|
Palestine Open Thread 2023-255
Only for news & views directly related to the war in Palestine.
The current open thread for other issues is here.
Please stick to the topic. Contribute facts. Do not attack other commentators.
Sorry if I comment here about a previous post (De Villepin’s interview) :
I think the reason why this interview was translated is the constant need for some French to be proud of themselves. All the more when the International context is such a curtain raiser on the pathetic and criminal complicity of Western politicians and medias, we as French try to find reasons to comfort ourselves in this turmoil, even if De Villepin’s line is out-of-date. He just represents what’s left of France’s diplomatic grandeur. But did he do as many good things as he did bad ? I won’t bet my life on it. We’re among the worst Israel supports in the Western world if not the worst. You’ll find equal end even more accurate postures on the left side of the French political spectrum. What is more interesting here is the demonstration that mainstream journalism is not about informing about the power missteps but about defending them.
So let me humbly share with you an article I wrote a few days ago that also highlights this cowardice.
DYING IN SILENCE
This is what the entire French media and a large proportion of the country’s politicians are demanding of the Palestinians. The reluctance of this cornered people to disappear and its outbursts of despair outrage everyone who comes to the rescue of Israel, the perpetual expiatory victim for Western guilt, now an inhuman persecutor in its turn.
A 17-year-old Gazan will have experienced eleven wars in his life.
From June to November 2006, Operation Summer Rains killed more than 400 Palestinians and 11 Israelis, followed immediately by Operation Autumn Clouds, which killed 82 Palestinians and one Israeli; in February-March 2008, Operation Hot Winter lasted 3 days and killed 112 Palestinians and 3 Israelis; from 27 December 2008 to 18 January 2009, Operation Cast Lead killed 1,330 Palestinians and 13 Israelis; in March 2012, Operation Returning Echo killed 23 Palestinians; in November 2012, Operation Pillar of Defence killed 174 Palestinians and 6 Israelis; from 8 July to 26 August 2014, Operation Protective Edge killed 2,000 Palestinians (more than a third of them women and children) and 66 Israelis; in November 2019, Operation Black Belt killed 34 Palestinians; from 5 to 7 August 2022, Operation Breaking Dawn killed around 50 Palestinians; in May 2023, Operation Shield and Arrow resulted in the deaths of 33 Palestinians and one Israeli; in October 2023, in retaliation for the Hamas attack in which more than a thousand Israelis, civilians and soldiers, were killed, the current operation called Iron Swords has so far claimed nearly 4,000 lives in Gaza and displaced more than 260,000 Palestinians. Although the number of victims on the Israeli side is exceptionally high due to the surprise effect, we will have to wait until the end of the conflict to know the full toll. The violence of Israel’s response to the Hamas attacks on 7 October leaves us to fear dire prospects for the people of Gaza.
This morbid account, which shows the disproportion of the forces involved, above all highlights the hypocrisy of the French media (and the Western media in general), whose double standard indignation systematically ignores the fate of the Palestinian people. Everyone rushes to the French broadcasts to express their support for the Israeli government, although the most openly fascist in power since the birth of the Hebrew state. They are literally terrified at the thought of this support being questioned, and of this doubt being expressed by a word they have spent so many years abusing. A word capable of bringing a career to a screeching halt at its mere mention: anti-Semitic. All of them, journalists and politicians, hand in hand, disregarding their past differences and disagreements, are today united in their zeal to use it against those they consider too unsympathetic to the Israelis and excessively compassionate to the Palestinians. Even measured, balanced positions and calls for peace or a ceasefire are burnt to a crisp by their unshakeable and total devotion to Israel, which they display with the utmost ostentation. To this end, their television and radio hosts, who share this veneration, offer them platforms. Platforms, forsooth! National stages worthy of the greatest theatres! On which they can pour out their hearts and take their share of the Israeli tragedy and condemn, sometimes to death, the sceptics, those who dare to mention the Palestinians, those « terrorists ».
Those Nazis.
And that’s it. The word hits like a ton of bricks. Not only are the Palestinians terrorists, but today they are also Nazis. And anyone who defends them or even thinks of caring about them is an anti-Semite. If the depth of human stupidity had a bottom, it would look like this. And we thought we had seen it a little more every day, given the emptiness of the analyses of the Ukrainian conflict. But despite what we think, we still have to dig and dig some more. Once the surprise of the Hamas attack had passed, instead of the minimum emotional tribute to the innocent Israeli civilian victims, we were treated to a recital by Greek mourners on ecstasy. Journalists, editorialists, pundits, philosophers, essayists, commentators and presenters are bending over backwards to grovel, disgrace and humiliate themselves like no one before them has ever done, in the basest, most despicable vein and most incredible communion in the face of the crimes being committed against the Palestinian people by Benjamin Netanyahu’s government, drunk with vengeance. Deaf or feigning deafness in the face of the worst pre-genocidal horrors uttered by Israeli officials – « We are fighting human animals and we act accordingly » declared Defence Minister Yoav Gallant – they are already justifying these present and future crimes in the full knowledge that Israel has never made the slightest distinction between armed militants of the Palestinian cause, whether they be Hamas, Fatah or the Palestinian Communist Party, and civilians, women, children or the elderly.
The narrative of the terrorist is as hackneyed as that of the anti-Semite pinned as a target on the back of anyone who criticises Israel’s policy of apartheid and ethnic cleansing against the Palestinians, accompanied by the colonisation and expropriation of Palestinian land.
I don’t feel comfortable talking about the Resistance at a meeting devoted to « terrorism ».
It is true that our adversaries, the Nazis and their French allies, referred to us as terrorists in all the propaganda media, posters, newspapers and radio stations that they controlled. The pejorative description was intended to impress public opinion, but naturally we never accepted it.
We were volunteer fighters, who had accepted a hard life and the greatest risks to win back freedom. Our adversaries were an army of occupation that exploited our country and aimed to alienate its independence once and for all.
As for the terrorism perpetrated by the enemy, it would be wrong to believe that it was always in response to attacks by the Resistance. It was practised very early on under any pretext to show the population that it was the master. When it developed in response to sabotage or attacks, it was immediately disproportionate, often striking indiscriminately at innocent people, even hostages, and going as far as massacre, including of women and children, the destruction of houses and entire villages.
Raymond Aubrac, French Resistance fighter, in Topiques n°83, p. 7 to 10
Basically, it doesn’t matter how we judge Hamas after its attack. In any case, it has become common practice to equate any act of resistance with terrorism. In addition to Raymond Aubrac’s quote, we should remember that the Algerian FLN, a resistance movement against the French invaders, also committed acts that were described as terrorism. And frankly, this is not an untruth if you look at the definition of the word: terrorism is the deliberate use of violence for political ends, the psychological impact of which creates a climate of terror. This violence may be aimed, but it is most often indiscriminate, and its victims will be considered innocent by public opinion. Terrorism contains its own contradiction: as a weapon of the weak against the strong, it targets defenceless people indiscriminately. Yet who today would deny that the attacks perpetrated by the FLN were acts of resistance? The most important thing is not to determine whether a particular act is terrorist or not, but to determine the context in which it takes place and the causes behind it. But screaming about terrorism for the sake of screaming about terrorism, in front of an amnesiac audience, is precisely the way to avoid talking about the framework and the causes. As a result, some people tend to misuse the term not in terms of objective reality but in terms of their own interests or those of their class: while Hamas is a terrorist group, Al-Nosra in Syria was doing a good job and the Turkestan Islamist Party brings together Uighur citizens who have been pushed to the limit. Some are an inconvenience, others are a convenience, and vice versa, depending on which way the wind of necessity is blowing. This is wishful thinking, but it would be far more enlightening to point out, for example, that the current Israeli Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, has favoured Hamas by supporting it financially, to the detriment of the secular Fatah, in order to weaken the latter, scuttle negotiations and create a division between Gaza and the rest of the Palestinian territories. Israel is not the only country to have deliberately nurtured a radicalism that has turned against it.
Today we live in societies where the pillars of power reject violence as a means of struggle and confine it to the exclusive use of the state. In France, the people withstands state violence with the consent of the same people who are now indignant that it is being used by the Palestinians against Israeli oppression. For those in power, there is nothing more contagious than an idea. It is, of course, morally unacceptable to rejoice in the deaths of innocent civilians, but it is equally unacceptable to consider only Israeli civilians and invariably keep silent about the countless Palestinian civilian deaths. Beyond compassion, we need to give meaning, to explain that it is violence that breeds violence, that it is a vicious circle that has been going on for nearly a century in the Middle East, and particularly in Palestine. And we must admit that this vicious circle is perpetuated by a Hebrew state that has become fascist and whose current government includes some of the most extremist, fundamentalist and supremacist Jewish figures in Israeli politics. The South African natives in the Apartheid era would have nothing to envy today’s Palestinians. Whether they are children, women or elderly people, and even more so young teenagers old enough to throw stones at tanks, in the eyes of a large part of Israeli society and for the Western media whose moral decay has been recorded, the lives of Palestinians are worth nothing and Israeli law has gradually legitimised the murder of these undesirables by the Tsahal soldiers.
To come back to the incalculable number of acts of violence committed against Palestinians over decades, with total indifference on the part of the Western media, would require dozens of articles, days and weeks of reading, an enumeration that would make your head spin. Giving a few examples would give no more idea than estimating the amount of sand in the desert with a single handful. No, we cannot have the slightest idea of what it is like to be a Palestinian under the Israeli boot, and those who still consider that their job is to inform the rest of the world have done so by risking their lives and even losing it under the bullets of the Israeli army. My present personal contribution is insignificant and infinitely less legitimate compared to these scrupulous observers of the evolution of Palestinian suffering. It will have no more effect on the media wall than the Gaza slings on the armour of the tanks. As a child and then as a teenager, I grew up with this conflict in which the Palestinians always played the villain. I didn’t know at the time that behind this wall, built on the foundations of a long history of persecution that culminated in the Final Solution, Jewish people could also commit the same crimes as those of which they had been victims. Journalism could already be the art of lying, the art of collaborating with oppressors, the art of serving oppressors wherever they acted. Today, this wall is crumbling, revealing a crude reality from which the words « terrorist » and « anti-Semitic » are no longer enough to avert our gaze. And to do justice to the Palestinians and to all those who have died or suffered for having done so, the first thing I can do, in all humility, is to highlight these shameful complicities. Since I have neither the talent nor the expertise to put them into words, I will paraphrase at length the words of the historian Barnaby Raine, reacting to the recent bombing of a hospital in Gaza and the media contortions that followed:
«Israel ordered 22 hospitals evacuated. The World Health Organisation called that a death sentence for patients in those hospitals who could’nt be moved and so were being left to die. One of the hospitals that Israel ordered evacuated was the hospital that is now being bombed. So Israel said it was going to bomb hospitals, then a hospital got bombed. Israel dropped more bombs on Gaza this week than America dropped on Afghanistan in the first year of their occupation of Afghanistan in 2001. […] A priest in Ramalla said: « We hold the occupying power responsible ». […] And we know that Israel continues to block electricity from baby incubators and dialysis patients, we know that Israel continues to block water from surgeons and elderly people, I mean, people in Gaza don’t have access to clean water, food from survivors and we know that Israel bombs roads after it tells people to flee along those roads. We also know that on October the 14th, Israel targeted ambulances and we know that before this bombing, Israel had already killed 28 medical staff in Gaza. We know too, as you said, that part of Israeli playbook is to lie about the attacks, the murders. It doesn’t please me to say this: in 1996, Israel shelled a UN compound in Lebanon, and blamed it on others. This was not true. In 2006, Israel murdered an entire family on a beach in Gaza. The IDF had a quick investigation that said the IDF was not responsible. It was not true. In 2014, Mark Regev, we’d seen him again on TV screens recently, claimed that UNRRA sites, that’s UN Refugee Agency sites, were used to launch missiles. The UN investigated: it was not true. Last year, Israeli forces murdered Palestinian journalist Shireen Abou Akleh, blamed Palestinians: it wasn’t true. Journalists can’t really investigate what’s going on in Gaza, because even the Washington Post, which is not, I tell you, a friend of the Palestinian people, says it is « becoming impossible to report from Gaza under the conditions of siege and bombardment that Israel has established ». So part of what concerns me here, looking at the Western media, because this whole brutal siege and bombardment campaign by Israel has been an object lesson in the racism that structures everything in our media ecosystem. It has been quite… well, I want to say « extraordinary » but I haven’t been that surprised, to watch Western journalists rush to report an old blood libel, to rush to report that 40 babies were beheaded by bloodthirsty savage Palestinians even though it later turned out that there was not much evidence for it, completely ignore Hamas’s accounts of what happened in their attack and just report the Israeli accounts. But then, when Israel says, despite its record of lying, when Israel says that they’re not sure who bombed this hospital or blames Palestinians for killing their own children, journalists rush to say of course that it must be measured and take them seriously, including, I should say, some left-wing journalists, and that’s concerning to people because it seems to be kind of double standard that reeks of racism. Raz Segal, the Israeli genocide expert, is calling what happens in Gaza as « a textbook case of genocide ». 800 legal scholars have written that they are « compelled to sound the alarm about the possibility of genocide in Gaza. It is clear that Israel is targeting civilians, they’ve targeted residential buildings, they’ve targeted journalists, they’ve targeted medics and medical facilities. This is not the first case. The question we, I think, should ask is « Why they’re doing this? Why this brutal blanket campaign ? Cutting off water ? If you didn’t want to target civilians, you wouldn’t cut off water, you wouldn’t cut off fuel. Why they’re doing it? They don’t need to, they have a Iron Dome missile defence system, that means most of the missiles that Palestinians fire at Israel don’t reach target. They could negotiate the release of hostages. There are six thousand Palestinian prisoners languishing in Israeli jails without receiving fair trial, serious allegations of torture, which we rarely hear about on the news that we hear about hostages in Gaza. They could negotiate for the release of their hostages. Instead, they are bombing Gaza and killing, by some reports, some of their own hostages. This won’t of course destroy Hamas. When you carpet bomb people who are living under a colonial siege and constant bombardment, the only effect it can have is to strengthen people’s fury, anger and resolve to resist the colonising power, so of course it won’t break resistance, even if they were to destroy Hamas’s infrastructure, something else would emerge in its place. So why, why are they doing this? It’s not by the way because Hamas caused the problem, because in the West Bank, where there is no Hamas regime, settlers have attacked funerals in the last week and launched attacks on Palestinian villagers, killing parents and children, and the IDF has shot and killed 62 Palestinians in the last week, when I last checked. In the West Bank, which is a place that does not have a Hamas government, and before this latest massacre, 2023 was already the deadliest year on record for children in the West Bank, with one child murdered every week by Israeli forces. So it’s not because there’s a resistance enclave that Israel is violent. It seems to have this lashing-out violent impulse regardless. The reason is that it is the logic of the coloniser, the reason is that Israelis know deep-down, and I am speaking here of some of my own family members, so it pains me, but they know deep-down that they are living in other people‘s stolen homes. They know that they are living in a state that was premised on an act of ethnic cleansing when 700,000 Palestinians were driven from their homes. That’s why Gaza is so densely populated, because most of the Palestinians living in Gaza aren’t from Gaza, they are refugees penned in there because they were chased out of other parts of Israel. And that’s why the important thing to do now is not simply to call for peace, not simply to call for the end of this massacre, though that’s crucial, but to understand that we want a world in which people don’t live penned into an open-air prison because they’re chased from their homes, to call not simply for peace, but for freedom. And to say, when we see people partying at a rave party and being killed by Hamas operatives, that they were partying five miles away from an open-air prison. If you move 5 miles from where those people were partying in Israel to Gaza, life expectancy drops 10 years. We don’t just want peace and the return of a world in which that is the case, we desperately want people all over the world, in our millions, for freedom, for everyone to be able to live a life of freedom and dignity, and that’s why we want victory for the Palestinian people.»<
And as there is nothing clearer than the words of the oppressor to give a glimpse of the martyrdom of the oppressed, here are those recently uttered by figures of the Hebrew State during the history of its oppression of the Palestinian people, demonstrating the racism that structures a society flawed by it:
Palestinians are beasts, not humans.
Eli Ben Dahan, Minister of Defense, 2013
What’s so horrifying about understanding that the entire Palestinian people is the enemy?… They are all enemy combatants, and their blood shall be on all their heads. Now this also includes the mothers of the martyrs, who send them to hell with flowers and kisses. They should follow their sons, nothing would be more just. They should go, as should the physical homes in which they raised the snakes. Otherwise, more little snakes will be raised there.
Ayelet Shaked, Minister of Justice, 2014
The Palestinian threat harbors cancer-like attributes that have to be severed. There are all kinds of solutions to cancer. Some say it’s necessary to amputate organs but at the moment I am applying chemotherapy.
Moshe Yaalon, General and Minister of Defense, 2002
[The way to deal with Palestinians is to] beat them up, not once but repeatedly, beat them up so it hurts so badly, until it’s unbearable.
Benjamin Netanyahu, Prime Minister, 2001
Those who are with us deserve everything, but those who are against us deserve to have their heads chopped off with an axe.
Avigdor Lieberman, Minister of Foreign affairs, 2015
Our soldiers are the only innocents in Gaza. Under no circumstances should they be killed because of false morality that prefers to protect enemy civilians. One hair on the head of an Israeli soldier is more precious than the entire Gazan populace.
Moshe Feiglin, Speaker of the Knesset, 2014
The die is cast. And I’ll end on a note of gutter mediocrity, with the genocidal arsehole Ben Shapiro, muse of American conservatism, whom I’ve already mentioned.
The only solution for Israel is to annex the Gaza Strip and kill enough sons of bitches to make sure the problem never comes back.
Ben Shapiro, 2023
So, happy, bastard ?
Posted by: xiao pignouf | Oct 30 2023 5:13 utc | 673
Sorry if I comment here about a previous post (De Villepin’s interview) :
I think the reason why this interview was translated is the constant need for some French to be proud of themselves. All the more when the International context is such a curtain raiser on the pathetic and criminal complicity of Western politicians and medias, we as French try to find reasons to comfort ourselves in this turmoil, even if De Villepin’s line is out-of-date. He just represents what’s left of France’s diplomatic grandeur. But did he do as many good things as he did bad ? I won’t bet my life on it. We’re among the worst Israel supports in the Western world if not the worst. You’ll find equal end even more accurate postures on the left side of the French political spectrum. What is more interesting here is the demonstration that mainstream journalism is not about informing about the power missteps but about defending them.
So let me humbly share with you an article I wrote a few days ago that also highlights this cowardice.
DYING IN SILENCE
This is what the entire French media and a large proportion of the country’s politicians are demanding of the Palestinians. The reluctance of this cornered people to disappear and its outbursts of despair outrage everyone who comes to the rescue of Israel, the perpetual expiatory victim for Western guilt, now an inhuman persecutor in its turn.
A 17-year-old Gazan will have experienced eleven wars in his life.
From June to November 2006, Operation Summer Rains killed more than 400 Palestinians and 11 Israelis, followed immediately by Operation Autumn Clouds, which killed 82 Palestinians and one Israeli; in February-March 2008, Operation Hot Winter lasted 3 days and killed 112 Palestinians and 3 Israelis; from 27 December 2008 to 18 January 2009, Operation Cast Lead killed 1,330 Palestinians and 13 Israelis; in March 2012, Operation Returning Echo killed 23 Palestinians; in November 2012, Operation Pillar of Defence killed 174 Palestinians and 6 Israelis; from 8 July to 26 August 2014, Operation Protective Edge killed 2,000 Palestinians (more than a third of them women and children) and 66 Israelis; in November 2019, Operation Black Belt killed 34 Palestinians; from 5 to 7 August 2022, Operation Breaking Dawn killed around 50 Palestinians; in May 2023, Operation Shield and Arrow resulted in the deaths of 33 Palestinians and one Israeli; in October 2023, in retaliation for the Hamas attack in which more than a thousand Israelis, civilians and soldiers, were killed, the current operation called Iron Swords has so far claimed nearly 4,000 lives in Gaza and displaced more than 260,000 Palestinians. Although the number of victims on the Israeli side is exceptionally high due to the surprise effect, we will have to wait until the end of the conflict to know the full toll. The violence of Israel’s response to the Hamas attacks on 7 October leaves us to fear dire prospects for the people of Gaza.
This morbid account, which shows the disproportion of the forces involved, above all highlights the hypocrisy of the French media (and the Western media in general), whose double standard indignation systematically ignores the fate of the Palestinian people. Everyone rushes to the French broadcasts to express their support for the Israeli government, although the most openly fascist in power since the birth of the Hebrew state. They are literally terrified at the thought of this support being questioned, and of this doubt being expressed by a word they have spent so many years abusing. A word capable of bringing a career to a screeching halt at its mere mention: anti-Semitic. All of them, journalists and politicians, hand in hand, disregarding their past differences and disagreements, are today united in their zeal to use it against those they consider too unsympathetic to the Israelis and excessively compassionate to the Palestinians. Even measured, balanced positions and calls for peace or a ceasefire are burnt to a crisp by their unshakeable and total devotion to Israel, which they display with the utmost ostentation. To this end, their television and radio hosts, who share this veneration, offer them platforms. Platforms, forsooth! National stages worthy of the greatest theatres! On which they can pour out their hearts and take their share of the Israeli tragedy and condemn, sometimes to death, the sceptics, those who dare to mention the Palestinians, those « terrorists ».
Those Nazis.
And that’s it. The word hits like a ton of bricks. Not only are the Palestinians terrorists, but today they are also Nazis. And anyone who defends them or even thinks of caring about them is an anti-Semite. If the depth of human stupidity had a bottom, it would look like this. And we thought we had seen it a little more every day, given the emptiness of the analyses of the Ukrainian conflict. But despite what we think, we still have to dig and dig some more. Once the surprise of the Hamas attack had passed, instead of the minimum emotional tribute to the innocent Israeli civilian victims, we were treated to a recital by Greek mourners on ecstasy. Journalists, editorialists, pundits, philosophers, essayists, commentators and presenters are bending over backwards to grovel, disgrace and humiliate themselves like no one before them has ever done, in the basest, most despicable vein and most incredible communion in the face of the crimes being committed against the Palestinian people by Benjamin Netanyahu’s government, drunk with vengeance. Deaf or feigning deafness in the face of the worst pre-genocidal horrors uttered by Israeli officials – « We are fighting human animals and we act accordingly » declared Defence Minister Yoav Gallant – they are already justifying these present and future crimes in the full knowledge that Israel has never made the slightest distinction between armed militants of the Palestinian cause, whether they be Hamas, Fatah or the Palestinian Communist Party, and civilians, women, children or the elderly.
The narrative of the terrorist is as hackneyed as that of the anti-Semite pinned as a target on the back of anyone who criticises Israel’s policy of apartheid and ethnic cleansing against the Palestinians, accompanied by the colonisation and expropriation of Palestinian land.
I don’t feel comfortable talking about the Resistance at a meeting devoted to « terrorism ».
It is true that our adversaries, the Nazis and their French allies, referred to us as terrorists in all the propaganda media, posters, newspapers and radio stations that they controlled. The pejorative description was intended to impress public opinion, but naturally we never accepted it.
We were volunteer fighters, who had accepted a hard life and the greatest risks to win back freedom. Our adversaries were an army of occupation that exploited our country and aimed to alienate its independence once and for all.
As for the terrorism perpetrated by the enemy, it would be wrong to believe that it was always in response to attacks by the Resistance. It was practised very early on under any pretext to show the population that it was the master. When it developed in response to sabotage or attacks, it was immediately disproportionate, often striking indiscriminately at innocent people, even hostages, and going as far as massacre, including of women and children, the destruction of houses and entire villages.
Raymond Aubrac, French Resistance fighter, in Topiques n°83, p. 7 to 10
Basically, it doesn’t matter how we judge Hamas after its attack. In any case, it has become common practice to equate any act of resistance with terrorism. In addition to Raymond Aubrac’s quote, we should remember that the Algerian FLN, a resistance movement against the French invaders, also committed acts that were described as terrorism. And frankly, this is not an untruth if you look at the definition of the word: terrorism is the deliberate use of violence for political ends, the psychological impact of which creates a climate of terror. This violence may be aimed, but it is most often indiscriminate, and its victims will be considered innocent by public opinion. Terrorism contains its own contradiction: as a weapon of the weak against the strong, it targets defenceless people indiscriminately. Yet who today would deny that the attacks perpetrated by the FLN were acts of resistance? The most important thing is not to determine whether a particular act is terrorist or not, but to determine the context in which it takes place and the causes behind it. But screaming about terrorism for the sake of screaming about terrorism, in front of an amnesiac audience, is precisely the way to avoid talking about the framework and the causes. As a result, some people tend to misuse the term not in terms of objective reality but in terms of their own interests or those of their class: while Hamas is a terrorist group, Al-Nosra in Syria was doing a good job and the Turkestan Islamist Party brings together Uighur citizens who have been pushed to the limit. Some are an inconvenience, others are a convenience, and vice versa, depending on which way the wind of necessity is blowing. This is wishful thinking, but it would be far more enlightening to point out, for example, that the current Israeli Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, has favoured Hamas by supporting it financially, to the detriment of the secular Fatah, in order to weaken the latter, scuttle negotiations and create a division between Gaza and the rest of the Palestinian territories. Israel is not the only country to have deliberately nurtured a radicalism that has turned against it.
Today we live in societies where the pillars of power reject violence as a means of struggle and confine it to the exclusive use of the state. In France, the people withstands state violence with the consent of the same people who are now indignant that it is being used by the Palestinians against Israeli oppression. For those in power, there is nothing more contagious than an idea. It is, of course, morally unacceptable to rejoice in the deaths of innocent civilians, but it is equally unacceptable to consider only Israeli civilians and invariably keep silent about the countless Palestinian civilian deaths. Beyond compassion, we need to give meaning, to explain that it is violence that breeds violence, that it is a vicious circle that has been going on for nearly a century in the Middle East, and particularly in Palestine. And we must admit that this vicious circle is perpetuated by a Hebrew state that has become fascist and whose current government includes some of the most extremist, fundamentalist and supremacist Jewish figures in Israeli politics. The South African natives in the Apartheid era would have nothing to envy today’s Palestinians. Whether they are children, women or elderly people, and even more so young teenagers old enough to throw stones at tanks, in the eyes of a large part of Israeli society and for the Western media whose moral decay has been recorded, the lives of Palestinians are worth nothing and Israeli law has gradually legitimised the murder of these undesirables by the Tsahal soldiers.
To come back to the incalculable number of acts of violence committed against Palestinians over decades, with total indifference on the part of the Western media, would require dozens of articles, days and weeks of reading, an enumeration that would make your head spin. Giving a few examples would give no more idea than estimating the amount of sand in the desert with a single handful. No, we cannot have the slightest idea of what it is like to be a Palestinian under the Israeli boot, and those who still consider that their job is to inform the rest of the world have done so by risking their lives and even losing it under the bullets of the Israeli army. My present personal contribution is insignificant and infinitely less legitimate compared to these scrupulous observers of the evolution of Palestinian suffering. It will have no more effect on the media wall than the Gaza slings on the armour of the tanks. As a child and then as a teenager, I grew up with this conflict in which the Palestinians always played the villain. I didn’t know at the time that behind this wall, built on the foundations of a long history of persecution that culminated in the Final Solution, Jewish people could also commit the same crimes as those of which they had been victims. Journalism could already be the art of lying, the art of collaborating with oppressors, the art of serving oppressors wherever they acted. Today, this wall is crumbling, revealing a crude reality from which the words « terrorist » and « anti-Semitic » are no longer enough to avert our gaze. And to do justice to the Palestinians and to all those who have died or suffered for having done so, the first thing I can do, in all humility, is to highlight these shameful complicities. Since I have neither the talent nor the expertise to put them into words, I will paraphrase at length the words of the historian Barnaby Raine, reacting to the recent bombing of a hospital in Gaza and the media contortions that followed:
«Israel ordered 22 hospitals evacuated. The World Health Organisation called that a death sentence for patients in those hospitals who could’nt be moved and so were being left to die. One of the hospitals that Israel ordered evacuated was the hospital that is now being bombed. So Israel said it was going to bomb hospitals, then a hospital got bombed. Israel dropped more bombs on Gaza this week than America dropped on Afghanistan in the first year of their occupation of Afghanistan in 2001. […] A priest in Ramalla said: « We hold the occupying power responsible ». […] And we know that Israel continues to block electricity from baby incubators and dialysis patients, we know that Israel continues to block water from surgeons and elderly people, I mean, people in Gaza don’t have access to clean water, food from survivors and we know that Israel bombs roads after it tells people to flee along those roads. We also know that on October the 14th, Israel targeted ambulances and we know that before this bombing, Israel had already killed 28 medical staff in Gaza. We know too, as you said, that part of Israeli playbook is to lie about the attacks, the murders. It doesn’t please me to say this: in 1996, Israel shelled a UN compound in Lebanon, and blamed it on others. This was not true. In 2006, Israel murdered an entire family on a beach in Gaza. The IDF had a quick investigation that said the IDF was not responsible. It was not true. In 2014, Mark Regev, we’d seen him again on TV screens recently, claimed that UNRRA sites, that’s UN Refugee Agency sites, were used to launch missiles. The UN investigated: it was not true. Last year, Israeli forces murdered Palestinian journalist Shireen Abou Akleh, blamed Palestinians: it wasn’t true. Journalists can’t really investigate what’s going on in Gaza, because even the Washington Post, which is not, I tell you, a friend of the Palestinian people, says it is « becoming impossible to report from Gaza under the conditions of siege and bombardment that Israel has established ». So part of what concerns me here, looking at the Western media, because this whole brutal siege and bombardment campaign by Israel has been an object lesson in the racism that structures everything in our media ecosystem. It has been quite… well, I want to say « extraordinary » but I haven’t been that surprised, to watch Western journalists rush to report an old blood libel, to rush to report that 40 babies were beheaded by bloodthirsty savage Palestinians even though it later turned out that there was not much evidence for it, completely ignore Hamas’s accounts of what happened in their attack and just report the Israeli accounts. But then, when Israel says, despite its record of lying, when Israel says that they’re not sure who bombed this hospital or blames Palestinians for killing their own children, journalists rush to say of course that it must be measured and take them seriously, including, I should say, some left-wing journalists, and that’s concerning to people because it seems to be kind of double standard that reeks of racism. Raz Segal, the Israeli genocide expert, is calling what happens in Gaza as « a textbook case of genocide ». 800 legal scholars have written that they are « compelled to sound the alarm about the possibility of genocide in Gaza. It is clear that Israel is targeting civilians, they’ve targeted residential buildings, they’ve targeted journalists, they’ve targeted medics and medical facilities. This is not the first case. The question we, I think, should ask is « Why they’re doing this? Why this brutal blanket campaign ? Cutting off water ? If you didn’t want to target civilians, you wouldn’t cut off water, you wouldn’t cut off fuel. Why they’re doing it? They don’t need to, they have a Iron Dome missile defence system, that means most of the missiles that Palestinians fire at Israel don’t reach target. They could negotiate the release of hostages. There are six thousand Palestinian prisoners languishing in Israeli jails without receiving fair trial, serious allegations of torture, which we rarely hear about on the news that we hear about hostages in Gaza. They could negotiate for the release of their hostages. Instead, they are bombing Gaza and killing, by some reports, some of their own hostages. This won’t of course destroy Hamas. When you carpet bomb people who are living under a colonial siege and constant bombardment, the only effect it can have is to strengthen people’s fury, anger and resolve to resist the colonising power, so of course it won’t break resistance, even if they were to destroy Hamas’s infrastructure, something else would emerge in its place. So why, why are they doing this? It’s not by the way because Hamas caused the problem, because in the West Bank, where there is no Hamas regime, settlers have attacked funerals in the last week and launched attacks on Palestinian villagers, killing parents and children, and the IDF has shot and killed 62 Palestinians in the last week, when I last checked. In the West Bank, which is a place that does not have a Hamas government, and before this latest massacre, 2023 was already the deadliest year on record for children in the West Bank, with one child murdered every week by Israeli forces. So it’s not because there’s a resistance enclave that Israel is violent. It seems to have this lashing-out violent impulse regardless. The reason is that it is the logic of the coloniser, the reason is that Israelis know deep-down, and I am speaking here of some of my own family members, so it pains me, but they know deep-down that they are living in other people‘s stolen homes. They know that they are living in a state that was premised on an act of ethnic cleansing when 700,000 Palestinians were driven from their homes. That’s why Gaza is so densely populated, because most of the Palestinians living in Gaza aren’t from Gaza, they are refugees penned in there because they were chased out of other parts of Israel. And that’s why the important thing to do now is not simply to call for peace, not simply to call for the end of this massacre, though that’s crucial, but to understand that we want a world in which people don’t live penned into an open-air prison because they’re chased from their homes, to call not simply for peace, but for freedom. And to say, when we see people partying at a rave party and being killed by Hamas operatives, that they were partying five miles away from an open-air prison. If you move 5 miles from where those people were partying in Israel to Gaza, life expectancy drops 10 years. We don’t just want peace and the return of a world in which that is the case, we desperately want people all over the world, in our millions, for freedom, for everyone to be able to live a life of freedom and dignity, and that’s why we want victory for the Palestinian people.»<
And as there is nothing clearer than the words of the oppressor to give a glimpse of the martyrdom of the oppressed, here are those recently uttered by figures of the Hebrew State during the history of its oppression of the Palestinian people, demonstrating the racism that structures a society flawed by it:
Palestinians are beasts, not humans.
Eli Ben Dahan, Minister of Defense, 2013
What’s so horrifying about understanding that the entire Palestinian people is the enemy?… They are all enemy combatants, and their blood shall be on all their heads. Now this also includes the mothers of the martyrs, who send them to hell with flowers and kisses. They should follow their sons, nothing would be more just. They should go, as should the physical homes in which they raised the snakes. Otherwise, more little snakes will be raised there.
Ayelet Shaked, Minister of Justice, 2014
The Palestinian threat harbors cancer-like attributes that have to be severed. There are all kinds of solutions to cancer. Some say it’s necessary to amputate organs but at the moment I am applying chemotherapy.
Moshe Yaalon, General and Minister of Defense, 2002
[The way to deal with Palestinians is to] beat them up, not once but repeatedly, beat them up so it hurts so badly, until it’s unbearable.
Benjamin Netanyahu, Prime Minister, 2001
Those who are with us deserve everything, but those who are against us deserve to have their heads chopped off with an axe.
Avigdor Lieberman, Minister of Foreign affairs, 2015
Our soldiers are the only innocents in Gaza. Under no circumstances should they be killed because of false morality that prefers to protect enemy civilians. One hair on the head of an Israeli soldier is more precious than the entire Gazan populace.
Moshe Feiglin, Speaker of the Knesset, 2014
The die is cast. And I’ll end on a note of gutter mediocrity, with the genocidal arsehole Ben Shapiro, muse of American conservatism, whom I’ve already mentioned.
The only solution for Israel is to annex the Gaza Strip and kill enough sons of bitches to make sure the problem never comes back.
Ben Shapiro, 2023
So, happy, bastard ?
Posted by: xiao pignouf | Oct 30 2023 5:13 utc | 674
|