Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
June 21, 2023
And Then Biden Blew It …

The talks Secretary of State Anthony Blinken had in China were somewhat useful. On his way out he at least used the right words on Taiwan:

'We do not support Taiwan independence,' America's top diplomat said in Beijing after meeting with Chinese president Xi Jingping.

The U.S. had practically begged for the meeting and that it took place is itself a small success:

To stabilise their relations, China and the United States must first arrest a downward spiral. That may turn out to be the achievement of US Secretary of State Antony Blinken’s talks with Chinese leaders in Beijing. It was unrealistic to expect any more just now. The negative fundamentals of the relationship remain the same. Both sides described Blinken’s talks with Foreign Minister Qin Gang and top diplomat Wang Yi as “candid” – meaning very frank. But they paved the way for a meeting between Blinken and President Xi Jinping, which did no harm to hopes for a Xi- Joe Biden summit.

Along with Qin’s acceptance of an invitation to Washington, that suggests the two sides found some common ground – particularly the need for more stable ties and to reduce the risk of military conflict.

Then, within just 24 hours, President Biden blew it:

US President Joe Biden has called Chinese President Xi Jinping a dictator at a fundraising event in California.

His remarks came a day after US Secretary of State Antony Blinken met Mr Xi for talks in Beijing, which were aimed at easing tensions between the two superpowers.

Mr Biden also said Mr Xi was embarrassed after an alleged Chinese spy balloon was shot down by the US.
..
"The reason why Xi Jinping got very upset, in terms of when I shot that balloon down with two box cars full of spy equipment in it, was he didn't know it was there," Mr Biden said at the event on Tuesday.

"That's a great embarrassment for dictators. When they didn't know what happened," he added.

The Chinese government was not amused:

China's foreign ministry spokeswoman Mao Ning called Mr Biden's remarks "extremely absurd and irresponsible". Speaking at a regularly scheduled press conference on Wednesday, she said that the comments were "an open political provocation" that violated diplomatic etiquette.

The whole Biden remarks with regards to China from the White House website:

And so, things are changing. We put together in Southeast Asia — and, by the way, I promise you we’re going to — don’t worry about China. I mean, worry about China, but don’t worry about China. (Laughter.)

No, but I really mean it. China is real — has real economic difficulties. And the reason why Xi Jinping got very upset in terms of when I shot that balloon down with two boxcars full of spy equipment in it is he didn’t know it was there. No, I’m serious. That’s what’s a great embarrassment for dictators, when they didn’t know what happened. That wasn’t supposed to be going where it was. It was blown off course up through Alaska and then down through the United States. And he didn’t know about it. When it got shot down, he was very embarrassed. He denied it was even there.

But the fo- — did — the very important point is he’s in a situation now where he wants to have a relationship again. Tony Blinken just went over there — our Secretary of State; did a good job. And it’s going to take time.

But what he was really upset about was that I insisted that we — we reunite the Qu- — so-called Quad. He called me and told me not to do that because it was putting him in a bind. I said, “All we’re doing — we’re not trying to surround you, we’re just trying to make sure the international rules with air and sea lanes remain open. And we’re not going to yield to that — on that.”

There are several issues in there that need some clarifying.

China has no real economic difficulties, just minor issues:

The Chinese economy this year is expected to grow faster than previously forecast and exceed the government's target of "around 5%," according to a survey of local economists.

A survey of 28 economists in March revealed that, on average, they expect the Chinese economy to grow 5.4% in 2023, up from 4.7% they forecast in December. The survey was jointly conducted by Nikkei and Nikkei Quick News.

The hope for China this year was 6% GDP growth. China's central bank just lowered a key interest rate by a small margin to achieve that.

Biden acknowledges that the weather balloon was 'blow off course' and thereby debunks previous claims that it was steerable. China had no intent to let the balloon cross Canada and the United States. And if there had really been 'two boxcars full of spy equipment' on the balloon why hasn't the U.S. shown any of it?

Why would or should a president of the U.S. or China know of some weather balloon floating somewhere?

Xi was embarrassed by the circus the U.S. made over that affair?

Xi is a dictator? The man came to his post by merits (scroll down) and through a complex representational election system. He can even be dismissed.

Xi denied that the ballon was where it was to whom? And the U.S. would know about that how?

Then comes the tale over the Quad. Biden claims that Xi called him over a quad meeting which is most likely a blatant lie. There are typically read-outs of phone calls between leaders at that level but I do not find any of a Xi-Biden call during the relevant months on the White House website. Nor was there any news of one.

The Biden talk, made official by posting it on the White House site, is an insult to China. Whatever Blinken has said or done to smooth the relations is no gone. It was already known that the U.S. can not be trusted with anything that it says. What counts is what the U.S. does and there it has so far shown no positive move towards China.

I am not sure that Biden intentionally talked about the balloon incident or was selective with his words on China. But even if it was somewhat accidentally it would not change anything. What matters is the effect. He has sabotaged the results of Blinken's talks in China and the U.S. will rightly be blamed for again worsening the relations.

As Yves Smith summarizes:

I wouldn’t bet on the minimal commitments from the meetings, like a return to pre-zero Covid levels of passenger flights, to be implemented.

The worst is that this insult does not simply demonstrate that the US is incapable of diplomacy. It shows we are so interested in dominance that we’ve lost sight of what our interests our. So institutionally, we are engaging in the same sort of self-destructive behavior that Trump practices personally. Perhaps that is the real reason Democrats hate him. Despite decorating in gold, the essence of his behavior is not all that different than theirs.

Comments

“I am not sure that Biden intentionally talked about the balloon incident or was selective with his words on China. But even if it was somewhat accidentally it would not change anything. What matters is the effect. He has sabotaged the results of Blinken’s talks in China and the U.S. will rightly be blamed for again worsening the relations.”
b. June 22, 2023

If there was any remaining doubt about Biden’s negative attitude towards Xi and China, Thursday’s edition of PBS Newshour totally erased it by reproducing Joe’s follow-up attempt to add insult to injury.
Biden could have responded positively to China’s gracious acknowledgement of Blinken’s visit but chose to do the opposite.

Posted by: Hoarsewhisperer | Jun 23 2023 4:30 utc | 201

Compare:
Russian Army getting enough recruits to form new regiment per day – Shoigu.
The US Army does not expect to hit its ambitious recruiting goal of 65,000 new soldiers this year as the pool of young Americans eligible to serve continues to shrink.

Posted by: Passerby | Jun 23 2023 8:18 utc | 202

Biden could have responded positively to China’s gracious acknowledgement of Blinken’s visit but chose to do the opposite.
Posted by: Hoarsewhisperer | Jun 23 2023 4:30 utc | 201
Given the frequency and subsequent restating the context of Bidens remarks.
It’s becoming undeniable that he’s into serious cognitive degradation.
And more importantly.
He’s no influence on the policies being set.

Posted by: jpc | Jun 23 2023 8:20 utc | 203

“I was very excited,” Lin said recently. “Joining the party is not easy — of the 40 students in my class, only five were admitted.” Lin credits his admission to his top-notch grades, student government positions, and willingness to help his classmates, which earned him a strong reputation.
https://daily.jstor.org/communist-party-of-china/
too scents @ 89
————————————————————–
Meritocracy is “the notion of a political system in which economic goods or political power are vested in individual people based on ability and talent, rather than wealth or social class.
Advancement in such a system is based on performance, as measured through examination or demonstrated achievement. ”
Lin, quoted in your second links, just proves the point that CPC’s selection process is based on examination and demonstrated achievement.
Your first link shows that anyone, whether he/she comes from a peasant family or his/her parents are street sweepers, can become a CPC member if he/she could study hard, work hard and determinate to join the Party will get his/her acceptance.
Meritocracy =/= Elite
IMHO, the Western professors who are quoted in the daily.jstor.org article are either mis-interpret CPC’s meritocratic selection process with Western elitism, or intentionly use misnomer to give CPC memebership some negative connotation.

Posted by: lulu | Jun 23 2023 13:09 utc | 204

Personally, I think it is just fine for China that Biden blew up Blinken’s trip to Beijing.
This just smashes any delusion that some Chinese, incl. some top officials and CPC memebers still hold towards U$A as the “Lighttower of Democracy” and show the true face of the perfidy U$A. Esp. 公知 (gong zhi) aka Chinese intelligentsia who are brainwashed with Bai Zuo ideologoy and ardent U$A worshippers.

Posted by: lulu | Jun 23 2023 13:46 utc | 205

The odd, or very problematic thing about all this is that Biden’s remarks made it onto the WH website in a written version -> an official record. (As b tells us in the top post.)
Biden was speaking to a group of private individuals, he was not making a statement as President, adressing other powers, the world, etc. Biden calling Xi a dictator in a sort of adjectival or by-the-way fashion certainly wildly trangressed the usual politeness standards, was extremely undiplomatic, a real fault, but was not disastrous in a practical sense, as possibly nobody would have commented on it (Joe is nuts, doncha know, he likes to show off, he is senile, etc.), and could easily have been publically rolled back as a poor joke or whatever, etc.
Had there been a reporter in the room (perhaps there was, idk) who reported on what he said it also wouldn’t have mattered much, depending on the US Gvmt. / media reaction to that report.
But …No. It was set in stone (written word on official website) so must, in the eyes of the Chinese and many others, have been a deliberate, calculated insult, perhaps aimed at undoing whatever Blinken accomplished with his visit (which is possibly nothing, idk.)
So the Question is, via Whom, How, did Joe’s confused discourse and scuzzy remarks become so ‘vital’ and ‘viral’ ?
My own ‘best guess’ – I’m not sure of it at all – is that the WH is completely disorganised, no coherent policy line exists, fights / influence forcing between different factions take place, staff doesn’t know where to look, whom to obey, etc. I.e., the insult to Xi was not intended as such, and it wasn’t tabulated to become ‘official’. (Which is frightening..)

Posted by: Noirette | Jun 23 2023 15:14 utc | 206

@ Noirette | Jun 23 2023 15:14 utc | 206
those are very good overall observations noirette and worth considering here in this example.. i think it shows a completely disorganized and non coherent policy in general..

Posted by: james | Jun 23 2023 15:24 utc | 207

This is so called “cruelty of low expectations”. According to Duran, WH posted Biden words.
Yet, some people expressed huge relief after learning about Biden’s speech. A pro-Russian commentator from Belarus confessed that he felled very anxious about a possible quid pro quo detrimental to Russia before those news.
The political culture of insulting foreign leaders and entire countries became bi-partisan and pervasive. Apparently, Modi can be next, although this is uncertain, I read signals in opposite directions.
Posted by: Noirette | Jun 23 2023 15:14 utc | 206

Posted by: Piotr Berman | Jun 23 2023 16:53 utc | 208

With regard to Xi’s chemical engineering degree: unlike the West, in China you don’t get to select your undergraduate subject. You are placed into a degree depending on how you did in the GaoKao university entrance exams, which is your final test in high school.

Posted by: Paul_Zed | Jun 23 2023 19:42 utc | 209

Thank you, b, and to karlof1 for your link @| Jun 21 2023 16:10 utc | 15. I spent some time enjoying the photograph – the painting, the generous cordiality of Xi, his kind but unwavering firmness. This has to be important to all peoples in these dispiriting times, which thankfully will end as all periods of instability end, leaving those who have held out as China has done, on that lovely naturalistic but ethereal plane of spiritual promise that is the earth’s gift to all. As the blooms of the lotus!
I quote from the final paragraph:
“…It is currently the season of lotus blooms, and “lotus” has the same pronunciation in Chinese as “harmony,” conveying the expectation of peaceful coexistence and win-win cooperation between China and the US…”
Here is what Eliot had to say in the first of his Four Quartets:
There they were as our guests, accepted and accepting.
So we moved, and they, in a formal pattern,
Along the empty alley, into the box circle,
To look down into the drained pool.
Dry the pool, dry concrete, brown-edged,
And the pool was filled with water out of sunlight,
And the lotus rose, quietly, quietly,
The surface glittered out of heart of light,
And they were behind us, reflected in the pool.

It is worth our reflection to be able to find even in earlier western poetic hearts, a generation back, this eastern vision, one being embodied today by China.

Posted by: juliania | Jun 24 2023 0:04 utc | 210

The usual suspects ‘whitemandindunuthin‘ wn are again bleating about Blinken’s wars, Jew’s wars blah blah..
FFS, garden wars on row, China in particular, have been going on for centuries since the days of 8NA..
To recall…
————————-
Representative Frederick R. Coudert. …

Did I correctly understand you to say that the heart of the present policy toward China and Formosa is that there is to be kept alive a constant threat of military action vis-a-vis Red China in the hope that at some point there will be an internal break- down?

Walter S. Robertson, Assistant Secretary of State for Far Eastern Affairs. ..

Yes, sir. That is my conception.

Coudert. ..

In other words, a cold war waged under the leadership of the United States, with constant threat of attack against China, led by Formosa and other Far Eastern groups, and militarily backed by the United States?

Robertson. ..

Yes…

Coudert. ..

Fundamentally, does this mean that the United States is undertaking to maintain for an indefinite period of years American dominance in the Far East?

Robertson…

Yes. Exactly.

(Hearings before the House Committee on Appropriations, Jan. 26, 1954.)
—————————–
As they say,
In China, they kept the same bottle but replace the content whenever it got stale
In THE ‘democratic’ garden, they keep changing the bottle to dupe the mushrooms while feeding them the same old shit !
https://tinyurl.com/mr3yrv7n

Posted by: denk | Jun 24 2023 3:41 utc | 211