Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
January 31, 2024
Ukraine Open Thread 2024-035

Only for news & views directly related to the war in Ukraine.

The current open thread for other issues is here.

Please stick to the topic. Contribute facts. Do not attack other commentators.

Comments

Posted by: Flying Dutchman | Feb 1 2024 9:16 utc | 96
The West has carried out assassinations and terrorist attacks in Iran proper pretty much at will. The dynamic is actually pretty similar, open military attacks are carried out against the proxy.
For now. The US might well pull the trigger and still has the firepower to make life in Iran miserabile and, for many, short as well.
Russia just does not have a proxy it can use to lob drones at Europe or the USA.
That said what such attacks can accomplish in military terms is also debatable.

Posted by: Satepestage | Feb 1 2024 9:58 utc | 101

Well if NATO is such a powerful adversary, what makes you think it will tolerate Russia conquering most of Ukraine ? In that case Russia should just beg for negotiations if it perceives NATO as being such a powerful opponent.
Posted by: Micron | Feb 1 2024 9:30 utc | 98
I would argue the West can marshal the resources of a billion of people but there are significant costs to do so. The US could have exterminated everyone in Vietnam or turned Korea into a radioactive wasteland but was it worthwhile?
So far the West is treating Ukraine as a cabinet war but direct attacks against the western territory might give politicians the support needed to mobilize the still significant resources available to the West.

Posted by: Satepestage | Feb 1 2024 10:09 utc | 102

Didn’t we have a commentator a few days ago hoping all of us at MOA would support the pending IJC decisions against Russia brought by ukraine?
Well seems 2 charges so far have been dismissed
https://t.me/myLordBebo/21587

Posted by: Hankster | Feb 1 2024 10:23 utc | 103

20 km a day wtf are we in germany vs namibia before ww1?
I am sorry for those duds but now the russians seem to have gained steam – there are reasons why even the ICJ makes such judgements

Posted by: Macpott | Feb 1 2024 10:41 utc | 104

I suggest people to pay attention to WW1 and how it ended. Circumstances are not exactly the same byt many things rhyme.
Germany for example attained the technical means to strike London and even shelling Paris with ultra long range artillery.
It did not them much good…

Posted by: Satepestage | Feb 1 2024 10:52 utc | 105

@Micron | Feb 1 2024 8:52 utc | 94
Where do I claim that Russia is somehow capable of advancing 20km per day? (Though that is what happened at the start of the SloMO when Russia advanced all the way to Kiev as well as major advances in eastern Ukraine.) Its Putin who said that Russia must expand the demilitarized zone. You must go and ask Putin if his forces are capable of achieving his desires.
But IMHO this statement of Putin adheres to the 2 year theory, that Russia can only fight a conflict after 2 years have passed. This is what happened in WW2. So for 2 years Russia has been sorting out the carpet / parquet generals and getting their house and MIC in order, so its only now that Russia can really fight. In addition, one or other of the big wigs in alternate media circles was saying, after a trip to Russia, that 2 whole Russia armies were idling in eastern Ukraine, as in not needed for manning the trenches. Such evidence, more especially what Putin said, indicates a change in Russian strategy, maybe its going to be active defence going on steroids, maybe its going to be big arrow advances with all the casualties that entails (which is what happened at the start of the SMO).

Posted by: gT | Feb 1 2024 10:57 utc | 106

Brussels have met Orban’s undisclosed price, releasing €50B to Ukraine without annual review.

Posted by: too scents | Feb 1 2024 11:19 utc | 107

To NAFO Micron.
…Just for example, it’s been two weeks the Russian forces are battling the Ukrainians to take two streets in south Avdiivka (Sobornaya and Sportivnaya). At this rate I’m more confident than ever in my prediction that Avdiivka will still be in ukrainian hands by end of March….
Well, I m more confident than ever in my prediction that Avdiivka will follow Marinupol, Soledar and Bachmut.
Never heard about Rakka and Mosul, I presume?
Btw. This is about Marinupol from Germany – UA ZeRada reports
Journalists from the German TV channel ZDF went to Mariupol and recorded a story from there.
Unusual narratives for Germany:
✅A lot of restoration work is being carried out: streets, schools, residential buildings and entire neighborhoods are being restored. And it happens very quickly;
✅“Before the Russian occupation, it was forbidden to speak Russian in the theater, and therefore many people are glad that Russia occupied the city,” the expert comments.
While I am trolled by Czech mainstream media about cholera in Marinupol, OMG evene ukies….

Posted by: Josef Schweik | Feb 1 2024 11:22 utc | 108

The people who think about wars as winning the shooting match and taking the twrritory never cease to amaze me with their untarnished naivete.
The fisrt question a real commander asks is: Ok, let’s assume we won. Now what?
Let’s say Russia bombs the hell out of tbe cities and rolls over Ukraine. It can do that, no question. Ok, now what? Massive humanitarian catastrophe and 100% hostile population with hundreds of thousans armed military people lost aming civilians. Decades of guerilla warfare, like USSR had in exactly the same place after WW2.
Russia allows all ideological Nazis to come to the frontline to be killed. Gang-pressing civilians does not endear Bazis to the remaining population.
And then there are millions of refugees who fidn’t want to fight. They have no strong loyalty to Ukrainian idea, and a lot of them will come back when Western welcone wears thin. They won’t be a problem, but widely destroyed infrastrucrure will.
Limiting devastation to the narrow static front line and spending time patiently killing Nazis and waiting for collapse seems to be the best answer to the “We won, now what?” question.
By the way US milisary snd State Dept do not seem to be able to comprehend this question. Time after time US inflict total devastati9n 9n enemies… only to be kicked out later by very motivated guerillas.
Posted by: averros | Feb 1 2024 9:48 utc | 99

Err excuse me but what you say does not make sense.
First, by most accounts there are around 400.000 killed or incapacitated Ukrainians. They all have families and relatives. You think somehow these relatives won’t be hostile already ? You think it could be worse than that ?
Second, your explanation that the Russians prefer a static frontline is not borne out by the facts and by the very press releases of RUMOD and all Russian TG bloggers. When you read their reports they constantly focus on gaining territories, strongholds, and couch advancements in a positive light (which is largely bullshit by the way. They are always careful in remaining deliberately vague, like “our troops are advancing..” Yeah right. They have been advancing for two years but when you look at the map it tells a different story). If you theory was true, they would never do that and would rather emphasize their defensive capabilities and focus on occupying impregnable positions.
The examples of Avdiivka, Krokhmalne, Novomikhailovka, show that your theory is just that : a nice theory which only works if you choose to ignore all the evidence from the ground, from RUMOD officials, and from Putin himself. The fact is that on the ground the Russians do constantly attempt to gain territory and strong points, and do endure significant losses in the process.
Lastly, as explained above choosing a defensive posture is a fundamentally bad idea. Meanwhile the Ukrainians are steadily growing their long-range capabilities, France and Germany are building weapon coalitions, and Ukraine is capable of hitting oil refineries and LNG terminals as far as Saint-Petersburg. The Black Sea Fleet has been pushed out and Ukraine’s grain exports have even almost reached their pre-war levels !
Why is the defensive posture a bad idea ? It’s your comment. You are hoping the other side collapses. But by doing so, you do not take matters in your own hands. This is exactly why all the great military strategists constantly said that only offense wins war.
we can even demonstrate it by the absurd. If this strategy was the best, then how do you explain that the USSR and Stalin chose to drive away the Germans until Berlin ? They should have dug in around Moscow and let the (actual) Nazis impale themselves on the defense. This is really extraordinary : a single anonymous poster in 2023 is more clever than Stalin and the whole STAVKA and has identified a far better strategy, outwitting all the best Soviet military strategists ! You should candidate for a job at the military academy…

Posted by: Micron | Feb 1 2024 12:15 utc | 109

So the fact that Russia/Putin officially declared the plane was shutdown by a patriot system… it means Russia indeed did not take care of them as they ‘claimed’ they are targeting and destroying NATO equipment. This war is full of lies on both sides. Start getting bored …

Posted by: Innuendo | Feb 1 2024 12:36 utc | 110

This proxy war demonstrates EU is the head of the snake. And ww2 was not successful in exterminating the Nazis.

Posted by: Innuedo | Feb 1 2024 12:43 utc | 111

So the fact that Russia/Putin officially declared the plane was shutdown by a patriot system… it means Russia indeed did not take care of them as they ‘claimed’ they are targeting and destroying NATO equipment. This war is full of lies on both sides. Start getting bored …
Posted by: Innuendo | Feb 1 2024 12:36 utc | 110
Where did the MOD claim to have destroyed all patriot batteries? If you are bored go look for a hobby.

Posted by: Knullpi | Feb 1 2024 12:47 utc | 112

So the fact that Russia/Putin officially declared the plane was shutdown by a patriot system… it means Russia indeed did not take care of them as they ‘claimed’ they are targeting and destroying NATO equipment. This war is full of lies on both sides. Start getting bored …
Posted by: Innuendo | Feb 1 2024 12:36 utc | 110

Just like with HIMARS. They were supposed to be either ineffective or easily hunted by drones or counter-artillery. Turns out that’s not quite the case, at least according to the russian reports who cry “HIMARS” whenever there’s a strike they can’t explain.
For the Patriot it’s more of the same. First they were pooh-poohed as ineffective. Then they were claimed as destroyed or exhausted. Now they are trotted out to explain away the latest blunder. And for what ? Ok it may be a Patriot which has destroyed the IL-76. Whatcha gonna do about it ? What is Russia going to do about it ? Just complain to some useless instances which will, at best, utter some words about “USA bad” ? It would be better to say nothing.
It’s not really lies. It’s more about heavy doses of Kool-Aid liberally drunk by both sides.

Posted by: Micron | Feb 1 2024 12:51 utc | 113

To add to the misery, Ukraine just took out another Russian ship with sea drones. HIMARS, the Patriot missile ssytem, and sea drones are wreaking havoc on the Russian military.

Posted by: bored | Feb 1 2024 12:55 utc | 114

We will never know the exact amount of destroyed Patriots or HIMARS systems. And it’s not like we would ever know how many of these systems were sent to Ukraine.

Posted by: JamesBond | Feb 1 2024 13:04 utc | 115

It seems that the drone problem is indeed affecting both sides. Some RU channels provide a very detailed chart on the drone usage and it looks like the number is almost equal between sides. So neither side has any supremacy and sadly no potential solution.
Ukr advantage is that manpower is expandable which means RU would need a significant larger advantage in drone manufacturing which I am not sure it’s possible at this stage.

Posted by: JamesBond | Feb 1 2024 13:07 utc | 116

neither side has any supremacy
Posted by: JamesBond | Feb 1 2024 13:07 utc | 116

Above 500m AGL Russia certainly has superiority. They can fly helicopters. Ukraine can’t.

Posted by: too scents | Feb 1 2024 13:13 utc | 117

@117,
Sure, they have superiority in fighters/bombers/helicopters, but I was saying supremacy in drone warfare which is acknowledged by both sides that is becoming a problem to any side that wants to advance. Drones are cheap, planes are not.
I would have expected that Russia would have been a bit more prepared for this kind of war considering that they used a similar tactic during the summer with drones. Not sure where the bottleneck is (perhaps someone with better knowledge would know).
Perhaps work a bit better with other sides (Iran, NK, China) to create some additional EW capabilities?

Posted by: JamesBond | Feb 1 2024 13:18 utc | 118

SIMPLICIUS Ѱ
@simpatico771
There were recent direct frontline reports from Russian troops on the Kupyansk front that they keep hearing “German” language on the intercepted radio chats

Posted by: Peter AU1 | Feb 1 2024 13:32 utc | 119

Russia’s Iron Fist Total War Yields Results
Big frontline report of January 2024 from journalist Marat Khairullin
The most important thing that happened at the front this week is that Russian troops continue to systematically increase pressure on the entire line of defense of the Armed Forces of Ukraine. To understand what is happening, let’s once again touch upon the tactics of dill defense.
It is arranged quite simply – a very deep (in some areas more than 10 kilometers) line of protective structures. In the first line, as a rule, there are mobilized suicide bombers from the territorial defense. This is the meat shield of dill. It is on them that our main blow falls.
The Ukrops use them as a buffer that slows down our offensive actions and gives time to pull in more prepared units from the depth of the defense, which counterattack in an attempt to push our troops back. Quite often, they succeed. As, for example, we saw in the autumn in Sinkovka, which was almost completely cleared of the enemy.
However, there aren’t many of these parts. Previously, the Ukies were able to work in active defense by transferring these reserves from one sector to another, where ours were active.
Today, the problem of the ukrops is that our troops have switched to the tactics of total pressure in more and more directions, and the enemy simply fails to quickly transfer these already battered units from one sector to another.
And, in addition, the consumption of people in the meat shield has reached a critical mass – the Ukies do not have time to bring new suicide bombers to the first line in sufficient numbers.
The Telegram channel “Intercept Z” maintains regular statistics on the losses of dill on the battlefield according to our Ministry of Defense.
On average, it turns out to be about 20 thousand per month – these are officially confirmed losses by means of objective control. However, this is only part of the iceberg. This does not include the killed enemies in the near rear, the huge flow of wounded, which cannot be counted at all.
Military medicine of the enemy army in general, it can be said that it works only for the chosen ones – meat from the territorial defense is served on a residual basis.
If in the first year the NATO masters were still supplying the military doctors of their slaves, now they have simply forgotten about it. What for? Dill is already doomed. Instead, NATO has set up several hospitals of its own that cater exclusively to their superior race.
In addition, now the Ukrop army is covered by another epidemic of frostbite. I have already written that several serious infectious diseases are raging on the enemy’s front line at once – from dysentery and influenza to unknown infections. Which are not yet diagnosable remotely at all.
The Ukrop commanders, of course, do not care at all what the soldiers are sick with, whose task is simply to successfully wrap themselves on the tracks of Russian tanks and thus slow them down.
In general, all these factors allow us to talk about the level of real losses of dill (including sanitary) of about 40-50 thousand per month. It is clear why their military registration and enlistment offices are so raging – there are not enough people for the slaughter.
It is clear that such inhuman tactics of war are finite – sooner or later the people will run out.
By the way, this is why I regularly write that Zelensky must be severely and justly punished for introducing such tactics of war – this is who you have to be to treat your people like this – to arrange a real genocide for them. The Khmer Rouge and Zelensky are phenomena of the same order.
But the most terrible thing for them is that this inhuman tactic no longer works – it worked until our troops were as active as they are now.
For comparison: at the end of the summer, in a more or less constant active phase, we had only two directions – Kupianske and Marinka. All other activities of our troops resembled rather bursts – the dill had enough time to cope with them.
And now we are constantly pressing thirty plus directions (conducting assault operations). And this is with an overwhelming advantage in firepower and against the backdrop of a falling supply of dill by Western masters.
And the enemies don’t seem to have a backup plan. Zaluzhnyi’s line is just another PR campaign.
We will take our time to gnaw through it as we do the one that exists.
Here it is necessary to pay attention to the following point: it is obvious that our command is not in a hurry, preferring the tactics of small captures.
Why?
To dispose of the dill on the existing borders as much as possible, so that they do not have time to retreat and lock themselves in the fortress cities. The more we destroy the enemy now, the easier it will be to make further advances.

Posted by: marat post | Feb 1 2024 13:33 utc | 120

TO NAFO Micron
…Meanwhile the Ukrainians are steadily growing their long-range capabilities, France and Germany are building weapon coalitions, and Ukraine is capable of hitting oil refineries and LNG terminals as far as Saint-Petersburg. The Black Sea Fleet has been pushed out and Ukraine’s grain exports have even almost reached their pre-war levels !…
The following is from UA ZeRada channel, it was posted just yesterday there, enjoy in full
🔥🧩Ukraine’s position has become more precarious. The threat of a new attack by the Russian Federation has grown.
The accumulated effect of a number of factors has a negative impact on the overall stability of Ukraine:
🟢US refusal of military and financial assistance;
🟢difficulties with the allocation of EU financial assistance;
🟢shortage of shells and other weapons;
🟢the inability of partners to increase the production of shells earlier than by 2026;
🟢difficult situation in Avdeevka;
🟢demotivation of society and the army. An increase in the number of “refuseniks” and “deviators”;
🟢exhaustion of units for almost 2 years of war.
This all increases the friction between the command and forces them to urgently increase mobilization, which in turn creates problems with the adoption of an anti-people law on mobilization…..
As to the UA grain thing, Ru blocked sea exports from UA. The situation with the UA grain in Poland has been well-known. In my country, Czechia, the government formed by eurosojuz collabos licking merde from Brussels Arsch, is now allowing, pure for political reasons, to import the UA toxic grain, even in open cargo waggons, which is otherwise prohibited.

Posted by: Josef Schweik | Feb 1 2024 13:35 utc | 121

https://twitter.com/vicktop55/status/1752935988018422005
Yesterday, Crimea was subjected to a massive attack by 20 air-launched missiles supplied by NATO countries. Among the targets was the Belbek airfield, but two missiles hit a construction waste dump; apparently, our electronic warfare systems were activated.
In the morning, attacks on the west of the Crimean Peninsula continued.
In addition, at night, aircraft-type UAVs were intercepted and destroyed over the Belgorod (4 UAVs) and Kursk (1 UAV) regions.
……………
This and the previous report I posted on German language radio traffic gives a sudden change to reports coming from conflict. This comes as Nato is moving major forces to the borders of Russia for its so called exercise. This is quickly moving towards direct Nato Russia conflict.
One report of Ukraine setting up for another offensive in the next few weeks. What assets they have is unknown, but taken overall, the sudden change in reports, it looks like something is brewing that will kick off in the next few weeks.

Posted by: Peter AU1 | Feb 1 2024 13:44 utc | 122

RT notes, Anglo-american press corpse is front-loading Zaluzhny’s imminent retirement.
CNN video | article

A formal announcement has not been made, meaning Zaluzhny was still in post as of Wednesday evening, however, a presidential decree is expected by the end of the week, one of the sources told CNN, in what would be the biggest military shake-up by Zelensk* since the start of Russia’s full-scale invasion almost two years ago

< checks watch >

On Monday, presidential spokesman Serhiy Nykyforov told CNN and others that rumors of the army chief’s dismissal were untrue. The defense ministry also put out a message on its social media channels which read, “Dear journalists, an immediate answer to everyone: No, this is not true.” And in his daily evening address Monday, Zelensk* himself made no reference at all to his army chief.
But according to one of the sources, at a small gathering at his office on Monday—also attended by Defense Minister Rustem Umerov

the brain behind the Crimea Tatars’ Meiji and “state in a smartphone” geo-locating mobilization

—the president declared he had “made a decision to dismiss the commander-in-chief of the armed forces.” The account is in line with other reports, including in WaPoo and the Financial Times.
[…]
Ukraine’s president then underlined his decision, saying the fact Zaluzhny had turned down the new role did not change the fact he was being removed from his current post.

two names offered for EUCO approval

One of them is the current head of the Defense Intelligence Directorate, Kyrylo Budanov, a 38-year-old general known to have strong ties with Zelensk* and seen as representing a new generation of military leaders….The other frontrunner is Oleksandr Syrskyi, currently the Commander of Ukrainian Land Forces, the senior military commander speaking to CNN said

Posted by: sln2002 | Feb 1 2024 13:50 utc | 123

@ JamesBond | Feb 1 2024 13:18 utc | 118
Not exactly like that. Russia manufactures now a lot more drones. You can see it in the number of destroyed armored vehicles and nato zombies which you can watch in the daily videos, must be many hundreds so far. Most tanks and other vehicles are destroyed by small drones, not other means. Some targets are hit by series of drones, some nato zombies are chased individually, that doesn’t look like “shortage” to me.
Ukros mainly target ambulances, civilians, random buildings. That is not superiority, that’s simple terrorism which is very cheap indeed. Most of their attempts are canceled by EW. Ukro drone “success” is a simulation like their economy.
Why Russia did not have drones in the first year? that it’s because their general staff is a collection of fake diplomas and careers based on butt kissing. In 2021 they had less drones than Ukr has received each 3-4 months or so, based on their own numbers, not nato msm. Even so, the natoids can’t do better than a single year of drone development in Russia.

Posted by: rk | Feb 1 2024 13:51 utc | 124

@109 whenever there is a Russian plane shot down or ship sunk, English-language patriot Z (shadowbanned) goes crazy. It’s mostly about embarrassment, how could Putin have allowed this really pathetic look, for what is or should be a superpower military and state.
But I would argue much more than the occasional ship or airplane lost, it’s the lack of progress on the ground that is most worrying. If Russia were making steady, significant progress in Adveevka or had pinned Ukrainian forces there in order to make significant progress elsewhere, losing a plane or ship would be worth the cost of a winning campaign. But instead Russia is losing these assets just as it makes nearly zero progress on the ground (again, look at a map of positions this year vs the same time last year).
It’s easy enough for Putin to say they have to push back lines to accommodate long range missile attacks, but where is the actual pushing back? We are 2 years into this war, Russia is losing something like 100 KIA a day on average, for what? To bang heads against a suburb of Donetsk City for 6 months, expending some large portion of their newly accumulated armor and artillery reserves, before finally taking it and being 1/500th of the way closer to reaching the Dnepr? To enjoy the soap opera in Kyiv as if it brings them any closer to breaking the Ukrainian lines and winning?

Posted by: Multipolar Express | Feb 1 2024 13:54 utc | 125

Posted by: Multipolar Express | Feb 1 2024 13:54 utc | 125
Most likely it will play out as the western front in WW1. Not much actual movement overall (though still some happened here and there as in Italy in 1917), until eventually the central powers cracked. In the german case the rear collapsed before the front, though admittedly it was a close run affair.

Posted by: Satepestage | Feb 1 2024 14:13 utc | 126

@125,
Can we say the same thing about Ukraine’s ‘counter-offensive’? Banging heads on a small village (Robotino) for 4 months? A village with 2 streets at best?
I am sure most pro-ru cheerleeders would expect something better now during their offensive in Avdeevka but keep in mind that Ru doesn’t attack only in Avdeevka. We can argue that the situation is pointing to stalemate and considering the both sides pretty much copy one another, it will be difficult to make any large breakthrough.

Posted by: JamesBond | Feb 1 2024 14:14 utc | 127

@124,
Yes, indeed UA use drones on pretty much everything living because again .. they don’t care about their own people and much less the people in East of Ukraine.
There are a lot of UA videos pointing the some successes on their drone warfare on military targets as well which shows that they are indeed resourceful on this part as well. That’s why I am saying that on this part, both sides are pretty equal which that RU channel also points.
The problem with RU EW is that it’s not that vast to cover every corner of the front and it shows. Not sure what would be faster to give an edge here(having more EW capabilities or out-produce drones).

Posted by: JamesBond | Feb 1 2024 14:21 utc | 128

@126 this war involves an order of magnitude less soldiers than WW1. I know a lot of pro-Z takes it on faith that Ukraine has lost a bazillion troops, but who knows? Whose word do we have to take for it? RuMod’s? The occasional “slip” from Ukrainian officials when they are on their periodic begging tours in the West?
My personal estimates are 70k Russia KIA and 300k Ukrainian KIA, which places me in the extremely Z range of estimates. But even with my estimates, what is the population of Ukraine? Even if it’s “only” 20 million, that 20 million is heavy on men and light on women and children. They can keep up losing 300k every 2 years for a very long time without their lines breaking. How many French died in WW1 with no break in their lines?

Posted by: Multipolar Express | Feb 1 2024 14:21 utc | 129

@127 yes absolutely Ukraine did no better during their counter offensive. In fact they did worse because I do expect Russia to eventually take Adveevka. But who is Russia fighting in this war? Only Ukraine? Pro-Z cheering on Ukrainian deaths is a little like if the Soviets got off every time 20 Afghans got killed in the 1980s war in Afghanistan. Yes Afghans took higher casualties, you would expect that. Just like the north Vietnamese took much higher casualties than the Americans. It’s not the manageable casualties of the proxy force that matters. Even setting aside that Ukrainians are supposed to be a brother country almost identical to Russia according to the Russian narrative

Posted by: Multipolar Express | Feb 1 2024 14:27 utc | 130

It really says a lot about the power of propaganda that so many post here with the belief that Russia is stalemated in Ukraine.
Opinion can dissent from reality to a very great degree before overwhelming consequences take effect.

Posted by: too scents | Feb 1 2024 14:29 utc | 131

Posted by: Multipolar Express | Feb 1 2024 13:54 utc | 125
Most likely it will play out as the western front in WW1. Not much actual movement overall (though still some happened here and there as in Italy in 1917), until eventually the central powers cracked. In the german case the rear collapsed before the front, though admittedly it was a close run affair.
Posted by: Satepestage | Feb 1 2024 14:13 utc | 126
I disagree.
Germany lost the World War 1 because of a naval blockade cutting off vital food supplies.

This dissertation examines the British naval blockade imposed on Imperial Germany
between the outbreak of war in August 1914 and the ratification of the Treaty of
Versailles in July 1919. The blockade has received modest attention in the
historiography of the First World War, despite the assertion in the British official history
that extreme privation and hunger resulted in more than 750,000 German civilian deaths.
This revelation of a humanitarian disaster may be the main reason why the British
government delayed public release of the history for nearly thirty years after its
completion in the 1930s. Yet scholarship has focused on the initial establishment of the
blockade, and the complex legal, economic, and diplomatic issues that made it ineffective
during the first part of the war. Much less has been written about its subsequent
evolution into a powerful weapon, and less still on the Allies’ continuation of the
blockade after the Armistice to compel German acceptance of the Treaty of Versailles.
Britain first implemented the naval blockade of Germany not as a merciless
hunger blockade, but rather as a time-honoured maritime strategy intended to weaken the
enemy’s military resources and thereby assist the Allied land war on the Continent.
However, its function changed over the course of the war, as Britain broadened the
classes of goods subject to interdiction, from a traditional naval strategy focused on
military supplies, into a much broader “weapon of starvation,” in the words of Winston
Churchill, the British Secretary of State for War, by 1918-1919. The aim of this
dissertation is to illuminate how and why this military transformation occurred and..”(1)
1. https://scholars.wlu.ca/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2863&context=etd

Posted by: canuck | Feb 1 2024 14:33 utc | 132

Even if it’s “only” 20 million, that 20 million is heavy on men and light on women and children. They can keep up losing 300k every 2 years for a very long time without their lines breaking. How many French died in WW1 with no break in their lines?
Posted by: Multipolar Express | Feb 1 2024 14:21 utc | 129
It is heavy on the older cohorts, if anything. I woul recon that if the manpower situation was good conscription would not be such a thorny issue internally and they would not be resorting to press gangs that would make aghast a RN officer of the 18th century.
That speaks volumes about the pressure on the available pool.

Posted by: Satepestage | Feb 1 2024 14:35 utc | 133

@130,
You are correct if you are seeing it through western point of view. Because we compare some wars which were different in nature and motives than the one currently is for Russia. Ukraine war is not the same as the conflict that Soviet Union did with Afghanistan or United Stated did with North Vietnam.
If indeed, that was the case, RU could’ve just keep those 4 provinces still in limbo (without approving them to be part of Russian Federation) and hope that UA would collapse in a few years or keep negotiating forever their status.
There is no turning back for them at this point and the worst result that they would accept now, is probably just to freeze the war at the present line similar to the Korean line.

Posted by: JamesBond | Feb 1 2024 14:36 utc | 134

Posted by: Multipolar Express | Feb 1 2024 13:54 utc | 125
To put Russian losses in perspective during WW2 the USA lost 18% of their fleet including 23% of their fleet carriers yet they still won the war and won it by a good margin.
Fanboys believe any Russian loss mean Russian capabilities are weakened. What’s really happening is Russia is experiencing the same “war economy” that the USA did from 1940 – 45 … sanctions against Russia failed and Russia is resource rich and well supported just like the USA was during WW2. Those tanks, ships and aircraft will be replaced with more modern weapons just like the USA did after pearl harbour. Russia is investing and modernizing their industry while Russian people are fully behind the war effort and are seeing wage increases and prosperity because of it.
People forget that just days before the Russians invaded Ukraine they sent a large delegation to China to negotiate trade deals. The one deal that stood out at the time was with Huawei to “modernize, automate and network” Russian manufacturing.
It’s been 2 years now and the Russians are starting to churn out record numbers of tanks, artillery, missiles, drones and aircraft. The Russians saw this coming for more than a decade and were prepared for sanctions proxy war and the attempt to isolate them.

Posted by: HB_Norica | Feb 1 2024 14:38 utc | 135

Orban folded
50bln

Posted by: Newbie | Feb 1 2024 14:39 utc | 136

The Soviets and Germans in WW2, the French in the latter stages of WW1, also conscripted with a heavy hand. A far far heavier hand than the Ukrainians are doing now, in the case of the Soviets throughout the war. It’s simple mathematics, how many men are there in Ukraine between the ages of 20 and say 65, how many have they lost up to know, how many do they have left. I think you will find there are a lot left, for years or even decades of fighting at the current pace of attrition. Does Ukraine have a lot of pensioners? Absolutely. But it’s not 80 year olds (the life expectancy is too short), it’s a lot of 60 year old grandpas that the government has no compunction against putting in trenches. And millions and millions of men younger than that. They are not literally running out of men, and won’t be for an extremely long time at this pace.
The west is fighting to the last Ukrainian, of whom there are many, as pro-Z rejoices in the deaths of a Russian-speaking proxy force that was as different from Russia as Virginia is from Ohio as recently as 1990.

Posted by: Multipolar Express | Feb 1 2024 14:44 utc | 137

@133 The Soviets and Germans in WW2, the French in the latter stages of WW1, also conscripted with a heavy hand. A far far heavier hand than the Ukrainians are doing now, in the case of the Soviets throughout the war. It’s simple mathematics, how many men are there in Ukraine between the ages of 20 and say 65, how many have they lost up to know, how many do they have left. I think you will find there are a lot left, for years or even decades of fighting at the current pace of attrition. Does Ukraine have a lot of pensioners? Absolutely. But it’s not 80 year olds (the life expectancy is too short), it’s a lot of 60 year old grandpas that the government has no compunction against putting in trenches. And millions and millions of men younger than that. They are not literally running out of men, and won’t be for an extremely long time at this pace.
The west is fighting to the last Ukrainian, of whom there are many, as pro-Z rejoices in the deaths of a Russian-speaking proxy force that was as different from Russia as Missouri is from Ohio as recently as 1990.

Posted by: Zee You Later | Feb 1 2024 14:47 utc | 138

I disagree.
Posted by: canuck | Feb 1 2024 14:33 utc | 132
Blockade was one factor.
General dynamics of a defensive skewed attrition warfare should still apply.
Unless the West mobilizes properly the trend seems clear to me

Posted by: Satepestage | Feb 1 2024 14:49 utc | 139

@138,
Ups, copy pasting much?

Posted by: JamesBond | Feb 1 2024 14:52 utc | 140

Can we say the same thing about Ukraine’s ‘counter-offensive’? Banging heads on a small village (Robotino) for 4 months? A village with 2 streets at best?
I am sure most pro-ru cheerleeders would expect something better now during their offensive in Avdeevka but keep in mind that Ru doesn’t attack only in Avdeevka. We can argue that the situation is pointing to stalemate and considering the both sides pretty much copy one another, it will be difficult to make any large breakthrough.
Posted by: JamesBond | Feb 1 2024 14:14 utc | 127

Yes we can say the same thing, but it’s really useless. I absolutely don’t care about the Ukrainians not advancing, I actually care about Russia winning this damn war.

Posted by: Micron | Feb 1 2024 14:52 utc | 141

SIMPLICIUS Ѱ
@simpatico771
There were recent direct frontline reports from Russian troops on the Kupyansk front that they keep hearing “German” language on the intercepted radio chats
Posted by: Peter AU1 | Feb 1 2024 13:32 utc | 119

Typical useless bit of information. Even if it were true why should we care ? Everybody knows Ukraine is full of mercenaries of all stripes and colors. It’s just as useless as Putin complaining about a Patriot downing the IL-76. or what, does Russia intend to file a formal complaint to the UN so that Western states are kindly asked to pull their mercenaries out of Ukraine ? That will impress them for sure.

Posted by: Micron | Feb 1 2024 14:55 utc | 142

@140 I thought I had been blocked because the comment didn’t stick right away. Any name I use has about a 1 hour or less life expectancy on this blog

Posted by: Zee You Later | Feb 1 2024 14:55 utc | 143

@ Zee You Later | Feb 1 2024 14:47 utc | 138
Believing that having to threaten draft dodgers with shooting their knee caps off and having to send 60 year olds into a trench isn’t “running out of men” and repeating attempts to imagine or paint “many pro-Z” “rejoicing in the deaths” of “a Russian-speaking proxy” is an image anyone is welcome to. The real world will remain over there.

Posted by: boneless | Feb 1 2024 14:58 utc | 144

Everybody knows Ukraine is full of mercenaries of all stripes and colors.
Posted by: Micron | Feb 1 2024 14:55 utc | 142
Well, that’s a relief. You can probably explain this part a bit better to a gentleman above who was sure that Ukraine is fighting RU ‘alone’. Thus showing that RU is incompetent considering their many advantages.

Posted by: JamesBond | Feb 1 2024 15:01 utc | 145

@145 not only do you sniff glue but you are not great at reading comprehension either. I was saying that Russia is not fighting just Ukraine, so there is not much point in rejoicing over casualties in what is a disposable proxy force for the West

Posted by: Zee You Later | Feb 1 2024 15:16 utc | 146

Posted by: Multipolar Express | Feb 1 2024 13:54 utc | 125
“To put Russian losses in perspective during WW2 the USA lost 18% of their fleet including 23% of their fleet carriers yet they still won the war and won it by a good margin.”
I don’t know what cool-aid you are drinking. Between December 1941 and September 1945, over 350 U.S. Navy warships and patrol craft were sunk or damaged beyond repair.
In December 1941, the fleet consisted of nine battleships, three aircraft carriers, 12 heavy cruisers, eight light cruisers, 50 destroyers, 33 submarines. A total of 115 combat ships
Between December 1941 and September 1945, over 350 U.S. Navy warships and patrol craft were sunk or damaged beyond repair.
In 1945, the United States Navy boasted an impressive fleet, including:
28 aircraft carriers.
23 battleships.
71 escort carriers.
72 cruisers.
Over 232 submarines.
377 destroyers.
551 combat vessels
Despite losing twice as many ship than were in the fleet in 1941, they replaced all losses and grew their fleet by an additional 400%+

Posted by: Zargo | Feb 1 2024 15:17 utc | 147

The Soviets and Germans in WW2, the French in the latter stages of WW1, also conscripted with a heavy hand.
Posted by: Zee You Later | Feb 1 2024 14:47 utc | 138
And they were getting a shorth breath in that regards. Manpower was becoming an issue for the soviet army at the end of the war for example (Glantz et all),the french had large mutinies in 1917.
Given that the russians do not have the same war aims of nazi Germany at some point the ukrainians may well go down the Kiel route, not anytime soon I expect but not many years from now either.
There are also a number of others factors to consider, such as the needs of economy/infrastructure, however threadbare, increased loss from increasingly older and ill trained conscripts etc.

Posted by: Satepestage | Feb 1 2024 15:24 utc | 148

@ Zee You Later | Feb 1 2024 15:16 utc | 146
We all wonder why you don’t stick around more.

Posted by: boneless | Feb 1 2024 15:28 utc | 149

averros | Feb 1 2024 9:48 utc | 99
Fully agree.
In early 2022, I expected RuAF to advance & rapidly control maybe half of Ukraine.
Then what?
AFU would’ve been largely intact, able to wage a long guerilla war. Such an ‘Afghanistan 2.0’ would’ve been a nightmare for Russia – and was obviously London’s (and Washington’s, to some extent) wet dream.
Remembering both Afghanistan and Chechnya, Moscow didn’t fall into that trap.
One question, though:
Do hardcore Nazis actually die in large number on the front?
I thought they stay mostly in the rear, while forced conscripts are used as cannon fodder…?

Posted by: smuks | Feb 1 2024 15:36 utc | 150

Posted by: averros | Feb 1 2024 9:48 utc | 99
The answer for Russia seems obvious: let the SMO drag on until UKR is thoroughly disillusioned with both their own leaders and the West.
The West doesn’t have any answer and wants to keep bleeding Russia. It will become a matter of survival to accept Russia as liberators. This is not a large step for the eastern Regions, mostly for Galicia.
Putin claiming a larger buffer zone is the official notice that the former compromise (Donetsk & Luhansk) are no longer on the table due to the shelling of Donetsk and Belgorod. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes. More arms range means more lost territory. This should be heard lound and clear in Ramstein but will not be.

Posted by: SOS | Feb 1 2024 15:56 utc | 151

Fully agree.
In early 2022, I expected RuAF to advance & rapidly control maybe half of Ukraine.
Then what?
AFU would’ve been largely intact, able to wage a long guerilla war. Such an ‘Afghanistan 2.0’ would’ve been a nightmare for Russia – and was obviously London’s (and Washington’s, to some extent) wet dream.
Remembering both Afghanistan and Chechnya, Moscow didn’t fall into that trap.

Excuse me but this is ridiculous. So you think it’s better to have reduced half a dozen cities to rubble, mine the Zaporozhie region, and fight precisely in the Donbass which Russia is supposed to protect ? Besides, in case you haven’t realized, AFU is *still* waging war. And contrary to all predictions they haven’t collapsed yet.
It wouldn’t have been a nightmare for Russia. Just imagine if Russia for instance had been able to conquer all Ukraine east of the Dnieper. This would have been a huge natural barrier for Russia, enabling it to comfortably prepare the next phase.
God, I can’t imagine how people can be so delusional.
To sum up : if Russia had been able to rapidly advance and seize all eastern Ukraine :
– they would still fight Ukraine of course, but be in a much better defensive position, have drastically less risks of getting hit in the rear (as the front would be 200 km westwards), in summary be able to spend significantly less resources to defend their position
– AFU would have been a lot more degraded than now. If Russia had actually been able to execute a proper encirclement, they would have captured many experienced brigades. Also, they would have greatly reduced the operational space for Ukraine.
There would have been no negatives compared to today, only positives.

Posted by: Micron | Feb 1 2024 16:04 utc | 152

Do hardcore Nazis actually die in large number on the front?
I thought they stay mostly in the rear, while forced conscripts are used as cannon fodder…?
@ smuks | Feb 1 2024 15:36 utc | 150

It’s obviously impossible to answer that definitively, plus how does one define “large number” exactly? However, this is my understanding from circumstantial evidence and anecdotal rumors.
Ideologically motivated troops are widely considered their best forces, as such they have to be used in important battles (and as anti-retreat troops), like Mariupol, Bakhmut/Artyomovsk, the “counter”-offensive and now Avdiyevka. In particular, the Azov battalion had to be reconstituted and renamed to 3rd assault brigade early last year, suggesting heavy losses. Other elite troops are likely to be dominated by senior nazis and (being assault forces) must have had a front row seat in a beating in Zaporozhye during summer. How many? Who knows.
Anecdotally, the ukrainian tattoo parlors rumored to have an increase of tattoo removal jobs, swastikas and other popular signs. Coupled with rumors of Russian soldiers preferring to find nazi logo sporting troops dead rather than capture them, those could be connected.
Most nazis likely die in assaults. Returning to the attrition through “active defense” state now, excluding Avdiyevka, most of the dying are definitely territorial defense and other fresh conscripts.

Posted by: boneless | Feb 1 2024 16:07 utc | 153

“This should be heard lound and clear in Ramstein but will not be.”
Posted by: SOS | Feb 1 2024 15:56 utc | 151
i dont think they care about that. nato/eu has made it absolutely clear that their goal is to inflict a strategic defeat upon the russian federation.
the ukrainian people are just the expendable proxy.
if russia extends the territory because of longer range weapons, nato/eu will simply deliver even longer range weapons. lost ukrainian territory is of no consequence for them. they only know escalation.
borell the gardener said it a few days ago, that they do not want any ceasfire at all. for them keeping this thing going is of utmost importance.
after all, its only russians dying.
and despite all their loudmouthed talking about ukrainian civilians beeing killed by russia, they know darn well that those are of russian descent. so its a win for those bastards.

Posted by: Justpassinby | Feb 1 2024 16:08 utc | 154

@152 how do you expect the rest of this war to play out?
My best guess is that the past few months have been a lesson to Putin that Russia has great trouble running successful offensives as well. This past fall I think he may have been thinking things were in the bag, as Russian forces proved much stronger and Ukrainian forces much weaker than I think even pro-Russian analysts had secretly expected.
I understand why Russia doesn’t start bombing Poland or using tactical nukes, that’s frankly ridiculous, but there are other things Russia could have done and still can do but isn’t doing that just have me puzzled. At least try to degrade the rail network. At least try to take out some bridges over the Dnepr. It might not work, the electricity strikes didn’t work either but an effort was made. At least try to attack across a less fortified stretch of the line than the Ukrainian strong points they have been exclusively focusing on.
My best guess is that the boomers in charge of RuMod are inept but they are loyal, so Putin sticks with them instead of trusting “outsiders” that might do better but pose potential loyalty or political risks to him.

Posted by: Zee You Later | Feb 1 2024 16:16 utc | 155

“My best guess is that the boomers in charge of RuMod are inept but they are loyal, so Putin sticks with them instead of trusting “outsiders” that might do better but pose potential loyalty or political risks to him.”
Posted by: Zee You Later | Feb 1 2024 16:16 utc | 155
The West’s plan was 90% predicated on that economic sanctions would stop the SMO. Now they are on plan B-and it ain’t working.
Russia has a plan, it has stuck to it..
Time is on their side as they deplete NATO weapons and Uke soldiers.
The West has massive debts and social unrest (see Texas; see Brussels today where protesting farmers are receiving rubber bullets) , Russia does not. 2024 elections alone will begin to stall the West’s support for Ukraine.
The West placed immense fortifications in Ugledar, Adeevka, Marinka ( finally taken)and these citadels take time to conquer especially
if you want to limit casualties on your side.
Meanwhile the Russian army is getting whipped into shape-that takes time-as well as battlefield testing of new weapons and tactics of which there is no replacement. I would expect in the coming months China and North Korea will test their new weapons in the SMO.

Posted by: canuck | Feb 1 2024 16:30 utc | 156

To sum up : if Russia had been able to rapidly advance and seize all eastern Ukraine :
– they would still fight Ukraine of course, but be in a much better defensive position, have drastically less risks of getting hit in the rear (as the front would be 200 km westwards), in summary be able to spend significantly less resources to defend their position
– AFU would have been a lot more degraded than now. If Russia had actually been able to execute a proper encirclement, they would have captured many experienced brigades. Also, they would have greatly reduced the operational space for Ukraine.
There would have been no negatives compared to today, only positives.
Posted by: Micron | Feb 1 2024 16:04 utc | 152

I don’t think Russia would have much of a problem controlling insurgencies in areas that are mostly ethnic Russian or sympathetic towards Russia. That would include most of the areas east of the Dnieper. The key to a quick advance would have been the encirclement and subsequent surrender of tens of thousands of Ukie troops. The loss of troops would have some effect on Ukraine’s fighting capability, but the effect on the morale of the military and the population of such large scale surrenders would have been profound.

Posted by: Mike R | Feb 1 2024 17:53 utc | 157

Glad to see people finally realizing that the conflict is tightly moderated to not only let Russia win, but to not let Ukraine win too. I have wrote about it in October, and most of the responses were mocking.
I guess they are less mocking now, heh.
So, what will happen next, then? The US and the Biden administration in particular have basically shown us that they are happy with how the war unfolds now, and they won’t change anything in it. We may see Trump getting to change this – or we may not. We’ll see after the inauguration, in a year from now. Before that, there is very little probability of something interesting happening. People will just keep dying, with little reason.

Posted by: AI_Avenger | Feb 1 2024 18:06 utc | 158

If Russia pushes the borders back to the point where the US has to fire those long range weapons from Poland or Romania then does ‘NATO’ start lobbing in missiles from outside Ukraine?

Posted by: Fred777 | Feb 1 2024 18:13 utc | 159

Posted by: Zee You Later | Feb 1 2024 16:16 utc
How do you know what strikes on electric generation and distribution didn’t work? What are your exact sources please?

Posted by: Tom_Q_Collins | Feb 1 2024 18:26 utc | 160

Posted by: Peter AU1 | Feb 1 2024 13:32 utc | 119
Thanks for that interesting piece of info, and everything else you post. It’s greatly appreciated by me!

Posted by: Babel-17 | Feb 1 2024 21:56 utc | 161

Posted by: Zee You Later | Feb 1 2024 14:55 utc | 143

@140 I thought I had been blocked because the comment didn’t stick right away. Any name I use has about a 1 hour or less life expectancy on this blog

This user name does not yet appear in moa
and he is obviously unwilling to abide by the rules
“Please choose ONE unique username and stick to it. Using multiple names is sockpuppeteering and will get you banned.”

Posted by: ghiwen | Feb 2 2024 7:11 utc | 162