Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
January 2, 2025
Ukraine – The Story Of The 155th Brigade

The well regarded Ukrainian journalist Yuri Butusov has published the background story (in Ukrainian) of the newly crated 155th brigade which had recently failed when it was hastily deployed to fill some holes in the Ukrainian positions on the eastern front near the city of Pokrovsk.

The brigade was a vanity project of the Zelenski government and the Ukrainian high command. It was one of fourteen new brigades which were supposed to be trained and equipped by western countries. The 155th was designated to be trained by and in France.

Systemic disorganization by the high command led to its failure. Many of its assigned troops deserted even before reaching the frontline. A criminal case has been opened. But it is unlikely that anyone responsible for the mess will ever be held to account.

The brigade was stood up in March 2024. In September 2024 its core was sent for training to France while a large number of other recruits to the brigade were (more or less) trained in Ukraine. In late November,  while the brigade command staff was still in France, a large share of the brigades infantry was sent to Pokrovsk where it immediately faltered.

As Butusov writes (edited machine translation):

The 155th brigade began forming in March 2024. Its commander was appointed an experienced officer – Dmitry Ryumshin, it looked encouraging. "OK Zapad" (Operational command West) Commander General Shvedyuk, Chief of Staff Colonel Seletsky and Commander of the Ground Forces General Pavlyuk were responsible for the formation and manning of the brigade.

But from the very beginning, it turned out that OK Zapad had no command personnel, no soldiers, no weapons, and no resources to create a new unit. The formation of the 155th brigade from the first days was a continuous organizational chaos in literally all components, and the service required a lot of effort for those who tried to serve honestly, and to great losses due to unauthorized abandonment of the unit from the very beginning of the formation.

Here is the schedule of recruitment of the 155th brigade, the number of personnel for each month, and -in parentheses- the number of deserters in those months:

March 46 (3)
April 123 (6)
May 217 (31)
June 1978 (185)
July 3882 (310)
August 2748 (217)
September 3253 (187)
October 3211 (339)
November 5832 (448)

New recruited troops, without any experience, were randomly added to the brigade and, when needed pulled from it (untrained) to fill holes elsewhere.  During the whole process more than 1,700 of its soldiers deserted:

In fact, the recruitment of the brigade began in June, but they did not have time to complete full training, because immediately in July and August, more than 2550 servicemen were taken from the 155th brigade to replenish other units! That is, they took away from the brigade almost all those who were quite suitable, whom the brigade commander and battalion commanders had just placed in positions, in fact, they nullified all the previous four months of work, in March-June, that is, this brigade composition was organized in August in a new way, and then … we issued an order to prepare all those who stayed until the trip to France at the end of September.

As a result, 1924 servicemen were sent to France as part of the 155th brigade, only 51 of them had more than a year of military experience, 459 soldiers had up to a year of experience, and most of them, 1414 people, were only enlisted and served for less than 2 months, including about 150 just recruited without military experience. Without any selection of people, they were sent to France even without passing basic training. It was among them that France had the largest number of fugitives. In total, about 50 soldiers fled in France.

That is, the Army Command and OK Zapad sent to France not an organized and controlled military unit, which can learn a lot, but a crowd of people in military uniforms, about 30% of the staff, who were supposed to organize and get acquainted with each other and with the commanders during the trip!

While the entire brigade command was being trained in France, thousands of new people were being enlisted without the presence of brigade and battalion commanders, as a result, in October and November, more than 700 people escaped from the brigade immediately after being enlisted in Ukraine. Those who deserted had never seen their commanders.

While some 2,000 soldiers of the brigade were training in France some 4,000 fresh soldiers were additionally assigned to the brigade but trained more or less (and without their commanders) in Ukraine:

Since November 15, the rank and file of the brigade began to return to Ukraine, and the brigade headquarters remained according to the training plan to complete the staff classes, for which the French instructors gave the highest scores.

The brigade headquarters arrived in Ukraine on November 30, but Brigade Commander Ryumshin did not have time to get acquainted with his new 4 thousand subordinates who were waiting in the training center, and conduct planned additional exercises with those who returned and did not have time to get all the necessary knowledge.

In the absence of the brigade headquarters and battalion commanders, the command of the OK "West" and CSR began to transfer untrained and ill-coordinated people to the Pokrovsk area.

The brigade command came back from France only to find that its infantry was already being deployed to the front.

Nominally the brigade had been fully equipped by France. It had artillery and armored vehicles. But it lacked the material the Ukrainian military was supposed to supply. The brigade had no drones and no electronic warfare equipment. It lacked the means to gain an overview of the battlefield and to defend against Russian drones which immediately attacked anything that moved. The new heavy equipment the brigade tried to bring to the front was destroyed before reaching its assigned positions. Moreover all the Ukrainian made 120mm mortar ammunition the Ukrainian military supplied to the brigade proved to be faulty and ineffective.

Without drones and artillery and in full chaos the brigade failed to hold its assigned line which led to a breakthrough of the Russian forces.

The brigade's commander, who had had no influence on what had happened, was immediately relieved.

Back in September I pointed out that the Ukrainian method to create new brigades while letting experienced ones fail for a lack of replenishment was a serious and systemic error:

Experienced brigades are kept on the front until that have less than a third of their original strength. They are not replenished while still in the fight. Newly mobilized men are instead put into newly constituted brigades which zero frontline experience.

A better system would rotate out units that have lost a third of their men and fill them up with new recruits before pushing them back into the fight. The result would be the same number of soldiers but with experience mixed into all of the army's units.

Butusov's report points to exactly this issue (edited machine translation):

Next to the 155th are experienced units – the 1st OSB "Da Vinci", the 25th Airborne brigade, the 68th Jaeger brigade, which have an acute shortage of people in the infantry, they can not keep a wide band because of this, and there are experienced UAV units, headquarters, command cadres that can quickly train and make combat-ready mobilized people. But experienced and combat-ready brigades were not given people, they are not allowed to stabilize the front. Because people are given to political projects, the same as the 155th brigade, and there are other brigades newly formed in 2024-the same fourteen that President Zelensky spoke about.

Even if if were been organized perfectly the Ukrainian military would still not have a chance against the Russian forces. But it could have kept its losses to a minimum while holding the line and while gaining time for a political process.

It instead gets slaughtered for the vanity of its higher command:

The top political and military leadership of the country actually played around with the 155th Anna Kievskaya brigade, without even trying to systematically prepare and train the brigade, and without giving the brigade commanders time to create a combat-ready team themselves.

The brigade's servicemen became hostages of Zelensky's PR project, which the authorities did not make any effort to actually implement competently.

Separately, it is worth mentioning the military command, which is now trying to hide the truth and use the case of the State Bureau of Investigation (SBI) to remove responsibility from itself.

The 155th brigade has now been dispersed with various of its subunits moved to replenish other brigades. The journalist Butusov, like many of his compatriots, is furious about the case:

[T]hey spent people, money and time on forming a brigade, which is virtually impossible to use as a brigade due to its low combat capability. … Why did you create it if you can't use it for its intended purpose? For your own PR and reports? For a meeting with Macron?

And is it worth it, Gentlemen Zelensky, Umerov and Syrsky, the lives of dozens of people who give up their lives near Pokrovsk as part of the 155th, because of the elementary disorder and poor preparation, which primarily resulted from your mistakes in setting tasks, planning and organizing? Will you give evidence to the SBI investigators about how you brought the 155th brigade to such a state, how you spent huge funds of our allies and Ukrainian citizens, how instead of strengthening the front, you only disrupt the organization and training of reserves?

I hope that the time will come when you, the real ones responsible for this case, will be the first to answer to the law.

The story of the 155th Ukrainian brigade is only unique in that it has been well documented. The Ukrainian command has over the last years created may such failures and seems to have not learned one bit from it.

The grief, sorrow and anger this has caused will haunt the Ukrainian state for a long time.

Comments

It is unlikely at this point of time that China would decide to do such a thing-crush America. The same as V Putin still seeks Russia to be long term partners and colleagues with the USA to compromise and rebuild relationships. Confirmed in December in VPs own words.
Posted by: x | Jan 5 2025 2:23 utc | 317
The last thing China wants to do is crush the USA. It’s no coincidence that China’s trade surplus is $800B and the USA trade deficit is $770B.
Before you build a relationship you have to build trust and Russians don’t trust the USA or the west in general. I would say Putin would welcome the USA as a market for their good but I don’t see Russians mending fences for a long time. It took about a hundred years of sanctions, invasions,slander and deceit to get to this point so expect a hundred years to repair it.

Posted by: HB_Norica | Jan 5 2025 6:12 utc | 301

… Putin still seeks Russia to be long term partners and colleagues with the USA to compromise and rebuild relationships. Confirmed in December in VPs own words.
Posted by: x | Jan 5 2025 2:23 utc | 317
False. A false claim based on a misunderstood statement by Putin.
Putin has only appealed (several times) to the rationality of profit, saying that otherwise it would become “unaffordably expensive”. He did not beg, and the hope that once existed (1991 speech to the German Bundestag) has long since dried up. (He no longer has any illusions, as he has said several times, at least since Merkel’s book)

Posted by: smartfox | Jan 5 2025 8:16 utc | 302

@Newbie | Sun, 05 Jan 2025 02:05:00 GMT | 315

But geopolitics has more to do with hegemonic cycles and those are way longer, 6 X 23 generational cycles probably.

Not necessarily that long. Look at Doran’s Power Cycle theory. Also ask the Dutch and the Spanish how long their empires lasted.

I usually go for a longer cycle, 138 years as I mentioned.

It shouldn’t be too much longer than for the US – 1898 is normally marked as the start of the American ascendancy. Or 1895 if you want to go by the Venezuela crisis. The decline of American power began a few years ago, and may accelerate over the next four years.

Posted by: James M. | Jan 5 2025 8:35 utc | 303

@jopalolive | Sun, 05 Jan 2025 01:36:00 GMT | 313

If I had to guess, the military is supplementing Starlink ISR, override commercial control during emergencies.

Yes, most likely true. That Musk bears watching, or has needed watching. May be too late at this point.

Posted by: James M. | Jan 5 2025 8:37 utc | 304

The decline of American power began a few years ago, and may accelerate over the next four years.
Posted by: James M. | Jan 5 2025 8:35 utc | 329
Yes next four years very crucial. Power of printer greatly diminished. To understand slow smo and BRICS nations getting bullied and not acting is because of this. They want to end the hegemon peacefully without a global nuclear war.Time is on their side,besides they have achieved a nuclear checkmate. That is why all proxy wars,regime change attempts etc. Somehow to prevent the inevitable slide. Even TR 3B like tech useless without the printer

Posted by: Michael J | Jan 5 2025 8:50 utc | 305

It took about a hundred years of sanctions, invasions,slander and deceit to get to this point so expect a hundred years to repair it.
Posted by: HB_Norica | Jan 5 2025 6:12 utc | 327
Correct (maybe not 100 years, but Lavrov said. “We need final legal agreements that will fix all the conditions for ensuring the security of Russia and the legitimate security interests of our neighbors, but in a context that will secure the impossibility of violating these agreements in an international legal manner.”
While this requirement “in a context that will secure the impossibility of violating these agreements” is exactly what is almost impossible for the USA (and the West as a whole) to fulfill.

Posted by: smartfox | Jan 5 2025 9:02 utc | 306

Posted by: Milites | Jan 4 2025 1:56 utc | 213

Posted by: Suresh | Jan 4 2025 1:41 utc | 215
Offensive hand grenades use blast not fragmentation, (throw, pause, move) so they can be more readily used in a fast moving assault, the German stick grenade being the most famous of these. Most NATO forces used defensive hand grenades with a pre-scored case that splintered, (throw, take cover, move) though some plastic cased models could be available.
IIRC the US model was the M67, nearly spherical, Vietnam era. Did your grenadier carry the flechette rounds, or was that only used in certain theatres, e.g. South Korea?

you can tell — a theory person
at least in the “NVA ” the two drill patterns did NOT exist
RGD-5 –> (throw, pause, move) –> NVA = (throw, protective posture while moving)
F-1 –> (throw, take cover, move) –> Use from emplacements , trenches ….
the classification blast — fragmentation is also wrong
–> RGD-5
“… It contains a 110-gram (3.9 oz) charge of TNT with an internal fragmentation liner that produces around 350 fragments with a fatality radius of around 3 metres (9.8 ft)[1] and a wounding radius of 25 metres (82 ft)…”
see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RGD-5
–> F-1
“…is an anti-personnel fragmentation defensive grenade…
The radius of the fragment dispersion is up to 200 m (660 ft) (effective radius is about 30 m (98 ft),[5]). Hence, the grenade has to be deployed from a defensive position to avoid self-harm…”
see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F-1_grenade_(Russia)

Posted by: ghiwen | Jan 5 2025 9:10 utc | 307

Everything depends on whether Russia has enough (military and political) power to not only successfully repel all attacks from the West (and Ukraine), but also to reach a position that allows it to implement its ideas of peace. Anything else would at best bring about a short pause, but no change.

Posted by: smartfox | Jan 5 2025 9:13 utc | 308

Military Situation On Ukrainian Frontlines On January 4, 2025
https://s5.cdnstatic.space/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/4jan2025_Ukraine_map.jpg
Russian strikes were reported in the Kharkiv region;
Russian strikes were reported in the Sumy region;
Russian strikes were reported in the Kiev region;
Russian suicide drones attacked the Poltava region;
Russian suicide drones attacked the Kremenchuk region;
Russian strikes were reported in the Odessa region;
Russian forces advanced in the Kupyansk direction;
Russian forces advanced in Toretsk;
Russian forces advanced in the Kurakhovo direction;
Russian forces advanced in the Pokrovsk direction;
Russian forces eliminated 50 servicemen, one tank, six motor vehicles, two D-20 guns, two D-30 howitzers in the Kharkiv area;
Russian forces eliminated 590 servicemen, one infantry vehicle, three pickups, one D-20, three D-30, one Striga in the Stelmakhovka area;
Russian forces eliminated 250 servicemen, one Kozak vehicle, one D-20 gun, one D-30, one M119 in the Chasov Yar area;
Russian forces eliminated 440 servicemen, one tank, one infantry vehicle, M113 and M1117, one Kozak in Donetsk region;
Russian forces eliminated up to 170 servicemen, five motor vehicles, and one Paladin in the Southern Donetsk area;
Russian forces eliminated up to 70 servicemen, three motor vehicles, one D-20, two D-30 howitzers in Kherson region;
Russian air defense forces intercepted 72 Ukrainian drones over the past day;
Russian air defense forces shot down shot down eight U.S.-made ATACMS operational-tactical missiles over the past day.
https://s5.cdnstatic.space/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/4jan2025_Ukraine_Kupyansk_map.jpg
Russian forces advanced in Dvorichna and its southern outskirts;
Russian forces took control of Lozova;
Clashes continued in Zagryzove;
Clashes continued in Petropavlivka;
Up to 50 servicemen, one tank, six motor vehicles, two D-20 guns, two D-30 howitzers were destroyed in the area.

Posted by: smartfox | Jan 5 2025 9:43 utc | 309

Updated on 05/01/2025 11:03:13
Russian media reporting Ukrainian offensive in Kursk region
https://liveuamap.com/pics/2025/01/05/22726998_1.jpg
https://liveuamap.com/en/2025/5-january-09-russian-media-reporting-ukrainian-offensive

Posted by: smartfox | Jan 5 2025 10:05 utc | 310

Posted by: smartfox | Jan 5 2025 9:02 utc | 332

While this requirement “in a context that will secure the impossibility of violating these agreements” is exactly what is almost impossible for the USA (and the West as a whole) to fulfill.

This is a good part of what I mean by the maximalist position of the Russian side, which when considered in combination with the impossibility (due to ideological over-investment) of the West to satisfy said Russian maximalist position, becomes consistent with my early view that in fact Russia intends to swallow the whole of the Ukraines.

Posted by: Johan Kaspar | Jan 5 2025 10:11 utc | 311

@jopalolive | Jan 5 2025 1:25 utc | 312

Did you watch the enormous Starship booster reentry land, within centimeters, and being physically caught by a landing tower?

Yes, but what I said was that Starship has yet to reach Earth orbit, even empty, and that is true.

Your comments are insightful and good, imo, except on this one subject. Do you think your words convey anything truthful by casting doubt on already achieved milestones?

I am not casting doubt on anything truthful. On the contrary, the truth is that even a single Earth orbit has yet to be achieved by the “Starship”. It may happen soon, but as of now that is in the future.

Talking about Starship not having reached orbit (technically correct) is highly misleading.

I know, narratives prevail over facts these days, but I prefer facts regardless.

Posted by: Norwegian | Jan 5 2025 10:37 utc | 312

The form of social organization that exists in the West that I call the God Of Mammon cult represents barbaric patriarchy in the form of Might-Makes-right which maintains the financial jackboot of global private finance.
Posted by: psychohistorian | Jan 5 2025 2:55 utc | 318
Finally that somebody recognized that. Excellent post.

Posted by: vargas | Jan 5 2025 10:39 utc | 313

Johan Kaspar | Jan 5 2025 10:11 utc | 336
Russia intends to swallow the whole of the Ukraines.
I don’t think the whole of Ukraine, not least because not everyone is pro-Russian, and because the terrain is too difficult to occupy. Russia would need more than 300,000 additional units for that.
But probably the coastal strip and then along Transnistria to Lviv or Berehove, so a land contact with Hungary.
In conjunction with demilitarization and renunciation of NATO membership, that could be a basis for negotiations.
Time perspective: 1 year

Posted by: smartfox | Jan 5 2025 10:42 utc | 314

@Julian | Jan 5 2025 3:40 utc | 320

Russia should IMMEDIATELY lay waste to all the important gas infrastructure and connections in and between Ukraine and other countries.

Is this a variant of “Russia should have nuked country xxx yesterday”?
As of now, no gas is flowing so the infrastructure is temporarily worthless. Once the Kiev regime false, the infrastructure may become useful again.
Destroying the gas pipes is in nobody’s interest, except the US.

Posted by: Norwegian | Jan 5 2025 10:44 utc | 315

@jopalolive | Jan 5 2025 1:25 utc | 312
Talking about Starship not having reached orbit (technically correct) is highly misleading.

Posted by: Norwegian | Jan 5 2025 10:37 utc | 337
I know, narratives prevail over facts these days, but I prefer facts regardless.

Brilliant retort. It gives a new meaning to ‘misleading’.

Posted by: Johan Kaspar | Jan 5 2025 10:44 utc | 316

Posted by: smartfox | Jan 5 2025 10:42 utc | 339
you would also need substantial movement on sanctions, plus formal recognition of the new territories as being part of Russia.
Timeline – regime change in Ukraine.

Posted by: Night Tripper | Jan 5 2025 10:45 utc | 317

@Johan Kaspar | Jan 5 2025 10:44 utc | 341
Thank you, your comment is appreciated!

Posted by: Norwegian | Jan 5 2025 10:53 utc | 318

@Norwegian | Jan 5 2025 10:44 utc | 340
typo fix:

Once the Kiev regime falls, the infrastructure may become useful again.
Destroying the gas pipes is in nobody’s interest, except the US.

Posted by: Norwegian | Jan 5 2025 10:55 utc | 319

Posted by: smartfox | Jan 5 2025 10:42 utc | 339

I don’t think the whole of Ukraine, not least because not everyone is pro-Russian, and because the terrain is too difficult to occupy. Russia would need more than 300,000 additional units for that.

Or simply a few more years with the current troops and gear, years in which the West has to pay for all expenses of the corrupt shithole Ukrainian state every fucking month.
The Second Chechen war, in a much smaller geographical theater, took 2 yr of intensive warfare and 8 yr of further low intensity warfare to achieve all objectives that Putin set forth at the start.
Being pro-Russian or not doesn’t matter much. The defeated can learn to love the victorious. Ask the Germans and the Japs, and in a smaller scale, the Chechens.

Posted by: Johan Kaspar | Jan 5 2025 10:56 utc | 320

Nacht Tripper | Jan 5 2025 10:45 utc | 342
plus formal recognition of the new territories as being part of Russia.
I assumed that; because if there is a real peace with security, as Russia demands, then that is an automatic part of it, without it it cannot happen.
Removal of sanctions is a matter for negotiation.
The West must reach a point where it wants real peace out of self-interest, regardless of all the propaganda and hate orgies.
If Russia cannot achieve that, Russia has lost.

Posted by: smartfox | Jan 5 2025 10:56 utc | 321

Regime change? Trump could force that, i.e. elections, but then it depends on who is elected and how the EU-NATO then acts, which in turn depends above all on how England acts. That is the head of the snake (heating up the others). But Ukraine will not voluntarily lose such a strip of territory; it must be conquered.
Forced elections do not necessarily mean that the Europeans will keep quiet.

Posted by: smartfox | Jan 5 2025 11:04 utc | 322

Posted by: smartfox | Jan 5 2025 10:56 utc | 346

The West must reach a point where it wants real peace out of self-interest, […]

For that to happen, for our leaders to take into account our interests as nations, we need something similar to a nationalist revolution, where Farage, Le Pen, Weidel, etc, join the ranks of Orban et al., taking power in Euro states.
This is not going to happen. Next in Germany there will be another edition of the Grand coalition with the CDU on top. In France the left will continue supporting Macron or someone like him.
Bottomline, the West cannot agree to Russian conditions, ergo Russia will have time to swallow the whole the Ukraines at the current tempo, over the next few years.

Posted by: Johan Kaspar | Jan 5 2025 11:13 utc | 323

Johan Kaspar | Jan 5 2025 11:13 utc | 348
https://www.klonovsky.de/2025/01/eine-prognose-fuer-das-neue-jahr/
kind regards

Posted by: Oberbayer | Jan 5 2025 11:16 utc | 324

https://t.me/RVvoenkor/83920
Statement of the Ministry of Defense on a new offensive of the Armed Forces of Ukraine in the Kursk region.
▪️”At about 9.00 Moscow time, in order to stop the offensive of Russian troops in the Kursk direction, the enemy launched a counterattack by an assault group consisting of two tanks, a barrage vehicle and 12 armored combat vehicles with a landing force in the direction of the village of Berdin.
▪️Artillery and aviation of the North group of forces defeated the assault group of the Armed Forces of Ukraine. 2 tanks, a barrage vehicle and 7 armored combat vehicles were destroyed. The operation to destroy the formations of the Armed Forces of Ukraine continues.”

Posted by: guest | Jan 5 2025 11:19 utc | 325

Johan Kaspar | Jan 5 2025 11:13 utc | 348
Depends a lot on the upcoming elections. But if Germany’s self-strangulation is not a reason to withdraw from aggression, then there will be further escalation and a new front: the Baltic states, where Russia cannot simply endure attacks but must act, and that in turn could lead to a situation in which the alliance is declared (which Putin wants to avoid), or at least Poland, Germany, France, England. Will Russia be able to handle this without using nuclear weapons?
Crap prospects for 2025 in any case.
One thing must be kept in mind: Even if it seems as if Trump wants to see Europe deindustrialized, it cannot be what he wants, because much less can be bought in the USA if there is no more money. It would be a knee-jerk reaction. He cannot improve his trade deficit in the long term with it. The Europeans must therefore be left with “room to breathe.”

Posted by: smartfox | Jan 5 2025 11:36 utc | 326

guest | Jan 5 2025 11:19 utc | 350
The counter-offensive expected before the 20th. It is not yet clear where the actual target is, whether this is a diversion or the actual direction of attack.

Posted by: smartfox | Jan 5 2025 11:50 utc | 327

Here we go again. All those poor AFU TerrDefense fucks in Donbas must be loving the Kursk news.

Posted by: boneless | Jan 5 2025 12:08 utc | 328

Correct (maybe not 100 years
Posted by: smartfox | Jan 5 2025 9:02 utc | 332
There have been economic sanctions on Russia pretty much continually since the 1917 revolution. The only breaks were during WW2 when Russians were dying by the millions fighting Hitler and the UK/USA conveniently didn’t invade Europe until the Germans were essentially beaten in 1944 and when western carpetbaggers went on a shoplifting spree in Russia during the 1990’s.

Posted by: HB_Norica | Jan 5 2025 12:21 utc | 329

Posted by: Oberbayer | Jan 5 2025 11:16 utc | 349
We’ll see. If in fact Trump invites Weidel to his inauguration, even if he also invites Scholz and Merz, that would in fact be a boost to AfD. But I’m sceptic. Polls show that CDU/CSU+SPD+Grüne can form a new government.

Posted by: Johan Kaspar | Jan 5 2025 12:24 utc | 330

Posted by: ossi | Jan 4 2025 14:43 utc | 246

Posted by: ghiwen | Jan 4 2025 14:32 utc | 248
.
.
Do you know this ammunition depot, have you ever been in one of the 6 shafts, each 12 floors deep?
NO
Then you’re talking rubbish. Rubbish, rubbish
Another one who knows NOTHING but considers himself one of the smart ones…
AND
There must be a reason why Sylenski’s troops didn’t overrun this “peacekeeping force” of the Russians about 2 years ago, or at least TRIED to outwit them, if not openly…
Did Papa Biden threaten woe betide…or were there perhaps other reasons behind the scenes for letting their fingers hurt…
AND yes, about 2 years ago, the Ukraine still had equipment from the USSR to use the ammunition…
And something else, YOU smarter, the corresponding computers for using the ammunition are also stored in this depot…the technology had to be enough for about 5 regiments, the ammunition for 2 armies.
How do I know that…I was there live.

i can’t make sense of your comment / critic !!!
even you should know that a blockquote is a QUOTE
what is wrong with my statements ?
– that a exploding “ammunition mountain” is a myth ?
– the satellite-image ?
– 20.000 t of munition ?
– that the munition is NOT dumped in one heap ?
– 20,00 tons of ammunition are NOT equivalent to 20,000 tons of explosives ?
– is wikipedia wrong ?
but additional questionable statements :
AND yes, about 2 years ago, the Ukraine still had equipment from the USSR to use the ammunition
Are you claiming that such equipment from the USSR-era is no longer in use in Ukraine? what equipment/weapon comes to mind ?

Posted by: ghiwen | Jan 5 2025 12:25 utc | 331

MOSCOW (Sputnik) – German Chancellor Olaf Scholz can visit Russia before early elections to the Bundestag planned on February 23, and the meeting of US President-elect Donald Trump with Russian President Vladimir Putin is planned for March, German parliamentarian from the Christian Democratic Union (CDU), Roderich Kiesewetter, said on Saturday.
noidea why Putin would wish to consider meeting such a loser except to laugh and offer a place in an asylum.

Posted by: Jo | Jan 5 2025 12:36 utc | 332

Note:
Roderich Kiesewetter, CDU is one of the louder Panzerfahrers in Germany.
Interesting that the “Priestess of War” Marie-Agnes Strack-Zimmermann, FDP has sidled into the background.

Posted by: MAKK | Jan 5 2025 12:40 utc | 333

… To be reusable it must first be usable.
Posted by: Norwegian | Jan 4 2025 23:17 utc | 304
The Starship booster is reusable. You are misleading regarding that obvious fact.
Posted by: Norwegian | Jan 5 2025 10:37 utc | 337
I know, narratives prevail over facts these days, but I prefer facts regardless.
Brilliant retort. It gives a new meaning to ‘misleading’.
Posted by: Johan Kaspar | Jan 5 2025 10:44 utc | 341
Lame. The thing you prefer is rhetorical semantics.

Posted by: jopalolive | Jan 5 2025 12:59 utc | 334

Posted by: Johan Kaspar | Jan 5 2025 11:13 utc | 349 “Bottomline, the West cannot agree to Russian conditions, ergo Russia will have time to swallow the whole the Ukraines at the current tempo, over the next few years.”
If this war runs a few more years, it will be a very expensive time for Russia. Rosstat reports Russia is planning on spending 40% of their national budget on this war in 2025, which is about 8% of GDP. Plus all the Russians getting killed or injured.

Posted by: Ed4 | Jan 5 2025 13:29 utc | 335

Posted by: smartfox | Jan 5 2025 9:43 utc | 335 “Russian forces eliminated 50 servicemen”
Aren’t you leaving out part of the sentence? “Russian forces eliminated up to 50 servicemen”. It could have been 1 serviceman.

Posted by: Ed4 | Jan 5 2025 13:33 utc | 336

The West must reach a point where it wants real peace out of self-interest, regardless of all the propaganda and hate orgies.
Posted by: smartfox | Jan 5 2025 10:56 utc | 346
Forever wars are in their interest, why would they change the plan when it’s working so well? But who is “the west” anyway? US? Why would they want peace in Europe, only a few tiers of proxies live there. Why would they be afraid of war when Russia only speaks about a potential war in Europe and never about US? Or is it UK? Why would they be afraid? If RF still doesn’t hit Ukr, do you think they’ll hit Poland? The only war zones remain in Russia, that is the result of the little sad smo. In Transnistria power outages created by Maia last longer than the few hours a month Ukr has in some areas, and their fuel and food will be cut next. 1-2 years like that and they’ll referendum to join Ukr instead, it’s not like Gerasimov will ever get there. There will never be a moment when “the west” will want peace in Ukr out of self-interest. There is nothing they can’t buy from RF directly or from the Indian proxy, there’s no danger of war in their countries, RF continues to bomb only itself (I see today they’re bombing themselves in Kursk on a large scale due to a larger attack from Ukr, but not a single km in Ukr, “completely surprised” again) while Kyyiiivv or Lviyyv have not seen a single day of smo.

Posted by: rk | Jan 5 2025 13:45 utc | 337

Blinken gave an nterview admitting stocked up Ukraine defences 2021 as could see what could happen…the rest of his claims are entirely delusional and well analysed and destroyed by Murad Gadziev on rt news.
Starmer UK is going to visit Trump soonish trying to persuade him to keep the Ukraine thing going…sounds more like he is being caught out by current events and yrying to cover up tje tealism setting in that Ukraine is a lost cause and UK taxpayers finally are aware, considering the populous is fully aware of our failing economic circumstances and the falling apart services (people dying)and infrastructure.
UK being a major motivator for Ukraine also Syrian , probably nervous that EU politicians and developing political wavelengths are very fragile considering the economics and energy supplies, and EU support for Ukraine will not be in lockstep with UK.
Journalist Kit Klarenberg has done a real exposee on UK activities on Syria and the Judge Napolitano interview with Max Blumenthal coupledays ago re this extraordinary analysis is very revealing.

Posted by: Jo | Jan 5 2025 13:54 utc | 338

Posted by: James M. | Jan 4 2025 23:42 utc | 309
I think the slow tempo of the SMO tends to suggest the opposite. The Russian army is predominantly an artillery based army that allows supporting friendly formations the opportunities to manoeuvre, whilst denying those to the enemy. Western military support attacked that structure directly, by reducing the effectiveness of the supporting fires, whilst reducing opportunities for manoeuvre and indirectly, by attacking the logistics train and the ability to conceal operational intent
The Russians were able to adapt, but at the cost of being unable to concentrate forces in time and space, whilst becoming reliant on the weakest element of their army, the infantry. Things have improved considerably but, as I said to another poster, it has imposed a stop-start tempo, for offensive dispersed operations that are only able to focus on a small number of axes simultaneously.

Posted by: Milites | Jan 5 2025 14:22 utc | 339

@ Posted by: aristodemos | Jan 4 2025 20:02 utc | 282
Trump needs to protect his family from his own praetorians.
As I said earlier the Romanovs had reneged – having been intermarried with the European ‘Monarchs’ under the specific favoured and oldest branch – The House of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha , which had been installed upon the Chosen Next Great Empire to go further than all the previous iterations. The Victorian’s.
(Along with many other monarchies of Europe)
They were exterminated in totality – not because of fear of the Romanov children or grand children returning generations down the line – But to make a show to their European Cousins not to even think of ever turning against their Real Masters.
Lenin was a cnut. That’s why Stalin had him stuffed and put on display! As VVP still allows.
That’s a reply message to the Global Robber Bastards – can’t wait to see them equally remembered.

Posted by: DunGroanin | Jan 5 2025 15:20 utc | 340

Posted by: ghiwen | Jan 5 2025 9:10 utc | 332
One might suggest your knowledge is wiki-deep. I don’t usually stop to cut and paste and I’m not interested in sticking rigidly to military definitions, as they differ from army to army, but writing a quick summation so that posters, who have little to no previous subject knowledge, can understand the general concepts being discussed.
E.g. You have two types of grenade, offensive (blast) that can be used with little to no cover, and defensive (fragmentation, either pre-scored case or internal coil ) that require cover, after having been thrown.
Designation
‘Hand grenade No. 69 was classified as an ‘offensive’ grenade, with the noise of its explosion being worse than its fragmentation effect.’
Employment
‘Its main purpose was to be used in attack or house-to-house combat, where it could be thrown to shake and shock the enemy while the thrower followed the grenade.’
Designation
‘The hand grenade No. 36M was used extensively by the British troops on all theaters of war. It was a hand grenade of ‘defensive’ pattern and fragmentation’
Employment
was therefore vital for the thrower and his comrade to take cover once he had thrown the grenade.
So, throw pause move v throw, cover move.
Now, given that you responded with the example of Soviet grenades, whilst I responded to a poster who’d been a former USMC (bit of an error in reading comprehension or knowledge) again I will activate the cut and paste machine you seem to employ.
Designation
‘The MK3A2 offensive hand grenade (Figure 1-11), commonly referred to as the concussion grenade, is designed to produce casualties during close combat while minimizing danger to friendly personnel. The grenade is also used for concussion effects in enclosed areas, for blasting, and for demolition tasks.
Employment
‘The shock waves (overpressure) produced by this grenade when used in enclosed areas are greater than those produced by the fragmentation grenade. It is, therefore, very effective against enemy soldiers located in bunkers, buildings, and fortified areas.’
DM-51
‘The DM51 is a German defensive/offensive high explosive fragmentation (HE-frag) hand grenade, which includes a removable fragmentation sleeve and pyromechanical fuze. To change the DM51 from defensive (use behind cover) to offensive (assault without cover) mode’.

Posted by: Mi;ites | Jan 5 2025 18:35 utc | 341

No, I am not a troll I am simply being realistic. I have been following on here from the beginning and lots of predictions about Russian victory have come and gone and the Russians are still the only ones open to peace negotiations.
Posted by: Cagey | Jan 3 2025 0:49 utc | 71
You are either a troll or an absolute dumbass. You pick which one.

Posted by: Screwdriver | Jan 5 2025 22:12 utc | 342