Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
March 18, 2024
Selling A Predicted Behavior As Protest?

This morning I read through some curious stories.

U.S. citizens, answering anti-buy-lobby call, protest as shops open

NEW YORK – Citizens protested against rampant consumerism by forming large lines just as shops opened – answering calls by Back-To-Nature to buy less, and undercutting preliminary reports of record sales.


bigger

bigger

Holiday travelers, answering leaders call, protest as check-ins open

WASHINGTON – On the day before Thanksgiving travelers protested air planes' emissions, by forming long lines as flight check-ins were opening – answering a call by the late deaf Thomas, and undercutting preliminary congestion reports.


bigger

bigger

You, dear reader, will have immediately noticed that the above items are nonsense and fake. Protesting shopping by rushing stores and protesting plane emissions by booking flights does not make any sense.

Neither does protesting against an election by going to vote. Still, this is what U.S. propaganda tries to insinuate.

Russian voters, answering Navalny’s call, protest as Putin extends his rule

MOSCOW — On the final day of a presidential election with only one possible result, Russians protested Vladimir Putin’s authoritarian hold on power by forming long lines to vote against him at noon Sunday — answering the call of the late opposition leader Alexei Navalny, and undercutting preliminary results Sunday night that led Putin to claim a landslide victory.

The “Noon Against Putin” protest, with voters forming queues at polling stations in major cities such as Moscow, St. Petersburg, Yekaterinburg, Chelyabinsk, Tomsk and Novosibirsk, was a striking — if futile — display of solidarity and dissent and challenged the Kremlin’s main message: that Putin is a legitimate president who commands massive support.

The Noon Against Putin protest was particularly striking at Russian embassies in nations with significant numbers of Russians who fled after the invasion of Ukraine. They included those in Armenia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Germany, China, Portugal, Britain and others.

Here is a reality based report from one of those embassies:

Today, Sunday, is the third and final day of balloting at Russian polling stations around the world and at 9.30 am I arrived at the Russian embassy in Brussels to accompany a friend to vote.

Russians are late risers, especially on Sundays, and we were well rewarded for our early arrival at the embassy, because the line inside to register and then vote was only 20 minutes long. As we left, the throngs began to arrive.

Gilbert Doctorow, who wrote the above, has lived in Russia for many years. He knows Russian habits. It was obvious, not only to him, that  Sunday noon in Russia would see the longest lines of voters.

To preemptively declare these predictable lines a sign of protest may be be seen as smart propaganda but it will have little effect on anyone living outside of the propagandists' bubble.

But somehow, from inside that bubble, such idiotic claims are seen as sane:

Thousands of Russians in big cities attempted to make their displeasure known at both the nature of Putin’s regime and the ongoing war in Ukraine by going to vote at noon Sunday — a symbolic act of solidarity with the late pro-democracy activist Alexei Navalny, who had long called for fairer and freer elections in Russia before dying in captivity.

Do such folks believe in this most primitive form of their propaganda?

Comments

Typo: 758 million should be 738 million dollars

Posted by: Pravda | Mar 20 2024 12:56 utc | 201

hough people FINALLY got around to mentioning the excerable Jakob Schiff when discussung Wall St directly financing the rise of Bolshevism, no one mentioned the extent of his largesse.
From at least as early as 1905, Schiff provided at least 20,000,000 Dollars (Million with an “M”) of financial support, to the Bolshevics.
Schiff’s financial support probably began earlier than 1905 but that is the earliest date we know for sure that he was providing funds to the Bolshevics.
When converted to 2024 Dollars Shiff’s direct financial support for Bolshevism amounts to at least 758,000,000 Dollars …. at a minimum
Emotive and knee-jerk attempts by ridiculous ideologues to dismiss that level of funding, to pretend it had little or no effect on the rise of Bolshevism, are simply laughable. Even a midwit at this point should be wondering “Would Bolshevism have existed at all in Russia without that massive amount of foreign (ie: Wall St Jewish) funding?”
Equally laughable is the, as usual, completely dishonest attempt to claim that Trotsky’s release from Canadian custody and return to Russia, was due solely to Russian Provisional Gov’t pressure, when the world and it’s dog knows (or should know) that it was the influence of Wall St Bankers (Jakob Schiff and his cronies again) which finally secured his release.
The fact that any 1920’s list of the top 500 or so Bolshevics, would have had at least 400 Jewish names on it, seemingly signifies nothing to the pseudo-intellectuals. Just a coincidence, lol
The pathetically inept attempts to gloss-over German and international banker (ie: Jewish/Wall St) support for Lenin are so risible as to not even require further comment”
Posted by: Pravda | Mar 20 2024 12:45 utc | 201
Thank you for the reality check.
Your post is much better than mine illustrating the obvious point that Leftist ideologues as it decimates their narrative..

Posted by: canuck | Mar 20 2024 15:36 utc | 202

Posted by: canuck | Mar 20 2024 15:36 utc | 203
apologies for my error in saying no one referred to it, but i see now that you in fact did make reference to Schiff’s 20,000,000 largesse in support of Russian Bolshevism.

Posted by: Pravda | Mar 20 2024 17:52 utc | 203

You could also have mentioned the daily protests against congestion by motorists who insist on driving to work at 8 am and returning home after 5 pm.
Posted by: Jan Sammer | Mar 18 2024 12:17 utc | 1
You cannot make morons who create traffic jams to suffer without some personal sacrifice.

Posted by: Piotr Berman | Mar 24 2024 18:37 utc | 204

Posted by: bevin | Mar 18 2024 15:04 utc | 31
It is somewhat strange, because Ukrainian fortifications were quite effective so far, including those in south Donbas and Zaporozhye, the latter presumably build after SMO started. Perhaps the problems go beyond funding, e.g. workforce cannibalized by the mobilizations, and with bidding system, there are too few companies with equipment, workers and materials so the costs went up.

Posted by: Piotr Berman | Mar 24 2024 20:06 utc | 205