|
“Let’s Try This Again!”
Yesterday I posted a picture of a Leopard 2A6 tank, 4 Bradley infantry fighting vehicles, and a Soviet era mine clearing vehicle all caught up next to each other in a minefield. There is now also better video of that scene as well as others.
 bigger
For unknown reasons the Ukrainian command later decided to add five more Bradleys to the scrap exposition:
Military Advisor @miladvisor – 18:06 UTC · Jun 9, 2023
⚡️👇9x 🇺🇸M2 Bradley,🇩🇪Leopard 2A6, armoured recovery vehicle lost by Ukrainian forces. video
 bigger
It is the same Leopard tank in the same position. I believe that the ‘armoured recovery vehicle’ @miladvisor mentions is an incorrect identification of the mine clearing vehicle that can also be seen in the previous picture.
All of those vehicles seem to have some mobility damage, i.e. they lost a track or two due to mine explosions. One of the added Bradleys seems to be on fire. Then its neighboring Bradley decides to also burn and explodes.
 bigger
Someone had sent half a company into a minefield where it was damaged and stopped. He then sent the second half of the company to the same place where it met the same fate.
“Insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results.” (No, that is not an Einstein quote.)
Here is a first person view video from the Ukrainian side of what, I believe, is another group of four Bradleys in a minefield. Finally someone throws smoke grenades so some of the soldiers involved can be evacuated.
Simplicitus tries to put some rationality cover over the Ukrainian decision to attack the strongest defense position of the Russian forces:
This is all to say that Ukraine has almost no time left to make a big splash. They have no option apart from gaining one final big flashy triumph they can hail as a victory to be sold to their souring Western audience, whose support is slowly drying up, and who’s getting ready to throw in the towel.
And the only way for Ukraine to get such a huge and relatively ‘fast’ triumph is by severing the Crimean landbridge. It’s the only objective in the entire conflict where Ukraine can deal one big deathblow to Russia’s jugular in a very proportionately small amount of moves. No other possible combination of captures or assaults in Donbass can have such an effect.
I find that hard to accept. One attacks where one has the highest chance of success, not where some foreign political calender tells one to go. How that is then (over-)sold to the ‘western’ public is a completely different question.
Throughout the last night the 47th brigade of the Ukrainian armed forces tried to attack the Russian lines.The 47th is supposed to be elite, as it was trained and armed by NATO countries.
Two columns of the brigade were hit and stopped before they could reach the line of contact. What was then left to attack failed to break through.
I asked why some posters seem to think that these two things are true at the same time:
1. Russia is winning the war in Ukraine and can fend off any NATO attacks.
2. NATO/USA will go to direct war, starting WW3.
Posted by: james | Jun 10 2023 16:28 utc | 78
because they are already doing this covertly?? poland is vying for head servant and stooge of the usa at this point…
now, for fun – you tell me why it won’t happen.. thanks and for your posts here in general..
I agree that current Polish leadership is extremely ambitious: “largest European army”, rzeczpospolita, the dreams of Lithuania, Ukraine, Poland united from Warsaw. They’re out-transatlanticising Germany, for example. I have no doubt that there are Polish politicians and soldiers who are itching to fight Russia. But they don’t make global decisions.
USA was always interested in Russia’s resources. The ultimate goal is to split up the country (“decolonisation”) and privatise everything. Many measures are ok to weaken Russia. Proxy war is one of these, direct war is not.
During the Ukrainian war, US statements and actions increased, always pretending not to lead a direct war. Everybody knows how deeply NATO/USA are involved. Yet direct confrontation has been avoided, and will continue to do so, in my opinion: we see Russia > NATO in military-technical details, not just from the current war, also from Syria. If McGregor and Ritter know this, Pentagon does too. They may be ideologues and evil, and they easily take actions killing millions (Iraq, for example) but they are not stupid-stupid.
What I mean by stupid-stupid: there have been a lot of bad decisions (“stupid”, although there were always enough people who profited personally) but that does not imply the actions are entirely irrational or impulsive (“stupid-stupid”). Of course this can change, and ideology can beat thought, so I am not ruling it out. Observing several decades of US hegemony told me that they’re good at attacking weak enemies, and they shy away from attacking peers. This includes North Korea! A major enemy like Russia needs to be, and has been continuously, attacked indirectly. Sending Ukrainians to kill Russians is such an indirect attack. For the Lindsay Grahams of this world: great if it works, no game breaker if not, and certainly nothing to risk the existence of the USA for.
The current US crisis may be worse than any before, even existential, and I don’t know how they act then. Historically, they’ve shied away from direct conflict.
Posted by: Mike R | Jun 10 2023 17:13 utc | 93
As for the fears of NATO going nuclear, you are presuming that NATO thinking is rational, pro-human and fact-based, but its behavior has shown that it is not.
Yes, that’s exactly the difference: I see some ratio beneath the madness. I am not talking about “pro-human”, it’s about US foreign policy which has been anti-human forever. We can try to be specific: give me instances where you think US leadership was irrational, please. This also goes to LoveDonbass: I am interested in discussing the (ir)rationality of Western politics.
I admit that I’m inclusive: I can see how Inquisition, 1618-1648, Verdun, Barbarossa, Auschwitz, Hiroshima, the Chinese Cultural Revolution, Vietnam have been rational decisions. People pondered their options and chose something that’d maximise their chances, in their own thinking. The result width for nuclear wars is small, chances of winning are miniscule. Hitler and his generals thought they had a chance when they attacked in June 1941, and they were willing to go to the bitter end (his generals seeing the upcoming loss before 1944, Hitler not). Of course that’s insane from a normal point of view but they had a plan. Starting a war against Russia is more insane than that because it is harder to come up with the positive scenario.
Posted by: Blissex | Jun 10 2023 17:17 utc | 96
So the current USA strategy seems simple to me: progressively “flip” states near the targets and then use them to start insurgencies or little wars with the targets. It so happens that Ukraine was a big “buffer” state for the RF, and the RF (and Kazakhstan) is a big “buffer” state for the PRC.
Indeed. The US have been preparing the current war for loooong time, more than just since 2014. I also agree that demilitarized zones like in Korea could work as a win for the US, and I don’t see why Moscow should agree to that: they’re winning on the ground. This is why US strategists are discussing the kind and amount of carrot.
Posted by: La Bastille | Jun 10 2023 17:24 utc | 100
My opinion is that the defeat of Ukraine (essentially armed and trained by Europeans) is NOW a winning option if not the desirable option for the USA and its military-industrial complex.
Yes, I agree. There’s logic to this plan. Evil, reprehensible logic but it makes sense. This would explain a lot of what we’ve seen in the last months: sanctions hurting EU more than Russia but befitting US companies etc.
Posted by: Manage without me | Jun 10 2023 19:58 utc | 171
Not many people have emphasized how the neocons have made the same mistake as Hitler regarding Russia/Soviet Union: “You only have to kick in the door and the whole rotten structure will come crashing down.” Not the only resemblance, either, is it?
The hubris may be similar but the methods are so different. Not related to the rest but I’ve been looking for the German original for some time now. Can you or someone point me to it?
Posted by: YetAnotherAnon | Jun 10 2023 20:45 utc | 196
The monster in the Kremlin was surely behind the Ukraine dam explosion. … the monster in the Kremlin will not stop – yet stopped he must be before he blows up the world. (Guardian!)
I had to click the link to check if you’re really quoting. That’s quite something. I am sure I could find equivalents of this in Der Stürmer.
Many thank for the replies, I am sorry for the long posting. We don’t have to bicker about the future, it will come anyway!
Posted by: Konami | Jun 10 2023 23:13 utc | 248
|