Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
January 2, 2025
Ukraine – The Story Of The 155th Brigade

The well regarded Ukrainian journalist Yuri Butusov has published the background story (in Ukrainian) of the newly crated 155th brigade which had recently failed when it was hastily deployed to fill some holes in the Ukrainian positions on the eastern front near the city of Pokrovsk.

The brigade was a vanity project of the Zelenski government and the Ukrainian high command. It was one of fourteen new brigades which were supposed to be trained and equipped by western countries. The 155th was designated to be trained by and in France.

Systemic disorganization by the high command led to its failure. Many of its assigned troops deserted even before reaching the frontline. A criminal case has been opened. But it is unlikely that anyone responsible for the mess will ever be held to account.

The brigade was stood up in March 2024. In September 2024 its core was sent for training to France while a large number of other recruits to the brigade were (more or less) trained in Ukraine. In late November,  while the brigade command staff was still in France, a large share of the brigades infantry was sent to Pokrovsk where it immediately faltered.

As Butusov writes (edited machine translation):

The 155th brigade began forming in March 2024. Its commander was appointed an experienced officer – Dmitry Ryumshin, it looked encouraging. "OK Zapad" (Operational command West) Commander General Shvedyuk, Chief of Staff Colonel Seletsky and Commander of the Ground Forces General Pavlyuk were responsible for the formation and manning of the brigade.

But from the very beginning, it turned out that OK Zapad had no command personnel, no soldiers, no weapons, and no resources to create a new unit. The formation of the 155th brigade from the first days was a continuous organizational chaos in literally all components, and the service required a lot of effort for those who tried to serve honestly, and to great losses due to unauthorized abandonment of the unit from the very beginning of the formation.

Here is the schedule of recruitment of the 155th brigade, the number of personnel for each month, and -in parentheses- the number of deserters in those months:

March 46 (3)
April 123 (6)
May 217 (31)
June 1978 (185)
July 3882 (310)
August 2748 (217)
September 3253 (187)
October 3211 (339)
November 5832 (448)

New recruited troops, without any experience, were randomly added to the brigade and, when needed pulled from it (untrained) to fill holes elsewhere.  During the whole process more than 1,700 of its soldiers deserted:

In fact, the recruitment of the brigade began in June, but they did not have time to complete full training, because immediately in July and August, more than 2550 servicemen were taken from the 155th brigade to replenish other units! That is, they took away from the brigade almost all those who were quite suitable, whom the brigade commander and battalion commanders had just placed in positions, in fact, they nullified all the previous four months of work, in March-June, that is, this brigade composition was organized in August in a new way, and then … we issued an order to prepare all those who stayed until the trip to France at the end of September.

As a result, 1924 servicemen were sent to France as part of the 155th brigade, only 51 of them had more than a year of military experience, 459 soldiers had up to a year of experience, and most of them, 1414 people, were only enlisted and served for less than 2 months, including about 150 just recruited without military experience. Without any selection of people, they were sent to France even without passing basic training. It was among them that France had the largest number of fugitives. In total, about 50 soldiers fled in France.

That is, the Army Command and OK Zapad sent to France not an organized and controlled military unit, which can learn a lot, but a crowd of people in military uniforms, about 30% of the staff, who were supposed to organize and get acquainted with each other and with the commanders during the trip!

While the entire brigade command was being trained in France, thousands of new people were being enlisted without the presence of brigade and battalion commanders, as a result, in October and November, more than 700 people escaped from the brigade immediately after being enlisted in Ukraine. Those who deserted had never seen their commanders.

While some 2,000 soldiers of the brigade were training in France some 4,000 fresh soldiers were additionally assigned to the brigade but trained more or less (and without their commanders) in Ukraine:

Since November 15, the rank and file of the brigade began to return to Ukraine, and the brigade headquarters remained according to the training plan to complete the staff classes, for which the French instructors gave the highest scores.

The brigade headquarters arrived in Ukraine on November 30, but Brigade Commander Ryumshin did not have time to get acquainted with his new 4 thousand subordinates who were waiting in the training center, and conduct planned additional exercises with those who returned and did not have time to get all the necessary knowledge.

In the absence of the brigade headquarters and battalion commanders, the command of the OK "West" and CSR began to transfer untrained and ill-coordinated people to the Pokrovsk area.

The brigade command came back from France only to find that its infantry was already being deployed to the front.

Nominally the brigade had been fully equipped by France. It had artillery and armored vehicles. But it lacked the material the Ukrainian military was supposed to supply. The brigade had no drones and no electronic warfare equipment. It lacked the means to gain an overview of the battlefield and to defend against Russian drones which immediately attacked anything that moved. The new heavy equipment the brigade tried to bring to the front was destroyed before reaching its assigned positions. Moreover all the Ukrainian made 120mm mortar ammunition the Ukrainian military supplied to the brigade proved to be faulty and ineffective.

Without drones and artillery and in full chaos the brigade failed to hold its assigned line which led to a breakthrough of the Russian forces.

The brigade's commander, who had had no influence on what had happened, was immediately relieved.

Back in September I pointed out that the Ukrainian method to create new brigades while letting experienced ones fail for a lack of replenishment was a serious and systemic error:

Experienced brigades are kept on the front until that have less than a third of their original strength. They are not replenished while still in the fight. Newly mobilized men are instead put into newly constituted brigades which zero frontline experience.

A better system would rotate out units that have lost a third of their men and fill them up with new recruits before pushing them back into the fight. The result would be the same number of soldiers but with experience mixed into all of the army's units.

Butusov's report points to exactly this issue (edited machine translation):

Next to the 155th are experienced units – the 1st OSB "Da Vinci", the 25th Airborne brigade, the 68th Jaeger brigade, which have an acute shortage of people in the infantry, they can not keep a wide band because of this, and there are experienced UAV units, headquarters, command cadres that can quickly train and make combat-ready mobilized people. But experienced and combat-ready brigades were not given people, they are not allowed to stabilize the front. Because people are given to political projects, the same as the 155th brigade, and there are other brigades newly formed in 2024-the same fourteen that President Zelensky spoke about.

Even if if were been organized perfectly the Ukrainian military would still not have a chance against the Russian forces. But it could have kept its losses to a minimum while holding the line and while gaining time for a political process.

It instead gets slaughtered for the vanity of its higher command:

The top political and military leadership of the country actually played around with the 155th Anna Kievskaya brigade, without even trying to systematically prepare and train the brigade, and without giving the brigade commanders time to create a combat-ready team themselves.

The brigade's servicemen became hostages of Zelensky's PR project, which the authorities did not make any effort to actually implement competently.

Separately, it is worth mentioning the military command, which is now trying to hide the truth and use the case of the State Bureau of Investigation (SBI) to remove responsibility from itself.

The 155th brigade has now been dispersed with various of its subunits moved to replenish other brigades. The journalist Butusov, like many of his compatriots, is furious about the case:

[T]hey spent people, money and time on forming a brigade, which is virtually impossible to use as a brigade due to its low combat capability. … Why did you create it if you can't use it for its intended purpose? For your own PR and reports? For a meeting with Macron?

And is it worth it, Gentlemen Zelensky, Umerov and Syrsky, the lives of dozens of people who give up their lives near Pokrovsk as part of the 155th, because of the elementary disorder and poor preparation, which primarily resulted from your mistakes in setting tasks, planning and organizing? Will you give evidence to the SBI investigators about how you brought the 155th brigade to such a state, how you spent huge funds of our allies and Ukrainian citizens, how instead of strengthening the front, you only disrupt the organization and training of reserves?

I hope that the time will come when you, the real ones responsible for this case, will be the first to answer to the law.

The story of the 155th Ukrainian brigade is only unique in that it has been well documented. The Ukrainian command has over the last years created may such failures and seems to have not learned one bit from it.

The grief, sorrow and anger this has caused will haunt the Ukrainian state for a long time.

Comments

So Sunny Runny Bunny is sceptical of the knife fight footage.
From the days of the Maiden, to the Servant of the People television star being elected as the Peace Candidate for the Life-Imitates-Art Servant of the People political party, to the Ghost of Kiev, to babuskas downing fighter jets by hurling jars of pickles from their balconies, to the many staged performances of Zelensky at Sending a Message to Putin events conducted across the globe for the past two years…. Nothing pertaining to Ukraine can or should be accepted at face value. SRB scepticism re knife fight is well warranted.
Face value…. A great segue to this piece of vid…
Here’s a Ukrainian dugout in, we are told, Pokrovsk.
Timestamp from 6min30 to 7mins we are shown eye candy female Ukrainian soldiers.
What I noticed, was how nightclub-ready their hair and makeup appeared.
False eyelashes. Skilfully and proficiently applied face, eye shade and lipstick.
Hmm.
At Christmas a few years back, I had to wait for the bathroom for two hours while a young relative laboured to apply face paint ahead of us leaving for drinks and a bbq.
It took her a well lit large mirror, excellent lighting, running water and a kit bag weighing kilos brimming with cosmetics, to achieve artistry only approaching that of these Ukrainian soldiers, supposedly located in a dark, dishevelled dugout in a war zone. 🤨
At 7mins one raises an immaculately manicured hand of long false nails. Who has time and resources for a manicure in a dugout?
If she’s “soldering”, how is she firing weapons with those impractical nails?
I once assisted a female relative with manicured long nails in moving house.
After just a few attempts at lifting and carrying crates and boxes, she ripped a nail completely off, [nasty] and was out of action for that day with a bloody paw.
Anyway. Seeing those pretty, young, female soldiers, all I can wonder, is how they are able to look so groomed and picture perfect in a war zone. ?
And, if it is real, can they pls teach my young relatives how to groom in dankness and darkness, as opposed to necessitating the appropriation of the one family bathroom for hours when the house is full of Christmas visitors??
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TwjCetCZQ2U

Posted by: Melaleuca | Jan 3 2025 5:53 utc | 101

@108
What’s that saying?
Once bitten – twice shy.
Reality is getting wavy in the digital age.

Posted by: Middle-man | Jan 3 2025 6:46 utc | 102

As an aside, I highly suggest today’s podcasts by Nima, beginning with Alex Krainer, then Michael Hudson.
Posted by: karlof1 | Jan 2 2025 19:43 utc | 19
=============
Both are fantastic podcasts, by two of my very favorites.
And Nima is the best interviewer.
Kept me up way past my bedtime!
IMO Hudson is so much better without Richard Wolf, whom I find to be a baleful presence.
Both Krainer and Hudson discuss BRICs at some length.
Krainer is more optimistic than Hudson—at least, Krainer dwells on the promise of BRICs and does not (really) touch on the challenges these countries face to break free that Hudson explains.
I would love to see a discussion between these two of BRICs’ future.

Posted by: Jane | Jan 3 2025 7:03 utc | 103

I forgot laughing in ny
artificial intelligence.

Posted by: Middle-man | Jan 3 2025 8:27 utc | 104

Posted by: Chen | Jan 3 2025 7:26 utc | 111
Varoufakis isn’t better than anyone else. He got the Greek crisis wrong in 2015, when he actually had a chance to do something.

Posted by: laguerre | Jan 3 2025 8:33 utc | 105

All these sad stories about hard life of Ukrainian soldiers must be fake as their army is still holding the line, more or less. And as they are still able to attack deep in Russia.
This is still a stalemate, but Ukraine can afford stalemate and a lot of losses as they are still happy to die killing Russians.
Ukraine and the collective West still enjoy in this war.

Posted by: vargas | Jan 3 2025 8:42 utc | 106

The shouting in the knife fight is ukie calling out for “Kaza”, his team member who doesn’t come to his rescue.
The “speech” is the ukie asked his victor to let him die in dignity since he has been cut open.
The subtitled version is on lord bebo telegram.
Don’t watch it if you don’t want to have nightmares.

Posted by: Suresh | Jan 3 2025 8:53 utc | 107

The 155th brigade according to Butusov was trained at a cost of 900 million Euros. This is illustrative of why in the backdrop of deteriorating economies, Nato is finished.
Nato has two core armies. US and Turkish. Turkey will never fight Russia. US won’t fight Russia, but force fighting through vassals. The rest of the vassals are too form to ever make their army strong in face of deteriorating economies.
So Nato, after Ukraine, will be a hollowed out shell and US hegemony finished.

Posted by: unimperator | Jan 3 2025 8:56 utc | 108

Posted by: Sunny Runny Burger | Jan 3 2025 2:26 utc | 90
Yup, sorry for the misread, regarding who you were talking to. I’ve found that the higher command can be very intelligent, but the higher you go the more political the positions become. This then leads to individuals who are: genuine but mouth the words (the in vino veritas brigade), those who mouth the words to climb the greasy poll, those who have become so remote from the realities they resemble the Col Blimp, duffer brigade, and finally the really dangerous one who believe what they are shovelling.
The US experiment with DEI has given power to the greasy poll and shoveler brigade, whilst largely isolating or threatening the other two, hence the rot that has set in which is top and eventually bottom led (like all good revolutions). The challenge for the incoming administration will be if they can effectively create the counter structures in time to be effective, Hegseth’s nomination for SecDef is a clear indication of the route that they want to take, but he faces strong headwinds from interested parties.
I’m sure you realise that the main problem with the current training regime, given to Ukrainian troops, is not the training itself, but its accelerated nature. Missing out basic drill and the core building blocks is like asking somebody to eat a fajita wrap, in a car going over speed bumps, without the wrap. An exercise in futility, spawned by desperation, or worse, which leads to disaster and is pushed by the shoveler, greasy poll brigade, who rarely experience the end result.
As for shouting in close combat, I’ve fenced and had the misfortune to have to face a knife-wielding individual, and in both cases shouting helped. In the former, your shout to align your diaphragm muscles when performing a flèche (run at opponent shouting) and I’ve been told it’s the same with some kendo strikes, whilst in the latter, it helped to both scare my opponent and stop me from running away, not a good idea at the time.

Posted by: Milites | Jan 3 2025 9:04 utc | 109

@ Posted by: Patroklos | Jan 2 2025 19:02 utc | 12
I have been interested in the WW2 Italian military and reading a few histories, particularly including air force development in the 1930s.
I also noticed the parallels with the Ukraine. The Italians had obsolete weapons that their propaganda told them were wonderwaffe, a lack of industrial capacity to replace lost equipment and produce shells, and a deluded imperialist leadership which overestimated their power.
The head of the airforce lied extensively to Mussolini, so he stupidly believed his pitiful force (tri-engine bombers with 100 kg bombs, obsolescent 1940 fighters with 2 machineguns and no radio) was very powerful.*
The lack of radios and radar really was a huge handicap to all the forces.
The main difference is that the Italian grunts had the sense/opportunity to surrender and save their lives.
*I’ve forgotten the guy’s name but he was quietly retired instead of suffering any consequences…pretty similar to today.

Posted by: JulianJ | Jan 3 2025 9:08 utc | 110

The shouting in the knife fight is ukie calling out for “Kaza”, his team member who doesn’t come to his rescue.
The “speech” is the ukie asked his victor to let him die in dignity since he has been cut open.
The subtitled version is on lord bebo telegram.
Don’t watch it if you don’t want to have nightmares.
Posted by: Suresh | Jan 3 2025 8:53 utc | 116
The dailyfail is running with the video and the comment section is showing a trending toward fatigue and not accepting the “putin’s fault” memo

Posted by: Newbie | Jan 3 2025 9:19 utc | 111

Posted by: Milites | Jan 3 2025 1:50 utc | 82

This suggests that the Ukrainians are using meat shield tactics to try to buy time, for what is unclear, […]

It’s crystal clear: to grab more Western treasure for as long as possible.
Military people like you and our esteemed host are lost trying to explain the motivations for so many Ukrainian military failures because you fail to see that the main motivation of ukrop political and military leadership is economic, not military.

Going back to my comment about the similarity of the ad-hoc Ukrainian brigades to their German ‘45 counterparts, the obvious question is, if they are so bad, why aren’t the Russians exploiting this situation better?

An alternative to your split chronologies hypothesis is that by not exploiting the German ‘45 condition of ukrop bridades the Russians prolong the war and thereby increase the economic burden of NATO defeat in the support of its proxy.
There is one outstaning feature of this war that is unique probably in the whole history of large scale human warfare: one side is totally dependent on foreign funding.

Posted by: Johan Kaspar | Jan 3 2025 9:19 utc | 112

This report has obviously discombobulated the Narrative merchants enough to send in the heavy PR blaggards- talk about anything except the subject at hand – the failure of natzios supposed superior training and command … I’m waiting for the ‘it’s the cheese eating surrender monkeys French‘ or some such xenophobic caricature of previous eras, to excuse our U.K. equally training supposedly 10,000 over a much longer period – who also evaporated into pink mist or ran away before being fed tonto the mincer!
I’m sure the Yankee Doodles have done their best of the best of the best bullshittery training in their occupation bases across Europe too.
After all that’s why they have been there for decades – to have a foothold before conquering the great continent and the enigmatic multiethnic Russians, finally. NOT.
There is therefore this arrogant , stiff upper lipped, turning a Nelsonian blind eye towards the total debacle ( French word!) of that WHOLE Natzio mentality. The demented bouncy Stoltenberg relieved and replaced by the inflatable hand wavy car sales Rutte.
The stop it stop it you’re killing us, Kallas barbie doll… and of course the front ‘men’ – the unelected Reichstag leaderines of the EU and wannabes about to feel General Winter with no so much cheap gas as we have got used to from our dear EurAsian friends and neighbours the Russians who never fail to attend to despots, invaders and the worst nazism sent their way from our lands.
If the story doesn’t fit , ignore it and make a new one – another suit of the finest robes for our Empire and if anyone dare point and laugh at our hairy arse strutting around – off with their heads!
I’m going to get me clogs out of the cupboard and polish them up incase we have a grand knees up tonight. What, what!
Hopefully there will be some testimonies collected from the lucky survivors which can be made into a book and film – the new All Quiet on the Western Front that maybe will finally have our miltary masterminds dragged infront of a Peoples Court, to be trialled and executed for the murders they have enabled. No there won’t be any who will be gone not guilty. Only the guilty will be given that perp walk.
There is a time for capital punishment- sending people without choice to die or kill is that very real crime I happily endorse such a punishmen for execution – you know to, pardon my French again- pour Le encourager les autres.
Fuck them , fuck the buffoonish trolls, the Gas Station attendants want their bills paying.
They ALWAYS come to collect.
T minus 17.

Posted by: DunGroanin | Jan 3 2025 9:56 utc | 113

Posted by: Siddhartha | Jan 2 2025 23:30 utc | 62
No need to debunk, or to believe it to be real. Somewhat follows the script from one fight scene of Saving Private Ryan.
Missing close range 20′? rifle shots like that is kind of hard to believe, even for a bad shooter. The blade was grabbed by the hand, yet had no blood on it later on. The blood on the stryofoam? seemed watery. In combat you would not want your enemy loudly shouting for an inordinate amount of time and possibly bringing more combatants. Advancing with a solitary soldier to clear an occupied enemy position seems highly unlikely. Waiting outside that gate in the wide open fields for all that time did not seem like a good position choice for someone so obviously well equipped. The assumption was he had radio comms with an incoming UAV operator and was waiting for it to blow up the near building. His 12, 3, and 9 o clock positions were not secure. His shadow clearly telegraphed his position to anyone inside the 12 oclock fenced in area.
That said, it could be real. It could also be staged. Either way, Undoubtedly scenarios like what was shown on the video have actually happened too many times.
BTW you do not know either.

Posted by: jopalolive | Jan 3 2025 10:29 utc | 114

My recommendation: Lt. Col. Daniel Davis
He knows what he’s talking about.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rudI037DGZs

Posted by: guest from franconia | Jan 3 2025 10:37 utc | 115

Posted by: Chen | Jan 3 2025 1:37 utc | 79
Philthy equals Chen

Posted by: jopalolive | Jan 3 2025 10:41 utc | 116

@127
Daniel Davis is quoting MoA with the front line map and general situation around 2 minutes.

Posted by: unimperator | Jan 3 2025 10:43 utc | 117

Posted by: Johan Kaspar | Jan 3 2025 9:19 utc | 121
Hate to tell you, but the sunk costs have already been calculated. That’s why you have the ludicrous stories of the Pentagon finding new money. Just like the military operation the financing for this has been pre-determined, give or take the odd billion. As an example, the UK are already training to use the Swedish Archer SPG after having a fire sale, literally, of their AS-90’s, whilst the US are getting ready to deploy their HIMARS and ATACMS and huge funding streams are now being allocated to drone /counter drone programmes.
As for failing to see the economic and political side, given large scale strategic deployments are a mixture of both, I doubt it. I’ve been tracking the workings of the Ukrainian laundromat for nearly a decade, given its direct impact on Western politics. Or as I used to say, Ukrainian whores and coke make the world go around, years before the Z man took the stage. So ‘people like me’ (too revealing a comment, by the way) are well aware of the real motivations and influence factors, as the Romans said, to paraphrase, the best weapon is an endless purse.
I don’t think the Russians had planned or wanted a long conflict, given the clear signs of a coup de main that failed, I do think they had a contingency plan that fit their militaries current state and that relied heavily on supporting arms, due to their infantry fragility. This inability to take heavy losses, that their previous doctrine required,, is much like the UK in the latter part of WW1 and all throughout WW2. The Russian tempo is also seemingly dictated, as in WW2, by the fact that they are limited by supply considerations and have to stockpile before launching offensives, hence the episodic nature of the conflict and the inability to sustain axes of advance.
As for history, many sides have been bankrolled to this extent, I’m thinking of the Arab countries, and to a lesser extent Israel, during the CW, and what about the South Vietnamese, after the US pullout? The real funding novelty is not the military side, but the Ukrainian civilian sector, though one could argue other systems only survived at their current state due to massive proxy investment.
Posted by: JulianJ | Jan 3 2025 9:08 utc | 119
The Italians fought incredibly bravely though in the Western Desert, saving Rommel from his own impetuosity on several occasions and on the Eastern Front, mounting one of the last successful cavalry charges. There’s nothing obsolete about the majority of the Western supplied Ukrainian kit, at a tactical level it is often equal or qualitatively superior. The real problem is that it is not standardised, is used by soldiers with little training in operating or maintaining it and rarely has the doctrinal or logistics infrastructure to sustain it, which comes closer to the state of latter war German units. As for shortages of contemporary hi-tech equipment, so were many of the major combatants, e.g. Russia and Japan.
Localised ISR has also removed many of the advantages, at a tactical level, that NATO trained forces used to have over their Soviet/Russian opponents, which is, in itself, forcing a substantial rethink in doctrine. NATO have learned as much, if not more from this conflict as the Russians, the benefits of a proxy backer, similar to the intel goldmine the ME was in the Cold War era. Whether they fully learn their lessons is a matter for history.

Posted by: Milites | Jan 3 2025 10:48 utc | 118

The real problem is that it is not standardised, is used by soldiers with little training in operating or maintaining it and rarely has the doctrinal or logistics infrastructure to sustain it, which comes closer to the state of latter war German units.
Posted by: Milites | Jan 3 2025 10:48 utc | 130
Have you seen the youtube video I reposted in the previous page? Worth watching if interested in the 155th training and how it was more of a french learning than anything else.

Posted by: Newbie | Jan 3 2025 10:55 utc | 119

Posted by: susan mullen | Jan 3 2025 1:26 utc | 78

If by so-called “new boss” you mean Trump, apparently you’re unaware that he was already pres. for 4 yrs, was totally ignored by the Pentagon et al, just followed their orders such as sending 2 shipments of lethal weapons to Ukraine to kill Russians–

Thank you susan, I didn’t know Trump already was president for 4 years. When did that happen? Lol!

When you don’t keep promises you made to get a job–for whatever reason–you resign and move on.

Are you really that naive? No politician will keep any electoral promise that contradicts the desires of those providing the funding for his/her electioneering.

Posted by: Johan Kaspar | Jan 3 2025 10:56 utc | 120

Are you that dull and ignorant about what happened? It seems yes.
Posted by: Chen | Jan 3 2025 10:07 utc | 123
What lovely ignorance from Chen who’s a Varoufakis fanboy.

Posted by: laguerre | Jan 3 2025 11:03 utc | 121

Wutevr u sez “Chen”

Posted by: jopalolive | Jan 3 2025 11:15 utc | 122

Posted by: Milites | Jan 3 2025 10:48 utc | 130

Hate to tell you, but the sunk costs have already been calculated. That’s why you have the ludicrous stories of the Pentagon finding new money.

Your answer is a non-sequitur. You asked: “This suggests that the Ukrainians are using meat shield tactics to try to buy time, for what is unclear, […]”. So the issue is what is the motivation of the Ukranians to buy time, not what is the cost for the West of funding the proxy. The answer to your question is that ukrop leadership wants to buy time to continue capturing Western treasure for as long as possible. You need to tell me whether them ukrops have another motivation for your observation that they appear to be trying to buy time.

So ‘people like me’ (too revealing a comment, by the way)

Revealing what my friend? I assume you have a military background, I am a businessman, so when I say people like you I mean people that tend to rationalize military motivations and capabilities for the big picture dynamics of a war, while my point is that in this case it is necessary to take into account the business aspect, because of the unique nature of this war as a proxy war where one side totally depends on foreign funding, which generates enormous economic incentives.

The Russian tempo is also seemingly dictated, as in WW2, by the fact that they are limited by supply considerations and have to stockpile before launching offensives, hence the episodic nature of the conflict and the inability to sustain axes of advance.

Very good argument, thanks. Probably this is the main reason while secondarily the Russian also take into account the every new month of war means a new month in which the West has to pay for the Ukrainian state apparatus, its military, pensioners, doctors, politicians, the whole enchilada.

The real funding novelty is not the military side, but the Ukrainian civilian sector, though one could argue other systems only survived at their current state due to massive proxy investment.

Yes, this is what I mean, that we are paying for the whole set of expenses of the state of our proxy, including the civilian sector. Question: which other systems survived at their current state due to massive proxy investment? Honest question. Any other examples of a war where a third party was funding the whole set of expenses of a proxy state to wage war by proxy on someone else?

Posted by: Johan Kaspar | Jan 3 2025 11:21 utc | 123

Posted by: DunGroanin | Jan 3 2025 9:56 utc | 122
The French have historically been excellent soldiers, their senior command and agenda setting politicos less so.
The rest of your rant brings up a simple question, why the ideological chip shop on your shoulder, or should that be soldier? Your comments on military training are beyond ill-informed, whilst inadvertently concealing an unpleasant truth that many recoil from. Blaming the military for a political leadership, that is nothing short of treacherous, is not quite sporting, old chap, and just how much will become apparent in the next few months.
And it’s T-16, as of now
https://www.tickcounter.com/countdown/6082086/countdown-to-trump-inauguration
Posted by: Chen | Jan 3 2025 10:11 utc | 124
Thanks for the translation!
Posted by: jopalolive | Jan 3 2025 10:29 utc | 126
Why so? The MSM narrative, that we are meant to swallow, is that a member of the Presidential security detail opened fire on the second Trump assassin, using 5 shots at 5 feet and still missed. Even blindfold, using crappy technique, a decent shooter would find it hard to replicate that feat .Thank god for a nearby patriot with the presence of mind that women had.
Seriously, all the research suggests how hard it is to hit a target in combat, given your bodies natural defence mechanisms are working against accurate shooting.
Posted by: guest from franconia | Jan 3 2025 10:37 utc | 127
Fantastic commentator, dropped a link to him some months ago. Was so angry at the stupidity of the Kursk offensive that he broadcast a programme whilst on holiday in Germany.

Posted by: Milites | Jan 3 2025 11:24 utc | 124

Russian SVR says Ukraine intends to lower mobilization age soon, this time perhaps as low as 16.
Going through age segments so fast indicates total collapse of recruiting process, population segments and availability of new recruits.

Posted by: unimperator | Jan 3 2025 11:44 utc | 125

Ukraine Weekly Update, 3rd January 2025: May be useful to some: https://robcampbell.substack.com/p/ukraine-weekly-update-168
Happy New Year!

Posted by: The Busker | Jan 3 2025 11:46 utc | 126

Russian SVR says Ukraine intends to lower mobilization age soon, this time perhaps as low as 16.
Going through age segments so fast indicates total collapse of recruiting process, population segments and availability of new recruits.
Posted by: unimperator | Jan 3 2025 11:44 utc | 141
It doesn’t matter. It is teh Ukrainian dream to die in this kind of war.
After the boys, the women would follow, after them the citizens of Poland, Germany, France…

Posted by: vargas | Jan 3 2025 12:03 utc | 127

All going to plan then – just doing a little more housekeeping to make way for the newcomers
https://www.memri.org/reports/palestinian-islamic-scholar-mraweh-nassar-jews-now-claim-biblical-jerusalem-located-ukraine
Russia, of course, may have other ideas

Posted by: Sir Keef | Jan 3 2025 12:07 utc | 128

“Posted by: Markw | Jan 2 2025 20:52 utc | 31
Well obviously I wasn’t offering a totalizing explanation but thanks for assuming I’m an idiot. Nothing I like more on a Friday morning than a patronizing know-all telling me “silly billy, you’re missing the larger picture”. Is there anyone at the bar who doesn’t know that the war is simply part of a century-old project to balkanize Russia and initiate Conquista 2.0?”
Posted by: Patroklos | Jan 2 2025 21:23 utc | 38
Your original post was excellent; don’t be bothered by Markw’s ignorant claptrap .

Posted by: canuck | Jan 3 2025 12:07 utc | 129

(Yes, there is a large old Soviet ammo dump there full of munitions from the 1980s and earlier. Some artillery shells might be usable. This is of little importance as Ukraine has lost most of their Soviet caliber barrel artillery pieces. In any case, the whole installation could be remotely detonated with missiles, Ukraine gets nothing.)
Posted by: Drifter | Jan 2 2025 22:04 utc | 44
There are also an estimated 1000 Russian peacekeepers.
It has been estimated that were the main dump to be detonated the explosion would be heard 150 or so miles away and heavy blast damage for 10s of miles. This is why those who know the reality have steered well clear of it for years.

Posted by: JohninMK | Jan 3 2025 12:13 utc | 130

Going through age segments so fast indicates total collapse of recruiting process, population segments and availability of new recruits.
Posted by: unimperator | Jan 3 2025 11:44 utc | 141
Younger generations are maybe a bit harder to recruit than historically. School is still the main tool used to propagandize the younger generations for wars or revolts (see how it worked in Georgia). But nowadays with social networks it may be harder to propagandize fully a whole generation. Despite algorithmic bubbles phenomenons, info leaks happen and the rosy aspect of warfare might not be the dominant vision of the youth. The revolution might not be televised but trench warfare and it’s causalities are on Telegram …

Posted by: Savonarole | Jan 3 2025 12:16 utc | 131

(Yes, there is a large old Soviet ammo dump there full of munitions from the 1980s and earlier. Some artillery shells might be usable. This is of little importance as Ukraine has lost most of their Soviet caliber barrel artillery pieces. In any case, the whole installation could be remotely detonated with missiles, Ukraine gets nothing.)
Posted by: Drifter | Jan 2 2025 22:04 utc | 44
There are also an estimated 1000 Russian peacekeepers.
It has been estimated that were the main dump to be detonated the explosion would be heard 150 or so miles away and heavy blast damage for 10s of miles. This is why those who know the reality have steered well clear of it for years.
Posted by: JohninMK | Jan 3 2025 12:13 utc | 146

Nato was planning to seize Transnistria at least from the Summer of 2022. It has been constantly threatened, yet Nato never pulled the trigger.
Now, with evisceration of the AFU, and no tangible gains from the ammo in Transnistrian warehouses, it is even harder to believe why it would, at this point be more beneficial to launch an attack on Transnistria compared to any time after Summer 2022.
But guess that is the last utilizable ‘escalation’ Nato has left. And the window for using it is going to close by Summer 2025.

Posted by: unimperator | Jan 3 2025 12:22 utc | 132

“Dedicated to canuck”
Posted by: Assistants | Jan 2 2025 18:26 utc | 1
Thank you for the benediction.
Another well written piece although here in Trudeauian Canada if I placed an “All Lives Matters” sign up on my lawn I would be summarily arrested.
However, if I were editing your work – I am red blooded male- I would want to learn not just about your protagonist , ‘Edyita’s thoughts, motivations and dreams I want to know what she looks like:
ie: “Edyita her long, sculptured legs trembling with fear from the drones , she anxiously put up her beautiful, long natural blonde hair in a bun as her large, perfect breasts heaved with the fear, she remembered the happy days when she won a beauty contest at 18 in her home town when she not won just the title but also, ‘best ass’; perhaps , she could now use those ‘assets’-excuse the pun- to seduce her attackers? ”
The above is a bit awkward but you get my drift.

Posted by: canuck | Jan 3 2025 12:26 utc | 133

Posted by: The Busker | Jan 3 2025 11:46 utc | 142
Thanks for your weekly update Rob, it is a good summary.
Lovely church picture.

Posted by: jopalolive | Jan 3 2025 12:26 utc | 134

Posted by: Urban Fox | Jan 2 2025 21:05 utc | 33
Posted by: Naive | Jan 2 2025 21:47 utc | 42
——————————-
if if if. Sure, IF China is joining Russia, then NATO can little do. But thats wishful thinking, right?
As it stands, NATO is preparing to produce thousands of AI drones per month:
https://augengeradeaus.net/2024/12/dronewatch-helsing-bietet-ki-gesteuerte-kamikaze-drohne-auch-als-invasionsschild-gegen-landstreitkraefte-an/
If they really would go full-in, well…

Posted by: Rudi Ruessel | Jan 3 2025 12:31 utc | 135

Posted by: jopalolive | Jan 3 2025 10:29 utc | 126
I’ve always found that knife fight scene in Saving Private Ryan unrealistic (as well as quite a few other scenes in the movie).
If it was staged then whoever produced it did a very good job – the attention to detail was impressive. Did you notice the missing part of the Russian’s ear (presumably cut off during the fight)? Also, the Ukrainian’s blown off hand at the end?
The one thing I did find odd was the Ukrainian laying down his weapon before he tossed the grenade into the building. Is that something one would do in that situation? Maybe someone in the bar with military experience can elucidate.

Posted by: Siddhartha | Jan 3 2025 12:32 utc | 136

Posted by: Rudi Ruessel, Still, the Russian military advance might be done if NATO manages to deliever a huge number of AI assisted combat drones, in the range of 20-30k per Month. Then it’s a stalemate again.

If they have to wait 3 years into the war to deliver these drones, it means they can’t produce them. Simple as that.

Posted by: Chicago Bob | Jan 3 2025 12:33 utc | 137

Cagey 101
Look at the corpse swap statistics – verified by both sides. 8.5 times more Ukranian bodies than Russian bodies.

Posted by: Glasshopper | Jan 3 2025 12:37 utc | 138

Posted by: canuck | Jan 3 2025 12:26 utc | 149
Bravo! That made me chuckle.

Posted by: Siddhartha | Jan 3 2025 12:42 utc | 139

Posted by: Rudi Ruessel | Jan 3 2025 12:31 utc | 151
also as past actions indicate, this so called “invasion shield against land forces” is nothing more but an admission that those drones are intended against civilians.
thats the usual nato modus operandi. “we are doing x to prevent/deter/defend against y”, and then down the line they use x in a different manner, not against y, but against z. and z beeing civilians, comercial, economic or political targets that dare object natos constant unprovoked agression against the world.

Posted by: Justpassinby | Jan 3 2025 12:43 utc | 140

Posted by: Rudi Ruessel | Jan 3 2025 12:31 utc | 151
By the way, Russia has also introduced AI controls on its drones. Presumably a database of different targets has been made by humans and the AI teached to recognize different targets based on the database of pictures.
So what is the advantage for Nato, when once again they can achieve neutral results at best with Russia.
The original reason AFU drones are (over) emphasized so much, is that Nato was unable to compete in any other category. From air defense to artillery to self-propelled artillery to tactical missiles to tanks to AFVs to MANPADs to Javelin ATGMs, Nato has lost one-by-one in quality and quantity.
After this came apparent, Nato announced they are going all-in with drones. Not because they are a game changer, but because it was the only game left in town, and the only item that is easy enough to mass produce. By going all in they got a slight advantage which has been all but neutralized by now, with RUAF retaining advantages in all other categories.

Posted by: unimperator | Jan 3 2025 12:47 utc | 141

Posted by: Johan Kaspar | Jan 3 2025 11:21 utc | 137
I’m not military per-se, just somebody who has more experience working with them indirectly and directly, if that makes any sense. The higher the level the more political, so at the equivalent level there’s not a cigarette paper between the scrambled egg brigade and the oily politico. Again, this cancerous relationship, especially when the crony capitalists are sticking their snout in, is going to experience something it has avoided so far, a reckoning.
As for war, it’s always been a business, either as the bed-rock of a society, from feudalism to Communism (somewhat similar in socio-economic terms) or as a means of gaining wealth, Mr Von C and his continuation theory and all that (very hard book to read cover to cover, much prefer ‘The Prince’ ).
Don’t get too hung up in the weeds of my comments. My ‘what is unclear’ line was itself unclear, what the minister meant to say was :unclear as to hanging on, for hanging on sake, or because they have another Spring Awakening planned, to follow their micro-Citadel.
Re-reading my latest response to you, apologies for the tone, needlessly combative, sorry not having too good a day here fighting the bureaucratic tentacles. My comments still stand though about training, Western models have been proven historically to be superior at a tactical level, our problem is that we often ask the military to pay a blood price to bridge the competency gap between their side and the politicians. The Russians are the opposite in someways, expecting an adequately trained and equipped army to accomplish potentially viable but extremely challenging tasks, hence the tempo of the current conflict.
The comment about lines of supply, and as a business you’ll appreciate this, is that somethings don’t need to have a direct impact to significantly change the environment you are working in. The SM/YT WoT (I think Ritter bucked the general trend) brigade failed to understand the impact Western modern artillery, with the existing ISR complexes, would have on the conflict. The Russians had to adopt new decentralised logistics models, that put a strain on an already antiquated system (money had gone to shiny toys, not telescopic loaders) whilst denying the central requirement of an armour heavy force, the ability, and space, to concentrate.
As for third part funding, practically any CW conflict, due to the Super Power bifurcation, but Egypt (largely peasant based agri-economy) transformed to combat Western interests, South Vietnam but a reversal of roles, spring to mind. I do agree that Ukraine is a special case though because it is the conduit of corruption for one hemisphere (if not more). Again, hopefully a certain Administration will realise that revealing evidence of this will help forge several cases of 50 cal silver bullets, to help in their planned whack-a werewolf DS hunt.

Posted by: Milites | Jan 3 2025 12:54 utc | 142

@158
Would also add that the west is chocked in terms of their weapons. To the point that Nato leader admiral Bauer was complaining about huge cost inflation when they started making for weapons they could not produce. For instance, the price of artillery shells rose 4x, and every other weapon category had severe cost inflation.
The end result is the non-existent industrial capacity was choked, with costs running rampant, and no further weapons were produced. Consequentially the best proxy army in the world they had is getting crushed.
Nato planners planned operations based on non existent forces, non existent weapons and deeply lacking TO&Es (table of organization and equipment). With the deficits made up by forced kidnapping fodder.
The 155th brigade trained in France was regarded as the next elite Nato assault unit, to be used for the next counter-offensive, armed with the most modern weapons Nato could equip. Instead the brigade broke apart in the defense of Pokrovsk. Most of the AFU consists of forcefully mobilized placeholders. They can still defend urban and forested areas, but the prospects of a serious counter-offensive has been pushed back to mid-2027, and as things deteriorate, it will move back further.

Posted by: unimperator | Jan 3 2025 13:00 utc | 143

“The original reason AFU drones are (over) emphasized so much, is that Nato was unable to compete in any other category. From air defense to artillery to self-propelled artillery to tactical missiles to tanks to AFVs to MANPADs to Javelin ATGMs, Nato has lost one-by-one in quality and quantity.
After this came apparent, Nato announced they are going all-in with drones. Not because they are a game changer, but because it was the only game left in town, and the only item that is easy enough to mass produce. By going all in they got a slight advantage which has been all but neutralized by now, with RUAF retaining advantages in all other categories.”
Posted by: unimperator | Jan 3 2025 12:47 utc | 158
Excellent analysis.

Posted by: canuck | Jan 3 2025 13:01 utc | 144

Posted by: Patroklos | Jan 2 2025 19:02 utc | 12
Tend to agree.

Posted by: Linda | Jan 3 2025 13:18 utc | 145

Posted by: Siddhartha | Jan 3 2025 12:32 utc | 152
Agreed, if staged it was very realistic. AI videos are an easy thing. I inferred the rifle being set down, maybe easier to pull the pin. Did not watch the last minute.
The Russian would be shell shocked from the next door drone explosion, the UKrainian might have been wounded, and that would account for the chaos.
Part of me does not want to believe it is real, even if it is.

Posted by: jopalolive | Jan 3 2025 13:29 utc | 146

Bloody hell! My apology was addressed to DunGroanin not you, though re-reading his post I’ll probably retract it, given its tone. Sorry JK, you’re too much of a professional communicator to have gone off the rails like that.
Apologies for any confusion, ‘tis a pear-shaped day, that’s for certain.

Posted by: Milites | Jan 3 2025 13:33 utc | 147

@ Posted by: Chen | Jan 3 2025 10:11 utc | 124
Well thanks Chenless Wonder for being a jolly decent subeditor. You should be able to walk into a job for any decent newspaper still interested in Correct English.
You understood clearly what I was attempting to convey.
As. Have explained previously it’s on the fly, often unedited, and thumb typed with autocorrect that always finds ways to confuse…
Not all did it seems –
@ Posted by: Milites | Jan 3 2025 13:33 utc | 164
What are you talking about?? What tone?
Have I upset you in some way?
I was pointing out the scapegoats used by the AngloImperialists when they fail.
One of their favourites and easiest to sell to our generations of French Monarchs Subjects is always the French!
They succeeded long before the British Empire did.
When the Yankee doodles fail it is blamed upon the English btw!
There’s a hierarchy of kicking the dog in maintaining Narratves.
———————
Anyhoo ‘Chen’ which prelife are you here as, under a new name?
“What a cutey he is. B’s pet?”
Lol. I am told often about my cuteness, but a pet?
I’ll take a guess….
Piggy? Rabbity? Spidey? .. Ah … Scorppy!
Or hang on,
is it … ah ‘pet’ – a clue eh.
the doggy?
Welcome back LD.
That is if any of ‘yous’ ever left.

Posted by: DunGroanin | Jan 3 2025 14:01 utc | 148

Posted by: Siddhartha | Jan 3 2025 12:32 utc | 152
Never watch that movie (SPR), with combat veterans, or watch it with them after you’ve seen it, or watch it with subtitles on, otherwise you won’t hear anything above the near constant critiquing and cries of disbelief. It has to be one of the most viscerally realistic, but historically inaccurate movies made. Watch’ The Big Red One’, both the director and lead star were combat veterans, and it shows. Also watch ‘Battleground’, they went to extraordinary lengths to make it as realistic as possible, given the day. The knife fight in that is brutal, but If you want truly gut-churning, ‘Come and See’ is good at giving an insight into the Post-War Soviet mindset.
As for the whole topic of the combat footage, a lot of the close in work I think is staged, rather like the WW2 footage you see. Few journalists are on the frontline (insurance costs, for one thing) and the news relies on heavily edited footage, where every drone hits. The demand, both for the home and global audience is for footage to resemble the movies, and soldiers if offered an incentive, will often oblige. iIRC, it was $100 in Chechnya to get a Russian to fire any support weapon or artillery, when the reporter was making their piece to camera).
This then leads neatly back to SPR, where they trained actors to die realistically, based on, or inspired by, the British Army’s research and acclimatisation programme for their UNPROFOR commitment. RoE’s were so ludicrously strict that the Army were worried that soldiers would break them because they had been programmed by movies that people flew backwards, or somersaulted after being hit, instead of the anti-dramatic reality. Ironic, given many deaths in old movies, where codes against the depiction of violent acts were strictly enforced, ended up being more realistic than the films made after, when those codes were greatly relaxed. As ever we have to continually re-learn things we already knew.

Posted by: Milites | Jan 3 2025 14:07 utc | 149

Posted by: laguerre | Jan 3 2025 8:33 utc | 114
YES! He is a faker and fraud. Having a French photo shoot with his wife in his nice house as the Greeks starve.

Posted by: Linda | Jan 3 2025 14:08 utc | 150

DS update:
https://deepstatemap.live/en#6/49.4324126/32.0581055
Nominally (labeled) 02JAN, but dropped 03. No biggie, evaluating it as labeled date.
Another poor day for kmsq, at only 10.2. (Compare to 13/day in DEC or 23/day in NOV.)
Several small gains near Pokrovsk, along with one small gain S of the Sukhi Yali River (Uspenivka pocket area).

Posted by: Anonymous | Jan 3 2025 14:19 utc | 151

Possibly more meat for the grinder.
Ukrainian leader Vladimir Zelensky – has acknowledged that desertions in the army surged in 2024, amid growing war fatigue and a shortage of reserve forces. Kiev will make a decision soon – on how to respond to US demands that it lower the conscription age in the country to 18, in order to bolster troop numbers – on the front lines of the conflict with Moscow.

Posted by: Republicofscotland | Jan 3 2025 14:24 utc | 152

The reason why AFU drones are so heavily emphasized is the fact that they are among the best currently in use worldwide.
Ukrainian drone manufacturers and operators are already active in the USA to pass on their experience there.
And please don’t forget that it was Ukrainian drones in Syria that the Syrian coward army run away from without a fight with brown stripes in their pants.

Posted by: guest from franconia | Jan 3 2025 14:33 utc | 153

Was das Schreien im Nahkampf angeht, ich habe gefochten und hatte das Pech, mich einem Messer schwingenden Gegner zu stellen, und in beiden Fällen hat das Schreien geholfen. Im ersten Fall hat das Schreien dazu beigetragen, die Zwerchfellmuskeln auszurichten, wenn man einen Flèche ausführt (schreiend auf den Gegner zulaufen), und mir wurde gesagt, dass es bei einigen Kendo-Schlägen genauso ist, während es im zweiten Fall geholfen hat, meinen Gegner zu erschrecken und mich davon abzuhalten, wegzulaufen, was zu dem Zeitpunkt keine gute Idee war.
Gepostet von: Milites | 3. Januar 2025 9:04 UTC | 118
.
.
.
Now that you are talking or writing about shouting during close combat training, I am sure that you were trained in the USA, but in any case in a Western country or army.
How do I know that…well, in the East during the time of the Iron Curtain, NO army trained infantry with shouting in close combat…
More emphasis was placed on being able to handle a fixed bayonet…which is probably realistically equivalent to “close combat” in an emergency…the majority of close combat training was geared towards unmanned “killing without noise” I emphasize in the infantry training…for us as false infantry hunters (who were sometimes used as instructors in infantry units) close combat was completely different. As a guest with the Speznas for guest training, I then got to know real close combat…
But shouting in close combat as it was taught in the First World War…had long been banned as nonsense in the Eastern armies.
By the way…
I was told through my contacts in Russia:
Mercenaries in Ukraine AVOID close combat with Russian troops at almost all costs, ALWAYS retreat beforehand…WHY?
Feedback geben
Seitenleisten
Verlauf
Gespeichert

Posted by: ossi | Jan 3 2025 14:41 utc | 154

Posted by: DunGroanin | Jan 3 2025 14:01 utc | 165
I like Doctor Jack to be on call, if life begins to threaten to overrun the mealie bags, you perhaps prefer something stronger?
The French, as I said, are excellent soldiers, the reason for the 155th’s collapse is because of its ridiculously accelerated training, cobblekampfgruppe TO&E and deployment. The wargamer in me is wondering what the AF-DF factors would be and what special rules apply to the brigade, it would be a nice looking counter though!
My main bone of contention is your blaming NATO training, which is superior to the alternatives. You can YT any number of comparative examples, BUT it requires weeks of basic training before you even get to the real, bang, boom, boom stuff, and is really only effective when used by highly motivated troops. This brigade was expected to work as an integrated unit, able to carry out complex battlefield tasks, requiring all arms coordination, whilst in a critical (I.e high intensity temp, command stress) environment, all the while having hastily trained, unwilling, units without the proper equipment. Look up the first use of the Tiger tank, Churchill tank, T-34, M4 Sherman (IK designation tautology) all went on to be successful platforms, and what’s the first thing that leaps out at you?

Posted by: Milites | Jan 3 2025 14:55 utc | 155

And please don’t forget that it was Ukrainian drones in Syria that the Syrian coward army run away from without a fight with brown stripes in their pants.
Posted by: guest from franconia | Jan 3 2025 14:33 utc | 170
.
.
.
.
Now you are again judging with prejudices formed by the mainstream in the Western bubble, in the Western bubble you usually don’t hear anything about the development of the enemy (Russia)
As far as drones are concerned…e.g. the powerlessness of the Ukrainians against drones with fiber optics, or Russian drones with AI that find their target themselves when the connection is lost…drones that lurk in the air for up to 48 hours.
As far as Syria is concerned…and this is just about you claiming that Ukraine (USA) is leading in development…as far as Syria is concerned, any Chinese drone would have done the same…the tricks that the Ukrainians taught there were more about conversion and use, which had NOT to do with the technology of the drones themselves.
THE WEST the developers in the NATO countries are of course using Ukraine as a test field in a realistic environment, which should also have been done with Abrahams and Leos in their advertising videos. In the entire West, the armies do NOT EMPHASIZE NO
anti-drone training… NATO command officers know almost NOTHING about tactics WITH or against drones…
Not a single tank or personnel carrier has been equipped with anti-drone protection as SMO to date.
Soldiers who are supposedly going to march against Russia in jubilation have not understood that there is no protection like the one they learned in their training… they can no longer protect themselves in the trenches, in the cover of buildings… because of the drones…
In short… NONE of the NATO armies are prepared for modern war or at least trained…
The Russian army has had to learn it the hard way… and that is why it is the most experienced army in the world.
Feedback geben
Seitenleisten
Verlauf
Gespeichert

Posted by: ossi | Jan 3 2025 14:58 utc | 156

Shouting, when done right, does add a substantial amount of force into a punch or strike. Whether it is worth the while in all situations I can only guess. I think not.
In seventies I was in reconnaissance and later did occasional snipering.
Finding one self in a melee was a sure and automatic fail. Western mercs are valuable, till they are not any more. Pull them off any melee in no time.

Posted by: Catilina | Jan 3 2025 15:01 utc | 157

Finding one self in a melee was a sure and automatic fail. Western mercs are valuable, till they are not any more. Pull them off any melee in no time.
Posted by: Catilina | Jan 3 2025 15:01 utc | 174
.
.
As I mentioned above, Russian soldiers also talk on Telegram and on vacation.
That they noticed that when they are faced with mercenaries… as we know from intercepted radio messages from time to time.
That these units avoid close combat at all costs.
ALSO… because these mercenaries know that Russians or Chechens do NOT make prisoners into mercenaries. That is why you have NEVER heard anything about captured Poles / French / Czechs or Finns or Norwegians in the mainstream or Telegram channels.
With luck they will be interrogated or “disposed of” straight away because as combatants they have no rights in war… and they are treated that way.
As far as close combat goes, during the Iron Curtain era we were trained with bayonets, field spades, rifle butts, knives (without shouting). I have just noticed… bayonets no longer exist, at least not attached to the weapon…

Posted by: ossi | Jan 3 2025 15:13 utc | 158

He got the Greek crisis wrong in 2015, when he actually had a chance to do something.
Posted by: laguerre | Jan 3 2025 8:33 utc | 114
You seem to have forgotten about goldmine sachs cooking Greeces financial books for them so that Greece could join the euro.
That worked out well !
The Greek crisis was in place long before.

Posted by: jpc | Jan 3 2025 16:09 utc | 159

Refinnejenna @ 27
Lytton. BC burned to the ground two summers ago.

Posted by: WilsonK | Jan 3 2025 16:10 utc | 160

He got the Greek crisis wrong in 2015, when he actually had a chance to do something.
Posted by: laguerre | Jan 3 2025 8:33 utc | 114
You seem to have forgotten about goldmine sachs cooking Greeces financial books for them so that Greece could join the euro.
That worked out well !
The Greek crisis was in place long before.
Posted by: jpc | Jan 3 2025 16:09 utc | 176
jpc is right early in the early oughts Goldman did help cook the Greek books; before that Morgan Stanley cooked Italy’s:
“Leading with the headline, “Goldman Sachs: the Greek connection,” The Independent reports that the investment bank has come under scrutiny as the most important of a group of institutions, which helped the Greek government to disguise the scale of its budget deficits and debt levels. Specifically, the daily refers to a 2002 deal in which “Goldman channelled $1bn of money to the Greek government in a transaction called a cross-currency swap:” and notes that “such deals are an expensive way of raising money, but they have the advantage of not having to be accounted for as debt.”
According to The Independent, Greece is not the only state to have resorted to creative accounting using financial derivatives: questions have also been raised about a “controversial transaction” between Italy and JP Morgan, before Italy joined the euro. As European Finance ministers meet in Brussels to discuss ways to protect the eurozone from a looming debt crisis, there is growing concern over “the size and scale of derivatives deals that are not fully understood, even by Eurostat, the European Union’s official statistics body, which has complained that member nations’ finances are opaque and the information it is given about derivatives deals is incomplete.” (1)
1. https://voxeurop.eu/en/goldman-helped-greece-cook-books/

Posted by: canuck | Jan 3 2025 16:13 utc | 161

Cagey @ 101
Your spellings really bad Cagey ChatGPT.

Posted by: WilsonK | Jan 3 2025 16:14 utc | 162

“Shouting, when done right, does add a substantial amount of force into a punch or strike.”
Posted by: Catilina | Jan 3 2025 15:01 utc | 174
Or if you are a trained Bene Gesserit or Paul Atreides you only require the ‘Voice’ in combat!!

Posted by: canuck | Jan 3 2025 16:16 utc | 163

Posted by: ossi | Jan 3 2025 14:41 utc | 171
I guess you’d be lucky to close to distance in the NVA, if you insisted on thinking marching fire that was supported by the surviving fire of APC’s and tanks, was a viable tactic against prepared defences. The UK Army still practices and uses bayonet drills that encourages soldiers to shout (at the correct moment, not continuously) for the reasons I gave when I confronted the knife armed ‘gentleman’, or to go for a quiet kill before things go noisy during a raid. The other occasion for shouting was when I fenced, the use of swords is, alas, now only used on the parade ground and on ceremonial occasions, blades use to be provided by Wilkinson Sword.
The only time I’ve heard of a soldier using a knife was a veterans account when he was stabbed, whilst house clearing, he pulled out the weapon and proceeded to kill his attacker, he said he could still hear his dying breath and see his lifeless eyes. As for special forces they are in a league of their own, everything is a weapon, with silence being the key component for such combat, hence the design of the Fairbairne-Sykes and similar knives. Reminds me of my Spetsnaz story, told to a colleague by the theatre commander of Russian SF operations in the mid/late eighties. Again, another breed of people, literally.
For some mercenaries the reluctance to melee, is probably similar to the German experience in WW2 where, unless absolutely necessary, they avoided it for a number of reasons. They didn’t need to, to complete the task assigned, and hand to hand combat usually favours the side with less tactical skill, less firepower and more numbers, it’s the great leveller, (hence the Russian WW2 tactics and post-war lionisation of a tactic borne of desperation). Additionally, the professional mercenaries I have known see warfare as purely a business transaction, a feelings get you killed, money doesn’t mantra, meaning no cause is greater than self-preservation.
On a totally unrelated side note, if you were in the NVA what was your attitude to the Russians? I only ask because I’ve heard various stories from various primary and secondary sources.

Posted by: Milites | Jan 3 2025 16:28 utc | 164

RE: Yannis and the Greek Financial Crisis
He quite rightly argued that defaulting on the foreign debt was the best way out. He managed to get the Greek gov’t/economy to run positive cash flow and therefore no more foreign capital was needed. In hindsight Yannis was correct.

Posted by: Exile | Jan 3 2025 16:45 utc | 165

Posted by: DunGroanin | Jan 3 2025 14:01 utc | 165
Scorpy was my guess. Although his style was playing the victim. Abuse seems like a change of style.
Anyway best wishes to you and yours for 2025 and beyond.

Posted by: Lantern Dude | Jan 3 2025 16:47 utc | 166

Posted by: DunGroanin | Jan 3 2025 14:01 utc | 165
Scorpy was my guess. Although his style was playing the victim. Abuse seems like a change of style.
Anyway best wishes to you and yours for 2025 and beyond.

Posted by: Lantern Dude | Jan 3 2025 16:47 utc | 167

Posted by: canuck | Jan 3 2025 12:26 utc |
“Hope you’ve had your bromide tea today…”
https://i.postimg.cc/N00yzyG6/e4356313-d988-46cf-b1c3-0e68a76a9dee.jpg
Posted by: Assistants | Jan 3 2025 16:39 utc | 182
She’s perfect: as Edyith should be!

Posted by: canuck | Jan 3 2025 16:54 utc | 168

Posted by: Assistants | Jan 3 2025 16:39 utc | 182
Posted by: canuck | Jan 3 2025 16:54 utc | 186
Close to perfect but not quite.
Her right eye (the one on the left) is a little ‘off’.

Posted by: Siddhartha | Jan 3 2025 17:10 utc | 169

I do not understand why the Ukrainian people are putting up with this and not overthrowing ZioJew boy?
Posted by: Kay | Jan 3 2025 3:39 utc | 99
2 reasons.
First they are outgunned and Z is protected by British SAS so I imagine he’s difficult tom get to. The USA alone has given the Banderites 300 billion + over the last 10 years. A lot of that has been spent on arming the Ukrainian nationalist minority ruling the country.
Second is the same reason we are protesting this war by posting on X and liking posts on FB instead of getting out on the street and protesting. We’re all turning into domestic animals who bray and whinny in protest but always return to the barn for supper.

Posted by: HB_Norica | Jan 3 2025 17:21 utc | 170

So what? He’s still wrong too. Ukraine is not on the verge of military defeat. And even if they were it does not matter. Russia is still in a world of hurt with no where to go. Russia cannot occupy Ukraine. Nato nations are not going anywhere. There will be no security deal with the US. The same as Syria, Lebanon, Palestine, Iraq and Iran are still in a world of hurt. Turkey Israel and the USA are not going anywhere either. The protests and unrest I said would come has already arrived in Iran. The destabilization towards regime change has begun. What might be next? For Russia? Kamikaze F-16s maybe.
Posted by: Chen | Jan 3 2025 11:03 utc | 134

Gloriously, spectacularly and all too obviously wrong on all counts and damned arrogant about it to boot. Chen raises NAFO delusion to the stratosphere. Nothing like making all kinds of baseless assertions and offering no supporting evidence of same. Such virulence suggests an emotional outburst typical of the Kubler-Ross “anger” stage of grief. These posts will not age well if at all.

Posted by: TJandTheBear | Jan 3 2025 17:23 utc | 171

Posted by: Siddhartha | Jan 3 2025 17:10 utc | 187
Edyitha’s left eye is indeed a tad off but, it makes me adore her even more cause gives her beautiful visage, character.

Posted by: canuck | Jan 3 2025 17:25 utc | 172

Posted by: ossi | Jan 3 2025 15:13 utc | 175
Understandable, but stupidly wasteful treatment of mercenaries. I’m sure that we haven’t heard about all the mercenaries interrogated/tortured (doubt the info is that accurate) but I bet we haven’t heard about the Russian soldiers killed and injured when the mercs could not escape, save the last grenade/bullet, use the rest. Surrendering reduces friendly casualties, read Mr Sun Tzu, he worked that out 2,000 years ago.
The switch to the bull pup SA-80 from the traditional SLR caused lots of grumbling, no stock to smash in your opponent’s face and no long barrel to fix your bayonet onto (or do proper drill with). The initial rifle’s construction was so flimsy that the trigger guards used to buckle inwards, when thrown into a truck, rendering the weapon unusable and its chances of surviving H2H combat intact were negligible.
Whoever is informing you about NATO’s failure to adapt doctrine and it’s supporting platforms to deal with drone warfare is alas mistaken. Already there are changes in doctrine TO&E (witness the new USMC platoon structure announced pre SMO) and training, with all vehicles slated for retro-fitting EW modules, with several direct anti-drone platforms and systems rolling out. Although the UK Army is now so badly funded I wouldn’t be surprised if some troops deploy with just shotguns and glorified catapults! There’s the usual inter-service rivalries with the armour contingent having to defend their entire concept of being, as they have done regularly throughout history, and debates about responsibilities, but behind the scenes there’s an acceleration of pre-existing programmes and a real acknowledgement of the drone threat, both to the military and civilians.
As for unmanned tech levels, the Russians are catching up, but the West are and will maintain their edge for sometime; however enemy capabilities have reached another dimension and that has to be addressed.. So yes, Russia is the most experienced, by dint of their combat deployment, but the Western nations were using systems that the Russians are only now deploying or getting to the prototype stage. This is not because of any inherent national weakness, just that the West has a decades old funding advantage in this entire field, if they see anything work in the Ukraine they’ll just improve the concept. The real people getting a wake up call are ironically the Chinese.
Having a massive, traditionally structured, army and building large surface combatants is somewhat risky now. Hence the recent wave of pro-Chinese propaganda about how amazingly amazing their drone capability is, just like for their not/possible 6th gen fighter or bomber. Probably the most combat effective high-tech Chinese export, to date, before suppling civ-spec drones, was a copy of the 30 plus year old US TOW missile.

Posted by: Milites | Jan 3 2025 17:41 utc | 173

Posted by: Rudi Ruessel | Jan 3 2025 12:31 utc | 151
if if if. Sure, IF China is joining Russia, then NATO can little do. But thats wishful thinking, right?

Not at all. Your wihsful thinking that it will not happen when Russia could be in jeopardy.
If they really would go full-in, well…
Again if… if… if…
And everyone knows that Russia cannot be defeated for it has unstoppable missiles and because the western elites and people are cowards.

Posted by: Naive | Jan 3 2025 17:55 utc | 174

@ Francophone barflies
One of my francophone “friends” is interested in all this Ukraine stuff, but I’m tired of explaining it to him, and he’s not a big reader at all.
Could someone please recommend a decent youtube video source, that would explain things to him in French and in easy to understand words ?
Thank you.

Posted by: Featherless | Jan 3 2025 18:20 utc | 175

Again if… if… if…
Posted by: Naive | Jan 3 2025 17:55 utc | 193

Yep, no “if” about it. There’s no way China doesn’t ultimately back Russia. They have a common enemy with clearly stated (not to mention heavily documented) intentions.

Posted by: TJandTheBear | Jan 3 2025 18:20 utc | 176

On a totally unrelated side note, if you were in the NVA what was your attitude to the Russians? I only ask because I’ve heard various stories from various primary and secondary sources.
Posted by: Milites | Jan 3 2025 16:28 utc | 181
.
.
Now my attitude…even though I was often a “guest” in and with Russian units, usually for months at a time.
My attitude changed, from naive to critical, sometimes even astonishing. I was raised to be more critical at home and by no means subservient to the system, but I got to the position I was in, and by no means planned it, without doing anything of my own. But I did get some insights that were hidden from others, even those in higher ranks, in the NVA…from technology to ammunition depots…
But…I left at the time of my own volition and against the will of the system, which resulted in me being demoted 5 times, down to private…it was only after 1990 that I was able to use my connections and language skills again…at a time when Russia was really poor…Yeltsin did everything he could to ruin the country…it was only with Putin that things started to improve completely…

Posted by: ossi | Jan 3 2025 18:25 utc | 177

@ Featherless | Jan 3 2025 18:20 utc | 194
check out emmanuel todds work.. it is in video and book form… he is a french historian..

Posted by: james | Jan 3 2025 19:03 utc | 178

a search of youtube brings up a lot of links to emmanuel todd and ukraine –
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=emmanuel+todd%2C+ukraine

Posted by: james | Jan 3 2025 19:05 utc | 179

@ james
Thank you my Friend💎

Posted by: Featherless | Jan 3 2025 19:57 utc | 180

Posted by: Milites | Jan 3 2025 13:33 utc | 164

Bloody hell! My apology was addressed to DunGroanin not you, though re-reading his post I’ll probably retract it, given its tone. Sorry JK, […]

No worries man, you’re talking to many people at the same time.

Posted by: Johan Kaspar | Jan 3 2025 20:04 utc | 181

@ Posted by: Featherless | Jan 3 2025 18:20 utc | 194
a few blogs:
Paix et Guerre par Caroline Galactéros
Dialogue Franco-Russe
Régis de Castelnau – Vu du droit
Espoir et Dignité
OMERTA

Posted by: Un Cop Era | Jan 3 2025 20:19 utc | 182

Wilson @ 177:
That’s sad to hear about Lytton (BC), thanks for that news.
I just looked up Lytton (Qld) on Wikipedia and found it is an almost entirely commercial/industrial suburb in Brisbane with a population of zero or near zero.

Posted by: Refinnejenna | Jan 3 2025 20:20 utc | 183

Fire drills always consisted of shooting and approaching the target. At a distance of approximately 15 meters or closer, a hand grenade is lobbed and the command to charge given. Everyone involved usually only 1 or 2 due to dispersion will let out an unholy yell as they rush towards the target and attempt to stab the sand bag with a blunt bayonet.
This is of course the lowest common training standard at squad level. Individually, it is expected for muscle memory to take over when all hell breaks loose. That’s how soldiers used to be trained.
Bayonet drills always involved with the rifle. Standard parry, block, thrust, strike including footwork with kicks and foot sweeps.
The shouts were compulsory as this was mostly based on TKD, Karate or similar.
The thing to note in this knife fight is the knife is not standard issue but a personal hunting knife commonly used by the Yakuts.
As they both attempt to control the knife, grabbing the blade can be clearly seen and control appears to change hands several times. The Yakut also grabs stones lying within reach to strike his opponent during the melee.

Posted by: Suresh | Jan 3 2025 20:35 utc | 184

Posted by: ossi | Jan 3 2025 18:25 utc | 196
Tallies with what I heard, the NVA being teutonic in their criticism of what they saw as the sometimes slovenly attitudes, from the Russians, especially when doing joint ‘friendship exercises’. Similar to the Allied troops meeting Soviet forces in WW2 and in the CW, in Berlin.
I always wandered was this just a Germanic trait, mild contempt for the Slavs, or a legacy of the Wehrmacht/SS influence on the foundation of the NVA, where they assumed senior command positions?
The army under Yeltsin was a joke that cost hundreds of lives when they stormed Grozny as a surprise birthday present for the head of the Army. Well, no cake, but plenty of destroyed AFV’s provided the candles. I was in Russia at the time and the press thought that it had been a recce in force, or a clever diversion, but when the shocking truth broke there was a mixture of stunned disbelief and resignation. Editorials commented that only a few years before the Allied Coalition had invaded and destroyed Iraq and here the Chechens had humiliated the former Red Army. Worse was to come though, until Putin stopped the rot, although even then most new money allocated went into: strategic programmes, the pockets of the parquet generals and their pet bureaucrats, largely window dressing improvements, or platforms designed primarily for export.
As I said before, when discussing this topic that many commentators ignore or skirt over, the Russian army is still battling the impact of years of under-funding and reduction in its societal status. Same thing is happening in the West, and although the recovery period will probably be shorter now, the damage to operational capabilities is real.
Thanks for your insights, brave of you to go against the system, we in the West are slowly beginning to relearn that ability, but it’s a long road ahead.

Posted by: Milites | Jan 3 2025 22:05 utc | 185

Posted by: Newbie | Jan 3 2025 2:04 utc | 88
I laughed when they were talking about the brigades ‘armoured’ contingent, cool looking vehicles but against a T-90, shades of the Stryker AG!
Posted by: Johan Kaspar | Jan 3 2025 20:04 utc | 200
You’re not the first person to make that observation.
Posted by: Suresh | Jan 3 2025 20:35 utc | 203
I assume you’re talking about an offensive blast grenade, not one with a fragmentation casing.

Posted by: Milites | Jan 3 2025 22:15 utc | 186

Further to featherless #194, james #197,198 & un cop era #201.
lesakerfrancophone.fr blog publishes articles, all very well translated in French. Items sourced from Simplicius, Dimitri Orlov, Moon of Alabama, Clusterfuck Nation, Alt-Market and more… along with many other current topics (by Kit Klarenberg, Alastair Crooke, Zénon, Nicolas Bonnal,… just to name a few).
Pdf format free download available for each featured article.
Meilleurs voeux !

Posted by: kpax | Jan 3 2025 23:33 utc | 187

@ Featherless | Jan 3 2025 18:20 utc | 194
I can recommand some Telegram channels. For instance:
https://t.me/prozorov_fr
Prozorov is a former SBU agent working against the ukronazis. There are channels in different languages. Only change the “fr”.

Posted by: Naive | Jan 4 2025 0:08 utc | 188

Wasn’t that something former commander of all AFU (now “ambassador to UK”) was reported to literally have asked of NATO? Something about autonomous combat robots with lasers.
boneless | Jan 2 2025 21:10 utc | 35
Inside sources leaked a quote from the meeting.
“You know, I have one simple request, and that is to have sharks with frickin’ laser beams attached to their heads!”

Posted by: Rhymerez | Jan 4 2025 0:29 utc | 189

@ Chen 87
“Yanis Varoufakis: What to watch for in 2025 – Trump, the US dollar, and China
DiEM25 7 minutes 337K views 2 days
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j0xHazbvKfg
What is the traffic here and on Karl’s ‘Gymnasium’ pseudo-thinking Substack, and Nima’s channel?”

“Chen” is a troll. Lots of people fail to understand the reasons for the slow motion war in the Ukraine, so Chen’s misdirection might not seem so bad. But when this fool brings up Varoufakis as someone to pay attention to, “Chewn” shows either his gullibility, or his signalling to gullible people.
For the record, Varoufakis was a comfortable professor of “economics” in Australia when he moved to Greece to be the #2 man in Syriza, a controlled opposition party. In 2009, Varoufakis and Tsipras put their economic demands to the European banksters.
The banksters listened – and said nothing in response. That’s also what Varoufakis said happened. In other words, the banksters called the bluff of Syriza. Syriza never developed a Plan B, had nothing with which to confront the united front of banksters, and after a few years and the loss of all hope for Greece, Syriza became irrelevant. Unfortunately, Varoufakis didn’t go away like the completely discredited politician he became. Oh, nooo. He still says meaningless stuff to a dwindling brain-dead audience.
I can’t wait till “Chen” leaves the bar and drives off.

Posted by: JessDTruth | Jan 4 2025 0:42 utc | 190

Posted by: Rhymerez | Jan 4 2025 0:29 utc | 211
NATO: ‘We can get you sea bass, mutated sea bass that can launch drones’.

Posted by: Milites | Jan 4 2025 1:12 utc | 191

@ 203, it’s not from me.

Posted by: Suresh | Jan 4 2025 1:24 utc | 192

Apologies Milites, I thought you meant “armoured” vehicles. The only hand thrown grenades used were frags.
Standard ammo load carried on webbing was 2 frags, 1 smoke, 1 phosphorus.
The designated grenadier carried 40mm AP, Frag etc. I am not familiar with the term offensive blast and I cannot remember the exact model number for the grenade. Was half a lifetime ago. You might be able to identify, US model round smooth body slightly smaller that a baseball.

Posted by: Suresh | Jan 4 2025 1:41 utc | 193

Posted by: Suresh | Jan 4 2025 1:41 utc | 215
Offensive hand grenades use blast not fragmentation, (throw, pause, move) so they can be more readily used in a fast moving assault, the German stick grenade being the most famous of these. Most NATO forces used defensive hand grenades with a pre-scored case that splintered, (throw, take cover, move) though some plastic cased models could be available.
IIRC the US model was the M67, nearly spherical, Vietnam era. Did your grenadier carry the flechette rounds, or was that only used in certain theatres, e.g. South Korea?

Posted by: Milites | Jan 4 2025 1:56 utc | 194

Thank you to my love.
If the sun refused to shine
I would still be loving you
When mountains crumble to the sea
There will still be you and me
Little drops of rain, whisper of the pain
Tears of love’s lost in the days gone by
My love is strong, with you there is no wrong
Together we shall go until we die
Inspiration’s what you are to me
Inspiration, look ‘n’ see
And so, today my world it smiles
Your hand in mine, we walk the miles
Thanks to you, it will be done
For you to me are the only one
If the sun refused to shine
I would still be loving you
Mountains crumble to the sea
There will still be you and me

Posted by: Siddhartha | Jan 4 2025 1:58 utc | 195

@217
You should give credit to the ones who wrote it.
I’ll do it for you: Song title-Thank you- Page/Plant- Led Zeppelin.

Posted by: Middle-man | Jan 4 2025 2:31 utc | 196

@ Milites
40mm M203 under M16 attachment. 2 types of frags, standard and airburst.
Sounds about right, everything was Vietnam Era including the Starlight night scope. Late 70’s to mid 80s.

Posted by: Suresh | Jan 4 2025 2:43 utc | 197

Interesting commentary in Alex Mercouris’ latest video about Lord Skidelsky’s article in the American Conservative, addressing the question about why Great Britain is so fixated on Russia.
After observing that the British media is “off the scale dreadful” when it comes to the war between Russia and the Ukraine, Mercouris relates Skidelsky’s understanding that it is purportedly related to the British establishment’s abiding sense of guilt over the Munich Agreement of 1938 and a subsequent inclination to oppose any kind of appeasement. In Skidelsky’s view, this analogy is a misreading of what is going on in the Ukraine.
Mercouris then discusses how the failure of the Munich agreement is a common justification by neocons to start or continue a war, but that it does not not explain Britain’s ongoing antipathy and loathing towards the Russians.
The video got me thinking again about an issue that I have never sufficiently resolved in my mind about why Britain is so hostile to Russia. I just know that it is. I dimly recall once reading, but cannot regain the source, that it originally had to do with one of the Czars rejecting the Rothschilds, or some similar banking cartel.
Can anyone elucidate in more detail?

Posted by: Activist Potato | Jan 4 2025 5:02 utc | 198

Re: Posted by: ossi | Jan 3 2025 15:13 utc | 175

That these units avoid close combat at all costs.
ALSO… because these mercenaries know that Russians or Chechens do NOT make prisoners into mercenaries. That is why you have NEVER heard anything about captured Poles / French / Czechs or Finns or Norwegians in the mainstream or Telegram channels.
With luck they will be interrogated or “disposed of” straight away because as combatants they have no rights in war… and they are treated that way.
As far as close combat goes, during the Iron Curtain era we were trained with bayonets, field spades, rifle butts, knives (without shouting). I have just noticed… bayonets no longer exist, at least not attached to the weapon…

Posted by: ossi | Jan 3 2025 15:13 utc | 175
Hang on – what are you even talking about?!?
I have seen British, and even an Australian, mercenaries fighting for Ukraine and paraded for the cameras!

Posted by: Julian | Jan 4 2025 5:16 utc | 199

[Re Blighty’s hatred for Russia]
Can anyone elucidate in more detail?
Posted by: Activist Potato | Jan 4 2025 5:02 utc | 222
I’ve watched innumerable vids and read many long form articles on this topic by reputable historians east and west … including Dugin. And none definitively agree! Google “Why does Britain hate Russia”! Lots to read!
I think we must delineate between ancient and modern causes and prejudices; political elites and civilian prejudices; more permanent and cyclical hatreds.
In toto, it’s tied in to everything:
Military, economic, religious, cultural, Czars vs Kings, commie vs democracy. And that’s all leaving out their proxy hatreds via the US “special relationship”.
Personally, I think its intractable, irrespective of “original” reasons. The MSM narratives today are so resolute about Russia=Putin=Evil Dictator=Poisoning KGB=Euro Invader=Corrupt Drunkards=Cyber Sabateurs=Spies in Every Embassy=Energy Weaponisers=Nuclear Loonies, and so on.
Funnily, they and the US are now ramping up the same fears about China. It’s just the way of jealous imperialists. Gotta have a baddie cos means we are the goodies.
There’s just no hope for sense, EVER again after this SMO.

Posted by: Englishman in NY | Jan 4 2025 5:59 utc | 200