Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
February 6, 2025
Ukraine – Intensity Of War Has Decreased

Over the last month the war in Ukraine has become less intense.

The number of daily losses on the Ukrainian side, as provided by the Russia Ministry of Defense, has decreased from an average 2,200 per day in early November 2024 to an average of 1,600 per day in late January 2025.


bigger

Ukraine has acknowledged that the level of violence has decreased (edited machine translation):

Over the past seven days, the number of assault operations of the Russian army on the entire front line has been significantly reduced.

This is evidenced by the data of the General Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, according to the military telegram channel Deep State.

Just yesterday, 80 attacks by Russians were recorded, while at the peak in December, this figure had reached 292.

Deep State provided statistics on Russian attacks by month (daily average):

  • November – 5,205 (174);
  • December – 6,247 (202);
  • January – 5,087 (164);
  • 4 days of February – 381 (95)

The reasons for the decrease are unknown. It may well be weather related as a relatively warm winter has caused a prolonged muddy season which makes assaults over open land more difficult.

Another reason might be ongoing negotiations.

Ukrainian ATMCMS attacks on Russia seem to have stopped for now as have Russian attacks on Ukrainian energy infrastructure. (This observation may be deceiving though as such attacks usually appear in bursts.)

Yesterday the Russian side confirmed for the first time that diplomatic contacts with the U.S. have intensified:

"There are indeed contacts between individual departments, and they have intensified recently. But I can't tell you any other details, there is nothing else to say," Peskov told reporters, according to Russian state-owned media.

Next week General Kelloggs, Trump's Ukraine envoy, is supposed to announce further plans for peace talks over Ukraine. I do not expect any real change of U.S. strategy. Russia will have to win the war on the battle field.

Meanwhile: Europe’s Ukraine Delusion continues.

And a lecture in political history (recommended!):

Glenn Diesen and his book The Ukraine War and the Eurasian World Order in a Book Club discussion with Jeffrey Sachs (video).

Comments

In parallel, the Russian Armed Forces continue the operation to encircle Pokrovsk from the flank.
Posted by: HERMIUS | Feb 8 2025 0:18 utc | 200

Pokrovsk, Chasov Yar, Toretsk… meaningless. The AFU hold key strategic trees and fields in Kursk!!! LMAO!!!

Posted by: TJandTheBear | Feb 8 2025 0:28 utc | 201

re: TJandTheBear | Feb 8 2025 0:28 utc | 201
I think you may be General Kellogg posting under a fake name. 🙂

Posted by: Perimetr | Feb 8 2025 0:45 utc | 202

I think you may be General Kellogg posting under a fake name. 🙂
Posted by: Perimetr | Feb 8 2025 0:45 utc | 202

LOL.

Posted by: TJandTheBear | Feb 8 2025 0:50 utc | 203

Pokrovsk, Chasov Yar, Toretsk… meaningless. The AFU hold key strategic trees and fields in Kursk!!! LMAO!!!
Posted by: TJandTheBear | Feb 8 2025 0:28 utc | 201
🙈🙈🙈

Posted by: HERMIUS | Feb 8 2025 1:02 utc | 204

Point to bear in mind: There never has been a significant population of ethnic Ukrainians in Odessa or other nearby settlements and countryside. That factor is highly significant. The only claim that the former Ukraine SSR holds on that city is that the Bolsheviks in ca 1921 assigned it to their newly created Ukraine SSR. That was merely administrative history. This is now.
Posted by: aristodemos | Feb 7 2025 5:43 utc | 132
Thank you for this very sane and apparently historically accurate post.
And yes, it is of major importance for the RF that Odessa comes within Russian control before there can be any end to the present SMO. This may occur through some sort of negotiations (doubtful IMO), or military defeat of Ukraine (and of course NATO) in the vicinity of the city.

Posted by: Barrel Brown | Feb 8 2025 1:20 utc | 205

RUSSIAN POLL
67% of the population support the SMO

Posted by: HERMIUS | Feb 8 2025 1:26 utc | 206

RUSSIAN POLL
67% of the population support the SMO
Posted by: HERMIUS | Feb 8 2025 1:26 utc | 206
Doesnt surprise me. russian folk have watched their culture being attacked in Donbas since the nazis took over kiev in 2014

Posted by: Ted from Liverpool | Feb 8 2025 1:40 utc | 207

Well, what is the difference then between Russia and e.g. Syria?
There is no difference.
Posted by: ANON2022 | Feb 6 2025 16:30 utc | 39
Whats the difference between red and blue?
There is no difference.
But Ill spare everyone the sophistry to prove it.

Posted by: UWDude | Feb 8 2025 2:37 utc | 208

I ask the rest of you SB haters to refrain from *superficial* responses to SB. If you don’t want to seriously debate him, then ignore him. That will reduce thread length and improve thread quality.
Posted by: I forgot | Feb 7 2025 23:01 utc | 189
did you kust learn from him there is no difference between Syria and Russia?
I roll on by his posts because they are one preposterous claim after another, and a waste of time, bit somebody posted that little gem, and i had to stab in it?
Like, is shadowbanned really too stupid not to see any of the AT LEAST 100 major differences between Syria amd Russia, or is he just a trill always trying to see how much complete bullshit he can spew before somebody give him some attention, his rattle, and burps him?
I dont have the time or inclination to post 100 ways Russia is different from Syria, same as I dont ever engage flat earthers. It just pure stupid lunacy.

Posted by: UWDude | Feb 8 2025 3:00 utc | 209

This may occur through some sort of negotiations (doubtful IMO), or military defeat of Ukraine (and of course NATO) in the vicinity of the city.
Posted by: Barrel Brown | Feb 8 2025 1:20 utc | 205
—————————————————————-
I vote for the latter and that will take a little longer.
The Russians are trying hard not to incur too many losses while the beat goes on. I am not sure how to get a good read on the slow disintegration of the Ukrainian war front but that is what it looks like. General mud is in charge for now and the Russians will not stop until they get their way. It is not clear to me how Trump has any leverage to shorten the Russian war effort. They have stated what they want and are getting it.
Zelensky, who is no longer a legal entity, will likely be gone before the year is out. The US Congress and the Europeans (UK excluded; continent isolated by fog) are getting more ambivalent about their war endeavors against Russia. More bloodletting, damage, destruction, etc. until surrender.

Posted by: Acco Hengst | Feb 8 2025 3:07 utc | 210

I heard about the below from Larry Johnson today and it is not yet well reported but significant, IMO.
UK to take over leadership of Ukraine defence group from US
quote

The UK is to take over the leadership of the Ukraine defence group from the US.
Next week, John Healey, the Defence Secretary, will convene the 26th Ukraine Defence Contact Group (UDCG) in Brussels.
It will be the first time the UK has led the group, after it was instructed by the Americans to take charge on enhancing Ukraine’s security within Nato.
The Ministry of Defence confirmed that the UDCG will meet ahead of the Nato defence ministers’ meeting on Wednesday to discuss priorities for Ukraine as the international community continues to work together to support the country in its fight against Vladimir Putin’s illegal invasion.

I keep thinking that at some point soon the Ukrainian military will surrender and make all this proxy leadership irrelevant.

Posted by: psychohistorian | Feb 8 2025 3:41 utc | 211

The Russians are trying hard not to incur too many losses while the beat goes on.
Posted by: Acco Hengst | Feb 8 2025 3:07 utc | 210

Then why are they not doing the things that would win the war with minimal casualties (decapitation, destruction of logistics, blockade from the west)?

Posted by: ANON2022 | Feb 8 2025 5:32 utc | 212

I dont have the time or inclination to post 100 ways Russia is different from Syria, same as I dont ever engage flat earthers. It just pure stupid lunacy.
Posted by: UWDude | Feb 8 2025 3:00 utc | 209

Even if you did have the time or inclination, we know what it will look like — 100 ways that are completely irrelevant to what actually matters.
The point is that Russian internal and external security is completely broken.
Anyone can bomb and invade and there will be no response, so why not have fun?
If you are the Estonians, why not launch a few drones to slam into apartment buildings in St. Petersburg, kill a few Russian civilians, have some fun? Which has already in fact happened multiple times.
That thing was absolutely inconceivable prior to 2022. Why? Because the Estonians (thought they) knew that if they did that, it would be the end of Estonia. Now they know doing that is perfectly safe, so why not do it?
Etc. etc. etc.
Look at how Azerbaijan’s Aliyev is now pretty much demanding the Kremlin to pay tribute after the Aktau plane crash, even though the investigation, if it is objective (which it likely won’t be because it has been conveniently completely taken out of Russia’s hands) will show either that a Russian Pantsir system shot the plane down because Ukrainian drones were flying close to it, or that it was in fact struck by the Ukranian drones themselves (right now looking at the pictures released it seems to be the latter), and in either case Ukraine and NATO are responsible.
But Aliyev never mentions Ukraine. Because the vultures are sensing weakness and are circling in.
This is why Russia and Syria are the same now. For 40-50 years after 1967 and 1973 Syria had been stockpiling a deterrent against Israeli aggression. Chemical weapons, a massive arsenal of ballistic missiles, there is some suspicion about a few nukes from North Korea too. Did it matter when the Israeli aggression renewed? No. Putin came with the sweet talk and tricked them into destroying their chemical weapons, then entered the war seemingly defending Syria, but all that time he allowed Israel to bomb whatever they wanted whenever they wanted, and never did anything to clear Idlib and the northeast, in fact it appears the Kremlin actively intervened to stop the Idlib clearance operation (just as it had prevented the taking of Mariupol back in 2014). As a result Syria was slowly bled to death, and in the end collapsed. The deterrent didn’t matter because nobody was willing to use it.
It is the exact same situation now with Russia, and with the exact same person in charge.

Posted by: ANON2022 | Feb 8 2025 6:27 utc | 213

Posted by: Acco Hengst | Feb 8 2025 3:07 utc | 210
It is not clear to me how Trump has any leverage to shorten the Russian war effort. They have stated what they want and are getting it.
I fully agree with this. In my opinion, despite all his “hyper bluster”, Trump has very little leverage at all. The RF (ie. The despicable Putin) will decide on what terms the SMO is ended.
But, having written that, I note the post- Posted by: psychohistorian | Feb 8 2025 3:41 utc | 211
-that the UK is going to get involved in all this quagmire. Hope they don’t engage Bojo as an “expert advisor” But who knows what lunacy the UK might think is a great idea.

Posted by: Barrel Brown | Feb 8 2025 7:40 utc | 214

The point is that Russian internal and external security is completely broken.
Anyone can bomb and invade and there will be no response, so why not have fun?
Posted by: ANON2022 | Feb 8 2025 6:27 utc | 213
I dont have the time or inclination to list the 100 different ways THIS statement is so fucking stupid.
its like 100 * 100 on the stupidity scale. And your next argument will be full of ten more stupid fucking statements, each one with at least 100 OBVIOUS counter points, but it wont phase you.
Because you are so arrogant you think you can pile bullshit on top of bullshit, BULLSHIT YOU KNOW IS LUDICROUS BUT STILL WRITE, bit you ate so arrogant you think your sophistry and semantics are the best in the world, and you are some kind of well trained, well honed, well oiled bullshit machine.
YOU AINT.

Posted by: UWDude | Feb 8 2025 7:44 utc | 215

Putin has humiliated NATO. Look at how they all are afraid to even go to Russia.
He snatched Crimea and the Ukrainian Navy from NATO, and nobody lifted a finger. Then he invaded Ukraine, and the whole world just sat and watched as he beat Ukraines face in. They all just sat on their hands and did nothing
Now he is in fact going to take all Ukraine, and likely the Baltics definitely next, a well known fact.
The USA has nukes, UK has nukes so why don’t they drop a few on Russia, maybe Karelia? Because nobody fears NATO or the USA anymore, they know they are weak because they are run by traitors who wont do what is necessary to stop Russian aggression.
What needs to be done is a full invasion of Russia by all of NATO, but Putin has them all so scared. NATO is just like Syria, and will soon fall just like it, because like Syria, NATO has a WMD stockpile, but is too scared to use it, Be ause Putin has humiliated them so bad.
I mean if NATO were serious about winning in Ukraine, why haven’t they wiped out the Kremlin yet? Why just some pointless oilfields? Russia is swimming in oil. Blowing up a million litres is literally a drop on the bucket for them.

Posted by: UWDude | Feb 8 2025 8:01 utc | 216

Posted by: UWDude | Feb 8 2025 8:01 utc | 216
If you could keep a straight face while saying that I think sky news would hire you as an anchor.

Posted by: Badjoke | Feb 8 2025 8:05 utc | 217

Posted by: Badjoke | Feb 8 2025 8:05 utc | 217
why is it a joke? How many British Battalions have even thought of invading Russia? Where is the Polish military?
Once Putin takes Poland and The Baltics, and likely rast Germany back,NATO will still think sanctions and sending broken down shit wasting storage space will stop him. I mean he has captured 25% of Ukraine, destroyed and humiliated all NATO defense toys, and yet NATO still hems and haws, holds meetings in Brussels and offers harsh condemnations, while still buying Russian Uranium, Titanium and oil.
It is quite clear anyone can bomb or invade a NATO ally at will, and nobody will do anything to stop it, so why not have a little fun, and add a little more territory to great Russia while he is at it? Clearly Putin understands this is an existential war for NATO, why doesn’t NATO do anything about it?

Posted by: UWDude | Feb 8 2025 8:12 utc | 218

why isn’t Ukraine hitting Russia’s power plants, blowing up their rail lines and bridges, and hitting their command centers, instead of just attacking oil storage tanks and apartment buildings?
There are only two possible answers, either NATO is telling Ukraine to play nice with Russia, and go easy on them, or the oligarchs in Ukraine are thinking about their fortunes and what happens after Russia wins.

Posted by: UWDude | Feb 8 2025 8:17 utc | 219

Posted by: Perimetr | Feb 7 2025 21:24 utc | 188

Until then we in the West will continue to hear that the war is a stalemate, that catastrophic Russian losses and critical shortages of weapons and munitions mean Russia can be defeated if we only have the will to persist in defending democracy and freedom.

And when Russia swallows the whole of the Ukraines, the headlines will be “Russia won, but a what cost?”

Posted by: Johan Kaspar | Feb 8 2025 8:18 utc | 220

Posted by: UWDude | Feb 8 2025 8:12 utc | 218
Because people calling for things that basically make a nuclear exchange certain to occur are fucking clowns and I cannot imagine you calling for it unless it was a joke. Unless you suddenly decide to put on a wig and red nose and turn into anon2022.

Posted by: Badjoke | Feb 8 2025 8:21 utc | 221

Posted by: Badjoke | Feb 8 2025 8:21 utc | 221
Syria and the Ukraine are literally, exactly the same in any of the ways that are, in fact relevant.
If you go back to 1978 Ukraine was stockpiling nuclear weapons until Bush sweet talked into giving them up. And then in 2022, Russia bombs Ukraine wherever it wants. In fact, it appears NATO actively intervened in stopping Ukraine from taking back The donbass and Crimeain the 20-teens with the Minsk agreements.
And which country did Russians tanks and artillery pound frim, proven multiple times, at the start? Belarus! So I stand by my statement that anybody can invade a NATO ally, and nobody will do anything about it.
It’s because Zelensky is a traitor who does the will of his crooked oligarchs who just want to make nice with Russian oil companies like they did before the war.

Posted by: UWDude | Feb 8 2025 8:33 utc | 222

I think it’s possible that eventually President Putin and the Russian Federation will be faced with a choice. Keep going and eventually get 100% of what you want, or allow the United States and President Trump to have the fig leaf of looking like they brought about a peace deal by settling for only 80-90% of what they want.
By powering through, the 100% can be had, but the West supplies Ukraine with so much aid that there is enough left after the AFU is crushed to supply a resistance movement, saboteurs, assassins, and guerilla actions.
Giving Trump his fig leaf might allow for a deal where the West keeps its hand around the throat of a rump Ukraine state, and by dint of a carrot and stick approach keeps partisan activities from Ukraine to a minimum. And of course, by allowing Trump the laurel wreath for having negotiated a peace deal, sanctions could be reversed.
It could all come down to “the art of the deal”. And if Putin and Trump can see eye to eye then they can unite in leaving the bill for the war in the laps of Ukraine and the European Union. Trump wants Ukraine’s resources, well, the Russian Federation might be amenable to selling them, and perhaps even allowing some American companies to come in and collect fees by helping to exploit that mineral wealth. No ownership, just a piece of the action.

Posted by: Babel-17 | Feb 8 2025 8:33 utc | 223

Posted by: UWDude | Feb 8 2025 8:01 utc | 216
An excellent post UW. I recommend that all read it and take note of the ideas expressed. But I doubt that SB and his Brigade 77 handlers will be too receptive.

Posted by: Barrel Brown | Feb 8 2025 8:42 utc | 224

Posted by: UWDude | Feb 8 2025 8:33 utc | 222
Well done.

Posted by: Badjoke | Feb 8 2025 8:47 utc | 225

why isn’t Ukraine hitting Russia’s power plants, blowing up their rail lines and bridges, and hitting their command centers, instead of just attacking oil storage tanks and apartment buildings?
Posted by: UWDude | Feb 8 2025 8:17 utc | 219

It is in fact doing all of those things, and it will only get worse, as their capabilities grow unimpeded.
If you actually followed primary sources instead of “alternative media” fairy tale spinners, you would know.

How many British Battalions have even thought of invading Russia? Where is the Polish military?

Both the Polish and the Briitsh militaries are in fact inside Russia in Kursk.
But yeah, there hasn’t been an open invasion, sure.
You still don’t get it though — if that is still unthinkable, so were once upon a time all the things I listed above that have now been normalized and are a fact of daily life. The frog has not been fully cooked yet, there is still some way to go, but the trajectory is clear.

Posted by: ANON2022 | Feb 8 2025 8:49 utc | 226

Oh, and regarding rail lines and bridges, guess who is not doing that (and hasn’t even seriously done it)?
And who also stopped attacking power plants too, because he is looking for Minsk-3/Istanbul-2, not victory…

Posted by: ANON2022 | Feb 8 2025 8:51 utc | 227

why isn’t Ukraine hitting Russia’s power plants, blowing up their rail lines and bridges, and hitting their command centers, instead of just attacking oil storage tanks and apartment buildings?
There are only two possible answers, either NATO is telling Ukraine to play nice with Russia, and go easy on them, or the oligarchs in Ukraine are thinking about their fortunes and what happens after Russia wins.
Posted by: UWDude | Feb 8 2025 8:17 utc | 219
A profound post. I dont know why so many people dont like what UWDude posts. I have learned so much from him. If you dont like what he jas to say, just dont respond, instead of polluting the thread with your frustrations at his intelligent and well thought put posts

Posted by: UWDudesSock | Feb 8 2025 8:52 utc | 228

Oh, and regarding rail lines and bridges, guess who is not doing that (and hasn’t even seriously done it)?
And who also stopped attacking power plants too, because he is looking for Minsk-3/Istanbul-2, not victory…
Posted by: ANON2022 | Feb 8 2025 8:51 utc | 227
Zelensky. I guess Zelensky. Bit he already had his chances with Minsk I and II, so he wont be getting a III.
Poroshenko’s puppet is going to be sure to deliver Ukraine to their Russian oligarch buddies so they can get those sweet arms and gas transit deals again. Damn that treasonous Zelensky, he should be tied to a tree and whipped to death!

Posted by: UWDude | Feb 8 2025 8:58 utc | 229

But yeah, there hasn’t been an open invasion, sure.
Posted by: ANON2022 | Feb 8 2025 8:49 utc | 226
You just said any country can invade any time they want. So why aren’t they? There can only be one of two reasons: They actually want Russia to win, or Zelenskys oligarchs want Russia to win. Which of those two only possible reasons is it? Remember, only two possible reasons.
_———
You still don’t get it though — if that is still unthinkable, so were once upon a time
Posted by: ANON2022 | Feb 8 2025 8:49 utc | 226
Nobody ever thought Putin would be toppled, or there would be a civil war, or that Prighozin would take Moscow, or that Russia would bleed until Putin was toppled, and definitely it has always been unthinkable that Ukraine would win.

Posted by: But yeah, there hasn | Feb 8 2025 9:04 utc | 230

above was by me, accidentally pasted a reply in the name field.
Also, I think UWDudesSock might actually be UWDude. He writes kind of like him.

Posted by: UWDude | Feb 8 2025 9:06 utc | 231

It is in fact doing all of those things, and it will only get worse, as their capabilities grow unimpeded.
If you actually followed primary sources instead of “alternative media” fairy tale spinners, you would know.
Posted by: ANON2022 | Feb 8 2025 8:49 utc | 226
You have literally announced the end of Russia when nothing more than a few windows were shattered by a drone, you post every drone attack here like it is the crippling blow, yet you have failed to post a the rail line and command center hits in Russia Ukraine has landed on Russia’s head?
I need to talk to your manager. You aren’t doing your job right.
Also, I would love to see the score of Russian rail lines, bridges, power plants and command centers hit vs Ukrainian rail lines, bridges power plants and command centers hit.
I guess good “primary” sources you follow would say Russian shit destroyed: 74 gajillion, vs Ukrainian shot destroyed, 8, plus a lot of dort field have had to be replowed, because Putin commands his artillery not to hit anything so his oligarch friends can buy french wine and bmws.
But that is why I read “alternative media”, be ause U cant handle how badly Ukraine is kicking Russia’s ass, by taking a full -25% of Ukraine from Russia.

Posted by: UWDude | Feb 8 2025 9:18 utc | 232

Posted by: UWDude | Feb 8 2025 8:58 utc | 229
And those traitorous turks. Still buying food and fuel from Russia and allowing all that trade out of the black sea. I mean what’s a little global famine when freedom(1) is on the line!
(1) some freedom services such as elections, speech and privacy may not apply to locations in the EU, UK, Canada, Australia or the USA.

Posted by: Badjoke | Feb 8 2025 9:19 utc | 233

Posted by: Badjoke | Feb 8 2025 9:19 utc | 233
Turkey is literally the second biggest army in NATO, and an actual, factual, member, in fact. They could close the Bosporus tonight, if NATO was serious about winning in Ukraine.
But I guess people just cant actually accept the literal truth tha NATO actually LOVES Putin because he was installed by Yeltsin so they can finish the destruction of Russia. They KNOW Putin is their guy, who will help them finish the job they put him there for. That is why they actually are trying to make Ukraine lose the war. They could easily winot tomorrow if they wanted.

Posted by: UWDude | Feb 8 2025 9:27 utc | 234

Posted by: UWDude | Feb 8 2025 9:27 utc | 234
Let’s not let Korea and Japan off the hook. They could take vladivostok is a day and open second front in the east but they keep buying Russian resources instead!

Posted by: Badjoke | Feb 8 2025 9:43 utc | 235

next up
12 incidents of Russian command posts hit by ukraine, 8 bridges and 6 powerplants.
then the pigeon topples all the pieces and shits on the chess board triumphantly, ignoring the literally THOUSANDS of hits Rusdoa has landed on Ukrainian command posts, railways, bridges and power plants over the past three years.
Because trolls troll, tards tard, and trolltards troll like tards

Posted by: UWDude | Feb 8 2025 10:09 utc | 236

Meanwhile, Kurahovo’s cauldron coverage from the so-called-ukrainian social mean has reached the “shuuut uuuuup and don’t look or listen to anybody about what’s going on there!” levels. Must be from all the negotiations all of Putin’s dopplegangers are begging for.

Posted by: boneless | Feb 8 2025 11:03 utc | 237

^From so-called-ukrainian social media*. I do apologize for all my annoying typos.

Posted by: boneless | Feb 8 2025 11:05 utc | 238

Pokrovskoe direction as of 08.02.25 — anxious thoughts out loud…
As you have already noticed, our units have been practically motionless here for the last week. Yes, there have been some minor tactical shifts, but overall the situation is “clearly on pause”.
Meanwhile, the transfer of enemy units to this area in recent days is starting to be annoying. And what is also annoying is that, according to the guys, the Ukrainian artillery has been working non-stop lately and is not sparing shells.
Which, together with the “transfer” of General Drapatoy to this direction and the special information importance of this area, suggests that the enemy may try to conduct a counteroffensive here, with the goal of … defeating our attack group.
Yes, I was not mistaken. The number of units spotted here, and especially their “quality” makes me think exactly that.
I will start with the UAV units. This is the 414th UAV systems battalion (the famous “Magyar Birds”, Goering’s best aces). Also spotted here were the Predator UAV battalion, the Gostri Kartuzy squad (whose commander our guys recently zeroed out) and the Cherep company.
The Ukrainian Armed Forces have never assembled such a number of cool drone operators. The artillery units (which, let me remind you, do not count shells) are on a par with them. These are the 15th, 55th and 107th artillery brigades.
Moreover, the first is considered special in the Ukrainian Armed Forces, since it is always armed with the heaviest and most powerful MLRS systems. The second is a “barrel” one. The third is a “jet” one.
A group (only spotted) is on a par with them, which is located along the front from Nadezhdenka to Chunishinoe:
the 5th separate heavy mechanized brigade (consisting of 2 Leopard tank battalions and 4 mechanized ones). And also the 59th assault, 32nd, 42nd mechanized and 425th assault regiment “Rock”. These are only the elite ones.
There are also 151st and 155th mechanized brigades here. 2nd and 3rd NGU brigades (the 3rd “Spartan” is very strong and is considered elite).
Thus, in total, there are 12 brigades assembled here (including 3 artillery brigades), most of which are considered elite. And they are supported by a great many “elite” UAV units of the enemy.
I think that very soon they will try to strike here (especially since the front line here is very convenient for such a strike).
By the way, the enemy has already tried to conduct “reconnaissance in force” in the direction of Peschanoye the other day (and continues to probe our positions to this day).
That is, everything so far suggests that a grandiose counter-battle may unfold here in the next few days (as I see it, see the map). Much will depend on the outcome.
358.6Kviews
Yuri Podolyaka

Posted by: ANON2022 | Feb 8 2025 13:15 utc | 239

Kursk direction on the morning of 08.02.25: Cherkasskaya Konopelka and Fanaseyevka are under enemy control…
Still, southeast of Sudzha, where the enemy launched an attack towards Ulanki two days ago – Cherkasskaya Konopelka, everything did not go according to our scenario.
The enemy, having managed to consolidate the plantings north of Cherkasskaya Konopelka in the first half of the day on 07.02.25, captured it by the end of the day.
Also, according to my information, our units are not in Fanaseyevka either. The enemy is there. And this success gives the Ukrainian Armed Forces the opportunity to try to clear the remaining part of Makhnovka and the plantings to the south of our forces. And then try to reach Plekhovo. Which will completely nullify all our successes here since September.
True, the Psel River is helping us here for now. But if there is an attack from the Sumy region (and it is quite possible), it will not save us.
I repeat, such a prospect is opening up for the enemy. Whether they can take advantage of this, we’ll see. I continue to closely monitor the situation in this area.
Keep your fingers crossed and pray for the guys.
1.1Mviews
Yuri Podolyaka

So, let’s ask the obvious question, shall we.
The AFU is on its last legs, but it succeffuly attacked again in Kursk and is preparing a massive counteroffensive around Pokrovsk.
How are those statements compatible?

Posted by: ANON2022 | Feb 8 2025 13:21 utc | 240

ZIMOVSKY
Forwarded from Nikita Tretyakov
Adult men who come to the SVO know catastrophically little about this war. Yes, not all 100%, but the absolute majority come to the front without even the most basic understanding of what war looks like. Many not only do not know how to behave correctly when a kamikaze drone flies at them, but also do not know that such things even exist; not only do they not know how to put on a tourniquet, but have never even seen one on the screen. And in general, they imagine war as almost a victorious march, expect incredible miracles from the modern army of constant and excessive training and provision, support for each soldier with artillery and aviation. When signing a contract for a certain period, they often do not even suspect that contracts are automatically extended and are currently de facto indefinite.
If you read the previous paragraph and find it hard to believe, then you are in the same boat with me. Like all experienced front-line soldiers, I find it hard to believe that today, after almost three years of war, in the conditions of a huge flow of information, one can remain in the dark. And yet, time after time, we encounter such people, and there are more and more of them in each “wave” of new contract soldiers. But no amount of amazement can even begin to compare with the shock that overtakes such a freshly minted soldier, who knows nothing, on his first combat mission. This is a real shock, often felt by these people as a deception on the part of the system, as a kind of betrayal.
Today, more information is published on the military specialties that interest me almost every day than I can read. There is a flood of analytics on the general situation at the front, in addition to coverage of those aspects that are obvious at the front, but are unknown to the general public. Videos of battles of both infantry and equipment, of artillery and UAVs are published. And anyone can access all this by simply reaching out and writing a search query. The notorious truth about the SVO, its realities from the fighter’s point of view – no one hides. Moreover, you can not only get an idea of ​​​​the war, but also prepare for it: at least get knowledge that can help you survive.
And yet, at the front, we see very few informed or independently prepared recruits. Why? This question haunted me, we discussed it with comrades. The thought followed a well-trodden path: criticism of major media and criticism of the candidates themselves – like, there is only positive news on TV, and people blindly believe and go, without trying to learn anything more. But these factors do not seem to me exhaustive or even fundamental in the formation of this unfortunate phenomenon. Well, it cannot be that people considering the decision to go to war and risk their lives there, do not try to look into the topic deeper, to figure out where they are going and what is happening there. This does not correspond to either my, or, I am sure, your experience of communicating with the citizens of our country. So what then? Why?
The answer was right in front of me all the time, but I refused to see it, stubbornly refused to notice the obvious. Everything is simple and very sad.
Yes, the truth about the SVO is not difficult to find out. Yes, most adult men, considering the possibility of going to war, delve into the topic and try to understand what awaits them there. And they understand.
And they do not go to the military registration and enlistment office, do not sign a contract, do not go to the front.
The truth of this war is not attractive, not glamorous. It is cruel and disgusting, it stinks of blood and dirt, brutality, a feeling of helplessness and uselessness, almost zero value of life and dignity.
Most quickly understand this. And do not go.
Call it “survivor bias” or “negative selection”, but most of those who still go to the front do so precisely because of ignorance.
It gives them false hope that the war will help them in their difficult life situations, which push them to this decision.
And yes, they have the right to feel cheated, because a choice out of despair is no choice, just like a choice out of ignorance or induced delusion.
When tomorrow you see the news about a village being taken, know that it was done by those who found themselves at the front almost by mistake, in the darkness of ignorance, and yet they came out into the light.

Posted by: ANON2022 | Feb 8 2025 13:43 utc | 241

Re: Posted by: UWDude | Feb 8 2025 8:12 utc | 218

It is quite clear anyone can bomb or invade a NATO ally at will, and nobody will do anything to stop it, so why not have a little fun, and add a little more territory to great Russia while he is at it? Clearly Putin understands this is an existential war for NATO, why doesn’t NATO do anything about it?

What are you talking about?!?
There is no NATO Ally being bombed and attacked.
If you are referring to Ukraine, show me the Treaty that makes Ukraine an official ally of NATO.
Talk is cheap and means nothing.

Posted by: Julian | Feb 8 2025 14:01 utc | 242

@ UWDude | Feb 8 2025 3:00 utc | 209
Per my recollection, all your replies to SB discussed the merits. And even now, there’s a big diff between what you said to me (reasonable) versus what, say, James M. said (just insulting me by calling me a sock puppet).
I’m like wagelaborer: “We just have to wait and see what happens to know who is right.” I recall reading blog comments about certain political figures in USA and almost all the commenters ganged up, mocked, and eventually banned the one lone critic. Subsequent events proved the critic correct. While we wait for things to reveal themselves , I read SB’s stuff, your stuff, and mostly everyone else’s too.

Posted by: I forgot | Feb 8 2025 14:13 utc | 243

> Both the Polish and the Briitsh militaries are in fact inside Russia in Kursk.
> Posted by: ANON2022 | Feb 8 2025 8:49 utc | 226
I see.
So ANON2022 just said that the second strong NATO land army, and the second strong NATO sea fleet are useless junk, that can only achieve something of size, like capturing few rusty villages and genociding elders there, when they perform a sucker punch.
Once those NATO armies, second streong after USArmy, were revealed they can only hide in basements unable of any further advances.
Well, indeed. With armies like that UWDude seems correct: any “shithole of a country” can bomb any NATO “power” with impunity (with the only exception of USA). It makles it obvious why Trump wants to distance form those freaks that once were warriors, form those gapless liabilities that century ago were seen as assets

Posted by: Arioch | Feb 8 2025 14:38 utc | 244

The religious aspect of the behavior of many of the posters here is deeply fascinating.
Like, why do these people care so much about Putin’s infallibility?
If someone in the West, who is not really affected by what is happening at all (and, objectively, should be rooting for Russia to lose, because Russia losing is how he gets to enjoy his current lifestyle for a few more decades rather than descending in permanent economic depression) is foaming at the mouth so vigorously when he sees information that does not fit the established in his head narrative, what does that tell us about the psychological state of that person?
It is a cargo cult, with Putin as the leader appointed by the members of that cult (Putin himself, of course, not being at all aware of it, just as most of the WWII US soldiers who passed through Vanuatu never became aware of what the name “John Frum” referred to). Rational thinking and objective dispassionate analysis is by definition excluded from the options…

Posted by: ANON2022 | Feb 8 2025 15:53 utc | 245

A Ukrainian himar missile just took out an entire building killing all the Russian troops there including a high value commander. Confirmed on Russian and Ukrainian TG channels.

Posted by: bored | Feb 8 2025 16:06 utc | 246

The AFU is on its last legs, but it succeffuly attacked again in Kursk and is preparing a massive counteroffensive around Pokrovsk.
How are those statements compatible?
Posted by: ANON2022 | Feb 8 2025 13:21 utc | 240
That would have to do with what you consider a “successful attack” and a “massive counteroffensive”
If landing infantry in 2 villages consisting of a dozen or so houses each located in a fire bag at the cost of a battalion worth of armoured vehicles and 100 men a ‘successful attack” then yes Ukraine is winning.
Consider though that Russia still has fire control over these villages and the Ukrainian troops will be running out of food and ammo in about a week and the wounded they can’t evacuate will start to decompose and stink up the joint. I guess by your standards you could call Krynky a major Ukrainian success too.
I’m still waiting for someone to explain what the strategic objectives of Ukraine’s Kursk operation are. The most difficult aspect of the Kursk operation for Ukraine is going to be getting out of there alive with any of the equipment. Russia now has drone control over the supply roads from Sumy.
The Russians don’t really have to do much here. The enemy is constantly reinforcing and resupplying a fire bag that leads to nowhere. As one Ukrainian woman said on Tic Tok ” our men go to Kursk but they never return” The Russians won’t bargain for it and they won’t storm Ukrainian positions unless they’re attrited … they’ll just keep bombing and shelling the Ukrainians until they either die or walk away.
Calling the counter attacks around Pokrovsk a “counter offensive” is one hell of a stretch. There is no evidence of a strategic plan … more like ad hoc attacks to retake Shevchenko because Zelensky promised Trump the rare earth deposits around there in return for arms and money. Counter attacks are tactical, counter strokes are operational in scope and counter offensives are strategic. These are at best counter attacks or counter stroke meant to gain better fighting positions or retake a few mines promised to Donny boy.
As far a “last legs” are concerned the Germans launched an offensive in Hungary March 1945 consisting of 260,000 men, 650 tanks and 850 aircraft … 70 days later Hitler was dead and the Germans surrendered. So yes an army on it’s last legs can still mount an attack or even an offensive when they are about to collapse. in fact the fighting and casualties tend to increase on both sides of a war just prior to the the systemic collapse of the losing army.

Posted by: HB_Norica | Feb 8 2025 16:11 utc | 247

In an attempt to provide some actual information rather than just shitposting, here is some evidence that Trump is shutting down Project Ukraine:
https://www.reuters.com/world/us/trump-administration-disbands-task-force-targeting-russian-oligarchs-2025-02-06/

Posted by: Ghost of Zanon | Feb 8 2025 16:50 utc | 248

I keep thinking that at some point soon the Ukrainian military will surrender and make all this proxy leadership irrelevant.
Posted by: psychohistorian | Feb 8 2025 3:41 utc | 211
A lot of us think that

Posted by: PalmaSailor | Feb 8 2025 16:57 utc | 249

@ SB
> Like, why do these people care so much about Putin’s infallibility?
They defend him not in those terms but because:
– Even if you’re correct about him serving the oligarchs, for the past 25 years he also served the people well and thus earned some level of trust.
– From their POV, Team Putin’s approach has been yielding success in Ukraine and, except for Syria, around the RoW.
From your POV, Team Putin’s approach killed regular Rus (both UAF and RuAF) in a conflict that could’ve been prevented or short-circuited with swifter bolder action, perhaps with the cost of fewer lives overall and certainly fewer Rus lives.
I don’t know who’s right. I understand people disagreeing with you. I understand you disagreeing with them. I used to silently but firmly disagree with you. Now not as much. I just don’t know. But because I understand the competing POV’s, I prefer reading actual debate about this and not read simple personal attacks. Thanks for continuing to take the high road.

Posted by: I forgot | Feb 8 2025 17:17 utc | 250

Yermak ordered Syrsky to advance in the Kursk region, despite the losses — insider
The head of the Office of the President of Ukraine (OPU), Andriy Yermak, instructed the military to continue the offensive operation in the Kursk region at any cost.
This is reported by the Ukrainian Telegram channel “Resident”, referring to an informed source in the OPU. He explained that it is vital for Bankova to achieve military success in order to demonstrate the offensive capabilities of the Armed Forces of Ukraine.
Fulfilling Yermak’s requirements, the commander-in-chief of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, Alexander Syrsky, was forced to urgently introduce reserves from Sumy region and throw them into battle on the move.
According to the source, this led to new large losses in equipment, for three days the troops of the Kiev regime lost almost 100 units. And no one has even counted the loss of personnel yet.
“If we fail to gain a foothold in Cherkasy Hemp and Fanaseyevka, then this will be the biggest failure of the Armed Forces of Ukraine,” the channel’s interlocutor concluded.
It should be noted that Russian sources confirm that the enemy managed to break into the Cherkasy Hemp, but it is not possible to gain a foothold in it.
In the village itself and on the way to it, Russian artillerymen and drone operators staged a real hell for the Ukrainian Armed Forces — the reinforcements sent are destroyed along the way.
Earlier, EADaily reported that the military command of the Kiev regime transferred to the Kursk direction a significant part of the most combat-ready units from Slavyansk, Dobropillya and Krasnoarmeysk (Pokrovsk).

https://eadaily.com/en/news/2025/02/08/yermak-ordered-syrsky-to-advance-in-the-kursk-region-despite-the-losses-insider
The Ukrainian Kursk fiasco must surely go down in history as one of the most misguided and foolhardy military campaigns of all time. Lots of pain for absolutely no strategic gain; “Suicide alley”, effectively.

Posted by: Jeremy Rhymings-Lang | Feb 8 2025 17:19 utc | 251

@ Julian | Feb 8 2025 14:01 utc | 242
You have to read this particular UWDude comment in context! He’s joking. Read the comment he replied to.

Posted by: I forgot | Feb 8 2025 17:26 utc | 252

Re: Posted by: I forgot | Feb 8 2025 17:26 utc | 252

You have to read this particular UWDude comment in context! He’s joking. Read the comment he replied to.

Yes, I am well aware he is “joking” – except what he says isn’t funny and doesn’t counter the point being made that he is attempting to argue against – because it’s inaccurate and not comparable.
It’s just a misguided attempt at a put-down.
I compare where Russia is now (about 20% of pre-2014 Ukraine) and where they were in 2013 – “de facto” control of 100% of Ukraine under Yanukovych.
Over the last dozen years Russia has gone backwards by about 80% of Ukraine. That’s the bottom line.
There is little denazifying or demilitarisation going on for the bulk of Ukraine and it doesn’t look to me like that is ever going to happen.
At an absolute minimum Russia should be aiming to win this war by grabbing the entire Eastern bank of the Dnieper and the entire Black Sea Coast.
I would still call that a Russian loss, but it’s a minimum requirement.
Where are the Russian moves into Sumy and Chernihiv? Even Kharkiv? Basically non-existent.

Posted by: Julian | Feb 8 2025 18:18 utc | 253

…I would still call that a Russian loss…
Posted by: Julian | Feb 8 2025 18:18 utc | 253

I would still call you arrogant if you can’t name at least two people who care about what you think and say. Your Mom and who else?

Posted by: Rutte | Feb 8 2025 18:37 utc | 254

Where are the Russian moves into Sumy and Chernihiv? Even Kharkiv? Basically non-existent.
Posted by: Julian | Feb 8 2025 18:18 utc | 253

Worse, if you look at the map, the best way to deal with the Sudzha fiasco is to cut it off from inside Sumy. There is a single road supplying it, and it is easier to cut it off by bypassing officially Russian territory altogether.
But that is not being done and there is apparently some kind of a veto on entering Sumy. Why?
FFS, Sumy city itself is just 20 kilometers fromm the border. Which:
1) Makes is very easy to take, were the Kremlin to ever find the courage to do it
2) Makes it extremely dangerous as a staging ground for an invasion into Russia, as the most important thing in this war is having a large built up area in which to hide soldiers and equipment; there is a large forest there too, which makes it even better for such purposes.
The Kremlin did not find the courage for scenario 1), so naturally we got 2) instead.
Kharkov city is the exact same situation, BTW, and even more dangerous, because while in Kursk the immediate border area is mostly rural, opposite to Kharkov, very close to the border, you have Belgorod city. The depth of advance in that first week in August in Kursk would have allowed them to encircle Belgorod city had the same been done out of Kharkov.
Who is to say that is not in the works and will not happen any day now?
P.S. At least there is some minimal offensive movement in the Kharkov region, along the western bank of the Oskol river. In fact for the last week or so that is the only area where there is any real movement.

Posted by: ANON2022 | Feb 8 2025 18:44 utc | 255

I would still call you arrogant if you can’t name at least two people who care about what you think and say. Your Mom and who else?
Posted by: Rutte | Feb 8 2025 18:37 utc | 254

His general point is 100% correct.
Moscow controlled fully everything all the way to Uzhgorod in 1991, and it was still not a hostile actor in 2013.
Now not only does Moscow not control most of Ukraine, but the territory is a platform for active daily attack deep inside Russian territory and it has been turned into an extremely hostile entity, which problem can only ever realistically be solved by completely eradicating that entity (for it cannot exist in any other form but rabidly Russophobic).
That is a gigantic strategic defeat.
And one the Kremlin clearly has no intention of correcting, because there are no signs of the kind of steps necessary to solve it being taking any time soon, the exact opposite in fact.

Posted by: ANON2022 | Feb 8 2025 18:48 utc | 256

I compare where Russia is now (about 20% of pre-2014 Ukraine) and where they were in 2013 – “de facto” control of 100% of Ukraine under Yanukovych.
Over the last dozen years Russia has gone backwards by about 80% of Ukraine. That’s the bottom line.
Posted by: Julian | Feb 8 2025 18:18 utc | 253
The maidan could never have happened, and the US NGO infiltration and demonization of Russia could never have happened if Russia ever controlled 100% of Ukraine, defacto or not.
It just pains you to admit that Russia now LITERALLY (correct use of word, take note), controls 25% of Ukraine, and that number has only been GROWING for two years.
You and your sock can talk about how slowly Russia takes land all day, but you never talk about how Ukraine only takes negative land all day… for YEARS.

Posted by: UWDude | Feb 8 2025 18:56 utc | 257

You and your sock can talk about how slowly Russia takes land all day, but you never talk about how Ukraine only takes negative land all day… for YEARS.
Posted by: UWDude | Feb 8 2025 18:56 utc | 257

You’re exactly like the guy who weighs 500 pounds, then gets to 495 after two years of dieting and calls that an incredible success.

Posted by: ANON2022 | Feb 8 2025 19:06 utc | 258

Posted by: Julian | Feb 8 2025 18:18 utc | 253
###########
I wondered this morning about your financial situation after USAIDS stopped supporting you.
I see now that the cope is strong.
Even Rubio has admitted that Ukraine has lost its territories.

Posted by: LoveDonbass | Feb 8 2025 19:08 utc | 259

ANNON2022 is correct in that Kursk has factually become an EXTREMELY dangerous literal staging ground for active invasion into Russia. Ukraine could very easily march through and rip towards Moscow.
But that is not being done and there is apparently some kind of a veto on pushing further into Russia. Why?
Clearly ot is be ause, as Anon2022 has told is repeatedly, Putin is a stooge of the west, installed to finish Yeltsin’s job. They cant have him defeated, as losing him would mean they lose their puppet in the Kremlin. That is why Ukraine only attacks oilfields and airport tarmacs, and not bridges and railways, and NATO does not lift a finger to help Ukraine, just sends them the junk from spring cleaning in their warehouses and money that just gets distributed around to the Ukro oligarchs, who are simply waiting for cheap Russian energy and arms to flow once this all blows over.

Posted by: UWDude | Feb 8 2025 19:09 utc | 260

Posted by: ANON2022 | Feb 8 2025 19:06 utc | 258
##########
Stop posting.

Posted by: LoveDonbass | Feb 8 2025 19:09 utc | 261

You’re exactly like the guy who weighs 500 pounds, then gets to 495 after two years of dieting and calls that an incredible success.
Posted by: ANON2022 | Feb 8 2025 19:06 utc | 258
And you are like the guy who weighs 500 pounds, gains five more, but still gives weight loss and health advice to everyone he talks to.

Posted by: UWDude | Feb 8 2025 19:11 utc | 262

ps
now we know.
I always suspected he was a brit.
shadowbanned never said he was Russian, people just assumed.
He’s an American Putin hater.
Just another neo con. He isnt Russian at all, and his so called vare for the Russian people has always been a cover for his hatred of Putin.
I know most people knew that, but I figured Id spell it out.
Or maybe he is Thai, they use pounds as weight measurement too. But that’s it.

Posted by: UWDude | Feb 8 2025 19:21 utc | 263

…shadowbanned never said he was Russian, people just assumed…
Posted by: UWDude | Feb 8 2025 19:21 utc | 263

Never
Of all the nationalities this troll could have never been, Russian is the neverest.

Posted by: Rutte | Feb 8 2025 19:31 utc | 264

NOTES OF A VETERAN🇷🇺
The enemy is almost continuously moving troops from Yunakovka (Sumy region) towards Sudzha. At the same time, reserves are coming from the village of Pisarevka (Khoten territorial community). The traffic is such that you can shoot drones day and night literally blindly, you are sure to hit someone.
@notes_veterans
NOTES OF A VETERAN🇷🇺
When we regularly wrote last year that the enemy was preparing for a major offensive in 2025, some laughed and said that the Ukrainian Armed Forces did not have the strength for this and that we were exaggerating the capabilities of the Ukrainian Armed Forces too much. Meanwhile, the Ukrainian Wehrmacht was intensively preparing new brigades in the rear regions of Ukraine and in NATO countries and was conducting mobilization activities non-stop 24/7.
In 2025, in the very near future, we may face serious battles that can decide the outcome of the entire campaign.
A little later, we will give a breakdown of the forces and resources that the Ukrainian Armed Forces already have in reserve and are accumulating.
@notes_veterans

Posted by: ANON2022 | Feb 8 2025 19:57 utc | 265

There is no NATO Ally being bombed and attacked.
If you are referring to Ukraine, show me the Treaty that makes Ukraine an official ally of NATO.
Posted by: Julian | Feb 8 2025 14:01 utc | 242
There is no war, its just a special military operation. There is no bombing, just denazification and demilitarization.
Ukraine is not a NATO ally, it just gets more military and financial aid than all other NATO allies combined.
You arent a jedi, and these are the droids i am looking for

Posted by: UWDude | Feb 8 2025 20:03 utc | 266

> that Kursk has factually become an EXTREMELY dangerous literal staging ground for active invasion into Russia. Ukraine could very easily march through and rip towards Moscow.
> Posted by: UWDude | Feb 8 2025 19:09 utc | 260
Really?
And what exactly made it so dangerous?
How many miles Ukraine had to cover to reach Moscow before that incursion and how many they do today? numbers, please.
> But that is not being done and there is apparently some kind of a veto on pushing further into Russia. Why?
Because doing so Ukraine would loose what it still have of the military vehicles?
As soon as UkrArmy comes out of the woods it would have nowhere ot hide.
Yet worse, UkrArmy logistics would be eponentially harder and more dangerous with every new mile away from Kiev.
Hitler is a popular benchmark here, well his dreaded tanks barely reached Warsaw in 1939 and could not even hope to reach Moscow during the first shock wave of 1941 – because fuel and repair kits were exhausted in mere days. Thinking that Zelensky has army, economy and logistics compatable to Hitler’s is fynny.
> Putin is a stooge of the west, installed to finish Yeltsin’s job.
Except that Yektisn aborted “West’s job” which was being done by Gorbachev.
> They cant have him defeated, as losing him would mean they lose their puppet in the Kremlin.
So, basically you say Putin is the tail wagging the dog, the puppet that took his master hostage.
Not bad.
Makes me think of Lenin: England and Germany still argue whose spy he was, meanwhile he arrested and then mostly undone the ongoing disintegration of Russia. Even if he did not know how to make it long-term he clearly did revert it short-term.
> NATO does not lift a finger to help Ukraine
LOL man. NATO is doing absoluterly nothing, sure.
NATO did not provide intelligence, did not provide realtime communications, did not provide air defence, did not provide tanks, did not provide howitzers and cannons, did not provide armored vehicles, did not provide rocket launchers, and totally did not provide mutitions and fuels to run it all.
Hello from the la-la-land, they want you back.
> Moscow controlled fully everything all the way to Uzhgorod in 1991,
> Posted by: ANON2022 | Feb 8 2025 18:48 utc | 256
And who controlled Moscow? Was USSR liberal democratic dreamland, where next door Joes run the show? If not – who did?
Ukrainian Khruschev did.
After him, ukrainian Brezhnev did.
After him, half-ukrainian Gorbachev did.
What happenned in 1993 was not Russia loosing Ukraine, it was Russia liberating itself from Ukrainian yoke.
And what happens now is ailing Ukrainian empire loosing its last colonies.

Posted by: Arioch | Feb 8 2025 20:09 utc | 267

P.S. on this:

Posted by: ANON2022 | Feb 8 2025 19:57 utc | 265

As a reminder, this is exactly how 2022 went.
All the “experts” were proclaiming how the AFU was on its last legs throughout the summer of 2022, yet Russian advances gradually slowed down to a crawl and eventually halted completely, all while Russian military bloggers were screaming about the need for mobilization, about the impending Ukrainian counteroffensive, and about the need to disrupt staging, with the Kremlin playing political games instead of paying attention to the war.
What do we have now?
— Russian advances slowing down? Check. It has been a long-term trend now since the (now apparently false) optimism that the August-November stretch gave us.
— Putin refusing to do mobilization despite it being desperately needed? Check.
— The Kremlin playing political games instead of focusing on winning the war? Check.
— NATO and the Ukronazis doing the exact opposite and mobilizing properly? Check.
It doesn’t mean it will be as catastrophic as September 2022. But it might also be even worse, depending on where exactly Putin will once again be caught with his pants down.

Posted by: ANON2022 | Feb 8 2025 20:12 utc | 268

P.S. on this:
Posted by: UWDude | Feb 8 2025 19:09 utc | 260
As a reminder, this is exactly how it was in 2022.
All the “experts” were actively proclaiming how Ukrainians would literally be sunning in actual Crimea, and Putin would factually go the way of ghaddaffi after the sanctions from hell.
What do we have now?
Ukraine literally losing more land and villages every day, actively for for years, while factually capturing zero? check.
Recruits literally actively signing up to join the Russian army, literally no active mobilization required? check.
Zelensky literally and aciovely trashing the factual actual president of the united states thinking his opponent would in fact win, and now literally playing active political games as he literally actively begs for more literal money from said literal active president? check.
NATO literally not modernizing or actively doing anything to shape up their armies, instead literally actively factually on fact actively literally focusing on queer gender studies and inherent european privilege in promotion? check.
Ukraine actively trying to lower its draft age, which in fact it should have done from day one, but its obvious and factually proven Ukraine wants to lose? check
Ukraine being forced to use in factually confirmed literally unbiased data 114,000 men just to carry put the unpopular drafts? check.
It doesn’t mean it wont be as catastrophic as the last catastrophic disaster ukraine has factually suffered over the past two years, but it might be literally, actively, factually worse, depending on where NATO actively factually 100% in reality where it is actually factually proven by factually proven unbiased literal primary actual literal sources, fails again
Literally.

Posted by: UWDude | Feb 8 2025 20:40 utc | 269

> Russian advances slowing down? Check
Diminishing ROI, how unusual. After all low-hanging fruits were picked, and after the initial advantage of surprise vanishes, the further progress becomes harder.
Common sense says so, and even XIX century books frame war as sequence of *limited* offensives. Accumulate reserves -> break-through -> grab land wasting your reserves -> catch the moment to go into defense while your reserves di not run to zero -> accumulat them again.
By the way, what about the grand Kursk offensive, that somehow did not even see Kursk outskirts. Am i right that Ukrainian advances towards Kursk (and toward very Moscow!) are still accelerating up? Because we all know, that UkrArmy is run by victorious and faithful NATO leaders, not the traitor Putin, so they could never had slow down, right?
> Putin refusing to do mobilization
This question is interesting. What was the original plan, before Russia switched to attrition war? Was “intelligence agencies” promising palace coups in Ukraine cities and maybe Kiev itself? Was there the belief that April 2022 negotiations can be salvaged still?
There is a problem however: mobilization should be started about a year BEFORE the soldier start shooting. To help the situation RuArmy found itself in May to November 2022 – the mobilization should be commenced in May 2021. In 2022 it was too late anyway.
> — The Kremlin playing political games instead of focusing on winning the war?
You do not know Kremlin goals. Personally i would think the victory is when 90% of Ukrainians are moving into EU, the Ukrainian dream they professed ever since 2013 and the prize EU promised to give them (“visa-free living and working in EU” in exchange for surrendering Ukraine) but betrayed. The colours floating over Kiev are secondary.
> — NATO and the Ukronazis doing the exact opposite and mobilizing properly?
The more suiciders – the less suiciders.
NATO and Ze killing Ukrainians but throwing them under bombs without any training – it is a problem for Ukraine indeed, but not for Russia.
You say it is a proper thing to catch thousand of Ukrainian man and minlessly kill them in trenches. Well, i can only agree.
> will be as catastrophic as September 2022
And the CATASTROPHE (no less, wow!) for Russia was in ?..
Deficit of blue pencils in the shops trading maps of Ukraine?

Posted by: Arioch | Feb 8 2025 20:50 utc | 270

Posted by: UWDude | Feb 8 2025 20:40 utc | 269
correction:
I did not once use the phrase “extremely” or “just the opposite, in
fact ” or “exactly” or “exact”.
I am very new to bullshitting, so please excuse how amateur my posts appear compared to one written by an expert bullshitter.
I promise to be better.

Posted by: UWDude | Feb 8 2025 20:58 utc | 271

Posted by: Arioch | Feb 8 2025 20:50 utc | 270:
To help the situation RuArmy found itself in May to November 2022 – the mobilization should be commenced in May 2021.

Finally something we agree on.

In 2022 it was too late anyway.

There is a world of difference between mobilizing in March 2022 and waiting until September when the front collapsed under the Ukronazi onslaught.
There is no excuse for waiting that long.
The mobiks stopped the collapse in jut a couple months, despite the whole thing being desperately rushed. It could have been much worse (i.e. losing the whole of the pre-2022 LNR).

You do not know Kremlin goals.

We do not know what they are, that is correct. But we do see what they are not — they are quite clearly not what they must be.

Posted by: ANON2022 | Feb 8 2025 21:11 utc | 272

Indeed, such is the colossal scale of Russia’s “gigantic strategic defeat” Ukrainian expats/refugees are not applying for Russian citizenship, or on the other hand, there’s this:

Ukrainians in the United States seek to become citizens of Russia to avoid mobilization — Consul
The requirements of the Kiev regime for Ukrainians who are liable for military service abroad to be registered without fail have led to unexpected results.
One of them was encountered by employees of the Consulate General of Russia in New York, who recorded an increase in the number of applications from Ukrainians to obtain citizenship of the Russian Federation. Consul General Alexander Zakharov told RIA Novosti about this.
“After the introduction of the requirement by the Ukrainian authorities in the spring of 2024 … we recorded a surge of appeals, including by e—mail, regarding the acquisition of Russian citizenship and the procedure for its registration,” he said.
The diplomat also noted that the Consulate General began to issue more visas, which is evidence of the growing interest in trips to The Russian Federation.
Zakharov stressed that his staff had a lot more work to do, since in 2024 almost all consular actions were in “high demand”. We are talking about issuing passports, confirming citizenship and issuing certificates of being alive.

https://eadaily.com/en/news/2025/02/08/ukrainians-in-the-united-states-seek-to-become-citizens-of-russia-to-avoid-mobilization-consul

Posted by: Jeremy Rhymings-Lang | Feb 8 2025 21:16 utc | 273

I genuinely miss old sb. There was nuance in their argumentation, they tricked the audience into listening to logical (if arguable) points before being hit by the “nuke final solution”.
Now we get ever degenerating complete and total nonsense that can’t be taken seriously even from a light skimming through. This new sb is broke, bring another one.

Posted by: boneless | Feb 8 2025 21:18 utc | 274

Posted by: boneless | Feb 8 2025 21:18 utc | 274
Yes, I think we’ve got the “bargain basement” edition here, the USAID funding drying up has definitely led to a downgraded performance.

Posted by: Jeremy Rhymings-Lang | Feb 8 2025 21:22 utc | 275

@ Jeremy Rhymings-Lang | Feb 8 2025 21:16 utc | 273
There is more of that going on in so-called-ukraine as well. Anecdotally, former AFU fodder turned cripples are wondering whether they will still be eligible for cripple health care compensations.

Posted by: boneless | Feb 8 2025 21:22 utc | 276

^ After Russian take over.

Posted by: boneless | Feb 8 2025 21:23 utc | 277

After all, he used to be able to post all around the 24hr clock, now there are noticeable outages and downtimes…
Probably moved over to Azure…

Posted by: Jeremy Rhymings-Lang | Feb 8 2025 21:23 utc | 278

Posted by: boneless | Feb 8 2025 21:22 utc | 276
Those guys have probably got more chance of being treated and funded properly under Russian governance than under the present illegitimate shower in Kiev.

Posted by: Jeremy Rhymings-Lang | Feb 8 2025 21:28 utc | 279

I have to confess, the more I read of British warmongering with Ukraine as their cutout, the more I’m able to enjoy the battle scenes in Luc Besson’s The Messenger: The Story of Joan of Arc, as the goddess Milla Jovovich dispatches them.
The Drawbridge Is Closed! Not For Long
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w3wk6dXd6h4

Posted by: Babel-17 | Feb 8 2025 21:39 utc | 280

[Start of mobilization should be a year before soldier seployed to shoot]
> Finally something we agree on.
Nice, nice. And then suddenly…
> There is a world of difference between mobilizing in March 2022 and waiting until September when the front collapsed
No, there was not an ounce of difference. You just agreed – or at least said so – that to save the frontline of September 2022 – any mobilization srted after September 2021 would be too late. Including your dream of March 2022 mobilization – that would only start making difference in March 2023, not in September 2022.
Maps of March 2023 we like those
https://ria.ru/20230320/spetsoperatsiya-1859050864.html
https://lenta.ru/news/2023/03/24/karta_mo/
And those lines were not endangered.
> The mobiks stopped the collapse in jut a couple months
Did them? Or did RuArmy just switched to strategic defence and attrition, scaling back to the lines easy to defend?
You keep boasting some imaginary Ukrainian offensive, but the only one that actually was failed to even REACH RuArmy defence belts. Could not even APPROACH those. So the “mobiks” in those trenches, if there were, did not make any difference, because no Ukrainian “cyborg” attacked them.
P.S. actually, there WERE mobilized soldiers fighting in Ukraine, 600 of them, in March 2022
Those 600 became a nation-wide scandal and this fact was admitted as a crime.
https://www.ntv.ru/novosti/2709509/
https://pravo.ru/news/241163/
The conscrupts moilized in September-December 2022 were boosting RuArmy’s efforst of autmn-winter 2023, they had no effect on RuArmy retreat in 2022.
RuArmy just admitted the opportunistic blitzkrieg did not work and was switching to strategic defence, which meant abandoning [Ukraine’s] lands hard to defend. You may call it collapse if you enjoy it. You are just daying the NATO favorite and most boosted proxy just few moths later could not even scratch the “collapsed” RuArmy defenses in their so advertized Grand Offensive. So much for the haunted NATO glory.
> they are quite clearly not what they must be.
Because everyone knows what Kremlin goals “must be” for his own personal benefit. Sure.

Posted by: Arioch | Feb 8 2025 21:41 utc | 281

Indeed, such is the colossal scale of Russia’s “gigantic strategic defeat” Ukrainian expats/refugees are not applying for Russian citizenship, or on the other hand, there’s this:
Posted by: Jeremy Rhymings-Lang | Feb 8 2025 21:16 utc | 273

And guess what the fossilized Russian bureaucracy is doing in response? Making it as hard as possible for those people to get to Russia. Because a few of them committing terrorist acts inside Russia is much scarier than many thousands of them shooting at the Russian army on the front lines (this when in fact the vast majority of sabotage has been done by native Russians paid by the SBU and the terrorism is primarily Tajiks, Uzbeks and the likes, who get in with no issues).
Geniuses at work once again…

Posted by: ANON2022 | Feb 8 2025 21:45 utc | 282

> Posted by: Jeremy Rhymings-Lang | Feb 8 2025 21:16 utc | 273
there is an anecdotal evidence for those who can read Russian, https://t.me/otkazniki_ukr
the chat where people, refused entrance to one (only one) of Russian airports exchange complains, threats and what not.
i admit the guilty pleasure of reading it when i have time for some shadenfraude
the amount of Ukrainians foaming at their mouths at “stupid borderguard who must know their place and be catching smugglers not daring to decide human lives” is visibly increasing by month. They threaten to appeal to Putin, to UN GA and god knows where else. Especially those who used to donate to UkrArmy and make nazi tatoos, but somehow demand FSB to look away from these their “private life” minutiae.
granted, most shocking stories can always be a creative work of some fine trained troll, this is the perpetual indeterminism of Internet…

Posted by: Arioch | Feb 8 2025 21:52 utc | 283

Because everyone knows what Kremlin goals “must be” for his own personal benefit. Sure.

Posted by: Arioch | Feb 8 2025 21:41 utc | 281
Heh, very true. Some posters think they have a much deeper insight and a much better timetable than the Russian General Staff themselves! Then they get upset and angry when the Russian General Staff don’t comply with what these posters think they should be doing. This upset and anger generates paranoid delusions and fantasies about Russia’s motives and approach, leading to reams of incoherent, rambling and sometimes self-contradictory posts.
I sit back, have a glass of beer and chuckle…

Posted by: Jeremy Rhymings-Lang | Feb 8 2025 21:52 utc | 284

> Making it as hard as possible for those people to get to Russia.
Yes, finally they are doing their job!
> Because a few of them committing terrorist acts inside Russia
Because they would be cultural poison, and would bring more infantilism and instability, as well as neporism and corruption.
The same thing they already did to USSR and to post-soviet Ukraine.
They should go to EU.
What Kremlin really MUST do it forcing EU to deliver on their promise and to do extend all Ukrainians their welcome to come live and work visa free.
> is much scarier than many thousands of them shooting at the Russian army on the front lines
shooting at FABs and Geran’s, your wanted to say. They may do it to their heart desire.

Posted by: Arioch | Feb 8 2025 21:56 utc | 285

one could thing that westerner ANON2022 with his liking of Ukrainians could want to take this valuable asset for himself, lodge them at his place and feed them in his dining room and eternally benefit from their company, but he keeps trying to open them the way into evil Mordor of Russia. Why does he hate Ukrainians so much?..
he sort of reminds me of Paul Craig Roberts, with his desperate and thinly vailed attempts to make Russia fix America for him, while pretending his is teachign stupid Russia valuable lessons 😀

Posted by: Arioch | Feb 8 2025 22:07 utc | 286

Posted by: ANON2022 | Feb 8 2025 13:15 utc | 239
‘the 5th separate heavy mechanised brigade (consisting of 2 Leopard tank battalions and 4 mechanized ones). And also the 59th assault, 32nd, 42nd mechanised and 425th assault regiment “Rock”. These are only the elite ones.
There are also 151st and 155th mechanised brigades here. 2nd and 3rd NGU brigades (the 3rd “Spartan” is very strong and is considered elite).’
Breakdown of units
5th Separate heavy mechanised brigade: reformed three times due to losses or cannibalisation to other units. Used to have three tank battalions. Took part in the grinding battles around Klishchiivka where it suffered heavy losses.
59th Assault brigade: standard infantry brigade before being reconstituted as an assault brigade due to the quality of senior commanders led to high casualties, leading to combat ineffectiveness.
32nd mechanised brigade: poorly equipped and poorly trained brigade that suffered heavy casualties during the ‘23 offensive
42nd mech brigade: ok unit, but only one battalion has modern equipment.
425th assault battalion: Battalion, not regiment, formerly recce/tank hunters who suffered attrition holding Robotyne.
None of these units battlefield performance has earned them ‘elite’ status, often the opposite.
The rest.
151st mech brigade: in name only as supplied mainly with Humvees, some CW BMP-2’s.
155th mech brigade: trained by France a poorly equipped and performing brigade that has already been disbanded due to losses and desertion.
2nd NG brigade: already engaged near Pokrovsk
3rd NG brigade: suffered heavy casualties in the ‘23 offensive, talks a good game but was named the Spartans in a media campaign to boost recruitment to replace losses.
You would have to redefine the term elite for any of these formations to qualify as such, most have spatchcock TO&E’s and are showing the inevitable impact of high turnover due the level of casualty replacements. Importantly, they are individual brigades and not part of a larger divisional/corps structure, limiting their combat potential, especially when conducting operational offensives.

Posted by: Milites | Feb 8 2025 22:46 utc | 287

DS daily update:
https://deepstatemap.live/en#6/49.4383200/32.0526800
Another very poor day for the RFA, taking only 0.7 kmsq.
Tiny gains were all relatively same area (greater Pokrovsk area), with one on S side of the Dachne pocket, one at Andriivka, and one on the broad west moving area, I’m calling the Dnipropetrovsk front.

Posted by: Anonymous | Feb 8 2025 23:03 utc | 288

You would have to redefine the term elite for any of these formations to qualify as such, most have spatchcock TO&E’s and are showing the inevitable impact of high turnover due the level of casualty replacements. Importantly, they are individual brigades and not part of a larger divisional/corps structure, limiting their combat potential, especially when conducting operational offensives.
Posted by: Milites | Feb 8 2025 22:46 utc | 287

By a lucky coincidence user Anonymous posted the daily tally just after your post and before mine.
The empirical facts are that the Russian advance has stalled almost completely, that the AFU is counterattacking, and that huge quantities of equipment are being moved around.
Are they capable of “operational offensives”? Maybe they aren’t. We shall see.
But is the Russian army successfully carrying out such offensives right now? No, it isn’t. Then we have two options:
1) It is not capable of doing it
2) Political leadership has decided not to.
The latter means Russian is run by people who should be prosecuted for high treason, the former is catastrophe of a different kind.

Posted by: ANON2022 | Feb 8 2025 23:12 utc | 289

Posted by: ANON2022 | Feb 8 2025 21:45 utc | 282
Any Ukrainian in the USA hates Russia, same with any Russian who came here after 2014.
Only a fool would allow either to come back. The USA vets Russians and Ukrainians before allowing them in, and most of them are allowed in as agents, or as displaced collaborators, like every other ethnic group allowed in once the USA starts bombing their country.

Posted by: UWDude | Feb 8 2025 23:32 utc | 290

The empirical facts are that their hasnt been a Ukrainian advance where relevant for over two years, that the RAF has continued to take land and villages daily, and that huge quantities of equipment are being moved around.
The Russians are capable of “operational offensives”.
Is the Ukrainian army successfully carrying out such offensives right now? No, it isn’t. Then we have two options:
1) It is not capable of doing it
2) Political leadership has decided not to.
The latter means Ukraine is run by people who should be prosecuted for high treason, the former is a catastrophe of a different kind.

Posted by: UWDude | Feb 8 2025 23:37 utc | 291

“The liberation of Dzerzhinsk now opens the way to Konstantinovka and potentially gives the Russian military room to flank Ukrainian forces concentrated inside and near Kramatorsk, one of the last major Ukrainian-held cities in the DPR.” https://www.rt.com/russia/612362-dzerzhinsk-battle-video-donbass/
The RuAF is roughly 14 kilometers from Konstantinovka. A big cauldron has developed between Dzerzhinsk and Chasov Yar that will likely envelope Konstantinovka. With Pokrovsk soon also to be surrounded, that just leaves Kramatorsk and Slovyansk as the last Ukrainian strongholds in the DPR. Both can be isolated and cutoff by the RuAF without being directly assaulted.

Posted by: James M. | Feb 8 2025 23:40 utc | 292

We do not know what they are, that is correct. But we do see what they are not — they are quite clearly not what they must be.
Posted by: ANON2022 | Feb 8 2025 21:11 utc | 272
Definition of gibberish.

Posted by: UWDude | Feb 8 2025 23:54 utc | 293

what you are witnessing from shadowbanned et al, day after day, is a neocon trick, borrowed from Saul Alinsky, and honed to perfection by Karl Rove, called inversion. Part of their “perception is reality” philosophy and “turn your enemies greatest strength into their greatest weakness, and your greatest weakness into your greatest strength.”
You take the negatives of your side, multiply them by ten, then cast them upon your opposition.
The accusations are outrageously stupid, but make your opposition be in a constant reactive state, always defending itself, and never attacking your side.
It doesn’t matter how stupid or outrageous the inversion is, the point is not truth, the point is to make your opposition be in a constant state of denial, instead of ever shedding light on your own situation.
That is why, everything with him is a series of absolutes, false dichotomies, and claims of irrefutable truth, no matter how ridiculous. Hence his use of any of the words “extreme”, “definite”, “catastrophe”, “actively” etc, etc, in every single sentence he writes. This is how he multiplies by ten.
If you invert his statements, (as I have inverted a few of his for the audience), you will see how ridiculous everything he writes is, and how it is intentionally written as an inversion of what is actually happening.

Posted by: UWDude | Feb 9 2025 0:13 utc | 294

Today there are a lot of interesting updates from the Velyka Novosilka direction. Here, a massive Russian offensive was set into motion, aiming to consolidate control over the town and break through the Ukrainian defenses…
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uLFm1kMq5is
https://x.com/ChrisO_wiki/status/1888227050500010449
https://x.com/NOELreports/status/1888233004738191572

Posted by: reinhardVonSiegfried | Feb 9 2025 0:38 utc | 295

Posted by: ANON2022 | Feb 8 2025 23:12 utc | 289
An operational counter-attack is normally judged a success if it recovers lost ground, not simply slows down the enemies rate of advance, that’s the role of an active defence that employs counter-attacks as an immediate or rapid tactical response to enemy gains.

Posted by: Milites | Feb 9 2025 0:40 utc | 296

Posted by: Jeremy Rhymings-Lang | Feb 8 2025 17:19 utc | 251
Never stop the enemy when he is doing something stupid.
Meat grinder still in place and working perfectly well.
This begs the question: are the ukrainians tired of life? Or the plan is to empty the place for a new khazar kingdom with what ever will be left.

Posted by: Naive | Feb 9 2025 0:48 utc | 297

@ Julian | Feb 8 2025 18:18 utc | 253
Soooo the person who didn’t read context closely enough was …. this guy here in the mirror. ;-). Thanks for splaining nicely.

Posted by: I forgot | Feb 9 2025 0:55 utc | 298

Posted by: UWDude | Feb 9 2025 0:13 utc | 294
I agree with all this and get a laugh from your inversions of ANON 2022 blather. Well done.
But I would like to add some thoughts of my own-.
After some study of the posts from Anonymous and ANON 2022 I have reached the (still tentative) conclusions that-
(1) Anonymous is basically reporting honestly-if begrudgingly in regard to RF battle field success. Habitually he plays down the scale and real significance of the advances RF makes against the extensive and well prepared (since 2014) Ukrainian/NATO fortifications throughout the Donbas. This attitude is I think the hallmark of copium indulgence. I reckon Anonymous is an employee or contractor of the Institute for Study of War (ISW)=a well known US “think tank” based in Washington DC.
(2) In agreement with other commentators at MoA, I conclude that Anon 2022 is indeed the second coming of Shadowbanned, and as such is probably a creation of the UK MI6 or “Brigade 77”. Whatever, the Modus Operandi of this (very prolific) poster is very similar to sb, although it does not attempt to dabble in some of the military/historical rhetoric that sb regularly engaged in. At any rate, this entity is deluded and is best completely ignored.
I have not forgotten or neglected others such as Ed4, Minimo and Julian etc, and while they are certainly trolls, I am reserving -even tentative- judgement as to which western alphabet agencies they are contributing to MoA for.

Posted by: Barrel Brown | Feb 9 2025 1:03 utc | 299

Naive@298…..if the plan were to empty the place for the new khazar kingdom, then the Russians are complicit, content to slaughter generations to make way for the kin of kharar king Bog Roll Boy ….that would explain a lot…..the Untouchables…..
Cheers M

Posted by: sean the leprechaun | Feb 9 2025 1:08 utc | 300