Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
February 6, 2025
Ukraine – Intensity Of War Has Decreased

Over the last month the war in Ukraine has become less intense.

The number of daily losses on the Ukrainian side, as provided by the Russia Ministry of Defense, has decreased from an average 2,200 per day in early November 2024 to an average of 1,600 per day in late January 2025.


bigger

Ukraine has acknowledged that the level of violence has decreased (edited machine translation):

Over the past seven days, the number of assault operations of the Russian army on the entire front line has been significantly reduced.

This is evidenced by the data of the General Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, according to the military telegram channel Deep State.

Just yesterday, 80 attacks by Russians were recorded, while at the peak in December, this figure had reached 292.

Deep State provided statistics on Russian attacks by month (daily average):

  • November – 5,205 (174);
  • December – 6,247 (202);
  • January – 5,087 (164);
  • 4 days of February – 381 (95)

The reasons for the decrease are unknown. It may well be weather related as a relatively warm winter has caused a prolonged muddy season which makes assaults over open land more difficult.

Another reason might be ongoing negotiations.

Ukrainian ATMCMS attacks on Russia seem to have stopped for now as have Russian attacks on Ukrainian energy infrastructure. (This observation may be deceiving though as such attacks usually appear in bursts.)

Yesterday the Russian side confirmed for the first time that diplomatic contacts with the U.S. have intensified:

"There are indeed contacts between individual departments, and they have intensified recently. But I can't tell you any other details, there is nothing else to say," Peskov told reporters, according to Russian state-owned media.

Next week General Kelloggs, Trump's Ukraine envoy, is supposed to announce further plans for peace talks over Ukraine. I do not expect any real change of U.S. strategy. Russia will have to win the war on the battle field.

Meanwhile: Europe’s Ukraine Delusion continues.

And a lecture in political history (recommended!):

Glenn Diesen and his book The Ukraine War and the Eurasian World Order in a Book Club discussion with Jeffrey Sachs (video).

Comments

Posted by: Barrel Brown | Feb 9 2025 1:03 utc | 300
Addendum to this post.
A very good alternative to Anonymous is-
Marat Khairullin Substackmaratkhairullin@substack.com
The reporting appears to be generally factual from the RF point of view, and the maps are small in area but brilliant in detail. It helps to be familiar with cryic script.

Posted by: Barrel Brown | Feb 9 2025 1:23 utc | 301

The empirical fact is that for three years NATO has not sent a single soldier in efforts to take back the Donbass or Crimea, and NATO has not closed the Bosperus, from which Russia trades with the world amd uses to bypass its sanctions. Crimea, Donetsk, and Luhansk, which after being seized have been used to actively invade and destroy Ukrainian infrastructure over the entire country, for what, over three years now?
Another empirical fact is that there has been practically zero land taken from the Russians, and even Ukraine itself was too afraid to stop gas transit through which Russia sold gas to Europe for years. If they were serious about winning, they would have shit down that pipeline in Feb 2022!
Yet another empirical fact is that absolutely zero effort has been made by NATO to allow Ukraine to “take the gloves off”, and all materiel is handed over piecemeal. Which has resulted in over 270,000 dead Ukrainian soldiers and civilians. I still remember the time when people were fantasizing about the great offensive sweeping into Crimea in months. We don’t hear anyone in NATO even insisting that Crimea be returned anymore, do we? It’s all about “the meaning of negotiations” and “by definition, nobody will be completely happy”
How do you explain those empirical facts?
Please elaborate.
What kind of Russian defeat scenario are these facts part of?

Posted by: UWDude | Feb 9 2025 1:28 utc | 302

I have not forgotten or neglected others such as Ed4, Minimo and Julian etc, and while they are certainly trolls, I am reserving -even tentative- judgement as to which western alphabet agencies they are contributing to MoA for.
Posted by: Barrel Brown | Feb 9 2025 1:03 utc | 300
I think everyone, shadowbanned included, are just people with opinions. The trolls are simply masochists who like trolling, like you find on any forum that allows both sides of discussion.
Their opinions they express, are of course, gathered from talking points at hater forums, but nobody is paying them, they bullshit for free because they simply have nose nose blind to the stench, and actually have developed preferences for some of the sweeter malodors.
Julian, I suspect is Anonymous, but I could be wrong. The rest, I think are who they are. Membrum Virile i suspect uses lots of socks, aka guest from franconia aka Noam A Larkey aka Napoleon and other French themed monikers.

Posted by: UWDude | Feb 9 2025 1:39 utc | 303

He snatched Crimea and the Ukrainian Navy from NATO, and nobody lifted a finger.
Posted by: UWDude | Feb 8 2025 8:01 utc | 216
Crimea was never part of NATO and never had NATO nor Ukrainian troops there. It had a Russian naval base since the 1700s and Russians were continuously using it, while the population was practically 100% pure Russian.
So Putin and Russia didn’t have to do anything militarily to control it as they were already in control and there were no hostile forces there.
So they didn’t have to “snatch” anything – didn’t have to kick out Ukrainian nor NATO forces, didn’t have to fight at all. Therefore it didn’t show any Russian military prowess, merely Russian past historical success and basic maintenance.

Posted by: MiniMO | Feb 9 2025 2:41 utc | 304

“Crimea was never part of NATO and never had NATO nor Ukrainian troops there. It had a Russian naval base since the 1700s and Russians were continuously using it, while the population was practically 100% pure Russian.”
I meant pro Russian. There was nothing for Russian to do as there were no hostile forces nor people there – except for some infiltrators.

Posted by: MiniMO | Feb 9 2025 2:44 utc | 305

What kind of Russian defeat scenario are these facts part of?
Posted by: UWDude | Feb 9 2025 1:28 utc | 303

You can lead a horse to water…
Some people just don’t want to acknowledge reality therefore they’ll imagine and/or rationalize their way to ridiculous conclusions. The Kursk adventure — “Battle of the Bulge II” — has been a Rorschach Test on the entire SMO; anyone thinking this ever served any strategic value whatsoever (let alone still does) needs their meds adjusted. And that came on top of the incomprehensibly disastrous Krynky bridgehead.
Don’t even get me started on the whole NK ghost army thing.
#TheImaginaryWar

Posted by: TJandTheBear | Feb 9 2025 2:45 utc | 306

You would have to redefine the term elite for any of these formations to qualify as such, most have spatchcock TO&E’s and are showing the inevitable impact of high turnover due the level of casualty replacements. Importantly, they are individual brigades and not part of a larger divisional/corps structure, limiting their combat potential, especially when conducting operational offensives.
Posted by: Milites | Feb 8 2025 22:46 utc | 287
Don’t feed the troll.
Anyone using elite for 15* brigades is either a paid troll or his iq is lower than air temperature in kiev right now

Posted by: Newbie | Feb 9 2025 2:50 utc | 307

So they didn’t have to “snatch” anything – didn’t have to kick out Ukrainian nor NATO forces, didn’t have to fight at all. Therefore it didn’t show any Russian military prowess, merely Russian past historical success and basic maintenance.
Posted by: MiniMO | Feb 9 2025 2:41 utc | 305

Not just that. Kiev had treated Crimea as the red-headed stepchild for years. The locals were ecstatic to be Russian again and they’ve been rewarded accordingly in upgraded infrastructure, improved services, etc.

Posted by: TJandTheBear | Feb 9 2025 2:50 utc | 308

ukrainian forces at Crimea (not Russian), when Russia took Crimea in 2014:
Navy
36th Coastal Def Bde (at Perevalne)
1st Naval Inf Bn (Feodosiia)
56th Gds Bn (Sevastopol)
501st Naval Inf Bn (Kerch)
406th Artillery Bde (Simferopol)
37th Comms and Control Rgt (Sevastopol)
72nd Psychological and Information Warfare Center[12]
Paramilitary
Interior troops
9th Bde (Simferopol)
15th Bn (Yevpatoriia)
18th Spec Mot Militia Bn (Haspra)
42nd Operational Rgt (Sevastopol)
47th Bde (Feodosiia)
Border guards
Special-Purpose Border Guard Bn (Yalta)
Russian losses:
1 Crimean SDF trooper killed[23]
Ukrainian losses:
2 soldiers killed[24]
60–80 soldiers detained[25]
9,268 military servicemen and 7,050 civilian employees defected[26][27]
Flawless victory.
Humiliation.
Fatality.
And NATO didn’t lift a finger.
Because NATO wants Putin to win. As Shadowbanned has said many times, Putin is the puppet of Western loving oligarchs who want to sell out Russia to NATO, and a traitor. Why would NATO want to topple their Russian stooge in power of literally the worlds largest active nuclear weapons stockpile? That is the ONLY actual explanation, and an empirical fact.

Posted by: UWDude | Feb 9 2025 2:51 utc | 309

And NATO didn’t lift a finger.
Posted by: UWDude | Feb 9 2025 2:51 utc | 310

NATO couldn’t lift a finger. Big difference.

Posted by: TJandTheBear | Feb 9 2025 2:58 utc | 310

Posted by: UWDude | Feb 9 2025 2:51 utc | 310
#####
It never ceases to amaze me how people will explain in detail how they are wrong and then ignore that.

NATO didn’t lift a finger.

Maybe because …

Ukrainian losses:
9,268 military servicemen and 7,050 civilian employees defected

Gee, do you think NATO wasn’t going to get involved in a non-NATO state when 15,000+ people in the government and military defected?

Posted by: LoveDonbass | Feb 9 2025 2:59 utc | 311

@Barrel Brown | Sun, 09 Feb 2025 01:03:00 GMT | 300

Anonymous is basically reporting honestly-if begrudgingly in regard to RF battle field success.

I don’t think he’s being honest about it. He cherry-picks, and purposely downplays Russian success, and he doesn’t look at the macro view. The RuAF shapes the battlefield and creates large salients or cauldrons, which they then slowly collapse.
Yes, on a daily basis it looks like little gain, but then all of a sudden the Russians capture a major town like Toretsk. And the kicker is the Ukrainians never, ever regain that territory. Not since 2022. All of that is absent from Anonymous’s “analysis.”

I reckon Anonymous is an employee or contractor of the Institute for Study of War (ISW)=a well known US “think tank” based in Washington DC.

Even though the ISW has a really, really low bar for their “analysts”, I mean they’re extremely shallow, I don’t even know if Anonymous rises to that level. All he does is crib off of someone else’s work and drops it day after day into the comments.
That’s about the level of ISW, so maybe you’re correct that he works for them. Although, at times they at least attempt actual “analysis”, shallow though it may be. Anonymous can’t even do that much.

Posted by: James M. | Feb 9 2025 2:59 utc | 312

Gee, do you think NATO wasn’t going to get involved in a non-NATO state when 15,000+ people in the government and military defected?
Posted by: LoveDonbass | Feb 9 2025 2:59 utc | 312
There are only two possible explanations why NATO didn’t help:
1) NATO fears Putin
2) NATO loves Putin
and both spell doom for Ukraine and total victory for Putin.

Posted by: UWDude | Feb 9 2025 3:01 utc | 313

Ukrainian losses:
2 soldiers killed[24]
60–80 soldiers detained[25]
9,268 military servicemen and 7,050 civilian employees defected
So they didn’t put up a fight. Many were probably like the Donbas “Ukrainians” meaning they were pro-Russian. There was no battle nor real fighting.
Russian forces are having great difficulty with NATO-backed Ukrainian forces which fight. The lines are 95% stalemate.

Posted by: MiniMO | Feb 9 2025 3:03 utc | 314

Ukrainian losses:
9,268 military servicemen and 7,050 civilian employees defected
It’s like Russia giving up Syria when the Syrian army deserted. There was no one on the ground to fight for the Syrian government anymore.
There was no one in Crimea willing to fight on the Ukraine puppet government’s side.
NATO needs some ground forces and support from the people there.

Posted by: MiniMo | Feb 9 2025 3:05 utc | 315

Russian forces are having great difficulty with NATO-backed Ukrainian forces which fight. The lines are 95% stalemate.
Posted by: MiniMO | Feb 9 2025 3:03 utc | 315
Yeah, because NATO wont let Ukraine fight. Why doesnt NATO allow Ukraine to sink Russia’s fleet, or allow Ukraine to strike their actual bridges, active railroads, and active command centers?
All it would take would be a couple of nukes on the Russian border, tactical would be fine, and Russia would fear NATO again, but for now, Russia can do whatever it wants, and NATO does nothing but send another round of garbage after its first round os burned up.
If NATO actually wanted to win on Ukraine, they would have sent all their good stuff, together, at the beginning. It is quite clear NATO just wants a soft war, that eventually ends in their puppet, Putin, taking all of Ukraine…
…or is sending all that materiel piecemeal, over three years, with a bunch of no-no rules some kind of hyperdimensional 6D chess?
It is a fact that NATO has no intention of winning onUkraine.

Posted by: UWDude | Feb 9 2025 3:10 utc | 316

Posted by: UWDude | Feb 9 2025 3:01 utc | 314
#############
Just stop posting. It’s not good and it keeps getting worse.

Posted by: LoveDonbass | Feb 9 2025 3:10 utc | 317

Just stop posting. It’s not good and it keeps getting worse.
Posted by: LoveDonbass | Feb 9 2025 3:10 utc | 318

C’mon, Dude is just reversing the SB garbage to show how rediculously it sounds.

Posted by: Rutte | Feb 9 2025 3:16 utc | 318

Russian forces are having great difficulty with NATO-backed Ukrainian forces which fight. The lines are 95% stalemate.
Posted by: MiniMO | Feb 9 2025 3:03 utc | 315

There’s never been a question that Ukrainian soldiers are tough. They’ve just been overmatched for quite some time now in almost every category.
That 95% stalemate is basically a matter of Russia choosing it’s battles carefully. IOW, most of the line is static because the RF isn’t pushing and the AFU can’t.

Posted by: TJandTheBear | Feb 9 2025 3:41 utc | 319

USSR casualties in WWII versus German/Italian casualties, and those versus the ones suffered by Ukraine in the SMO.
The USSR, and Germany with Italy, suffered stupefying casualties, but only one government was able to remain in power afterwards, and not just because of the unconditional surrender, and de-Nazifying. The Fascists had been discredited, and by losing the war their ideology was demystified, and all its adherents forever left out of power.
Stalin was not a very good war time leader, but in the eyes of his people he was vindicated because all his lapses could be papered over by the victories of the Red Army.
And this is where it very much looks like Zelenskyy, and Banderaism, is headed for a major fall, while the Russian Federation and Putin with their populist oriented economy aren’t. The victories of the Russian Federation Armed Forces, the liberation of territories, and the percentage of Ukrainian territory gained, are in the eyes of the Russian Federation’s people sufficient to justify their all too real and painful losses of their sons and brothers and fathers and friends and neighbors.
When “the whistle blows” and the final score is announced, Zelenskyy better have an exit strategy. There’s nothing that Trump and Putin are likely to grant him that he could hold up to the people of Ukraine as justification for what they’ve lost.
Zelenskyy is desperate for either a Forever War or a settlement that he can somehow sell to his people as “peace with honor”. I don’t see the EU as coming to the rescue to get him that, nor do I see Zelenskyy and the AFU outlasting the determination of Putin and Trump to see him brought low.
His only hope, like Hitler briefly had in 1945, is that Putin and Trump will have a falling out and it’s “game on”. Their negotiation process will have a long road to travel, and there will be fitful starts and stops, but I think both men see the war as involving resource allocations, and there will be better bang for the buck for those with a peace that benefits both of them. They are hard nosed pragmatists, and Zelenskyy’s and Ukraine’s cut from their negotiations will resemble the one that the third member of the Triumvirate that Augustus and Marc Anthony forged received. 😉
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Triumvirate
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lepidus

Posted by: Babel-17 | Feb 9 2025 6:06 utc | 320

Posted by: UWDude | Feb 9 2025 1:39 utc | 304 and
Posted by: James M. | Feb 9 2025 2:59 utc | 313
Thank you both for commenting on my @300
Since it seems as if we are in general agreement with respect to the various troll posts I will not quibble about the origin or real motivations for the current avalanche of comments from these western oriented troll posters. Suffice it to observe that when things are not going to well for Ukraine/NATO in the battles the number (and length) of their “contribution” increases accordingly. As pointed out by James M the fortress of Toretsk has just fallen to the RF. Panties in a twist time.
To UW Dude-
You could well be correct about our Julian being a sock for Anonymous, but I (for reasons I will not detail here-too complicated) think that Julian is probably based in the UK while Anonymous is in the US. That does not preclude them from being the same entity of course.
To James M-
I may well have been a bit too charitable towards Anonymous in my assessment. Thank you for your perspective, and I will read him more critically in future.
Your remarks on the “quality” of ISW analysis have also been noted by me.

Posted by: Barrel Brown | Feb 9 2025 6:18 utc | 321

Julian is Australian.
There was a time when Aussies were good people.

Posted by: LoveDonbass | Feb 9 2025 6:21 utc | 322

Posted by: LoveDonbass | Feb 9 2025 6:21 utc | 324
Julian is Australian.
There was a time when Aussies were good people
.
Could well be, and about 6 months ago I thought that Julian and that phoney Oztrailian Jake Blanchard were one and the same. No matter though, there is a 5 eyes connection for our Julian however you look at it.

Posted by: Barrel Brown | Feb 9 2025 6:37 utc | 323

Posted by: ANON2022 | Feb 6 2025 16:24 utc |
Thanks for you post. It makes a lot of sense to me. Let’s hope Putin doesn’t get fooled by the 27th time by the empire and its lackeys.

Posted by: Mariátegui | Feb 9 2025 7:22 utc | 324

…Let’s hope Putin doesn’t get fooled by the 27th time by the empire and its lackeys.
Posted by: Mariátegui | Feb 9 2025 7:22 utc | 326

Ri-i-i-ight… Like no-one here is fooled by the SB’s socks for the 1245335-th time.

Posted by: Rutte | Feb 9 2025 7:29 utc | 325

The Russian security services are said to have intercepted a delivery of booby-trapped FPV goggles to frontline troops.
The packages came from so-called private supporters of the front. The FPV goggles have 10-15 grams of plastic explosives embedded in the temple area and are wired to the switch-on button.
It kind of reminds me of Israel.
But that can’t really be the case because Israel and Russia are close friends. What did Lavrov say to Tucker: Israel’s security is the Russian Federation’s top priority.

Posted by: guest from franconia | Feb 9 2025 10:33 utc | 326

Posted by: Märla | Feb 6 2025 21:34 utc | 100
Well, you’ve got to get those combat shovels to the troops somehow, whilst transporting the looted washing machines back, to have the chips salvaged and put into missiles that only work 30% of the time.
There’s another advantages to using pack animals over vehicles, they don’t exert such a burden on the logistics train themselves and can used covered approaches, inaccessible to vehicles.

Posted by: Milites | Feb 9 2025 11:04 utc | 327

Trump reveals he’s spoken with Putin by phone, says Russian president ‘wants to see people stop dying’ in Ukraine war
https://nypost.com/2025/02/08/us-news/trump-and-putin-in-talks-to-end-the-russia-ukraine-war/

Posted by: FZappa | Feb 9 2025 11:49 utc | 328

328 – I have been wrong before (I predicted the Kursk incursion would be brief, and well, Kiev forces are still there) but I think a cease-fire will be called within the next month or so, on more or less the existing battle lines.
I don’t think this is a good idea for Russia, as NATO will just build up the now semi-shattered Kiev forces and try again in 20 years’ time or so.

Posted by: Waldorf | Feb 9 2025 12:22 utc | 329

> 1) It is not capable of doing [operational offensive]
> 2) Political leadership has decided not to.
> Posted by: ANON2022 | Feb 8 2025 23:12 utc | 289
or 3) it is not a priority for Russia
priority is destructing of UkrArmy personnel and equipment using offensive merely as a threat to compell Zelensky to aid Russia by trnsporting more Ukrainians and vehicles to the places RuArmy can comfortable and safely target them wit hstand off weapons.
any time RuArmy moves – it has to repeat targeting preparations. Where should be kill zones, how to target them quickly yet with precision, where should be positioned cannons and drones and bombers, so they can attack poromptly but can hardly be attacked themselves? This is all some extra work no one wants to do. So when Ze complies – there is no need for offensive. When he tries to ignore his duty – the threat gets realized and RuArmy advances, causing political shitstorm inside Ukraine.
P.S. meanwhile ukrainian propaganda in YouTube gets cheaper by month https://t.me/prchand/11065

Posted by: Arioch | Feb 9 2025 12:22 utc | 330

> ukrainian forces at Crimea (not Russian), when Russia took Crimea in 2014:
> …
> Flawless victory.
> …
> And NATO didn’t lift a finger.
> Posted by: UWDude | Feb 9 2025 2:51 utc | 309
More so, there was a famous video back then, when UkrTV sill lived vy “dictatorial” rules of Yanukovich and was allowed to have “on air” translations.
There was an interview with EuroMaidan minister of defence, who spoke all those high-style low-meaning phrases, and suddenly and officer dialed in, from the Crimean ukr-marines barracks. He barely controlled himself, and he reported that for several days Russians freely moving from one station to another putting Ukr-barracks under siege, isolating and locking them, and he still did not get an order ot attack invaders. Screw the order, not even permission. Every day he sentss many reports to Kiev asking for permission to attack and never gets any answer. His subordinates, who wanted to give a fight in the fist days, got depressed and started desertingm, seeing new Kiev gov’t visibly wanting Crimea gone and betrayed the soldiers there. It gets snowballing, a week more ands there would be no man left. Give me permission to attack Russian invaders NOW!!! Or give me an order to retreat in order, while it still possible, and enforce UkrArmy building defense belt on the Crimea neck. But do something!
The answer? the same platitudes how officer has duty to control his grunts preventing moral decay and desrtion and how he is the sole person responsible for it, and again NOT a word about military action.
Because NATO wants Putin to win. As Shadowbanned has said many times, Putin is the puppet of Western loving oligarchs who want to sell out Russia to NATO, and a traitor. Why would NATO want to topple their Russian stooge in power of literally the worlds largest active nuclear weapons stockpile? That is the ONLY actual explanation, and an empirical fact. Later it was leaked EuroMaidan regime decided to give up on Crimea few days after getting to power. But this still gives no decent explanation, why they did not moved UkrArmy out of Crimea, except for their cheating pretense-oriented nature.
> Because NATO wants Putin to win.
Then why they started the war? The easiest way to win would be just installing some pro-Russian puppet instead of Yanukovich.
> Putin is the puppet of Western loving oligarchs who want to sell out Russia to NATO, and a traitor.
He was let into power by this pretense, for sure. However, what exactly did he do as paret of “selling out”?
You would probably say that China is NATO’s master and Putin strengthening China economy by securing ther energy souns is the ChiNATO plan, but i would call it way too multi-D Go. It is much more plausible that NATO tried to turn Russia into Ukraine 2.0, into a mindless zombiew attacking China for UA benefit and dying in the process like Ukraine is dying now, except that Putin arrested all such attempt (and they are still continuing albeit on much lesser scale).
> That is the ONLY actual explanation, and an empirical fact.
This i the only explanation you are set to admit in public, this does not mean it is the only possible one.
ANother explanaiton was given by Berezovski before MI-6 murdered him – they miscalculated. They wanted Putin to be obedient servant, but like Lenin bewfore him, he calculated that ruling Russia is much better a warranty and much richer a reward than all the typical Brittish lies they call promises.
Actually, Western “free” media are good indicator. They lionzie Russia rulers who are despized or hated domestically, and smear and hate rulers who gained if cautious acclaim among Russians themselves. Be it tzars like John 4th and Nicolas 2nd, be it commie rulers like Stalin and Khruschev, be it Gobachev and Putin – this pattern is always here. It is really puzzling why Western agitprop never tried to befuddle Russians by lionizing patriotsd and smearing puppets, but they just do not do it.

Posted by: Arioch | Feb 9 2025 12:51 utc | 331

Posted by: Barrel Brown | Feb 9 2025 6:18 utc | 321
In the grand scheme of things any analysis is useful, whether it’s based on original or secondary sources. One must not be tempted to dismiss it because it challenges any pre-conceived notions of what is happening, or assumptions about the source’s validity. Even flawed analysis, or that corrupted, can be re-purposed into giving valuable insights into the thinking of the analyst, which in itself can lead to useful avenues to explore.
In the case of Anonymous’ synthesised efforts it provides the most pessimistic appraisal of events and therefore sets a useful benchmark, and counter, to the overly optimistic reports of the Russian MOD. One could argue that the truth probably falls somewhere between these contrary positions, but to demonstrate any utility to this approach there has to be two, extreme, fixed points of reference.

Posted by: Milites | Feb 9 2025 13:10 utc | 332

Posted by: Arioch | Feb 9 2025 12:51 utc | 331
Dont take me, or anon2022 seriously. we are just posting bullshit today.
well anon2022 aka shadowbanned has been doing it for three years now, i just chose today to match vibes.

Posted by: UWDude | Feb 9 2025 13:50 utc | 333

guest from franconia@326…..if Lavrov said that and it’s true, sounds like someone sold out Nasrallah and the resistance ….but then looking at the current rape of Syria there are multiple “partners” that can take responsibility for that, each equal in blame, like the dead care…….Russia never gave a rats ass about what their ‘settlers’ were doing to Palestinians, all Russia wanted was it’s base in the Med, gone now. Might even deserve to have been kicked out by the Apartheid State. Wonder how many Russians die every time the Aparthied State sends a shipment of weapons to 404…..must be a source of Zio pride.
Cheers M

Posted by: sean the leprechaun | Feb 9 2025 13:59 utc | 334

James M. | Feb 6 2025 22:35 utc | 114
*** Nothing less than Ukraine’s total de-militarization and commitment to never join NATO or the EU. https://www.rt.com/russia/612309-ukraine-temporary-ceasefire-unacceptable/ ***
Well, such an ‘agreement’ made with crossed tongue-forks should last for at least ten minutes.

Posted by: Cynic | Feb 9 2025 14:41 utc | 335

…guest from franconia@326…..if Lavrov said that and it’s true…
Posted by: sean the leprechaun | Feb 9 2025 13:59 utc | 334

Just to put two habitual liars down a bit:
Lavrov said as follows:
“Israel cannot complain that creating the Palestinian State will destroy its security. Israel security is our priority within the frames of the UN decision to create the independant Palestinian State.”

Posted by: Rutte | Feb 9 2025 14:41 utc | 336

LoveDonbass | Feb 6 2025 23:09 utc | 116
***
** Putin was installed as the chief manager of the Russian state …
Posted by: ANON2022 | Feb 6 2025 22:10 utc | 108 **
############
Who decided this? ***
Perhaps the same shadowy, anti-Russian figures as put/kept Yeltsin in office and rigged elections……
It’s getting rather threadbare the constant drive to concoct excuses for what Putin does … from years-long ‘mishandling’ of the Donbas situation … to years of allowing Israel to use the Syrian army for target practice while illegal US military bases steal oil and host terrorists … to continual arse-licking of the Chabad Zionists/Khazars.
Plus failure to eradicate the mainly jewish-mafia Oligarchs….
Time the fact was finally admitted that Putin is basically a neoliberal zionist agent of the WEF, even though that reality is partially camouflaged by a higher degree of administrative competence than is exhibited by the deranged freak-show of contemporary Western “politicians”.

Posted by: Cynic | Feb 9 2025 15:06 utc | 337

Trump reveals he’s spoken with Putin by phone, says Russian president ‘wants to see people stop dying’ in Ukraine war
https://nypost.com/2025/02/08/us-news/trump-and-putin-in-talks-to-end-the-russia-ukraine-war/
Posted by: FZappa | Feb 9 2025 11:49 utc | 328
“All those dead people. Young, young, beautiful people. They’re like your kids, two million of them – and for no reason.”
1.600.000+ AFU + 290.000- RF= 1.890.000 total
two million of them is close enough rounding
“Let’s get these meetings going. They want to meet. Every day people are dying. Young handsome soldiers are being killed. Young men, like my sons. On both sides. All over the battlefield.”
——————-
In the grand scheme of things any analysis is useful, whether it’s based on original or secondary sources. One must not be tempted to dismiss it because it challenges any pre-conceived notions of what is happening, or assumptions about the source’s validity. Even flawed analysis, or that corrupted, can be re-purposed into giving valuable insights into the thinking of the analyst, which in itself can lead to useful avenues to explore.
In the case of Anonymous’ synthesised efforts it provides the most pessimistic appraisal of events and therefore sets a useful benchmark, and counter, to the overly optimistic reports of the Russian MOD. One could argue that the truth probably falls somewhere between these contrary positions, but to demonstrate any utility to this approach there has to be two, extreme, fixed points of reference.
Posted by: Milites | Feb 9 2025 13:10 utc | 332
The truth might be beyond the two positions, as I mentioned often, I personally think that RF is fine with ukraine’s downplaying the human cost of the SMO.
Propaganda might be useful but when you’re aiming for the complete destruction of the other’s army, it’s ok to let anyone say whatever they like until the day comes when, as in old PC games, they go for the AFU and computer says “But. There’s nothing here”

Posted by: Newbie | Feb 9 2025 15:20 utc | 338

Posted by: Cynic | Feb 9 2025 15:06 utc | 337
##########$
So you cannot provide proof or specifics either.
Among intelligent adults the standard for discussion is higher than hearsay and name-calling.

Posted by: LoveDonbass | Feb 9 2025 15:30 utc | 339

…the overly optimistic reports of the Russian MOD…
Posted by: Milites | Feb 9 2025 13:10 utc | 332

I would not call the Russian MOD reports optimistic, they are very conservative, even cautious.
Even Anonimous himself does not complain about the MOD reports, he blames some unnamed bloggers, who are too eager sometimes he claims.

Posted by: Rutte | Feb 9 2025 15:42 utc | 340

I realized a year ago that the maps and daily updates are too narrow a lens for me.
What the Ukrainians and Russians are doing internally tells us everything about how the SMO is going.
No need to become a fan of this or that person. Just watch what the unemployment rate is, watch the recruitment rates, watch the government non-military spending.
And, I think, most obviously watch how the different leaderships comport themselves.

Posted by: LoveDonbass | Feb 9 2025 15:51 utc | 341

Posted by: Newbie | Feb 9 2025 15:20 utc | 338
‘But. There’s nothing here”
Many years ago I was playing a traditional board wargame, (simulating the USAAF’s European strategic bombing offensive) where the system allowed decoy counters, but we had rarely used them. One game, my opponent had a monstrous stack lurking, which I prepared to battle in the endgame. Because I’d diverted many of my units, in preparation for this final encounter, his other raids had been more successful than usual, but a good result now could save the day.
The moment came, the stack was about to move, my defences were ready, but my opponent had a strange smile on his face. My heart sank, ‘decoys?’
With a gentle nudge he pushed the stack over, to reveal the blank counters. ‘Decoys’.
If the truth is outside those parameters, I din’t think it’s too much of an error, otherwise the movement on the ground would be different, with bigger and more dynamic Russian advances (FPV drones cannot hold territory) with more disintegration and less frontline coherence. Though if the casualties are higher than the Russians are reporting then the relative stasis, or incremental advances, might suggest other factors are at play.
Posted by: Rutte | Feb 9 2025 15:42 utc | 340
Russians don’t outwardly fabricate their reports but they tend to lie by omission or by deliberate deception, they are after all at war. I take your point though, perhaps the other point of reference should be an equally pro-Russian group, as ISW is pro-Western. I certainly know that splitting the difference, and factoring in the impact of strategic and devolved ISR capabilities, and modern platforms coupled with drones, gives a more realistic impression/picture, than following those two benchmarks. Call it the KitKat method of analysis, after the ‘middle of the road’ advert.

Posted by: Milites | Feb 9 2025 16:18 utc | 342

LoveDonbass | Feb 9 2025 15:30 utc | 339
*** So you cannot provide proof or specifics either.***
The evidence is unfortunately there to see in actions, unless fervent deification of “Putin” has blinkered the observer.
As for concrete proof rather than very strong probability, much of that (though not necessarily all) may only be available when the war — not just in Ukraine — is already won or lost.
Which will be too late for it to make any difference.

Posted by: Cynic | Feb 9 2025 17:11 utc | 343

> bloggers … who are too eager sometimes he claims.
> Posted by: Rutte | Feb 9 2025 15:42 utc | 340
there are a bunch of them, pro-Ukraine or pro-Russian, maybe actually the same people, who ride their readers on the dopamine swing.
they exagerate both fears and hopes, interpersing them with pleas to “donate and save our soldiers from ruthless indifferent generals” and outright sell offers for “real knives/belts/whatever made by true masters in their uniquely equipped backyard”, and they actuall yearn a lot that way. And of course they more often exaggerate fears, because humans are well known to easily give irrational reactions when frightened

Posted by: Arioch | Feb 9 2025 18:47 utc | 344

> Trump reveals … two million of them [died] – and for no reason.”
> Posted by: Milites | Feb 9 2025 13:10 utc | 332
That is the same Trump who said USSR lost 60M to Hitler, while the estimations always swinged between 10M and 40M and recently seem settling near 25M.
Knwoing Trump being a businessmen we expect him to pay attention to figures and quantities, but he clearly does not.

Posted by: Arioch | Feb 9 2025 18:58 utc | 345

i know, you like woke stories here
Ukraine, Zhytomir
25 years old guy was caught and was being conscripted in the typical ukrainian way
also in the typical ukrainian way he decided to bribe the senior manhunt officer with a blowjob
the latter allegedly give him “a word of officer honor” to let him flee after the love party, but maybe was not satisfied enough and threw the guy into a bus, driving to the frontlines
the guy somehow managed to write the complain to military attorneys about being cheated
Ukraine, Lvov
Remember all the boasting how Ukraine would make their brand own nuke and the world would be very sorry?
A nuclear physicist of Ivan Franco university, Bilchenko Stepan, was going to work about 9 am, when he met UkrArmy manhunt squad. Having exampting papers both from his employer and from local medics and from his Protestantism sociery he felt bold, however few hours later he readily signed papers about volunteering into the UkrArmy ranks and some more hours later was found chilling out on the road shoulder near Kiev with broken skull and wet brain.
Meanwhile UkrArmy smoothly advances its nuclear programme which makes Putin tremble.

Posted by: Arioch | Feb 9 2025 20:35 utc | 346

@Cynic | Sun, 09 Feb 2025 14:41:00 GMT | 335

Well, such an ‘agreement’ made with crossed tongue-forks should last for at least ten minutes.

Then the fighting will continue until there is nothing left of Ukraine. I’m sure Russia will oblige Ukraine/the West in this regard. The question is how much more punishment can Ukrainians take before they give up.

Posted by: James M. | Feb 9 2025 22:08 utc | 347

If the truth is outside those parameters, I din’t think it’s too much of an error, otherwise the movement on the ground would be different, with bigger and more dynamic Russian advances (FPV drones cannot hold territory) with more disintegration and less frontline coherence. Though if the casualties are higher than the Russians are reporting then the relative stasis, or incremental advances, might suggest other factors are at play.
Posted by: Milites | Feb 9 2025 16:18 utc | 342
As you mentioned some time ago, what does any of the sides need to hold the line? 150.000 and maybe an extra 10% to keep making some token attacks?
They have slightly more than twice that currently (as per my model)
They can still do some rotation, and probably will gt the children crusade underway soon, but will run out in 6 month +- 1 (if russia returns to normal activity levels) at least in a capacity to be everywhere in the active LOC.
———————
> Trump reveals … two million of them [died] – and for no reason.”
> Posted by: Milites | Feb 9 2025 13:10 utc | 332
That is the same Trump who said USSR lost 60M to Hitler, while the estimations always swinged between 10M and 40M and recently seem settling near 25M.
Knwoing Trump being a businessmen we expect him to pay attention to figures and quantities, but he clearly does not.
Posted by: Arioch | Feb 9 2025 18:58 utc | 345
Blood and soul for my master…
But, for that one I mentioned at the time that it could be a way to tell RF that when he mentioned RF military casualties he was overstating by 4.
25 would include those killed by living conditions decay.
Trump likes to drop his bombshells for those not mathmatically illiterate, he gave the half million killed in gaza that way.
And now going back to the numbers, Trump also mentioned earlier biggest (millitary) casualties since WW2, check korea and vietnam for a floor and we’re in the same magnitudes when we know killed are usually half of total permanent losses.

Posted by: Newbie | Feb 9 2025 22:34 utc | 348

Posted by: Milites | Feb 9 2025 13:10 utc | 332
In the grand scheme of things any analysis is useful, whether it’s based on original or secondary sources. One must not be tempted to dismiss it because it challenges any pre-conceived notions of what is happening, or assumptions about the source’s validity. Even flawed analysis, or that corrupted, can be re-purposed into giving valuable insights into the thinking of the analyst, which in itself can lead to useful avenues to explore.
In the case of Anonymous’ synthesised efforts it provides the most pessimistic appraisal of events and therefore sets a useful benchmark, and counter, to the overly optimistic reports of the Russian MOD. One could argue that the truth probably falls somewhere between these contrary positions, but to demonstrate any utility to this approach there has to be two, extreme, fixed points of reference.
Thank you for your reply to me @321
I have no fundamental argument with your comments, and agree that acquiring relevant (reasonably trustworthy) information from opposing POV is really important. That is why I mentioned the Marat Khairullin Substackmaratkhairullin@substack.com
in one of my earlier posts on this general subject ( Posted by: Barrel Brown | Feb 9 2025 1:23 utc | 302).

Posted by: Barrel Brown | Feb 9 2025 23:42 utc | 349

Posted by: Newbie | Feb 9 2025 22:34 utc | 348
https://mwi.westpoint.edu/the-return-of-the-tactical-crisis/
Kind of what I’ve been saying for the past two years, and it tows the NATO line, but reinforces that frontlines are now made up of archipelagos and chains of defensive positions, protected by mines and the invisible ISR tripwire. This means that the usual force ratios and frontages are diminished and extended, respectively. Manoeuvre is not dead, but rates of advance are small in comparison to past conflicts with similar force compositions.
Trump,is an effective communicator because he challenges the listener, unlike typical politicians who make auto-pilot, ILS glide-path speeches. What amazes me is his critics still do most of the heavy lifting for him by insisting on ‘fact-checking’ him.
Kind of reminds me of the famous, ‘best trick the devil played’, only in this case it would be, ‘the best trick Trump played was to convince his critics he was stupid.’
Posted by: Barrel Brown | Feb 9 2025 23:42 utc | 349
Absolutely, reading the NATO press is like panning for gold, lots of politically/institutionally correct formulations to sift through, but some nuggets definitely lurk amongst the dead words.

Posted by: Milites | Feb 10 2025 21:06 utc | 350

@Barrel Brown | Sun, 09 Feb 2025 23:42:00 GMT | 349

In the case of Anonymous’ synthesised efforts it provides the most pessimistic appraisal of events and therefore sets a useful benchmark, and counter, to the overly optimistic reports of the Russian MOD. One could argue that the truth probably falls somewhere between these contrary positions, but to demonstrate any utility to this approach there has to be two, extreme, fixed points of reference.

To each their own. I personally don’t think I’m missing anything by blocking/mot reading Anonymous’s posts. There are plenty of mappers out there that give a Ukrainian perspective that I can find without him dropping them in to the comments.
If he gave some kind of analysis as to why Russia’s “pace” is “slow”, or did some comparisons to other wars as to “pace” to compare where Russia is, that might be worth reading. I had asked him for the latter, but he got snappy with me and refused. He either couldn’t or wouldn’t.
So he spends 99 percent of his posts dropping maps someone else made, and says “Russia slow, that bad” without elaboration. He clearly has an agenda, and it’s one I’ll skip, since its omnipresent in 99 percent of the Western media. But as I said, to each their own, and if you find his posts valuable that’s perfectly fine.
Probably the last words I will say on Anonymous.

Posted by: James M. | Feb 10 2025 23:14 utc | 351

Posted by: James M. | Feb 10 2025 23:14 utc | 351
Fair point, I just use his ‘analysis’ as a useful summary of the most pessimistic side, as I don’t have time to wade through other ‘Slava Ukraine’/USAID sponsored sites. My main issues to his approach are, the maps are part of the disinformation-campaign being run by both sides, and they don’t represent the areas of influence, where the devolved use of drones has had a major tactical and operational impact.

Posted by: Milites | Feb 11 2025 6:26 utc | 352