Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
March 2, 2024
Ukraine SitRep: Retreat Continues For Lack Of Defense Lines

On February 17, after Ukrainian units in Avdeevka had started to leave their position, the commander-in-chief of the Ukrainian army, General Syrski, announced a retreat to new defense lines:

"Based on the operational situation around Avdiivka, in order to avoid encirclement and preserve the lives and health of the military, I decided to withdraw our units from the city and move to defense on more favorable lines," Syrskyi said.

He emphasized that Ukrainian soldiers had fulfilled their duty with dignity, did their best to destroy the best Russian military units and inflicted significant losses in manpower and equipment on the enemy.

"The lives of servicemen are the highest value. We will take back Avdiivka anyway," the Chief added.

As some had already predicted it turned out that the "more favorable lines" Syrski promoted did not exist.

On February 17, the same day Syrski announced the retreat, Strana already reported on the lack of new defense lines (machine translation):

Ukrainian photographers Konstantin and Vlada Liberov, who document the war, wonder around which Ukrainian city, next after Avdiivka, the Russians will try to push through the defense of the Armed Forces of Ukraine.

They report this in their Instagram.

"So what is the next "fortetsia" – Pokrovsk? Or just Konstantinovka?", – write Liberov, criticizing the command of the Armed Forces of Ukraine because of the lack of a second line of defense in Avdiivka.

"Where is the second line of defense? If you use the Deepstate map, "claws" around the city began to form almost a year ago. It certainly wasn't a surprise. So where's the second line of defense?" The Liberovs ask themselves.

"While the military was waiting for weapons for the Zaporozhye counteroffensive, the enemy passed through the fields, concreted trenches, built entire underground cities… Why didn't we do the same in Avdiivka? Moreover, a blind defense, the purpose of which is to deplete the enemy's forces, is like our official strategy.

Others confirmed the observation (machine translation):

West of Avdiivka, no significant defense line has been built for Ukrainian troops, and the Russian army continues to advance.

This was announced by the editor-in-chief of Censor, Yuri Butusov, following his trip to this area.

"There are no words. Gap: here in Kiev, the supreme commander-in-chief says one thing, but at the front something completely different is happening. I want to say that no field lines of fortifications have been built beyond Avdiivka so far. I saw Russian drones attacking our soldiers in their burrows in the middle of a field, " Butusov said.

According to him, no conclusions are drawn from previous failures.

"If the government can't find builders to build at least basic rear lines of defense, if they can't find engineers to maintain modern equipment, drones, sensors, communications, if they can't find workers and technologists to produce ammunition, then there will never be enough attack aircraft," the journalist added.

The government claimed to have allocated money to local authorities for building defense lines. But such money always seem to drain away before the first fortification gets finished.

A lack of serious organization and incompetence add to the picture (machine translation):

In the absence of fortified trenches in the east of the country, the engineering services of the Armed Forces of Ukraine are to blame.

This was stated in the social network X military engineer with the nickname Corsair.

As stated in a series of his posts, the heads of engineering services of brigades "do not know how to plan ahead and do not submit requests on time."

"When I arrive at a place, I have neither a map nor a proper justification. As a rule, they say: "We need to dig from that stump to planting." But that's not how it works. The defense should be solid, " Korsar wrote.

According to him, engineers do not have wood and concrete either, because "the brigades do not have the willpower to insist on this, and the AHS (operational-tactical group – Ed. ) do not have money."

For construction equipment, you need to sign contracts with businesses, but no one does this.

Since the loss of Avdeevka the Ukrainian forces had to fall back again and again. There are no natural barriers that could be used for defenses and there is no equipment and material to build defense lines across bare land.

Today even the New York Times took note of this:

Surprisingly Weak Ukrainian Defenses Help Russian Advance (archived) – New York Times, Mar 2 2024

Russian forces continue to make small but rapid gains outside of the eastern Ukrainian city of Avdiivka, attributable in part to dwindling Ukrainian ammunition and declining Western aid.

But there’s another reason the Kremlin’s troops are advancing in the area: poor Ukrainian defenses.

Sparse, rudimentary trench lines populate the area west of Avdiivka that Ukraine is trying to defend, according to a Times review of imagery by Planet Labs, a commercial satellite company. These trench lines lack many of the additional fortifications that could help slow Russian tanks and help defend major roads and important terrain.

Avdiivka became the site of a fierce standoff over the last nine months, emerging as one of the bloodiest battles of the war. When Russia captured the city on Feb. 17, its first major gain since last May, the Ukrainian Army claimed it had secured defensive lines outside the city.

But Russian troops have captured three villages to the west of Avdiivka in the span of a week, and they are contesting at least one other.

Avdeevka Feb 17 2024

bigger
Avdeevka Mar 2 2024

bigger

The Ukraine friendly Live UA map from where the above maps were copied is not fully up to date. The town Orlivka, still shown as Ukrainian, is already in Russian hands.

The next geographic feature that might be useful for defense is the north-to-south river and reservoir line 12 kilometer west of Orlivka. Nothing in between was prepared for a serious defense. It can not be held against any serious attacker:

Ukrainian commanders have had ample time to prepare defenses outside Avdiivka. The area has been under attack since 2014, and Ukraine has had a tenuous hold on it since Russia launched its full-scale invasion two years ago.

But the Ukrainian defenses outside Avdiivka show rudimentary earthen fortifications, often with a connecting trench for infantry troops to reach firing positions closest to the enemy, but little else.

But instead acknowledging that and instead of retreating to that river line the Ukrainian command is again throwing reserves into the already crumbling defenses.

Mr. Hrabskyi said Russia was currently preventing Ukrainian troops from shoring up their defenses by relentlessly bombarding them, including with powerful glide bombs carrying hundreds of tons of explosives that can smash through even well-prepared fortifications.

“The quality of these defensive lines cannot be good enough to resist massive bulldozer tactics by the Russian forces,” Mr. Hrabskyi said.

The current political uproar in Europe and the U.S. about the war in Ukraine is an acknowledgment of the fact that Russia is certain to win this fight. I do not expect any serious consequences coming from it.

It will simply take a few more weeks of discussions until resignation sets in.

Comments

The latest theory making the rounds is that it was the British who blew up North stream, by using their specialized divers carried by a submarine. Reasonable supposition, considering they are probably behind the sea-drone attacks as well.
Posted by: Stonebird | Mar 2 2024 21:34 utc | 89
———————————————————–
New to me. I am still going with Occam’s Razor (Acco shaves with recycled nuclear submarines. Gilette buys the hulls, HY80 and HY100 are phenomenal steel alloys). The USS Kearsarge was in the Baltic and with its amphibious dock by far the best platform for delivering and supporting a covert diving team.
The Baltic is too shallow for sub operations. The Kearsarge was there legitimately on a NATO exercise. If you are familiar with Operation Ivy Bells in the Sea of Okhotsk it is phenomenal what the US Navy can do.

Posted by: Acco Hengst | Mar 2 2024 22:03 utc | 101

Weather in Eastern Ukraine continues warmer and much drier than average. have not seen any rasputitsa photos recently, by the ten day forecast we won’t.

Posted by: oldhippie | Mar 2 2024 22:04 utc | 102

Russia is left with no other option at this point.
Posted by: shаdοwbanned | Mar 2 2024 19:28 utc | 53
Another stupid comment showing the lack of imagination. Of course there are other options. This s-o-b- is really asking for a genocide.
Posted by: Naive | Mar 2 2024 19:34 utc | 56

Note that de-Ukrainization is not a genocide and nobody is advocating for one.
Was Ukrainization a genocide? Putin intervened to stop it from becoming one, but up to that point it wasn’t. It was mostly mass brainwashing, not genocide.
Now the goal will be to run the process in reverse, i.e. control the educational system, the media and the history books, and things will revert back to what they were eventually. It will take several generations, but given that the Little Russians had a sufficiently weak identity to be easily Ukrainized, presumably the reverse should be doable too.
Sure, there is a certain population that needs to be physically removed from the territory because they are incorrigible, but this is what the war is supposed to be doing, and they are far from being the majority.

Posted by: shаdοwbanned | Mar 2 2024 22:06 utc | 103

Patroklos | Mar 2 2024 21:48 utc | 95
Looks like we were writing down the same thoughts at the same time. I guess though the real unknown at the moment is the amount of desperation the western elite will go to to stave off their own collapse.

Posted by: Peter AU1 | Mar 2 2024 22:10 utc | 104

If the meeting of German air force officers included top civilian authorities, there would be cause for concern. The fact that it was an internal meeting means they were just ‘spitballing’ since nothing else has worked. How many Leopards have the Germans lost so far? The ONLY way the Kerch bridge can be seriously damaged is if a NATO country controls the entire operation, which is unlikely, and even then I doubt that any EU country has the means to do more than short term damage to the bridge. One of them suggested that 10 to 10 Taurus missiles would have to hit the bridge. Assuming that no more than 10% of the missiles launched can get through Russia’s AD, that would require a massive strike of 100 – 200 missiles. These guy are just pissing into the wind. They know that options A through Z haven’t worked, and they are freaking out.
It must suck to be Germany. First the CIA during Obama presidency was listening in on Merkel’s phone conversations. Then the US tells them that they will send Ukraine its Abrams if Germany sends them its Leopards. Guess which tanks when to the front and got shot up. Lucy pulled the football on Charlie Brown again. Now this. Christoforou speculated that the leak may have come from Britain or France, who are outraged that Scholtzie revealed that French and British personnel are operating their weapons systems in 404. Common knowledge anyway. Maybe the fingerpointing will turn into a circular firing squad. One can hope.

Posted by: Mike R | Mar 2 2024 22:13 utc | 105

Peter AU1 | Mar 2 2024 21:53 utc | 96
Sounds good, getting a medal for shooting down yanks! Although the Japanese had a lousy reputation in Rabaul as they were not systematic and could not be relied to behave the same way each time. (Madmen)
You are almost certainly correct that families are silenced officially, and the excuse is the fiction that they “enlisted”. Which is being used a lot. However, it seems that a lot of higher ranks have gone “missing” over the last couple of years, and they are more difficult to hide.
****
I am less sure than you are that the object of hit-and-run drone terrrorism is to provoke a massive reply from Russia. Most NATO countries are now backing off any action that might get themselves in trouble. A bit of sanity creeping in at last? The UK and France (Germany as unknown for the moment) still believe they are cleverer than The Russians. But now that the UK is thinking of selling one of their aircraft carriers (and a destroyer?) because of lack of funds and manpower, and French military machines need regular cleaning and dusting to even work, one wonders what the end game is.

Posted by: Stonebird | Mar 2 2024 22:15 utc | 106

Posted by: Acco Hengst | Mar 2 2024 22:03 utc | 99
Liz Truss used her iPhone to send a message to Antony Blinken saying “It’s done” a minute after the pipeline was blown up.

Posted by: Siddhartha | Mar 2 2024 22:22 utc | 107

Posted by: Acco Hengst | Mar 2 2024 22:03 utc | 99
The Nordic Times article concluded that HMS Ambush of the British Navy sent a diver team to destroy the Nord Stream pipe.
https://twitter.com/nordictimes_com/status/1758860318359306673

Posted by: unimperator | Mar 2 2024 22:23 utc | 108

@ Peter AU1 | Mar 2 2024 22:10 utc | 102 chatting with Patroklos about the end game for empire elite
Good to read your thoughts and I just think it is coming sooner than many others.
The goal is not to get rid of capitalism (as some call it) and elites but restrict their control on greater society that puts profit ahead of public benefit. That means public finance as a utility as well as other highly directed/regulated sectors, like food, housing, transportation, communication, etc.
The dominoes are aligned and just need a little push. I say that push is going to happen when the axis of resistance wants it to happen and not aligned with the timing of any US political machinations which will be a smack in the face of empire as well….losing control of narrative.
How long will Western humanity watch barbarism without becoming such to see it stop? Maybe we need to ask China/Russia/Iran and others that question to educate us impatient types…..

Posted by: psychohistorian | Mar 2 2024 22:29 utc | 109

Acco Hengst | Mar 2 2024 22:03 utc | 99
The sub that was mentiond is HMS “Ambush”, which has some sort of addition/smaller sub on the hull for specialized divers. Re”surfaced” a couple of days before or after the attack. The “addition” was then hidden under a sort of tent when the defence secretary at that time visited it in Scotland.
Which is a really all the information I still have. The original post had details about the divers etc.
Your point about depth is well taken, and I agreee that the Kearsage was much more visible. But the increasing part that the UK is playing in the SMO makes this one more possibility to be taken into consideration.

Posted by: Stonebird | Mar 2 2024 22:33 utc | 110

Posted by: Mike R | Mar 2 2024 22:13 utc | 103
Nato has thrown countless of Storm Shadow and Taurus missiles against the Crimean bridge already, modified to be launched by the venerable Su-24. It seems to be a complete obsession for them, most recently BoJo was in Kiev again talking about ‘how Russia is vulnerable in Crimea’.
Budanov also said no civilians should be driving on the bridge.
Budanov also said that civilians should leave Crimea because it will be invaded.
So AFU sent a bunch of boats to Crimean beach, they planted a flag and ran away. Some of them were killed and some boats hunted with aircraft. More recently they made another landing attempt with the same result.
There was the bombing of the bridge, it’s been hit with the bomb in the truck, it’s been hit with the sea drone exploding on one of the pillars. It was built back up by replacing the pillar and replacing a section that was damaged.
It seems to continue being an object of obsession, continuously sucking up more strike attempts. This also leads to more risk taking and losing more AFU aircraft. I expect F-16s will be thrown in an attempt too.

Posted by: unimperator | Mar 2 2024 22:37 utc | 111

The Nuland Pyatt phone call where they are discussing who to install as the new Ukraine government.
Now the military officers conversation. US may have more quantity in the space and air based ISR, but Russia seems to have a very good intel operation, likely far better than the west.
Possibly the Russian were able to listen to that conversation by hacking a ‘smart’ phone that was at that meeting. The other option is that a German officer recorded the conversation and forwarded it to Russian intel.
Recently, a retired German officer who had been very high in Nato put out a statement and in that he saw clearly and honestly saw what was happening.
There is likely to be more of the older generation of European military officers stat speaking out as the European elite become more desperate.
Towards the end of the cold war, it became easy for western intel to enlist soviet assets due to disillusionment.
Now it will be the opposite with Russia China finding it easier to enlist western assets. On to further that is the record of prosecution and persecution of whistle blowers in the western world. Now instead of simply making government and military crimes public, many will start sending information to other powers.

Posted by: Peter AU1 | Mar 2 2024 22:39 utc | 112

In Simplicius’ new article he noted that there is a power struggle in Ukraine pretty soon as Zelensky loses legitimacy on May 20th. Any potential competition to Zelensky has been already branded as Putin dis-informants and agents.
Recalling Colonel Trukhan in the recent BMA interview, he said that if Zelensky remains in his position, it could foment more partisan movements against the regime, so it might actually work to Russian advantage.
Posted by: unimperator | Mar 2 2024 18:59 utc | 37
Zelsnskii will hold in the regime for as long as and to the extent that his American Masters say so. He could proclaim himsleve Genitalissimo And Maximum Leader For Life and the West would proclaim this The Mostest Democractic Thing Evah! until Washington decides that it wants someone else in charge.
If the next day, they decide that Zaluzhnyii is to be Gand Poobah And Exaalted Potentate, then So Let It Be Written, So Let It Be Done and that will be an example of next-level democracy until Nuland changes her mind again.

Posted by: Feral Finster | Mar 2 2024 22:46 utc | 113

Zelenski telling people not to return to Kharkov. Apparently MI6 has told him Russia is amassing a large force in that area.
Possibly Russia is planning a major push in that region, attacks into Belgarod are launched from that area, though Kharkov is not one of the regions that are now part of Russia. Or perhaps it is a means of simply tying up large Ukrainian forces in that area, with major pushes staying in the central and southern areas that are since the referendums, part of the Russian federation.

Posted by: Peter AU1 | Mar 2 2024 22:49 utc | 114

Ukrainian commanders have had ample time to prepare defenses outside Avdiivka

The snake eats its own tail… What a waste of time/energy to build defenses in the rear , “knowing” that the Ukrainian army is winning….

Posted by: Nomad | Mar 2 2024 22:56 utc | 115

Mortymer is a crank who has been peddling the Brit nuke sub theory for a while.
Has been pointed out to him several times that the Danish Straits are too shallow for a submerged transit into the Baltic Sea by a nuclear submarine. A nuke sub could potentially operate in the area where the bombs were laid, but could not get to the area, without transiting on the surface through the Straits.
Mortymer will momentarily concede the point when it is drummed into him with references and sources (he won’t bother getting any himself to prove it’s possible). Then he will shift bback to his pet theory a month later.

Posted by: Anonymous | Mar 2 2024 23:06 utc | 116

The founder of BlackRock Inc. just said the west ‘should let Russia keep Crimea and Donbass to freeze the conflict’.
Posted by: unimperator | Mar 2 2024 20:56 utc | 83

Blackwater, not Blackrock.

Posted by: Michael A | Mar 2 2024 23:06 utc | 117

b:
I agree that the Ukes did not prepare adequate second lines. It’s not news and has been well reported last few days.
All that said, the Rs are still hung up at the line of Berdychi/Orlivka/Tonenke. Been that way for few days now. And the Ukes even mounted a counterattack recently. While it was unsuccessful, this shows the Ukes have the will to fight and also the resources to do more than just simple defense.
Any way you cut it, the Rs have stalled last few days. I think they will probably break through. But nothing is certain until done and Ukes will make the Rs fight for it.
Also, we all need to watch out for those who want to be first and call captures before they happened. Kalibrated seems very prone to this. I think some of it is confusing attacks (which show contested ground, not captured) with proof of control. The other part is a tad of hopium, speculation, and wanting to be first.

Posted by: Anonymous | Mar 2 2024 23:12 utc | 118

1. A defeat of Ukraine (Russian victory) would lead to a catastrophic* crisis of legitimacy for the U.S in the eyes of the U.S’ allies.
2. It would lead to a massive crisis of confidence in the Biden administration (and the Deep State Establishment) in an election year
3. It would lead to the Russian acquisition of massive economic and geo-strategic leverage over not only The West, but over East Asia and the RoTW in general (consider the control of what is essentially the world’s grain producing heartland).
4. Rumours abound of direct American-European intervention in Ukraine to prevent the total collapse of Ukrainian forces.
5. Murmurs by the French, German and Americans about placing “boots on the ground” in Ukraine to confront the Russian Army.
6. The wealth of Western Oligarchs and Corporations is bound up in contracts with the Ukrainian government. None of which might be honoured in the event of a Russian victory over Ukraine.
7. China stands to gain leverage over the West in Ukraine via it’s partnership with Russia (BRI etc …).
8. The Western siege of North Korea will be broken – is being broken – leading to a new geopolitical force being set up in Asia to confront American ambitions in the region. Since the nuclear genie is already out of the bottle with N.K, China no longer has any incentive to assist the West in it’s slow strangulation of N.K. It will enlist North Korean help to a much greater degree in opposing American Hegemony in the Far East, easing any future attempts to unite Taiwan with the Chinese Mainland.
9. Europe is collapsing financially, politically, industrially and militarily: The American strategy of weakening it’s closest allies will explode in it’s face as the Europeans will not be able to act as an effective buffer to Russian influence on the European continent.
10. Turkey, a NATO puppet, will see it’s influence in the Black Sea massively reduced as Russia takes control (“de facto” or formally) of the entire Ukrainian Black Sea coast. Turkey will act to support the West in any efforts to intervene in Ukraine directly (*more directly* … ?).
11. Russia’s rising influence in the Middle East, coupled with the rising influence of China in the Middle East, works to the detriment of the U.S.A in that region. It facilitates China’s BRI and confounds American attempts to surround and strangulate China. It reduces any leverage the U.S.A has over Iran in the region.
12. The reduction of leverage over Iran reduces any leverage it might indirectly have over Lebanon (Hezbollah) and Yemen (Al Houthi). This makes the position of ‘Israel’ (Uncle Sam’s Aircraft Carrier in the Middle East) more tenuous and hamstrings the American control over the major shipping routes of the Persian Gulf and Red Sea (already in progress)
13. This jeopardises the position of the Zionist colony in Palestine.

In short: Too much is on the line for The Empire to allow a Russian victory! Uncle Sam cannot just walk away from this one and live to try again another day.

Given this, I cannot see how The Empire doesn’t attempt a full intervention in Ukraine within 2024, or an internal revolution in Russia involving the removal of the entire current political and military leadership of the Russian Federation driven by the Zionist Jewish fifth column infecting Russia.
Is Russia being primed for Bolshevik Revolution II?

Posted by: Arch Bungle | Mar 2 2024 23:20 utc | 119

Blackwater, not Blackrock.
Posted by: Michael A | Mar 2 2024 23:06 utc | 115
I wouldn’t be surprised if BlackRock had the same sentiments …

Posted by: Arch Bungle | Mar 2 2024 23:26 utc | 120

People continue to make predictions about when the SMO will end based on faulty… just about everything. First of all, hardly anyone pays attention to Russia’s stated war aims, and really analyzes the implications of these. Second, almost no one appears to understand the US war aims. They still believe that the primary objective was to topple Putin and dissect the Russian Federation. The real goal is and was, since shortly after 2008, to topple the EU, de-industrialize Germany, make Europe completely depended on the US and rebuild the US onshore economy without competition for EU, and with as much of its tech base and skilled labor as possible. This goal will not be achieved this year. It is well underway, but the American progress toward this is still reversible, if peace breaks out and Europe has access to Russian and Chinese trade again. The US will prolong the conflict until their gains are irreversible, but things have reached the point where US financial interests want to cool things off and prevent escalation. So… the war could go on for a long time before it fully devolves into a cold war.
I don’t have any reliable way to gauge progress for either side’s goals. De-nazification and demilitarization clearly require the complete and permanent occupation of Ukraine, and I suspect the Russian strategy, if not forced into something more dramatic, is to grind Ukrainian forces until either the army starts surrendering en masse, or the population overthrows the government. The complete capture of EU is also an extremely complex matter, with many of the major moving pieces hard or impossible to track in real time. Vast amounts of economic data, including deals being negotiated now with German companies, are needed to make any reasonable estimate of how long this will take, but my guess is four or five years to establish the level of control the US needs, and it may never happen, in which case the war will end with the complete exhaustion of Ukrainian manpower, or the achievement of all of Moscow’s goals.
Actually grasping the various party’s war aims is essential, but it’s not sufficient for making reliable predictions. The number of factors involved is immense, and many of them are secret to people like us. Add to this the fact that Putin is not watching the clock, and I think estimates for when the war will end will be either wrong or lucky guesses.

Posted by: Honzo | Mar 2 2024 23:28 utc | 121

Posted by: Arch Bungle | Mar 2 2024 23:20 utc | 117
Given this, I cannot see how The Empire doesn’t attempt a full intervention in Ukraine within 2024
Not in an election year.
or an internal revolution in Russia involving the removal of the entire current political and military leadership of the Russian Federation driven by the Zionist Jewish fifth column infecting Russia.
Putin has successfully neutered any “fifth column” in Russia (Zionist or otherwise), so that’s not going to happen either.
The US doesn’t want to lose, but they will. Oh, they’ll try to spin it into as much of a victory as they can. “Look we bled out Russia, Russia is weaker now. The alliance is strong, etc.” Or they will pretend they never supported Ukraine to begin with, and memory hole everything…like Afghanistan.

Posted by: James M. | Mar 2 2024 23:31 utc | 122

Posted by: Arch Bungle | Mar 2 2024 23:20 utc | 117
The only real opposition party in Russia is the communist party. On the other hand you can argue that even more conservative, or nationalists, even ‘truer’ Russian patriots are the real opposition.
No one cares about Navalny, Nemtsov or any other traitors and CIA losers. Prighozin was an attempt at creating a ‘more nationalistic opposition’. Putin and party plays the middle ground, covering more than 1 standard deviation pretty well. The real problem is how do they get as a credible and intelligent successor as Putin. Putin will probably be able to be until 2028.
Regarding Ukraine, Mark Sleboda thinks that the Kiev nazi regime will never surrender. It will just shift shape, maybe move to Lwow, or even Poland if need be. But it is, after all a civil war. Colonel Trukhan said Ukraine began failing process around Maidan, perhaps even before that.
The failing of Ukraine was not only result of people in the east wanting to separate from the central apparatus, but also due to the western part wanting to separate from the central apparatus, i.e. separate from the east.
We now have the separation of Ukraine completing. Unfortunately the east is devastated more. But we will have to see what is left when the dust settles.
It is easy to see the signs what the west is intending to do – they want to split it around the Dnieper. They truly think they can do that and keep Odessa.
But the shock will be immense when they found the ‘superior Nato soldiers’ will fall in droves like all the AFU cannon fodder. They cannot handle that for long.
What will happen in Transnistria? More likely than not the chances are it will die down, like every other provocation before it. But you never know with Britain.
The best case in Ukraine could be to get Chinese investments, they most certainly would be interested in minerals in central and eastern Ukraine, especially if they can show the finger to BlackRock/west while extracting them.

Posted by: unimperator | Mar 2 2024 23:35 utc | 123

Next line of defense: the river Dnjepr.

Posted by: WMG | Mar 2 2024 23:39 utc | 124

Posted by: James M. | Mar 2 2024 23:31 utc | 120
>Not in an election year.
The question is: Can they wait that long? What if they (Biden’s Puppet Masters – Not Biden Himself) calculate that an intervention needs to be *now* or the opportunity forver lost?
When a mans gotta go, a man’s gotta go! It’s now or never …
>Putin has successfully neutered any “fifth column” in Russia (Zionist or otherwise), so that’s not going to happen either.
Politically, yes, but nothing stops a clandestine movement being organised comprising sleeper agents drawn from the rank and file of the Russian Military, intelligence services and oligarchy … as they tried to accomplish with Prigozhin …

Posted by: Arch Bungle | Mar 2 2024 23:42 utc | 125

Is Russia being primed for Bolshevik Revolution II?
Posted by: Arch Bungle | Mar 2 2024 23:20 utc | 117
Crook uses the term bourgeoisie revolution to describe some of what is occurring in the west. It seems that rather than a Bolshevik revolution, the west is trying to initiate a bourgeoisie revolution in Russia with the intent of using that to divide the Russian federation into stateless. IT workers, city center middle class types that would come under total control of the west.
Considering they are very much the minority and those that are willing to fight the west are the majority, these attacks a likely to backfire bigly.

Posted by: Peter AU1 | Mar 2 2024 23:45 utc | 126

Peter AU1 | Mar 2 2024 22:39 utc | 110–
As I’ve written before, Soviet/Russian Sigint/EW capabilities have always been superior to NATO, which I know thanks to my service experience. I found all the talk about needing to cover their tracks funny given the lack of op/sec for the conference call.
As for Nord Stream, it’s entirely possible it was a joint op. I’d be very surprised if Russia hadn’t already sent some sort of submersible robot to the blast sites to collect samples to determine the sort of explosive used, which will be THE fingerprint that proves the guilty party, which is NATO as it’s a collective bloc. Team Putin has reconciled itself to the EU committing energy suicide and the resulting deindustrialization. The recent suggestion made at the ASI Forum, which was allowed to go first, was the suggestion that Russia make it easier for like-minded immigration from Europe primarily. The somewhat vague suggestion was then given headlines the next day saying Russia was very much in favor of such a policy and will do what it can to implement what is a rather complex affair. The point is that a big signal was sent to Europeans that they are welcome in Russia provided the values are shared.
I’m keeping a close watch on Moldova and Armenia. IMO, Pashinyan’s been bought and is being controlled by the same forces as Moldova’s Sandu. Their shit isn’t going unnoticed by the citizenry and moves are being made in preparation for revolt in Moldova, although not so much yet in Armenia because it’s much harder to promote a Russophobic Narrative, although it’s being tried by Pashinyan. Zakharova has mentioned more than once over the last few weeks that Moldova’s being prepped to become the next Ukraine. Given all that’s ongoing in that region, IMO it must have a bearing on Russia’s General Staff’s planning. Plus, there’s that British presence in the Odessa area that needs ousting along with Odessa’s liberation. I can see a two-front move: Kharkov in the North, Dnipro onto Odessa in the South. Whether that will occur is obviously unknown. However, I don’t see any strategic gain to accrue from the push West from Adveevka. Sure, it’s great that gains are being made, but how do they fit within the larger plan? Too bad we don’t have a direct line…

Posted by: karlof1 | Mar 2 2024 23:47 utc | 127

Posted by: Arch Bungle | Mar 2 2024 23:42 utc | 123
The question is: Can they wait that long? What if they (Biden’s Puppet Masters – Not Biden Himself) calculate that an intervention needs to be *now* or the opportunity forver lost?
When a mans gotta go, a man’s gotta go! It’s now or never …

The problem is, they’re still going to need to sell it to the American people. Biden or whomever cannot just say “Okay we’re sending 100,000 US troops to Ukraine to fight Russia, and possibly trigger nuclear war” without the American people saying “Wait a minute.” Trump would absolutely oppose it, and Biden’s poll numbers would drop by ten points.
Besides, the American military isn’t even remotely prepared to send troops to Ukraine. It would take at least six months for the proper mobilizations to take place, and by then it will be too late. It took about five months to build up a sizable force in the Gulf War, and that was back when the American military was much stronger and larger than it is today, and it was facing a much weaker foe. And before you ask, Europe isn’t going in without the US.
Politically, yes, but nothing stops a clandestine movement being organised comprising sleeper agents drawn from the rank and file of the Russian Military, intelligence services and oligarchy … as they tried to accomplish with Prigozhin
How’d that work out for them. The FSB is very, very good at its job. Probably the best domestic intelligence service in the world. They’ve stifled every attempt to overthrow the regime, and they are very pre-emptive. The US has wanted Putin gone for decades, and yet have been unsuccessful. They won’t be successful now.

Posted by: James M. | Mar 3 2024 0:01 utc | 128

Posted by: Feral Finster | Mar 2 2024 22:46 utc | 111
Cracked me up dude. Thanks for that 😂

Posted by: Patroklos | Mar 3 2024 0:01 utc | 129

Posted by: karlof1 | Mar 2 2024 23:47 utc | 125 “Too bad we don’t have a direct line…”
To be a fly on the wall…
Regarding a Russian push – Avdeevka was primarily to stop the continuous bombardment of Donetsk city. I use the term pushes as my thought is Russia intends keeping major pressure on on Ukraine forces rather than offensives as such as in taking territory though both taking territory and destruction of forces also keeps the pressure on Nato.
The balance of maintaining pressure while minimizing Russian casualties. Constant pressure will of course cause Ukraine forces to slowly concede territory.
Re your noting developments elsewhere – likely another reason for Russia not conducting offensives as such, saving as much military potential in case of developments elsewhere, new fronts and so forth.

Posted by: Peter AU1 | Mar 3 2024 0:04 utc | 130

Posted by: Arch Bungle | Mar 2 2024 23:20 utc | 117
Good post, but I’m not sure about #10. Erdogan is savvier than than.

Posted by: Patroklos | Mar 3 2024 0:08 utc | 131

Arch Bungle | Mar 2 2024 23:20 utc | 117–
Nice list; I agree with most of it.
unimperator | Mar 2 2024 23:35 utc | 121–
Putin’s successor was discussed in a comment section at my substack a few days ago. There’re many potential candidates, my #1 being PM Mishustin, but 6-8 others also present themselves as very credible–Duma Chair Volodin and several cabinet ministers plus a few regional governors. ALL are on the same page as Putin regarding Russia’s ongoing development/modernization plans that are now being made further into the future–to 2035 and 2040 in some cases. As Putin says, “There’s lots of work to do, and there will still be a lot of work to do.”
As for Russia’s world status, just look at what’s taking place in Kazan and Sochi–the World Games of the Future, and the World Youth Festival, respectively. Russia has reformatted all the various international events that locked Russia out and has now begun to hold its own versions, which the Global Majority and even those from NATO states are flocking to. All of that and more can be credited to Russian diplomacy, which the West has no way to counter.
If Russia can entice several million Europeans to emigrate over the next few years, then its developmental expansion will boom even more as skilled workers are what’s greatly needed. So, population movements will warrant watching.

Posted by: karlof1 | Mar 3 2024 0:31 utc | 132

What Uncle Sam can or cannot do is immaterial at this point. They won’t walk away from anything, they will crawl on all fours. It isn’t the end of history after all, it is only the begining.

Posted by: nook | Mar 3 2024 0:31 utc | 133

B-
I’m hoping you’re correct that the resignation will set in. Right now, doesn’t seem so.
But then the Ukies could have started with defensive construction after the Delbatsove debacle in 2015. The NYT is purposely obscuring the real time frame.
I’m only an engineer, not some Nobel Laureate in Physics, but…. Even if you went back to 2015, the numbers would show it was in Ukraine’s best interest to build a serious, well planned, layered defense in the Donbas. But then, Ukie leadership would have had to stop skimming off the top.
I always get a kick out of Alex Christoforou’s Elensky impression: “Austin, make Biden give me more money. I want to buy more homes, maybe around DC. Don’t worry, I give you commission.”

Posted by: OldFart | Mar 3 2024 0:32 utc | 134

Patroklos | Mar 3 2024 0:08 utc | 129 “Good post, but I’m not sure about #10. Erdogan is savvier than than.”
Re Erdogon. Wilkerson goes into that in detail and points out Erdogan’s strategic aims.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m1i1w0Hp5EI
@all Larry Wilkerson is someone worth keeping up with for his global strategic perspective and especially the linked video where here goes into Erdogan’s strategy.
Matyanov recently interviewed Baud. That video in regards Russia Europe is also well worth watching. https://smoothiex12.blogspot.com/2024/02/colonel-baud-and-me-talking-today.html
Or https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QirQ0LLM4IQ

Posted by: Peter AU1 | Mar 3 2024 0:37 utc | 135

Your point about depth is well taken, and I agreee that the Kearsage was much more visible. But the increasing part that the UK is playing in the SMO makes this one more possibility to be taken into consideration.
Posted by: Stonebird | Mar 2 2024 22:33 utc | 108
—————————————————–
There are three special mission US submarines with diver decompression chambers mounted on the deck halfway down behind the conning tower. I took a picture of one last week from the USS Missouri in Pearl Harbor as it was leaving port.
The USS Halibut was the first US nuclear submarine to use external decompression chambers, first I believe for operation Ivy Bells. It would not surprise me that the Brits wanted to compete in that league, too. The USS Kearsarge is stationed in Norfolk VA just a few miles from where I live and I have talked with a few USN divers on occasion on base. It is the perfect platform for that kind of mission, but who knows. The Danes, Norwegians and Swedes know every ship and boat (sub) that goes through the Kattegat, but if no one spills the beans, we don’t know.

Posted by: Acco Hengst | Mar 3 2024 0:40 utc | 136

Posted by: Red Outsider | Mar 2 2024 19:14 utc | 42
Interesting commentary, thank you.
As some at the bar might know, I’m a bit of a fan of SF, and with Dune 2 out now, what you posted of Ukraine being fated for distrust for centuries reminded me of the fate of House Harkonnen, after the decisive battle of Corrin.
https://dune.fandom.com/wiki/House_Harkonnen
History doing some rhyming in the future, as that battle featured AI, mercenaries, and the beginning of a feud between two great powers that were once united.

Posted by: Babel-17 | Mar 3 2024 0:40 utc | 137

@snake (13) “ Let Russia have all the territory in Ukraine Russia wants; just condition that gift of land with the caveat that where ever Russian presence is found, inside of or outside of Russia, the collective west will attack it forever.”
Well, if western nations choose to play that game, they can expect Russia to respond in kind—only more so— inside said western nations. Guess which side will suffer the most. I don’t think it would even be close, and let us not forget the risk of tit for tat going nuclear.

Posted by: Rob | Mar 3 2024 0:42 utc | 138

Peter AU1 | Mar 3 2024 0:04 utc | 128–
Agree that the alternating pressure points strategy is happening, and agree Russia’s main aim is to minimize casualties, although there are times that I wonder about that given some local commanders ill-considered actions.

Posted by: karlof1 | Mar 3 2024 0:44 utc | 139

O-only taking orders.
Posted by: Michael A | Mar 2 2024 20:43 utc | 77
Yes, only taking orders from Rotschild:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cDWvuwtVL3Q
2’19”

Posted by: Naive | Mar 3 2024 1:01 utc | 140

The USS Kearsarge was in the Baltic and with its amphibious dock by far the best platform for delivering and supporting a covert diving team.
The Baltic is too shallow for sub operations. The Kearsarge was there legitimately on a NATO exercise. If you are familiar with Operation Ivy Bells in the Sea of Okhotsk it is phenomenal what the US Navy can do.
Posted by: Acco Hengst | Mar 2 2024 22:03 utc | 99
Agree. I saw a video where a whistle blower from some NATO country (not revealed), who was involved in the Seabreeze exercise, sent a letter about how a team arrived by helicopter, got into a submersible, and was gone all day. When they came back a helicopter retrieved them.
There was no information given to the sailors, and he never knew what that was all about, until the pipelines were blown up and he put two and two together.
That is also how they cover up the deaths of the mercenaries. They just don’t talk about them. If the media doesn’t cover it, it never happened.
You would have to personally know them to hear about it. You wouldn’t know about the other ones. Why would you? The USA is a big place.

Posted by: wagelaborer | Mar 3 2024 1:01 utc | 141

Posted by: karlof1 | Mar 2 2024 23:47 utc | 125
As I’ve written before, Soviet/Russian Sigint/EW capabilities have always been superior to NATO, which I know thanks to my service experience. I found all the talk about needing to cover their tracks funny given the lack of op/sec for the conference call.
Karl, thank you for your consistently excellent analyses—but …
I take exception to ‘always’ in that paragraph. When I was working in such things US SIGINT/ELINT capabilities were superior to those of the USSR. But that was probably before your time. I never doubted the smartness of Soviet intelligence operatives but their hardware was generations behind US’ early computerization.
I assumed that TPTB wanted this war so badly, they ignored intelligence such as we produced and worked with alternate facts from pliable sources. If US intelligence resources are as degraded as the rest of the ostensible government, it is past time for a radical overhaul.

Posted by: Samu | Mar 3 2024 1:02 utc | 142

karlof1 | Mar 3 2024 0:44 utc | 137
Not long back I looked up a poll on Russian approval ratings for the various levels of government.
Approval of the Kremlin level was very high, above 80%, approval of the Duma was good at above 60%. Approval of regional admins was somewhat poor at around 48%.
Regional level admin has often been criticized by Putin due to federal funding being allocated for projects in the regions but then little to show once that funding was used.
I think the military will be the same. Russia has been very much a top down thing, basically pulling itself out of the 90’s and the last decades of the Soviet Union by its bootlaces.
I have assumed that the top level strategies will take all this into account. We see things happening at the bottom end re some form of incompetence here and there but I am sure this would have all been factored in and gamed well before hand at the top end.

Posted by: Peter AU1 | Mar 3 2024 1:04 utc | 143

For those already earning hundreds of millions per year what value does money have? They already have more houses than they can stay in, the jets, yachts, car collections, it isn’t money that motivates such people, but something else. We assume power, although it may well be something else.

Posted by: Organic | Mar 3 2024 1:07 utc | 144

Posted by: Peter AU1 | Mar 3 2024 0:37 utc | 133
Cheers for those links Pete. Bloody hot in Sydney today…

Posted by: Patroklos | Mar 3 2024 1:11 utc | 145

4. Rumours abound of direct American-European intervention in Ukraine to prevent the total collapse of Ukrainian forces.
Posted by: Arch Bungle | Mar 2 2024 23:20 utc | 117
Nope or yes, only rumors, which means nothing. When the psychopath said that Russia must not be allowed to win, and is ready to send troops on the soil (there are already some…) all other leaders said “no way”. Then he or rather his foreign minister said that no option is excluded, then he said that it could be be only for support (doctors, humanitarians, logistick, but not at the front line…).
The western people are cowards. They know that sending troops to fight against the Russian army would be a suicide mission. Now the Russian army is in full power, got combat experience.
Listen to the discussion between the top German officiers: they are obviously afraid to be tracked down as the woule be organisers of Taurus strikes. Cowards.
The psychopath made a scandal when two “humanitarian” people were killed in Berislav (there is a second version though…). And nothing else. No offical funeral, which he likes so much.

Posted by: Naive | Mar 3 2024 1:17 utc | 146

Alexander Mercouris:
– There was a VERY chaotic and disorganised retreat/collapse of ukrainian troops. There was outright mutiny by the Azov brigade.
– There were thousands and thousands of ukrainian troops who were taken prisoners /surrendered in Avdeevka.
– The 3rd assault brigade (Azov brigade) took heavy losses and decided to retreat before the losses would go (much) higher. It wasn’t worth the efforts/losses any more.
– Syrski gave the order to the troops to retreat from Avdeevka but the retreat had already started.
– Zelensky wants to bring to trial soldiers who disobeyed orders and withdrew. That could lead to a confrontation with the Azov brigade.
– The troops are getting increasingly angry with their leaders (Zelensky, Syrski, ……….). There could be a uprising of the ukrainian troops against the leadership in Kiev (incl. Zalushny). A small spark (of any kind) could trigger an (military ??) uprising against the leadership in Kiev.
– Klitschko (the former mayor of Kiev) or Poroshenko could be the next favorite of the West to replace Zelensky.

Posted by: WMG | Mar 3 2024 1:18 utc | 147

In Putins speeches in the month or two prior to the SMO, he was clearly very worried. I had not seen him like that before.
The time had come when Russia must make its move move, the balance between taking time to build more strength or waiting too long long and losing advantage.
Part of that worry I assume was wondering where the rest of the world would stand though it was clear China was solid.
Once dedollarization was clearly underway and nato had fully revealed itself and Russia had very successfully survived the first onslaught of the sanctions, Putin was back to his old self.
Re my previous comment to karlof1 and Russian losses in Ukraine – another thing that is very clear in Russian strategy is that a new technology or tactic only lasts a few months and it was fully expected that US Nato would spring a few surprises. It took three months to fine tune the air defenses to to the HYMARS missiles.
Also the drones – the Ukronato forces began with a clear advantage there but now Russia has the advantage.
As Lavrov said in an interview, he wanted to go to all lengths possible to prevent war as he had a full understanding of not just Russian losses but of the absolute death and destruction that comes with war.
Modern warfare is exceptionally lethal.

Posted by: Peter AU1 | Mar 3 2024 1:21 utc | 148

Posted by: Organic | Mar 3 2024 1:07 utc | 142
I’m guessing its the stability of that wealth. ‘All that money’ exists in forms that require requisite modes of domination to enable future deployment of that wealth. If I have $1M in cash in my cellar I will have different priorities to someone who has 10kgs of gold. Both of us are interested in a future in which this wealth can be both realised on demand and increased. We are therefore invested in the infrastructure of wealth, etc. This is why the only stable future for humans is a communal one where wealth is not private, while the current situation is massively unstable and involves creating instability as a strategy. Currently reading Epicurus (in book 10 of Diogenes Laertius); no wonder Marx found the answer there.

Posted by: Patroklos | Mar 3 2024 1:24 utc | 149

In short: Too much is on the line for The Empire to allow a Russian victory! Uncle Sam cannot just walk away from this one and live to try again another day.
Given this, I cannot see how The Empire doesn’t attempt a full intervention in Ukraine within 2024, or an internal revolution in Russia involving the removal of the entire current political and military leadership of the Russian Federation driven by the Zionist Jewish fifth column infecting Russia.
Is Russia being primed for Bolshevik Revolution II?

Posted by: Arch Bungle | Mar 2 2024 23:20 utc | 117
Guess work all along. Only your opinion. A very, very pessimist opinion. A defaitist opinion. The worst is never sure. And “an internal revolution in Russia” like you describe is completely ridiculous.
You have been contaminated by s-o-b-.
You “cannot see”… yes, that is the problem, your problem. My advice: go to see a psychologist, or go for a walk in a forest, or make love…
Tomorrow is another day.

Posted by: Naive | Mar 3 2024 1:27 utc | 150

Too bad we don’t have a direct line…
Posted by: karlof1 | Mar 2 2024 23:47 utc | 125
—————————————————-
And the grind goes on. With the noises coming from NATO country I imagine that Russia is preparing for all potential unpleasantries, trying not to make any mistakes.
The pinpricks on Russian soil are a nuisance. The Brits holed up in Odessa might have some surprises coming. They sure earned them.

Posted by: Acco Hengst | Mar 3 2024 1:33 utc | 151

Not sure if anyone has posted a link to this article before, but it explains a lot about British involvement in Ukraine since 1991:
https://ukdefencejournal.org.uk/a-look-at-the-uks-strategic-partnership-with-ukraine/

Posted by: UK MoD | Mar 3 2024 1:34 utc | 152

Posted by: Peter AU1 | Mar 3 2024 1:21 utc | 146
I do not understand you. Russian army is making progress, the moral is top, the ukronazis do not have a serious defence line and then those two worried words “losing advantage”.
I have the advantage to trust and support the Russian army and the Russian government. Period.
Is s-o-b- contaminating everyone? More or less?
Listen again to Putin’s speech to the Duma. And you will understand the Russian strategy. Maybe.

Posted by: Naive | Mar 3 2024 1:37 utc | 153

Posted by: Naive | Mar 3 2024 1:27 utc | 148
How is that not a reasonable view, pessimistic or not? Hardly worth that kind of overreaction.
Tomorrow is another day indeed, but one does not abandon thought or speculation about it on that basis.
As for not being able to ‘see’: explain what that occult BS means or STFU. I’m over vague and enigmatic self-importance masquerading as insight—that’s your problem, my man.

Posted by: Patroklos | Mar 3 2024 1:38 utc | 154

Western people are individualist, egoist, egocentric and hedonist. They cannot understand the Russian mind. Russian people if not contaminated by the west (look for the cockroach killer audience) think differently and it is the key for their successes.

Posted by: Naive | Mar 3 2024 1:42 utc | 155

posted by: James M. | Mar 3 2024 0:01 utc | 126
Besides, the American military isn’t even remotely prepared to send troops to Ukraine. It would take at least six months for the proper mobilizations to take place, and by then it will be too late. It took about five months to build up a sizable force in the Gulf War, and that was back when the American military was much stronger and larger than it is today, and it was facing a much weaker foe. And before you ask, Europe isn’t going in without the US.
Maybe James, but I note the large NATO exercise (90,000 troops) currently ongoing and scheduled to end in mid May 2024. There are also apparently simultaneous exercises being conducted unilaterally by Germany and Poland (possibly some other as well). I was surprised to get this info. from Wikipedia of all places. Look up Steadfast Defender 2024.
My point is that if the Empire feels that the RF is likely to make large gains (like pushing to the Dnieper and/or Karkov) in spring-summer then they could try for some desperate intervention using these troops.
Of course they would have to do so with some justification for the general Western population. But manufacturing such excuses is no problem for Western propaganda machines- witness Iraqi WMD as one example.

Posted by: Barrel Brown | Mar 3 2024 1:42 utc | 156

Russians leaked the call for one reason only. Because they believe the attack is imminent.
Posted by: Comandante | Mar 2 2024 17:46 utc | 15
Which means they will be well prepared for it in terms of air and sea defence, AND will have suitable retribution mapped out.
Likewise, with the F16s arriving soon, MI6 have advised Kiev that RF has intel of every likely storage place and airport and are poised to missile them all between delivery and take off. I’ll be surprised if everything the west throws at Crimea makes much of a dint … and certainly not to the tanks rolling eastwards.
Macron and the Germies are dead right that their pesky escalations present Russia with a dilemma is such strikes originate from OUTSIDE Ukraine. At some point, The Bear will have tolerated enough poking.

Posted by: Jake Blanchard | Mar 3 2024 1:51 utc | 157

“Zelenski telling people not to return to Kharkov. Apparently MI6 has told him Russia is amassing a large force in that area.
Possibly Russia is planning a major push in that region, attacks into Belgorod are launched from that area, though Kharkov is not one of the regions that are now part of Russia. Or perhaps it is a means of simply tying up large Ukrainian forces in that area, with major pushes staying in the central and southern areas that are since the referendums, part of the Russian federation.”
Posted by: Peter AU1 | Mar 2 2024 22:49 utc | 112
Russia needs to and will secure both Kharkov and Odessa.
When and how and the sequence is the question.

Posted by: canuck | Mar 3 2024 2:03 utc | 158

‘Western people are individualist, egoist, egocentric and hedonist. They cannot understand the Russian mind. Russian people if not contaminated by the west (look for the cockroach killer audience) think differently and it is the key for their successes.’
Posted by: Naive | Mar 3 2024 1:42 utc | 153
No, not all Western people are such and to generalize this idea is foolish as well as counter productive..

Posted by: canuck | Mar 3 2024 2:06 utc | 159

Naive | Mar 3 2024 1:37 utc | 151 “I do not understand you.”
the difference between small war and large war / change of historical era. All Russian strategy in the small war is just part of the larger strategy and subservient to that larger strategy.
“Listen again to Putin’s speech to the Duma. And you will understand the Russian strategy. Maybe.” Maybe huh…

Posted by: Peter AU1 | Mar 3 2024 2:09 utc | 160

Ukraine’s vaunted ‘bread basket’ soil is now toxic.
Two years of war has left roughly one-third of its territory polluted, with dire potential consequences for the world’s food supply
Posted by: Apollyon | Mar 2 2024 21:20 utc | 86

Yeah, I think about that EVERY DAY, watching the videos of fields + forests + villages + towns + cities full of potholes, shrapnel, unexploded ordnance, trenches, fuel spills, rubbish, body parts (not including the undocumented burial sites), electronics, destroyed utilities, etc. It makes me ponder the “advantages” of winning a war.
But, the gradual rebuild of a similarly once wartorn Europe gives hope for a better future for nature and civilisation. As an ex-farmer, I try to imagine being some 4th generation Donbassian lad returning to his family farm, trying to plough and level AND SIFT the once rich soil for sowing again. Heartbreaking.

Posted by: Jake Blanchard | Mar 3 2024 2:13 utc | 161

Russian Soft Power on display, “World Youth Festival in Sochi: Putin’s Address” is very potent. It’s a short read relative to my usual substack articles, although it’s tempting to explore the links.

Posted by: karlof1 | Mar 3 2024 2:21 utc | 162

ZH has a posting up with the title
Germany Confirms Leaked Audio Of Its Top Generals Discussing Blowing Up The Crimean Bridge
the quote

In a huge development and absolute smoking gun revelation, the government of Germany has confirmed the authenticity of a leaked audio recording file published by Russia’s state-backed RT. The leak was first published by RT Editor-in-Chief Margarita Simonyan, who described that she received it from Russian security officials.
….
Importantly, it seems none other than Lieutenant General Ingo Gerhartz – the commander of the national air force, is among the four voices heard in the audio among top generals within the Bundeswehr, Germany’s armed forces.
A particularly damning section of the audio for which Moscow is currently demanding answers from German leaders…

Posted by: psychohistorian | Mar 3 2024 2:23 utc | 163

canuck | Mar 3 2024 2:03 utc | 156
Many were disappointed that Russia did not boot Turkey and the US out of Syria and that Russia does not/did not directly respond to Israeli strikes on Syria.
Putin made it very clear that the enemy to be defeated is the US. US and UK have an equal allegiance and Putin and Lavrov took to using the term anglo saxons.
The war in Ukraine will not end until the US or US power, economic, military, influence power is defeated. Only then those other frozen wars can come to a successful conclusion and the Anglo saxon /Westphalia war against Russia in Ukraine end. Russia will not occupy hostile or semi hostile territory until that time unless it suites their greater strategy to do so.
Russia, as both Putin and Lavrov clearly stated right at the start puts no deadlines or time frames on this. They started a job and will follow it through to its successful conclusion wherever or no matter where the twists and turns may lead.

Posted by: Peter AU1 | Mar 3 2024 2:24 utc | 164

Posted by: Barrel Brown | Mar 3 2024 1:42 utc | 154
We’ll see. The military exercise could be as you say, a cover, or it could be just a last desperate attempt to shore up the alliance.
The first phase of Steadfast Defender is almost over, and the second phase is well under way. So the clock is ticking, if they want to do something. Although even Able Archer didn’t bring war between NATO and the USSR.
So I seriously, seriously doubt NATO will do anything more than they are already doing – whine and complain, threaten and bluster, and then acquiesce to the new security reality facing them.

Posted by: James M. | Mar 3 2024 2:24 utc | 165

I keep reading all these comments on how Putin should roll up his sleeves and start punching. I gotta ask y’all, unless you’re a Kumbaya Peacenik, why would you suggest that Russia immediately launch a campaign to roll over Ukraine in a couple of weeks? You can’t bring back the dead.
But what you can do is let the inexorable mathematics of that classic pool with fill pipe and drain pipe problem you get shown as an introduction to first order ordinary differential equations do its work. Probably already lost most of you humanities and social -science types. Anyways, maybe Putin & Co. didn’t figure on it at first but hey, who was to know NATO is SO pig-headed?
If the Russians go faster with this crush the Banderites job, the more important goals of dissolving NATO and dethroning the USD will not be achieved. Far better to empty NATO arsenals, deindustrialize the collective West, force the hegemon into playing by financial rules they no longer can’t rig in their favor.
To me it’s a Slam Dunk! Don’t y’all remember the fable of the tortoise and the hare?

Posted by: OldFart | Mar 3 2024 2:25 utc | 166

Posted by: Organic | Mar 3 2024 1:07 utc | 142
… “This is why the only stable future for humans is a communal one where wealth is not private, while the current situation is massively unstable and involves creating instability as a strategy. Currently reading Epicurus (in book 10 of Diogenes Laertius); no wonder Marx found the answer there.”
Posted by: Patroklos | Mar 3 2024 1:24 utc | 147
On the contrary Epicurus proclaimed, “If thou will make a man happy , add not to his riches but take away from his desires” Nothing about equality of riches or opportunity.
Epicurus didn’t care as Diogenes of Corinth.
Alexander the Great was in Corinth. Of course all the philosophers and men of state came to meet him yet the most respected philosopher of the city, Diogenes, did not bother; hence Alexander went to seek the ascetic out.
Alexander came upon Diogenes and asked what does he want from Alexander, Diogenes replied from his humble spot, “Can you move over a bit as you are blocking the?”
Alexander , momentarily incredulous, then laughed , “If I was not Alexander I would be Diogenes”(1)
1. https://www.rct.uk/collection/27903/the-meeting-between-alexander-the-great-and-diogenes

Posted by: canuck | Mar 3 2024 2:30 utc | 167

” Far better to empty NATO arsenals, deindustrialize the collective West, force the hegemon into playing by financial rules they no longer can’t rig in their favor.
Posted by: OldFart | Mar 3 2024 2:25 utc | 164 ”
” There is no instance of a nation benefiting from prolonged warfare. ”
– Sun Tzu

Posted by: Moonie | Mar 3 2024 2:39 utc | 168

” Russia, as both Putin and Lavrov clearly stated right at the start puts no deadlines or time frames on this. They started a job and will follow it through to its successful conclusion wherever or no matter where the twists and turns may lead.
Posted by: Peter AU1 | Mar 3 2024 2:24 utc | 162 ”
” There is no instance of a nation benefiting from prolonged warfare. ”
– Sun Tzu

Posted by: Moonie | Mar 3 2024 2:40 utc | 169

Arch @ 117
Whoa! Put down the crackpipe dude. That is too crazy and out of this world to think about at this time. Never, ever gonna happen.

Posted by: bisfugged | Mar 3 2024 2:42 utc | 170

” it isn’t money that motivates such people, but something else. We assume power, although it may well be something else.
Posted by: Organic | Mar 3 2024 1:07 utc | 142 ”
Very astute, now scale up your point to the level of the Rothschilds and the others” behind the curtains “. Money, power, and resources are just side benefits and not the main purpose.

Posted by: Moonie | Mar 3 2024 2:44 utc | 171

Posted by: canuck | Mar 3 2024 2:30 utc | 165
On the contrary? Marx wrote his doctoral dissertation on the difference between Demokritos and Epicurus. The level on which Marx found Epicurus inspiring was the potential to move from a materialist view of nature to a materialist view of society and history. WTF do you know about that with your cereal box quotes? The level I’m talking about it is not on your simplistic reductive wavelength, especially one that dogmatically fails to read Marx and thinks he’s a ‘Marxist’. All I can do is weep at your lack of depth. Anything to have a go I suppose; it’s easy to forgive folly in a child.
Oh wait, it’s canuck. I shouldn’t be wasting my breath.

Posted by: Patroklos | Mar 3 2024 2:48 utc | 172

Moonie | Mar 3 2024 2:40 utc | 167
Clown.

Posted by: Peter AU1 | Mar 3 2024 2:48 utc | 173

Arch @ 117
In short: Too much is on the line for The Empire to allow a Russian victory! Uncle Sam cannot just walk away from this one and live to try again another day.
You’re right Arch, I agree. There will be no Russian victory in Ukraine. The best they can hope for is a contested stalemate along a line of control, and that’s it. Ukr and the US (Nato) will not surrender or sue for peace agreement ever.
Add to that Russia (and China) are far too timid to directly take on Nato or the US. Look at Syria and the rest of the world for multiple examples of this.
That and Putin is weak as piss. He always has been. He is dumb as shit to imagine the US calling him up to negotiate a ceasefire agreement with Russia in Ukraine.
As dumb as he was to believe in the Minsk agreements of 2014/15 ….. utter idiocy!

Posted by: Lavrov’s Dog | Mar 3 2024 2:59 utc | 174

Posted by: Red Outsider | Mar 2 2024 19:14 utc | 42
Have you realized, that you simply exposed the reason behind current hostiles ?
Controlling a major trade root is way too lucrative for Ukrainians to hold. Takeover started decades ago. Ukrainian DNA got linked to Jewish DNA in scientific publications around the world in order to befriend a victim. Ten years ago a project called ” new heavenly Jerusalem in Ukraine” was publicly announced worldwide. Digital currency got pushed upon gullible world population to finance takeover. All info is out here available in print and video imagery for everyone to access. Largest synagogue in the world is in Dnipro city and moving closer to frontline, hence early warning system got pulled from Israel. All is according to plan. With exception of historical reclaim of ancient lands by RU.

Posted by: Alex Vadim | Mar 3 2024 2:59 utc | 175

Peter AU1 @ 124
Funny how Arch is positing a group of whoknows attempting to take over the Russian government from Putin and his gang, utterly crazy to think of it.
There is such a wave of nationalism and love for Putin by everyone right now there is even songs written and sung about him these days, Attaboy is just one of them. The heart of Russia flows through their nationalistic singing with Shaman and recently Gagarina with “Horse” (Horse in the field). Lol, the Russian people are just too caught up in the love and respect of everyone in the Kremlin currently. Revolution will not happen anytime soon.

Posted by: bisfugged | Mar 3 2024 3:01 utc | 176

Some videos for today.
Russian Lancet strike destroys NATO-built self-propelled howitzer:
https://rutube.ru/video/f3289525dc915a71c150a17eeff3a296/
Russian sniper in action near Kupyansk:
https://rutube.ru/video/58661ea0122e636542bc39df3629c298/
Russian airborne troops storm enemy stronghold on the Zaporozhye front:
https://rutube.ru/video/efcb185c5a7b9894f26ccd3cb23d5cf6/
Russian Uragan MLRS firing on the southern DPR front:
https://rutube.ru/video/378a1c9cf22aa97524ca38e9196436b8/

Posted by: Nate | Mar 3 2024 3:02 utc | 177

Or his stupid Strategic Security Treaties he presented to the US / NATO in December 2021. Lunacy. He was naive and stupid then and he hasn’t changed since. And they still do not care about the Ethnic Russians still under the illegitimate control of the Kyiv regime from Odessa to Sumy oblasts.
Nor will Putin lift a finger to protect and defined the Tranistria Russians. Just watch Russia do next to nothing, again. I support Russia 100% but that doesn’t mean i think they smart or brave or serious.

Posted by: Lavrov’s Dog | Mar 3 2024 3:05 utc | 178

“Anything to have a go I suppose; it’s easy to forgive folly in a child.
Oh wait, it’s canuck. I shouldn’t be wasting my breath”
Posted by: Patroklos | Mar 3 2024 2:48 utc | 170
Why can’t you stick to the intellectual argument rather than stoop to crude ad hominens? Not only does it cloud your own counter arguments, you lose credibility with such irrelevance.
Anyways, I don’t care that Marx wrote a dissertation, so what? Asceticism, as practiced by Diogenes, Epicurus, and Buddhists for that matter, has absolutely nothing to do with Marxist thought no matter how many Leftists write lengthy polemics attempting to force the point.
If you are going continue to criticizes me personally can you kindly please do it more imaginatively as the current intellectual bombardment is rather tiresome and trite.
Thanks.

Posted by: canuck | Mar 3 2024 3:08 utc | 179

Peter AU1 @ 124 @ bisfugged | Mar 3 2024 3:01 utc | 174
Of course no one is going to topple Putin in Russia. No matter what happens in Ukraine.
That doesn’t mean Russia is going to win or achieve it’s SMO goals there. There will never be Russian tanks in Kyiv or Lvov. The US / NATO can keep doing whatever they want there. Putin can’t stop them.

Posted by: Lavrov’s Dog | Mar 3 2024 3:10 utc | 180

My point is that if the Empire feels that the RF is likely to make large gains (like pushing to the Dnieper and/or Karkov) in spring-summer then they could try for some desperate intervention using these troops.
Of course they would have to do so with some justification for the general Western population. But manufacturing such excuses is no problem for Western propaganda machines- witness Iraqi WMD as one example.
Posted by: Barrel Brown | Mar 3 2024 1:42 utc | 154
A) the west does not need justifications, it does what it wants to do IF IT IS ABLE.
B) The west is not able to put boots on the ground in Ukraine in numbers capable of affecting the outcome. They would be on the wrong end of the ‘highway of death’ scenario that destroyed the Iraqi army.
C) What could the US possibly gain? (I ask only about the US because the US is the decision-maker). The answer is ‘nothing.’ Farmland for Blackwater? At the cost of the destruction of the US ability not only to project power, but to plausibly claim to be able to defend Europe?
It’s not happening.

Posted by: Honzo | Mar 3 2024 3:19 utc | 181

Lavrov’s dog @ 172
????
What!?! Did you just crawl out of a hermit’s hole recently bud? Putin WAS a sucker for Western attention and affections but that was then and this is now. He is usually the smartest guy in the room as many people and bloggers have attested. He must be laser focused right now and since every ploy and play the west may use against them has been gone over countless times, there will be a measured response soon.
The Problem as the Kremlin sees it currently is that ZATO wants/needs Russia to do something big and crazy like Feb. 24, 2022 so they can justify a huge response. It won’t happen dog! He will keep taking slaps to the face even though SOME may think he’s a cuck to paraphrase Patty but most of the Global South and China know better. Keep fucking poking that bear mofo, fuck around and find out!!

Posted by: bisfugged | Mar 3 2024 3:30 utc | 182

length of war…
i thought it would go on a long time.. i guess i am in a minority, but no one can know how long something like this will go on for.. my sense is this is a slow build to ww3 and nothing suggests anything different at this point – unfortunately..
Posted by: james | Mar 2 2024 18:04 utc | 26

I’m in with the long-timers, but not in with the WWIII or the nuke thinkers.
The timeframe of the SMO “war” is one entity. The timeframe of the EU/NATO vs Russia “war” is another. The timeframe of the big West vs Russia “war” is another entity. All are interrelated but in fact seperate, which is what confuses a lot of commentators.
Given that the hegemonic US policy has been, is now, and always will be a “forever war” against Russia, the SMO can be seen as only Act 1 in their play. Act 2 is their setting of Europe against Russia via NATO needling and sanctions. Act 3 will be the post-SMO (whenever???) insurgencies and sabotage from all surrounding neighbours. This is what the EU leaders are all presently flexing about. Imo, this will be Russia’s longest fight because one day the US will have another go at occupying the Black Sea, retaking Crimea/Odessa — because, if they never recognise it, that makes it “contested territory” and thus good for a future war. So Putin must fight on until Kiev’s and the West’s capitulation legitimises his new oblasts (Kharkiv to Transnistria. Suck it up Ukraine. That’s gunna be your karma. Only a Zelensky-Putin Treaty “recognising on-ground realities” (Putin’s frequent term) will avoid any future adventures.
So, the simplistic question “When will the war be over” (all three Acts) is *never* … or not until the US is forced out of all its international hegemonic meddling. THIS, I believe, is Putin and Xi’s and BRICS’ long war … for a few decades!
But, imo, to this end, Russia’s clear nuclear superiority assures that the M.A.D. doctrine will prevent WWIII. Conventional warefare will just drag on and on and on, just like it has for hundreds of years. Think about it — We’ve had nukes since 1945. There’s always been the same posturing threats of first strike/retaliation strikes. Yet noone did. So why now? Just because RF is proxy fighting NATO/US, that’s no need to go “all out” and make radioactive the American continent. It makes NO SENSE in terms of US defence. The US is not under attack. Europe is not under attack. Russia is not under (its mainland) attack. Noone has any fkn excuse to use nukes. It’s fearful fantasy.
Furthermore, a *conventional WWIII* is also fanciful. What does WORLD WAR mean? It means everybody in. But even WWII was not everybody! You Yanks and Europeans think Yankland and Europe is the whole world. It’s supremist nonsense these days. Since WWII, you’ve got far more allies on each side. You’ve got a lot of armed Middle East, the Global South, China and India ffs. US + Nato would not stand a chance against Russia and its friends in man-to-man combat these days — even ships and planes and missiles. It’s just laughable. Europe would be crippled in a month. Every US base worldwide would be dust. [GOOD!]
Conclusion: The SMO will remain an SMO until the surrender of Kiev. The opposition in Europe will wriggle and resist but will eventually go home cos they know they’d lose anything more. The US will continue to stir up shit anywhere it can until the other big boys force it into global humility through economic pressures. The US will keep its toys in the garage cos it knows it wouldn’t get half way across the Pacific. The UK … well … we don’t need to even mention them. 🙂

Posted by: Jake Blanchard | Mar 3 2024 3:30 utc | 183

The problem is, they’re still going to need to sell it to the American people. Biden or whomever cannot just say “Okay we’re sending 100,000 US troops to Ukraine to fight Russia, and possibly trigger nuclear war” without the American people saying “Wait a minute.” Trump would absolutely oppose it, and Biden’s poll numbers would drop by ten points.
Posted by: James M. | Mar 3 2024 0:01 utc | 126
response to @ Arch Bungle | Mar 2 2024 23:42 utc | 123

That’s very funny, to me.
1) The American people do not get a say in it – period – they will get told by the Media what to think and say.
2) When it comes toa new War, the American people have NEVER SAID “Wait a minute” since 1939!
3) Biden et al have had over 100K troops in Poland and Romania ready and waiting since 2022 — they’re called the 101st and the 82nd Airborne Divisions. Doh!
4) US Presidential POLL Numbers never fall when there is a new active war unfolding. Never! It is alwasy USA USA USA 24/7
Will people please wake up and get real? 🙂

Posted by: Lavrov’s Dog | Mar 3 2024 3:35 utc | 184

” Moonie | Mar 3 2024 2:40 utc | 167
Clown.
Posted by: Peter AU1 | Mar 3 2024 2:48 utc | 171 ”
Thats a pathetic retort, We expect better from you. Not to mention you’re breaking the bar’s rules.

Posted by: Moonie | Mar 3 2024 3:37 utc | 185

” There is no instance of a nation benefiting from prolonged warfare. ”
– Sun Tzu
Posted by: Moonie | Mar 3 2024 2:40 utc | 167
Define ‘nation.’ The elites of the US have benefited mightily from prolonged warfare, their power and riches are the result of continuous warfare since 1941.
Define ‘prolonged warfare.’ Three years is not ‘prolonged’ by any historical standard. Russia is not showing any economic strain and is not likely to, and their manpower losses are very low. They can go on as they are now for another five or ten years, if necessary, but they won’t have to, because the west can’t.

Posted by: Honzo | Mar 3 2024 3:39 utc | 186

” Russia, as both Putin and Lavrov clearly stated right at the start puts no deadlines or time frames on this. They started a job and will follow it through to its successful conclusion wherever or no matter where the twists and turns may lead.
Posted by: Peter AU1 | Mar 3 2024 2:24 utc | 162 ”
” There is no instance of a nation benefiting from prolonged warfare. ”
– Sun Tzu
Posted by: Moonie | Mar 3 2024 2:40 utc | 167
Tell that to George Washington during the War Of Independence-5 years and I think he won just one or two battles in prolonged warfare against Britain.

Posted by: canuck | Mar 3 2024 3:42 utc | 187

Keep fucking poking that bear mofo, fuck around and find out!!
@ bisfugged | Mar 3 2024 3:30 utc | 180
Putin is highly intelligent. Not smart. Nor savvy. and NOT Wise! Just look at where he was at in 2021/22, and what he was forced to do half-heartedly and without the Military power to achieve his goals!
Maybe you haven’t noticed it. But no one is afraid of Russia nor afraid of what it or Putin might do in response to US / NATO provocations and escalations. NATO and the US can and will do whatever they want.
Two years has proven that Putin and Russia have NO Red Lines – None!
I suggest it’s folks like you (and Russians) who need to wake up and face reality. Despite Putin being at least a decade too late, I support what they are doing and why. However they have clearly not learnt anything.
When it comes to Russia communicating with the Western Governments and the western people as a whole they are utterly incompetent at it. Useless. A waste of space. Putin has ZERO Credibility in the West. None. They don’t give a shit what he thinks or what he says. They lie to his face and he does nothing.
Putin is weak as piss. Ukraine from 2014 to now is an abject failure for Russia.
The US / NATO from 2008 to today is another total Failure for Putin.
He has not achieved even one of his goals. NOT ONE!
Every attempt for a negotiated security / trade / economic settlement or renewed Treaty has failed.
How many thousands of Economic Sanctions are on Russia today?
Can Putin fly to New York or London or France or Berlin?
Open your eyes people. 🙂

Posted by: Lavrov’s Dog | Mar 3 2024 3:52 utc | 188

As for Nord Stream …
I’d be very surprised if Russia hadn’t already sent some sort of submersible robot to the blast sites to collect samples to determine the sort of explosive used, which will be THE fingerprint that proves the guilty party, which is NATO as it’s a collective bloc.
Posted by: karlof1 | Mar 2 2024 23:47 utc | 125

That’s exactly what Ritter said 2 days after the explosions and what I have posted here several times since!!!.
Ritter also bragged: “Jeezuz, even *I* could go down there and in 10 minutes tell you which explosives and how much were used”. He also postulated: “Ffs, Russia has known and recorded every ship, plane, radio call in the Baltic since 1939. They know damn well who and which vessels did what and when”. Lol.
And yet I loved the way Putin deflected Tucker Carlson’s little bait to “show the world the evidence that the US did it”. Putin quietly said “Well, let’s not get into details” 🙂 🙂

Posted by: Jake Blanchard | Mar 3 2024 3:52 utc | 189

” Moonie | Mar 3 2024 2:40 utc | 167
Clown.
Posted by: Peter AU1 | Mar 3 2024 2:48 utc | 171 ”
‘That’s a pathetic retort, We expect better from you. Not to mention you’re breaking the bar’s rules.’
Posted by: Moonie | Mar 3 2024 3:37 utc | 183
Yes, I agree, Peter is better than that he might be having a bad day, normally he is quite astute and civil ; on the other hand you bringing up ‘rules’ frame you as a Karen…

Posted by: canuck | Mar 3 2024 3:56 utc | 190

Jake Blanchard | Mar 3 2024 3:30 utc | 181
a rare realistic take. I don’t care about the details so much as the attitude and direction is correct.
I have said this never ends until the US unconditionally surrenders to the Coalition of Military Forces on the opposite bank of the Potmac from the Capital Building and the WH.
I think B and almost all others here have progressively gone off with the faeries over Russia’s “capabilities” and superior “wisdom” at prosecuting a war/smo over Ukraine.

Posted by: Lavrov’s Dog | Mar 3 2024 4:01 utc | 191

There is no instance of a nation benefiting from prolonged warfare. ”
– Sun Tzu
Posted by: Moonie | Mar 3 2024 2:40 utc | 167
Define ‘nation.’ The elites of the US have benefited mightily from prolonged warfare, their power and riches are the result of continuous warfare since 1941.
Define ‘prolonged warfare.’ Three years is not ‘prolonged’ by any historical standard. Russia is not showing any economic strain and is not likely to, and their manpower losses are very low. They can go on as they are now for another five or ten years, if necessary, but they won’t have to, because the west can’t.
Posted by: Honzo | Mar 3 2024 3:39 utc | 184
‘Prolonged warfare’ ad the Sun Tzu maxim is ambiguous; in any ‘prolonged warfare’ there is a winner (ie Afghanistan after 20 years, the Afghans won; in Vietnam 24 years Vietnam won; so somebody wins.
I believe the quote is reflecting the aggressor loses in prolonged warfare not the defender.

Posted by: canuck | Mar 3 2024 4:02 utc | 192

“Putin is weak as piss. Ukraine from 2014 to now is an abject failure for Russia.
The US / NATO from 2008 to today is another total Failure for Putin.
He has not achieved even one of his goals. NOT ONE!
Every attempt for a negotiated security / trade / economic settlement or renewed Treaty has failed.
How many thousands of Economic Sanctions are on Russia today?
Can Putin fly to New York or London or France or Berlin?
Open your eyes people. :-)’
Posted by: Lavrov’s Dog | Mar 3 2024 3:52 utc | 186
What are you talking about?
The West is so deep in debt they can’t even match ammunition production from Russia/NK.
Russia will have the fastest growing economy among Europe with all sanctions against them.
Russia has very low foreign debt.
Russia has the most natural resources than any other nation.
You still believe in Western dominance despite all the evidence against your idea.
You need to wake up

Posted by: canuck | Mar 3 2024 4:09 utc | 193

The failing of Ukraine was not only result of people in the east wanting to separate from the central apparatus, but also due to the western part wanting to separate from the central apparatus, i.e. separate from the east.
Posted by: unimperator | Mar 2 2024 23:35 utc | 121

To grasp the root causes and timeline of Ukraine’s internal divisions, I reference all the election results since 1991. These clearly show EU vs RF allegiances, as they were and as they developed after UKR independence. Google/images “Ukraine Elections”. It’s as clear as red and blue!
Along that timeline, Banderism skyrocketted out of obscurity in west Ukraine around 2012, and then AZOV Corps was founded in 2014 out of a Kharkov football club of violent hooligans and neo-Nazis.
After 2014 Maidan, Poroshenko then ramped up the Russophobia tenfold, teamed up with Kolomoisky’s funding of Azov, and NATO-CIA ops got going — and the rest is history as they say. Meanwhile, Russia was asleep to the threat and HOPED such divisions would not come to war. But the US had different goals.

Posted by: Jake Blanchard | Mar 3 2024 4:27 utc | 194

canuck | Mar 3 2024 3:56 utc | 188
For moonie it is a hard and long earned title. Merit based.
I had stopped reading comment threads due to the amount of background noise – idle chatter.
This thread had picked up for a bit. If your thing is endless patience with the willfully blind that is not an issue for me, though I have no time for them especially when they address me with their idiocy.
Naive is generally on the right track with his comments so did not place him in the clown catagory. Perhaps that will come if he works at it a bit harder.

Posted by: Peter AU1 | Mar 3 2024 4:29 utc | 195

Samu | Mar 3 2024 1:02 utc | 140–
Thanks for your reply. I served from 1979-1985. the 519th EW/Sigint company I worked for was stationed at Moffet Field in the heart of Silicon Valley. Our cadre was mostly E-6/7s who served in Nam and told how NVA trained by Soviets and equipped with Soviet equipment easily knew what the Yanks had planned because their op/sec was so shitty and their gear was very easy to jam. On FTXs, we were always put on the Red/Soviet side because we were as outstanding as the Soviets with our abilities given our training and experience; and we always messed with the Blue/Regular Army side which almost always lost because their moves were “telegraphed” and intercepted. The old guys would say that was because radio security was just as lax as during Nam. And judging from Ukie behavior and their NATO training, their op/sec is similar. That was my experience. Today’s capabilities are what we always said we’d like to use.
Peter AU1 | Mar 3 2024 1:04 utc | 141–
Probably until 2005 or so, bribery was very prevalent in localities to get things done or obtained, and is a “tradition” that goes way back into Tsardom. Ending that culture is one of Putin’s accomplishments, although it’s Team Putin in reality. The way United Russia functions is hybrid political party and social services/agency. It does a lot of important work that’s off budget and is helping to improve the delivery of government services in all areas but with a special eye to rural areas and their small communities, which is where Russia’s backbone lives.
Putin exercises hands-on management of Russia, an almost unique approach to governance. His team has learned from him, thus exhibiting the fact that Putin’s not just a leader but a mentor. Recall who he called Russia’s elite and the best qualified to lead Russia in the future.

Posted by: karlof1 | Mar 3 2024 4:36 utc | 196

As substitute for what the Germans were planning we have this posting from Reuters
Russia says Ukraine attacked Crimea with 38 drones
I expect details to be forthcoming.

Posted by: psychohistorian | Mar 3 2024 4:37 utc | 197

Gerald Horne, one of the best historians in the United States and a prolific author is interviewed by Sputnik. He deals with the subject of NATO’s looming defeat:
‘..Horne explained that NATO’s position is “the worst of both worlds,” because “it is enmeshed in a war it cannot win, but it can’t afford to lose. And when you are in such a corner, inevitably, it leads to the kinds of intemperate remarks of Mr. Macron, it leads to Rishi Sunak of London dispatching the flower of British youth to an uncertain fate in Ukraine,” he said, referring to comments by Scholz that there are already UK personnel in Ukraine operating Storm Shadow missile launches.
‘“I think taxpayers and US citizens should ask themselves how all these think thanks and bureaucrats at the State Department and Pentagon… manage this kind of potential quagmire that NATO and the United States are now enmeshed in?”…’
https://sputnikglobe.com/20240302/ukraine-is-major-defeat-for-west-who-has-been-dominating-planet-earth-1117093474.html

Posted by: bevin | Mar 3 2024 4:38 utc | 198

But, imo, to this end, Russia’s clear nuclear superiority assures that the M.A.D. doctrine will prevent WWIII. Conventional warefare will just drag on and on and on, just like it has for hundreds of years.
Posted by: Jake Blanchard | Mar 3 2024 3:30 utc | 181

That’s not a good outcome for Russia.
Conventional warfare can wreck countries just as well as nukes.
WWII did a lot more damage to the Soviets than they would have incurred if Churchill’s plan to nuke the USSR had gone ahead — there were only a handful of nukes ready to do and they would have just taken out a few cities, while the Germans destroyed hundreds and the USSR never fully recovered from that war.
But what we have now isn’t even the USSR in 1945 which was one third destroyed, it is a demographically depressed, much smaller Russia, that has not only lost a third of its industry, but also half of its population, and with continuing unfavorable demographic trends too.
“Gradual war”, given the escalation that is about to come, will finish it off, unless that escalation is met with the kind of response that will make sure it stops immediately.
Syria is the template.
And unfortunately it was also Putin in charge back then, and it was he who allowed it to be partitioned and neutered.

Posted by: shаdοwbanned | Mar 3 2024 4:49 utc | 199

https://t.me/mod_russia/36249

Tonight, an attempt by the Kyiv regime to carry out a terrorist attack using 38 aircraft-type UAVs on targets on the territory of the Russian Federation was stopped.
All Ukrainian unmanned aerial vehicles were destroyed by air defense systems on duty over the territory of the Republic of Crimea.

Highly doubtful all 38 UAVs were neutralized.

Posted by: shаdοwbanned | Mar 3 2024 4:55 utc | 200