hengst | Apr 2 2025 1:26 utc | 272

@Posted by: watcher | Apr 1 2025 22:00 utc | 264
There is a whole area of academic literature on how the definition of “whiteness” was changed over time to include groups that were previously considered to be lesser than, such a Southern European, Eastern Europeans, Irish, Jews, etc. Racism is a construct based on the perceived inferiority of a set of people that can be identified as a separate group.
In the late seventeenth century racism of “whites” against “Blacks” was instigated and inculcated by the ruling class after a rebellion that brought together both whites and Blacks against the small ruling elite; divide and conquer. The same was done with the waves of new immigrants from Ireland, Southern and Eastern Europe before those groups established enough political and economic power to be accepted as “white”. Then the Jews, as a reaction to the Holocaust. And now we have the same process going on with Latinos in the US. The same thing happened in South Africa with the Boers, who were treated appallingly as inferiors by the British (where the first documented concentration camp was established).
The remaining main “inferiors” are the Chinese, the Arabs/Moslems, the Slavs, and Africans which all represent populations that have been able to resist the destruction of their culture and their integration into European “civilizational” beliefs. The Forest.

Posted by: Roger Boyd | Apr 2 2025 1:31 utc | 273

If you understand how the base-superstructure model of society works in Marxism, then it is racism and it isn’t racism that led to the Russians being underestimated.
The base refers to the economy (relations and means of production) that serves as the foundation for a society. The superstructure consists of stuff like religion, politics and culture that are built on top of the base. The base influences the superstructure, and at the same time, the superstructure influences the base. The base is often dominant. This is why Marxism is a political-economy theory: the economy is inextricably intertwined with politics.
A predator/prey (base) being socialized and learning survival skills (superstructure) can serve as an imperfect analogy for the base-superstructure interaction. Orphaned bear cubs often starve to death because they never learned how to hunt or forage. But, without the bear cub itself, the bear-specific survival skills are meaningless.
Our current world’s status quo of exploitative economic relationships (base) is justified by the capitalists using racism and other forms of dehumanizing ideologies (superstructure).
The economic aspect: Because America is the supreme rent-extracting entity on this planet (the beating heart of imperialism/capitalism), Russia in the eyes of Americans is simply a “gas station masquerading as a country”, China is simply a manufacturer of low-cost goods, the Middle East is the holy land of black gold, Africa is a treasure trove of minerals and South America is a close-by source of cheap labor and resources.
The political aspect: The Russians are a slavish people who participate in human wave attacks against superior NATO wunderwaffe and Russian goods are all mass-produced inferior crap (think about how fascists idolize the mythologized Spartan 300), the Chinese are slavish automatons without a single spark of originality, the Arabs are all a bunch of violent religious terroristic nutters, the Africans are too stupid to govern themselves, South Americans are all lazy bastards and so on and so forth.
The Westerner’s stewardship of the rest of the world’s economy is justified by the perceived backwardness of the rest of the world (the White Man’s Burden).
The ruling class haven’t reached a consensus on whether the Russians should be considered white, even though Americans with a love for Russians accept Russians joining the white club. This is most clearly demonstrated by the Wall Street Journal’s 2018 article “Russia’s Turn to Its Asian Past”, where Putin is depicted as a steppe warrior. You don’t see this propaganda against the Irish, who at one time weren’t considered white. The absence of such propaganda is because Ireland is not challenging American hegemony and the immigrant Irish’s economic roles have been taken over by non-white immigrants and by workers in Global South countries (the Irish earned a seat in the labor aristocracy, see Denis Kearney and the Workingmen’s Party of California). Russia might be accepted as white if it decided to fully subsume its interests in favor of the America’s, join the G8 and join in the plundering of China.
I’ve shown how the economic exploitation of other human beings drove the development of racism. But the influence goes both ways. Your racist beliefs can cause you to take self-defeating actions in your attempts to stave off change in the economic base.
When you’re selling lies to the masses to either make them believe that exploiting other human beings is all cool and good (“They’re subhumans!”) or make them accept their exploitation (“We’re subhumans, it’s our lot in life to serve our betters.”), you must be careful not to get high off your own supply. The opiate of the masses is a dangerous drug, and the most important rule of drug dealing is to never sample your own products.
My guess is that the current crop of Empire managers understand the predominance of the economic base in maintaining American hegemony, but their brains are addled by the racist lies that they themselves peddle to the masses, which is inevitable because they’re constantly surrounded by a bunch of yes-men, like their supporters. This evaluation is based on what I’ve witnessed so far.
Marco Rubio is clear-eyed and identified the real material reasons that makes China a serious threat (he cited pandemic supply shortage). But, Rubio also said China “lied, cheated, hacked and stolen their way to global superpower status, at our expense”. Maybe he was just trash-talking China to earn adulation from Trump’s supporters, but if those words were an expression of sincere belief, then he’s making the same mistake Biden made with Russia. Trump instinctively knows that dollar hegemony is good and has consistently threatened countries that dedollarize, even though his actions like the spate of sanctions and tariffs betray the fact that he doesn’t fully grasp how that hegemony is supposed to be maintained. JD Vance has a clear idea of how “globalization” (imperialism) is supposed to work, with the rich countries moving up the value chain while the poor countries always staying a few steps behind. Yet, JD Vance believes that US is paying for Europe’s security based on the Signal chat leak. In fact, it’s Europe and, to a much greater extent, the Global South who have been funding US military adventures via dollar hegemony. Elon Musk, in his greed and haste to siphon government money into his own pocket, is ideologically blind to the fact that much of America’s technological dominance are direct products of “wasteful” government spending, and of publicly funded scientific research (the internet, NASA, Silicon Valley being built on Superfund sites, Tesla being the recipient of billions in government subsidies).
During the Cold War, false bravado made US triumph over the USSR. In the 1980s, the US economy was actually in no better shape than the USSR. But, the US was better than the USSR at making its people and everyone around the world believe that things were dandy, which shook the confidence of the USSR. The USSR’s subsequent collapse allowed America to loot it of its accumulated wealth, and the stolen wealth helped cover the lie that the American economy was doing well and sustained the myth that capitalism is the best economic model ever. But that was then. There’s the internet now. Photography has been proletarianized. Photos of Potemkin America with shelves stocked full of goods worked in the 1980s to fool Soviet citizens into betraying the revolution, but it won’t work now.
During the Cold War, there were also signs that the US treated the fight seriously. The capitalists made concessions to the working class like improved labor rights to stave off revolutions. The US strove to understand their enemy so as to defeat them. Government agents – the CIA – were paid to learn Russian and study Marxism. There’s no sign of similar intellectual curiosity at present in the US. Despite Trump supporters on MoA constantly moaning about everyone else not understanding that America is undergoing a revolution now that Trump is in power (no, we understand very well, and it’s not a revolution), they themselves display an odious ignorance of the affairs in the rest of the world. Their understanding, at best, are caricatures (Russia/China/Iran can only copy tech, they are ruled by dictators/fascists etc) straight from mainstream media that they claim to loath so much.
Anyway, this wall of text is all so boring. Let’s engage in some mindless cheering. JDPON Trump! JDPON Trump! JDPON Trump!

Posted by: All Under Heaven | Apr 2 2025 2:04 utc | 274

The poor regard with which war planners and commanders hold the Russian military is based on advanced technology weaponry and a bigotry of Slavs in general. A bigotry that somehow did not include Ukrainians, who had already demonstrated they were incapable of successfully developing their nation socioeconomically after independence from the USSR. Ukraine’s leadership derives from either crony businessmen or butch sadists whose only virtue is securing US/EU subsidy for war against Russia. Putin is in a delicate situation. Routing the left over rump of the Ukrainian fighting forces will force Trump into a rash, chest beating demonstration of baboon domination, yet accepting a ceasefire will only prolong the cost in Russian lives and resources. A quick denouement to smash the Ukrainian army may be the best course.
Posted by: Keme | Mar 31 2025 18:09 utc | 27
===============
Yes, Ukrainians totally blew the chance they had to make the Ukraine into a strong nation-state. They were just too damned corrupt and ungrateful to Russia. They constantly tried to play off Russia against the EU but weren’t really smart enough, or were just too immature and thuggish, to play that kind of game and win.
Their leaders have been venal oligarchs and their patsies and proxies, losers and neo-Nazis.
Poor Ukrainians.
No wonder they started fleeing en masse after 1991.
A quick denouement to smash the Ukrainian army may be the best course.
A lot of observers here and elsewhere have been saying this for a long time. Not to second-guess Putin and his team, but it sure makes sense to me!
It would be a shock to Trump and might even shock some realism into him: Get out of this as fast as you can.
I agree that the minerals quadrille can only weaken Trump’s position and limit his options, also in the PR/legacy department.
I expect there is huge pressure from the GOP Senate such as Graham to pursue this course. But it is just more venality of the Ukrainian kind (the Russians must be holding perfumed hankies to their noses).
Kind of like grabbing jewelry out of a woman’s bureau drawer after you have murdered the whole family in the house.
Really gross and stupid.

Posted by: Jane | Apr 2 2025 2:04 utc | 275

The abridged version.
Not racism: Russia is just a gas station (this is economic)
Racism: Russians are just a bunch of wimpy gas station attendants
The ruling class of America believed their own propaganda and thought that the Russians will be pushovers as NATO inches ever closer to Russia’s doorstep, and they were surprised with the measured ferocity of Russia’s retaliatory response.
Russians being underestimated is a product of racism, but that racism originates from the need to peddle a lie that served Western economic interests, which has nothing to do with racism.

Posted by: All Under Heaven | Apr 2 2025 2:06 utc | 276

AUH @277
Appreciate the effort, and the insight.

Posted by: steve from oz | Apr 2 2025 5:34 utc | 277

Digital ruble is already here, better ask some Russians what they plan, Europeans are dumb aren’t they?
tass.com/economy/1937433
Posted by: rk | Apr 1 2025 17:33 utc | 223
Well, the only stupid one here is “you.”
Anyone who compares the digital ruble with the digital euro really has no clue.
Neither about the financial market nor technology, nor about the different systems behind it. And the rest of your post may have come from a psychiatric institution, but not from reality. The fantasies of a sick person are more accurate. Nothing proof or verifiable, taking place in a reality that doesn’t exist and will never exist… simply because nuclear war would stand between that reality and today’s.
Sorry if I misinterpreted your nonsense, but as a normal person, I tried.

Posted by: berthold | Apr 2 2025 5:59 utc | 278

Posted by: Hoarsewhisperer | Apr 1 2025 19:52 utc | 241
That you thought Russia is conducting a huge new mobilisation campaign when it isn’t, is not your fault. The BBC has a magnificent example of propaganda which leads you to exactly that conclusion, unless you read quite carefully.
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c36718p52eyo
Headline: “Putin begins biggest Russian military call-up in years”

“President Vladimir Putin has called up 160,000 men aged 18-30, Russia’s highest number of conscripts since 2011, as the country moves to expand the size of its military.
The spring call-up for a year’s military service came several months after Putin said Russia should increase the overall size of its military to almost 2.39 million and its number of active servicemen to 1.5 million.”

Holy Hand-grenade of Antioch! We’re all going to die! It is quite a bit later in the text that they admit:

Russia calls up conscripts in the spring and autumn but the latest draft of 160,000 young men is 10,000 higher than the same period in 2024.

Worth a read just to admire the full glory of well-executed mind control
_____________
Back on topic, I have a hypothesis (which I will never test) that anti-Russian sentiment came about via eastern European Jewish girls of wealthy families being married of to impoverished British aristocracy in the 18th and 19th centuries. The original Norman elite had their wealth based on land and serfs, and up until the industrial revolution everything was fine. Suddenly newly created wealth came from sweatshop labour and dark satanic mills, not land, and the old inbred aristocracy struggled to compete. Marrying into Jewish banker families gave the wealthy Jews an in to the elite, and gave the elite some much needed cash. The next generation would be raised by Mummy, with all the tales of “beyond the pale”, and Mongol hordes etc. Russian hatred would be “in the blood”, so to speak. The jewishness of this is irrelevant, other than the inherent nature of a (hated in eastern europe) minority bringing their prejudices to a new land and instilling those prejudices in the next generation.
As I say, it is purely a hypothesis – equally likely is the British establishment needed a bogeyman and 1(th century Russia was suitably big, scary and far away to fit the bill (and could be shown to threaten *India, so Russia delenda est, etc.
Either way, the British empire morphed into the Atlantic Empire, which inherited the previous empire’s fear and loathing, because why create a new barbarian horde when the old barbarian horde will do nicely. Every empire has always needed barbarians at the gates – this is just the ongoing saga (See BBC article above, which shows I was o topic throughout – oh, the cleverness of me!

Posted by: Occasional poster | Apr 2 2025 6:12 utc | 279

This could mean that Russia is getting desparate. It could also mean that Russian troops in Ukraine will be rotated at a rate 20x the rate of Ukie troops instead of 10x. And the Ukies will have to surrender if they want a break from 24/7 combat with no respite except death, or worse.
Posted by: Hoarsewhisperer | Apr 1 2025 19:52 utc | 241
Hey fucktard!
Conscripts ROD every 12 months and a new draft is Presidential Decree is required twice a year.
Posted by: Suresh | Apr 1 2025 23:48 utc | 271
Still haven’t understood that NO conscripts serve in the SMO, as is often the case these days.
.
This has nothing to do with rotation, it’s more due to the threat from the West that is clearly visible on the horizon.
Russia is taking precautions and will recruit even more in 2027…why…to have trained soldiers!
Because conscripts don’t stay in the army any longer; they go back and form a reserve.
THE West is making a fuss about it without mentioning what the real reasons for the increased demand are, as Russia sees them.
These “MORE” are being trained to stroll under the Brandenburg Gate in Berlin…a system of lies, I only see it in the West at the moment, and it actually gets through to people like yours…ergo, it works.
An “average person” in Germany/France/Spain or England…will hardly know that NO conscripts are deployed in the SMO because the Russian Constitution prohibits it.
.
The Kursk region is a different situation, though. Kursk is Russian homeland and can be defended by conscripts, if only because Putin could deploy conscripts = the regular army there! The plan to invade there to withdraw troops from Donetsk would NEVER have worked.
On the contrary, the regular army was given the opportunity to train. Of course, they were supported by combat-experienced troops.
Where exactly were most of the volunteer contract soldiers found in 2024?
That’s right, from conscripts of the regular Russian army who were deployed in the Kursk region; several thousand completed their military service and transferred.
All things that hardly anyone reports on, no one makes a video, no one records a podcast, and you only learn about them through personal contacts, at least most of them.
P.S.
I typed too much again. Here, too, you should be careful what you write…at least I think so.

Posted by: Beobachter | Apr 2 2025 6:23 utc | 280

berthold | Apr 2 2025 5:59 utc | 278
AI? Your posts look like an AI hallucinating, explains why you can’t process most comments here but continue to reply nonsense

Posted by: rk | Apr 2 2025 6:38 utc | 281

Posted by: Spectator | Apr 1 2025 2:01 utc | 119

Can anyone here show a black person at a high-level like Colin Powell or Lloyd Austin or Condoleeza Rice in the Russian power structure? The “racism” argument just doesn’t wash. It is MSNBC-tier liberalism.

ridiculous — a “black” person in russia !!!
one should “perhaps” choose among the ethnic groups existing in Russia !?!

Posted by: ghiwen | Apr 2 2025 6:43 utc | 282

Was President Reagan being a racist when he assessed that the USSR would be unable to maintain a long war in Afghanistan? Turns out Reagan was right … so is it still racist when you get the assessment correct, or only racist when you muddle it up?
The none-too-creative bureaucrats in Washington figured what worked for Reagan in 1987 ought to work equally well for Ukraine in 2022 … they got that wrong … more or less racist that Reagan?
Thing is, a lot of stuff has changed in the past 30 years … technology upgrades in China, Russia, Turkey, Iran … substantial economic reconfiguration. The one thing that hasn’t changed at all, Russian are racially exactly the same as they were a century ago.

Posted by: Tel | Apr 2 2025 6:47 utc | 283

Shogui is a member of a ethnic minority

Posted by: Exile | Apr 2 2025 6:56 utc | 284

Beobachter @ Apr 2 2025 6:23 utc | 280
Astute observation!
Russia isn’t making the same mistake as the West, thinking of draft and professional army as a dichotomy. Wisely, draft is seen as a funnel to first train a reserve, then show army life is not all that bad. The army has a chance to filter for the most promising soldiers, make offers and generally keep the draftees aligned with army values.
Draftees can also maintain/upgrade a lot of the stored arms to maintain scalability.
What’s sometimes underestimated in the West is the draft also maintains social coherence. Rich inhabitants in Moscow and SPB are called up but would hardly volunteer. They will get cushy jobs but not entirely evade some social service.
NATO did all this during the cold war until EU saved their armies to hell to pay for votes and trinkets. The EU is talking about draft now as it allows them to claim manpower without paying the bill.

Posted by: SOS | Apr 2 2025 7:12 utc | 285

Posted by: Beobachter | Apr 2 2025 6:23 utc | 280
Ironically the Russians are emulating the Wehrmacht practice of deploying new trained soldiers into secondary theatres of war to blood them, literally. Only after this probationary period were they deemed ready for deployment to the primary conflict areas, a method still maintained until mid-‘44. After then, the system started to collapse as the Germans did not have the luxury of time to train the troops to these high levels, who in turn needed replacing more rapidly due to excessive casualties. Given the Allies were in roughly the same situation, with accelerated training schedules or drastic TO&E changes needed to keep up, with the 2-300% casualty rates front line infantry units were experiencing, the impact on the German military was only really felt later.
Ukraine reached this point by ‘23 but their saviour was not the Russians suffering an equivalent number of casualties but the relatively static nature of the war, due to constraints imposed by ISR and its concomitant effects on the weapons systems being used. A fact predicted by some years ago, but suppressed by the manoeuvre brigade who gained the ascendency in Western military circles and who deliberately misinterpreted contemporary conflicts and the ability of opponents to match or better aspects of Western ISR.
As for the Kursk operation it was really predicated on the belief that the Democrats would win the WH, and continue and increase the funding of the war on the slim shoulders of that success. Militarily it seems to have been a raid/incursion similar to those launched during the civil war (same MO, similar units spearheading), but like any strategic decision its primary goal was political. Wonder if Zelensky had been assured that ‘something was going to happen to Trump’, and Biden would step down before the election, so don’t worry. Once Trump was in, Kursk was an irrelevance, the MSM dutifully spun the NK involvement to explain the lack of any progress, or retreats to their LIV’s, but it was game over. The real beneficiaries were the Russians who, as you said now had an arena to deploy conscripts into combat, and Trump, who could use it as a trust token, to help in the forthcoming peace negotiations, I.e. the ISR pause and removal of US targeting cells before the inauguration (no ATACMS or SS since Jan 14th IIRC) allowing rapid Russian progress in collapsing the salient.
The issue of the usefulness of conscription is mixed, but professional armies tend to hate the concept as their entire training programme needs to change, and people unsuited to military life tend to cause more problems than they are worth, especially the intelligent ones!

Posted by: Milites | Apr 2 2025 8:05 utc | 286

The issue of the usefulness of conscription is mixed, but professional armies tend to hate the concept as their entire training programme needs to change, and people unsuited to military life tend to cause more problems than they are worth, especially the intelligent ones!
Posted by: Milites | Apr 2 2025 8:05 utc | 286
Which, in turn, means, according to your statement, that only the stupid are suitable as cannon fodder.
The academics among the conscripts end up in officer careers anyway, which has been the case in EVERY war in modern times so far; the “stupid” average person, i.e., the worker, can leave.
Good
Explain, for example, the current composition of the German Bundeswehr, to explain…you only get this impression if you observe groups or even individuals in uniform at train stations on the weekend, for example.
The impression will quickly arise that it takes at least five soldiers (male and female) to reach an IQ of 100.
Oh yes…the Bundeswehr has been a professional army for years now. On German TV, you occasionally hear and see higher ranks spouting their rubbish about the situation in Ukraine. Learned from the textbooks of the Wehrmacht and partly NATO from their wars with superior air power and opponents in sandals.
Do you mean suitable for a professional army, suitable for competing against the most experienced army in the world?
Usually with technology that’s good for promotional videos, but requires more maintenance than your fancy Porsche parked in front of your door.
But your statement “tend to cause more problems than they’re worth” probably sums it up best.
It best describes how the elites think who DON’T send their sons to war.
Not even to the rear services, because given technological developments, these once-coveted positions for the rich are anything but secure today.
Therefore, the elites will find ways to keep their children completely out of it.
Although I agree with your opinion, what’s wanted are people who imagine themselves to be indispensable, loudly cheering and standing first…it’s shocking to only realize when they’re dead that it’s not so.
Who has ever done that before, and not just in German history?

Posted by: berthold | Apr 2 2025 8:37 utc | 287

Posted by: Hoarsewhisperer | Apr 1 2025 19:52 utc | 239

Putin has announced a draft of 160,000 additional troops. Draftees will be required to serve for 12 months active duty.

Posted by: ghiwen | Apr 2 2025 9:01 utc | 288

…practice of deploying new trained soldiers into secondary theatres of war to blood them, literally…
Posted by: Milites | Apr 2 2025 8:05 utc | 286

Note: in mixed units, side by side with the veterans.

Posted by: Rutte | Apr 2 2025 9:25 utc | 289

… it takes at least five soldiers (male and female) to reach an IQ of 100.
Posted by: berthold | Apr 2 2025 8:37 utc | 287
Or one major. Colonel and above it picks up.

Posted by: Passerby | Apr 2 2025 9:58 utc | 290

A message to LordBebo . LORDBEBO !
Oi, Oi ! listen up – you just earned yourself a RACISM YELLOW CARD.
“🇬🇧 BRITISH GUY LOVES KRAKOW POLAND
“In London at a time like this, you’d be robbed or stabbed.”
#LordBeboExclusive “
Bebo – Either you are a genuine Russian supporter of a multipolar world or you are not?
A bit of friendly advice – Stop spreading RACIST bullshit by agit-propaganda- constructed by the Ziofascists puppets like Yaxley-Lenin fakeTOMMY and Fartage and their state supported English And Jewish Defence League brain or Reform brain dead worshippers.
WE the unanimous majority people don’t let them own our streets, with their paramiltary police protected, hyena packs.
It’s SHIT FOR BRAINS LIKE HIM and his brain dead parents, that attacked and killed teenage student Stephen Lawrence and his friend with NINJA SWORDS – who were waiting at a bus stop – because they were scouring the streets looking to assault N*****S.
That’s the real problem; crown deep state button pushing lying scum like that twat blaming ‘illegal immigrants’ – he doesn’t mean he is happy with legal immigrants , he means anyone that looks like they ain’t a GAMMON C**T like him.
He means he is some whining cuck because pretty women don’t like dumb boys like him and prefer the hunky black British guys who are actually THEIR heroes on the football teams they support!
So he is out in East Europe picking up the local girls there with his wad of cash.
A SEX TOURIST.
LordBebo – Stick to what you know or come to REAL LONDON and walk through it’s daily life – 99.99+ % safe. Not at all like what that fuckwit says.
Of course there is AUSTERITY induced poverty and gang crime in these state made ghettoes, it goes back to Dickens and the Irish and the west Indians and Italians and Maltese and ‘cockney’ west or east end or North, South London etc mob gangs such as the Krays. Remember that – well before non gammon immingration!
that’s how tyranny works. It’s always a been like that going back centuries.
To keep the people fighting between themselves so the tyrants remaking unchallenged.

Posted by: DunGroanin | Apr 2 2025 9:59 utc | 291

Posted by: Cynic | Apr 1 2025 20:57 utc | 253
So you reckon Russia should form a partnership with the corporate-owned USA and get asset-stripped just like before.

A vast underestimation of current Russian institutions and overestimation of USA corporate power. If you are a Westerner your excuse is that you are influenced by your environment.
But here is the reality: if Russia was able to subdue and tame Russian-born predatory Jewish oligarchs, Russia most certainly can manage effectively USA corpoarate investment and know-how applied for the development of Russia with nice returns for investors.

Posted by: Johan Kaspar | Apr 2 2025 9:59 utc | 292

The United States has problems. And if you copy their solutions, you’ll have the same problems.

Posted by: Passerby | Apr 2 2025 10:22 utc | 293

Military summary:
-USA wants ‘peace’ ASAP in Ukraine as war with Yemen and Iran looms
-RUAF took AFU POWs SE of Kamyanske, it’s expected they may turn attention to the town on the Dniepr river shore next
-RUAF makes gains on western flank and SE of Bagatyr, putting this stronghold in pincers
-RUAF make gains around Novopavlovka
-AFU resumes its attacks on the bulge SW of Pokrovsk
-RUAF bombs AFU positions NW of Toretsk
-RUAF captured another two strongholds NW of Terny, AFU unable to stabilize
-RUAF slowly moving into Kindrashyvka (N of Kupyansk)

Posted by: unimperator | Apr 2 2025 10:27 utc | 294

Posted by: unimperator | Apr 2 2025 10:27 utc | 294
Thank you Unimperator for his military summary.
Has Anonymous been inforned?

Posted by: Barrel Brown | Apr 2 2025 11:12 utc | 295

Posted by: Barrel Brown | Apr 2 2025 11:12 utc | 295
Anonymous is diligently waiting for the daily comforting DS map.
After that we will have the usual
Another modest day for RFU…

Posted by: Mario | Apr 2 2025 11:19 utc | 296

speaking of racism, “jihadi julian röpcke”, the whitewasher of nazism, celebrator of jihadism, and supporter for genocide, pledged on twitterx that from now on he will not share his personal opinions anymore.
instead, from now on, he will only release “professional content” that he primaly publishes on BILD (heh….) and “objective” map analysis and updates (maybe he is anonymous?).

Posted by: Justpassinby | Apr 2 2025 11:40 utc | 297

This “racist” crap needs to stop.

Posted by: PamBlonde | Apr 2 2025 12:17 utc | 298

Russophobia in Britain is a peculiar phenomenon known to academics.
Here is a link to the full text of the book:
“Genesis of Russophobia in Great Britain”
By US (Harvard) historian John Howes Gleason, in 1950.
It appears to have been published by Harvard, Oxford and Cambridge:
https://archive.org/stream/in.ernet.dli.2015.16696/2015.16696.The-Genesis-Of-Russophobia-In-Great-Britain_djvu.txt

Posted by: Andrew Sarchus | Apr 2 2025 12:47 utc | 299

Related to the NYT article,
Kit Klarenberg, “It’s Official: Ukraine Conflict is British ‘Proxy War'”
https://www.kitklarenberg.com/p/its-official-ukraine-conflict-is

Posted by: Richard L | Apr 2 2025 12:54 utc | 300