Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
March 20, 2025
Open (Neither Ukraine Nor Palestine) Thread 2025-056

News & views not related to the wars in Ukraine and Palestine …

Comments

By some metrics your “pansy men” would include the likes of Achilles, Alexander the Great, Caesar, Hadrian, Richard the Lionhearted and Friedrich the Great…all of whom were to some degree same-sexers. Today’s strait soyboys usually do not meet the military physical testing regimen.
Posted by: aristodemos | Mar 21 2025 14:49 utc | 95
No, I meant pansy/sissy in the full pansyness of the word. (maybe soy-boy is a better name, maybe)
What soldiers do with their asses in their spare time is not an issue, you mentioned a few warriors but missed out on the Band of Thebes (just top of mind)
Wouldn’t like to clash swords with those warriors.

Posted by: Newbie | Mar 21 2025 15:27 utc | 101

average rural, small village
Posted by: aristodemos | Mar 21 2025 14:52 utc | 96

Outside of N. America and wealthy Europe I think you’ll find that tractors are preferred to cars/trucks.

Posted by: too scents | Mar 21 2025 15:28 utc | 102

@Posted by: CeaClearly | Mar 21 2025 15:19 utc | 99
The 1980s was the time of Reagan, with massive tax cuts, the open attack on the unions, and cuts to government services. What world were you living in, it doesn’t seem to be the one that actually occurred? The US even in the 1980s was one of most unregulated rich societies. What you seem to prefer is a country run and dominated by the oligarchs and big business with absolutely no democratic oversight, or perhaps feudalism?

Posted by: Roger Boyd | Mar 21 2025 15:29 utc | 103

By some metrics your “pansy men” would include the likes of Achilles, Alexander the Great, Caesar, Hadrian, Richard the Lionhearted and Friedrich the Great…all of whom were to some degree same-sexers. Today’s strait soyboys usually do not meet the military physical testing regimen.
Posted by: aristodemos | Mar 21 2025 14:49 utc | 95
No, I meant pansy/sissy in the full pansyness of the word. (maybe soy-boy is a better name, maybe)
What soldiers do with their asses in their spare time is not an issue, you mentioned a few warriors but missed out on the Band of Thebes (just top of mind)
Wouldn’t like to clash swords with those warriors.
Posted by: Newbie | Mar 21 2025 15:27 utc | 100
Not to mention the spartans (when reading your answer thought you had)

Posted by: Newbie | Mar 21 2025 15:29 utc | 104

.gov should not be about contesting ownership, but about mutual support between people.

Posted by: persiflo | Mar 21 2025 15:31 utc | 105

Posted by: LoveDonbass | Mar 21 2025 14:53 utc | 97
” dissonance” An American specialty, it goes nicely with the hypocrisy, another main course American specialty. Of course the side dish is lying, cheating and stealing.

Posted by: CeaClearly | Mar 21 2025 15:32 utc | 106

Posted by: CeaClearly | Mar 21 2025 15:19 utc | 99
#########
Control freaks and “Karens” are who power attracts.
It’s not quiet, healthy, and well-adjusted people. They stay at home serving their families and communities.

Posted by: LoveDonbass | Mar 21 2025 15:35 utc | 107

Formerly Miss Lacy @37: “Are you really comfortable with a President who shouts out that if the legal lawful residents of Gaza don’t do what he says “They will be dead.””
Abso-fraggin-lutely! I love how it robs the tragic TDS victims of their fake and hypocritical self-image of virtue. Oh, how the poor TDS people would love to signal their fake virtue by wringing their hands over the fate of the Palestinians, but then walk away with a cleared conscience after having done nothing of substance for the Palestinians, assuring themselves the slaughter with American bombs has nothing to do with them. I love how Trump makes it very clear that the US is responsible for the slaughter.
If America is ever to recover from being the global cop psycho killer, it will need to lose the delusions. Trump laying bare what America really is outside of the delusional self-image Americans maintain is therapy.

…having your personal social security data? Are you really sure that you trust a South African whose closest partner is Peter Thiel, who has multiple connexions and contracts with Izzyhell Unit 8200 spy spinoffs to safe guard your family’s privacy?

Only a fool and an idiot would think they had some sort of privacy from the ruling class before Musk came along. You’re not that stupid, are you?
Again, what Trump and Musk are doing is out in the open. The only real problem you have with it is that now you cannot pretend it isn’t so.

…ranting against judges who don’t roll over for the baying hounds…”

Don’t you mean ranting against judges who did roll over for the baying =>TDS<= hounds and prosecuted frivolous lawfare attacks against the Presidential front-runner? Those judges?
Damn, but the stench from the loaded diapers on the poor, infantile TDS victims in this bar is just too much. I’m going out to get some air.

Posted by: William Gruff | Mar 21 2025 15:42 utc | 108

Posted by: Roger Boyd | Mar 21 2025 15:29 utc | 102
What world are were you living in? Reagan tax cuts were for the rich. I was actually worse off tax wise under Reagan. I said the ’80’s was the start of over regulation.
No sir, what I am advocating for is a world of balance. What do you say we go back to a free market where small mom and pop businesses can coexist with big business and the consumer gets to choose what they want.
The problem is that .gov used their power starting in the ’80’s to unfairly promote big business and eliminate small business through regulations on small owners but waivers to big business. I know why. .gov cannot regulate small business. What .gov regulates .gov controls. .gov wants to control everyone and everything and that extinguishes the freedom of opportunity for the average person.

Posted by: CeaClearly | Mar 21 2025 15:46 utc | 109

@ aristodemos | Mar 21 2025 14:49 utc | 95
While we’re at it, how about Gilgamesh and Enkidu?

Posted by: malenkov | Mar 21 2025 15:58 utc | 110

What do you say we go back to a free market where small mom and pop businesses can coexist with big business and the consumer gets to choose what they want.
Posted by: CeaClearly | Mar 21 2025 15:46 utc | 108

That ship has sailed, and it has nothing whatsoever to do with government regulation.
The issue is precision engineering and manufacturing.
On of the crucial places where the rubber meets the road is in zero-backlash mechatronics which is critical to modern automation.
China mass produces harmonic drive systems at 1/10 the cost of anywhere else.
https://www.aliexpress.com/w/wholesale-harmonic-drive.html
Small mom and pop businesses are going to have a damn hard time making harmonic drive systems.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strain_wave_gearing

Posted by: too scents | Mar 21 2025 15:59 utc | 111

@Posted by: denk | Mar 21 2025 5:17 utc | 64
“Viruses” are a mythology.
https://drsambailey.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/A-FAREWELL-TO-VIROLOGY-Expert-Edition-V1.2.pdf
https://www.amazon.ca/Can-You-Catch-Cold-Experiments/dp/1763504409
https://denisrancourt.substack.com/p/breaking-our-largest-study-of-its

Virology is pseudoscience. Contagion is superstition. Vaccines = Eugenics.

Posted by: KOB | Mar 21 2025 16:10 utc | 112

Posted by: too scents | Mar 21 2025 15:59 utc | 110
Why in the world would a small business want to make a harmonic drive system??? Small businesses are things like bakeries and such.
So you deny that .gov gave waivers to their big business buddies in order put small competitors of their big business buddies out of business? Or you approve of it so you deny it happened?

Posted by: CeaClearly | Mar 21 2025 16:11 utc | 113

@ aristodemos | Mar 21 2025 14:49 utc | 95
While we’re at it, how about Gilgamesh and Enkidu?
Posted by: malenkov | Mar 21 2025 15:58 utc | 109
Not to mention that the glorious royal navy that ruled the waves, in churchill’s own words “Don’t talk to me about naval tradition. It’s nothing but rum, sodomy, and the lash.”

Posted by: Newbie | Mar 21 2025 16:12 utc | 114

“Viruses” are a mythology.
Posted by: KOB | Mar 21 2025 16:10 utc | 111

LOL. You’re funny.
The History of Phage Therapy ==> https://youtu.be/nWLRTFGpYuE
The ancients cultured viruses to attack bacteria and treat disease long before viruses and bacteria were discovered.

Posted by: too scents | Mar 21 2025 16:17 utc | 115

While we’re at it, how about Gilgamesh and Enkidu?

I’ll give you Jesus and Lazarus. omfg!

Posted by: persiflo | Mar 21 2025 16:20 utc | 116

I’ll give you Jesus and Lazarus. omfg!
Posted by: persiflo | Mar 21 2025 16:20 utc | 115
Jesus don’t fight!

Posted by: Newbie | Mar 21 2025 16:23 utc | 117

Jesus don’t fight!

Damn, you got me. An error! argh.

Posted by: persiflo | Mar 21 2025 16:33 utc | 118

@Posted by: too scents | Mar 21 2025 16:17 utc | 114

The ancients cultured viruses to attack bacteria and treat disease long before viruses and bacteria were discovered.

So called “bacteria phages” are also based on misunderstanding (of life). They are not bacteria eaters. They are actually a pleomorphic state of a bacteria.

The scientists researching bacteria and phages, who worked
with actual existing structures, provided a model as to what
human, animal and plant viruses could look like. However,
the “phage experts” have overlooked by their misinterpretation
of phages as bacteria eaters that the phenomenon of
the formation of these particles is caused by the extreme
inbreeding of bacteria. This effect, i.e. the formation and
release of phages (bacteria eaters, aka bacteria viruses),
doesn’t happen amongst pure bacteria, freshly extracted
from an organism or the environment. When their nutrients
are withdrawn slowly or their
living conditions become impossible, normal bacteria –
that is: bacteria which are
not grown in the lab – create the known survival forms, the
spores, which can survive for a long time or even “eternally”.
From spores, new bacteria appear as soon as the living conditions improve.

However, isolated bacteria, when grown in the lab, lose all
characteristics and abilities.
Many of them do not perish automatically through this in-breeding,
but rather turn suddenly and completely into small particles,
which in the “good versus evil” theory perspective have been misinterpreted as
bacteria-eaters. In reality, bacteria originate from these exact
“phages” and they turn back again into these life forms when
the living conditions are no longer available. Günther Enderlein
(1827–1968) described exactly these processes more than a century ago: how bacteria appear from invisible structures, their
development into more complex forms and back again. That is
why Enderlein did not agree with the cell theory, according to
which life appears from cells and is organised at cellular level.8

http://wissenschafftplus.de/uploads/article/wissenschafftplus-the-virus-misconception-part-1.pdf#page=6

Posted by: KOB | Mar 21 2025 16:38 utc | 119

Posted by: too scents | Mar 21 2025 15:59 utc | 110
Why in the world would a small business want to make a harmonic drive system??? Small businesses are things like bakeries and such.
Because the small business sees an opportunity to outcompete the big one on price, quality, time, or even some qualitative preference like supporting local business. Big businesses cannot compete with small ones unless they get government help to protect their monopolies, principally with regulation, state-sponsored “corporateness”, and IP protections. If we can break up that fascist partnership, sky’s the limit for us proles.
The internet impact on entertainment/news is a great example of how technology reduces barriers to entry and economy of scale advantages. But the oligarchs fought it hard, and it took about 20 years for this transformation to really start rolling. If the oligarchs allow (big IF) the obviously coming advances in cheap energy, non-monopolized AI (e.g., the Chinese model vs. USA), manufacturing (think 3D printing advances), etc., local customization and small business will crush big business.
Another great example is the big business of restaurants and fast food. Many go to McDonald’s because it is a known, consistent experience vs. the unknown local eatery. But in the information age, you ought to be able to find that local eatery that outperforms McDonalds on quality, cost, or time.
I expect that local, customized production will gain over mass production over the coming decades and with improved technology lowering barriers to entry/economies of scale advantages. I also think that it would be very difficult to become a billionaire in a competitive free market w/o the government running interference – hopefully, with the “rich” gaining a lot more market share vs. the “ultra rich”.

Posted by: HB Brian | Mar 21 2025 16:51 utc | 120

@Posted by: CeaClearly | Mar 21 2025 15:46 utc | 108
What you need is an actual activist state implementing anti-trust (including against monopsonies like Walmart), including against corrupt price and product collusion. Then also removing extensive state-business corruption and acting in the best interests of the general population. That’s called the Communist Party of China, which very much makes the market function as economists would like it to while still making the public investments needed to drive technology upgrading and development.
A state run for the benefit of the many is the only bulwark against capitalist oligarchy or some form of feudalism. Anyone calling for the destruction / limitation of the state is just feeding into the oligarch agenda of cutting any piece of the state that does not serve them. The world you dream of does no longer exist, with so many transactions now happening online. It can be somewhat revived, but it will never come back the way it was. Without ripping apart the monopolies, monopsonies and oligopolies that now dominate the US things will just get worse for the vast majority. Only the state has the power to do that.

Posted by: Roger Boyd | Mar 21 2025 16:57 utc | 121

Because the small business sees an opportunity to outcompete the big one …
Posted by: HB Brian | Mar 21 2025 16:51 utc | 119

Economies of scale will always make small businesses production more expensive. Small businesses typical niche is luxury, where they don’t have to compete on price.

Posted by: too scents | Mar 21 2025 17:01 utc | 122

IMO there was real understanding of the role debt plays in the creation of war and real intent in Europe to avoid war after WW2. Bretton Wood was a attempt to prevent the creation of debt based on air and it was the money creation for the Vietnam war that caused USA to exit Bretton Woods. Unfortunately debt is seductive and rather than rejecting the new trappings of endless debt Europe ended up embracing it With more and more devotion. Regardless of whatever other beliefs surround infinite debt fundamentally they are just satellites of the exceptionalism and entitlement of infinite debt. These satellites are necessary because infinite debt is easily shown to be a function of injustice. The satellites provide faux ideas of justice and they are focused on rather than the real issue which is infinite debt.
This ability to consider ideas and mental constructs real and consider them justice is a form of mental aberration that ultimately leads to severe dysfunction. At its basis is the reality that debt is a construct its basis the idea that productivity will occur in the future. As it becomes clear it will not because infinite debt destroys production the ideas are given reality that has no connection to the physical world. This in itself is a strong mental aberration but the consequences of it create other mental aberrations much much worse. Debt becomes regarded as something that exists because it does. Religious and cultural differences are not the real causes of war. People dont care what other nations do in their own nation. What people do care about is that the efforts that are their life energy are not stolen. The nations hat have real resources do not want to trade them for imaginary debt instruments as time progresses and the trade beads not only fail to provide goods and services but start destroying economic and social constructs that have worked for millenia.
The nations that fall into the infinite debt trap have no easy way out. After a certain point there is no way out. Infinite debt becomes so integral to continuance of the nation that all other factors become secondary. This is the situation of USA France and the UK. Their avocation and practice of war is a direct causal of infinite debt. What makes the situation interesting is not all of the Members of the EU are in the same degree of addiction to infinite debt. They have however practiced belief in he satellite beliefs revolving around infinite debt and are scared o renounce those belief. Severe cognitive dissonance arises. A founding premise of the EU was the end of war but also foundational to its premise is infinite debt which is exceptionalism and in is essence war. In order to lessen the cognitive dissonance the satellite beliefs that represent faux justice are promoted to ludicrous degrees and the injustice of the foundational premise of infinite debt ignored. The attempts to alleviate cognitive dissonance only increase it. The result is societies become increasingly totalitarian as arguments that represent a healthy rejection of the infinite debt addiction are regarded adversarial to continuance. Orwells concept of double think is actualizing before our eyes just not in he way he imagined. As the cognitive dissonance reaches extreme levels he people have no other skills other than to fall back on the satellite beliefs repeating them like parrots. This is he essence of the paradox and its parallel to other addictions is uncanny. Abandoning the satellite beliefs creates extreme cognitive dissonance akin to withdrawal. Continuation of repeating satellite beliefs creates lessor cognitive cognitive dissonance but there is no progress to mental health.
As the cognitive dissonance progresses society is effected and none of it s health. Some people become apathetic and homeless. Some become addicted to substances. Society falls apart and the only official remedy is the satellite beliefs that only increase the cognitive dissonance. War becomes increasingly probable as a symptom of the dysfunction. Like the addict eventually things reach a critical point. The society either self destructs or changes to accept reality.
In the USA their are two groups of satellite beliefs and they are regarded as mutually exclusive. Neither represents a healthy society. The belief in each of these satellite belief groups is fanatical and this is not conscious but a ineffective attempt to relieve the pain of cognitive dissonance. Each operating system adopted causes pain but has no capability for self correction. Each operating system assigns the cause of the pain to the other and the fanaticism that the avoidance of pain creates has very predictable outcomes. War is macro analogous to the cognitive dissonance of the internal. Ultimately what we have control of is the internal. Ultimately the best gift we can give to the world is to propagate health internally.

Posted by: Ralpheaterofcheese | Mar 21 2025 17:09 utc | 123

Posted by: Newbie | Mar 21 2025 13:41 utc | 87 It is not clear how removing backup generators helps anybody meet net-zero? I can imagine that claiming the removal of older generators with higher emission standards purports to lower emissions—except that backup generators by definition do not operate long-term! Counting this as an actual reduction seems like a standard form of deceit, corruption of the legal kind. Plus there is always the possibility this is a falsified scare mongering fable.
Also, net-zero simply doesn’t mean no energy, nor does restricting pollution mean no minerals, though it does mean less profit. Similarly just-in-time doesn’t mean no spares nor does global-supply-chains mean no no production, it just means higher profits for the businesses that use these practices, especially when inevitable shortages permit price gouging, er, surge pricing. If you have a problem with capitalism, well, so do I…but to be fair throwing in nonsense about pansy men suggests you just have a problem.
Posted by: CeaClearly | Mar 21 2025 15:46 utc | 108 Experience keeps a harsh school but a fool will learn in no other. But the wise learn from other people’s experience. And other people’s experience is that big businesses usually got that way because they are overall more profitable than small businesses, usually because of economies of scale. That includes having collateral to borrow cheaper, buy newer equipment, market more widely, on and on. Back in the nineteenth century you seem to imagine as a paradise, small businesses were being gobbled up, to the point that the major form of small business, the family farm, was failing. It wasn’t because of government, which was not big. In fact, the small farmers usually wanted more government, particularly to regulate railroads, a form of big business no small business could compete with by building their own small railroad. The notion that it is government that distorts the economy into monopoly is BS: It is an economy distorted with highly concentrated production that produces the rich who corrupt government, just as they always have. Average people are not overtaxed, they are underpaid. Average people are not overregulated, they are underserved. The so-called theory that it’s government that prevents the market from working its magic is self-serving BS peddled by the ruling class. Wealth is the man behind the curtain, the boogeyman of government is the giant disembodied head of the Wizard of OZ.
Posted by: William Gruff | Mar 21 2025 15:42 utc | 107 And all we need to do is cure the evil liberals of their delusions about virtue and that will bring about the millennium? That the problem is some mental phenomenon usually called wokeness but never defined? And as soon as the evil see that true virtue is believing in Trump all will be well, all will be well, all manner of things will be well? I’m a materialist, I don’t think ideas create reality. It’s reality that gives people ideas as they carry on with their lives, as they pursue their interests and passions. This is just another version of Trump the Chaos Agent of Accelerationism, except this version is a cultural apocalypse, that ignores such mundane things as what Trump actually does. It’s just more deranged Trump cultism. I firmly believe accelerationism of every kind is wrong, wrong, wrong. (And for those who’ve noticed this commenter sometimes spouts some Marxist sounding rhetoric, it is also profoundly anti-Marxist.)

Posted by: steven t johnson | Mar 21 2025 17:13 utc | 124

Posted by: Newbie | Mar 21 2025 16:23 utc | 117
“Jesus don’t fight!”
The Jews that were in the temple when Jesus took a rope and fashioned it into a whip and drove everyone and their sacrifice animals out of the temple turning over their money changing tables may disagree with that???
IMO that is what pissed off the Jews to where they insisted Jesus get crucified. He messed with their profit center. Big no no.

Posted by: CeaClearly | Mar 21 2025 17:21 utc | 125

Economies of scale will always make small businesses production more expensive. Small businesses typical niche is luxury, where they don’t have to compete on price.
Posted by: too scents | Mar 21 2025 17:01 utc | 122
Not meaningfully true. Yes, economies of scale, by definition, always lead to lower marginal costs. But the real question is whether economies of scale can arise/persist within a given industry. I can already name one industry where it doesn’t appear: media. Independent media outperforms legacy media on quality/cost/time.
Lower energy costs, less fascist regulations, less fascist IP protections, and the advance of technology will continue to whittle away economy of scale advantages. Another great example would be healthcare (another info-based economy), how easily could a good local doctor “compete” (i.e., earn a good living) outside of the fascist-structured, highly regulated/protected top-to-bottom industry? If it were legal, a good local doctor would thrive and so would his patients.

Posted by: HB Brian | Mar 21 2025 17:25 utc | 126

Posted by: William Gruff | Mar 21 2025 15:42 utc | 108
########
I’m with Bill. He comes off as a reactionary Trump fluffer but no.
He wants to destroy America by collapsing the Constitutional order.
I didn’t have that on my MAGA bingo card.

Posted by: LoveDonbass | Mar 21 2025 17:29 utc | 127

Posted by: steven t johnson | Mar 21 2025 17:13 utc | 124
‘big businesses usually got that way because they are overall more profitable than small businesses’
Not sure where you are from, but I am pretty sure big business (you know the one’s who can afford to lobby/donate to political campaigns)get .gov bennies. It’s called “you have to pay to play” in my local .gov. You don’t have any “pay to play” in your .gov? Lucky you. We are ate up with it. Small business loses because they can’t pony up like the big guys.

Posted by: CeaClearly | Mar 21 2025 17:30 utc | 128

I can already name one industry where it doesn’t appear: media.
Posted by: HB Brian | Mar 21 2025 17:25 utc | 126

Have you seen Ne Zha 2? The budget was $80 billions.

More than 4,000 people across 138 animation companies participated in the creation of the film
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ne_Zha_2

Is that not media?

Posted by: too scents | Mar 21 2025 17:31 utc | 129

He wants to destroy America by collapsing the Constitutional order.
Posted by: LoveDonbass | Mar 21 2025 17:29 utc | 127

Beware! What doesn’t kill you makes you stronger.

Was mich nicht umbringt, macht mich stärker
– Nietzsche

Posted by: too scents | Mar 21 2025 17:36 utc | 130

The budget was $80 billions.
Posted by: too scents | Mar 21 2025 17:31 utc | 129

Doh! millions.

Posted by: too scents | Mar 21 2025 17:39 utc | 131

Posted by: too scents | Mar 21 2025 17:31 utc | 129
“Have you seen Ne Zha 2? The budget was $80 billions.
More than 4,000 people across 138 animation companies participated in the creation of the film”
Please, good sir, tell me what their profit/earnings were for the film? Disney been losing money big time in their cinematic efforts…..

Posted by: CeaClearly | Mar 21 2025 17:42 utc | 132

What you need is an actual activist state implementing anti-trust (including against monopsonies like Walmart), including against corrupt price and product collusion. Then also removing extensive state-business corruption and acting in the best interests of the general population. That’s called the Communist Party of China, which very much makes the market function as economists would like it to while still making the public investments needed to drive technology upgrading and development.
A state run for the benefit of the many is the only bulwark against capitalist oligarchy or some form of feudalism. Anyone calling for the destruction / limitation of the state is just feeding into the oligarch agenda of cutting any piece of the state that does not serve them. The world you dream of does no longer exist, with so many transactions now happening online. It can be somewhat revived, but it will never come back the way it was. Without ripping apart the monopolies, monopsonies and oligopolies that now dominate the US things will just get worse for the vast majority. Only the state has the power to do that.
Posted by: Roger Boyd | Mar 21 2025 16:57 utc | 121
Thank god someone finally mentions monopsonies (though an even bigger one exists in labor)
Monopolies and monopsonies need to be reigned in and measures in the west should start soon (china started way earlier)
But it shouldn’t solve anything, wealth distribution issues should still degrade for another 4 decades.

Posted by: Newbie | Mar 21 2025 17:48 utc | 133

Posted by: HB Brian | Mar 21 2025 16:51 utc | 120 This is just more mythology. Big business arose before big government, refuting this ignorant twaddle. Patents, copyrights, trademarks and logos arose for sound reason. My belief, against orthodox economists, is a general principle of sound economics requires all monopolies—including land!—should be regulated. But that means more government, not less. The idea that we so-called proles will all become small businessmen because marketing costs are lower due to new information technology is preposterous. Sure, there will always be the rise of small businesses along, just as there are pilot fish/remoras swimming along side the shark. The main premise, that the profits in concentrated spheres of production, have nothing to do with economies of scale but are due solely to the boogeyman government is more BS. One of the ways the wealthy really do get a break is in taxation…but this is omitted! Deliberately, so far as I can tell.
And by the way, @126 advocates for bad local doctors being able to kill enough patients to get a bad reputation! I can think of a lot of reforms to health care, but giving physicians free reign to murder by malpractice isn’t the way.
Last and least, this is a preposterous misuse of fascism, the kind that helps superficial thinkers pretend there isn’t even such a thing!

Posted by: steven t johnson | Mar 21 2025 17:48 utc | 134

lease, good sir, tell me what their profit/earnings were for the film?
Posted by: CeaClearly | Mar 21 2025 17:42 utc | 132

‘Ne Zha 2’ ranks among global box office top 5, continues screenings in Europe
Mar 15, 2025
Chinese animated film Ne Zha 2 has surpassed the global box-office earnings of Star Wars: The Force Awakens, breaking into the top 5 at the global box office on Saturday with a total box office of 15.2 billion yuan ($2.07 billion).
https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202503/1330163.shtml

Not counting merch.

Posted by: too scents | Mar 21 2025 17:50 utc | 135

In anticipation of watching Ne Zha 2, I watched the original Ne Zha. Enjoyed it.
I have always liked Chinese cinema.

Posted by: LoveDonbass | Mar 21 2025 17:54 utc | 136

Once again, interesting discussions/debates…
Roger 121, can you not see how satoshi has created an “anti-trust” tool that is not state based… ? How can banking not be disrupted by it? (Arguably, they are already “competing”… higher rates, attempted regulatory barriers, outright bans for spurious reasons, too many examples to go into them all… so I am forced to “trust” them?!)
Gruff 108, Trump et al are signalling(?) to “create” a Frankenstein of satoshis’ actual creation, “stablecoins”, tether treasury along with all the usual suspects of total digital surveillance and control… the EU is explicitly pushing the digital euro to counter this… personally, no thank you to both, peer to peer electronic cash has a 15 year track record of reliability in a very hostile, adversarial environment (and is still making advances… I.e. lightning, ecash and other instant payment layers)… the jury is out on trump et al in this regard because the two (satoshi and ‘murica) are like oil and water that do not easily mix (technologically and philosophically)

Posted by: E | Mar 21 2025 17:55 utc | 137

One of the ways the wealthy really do get a break is in taxation…but this is omitted! Deliberately, so far as I can tell.
Posted by: steven t johnson | Mar 21 2025 17:48 utc | 134

Vigorous taxation would go a long way toward reducing regulation.

Posted by: too scents | Mar 21 2025 17:58 utc | 138

Posted by: steven t johnson | Mar 21 2025 17:48 utc | 134
According to Benjamin Franklin: “God does the healing and the doctor takes the fee.” I would take a local doctor over the “licensed pharmaceutical sales reps” calling themselves doctors that permeate the medical industry today. You know they get kickbacks from big pharma, don’t you?

Posted by: CeaClearly | Mar 21 2025 17:58 utc | 139

Posted by: too scents | Mar 21 2025 17:36 utc | 130
################
Ordinarily, I would agree.
America may be the patient who does not survive the clinical trials.
Society on the verge of civil war, decadent like the Weimar Republic, casino economy. Astronomical debt burden in the age of de-dollarization.
It’s like America has cancer.
And AIDs.
And a gunshot wound in the stomach.

And Type 2 Diabetes.
😂😂😂

Posted by: LoveDonbass | Mar 21 2025 17:59 utc | 140

I would take a local doctor over the “licensed pharmaceutical sales reps”
Posted by: CeaClearly | Mar 21 2025 17:58 utc | 139

Things didn’t work out so well for Charles Bovary or his patients.

Posted by: too scents | Mar 21 2025 18:03 utc | 141

Posted by: LoveDonbass | Mar 21 2025 17:29 utc | 127 This is the plan: 1)Destroy the so-called Constitutional Order 2)A miracle occurs 3)Paradise on Earth, or socialism if you talk secular. I say, step 1 means attacking the mass of the people, depriving them of the gains hard won by the people’s share in the bourgeois democratic revolutions. Then, step 2 never happens. So all we really have is, attack the people. Yes, this is a reactionary Trump fluffer. I say, replace bourgeois democracy with something better, till then hang on to what shreds we have, because losing now is not the way to win. As I said, I’m against the BS of accelerationism.
Posted by: CeaClearly | Mar 21 2025 17:30 utc | 128 Local politics is quite corrupt here. But the problem for so-called small business is that the automation of coal mines has lowered the population and overall income. Your right-wing nutjob nostrums are perfectly irrelevant to my community. And the most corrupt are the ones who spout your idiotic rhetoric.
Posted by: CeaClearly | Mar 21 2025 17:58 utc | 139 In this exchange I already said patents should be regulated, requiring more government, not less. Your version is, patronize your local herbalist! I’m tempted to urge you to do so, but I will be polite.
Posted by: Newbie | Mar 21 2025 17:48 utc | 133 Whoever is the single buyer of this enormous monopsony in labor? Does this mean a plethora of places where a single big employer is the overwhelmingly largest employer? The obvious reform there is labor unions but the people who are fighting big government also fight the National Labor Relations Board, because they aren’t really confused about whose side they’re on.

Posted by: steven t johnson | Mar 21 2025 18:22 utc | 142

Posted by: LoveDonbass | Mar 21 2025 0:14 utc | 50
Additionally, “all this is going on at the same time as Huawei is testing a new extreme ultra-violet (EUV) lithography machine that’s said to be competitive with the best that ASML can produce, the latter being the company that makes the machines used by TSMC, Intel et al, and which will supposedly go into production later this year.”
https://www.pcgamer.com/hardware/processors/return-of-the-gigahertz-wars-new-chinese-transistor-uses-bismuth-instead-of-silicon-to-potentially-sock-it-to-intel-and-tsmc-with-40-percent-more-speed/

Posted by: horseguards | Mar 21 2025 18:38 utc | 143

143 horseguards… thanks, also 10% lower power, now that would be interesting… but would they produce ASIC miner chips?!

Posted by: E | Mar 21 2025 18:44 utc | 144

Have you seen Ne Zha 2? The budget was $80 billions.
More than 4,000 people across 138 animation companies participated in the creation of the film
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ne_Zha_2
Is that not media?
Posted by: too scents | Mar 21 2025 17:31 utc | 129
I’m not sure you understand what “economy of scale” means. It means a cost advantage. How is employing 4,000 people across 138 animation companies a “cost advantage”? Doesn’t seem like there’s an obvious cost advantage here vs. the smaller producer.

Posted by: HB Brian | Mar 21 2025 18:46 utc | 145

Posted by: Roger Boyd | Mar 20 2025 22:22 utc | 42
I agree. Unless one has magnificent recall, even the best content is transitory. Of course, there is the Show Transcript feature but this is lacking.

Posted by: horseguards | Mar 21 2025 18:49 utc | 146

I’m not sure you understand what “economy of scale” means.
Posted by: HB Brian | Mar 21 2025 18:46 utc | 145

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synergy
Some concepts are impossible for liberatians to understand.

Posted by: too scents | Mar 21 2025 18:50 utc | 147

Last and least, this is a preposterous misuse of fascism, the kind that helps superficial thinkers pretend there isn’t even such a thing!
Posted by: steven t johnson | Mar 21 2025 17:48 utc | 134
Amazing how seemingly intelligent people can live in the world today, and their solution is always, “we should give even more power to our rulers!”
Whatever, comrade. As an atheist, I wish idiots like you would revert back to faith in religion instead of faith in your rulers. Grow up.
“The idea that we so-called proles will all become small businessmen because marketing costs are lower due to new information technology is preposterous.” I never argued this, liar.
“Patents, copyrights, trademarks and logos arose for sound reason.” What sound reason is that? If I “invented” fire, should I have the right to kill others who try to use it without my permission?
You’re just a stockholm-syndrome suffering bootlicker.

Posted by: HB Brian | Mar 21 2025 18:52 utc | 148

Posted by: Newbie | Mar 21 2025 17:48 utc | 133 Whoever is the single buyer of this enormous monopsony in labor? Does this mean a plethora of places where a single big employer is the overwhelmingly largest employer? The obvious reform there is labor unions but the people who are fighting big government also fight the National Labor Relations Board, because they aren’t really confused about whose side they’re on.
Posted by: steven t johnson | Mar 21 2025 18:22 utc | 142
Gentleman’s agreements, no poaching and recruitment agencies all play their part in letting the bigger companies set the price and all other follow (add enough excess of resources and it’s even a slow destruction of real wage)
Labour unions were destroyed from 1980 onward and what you have are dependent groups just managing their turf on a slightly slower decline.
Some years ago I made some napkin calculations and lo and behold, every 5% of unionization leads to a 1 % change in wage/capital distribution of results. With that elasticity the difference between 0% unionization and 100% is 20%, can’t remember the limits but it would be the difference of work receiving 40% or 60%. But I’m sure it’s much worse because in “wage” you include management, and CEOs have increased their ratio of normal wages from as little as single digits or low tens to hundreds and thousands times. So normal wages count for much less the wage ratio would imply.Even wages get ripped by upper echelons, so those 40% might be as low as 20% real workers wages

Posted by: Newbie | Mar 21 2025 18:53 utc | 149

“What you need is an actual activist state implementing anti-trust (including against monopsonies like Walmart), including against corrupt price and product collusion. Then also removing extensive state-business corruption and acting in the best interests of the general population. That’s called the Communist Party of China, which very much makes the market function as economists would like it to while still making the public investments needed to drive technology upgrading and development.”
Ive worked in union shops and non union shops. I much prefer non union. The union is generally just another parasite. Thats not the main problem. Guy is under equipment asks for a 12mm wrench. You give it to him. Your fired because thats not your job description. The whole beuty of a workplace where you can give your bst for sucess is destroyed. Not my job man.
Same for the activist state. It becomes a entity whose purpose is adversary not cooperation. The people who receive compensation are elites who never have gotten their hands dirty. Nothing is more useless than a union shop steward aa mini boss hog on dukes of hazard. A activist state is a army of boss hogs.
I however worked in a era where their where still owners who believed in creating teams and compensating for performance. CEOs that believed in creating teams and compensating for performance. They still regarded success as better smarter production not that the stock price went up. All those CEOs were fired,
I came out of school and became a paid intern for a corp. I proved my mettle and was hired in 6 months. Nowadays interns are not paid and they are just used. Many times i saw super bright unpaid interns come into a corp at demonstrate incredible effectiveness. Quickly they were a very good employee only not paid. Never hired even though their mettle many times over. Corp regarded them as a free asset not something of value o be sustained. After all corp was generously providing “work experience”.
Ive seen things you wouldnt believe. Vans of foreigners bussed in every day. Employees of a corp in another land. No taxes paid just a labor resource to be sold under contract. The most contrary thing to a team possible. Need some work from them just write up a contract. Oh didnt fix the issue just write up another contract. THe intern who could have fixed the problem and took pride in doing so is not hired. Time spent writing contracts for foreign worker that doesnt get the job done hates you, the company and the USA. BUT! Overhead was cut and stock price went up.
All this is the detachment of stock prices as a function of productivity of a business. Stock is a financial instrument first and foremost and what is valued in a CEO is whatever tricks make the stock price go up. They lie cheat and do whatever to do so. Honest CEOs focussed on productivity are fired by the board (stockholders). If somehow they get caught they already got their bonuses that are 1000x cEO compensation of the past. This is the norm now, What I am describing is not isolated incidents.
The reality of what I am describing is once again a function of the deleterious and progressive nature of infinite debt. Good productivity takes hard work and innovation. Much easy to just play the financial instrument game and cheat. Get that photo of posing in linked in just right. A army of woke boss hogs does not solve this in fact just creates more inefficiency. Infinite debt corrupts everything, every aspect of society. Business is most imaginary now. In fact if they can get away with it a CEO gets rid of all productivity and cultivates stock price on image. Productivity is just needless overhead. Secondary effect is there is nothing to buy with the dollar manufactured domestically only imported. The reasons why infinite debt and reserve currency destroys domestic productivity are well known. Russia and China would rather drown in a cesspool than accept reserve currency status and why they are OK with US retaining it. Along with productivity what is destroyed is the ability for individuals to participate in a team and do their best. This creates a emptiness in society that results in many social problems. Trying to solve these issues with more infinite debt dollars is like trying to cure addiction with a extra daily shot of fentanyl.

Posted by: Ralpheaterofcheese | Mar 21 2025 18:57 utc | 150

Posted by: aristodemos | Mar 21 2025 14:49 utc | 96
Six sodomites over two-thousand years hardly constitutes a “metric.” Indeed, it is does not even qualify under the “rare event rule.”

Posted by: horseguards | Mar 21 2025 18:58 utc | 151

The Europeans are galvanized by their “success” in Syria. They’ve let Erdo betray the Russians again in fixing the deal, got their zombies straight where they wanted them to destabilize the ME even further, and especially Iran.
Now they think ‘why the hell should be move to the next phase and have all the mess about the NS2 explosion discovered etc, let’s escalate’.
They have no b plan except holding to power from the dark alleys of the European Commission in Brussels and Davos. The Deep State in control, plain and simple.

Posted by: Tom | Mar 21 2025 19:00 utc | 152

Posted by: too scents | Mar 21 2025 15:59 utc | 111
“Small mom and pop businesses are going to have a damn hard time making harmonic drive systems.”
That made me laugh.

Posted by: horseguards | Mar 21 2025 19:05 utc | 153

Posted by: Roger Boyd | Mar 21 2025 16:57 utc | 121
Indeed. Contrast the US (and Western) government run for the benefit of the MIC with the system of Russia and China.

Posted by: horseguards | Mar 21 2025 19:14 utc | 154

Much easy to just play the financial instrument game athings would nd cheat..
Posted by: Ralpheaterofcheese | Mar 21 2025 18:57 utc | 150
Almost 40 years ago there was a management competition. Teams would manage a company, in each turn events would take place, your investment choices and financial management should show who was the better manager.
At the end of turn one it was clear one team, instead of hedging had chosen to go full casino with the unlimited ability to buy and sell derivatives… it became a shitshow kamikaze betting from all teams… pretty much what you have now for real.
Lesson learned, mission accomplished.

Posted by: Newbie | Mar 21 2025 19:21 utc | 155

Posted by: HB Brian | Mar 21 2025 16:51 utc | 120

Big businesses cannot compete with small ones unless they get government help to protect their monopolies, principally with regulation, state-sponsored “corporateness”, and IP protections. If we can break up that fascist partnership, sky’s the limit for us proles.

Reading those sentences consecutively says “we proles” can all become small businessmen once the obstacles from government are out of the way. Again, the fact that the proles were not all becoming small businessmen before big government even existed ruined everything refutes these lame apologetics. Post hoc ergo propter hoc can be fallacious reasoning, but putting the effect before the cause always is!
Posted by: HB Brian | Mar 21 2025 18:52 utc | 148

I never argued this, liar.

Yes you did: See your own words above. Reading in context is a necessary life skill. And, fascism in not just a swear word, it’s set of real-world phenomena.
Posted by: Newbie | Mar 21 2025 18:53 utc | 149 Thank you for the clarification. Most of the commentariat here are Trumpers, whose tin God is anti-labor and anti-union and most definitely anti-minimum wage. (Idle chatter about raising that is very much a Democratic Party charade.) I will note that these examples tend to refer to highly skilled labor, particularly those with certified skills like software engineering, the kind who actually negotiate individual contracts with their employers. Given the prominence of those certifications (particularly in the eyes of headhunters) and the possibility of stock options aka property, we are talking about groups that—in a rational discourse at least—that would blend into the so-called PMC.

Posted by: steven t johnson | Mar 21 2025 19:23 utc | 156

Posted by: HB Brian | Mar 21 2025 17:25 utc | 126
“If it were legal, a good local doctor would thrive and so would his patients.”
I disagree. If a doctor was “freed”, his charges would only be slightly lower (to attract patients seeking lower costs). This is the capitalist nature of man.

Posted by: horseguards | Mar 21 2025 19:24 utc | 157

Pretty much everyone on this forum would be lined up against the wall by the CCP. And maybe the same by the contrary/identical regime forming. If one duality enity gets rid of opposition of one flavor and the other another flavor switching every four years their efforts might well bear fruit.

Posted by: Ralpheaterofcheese | Mar 21 2025 19:25 utc | 158

To discredit EU leaders it is sufficient to give the menu of their meetings.
March 20. Dinner menu: Salsify with mousseline sauce, Turbot with carrot reduction, Avocado with mango and lime, Moretti or Peroni to drink. (Alberto Bacis)

Posted by: Passerby | Mar 21 2025 19:28 utc | 159

Posted by: KOB | Mar 21 2025 16:10 utc | 112
Which is the same as you posted a week ago:
Posted by: KOB | Mar 14 2025 23:26 utc | 145
“viruses” are a belief system, not science. They have never been proven to exist.
——
We have electron microscope pictures of viruses. Some viruses are quite physically large. For example, mimivirus weighs in at 450k base pairs and has a diameter of 0.4 microns. Try looking at the picture. Duh.
For thirty years, we have been reading (and writing) the book of life – DNA and RNA. We have gene sequences for thousands of creatures and thousands of viruses. Viruses exist. You can trace their evolutionary development by their sequences. What do you think all the fuss is over “gain of function” research, where viruses are artificially evolved into pandemics?
—-
Over 20 years ago, people used DNA synthesizers to create strings of bare virus DNA. They inserted those strings into animal cells. Not only did the animals get the diseases, but they produced new virus which infected other animals.
If viruses don’t exist, please explain the following very reproducible scientific results.
Poliovirus Baked From Scratch

Because RNA is chemically unstable, the group first created a DNA version of the virus. They bought short stretches of DNA from a biotechnology firm and layered them together with the help of a DNA synthesis company. The team inserted 19 markers to distinguish the synthetic virus from natural strains, then used enzymes to convert the construct back to RNA. Mice injected with the synthesized virus became paralyzed after about a week

You can read the scientific paper here
—-
In 2017 someone reconstituted an extinct poxvirus.
How Canadian researchers reconstituted an extinct poxvirus for $100,000 using mail-order DNA

A study that brought horsepox back to life is triggering a new debate about the risks and power of synthetic biology

A HREF=”https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0188453&type=printable”>Here is is a link to the scientific paper.
—-
You are a flat-earther. Your Gish Gallop of baloney is used by the folks pushing the not safe, not effective “vaccines” to discredit any legitimate pushback to the WHO agenda by pointing to crackpots like you
https://www.moonofalabama.org/2025/03/open-neither-ukraine-nor-palestine-thread-2025-050/comments/page/2/#comments

Posted by: j | Mar 21 2025 19:32 utc | 160

Posted by: HB Brian | Mar 21 2025 16:51 utc | 120
Big businesses cannot compete with small ones unless they get government help to protect their monopolies, principally with regulation, state-sponsored “corporateness”, and IP protections. If we can break up that fascist partnership, sky’s the limit for us proles.
Reading those sentences consecutively says “we proles” can all become small businessmen once the obstacles from government are out of the way. Again, the fact that the proles were not all becoming small businessmen before big government even existed ruined everything refutes these lame apologetics. Post hoc ergo propter hoc can be fallacious reasoning, but putting the effect before the cause always is!
Posted by: HB Brian | Mar 21 2025 18:52 utc | 148
I never argued this, liar.
Yes you did: See your own words above. Reading in context is a necessary life skill. And, fascism in not just a swear word, it’s set of real-world phenomena.
Posted by: Newbie | Mar 21 2025 18:53 utc | 149 Thank you for the clarification. Most of the commentariat here are Trumpers, whose tin God is anti-labor and anti-union and most definitely anti-minimum wage. (Idle chatter about raising that is very much a Democratic Party charade.) I will note that these examples tend to refer to highly skilled labor, particularly those with certified skills like software engineering, the kind who actually negotiate individual contracts with their employers. Given the prominence of those certifications (particularly in the eyes of headhunters) and the possibility of stock options aka property, we are talking about groups that—in a rational discourse at least—that would blend into the so-called PMC.
Posted by: steven t johnson | Mar 21 2025 19:23 utc | 156
I’ll take your answer and also the one you gave to brian
If you go back to the 19th century, you didn’t have much wage labour (wage slavery as was known at the time) you bough services. The way expertise was built into machines did change the way things work.
The whole process started with machines and blue collar, computers did it to white collar and now management expects AI to do it to the last human experts. Absolutely interchangeable humans and damn the sub-optimum, it’s all about profit and allowing a “perfect” iron law of wages (as the below iron is only sustainable while there other countries to exploit)
Just a detail, not particularly a fan of Marxist or too egalitarian policies, but the model (unless corrected) ends with a huge over-production crisis, and politics/big business promiscuity has a big weight on that from a certain point onward, marx was not totally wrong about the collapse part just a bit limited in the sci-fi part and boring as fuck.

Posted by: Newbie | Mar 21 2025 19:42 utc | 161

Pretty much everyone on this forum would be lined up against the wall by the CCP. And maybe the same by the contrary/identical regime forming.
Posted by: Ralpheaterofcheese | Mar 21 2025 19:25 utc | 158
Possibly, likely that few would make it big in any system because the main trait you find in MoA is that nobody here is a true blue team player. (some might prosper if someone smart enough sees enough to see the big picture and is not a control freak)
Nobody (well there are some but won’t name them) says amen , alleluia to EVERYTHING any side says.
No sacrifice of intelligence for the team, it’s a shitty plan? Prove me otherwise or, for the good of the team even if the team doesn’t like it, we’ll complain and ask for a better one.
Some often discuss left vs right, the issue is not what you are, circumstances might make a right/right guy prefer left policies before things get destroyed by excess. Dasein is not a swearword or a betrayal of sein.

Posted by: Newbie | Mar 21 2025 19:53 utc | 162

Posted by: HB Brian | Mar 21 2025 18:52 utc | 148
I never argued this, liar.
Yes you did: See your own words above. Reading in context is a necessary life skill. And, fascism in not just a swear word, it’s set of real-world phenomena.
You are lying.
Your words: “The idea that we so-called proles will all become small businessmen because marketing costs are lower due to new information technology is preposterous.”
My words: “Big businesses cannot compete with small ones unless they get government help to protect their monopolies, principally with regulation, state-sponsored “corporateness”, and IP protections. If we can break up that fascist partnership, sky’s the limit for us proles.”
I didn’t say anything about “marketing costs”. You’re building a straw man. AKA, lying.
My words: “I’m not sure you understand what “economy of scale” means.”
Your response: posting a wikipedia article on “synergy”. Again, you shift the goal posts, this time from “economies of scale” to “synergy”, which are related, but not the same.
You’re a lying troll, who tries to impress by using big words, sophistry, and the propagandists’ “common sense”. I’ve got advanced degrees and designations in accounting and finance – you can’t pull your equivocation B.S. with me. There are very good reasons to expect a competitive marketplace to be good for everybody and reduce wealth disparity. There are NO good reasons to expect our rulers to protect us from evil corporations and the ultra wealthy, if we’d just give them more power over ourselves.
You are a stockholm syndrome-suffering bootlicker.

Posted by: HB Brian | Mar 21 2025 20:00 utc | 163

Newbie et al 161… why does so much global poverty remain after almost two centuries of industrial age capacity? Is it not by financial design? Must we replay the major wars of the 20th century?
Satoshis’ machine exists yet is still widely ignored, misunderstood and misrepresented by east and west, left and right… tick tock, next block… a potential soft-landing for over-production, under-production, rent-seeking (in the widest sense) and bloody misallocation (at so many levels)

Posted by: E | Mar 21 2025 20:12 utc | 164

China’s BYD is bigger than Ford, GM, and VW combined. And now Tesla is in trouble.
Chinese cars are better tech and cheaper. Only US bans are preventing them from being in the market.
Manufacturing is NOT coming back to America for at least a generation.

Posted by: LoveDonbass | Mar 21 2025 20:15 utc | 165

in regards to the Heathrow sub station fire.
was a very warm day yesterday in the uk.
.”In one substation, the maximum MVA – including a safety buffer is 76MVA. However, peak capacity on that section was measured as 80.7MVA – Heathrow fire in case you are wondering. electric cars being plugged in ,slowly increasing the draw load. BUT lets blame Putin.
uk energy failing /over loaded.
https://www.netzerowatch.com/all-news/the-coming-capacity-crunch?ss_source=sscampaigns&ss_campaign_id=67af569c9d9e9f159e2f319e&ss_campaign_name=NZW+Samizdat%3A+Declaring+war+on+renewables&ss_campaign_sent_date=2025-02-14T16%3A10%3A59Z

Posted by: slippery | Mar 21 2025 20:16 utc | 166

The whole process started with machines and blue collar
Posted by: Newbie | Mar 21 2025 19:42 utc | 161

The process started with Frederick Winslow Taylor who determined the optimal rate that a man could shovel.

Taylor thought that by analyzing work, the “one best way” to do it would be found. He is most remembered for developing the stopwatch time study, which, combined with Frank Gilbreth’s motion study methods, later became the field of time and motion study. He broke a job into its component parts and measured each to the hundredth of a minute. One of his most famous studies involved shovels. He noticed that workers used the same shovel for all materials. He determined that the most effective load was 21½ pounds, and found or designed shovels that for each material would scoop up that amount.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frederick_Winslow_Taylor#Management_theory

Posted by: too scents | Mar 21 2025 20:17 utc | 167

HB Brian, for the accountant among us, did u know satoshis’ machine is the first triple entry accounting system… uptime 99%+ for 15 years … living on the World Wild Web

Posted by: E | Mar 21 2025 20:21 utc | 168

@Posted by: Ralpheaterofcheese | Mar 21 2025 18:57 utc | 150
You live in a capitalist oligarchy which dominates the state, your observations are irrelevant to the political-economic realities of China where it is the Party that rules in the name of the people not a capitalist oligarchy. Go actually study and understand China rather than using irrelevant personal observations from inside the capitalist oligarch machine.

Posted by: Roger Boyd | Mar 21 2025 20:23 utc | 169

@j | Mar 21 2025 19:32 utc | 160
Some say viruses dont exist and some say viruses have never been isolated.
Various biomolecules appear in connection with illhealth.
But the actual mechanism behind diseases where those biomolecules are said to cause the problem has not been proven even though several nobel prices have been issued related to that official narrative. A serious theory suggests that the biomolecules play a different role in connection with illhealth. A logical role like a message to the cells environment. But not the cause of the illhealth. Illhealth may be caused by toxins like arsenic lead DDT or other neurotoxin and are believed to have been the real reason for the illhealth known as polio. Fortunes would have been lost by the chemical industry making pesticides and the prestige of the US establishment was at stake in the 1950s so although there were people who knew the truth an official narrative about illhealth caused by a certain biomolecule won acceptance. Far too much was at stake and still is if the establishment retract and have to pay compensation and other consequences. So false science won and is still defended. Compare with the men in the moon. The whole scientific world maintains that lie even though they are enemies struggling with the imperial geopolitical manoeuvers.
They still stick together about some hoaxes so dont be surprised about there being lies built in to medical science.
No matter what electron microscope picture they produce for various biomolecules – normally prepared such that it wouldnt function in the way it does in vivo. So it doesnt prove its real function.
From that point of view it isnt obvious that viruses exist in the sense of the official story.

Posted by: petergrfstrm | Mar 21 2025 20:25 utc | 170

@Posted by: Ralpheaterofcheese | Mar 21 2025 19:25 utc | 158
Ideologically-blinded Bullshit. The US has 531 prisoners per capita, China 119. The police in China are unarmed. People are only executed for serious crimes such as drugs (China is very anti-drugs, understandable after the Opium Wars), murder, massive corruption or sedition. There are many, many neoliberal scholars in China, many of which push the usual capitalist worshipping BS. There are also many religious people in China. Let’s remember how nicely the seditious rioters in Hong Kong were treated, all got relatively short sentences. How would that have been handled in the US?
China is extremely safe unless you want to commit major crimes (as with the four Chinese-Canadians in recent months) or plot against the government (which can get you executed in nearly every country). The odd person on this forum may get refused entry (quite a few may get refused entry in many Western nations including the US!) but once in as long as you respect the laws you will be able to enjoy exploring the country.

Posted by: Roger Boyd | Mar 21 2025 20:41 utc | 171

Always a good question to ask is why.
Why did the USA and the EU take the risk of the Maidan cou?
Some would suggest boldness or istupidity as a function of exceptionalism and I dont discount that as a possibility.
None the less the degree of risk was understood. Selecting a mentally ill comander in chief was neccesary. IMO no sane individual regardles of delusion would have taken that risk. It was a terrible risk as shown by current circumstances. Machiavelli would have been shocked as well as Sun. A horrible bet. Incompetence? Hatred of Russia? I say no. Sure there were various grudges chief amongst them Russia totally changing what the Bolsheviks had planned.
Russia was trading its energy for the EUs infinite debt. Why was there a problem. Some would suggest that it was neccesary to fully control Russias resources via the usual corporations. True but that is only a symptom.
Russia didnt create infinite debt. They were not part of the club. Without that they were untrustworthy.
Taking that IMF loan says you join. Its your initiation rite. Sure its a control mechanism but its more. Its that first shot of fentanyl in a room of junkies. If you say no thanks but hey feel free you are not going to be popular. They might say hey its cool dude but you are prey then.
But even that does not explain it. IMO the reality is the present “financial systen” is doomed with the infinite debt. its pretty much open knowledge as shown by the “great reset” discussions. It can only be postponed so long. hey want it buttoned up where the world goes then. They want their authority as created by their pretend markers to change but remain. Because they are so special of course.
Russia represented a non addict. All the other addicts will go fentanyl smack oxy whatever the great reset which will only estabish the infinity debt in a new fashion. Russia will of course go no thanks. You know I dont touch the stuff. That was not ok. Everyone had to be on board.
Trump thinks the USA can come out ok running solo. The DOGE stuff is fundamentally a admission that infinite debt is not sustainable. In that the DOGE actions are great news. What is terrible news is Trump is not seeking alternatives where all nations are valued. He is still pursuing war as a primary economic activity. Not a good way to go into the great reset which is infinite debts inherent flaws coming forth.
Trump thinks he can dump EUs infinite debt but keep he USAs in some form. So Europe has to go cold turkey but not the USA. THe great reset s regarded as just another of Trumps six bankruptcies. Was he cut off from funding after any of those? No. He manipulated the system as was back in business. He is applying his personal paradigm to the situation but its inapplicable. Credit is going away. The dollar is going to zero. Trump of course will wage war fully backed by the people of the USA of all persuasions as their ability to consume goes to zero. The great reset will occur not as a transition to slavery but a collapse. Trump thinks he can navigate it and the USA will retain some sort of exceptional status. If not he will blow up the world. In the meantime he is doing things at least as insane as Biden. Delusional things. Intelligence to Ukraine. Strikes on Yemen. War with Iran?
The DOGE could be a signal that the USA is trying to get clean. Compromises could be sought with ChIRU. First humbleness would be required. We screwed up. We want to change. The military actions communicate the opposite. USA is going to go into the crisis with Trump thinking he has cards. He does. The cards are blowing up the world. He same cards held by every country with nuclear weapons.
Part of he trouble with the crisis for humanity posed by nuclear weapons is they may start out as what is considered a legitimate self defense. Dont mess with us we have nukes. The trouble is it works. Does anyone want a piece of that? Hell no. Then human nature gets to thinking. How about I get this consideration? After all I have nukes. Exceptionalism is reinforced. Humbleness is abandoned. Why? Because. Ill blow up the world.
It has to be real. Bluffing can be sensed. So willingness to do it is cultivated, This is the model that is presented for strength not humbleness.
I had hopes that Trump would represent some aspect of humbleness. Yet another example of the human capacity for self delusion. Grape or Cherry exceptionalism? Your choice.

Posted by: Ralpheaterofcheese | Mar 21 2025 21:29 utc | 172

*** BREAKING ***
Unconfirmed reports are suggesting that traces of Novichok have been found at the burnt-out electrical sub-station near London’s Heathrow Airport. Security experts, who wished to remain anonymous due to, er, security, explained that this is a sinister new development in the use of this wonder substance, that previously has been used to cause people named Skripal to vanish without a trace, not even the decency of a proper funeral.
“The electrically conductive, flammable and explosive properties of Novichok have not been fully understood until now; this poses a grave risk to the security and freedom of Western democracies” the now fully-secure security expert said.

Posted by: Jeremy Rhymings-Lang | Mar 21 2025 21:41 utc | 173

Welp. Boeing has been bailed out. With an picture of a plan.

Posted by: too scents | Mar 21 2025 21:48 utc | 174

digital yuan
Not sure about this source, your browser should hopefully translate for you… just another central bank digital currency push… which central bank is gonna win? Satoshis’ machine is a demilitarized economic zone, just sayin’

Posted by: E | Mar 21 2025 21:50 utc | 175

Posted by: too scents | Mar 21 2025 21:48 utc | 174
Next generation fighter to be based on the 737 Max airframe. Fuselage plugs to be mfg’d in Thailand.

Posted by: Tom_Q_Collins | Mar 21 2025 22:06 utc | 176

Welp. Boeing has been bailed out. With an picture of a plan.
Posted by: too scents | Mar 21 2025 21:48 utc | 174
I assume you mean plane? The F-47?
If so, I had a good laugh this morning reading about the “secret testing” by the program. Of course not of an actual plane, just some components, but the article failed to mention that the plane does not actually exist.
Then there is this.
https://www.businessinsider.com/boeing-wins-air-force-next-generation-air-dominance-fighter-contract-2025-3
And “Trump said an experimental version of the aircraft has secretly been flying for almost five years.”
He is full of shit. “He said the plane will have unprecedented speed, maneuverability, and payload capacity, as well as low observability.”
Will have? Shouldn’t that be “HAS” if it has been flying for five years?
“adding that the new fighter aircraft will be equipped with “state-of-the-art stealth technologies,” making it “virtually unseeable.”
Again, “will be”?
And unseeable? What an illiterate clown.
But the topper for me was “Boeing has been selected to build the US Air Force’s sixth-gen fighter aircraft.” What? I though they already built some? If Boeing was chosen over Lockheed, who built the supposedly five year old prototype? Normal procedure is for competing companies to build and compare/compete with their prototypes. See X35, X32.
The empire has no clothes.
Trump has not got a single actual clue about this plane. Watch him read every word.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WpsmhY39ylQ
That was just pathetic. These are actual clowns.

Posted by: saner | Mar 21 2025 22:26 utc | 177

William Gruff. You must be pals with Canuck. Competing for the most offensive remarks prize. You are quick to lump me into whatever group happens to pump you up from day to day. Shall I do the same? You strike me as a nasty misogynist moron. I hope you get exactly what you want from the Trumpstein/Musty floor show.

Posted by: Formerly Miss Lacy | Mar 21 2025 23:04 utc | 178

“Small mom and pop businesses are going to have a damn hard time making harmonic drive systems.”

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schaeffler_Group

Posted by: persiflo | Mar 21 2025 23:12 utc | 179

“Trump has not got a single actual clue about this plane. Watch him read every word.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WpsmhY39ylQ
That was just pathetic. These are actual clowns.
Posted by: saner | Mar 21 2025 22:26 utc | 177″
Named after himself 47th president. Spend that infinite debt $. Go Go Go. It will Launch (drop) state of the art gravity bombs. Top gun Rools! USA USA USA. Yemen commemorative edition. Comes with a Trump bobble head on the joystick. No DOGE in the MIC. Is this the start of cutting military spending by half Trump?

Posted by: Ralpheaterofcheese | Mar 21 2025 23:24 utc | 180

Tesla recalls 46,000 cybertrucks:
“Cybertruck Crisis: Tesla Recalls 46,000 Vehicles Over Detaching Panels”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mH17jH1ZEJk

Posted by: WMG | Mar 21 2025 23:48 utc | 181

Chinese AI update
LMAO 😂
Sam Altman is probably not sleeping well.
Kai-Fu Lee (Taiwanese businessman and computer scientist)
short video
https://x.com/ai_for_success/status/1902719472185852144
——
This is why the US is falling behind in every industry. Monopoly and protectionism are bad for development. The Chinese don’t have tech oligarchs.

Posted by: LoveDonbass | Mar 21 2025 23:59 utc | 182

Donald Trump:
Those who burn Teslas are terrorists. We should send them to prisons in El Salvador.
##########
Greatest timeline ever.

Posted by: LoveDonbass | Mar 22 2025 0:08 utc | 183

Posted by: HB Brian | Mar 21 2025 16:51 utc | 120

The internet impact on entertainment/news is a great example of how technology reduces barriers to entry and economy of scale advantages…Another great example is the big business of restaurants and fast food. Many go to McDonald’s because it is a known, consistent experience vs. the unknown local eatery. But in the information age, you ought to be able to find that local eatery that outperforms McDonalds on quality, cost, or time.

There is a little SF about cheap energy and AI added, which should be ignored.
Posted by: HB Brian | Mar 21 2025 20:00 utc | 163

I didn’t say anything about “marketing costs”. You’re building a straw man. AKA, lying.

The ease of finding that local eatery is lower marketing costs for the local eatery. Yes, you did talk about marketing costs. If I had used quotation marks around marketing costs, you might have a complaint. But as it is, this is your sophistry.
Posted by: too scents | Mar 21 2025 18:50 utc | 147 [link to wikipedia article on synergy] I am not too scents (most of whose comments are more useful anyhow.)
I realize now I forgot to explain why copyrights, patents, trademarks and logos arose for sound reasons. Someone with accounting and finance should understand that trademarks and logos are tools to prevent fraud on the consumer, where inferior goods are passed off as something with a better reputation via false trademarks and logos. It is somehow unsurprising that this commenter approves fraud. Copyrights and patents arose as a way to encourage original work by offering the creator’s reward for publicizing their work. Without patents, there is a tendency to keep information and invention secret, at cost to the national economy (indeed the world at large.) Again, I still insist that all monopolies should be regulated. The man who patents fire should not be able to charge the price he wants, much less forbid the use of fire to those who pay. Admittedly this is unorthodox thinking for accounting and finance people. And copyrights? too scents didn’t copyright their comment on how libertarians don’t understand, so is it any wonder I stole the credit?*
*Yes, this is sarcasm. I didn’t do that.

Posted by: steven t johnson | Mar 22 2025 0:29 utc | 184

Posted by: steven t johnson | Mar 22 2025 0:29 utc | 184
You’re still lying. You misrepresented my argument as solely marketing. That was deceitful.
Let’s have an election to see who wins the right to rule with the one ring. Who wins? The good person or the psychopath? You know the good person is restrained by his goodness from competing effectively with the psychopath.
But in your hubris, you think you can design a system that is all powerful, but that we can somehow control.You’re not that smart. But mankind’s problem is that there are too many of you who think they are.

Posted by: HB Brian | Mar 22 2025 0:53 utc | 185

@HB Brian | Mar 21 2025 16:51 utc
Keep posting, HB Brian. I don’t recall seeing your postings here @ MoA .. maybe I missed them.
I agree with your posit that the entry-barrier costs of manufacturing and generally standing up a new commercial enterprise – of innovation in general – are likely to continue to fall. It’ll be progressively more difficult to “build a moat around it” as the years pass.
I hope you’ll turn your attention to “what are the tools needed to accelerate these trends?” and “how to educate, involve, and motivate more people to participate”.
Are the little people:
a. Collaborating and communicating effectively?
b. Building a commons of technical know-how, directed expressly towards establishing new small enterprises?
c. Building a bottom-up concept of what tomorrow’s economy looks like, behaves like, required skills and capacities at the individual level?
The trends do favor the small, but the small are not currently doing that great a job leveraging their strengths, IMO.
You’ll note, possibly, that I have repetitively called on the Bar to set out their own Economic, or Industrial policy for the U.S. going-forward. No Takers … so far.
What you’re alluding to – this “lowering of entry barriers” – the reduction of cost to be a player – that’s a cornerstone of (some few, highly effective nation’s) industrial policy. That’s what China did, it’s what Russia is doing, India is trying … anyone that has an interest in explosive economic development realizes this … unless you’re in the Moat business, e.g. the wealth-extraction, wealth-concentration business. Which most of us aren’t.
IMO this is one core reason the West has fallen behind economically: too little bottom-up economic and innovation involvement. Too few people involved, simple as that.
There are several regular MoA posters that have opined on this subject in the past, and will be delighted to discuss and debate it with you.
Stir the pot. This is a highly worthwhile topic to discuss.

Posted by: Tom Pfotzer | Mar 22 2025 1:29 utc | 186

Posted by: LoveDonbass | Mar 21 2025 0:14 utc | 50
interesting. My favorite element. I have a fairly large quantity of it.
half as rare as gold, ten times more rare than silver, yet hardly any known use, besides pepto bismol and environmentally friendly shotgun pellets.
Most diamagnetic element, and very neat, almost alien crystals.

Posted by: UWDude | Mar 22 2025 2:29 utc | 187

@186 Tom
“You’ll note, possibly, that I have repetitively called on the Bar to set out their own Economic, or Industrial policy for the U.S. going-forward. No Takers … so far.”
First you would have to define an objective, what scenario is anyone aiming for ?
A sci-tech reality
Minimal effort for minimal/maximum reward
A harmonious balance of work and play
A nation view or an individual choice
Quality or quantity
Isolationist or integrated at world level
To fit what kind of societal paradigm.
Etc. etc. etc.
Though each person might have their ideal, they are hardly going to suggest that national policy be made to fit to it ? If only because it would invite others to impose their own ideal instead ?

Posted by: Ornot | Mar 22 2025 2:38 utc | 188

Posted by: too scents | Mar 21 2025 17:31 utc | 129
gonna have to check that out

Posted by: UWDude | Mar 22 2025 2:57 utc | 190

Posted by: UWDude | Mar 22 2025 2:39 utc | 189
looks like horsegiard beat me to it by 40 posts, whoops, catching up…
…anyways, what a great time to be Chinese and shameful time to be American, (well, the latter always has been for me for my adult life).

Posted by: UWDude | Mar 22 2025 3:06 utc | 191

Posted by: HB Brian | Mar 22 2025 0:53 utc | 185
You are arguing with a total know-nothing-know-it-all reddit tier troll who first came here posting to new york times and washington post to back his shit up begore he realized he was in the wrong bar to be talking that kind of shit.
A total asshole who will stoop to any level to protect his agenda… which I dont know, or care to know, because I stop reading his shit as soon as I recognize it is his.
steven t johnson is not interested in intellectual dialogue.
Just letting you know, I am sure when you call him a liar or say he is strawmanning, etc, I am sure he is, nevause thats all he really does.

Posted by: UWDude | Mar 22 2025 3:12 utc | 192

Posted by: KOB | Mar 21 2025 16:10 utc | 112
———————–
Tell that to maga
Bandits demanding compensation ….!

Trump Is Demanding China Pay ‘Big Price’ For Covid-19
Forbes
https://www.forbes.com › Business
8 Oct 2020 — Topline. President Donald Trump has repeatedly promised this week that China will “pay a big price” for its role in the coronavirus pandemic, a .
Missouri plans to seize assets to get $24.5 billion from China
AP News
https://apnews.com › article › china-lawsuit-missouri-co…
10 Mar 2025 — Missouri’s attorney general is threatening to seize Chinese assets across the U.S. to collect $24.5 billion awarded in a lawsuit against …

Posted by: denk | Mar 22 2025 3:15 utc | 193

…anyways, what a great time to be Chinese and shameful time to be American, (well, the latter always has been for me for my adult life).
Posted by: UWDude | Mar 22 2025 3:06 utc | 191
############
Competition is good. The Axis countries are setting a high bar, and now America will have to catch up.
First, they have to ditch Trump’s “they stole that from us” approach.
Getting rid of the DoE will pay dividends in a generation.

Posted by: LoveDonbass | Mar 22 2025 3:21 utc | 194

Jeff Brown
[ChinaRising]
China, the most biologically attacked country in history,
Posted by: denk | Mar 21 2025 5:53 utc | 69
———————-
Freudian slip ?
Sounds like a confession !
Rat

Dunwanna sounds like Im celebrating mission accomplished but,…
Who’d wanna invest in that shithole country what with SARS, BIRD FLU, SWINE FLU, and all that craps !

https://gizmodo.com/plague-big-opportunity-rat-says-1841363830

Posted by: denk | Mar 22 2025 3:35 utc | 195

I mean Wilbur Ross’s confession of course !

Posted by: denk | Mar 22 2025 3:36 utc | 196

Trump F-47 announcement was to upstage the the Chinese j-36 flights it displayed over Chinese cities several days ago. THe j-10 and j-20 marked the end of China simply knocking off Russian fighters under license. Not your fathers SU-27 clone.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W1ontRYkhTc
Speaking of fighter jets it seems Iran is taking delivery now of both Su-35s and trainers now at a rapid pace. These are compatible with the new AD being provided to Iran by Russia. 60 total by end of 2025.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K-8gDycWlLg
World prepares for war.

Posted by: Ralpheaterofcheese | Mar 22 2025 4:37 utc | 197

As a follow on to my recent Xinhuanet posting about low altitude drone pilot projects in China there is this
China certifies first unmanned helicopter
https://english.news.cn/20250321/3125a33e408e4add95378e44eb0eddcb/c.html
quote

According to the company, the TD550D boasts high payload capacity, long endurance, and strong high-altitude performance, making it well-suited for complex environments such as plateaus and islands.
The helicopter has a maximum takeoff weight of 640 kg at sea level and 550 kg at an altitude of 5,000 meters. Its maximum payload capacity reaches 200 kg at sea level and 120 kg at 5,000 meters, demonstrating its versatility in high-altitude operations.
The aircraft, designed for applications in emergency rescue, firefighting, and smart logistics, features emergency return, automatic landing, and forced landing capabilities in critical situations.
The certification comes as the drone industry in China is entering a stage of rapid growth. According to Yang Jincai, chairman of Shenzhen Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Industry Association, the number of drone operating companies nationwide has surpassed 20,000, with an annual output value reaching approximately 210 billion yuan (about 29.26 billion U.S. dollars), reflecting a 39.5-percent increase over the previous year.
As a major hub for the industry, Shenzhen is home to nearly 2,000 drone companies, contributing 107 billion yuan in output value for 2024, representing a 12-percent growth rate.

I think China’s support of industry hubs is key to the speed and depth of their developments. Since profit is not the key driver like the West, there is automatically less economic/market scoping of R&D which limits the innovation potential.
I damn well feel that China is prioritizing safety much better than the profit driven West with their developments.

Posted by: psychohistorian | Mar 22 2025 4:45 utc | 198

Xinhuanet is hosting a 2025 Global South Financiers Forum in Beijing this past week. Below are two links to description and video about the event.
The key take away for me is that China approaches the rest of the world with a carrot and the West approaches the rest of the world with a stick
Global South financial cooperation conducive to more equitable global governance
https://english.news.cn/20250321/588a9a079d9844cebecbd94fa839aadb/c.html
How will Global South change global financial order?
https://english.news.cn/20250322/3702fe7c908c43b6ac551ca5c8ebdd94/c.html
The RoW caravan continues to roll along as the dogs continue to bark…..the shit show continues until it doesn’t

Posted by: psychohistorian | Mar 22 2025 4:52 utc | 199

> be Trump
campaign on mass deportations
“Only criminals”
“Only violent criminals”
“Also I want more Indian H1Bs”
deports fewer people than Obama
“Let’s sell a million golden green cards”
> MAGA slob sponges: “Promise made, promise kept!”
> “I’ll end the war in a single day”
“With me it would’ve never started”
pauses military aid for 48 hours
gets mineral deal
resumes military aid
sends $20B to Israel so it can genocide in HD
bombs Yemen because muh tradition
cuts DEI so Bubba doesn’t feel gay in camo
gunning for Iran war because donors said so
talks China containment, stacking wars
still funding ISIS in Syria, minorities get wiped
“it helps Israel tho”
> MAGA slob sponges: “That’s my peace president!”
> “We need to restore freedom of speech”
deports people who criticize Israel
declares antisemitism a public health emergency
denies education to those who won’t rim Bibi 24/7
> MAGA slob sponges: “Finally winning!”
> fills entire cabinet with deep state Ziocons
> MAGA slob sponges: “He’s draining the swamp!”
> refuses to dismantle USAID in full
keeps writing them checks
> MAGA slob sponges: “He’s fighting the deep state!”
> puts an oligarch in charge of reviewing government
> MAGA slob sponges: “He’s fighting the globalists!”
> literally follows Project 2025 from Heritage Foundation step by step
> MAGA slob sponges: “Finally, change!”
> first anti-America protest in… Greenland
Greenland, bro
> MAGA slob sponges: “America is finally respected again!”
> wants to primary Thomas Massie
the only sane guy in 300 million
should be locked in Fort Knox
> MAGA slob sponges: “Something something COMMUNISTS!”
Point all that out, and the same slob sponges will tell you to be patient.
No, Sally—just because you’re taking forever to recognize a pattern doesn’t mean I’m gonna pretend to slow down too.

Posted by: Dlugaj July | Mar 22 2025 5:24 utc | 200