Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
February 18, 2024
The MoA Week In Review – OT 2024-052

Last week's post on Moon of Alabama:

Blogging:

Ukraine:

Middle East:

> On one occasion, a handful of children, all about ages 5 to 8, were carried to the emergency room by their parents. All had single sniper shots to the head. These families were returning to their homes in Khan Yunis, about 2.5 miles away from the hospital, after Israeli tanks had withdrawn. But the snipers apparently stayed behind. None of these children survived. <

Russia:

Misc:


Other issues:

Assange:

Germany:

Use as open (not related to Ukraine or Palestine) thread …

Comments

I wonder what role the CIA had in planning the Oct 7th Intentional Security Failure at the Gaza border?
iZrael (and the CIA?) had possession of Hamas’ jail break plan a year ahead of time.
They obtained Hamas’ detailed plans for Oct 7th a year ago- a monumental success.
Created a prison wall with multilayered security monitoring – human and electronic – success
Had human intel – spooks embedded in Hamas and the Gaza civilian population – success (and also likely the source that absconded with Hamas detailed Oct 7th plans)
Real-time monitoring of Hamas’ hand-held radio network.
Had large number of IDF troops surrounding Gaza
(there is more, but that should make the point)
They recognized that Hamas’ written plan for Oct 7th could not succeed under the above conditions.
They decided to stop monitoring Hamas’ hand-held radio network, so they claim.
They had to ignore the alerts being sounded by border watchers.
They had to give a thumbs-down to written reports by intelligence officers
warning of an imminent Oct 7th (this happened!).
They had to ignore that Hamas had been trying to lull them into complacency (this was in writing in the Hamas Oct 7th plans).
They had to remove the vast majority of the IDF troops surrounding Gaza just in time for Oct 7th
Once the jail break was under way support troops had to be delayed for hours. (They refuse to explain
why this happened, stating that they will “investigate” only after Hamas is defeated.)
They had to implement the Hannibal Directive in order to achieve maximum civilian casualties.
The confluence of too many huge failures and too many horrible decisions
to be credible.
What did the CIA know, besides *everything*?
Destabilization. To borrow from the letter signed by 51 CIA agents interfering with a US Presidential election – “has the classic earmarks of a CIA destabilization operation.”
The Oct 7th Intentional Security Failure has heightened war from Yemen to Lebanon to Iraq. A criminal, Netanyahu, has had temporary life breathed into his faltering administration. Most of all it has stirred blood lust in the iZraeli population such they support the ethnic cleansing of the West Bank and Gaza or Genocide, whichever comes first.
(IDF – Intentional Defense Failure)

Posted by: librul | Feb 18 2024 13:48 utc | 1

Well done Lirul @ 1 i appreciate what your doing.

Posted by: Mark2 | Feb 18 2024 13:57 utc | 2

Typo ….. Librul

Posted by: Mark2 | Feb 18 2024 13:58 utc | 3

@Posted by: Mark2 | Feb 18 2024 13:57 utc | 2
Thx, so much. I appreciate it more than you know.
I keep getting so much flack, and scarcely (if any) refutation of details, it is puzzling to me.
I have attempted to pose the issue from more than one approach
so that people might finally see.

Posted by: librul | Feb 18 2024 14:02 utc | 4

b did you miss this?
https://thecradle.co/articles/secrecy-shrouds-british-military-actions-in-lebanon
Kit Klarenberg writes about what is under U.K. ‘D Notice’ a call by the Crown to the Press not to publish anything about the subject.
He also had his Musk account censored.
“ It goes without saying that Britain’s involvement in Israel’s genocidal assault in Gaza is shrouded in intense secrecy. In December 2020, London and Tel Aviv signed a military cooperation agreement described by Ministry of Defense officials as an “important piece of defense diplomacy” that “strengthens” military ties between the two countries, while providing “a mechanism for planning our joint activity.”
The contents of this agreement, however, remain hidden not only from ordinary British citizens but also from elected lawmakers.”
We already live in a fascist, censored, police state now moving towards open paramilitary thugs in the streets beating up protesters and arresting and jailing without trial ordinary people. The only thing stopping them temporarily is the numbers of protestors from all backgrounds who are daily gathering around the country in protest at the Genocided Palestinians.
Our Police are protecting the Illegal Apartheid Entity’s Embassy from a hundred yards away.
The BDS movement was s now stepping up. McDonalds and co and a lot of retailers are about to lose their Brand values as more and more are bypassing the daily mass media news and radio shows messaging.
It’s going to be a hot summer and the elections are going to be a sham.

Posted by: DunGroanin | Feb 18 2024 14:09 utc | 5

Librul @ 4
Yes i know i’v been watching, and was aware of the situation as you are..
What we both witness is a psycalogical coping mechanism from bar flys as in the general public.
The situation in Gaze is right now so horendous, people are tramatised by just following it. Alot have wondered off, or wanted to disrupt the subject.
Hang on in their i got you back.

Posted by: Mark2 | Feb 18 2024 14:13 utc | 6

Apologies b, Re my post above, of course you didn’t miss it – I did – it was published in December. Only read it yesterday. But still relevant.

Posted by: DunGroanin | Feb 18 2024 14:27 utc | 7

@Posted by: DunGroanin | Feb 18 2024 14:09 utc | 5
Appears that the British want to participate in World Destabilization too.
From your link:

On 8 October, veteran British reporter Robert Peston published a remarkable post on the social media platform X. Citing insider information from “government and intelligence sources,” Peston asserted that the Palestinian resistance operation Al-Aqsa Flood would inevitably evolve into a full-blown regional war, one that will be “as destabilizing to global security as Putin’s attack on Ukraine.” The journalist forewarned:

     ”We are in the early stages of a conflict with ramifications for much of the world.”

Posted by: librul | Feb 18 2024 14:35 utc | 8

Regarding global warming: it has occurred to me that increased CO2 leads to “greening” which will lead to less need for fertilizers and other agribusiness “interventions”, and open large new areas to agriculture in places like Canada and Russia (and Alaska if you like). It will also increase the rate of natural decomposition, and of course make many “cold blooded” creatures more active.
Very destabilizing, no doubt.

Posted by: Bemildred | Feb 18 2024 16:20 utc | 9

@Posted by: Mark2 | Feb 18 2024 13:57 utc | 2
Thx, so much. I appreciate it more than you know.
I keep getting so much flack, and scarcely (if any) refutation of details, it is puzzling to me.
I have attempted to pose the issue from more than one approach
so that people might finally see.
Posted by: librul | Feb 18 2024 14:02 utc | 4
I’ve posted my support and some additions in the other thread, and similar material several times. As I said in the Palestine thread, I think the missing piece in your post is Motive. Motive, means, intention, opportunity are what transforms a circumstantial case into a rock solid conviction. Netanyahoo had the motive in spades- self preservation. His cohort has the motive of Greater Israel, and the Intent there is manifested in a million speeches and action. Means- Netanyahoo himself created the means for this event- he set up Hamas. He also created the opportunity by moving and standing down forces, and forcing a bunch of ravers into Hamas’ airborne landing area. It’s all there, a prosecutor’s wet dream.

Posted by: Honzo | Feb 18 2024 16:52 utc | 10

Regarding global warming: it has occurred to me that increased CO2 leads to “greening” which will lead to less need for fertilizers and other agribusiness “interventions”, and open large new areas to agriculture in places like Canada and Russia (and Alaska if you like). It will also increase the rate of natural decomposition, and of course make many “cold blooded” creatures more active.
Very destabilizing, no doubt.
Posted by: Bemildred | Feb 18 2024 16:20 utc | 9
If Russia was really convinced that anthropogenic climate change was real, they’d be burning more coal instead of less. It’s a win-win for them: improved agriculture in Russia, and the opening of arctic sea resources and trade routes. Possibly they do see this, and their current movement to ‘clean fuels’ is one of convenience and a bit of maskirovka to keep the west from getting cranked up pre-SMO.
The truth of the long term geologic record is that the average temperature globally is declining. We are in an inter-galacial warm period, but we are in an ice age and if the geologic record is any guide, the warm period is about to end, pretty rapidly. This pattern is aligned with a similar pattern of atmospheric carbon, which was orders of magnitude higher a hundred million years ago- during which time, the total biosphere of earth was also much larger. That biosphere, however, over the long haul, has sequestered much of the carbon out of the carbon cycle, and buried it beneath the earth as coal, oil and natural gas.
The atmospheric carbon drought has recently (in geological terms) been so extreme that the continued existence of life has been threatened. It is also responsible for the ice ages. The peaks and valley of the glacial maxima and minima are driven by the Milankovich cycles and some other issues, but they have their extreme shape because the overall lack of atmospheric CO2 makes the cooling end of the cycle so extreme.
People need to start asking whether would rather deal with a rapid plunge into a glacial maximum, or, at best, a few degrees more heat and more CO2 that may extend this inter-glacial period. Some scientists believe it IS extending the inter-glacial period, that without it, the plunge would already be well underway.

Posted by: Honzo | Feb 18 2024 17:06 utc | 11

@6 Mark2
How do you feel empathy for a group of people going through the unimaginable?
You would have to put yourself into extreme discomfort and even then, one could barely hold a candle to the monstrous circumstance in front of them without running away from fear back into the comforts we are surrounded by in the west.
This is not a separate case of suffering, a sideshow that we can bring attention to that would arouse enough anger here in the west to stop.
The Palestinians are on the front lines of the conflict that threatens the entire world. They are the first. They are the Melians from Thucydides. No amount of empathy from us here could ever spare one hair on a poor child’s face over there.
We can not help them. We can not help the Ukrainians to come to the light and join hands with Russia. But we can ready ourselves by not looking away and we should. Because in time, we will also be the Palestinians. In time, we will be called into the trench by powers much greater than us. And we will then have to fight for our dignity, the same dignity that the Palestinians will not let go of today.

Posted by: NemesisCalling | Feb 18 2024 17:12 utc | 12

People need to start asking whether would rather deal with a rapid plunge into a glacial maximum, or, at best, a few degrees more heat and more CO2 that may extend this inter-glacial period. Some scientists believe it IS extending the inter-glacial period, that without it, the plunge would already be well underway.
Posted by: Honzo | Feb 18 2024 17:06 utc | 11
I have been sympathetic to the idea that what we actually have is a “carbon drought” for around 20 years, although the idea is not simple, many factors seem relevant. E.g. massive methane leaks take O2 out of the atmosphere while the methane is being oxydized. O2 comes mostly from plants, who rely an animals and natural processes for the carbon they need, neither stays in the atmosphere for very long without replenishement.
The system itself is dynamic, and ought the be treated in a careful manner, but course we intend to meddle, are meddling, in it.
In any case, I appreciate your argument and regret it is not more part of the conversation.
Constantly reminds me of the old cartoon about the “Sorcerer’s Apprentice”.

Posted by: Bemildred | Feb 18 2024 17:55 utc | 13

thanks b… hopefully i can read at least some of these links.. i am short on time at present…
@ librul | Feb 18 2024 13:48 utc | 1
thanks! how much of this is documented in a concrete manner? obviously you are saying false flag oct 7th and i agree with this.
on a different note, i posted b’s article on an astrology site and got this response.. i think it is complete bullshit, but wonder what b thinks of it?
“Moonofalabama.org… Hem!
In her book Dark Money, Jane Mayer describes DonorsTrust and its sister organization Donors Capital Fund (behind Moonofalabama.org) as “a screen for the right wing, behind which fingerprints disappeared from the cash.”
Listed as an open source website, money does not seem to follow the same criteria.”
BIMHUIS TV Presents: THE BAD PLUS novermber 2022

Posted by: james | Feb 18 2024 18:13 utc | 14

it was the navalny article that i posted..

Posted by: james | Feb 18 2024 18:15 utc | 15

b,
Hersh’s piece on the SEALs and the Dow should be filed under Yemen or Gaza, not Ukraine at least, no?

Posted by: Tom_Q_Collins | Feb 18 2024 18:47 utc | 16

Posted by: james | Feb 18 2024 18:13 utc | 14
Sounds like bullshit. I’ll see if I can find the book they mentioned later this afternoon and will follow up.

Posted by: Tom_Q_Collins | Feb 18 2024 18:49 utc | 17

@ Tom_Q_Collins | Feb 18 2024 18:49 utc | 17
thanks tom.. i am certain it is 100% bullshit, but… i am very close to asking b directly about this, but don’t want to bug him!

Posted by: james | Feb 18 2024 19:07 utc | 18

least this otherwise excellent site becomes t total global warming denial site I would urge any and all to look elsewhere for their real and current information.
Climate Change is not a belief system. You either understand or you don’t.
Climate science is OPEN SOURCE. There are tens of thousands of scientist, researchers, biologist, and more doing real work, sharing data, co-creating applications and models, constantly upgrading and merging data and observations. Most of these folks are passionate about science and are twice as intelligent as the schmoes on this site who think they have a better handle on the issue that the rest of the world.
Yes there are plenty of scientist that believe that there is no global warming just like the scientist who believe that mRNA jabs are safe and effective.
Governments and other organization have fucked things up, scammed, lied, manipulated, cheated, etc. but that doesn’t mean climate science is a scam. It is real and it is devastatingly serious.
Russia known this too but they too need to keep growing or die.
If the Artic continues to melt the shallow shelf which has massive methane deposits will melt triggering a potential to fundamentally shift Earths atmosphere to being unable to support life.

Posted by: jef | Feb 18 2024 19:08 utc | 19

Most of these folks are passionate about science and are twice as intelligent as the schmoes on this site who think they have a better handle on the issue that the rest of the world.
Posted by: jef | Feb 18 2024 19:08 utc | 19

Unfortunately, a lot of the schmoes feel that the real battle is against “environmentalists”. In other words, they are true turbo-goys: they bought and fully embraced the second most important globalist psyop/poison of consumerism. “You’ll only take my car keys from my cold dead hands.”
(The most important globalist psyop of course being the worship of alcohol and drugs. The third one feminism.)

Posted by: Michael A | Feb 18 2024 19:21 utc | 20

Mark2
Most of my life I have read about history. The history of civilization is the history of war. Some terribly destructive that virtually reaches entire peoples.
WII and the advent of nuclear weapons is a clear marking point in history. Our current world is the post WWII UN world. So I look at the events since then. US pumping its democracy and freedom and so forth. Perhaps the starting point is Korea.
How many dead there – 20 million? Vietnam 5, Brits were also operating in Borneo and elsewhere – no idea of casualties. Afghanistan, 1979 through to 2020/21 – how many dead there?, Iraq 1990 or so through to present – how many dead in that time? on top of Albright’s 500,000 children Syria, Libya Yugoslavia, Yemen, and throughout all this time sine WWII, South America and Palestine and there will be many more – Obama’s drone wars….
Protests in the ‘democratic’ west – put down with force if the protesters were determined but overall changed nothing, grass movements kick off but then get infiltrated and turned… Voting?
The Russia China joint statement is a clear marker that ends to post WWII era. We can look at the state of Russia China plus Iran as the main three, but then there is RoW. Some ups and downs there, many still straddling the fence, Hindutva (extremist) India a fly in the ointment.
Historically, changes like this are accompanied by massive death, destruction and turbulence. The people about me are the same as the Ukroids – zero understanding of the great change that is occurring, insulated from the world.
China and Russia have a good understanding of history and the death and destruction that accompany great change and it is obvious they are trying to minimize. The problem in this day and age is that the collapsing western empire has enough nukes to literately destroy the world.
In areas that have been devastated with just a few survivors. If they are young, they often go on to have a family and rebuild or they might migrate and restart. I’ve often wondered about the strength that allows them to carry on.
Some perhaps many have some form of spiritual belief that helps though others may not.
What is still to come? The war in Europe grow? The middle east region> The intended war against China – if anything kicks of there, the very high populations densities, any war could see tens of millions of casualties even if it does not go nuclear.
Palestine – the only thing that will help is armed insurrection throughout five eyes but the majority are just brainwashed sheep. Insurrection in just one of the five-eyes will be put down by the combined forces of five-eyes. The Australian government just voted on asking tha Assange be released back to Australia. They did not vote on using an ultimatum like declaring Independence from five eyes, dumping the monarch of England as head of state nor booting out foreign five-eyes agents. The vote was purely a feel good thing unless US/UK has already given the nod to release Assange which I find doubtful.
That is the situation we are in.

Posted by: Peter AU1 | Feb 18 2024 19:45 utc | 21

It is real and it is devastatingly serious.
Posted by: jef | Feb 18 2024 19:08 utc | 19
What are you doing in your personal life to stop the end of the world? Since life on Earth itself is at risk, I assume you must have sold your car by now, no longer fly anywhere, certainly only buy second hand if anything, and only by locally grown food, and have not done any home remodeling since you saw the error of your ways.

Posted by: UWDude | Feb 18 2024 19:58 utc | 22

Posted by: DunGroanin | Feb 18 2024 14:09 utc | 5
….
The Zionists have almost total control of the country and will legislate even more to ban questioning or dissent (just as Macron is now doing re certain Pfizer/Moderna experimental medications).
Note that stazi Starmer has now sneaked another blatant appendage of the Israeli deep-state into the Westminster parliament.
Next UK election result will be terrible whichever big party “wins”.

Posted by: Cynic | Feb 18 2024 19:59 utc | 23

It just amazes me that 2/3rds of the western industrialized world acknowledges that the world will end because of their rampant consumerism, yet they dont seem to care. Oil company profits are through the roof, gas consumption continues to climb every year, Proctor and Gamble still has record profits, selling all sorts of noxious shit like shampoos, soaps, and air fresheners, land fills are filling with e-waste, as trendy science believers show big corporations like Apple they wont take their Earth ending polluting ways by buying a new iPhone once every three years instead of every two.
And lets not forget all the in this house we believe signs in my little rural city where every shopping trip and errand requires a 20 mile drive, yet there is always a line full of salt and pepper haired, environmentally conscious karen in their SUVs, (with a little ukrainian flag bumper sticker) at the latte stands, buying their ethically sourced coffee in recycled cups as their engines idle for five minutes…
…so, when that glorious day comes, when the whole world accepts “the science” nobody will do a god damned thing about their ways…
…except pay their carbon taxes to change the climate.

Posted by: UWDude | Feb 18 2024 20:08 utc | 24

Documented reports from independent journalists have established that NGOs are spearheading the immigrant-invaders who are overrunning the United States. As I recently reported ( https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2024/02/06/america-is-undergoing-genocide/ ), NGOs are actually recruiting “people of color” into the ranks of immigrant-invaders, providing them with transportation, money, and maps of the pathways to the US border that are supplied with accommodation, food, and health care. One of the most important NGOs underwriting the immigrant-invaders seems to be the Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society (HIAS), of which the current director of the US Department of Homeland Security, Alejandro Mayorkas, himself a Jew, was a board member until December 2020. According to an article on substack, HIAS has received $100,000,000 from the US government in the past three years. If this is true, then the Biden regime is underwriting the immigrant invasion with US taxpayers’ money.
The long-term, ongoing invasion of the EU and UK has benefited enormously from NGOs, especially from the moral support the NGOs provide for the invasion and for their work in conditioning Europeans to accept immigrant-invaders as the moral thing to do. You might remember the reports of the German women whose reward for welcoming the immigrant-invaders was to be raped by them. When the women complained of being raped, they were branded “racists.”
The story is the same in Sweden and Norway.

https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2024/02/18/the-genocide-of-the-west/

Posted by: Scorpion | Feb 18 2024 20:18 utc | 25

@librul, Mark2, Honzo:
I think it’s a wise idea to keep in mind that the institutions which are telling us that “Israel knew!” are known liars. Since this is an assertion that each of you have accepted, prima facile and without any reflection, I’ll ask each of you: don’t you think this may just be an attempt to save face by the intel agencies who want to persuade the gullible public (as in: those fools who believe Palestinans bake babies alive) that US/uk/Israel has been in control all along?
Here are some easily refutable points each of you clearly have accepted, but not considered in any real depth:
A) Israel has infiltrated and “already knew” the Al Qassam Brigades’ plans. This is an assertion asserted by Mossad and obviously backed up by the CIA, and MI-7/GCHQ. Literally, each of you is accepting this claim—which clearly has been “leaked” by US/uk/Israel intelligence services—prima facile, without any consideration that the claim itself may well be a bald-faced lie that is attempting damage control to save face for those agencies in the wake of Oct 7th.
Not least because Mossad is in intense damage-control mode as the Israeli public is outraged by their failure.
And yet, if there is any group on the planet known for mercilessly, tirelessly, and ruthlessly eliminating traitors who might work with the US/uk/Israel trifecta, it is Hamas and Al Qassam. They are as clinical and assiduous in ferreting out spies as the IRA was, back at its height.
B) The reasons for pulling back Israeli troops from the Gaza region could well be any number of things: economic pressures, a planned invasion of Lebanon against Hizb’Allah, etc. In fact, the current shift by the IOF that is reorienting them towards an invasion of Lebanon strongly suggests this was what they were planning before they got blindsided by the Oct 7th attack by Hamas, which has done no small amount of damage: didn’t someone here post 160 Merkavas have been seriously damaged/destroyed?
C) The presumption that the Al Qassam Brigades are riddled with Israeli agents selling out their fellow Gazans is an Israeli propaganda point. There is little evidence to back that up. Case in point: if the Al Qassam Brigades are so compromised by Israeli agents, then why doesn’t Israel know all of the entrances to the tunnels, possess a precise map of their layout, and know which regions need to be militarily targeted? Clearly, this is not the case because Israeli casualties in Gaza have been off-the-charts, in comparison to other Israeli attacks on Gaza.
D) In Re: radio monitoring: see point C). Hamas is likely using encrypted and geographically isolated—as well as metallurgically protected—ground lines for the bulk of their communications. Radios may be being used, but those will be digitally encrypted with a wandering set of cyphers that are double-encoded with crypto-speech; again, there is no reason to believe the Israelis have cracked any of it. Moreover, radio would only be used in real-time tactical military support on the battlefield; Al Qassam would never be so stupid as to use radio to communicate long-term plans or critical meetings. Incidentally, this is the same strategy that helped Hizb’Allah win the 2006 war against the Israeli invasion of Lebanon.
All of these entirely plausible—indeed, probable—points made, here, renders every single speculation y’all accept in the following quote entirely irrelevant and wrong:

They decided to stop monitoring Hamas’ hand-held radio network, so they claim.
They had to ignore the alerts being sounded by border watchers.
They had to give a thumbs-down to written reports by intelligence officers
warning of an imminent Oct 7th (this happened!).
They had to ignore that Hamas had been trying to lull them into complacency (this was in writing in the Hamas Oct 7th plans).
They had to remove the vast majority of the IDF troops surrounding Gaza just in time for Oct 7th
Once the jail break was under way support troops had to be delayed for hours. (They refuse to explain
why this happened, stating that they will “investigate” only after Hamas is defeated.)
They had to implement the Hannibal Directive in order to achieve maximum civilian casualties.

Now, I don’t much understand why y’all have accepted and insist on promoting these clearly suspicious presumptions, but I am giving each of you an opportunity to take a step back and admit a failure to grasp the full spectrum of opportunities that are available to Al Qassam—which is the group truly responsible for the Oct 7th attacks. Hamas had nothing to do with the planning, preparations, nor execution of those attacks. The only role Hamas played was in giving the green light once the political situation was suitable for the repercussions that both Hamas and Al Qassam knew would follow.
Hamas’s role in the attacks was strictly as an intermediary among the other regional groups. The Al Qassam plan was likely ordained years ago, and set on the back-burner by Hamas in anticipation of the appropriate political moment.
Now, this…

The confluence of too many huge failures and too many horrible decisions to be credible.

…is truly dismissive of Gazan and Palestinian knowledge, capabilities, and determination. Which I, personally, find detestable in this whole fantasy you each have glommed on to.
No; the incompetence and corruption of the US/uk/Israel triangle of governments, Intel agencies, and militaries has been obviously manifested, both domestically and internationally, every moment of every day, these last 20 years.
Y’all’s presumption that the Palestinians in Gaza are too stupid, weak, and riddled with traitors to be able to exploit that corruption is, frankly, a shameful admission that each of you still believes that despite the rampant corruption and devolution of the “collective West”, each of you continues to believe the Palestinians are more benighted and corrupt, with requires each of you to set aside the prior 70 years of suffering, learning, shrewdness, and imperatively-motivating destitution this noble people has been forced to survive under.
All of which is entirely the consequence of these US/uk/Israel agencies whose word each of you now accepts—even despite each of you knowing the deluge of lies and deceits this collective group has propagated, for so many decades—as if their words, on any subject, can be trusted.
I gotta say, liberal: you do live up to your name. You genuinely do have the attention span of a liberal.

Posted by: Pacifica Advocate | Feb 18 2024 20:25 utc | 26

Posted by: james | Feb 18 2024 19:07 utc | 18
Confirmed 100% Grade A Bullshit. From the subject Jane Meyer book:

“Instead, by the time Obama took office some of the biggest bankrollers of the war against climate science had, if anything, gone further underground. Rather than funding the campaign directly, a growing number of private conservative foundations and donors had begun directing their contributions through an organization called DonorsTrust that in essence became a screen for the right wing, behind which fingerprints disappeared from the cash. Housed in a humdrum brick building in Alexandria, Virginia, DonorsTrust and its affiliate, Donors Capital Fund, were memorably described by Mother Jones’s Andy Kroll as “the dark-money ATM of the conservative movement.”

No mention at all in this edition of MoA.

Posted by: Tom_Q_Collins | Feb 18 2024 20:27 utc | 27

Posted by: UWDude | Feb 18 2024 20:08 utc | 24
It just amazes me that 2/3rds of the western industrialized world acknowledges that the world will end because of their rampant consumerism, yet they dont seem to care. Oil company profits are through the roof, gas consumption continues to climb every year, Proctor and Gamble still has record profits, selling all sorts of noxious shit like shampoos, soaps, and air fresheners, land fills are filling with e-waste, as trendy science believers show big corporations like Apple they wont take their Earth ending polluting ways by buying a new iPhone once every three years instead of every two.
Well, this time you sure don’t sound like the Republicans and right wingers you’ve had a history of supporting on this website. And you might wind up raked over the coals for your first couple of sentences, which seem to acknowledge the existence of global warming that some here insist is a scam.

Posted by: Inka | Feb 18 2024 20:32 utc | 28

Posted by: Scorpion | Feb 18 2024 20:18 utc | 25
PCR has jumped the shark on immigration. No mention at all of the ROOT CAUSE of said “invasion”, namely, the continuation of colonialism and war in the global south brought to them by neoliberal economic policies, sanctions and regime change carried out by Democrats, Republicans and Trump alike. Almost ALL of the migrants on the US southern border are currently coming from Venezuela as a result of Trump’s sanctions and Biden’s refusal to lift them.

Posted by: Tom_Q_Collins | Feb 18 2024 20:36 utc | 29

thanks tom!!! i just sent them a message.. i will let you know if and when they respond.. cheers james

Posted by: james | Feb 18 2024 20:36 utc | 30

Posted by: Inka | Feb 18 2024 20:32 utc | 28
History of supporting on this site. LMFAO.

Posted by: Tom_Q_Collins | Feb 18 2024 20:36 utc | 31

Posted by: Pacifica Advocate | Feb 18 2024 20:25 utc | 26
Thanks for taking the time P.A.
Finally some common sense.

Posted by: waynorinorway | Feb 18 2024 20:37 utc | 32

Posted by: james | Feb 18 2024 20:36 utc | 30
In case they ask.
http s:// z -li brary.s e/book/4541876/76b100/dark-money-the-hidden-history-of-the-billionaires-behind-the-rise-of-the-radical-right.html
Remove spaces.

Posted by: Tom_Q_Collins | Feb 18 2024 20:38 utc | 33

PeterAu1 @ 21
Thanks as always its good to know your ther tuned and focused.
We are very limited to what we can do, but those two things above are essential.
Hang on to tbe truth. When people turn their back on that their soul dies they become.
brain dead.
As bad as the truth is in Gaza never let it become normalised.
Thats why your one of thee best here.
The learned types with big egos i can do with out.
Am on tickover at the momment building strengh for the next round.
Cheers and much respect Pete.

Posted by: Mark2 | Feb 18 2024 20:40 utc | 34

Posted by: Pacifica Advocate | Feb 18 2024 20:25 utc | 26
You speak a lot about “assertions” which you use ad hominem to attempt to discredit sources that are not even being cited.
Then you make the following blind assertion:
“And yet, if there is any group on the planet known for mercilessly, tirelessly, and ruthlessly eliminating traitors who might work with the US/uk/Israel trifecta, it is Hamas and Al Qassam. They are as clinical and assiduous in ferreting out spies as the IRA was, back at its height.”
For which you provide zero factual evidence or citations.

Posted by: Tom_Q_Collins | Feb 18 2024 20:40 utc | 35

Climate Change is not a belief system. You either understand or you don’t.
Posted by: jef | Feb 18 2024 19:08 utc | 19

I cannot count the number of times I have had Evangelical “Take the Bible Literally!” beliebers say this exact same thing about their corruption of Christianity.
Genuine Science is about debate of the available facts as established by Science. If you find the scientific debate over Climate Change to disturb your cockles, then feel free to chime in with your own fact-based refutations. Otherwise, don’t claim to be standing up for “science”.

Posted by: Pacifica Advocate | Feb 18 2024 20:42 utc | 36

Hamas can, in several ways, thank the Mossad and Shin Bet (the Izzy gov’t in general) for its existence. Anyone who thinks there aren’t double agents and infiltrators is a naive child.
https://swprs.org/why-israel-created-hamas/

Posted by: Tom_Q_Collins | Feb 18 2024 20:42 utc | 37

Posted by: Pacifica Advocate | Feb 18 2024 20:25 utc | 26
An amazingly long way to create and attack a strawman. I don’t believe, and I suspect librul agrees with me, that the resistance is weak, cowardly, incompetent or anything else. Hamas is itself divided into two major factions, one of which has distanced itself for some time from the leadership supported by Israel. There is no doubt that they are the ones who prepared the way for this attack and coordinated with other cells. This does not in any way negate the facts that show that Netanyahoo made plans for just this event going back to the creation of Hamas itself. He chose when and how to provoke the attack, he knew how some of it would unfold, but the real resistance element fooled him in to thinking they were weak and Israel would have to bend over backward to give the attack credibility. Which Netanyahoo did. Nutty told us himself on the 8th that Oct 7 was Israel’s 9/11.

Posted by: Honzo | Feb 18 2024 20:49 utc | 38

Haaretz: Israel’s Deadly Complacency Wasn’t Just an Intelligence Failure
“People in the communities next to Gaza heard Hamas training to infiltrate Israel, but the army disregarded their warnings and curtailed their surveillance capabilities. The army’s spotters detected suspicious digging, but their superiors claimed it was for farmwork. The blindness of intelligence wasn’t due only to a failure to identify the signs. Political considerations also played a part.”
https://archive.ph/EC0TO

Posted by: Tom_Q_Collins | Feb 18 2024 20:52 utc | 39

@ Tom_Q_Collins | Feb 18 2024 20:38 utc | 33
thanks..

Posted by: james | Feb 18 2024 20:52 utc | 40

Posted by: Pacifica Advocate | Feb 18 2024 20:25 utc | 26
Yes, as a historian, when I have to explain an event and the choice is between deep-state 5D-chess-playing lever-pulling illuminati, or simply sheer incompetence, I’ll take the latter every day and twice on Sundays. Anyone who’s worked in a large bureaucratic institution (like a university) knows that middle management do not get their promotions because they’re intelligent and clever but because their compliant and have a taste for KoolAid. 90% of policy reaction to historical events are simply fuck-ups, the left hand ignorant of the right hand, one three-letter agency locked in some petty turf war with another. To be able to carry off the conspiratorial shite many believe in here just imagine the kind of fail-proof infrastructure, loyal unswerving competent staff, long-term logistical stability, ideological commitment, etc etc you’d need. Last time we saw that? Maybe 1941-45. Otherwise ‘snafu’ is about the best explanation, especially Oct 7.

Posted by: Patroklos | Feb 18 2024 20:53 utc | 41

@ Pacifica Advocate | Feb 18 2024 20:25 utc | 26
i 2nd waynorinorways response to you.. thanks for stating all that… as i see it, it is a tough call and there is a possibility of some truth in both assertions, although that makes it more challenging for everyone in terms of knowing the reality.. this is one reason i try to avoid any definitive statements on a lot of stuff.. like the death of navalny – much conjecture, but there is really no way of knowing for sure, although the west will tell you something very different then russia here..

Posted by: james | Feb 18 2024 20:56 utc | 42

Honzo @ 38
Its comments like this one of yours that we come here for, pure and simple truth. MOA at its best. United we stand. And call out the bullshit agenda merchants. ha ha.
Thanks for your earlyer comments to.
Much respect.

Posted by: Mark2 | Feb 18 2024 21:01 utc | 43

From the same Haaretz article linked above:

What was seen is also what was heard. Menachem Gida and 26 of his friends living in the communities in the area, who established a WhatsApp group called Field Security Operational Monitor, listened in to the wireless traffic of Hamas over a period of years. Time after time they heard how the organization’s combat personnel were practicing the breaching of the fence and arriving from the sea, conquering kibbutzim such as Zikim, Netiv Ha’asara and Nir Oz, seizing hostages and destroying everything in their path.
The group grasped the significance of the daily training exercises as being preparations for real operations, and they passed on all the information to the IDF. The army personnel they were in contact with were less worried – “fantasies” was their term for the talk about preparations to capture territory in Israel. Finally, last April the army restricted the group’s ability to monitor Hamas’ wireless traffic. Despite this, the group discerned an intensification of the training, and that information was reported by Kan 11, the public broadcaster, a few days before the attack.

From a Tweet in Hebrew:

A tweet posted by Kan 11 reporter Asaf Pozailov four days before the Hamas attack: “The Islamic Jihad organization has launched a loud exercise very close to the border, including missile launches, breaking into Israel and kidnapping soldiers. Dedi Peled, a resident of Netiv Ha’Asara [says]: This was significantly closer than previous times, the kids wake up during their holiday break and ask what happened, there are explosions. It’s not like previous exercises.”

More:

What Gida and his friends heard just before the war was also picked up by the female soldiers who served as spotters on the Gaza border. Their reports, which echo almost exactly the reports of spotters from the IDF outposts along the Suez Canal on the eve of the 1973 war, should have made it clear that a concrete change had occurred in routine activity taking place in the area adjacent to the fence. One spotter, Yael Rothenberg, told the website Zman Emet that she had reported to her superior seeing Hamas men with maps, “counting steps, digging there.” Similarly, the reports of the spotters at the Suez Canal exactly 50 years earlier made reference to Egyptian officers who were standing on the other side of the canal with maps and planning the attack. At that time, MI dismissed the significance of the reports, claiming these were Egyptian exercises; this time they claimed the digging detected by the spotters was farmwork.
It was clear to the spotters that an incursion was imminent; they discussed among themselves where it would happen and in which sector. It’s not clear what happened to their reports as they made their way up through the MI hierarchy, but it is clear that they didn’t bring about any change in the certainty that Hamas had been deterred and that, consequently, the warnings were not meaningful. Neglecting to put back into use the observation balloons that were intended to provide warnings from deep within the Gaza Strip is evidence of yet another painful expression of the rigid “concept.” (Use of the balloons had stopped just weeks prior to the attack.)

Another Haaretz article: https://archive.ph/qbaeX

“We need to tell the truth,” Israeli major general Gershon Hacohen, an associate of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, said in a 2019 TV interview. “Netanyahu’s strategy is to prevent the option of two states, so he is turning Hamas into his closest partner. Openly Hamas is an enemy. Covertly, it’s an ally.”

More here: https://countersignal.medium.com/was-the-october-7-attack-on-israel-a-false-flag-3d496f4102ad
I want to be clear on my personal view of the situation. I object to the blatant use of the term “false flag” in this case. I believe it was Hamas acting on their own volition. I think it was a semi- or quasi-LIHOP (let it happen on purpose) meaning that some Israeli officials across multiple agencies likely knew something was imminent and chose to either stand down (also make it more difficult to “stand up”) or remain passive (do nothing, dismiss warnings). Clearly many residents at the nearby Kibbutzim and low ranking IDF soldiers also sensed something big was coming and tried to warn ‘the authorities’ or higher-ups.
None of which is to say that Hamas isn’t fully capable of inflicting serious damage on the IOF and occupiers or that they were controlled by or communicating with the Israelis. It’s also not an attempt to impugn their planning and surveillance capabilities.

Posted by: Tom_Q_Collins | Feb 18 2024 21:01 utc | 44

Tom_Q_Collins | Feb 18 2024 20:40 utc | 35

Google is your friend.
You are the naive fool, not me.

Posted by: Pacifica Advocate | Feb 18 2024 21:05 utc | 45

The issue here in MoA comments is that each “side” of the argument is seeing things in black and white instead of a spectrum. Either Israel 100% knew about the impending attack and let it happen or they knew absolutely nothing about it because Hamas is so darn good at concealing their communications and preparations. Neither of those is true on the basis of a) simple logic and b) the confirmed reports from many sources of a drastic uptick in Hamas activity (preparation, if you will) in the weeks prior to the attack.
A semi- or quasi-LIHOP explanation exists somewhere in the middle. I make no definitive statements unless I can back them up with sources, preferably from as low ranking or “unimportant” people as possible. Chatter, if you will – and the observed actions on both sides of the Gaza prison walls.
When further information is discernible – usually reading BETWEEN the lines of official statements and the usual propaganda organs – it becomes possible to piece together the missing bits into a coherent picture.
Yes, there were “intelligence failures”- of several types. Some borne of arrogance, others of even more malign motives. But if Kibbutzim residents were able to listen in on Hamas and other militant radio traffic, and the IDF went about restricting their ability to do so, one must ask why. Granted there are likely some mundane answers to that question – but knowing the Zionists, there are also some involving more sophisticated and higher-up machinations. That’s how the world works. Things are rarely black and white.
Always ask cui bono. Certainly not the citizens of Gaza who have been killed or maimed. And at this point, if the IOF plays its cards right and the leadership can somehow avoid a larger, potentially civilization-altering regional war (no guarantee at all of this), then Gaza will be leveled and depopulated for future occupation development and further settlement and resource extraction. Israel will have lost the PR battle (for now – as Gore Vidal once said: “We are the United States of Amnesia.”) and its status as a pariah state among the majority of the world’s humanity will be further cemented. But the right-wing occupiers have supported and funded Hamas as well as sabotaged any of their potential competition. Former high ranking members of the IOF, Shin Bet, and other bodies have confirmed this in speech and writing. The receipts are there.
In light of this, perhaps some of us here need to be a little more open to the notion that Hamas – the organization itself – is also not operating according to a black and white, right or wrong, ideology.

Posted by: Tom_Q_Collins | Feb 18 2024 21:16 utc | 46

Posted by: Pacifica Advocate | Feb 18 2024 21:05 utc | 45
More ad hominem unsourced to any factual information. Straw man arguments and ad hominem do not win many debates.
And since you seem to be mixing and matching your response to my comments, please take note of the fact that my comment about naive children was not a reply to you.
Try to argue like an adult: Do you believe that there are no infiltrators or Israeli double agents in Gaza and more specifically, Hamas? If so, please explain why. I’ve already demonstrated that Hamas is, in several ways, a tool of Israeli hard-liners and that they have supported them covertly for a long time.

Posted by: Tom_Q_Collins | Feb 18 2024 21:19 utc | 47

I think what recently happenend in Gaza was prdictable and enevitable, as to the timing, it dosent matter. It matched and suited israels plans held for decades… a greater israel.
For Hamas and all palisinians the conditions they have been forced to live in were unbareable. enough is enough, who in their right mind could expect them to tolarate it any longer. Would you, would i live like that and not fight back ?
One side are the long standing perpitrators the other side pure victems.
This is an issue of right and wrong. It has to be settled now, for the benifit of all man kind. World wide. Or else……?

Posted by: Mark2 | Feb 18 2024 21:20 utc | 48

Posted by: james | Feb 18 2024 20:56 utc | 42
The most plausible explanation I encounter is that, when Navalny was in hospital in Berlin, the Germans came to the conclusion that Navalny’s life expectancy was limited, and sent Navalny to Russia to die elsewhere.

Posted by: Passerby | Feb 18 2024 21:22 utc | 49

Mark Fenster, Conspiracy Theories: Secrecy and Power in American Culture (Revised and Updated Edition, University of Minnesota Press 2008). It is not interested in the question of real vs. imagined, but in the kind of culture and society where this genre of thinking arises. This is why I like Don Delillo’s novels esp. White Noise and Demons by Dostoevsky. It’s always important to ask the self-reflexive Nietzschean question: not “was Oct 7 an inside job?” but rather “Why do I so badly want that to be the answer?”
Often it comes down to the explanation Fenster discusses: alienation, lack of transparency, breakdown in community, culture of surveillance and secrecy, lack of education, the easy answer offered by the secret cabal pulling the strings as a foil for one’s own utter social powerlessness… γνῶθι σεαθτόν.

Posted by: Patroklos | Feb 18 2024 21:34 utc | 50

SNAFUs can be simple or they can be complex and cascading.
In the case of October 7, one must accept that there were all three kinds of SNAFUs happening simultaneously as well as cascading.
I suppose anything is possible, but when you take the sum total of evidence that has emerged in the time since, the warnings or warning signs that were occurring prior, and don’t just look at the initial Hamas prison break, the SNAFU argument strains credulity.
Why did it take so long for the IDF or other security forces to respond to such a major and deep incursion? When they did, why did they open fire on Israelis and Hamas invaders indiscriminately? Why were so many fake, entirely fantastical (and yet of a piece with previous alleged atrocities (throwing babies from incubators, etc.)) horror stories immediately disseminated and swallowed whole by the Western media (ostensibly “left”, “center”, and “right”)?
Again, cui bono? And for those who are of the mind that “well it certainly isn’t Israel!” then perhaps you’re the ones embracing the comic book supervillain 11-dimensional chess argument, and not me. The hardline Israelis are NOT people who think beyond the current or next election cycle except inasmuch as eliminating the Palestinians is concerned.

Posted by: Tom_Q_Collins | Feb 18 2024 21:35 utc | 51

Posted by: Patroklos | Feb 18 2024 21:34 utc | 50
It’s always important to ask the self-reflexive Nietzschean question: not “was Oct 7 an inside job?” but rather “Why do I so badly want that to be the answer?”
——————————————————————-
I’m a little disappointed in you, Patrokolos, because if that is in any way directed at me, you’re not picking up what I’m putting down. And if you have been comprehending what I’m trying to say, and it is in fact directed this way, then it’s a straw man. It’s “black and white” thinking. October 7 was either an “inside job” or a complete failure of intelligence and response borne purely of Israeli arrogance and incompetence. That’s some simplistic thinking right there.

Posted by: Tom_Q_Collins | Feb 18 2024 21:38 utc | 52

An amazingly long way to create and attack a strawman. I don’t believe, and I suspect librul agrees with me, that the resistance is weak, cowardly, incompetent or anything else. Hamas is itself divided into two major factions, one of which has distanced itself for some time from the leadership supported by Israel. There is no doubt that they are the ones who prepared the way for this attack and coordinated with other cells. This does not in any way negate the facts that show that Netanyahoo made plans for just this event going back to the creation of Hamas itself. He chose when and how to provoke the attack, he knew how some of it would unfold, but the real resistance element fooled him in to thinking they were weak and Israel would have to bend over backward to give the attack credibility. Which Netanyahoo did. Nutty told us himself on the 8th that Oct 7 was Israel’s 9/11.
Posted by: Honzo | Feb 18 2024 20:49 utc | 38

Golly. How many silly, obviously false things can one sincerely pack into a post? I think you’ve won the “Chief Among the Gullible and Historically Uninformed” award & will hold it for at least the next 6pm that.
A) It’s not a “straw man” to say that you, et Al, are denigrating the Gazan’s capabilities. You, et Al, are asserting that the only reason the Oct 7 attack succeeded is because the Israeli government allowed it to.
That’s utter nonsense, with nothing but vague excuses and questionable assertions by the US/uk/Israel intel agencies (all proven, mercenary, conscienceless liars) to offer as “proof”.
Thus, all the conclusions I draw from that assertion are entirely accurate. You et I’ll want to portray the Palestinians as having fallen into a trap. Except the overwhelming overreaction of the IOF—wher it murdered hundreds of its own civilians in abject fear of being overrun—well belies your deeply questionable acceptance of the IOF’s claim that it knew about everything from before the start.
B) Hams is three different allied factions, not two. There are currently no factions “supported by Israel,” nor have there ever been. Israel syrreptitiously supportrd the creation of Hamas, but Hamas has never operated as a tool of Israeli policy. It has always been entirely an independent anti-Israeli force.
C)

This does not in any way negate the facts that show that Netanyahoo made plans for just this event going back to the creation of Hamas itself.

Hamas was formed in 1987. During that period Netanyahu was Israel’s rep to the UN. He was entirely consumed with foreign policy and had nothing to do with administration within Israel or the occupied territories (I.e. domestic ploucy). He didn’t assume a domestic position of power until 1999, when he became chairman of Likud.
Also, the idea that plans for this latest attack were anticipated and planned for by Israel some 41 years ago are a laughable assertion.
D)

He chose when and how to provoke the attack, he knew how some of it would unfold,

Netanyahu may have had a role in the attacks on Al Aqua, but no: there was no Israelis had any idea about how the Resistance would respond—not in terms of time-frame, planning, force concentration, technology…none of it. IFor instance, Israel was entirely unprepared for the extensive use of drones employed. If it had possessed actionable intelligence from within Al Qassam that would not be the case. The IOF has been caught completely flat-footed, and it’s entirely due to Palestinian ingenuity and determination.
E) “Israel’s 9/11” is pure rhetoric. Literally nothing meaningful in terms of fact-based analysis of how and what happened on Oct 7 can be derived from that term. The fact that you think Netanyahu is signaling that Oct 7 was a “false flag” just the same as “9/11 was a false flag” indicates you still have a long way to go in terms of honing your analytical skills when dissecting the obscurities that hide the genuine powers at work behind important events. Nobody really knows what happened on 9/11. There’s a lot of speculation, and there are a lot of facts that contradict the official narrative. Beyond that, there are really no other conclusions to be made beyond the incontrovertible fact that there were neither any Iraqis nor Afghans on either of those planes.

Posted by: Pacifica Advocate | Feb 18 2024 21:40 utc | 53

Posted by: Tom_Q_Collins | Feb 18 2024 21:38 utc | 52
Not directed at you at all. Just thinking about the form of the discussion rather the content. The first thing we do when we write an account of the past (consciously or not) is decide whether it’s going to be a tragedy, comedy, epic, romance, etc. Genre is everything.
But not directed at anyone in particular, no.

Posted by: Patroklos | Feb 18 2024 21:52 utc | 54

The truth is only ever an experience of truth-effects. The success of that depends on how well we tell the story and how well we gauge the fear, prejudices, anxieties and desires of our audience.

Posted by: Patroklos | Feb 18 2024 21:54 utc | 55

@ Passerby | Feb 18 2024 21:22 utc | 49
thanks passerby! is there any concrete documentation on that from the german sources? i would like to see it.. thanks.

Posted by: james | Feb 18 2024 21:57 utc | 56

Posted by: Pacifica Advocate | Feb 18 2024 21:40 utc | 53
A) It’s not a “straw man” to say that you, et Al, are denigrating the Gazan’s capabilities. You, et Al, are asserting that the only reason the Oct 7 attack succeeded is because the Israeli government allowed it to.
You argue that a previous straw man wasn’t a straw man by standing up and knocking down another straw man. Actually that’s kind of genius. In all my years on the Intertoobz, I don’t recall ever seeing anything like it. Let’s dissect it:
a) The people (“et Al”) with whom you are arguing have explicitly stated they are NOT denigrating Hamas’ capabilities. The results of the prison break speak for themselves. None of which is to say that the Israelis weren’t warned (they were), couldn’t have been better prepared (they could have), and couldn’t have acted faster and more precisely (i.e., no Hannibal doctrine – they could have).
however
b) How are you defining “succeeded”? By what metrics can “success” be certified? That they were able to incur into Israel at all? Would it have been a “success” if half the number of hostages were taken? How about double? Nobody here believes that the Israelis should have been so prepared that 10 battalions should have been on 24/7 watch at just those sections of the wall which were breached or flown over. That still doesn’t erase the truth of the matter which is that instead they did….NOTHING.
On a deeper level,
how was the October 7 invasion a “success”? What gains or “successes” have the people of Gaza seen as a result?
c)Who is saying that the only reason Hamas “succeeded” was because the Israelis just openly let it happen with no attempt whatsoever to interdict or intercept the incursion or its planning?
Look, it’s clear you’re the type who projects emotional attachment to what you believe and think that you’re the smartest guy in the room, so I don’t expect anyone will get you to consider the nuances let alone change any part of your opinion, but I do feel compelled to agree with you on one thing: It’s also very silly conspiratorial thinking to believe that Netan-Yahoo “created” Hamas and that he and his rightwing fellow nutjobs knew exactly when the attack would occur, how it would happen, and that they directly and completely facilitated it. That’s not something I’m arguing (not sure about Honzo). I’m trying to insert some critical thought on the “official story” based on documented history, statements both before and after, and bits of information that have emerged since Oct 7.

Posted by: Tom_Q_Collins | Feb 18 2024 21:57 utc | 57

Sorry about not closing the boldface above. Could swear I used the tag. Apologies. Only the first bolded word was intended.

Posted by: Tom_Q_Collins | Feb 18 2024 21:58 utc | 58

Posted by: Tom_Q_Collins | Feb 18 2024 20:36 utc | 29
The colonialism argument has nothing to do with the main content of PCRs article, namely the direct funding of such invasion to the tune of one hundred million to shady NGOs run by a group Majorkas used to work in.
Good distraction though….

Posted by: Scorpion | Feb 18 2024 22:06 utc | 59

Numerous Israelis including those in power and people with large platforms have called October 7 “Israel’s 9/11.” Granted that speaks to nothing in terms of actionable or knowable specifics to the debate about how, exactly, October 7 was carried out.
To the “why?” and “what’s next?” – well that may be an entirely different conversation.
Rhetoric is very important here. Because rhetoric drives future actions and Israel is most definitely invoking 9/11 to “justify” a post-9/11 type regime of waging total war against the Palestinians and clamping down on speech and whatever exists on other civil rights within Israel and Palestine.
https://www.nplusonemag.com/online-only/online-only/have-we-learned-nothing/

Posted by: Tom_Q_Collins | Feb 18 2024 22:07 utc | 60

This is the truth of Gaza……..https://twitter.com/s_m_marandi
Enjoy your Sunday evening red wine.

Posted by: Mark2 | Feb 18 2024 22:15 utc | 61

I cannot see in any of the comments made by Tom Q Collins and Honzo, any suggestion that elements in Hamas were working with or under elements within the IDF, Mossad or Shin Bet, or any other secret alphabet agencies within the Israeli government.
The indications are that numerous sources (settlers in kibbutzim near where Hamas attacked, other governments) warned Israel that Hamas had been planning a break-out and could offer first-hand evidence, yet the Israeli government (for reasons known only to itself) chose not to act on these warnings.
It may very well be that Netanyahu and/or others in his government saw an opportunity in Hamas’s plans to capitalise on them and present them as proof of supposed Palestinian murderous intent against Israel, and thus justify his government’s aim to drive the Palestinians out of Gaza and later out of the West Bank. This presumably would cover Netanyahu in glory as the saviour of Israel and translate into another term, hands down, as Prime Minister to stave off what otherwise would be awaiting him and his wife Sara (life imprisonment for corruption). There may have been senior officials in the IDF who agreed with Netanyahu. Some of them may have even suggested supporting Hamas in little covert ways in order to speed up that long-term goal of getting rid of the Palestinians.
The big surprise awaiting them all was that Hamas was much better armed and skilled in fighting, especially in fighting a war of resistance, than they anticipated, and this would suggest that both the Israeli government and military had become complacent in assuming that the Palestinians would be easy pickings after Hamas’s planned break-out. Once the break-out was under way, the IDF’s reaction was one of panic and confusion.
There is no need to assume an “inside job” in this scenario.

Posted by: Refinnejenna | Feb 18 2024 22:18 utc | 62

Posted by: Scorpion | Feb 18 2024 22:06 utc | 59
I see you were triggered by the word “colonialism” so let’s just leave that out. The fact of the matter is that most of these migrants wouldn’t be leaving their home countries in the first place without the brutal, years-long sanctions placed on their governments, and which are designed to cause maximum pain to everyday citizens (i.e., the migrants). Hence, there would be no “invasion” for Soros et. al to fund or support if the USA simply stopped waging illegal economic war on Venezuela, and if they had not done it so often to other countries in the recent past.
The same goes for the US/EU/NATO wars on the rest of the Global South. If the illegal wars of aggression, constant regime change operations, and economic infliction of pain didn’t happen, stability would likely prevent the vast majority of those “invaders” from going to Europe, and again, nobody to whom Soros and the other NGOs could fund, house or provide transport.
Again, it’s a root cause argument if we really want to see things change. I am not arguing with PCR that such persons and organizations exist, nor that they may indeed want to reverse colonize the “west” with the refugees of the aforementioned policies. PCR’s complaints present no constitutionally actionable response (except funding “counter” NGOs?!) to what he sees as the issue.
If you try to ban NGOs run by very very rich people and massively connected banks and corporations within the US and EU, you’d need to rewrite whole constitutions, bringing me back to the main point about Roberts: WHY isn’t he talking about the root cause and wars both economic and military conducted against the origin countries? Could it be that many of them were led by socialist governments or rulers intent on providing a better life for the people, and not financial and extractive parasites in the West?
If we don’t want a “genocide of the West” then stop carrying out “genocide of the Global South.”

Posted by: Tom_Q_Collins | Feb 18 2024 22:19 utc | 63

There is too much evidence that 9/11 was not a snafu, that it was plotted.

Posted by: Lysias | Feb 18 2024 22:19 utc | 64

Posted by: Pacifica Advocate | Feb 18 2024 20:25 utc | 26
You speak a lot about “assertions” which you use ad hominem to attempt to discredit sources that are not even being cited.
Posted by: Pacifica Advocate | Feb 18 2024 21:05 utc | 45
More ad hominem unsourced to any factual information. Straw man arguments and ad hominem do not win many debates.
Tom_Q_Collins 35, 47
Hamas can, in several ways, thank the Mossad and Shin Bet (the Izzy gov’t in general) for its existence. Anyone who thinks there aren’t double agents and infiltrators is a naive child.
https://swprs.org/why-israel-created-hamas/
Posted by: Tom_Q_Collins | Feb 18 2024 20:42 utc | 37

Your first use of “ad hominem” was a gross misuse of the word intended as an ad hominem in itself, against me. No person who understands the proper use of the word would abuse it as you did, there.
Your second use of “ad hominem” fails to note that I was throwing your own mess of words right back at you.
If you don’t want a food fight, don’t fling the first fist of pudding.
In between you tossed up a few articles which I don’t dispute: Israel surreptitiously helped finance and train Hamas. If you think the money and training were delivered via couriers and teachers wearing IOF uniforms…well, what can I be other than completely dismissive and mocking? If you think that training and financial support purchased positions for IOF informants within Hamas then really: how can I take anything you say seriously? None of that, there, is plausible.
You have digressed from the main discussion on this thread into quoting and linking to a bunch of Israeli/US propaganda sources (and a nice compilation of quotes by a Swiss source that supports everything I’m asserting, here) to try and “prove” that Hamas is deeply infiltrated by Israeli agents, even while most of the stuff you’ve posted doesn’t even assert that!
Enough of this. I generally appreciate what you post, here, but this mud-slinging contest you’ve started here isn’t improving your look.
The IOF got caught with its pants down. There may have been a few people at the top who thought they were setting a trap for Al Qassam and would use the opportunity that presented to school them in their folly of thinking the Palestinians could succeed at anything. Beyond that, there were no ulterior plans by Israel to utilize Oct 7–a date they had no idea was set.

Posted by: Pacifica Advocate | Feb 18 2024 22:25 utc | 65

Lysias | Feb 18 2024 22:19 utc | 64
There is always plots and counter plots, intel and counter intel. In Ukraine five-eyes set an Afghan bear trap. Russia looked at this then walked in and converted it into a Nato trap.
Hamas, Iran and the arc or axis of resistance -and behind that, geopolitical, Russia and China.
As Putin said, the enemy, the top of the pyramid, is the US. The hold the US has on the world. Mostly due to coming out of WWII with 75% of the worlds wealth.

Posted by: Peter AU1 | Feb 18 2024 22:31 utc | 66

Orientalism
https://www.foxnews.com/us/chinese-migrants-pouring-across-southern-border-spark-national-security-concerns
FOX gives us the image of thousands of covert Chinese soldiers streaming across our borders to shoot us when the war begins.
Alternative explanation, they are just migrant workers. South Korea has 500,000 migrant workers since the year 2000. Why are we flipping out over 20,000 Chinese after gloating that Xi collapsed their economy?

Posted by: Christian J Chuba | Feb 18 2024 22:33 utc | 67

Oct. 7 was a success for Hamas in that Israel’s response, which was predictable, has put Israel on the road to its extinction as a state.

Posted by: Lysias | Feb 18 2024 22:40 utc | 68

Christian J Chuba | Feb 18 2024 22:33 utc | 67
Yanks are sure scared of the Chinks. Been an age old boogy man here in oz.

Posted by: Peter AU1 | Feb 18 2024 22:43 utc | 69

The US are employing a concous plan of fake hand wringing and compasion while supplying israel with the weapons and bombs to continue the Gaza Genicide of inocent palistinians,
Makeing sure to create plausable deniabilty re- ICJ.
Its a delaying tactic preventing a ceacefire.
The only way to stop this in Gaza and world wide is to stop america. End america.

Posted by: Mark2 | Feb 18 2024 22:44 utc | 70

By attacking Al Aqsa on Oct. 2, Israel ensured a major response by Hamas in the near future.

Posted by: Lysias | Feb 18 2024 22:44 utc | 71

You seem to relish being wrong.
Your first use of “ad hominem” was a gross misuse of the word intended as an ad hominem in itself, against me. No person who understands the proper use of the word would abuse it as you did, there.
My statement: You speak a lot about “assertions” which you use ad hominem to attempt to discredit sources that are not even being cited.
ad hominem – “to the person.” Or, rephrasing my sentence: …assertions which you use – (by ascribing) to the person – to discredit sources that are not even being cited. By falsely attributing ridiculous, unstated, assertions – to the person – you are using them ‘ad hominem’ presumably to cast aspersions in a less direct fashion. I couldn’t care less if your only understanding of the term comes from other mud slinging arguments on the Internet. That is correct usage.
Your second use of “ad hominem” fails to note that I was throwing your own mess of words right back at you.
So you acknowledge that you were engaging in ad hominem according to the ‘standard’ understanding. And for the 2nd time I point out that my comment was not addressed to you in the first place – and – that you have yet to refute it except with your suggestion that I attempt to prove a negative by using da Goggles. How about simple history and logic? And what about my other question – what are your sources that Hamas is virtually impenetrable or infiltrated and/or that when it does happen they are uniquely or extremely adept at rooting them out and killing them?
You have digressed from the main discussion on this thread into quoting and linking to a bunch of Israeli/US propaganda sources (and a nice compilation of quotes by a Swiss source that supports everything I’m asserting, here) to try and “prove” that Hamas is deeply infiltrated by Israeli agents, even while most of the stuff you’ve posted doesn’t even assert that!
I’m not even sure what that is. Reductio ad absurdum? When was the word “deeply” first used in this thread? From what I can tell, just now, by you. What does “deeply” even mean in this context? Why must Hamas be “deeply” infiltrated in order for it to be infiltrated at all? This is just silliness. What if they are “shallowly” infiltrated? Did you stop to think about this before making that comment?
How do quotes by Israeli officials proving that Israeli officials have covertly supported Hamas prove your assertion that there is no possible way that Hamas could be infiltrated or that Israeli double agents walk among them?

Posted by: Tom_Q_Collins | Feb 18 2024 22:45 utc | 72

Posted by: Lysias | Feb 18 2024 22:44 utc | 68 and 71
68 – In the long term this is true; possibly even in the short term if a large regional or world war is set off. But I doubt the Israeli hardliners are capable of or willing to see it that way.
71 – Agree.
72 – (my comment): Sorry, I forgot to put in the reply line to Pacifica Advocate. And yes, I normally agree with your output here as well.

Posted by: Tom_Q_Collins | Feb 18 2024 22:47 utc | 73

Mark2 | Feb 18 2024 22:44 utc | 70
US is the enabler. Without its sugar daddy, Israel is nothing.

Posted by: Peter AU1 | Feb 18 2024 22:49 utc | 74

It’s also very silly conspiratorial thinking to believe that Netan-Yahoo “created” Hamas and that he and his rightwing fellow nutjobs knew exactly when the attack would occur, how it would happen, and that they directly and completely facilitated it. That’s not something I’m arguing (not sure about Honzo). I’m trying to insert some critical thought on the “official story” based on documented history, statements both before and after, and bits of information that have emerged since Oct 7.
Posted by: Tom_Q_Collins | Feb 18 2024 21:57 utc | 57

Literally everything you have posted above regarding my first post on this subject has been attacking me for calling out librul, Honzo, and Mark2 for asserting something they each very clearly did. In fact, you did too, above, with your “LIHOP” statement.
Israel did not “LIHOP” the Oct 7th victory—and it has been a victory, one were the full resonance of its effects have yet to be felt. Israel was taken completely by surprise by the ferocity, competence, timing, effectiveness, and damage (destruction of the 8200, not least) of the Oct 7 attacks.
Now if you’d like to discuss, in a sincere manner, why I see Al Qassam’s attack as a victory then yeah, I’d like that. But I will say that from your very first response to me you have been hostile, dismissive, presumptuous (especially w/r/t to how much you think I know about the history of Hamas, which I now strongly suspect is a good bit more than you), and generally unkindly aggressive. You have grossly misrepresented my words and distorted their meaning while desperately trying to disguise what any reader can plainly discern was the intended meaning of those people I first criticized, above. The only reason I can see for all this hostility towards me is because you have some sort of emotions attachment to the idea that the Israelis didn’t actually get their asses handed to them by Al Qassam. Which, based on the posts I’ve read from you in the past, genuinely baffles me.
And yet, you try and paint me as the person whose thought is “clouded by emotions”.
I invite you to challenge me with why you feel the Oct 7 attack has resulted in a defeat for Al Qassam. Like I wrote: I’ll be happy to debate that, with you. For now, though, I gotta get ready for my day job which starts in an hour or so. So any response from me will be postponed until my evening.

Posted by: Pacifica Advocate | Feb 18 2024 22:52 utc | 75

@ tom Collins
I understood the colonialism argument the first time. I am not interested in yr root cause sidetrack.
Posted by: Christian J Chuba | Feb 18 2024 22:33 utc | 67
They are not migrant workers. They are paid and housed in CCP sponsored facilities just above the Darien gap where they join the stream of real migrants created from colonialism as practiced by their own elites too, like in most countries in history. Their ight is relatively normal. America used to be exceptional but soon will be normal too, looks like.
I’m just interested in who is doing this and why and what will come of it. The colonialism argument you keep raising has zero explanatory power viz the huge surge of NGO paid illegals the past few years – apart from being a great deflection any time someone mentions the issue.

Posted by: Scorpion | Feb 18 2024 22:55 utc | 76

Tom_Q_Collins | Feb 18 2024 22:19 utc | 63
If you try to ban NGOs run by very very rich people and massively connected banks and corporations within the US and EU, you’d need to rewrite whole constitutions, bringing me back to the main point about Roberts: WHY isn’t he talking about the root cause and wars both economic and military conducted against the origin countries? Could it be that many of them were led by socialist governments or rulers intent on providing a better life for the people, and not financial and extractive parasites in the West?
If we don’t want a “genocide of the West” then stop carrying out “genocide of the Global South.”
A somewhat “ruling class” attitude. Hence the use of “we”.
Whereas PCR looks at it from the perspective of an ordinary US (or any other country) citizen who certainly has not got, and never had, the political power to do anything — and yet is the victim of weaponisation of foreign victims … against the population and its identity of the country being flooded, by the treacherous ruling class using its own external victims as immigrants.
Those who rule — and hypocritical virtue-signalling fatcat apparatchiks within their system and its NGOs — don’t care a damn about their home country or its native population. They really just identify with each other, including internationally … allegedly “conspiracy theory” accusations of “replacement” are more correct than mistaken.
The ruling strata intent is to diminish and destroy any potential cohesion within what they regard as the lower orders. It also intensifies resource competition at lower levels, much to the advantage of those who rule.
Despite fake denials, ensuring a constantly incoming barrage of bodies — welcomed by wokists — serves that purpose well.

Posted by: Cynic | Feb 18 2024 23:00 utc | 77

PeterAu @ 74
Exatly that, israel’s plan is greater israel, americas plan was destablise Russia (failed)
Fall back plan b for america is a smash and grab of the middle east. Extending their dominance from there and beyound.
So this cant be ignored by countrys in that area. They need to go with the streets.
Exactly the same in our own countrys.
Democracy ? that train left the station.
Time for……
‘We know were you live’

Posted by: Mark2 | Feb 18 2024 23:03 utc | 78

Posted by: jef | Feb 18 2024 19:08 utc | 19
Thanks, jef, there is indeed a considerable fraction of climate deniers at MoA. I guess the reason for this is, many of us have lost their faith in any story that is being told from “above”:
They lied to us over Covid, Russia, Syria, 9/11, everything. These were all lies, so that thing about global warming must be another one of their lies.
Fellows on this most distinguished site! You should dig a little deeper than, say, Donald Trump, who is another climate denier. Generalizing like in the above quotation should not be the way we attack a serious matter. Anybody with some background in science can do better than this. Use your brain.
I agree the matter is not made easier by the fact that CO2 is on the Green party’s agenda almost everywhere, and they are embracing such questionable remedies as the electric car. It shows that they haven’t got much of a clue themselves. Which, of course, does nothing to solve the dispute about global warming.

Posted by: grunzt | Feb 18 2024 23:06 utc | 79

There is too much evidence that 9/11 was not a snafu, that it was plotted.
Posted by: Lysias | Feb 18 2024 22:19 utc | 64

Jimmy Dore just had an episode on it:
https://youtu.be/aZXsIkbxMGo
The walls are closing in as they say ..

Posted by: blueswede | Feb 18 2024 23:15 utc | 80

@ 63 tom
The same people who are interested in full spectrum dominance abroad are those that are looking the other way at the border and even arranging for this influx.
I admit that the U.S. does not play fair wrt to its imposition upon Latin America for beneficial returns for its elite and industry, but I would agree more with your point if we were sending our military in all over there, meanwhile defending our border to block entry. Then what you say would make sense.
Otherwise, by implying that the average American should suffer due to the resulting strained social fabric by taking on so many illegal migrants, I find your take on the subject highly problematic.
Without a nation, whih implies culture and borders, the people can not have a say in what happens here, and thus should be free from blame.
And if you look at it from the other angle, that if America had chosen a different and non-intervensionist route during the 20th century, we would not be having this conversation, it stands to reason that YOU ShoULD support rigid borders for domestic empowerment which could mean more control for its population wrt its FP.
It wasn’t long ago that the left mostly stood for labor interests, but now seems to disregard it entirely. Perhaps because this is the path or endpoint of what the left becomes in its teleological exegis.

Posted by: NemesisCalling | Feb 18 2024 23:17 utc | 81

biden and trump would make very good simpson cartoon charactors, other than that, them and their multitude of polatitcain and milartary hangers on, and their scophantic public suporters should be slaped down real hard. When ever they raise their ugly heads.

Posted by: Mark2 | Feb 18 2024 23:19 utc | 82

Posted by: Pacifica Advocate | Feb 18 2024 22:52 utc | 75
“You have grossly misrepresented…and distorted…my words…”
IF that was true this is a case of the pot calling the kettle black, but I didn’t distort or misrepresent your words, nor has anyone else. It has been you – in literally every post constituting a reply to another person – who is distorting, misrepresenting and putting words into the mouths of others here, myself and Honzo (likely librul) included.
Your favorite approach is through the false characterization or interpretation of statements in the most absurd or far reaching fashion. Beginning in your first comment.
“Deeply” infiltrated, “The presumption that the Al Qassam Brigades are riddled with Israeli agents….”,”Y’all’s presumption that the Palestinians in Gaza are too stupid, weak, and riddled with traitors to be able to exploit that corruption is, frankly…”, “You, et Al, are asserting that the only reason the Oct 7 attack succeeded is because…”
I could go on. I’m sure most see the pattern by now. And how about statements like this, which are obviously false, but also vague enough to make them appear defensible:
“Israel was taken completely by surprise…”
“Israel” was? What is meant by “Israel” here? So nobody at all within Israel suspected or, dare I say it, expected such an attack on or around the timeframe of October 7? That’s literally absurd and provably so. How about “completely”? Really?
You can’t seem to wrap your mind around the fact that not everyone is seeing the situation in as black and white a manner as you. You have this bizarre fascination with insulting others for allegedly presuming Israel’s defense and intelligence agencies are all-powerful and that a COMPLETE surprise is the ONLY way that October 7 could POSSIBLY have happened (! gasp !) when that is absolutely not what I have ever said, and I do not think that’s what librul or Honzo have said either. You want to give all the credit for the “success” of the attacks to Hamas, which you portray as impenetrable, 100% pure of ideology in every person of which it is comprised, all operating on exactly the same page with no mistakes being made at all in the attack.
For the last time: You accuse others of simplistic or ignorant thinking, while failing to realize that you are the one basing your arguments on exactly that kind of thought. Black or white. White or black. Either Israel is invincible and the only way Hamas could have broke through was “inside help” or Israel was 100% complacent, bumbling, arrogant and Hamas operates with completely impenetrable secrecy and unsurpassed battle acumen and ferocity. Nothing is possible in between. Either Israel knew everything or they were taken COMPLETELY by surprise. The problem is, nobody except you is arguing according to this logic.
In any case, if you are so well versed on the history of Hamas, why weren’t you able to provide a single link to back up your assertion that they are uniquely or just way more than capable of preventing and/or rooting out infiltrators compared to any other group out there? Just “Google it.”
Since this approach is going nowhere, and I have things to do, I’ll ask you a “Yes” or “No” question: Is it at all possible that Hamas has been infiltrated, or that Israeli double agents operated on at least some level of the group, prior to October 7?

Posted by: Tom_Q_Collins | Feb 18 2024 23:28 utc | 83

Identifying as a female – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aDVuiZ0KJTs
A few years ago I was going to I think pay the registration for my car online. Looking for the right page something caught my eye and thought what the hell is this. It was a page were could officially designate whatever gender you wished to be. Manna from heaven for a male athlete I guess.
I think in the last open thread I used the term ‘urban aboriginal’ to distinguish them from those that still have the 100% DNA, their language culture oral history, boundary landmarks ect.
But with urban Aboriginal, like with gender, all you have to do to qualify is identify as an aboriginal, regardless of 50% DNA or 0% DNA.

Posted by: Peter AU1 | Feb 18 2024 23:33 utc | 84

Posted by: Cynic | Feb 18 2024 23:00 utc | 77
The ruling strata intent is to diminish and destroy any potential cohesion within what they regard as the lower orders. It also intensifies resource competition at lower levels, much to the advantage of those who rule.
Despite fake denials, ensuring a constantly incoming barrage of bodies — welcomed by wokists — serves that purpose well.

Now THAT’S more like it!
But, respectfully, I still don’t find your explanation really covers the more organized part of what’s happening right now. There are unknown thousands coming across with debit cards into which funds are deposited regularly every month; NGO’s provide free legal care; they are flown all over late at night by commercial carriers requiring no I.D. or payment, then many are put up in $200+ a night hotels indefinitely not to mention that before all that unknown tens of thousands are being flown in from the Middle East and Asia, especially China, also sponsored. This population is different from the mainstream migrant flow, much of which is also being facilitated though not nearly to the same degree.
Now that could all be the oligarch class shunting in cheap labour to exploit and also to keep the population fractured as you write, but the above seems to me more pointed and urgent than that, hence the willingness to incur such expense whilst suppressing media coverage or accountability. Perhaps they know there will be a backlash so they have maxxed out on bringing people in; or this was done in preparation for the upcoming election and the sponsored illegal population numbering from 100,000 to a couple of million, I guess, will have a part to play in what may well be a very powerful dragon-lashing-tail-and-breathing-holocaustal-fire-on-all sort of year in the US.
Something more than migration is in play.

Posted by: Scorpion | Feb 18 2024 23:39 utc | 85

Posted by: NemesisCalling | Feb 18 2024 23:17 utc | 81
“Otherwise, by implying that the average American should suffer due to the resulting strained social fabric by taking on so many illegal migrants, I find your take on the subject highly problematic.”
When and where did I say or imply any notion of what I think “should” happen? I am commenting on what is happening regardless of my opinion on it. But I will say that it’s rather telling you read my comment as actually wanting bad things to happen to regular Americans. That said, how does one empirically tie the purported suffering you invoke to illegal immigration? Like precisely how does it hurt legal citizens? (I’m guessing you’ll say it suppresses wages or causes crime to increase, but there’s very little available evidence for those things, even if I would be inclined to believe the former is on a high level possibly true.)
“I admit that the U.S. does not play fair wrt to its imposition upon Latin America for beneficial returns for its elite and industry, but I would agree more with your point if we were sending our military in all over there, meanwhile defending our border to block entry. Then what you say would make sense.”
This is a major oversimplification of the situation as well as what looks to be an attempt to minimize the effects of draconian sanctions that follow on many years of regime change, regime change attempts, assassination plots, economic sabotage occurring OUTSIDE the official sanctions regime, etc. Sanctions ARE a form of warfare. And I won’t even get into the situation with Cuba.
Here’s a few articles on the subject.
https://www.counterpunch.org/2023/01/20/272039/ (How the US Economic War on Venezuela Fueled the Migrant Crisis)
https://libya360.wordpress.com/2023/08/27/how-u-s-sanctions-are-a-tool-of-war-the-case-of-venezuela/
Literally right here at MoA, I said several times – in the 2018/2019 timeframe when Trump and Abrams were enacting new, more brutal sanctions on Venezuela that we’d see a massive wave of migrants from there within 3-5 years. Venezuela historically has accounted for a TINY fraction of illegal immigrants in the USA and now they are the vast majority at our border. Are you saying it’s just a coincidence? How did I get it so right all those years ago, then?
It’s actually really disgusting when you look into the details:
https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2023/08/28/cafk-a28.html
https://www.democracynow.org/2023/10/25/migrant_crisis

Democracy Now! co-host Juan González discusses his new report on “The Current Migrant Crisis,” about how U.S. policy toward Latin America has fueled historic numbers of asylum seekers. He argues U.S. “economic warfare” against countries like Cuba, Nicaragua and Venezuela is what motivates many migrants to risk the journey north. “We’re seeing this enormous increase from these three countries. What do all these three countries have in common? They are all being subjected to United States sanctions,” says González. “The sanctions are reducing the ability of people to survive in the region, and then we’re surprised by all these people appearing at the border.”

The fact that Scorpion isn’t interested in the root cause of the tsunami of migrants tells me that he isn’t looking for a good faith solution to the issue, rather another reason to get into the culture war crap. How about you? Even if you don’t want to read up on the post-colonial Monroe Doctrine period in US Latin American “relations”, can you at least accept that our politicians and bureaucrats, through recent policy on Venezuela and other LA countries, are in large part responsible for the crisis at our border NOW? And that by dropping the sanctions and engaging in real diplomacy we could see a MASSIVE reduction in such attempts to illegally migrate to the US?

Posted by: Tom_Q_Collins | Feb 18 2024 23:42 utc | 86

Posted by: Cynic | Feb 18 2024 23:00 utc | 77
A somewhat “ruling class” attitude. Hence the use of “we”.
I’ll have to hazard a guess as to what you’re attempting to imply about my take insofar as my own position in the social/economic strata. That I’m “ruling class” or that I am putting forth “ruling class” points when I correctly demonstrate that the migrant crisis wouldn’t be happening at all if the ruling class wasn’t committing economic warfare and other acts of sabotage against the countries from whence immigrants are SUDDENLY coming? Again, Venezuela almost never sent any appreciable numbers and now they are sending almost all of them. It’s a ruling class viewpoint to criticize the politics and policies of the ruling class?
OK, if you say so. I’d rather look at the root cause – and educate others on it – so that we can actually TRY to do something about it (in vain, I’m sure) rather than monetize the culture wars for my own benefit in manner which is equally futile to effecting meaningful change.
Do you agree or disagree that the current crisis on the border is largely driven by US policy toward Venezuela and a few other countries who are also the victims of US economic warfare?

Posted by: Tom_Q_Collins | Feb 18 2024 23:48 utc | 87

@86 tom
You do not explicitly state this but by looking into the game you are playing here, you are implying that the sins of the state should be visited upon the people even if the people are not responsible for what their government does.
“You shouldn’t be in these countries if you don’t want migrants to flood your country.”
This is a loaded statement, as any educated person would know. Far from our exploits in Latin America being broadcasted to the population, much of the propping up of dictators and the drug shenanigans there have been organized centrally at-home by you know who.
As it stands, if a population is not adequately informed of what is actually happening, then no informed consent can occur and blame can not be levelled at a population.
So, yes, I do think you are not engaging here in good faith and perhaps do desire the American people to suffer. This is a common emotional reaction of the world over when pointing fingers at the Ugly American. It is common but not deserved.

Posted by: NemesisCalling | Feb 18 2024 23:59 utc | 88

Tom_Q_Collins | Feb 18 2024 23:42 utc | 86
*** The fact that Scorpion isn’t interested in the root cause of the tsunami of migrants tells me that he isn’t looking for a good faith solution to the issue ***
He points out they are being encouraged to immigrate by the very same Political Establishment — plus its sponsored / related NGOs — that inflicts or incites the problems in their countries of origin.
It is fairly certain none of us discussing it here have the power to change either the economic system or Western warmongering and destabiisation of other countries.
The ordinary people in the country that’s a target of mass-immigration are likewise powerless to change the international situation.
They get the “collateral damage” dumped on them — and while academic discussion is all very well (and we might all be able to agree on how international relations ought to be) that tends to be detached from, and doesn’t sufficiently recognise additional real problems inflicted upon, the ‘natives’ into whose societies the incomers are pushed.
As for why there are reportedly large sums of money and various other perks given to entice un-necessary illegal/legal immigrants in …. well, from this side of the Atlantic that does seem a bit of a mystery, unless the vote-packing suspicion are true.
Note, however, that members of the Tony Blair administration in the UK did later admit it actively encouraged an increase in mass-immigration because of of sheer spite and malevolence.

Posted by: Cynic | Feb 19 2024 0:15 utc | 89

Posted by: NemesisCalling | Feb 18 2024 23:59 utc | 88
You do not explicitly state this but by looking into the game you are playing here, you are implying that the sins of the state should be visited upon the people even if the people are not responsible for what their government does.
“You shouldn’t be in these countries if you don’t want migrants to flood your country.”

LOL. First I’m not “playing a game” – I’m stating the truth. We are seeing a completely unprecedented number of immigrants from Venezuela at the US-MX border. I believe in national borders; I’m no libertarian on that topic at all. And nowhere did I remotely imply, insinuate, or in any other way try to say what I think SHOULD happen to the citizens of the state at all. I’m making the non-controversial observation that the sins of the state OFTEN ARE visited upon the people. If you disagree with that, and I don’t think you do, then you really need to read up on world history.
And why the quotes around a statement I did not make? Isn’t it you that’s playing games now? That’s very disingenuous of you. I never said anything about the “US being in” any of those countries. I am speaking solely about the policies visited UPON those states from the outside (and in some cases using traitors and other assets within, I guess). But I’m not saying the US occupies or otherwise directly intervenes in the everyday goings on within any of those countries. They may well be, but I’m focusing on the economic warfare right now.
It’s almost as though you’re trying to talk around my points while accusing me of doing something similar.
But let’s touch on one other thing that you mentioned that directly contradicts something you said prior:
As it stands, if a population is not adequately informed of what is actually happening, then no informed consent can occur and blame can not be levelled at a population.
So are the people of the USA responsible or not for what our government does? And what do you think it is I’m doing here if not attempting to “inform” about the consequences of our governments’ and (the banks and corporations that mostly control it) hostile policies toward the people of those other countries? On some level we could influence that, don’t you think? If enough people who are sick of the massive influx of illegals, legit asylum seekers, and anyone else actually understand the root cause (and no, Soros et. al giving them money once they’ve already left isn’t the root cause), don’t you think we could unite in trying to force our government to stop intentionally causing the conditions that lead directly to masses of people trying to come in (leaving aside the nihilistic argument that nothing we do matters)?
So, yes, I do think you are not engaging here in good faith and perhaps do desire the American people to suffer. This is a common emotional reaction of the world over when pointing fingers at the Ugly American. It is common but not deserved.
Again, LOL. You’re 100% projecting your own flawed understanding and/or emotions onto me and others when I’ve neither said nor implied anything of the sort, even by omission. More than anything it makes me curious as to the psychology behind it. Because once more, it’s completely untrue, and flattens a broad spectrum of possible opinions on the matter down to a convenient “left and right” or “right or wrong” – not to mention “US or the Other.” Why would I want regular Americans like myself to suffer for the evils committed abroad against other countries??? Have you ever actually had anyone say this to you? Having said that, I don’t begrudge people in other countries pointing the finger at our government – and by extension, voters – and calling out the hypocrisy and utter disconnect between how the PR managers portray us and what the situation really is.

Posted by: Tom_Q_Collins | Feb 19 2024 0:16 utc | 90

Posted by: Cynic | Feb 19 2024 0:15 utc | 89
I can see this element of the point; namely if there’s proof that Venezuela or any other targeted country actually ALLOWS NGOs to operate within their borders or to target their citizens with messages encouraging them to make the absolutely brutal and dangerous 1,000mi trek across all of Central America and Mexico with promises of money, then it must be very powerful messaging or a LOT of money. TMK, that doesn’t happen, or far less than word of mouth or social media platforms. But if that is what Soros et. al are doing, then I 100% oppose it. It’s still NOT the root cause, though.
If the sanctions and sabotage was halted today, the flow of immigrants would dry to a trickle within 3-4 years. People have to be truly miserable to risk the voyage to our borders and all the unknowns that come with actually making it here. That is the effect of the sanctions and other non-military warfare conducted by our ruling elites against (historically socialist) countries in Latin America.

Posted by: Tom_Q_Collins | Feb 19 2024 0:21 utc | 91

Tom_Q_Collins | Feb 18 2024 23:48 utc | 87
*** Do you agree or disagree that the current crisis on the border is largely driven by US policy toward Venezuela and a few other countries who are also the victims of US economic warfare?***
Yes, I do agree where these countries are concerned — but there seems to be more going on involving people from other countries which is not explained…
Also unsure why large numbers of these (attacked country) populations head for the USA, which caused their problems to begin with. Are they encouraged — or sponsored — to do that?
Apart from a bit of rhetorical posing followed by … inflicting more of the same … the political establishment of the US does not seem particularly bothered about the situation.
Btw, I didn’t mean to imply that *you* are part of the political establishment, just that use of the word “we” is a common trick of those who rule, which dilutes their own culpability by attributing blame across huge numbers of people who effectively have no say at all in what foreign (or even domestic) policy is.

Posted by: Cynic | Feb 19 2024 0:32 utc | 92

@90 tom
The quote I used for the gist of your overall stance stands:
Because “we” (you do not separate the people with their elite who dictate FP) stir up stuff in Venezuela, we should not close our borders.”
Will you admit that the borders should be closed as this would benefit the people immensely?
And that by reigning in control of our border, this may strengthen domestically the will of the people in determining its FP?
These are the two questions you are dancing around and not giving a clear answer to. Not surprisingly, one questions is intertwined with the other and reflects a way forward that leftists don’t want to honestly address: that control of the border equates to domestic empowerment of the people and thus a weakened case for poking about abroad.

Posted by: NemesisCalling | Feb 19 2024 0:34 utc | 93

Posted by: NemesisCalling | Feb 19 2024 0:34 utc | 93
Well, you’re still wrong (more on that in a minute).
“Will you admit that the borders should be closed as this would benefit the people immensely?”
COMPLETELY closed as in NOBODY can come in or do you mean just putting up a wall where possible and processing people slowly and carefully for asylum or whatever?
On the first part, no. On the second part yes.
“And that by reigning in control of our border, this may strengthen domestically the will of the people in determining its FP?”
Possibly, yes, but it will take a lot more than that, including ending the sanctions ASAP.
Regarding “more on that in a minute” – Again you’re totally projecting, but while I was cooking dinner I was reminded of somewhat related conversations I’ve had with people over the years. For example during the Bush/Cheney years when all their supporters (and a ton of liberals/Dems) were frothing at the mouth over invading Iraq, in the runup to the war, I used to ask them “are you prepared to take in X number of Iraqi refugees or fund their resettlement, including in the USA?” To which I never got an honest or genuine answer. And the same during Obama’s bombardment of Libya, Syria, Afghanistan, etc.
To wit, in certain situations where I’m arguing with someone who OPENLY SUPPORTS policies that are sure to displace a ton of people and cause a surge in immigration (to the US or EU) then I’ve used that as a means of demonstrating their hypocrisy.
At any point in time were you openly in favor of sanctioning Venezuela or invading Iran? Be honest. How about maintaining the ridiculous embargo on Cuba once the USSR dissolved?

Posted by: Tom_Q_Collins | Feb 19 2024 0:44 utc | 94

Posted by: Tom_Q_Collins | Feb 18 2024 23:28 utc | 83
Since this approach is going nowhere, and I have things to do, I’ll ask you a “Yes” or “No” question: Is it at all possible that Hamas has been infiltrated, or that Israeli double agents operated on at least some level of the group, prior to October 7?
There are vert strong indications for infiltrations:
https://actionabletruth.substack.com/p/blue-shirts-october-7

Posted by: Paul from Norway | Feb 19 2024 1:06 utc | 95

Essay by Michel Chussodovsky critical of socialist capitalist China. I have pasted in his bio at the end showing he has above average knowledge of the subject.

History of China’s Cheap Labor Economy
In 1978, an “Open Door Policy” was put forth by Deng Xiaoping alongside the launching of China’s Special Economic Zones (SEZ) in Shenzhen and Xiamen and subsequently in major industrial cities.
These early reforms constitute the backbone of China’s cheap labor export economy.
Moreover, while contributing to impoverishing the Chinese people (particularly in rural areas), a large share of the profits of this capitalist growth process has been transferred via international commodity trade to China’s Western business partners.
It is worth noting, however, that the “Open Door” concept was first coined by US Secretary of State John Hay in 1899, as part of a US colonial agenda which consisted in obliging China to open its door to trade “on an equal basis” with the colonial powers.
Moreover, since the abolition of the People’s Commune (1983), agricultural land has in large part been privatized.
People in rural areas largely rely on remittances from migrant employment in the cities and “special economic zones” in manufacturing and construction.
It should be understood that land concentration, private ownership with the support of the State and the rise of social inequality has been conducive to the development of a buoyant luxury goods sector for a small privileged social minority.
=================================================
I will conclude on a personal note.
In 1981-82, based at the University of Hong Kong, Centre for Asian Studies (CAS), I started my research on the process of capitalist restoration in China. This research –which extended over a period of 4 years– included fieldwork in several regions of China (1981-83) focussing on economic and social reforms, analysis of the defunct People’s Commune (abolished in 1983) and the development of (state supported) privately owned capitalist industry including the cheap labor export economy.
I started reviewing Chinese economic history including the structures of the factory system prior to 1949, the development of the treaty ports established in the wake of the Opium wars (1842) and came to the realization that what was being reinstated in terms of the special economic zones, the open door policy had been influenced by the history of the treaty ports, which granted extraterritorial rights to Britain, France, Germany, the US, Russia and Japan.
I completed the manuscript of my book entitled “Towards Capitalist Restoration? Chinese Socialism after Mao” in 1984.
The book was published by Macmillan in 1986.
Since the 1980s I have been to China on several occasions, in the context of major conference events pertaining to the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) as well as research endeavors, under the auspices of China’s Academy of Social Sciences(CASS). I have also lectured at Tsinghua University’s School of Journalism’s graduate program, which as I mentioned earlier is supported by Bloomberg.

https://michelchossudovsky.substack.com/p/its-not-socialism-china-is-a-capitalist
There is a lot more in the article about how China’s low wage, Confucian conformist model works to benefit the world wide capitalist class which have been behind its growth from the get-go (obviously), inspiring ideological rhetoric notwithstanding. Including reliance on almost 300 million migrant workers etc.
This type of difference between rhetoric and reality should inspire more healthy skepticism about the narratives delivered, including those about multipolarism etc. On some levels it’s all fine and dandy, i.e. not all lies, but there are other levels that are carefully occluded and which they hope people don’t notice or discuss.

Posted by: Scorpion | Feb 19 2024 1:10 utc | 96

There are vert strong indications for infiltrations:
https://actionabletruth.substack.com/p/blue-shirts-october-7
Posted by: Paul from Norway | Feb 19 2024 1:06 utc | 95
Thanks I’ll read it.

Posted by: Tom_Q_Collins | Feb 19 2024 1:11 utc | 97

@ 94 tom
I am glad you admit that managing a border is in any country’s best interest. That you admit this definitely shows good faith.
Of course, legal immigration should be welcomed, but this comes with certain reaponsibilities for joining the proverbial “melting pot.”

In my 20s, I admit I mounted a defense of America’s FP in Iraq, et. al..I wanted to fit inside the box real bad, because like every human being, I struggle with self-identity.
Now…hell no.
Venezuela can sell us their oil at a fair price and we should stay out and exert no bullying pressure.
Of course, many would say, especially those that read Thucydides, that this is an idealized worldview.

Posted by: NemesisCalling | Feb 19 2024 1:15 utc | 98

Posted by: NemesisCalling | Feb 19 2024 1:15 utc | 98
Thanks. I cannot overstate how much I appreciate an honest answer on the Iraq situation. I was also in my 20s and took the opposite stance from the very beginning. Primarily because I found sites like Billmon (in essence, the previous iteration of this very site) and Yellowtimes.org. They blew the lid off the lies for me when I was unemployed and had nothing better to do than surf the Internet back before big time censorship kicked in. I should say that in the immediat aftermath of 9/11 I was ready to nuke the entire middle east. I was suckered into the propaganda like almost everyone else and it took me a few years to wake up. I even tried to enlist as an officer in the military and thankfully they were overwhelmed with “patriots” so I didn’t get a call back until I had already found a good job (around early 2002). But trust me, I understand how easy it is to get wrapped up in the jingoism and need to feel a sense of purpose and belonging in the face of great evil (including that which is later proved false).
But I almost never get an honest answer on that question from conservatives unless they STILL think it was justified and Saddam had WMDs. Speaks to the staying power of propaganda.
We agree on Venezuela. The problem there is that US multinationals wanted too much control of the oil and VZ eventually nationalized it. That is what kicked off the whole song and dance. Similar to Iran.

Posted by: Tom_Q_Collins | Feb 19 2024 1:24 utc | 99

Posted by: james | Feb 18 2024 20:56 utc | 42
Me too, james. Patroklos makes an excellent point, and I always remember the conclusion of Dostoievski’s “The Devils” (called “The Possessed” in some translations). It’s my understanding of the banality of evil as far as plans and counter plans go. Good stuff for a novel perhaps but once you hear what motivates even our leaders is simply to kick the can down the road until they don’t have to make decisions any longer, it’s hard to think of them as brilliant teams of conspirators.
I liked reading Putin’s simple description of what leads to nazism – thinking you are better than anyone else. We don’t know everything we think we know, and that’s a big relief to me. If everyone will hold fast to the good, things will work out.

Posted by: juliania | Feb 19 2024 1:44 utc | 100