|
Economist Fakes Political History Of Gaza
The Economist is faking history:
Bibi Netanyahu is the wrong man in the wrong place – Economist – October 31, 2023
In the absence of clear government direction the Israeli defence establishment is doing all the planning. Its preferred solution is to see the PA ultimately return to Gaza, which it controlled until Hamas’s coup in 2007.
bigger
There was no 'Hamas coup', neither in 2007 nor before or after it. But there was indeed a coup attempt in Gaza. It was led by Muhammad Dahlan of the Fatah, which was also leading the Palestinian Authority, who, with U.S. support, was trying to overthrow the legally elected Hamas government of Gaza.
The Gaza Bombshell – Vanity Fair – March 3, 2008
After failing to anticipate Hamas’s victory over Fatah in the 2006 Palestinian election, the White House cooked up yet another scandalously covert and self-defeating Middle East debacle: part Iran-contra, part Bay of Pigs. With confidential documents, corroborated by outraged former and current U.S. officials, the author reveals how President Bush, Condoleezza Rice, and Deputy National-Security Adviser Elliott Abrams backed an armed force under Fatah strongman Muhammad Dahlan, touching off a bloody civil war in Gaza and leaving Hamas stronger than ever.
Then President Bush called Muhammad Dahlan 'our guy' and did everything he could to further a coup:
Vanity Fair has obtained confidential documents, since corroborated by sources in the U.S. and Palestine, which lay bare a covert initiative, approved by Bush and implemented by Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and Deputy National Security Adviser Elliott Abrams, to provoke a Palestinian civil war. The plan was for forces led by Dahlan, and armed with new weapons supplied at America’s behest, to give Fatah the muscle it needed to remove the democratically elected Hamas-led government from power.
It is a long complex story. In the end the Bush administration gave up and simply tried to ignore Hamas and Gaza. That did not work either.
As the Vanity Fair piece concluded at that time:
It is impossible to say for sure whether the outcome in Gaza would have been any better—for the Palestinian people, for the Israelis, and for America’s allies in Fatah—if the Bush administration had pursued a different policy. One thing, however, seems certain: it could not be any worse.
Seeing how helpless the Palestinians are in the West Bank, where the settlers and army are torturing and terrorizing them, it is difficult to agree with that conclusion.
Why Are Jews So Influential? by Kevin MacDonald.
https://www.unz.com/article/why-are-jews-so-influential/
Interesting article, with a conservative bias, but relevant I think.
Although the author has some “non-Jewish” blindspots that are crucial to really understand Jewish communal networks, or in a less PC way Jewish supremacist power.
1- The figure of the Rabbi is central to jewish identity formation, building the supremacist mindset and the besieged paranoia. The angry, hateful rabbi, reminding jews that “they are jalous of us” and thus that they need to be controlled even more, is equal influential among agnostic Jews and so-called “antizionist” and “secular” Jews (not that they lie to non-Jews when believing that they escaped the suffocating brainwashing and hatred of the rabbinic logos and ethos, they believe it! They are lying to themselves essentially)
2- There is no need for elaborate all-powerful, centralized plot against non-Jews. What Jews are conditionned to do anywhere (and reminded by the rabbinical mindset) is to a) mimic their host (be it the US, Russia, France…) and b) to do Entryism. This is as natural as breathing. Once they are in every vital political, cultural, financial, managerial organizations in the host, with low visibility, they then reproduce the rabbinical model, with the only ethos they know: tribal supremacist interests, whenever possible with short-term benefits to the host (so as to neutralize external threats, minimize hostility and for narcissistic rewards “What would the goyim do without us?”).
When the proverbial “dreck” hits the fan, the victimization cards is used simultaneously with the release of the internalized “vengeful angry Rabbi”: censorship, mobilisation of internal and external networks, full use of the logos and perception management to confuse and defuse as long as possible. If necessary instigation diversionary conflicts, offering other minority groups as scapegoats (Roma people in the past, muslims nowadays and africans in the past (slave trading and the subsequent racial segregation was a jewish business, as well as its dismantling when it outlived its usefullness; similarly negrophobia and negrophilia, entryism as easy as breathing, no plots, just cultural reflexes…), eventually wars must happen to save the Chosen Ones (not that hard as entryism is developped in all productive hosts nation-states). And as a sideline, war means debt and destruction, it means business opportunities, to share with non-jewish (equally rapacious) elites and ruling classes.
If all fails, or if the host does not offer enough material opportunities, then the host must die.
THe US and France are two exemplary cases: in both entryism is complete, from extreme left to extreme center (the “LGBTQ liberal-interventionists” and extreme right. (Trump in the US or Zemmour in France) Those nations are litteraly drained. And no secret plot needed: as “french” zionist Bernard-Henry-Levy admitted with the typical chutzpah, during the destruction of Libya (with the complicity of the powerful jewish-zionist russian elite), he did it “for Israel”. What he did of course was pushing france and Europe into another genocidal war. Not that neocolonial europe is innocent of course not. Non jews are capable of greed, genocide and war without help. But the jewish tribal supremacism has, had for the last 500 years more visibly, a devastating impact. Including on the distorted psyche of jews themselves. And their ability to develop normal relationships and behaviors in the future.
A few jews are healing from this collective madness, but the inner Rabbi is not very far, even among “pro-palestinian” activism: the need to control, confuse and defuse is always there.
Posted by: Roots | Nov 1 2023 15:52 utc | 59
Why Are Jews So Influential? by Kevin MacDonald.
https://www.unz.com/article/why-are-jews-so-influential/
Interesting article, with a conservative bias, but relevant I think.
Although the author has some “non-Jewish” blindspots that are crucial to really understand Jewish communal networks, or in a less PC way Jewish supremacist power.
1- The figure of the Rabbi is central to jewish identity formation, building the supremacist mindset and the besieged paranoia. The angry, hateful rabbi, reminding jews that “they are jalous of us” and thus that they need to be controlled even more, is equal influential among agnostic Jews and so-called “antizionist” and “secular” Jews (not that they lie to non-Jews when believing that they escaped the suffocating brainwashing and hatred of the rabbinic logos and ethos, they believe it! They are lying to themselves essentially)
2- There is no need for elaborate all-powerful, centralized plot against non-Jews. What Jews are conditionned to do anywhere (and reminded by the rabbinical mindset) is to a) mimic their host (be it the US, Russia, France…) and b) to do Entryism. This is as natural as breathing. Once they are in every vital political, cultural, financial, managerial organizations in the host, with low visibility, they then reproduce the rabbinical model, with the only ethos they know: tribal supremacist interests, whenever possible with short-term benefits to the host (so as to neutralize external threats, minimize hostility and for narcissistic rewards “What would the goyim do without us?”).
When the proverbial “dreck” hits the fan, the victimization cards is used simultaneously with the release of the internalized “vengeful angry Rabbi”: censorship, mobilisation of internal and external networks, full use of the logos and perception management to confuse and defuse as long as possible. If necessary instigation diversionary conflicts, offering other minority groups as scapegoats (Roma people in the past, muslims nowadays and africans in the past (slave trading and the subsequent racial segregation was a jewish business, as well as its dismantling when it outlived its usefullness; similarly negrophobia and negrophilia, entryism as easy as breathing, no plots, just cultural reflexes…), eventually wars must happen to save the Chosen Ones (not that hard as entryism is developped in all productive hosts nation-states). And as a sideline, war means debt and destruction, it means business opportunities, to share with non-jewish (equally rapacious) elites and ruling classes.
If all fails, or if the host does not offer enough material opportunities, then the host must die.
THe US and France are two exemplary cases: in both entryism is complete, from extreme left to extreme center (the “LGBTQ liberal-interventionists” and extreme right. (Trump in the US or Zemmour in France) Those nations are litteraly drained. And no secret plot needed: as “french” zionist Bernard-Henry-Levy admitted with the typical chutzpah, during the destruction of Libya (with the complicity of the powerful jewish-zionist russian elite), he did it “for Israel”. What he did of course was pushing france and Europe into another genocidal war. Not that neocolonial europe is innocent of course not. Non jews are capable of greed, genocide and war without help. But the jewish tribal supremacism has, had for the last 500 years more visibly, a devastating impact. Including on the distorted psyche of jews themselves. And their ability to develop normal relationships and behaviors in the future.
A few jews are healing from this collective madness, but the inner Rabbi is not very far, even among “pro-palestinian” activism: the need to control, confuse and defuse is always there.
Posted by: Roots | Nov 1 2023 15:52 utc | 60
|
