|
The MoA Week In Review – (Not Ukraine) OT 2023-138
Last week's post on Moon of Alabama:
— Other issues:
Picture story of the week:
 bigger
Mixed:
Economy:
Censorship:
Middle East:
Tech:
Use as open, not Ukraine related, thread …
Cont’d from #93
Yesterday Razgruzka Vagnera has published another angry reaction to the MoD’s order, this time by Ratibor, commander of Wagner’s 1st Assault Squad, Hero of Russia (MoA commenters may remember him as the bearded guy raising Russian and Wagner flags over the westernmost apartment building in Artyomovsk, signifying the end of the battle for the city):
Has this happened before? Or is it déjà vu!???
A sound heart is the life of the flesh: but ENVY the rottenness of the bones!!! (Proverbs 14:30 [KJV — S])
Not so long ago, in 2016, the Supreme Commander-in-Chief of the Russian Federation approved the decision to provide military assistance to the SAR in the fight against world terrorism represented by ISIS, which, in its essence, was entirely a project of the West.
This assistance consisted of providing air superiority by the Russian Aerospace Forces. However, in essence and in fact, the Wagner PMC took upon itself the entire burden of ground operations. Since the Syrian army at that time was completely demoralized, did not believe in victory (of Assad) and was conducting covert negotiations with ISIS representatives about guarantees of its security. Many commanders and fighters of the Syrian Army went over to the side of ISIS.
In March 2016, the entire world was glued to TV screens and following closely the ongoing rampage of terrorists in the ancient city of Palmyra/Tadmor (murder of civilians, live executions).
At that time, a Wagner PMC group was located on the territory of the SAR. At the request of the top leadership of the country and the generals of the SAR, the Wagner PMC group arrived in the vicinity of the ancient city without a second thought. Having assessed the situation and made a decision, the groups proceeded to liberate the city from world terrorism (ISIS). Having captured the dominant heights through fighting, completely cutting off the supply of the terrorists, the groups proceeded to clean up the city. Through the competent decision of the commander and the coordinated actions of our employees, the ancient city was liberated by the end of March 2016. This operation was carried out exclusively by the fighters of the Wagner PMC.
It is also impossible to keep silent about our fallen comrades-in-arms during the liberation of the ancient city. But in the end, the role of the Wagner PMC in the fight against terrorism was hidden from the public. Our division did not pursue fame, awards and vanity, but simply fulfilled the tasks set by the leadership of our Country and the leadership of our company with honor and dignity.
However, the near future showed that even in such a serious ministry as Russia’s MoD, there exist such human vices as “ENVY,” personalized directly in the Minister of Defense, who did everything to ensure that the military merits of the Wagner PMC remained insignificant [in the eyes of the public and the leadership of the country — S]. Because of this vice, Russia’s Minister of Defense, disregarding the common interests of our country and the SAR, including the danger that continued to emanate from numerous ISIS groups, using his administrative resources, ensured that the Wagner PMC was withdrawn from the territory of the SAR. The liberated Palmyra was handed over to the units of Russia’s Ministry of Defense and the army of the SAR.
But the peaceful sky over the ancient city did not last long. In December 2016, a small group of ISIS, consisting of 10 pickup trucks with HMGs [heavy machine guns — S], took over the city. Palmyra was again in their hands, and the units of Russia’s MoD, having abandoned the city, warehouses with ammunition, food and equipment, shamefully retreated to the Tiyas Airbase.
This failure of the city’s defense was not long in coming, and the Country again turned to the Wagner PMC with a request to liberate the ancient city again, which was triumphantly done by the assault groups of our Company. Once again, the Wagner PMC has shown high military professionalism in the fight against global terrorism, while instilling real fear in the hearts of ISIS and their Western masters. Thus, the Wagner PMC declared itself as a force that is able to successfully fight against any manifestation of terrorism and as a “Russian Force” to be reckoned with.
And this time, too, was no exception on the part of the Ministry of Defense to nullify the role of the Wagner PMC in the re-liberation of Palmyra.
But despite all the envy and bile that emanated from Russia’s Minister of Defense, Wagner PMC continued to carry out combat missions to liberate the territories occupied by ISIS in the SAR with pride for our Country.
In the future, there were several cases when the Ministry of Defense treacherously exposed units of the Wagner PMC to U.S. strikes (everyone knows the egregious case in the province of Deir ez-Zor).
But in spite of everything, after completing all the assigned tasks, the Wagner PMC group proudly left the territory of the SAR.
However, the main enemy of our country is not sleeping, and already in March 2022, the Motherland again called its sons, the Wagner PMC, to fight, but this time with a more dangerous enemy than world terrorism—fascism, which continues to be fueled by the collective West in the Ukraine.
In March, with great haste, given the disastrous situation with the offensive operations of the Russian Armed Forces in the Ukraine, the Wagner PMC again arrived in Donbass.
From the first days, our employees entered into bloody battles. In the process of carrying out combat missions, a number of key territories of the LPR and the DPR were liberated exclusively by the forces of the Wagner PMC. Huge enemy forces, several times larger than the forces of the Wagner PMC, were destroyed. It should also be understood that in such a fierce struggle, our employees of the Wagner PMC died heroically, which has been repeatedly recorded by means of objective control on the battlefield. Separately, I would like to note that former prisoners, who were accepted into the Wagner PMC brotherhood on a common basis, without any exceptions and discrimination, also fought shoulder to shoulder with us.
The Wagner PMC once again showed its colossal and unique effectiveness on the battlefield.
But the shadow of Palmyra, in the form of unjustified ENVY on the part of Russia’s Ministry of Defense and S.K. Shoygu personally, continued to haunt the Wagner PMC in Donbass as well.
It consisted of the following:
— the famous and well-known “shell hunger”;
— sabotage of cooperation with Russia’s MoD;
— dismissal of senior officers and fighters loyal to the Wagner PMC from the ranks of the RuAF;
— lobbying for the shutdown of Project K [I haven’t found a definite source for this, but “Project K” seems to refer to Wagner’s recruitment of fighters from Russian prisons — S];
— an attempt to instigate conflicts between Wagner and security and law enforcement agencies of the Russian Federation.
As a result of such activities and the undisguised envy of the Minister of Defense S.K. Shoygu, at the moment the latter is doing everything to ensure that the Wagner PMC completely ceases to exist.
But this time, having gone through such a hard 10-years-long battle path, at the cost of the lives of our fallen comrades, we will not allow the memory and military merits of the Wagner PMC to our Great Motherland to be erased.
Again, I considered all travail, and every right work, that for this a man is ENVIED of his neighbour. This is also vanity and vexation of spirit! (Ecclesiastes 4:4 [KJV — S])
Posted by: S | Jun 13 2023 20:04 utc | 116
Cont’d from #116
Yesterday, the Russian Telegram channel Kepka Prigozhina has published Prigozhin’s text about the Battle of Khasham, wherein he directly accuses Gerasimov and Shoygu of having intentionally set up Wagner fighters to be slaughtered by U.S. air forces:
Yevgeniy Prigozhin on the February 8, 2018 tragedy in Khasham
June 12, 2023
After crossing to the left bank of the Euphrates in September 2017, the Wagner PMC managed to create a foothold for further advance into the eastern part of Syria. The oil fields of Syria’s main field Al-Omar were the main source of income for the Syrian people, and the fields of Shaer and Hayan are the main source of electricity. At the same time, Syrian oil served as the main financial support for the entire world Islamic State. No oil fields for ISIS—no ISIS. That’s why the actions of the Wagner PMC in Syria were directed at them.
Therefore, in this case, the main task of the Wagner PMC units was to cut off the road from Conoco to Iraq, clear the southeast of Syria from ISIS and prevent the advance of the Kurdish formations under the control of the Americans to the south of Syria.
On February 2, 2018, I have discussed this plan with the Chief of the General Staff, and then with the officers on the ground who were involved in the operation. The Conoco plant served as a stronghold for ISIS—from time to time, they were starting skirmishes, biting and trying to go on the counteroffensive, but to no avail. We responded, and small arms battles between the sides continued daily; from time to time, we even shelled each other with artillery. The distance between positions in some places was 150–500 meters.
The operation to take control of the southeast of Syria was planned for the night of February 7–8, with an advance on the Conoco plant and further along the highway up to the Iraqi border. And, after establishing a security zone, it was possible to let Syrian army units in from the south.
I arrived at Khmeimim Base on the 7th at 16:00. I talked through everything in detail with the command of the facility, and we discussed the details of the cooperation.
From the military, we needed aviation support and flawlessly working air defense systems. We knew that the terrorists were covered by the Americans who were on their side. But on the ground we had the upper hand over the ISIS and American advisers and were confident that we could fight back. The main task of the military was to prevent the Americans from attacking us from the air.
It was promised to us that two pairs of Su-35 fighters would be constantly on duty, in “eights,” over the Euphrates. So that in the event of an appearance of enemy aircraft, it would be possible to attack them and prevent a strike on the moving infantry.
It was also promised that all air defense systems would work: S-300, Pantsirs and other available air defense and aviation equipment, which the Wagner PMC did not possess at the time. And during my earlier visit it was agreed that they would warn us in the event of a force majeure.
At 18:00, the assault detachments of the Wagner PMC began to move to the designated lines. Wagner PMC representative, who was at the headquarters, clarified with the command: “Is everything in order, is everything going according to the plan?” They told him: “Yes, don’t worry.” We synchronized our schedules, checked everything and began combat work.
The units reached their starting lines, set up a second echelon to pull up reserves after the start of the assault, the artillery was put in position, after which a small arms battle ensued. IS began to respond actively.
In order to suppress the militants, we began to fire artillery, IS responded with their guns and a normal battle ensued, in which it is advisable to go on the attack. At 23:45, a command was given to storm the positions of IS, and suddenly the Americans began to attack from the sky. They unleashed the entire power of their air force on Wagner’s assault troops: F-15E bombers, MQ-9 Reaper strike UAVs and an AC-130 flying artillery battery were involved. Several AH-64 Apache helicopters were spinning fire carousels non-stop [in Russian military lingo, “fire carousel” means several helicopters (or tanks, or other equipment) moving in a cycle so that at each point in time one of them is firing — S]. Even B-52 strategic bombers were launched in the air.
Enemy aviation was striking with great intensity, striving for complete annihilation, resulting in a large number of killed and wounded. At the same time, they were constantly striking the escape routes. It was decided to stop [the assault operation — S] at the lines that were reached. Which is what was done.
A subsequent analysis turned out to be as follows: at 18:00, an order was received from the Chief of the General Staff for “everyone to leave,” not to launch jets, to turn off all air defense systems. According to the information that I got from the representatives, it was ordered not to inform the Wagner PMC about these measures in any way and subsequently not to communicate with them.
As it turned out, on that day from 18:00 to 23:45, the Americans repeatedly asked whether Russian units were heading towards Conoco, even when the battle had already begun. But nobody from the military warned any of the Wagner PMC fighters that the Americans were seeing us from the air.
At 18:00, most of the members of the military command left their work posts, went off duty, or, to be more precise, fled. And when they began to look for them after the strikes began, it turned out that some of them closed themselves in trailers, while others completely changed their sleeping places so that they could not be reached.
Later it became known from the transcripts of the talks that the Americans saw from the very beginning that those were Russian units. And from 18:00 to 23:45 U.S. and Russian military commands were talking about how, if there are units of the Russian Federation there, they must be immediately stopped. Otherwise, the Americans warned directly, they would strike to kill, and the units would be destroyed.
However, the leadership of the Ministry of Defense ignored the need to warn us about this. Air defense systems, as I said, were all disabled and what happened, happened: at 23:45, strikes began on Russian units, which fearlessly faced all American power and continued to advance even in fiery hell, not knowing that RuAF support would never come—there were no jets, air defense systems were turned off.
At 3:00 at night, we finally managed to break through into RuAF headquarters in order to talk with the officer on duty. There was only one colonel at the desk who said that he would try to resolve the issue so that the strikes would stop and the Wagner PMC fighters could pull out the bodies of their dead comrades.
On February 9, I urgently flew to Moscow and tried to visit Shoygu in his office in order to find out what happened after all. I wanted to know why all the agreements collapsed and the February 8 tragedy happened.
The Minister of Defense didn’t let me in. I kept signing up for the 10th, 11th, and so on ad infinitum, but he didn’t have time to talk to me. Then I caught him at a state reception in the Kremlin, which I got to by using my connections.
I approached him and asked: “May I talk to you about the situation that occurred on February 8 near Deir ez-Zor?” He turned to me and replied in a calm and arrogant fashion: “You wanted to act like a hero? You have. All the heroes are now here, in this hall.” He motioned to those around him in expensive suits. “And you just rowed to the wrong bank of the river.” [Russian criminal slang for foolishly attempting to challenge someone who is way more powerful — S] This ended the conversation.
Posted by: S | Jun 14 2023 0:26 utc | 122
Posted by: denk | Jun 14 2023 3:35 utc | 125
25 million Chinese; 25 million Russians. The Woke can all go Broke, the Republic can be restored and we can all go Multipolar already!
Posted by: Scorpion | Jun 13 2023 1:17 utc | 102
—————
Always worrying about the chinaman dont you , even when IndiaNS are taking over
the anglo garden ?
==============================
As always with you and I, you misunderstand and then misrepresent my offerings.
I was suggesting (jokingly) that both Russians and Chinese move to the States in order to save it!!! It was complimentary of the Chinese (whose culture of late I am spending 3-10 hours a day studying!) and followed on from the article I linked in which PCR suggested that maybe we should let in millions more Hispanics since most of them are conservative Catholics and hate the open borders. Chinese are not Catholics, of course, but are generally far more conservative than the progressives in the US pushing all this woke borderless nation business. So if 25,000,000 Chinese moved to the States, that nonsense might soon stop. THAT was the point – which you entirely missed.
You have got one thing slightly right: I don’t generally trust the Communist Party, but nor do I pretend to know much about it. (As far as I can tell, China is also the most capitalist country in the world depending on how exactly you define capitalism. Or put another way: it’s a country with a huge amount of business going on so it doesn’t seem all that communist to me.)
I just don’t trust the CPC blindly, is all. And that’s because I don’t trust any centralized government these days, let alone one presiding over more than a billion people. It’s a general reservation, nothing more. For example, I certainly don’t trust any single govt in Europe but in your way of thinking that would make me anti-British, anti-French, or anti-German which would be wrong. Just as you are wrong in thinking that my general distrust of the CPC makes me anti-Chinese.
Indeed, I have been backing a general Russia-China Eurasian rise for many years and have even helped a friend with a website that has been promoting it and is generally very pro China and pro Russia. That said, of late I now have doubts because of what happened with Covid world wide after which, unlike most barflies here, I no longer unconditionally trust the ‘multipolarity’ proposition even though I still hope it is sincere and if so that it comes to be as described. But now, again because of covid but also to a lesser extent also because of the almost instant developments world wide following the SMO in February 2022, I strongly suspect ‘they’ are looking for an expanded United Nations One World Government model. And that I am very much against.
But that has NOTHING to do with being anti-Chinese. Respectfully, it seems to me from your posts – which I generally cannot understand – that you are extremely anti-American. As a Buddhist-Daoist type I tend to avoid such extremes – bad for the health if nothing else. Of course that sort of lifestyle choice is entirely up to you but I wish you would stop flinging your racist mud my way. Indeed, your projections in that regard reflect your own prejudices and certainly have nothing to do with me or mine. (I live with, and very much love, a part-Chinese woman for example!)
Denk: sincerely, your own bias is twisting your perceptions of what I write. This last was the clearest example yet when you read the exact opposite of what I meant – probably you didn’t read the article so didn’t get the joke. But this has been our dynamic since our very first interchange, about Taiwan I think. I don’t know much about it but don’t understand why they can’t have a referendum like in Donbass. Maybe there are good reasons. I couldn’t care less one way or another; I don’t live there and don’t pretend to understand much about it. Similarly, I don’t believe all the Chinese stories about how they liberated Tibet from abject darkness because I’ve known and actually lived with many Tibetans (in the West, after their exodus) so those first-hand perceptions carry more weight for me than government propaganda or any articles on either side in the press, hardly any of which I have ever read. (I never met a single Tibetan, btw, that hates Chinese people, though I also never met a single one who had anything nice to say about communism in China or their occupation of their country.) That said, I care very little about that issue too. Such things happen in history. Furthermore, as with Taiwan, I don’t live in Tibet and never will nor, having visited some of their exile communities in India thirty years ago, would I ever want to, not being a fan – at all – of Tibetan theocratic-feudal society.
All best.
Posted by: Scorpion | Jun 14 2023 17:23 utc | 149
Posted by: bevin | Jun 14 2023 0:31 utc | 123
Bevin:
My distrust of large, centralized governments in today’s secular age is why I personally don’t favour communism. Nor do I believe everything on Unz is anti-communist, certainly not most of the article linked which had mainly to do with various mainstream narratives of WW II being false. Rather, your dismissive objection is displaying your pro-communism-socialism petticoats!
My thrust tends to be more towards finding what is more or less truthful rather than supportive of Ideology A versus Ideology B. I find communism and capitalism to be two sides of the same reductionist-materialist coin and certainly wouldn’t want to favor one over the other. At the same time, there are underlying norms all societies share, some of which are well managed in both systems, others not. Not my beef either way.
The communist business is very tricky, IMO. First of all, it was so chaotic and violent that the true history may never be known, even by those who lived through it themselves, though they are all now long since dead. How many of us know for sure what happened with Covid? With the SMO? We don’t. Even Ukrainians and Russians now fighting in Donbass this very moment aren’t sure what’s going on except in their immediate location and even that might be highly confusing.
For a while communism overtly threatened to replace the dominant world order and national governments with something else. The leadership classes in countries where this was being proposed quite naturally felt threatened. Easy to understand and rather silly to expect them to feel any other way. Also, the visceral fear of communism may have less to do with its theoretical postulates as the violent, menacing way it came into being. There might be good reasons for that; I imagine you would say that if not for imperial resistance and deceit the whole business would have been peaceful and a new enlightened world would have transpired – though that will forever be only hypothetical speculation. Facts didn’t turn out that way and I believe that if the movement was so wise and good it should have been able to effect better results, knowing the nature of the opposition with which it had to contend.
So for whatever reasons, tens of millions died in both the Russian and Chinese communist experiments. And also, interestingly, neither of them are now communist though neither were conquered by other nations whilst being communist. I personally don’t look much further than that except again to remark that structurally it seems to me that such conceptual/ideological movements – such as communism – always result in top-down hierarchical structures that tend towards dictatorship and/or totalitarianism.
This, btw, is why I am somewhat of a monarchist. It’s certainly not in support of the British version – though from time to time the British people demonstrate just how much the institution resonates in their societal hearts even if the individuals in question are clearly lacking in merit. It’s more to do with supporting a vision and experience of life and society as being grounded in sacred perception. All organized societies need leaders, from the small family level to the overall nation. The supreme leader, so to speak, is just the one on top of all the other leaders. And in a sacred society, a monarch is just a sacred leader, albeit primus inter pares (being no more nor no less sacred than any subject in that sacred kingdom). In other words, the monarch is not the only sacred leader; indeed all leaders and followers are equally sacred in this sort of vision, which is why it has an egalitarian element. The monarch is a human being embodying the most sacred principles and is valued and admired for his or her ability to function that way, perceiving and feeling which elevates all members of the society who, again, are also sacred in essence. So the sacred monarch principle engenders the opposite of the sort of soul-deadening totalitarianism into which abstract idea-driven systems inevitably tend to devolve.
Because I believe sacred perception is the single best organizing principle for any society, from tribal to modern multi-national humongous. We are born with the capacity to feel reverence, luminosity and compassion, all part of the experience of sacredness, which most of us experience spontaneously during births, deaths, weddings and funerals. When we feel and experience things that way most evils encountered in society quite naturally self-correct. But I acknowledge it’s a bit of an oddball position and one that cannot reasonably be aired in a forum such as this. So back to the main point.
Socialism seems quite different from communism. The way it is practised it is not so much an -ism or ideology as a way of blending private and public sectors in modern societies. I suppose the socialist part of that – given the exercise is inevitable no matter the guiding philosophy – is to find ways to benefit as many of the people as possible and to prevent a small wealthy class from enjoying too high a share of the collective pie. So it’s still more or less materialist in philosophy, it just tries to strike a balanced approach.
Sounds great to me, and it’s got my vote generally as the best of a series of not so sophisticated options, but at different times in different nations some choices will prove more effective than others. So then the key trick is to have ways to view, analyze and above all course correct where necessary which involves dealing with corruption and stupidity. Some polities are flexible and responsive, others not. That is the key issue not the philosophy or -ism alone.
It is in this context that I share articles like the one from Unz yesterday here: when too many people share too many false conceptions and projections, it is virtually impossible for good outcomes to emerge no matter what the -ism. Right now the SMO, for example, in Ukraine is contextualized by many who view the historical context in Europe and Russia in highly distorted fashions, the roots of some of which preconceptions were covered in the article. Many here share many of the dominant false narrative views though critical of the current ‘Outlaw US Empire.’ Many including myself. And, I humbly suggest, including yourself.
Unz may have made some mistakes but I think in most cases he stayed in his lane, only pointing out falsehoods that have latterly come to light and clearly show the original narratives to be entirely or mainly false. My favorite – which he didn’t cover in this particular – is the myth of the Pearl Harbour attack being a ‘surprise’ because the Japanese fleet observed strict radio silence the whole way. Totally false as revealed by the archives when they were finally released after 50 years in 1995. Stinnet’s book shows many photocopies of the original documents including radio chatter all the way. It was not a surprise attack. There as no radio silence. They even sent Admiral Kimmel on a wild goose chase – into a sector he objected to being sent into – so that he would not detect the Japanese fleet and then avert the attack which they had deliberately provoked.
Just one of hundreds of examples of how so much of what we are told is categorically false. In this regard, I humbly suggest that most of our ideas of historical England, Germany, Russia, China and more are similarly twisted. And these distorted views inform how we observe the current geopolitical tectonics.
Of course, the tendency towards tyranny is also going on in the USA right now, but not, I think you would agree, because of ‘communism’ per se (though some on the right would beg to differ), rather because of what I think of as over-centralization.
Most likely, I don’t know a tenth of the history you and several others here know, Bevin. But the problem with history is that most of what we learn – and I suspect this is true for you as well – is wrong; moreover there is no sure way of knowing what is right. Further, political history – as it unfolds in its own present time – involves disagreements with multiple views in the mix all of which may seem right from their own point of view but together making it very hard to establish one over-arching ‘objective truth’ (which Putin often references for example) shared by all. Frankly, I believe that such a construct is fallacious to its core, but no doubt many will continue to believe that there is such a thing which can be somehow established and described. Even if so, almost certainly nobody will be able to discern it and publish it. Therefore, WW II events will forever remain in a forest of uncertainty and disinformation just as is the case with current events unfolding. Meaning we should guard against holding overly fixed views given much of the information we depend upon to fashion them is questionable at best.
In this context, Unz is a cautious and thorough revisionist who often admits his own ignorance even as he reveals various inconsistencies. Indeed, he is very much like b here at MoA who regularly debunks MSM and govt-pushed BS. A great service skillfully administered.
On the Unz site is an eclectic group of contributors with many of whom Unz does not agree. And yet he hosts them. Why? Clearly because he values free speech and because it is hard to find venues where it is truly welcomed except in a ‘one-view-only’ type milieus. So his site offers up many views, albeit most of them would agree that the dominant narratives we are mainly spoon fed are not to be trusted. And with that I concur.
In any case, dismissing all of that long article simply as ‘anti-communist’ or ‘anti-socialist’ displays your own bias in this, certainly not any in the article which mainly only debunked demonstrable falsehoods. Indeed such sloppy dismissal on your part possibly displays intellectual laziness, despite your vast knowledge, or even disingenuousness given how much you clearly have studied. Like them or not, articles like this perform a much-needed public service, like b’s articles here we all so much appreciate. If you feel he got a fact wrong, by all means share it. But don’t dismiss the whole thing as coming out of ‘anti-communist’ or ‘anti-socialist’ animus. That’s just a highbrow-sounding form of cheap ad hominem!! You can do better than that. (We don’t expect more from some of the cheap-seat ad hominem addicts here, but you can do better, old chap!!)
That’s okay: you express yourself here with great elegance and erudition which I for one value greatly even if I rarely agree with you – as yet again in this case.
All best.
Posted by: Scorpion | Jun 14 2023 18:35 utc | 150
Posted by: Ghost of Zanon | Jun 14 2023 18:38 utc | 151
People shouldn’t underestimate how huge yesterday’s first indictment of an ex-President in the US is.
================================
In the clown show that the Reality TV Republic, formerly known as the United States of America, currently airing its Election 2024 extended series, has now become it is hard to tell when something is real, false, important or not important. But I tend to favor your characterization.
Many here (and elsewhere) comment on how the US elites seem to keep getting everything wrong because they are either stupid or crazy or both stupid and crazy. Possible. But maybe they are neither. Maybe they have an agenda that most people would regard as unthinkable, not to mention immoral or unpleasant. And of course, given they operate principally with deceit and malice as their guiding animus, we are not going to find it easy to discern what it is they are really up to.
We can guestimate a little based on tone, quality, atmosphere though, also perhaps historical precedent. Generally, everything the Swamp wants the Uniparty in Congress wants and most of the Press wants and Intelligence wants and the Military-industrial complex wants, etc. And We generally don’t want. Trillions are spent, ever more, whilst the potholes in our neighborhoods – representing bad things we actually see and experience for ourselves – multiply.
So we can see that generally ‘they’ do not mean We the People well.
More: the emphasis of late in the political arena is to keep saying one thing and doing another. That is not new, of course, but the recent thrust seems inarguably to be that of driving the country into different factions. This is remarkably consistent. Men against women, rich against poor, straight against gay, religious against everyone not, democrats against republicans (even though most in the middle don’t like either) and so forth.
But they have ratcheted up this divisiveness quotient of late. People who weren’t even at the Capitol have been given extremely long sentences whilst minority burglars and drive-by shooters get released or short, wrist-slap sentences. Trump is being persecuted for nothing more than process crimes whereas people doing far worse are not prosecuted at all.
The Proud Boys leader last week predicted that Trump is going to end up in jail. (Just as PCR predicted in February 2017 after Trump stupidly let Flynn go, perhaps his only good pick.) Why? For the same reason he got 18 years in jail for doing something for which no evidence at all was presented in Discovery. He points out, rightly I suspect, that his sentencing provides a form of Judicial Notice of the Reality of the January Insurrection. The fact that he is in jail – continuing long-term solitary confinement though for no apparent behavioral reason, probably just to ensure he cannot communicate with the outside world – proves judicially that the Insurrection he is in jail for ostensibly helping to organize is a Real Thing Which Actually Happened.
Now: if the person who didn’t go and didn’t tell anyone to go into the Capitol and indeed told all Proud Boys there to leave their firearms at their hotels in other States etc, gets 18 years for aiding and abetting an ‘Insurrection,’ what do you think the person who caused the over 700,000 people to come to protest the election results and, it will be said despite his words to the contrary, incited an Insurrection to overthrow the Houses of Congress and deny the 2020 election results?
PCR wrote in February 2017 that Trump will spend the rest of his life behind bars. I thought that was hyperbolic. Now am not so sure.
Because of the above-mentioned divisiveness quotient: I believe that a powerful faction within the US is pushing for a confrontation after which draconian lock-downs will be the norm. Then comes the Reset business or whatever. They are going to keep pushing and pushing the mainstream centrist Americans and also for them to perceive themselves in an existential struggle for survival making them increasingly extreme in attitude – if nothing else with fear and paranoia but in some cases no doubt with anger and willing to fight back. The latter has already happened on the perception level: very few people are able, in public, to state that Trump and/or his supporters are perfectly fine people – unless they are in ‘Trump country.’ And increasingly those in Trump country feel that the rest of their nation is out to get them – and not without reason given the blatant two-tiered justice system which they are very aware of even as the progressive side is not (further division).
So: what if Trump is jailed and Trump country erupts and some Trump supporters demonstrate and then there are riots to suppress which in many States are general crackdowns, curfews, mass arrest, Amazon smart home shut-offs, bank account freezes and so forth? Then what?
That will be Act II. We have been in a very long Act I. It looks to me like they are pushing for division and conflict. What better way than to jail a populist leader campaigning against an unjust Deep State?
The cause is not as important as the result: and that result will be to give the Coupster Regime the justification for treating mainstream Americans as terrorists. Now, maybe most so demonized will elect to chicken out and knuckle under to protect themselves and their loved ones as most most reasonable people will no doubt do. Then the bad guys win. Indeed, either way, the Old Normal is finished. Making them not so stupid and not so crazy after all, eh?
Since 2020 I have doubted there will be a normal election in 2024, but certainly not by 2028. If there is, it will be because so many have knuckled under that the current Republic In Name Only Clown Show will have morphed into a new Series called ‘Lobotamerica – the New Normal!’
Posted by: Scorpion | Jun 14 2023 19:43 utc | 153
Posted by: juliania | Jun 16 2023 4:35 utc | 196
Thank you for your post, Juliana. But I’m not willing to engage with people who stoop to insult and little else – at least when responding to any of my posts. It is not acceptable behavior.
And I’m quite healthy, thank you. Indeed, putting up with such stuff would be unhealthy!
As to the history, I recommend you look into Menzies books. How often have we seen that revisionist or different history or analysis is often regarded as incredible or vilified and then it turns out to be more or less accurate. The books are very well written so easy to read. That said, I didn’t finish the second one yet because am in the middle of a deep dive on the Yi Ching and currently reading two authors at the same time, with both of whom am also corresponding so Menzies – and McGilchrist unfortunately – are on the back burner.
As to other history (you don’t say exactly what you are referring to), I recently linked to an article by Unz that went through many different false narratives about WW II. You can read it yourself and see whether you think Unz needs healing. I certainly don’t agree with all of his opinions, albeit with this article I think he got most right. With covid – which is the very recent past and almost present – I think he got it wrong.
I have been maintaining for a while that discrete concepts like ‘China’ and ‘America’ as in ‘China caused the virus to spread’ or ‘America seeded the virus in China’ are too simplistic. In fact, clearly there has been international coordination of various things in the financial, medical, military, intelligence and other fields, biolab research being one of many such examples. [I wrote more but it’s too much so snipped it out.]
Not saying am for sure I am right, but for sure that sort of international cooperation quotient is a possibility, one Unz refuses to consider because he has his pet theory and he is going to run with it. He had many similar pet theories about vaccines and anti-vaxxers several of which have not stood the test of time well. This is why I personally avoid getting too involved with current issues and prefer reading longer articles – or years ago whole books – on revisionist history involving events many decades or centuries ago. There you can sometimes get accurate documents from archival sources. That is not foolproof either, of course, but it is often better once the heat has died down and the disinformation quotient has lessened. Never eliminated, but lessened.
The heat has not yet died down on the JFK murder, for example, so the documents have not been released. The heat did die down sufficiently on Pearl Harbour so the documents were released although 90% of them were destroyed or actually not even submitted in the 1940’s when they should have been. Still, the 10% that did get archived was released and they clearly show, for example, lengthy conversations between the various ships in the Japanese fleet. If I recall correctly, they knew the day the fleet left, they knew its destination, they knew the names not only of the military vessel captains but the fuel tankers accompanying them. They spoke often the entire trip believing their communications secure and not knowing that thanks to Enigma (or was it ULTRA?), a top secret US-UK Intelligence codebreaking operation which is a fascinating story in itself, the Allies had all their communications all the time. Ergo, the surprise attack of Pearl Harbour was not a surprise AT ALL and all statements by the FDR Admin to that effect were whopping lies designed to fool the American people he was honor-bound to serve faithfully and to bring them into the war and cause the death of tens of thousands of young lives. He was a war criminal par excellence. And to this day, even though the archives clearly show the tale, the narrative has not changed and he is often cited, including by many barflies here, as one of the greatest and most honorable Presidents. Deceit on that sort of level seriously disgusts me.
There are many things – such as those in Unz’s article last week about WW II – that have been definitively debunked but the narrative does not change. That is very interesting in itself. But this comment is already too long!
All best Juliana. I am glad you enjoy those posters but I will not engage with people who refuse to treat me honorably and insist only on insult. It’s very simple. The blocking app is a godsend. They can froth about me all they like but thankfully I don’t have to read it any more. I gave Denk one last chance but he insisted on insult yet again without relating with what I actually said. He has since said more, I gather, but I don’t see it any more. I did the same with psycho and he also insisted on insult not issues. He’s very proud of a fancy word he uses to justify the fact that he doesn’t have the slightest understanding about the materialism issue because he is entirely invested in it. That’s fine, his choice. But he seems compelled to insult that which he either doesn’t understand or with which he disagrees without ever saying if he disagrees and why. No, he just insults. So shallow. I never treated him or Denk that way. They insist on treating me that way and the waynenorway troll person too. It is simply not acceptable and now thanks to the app I don’t have to engage any more and this, hopefully, is my last word on the subject.
Life’s too short. If you don’t like someone’s post just move on. If you disagree with an issue they raise and wish to engage, then engage with the issue. But childish, mean-spirited ad hominem is unhealthy both for those expressing themselves that way and those being addressed in such an unkind manner. Finis!
Posted by: Scorpion | Jun 16 2023 6:19 utc | 198
|