Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
August 19, 2023
Ukraine SitRep: Chernihiv Drone Exhibition – Russian Offensive

This morning at around 10:00 local time a Russian missile hit the drama theater in Chernihiv, some 150 kilometer north of Kiev:

"Five people died," Ukrainian Interior Minister Igor Klymenko said about the Chernihiv attack on Telegram. "Thirty-seven people were wounded, including 11 children."

Zelensky said the attack hit "in the center of the city" in a square that houses a "polytechnic university, a theatre".

"An ordinary Saturday, which Russia turned into a day of pain and loss," the Ukrainian leader said after he had arrived in Sweden.

He posted a video from the scene that showed debris around a large Soviet-era building, with parked cars around it that were partially destroyed, with smashed roofs and windows blown out.

AFP reporters saw fire trucks outside the Taras Shevchenko Drama Theatre and Music Academy, which suffered some damage.

The Ukrainian news site Strana reported that the missile hit a conference and exhibition about drones (machine translation):

13:54 There was a comment from the organizer of the drone exhibition at the Chernihiv Drama Theater, which was the target of a Russian strike.

Recall that after the strike, it turned out that the announcement of the exhibition was published in advance. Because of this, the organizers of the exhibition in social networks were accused of actually pointing the missiles themselves, revealing information about the event in advance.

The organizer of the exhibition, a well-known volunteer Maria Berlinskaya, denies the charges. She says that information about the specific venue was not publicly available, and it was sent to participants a few hours before the start of the exhibition. She also says that as soon as the air raid alert started, the exhibition was stopped.

At the same time, judging from the message of Berlinskaya, some of the participants of the exhibition suffered from the impact, as after the alarm was announced, they went not to the shelter, but to the street.

This week the Ukrainian army committed its last reserve brigade with western equipment to its counter-offensive. It will get ground up just like the forces it is replacing. The furthest the counter-offensive has gone in total was in the south of Orkiv where it progressed some 12 kilometer. It took more than 72 days, and many losses of men and material, to get that far. Tokmak, an important traffic center that Ukraine would like to take, is still 12 kilometer away. It is also protected by several well build defensive lines which the Ukrainian forces will be unable to cross.


bigger

On the second axis of the counter-offensive, south of Velyka Novosilka, the maximum progress is some 6 to 8 kilometer. Several small villages, now destroyed, were captured along the way. The number of lives lost during the fight is much bigger than the number of inhabitants those villages previously had.

The aim of the counter-offensive was to reach the Azov Sea or, if that was not possible, to go far enough to get all southern roads under artillery fire. The distance from the frontline to the sea as of June 5 was 100 kilometer. There are still 88 kilometer to go. But time is running out and all reserves have been committed.

Over the last week the Russian Defense Ministry reported on average 770 Ukrainian frontline casualties per day. The Ukrainian counter-offensive will likely culminate next week. It has reached is maximum potential and will now peter out.

That is the moment when the Russian army will go on the offensive. A sure sign of this was last night's visit of President Putin to Rostov-on-Don from where the 'special military operation' is controlled. General Gerasimov, the leader of the Russian military, and others briefed Putin about their plans.

I have no idea where or how large the Russian offensive will be, but two days ago the Belorussian President Lukashenko gave a hint of its potential size:

COMBATE |šŸ‡µšŸ‡· – @upholdreality – 21:56 UTC Ā· Aug 17, 2023

LUKASHENKO to Ukrainian reporter: "Your counteroffensive cost 45,000 people in dead and maimed. 45,000!.. Your losses are 1 to 8 at the frontline. And [Russia has] 250,000 people in reserve with cutting-edge hardware. You will be crushed… and the Poles rub their hands in glee. Pushed by the Americans, they will cut off the western regions… You have to take your head into your hands and act on the basis of reality. Act in the interests of this huge and beautiful territory."
video

Here is a longer version of the Lukashenko video with close captioning and the complete interview which unfortunately has no close captioning.

Comments

@ James M. | Aug 20 2023 2:03 utc | 189
of course, but i don’t think that is the case here.. in fact, there are a number of russian posters… no one is perfect, but i agree with constantine.. calling people trolls is not really accurate – most of the time..
@ Constantine | Aug 20 2023 2:05 utc | 191
thanks.. i am aware of that.. i call it like i see it… we can all differ, but i do agree with you as i said above..

Posted by: james | Aug 20 2023 2:46 utc | 201

@ shаdοwbanned | Aug 20 2023 2:41 utc | 196
sure… i see a little bit of both in many…

Posted by: james | Aug 20 2023 2:47 utc | 202

By the way, Marty, if Russia withdrew because it saw no point in expending resources on it, why is it expending so many resources now taking back Kupyansk and advancing on Krasni Liman?
Posted by: Biswapriya Purkayast | Aug 19 2023 23:44 utc | 141
—————————————————————-
That was before the mobilization, I suspect that Russia didn’t want to hold on to territory that they couldn’t hold on to through the winter. Besides the Russians made Kiev pay dearly for that territory. If Russia stayed and then got separated and then overwhelmed by the AFU forces, I can imagine what you comment would have been then?
Posted by: Ed | Aug 20 2023 0:09 utc | 151

This is pure cope.
I understand engaging in it when it was happening (though it was actually much worse back then — people were confidently claiming the deep Ukrainian salients were traps that would spring any second once reinforcements stream in from Belgorod). But a year later?
We know very well what happened — the Kremlin got caught with their pants down after everyone was screaming for several months that mobilization is needed.
It looks like they signed the six-month contracts on January 1st, Lisichansk was wrapped up around July 1st, then a lot of the already modest force left once the contracts ran out, and the front was left completely denuded because nobody bothered to move the regular forces doing god knows what inside Russia to Kharkov.
Why do we have to distort history even now? What purpose is that serving other than boosting the almost religious belief in the omniscience and omnibenevolence of the Kremlin?
P.S. Speaking of Lisichansk, something else that has been forgotten needs to be pointed out again and again — the rate of advance slowed down after the initial February-March rush, but it was still steady in May and June 2020. Severodonetsk and Lisichansk were taken actually quite quickly and in the grand scheme of things painlessly.
There has been none of that since then, despite the mobilization. And despite the annihilation of several Ukrainian armies since the SMO start. What changed and why are people blissfully oblivious to the fact that it has changed?

Posted by: shаdοwbanned | Aug 20 2023 2:48 utc | 203

Posted by: oracle | Aug 20 2023 2:28 utc | 194

.. Until NATO surrenders this war will not end ..

Good general statement at all. So, how to solve “this problem” ?
The Western minds and its thinking have been frozen on ice minus 3 C degrees, seem to be not possible to warm-up their brains within any further future times.
Why don’t “simply” eliminate “them” – instead of waiting .. waiting .. only on hope to weaken their powerful ‘resources’ ? – Sorry, radical thinking here ..

Posted by: spare_truth | Aug 20 2023 2:55 utc | 204

and i get how some both inside russia and many out – the armchair warriors – are unhappy with the pace and want to blame putin and etc.. the problem with the armchair warriors is they don’t know shit generally.. i am not naming names, but anyone following the comment section can put the name tags on them… it matters not, as what matters is what is happening and what will happen and no one fucking knows what that is.. sure many are pissed it isn’t going the way they want it to go.. much bellyaching to be had on moa, lol.. i generally ignore the bellyachers.. and i won’t be naming names.. that is what fucking school kids do.. and i don’t expect some of the school kids here to grow up either… all things being equal, i generally avoid commenting for all the obvious reasons..

Posted by: james | Aug 20 2023 2:55 utc | 205

Inkan1969 | Aug 19 2023 20:51 utc | 90/198
“Moon of Alabama would not even exist without Daily Kos.”
Ah
Nearly 20 years ago Billmon was a guest-poster on DKos, then set up his own blog that B continued when Billmon dropped out.
Unz recently compared page-views for July & included MoonofAlabama in the list.
https://www.unz.com/announcement/very-encouraging-website-traffic/
Over 6.3 million page views that month.
Is DKos responsible for those?

Posted by: ChasMark | Aug 20 2023 2:55 utc | 206

Posted by: James M. | Aug 20 2023 2:28 utc | 195
Abandoning one’s own is not an appeal to emotions, especially when such a development can be avoided. Indeed, it may be perceived as downright criminal according to certain circumstances. Morover, even a hardened cynic can comprehend the damaging impact of such an irresponsible stance to the morale of one’s supporters and allies. But this argument is not easily understood by those who aren’t truly invested in a relevant conflict, i.e., armchair generals.
Further, engaging in bluster about the defense of cities or locations one may be willing to abandon is irresponsible as it undermines one’s credibility and the conviction that one’s statements carry weight. Again, the issue isn’t the very real military need to leave an exposed position, but the irresponsible, phoney-tough language about its defense.
Similarly, lack of preparations or planning that would have rendered said retreats – with all their immediate negative consequences – unnecessary, further damages one’s cause. It is simply incomprehensible for me to understand how people can defend the yolo attitude that left the Russian lines naked of troops by late August – early September 2022. Do people comprehend the impact of territorial losses for ground won with much blood on the troops, on those to be conscripted or their families?
Continuing with the importance of official statements, what was the point of pompous early declarations about Russia’s unimaginable superiority and Ukrainian inadequacy? Sure, the Russians didn’t confront an army of chumps, but a NATO force of much better standards than the forces of almost any country officially part of this imperialist tumor. But that was not the image promoted on the Russian citizenry or even the troops.
And that last part played an important role on the lack of renewal of contracts by the military personnel fighting in Ukraine by August ’22. Cognitive dissonance degraded the convictions of victory and, especially, the minimization of the fear of a messy death on the battlefield.
Many of these issues may well be addressed and hopefully, the Maidanist regime will be utterly obliterated. But that won’t change the fact that much better options could have been made.
By now, the neo-Hitlerite Russophobia and the genocidal racist hatred vomited by the MSM and a segment of the citizenry in the west against the Russians has had a more visceral galvanizing effect on the Russian populace than a number of choices made by the government.

Posted by: Constantine | Aug 20 2023 3:00 utc | 207

Posted by: shаdοwbanned | Aug 19 2023 15:01 utc | 3

And it looks like at least one plane is damaged.
This is strike #4 on the strategic forces.

OMG! A whole 1 plane – damaged – you say?
Whoop dee doo.
More like Strike #4 on the strategic paperweights.
If Russia ever actually needs those ‘strategic forces’ their situation would have become dire indeed. At which point the strategic forces are nothing more than a “Samson Option”
But I don’t think it will get to that state, because if it does, it’s curtains for all of us.
Which means this is all a big nothing-burgher.

Posted by: Arch Bungle | Aug 20 2023 3:08 utc | 208

By now, the neo-Hitlerite Russophobia and the genocidal racist hatred vomited by the MSM and a segment of the citizenry in the west against the Russians has had a more visceral galvanizing effect on the Russian populace than a number of choices made by the government.
Posted by: Constantine | Aug 20 2023 3:00 utc | 206
—————————————————-
Worth saving for later, IMHO. There has been a fair bit of back and forth on these pages for quite some time. The Russians faced many challenges and have managed to overcome some quite well. The Russian military was perhaps ten percent modernized at the beginning of the SMO and conscripts could not be introduced into the theatre. Putin had little choice to start when he did because of the dramatically increased shelling med-Feb 2022.

Posted by: Acco Hengst | Aug 20 2023 3:10 utc | 209

Posted by: Ed | Aug 19 2023 18:16 utc | 62
Most of what you label “concern trolls”, Ed, bemoan the civilian losses on both sides as harmful to the overall Russian goals. It’s very disingenuous, if not downright dishonest, to assert that critics of the Russian government repeat western propaganda when it’s pbvious that they don’t. Just who is the western propagandist that suggests that Russia should not put up with attacks on any assets of the strategic nuclear triad, specifically the bombers?
I mean, sure, there have been trolls who have expressed fake concern, but they have been transparent due to their suggestions. And then, there have been fascist trash of the liberal milieu like the Inkanafo. But they do not define actual critical voices.
This attitude that the Russian government is composed by demigods who should be immune to any form of criticism is absurd and for this blog, harmful and unacceptable. Especially when the criticism aims at the confounding of the murderous Anglo-American empire. One may well disagree with aspects of said criticism (such as “shadowbanned” suggesting casually the use of tactical nukes and worse, for my part), but at no point should different voices be silenced in order to create a safe echo chamber.
Posted by: Constantine | Aug 19 2023 21:43 utc | 100
^ I agree and this behavior sickens me. Do you guys want to become another Vineyard of the Saker?
This is supposed to be an anti-imperialist, perhaps Socialist, perhaps even (one could dream) Marxist website. Putin represents the national bourgeoisie of Russia. Of course he is not infallible. As Hopkins has pointed out, national and globalist Capital intertwine and mesh.

Posted by: Tichy | Aug 20 2023 3:12 utc | 210

You can’t be liberal milieu and fascist trash at the same time. Reminds me of how right wing attacks would call the same person Communist and Fascist.
Posted by: Inkan1969 | Aug 19 2023 22:17 utc | 109
On the other hand it is entirely possible to be a piss liberal and a Nazi apologist at the same time, which I think is even worse. Encountered some of that trash today on Quora, guess I’ll be banned soon.

Posted by: Tichy | Aug 20 2023 3:15 utc | 211

If Russia ever actually needs those ‘strategic forces’ their situation would have become dire indeed. At which point the strategic forces are nothing more than a “Samson Option”
Typical shadowbanned horseshit. Starts his sentence with “if”, names off some hypothetical horrible defeat for Russia, and then blames Putin for the hypothetical defeat that comes from some minor incident, and calls Putin incompetent for being hypothetically defeated. He has done this over and over again for the past three months ive been here and when I see a long post I check first to make sure it isnt him, or one other long winded poster.
But you quoted him, and sure enough, he is still up to his “Putin is dumb because minor incident might lead to horrid defeat”
None of Shadowbanneds hypotheticals as results from minor incidents have ever come true, but that doesn’t stop him from long winded blab fests.

Posted by: UWDude | Aug 20 2023 3:22 utc | 212

Abandoning one’s own is not an appeal to emotions
Posted by: Constantine | Aug 20 2023 3:00 utc | 206
Arguing about it is, especially when the war is not over yet.
Abandoning one’s own, how dare they. They aren’t truly Russian, if only we had real Russians in charge, this would never have happened if only X were in charge, Putin is a terrible leader, etc. so on and so forth. It is an argumentum ad passiones used for manipulating emotions to make an argument, instead of logic.
As I said, there are perfectly valid reasons why the Russian military withdrew their lines from Kherson and Kharkiv last year. You might disagree with those reasons, but that’s a different argument than the one you are making.

Posted by: James M. | Aug 20 2023 3:23 utc | 213

Dr. George W Oprisko | Aug 19 2023 21:52 utc | 102
#######
I’ve always thought you were a bit of a loony, since your first post. But today you excelled yourself. I group you in with the pompous, self-important, bigotted, space-hogging pundits like RSH and Martyanov. No wonder you like them. Three peas in a pod. And just like RSH, you leave your opinionated droppings in forums and comment sections all over the web, in some vain search for respect and notoriety. You lecture, you condescend, you hypothesise, as much as anyone else on this site, yet you never miss an opportunity to critique other people’s conjecture with which you disagree. Just like Hack and Martyanov, you never state “in my opinion”. You only prognosticate unarguable “truths”. Just because you’re 75, well educated, and have travelled the world on a yacht, doesn’t make you an Oracle about the SMO. Pull ya fkn head in, ffs.
Above, in #102, your use of “we” is indicative of someone lost in their hateful fantasies of one-sided moral outrage, as if you are some die-hard Russian patriot at the front. But you’re not. You’re just a self-invented, US businessman-grifter (bankrupt 2020), with a PhD in Nutrient Utilization, a degree in Chemistry, and a few pet projects in alternative energies which enable you to name drop “collaborations” all over the globe, all via the pretence of a smokey, 1980s, self-built, self-written, vanity website which has no authentic or reciprocal links to/from any other website in the world. It’s a sham. “Professor Dr George W. Oprisko III”. Lmao at your vanities.
Yes, I know you have a Russian wife/parther and identify with Russian and Jewish and Christian Orthodox and Nazi-fighting family history, but from your condo in Florida … or wherever you presently operate your cyber “Institute” of consulting and begging … you are far far from the trenches of bleeding Russian soldiers or Donbass City cluster munitions. Your use of the royal “we” is pretentiousness in the extreme. Even the fervent Russian nationals on this site don’t extend their partisanship that far. By all means, take a side. But that does not make you omniscient.
You may well criticise @shadowbanned and others for their far out perspectives on how to manage the SMO, but I observe exactly the same fanatacism, ideological obsession, and presumptuousness of self-righteousness in yourself. You think you have knowledge, wisdom, overview. But you don’t. You just have a mouse on a pad and Google Search as the source of your ramblings, filtered through your own conscious, subconscious, and unconscious biases, all of which amount to nothing more than just 1 out of 8 billion opinions on this planet.
You copiously quote outside authorities, to give YOUR POSTS that air of authority. “Medvedev says ….” after which you write “He’s right, of course”. It’s an old device the intellectually insecure use to bolster their own viewpoints or support their prejudices.
Ha! You tell trolls to STFU; you tell the ignorant to get better informed; you suggest others learn better English before they post into your playground. But in Putin’s eyes, the MoD’s eyes, my eyes, and probably many others here, you are just a big-noting, bag of hot air, venting uncensored in a metaphorical cyber bar — like the rest. In other words, no more no less of a troll on the world stage than all the other armchair observers and generals. But at least you’re a legend in your own mind.
PS. Go on, report me. I don’t care if I’m banned. Unlike your own ego, I have no vested interest in being able to comment on MoA. I can still read what’s valuable and just skip your verbiage.

Posted by: SCCC | Aug 20 2023 3:24 utc | 214

By now, the neo-Hitlerite Russophobia and the genocidal racist hatred vomited by the MSM and a segment of the citizenry in the west against the Russians has had a more visceral galvanizing effect on the Russian populace than a number of choices made by the government.
Posted by: Constantine | Aug 20 2023 3:00 utc | 206
It’s not a “segment” of the citizenry in the West. It’s a qualified majority. I see this at my workplace. I’m not working at some fancy place filled with middle-class wannabe parasites. I work on a factory floor. By the most strict Marxist definition of the word I am a Proletarian.
If we are talking a city of Lviv, it’s not a “segment” of the citizenry who are Nazis. They’re all Nazis who breed more Nazis. Making meat loafs in the image of the murdered civilians on the Crimea bridge and selling them in their bakeries.
I’m not shadowbanned. Neither am I a concern troll. I don’t think “let’s tactically nuke them,” but Lviv deserves the Dresden treatment.

Posted by: Tichy | Aug 20 2023 3:24 utc | 215

Posted by: Acco Hengst | Aug 20 2023 3:10 utc | 208
Fully agreed with almost everything you pointed. Indeed, Putin did not have any good options by the end of ’21. Which is precisely why his rhetoric should reflect that by including the difficulty of the task ahead.
In the same vein, he isn’t responsible for the collective retardation of the Finnish nation due to later day liberalism, which compelled them to join NATO. But that is exactly why cocky attitudes should have been avoided. He would assert then that Finland in NATO isn’t such a big issue, when many perceive it as a genuine problem and the latter belief is validated by Shoigu’s statements and the creation of a new military district to confront a new threat.
Your argument on the modernization may be valid (not sure about the scale you posted, but what the hell), but that is not an excuse for undertaking a difficult task with severe numerical inferiority. Again, having a major military exercise in the Far East, while the Kharkov offensive is on by the Ukro-Nazis and the mercenary forces had a very bitter taste to the populace to put it mildly. And that is without the emergence of the consequences to follow.
I would conclude with one more point that blows my mind. Why is it that the Russian authorities refer to the anti-Russian governments, media, commentators etc. as “pro-Ukrainian”? What sort of messed up mentality is this, that one would describe championship of the colonization of Ukraine and the (ab)use of its population as human cattle as a pro-Ukrainian stance? How the hell is the urging to the Ukrainians to commit national suicide a pro-Ukrainian position?
I understand why the western liberals would opt for this self-description, but what is the excuse of the Russian authorities and the country’s media? It goes without saying that this terminology and labeling has been adopted by the pro-Russian folks and it is simly harmful and downright wrong. I mean who would describe the takeover of Mexico by a foreign power, its transformation to a colony and its use as a sacrificial battering ram against the US a “pro-Mexican” stance?
i have my own view as to why the Russian authorities and media use this label and its part of a much bigger problem, partly connected with the conflict in Ukraine, but it’s too much to expound my view now. It is still, however, a massive blunder it PR terms. And propaganda has been of paramount importance to keep many Ukrainians loyal to the Kiev regime, even in a fatalistic way, instead of emptying their magazines on the Maidanist scum and their masters and joining the Russians to liberate their country.

Posted by: Constantine | Aug 20 2023 3:35 utc | 216

@ Constantine | Aug 20 2023 3:35 utc | 215
interesting.. i’d be curious for you to expound your view on that when you feel like it..

Posted by: james | Aug 20 2023 3:42 utc | 217

Posted by: Tichy | Aug 20 2023 3:12 utc | 209
Bernhardt may be left-leaning, but despite that (and my own socialist convictions) I do not care for MoA to be a one-sided political platform. And I have had a number of unwholesome experiences with so-called verified leftist sites (mostly of the western variety).
I still consider it a respectable blog, with many commentators, including ones I have disagreements with (though I do not post oftn), contributing with info and links not at all availble in the MSM or even many alternate media.

Posted by: Constantine | Aug 20 2023 3:44 utc | 218

Re: Posted by: The Rev. David R. Gr | Aug 19 2023 21:25 utc | 95

That makes sense to me. Further on, I made an amateur’s study of river lines the Russian General Staff and Russian Security Council might make their new western border with the West Eurasian peninsula:
https://therevdavidrgraham.substack.com/p/new-western-borders-of-russia

After venturing to your website I read this.

Again, moving East to West: If Russia does not want a friendly Germany, the river line would be the Bug-Vistula. If Russia wants a partially friendly Germany, the river line would be the Oder. If Russia wants a friendly Germany, the river line would be the Elbe. This is decision-point #2

This is nuts. Russia is 1000% NOT going anywhere near the Elbe!!

Posted by: Julian | Aug 20 2023 3:51 utc | 219

There seem to be three types of postings here.
1) About the past – why Russia/Ukraine/USA should have done something differently and why. These are uninteresting because you can’t change the past and are mostly an ego-trip about ‘why I’m so much smarter than the Russian general staff’.
2) About the present – analysis and commentary about what’s happening today. This is often interesting.
3) About the future – predictions about what Russia/Ukraine/USA will do in the future. These predictions are most interesting, since they are then proven right or wrong, leading to an estimate of the predictive ability of the poster.
For instance, I predicted at the start of the SMO that Russia would completely shut down the electricity network in Ukraine, causing huge migration to Europe and putting pressure on Europe to end the war. I was wrong about this, since I didn’t understand that Russia didn’t want to disrupt Ukraine’s ability to transport troops to the Donbass meat grinder (demilitarization and denazification were accomplished by the meat grinder). This is the same reason Russia didn’t destroy the bridges across the Dnieper.
So, my current prediction is that once the Ukrainian counteroffensive peters out, Russia will destroy the 750 KV electricity grid and completely turn out the lights in Ukraine. The mayor of Kiev has said that he was previously ready to evacuate Kiev if the lights were turned out last winter.
Once the lights are out, trains won’t run, trucks won’t have fuel, and Ukrainian soldiers will be cold and hungry. Cold and hungry soldiers will surrender rather than freeze or starve. I predict that General Winter will win the Ukraine war.

Posted by: Contrarian_Ed | Aug 20 2023 3:59 utc | 220

massive blunder in PR terms.
Constantine | Aug 20 2023 3:35 utc | 215
———————————————–
karlof1 would be first person I would ask to explain it. Kudos to him.
When there are internal divisions the policy language needs to be cloaked to create some degree of consensus in decision-making. There is also give and take and fighting with the edges with those who hold strong opinions or have bigger egos.
IMHO Putin has done well, perhaps well enough. The bureaucratic, sclerotic Russian military has risen to the occasion and learned from experience. They nearly all realize by now that they are in a struggle for their survival. That tends to improve performance as recent results militarily have shown.
I have not followed the Russian decision making and its politics to engage in a viable discussion. There are a few more barflies who are quite capable.

Posted by: Acco Hengst | Aug 20 2023 4:05 utc | 221

So, my current prediction is that once the Ukrainian counteroffensive peters out, Russia will destroy the 750 KV electricity grid and completely turn out the lights in Ukraine.
Posted by: Contrarian_Ed | Aug 20 2023 3:59 utc | 219
That’s wishful thinking. If that was in the cards it’d happened a year ago.

Posted by: Tichy | Aug 20 2023 4:07 utc | 222

1) About the past – why Russia/Ukraine/USA should have done something differently and why. These are uninteresting because you can’t change the past and are mostly an ego-trip about ‘why I’m so much smarter than the Russian general staff’.
Posted by: Contrarian_Ed | Aug 20 2023 3:59 utc | 219
Arguing about certain, potentially faulty, past options may very well have to do with improving one’s current course. Speaking for myself, this isn’t a pissing contest with the MoD or other posters. But it is healthy, IMHO, to address realities in the various topics of the blog and not creating those one would wish into existence.
And once more, a part of my criticism has to do with the approach and rhetoric of the powers that be and the distorted view it led to. I do not know any descent commentator who seriously entertained the idea that the Ukro-Nazis could mount an offensive and seize very significant territories in the Kharkov region or that Kherson would be abandoned. The military options taken may have been the best under the circumstances, but why was the Russian force in Ukraine in such weakened state to propmpt such decisions? And why was there a lofty rhetoric about Kherson never to be lost again, accompanied by videos about the normality of life in the city under Russian control?
In the end, whatever we post in the MoA threads isn’t going to affect decision-makers. It is just that I do not desire to create a faulted picture of their options and reasoning about decisions on past, present and future developments.

Posted by: Constantine | Aug 20 2023 4:16 utc | 223

but Lviv deserves the Dresden treatment.
Tichy | Aug 20 2023 3:24 utc | 214
——————————————-
I ended my European vacation this week by spending last few days in Mainz on the Rhine, near Frankfurt. In February 1945, 80% of the city was destroyed by the RAF, three weeks before the end of WW II in that part of Germany. It is a nice town, well rebuilt.
The trend to destroy the civilian population as part of warfare antecedes WW II, Nanking coming to mind as a short term predecessor. Curtis LeMay decided that Hiroshima and Nagasaki were viable targets because they were undamaged unlike 72 other Japanese cities that had sustained major fire damage.
I was born during WW II in occupied territory. The Dutch surrendered on May 10, 1940 after the bombing of Rotterdam, seeing no need to incur more civilian casualties. The Dutch Government exiled itself to the UK, part of the Royal family to Canada.
Putin should get major credit for not holding the civilian population of Ukraine hostage. Zelensky is a war criminal for using them as shields and staging fake war crimes. Saving bridges, transportation infrastructure and the electric network, after showing that it will not take much to wipe it all out is another act of restraint.
In the end of the day we all have to get along and live. West Ukraine, too. I have my own rather intuitive reactions when I am in Germany. I suppress them.

Posted by: Acco Hengst | Aug 20 2023 4:21 utc | 224

Posted by: Acco Hengst | Aug 20 2023 4:05 utc | 220
Mr. Sanchez has made admirable efforts to keep himself informed on the subject of this war and the general geopolitical ramifications. But my point on the PR aspect doesn’t require any expertise to inflame the curiosity of any commentator, you included. That is precisely why I brought the hypothetical example of a similar scenario with Mexico. Would anyone with clarity of thought describe those leading – better yet, forcing – the Mexicans into a national suicide as “pro-Mexican”?
In the case of Ukraine, this surreal, manipulative terminology benefits only the very people who are implacably anti-Russian and have nothing but callous contempt for the Ukrainians.

Posted by: Constantine | Aug 20 2023 4:27 utc | 225

Russia must destroy NATO to secure it’s western border(s)
Posted by: Dr. George W Oprisko | Aug 19 2023 23:15 utc | 127

NATO must become destroyed to secure Europe’s independent future.
Russia isn’t the precipitating factor. They are reacting to NATO’s internal contradictions.

Posted by: too scents | Aug 20 2023 4:29 utc | 226

In the end, whatever we post in the MoA threads isn’t going to affect decision-makers. It is just that I do not desire to create a faulted picture of their options and reasoning about decisions on past, present and future developments.
Posted by: Constantine | Aug 20 2023 4:16 utc | 222
Far better than to write a book on the subject, at least that way your target audience might be reached. Although, I recommend waiting until military operations have finalized and the dust has settled a bit before putting pen to paper.

Posted by: James M. | Aug 20 2023 4:38 utc | 227

OMG! A whole 1 plane – damaged – you say?
Whoop dee doo.
More like Strike #4 on the strategic paperweights.
If Russia ever actually needs those ‘strategic forces’ their situation would have become dire indeed. At which point the strategic forces are nothing more than a “Samson Option”
But I don’t think it will get to that state, because if it does, it’s curtains for all of us.
Which means this is all a big nothing-burgher.
Posted by: Arch Bungle | Aug 20 2023 3:08 utc | 207

This is just idiotic.
If you actually spend some time reading Russian military experts, RU has a dire shortage of strategic bombers. All these fancy hypersonic missiles are useless if you have nothing to launch them from. That includes, and is in fact especially important, for the upcoming very-long range hypersonic missile.
Each plan only carries a limited number of these, and so the size of the salvo is not all that large. And with each plane taken out, it deceases further and further.
Again, there are already way too few planes, and they are not building new ones.
The USSR built 19 serial Tu-160 in just a few years before it collapsed, and it built 500 Tu-22M planes over 25 years, i.e. 20 airframes a year.
Russia only now built its first brand new Tu-160
This is a massive issue, and only morons who have no clue what they are talking about will just gloss over it.

Posted by: shаdοwbanned | Aug 20 2023 4:56 utc | 228

https://vk.com/wall701885602_85881

Russia may reconsider the decision not to use cluster munitions because of the violation of international humanitarian law by the Kyiv regime. This was announced by Russian Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu the day before yesterday, August 15, at the XI Moscow Conference on International Security.
“I wanted to draw attention to the fact that we are armed withThere are also cluster munitions. So far, for humanitarian reasons, we have refrained from using them. However, this decision can be reconsidered,” S. Shoigu said the day before yesterday.
Again, “gestures of good will”? Is this stupidity or betrayal?
And at this time, the Central Military Clinical Hospital named after Vishnevsky in Krasnogorsk is sounding the alarm: after the start of the use of cluster shells by the Armed Forces of Ukraine “Our fighters’ blood loss is terrible.” There was an acute shortage of donor blood of all groups at the Vishnevsky Central Exhibition Center. This is evidenced by the official “Donor traffic light” of the hospital.
https://3hospital.ru/services/podelis_zabotoj_sdaj_kr..
Let me remind you. that cluster munitions pose a serious threat, since they literally “seed” large areas from above with their submunitions. Even trenches of a full profile do not help from them. These damaging elements inflict monstrous wounds that are difficult to heal, and in most cases lead to death. It was the use of cluster munitions that allowed the Armed Forces of Ukraine to achieve tactical success in a number of sectors of the front due to a sharp increase in our losses.

Posted by: shаdοwbanned | Aug 20 2023 4:57 utc | 229

https://vk.com/wall701885602_85908

This morning at 08.18, I posted a post about the critical situation with donated blood at the Vishnevsky Central Military Clinical Hospital in Krasnogorsk, indicating that, according to doctors, this is due to the massive use of cluster munitions by the Armed Forces of Ukraine.
And already at 10.05 the situation with donor blood changed dramatically,there was only a need for two blood groups. Considering that my telegram channel is also read in the General Staff, I console myself with the hope that my post helped to resolve this situation. And thus it saved the lives of many wounded.
I hope that the crisis was really quickly resolved, and not just by replacing the colors of the donor traffic light from red to green on the site.
But this does not mean that I have forgotten about the critical situation with the use of cluster munitions at the front. About the massive use of their Armed Forces and about the refusal for humanitarian purposes of their use by us.
I will continue to write about this stupidity or betrayal.

Posted by: shаdοwbanned | Aug 20 2023 4:57 utc | 230

Constantine | Aug 20 2023 3:35 utc | 215–
It was suggested I put my oar in:
Russia’s two most publicly visible leaders–Putin and Lavrov–have noted the pitting of Slav against Slav in this conflict for many years with both going into great detail about the shared nature of the Rus being. Many have documented the vast effort made by the Outlaw US Empire and its UK deputy to keep the Nazi spirit and OUN alive and very well since 1945. Both Putin and Lavrov have voiced the great tragedy of attacking Russia to the last Ukrainian on many occasions and have never seen the West as “Pro-Ukrainian.” Pro-Ukrainian Nazis, yes, but the distinction is always made. A major point was made of the requirement to DeNazify Ukraine. Lavrov has said many times that the Outlaw US Empire uses others up then throws them away and that Ukraine is suffering that fate. The Russian media I read are Anti-Ukraine as a proxy, not Anti-Slavic. Yes, Russian soldiers curse their opponents in the most vile of terms, but all soldiers do that, although in this case it’s even more difficult to kill someone who looks and speaks very much like you.
PR gaffs occur. But when it comes to explaining the reality of this conflict to the world, IMO Russia has done an outstanding job in a milieu where it doesn’t have Narrative Dominance. The great number of nations siding with Russia is evidence of that, and that’s the international constituency that matters. Domestically, Russia’s people understand and support the effort and those in charge. And they have an amazing number of opportunities to tell those in charge how they feel about most everything, which is perhaps the most unknown aspect of Russia and Russians–their ability to talk to each other regardless of status and the vast number of organizations facilitating that.

Posted by: karlof1 | Aug 20 2023 5:09 utc | 231

Again, having a major military exercise in the Far East, while the Kharkov offensive is on by the Ukro-Nazis and the mercenary forces had a very bitter taste to the populace to put it mildly.
Posted by: Constantine | Aug 20 2023 3:35 utc | 215
_______________________________________________________________________
Management has its own prerogatives. You might be familiar wit the term. Optics, short-sightedness, favoring who screams, who the heck knows. At some point it all adds up. Being a foot soldier or perhaps NCO equivalent, you just have to fill in where you can. Sometimes the big logic makes sense,

Posted by: Acco Hengst | Aug 20 2023 5:26 utc | 232

This is supposed to be an anti-imperialist, perhaps Socialist, perhaps even (one could dream) Marxist website. Putin represents the national bourgeoisie of Russia. Of course he is not infallible. As Hopkins has pointed out, national and globalist Capital intertwine and mesh.
Posted by: Tichy | Aug 20 2023 3:12 utc | 209
This guy’s full of shit. He’s using this fake Marxist concern ploy to push the imperial line.

Posted by: Ahenobarbus | Aug 20 2023 5:28 utc | 233

You show yourself prone to delusion if you’re deluded enough to think that I’m working for some imaginary “masters”.
Posted by: Inkan1969 | Aug 19 2023 22:09 utc | 107
Maybe you’re like the angry feminists who hate “patriarchy” so much that they become regimented soldiers fully controlled by George Soros.

Posted by: Jusses | Aug 20 2023 5:34 utc | 234

Posted by: karlof1 | Aug 20 2023 5:09 utc | 230
I agree with much of what you put in your post. But on the point I made on the use of the term “pro-Ukrainian”, it simply is a matter of undisputed fact. Even here, in this blog, I have seen it time and again as the standard term to describe those who support the Maidanist regime or more accurately, its masters. It is the same practically on every show, podcast, site etc. throughout the internet as well as the media in both camps.
Now, it just so happens that at times alternative terms are used to describe the Maidanist regime or its troops, but “pro-Ukrainian” is an established label for the promoters of this proxy war against Russia. And why this may not mean much to some commentators here (though not you, if I can infer this from your posts), it is of paramount importance to create a perception of reality, especially since it positions those on the other camp effectively as “anti-Ukrainians”.
This influences people in Ukraine, Russia and beyond to the point that it creates a distorted point of view with attendant attitudes. It is my contention that the Russian/pro-Russian side should have established for tis opponents the term “anti-Russian”. This isn’t some sort of deception, but the most accurate description of this lot, since their goal isn’t the elevation and prosperity of Ukraine, but the destruction of Russia.
Obviously, the onus for this task fell to the Russian government and media who have failed spectacularly in this endeavour (in fact, aided the anti-Russian camp). It goes without saying that I agree with your points on the goals of the Russian intervention and the difficulty the Russians had to push their own narative. But this is exactly why such blunders should have been avoided and the proper course should have been pushed relentlessly. And these aren’t the only follies to have taken place.
The point of not pushing for a rosy picture that some posters of the pro-Russian canp prefer is that this is the critical attitude required to improve oneself and correct mistakes. This especially true when one is confronted with the horrific 5-eyed monstrosity and its appendages. The list of victims is already vast.

Posted by: Constantine | Aug 20 2023 5:34 utc | 235

Posted by: Constantine
Yes ! That’s why I always use the term ā€˜The Ukrainian Civil War’ and also always ā€˜NATO’s military’
Example: NATO’s military suffered another defeat yesterday in The Ukrainian Civil War.

Posted by: Exilejr | Aug 20 2023 5:45 utc | 236

Posted by: Constantine | Aug 20 2023 3:35 utc | 215
>i have my own view as to why the Russian authorities and media use this label and its part of a much bigger problem, partly connected with the conflict in Ukraine, but it’s too much to expound my view now. It is still, however, a massive blunder it PR terms. And propaganda has been of paramount importance to keep many Ukrainians loyal to the Kiev regime, even in a fatalistic way, instead of emptying their magazines on the Maidanist scum and their masters and joining the Russians to liberate their country.
It’s boils down to contempt for the idea that central Ukrainians (as opposed to Galicians, who are even more distinct) are a distinct ethnic group. Not as distinct as Chechens and Tatars, but distinct enough that they resent denial of that distinctiveness as an insult to their honor, and men will fight to the death over such insults. You see this same attitude in this forum, in statements that Ukrainian language is same as Russian. As someone who knows both, and also knows Spanish, I can assure you they are as separate as Spanish and Italian. No Spaniard thinks he is just an Italian who can’t speak Italian properly and if you said that to the whole Spanish nation, you are asking for a fight.
Ukrainian language wasn’t imposed on central Ukraine. They always spoke that way in villages. They always dressed slightly different from great Russians, had slightly different customs, etc. Same as Tatars and Chechens are distinct, except Ukrainians are closer to great Russians in religion, language, customs and so can easily integrate into Russia.
Which is why taking Ukrainian territory was a bad idea from day 1. The goal should always have been demilitarization and regime change so that Ukraine becomes a Russian vassal/puppet, without giving Ukrainians motivation to fight by seizing terroritory and calling Ukraine a fake state.
Of course, Putin is not all powerful, so a lot of compromises were necessary from a practical point of view. Crimea had to be taken to create a crisis and forestall NATO membership, since NATO can’t accept members into middle of crises. But seizure should have been temporary. Then Donbas and Kherson seizure was needed to allow conscripts to be assigned to those areas, since law only allows conscripts on Russian territory. I think a better idea would have been to change the constitution to make ALL of Ukraine part of Russia, but autonomous like Chechnya, but maybe that was too bold a step until Russian people were fully angered.
Dangling the possibility of restoring Donbas and Crimea to Ukraine, if it joins the Russian federation as an autonomous region, is an excellent way to give the Ukrainian people a face saving way to end the war. There is probably zero likelihood of this happening in reality, but putting the offer on the table could stir up propaganda trouble for the Ukrainian government. Kyiv would dismiss the offer as not serious, but it serves to emphasize to the Ukrainian people that Russia’s goal is not the obliteration of Ukraine or Ukrainian culture and language, but rather ensuring that Ukraine is forever under Russian military control and forever eliminating the possibility of Ukraine joining some other military alliance.
As for the Russian military incompetence, that again gets back to Putin is not all powerful. All bureaucracies inevitably become corrupt, which is why no socialist state will ever work. There need to be multiple competing oligarchies, of which the bureaucracy is one leg, progessive entrepreneurial meritocracy the second leg, conservative rentier plutocracy the third leg. Soviet Union had only the bureaucracy leg, so of course it became corrupt with no other leg to check the corruption. Modern Russia has the other legs, but entrepreneurial meritocracy leg is weak compared to bureaucracy and rentier plutocracy, which legs have become incestuous, so bureaucracy continues to be corrupt, with top bureaucrats creating personal fiefdoms, stealing government money, putting incompetent relatives in power, etc. Russia is very lucky to have a competent top leaders like Putin and his inner circle, but there was a limit to how much reform they could impose. Under pressure of war, reform is happening fast, however.
Full mobilization in early 2022 would have required buy-in by the Russian oligarchs, who constitute the conservative rentier plutocracy leg, meaning they dislike radical moves of any sort. There is a risk those oligarch could have used their wealth to bribe corrupt elements in the military to overthrow Putin. It is possible Putin moved slowly and cautiously in 2022 because he doubted his grip on power. Now that the Russian people are fully aroused, the rentier plutocrats will not dare to oppose Putin, and enough military officers have died in battle that the military as a whole is not going to tolerate indulging corruption and incompetence within the military any longer because that is now seen as a direct threat to their own lives.
Another point, which i repeat over and over, is this echo chamber severely underestimates the potential industrial capacity of the USA led alliance. Look outside. How many automobiles and trucks manufactured by the USA alliance (including Japan, Korea, EU, Mexican subsidiaries,c etc) versus manufactured in Russia? Until very recently, not even many Chinese automobiles and trucks exported to the West. If that USA alliance ever got serious, it could be massively dangerous. Moving slow ensures it doesn’t get serious.
Note that USA led propaganda industry has been very serious and 100% aroused from day 1, whereas the actual USA led military and industrial side is still dragging their feet. There is a deep split in the USA led alliance, between the idealists who control the top levels of the civil bureaucracy of the USA alliance versus the realists who control the military bureaucracy and the rentier plutocrats who own most of the industrial businesses. The idealists have long been living in a fool’s paradise where propaganda is everything, whereas the realists are well aware that Russia has nukes and missiles that can sink the USA Navy, and standing behind Russia is China, and so the realists are not interested in war as long as Russia moves slowly. It is strongly in Russia’s interest to maintain this inner conflict in the West by continuing to move slowly and gradually and moderately. No throwing nukes around like shadowbanned recommends. Eventually, the fool’s paradise phase will end and the idealists will be kicked to the curb and realists will again take full control of the west. At which point Russia and China can arrange a lasting peace with the West.

Posted by: Revelo | Aug 20 2023 5:58 utc | 237

@ Shadowbanned 228-9
It’s funny how you touchingly and earnestly believe Shoigu when it suits you. Doesn’t it occur that Russia is saying they haven’t been using CM when the AFU started, because they want *seem* grudgingly forced into using a controversial munition type?
The second post is histrionic & overly dire in tone. Cluster munitions are not nearly *that* deadly compared to other artillery. They wound far more than they kill. The real problem is detecting all the bomblets and cleaning them up, so the occasional poor bugger getting his foot and ankle mangled is far more common than “OMG everyone in the squad is dead”.
To you earlier fixation on the *big* planes at this rate Russia will indeed be (apparently) screwed in about 100 years, *if* they don’t build any new ones at all. However frankly no-one is building the big bombers the way they used to, they’re not as necessary nor cost-effective for their role which is now a shrinking niche.
Airforces like them for the same reason navies like aircraft carriers & big surface ships. They’re a guarantee of *big* bumper budgets & look impressive on display.

Posted by: Urban Fox | Aug 20 2023 6:00 utc | 238

Posted by: SCCC | Aug 20 2023 3:24 utc | 213
Whoa there, tiger. Did the Doc just break up with you or something? How do you know all that shit about him?
Just weird…

Posted by: Ahenobarbus | Aug 20 2023 6:06 utc | 239

Posted by: Inkan1969 | Aug 19 2023 22:09 utc | 107

You show yourself prone to delusion if you’re deluded enough to think that I’m working for some imaginary “masters”.

In this you speak truth but only because I’m absolutely certain nobody with any standards would employ you.

Posted by: Arch Bungle | Aug 20 2023 6:07 utc | 240

This is entirely, 100%, Putin’s fault. Everyone including the Donbass people were awaiting a Russian intervention. Now the only ones still defending Russia not intervening then are looking even stupider than ever with Luka and Putin themselves admitting it was a blunder.
Posted by: Biswapriya Purkayast | Aug 20 2023 0:01 utc | 147
This man child has an issue with everyone with a blog that he frequents, trying to be the first to get his 2 cents opinions in. Best to just ignore his attention seeking and self-destructive behavior. Judge for yourself at the incredibly stupid statement above after he has been ardently following and commenting on every post and thread on MoA, The Saker, Sonar21, Simplicius, smoothiex12, etc for the entirety of the SMO thus far.
Shadowbanned, Inka9….ish, rk, dh are just regular run of the mill trolls, welcome lads. Unfortunately, their game is pretty much low brow and there’s no intelligent rebuttals/retorts/riposte. Sigh!
Shadowbanned nuke nonsense is possibly to get this site labelled as an extremist blog, so is possibly dangerous to boot. Good on Ed to call out this particular scum.
Anyway, Chernihiv site – Ouch! What was the catch phrase again from that 70s show Fantasy Island? The Pain! The Pain…?
Will there be a big arrow push? Is there anyone left to hold down the 404 fort?
Or will Chinese flavoured Death by a Thousand Cuts process continue….., grab the pop corns, your favorite beverage and stay tuned.
Cheers

Posted by: Suresh | Aug 20 2023 6:08 utc | 241

Posted by: shаdοwbanned | Aug 20 2023 4:57 utc | 228

“I wanted to draw attention to the fact that we are armed withThere are also cluster munitions. So far, for humanitarian reasons, we have refrained from using them. However, this decision can be reconsidered,” S. Shoigu said the day before yesterday.

I predicted this would happen several threads back.
It’s the primary reason why the use of cluster munitions by the AFU was a stupid idea: Because nothing stops Shoigu from returning the favour.
Just like nothing stopped Shoigu from using drones once Ukraine set the trend.
The smarter thing to do would be to adopt weapons the Russians have no access to or equivalents (if they can find them)
Triggering an arms race is never a good idea.

Posted by: Arch Bungle | Aug 20 2023 6:14 utc | 242

That’s wishful thinking. If that was in the cards it’d happened a year ago.
Posted by: Tichy | Aug 20 2023 4:07 utc | 221

It’s not wishful thinking, it’s a prediction. I didn’t say what I wish would happen, just what I think will happen. I might wish I had a billion dollars and ten supermodel girlfriends, but I wouldn’t predict this will happen šŸ™‚
It’s impossible to say what would have happened if the Russian general staff had done something differently in the past – you can’t change the past. It’s easy to see if a prediction comes true. That’s why predictions are more interesting.

Posted by: Contrarian_Ed | Aug 20 2023 6:19 utc | 243

Posted by: shаdοwbanned | Aug 20 2023 4:56 utc | 227

If you actually spend some time reading Russian military experts,

But I have you, dear shadowbanned.

RU has a dire shortage of strategic bombers.

If the shortage is as dire as you claim (and I think you’re full of shit) RU is already up shit creek.
If the part of the bomber force is within reach of the AFU/NATO and not sheltered in the Russian East, they’re being stupid.

All these fancy hypersonic missiles are useless if you have nothing to launch them from.

They’re pretty useless if you need something to launch them from and they can’t be treated like ICBMs in hardened launch facilities, or they can’t be launched from subs or carriers or corvettes.

That includes, and is in fact especially important, for the upcoming very-long range hypersonic missile.
This is a massive issue, and only morons who have no clue what they are talking about will just gloss over it.

You’re just another drama queen. I’m pretty sure now.

Posted by: Arch Bungle | Aug 20 2023 6:20 utc | 244

@ASensibleMan | Aug 20 2023 0:54 utc | 168

ā€œReminds me of how right wing attacks would call the same person Communist and Fascist.ā€
Well considering that in the 21st century both of these labels are totally meaningless leftovers from a distant past, then yeah, they might as well apply to the same person. Neither means anything at all. Some people need to shake off their 1960s paradigms. There have been zero fascists or communists for several decades at least. Move on, boomer.

Thanks for that post. Although in my opinion fascism exists, I have been meaning to say something along these lines for some time. Being stuck in 20th century ideologies is as pointless as applying WWII war tactics in Ukraine. This endless talk about “Marxism” and what have you is boring. We need to base discussions on today’s realities when fighting the extremists in power, whether they call themselves red, green or blue or something else. You recognize the extremists by their hunger for war and disregard for the common man. People in the west are besieged by their own power elites.

Posted by: Norwegian | Aug 20 2023 6:26 utc | 245

In the end, whatever we post in the MoA threads isn’t going to affect decision-makers. It is just that I do not desire to create a faulted picture of their options and reasoning about decisions on past, present and future developments.
Posted by: Constantine | Aug 20 2023 4:16 utc | 222

You’re quite right that postings here have no effect at all on decision-makers.
It’s fun to discuss what might have happened if decision-makers had done something differently in the past, just as counter-factual SciFi is kind of fun. However, this is a fools errand, since the decision-makers knew things that people in this forum couldn’t ever know.
Predicting future events, and then being held to account for these predictions, is more fun – and only the brave dare to do this šŸ™‚

Posted by: Contrarian_Ed | Aug 20 2023 6:27 utc | 246

@karlof1 | Aug 20 2023 1:05 utc | 173

ASensibleMan | Aug 20 2023 0:54 utc | 168–
Quite the Orwellian moniker for the nonsensical comment proffered.

I respectfully disagree that his comment is nonsensical and I do not see anything Orwellian in being a sensible man.

Posted by: Norwegian | Aug 20 2023 6:32 utc | 247

Posted by: Contrarian_Ed | Aug 20 2023 6:27 utc | 245

Predicting future events, and then being held to account for these predictions, is more fun – and only the brave dare to do this šŸ™‚

Speaking of which, here are mine from last year:

Posted by: nrg-2u | Oct 9 2022 13:46 utc | 14
… five weeks from now?
1. In about four weeks the bulk of the newly mobilised Russian forces will be trained in the process of mass deployment to the front lines. These will be the reserves who’ve gone on refresher training. This will drive a rapid retreat of the AFU forces in the direction of Odessa.
2. Within five weeks the AFU forces currently on the frontlines of Donetsk, Zaporozhye and Karkhov will be decimated and driven back to defend Odessa. The offensive on Odessa will be in the early stages of initiation.
3. The EU will be experiencing extreme energy shortages for industry, increased mass protests due to rising energy costs and consequently increased political fractures among the states of the EU. Dozens of European manufacturing companies either declare bankruptcy, rescue sale or provide profit warnings.
4. Hungary and Serbia forced to toe the EU line on Russia under threat of complete gas cutoff, condemning Russia under EU duress.
5. Massive Ukrainian refugee influx into Europe, consequently spike in violent incidents between European citizens and refugees.
6. Collapse of the current UK government as Liz Truss and her sidekick Kwarteng are booted out of government as sacrificial lambs. New British puppets no better than the last are installed as the new sacrificial lambs.
7. War crimes charges brought against General Sergei Surovikhin at the International Court in the Hague due to the mass slaughter of AFU and NATO soldiers and claims of atrocities against Ukrainian civilians.
Posted by: Arch Bungle | Oct 9 2022 14:11 utc | 19

I’ll take my lashes like a man …

Posted by: Arch Bungle | Aug 20 2023 6:32 utc | 248

@Australian lady | Aug 20 2023 1:07 utc | 174

Lukashenko is Legend, he is The Man.
This interview with a Ukrainian woman journalist is brilliant strategy, and Russia owes Lukashenko a debt of gratitude. And I suspect the Global South holds the Belorussian leader in very high esteem.

I used to be bamboozled by the western propaganda against Belarus and Lukashenko in particular. His “Erdogan-like” flip-flopping until ~3 years ago didn’t help. Now, I agree he appears much more convincing and that interview was indeed brilliant.

Posted by: Norwegian | Aug 20 2023 6:39 utc | 249

@ASensibleMan | Aug 20 2023 0:54 utc | 168
ā€œReminds me of how right wing attacks would call the same person Communist and Fascist.ā€
Well considering that in the 21st century both of these labels are totally meaningless leftovers from a distant past, then yeah, they might as well apply to the same person. Neither means anything at all. Some people need to shake off their 1960s paradigms. There have been zero fascists or communists for several decades at least. Move on, boomer.
Thanks for that post. Although in my opinion fascism exists, I have been meaning to say something along these lines for some time. Being stuck in 20th century ideologies is as pointless as applying WWII war tactics in Ukraine. This endless talk about “Marxism” and what have you is boring. We need to base discussions on today’s realities when fighting the extremists in power, whether they call themselves red, green or blue or something else. You recognize the extremists by their hunger for war and disregard for the common man. People in the west are besieged by their own power elites.
Posted by: Norwegian | Aug 20 2023 6:26 utc | 244
As Karloff said, nonsensical. Correct and more polite than my description of you two blind boys.
Until Capitalism is superceded by a higher socioeconomic system, Marx and Marxists will be present. And as long as an effort to throw off capitalism exists, there will be Nazis provided to defend it.

Posted by: Ahenobarbus | Aug 20 2023 6:49 utc | 250

This is a massive issue, and only morons who have no clue what they are talking about will just gloss over it.
Posted by: shаdοwbanned | Aug 20 2023 4:56 utc | 227
You said the same thing about The Bolgorod incursion and the tiny drone over the Kremlin, and every other single tiny thing that happened.
Russia destroys about 3 – 4 multimillion dollar Ukrainian jets a week, but one unnamed Russian jet gets damaged, and you are talking like it was a Tupolev, or could have been, therefore Russia is doomed, and Putin is a traitor.

Posted by: UWDude | Aug 20 2023 6:52 utc | 251

Predicting future events, and then being held to account for these predictions, is more fun – and only the brave dare to do this šŸ™‚
Posted by: Contrarian_Ed | Aug 20 2023 6:27 utc | 245
True, but the only prediction that matters on this subject is whether Russia will accomplish its strategic objectives in Ukraine. Everything else is just wind.

Posted by: James M. | Aug 20 2023 6:54 utc | 252

Ukrainian drone hits civilians at Russian railway station – governor
Five people were injured in the early morning attack on the city of Kursk, according to Roman Starovoyt
Is it not funny how the Yes-men is declining in show? After 18 months of war the retards finally realize what a mess Russia is LOL?
Posted by: Where R D Yesmen? | Aug 20 2023 6:54 utc | 251
Lol
You think i care about five wounded Russians?
I know what is at stake.
Am I supposed to be crying, over a tiny drone strike? Why, because they are Russians?
Because this incident is the big Battle that list Russia the war?
It is truly pathetic you parade this non-event as some great triumph.
Ive read Southfront for eight years or so, almost daily.
Shit like this happened every fucking day, multiple times a day, in Syria, Yemen, Iraq, and the Donbass, for eight years. It is completely and utterly irrelevant, nit just in the large scheme of things, but also in the short term.
You are like a bum, holding a dollar up he found on the street, and telling everyone around him he told them hed be rich one day.
You are a joke.

Posted by: UWDude | Aug 20 2023 7:10 utc | 253

To you earlier fixation on the *big* planes at this rate Russia will indeed be (apparently) screwed in about 100 years, *if* they don’t build any new ones at all. However frankly no-one is building the big bombers the way they used to, they’re not as necessary nor cost-effective for their role which is now a shrinking niche.
Airforces like them for the same reason navies like aircraft carriers & big surface ships. They’re a guarantee of *big* bumper budgets & look impressive on display.
Posted by: Urban Fox | Aug 20 2023 6:00 utc | 237

Strategic bombers are right now a key method for delivering hypersonic strikes.
Sure, RU has subs, but those are slow to move and only carry a limited number of Zircons, and the Zircons have a more limited range. The new long-range hypersonic missile will be an ALCM, and will be carried by Tu-95s, Tu-160s and Tu-22Ms. Of which only new Tu-160s are built, and very slowly.
But the current fleet size is not enough for the kind of salvo the military would like to be able to launch. It is not me saying it, Russian military experts are saying it. So any airframe lost is in fact a big loss.
People need to get a grip on reality.
I was seeing the same kind of obliviousness when the A-50 was attacked in Belarus. I was explaining how Russia had a dire shortage of AWACS planes, and nobody wanted to listen. Since then we’ve seen numerous painful strikes, including the recent Kerch bridge attack, that happened precisely because while NATO has multiple AWACS planes watching everything 24/7, RU only gets them up from time to time and most of the airspace is not watched from above, resulting in UAVs and USVs (and now Storm Shadow ALCMs too) not being detected until it’s too late.
Russian military experts are bitterly complaining about this, but we have the geniuses here at MoA who know better.

Posted by: shаdοwbanned | Aug 20 2023 7:11 utc | 254

Canne see it myself. No proof it is the last reserve apart from the leaked documents and they were fantasy.
Simply can’t see the Russians charging across open fields because of drones & Cluster munitions.
They’ve left it too late anyway. How many weeks until the rains now?

Posted by: Echo Chamber | Aug 20 2023 7:13 utc | 255

@jared | Aug 20 2023 2:19 utc | 193

I dont feel any wish to defend Zaluzny, but I am left wondering at what is the motivation to lay blame with him – might just as well blame it on the dog.

The west blames Zaluzhnyi and Bodanov, probably because they are both dead. Mercouris is very careful and reports what the west is saying. Like us he doesn’t know 100% for sure the status of these men.
Mercouris does a stellar job btw.

Posted by: Norwegian | Aug 20 2023 7:14 utc | 256

Way I see it as are in for a stalemate winter of artillery duels. Wagner don’t have 50,000 prisoners to throw at anything this time around.

Posted by: Echo Chamber | Aug 20 2023 7:18 utc | 257

It’s boils down to contempt for the idea that central Ukrainians (as opposed to Galicians, who are even more distinct) are a distinct ethnic group. Not as distinct as Chechens and Tatars, but distinct enough that they resent denial of that distinctiveness as an insult to their honor, and men will fight to the death over such insults. You see this same attitude in this forum, in statements that Ukrainian language is same as Russian. As someone who knows both, and also knows Spanish, I can assure you they are as separate as Spanish and Italian. No Spaniard thinks he is just an Italian who can’t speak Italian properly and if you said that to the whole Spanish nation, you are asking for a fight.
Ukrainian language wasn’t imposed on central Ukraine. They always spoke that way in villages. They always dressed slightly different from great Russians, had slightly different customs, etc. Same as Tatars and Chechens are distinct, except Ukrainians are closer to great Russians in religion, language, customs and so can easily integrate into Russia.

Current Ukrainian language very much was imposed. There was a concerted effort to make it as distinct from Russian as possible, in fact continuing even now. There were also multiple Ukrainization campaigns, with the one in the 1920s being particularly repressive, as people were punished for not speaking Ukrainian at the time.
Also, they may have spoken a distinct dialect in the villages, but they certainly didn’t speak that in the major cities, and especially in Kharkov, the Donbass, Odessa, etc.. Those have always been 100% Russian. Kiev was 90%+ until very recently, and still is 80% Russian speaking (you see that in the videos when air defense is firing and people are cursing — in Russian).

Which is why taking Ukrainian territory was a bad idea from day 1. The goal should always have been demilitarization and regime change so that Ukraine becomes a Russian vassal/puppet, without giving Ukrainians motivation to fight by seizing terroritory and calling Ukraine a fake state.
Posted by: Revelo | Aug 20 2023 5:58 utc | 236

For the reasons listed above, there was never any choice but to take a lot of territory. And for other reasons, there was also never any choice but to take all the territory.

Posted by: shаdоwbаnnеd | Aug 20 2023 7:19 utc | 258

Your argument on the modernization may be valid (not sure about the scale you posted, but what the hell), but that is not an excuse for undertaking a difficult task with severe numerical inferiority. Again, having a major military exercise in the Far East, while the Kharkov offensive is on by the Ukro-Nazis and the mercenary forces had a very bitter taste to the populace to put it mildly. And that is without the emergence of the consequences to follow.

It was worse that than — there was the major exercise with 50,000 soldiers taking part (plus all the gear), and then there was Putin dedicating some Ferris wheel in Moscow right as Nazi death squads were moving in east of Kharkov and were starting to fill mass graves with the bodies of the civilians they murdered.

I would conclude with one more point that blows my mind. Why is it that the Russian authorities refer to the anti-Russian governments, media, commentators etc. as “pro-Ukrainian”? What sort of messed up mentality is this, that one would describe championship of the colonization of Ukraine and the (ab)use of its population as human cattle as a pro-Ukrainian stance? How the hell is the urging to the Ukrainians to commit national suicide a pro-Ukrainian position?
Posted by: Constantine | Aug 20 2023 3:35 utc | 215

Still to this day you see the word “partners” slipping in here and there. And it was a staple of their statements well into the war…

Posted by: shаdοwbanned | Aug 20 2023 7:27 utc | 259

Re: Posted by: Arch Bungle | Aug 20 2023 6:32 utc | 247

Posted by: Arch Bungle | Oct 9 2022 14:11 utc | 19
I’ll take my lashes like a man …

Nice to see you admit, in amongst all of your bloviating, that you have no idea what you’re talking about.
I’m sure I told you at the time most of your predictions would be wrong – but well done, you correctly predicted that knave Liz Truss would be deposed – probably the stupidest UK Prime Minister of all time – so not a hard prediction!!
I’ll give everyone a prediction I’ve made before – there will be absolutely no big Russian offensive this side of the Russian Presidential Election – there is simply absolutely no indication Russia is planning any sort of offensive anytime soon.
So at the earliest we are looking at a Russian offensive in May/June 2024 – Spring/Summer 2024.
If not then, I doubt there will be one at all.

Posted by: Julian | Aug 20 2023 7:34 utc | 260

Ignoring the leaked documents.
When Russia pulled back from the North and South. Ukraine had 70,000 in the North and what was in the South was moved to the East. After Bakhmut fell they had accumulated 70,000 to the North of Bakhmut.
It was said 50,000 were left in the north. 70,000 were at the North of Bakhmut and then you had the 60,000 in the South. Before the offensive started. Which didn’t include the new reserves that were trained in the West.
Which at a guess was 250k before the start of the offensive. They have lost coming up to 50,000 since the start of the offensive. That still leaves around 200k with constant mobilisation taking place and being extended for another 3 months. Nobody knows for sure how many NATO troops and how many of 300k poles are added to that.
Just can’t see it ending anytime soon. Stalemate winter will help them regroup even more.

Posted by: Echo Chamber | Aug 20 2023 7:36 utc | 261

You think i care about five wounded Russians?
Am I supposed to be crying, over a tiny drone strike? Why, because they are Russians?

The five wounded Russians very much care though.
As does everyone else in Kursk, Bryansk and Belgorod, who know that it can happen to them too at any moment.

Because this incident is the big Battle that list Russia the war?
It is truly pathetic you parade this non-event as some great triumph.
Ive read Southfront for eight years or so, almost daily.
Shit like this happened every fucking day, multiple times a day, in Syria, Yemen, Iraq, and the Donbass, for eight years. It is completely and utterly irrelevant, nit just in the large scheme of things, but also in the short term.
Posted by: UWDude | Aug 20 2023 7:10 utc | 253

So Russia, a nuclear superpower, is now on the level of Syria and Yemen, i.e. its civilians will be bombed daily with impunity while the leadership doesn’t care to lift a finger to stop it? Which, unlike those other places, they can do within days of deciding to stop it.
P.S. Let’s recall that the whole border area started being shelled daily once the “goodwill gesture” of March-April 2022 was carried out. At the time people thought this will not be allowed by the Kremlin and all hell will break loose once pre-war Russian territory is shelled. But nothing happened, and the border regions have been shelled daily ever since. But who cares about some babushkas in villages, right?
Well, in late May 2023 a whole city of 50,000 people — Shebekino — was systematically destroyed by the AFU, with deliberate large-scale artillerry and MLRS strikes at the civilian buildings. The city had to be evacuated, and to this day normal life has not returned there.
The Kremlin didn’t lift a finger to stop it then either.
Now it’s daily drone attacks on the major cities close to Ukraine as well as even Moscow.
Once again, the Kremlin is pretending it is not happening.
Why is it so hard to see the trajectory of where things are headed?

Posted by: shаdοwbanned | Aug 20 2023 7:37 utc | 262

@Contrarian_Ed | Aug 20 2023 3:59 utc | 219
Good post. I agree there is too much talk about the past. In the present active situation the immediate future and beyond is what should be in focus. Extensive historic analyses can come later.
I commend you for making a prediction about future destruction the 750 KV electricity grid, because it is a falsifiable prediction and therefore honest. I tend to share your view that General Winter will win the Ukraine war. I hope so, we shall see.

Posted by: Norwegian | Aug 20 2023 7:37 utc | 263

Lots of cries in german media about the Tschernihiw attack.
Russia totally unprovoked and without reason attacks historic city center, brings pain and tears to peaceloving, unknowing people.
The spin seems to be to just leave out everything about the why and what.

Posted by: Ruediger | Aug 20 2023 7:38 utc | 264

@Tichy | Aug 20 2023 4:07 utc | 221

That’s wishful thinking. If that was in the cards it’d happened a year ago.

I disagree it is wishful thinking. I mean, I wish it to happen but I think it is realistic because the Kiev regime is largely demilitarized now, unlike a year ago. As we remember, major goals of the SMO were demilitarization and denazification.

Posted by: Norwegian | Aug 20 2023 7:41 utc | 265

KIA calculation: BBC calculated Russian losses and found 12.200 killed by the 23rd Jan. They assume the real number is at max 60% higher in reality.
This brings us to 12.200 + 60% is a total of 19.520 dead Russian soldiers in 11 months.
-> roughly 1780 per month
1/7 -> Ukraine
EU’s Ursula von der Leyen said 100.000 Ukrainian soldiers died by 30th November, basically in 9 months since Feb 24th.
That brings us to 11.100 people per month.
-> Roughly 6.25x times higher than Russian losses.
2/7 -> Germans intelligence (BND)
To corroborate the high Ukrainian losses we have the German intelligence agency BND. They say losses are in three digit numbers daily.
And above, Ursula told us 11.100 per month, so divided by 30 days it is roughly 370 dead per day.
-> sounds about right
3/7 -> Ukrainian MoD
23rd Jan Ukraine’s MoD claimed to have killed 121.480 Russians.
Let’s take numbers from above:
– 11.100 dead Ukrainian soldiers monthly
– multiply by 11 months
= 122.000 KIA
-> Ukrainian MoD’s claim of 121.480 killed Russians is a self report on killed Ukrainians!
4/7 -> bonus
They project a lot, but that they self report their losses as killed Russians is weird.
5/7 -> Wagner bonus: Daily Express on
PS: That BBC article is tough to find and needs translation, so before you start calling this fake news, here it is:
https://www.bbc.com/russian/features-64377659
“Roughly 43.000 Russian mercenary fighters of the Wagner Group have either been ā€˜killed, gone missing or deserted’ the frontline, the head of a Russian NGO protecting the rights of convicts has claimed.ā€
-> Let’s compare this to BBC’s numbers
6/7 -> BBC on Wagner
So far BBC identified 450 dead Wagner soldiers.
I am not sure how to extrapolate, but the Daily Express claims 43.000. That means BBC is off by 95 times, what is impossible.
-> So Wagner is not sending human waves after all? … Or these waves are super efficient?
7/7
https://twitter.com/MyLordBebo/status/1617954398830989312

Posted by: unimperator | Aug 20 2023 7:43 utc | 266

This is an interview published yesterday on one of the pro Ukraine mainstream papers in Italy “Il Messaggero”. The guy was the former chief analyst at SISDE (Italian MI5 eqiv.), now university professor in Rome. The narrative is changing widely across the western media.
Friday 18 August 2023
Ukraine, the former SISDE analyst: «The secret services know that Kiev cannot win. The war will end with a Korean scenario»
Alfredo Mantici: «The US 007 dossier is a message to Ukraine. The intelligence presses for mediation »
https://www-ilmessaggero-it.translate.goog/mondo/guerra_ucraina_chi_vince_russia_servizi_segreti_scenario_coreano-7581952.html?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en-US&_x_tr_pto=wapp&refresh_ce

A bath in reality and a change of strategy, which pass through the “tips” of 007 to the media. Messages directed on the one hand to the White House, on the other to Western public opinion. Thus Alfredo Mantici, former head of analysts at SISDE and now professor of Intelligence at the Unit in Rome, interprets the latest releases in the American press regarding the war scenarios in Ukraine, from the distrust of the US secret services in the effectiveness of the Kiev counteroffensive to exorbitant number (half a million) of Russian and Ukrainian dead and wounded, passing through the proposal made by the NATO chief of staff to grant Ukraine entry into the Alliance in exchange for a ceasefire and the start of negotiations with Moscow. Ā«The problem – says Mantici – is that we live in a condition of information warfareĀ».
And what does this mean?
Ā«That on the one hand information is functional in supporting the cause of the good guys against the bad guys, on the other hand it is functional in supporting the politics of those who support the good guys against the bad guys. However, every day the intelligence and military structures, and then also the media, are also confronted with reality. For over a year and a half we were told that the Russian army was weak and that Putin was crazy and finished, as if Ukraine had now achieved victory. I have already won a dinner with an illustrious historian who telephoned me on the day of Wagner and Prigozhin’s march on Moscow to say that Putin was at the end of the lineĀ».
And instead?
«Instead, the time has come to confront reality, the one that Intelligence knows well, and test the reactions of public opinion to a truth that is not the one told by propaganda.
The chief of staff of the NATO secretary general a few days ago said what he said about the start of negotiations. The reaction with official denial was immediate, the poor fellow was cornered and forced into an embarrassing retreat for a technician of that levelĀ».
What is reality?
Ā«The Ukrainians will never win the war, they will never regain all the lost territories, and this feeling is starting to make its way not only on a technical level, but also on a political level. Then you call your journalist friend who lends himself to divulging the so-called “plausible deniability”, or plausible denial (the possibility of denying something that has been said or done by third parties for which you are responsible, ed). Through anonymous sources, Western public opinion is starting to digest the idea that this war will not end with the fall of Putin or with the triumphal march of the Ukrainian army in Red Square”.
And how will it end?
ā€œWith a Korean scenario, a war frozen along a ceasefire streak, maybe for 70-80 years. In my opinion, Putin did not want to invade all of Ukraine, he would not have employed 160,000 men if for the city of Berlin alone Stalin deployed 200,000 and for Czechoslovakia, in 1968, they were 800,000. Putin wanted Donbass and Mariupol, land connection with Crimea. It’s time to be realistic. Ukraine does not have enough men to regain what it has lost. Resisting to the last man makes no sense, just as attacking Bakhmut did not, as US intelligence has underlined. To attack, the proportion must not be equal but, as everyone knows, at least 3 against one. The reality of a war is like pregnancy, beyond a certain limit it cannot be hiddenĀ»

related articles
https://www-ilmessaggero-it.translate.goog/mondo/guerra_ucraina_controffensiva_fallita_dossier_007_stati_uniti-7581964.html?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en-US&_x_tr_pto=wapp&refresh_ce
https://www-ilmessaggero-it.translate.goog/mondo/guerra_ucraina_controffensiva_obiettivi_non_raggiungera_melitopol_rivelazione_intelligence_americana-7581449.html?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en-US&_x_tr_pto=wapp&refresh_ce

Posted by: Lavrov’s Dog | Aug 20 2023 7:44 utc | 267

@Ed | Aug 19 2023 22:48 utc | 118
Thank you, also for the link! I will toss that around my liberalist “friends” when they regurgitate pro-empire propaganda again.
And I wasn’t trying to imply that the first Gulf War was better, just that the propaganda in regard to this specific war hasn’t been refuted by the majority of the general populace yet.
It’s funny how this tendency to double down with ever more absurd propaganda can already be seen here. The justification for war could have been something like “Saddam is a bad guy and he is waging war against his neighbours and murdering his own minorities”, because he was doing all of that with the express compliance and assistance and permission of the West! So instead of him being a bad guy for waging war against Iran for eight years, it had to be because he moved against little Kuwait and killed babies in incubators *wink* *wink*.

Posted by: Roland | Aug 20 2023 7:48 utc | 268

@Constantine | Aug 20 2023 4:27 utc | 224

In the case of Ukraine, this surreal, manipulative terminology benefits only the very people who are implacably anti-Russian and have nothing but callous contempt for the Ukrainians.

It is a good point and it is precisely this kind of Orwellian Newspeak we need to learn to recognize. The western Orwellian propaganda is very powerful and it needs to be called out. In a way it isn’t very sophisticated, because you can just read ‘1984’ to understand how it works.

Posted by: Norwegian | Aug 20 2023 7:48 utc | 269

Posted by: Lavrov’s Dog | Aug 20 2023 7:44 utc | 266
Yeah, they are trying to “test” the truth with the western audience alright. But the problem again is, RU isn’t going to play ball with them of granting any ceasefire, so what’s the point of perception management or telling the truth in the west?
MSM is now hyping up drone attacks in Russia. They are very quiet of actual events taking place in Kozachi Laheri, Piyatikhatki, Robotyne, Andryivka, Kleschevka, or Kupyansk, which are what actually matter. Instead they hype up a drone flying onto some building hundreds of kilometers away.

Posted by: unimperator | Aug 20 2023 7:53 utc | 270

Posted by: Julian | Aug 20 2023 7:34 utc | 259

I’m sure I told you

Who are you again?

at the time most of your predictions would be wrong

2.5 out of 7 is not ‘most’. You must be a Brit.

– but well done, you correctly predicted that knave Liz Truss would be deposed – probably the stupidest UK Prime Minister of all time – so not a hard prediction!!

On the contrary the stupidest tend to hang on way past their sell by date. The recent crop included.

I’ll give everyone a prediction I’ve made before – there will be absolutely no big Russian offensive this side of the Russian Presidential Election

And in other news water is wet.

– there is simply absolutely no indication Russia is planning any sort of offensive anytime soon.

Predicted by everyone and his pet hamster. Either way, regardless of ‘indications’ you’d have no visibility into them. Those indications would be well concealed within the operational veil of the RF.

So at the earliest we are looking at a Russian offensive in May/June 2024 – Spring/Summer 2024.

About a dozen people on YouTube have thrown this one out.

If not then, I doubt there will be one at all.

This one’s bound to be wrong.

Posted by: Arch Bungle | Aug 20 2023 7:57 utc | 271

Yet, once again, you jump in the defense of the hapless Russian president who is unjustly maligned. Well, who bears responsibility for the fact that there were hardly any Russian forces by the end of August in Ukraine. Who should have been aware that NATO intelligence would expose such weaknesses to the proxy regime. Who should be careful about public declarations about Kherson, when the danger of the city being abandoned was real?
Posted by: Constantine | Aug 20 2023 2:00 utc | 188
I am calling BS on this poster. Taken up way too many comments here and always with a deflection to a different halfcocked argument to bait someone else in, like many of the trolls do.

Posted by: Suresh | Aug 20 2023 8:00 utc | 272

Here Are Three Ways to End the War in Ukraine. One Might Actually Work.
Putin has a veto over two endgames for Ukraine. But there’s a third that would bypass him.
https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2023/08/18/how-to-end-ukraine-war-00111752
Quote

While Ukraine is passing a law prohibiting territorial concessions, the United States believes that the division of Ukraine would be an end to the conflict that suits everyone.
Politico publishes the opinion of former Democratic Congressman and former Assistant Secretary of State Tom Malinowski, who supports the option of ceding territories to Russia and accepting Ukraine-controlled lands into NATO.
In his opinion, a war before the victory of Ukraine or negotiations with the Russian Federation are either not achievable for several years, or do not meet the interests of the West and Kyiv.
There are several steps in the scenario that Malinowski describes:
ā—½ļøThe United States will give Ukraine everything to advance as far as possible in the counteroffensive.
ā—½ļøNext year (maximum until June) Ukraine will announce a pause in the offensive and shift its attention to the defense of occupied territories.
ā—½ļøAt the NATO summit in July 2024, Ukraine will be offered to join the Alliance – “guaranteeing the security of all territory controlled by the Ukrainian government at that time.”
ā—½ļøAt the same time, the author makes it clear that the Alliance will not participate in further independent actions of the Armed Forces of Ukraine.
According to him, such a scheme “would be akin to accepting a divided Germany into NATO after World War II and an American security pact with South Korea after the armistice that ended the Korean War.”

“If the mountain won’t come to Muhammad, Muhammad must go to the mountain”

Posted by: Lavrov’s Dog | Aug 20 2023 8:02 utc | 273

Why is it that the Russian authorities refer to the anti-Russian governments, media, commentators etc. as “pro-Ukrainian”? … How the hell is the urging to the Ukrainians to commit national suicide a pro-Ukrainian position?
I understand why the western liberals would opt for this self-description, but what is the excuse of the Russian authorities and the country’s media? It goes without saying that this terminology and labeling has been adopted by the pro-Russian folks and it is simly harmful and downright wrong. I mean who would describe the takeover of Mexico by a foreign power, its transformation to a colony and its use as a sacrificial battering ram against the US a “pro-Mexican” stance?
Posted by: Constantine | Aug 20 2023 3:35 utc | 215

A flawed comparison, better try comparing the current situation with Texas being converted into an anti-American ram by promices of independancy and foreign merks with foreign weapons supolies. Killing foreign mercs will be pro-American, supplying weapons will be called pro-Texan.

Posted by: Poslan1 | Aug 20 2023 8:03 utc | 274

@Arch Bungle | Aug 20 2023 6:32 utc | 247

I’ll take my lashes like a man …

Well done posting that. It is like the scientific method, even of your hypothesis is proven wrong it is still science, because it is falsifiable.
Now we have the chance to learn from those predictions and make better ones for the future.

Posted by: Norwegian | Aug 20 2023 8:08 utc | 275

P.S. Let’s recall that the whole border area started being shelled daily once the “goodwill gesture” of March-April 2022 was
-shadowbanned
I told your pathetic sock account, I read Southfront almost religiously for eight years, which reports every tiny incident you lose your shit about, and have done so for EIGHT YEARS.
Shit like your pathetic sock account gloating about, happened ALL the time in the Donbass, for EIGHT YEARS.
A house fire is really significant to the house owners, a car accident is tragic, a shelling of a house is tragic, cancer is tragic to those it happens to.. but for the rest of the world, it is irrelevant.
And your sttempts to make every tiny incident into the end of Russia, is pathetic… Just like your sock, a joke.

Posted by: UWDude | Aug 20 2023 8:11 utc | 276

Revelo | Aug 20 2023 5:58 utc | 236

Which is why taking Ukrainian territory was a bad idea from day 1. The goal should always have been demilitarization and regime change so that Ukraine becomes a Russian vassal/puppet, without giving Ukrainians motivation to fight by seizing terroritory and calling Ukraine a fake state.

I believe that was the plan on day 1. Entering Ukrainian territory with ~125k troops supplemented with ~25k LDPR militiamen, PMCs etc was a clear signal to the UAF that Russian patience was at an end with the Maidan regime, but also that Russia had no intention of occupying Ukraine or laying claim to its territory beyond the independence of the LDPR. Had the UAFs desire for self-preservation won out and led to negotiations to remove the Banderites from power, Ukraine could have found a place in the Union State with its territory and independence largely intact.
I guess it will be many years before we learn how close this scenario was to playing out. Instead the UAF chose prolonged agony and becoming a mere appendage of NATO, doomed to watch helplessly as the Poles grab back their ‘historic lands’ in the west and Ukraine’s inheritance from the Soviet Union is flogged of to Blackrock et al.

Posted by: S.P. Korolev | Aug 20 2023 8:11 utc | 277

ā—½ļøNext year (maximum until June) Ukraine will announce a pause in the offensive and shift its attention to the defense of occupied territories.
ā—½ļøAt the NATO summit in July 2024, Ukraine will be offered to join the Alliance – “guaranteeing the security of all territory controlled by the Ukrainian government at that time.”
ā—½ļøAt the same time, the author makes it clear that the Alliance will not participate in further independent actions of the Armed Forces of Ukraine.
According to him, such a scheme “would be akin to accepting a divided Germany into NATO after World War II and an American security pact with South Korea after the armistice that ended the Korean War.”

That seems to be a de-facto suicide of Nato, if Russia decides to not honor this self-proclaimed acceptation of part of Ukraine in Nato.
So at that point, some time in next year the front may have already moved across the west of Dnepr and RU will focus more attacks on the areas self-proclaimed as part of Nato.

Posted by: unimperator | Aug 20 2023 8:14 utc | 278

Posted by: UWDude | Aug 19 2023 15:44 utc | 18
this incident is just another proof of the west’s mendacious behavior
however,it is not surprising at all and southfront was obviously prepared for it
( see new URL )

https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/jy0126
Treasury Escalates Sanctions Against the Russian Government’s Attempts to Influence U.S. Elections
https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/jy0628
Treasury Sanctions Russians Bankrolling Putin and Russia-Backed Influence Actors

i have read southfront for many years, but because of the bad quality it became
less and less over the years
the last coffin nail was an article from 12.05.2023 :
– fake news about “First German Leopard Main Battle Tank Destroyed”
– although the article is from 12.05., it is written there :

On May 13… the reports were confirmed by Russian military reporters,
who revealed an important detail provided by their sources from the military units deployed on these front lines….

@ karlof1 | Aug 20 2023 1:04 utc | 171
i don’t think we should equate the two things ( southfront and shadowstats )

Posted by: ghiwen | Aug 20 2023 8:18 utc | 279

Posted by: unimperator | Aug 20 2023 8:14 utc | 277
Just saying, these schemes were you can “be in Nato” while actually “not being in Nato” is basically rendering the entire Nato structure irrelevant. Of course the eurovassals might not care, but the rest of the world will see it easily.
Sinking into more complex schemes that avoid having to actually fulfill stated obligations is a sign of weakness and non-determination, and ultimately lead to Nato disintegration, IMHO.

Posted by: unimperator | Aug 20 2023 8:18 utc | 280

@Lavrov’s Dog | Aug 20 2023 8:02 utc | 272

ā—½ļøAt the same time, the author makes it clear that the Alliance will not participate in further independent actions of the Armed Forces of Ukraine.

So, to be allowed into NATO they first have to prove they don’t need NATO. This is irrational thinking.
The main question isn’t whether any remnant of Ukraine will enter NATO, but whether there is any remnant of NATO left when this armed conflict is over.

Posted by: Norwegian | Aug 20 2023 8:27 utc | 281

Posted by: Carlos Marques | Aug 19 2023 15:32 utc | 12

What plan? No one knows.

Especially you.

All attempts to predict the future events are a waste of time.

Wasting of time is big business, highly productive.

How can Russia reach Kherson again if they’re not even able to defeat the UkraNazi tiny bridgehead near the Antonovsky bridge in one of the Dniepr’s islands supposedly controlled by Russia?

It’s clear you are very ‘concerned’ about Russia, your ‘concern’ is noted, keep being ‘concerned’ and raise your ‘concern’s with long posts that waste your time.

Posted by: Johan Kaspar | Aug 20 2023 8:28 utc | 282

Posted by: Lavrov’s Dog | Aug 20 2023 7:44 utc | 266
Sorry to keep repeating myself but, if only in retrospect, it should be obvious to us all that Ukrainians, all along, have been given just enough for them to hope but not enough to ā€œwinā€, this has been as good as flat out stated in public with remarks from US officials along the lines of ā€œto the last Ukrainianā€ and ā€œneither side can achieve its goalsā€. RAND’s options for ā€œimposing costsā€, Barry Posen’s 1994 ā€œA Defense Concept for Ukraineā€ lay it out.
Ukrainian forces cannot advance across open ground without the equipment necessary to cut a hole in RF drone surveillance. Who knew this beforehand and went along with the whole scheme anyway, who now doesn’t understand it?
Western strategists wanted to depopulate Ukraine, kill Russians, waste Russian resources / potential … they’ve succeeded. The sanctions didn’t work, have blown back for the most part, significant faults have appeared, might widen, but still ….
A lot of this more ā€œrealisticā€ stuff quietly being introduced into the MSM is just rationalising outcomes that are probably within the margin of error if you look at the strategy documents mentioned above.
How the political-economic factors stand globally and where things go from here is another matter.

Posted by: anon2020 | Aug 20 2023 8:32 utc | 283

Thanks for the additional reporting on this latest missile strike on the drone exhibition at the Chernihiv theatre. For people working in the security sector these clowns sure messed up by releasing details of the event a few hours ahead of time. A drone expo in the current context is clearly judged as a legitimate target by the Russian MoD. The clowns also failed to clear the area of civilians and it is tragic that children were amongst the casualties.
It’s interesting how the corporate media contextualised this. Tass who are ā€˜media partner’ of this type of military equipment expo in the RF, ran prominent stories of drone attacks by UAF inside Russia. Pin pricks maybe, but highlighted as justification for the retaliatory strike. BBC ran headline ā€œSeven dead, 144 injured in strike on Ukrainian theatreā€. Relatively few people will read the story, which does mention there was a drone exhibition and has claims from the mayor that this is a ā€œwar crimeā€.
At this stage even the lobotomised readership of BBC news long since lost interest in Ukraine. Ukraine war stories never get higher than number 9 in the BBCs ā€˜Top Ten’ articles. Amongst ever rising prices, the destruction of UK healthcare, transport and education due to 40+ years of neo-liberal economic policy the UK public have no time for the misery of Ukraine. Even those who took in Ukrainian refugees want to get them out of their house, ā€œShe just speaks Russian, she can’t speak Englishā€. The BBC headline cynically takes advantage of the fact most people will not bother to click on the story, but the headline will register in the propagandised minds of UK public as if this were a normal ā€˜west-end’ theatre attacked by the ā€˜evil Russians’. This non-stop propaganda is amazingly effective at suppressing opposition to the NATO war machine.

Posted by: Lev Davidovich | Aug 20 2023 8:41 utc | 284

The name “southfront.org” has been dropped from the internet. To me, this is similar to the seizing of the dollar deposits of the Russian national bank. What was a technical matter – in one case of the internet, in the other case of the banking system – now is politicized, and faith in the institution drops.
Calls to turn IANA into an international organization will only become stronger.
I’d like to note that Russia, as a country, is technically prepared for actions like this. Russia could make “southfront.org” work again, but only within the Russian internet.
This is because Russia has its own infrastructure, ready to take over the internet domain name system within Russia if needed. Once a year, the Russian internet is disconnected from the global internet for a few hours, just to check the Russian internet keeps working. This also means that, in case of color revolution, Russia can disconnect, but keep business within Russia working, and selectively add connectivity with other countries, say China.

Posted by: Passerby | Aug 20 2023 8:44 utc | 285

Speaking of drones I see that shadowbore has made a re-appearance. So far in this thread he hasn’t advocated a nuclear strike by Russian MoD, but the usual criticism of Russian leadership and insinuation of corruption / treason is present. As ever these claims are made without a single shred of evidence to support them. Of course proving his case is not important to shadowbore, his intent is to create smoke without fire; to raise the possibility of division within Russia and its institutions is the objective of his paymasters. As all media savvy occupants of this bar know very well, the information war is more important to western elites than the situation in the combat zone. Four posts every shift from shadowbore and 750 UAF KIA every day. That’s 187.5 Ukrainian soldiers killed per bullshit post by shadowbore, not that he or his paymasters care, as NATO ā€˜fight’ to the last Ukrainian.

Posted by: Lev Davidovich | Aug 20 2023 8:50 utc | 286

Posted by: Seneschal | Aug 19 2023 16:53 utc | 32

Russia is – we should not forget about that – a country which still is dominated by neoliberal economic thinking, even after Putin adjusted some of the gears. They calculate and plan on a moneysaving basis and therefore try to avoid high costs and losses.

So now neo-liberalism means calculating costs and losses and making economically sound decisions? I’ve heard and read defenders of neolib ideology all over the world but this is the first time that someone claims that ALL economic-concious thinking is neolib thinking. You’ve got to be the most extreme neolib walking the Earth.

This was one of the main reasons that Putin did not give the green light to take Donbass already in 2014 – he did not want to have to incorporate a declining, deficient region – or even to attack further parts of Ukraine (especially the territories of New Russia) as these regions were even worse off than Donbass.

Totally wrong. The Donbass was the best part of Ukraine in terms of economic output, lots of resources and industry, over 50% of pre-2014 coup Ukrainian GDP. See this post by The Dolphin.
https://www.moonofalabama.org/2023/04/ukraine-open-thread-2023-89/comments/page/2/ (Posted by: The Dolphin | Apr 12 2023 23:37 utc | 124).

Posted by: Johan Kaspar | Aug 20 2023 9:07 utc | 287

Putin should get major credit for not holding the civilian population of Ukraine hostage. Zelensky is a war criminal for using them as shields and staging fake war crimes. Saving bridges, transportation infrastructure and the electric network, after showing that it will not take much to wipe it all out is another act of restraint.
In the end of the day we all have to get along and live. West Ukraine, too. I have my own rather intuitive reactions when I am in Germany. I suppress them.
Posted by: Acco Hengst | Aug 20 2023 4:21 utc | 223
I hear what you say. In a way I even sympathize, but this war has started to blur the line between restraint, weakness and treason.

Posted by: Tichy | Aug 20 2023 9:15 utc | 288

@Passerby | Aug 20 2023 8:44 utc | 284
I think natostan will disconnect from internet first, make it local and fully controlled. Mail encryption ban in EU is coming. The social credit score is also coming. They all love Xi’s firewall and methods. Xi and his friend Klaus have been testing various methods in China and now it seems the experiments are over and they’re ready to expand everywhere.

Posted by: rk | Aug 20 2023 9:17 utc | 289

Posted by: Norwegian | Aug 19 2023 17:25 utc | 39

Medvedev writes they will have to take it all:

I agree with Medvedev (which btw derives from the Russian for Bear, MеГвеГь).
It’s what I have been saying here, that the West is the least motivated of the three parties in this war, so they will be the first to abandon the project and cut losses. The Ukraine will be the new Vietnam-Afghanistan, under control of the forces that the USA tried to destroy after inmense yet unproductive effort.

Posted by: Johan Kaspar | Aug 20 2023 9:18 utc | 290

This guy’s full of shit. He’s using this fake Marxist concern ploy to push the imperial line.
Posted by: Ahenobarbus | Aug 20 2023 5:28 utc | 232
You may think whatever you want, but exactly which “imperial line” am I pushing? I’m getting confused here. Remember, you’re just talking to a lowly prole here.

Posted by: Tichy | Aug 20 2023 9:23 utc | 291

I hear what you say. In a way I even sympathize, but this war has started to blur the line between restraint, weakness and treason.
Posted by: Tichy | Aug 20 2023 9:15 utc | 287

Not taking out the bridges and not disabling the railways has killed a lot more Ukrainians than it has saved.
And no, that wasn’t just Banderites — press ganging of cannon fodder has been most intensive among the Russian population in Ukraine.
Then of course we have the obvious fact that taking out the Ukrainian leadership, who are all certified war criminals at this point, has zero effect on Ukrainian civilians, thus concerns about the latter have absolutely no relevance to the question why the former have not been taken out.

Posted by: shаdοwbanned | Aug 20 2023 9:23 utc | 292

And no, that wasn’t just Banderites — press ganging of cannon fodder has been most intensive among the Russian population in Ukraine.
Posted by: shаdοwbanned | Aug 20 2023 9:23 utc | 291
This I am fully aware of and it amounts to ethnic cleansing.
If I were to try to explain which line I TRY to follow, with variable success, it’s the line of Marxism-Leninism with an appreciation of the Three Worlds Theory of the Communist Party of China at to how to construct alliances against the imperialist superpower/s.

Posted by: Tichy | Aug 20 2023 9:28 utc | 293

šŸ‡·šŸ‡ŗšŸš€šŸ‡ŗšŸ‡¦šŸ“ā€ā˜ ļø More than 200 operators of combat UAVs were in the drama theater in Chernihiv during the missile attack.
Apparently, most of them are now on courses with Bandera.

https://t.me/ZandVchannel/75943

Posted by: Norwegian | Aug 20 2023 9:29 utc | 294

Posted by: karlof1 | Aug 19 2023 18:39 utc | 67

The usual disclaimer of not knowing what Russia actually has planned is warranted; the above currently being my best guess.

Thanks, that sounds realistic.
Only this bit:

Zelensky and his NATONazis, a la Hitler, won’t capitulate politically.

seems to me to be wrong. According to character, Zelensky will run to safety like the Afghan puppet did when the SHTF. The fascists on the other hand, ended up surrendering in Mariupol despite strident shouts of heroic fight to the death. So the prospect of political capitulation of Ukrainian state people has a higher chance than you anticipate, IMO.

Posted by: Johan Kaspar | Aug 20 2023 9:35 utc | 295

I disagree it is wishful thinking. I mean, I wish it to happen but I think it is realistic because the Kiev regime is largely demilitarized now, unlike a year ago. As we remember, major goals of the SMO were demilitarization and denazification.
Posted by: Norwegian | Aug 20 2023 7:41 utc | 264
Don’t get me wrong, I wish it’ll happen too, preferably yesterday.

Posted by: Tichy | Aug 20 2023 9:35 utc | 296

Posted by: Contrarian_Ed | Aug 20 2023 3:59 utc | 219 “Russia will destroy the 750 KV electricity grid”
That would be the 2023/2024 winter? So by April 1, 2024?

Posted by: Ed4 | Aug 20 2023 9:45 utc | 297

Posted by: Tichy | Aug 20 2023 9:15 utc | 287 “. Saving bridges, transportation infrastructure and the electric network, after showing that it will not take much to wipe it all out is another act of restraint.”
I’ll point out that “Posted by: Contrarian_Ed | Aug 20 2023 3:59 utc | 219 “Russia will destroy the 750 KV electricity grid”
Russia has attacked bridges multiple times. In the some cases the same bridge multiple times. Check out the Zatoka Bridge. Hit by air and sea. Russia pounded the electrical network for months.
Maybe this is all harder than it looks?

Posted by: Ed4 | Aug 20 2023 9:50 utc | 298

P.S. Speaking of Lisichansk, something else that has been forgotten needs to be pointed out again and again — the rate of advance slowed down after the initial February-March rush, but it was still steady in May and June 2020. Severodonetsk and Lisichansk were taken actually quite quickly and in the grand scheme of things painlessly.
There has been none of that since then, despite the mobilization. And despite the annihilation of several Ukrainian armies since the SMO start. What changed and why are people blissfully oblivious to the fact that it has changed?
Posted by: shаdοwbanned | Aug 20 2023 2:48 utc | 202
A very good question worthy a proper analysis.
Some thoughts to get started:
– after Lisichansk, there was the Ukrainian offensive. Arguably successful because Russia had neglected the defense in the newly occupied territories, and spread its army too thin. Took a while, and a lot of soldiers, to fix that.
– Ukraine, on the other hand, seems to be very good a building and staffing defenses. Evan after Bakmut, Russia did not try to proceed any further. In the current offensive, Ukraine is progressing very slowly, but they are progressing. Russian counters are successful only if they immediately follow Ukrainian advances.
– After the Ukrainian offensive, Winter never happened. The ground should have been sufficiently frozen for Tanks to roll on it for several months in the winter. This year, it wasn’t. Delaysed Ukraine’s offensive, too.
– Right now, Russia is in a comfortable position that Hordes of Ukrainians are storming into the traps Russia had built over the past 12 months. Russian soldiers are dug in comfortably and just watch the enemy die. Why give up that nice position and advance into open fields, where the positions are reversed – dug in Ukrainians taking pot shots at vulnerable Russians?
– a few weeks ago, President Biden ordered the shipment of cluster ammo on the grounds that both Ukraine and USA/NATO are out of regular artillery ammunition. Much better to wait for Ukraine to stop shooting and start attacking them then when they are out of rockets.

Posted by: Marvin | Aug 20 2023 9:57 utc | 299

Maybe this is all harder than it looks?
Posted by: Ed4 | Aug 20 2023 9:50 utc | 297
Maybe? I’m no military expert. I’m just a frustrated leftie thirsting for Ukrainian fascist blood. Oh, and that’d be a defining trait of a “Marxist,” by the way. Not mincing words. Compare Lenin – “Red Terror.”
Maybe that’s why shadowbanned is calling for tactical nukes? Believing that conventional weaponry would not be enough? Is that correctly understood?

Posted by: Tichy | Aug 20 2023 10:01 utc | 300