Yesterday I had linked the New York Times whitewashing of President Biden's (proxy) war against Russia:
Today's long-read from the NYT is some weird whitewashing and fake history. Anyone who, during the last three years, has read more than the propaganda from the New York Times already knew each and every of these points:
- The Partnership: The Secret History of the War in Ukraine (archived) – New York Times
- Key Takeaways From America’s Secret Military Partnership With Ukraine (archived) – New York Times
- A U.S. base in Wiesbaden, Germany, supplied the Ukrainians with the coordinates of Russian forces on their soil.
- U.S. intelligence and artillery helped Ukraine quickly turn the tide against the Russian invasion.
- The Biden administration kept moving its red lines.
- Ultimately, the U.S. military and C.I.A. were allowed to help with strikes into Russia.
- Political disagreements in Ukraine contributed to the 2023 counteroffensive’s collapse.
Alex Cristoforou also remarks on it:
NYT article admits that this was more than proxy war between the US and Russia. It was as close as could be to an all out hot war between the two sides (US and Russia).
NYT however is running cover for the Biden administration. When you read through this very long article, the conclusion is that the Biden administration and US military command were easily defeating Russia until…
- The Ukraine Generals started acting up and disobeyed US orders.
- Zelensky chased "big wins" for PR reasons, failing to follow US strategy.
- Resulting in the 2023 counteroffensive 'failure.' Trust was broken between US and Ukraine.
- What followed was the US keeping Ukraine in the game up to the US elections, by striking targets in Crimea and pre-2014 Russia.
- Trump entered the WH and decided to wind the war down, handing Russia the win.
"History Is Written by the Victors."
In this case the NYT has decided that the US (under Biden) was victorious, IF not for the insubordinate Ukrainian Generals and ego of Zelensky. Trump will be blamed for the end result capitulation.👉The article 100% explains why NATO and the Europeans still believe that they can win this war. Peak delusion and propaganda.
The U.S. has in fact lost the war. If you do not believe so (yet) please read this remarkable piece:
‘Please don’t use my name’ A report by journalist Shura Burtin on the growing war weariness among Ukrainians – Meduza, Mar 27 2025
The frontline reporting is extremely grim. Ukraine and its army are done with.
But back to the New York Times piece.
Alex Cristoforou's diagnosis of delusion and propaganda does not go deep enough.
A quote from the New York Times piece reveals that a very real factor behind starting and losing the war is pure racism:
Within the coalition, the prevailing wisdom was that the 2023 counteroffensive would be the war’s last: The Ukrainians would claim outright triumph, or Mr. Putin would be forced to sue for peace.
…
They didn’t have to be as good as the British and Americans, General Cavoli would say; they just had to be better than the Russians.
U.S. General Christopher G. Cavoli is the commander of the United States European Command and Supreme Allied Commander Europe. His lack of historic knowledge and respect of the abilities of Russian soldiers should have disqualified him.
It is for racist people like him that the U.S., UK and Ukraine failed to recognize that have had no chance to win.