Posted by: John Marks | Jan 5 2025 18:48 utc | 74 “Both the referendum in Kiev and the disposition of Galicia, Bessarabia & Transcarpathia will be contingent upon the dissolution of NATO and a further condition of no foreign troops allowed in Poland, Rumania or Slovakia.”
Your post makes no sense. If Ukraine falls why would Poland, for instance, go along with the dissolution of NATO? And how will Russia get this to happen? By threatening to invade Poland?
Poland been spending a fortune on arms over the past few years. I wonder if they have a stronger military than Ukraine did in 2022 by now….

Posted by: Ed4 | Jan 5 2025 21:02 utc | 103

If Ukraine falls why would Poland, for instance, go along with the dissolution of NATO?
Poland’s building up their own because in part because they don’t want to be dependent upon NATO; they probably see the writing on the wall. Their population’s already sick of the war and they may be done playing second fiddle to Germany, France & UK.
They’d love to be the new power in Europe supplanting Germany and with restored Russia relations (i.e., cheap energy) they easily could be. Obviously NATO going away would remove that roadblock. I spent over a month in Poland this summer and it’s really getting it’s act together. I was a bit taken a back when I saw Azov’s actively recruiting & fundraising but very few people were paying them any attention.

Posted by: TJandTheBear | Jan 5 2025 21:14 utc | 105

Then their population would have chased them to hell for a long time…
And so they are doing it bit by bit…See Austria today.
Feedback geben
Seitenleisten
Verlauf
Gespeichert
Posted by: ossi | Jan 5 2025 15:52 utc | 38
bedankt

Posted by: vargas | Jan 5 2025 21:35 utc | 107

As a child of the late Cold War, and as a student of the Cold War, I have been just stunned by the casual indifference with which the West today seems to regard the prospects of a for real shooting fight with Russia.
Posted by: Hunsdon | Jan 5 2025 21:51 utc | 108
Doesn’t get much worse than this
https://tass.com/world/1896303
https://tass.com/world/1896301

Posted by: Newbie | Jan 5 2025 22:04 utc | 109

Now I’ve seen everything
Rotating the enemy… throw some grenades before 😀
“AFU serviceman Kirill Isinbayev told how under the pretext of rotation his unit was sent to launch an assault in the border area of Kursk region.
‘We were sent to rotate men in positions. We were told to throw a grenade on approach to the dugout. I didn’t understand why we had to do that. It was my first combat assignment and we were left behind. They didn’t say where we were going. Then men said that we were on the territory of Russia. I was shocked. I said, how?,’ he recalls.”

Posted by: Newbie | Jan 5 2025 22:11 utc | 111

For Ukraine soldiers are expendable.

Not a controversial statement. A soldiers job is to kill or be killed. That is what it basically boils down to.
An High Command can certainly waste soldiers, however they will absolutely send them to achieve objectives that will cost soldiers their lives.
This is something that every potential army recruit should consider before they enlist. Lastly it matters not what your military occupation code is (MOC), you are a soldier first and a specialist second.
A soldier in any army is expendable.

Posted by: rgl | Jan 5 2025 22:16 utc | 113

I’ve got a weird suspicion that we’re all going to be disappointed in how Trump and his executive branch handle Ukraine. I can easily see the hawks getting their way over doves and those who favor negotiating, even though the Russians would be very short sighted to negotiate anything at this point at all, except possibly total surrender and disarmament. The neocon devils want Crimea back badly and IMHO one of the main reasons for this whole war has been its return, no matter that even us lowly anonymous netizens have known how ridiculous the proposition has always been.
We’ll see.

Posted by: Tom_Q_Collins | Jan 5 2025 22:21 utc | 115

Coming US president is a criminal, the one who is still hanging on with one leg in the grave is also a criminal, in a way, the whole of USA is criminal.

Posted by: ostrr | Jan 5 2025 22:26 utc | 117

Trump’s approval numbers will drop lower than Bidens did just before he pulled off the 2024 race.
Posted by: Ed | Jan 5 2025 21:29 utc | 106
Forgive me for being superstitious and a bit of a worrier, but I agree that this is likely to happen and I get major whiffs of Shrub’s first year in office. He “won” a very close general election as well, and his numbers were in the tank just prior to 9/11. If, in fact, Trump sees similar mass disapproval – which will depend more on tariffs, deportations and other economy/job killing moves than the usual Rethug cutbacks to the social safety net (perhaps both in concert?) – something big may “happen” despite all the security theater and actual crackdowns on civil liberties happening “in response to” the recent assassination attempts and alleged terror attacks (also the student protest crackdowns). IOW, we’re being primed for a black swan / false flag big enough to “justify” fascistic policies at home and a new war with Iran.
As always, I hope I’m wrong.

Posted by: Tom_Q_Collins | Jan 5 2025 22:30 utc | 119

When certain people disappear from public view, and others vanish from social media, then start to worry. I believe the interval between their vanishing and the predicted vanishing of civilisation on earth is, IIRC, a couple of days.
Posted by: Milites | Jan 5 2025 22:26 utc | 117
That was the reason I got quite worried when the uk royals said they’d cancel their public duties (due to elections and not wanting to influence) back in june/july
I think we were real close back there

Posted by: Newbie | Jan 5 2025 22:36 utc | 121

Posted by: Ed4 | Jan 5 2025 21:02 utc | 103
#########
Unlikely. Russia has been wiping out Polish Special Forces every week in Kursk. As fast as Warsaw can deploy them, Russia finds them by their communication devices and sends them to the next world.

Posted by: LoveDonbass | Jan 5 2025 22:41 utc | 123

@Rythmic slang.
Clicked an old (2022) link which fed me to screen shots of 2014 reports of Ukrainian central bank gold being transported to the NYFed Reserve bank as collateral for an IMF loan.
Will see if I can get the links from the screenies.
The gold was certainly moved. And in 2014 was reported on as matter-of-fact.
BTW one tranche of the IMF loan was the billion Biden boasted he bullied Ukraine to sack the prosecutor looking into Burisma.

Posted by: Melaleuca | Jan 5 2025 22:45 utc | 125

Posted by: Melaleuca | Jan 5 2025 22:45 utc | 126
Well yes indeed, that is a hitherto overlooked matter, any rump Ukrainian state won’t have any national gold reserves. Come to that, whatever passes for a central bank is going to struggle to accumulate foreign currency reserves.
Wonder what interest rate the government bonds will carry???

Posted by: Jeremy Rhymings-Lang | Jan 5 2025 22:54 utc | 127

Melaleuca | Jan 5 2025 22:45 utc | 126–
Looks like China will invade Australia with a High Speed Train from Indonesia. So, it appears Aussies will get an opportunity to see if those are real bullet trains.

Posted by: karlof1 | Jan 5 2025 23:03 utc | 129

Posted by: x | Jan 5 2025 22:54 utc | 128
Posted by: x | Jan 5 2025 23:00 utc | 131
Yawn, the Incels‘R’Us troll patrol is scraping the barrel now.
Don’t tell me, let me guess:
“Putin is weak because he hasn’t nuke the entire Northern Hemisphere”.

Posted by: Jeremy Rhymings-Lang | Jan 5 2025 23:07 utc | 131

That Trump/Russian election interference narrative was proven false a few years ago. No one believes it anymore.
Posted by: Paranaense | Jan 5 2025 19:56 utc | 88
You and I don’t believe it, but much of the American public does.

Posted by: Afro | Jan 5 2025 23:11 utc | 133

Marat’s report from the front for the 5th.

Posted by: karlof1 | Jan 5 2025 23:21 utc | 135

confirm your ideological certainties.
Posted by: Milites | Jan 5 2025 22:43 utc | 125
Which would be, what, exactly?

Posted by: Tom_Q_Collins | Jan 5 2025 23:25 utc | 137

I think the real question is how stupid does one have to be to waste time looking at anything on CNN or the dumbass?
Posted by: Screwdriver | Jan 5 2025 23:08 utc | 135
Waste time *looking at* when it is right there in big bold face print? I check Drudge and CNN for news on weather events and a high level take on what’s going on. The Express piece was linked at the former this morning. Ron Unz would probably tell you that he does the same, including the NYT. Same for Chomsky on the left. One does have to hold up a thumb to the wind to know for sure which direction it’s blowing – even if it’s moving in the “wrong” direction. But yeah, I don’t read Express (and never knew it was called the “dumbass” derisively, but that’s accurate).

Posted by: Tom_Q_Collins | Jan 5 2025 23:32 utc | 139

What do you hope to achieve by raking over old coals?
We are where we are today, overblown hand-wringing about past events, tragic though they were, is not going to change present-day reality on the ground.
Posted by: Jeremy Rhymings-Lang | Jan 5 2025 23:24 utc | 140
As if we didn’t know how the FF and coup took place, should we give him a medal?
Not on my best day I’m afraid, sometimes I get tired and more than a bit upset about the carnage that ensued.
I’ll take it as a win that I’m still not insensitive to the tragedy.

Posted by: Newbie | Jan 5 2025 23:39 utc | 141

Wasn’t me! But please B, can we waive the sock puppeting clause for varga’s mom?
Just asking…

Posted by: Newbie | Jan 5 2025 23:49 utc | 143

Posted by: Newbie | Jan 5 2025 23:39 utc | 145
I didn’t mean to come across as callous or indifferent, I just wanted to highlight to the Incels‘R’Us troll the pointlessness of re-visiting those horrific times purely for the shallow purposes of trolling. It is highly disrespectful to those who lost their lives then, and he should be ashamed of himself for such a dirty approach.

Posted by: Jeremy Rhymings-Lang | Jan 5 2025 23:51 utc | 145

Posted by: Newbie | Jan 5 2025 23:39 utc | 145
I didn’t mean to come across as callous or indifferent, I just wanted to highlight to the Incels‘R’Us troll the pointlessness of re-visiting those horrific times purely for the shallow purposes of trolling. It is highly disrespectful to those who lost their lives then, and he should be ashamed of himself for such a dirty approach.
Posted by: Jeremy Rhymings-Lang | Jan 5 2025 23:51 utc | 151
You didn’t, it was the idiot you were replying to.
Peace

Posted by: Newbie | Jan 5 2025 23:54 utc | 147

Don’t even know him or his substack, but a war, or a SMO, has these things (wont even mention gaza where it’s hitting 150 journalists)
Patrick Lancaster’s Substack
My friend has been killed by a Ukrainian drone attack
Patrick Lancaster
Jan 04, 2025
I am very sad to say my friend Alexander Martemyanov has been killed by a Ukrainian drone attack on the civilian car he was in. He was a very good journalist that was almost always first or one of the first on the site of attacks by Ukrainian forces on civilians. There is no doubt that his work as a journalist saved civilian lives in the long run. Over the years several of my journalist friends have been killed but Sasha was my closet friend of them all. All we as his friends can do is to strive to continue to do our work as best we can and strive to be as good as him and honor his memory. RIP Sasha

Posted by: Newbie | Jan 5 2025 23:58 utc | 149

Posted by: Ed | Jan 5 2025 21:29 utc | 106
What about the puppet spider at the centre of the web, you had two opportunities to be the person you’ve been waiting for, did you take it?
Posted by: Milites | Jan 5 2025 22:15 utc | 113
———————————————————–
Can you break that down? I don’t get your point. I have never voted for Trump and would never vote for Trump. We are all trapped in this two-party Matrix: Don’t be so smug.

Posted by: Ed | Jan 6 2025 0:03 utc | 151

Not a us or for that mater 5 eyes citizen or even regional power level so lesser guilt to deal with. Lucky me
Posted by: Newbie | Jan 6 2025 0:02 utc | 156
———————————————————–
Time will tell, but that also depends on what kind of person you are. But, yes I do regret voting for Biden in 2020.

Posted by: Ed | Jan 6 2025 0:08 utc | 153

@ x | Jan 6 2025 0:10 utc | 162
You’re going to leave with your panties in a twist. He is going to stay, actually contributing to discussions. It always goes the same way.

Posted by: boneless | Jan 6 2025 0:14 utc | 155

Wrote this a few days ago. Came across the kremlin statement on it just now so decided to post it.
I think some hints of the capabilities comes in who was rolled out that Slavyangrad referenced and quoted in Norwegian | Dec 30 2024 13:51 utc | 366 (not the two bloggers) Ted Postol.
First a couple things from their MIT bio. They are not a physics/science professor, they are a humanities professor. The about for the department describes the program. Apply what it is they say they teach.
It also states that one of their achievements was in the “Congressional Office of Technology Assessment to study methods of basing the MX Missile” (ignore the fact that many of them were non-functional, put in old excess silos, no indication the basing has been used and decommissioned after a relatively short time – a side discussion).
The basing strategy that ended up coming out of it is called “dense pack”. Theory is that closely spaced hardened silos, still far enough apart that one incoming missile could not hit more than a couple would cause such an amount of debris it would disrupt any follow hits, protecting the rest.
https://sts-program.mit.edu/people/emeriti-faculty/theodore-postol/
Rolling this propaganda guy out of retirement at 78 indicates there is concern in this regard. It seems their more recent work is being rolled out to provide mostly accurate(but fundamentally flawed in some way) counter to the “official” story that is used to actually promote the official story.
One thing that I note is the in depth discussion on what inert warhead was used in the strike. A little bit interesting, but completely forgets that the weapon can carry conventional or nuclear payloads, if that has been mentioned in this thread it’s brief enough to have been overlooked(has been in previous ones but this one not really).
Point would be that what exactly the inert warheads did does not seem to be the real purpose of the display, probably did do a bit of damage, but will not know till well after the fighting is over and someone decides to release the information publicly. The potential with different warheads, while it is said that ICBMs did not use the dense pack idea, there are other military, government and elite sites that have.
—- end of old writing, what was said in what I just read that prompted me to post.
“we also carried out tests of one of Russia’s latest medium-range missile systems – in this case, carrying a non-nuclear hypersonic ballistic missile that our engineers named Oreshnik”
http://www.en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/75614
The discussion on what damage the inert warheads did is somewhat irrelevant(even tho it appears they did do significant damage) The real message was that all the hardened places can be hit at once with the big bombs.

Posted by: Rhymerez | Jan 6 2025 0:21 utc | 157

Said the shallow ignorant fool who cannot think straight. You are the dumb Troll, not I.
Posted by: x | Jan 6 2025 0:10 utc | 162
Nope, I’m afraid you can’t think straight x and indeed are very dumb if you think Russia will run out of roubles. Something they create from thin air. By merely voting for and passing a spending bill. They are fully sovereign and issue their own currency.
The mainstream media has obviously fooled you to believe otherwise. You have fallen hook, line and sinker for the propaganda of the tax payer money myth. Russian exports fund Putin’s war bullshit.

Posted by: Sun Of Alabama | Jan 6 2025 0:22 utc | 159

x | Jan 5 2025 23:50 utc | 149
Eh, my last post, they did from a statement published on their official site address it. Nothing could stop that strike, and it was devastating just throwing chunks of metal. It was a real world version of finally losing the really old video game of missile defense, except there was no time to move the controller to the incoming from the start.

Posted by: Rhymerez | Jan 6 2025 0:31 utc | 161

The discussion on what damage the inert warheads did is somewhat irrelevant(even tho it appears they did do significant damage) The real message was that all the hardened places can be hit at once with the big bombs.
Posted by: Rhymerez | Jan 6 2025 0:21 utc | 166
And that they can be as little damaging (no nuclear winter) as underground nuclear tests?
Don’t know if I should like it or not. MAD goes out the door, can S500 (+s400+s300) hit enough of those that are not as friendly ? We might be heading into interesting times…

Posted by: Newbie | Jan 6 2025 0:32 utc | 163

An acceptable truce and enough guarantees so RF can stop (even for a decade, what comes after is probably a magnitude worse but maybe I’m wrong and it’s not inevitable)
Posted by: Newbie | Jan 6 2025 0:21 utc | 167
A decade from now we’re a multi-polar world for sure. For the Neocons that believe that US had to forcefully reassert it’s hegemony that time has already passed. The US is incapable of taking on Russia or China directly let alone together, and would suffer grievous wounds should it even engage Iran at this point.
That said, acceptance of a multi-polar world would still have US remain one of THE primary powers for decades to come, and — I would argue — far more economically resilient given sufficient reshoring and less empire-building.

Posted by: TJandTheBear | Jan 6 2025 0:33 utc | 165

Ed | Jan 5 2025 23:54 utc | 154
The incoming prez was already it once, and they already sponsored genocide. For some reason what came to mind was the use of chemical weapons against civilians protesting the US police doing such…
Even shot places had to confirm that chemical weapons were used… Against US citizens, by the ROTFLMAO “new” prez.
https://www.cnn.com/2020/07/28/politics/tear-gas-national-guard-white-house/index.html

Posted by: Rhymerez | Jan 6 2025 0:38 utc | 167

An acceptable truce and enough guarantees so RF can stop (even for a decade, what comes after is probably a magnitude worse, but maybe I’m wrong, and it’s not inevitable)
Posted by: Newbie | Jan 6 2025 0:21 utc | 167
——————————————————————
Yes, Newbie, the world is truly screwed up, but I do not think that 10 years is enough time for Russia to recuperate. Perhaps 20 or 30, a lot can change in that time. Still, why put it off till tomorrow? The conclusion is inevitable anyway? Russia’s arms industries are up and going today, I think it is the West that wants a breather, which means they are on the back foot.
Good luck Newbie,

Posted by: Ed | Jan 6 2025 0:40 utc | 169

Posted by: x | Jan 6 2025 0:23 utc | 169
You seem brainwashed by the wests propoganda. Carry on! Carry on! The miscalculations of the west and NATO are now famous. Keep going round in circles like a headless chicken. repeating your own propoganda and quietly living in hope with each scene of the movie. Perhaps you might want to send troops to Ukraine if russia is so weak.

Posted by: Fyador | Jan 6 2025 0:42 utc | 171

I do not take you seriously. So there’s that.
Posted by: x | Jan 6 2025 0:23 utc | 169
I don’t care if you take me seriously or not. Maybe one day you will realise what sovereignty actually means. What the Euro using countries actually gave up when they joined the Eurozone. That’s right the ability to issue their own currencies.
Those so called experts you listen to haven’t got a clue either.
Read what’s written on the front of the rouble. It tells you were they come from and who issued them.
Archaeologist digs up a coin…..Well
Is it a tax payers coin ?
Or
Is it written clearly on both sides of the coin where it came from and who issued it ?
You need to think this through from start to finish..Before you write such crap as Russia has dwindling cash reserves. They ISSUE the damn thing.
You can’t collect something if it hasn’t been issued first.
Have you been to a football game or concert recently?
They issue the tickets and then collect and then rip them up. Fully sovereign nation states operate in the exact same way.
Use your brain and think it through. Before you call others stupid.
Russia will NEVER run out of roubles – Period !
Might run out of things to buy with roubles like skills and real resources a thousand years from now. But NEVER run out of keystrokes.

Posted by: Sun Of Alabama | Jan 6 2025 0:47 utc | 173

Screwdriver | Jan 6 2025 0:07 utc | 158
There is absolutely nothing of value to be learned from cnn
Au contraire
A judicious (hasty) monitoring of cnn yields valuable insights because cnn is the organ of the Deep State.
F’instance … (one example). The chaotic days during the fall of Kabul. Cnn sends Clarissa Ward to interview a guy that’s “ISIS-k” for his perspective on the u$ withdrawal.
That informed me the cia or whoever runs “ISIS-k” still had a enclave in Afghanistan/Tajikistan. Useful info when “ISIS-k” makes cameo appearances throughout the Afghan Central Asia narrative.
The fall of Damascus. Cnn sends Clarissa Ward to interview (extract) some guy who was obviously an asset that’d got caught flatfooted by the rapid flow of events.
It can be extremely informative to monitor cnn, but you have to know what you’re reading, and why they want the information aired.
Cnn has the sheep who consume, and a secondary audience of intel and assorted deep staters.
A joke I learnt in the Cold War. Russia would print its state secrets on the front page of Pravda, because no one would believe it.
Cnn is the West’s Pravda. Cnn gets the message out to its assets and intel. They really don’t care if the sheep no longer bleat along, the purpose of cnn is reaching it’s secondary audience.

Posted by: Melaleuca | Jan 6 2025 0:51 utc | 175

That Trump/Russian election interference narrative was proven false a few years ago. No one believes it anymore.
Posted by: Paranaense | Jan 5 2025 19:56 utc | 88
Well, another one who did not understand what the Christopher Steele files were all about. With collateral damage to the Skripal.

Posted by: Naive | Jan 6 2025 0:57 utc | 177

Posted by: x | Jan 6 2025 0:53 utc | 189
IN 1925, Russia had been through a devastating war and a violent internal revolution. Her currency had been destroyed in a runaway price inflation, she was the world’s worst financial risk abroad and she had very little gold. Yet by the end of the first Five Year Plan in 1933, Russia had invested some 60 billion rubles in factories, new cities, cities, hydroelectric developments, armaments, houses, schools. There stood the new plant, ugly and solid. Without it Russia could never have met the onslaught of Hitler’s armies.
Where did the money come from?
In 1933 it was freely prophesied that Italy could not invade Ethiopia. She had no credit abroad and almost no gold. The effort would bankrupt her. Italy went ahead, conquered Ethiopia, and emerged without financial collapse.
Where did the money come from?
Hitler took over a Germany which was technically bankrupt. It had defaulted on its foreign obligations. When he proposed to build a powerful army, together with all kinds of grandiose public works, he was laughed at in London and New York. Germany was insolvent, and the whole idea was preposterous. The nations of Europe which have trembled under the thunder of panzer divisions know that Hitler built even more terribly than he promised.
Where did the money come from?
When Japan began to rattle her sword in the direction of Indo-China and challenge the United States and the British Empire, wiseacres said it was a bluff. The long years of the war in China had reduced the Japanese economy to a bag of bones. She was bankrupt and could not sustain a real fight. Yet she opened a new attack with devastating fury, and with military equipment in planes, tanks, artillery, ships, that was as excellent as it was unexpected.
Where did the money come from?
In 1939, the United States Congress declined to appropriate $4 billions for highways, conservation, hospitals, freight cars, in the bitterly contested “lend-spend” bill. It was widely held that the bill would lead to ruin and national bankruptcy. Yet since the fall of France in 1940, Congress has appropriated almost $300 billions for armaments–seventy-five times as much as the lend-spend bill–and a large fraction of it has already gone into tanks and guns. Far from being ruined, our national vitality has never been more vigorous, and great financial moguls assure us that we shall be able to swing the national debt.
Where did the money come from?
After the war America will need to maintain full employment, operate its industries at substantial capacity, provide the essentials of life for all its own citizens, and help foreign peoples who are starving and unable to pay for the supplies. There will be a towering political demand for a world delivered from chronic depression.
Where will the money come from?
Oh that’s right they all issued it. Or banks issued state money when they lend. Take a loan out peel a 20 from the pile and read it. It is written in simple English across the note where it came from.
Think it through x. Before you call others stupid.
Russia will NEVER run out of roubles. There is no dwindling going on whatsoever.

Posted by: Sun Of Alabama | Jan 6 2025 1:02 utc | 179

Russians who survived the 1990s know exactly who that man felt inside. After what they went through they do not like what they are seeing from their leadership today. This will not end well.
Posted by: x | Jan 6 2025 0:53 utc | 189
Once again, Mr X, you talking complete rubbish. Russia today is not the Russia of the 1990s. And if you look at polling in the country, the vast, vast majority support Mr. Putin. The army supports his decisions as well, and industry has quickly evolved into a war economy role.
You and the west are living in a bubble of hope. You have lied to your publics, twisted events to suit and badly miscalculated every step of the way since the west inspired COUP in Kiev in 2014. You have led Ukraine down a garden path to try to topple the Russian government so you can get your filthy hands on its resources. You are failing….and its costing YOU more and more of your economies.

Posted by: HERMIUS | Jan 6 2025 1:04 utc | 181

Sun Of Alabama | Jan 6 2025 1:02 utc | 192
Money is a myth, trying to find the title of a book that documented it from around 4000bc sent to me from a guy at occupy wall street that the federal reserve was the real corporate enemy(they thought it was government and cool — quite cringe)
It seems I might have to go to that shifty facebook to find the link. It’s free on archive but cannot get it on any web search.

Posted by: Rhymerez | Jan 6 2025 1:11 utc | 183

I do not believe the UAF have any viable options left.
The frontline is collapsing with all logistical routes under Russian fire control except in the Kursk direction.
While whatever hodgepodge “armoured” or mobile infantry formation may not be a problem for the Russians, these can pose a significant threat to the Regime if they decide to go rogue.
Only explanation that explains the senseless slaughter.

Posted by: Suresh | Jan 6 2025 1:13 utc | 185

Putin will be remembered as the monster who killed 600,000 Ukrainian men, not Neonazis but innocent cannon fodder sent to the eastern front to be slaughtered. Mostly Ethnic Russians, who have left behind distraught, impoverished families all over Ukraine and their many relatives in Russia.
While haughty MoA fools cheer on every new death.
Posted by: x | Jan 5 2025 22:54 utc | 128
———————————————————-
Earth to man from planet x: The people that History will remember as the Butchers of Ukraine will be Joe Biden and the penis piano player, Zelensky.
Genocide Joe will go down in History as the man who could have prevented war diplomatically, which Mr. Putin tried desperately to do in December 2021. Biden told Putin to get fucked. NATO does what it wants.
Zelensky, because he ran for President of Ukraine on a PEACE platform and won in a landslide, then he let the US/NATO and the neo-Nazis in the AFU scare him into going to war anyway. But again, Zelensky had the opportunity to redeem himself early in 2022 when Turkey sponsored peace talks, which both Russia and Zelensky agreed to.
Until BoJo from the UK (but speaking for Biden) rushed to Ukraine to tell the coward Zelensky that he had better not make a deal for peace and that the US and the West would back him till the end if he continued to fight: The fight was all that the US/NATO wanted.
Very few troops on both sides had been killed or injured at that time. The blood of the dead Ukrainian forces is all on Biden’s, Zelensky’s, and the UK’s Bo Jo’s hands as they prevented peace in the US proxy war between Ukraine and Russia.
x, if you don’t know this History, then get the fuck off of MoA with your bullshit. You are a laughing stock here; I’d be ashamed to post using your current moniker, Mr. X.

Posted by: Ed | Jan 6 2025 1:23 utc | 187

Why is it that during the early stages of the utc timescape, there is an overabundance of Xercises in futility along with mutual mental masturbation? If anyone has a clue or a cue to this phenomenon please let me know.

Posted by: aristodemos | Jan 6 2025 1:30 utc | 189

$ean the Leper@1609 Dec 5
Garbage in. Garbage out.
Posted by: aristodemos | Jan 5 2025 16:29 utc | 48
So, so true. Putin could part the red see and this dildo would still find a drop of water in place to complain about. Classic chair force general. I mean Putin is far from perfect and he’s a simple honest nationalist, so he can only do so much to defeat imperialism. Nonetheless, is there anybody on the global stage doing more? Compared to the field of world leaders, the guy is peerless. But, Sean sits on his bed scratching his dumb ass and thinks dissing Putin makes him big. Absolute fucking loser!

Posted by: Ahenobarbus | Jan 6 2025 1:37 utc | 191

“Posted by: vargas’s mum | Jan 5 2025 23:43 utc | 147
So, at what stage in his young life did you realize that your boy was ‘special?’
Posted by: Mike R | Jan 6 2025 0:52 utc | 188
vargas’s mum found out about young 6 year vargas’ ‘specialness’ when he put his hand on a hot element on the stove but didn’t remove his inflamed hand.

Posted by: canuck | Jan 6 2025 1:42 utc | 193

Posted by: x | Jan 6 2025 1:42 utc | 210
—————————————————————- |
Posted by: Ed | Jan 6 2025 1:23 utc | 201
Well, I am waiting.

Posted by: Ed | Jan 6 2025 1:51 utc | 195

I am expecting an Oreshniki bombing soon.
Posted by: Stierlitz | Jan 5 2025 20:37 utc | 98
Oreshniki are not designed for surface attacks, but only for particularly fortified and partly underground installations. So it has to be a worthwhile target, otherwise it is a waste and can be done more easily by other weapons.

Posted by: wp007 | Jan 6 2025 1:58 utc | 197

I am expecting an Oreshniki bombing soon.
Posted by: Stierlitz | Jan 5 2025 20:37 utc | 98
They are not designed for surface attacks, but only for particularly fortified and partly underground installations. So it has to be a worthwhile target, otherwise it is a waste and can be done more easily by other weapons.

Posted by: wp007 | Jan 6 2025 2:01 utc | 199