Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
January 18, 2024
Open (Neither Ukraine Nor Palestine) Thread 2024-019

News & views (not related the wars in Ukraine and Palestine) …

Comments

Posted by: Scorpion | Jan 18 2024 22:14 utc | 76
The standard rejoinder is to point out that the Soviet Union, China and Cuba were/are socialist, not communist countries, and that their ‘communism’ was aspirational, expected to take a long to achieve the ‘withering away of the state.’ And by ‘long time,’ I mean many generations AFTER ridding the world of capitalist threats, for which the state is the only possible answer. So, nobody who understands Marxism would expect any of those countries, let alone a successor state, to be classless.
To address the material issues in your post, it’s also helpful to understand that the classes that currently exist in Russia are the result of fall of the socialist state and its replacement with an oligarchy of plunderbunders in league with foreign capitalists for the exploitation of Russia’s resources. Putin tamed the oligarchs to a considerable extent, making them arms of the state rather than owners of it, so in that sense they are no longer oligarchs, they are simply rich people doing what the state tells them to with their capital. In that sense, it’s more appropriate to consider the RF as a classically fascist system, in which the state controls the employment of capital for the purposes of the state. The OG fascists, however, were devoted to protecting the interests of private capital, and the RF is redeveloping decentralized social/political structures designed to ensure that the state directs the employment of capital for the benefit of the citizenry. It’s early days, and I think that full on Workers and Peasants Soviets are not likely to spring up any time soon, but the seeds are being planted.
Such a system is not, as the USSR proved, incorruptible, but one can hope that under whatever name it is called, the coming system in the RF will be more resistant than the first time around. After all, Marx predicted that socialism would take hold first in the advanced capitalist countries, and the RF is turning out to be the most advanced capitalist country of this period.
If I recall, there are something like 97 volumes of the Collected Works of V.I. Lenin, and in the long ago, I read them all. Lenin was quite clear that ‘one step forward, two steps back’ was what the future would hold for socialism for a long time to come. Unlike Trotsky, who thought the capitalists could be destroyed if the communists just pushed hard enough, Lenin expected there to be setbacks. No ‘historical inevitability’ except in the broadest sense of ‘the working class won’t give up until it wins.’
You can see similar ideas in Mao, and in ‘Socialism with Chinese Characteristic.’

Posted by: Honzo | Jan 19 2024 1:10 utc | 101

1/ Honzo as I recently pointed out elsewhere the centennial of Lenin’s death is the coming Sunday. Am I alone in thinking that nothing could be more powerful evidence of his continued importance than the failure of everyone to mention this important anniversary. I hope that nobody reads Materialism and Empirio Criticism as result of this.
2/ State funeral for Barry Humphries, creator of Dame Edna Everage and other Australian caricatures
by Richard Phillips
A really good article at the WSWS on the life and State Funeral of Barry Humphries who died 8 months ago. If I knew I had forgotten. Any Australian readers who have comments to make on this quintessential (I think) Melbourne intellectual and disturber of the comfortable will only enrich this, already orrnamental thread.
I remember Humphries as Barry Mackenzie in Private Eye, in the days when Private Eye was both funny and a thorn in the side of the great and good. Among its regular feature writers was Claude Cockburn who had been the Washington correspondent of The Times (the real one) in the early 1920s. He wrote for the Eye from exile in Youghal Co Cork, where Alex Cockburn grew up and Patrick caught polio. But I digress, back to Barry aka Dame Edna

Posted by: bevin | Jan 19 2024 1:17 utc | 102

@Peter AU1, #36:
I believe the first color revolution was Philippine to overthrow Marcos. Beijing was #2.
@karlof1, #2:
Thanks for the Lavrov’s perspectives. Yup, he laid it out plain, calling the western spade SPADE! I only wish China (Wang Yi) would do likewise. Doing so would enhance the multi polarity status quo both China and Russia are championing. Distinctive finger pointing would also embolden global south to be more vocal in their protests against western hegemony.

Posted by: Oriental Voice | Jan 19 2024 1:18 utc | 103

Posted by: Honzo | Jan 18 2024 0:02 utc | 169
The Brits are sending DU shells to Ukraine, ..
Posted by: Sam | Jan 18 2024 18:05 utc | 25
“…the UK is hated. Lots of countries would like to see it broken up….
“….the UK’s reaction to this isolation was a series of increasingly wild moves to try to gain relevance.
“The UK was out in front in declaring China a threat and an enemy,
Posted by: San | Jan 18 2024 18:06 utc | 26
British mentality actually controls U.S. foreign policy. Tom Luongo seems to think so.
“The three most important groups who have been pressing this country toward war are the British, the Jewish, and the Roosevelt administration.
https://www.southfront.press/uk-flew-50-surveillance-mission-
over-gaza-report/
Posted by: Peter AU1 | Jan 18 2024 20:28 utc | 47
The Brits seem to be the main driver,
<= Where ever there is war and pillage, UK is usually found to be the initiating culprit.

Posted by: snake | Jan 19 2024 1:24 utc | 104

Pakistan’s Establishment = the military copy the US example: win the next elections (Feb 8th) through court favoritism. Denying former cricket captain Imran Khan his cricket bat election symbol is a political death penalty in a semi-illiterate area. Two supreme court judges resign just before. The PTI is also not allowed rallies, and its old leader is in jail since months.
https://www.dawn.com/news/1805475
https://www.dawn.com/news/1806478/the-judgement-and-after

Posted by: Antonym | Jan 19 2024 1:45 utc | 105

Jane | Jan 19 2024 0:12 utc | 97–
Thanks for your reply. I’ve long desired English CC for Kremlin events. The English Kremlin site doesn’t even provide the Russian language videos and the transcripts are often abridged, while not all events get posted, which is why I go to the Russian sites. There are a slew of voice/video translation apps available, but I’ve yet to try one. Print for my purposes works best. The awards video featured just Putin and the Grand Winner. The others on stage spoke, but weren’t recorded.
Thanks for taking the time to read my output. Many recent things have been rather long, but readers still open them and read, although I don’t know how much is read.
juliania | Jan 19 2024 0:57 utc | 100–
Thanks for your reply. I agree with your desire to see that sort of spiritual resurrection here along the lines of the Social Gospel Movement of 100 years ago, but a great deal will need to change.

Posted by: karlof1 | Jan 19 2024 1:52 utc | 106

Oriental Voice | Jan 19 2024 1:18 utc | 104–
Thanks for your reply. If China was being assaulted in the same way Russia is, perhaps Wang Yi’s rhetoric would be more forceful. His latest major speech was soft in that sense, but the emphasis on who would be allowed to join in Humanity’s shared future didn’t include the West as its behavior disqualifies it.
Wang Yi’s 9 January speech is here.

Posted by: karlof1 | Jan 19 2024 2:05 utc | 107

Posted by: bevin | Jan 19 2024 1:17 utc | 103
1/ Honzo as I recently pointed out elsewhere the centennial of Lenin’s death is the coming Sunday. Am I alone in thinking that nothing could be more powerful evidence of his continued importance than the failure of everyone to mention this important anniversary. I hope that nobody reads Materialism and Empirio Criticism as result of this.
No worries here in USA, the educational system has been so thoroughly trashed that not many people could understand it.

Posted by: Honzo | Jan 19 2024 2:08 utc | 108

Pepe Escobar reviews eminent French historian Emmanuel Todd’s latest and final book https://www.unz.com/pescobar/how-the-west-was-defeated/ – a must read……

Posted by: NotEinstein | Jan 19 2024 2:46 utc | 109

The Australian Aboriginals peoples. Archaeological evidence dates back 50-60 thousand years. To get here, they had to cross open ocean, the deep straight the divide Eurasian mammals and Australian marsupials. They had to cross it with sufficient numbers and DNA to populate whatever Australia was called then, a far larger land mass that included New Guinea and Tasmania and much continental shelf. And that would have been much earlier than current recorded artifacts in current Australia. How? Can’t happen by a few fishermen getting blown away.
Oldest dugout canoe to date was found in the Baltic, dated to 13000 years. Before the great sea level rise. Very rare to find wooden artifacts that old. How old are dugout canoes? Polynesians navigated the pacific in dugout canoes. Dating indicates Polynesians populated the pacific islands about 3.5 thousand years ago. They could read the sea and by waves, currents and other signs new there was land in a certain direction even if they were days away from it. On one island, I forget where, one far older skeleton has been found.
The polygonal stone building/walls. Perfect joints. nobody knows who built them. South America, Easter Island, Mediterranean all exactly the same.
Writing developed in different civilizations all with a different style so each developed independently of each other. Writing is a natural follow on to rock painting. Written language is only very recent.
Stone works are far, far older. Göbekli Tepe. 13,000 years. So what happened? A group of hunters sitting around banging rocks to make a few spear points and the one day one says – eff it. I gonna carve a stone crucifix and decorate it with carvings, but I’m gonna do it right and leave the decorations as reliefs? Bullshit. There had to be evolution to get to that stage. 13,000 years. Like the canoe – before the great sea level rise.
The massive carved perfectly finished stone, no matter how old or how recent there had to be a massive abundance of food to supply the man house required. That work cannot be done by slaves quickly worked to death. It is done by craftsmen that began learning their trade as boys, be they slaves or whatever, and like any working animal, they have to be kept in good working condition. All these works occurred in the ice age warm belt be they recent or old. Move into northern Europe where it is colder and the stone is carved. Far less man hours, far less food required.
Saw marks and core drill marks both in Egypt and south America. One researcher demonstrated rock sawing with a copper crosscut saw. A copper core drill will work in the same way.
The great pyramid in Egypt. Relevantly recent. Much about it was recorded included time to build but not how.
Göbekli Tepe – the hands. Easter Island the hands. Different times, different places but the same. Something that can be carried in common memory. Oral history stories and such.
You look at technologies like the bow. From southern Africa, across Eurasia, through the Americas through the pacific islands – but it bypassed Australia.
The later peoples to come out of Africa – one group or many – somewhere in that culture was something that drove them to waste time on massive stones at different times and in different parts of the world, but in many areas, common technologies can be seen – so much the same it is doubtful they were devolved independently of each other.
A commonality of culture across the Bearing strait. Dwellings and so forth. Cone stick frame covered in skin. Arctic peoples of eastern Russia roughly 45 degrees, plains Indians of US 60 degrees.
Built one one time When camping at the beach or just behind the beach. Had taken on old truck tarp to string up but it was stormy and that didn’t cut it. Bought some cheap plastic tarp from the hardware, went up into the greeny nature reserve and cut some 4.5 meter sticks and set it up at 60 degrees. dead easy to build. Couple of square tarps wrapped around easy, no pegs. close the top and light a charcoal fire and nice and warm. warms up through the day, open the top and door and the invection fan turns on.
But back to ..
Cultures merge. southern Americas stone culture and the Bearing Strait culture.
The southern Americas west coast and inland a bit have a commonality with the wider Mediterranean region not the Bearing Strait lot.
What I haven’t been able to find is a bathometric map that show the under water achipeligo that runs from roughly east new guinea/french Polynesia, around through Pitcairn, Easter Island to Peru. That if it existed at lower sea levels is the link in large stone building.
Oral history is key to going back past written history. In places where writing developed those oral histories were written down. karlof1s comment some days ago about the oral history in his part of the woods triggered a lot of thought as Australian Aboriginal history is the same. Where that can be dated, it goes back to the great climate/sea level rise event. It is when the megafauna of eastern Russia, north America And Australia died off. Like the Sahara, savanas became deserts and sea levels rose. Climate changed everywhere causing both droughts and floods, perhaps dependent on region as to which.
Extremely tough times for the peoples of the day. Condition which only some of the young adults in their prime will survive. The children will perish, the old – the keepers of history- will die and history is lost.
The Bearing Straight connection and the Pacific stone culture connection. Ancient sea travel as proved by the Australian aboriginal people. Already developed by 13,000 BP stone working technology as proved by Göbekli Tepe.

Posted by: Peter AU1 | Jan 19 2024 2:50 utc | 110

MARK CURTIS

BRITAIN ALWAYS SEEKS A PROFIT IN WARS
The Ukraine conflict is but the most recent case where UK policy-makers and weapons manufacturers seek commercial opportunities from devastating wars – often by arming both sides.

LAUREN SANDERS

How much is Australia profiting from the Gaza war?
Question: How much is publicly divulged about Australia’s weapons exports to Israel? Answer: very little

Conor Gallagher, Newcoldwar

Reports Expose US Billionaires and Corporate Profiteers Enabling Israel’s War on Gaza
Posted on October 30, 2023

Global Times
Who stands to profit from Israeli-Palestinian conflict?

President Joe Biden warned on Tuesday against any country or organization thinking of taking advantage of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, [sic] while indicating that the US is surging additional military assistance, including ammunition and interceptors, to Israel.
Also on Tuesday, the first plane carrying American ammunition for Israel’s strikes against Gaza landed in Israel.
Rarely does the US react so efficiently to an issue unless there is a huge interest in it. If anything, the fast provision of military aid is another reminder that the US military-industrial complex stands to gain the most again from a Middle East conflict, like it did in Ukraine and other regional instabilities in the past.

New Eastern Outlook
Salman Rafi Sheikh

Who Benefits from a Wider War in the Middle East
Ans….
The UsualSuspects !

Posted by: denk | Jan 19 2024 3:01 utc | 111

Posted by: Peter AU1 | Jan 18 2024 23:01 utc | 86
You have made me smile, Peter AU1. Keep on keeping on!

Posted by: juliania | Jan 19 2024 3:04 utc | 112

(To Scorpion | Jan 18 2024 20:01 utc | 37
There are some systems that promote predation very intensely. Capitalism is one of them. It’s possible to conceive of a benign Sage King, but a benign Sage Capitalist is an oxymoron. Getting rid of capitalism is not the solution to all the world’s ills, but it’s a precondition for solving pretty much any of them.
Posted by: Honzo | Jan 18 2024 20:20 utc | 45
Thanks. Well put.
And delightfully brief too!

Posted by: Hoarsewhisperer | Jan 19 2024 3:47 utc | 113

Peter AU1@111….the migration ‘out of Africa’ is an agenda driven, well controlled theory.
Who says the Aborigines of Australia didn’t evolve right there. No migration required. Beaver Creek peoples of interior BC state they were always on Turtle Island. No Oral traditions of migration.
Not to distract from the topic, but the academic story of man is tightly controlled to demonstrate a ‘we were first movement’….’it’s all ours’, especially when one tosses in eschatological ‘theories’ of God and it’s benevolence to bestow ownership of the planet to a group of narcissistic psychopaths.
Not saying while Ice Sheets were bigger, ocean levels were lower, migration didn’t occur, but humans were well established before that. High functioning, ocean faring humans have been on the planet for a very long time.
Cheers M

Posted by: sean the leprechaun | Jan 19 2024 4:09 utc | 114

Eighthman@2153
The hanging of the child has nothing to do with the image of the child, per se. Rather, it is foundational to the mindset of one who is impelled/compelled into that level of insanity.

Posted by: aristodemos | Jan 19 2024 4:21 utc | 115

scorpion@2214
The tenor of “vanguard of the proletariat” has always stuck in my craw. Milovan Djilas in his “The New Class” delineated how this transmutation of revolutionaries and guerrillas into apparatchiks and faceless bureaucrats driving nice new automobiles reflected the insights of Tito’s original #2 in postwar Yugoslavia. Seems that there are genuine leaders and then there are “new boss, same as the old boss”.

Posted by: aristodemos | Jan 19 2024 4:31 utc | 116

scorpion@2238
V.V. Putin knows his people well. Brilliantly psychological and yet apparently genuine. Even the folksy side does not appear to be a mask. Russians strike me as as you say, a “romantic” people. They are down to earth and yet canny types who can spot a phony at a hundred paces. Overall take for me is that they view their president in the light of the idealized “Good Tsar”.

Posted by: aristodemos | Jan 19 2024 4:47 utc | 117

Moonie@2306
Of Klaus Schwab becomes laudatory, I become cynical and suspicious.

Posted by: aristodemos | Jan 19 2024 4:50 utc | 118

karlof1@2329
Re lavrov: How someone with such a lugubrious appearance can be blessed with such an incisive and cutting sense of humor has to be purely Russian.

Posted by: aristodemos | Jan 19 2024 4:56 utc | 119

Snake @124
Centers of the British government are quite proximate to that independent little entity known mainly locally as “The City”.

Posted by: aristodemos | Jan 19 2024 5:04 utc | 120

Re lavrov: How someone with such a lugubrious appearance can be blessed with such an incisive and cutting sense of humor has to be purely Russian.
Posted by: aristodemos | Jan 19 2024 4:56 utc | 120
He’s his own straight man.

Posted by: Honzo | Jan 19 2024 5:08 utc | 121

sean the leprechaun | Jan 19 2024 4:09 utc | 115
Don’t agree with your fist two paragraphs. In the so called professional archaeology there is a huge amount of group think plus the aspect of everything they find must fit within the box of what they have been taught. Few in any professions can see outside those boxes. It is not a political thing. Its across the board.

Posted by: Peter AU1 | Jan 19 2024 5:09 utc | 122

PeterAU @250
Curious: Have you read the works of Graham Hancock? Straitlace archaeologists despise the man. Retroprojective thinkers celebrate his explorations into human histories which predate great extinction events promulgated by massive bolts from the blue. The dissolution of the massive North American glaciers post the Younger Dryas tend to be quite instructive. None of todays purely techno/mechanical “marvels” can achieve theGreat Pyramid’s construction, the stonework of Macchu Pichu or Baalbeck.

Posted by: aristodemos | Jan 19 2024 5:13 utc | 123

Honzo@122
Zinger!!!

Posted by: aristodemos | Jan 19 2024 5:15 utc | 124

Posted by: Scorpion | Jan 18 2024 23:32 utc | 92
No, I will not be entrapped in word games.
The seemingly innocuous, playful propositions of “The Two Independences” and “”The Four One China’s are just variations of the 一中各表/”One China with respective interpretations” hogwash peddled by the KMT, which the CPC rejected as a pro-independence political concept.
The Wikipedia article on 一中各表/”One China with respective interpretations” describes many incidences where Taiwanese separatists used this concept to advocate for independence. Separatists sought to replace 九二共识/”1992 Consensus” with this “One China with respective interpretations” bullcrap. Under the 1992 Consensus, there is only one China principle, one China policy, and one China framework. There is no room for “respective interpretations”.
The propositions are also similar to how the US is dancing around the semantics of the Joint Communique and say that “acknwoledgement” is different from “recognition”. To cite the dean of the School of International Law, China University of Political Science and Law in a China Daily article:

Therefore, the US is obligated to honor the commitment of maintaining only unofficial relations with the people of Taiwan. Specifically, it should not accord any official from the Taiwan province special treatment that is otherwise inaccessible to the ordinary people of Taiwan. Unfortunately, the US has often been found to circumvent its obligations and commitments, either on the pretext of providing humanitarian convenience for senior officials of the island on their way to or from Central American countries or by citing the uncertain international status of Taiwan.
The inclusion of the US’ unofficial relations with Taiwan in the communique, in fact, reinforced the fact that the US was obligated to respect the dignity of the government of the People’s Republic of China which is the sole legal representative of China, just as it does to the governments of other countries with which it has diplomatic relations.
Some US officials refer to a paragraph in the joint communique, which reads: “The Government of the United States of America acknowledges the Chinese position that there is but one China and Taiwan is part of China.” They claim that it is the Chinese position that there is but one China and Taiwan is part of China, and the US merely admits the existence of the Chinese position. The US side tends to offer its own understanding of the term “acknowledge”, but in the eyes of China, “acknowledgement” is no different from “recognition”.
It is clear that the US side is using semantics to confuse the international community. Any sane person will acknowledge that in the likelihood of the US later denying Taiwan’s status as part of China, no joint communique would have been prepared, let alone signed. Also, the misinterpretation of the Sino-US agreement by some US politicians would not only threaten China’s sovereign interests but also harm the overall interests of the American people.
As a matter of fact, some US politicians’ position in this regard does not hold. The joint communique has two versions, one in English and the other in Chinese. Both versions are authentic and legally binding. Under the customary international law on treaty interpretation, when one version of a single treaty allows two interpretations, the other version of the treaty must be referred to for ascertaining the true meaning of the treaty.
In the Chinese version of the above paragraph from the joint communique, the Chinese word chengren must be undisputedly interpreted as “recognition” in English. Therefore, the US commitment in this regard is clear: The government of the US recognizes the Chinese position that there is but one China and Taiwan is part of China.

Taiwan is an indisputable part of Chima, Taiwan is not a country, and that’s final.

Posted by: All Under Heaven | Jan 19 2024 5:53 utc | 125

I see that our pop is up to his usual trick, ‘agreeing’, ‘thanking’ all around to curry favor.
Just to remind newbie here,
When the pop popped up in 2002, his very first posts were to champion TW’s right to self determination, for good measure, the pop declared , Chinese claim to TW is pure hypocrisy.
Oh, his equally inane soul mate the anton mouthing his usual rubbish !
Comparing a Chinese province to sovereign states like Lanka, Maldize. !
PS
Do not feed the troll , but pop is different, he’s kinda cult figure at the bar, some of his disciple even threatened murder to avenge his gawd’s humiliation.
Posted by: denk | Jan 15 2024 3:48 utc | 95

I had difficulty discerning whether it was Scorpion or Pacifica Advocate whom denk was referring to as pop, but now I am beginning to strongly suspect it is Scorpion. The user referred to as anton is undoubtedly Antonym.

Posted by: All Under Heaven | Jan 19 2024 5:55 utc | 126

“I had difficulty discerning whether it was Scorpion or Pacifica Advocate whom denk was referring to as pop, but now I am beginning to strongly suspect it is Scorpion.
Posted by: All Under Heaven | Jan 19 2024 5:53 utc | 126-127
It’s definitely Scorpion, the ‘professor of philosophistry’ or ‘pop’.
“No, I will not be entrapped in word games.” – Word games is why he’s the pop.
Pacifica Advocate by contrast is solid.

Posted by: waynorinorway | Jan 19 2024 6:11 utc | 127

Posted by: Peter AU1 | Jan 18 2024 22:37 utc | 83
This comment is a good example of why reading and understanding theory is important instead of relying on the twisted descriptions provided by barflies who bear ill will and grudges against communism.
China is a communist country through and through. China’s economic development is at the primary stage of socialism, as affirmed by President Xi Jinping. China’s goal is to transition to the later stages of socialism and eventually communism. Now, this may confuse some barflies, but having capitalist elements in its economy does not turn China into a semi-capitalist country.
Let’s go all the way back to Mao’s On State Captialism, published July 9, 1953:

The present-day capitalist economy in China is a capitalist economy which for the most part is under the control of the People’s Government and which is linked with the state-owned socialist economy in various forms and supervised by the workers. It is not an ordinary but a particular kind of capitalist economy, namely, a state-capitalist economy of a new type. It exists not chiefly to make profits for the capitalists but to meet the needs of the people and the state. True, a share of the profits produced by the workers goes to the capitalists, but that is only a small part, about one quarter, of the total. The remaining three quarters are produced for the workers (in the form of the welfare fund), for the state (in the form of income tax) and for expanding productive capacity (a small part of which produces profits for the capitalists). Therefore, this state-capitalist economy of a new type takes on a socialist character to a very great extent and benefits the workers and the state.

China did not suddenly turn capitalist with Deng’s reform and opening up in 1978. China remained just as communist now as it was back in Mao’s time.
Communist countries relying on the capitalist mode of production isn’t something unique to China. The Soviet Union relied on it as well. Let’s look at Lenin’s New Economic Policy published on October 17, 1921:

Get down to business, all of you! You will have capitalists beside you, including foreign capitalists, concessionaires and leaseholders. They will squeeze profits out of you amounting to hundreds per cent; they will enrich themselves, operating alongside of you. Let them. Meanwhile you will learn from them the business of running the economy, and only when you do that will you be able to build up a communist republic. Since we must necessarily learn quickly, any slackness in this respect is a serious crime. And we must undergo this training, this severe, stern and sometimes even cruel training, because we have no other way out.

Communism is not totalitarianism or authoritarianism or whatever bullcrap made up concept that liberals use to smear communism.
The central feature of a communist country is whether the workers own the means of production, whether it is a dictatorship of the proletariat (as opposed to dictatorships of the bourgeoisie which all current liberal democracies belong to).

Posted by: All Under Heaven | Jan 19 2024 6:30 utc | 128

@ All Under Heaven | Jan 19 2024 6:30 utc | 129 with the China description….thanks
What I continue to emphasize about China is the government control of the Central Bank PBOC
In the West, the major Central Banks are privately owned instead of sovereign owned (US Fed in US, UK – The City of London Corp. relative to BOE)
How does China decide what should be public or private goods/services?….Thanks in advance for your contributions

Posted by: psychohistorian | Jan 19 2024 6:55 utc | 129

Posted by: All Under Heaven | Jan 19 2024 5:53 utc | 126
I think you will find that unlike China and Russia, where precision of language is valued, in the Anglosphere, we are resolutely opposed to ‘the rectification of names.’ We pride ourselves on the ability to call a freedom fighter a terrorist, a terrorist a freedom fighter, and a man a woman (and make people believe it). If we were to start calling things by their proper names, the entire system would collapse overnight.

Posted by: Honzo | Jan 19 2024 7:09 utc | 130

I believe in Carl Linnaeus a Swedish botanist in 1757 made taxonomic order very understandable. Kingdom phylum class order family genus species. A hyena and a canine cannot make viable offspring. A donkey and a horse can make a mule which is not a viable offspring although a very strong animal. Different species. Homo sapiens can make viable offspring therefore same species. Race is not a part of the taxonomic order. Just looking out for
psychological operations.
The idea of race has become a psychological operation on everyone.
Now the idea of gender has become a psychological operation.
How about fossil fuels, a good one to villainize. Oil and gas are abiotic, unless you’re capturing the methane from the dairy heaps and powering towns, wow that’s brilliant. Cole is from fossilized plant manner. Very abundant. Easily extracted unlike rare Earth elements. Oil gas and coal are some of the most easily extracted and abundant sources of power on the planet yet they’re villainized. This sounds like a psychological operation. How long has this been going on we were supposed to run out of oil in 1990. How’s the electric car going up there in Minneapolis? Two and a half hours to charge it, if you can make it to the charging station without losing your battery. Sounds like a psychological operation
How about a manipulated virus? We saw that in The Bourne legacy in other mainstream sci-fi to prep you for the fake pandemic with a manipulated virus. It came out of Wuhan. Really it was sprayed on you all along. If you believe it escaped the lab in Wuhan man I have a smoking deal on a bridge for you. A virus doesn’t travel the globe in 2 months I’m sorry that dog don’t hunt.
That was a psy-op, followed up by a fake vaccine that everybody bought into because they were scared by the mainstream media. That was a psy-op. So they kick the president out and put in a fake president by cheating and scaring you. So the government is basically turn themselves into a psy-op. Completely illegitimate in every respect all three parts of government and the fourth part of government which is administrative deep state. Monetarily Bankrupt, therefore a non-entity. The people that have done the psychological operations have been successful in dividing the country. Those that took the vaccine will not admit to their wrongdoing and will not admit to fatally damaging their immune systems and shortening their lives by 30 years. They want the shame those that did not do this this is a massive divide. The trust in the medical complex is gone. It has been shown that they are just beholden to the pharmaceutical companies that make extremely suspect drugs which actually heroin addicts are better off. The trust in government is gone and as it is proven that both Republican and Democrats are holding massive accounts offshore and they are funneling money from taxes into their accounts they’re all criminals. The government is corrupt the medical complex is corrupt the pharmaceutical industry is corrupt the mainstream media is telling you lies every day. The people running businesses in this country have no choice but to cut the taxes paid in. The divide is massive and the country will not recover.

Posted by: Diego | Jan 19 2024 7:14 utc | 131

Right I forgot about the climate change psychological operation. That’s one of the biggest ones. I googled the composition of the Earth’s atmosphere. National geographic said it was 78% nitrogen, 16% oxygen 5% argon, and the last one percent was composed of other gases like methane carbon dioxide helium etc etc. and everyone is all concerned with carbon dioxide and methane which is less than 1% of the Earth’s atmosphere yet, apparently this is a big concern. Plants require carbon dioxide to make photosynthesis and grow. If they don’t get it they do not grow. The hysteria around carbon dioxide is obviously very very overblown and designed to scare the people that do not understand the composition of the Earth’s atmosphere. It just comes down to how you want to live your life. Do you want to wake up and be scared everyday? The best idea is not to believe the hype or anything that the mainstream media says and live your life to the fullest and there is no reason to be scared about a thing. Take your mask off breathe the fresh air.
If you got more psyops let me know. Thx

Posted by: Diego | Jan 19 2024 7:31 utc | 132

@ karlof1 | Jan 18 2024 16:40 utc | 2
Thanks for the info; my problem is with this kind of extreme hyperbole:
“Since the adoption of the Charter in 1945, not a single foreign policy action of the West in the international arena has taken into account or respected the principle (as stated in the Charter) of the equality of all states, large and small, regardless of their values, religions and traditions in general.”
Seriously? They surely cannot be. The Russian FM expects us here and the whole world to go back almost 80 years in time and conclude the “West has never taken into account or respected the principle (as stated in the Charter) of the equality of all states.”
Not once, not ever, for 80 years. Please give me a break Lavrov & Co. 🙂
How is this helpful? They do not like it when the west lies through it’s teeth, there’s no need to copy them. This kind of exaggerated sophistry won’t win Russia win any friends nor shift minds in the West among good people.
While totally accept their frustration, in fact their anger over the West, they need to do much better than this. imo.

Posted by: Lavrov’s Dog | Jan 19 2024 7:57 utc | 133

Some reality checks about the performance of the US Army in WW1 and WW2.
The Slaughter of the Yanks in 1918
American Military Disasters in 1942
The Bloody 1944 Crusade in Europe
Why a US Army Division was Overrun in 1944
The Disastrous Liberation of the Philippines
The US way of war has been to bring overwhelming amounts of air power, artillery and men to blow the opposition away. That option is not available against the Russians and Chinese.

Posted by: Roger | Jan 19 2024 8:02 utc | 134

Oh I forgot the other glaring issue above — it’s taken them 80 years to say this and get serious?
Sorry, no I don’t believe a word of that paragraph … the overall theme may be ok and in line but …

Posted by: Lavrov’s Dog | Jan 19 2024 8:06 utc | 135

Posted by: Lavrov’s Dog | Jan 19 2024 7:57 utc | 134
Excuse the repetition but this more than illustrates why Lavrov is correct regarding western elites, Atlanticists, Anglozionists, imperialist neoliberal warmongers. NATO = United States and its vassals who are bullied into buying weapons and hosting United States military bases, nuclear weapons. Here’s a list of United States overthrowing, or attempting to overthrow, a foreign government since the Second World War. (* indicates successful ouster of a government) from William Blum.
* China 1949 to early 1960s
* Albania 1949-53
* East Germany 1950s
* Iran 1953 *
* Guatemala 1954 *
* Costa Rica mid-1950s
* Syria 1956-7
* Egypt 1957
* Indonesia 1957-8
* British Guiana 1953-64 *
* Iraq 1963 *
* North Vietnam 1945-73
* Cambodia 1955-70 *
* Laos 1958 *, 1959 *, 1960 *
* Ecuador 1960-63 *
* Congo 1960 *
* France 1965
* Brazil 1962-64 *
* Dominican Republic 1963 *
* Cuba 1959 to present
* Bolivia 1964 *
* Indonesia 1965 *
* Ghana 1966 *
* Chile 1964-73 *
* Greece 1967 *
* Costa Rica 1970-71
* Bolivia 1971 *
* Australia 1973-75 *
* Angola 1975, 1980s
* Zaire 1975
* Portugal 1974-76 *
* Jamaica 1976-80 *
* Seychelles 1979-81
* Chad 1981-82 *
* Grenada 1983 *
* South Yemen 1982-84
* Suriname 1982-84
* Fiji 1987 *
* Libya 1980s
* Nicaragua 1981-90 *
* Panama 1989 *
* Bulgaria 1990 *
* Albania 1991 *
* Iraq 1991
* Afghanistan 1980s *
* Somalia 1993
* Yugoslavia 1999-2000 *
* Ecuador 2000 *
* Afghanistan 2001 *
* Venezuela 2002 *
* Iraq 2003 *
* Haiti 2004 *
* Somalia 2007 to present
* Honduras 2009 *
* Libya 2011 *
* Syria 2012
* Ukraine 2014 *

Posted by: Lev Davidovich | Jan 19 2024 8:12 utc | 136

“…..and everyone is all concerned with carbon dioxide and methane which is less than 1% of the Earth’s atmosphere yet”
@ Diego | Jan 19 2024 7:31 utc | 133
So what’s your problem about that Diego? There’s so little CO2 and Methane it can’t possibly cause any “global warming”! Right?
Maybe you’re worried that there is so little CO2 in the atmosphere that plants won’t be able “breathe” and they’ll all die.
You wanna go back a few centuries in your mind now …. see all the global forests and rainforests across asia, africa, australia, the americas and Europe, even the middle east before humans started having to chop them all down for firewood. OK.
Then look at all the reaming timber in indonesia malayasia and the amazon, the redwoods in CA and all the rest over the world still. And know that ALL that wood which almost entirely made of Carbon came from the CO2 gas in the atmosphere.
Amazing huh?
Because there is so “little” of it. 🙂

Posted by: Lavrov’s Dog | Jan 19 2024 8:15 utc | 137

@ Lev Davidovich | Jan 19 2024 8:12 utc | 137
Nah. I was very specific in what I said, and I stand by it.
Please don’t verbal me, and try to change what I said.
which is here Lavrov’s Dog | Jan 19 2024 8:06 utc | 136
and here Lavrov’s Dog | Jan 19 2024 7:57 utc | 134

Posted by: Lavrov’s Dog | Jan 19 2024 8:18 utc | 138

@ All Under Heaven | Jan 19 2024 5:53 utc | 126
Ah, that’s nice. Are you new here, I hadn’t noticed your name before (sorry). Good to see. I’m assuming you’re mainland chinese? I hope so … more are needed on western platforms imo.
fwiw my view of pop/scorpion is he’s toxic and manipulative and extreme. Plus a racist. Cheers

Posted by: Lavrov’s Dog | Jan 19 2024 8:34 utc | 139

“In Iran’s strike on Pakistan, 9 Pakistani citizens were killed.
And in Pakistan’s strike on Iran, 10 Pakistani citizens were killed.
Iran and Pakistan killed 19 Pakistani nationals.
The Taliban called on the parties to stop killing Pakistani citizens.
Usual news for 2024”. – Col Cassad

Posted by: Suresh | Jan 19 2024 9:26 utc | 140

Graham Hancock?
Posted by: aristodemos | Jan 19 2024 5:13 utc | 124
I don’t know the name name. I did a quick look up and looks a bit over the top in some areas and I think in others more down to earth. Difficult to judge without going through his work.

None of todays purely techno/mechanical “marvels” can achieve theGreat Pyramid’s construction, the stonework of Macchu Pichu or Baalbeck.

Pen pushers have difficulty understanding how fast and accurately a craftsman of any part of the long manual labour era can work. The vast majority of archaeology is westsphalian (I find that a far more precise term than the vague ‘west’)
There is a typical underlying or subconscious racism that blinds most. In Mesopotamia and that neck of the woods, written history goes hand in hand with archaeology. But once they go back past written history, the oral history is dismissed, but like written history, oral histories must go hand in hand with archaeology. As most or all oral histories only go back to the great climate change it becomes difficult beyond that though some oral histories may contain glimpses of that far distant past.
The bible is a good example. That oral history is quite detailed from the great flood onwards, but prior to that is very vague and mystical.
Its a pity all the great libraries of the region, Persia Mespotamia, Egypt have been lost as there was likely a lot of clues, a lot more written down oral histories in those libraries.
Chinese writing goes back to around the time of Mesopotamia and is unchanged. People of today can read it without having to translate or decode. Seems to be mostly written on wood so a lot would have been lost. The great pyramid burial mounds – they don’t open them because it is like opening grandads grave to see what trinkets were buried with him. But they do have written texts detailing what is inside some or many.

Posted by: Peter AU1 | Jan 19 2024 10:58 utc | 141

Petar AU,
Time for you to get acquantined with Mau Piailug – without his knowledge and teaching the Polynesian Way of Navigation would be lost forever.
As the grandson of a at least tenth generation old style craftsman, who spent every summer as a child working in his workshop…….yes, most office workers and academics can’t fathom actually making things by hand. In the U.S. back in the day – we used to learn how to make things puttering around in the garage with Dad or our buddies. That culture lives on only in farming communities and small towns.

Posted by: Exile | Jan 19 2024 11:21 utc | 142

Not once, not ever, for 80 years. Please give me a break Lavrov & Co. 🙂
Posted by: Lavrov’s Dog | Jan 19 2024 8:18 utc | 139
If you look at the list I posted you can see that not once, not ever for 80 years has US foreign policy not been engaged in nefarious undermining of foreign governments. There was never a golden age under JFK or Carter – the CIA has been ‘at it’ continuously.
This statement of Lavrov’s is therefore not hyperbolic but based on a material reality.
I can agree with you if you say the US has contributed some positive actions during those 80 years, but for many sovereign states US actions have been consistently negative over that time period. It’s unusual that I disagree with your point and I am not “verbaling” you or wilfully misinterpreting you. We are just seeing a different perspective. I hope you will consider mine.

Posted by: Lev Davidovich | Jan 19 2024 11:35 utc | 143

Posted by: Diego | Jan 19 2024 7:31 utc | 133 and 132 (and some others)
…….I googled the composition of the Earth’s atmosphere. National geographic said it was 78% nitrogen, 16% oxygen 5% argon, and the last one percent was composed of other gases like methane carbon dioxide helium etc etc.
I will not reply to this in detail because -despite some half- truths stated by Diego the ramifications of small increases in carbon dioxide and methane are far more profound than their very modest values might imply. Without getting technical (anyone can Google greenhouse effect) the main problem this planet is facing at present is not so much the absolute atmospheric concentrations of the main greenhouse gasses but the rate at which they are increasing.
If you want a simple analogy, imagine a modest mortgage of (say) $100,000 with a fixed interest rate of (say) 1% over (say) a 15 year period. For most mortgagees this would ordinarily be perfectly manageable enabling payment of accrued interest and original capital in a timely -and relatively painless-fashion.
But suppose that the lending institution decided to raise the interest rate to an additional 1% each year some of the mortgage was outstanding. Without any controls on the interest debt the average person would be quickly “swamped” and be compelled to default. I realise that this analogy is very rough and ready, but it makes sense if you think of the incremental increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide as being the interest rate hikes, and the resulting increased payments required being responsible for enhancing the heat trapping potential of the global atmosphere.
In short, without drastically controlling the rate of green house gas emissions we are fated with an increase in overall planetary temperatures with the consequences for climate change – mostly adverse.

Posted by: Barrel Brown | Jan 19 2024 11:36 utc | 144

@ Lev Davidovich | Jan 19 2024 11:35 utc | 144
Look Lev, try and get really clear on this and on what I said and on where the quote came from I was commenting on … OK?
US foreign policy including your list is NOT the West for 80 years!
Read what I wrote as it was written again. Please!

Posted by: Lavrov’s Dog | Jan 19 2024 11:39 utc | 145

US foreign policy including your list is NOT the West for 80 years!
Posted by: Lavrov’s Dog | Jan 19 2024 11:39 utc | 146
Well if it’s not the west for 80 years, please tell me what that list of CIA actions represents. I know we’ve had movies and world series and apple pie I.e culture during that time.
Lavrov is FM he’s going to refer to geopolitical foreign policy, not culture for example.
Sorry I read your words several times but I still apparently don’t get what you’re trying to say.

Posted by: Lev Davidovich | Jan 19 2024 11:46 utc | 146

A colossal ideological and cultural change is expected in the West. It is going to be a big transformation form the woke humanism to spartan militarism. A Dutch admiral is warning that The West need to mobilize, that “common people” must be participate in the long war against Russia. It is going to be a new kick, interesting times, the west wants to find a new meaning, also the meaning of life for common white trash. The Dutch want to raise again as a nation of warriors.
https://www.politico.eu/article/nato-needs-warfighting-transformation-says-military-chief/
“In order to be fully effective, also in the future, we need a warfighting transformation of NATO,” said Bauer during a meeting of military chiefs in Brussels. “For this too, public-private cooperation will be the key.”

Posted by: zorge | Jan 19 2024 11:48 utc | 147

Exile | Jan 19 2024 11:21 utc | 143
Thanks for the name. Have gained a bit of an overview from the wiki page and certainly what I am thinking about. Will have to research him more.
This from wiki.
“At the age of four or five, Mau was chosen by his grandfather Raangipi to study as an apprentice navigator”
Up until just very recently, that his how all skilled craftsmen/tradesmen learnt their trade. A 12-15 year apprenticeship or longer. By the time they become a master they are exceptionally skilled and this carries down through the generations for millennia.
I watched a relatively large telescope lens being made by hand on youtube some time back. He was an academic but very skilled with his hands. Started and finished with nothing but two piece of glass and various grades of grit from roughing out to polishing.
When he stated getting close with the roughing out, he would hold it up to the sun and check the focal length adjusting radius of the part sphere concave to the focal length he wanted.
In just a few days he turned a thick flat sheet of glass into a perfectly focused telescope lens with nothing but another smaller circle of flat glass and some carborundum grit of various grades.
I have seen very old stones checked with a flatness tester and the have a higher degree of flatness than current window glass. Yo create a perfectly flat surface, it is a simple mater to find three relatively flat stones, use some sand for grit and start rubbing. Rubbing using the right combinations of the three stones and correct rubbing patterns. I haven’t seen it done, but it is exactly the same as creating the telescope lens. Depending on size and amount of material to be removed, a good craftsman would create three perfectly flat plates in just a day or two.
In this way, although more skill required, the perfect seems in very old stoneworks can be achieved. Heating quenching, pounding can be used to remove bulk material the the above rubbing skills to achieve final sizing. But the skills required to work complex pieces in a similar manner only comes from a very long apprenticeship.

Posted by: Peter AU1 | Jan 19 2024 12:07 utc | 148

Came across a useful term h/t ZH
“We’ve Memory-Holed How Awful Things Were” – Axios Beclowns Itself In Anti-Trump Rant”
I love the word “beclowns,” so very apropos.

Posted by: Stumpy | Jan 19 2024 12:29 utc | 149

The chair of the House of Representatives Armed Services Committee on Thursday asked Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin to testify before the panel over the failure to timely disclose his recent hospitalization, even to President Joe Biden.

Posted by: Jonathan W | Jan 19 2024 12:46 utc | 150

I had difficulty discerning whether it was Scorpion or Pacifica Advocate whom denk was referring to as pop, but now I am beginning to strongly suspect it is Scorpion. The user referred to as anton is undoubtedly Antonym.
Posted by: All Under Heaven | Jan 19 2024 5:55 utc | 127
————–
I could live with the troll anton.
BUt his soul mate pop needs to be constantly exposed for the sake of newbie.
Here’s a classic pop post..
Starting with profuse platitudes trying to cozy up with barflies.

Thanks to both (and others); very interesting – and intricate. I now understand better why most of what little have read about Taiwan makes little sense. The authors lack knowledge and column length to do the topic justice

Followed by his usual long winded blathering .
Buried into the tiresome rhetoric there would be the obligatory put down of Chinese people…

Why do Chinese-speaking people allow gweilo (?) to influence them so much?

http://tinyurl.com/mt5tkc9h
LOL !
the pop should listen to his fav asian, the jap commenting on Toshiba’s demise..

If our leaders grow a pair and stood up to Washington like the Chinese, we wouldnt be in such a mess.

Posted by: denk | Jan 19 2024 15:21 utc | 151

aristodemos@124….thanks for the Hancock mention, wiki does quite the hatchet job on him…….so right there, there is smoke….besides, anything outside the Academic norm shakes the ‘out of Africa’ megalomaniacs to their control freak core.
Cheers M

Posted by: sean the leprechaun | Jan 19 2024 15:37 utc | 152

https://roburie.substack.com/p/the-end-of-the-world-as-we-know-it-92b

At present, Joe Biden is actively working to dissuade Donald Trump’s supporters from voting for him (Biden) by calling them racists and extremists. And Donald Trump is calling Mr. Biden’s supporters ‘vermin.’ Each is crafting their own sanctimonious cult of culture warriors to vote against the other candidate. This reflects a political culture where defeating the other party is close to all that matters for the zombie death cults that are what remain of the legacy parties after the voters who care about policy fled.
[…]
The question then is how the US got to the point where half of the country is ready to kill the other half, and vice versa. The answer: capitalism. About a half century ago oligarchs and corporate executives decided that they had had enough of liberation politics (e.g. Black Liberation, Women’s Liberation) and they launched a form of corporatism called neoliberalism. While definitions vary, neoliberalism is capitalist imperialism as a class politics, very close in structure to Lenin’s explanation of the capitalist state found in The State and Revolution. In that exposition, the state exists to serve the interests of the rich and powerful.
Compare this to the claim that elections grant political legitimacy to the state through the will of the people. Well, the largest political party in the US— Independents, is functionally precluded from fielding candidates by the duopoly / uniparty. And the ‘right’ of Independents to vote for duopoly / uniparty candidates begs the question of why voters fled the parties if the party candidates were their choice? Moreover, why did these departures coincide with dramatic and well-publicized policy failures? The reasonable conclusion to draw is that the American electoral system is broken. It does not represent the will of the people.

Posted by: Tom_Q_Collins | Jan 19 2024 15:52 utc | 153

sean the leprechaun | Jan 19 2024 15:37 utc | 153
The core of pentagon bioweapon development is genetic targeting. They have acquired dna from around the world to see what gentic group is susceptible to what pathogen and what genetic group has resistance to what pathogen.
Sufficient DNA to roughly trace migrations and which people came from which.
Much non DNA evidence also helps. DNA migration patterns will be in the ballpark. Parts of it may be found wrong and changed at a later date but overall…
Then there is the matter of looking at the peoples who have a very wide range of DNA and the start point will be in that vicinity.
The European wild cattle that are the foundation of all European domestic cattle are now extinct but the wild cattle that form the Asian domestic breeds still exist and they will carry the full range of DNA from all the domestic cattle breeds.

Posted by: Peter AU1 | Jan 19 2024 15:58 utc | 154

” None of todays purely techno/mechanical “marvels” can achieve theGreat Pyramid’s construction, the stonework of Macchu Pichu or Baalbeck.
Posted by: aristodemos | Jan 19 2024 5:13 utc | 124 ”
This is correct but it might still be denied by many people. However, the answer lies in the ” tolerances ” of the various constructions and creations. Tolerances that can only be reproduced, if it all, using computers, lasers, and high level manufacturing equipment. When the mainstream critics can fully explain how these “tolerances” were achieved by hand, using copper tools, and in some of the hardest know materials on this planet then I will accept the mainstream narrative. For example I challenge anyone to explain how these pre-Dynastic Egyptian vases were created.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QzFMDS6dkWU
Or to explain how this device was crafted in ancient times by hand.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ML4tw_UzqZE

Posted by: Moonie | Jan 19 2024 16:28 utc | 155

Posted by: All Under Heaven | Jan 19 2024 5:53 utc | 126
Although playfully using the translator, I seriously hoped you could use my list to clarify. When you say ‘there is only one china’ which of the types I put out there do you mean? (Sounds like all PRC #2.)
The poster known as denk, who knows no nuance and frequently lies, believes I ‘champion’ Taiwanese independence but I just wondered out loud why they don’t decide by referendum like recently in Donbass. I still wonder. You might suspect I have a big agenda against communism but no more than I do against capitalism and socialism. (Am an equal opportunity cynic.)
Since China is back to being a world leader and her centralized, authoritarian anti-religious one-party system may soon be adopted by much of the world (as larger populations are understandably dysfunctional under multiparty systems), I have questions.
Now I also have doubts about communism, but not from any nationalist or ethnic concerns, rather because capitalism, communism and socialism derive from a modernist ‘scientific’ mindset, sometimes called reductive materialism, which am personally convinced provides an overly narrow bandwidth through which to view human life and society and which has been spawning an overly mechanistic culture worldwide, as much in China as the US (an almost failed state with nuclear armaments).
Many get emotional and even hostile when doubts or questions are raised. It’s a somewhat boorish approach to friendly conversation, but here we are.
I say: may the views and being of ‘All under Heaven’ be welcome!!
Please understand: I don’t have a dog in the fight at all. I just find most articles about the subject matter more confusing than clarifying.

Posted by: Scorpion | Jan 19 2024 16:29 utc | 156

” Moonie@2306
Of Klaus Schwab becomes laudatory, I become cynical and suspicious.
Posted by: aristodemos | Jan 19 2024 4:50 utc | 119 ”
Do explain.

Posted by: Moonie | Jan 19 2024 16:29 utc | 157

Moonie@1629
And here I thought the statement would be self-evident. I did hit the wrong key on the very first word, perhaps that was confusing. Instead of “of” the correct word is “if”. “laudatory” may be sussed from a brief dip into a dictionary.

Posted by: aristodemos | Jan 19 2024 16:34 utc | 158

Yves Engler shows how it is done: accused of anti-semitism for his criticism of genocide he answers in this current column.
https://yvesengler.com/2024/01/19/when-leftists-use-antisemitism-smears-to-weaken-palestinian-solidarity/

Posted by: bevin | Jan 19 2024 16:42 utc | 159

Moonie@1628
No directly materialist explanation is required at this time as to the how-did-they-do-it on the part of pre Younger Dryas catastrophe civilizations. We simply do not know the “mechanisms” which may or may not have been mechanical or any other formulation currently in use.
We are historically and culturally suffering from a serious case of amnesia.
What we do know for a fact is that those “reductionistic materialists” Scorpion cited, are both ignorant and arrogant in their know it all presumptions. Fact is…when it comes to ancient mysteries…they don’t know shit.”copper tools” indeed.

Posted by: aristodemos | Jan 19 2024 16:42 utc | 160

Lavrov’s Dog | Jan 19 2024 7:57 utc | 134–
Agreed, you pointed out the problem with absolutes–they are easily disproven. IMO, my interpretation is much better: The UN Charter was broken at the outset and the West thus embarked on its continuing career as an Outlaw as its behavior really didn’t change to accommodate what the UN Charter required of the Plundering Nations. All acted unilaterally to a certain degree, with some far more and blatantly than others. The main issues all relate to Decolonization which the Plunderers didn’t want to allow, and so their crimes/outlawry. However, from the POV of the Colonized, they were continuing to be denied the Four Freedoms for which WW2 was fought, and not just denied but killed in massive numbers–very much like Gaza today.
I highly suggest reading/watching Dr. Hudson’s latest interview, especially the first half where you’ll get the further context to understand what this means:

And yet, in a way, they’re also saying, well, wait a minute, look at what Israel’s doing.
Israel says, God gave us this land. We used to have it. Well, the South Americans and Africans and Asians are saying, Well, this is our land, but we never left it. We’re still on the land. And even though we’re on the land, we’re still locked up, like Israel is treating the Palestinians. We don’t have to live this way. We can decolonize.

That’s the Big Picture. The West has never completely honored the UN Charter which is why we have today’s conflicts. The conflict is to enforce the UN Charter versus those who want to continue with the status quo of not obeying it.

Posted by: karlof1 | Jan 19 2024 16:52 utc | 161

Peter1AU@1058
Highly respect your delving into oral traditions, fleshing it out with specifics and all. On this particular platform you appear to have become the resident expert on that area of knowledge.
That said, you really do try and find some time to explore Hancock’s books and/or the several podcasts in which he has been interviewed/featured. Along with numerous geologists and their scientific understanding of the age of the Sphinx; Hancock essentially shitcans the archeologist claque of dimwitted academicist reductionists…and as can be expected, they detest him as he demolishes their carefully curated suppositions, such as the Great Pyramid of Giza having been built by some Pharaoh as his friggen TOMB…ridiculous on the face of it if one dares to question the materialistic narrative.
Academic dogmatism is a subject desperately needful of a total deconstruction. Essentially they are “scientific” materialist ideologues…AND they are in charge of “higher” edumacasion.

Posted by: aristodemos | Jan 19 2024 16:58 utc | 162

” And here I thought the statement would be self-evident. I did hit the wrong key on the very first word, perhaps that was confusing. Instead of “of” the correct word is “if”. “laudatory” may be sussed from a brief dip into a dictionary.
Posted by: aristodemos | Jan 19 2024 16:34 utc | 159 ”
Are you implying I dont know what “laudatory” means ? That could be misconstrued as an insult 🙂
I gather you’re implying good ole Schwab was just flattering his hosts, however, I’ve never heard him give such flattery to any other political / ruling system besides China. Hence my request for a clarification.

Posted by: Moonie | Jan 19 2024 17:01 utc | 163

Moonie | Jan 19 2024 16:28 utc | 156
The solar system gadget reqires nothing more than a good knowledge of the solar system and mathematics. Both were present within early written history. It does not require exacting tolerances. In WWII, aircraft fuel pumps mating surfaces were and scraped to give a gasket free seal. Even today, high precision lathe or milling machine beds and slides are first precision ground then taken to a higher precision by hand scraping.
That instrument takes some ingenuity but not absolute precision in tolerance.

Posted by: Peter AU1 | Jan 19 2024 17:03 utc | 164

” Moonie@1628
No directly materialist explanation is required at this time as to the how-did-they-do-it on the part of pre Younger Dryas catastrophe civilizations. We simply do not know the “mechanisms” which may or may not have been mechanical or any other formulation currently in use.
Posted by: aristodemos | Jan 19 2024 16:42 utc | 161 ”
Very true. Its sad when the mainstream denies obvious physical reality and the logical conclusions associated with them. However, the sheeple must be kept asleep and accepted paradigms must go on in perpetuity.

Posted by: Moonie | Jan 19 2024 17:08 utc | 165

” Posted by: aristodemos | Jan 19 2024 5:13 utc | 124
“None of todays purely techno/mechanical “marvels” can achieve theGreat Pyramid’s construction, the stonework of Macchu Pichu or Baalbeck.

Back in the 80’s someone developed a type of sandstone-lyme concrete from studying the Giza pyramid. He believes that it was all made of concrete poured block by block in situ which is why the inter-block tolerances are laser thin. In other words, the stones were not cut and dragged by slaves on logs for hundreds of miles.
I have enjoyed your posts about this Peter AU, especially regarding apprenticeship training and hand skills. I recently constructed a small woodworking workshop in which will soon mainly use hand tools to build most of the furniture in a new house built slowly with retirement income the past two years. I had an organic brick oven bakery a while back and made all the bread by hand without a mixer, though I did use a machine to fresh grind grains into flour. It actually took me less work time to make the traditional doughs without a mechanical mixer though the dough needed twelve hours to soak before adding the starter instead of 10 minutes with the mixer – albeit the lack of slow soaking makes the final bread bad for the digestion and immune system. Funny how that works; in so many cases, the old ways, by hand, are better.
In Tibetan Dzogchen histories they have names and locations going back to around 18,000 BC in areas near Ur and Swat, Afghanistan. (No floods up there maybe!)

Posted by: Scorpion | Jan 19 2024 17:15 utc | 166

Posted by: Scorpion | Jan 19 2024 16:29 utc | 157
———————

denk often lies

Show me one instance.
Gawd knows how many times I’ve caught the pop with his pants down..
Exhibit A

China anti regions

Posted by: denk | Jan 19 2024 17:27 utc | 167

aristodemos | Jan 19 2024 16:58 utc | 163
For me, going through academic archaeology is like sorting the treasures from the dogma and group think. Somewhat similar of after having lived most my life under cold war propaganda, having to put it all aside and start again from scratch to sort fact from fiction.
I will have to keep Hancock in mind to study more. At the moment I have just watched one video where he pointed out a few of the questions on the Turkish site. He seems to look at it in a similar manner to me.
Stoneworking other than napping cutting edges and points certainly predates the great climate change, the skills and crafts necessary for precision monolithic rock work appears to straddle the climate change yet that knowledge has been lost.
Boat building, navigation interest me greatly which would help make the connections that span the pacific but dont run around the Bearing Strait. That nam Exile gave me goes a long way towards that, aqnd from there looked into the boats. One with solid hulls and a platform lashed on. so long as the lashings held, capable of sailing any ocean and unsinkable hulls. not only that, a natural progression from a simple raft of logs lashed together.

Posted by: Peter AU1 | Jan 19 2024 17:35 utc | 168

Posted by: Honzo | Jan 19 2024 1:10 utc | 102
Posted by: Scorpion | Jan 18 2024 22:14 utc | 76
The standard rejoinder is to point out that the Soviet Union, China and Cuba were/are socialist, not communist countries, and that their ‘communism’ was aspirational, expected to take a long to achieve the ‘withering away of the state.’ And by ‘long time,’ I mean many generations AFTER ridding the world of capitalist threats, for which the state is the only possible answer. So, nobody who understands Marxism would expect any of those countries, let alone a successor state, to be classless.

Thanks for all your interesting posts. My use of the word class is not in the marxist frame so much as in traditional ‘class system’. This includes differences in rank between captain and midshipman as well as officer class versus enlisted, noble versus peasant, but also worker in Department X versus Department Y. In other words, there are endless layers and levels in human society (as in all phenomena) and trying to smother everything with the same concept (like equality) is an over-simplification that usually ends up doing more harm than good as leaders (a class) try to impose that concept onto living humans when it turns out (inevitably) that reality doesn’t conform to their ill-founded concepts.
Of course humanity is always a work in progress involving trial and error. Of course people will make plans and develop theories of governance without which it’s well nigh impossible to get anything done. But too often people, having invested in a pet theory or revolution, become inflexible in the face of continuous change (why such revolutions were needed in the first place) and then become part of the problem instead of providing real-time solutions.
We all know what it looks like when things are working well. Societies where nearly all are pulling in the same direction industriously and cheerfully. And a large society wherein all are equal has and never will happen because it is a flight of fancy fashioned by concept, not grounded in bedrock reality.

Posted by: Scorpion | Jan 19 2024 17:37 utc | 169

The poster known as denk, who knows no nuance and frequently lies, believes I ‘champion’ Taiwanese independence but I just wondered out loud why they don’t decide by referendum like recently in Donbass. I still wonder. You might suspect I have a big agenda against communism but no more than I do against capitalism and socialism. (Am an equal opportunity cynic.)
Posted by: Scorpion | Jan 19 2024 16:29 utc | 157
———————
If only, if only...
When was the last you time you ‘wondered’ about

Why cant the Chagosians go back to their home ?
Why cant the Ryuku Ren get back their ancestral homes from the occupying gring ?
Why are gringo boots still in Iraq, Syria, ?
Why is there no global outrage on genocides in India, ?

Just to name a few…

Posted by: denk | Jan 19 2024 17:44 utc | 170

scorpion

Am an equal opportunity cynic.

Dont make my toe laugh !
You and your ilks claim that

The west’s rule based order would lose all cred if Israel get away scot free at the ICJ’

As if the west ruse based order had any cred in the first place.
Have you ever ‘wonder aloud’,

When will the west face its own music at the ICJ, FOR killing at least 20M civies since WW2

Posted by: denk | Jan 19 2024 18:06 utc | 171

Moonie@156…. that’d be a handy wee device to use for plotting tides…
Cheers M

Posted by: sean the leprechaun | Jan 19 2024 18:14 utc | 172

Posted by: Peter AU1 | Jan 18 2024 22:37 utc | 83
AFAIK the early socialists in power (i.e. the Bolsheviks) implemented a mixed-economy system. Moreover, Lenin moved past the standard Marxist construct of system progression which required capitalism to predate socialism. Hence the criticism he received for advocating for a socialist revolution.
The SOviet communist system as we know it was formulated around 1930, with a state of siege in mind (and to a great extent in practice). But when the Chinese began their reforms under Deng, it was the NEP and the first version of “Socialism in One Country” they invoked.
As for modern Russia, it has to go a long way to get rid of the baggage of the 90s. Had they followed the example of Belarus undr Lukashenko (a country of infinitely more limited resources that has outperformed Russia), the situation would be much different. Under Putin, the country at least dodged a final neoliberal bullet in the head and somewhat recovered. But the key is to put the oligarchs under control Chinese style, especially in the current situation.

Posted by: Constantine | Jan 19 2024 18:18 utc | 173

Since China is back to being a world leader and her centralized, authoritarian anti-religious one-party system may soon be adopted by much of the world (as larger populations are understandably dysfunctional under multiparty systems), I have questions.
Posted by: Scorpion | Jan 19 2024 16:29 utc | 157
——————–
That is a much diluted version, lets see the original
pop

The fate of America is being made in China, our role model for all things dystopian.
An economic and political powerhouse that owns more of America’s debt than any other country and is buying up American businesses across the spectrum, China is a vicious totalitarian regime that routinely employs censorship, surveillance, and brutal police state tactics to intimidate its populace, maintain its power, and expand the largesse of its corporate elite.
Where China goes, the United States eventually follows. This way lies outright tyranny.

Care to substantiate your claim , prof ?

Posted by: denk | Jan 19 2024 18:25 utc | 174

” Moonie@156…. that’d be a handy wee device to use for plotting tides…
Cheers M
Posted by: sean the leprechaun | Jan 19 2024 18:14 utc | 173 ”
It does more then that.The mathematics behind this device are highly advanced.

Posted by: Moonie | Jan 19 2024 18:31 utc | 175

China anti regions
Posted by: denk | Jan 19 2024 17:27 utc | 168
———————
anti religions. !

Posted by: denk | Jan 19 2024 18:31 utc | 176

” That instrument takes some ingenuity but not absolute precision in tolerance.
Posted by: Peter AU1 | Jan 19 2024 17:03 utc | 165 ”
Predicting eclipses, among other things, doesnt take absolute precision, because there are tolerances but never absolutes, however the degree of these ” tolerances” has to be quite high. Not to mention, note all the modern powered and precision tools the the maker of the video has to use just to reproduce the device. How could the ancients make these things by hand ? What about the multi-disciplinary skill levels the maker had to have if it was just one person. A genius in math, engineering, astrophysics, metal working. Something just doesn’t add up.

Posted by: Moonie | Jan 19 2024 18:41 utc | 177

copied from two discussions back — would have been more appropriate here (sorry, didn’t notice there was a new “open”)
unimperator | Jan 19 2024 12:32 utc | 128
***.. now we heard the only steel plant in UK run by Tata Steel is being shut down.***
Which will pretty much terminate (already rotted) Britain as a serious country.
Incidentally. there is supposedly a shortage of general-practice doctors in the UK … but it turns out there actually is not — rather,the government has prevented fully qualified from taking such posts, and is instead imposing non-doctors in the guise of doctors.
Likewise, in the 1990s several good UK dental schools were shut down. No sensible reason was offered. As a result, a massive shortage of dentists even in the private sector. Now guess what the fake “opposition” Party has announced as one of its top election policies — tooth-brushing lessons in primary schools.
And, amidst the increasing mess, there is still huge immigration (illegal and legal) into an already unsustainable country.
Why have the Political Establishment spent decades systematically destroying the country and its native population?
Perhaps copying the Political Establishment’s masters in the USA … but why?

Posted by: Cynic | Jan 19 2024 18:49 utc | 178

bevin | Jan 18 2024 17:47 utc | 20
*** It is a nonsense of the worst kind to call the demonstration on January 6th an insurrection.***
Indeed so; if that counts as an “insurrection” then some football fan problems in England and elsewhere years ago must have, in retrospect, been world wars.

Posted by: Cynic | Jan 19 2024 19:25 utc | 179

PeterAU –
A oft hilarious thread about a utterly hopeless blue water sailor in his 60s who over many years entertained the professional sailing world with his bumbling voyages. The first post of the thread:

Have you ever wondered (hypothetically) just how far you could go if you set sail one day and headed out over the horizon in a Craiglist special 4ksb with almost no preparation? Well…now you dont have to because three weeks ago this Russian immigrant, Rimas Meleshyus, left Oak Harbor, Washington in an old San Juan 24 he bought for $500 the month before.
Where is he headed? Around the world…via Cape Horn. He has no autopilot or self steering, no communications equipment other than a handheld VHF. He has two ancient handheld gps units, 85 gallons of water and a boatload of food. Despite everyone telling him this was probably a bad idea, he left determined to follow his dream.

https://forums.sailinganarchy.com/threads/sailing-around-the-world-in-a-san-juan-24.149798/

Posted by: Exile | Jan 19 2024 19:51 utc | 180

Jargon
4ksb = 4 knot shitbox

Posted by: Exile | Jan 19 2024 19:53 utc | 181

Posted by: karlof1 | Jan 19 2024 16:52 utc | 162
IMO, my interpretation is much better: The UN Charter was broken at the outset ….
The main issues all relate to Decolonization which the Plunderers didn’t want to allow, and so their crimes/outlawry. However, from the POV of the Colonized, they were continuing to be denied the Four Freedoms for which WW2 was fought, and not just denied but killed in massive numbers–very much like Gaza today.

Something ‘broken from the outset’ was never properly made. I believe it was a con job from the beginning – at least by movers and shakers in the mix able to make it so. The aspiration of a ‘united nations’ creating a peaceful world is admirable but the devil, as always, is in the procedural details.
Re: “the Four Freedoms for which WW2 was fought.” A novel theory. Care to explain?
My impression is that it was the same old BS all over again. I guess the root question there goes back to why on earth WWI happened and especially why so many nations from all over the world got involved in it. (Have you seen the recently developed colour photographs of all the various regiments from all over the world? Hundreds of different national and regimental outfits. Heartbreaking.) WWII was just a continuation of that initial disaster, the repercussions of which are still playing out today including the Ukrainian SMO and the massacres in Gaza.

Posted by: Scorpion | Jan 19 2024 20:03 utc | 182

Posted by: Refinnejenna | Jan 19 2024 0:08 utc | 96
how many times has this place predicted world war 3 whenever a NATO military exercise happens?

Posted by: tir | Jan 19 2024 20:15 utc | 183

@Posted by: Scorpion | Jan 19 2024 20:03 utc | 183

My impression is that it was the same old BS all over again. I guess the root question there goes back to why on earth WWI happened and especially why so many nations from all over the world got involved in it. (Have you seen the recently developed colour photographs of all the various regiments from all over the world? Hundreds of different national and regimental outfits. Heartbreaking.) WWII was just a continuation of that initial disaster, the repercussions of which are still playing out today including the Ukrainian SMO and the massacres in Gaza.

The success of Germany in the 2nd, scientific, industrial revolution challenged the power of the UK and its Empire. The mad dash by everyone to industrialize after the UK gained so much relative power from the first industrial revolution also destabilized the European balance of power. The working class were also very troubling to those in power, and a good little war would help quieten their demands. All involved expected a quickish war, not the grinding industrialized slaughter that ensued. It was a tinder box ready to go off, with some help from the British (driving an armaments race) and bad decision making.
Once war broke out, the Empire nations (UK, France, Belgium, Holland, Germany) called upon all of their colonies and smaller white settler spin-offs (Canada, Australia, New Zealand), massively increasing the number of countries/colonies involved. The US fully supplied the UK and France while respecting the blockade of Germany, and extended huge amounts of loans to the UK. When it looked like the war would end in a way very bad for the US bankers, Wilson dragged the US into the war.
Alexander Anievas wrote a good book on the impact of industrialization upon the European balance of power and increasing tensions, and the increasing class conflict “Capital, the State, and War: Class Conflict and Geopolitics in the Thirty Years’ Crisis, 1914-1945”.

Posted by: Roger | Jan 19 2024 20:29 utc | 184

Chaka Khagan | Jan 18 2024 20:17 utc | 43
*** Aside from war, What will our late stage Capitalism devolve into?***
A form of feudalism devoid of any degree of even theoretical downwards duty or responsibility … partly enforced through rampant (and very selective) wokism … with bullshitting politicians akin to the demented twat levered into presidency of Argentina.
Plus, of course, periodic media-instilled panics — and harmful alleged “solutions” — devised by the WHO and WEF.

Posted by: Cynic | Jan 19 2024 20:41 utc | 185

Eighthman | Jan 18 2024 20:50 utc | 52
*** What is it supposed to represent? Does anyone know? I only ask here because I don’t know who else to ask. Very disturbing.***
Just a guess, not having seen it, but maybe something to do with blood and adrenaline or some other content being boosted by pain and fear.

Posted by: Cynic | Jan 19 2024 20:56 utc | 186

GOOD NEWS EVERYBODY:
World Economic Forum Chairman Klaus Schwab envisioned a future without elections, predicting that voting will no longer be needed as artificial intelligence will be able to predict who voters would want in power.

Posted by: Jonathan W | Jan 19 2024 20:59 utc | 187

RE: “Moreover, why did these departures coincide with dramatic and well-publicized policy failures? The reasonable conclusion to draw is that the American electoral system is broken. It does not represent the will of the people.”
Posted by: Tom_Q_Collins | Jan 19 2024 15:52 utc | 154
IMO:
The American “House” was built with 4 pillars/cornerstones
1)Executive 2)Congressional 3)Judicial 4)Supreme court
Pillar 1&2 fell with Kennedy assassinations as finality, and is now wholly corrupted.. unredeemable. The last 2, Judicial & Supreme Court, fell simultaneously, ending with Covid/Trump eta. Totally corrupted & irredeemable.
Americans have not figured out, the pillars are pulled, the house has collapsed, now… all power bases are fighting, trying to put Humpty Dumpty back together again, preferably in their own image, whichever power bases succeeds in reorganizing the left over pickens.
I’m quite certain, the collapse of the Soviet Union went much the same way. Ordinary people had no say in its “reimagining itself”. They were trying to keep lights on and eat.

Posted by: Trubind1 | Jan 19 2024 21:30 utc | 188

” World Economic Forum founder and Chair Klaus Schwab recently sat down for an interview with Moonie | Jan 18 2024 23:06 utc | 87
*** .. a Chinese state media outlet and proclaimed that China was a “role model” for other nations. “***
Well, given the media outlet and him doing a public relations interview, he was hardly likely to describe it as unacceptable.
But maybe he just didn’t consider it expedient to also mention it would all be subject to an alternative interpretation and implementation?
*** The WEF hosts an annual conference in Davos, Switzerland where it trains world leaders on ushering in the organization’s globalist agenda. “***
Who or what ever did authorise these self-appointing megalomanics to concoct and impose an anti-democratic agenda anyway? They have zero legitimacy.
“Training” for treason. Its products ought to be treated accordingly.

Posted by: Cynic | Jan 19 2024 21:46 utc | 189

RE: Posted by: Tom_Q_Collins | Jan 19 2024 15:52 utc | 154
I’m not a defender of “savage” or “ravage” “capitalism”. All of the “ism”’s and world governance systems as far as I’m concerned are flawed.
Some work better for the Nation’s citizens than others, but I think that’s a real cultural, natural or historical choices that all nations need to assess for themselves.
All I am completely certain of, historically & concurrently, is the main poison pill for ALL systems of governance, is CORRUPTION, how it manifests, how it is isolated or eliminated, or kept at bay, or allowed to run rampant to the detriment of entire Nation states. This happens in Capitalist, Socialist, Communist, Dictatorships as well as Kingdoms. They fall on themselves from the weight of their own greed, corruption & failed Judiciary systems that become corrupt to the core. Anyways, just my opinion about “systems” of governance, strengths & weaknesses in all.

Posted by: Trubind1 | Jan 19 2024 21:46 utc | 190

Unfortunately, only in the Israeli media, but in the German media was there nothing to be read about Germany defending Israel in The Hague. Times of Israel: “Germany says will intervene at The Hague on Israel’s behalf, blasts genocide charge
Berlin will present its own arguments against South Africa’s allegation Israel violated Genocide Convention; can’t impact call for interim injunction from court demanding ceasefire”
That’s a shame. The green German fascists fit Netanyahu like ass on pot.

Posted by: Oliver Krug | Jan 19 2024 21:49 utc | 191

For the Bar:
When a law is passed, it’s either obeyed or violated. The UN Charter is a corpus of laws that was signed and ratified by all nations wanting to become UN members–one must be done for the other to occur. Once a nation agrees to obey a law it becomes an outlaw if it disobeys. As documented many times here and elsewhere, at the moment the UN Charter attained its legal status, the USA and many other Western signatories were already violating the law and thus became outlaws. An Outlaw remains an Outlaw until it’s brought to justice and as part of its penalty says it will refrain from breaking the law again. Since all those outlaw nations have yet to face justice for their actions, they remain outlaws. It’s really that simple. When the history of the making of the UN Charter is studied, it becomes very clear that the Four Freedoms are at the base of it and are within both the UN Charter and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Part of my Big Picture argument is that WW2 never really ended as the fixtures that were to provide for a lasting peace were never attained: Denazification of Europe was prevented by the USA, UK and France, meaning they immediately broke the covenant by which they were rewarded with permanent UNSC seats and vetoes. Thus, the three main Plundering nations immediately gained outlaw status by November 1945, and have retained that status ever since.
The Global Majority Movement aims to right the wrongs that emerged in November 1945, the primary document being China’s Global Security Initiative (GSI), which is essentially a restatement of the UN Charter specifying no hegemonic nations will be allowed to join. If such nations are to exist, they will exist outside the primary global organization and will remain outlaws since they choose to be outside the laws of nations. Such a reorganization of the UN will eliminate the “privatization” of its global agencies by the hegemonic outlaws that’s impeding their ability to do good and exacerbating the potential for them to do ill, like the subversion happening at the World Health Organization. Of course, the reorganization won’t be perfect–there’ll always be problems with governance no matter what, which is Putin’s mantra, the point being to accept that fact and continue to strive for excellence. Wang Yi in his New Year’s speech on 9 January said it’s China’s goal to make the GSI a reality this year as a supermajority of the world’s nations have already said they will join.
The League of Nations failed for a number of reasons. The UN is failing because it’s held hostage by outlaws. Humanity needs an organization global in breadth that helps Humanity organize to advance its wellbeing while solving problems affecting the global community, a fact differing little from the visions expressed by many in 1944. The reformed UN will immediately be improved since it’s no longer held hostage, and the Security Council will be reformulated to exist without the veto since there’re no hegemonic members requiring it to protect themselves from justice.
Humanity is on the cusp of evolving beyond armed conflict to solve problems. Universal moral values have advanced for that goal to be possible, but to-date the hegemonic outlaw nations impede that progress. It appears the best way to change their behavior is to relegate them to the Out Group until they prove their behavior’s changed and they’ve atoned for their outlaw past. Yes, the outlaw nations will yell and squeal, stomp their feet, pull their hair, and propose all sorts of threats that prove exactly what they are and why they need to sit in the corner and think about their actions like the small children they show themselves to be. Yes, it will probably take a generation or so (20 years) for them to figure it out–they’ve been serial outlaws for almost 80 years and even longer before that, so their ways are habitual.
The job is to formulate the future so Humanity cannot just survive but thrive. The past can and will be argued about endlessly, which is a given. But enough about the past is agreed upon so the future can be formulated and constructed. It’s time to take a big step outside the box to do what must be done. As was once said: Lead, follow or get out of the way.

Posted by: karlof1 | Jan 19 2024 21:52 utc | 192

RE: Posted by: Jonathan W | Jan 19 2024 20:59 utc | 188
Ok. Wise Klaus. Guess getting rid of the pretense of it all would actually benefit sovereign citizens. Give them their power back. Forks and tridents worked better in the past for voting.

Posted by: Trubind1 | Jan 19 2024 21:53 utc | 193

Constantine | Jan 19 2024 18:18 utc | 174
Putin doesn’t run ahead of the people. He does however set up circumstance that allow the people to evolve. Putin is very much evolution rather than the turbulence of revolution.
Lukashenko has held the Belorussian ship steady but a lot of subsidies from Russia. Extra good deals on gas and that sort of thing plus some loans.

Posted by: Peter AU1 | Jan 19 2024 22:05 utc | 194

RE: Posted by: karlof1 | Jan 19 2024 21:52 utc | 193
This isn’t the first circle of wagons around a “global governance” world order thingy. Been attempted in many civilizations & Empires.
It will fail. The the plots, schemes and machinations will be empty rhetoric and forgotten. IMO.
You can put some slave tech device implant in a man, or thrown a gold nose ring in him to make him a slave, but in the end, humanity cannot be enslaved.

Posted by: Trubind1 | Jan 19 2024 22:10 utc | 195

karlof1 | Jan 19 2024 21:52 utc | 193
With the due respect, a wall of words?
I imagine that you try to communicate some thesis within this fore.
Paragraphing?

Posted by: Dadi | Jan 19 2024 22:15 utc | 196

Moonie | Jan 19 2024 18:41 utc | 178
The precision required is in the maths as gear ratios are the secret to the gadget. To convert the solar system to gear ratios, mathematics is required. A good craftsman can then achieve the rest. Some gears are I believe elliptical to mimic rotational speed of an elliptical orbit. Modern machining is not required. It is a highly complex mechanism for the day but that is in the number of parts and the gear ratios.
Off memory the gear teeth are simple triangles rather than the gear teeth of today. Very easy to cut with a file.

Posted by: Peter AU1 | Jan 19 2024 22:16 utc | 197

Posted by: Peter AU1 | Jan 19 2024 2:50 utc | 111
Posted by: Peter AU1 | Jan 19 2024 5:09 utc | 123

In the so called professional archaeology there is a huge amount of group think plus the aspect of everything they find must fit within the box of what they have been taught. Few in any professions can see outside those boxes. It is not a political thing. Its across the board.

The groupthink is definitely there. For example, in 1991, Robert Schoch used water erosion to date the Sphinx to about 8000 BCE.
Story of Dr. Robert Schoch
The pushback he got from his profession was terrific. The whole discussion of the pyramids is deeply warped by guys like Mark Lerner and Zahi Hawas. The dating of the pyramids is based on the equivalent of a “Killjoy was here” stone inscription. The complete absence of grave goods in the pyramids destroys the story that they are just royal burial places. But. no alternatives are allowed to be discussed in “professional” circles.
Gobekli Tepe has upset that applecart somewhat.

Posted by: john brewster | Jan 19 2024 22:20 utc | 198

john brewster | Jan 19 2024 22:20 utc | 199
The erosion is a very solid analysis of the sphinx so yes a good example. As to the pyramid being burial places or otherwise, I largely stay away from that, but according to ancient records it seems they are. My main interest is in the lost craft of precision working large stone and how that and other things spread around what would have been the warm belt in the ice age, how aboriginal people crossed a short stretch of ocean well over 50,000 years ago. The sphinx is very much into that area of interest, but also the pyramids as the trade skills to build them with the tools of the day have been lost.

Posted by: Peter AU1 | Jan 19 2024 22:37 utc | 199

zorge | Jan 19 2024 11:48 utc | 148
“In order to be fully effective, also in the future, we need a warfighting transformation of NATO,” said Bauer during a meeting of military chiefs in Brussels. “For this too, public-private cooperation will be the key.”
Take it the clog-shit NATzO windmiller means an endless proliferation of crony corporate ripoffs of the public like was already inflicted in Britain with the likes of schools and hospitals.
Populations conscripted to fight, get maimed and die for “values” that at best stink.

Posted by: Cynic | Jan 19 2024 22:39 utc | 200